Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 1aPage 1 of 17 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 18, 2011 CALL TO ORDER Chairman Gonzales called the regular meeting of the Commission held on Tuesday, January 18, 2011, to c Cultural Center, located at 183 N. Main Street, Lake Els PRESENT: Chairman Gonzales, Vice Jordan, Commissioner Mc ABSENT: None Also present: City Manager Brady, City Staff members present includf Seumalo, and Office Specialist The Vice Chan F ; n Mendoza 'commiss'.�= rJcrdan C S mi $ , her Morsch Commissioner O'Neal Absent: None. AINN e Elsinore Planning at 6:00 p.m. in the CA 92530. Commissioner Public Works Director PUBLIC COMMENTS — NON AGENDIZED ITEMS — 3 MINUTES None. PC February 15, 2011 Item No. 1 a Page 1 of 17 Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Meeting Regular Meeting Minutes of January 18, 2011 Page 2 of 17 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM(S) (1) Minutes for Special Joint Meeting of City Council and Planning Commission • November 16, 2010 Recommendation: Approval MOTION was made by Commissioner J Commissioner O'Neal, and unanimously c• Minutes for Special Joint Meeting of Ci Commission of November 16, 2010. AYES: Chairman Gonzales, Vic airman Mi Commissioner Jorda ,1 mmissioner Commissioner Oea , 'N NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None (2) • December 7, seconded by to approve the it and Planning 3sio Jord- requested that a correction be made to the g para h att bottom of page 6 of 18 to read: Commissioner asked oor:Tvehicles have caught on fire inside the facility. Commissio Jordan requested that a correction be made to the paragraph a the top of page 15 of 18 to read: Commissioner Jordan indicated that she wanted to make sure that it met minimum front yard setback requirement. Commissioner O'Neal indicated at the December 7, 2010, Planning Commission meeting that there was graffiti on the City Council sign located at Riverside Drive at 4 corners, and noted that it is still there. MOTION was made by Commissioner Jordan, seconded by Commissioner O'Neal, and unanimously carried to approve the PC February 15, 2011 Item No. 1a Page 2 of 17 Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Meeting Regular Meeting Minutes of January 18, 2011 Page 3 of 17 (3) Planning Commission Minutes of December 7, 2010, with corrections. AYES: Chairman Gonzales, Vice Chairman Mendoza Commissioner Jordan, Commissioner Morsch, Commissioner O'Neal NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Conditional Use Permit No. 2010: Are ue o e eblish and operate an animal crematory facility within an existinw.1.ndustrial tdino located all 18345 Pasadena Street gdNE _ Recommendation: P a. If it is determined th t the CC & ev�rn the subject property, staff recommends that Commissi on eny Conditional Use Permit No. 2010 -07 for the ester josh and opetion of an animal crematory facility with r�ari e indu I building. WON, b. If it is that the s do not govern the subject prop , staff re Qmmen , $ hat the Commission consider all of the evad ce prese �tl in the report and during the public heat , t Jo eva a ethe x" findings necessary to approve the S CUP arldeYr determination are justified. ManaJ- �rady� ked Senior Planner Harris to review this Item with Planning'C � : and answer any questions that the Commission have. provided an overview of the project. Attorney; f%,A, John Lemmo, gave his name and address and indicated that he was representing the applicant of Peaceful Paws. He stated that the CC &Rs related to this subdivision are private land use controls, and stated that this is a proceeding about the application and the standards associated with the City's zoning Ordinance. The purpose of the zoning Ordinance is for consistency for zoning within the City and within the M -1 zone, and as stated in the Staff Report, this use was already approved within the City and within the zone and noted that it is important that they are consistent with what the Commission has approved. He discussed the legalities of the private land use controls, and indicated that the CC &Rs are a private civil action. PC February 15, 2011 Item No. 1a Page 3 of 17 Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Meeting Regular Meeting Minutes of January 18, 2011 Page 4 of 17 The applicant, Mr. Sarit Dhupa of Peaceful Paws, gave his name and address. He indicated that they have been in this community for five (5) years and are grateful to be in the City. He stated that they have grown and are requesting to move into a new facility within a mile of where they are located now. Their goal is to provide a dignified farewell to family pets which they have been doing for the past five (5) years. He noted that the business is not a garbage disposal /animal incineration, it is a cremation facility. They have been good neighbors for five (5) years and haven't had any complaints. They have had Air Quality Management District Compliance visits frequently and their goal is to continue to grow and develop in the community. 0 ", Ms. Vivianne Villanueva Dhupa stated thaAll � e wife of Sarit Dhupa of Peaceful Paws. She reiterated what h sf said and indicated that they have been good neighbors a appy to 1 11 6Jn the community. They are consistently monitored by t r Quality Co eople and by the City. She said she understa y people are hesrf, in having a crematory in their community an= at peo may have ��ear of the unknown but cremation is a green j'esour - d is better than burying, landfills, and rendering p lants. She staei at they would appreciate the Commission's approval fQraGonditional- Permit because they want to continue providing a d ell for beloved family pet. She respectively corrected Mr. Harp ent i ting that they deal with a lot of humane �,v. eties ands kn «; S. .9% of their pets come from private , "t .o . s. It pet o Vs choice to receive the remains b They a the n to receive an urn back or to scatter the rema' t sea an thing is own away in dumpters or the trash. Mr. sseeb �i AgarSe and address. He stated that he r .fit Urb' S5 rossroads, Inc., the firm that prepared the air quality an healfh "�sse,e11t studies for the project and indicated that the project find ings�h re v I below the South Coast Air Quality Management 1 trict's threshes plds TWE hese types of projects and would not trigger any slgbficcant im acs He also indicated that SCAQMP has reviewed their t chr1,L, I studie d concurs with their findings and would answer any questio 'hat ommission may have. Commissio a Jordan referred to Table 3.3 regarding existing air quality in the Staff Report and asked why the study was taken in a different city and not in the City of Lake Elsinore. Mr. Qureshi indicated that the reason why the Study was not done in Lake Elsinore was because the Air Quality Management District does not provide the data for every monitoring station. Commissioner Jordan requested clarification of the days and hours of operation of the project should it get approved. PC February 15, 2011 Item No. 1a Page 4 of 17 Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Meeting Regular Meeting Minutes of January 18, 2011 Page 5 of 17 Mr. Qureshi indicated that the reason why they operate twelve (12) hours a day seven (7) days a week is that this represents the maximum allowed under the permit that is currently on file with the Air Quality District and stated this represents a conservative estimate of all of the emissions and activities that occur. Mr. Dhupa indicated that their permit allows them to be open 7 days a week although they are normally open 5 days a week, Monday through Friday. Under other circumstances, if needed, the facility is open on weekends for an hour or less due to the death of a pet. Chairman Gonzales asked how long it takes to Gf'Eeme a small cat or dog. a " Mr. Dhupa described the cremation pros s , a length of time it takes for cremation. Chairman Gonzales asked how Mr. Dhupa indicated that a horse or dog. Mr. Dhupa indicated horses and their m haven't opted to whole orocess f a e C take to cremafta horse. to cremate` than a cat for years to cremate nals of that size but nt. He noted that the f�17 at the er Dut `1t Dn of vans because if they would be cremating horses I that theyra a not planning on cremating horses i;Haddressed that issue. It is something that they may Wt ,,alter anything. He explained the particulate of nits and stated that the emission in a horse is very are lean. Ofsch asked if the facility has scrubbers that treat the they leave the facility. Mr. Dhupa indicated that there are very few emissions and explained that it is not total incineration; they have very sophisticated equipment that reduces the amount of emissions and he requested that Mr. Qureshi explain the technical data. Mr. Qureshi explained the process of the emissions, and indicated that the emissions that come out are not pure but filtered and noted that the equipment that Mr. Dhupa utilizes at the facility is Mathews International which is a leading and cutting edge firm that manufactures cremation PC February 15, 2011 Item No. 1a Page 5 of 17 Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Meeting Regular Meeting Minutes of January 18, 2011 Page 6 of 17 equipment. All of their equipment has emission controls on the stacks which is a requirement not only from the Air Resources Board but also by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Commissioner Morsch asked if they are subject to annual or semi - annual inspections of the emissions in the facility. Mr. Qureshi indicated that the Air Quality Management District has the authority to come whenever they chose for random site visits and frequently come unannounced or if any complaints are made. Commissioner Morsch asked how many comp) ^ "'have been filed within the past five (5) years since the existing facility h s een in operation. Mr. Qureshi indicated that to his kno ge, no c aints have been filed. They have done a thorough ds review fr the Air Quality Management District using their h y information dat se and there were zero (0) results. REQUESTS TO SPEAK Mr. Carl Johnson of Near - "'r he was the original develope bought the land h reviewed something on th'ble�\ t the CC &Rs met,`g l h wh1they development He revle, ' d thi its naffiond address. He stated that e a land bdicated that when he first th-hls attorney, and added are cause they felt that the :d to do as far as a quality type issues regarding the CUP. tiermai t # V zoning description (M -1) that s e supposede is not intended as permitted. 2) a st that he read the CC &Rs and the exact use is not 3) He ke't*bll of the owners that bought property in this are nd they do not want this animal crematory there. He indicated ft the owners that bought the property knew what they were buyip because the CC &Rs are on every Title Report on that property a believes that the Commission should uphold the request of the rest of the property owners and not allow this use. Commissioner Jordan asked what the penalty is, if the CUP is approved and Mr. Dhupa opens the facility. Mr. Johnson indicated that there would be a lawsuit. Commissioner Jordan asked why the other owners have a problem with this use. PC February 15, 2011 Item No. 1a Page 6 of 17 Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Meeting Regular Meeting Minutes of January 18, 2011 Page 7 of 17 Mr. Johnson indicated that it is a perception that the facility downgrades the property. Attorney, Mr. David Reynolds, gave his name and address. He indicated that he was representing the owners of the Pasadena Business Park and nine (9) of the owners have bought buildings approximately four (4) or five (5) years ago in what was then a new business park. He stated that based upon the CC &Rs and the zoning that existed for that property; the CC &Rs that were filed in 1986 as Matthew Harris indicated specifically prohibited the dumping, disposal, and incineration of reduction, garbage, and dead animals on this property. Under th � unicipal Code, uses permitted in the M -1 district shall maintain a erior environment free from odor, dust, smoke, gas, noise, etc. He noted that CC &Rs recorded on the all owners and subsequent owners notice that those obligations and .fir ; adjoining owners of this property °t c agreed to restrict when they bough that Mr. Harris stated that the CC &Rs allowing this use in a lig, zone K'g"w perty, run Xviola perty and nership erty upon exist and ne existing to this� se twhat they K\ elopment. a indicated i an d run with the land and the zoning requirements of use is allowed, there will the Municipal Code of La and be a lawsuit filed. Chairman property. Mr. D for at the CC &Rs for that re not CC &Rs for a particular block, he was not aware of the CC &Rs at rscl,,,,,asked if he had taken this up with the Title this was not disclosed in the Title Report. Mr. 11 pa indic `° that this issue was just raised a day ago, and stated that th ill -up with the Title Company regarding this issue. He wanted t flat there has never been any notice given to the applicant that there ha not been a violation of the CC &Rs for what he is applying for now, or at his existing property. He specified that the CC &Rs should be interpreted by a court of law and that the Commission has discretion to apply the City's Ordinance as they see fit. Vice Chairman Mendoza asked how long the application process has been in the works. Mr. Dhupa indicated probably about four (4) months. PC February 15, 2011 Item No. 1 a Page 7 of 17 Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Meeting Regular Meeting Minutes of January 18, 2011 Page 8 of 17 Vice Chairman Mendoza asked Mr. Dhupa if within the past four (4) months, were the CC &Rs disclosed to him. Mr. Dhupa indicated that the Title Company did not come up with those CC &Rs. They had one (1) day to research this and his understanding was that through a 3 party, there are two (2) separate parts to the development; one (1) of the CC &Rs is recorded, and the other isn't and this parcel is in the CC &Rs that is not recorded and this is the reason they didn't come up with Title. Vice Chairman Mendoza asked if Mr. Dhupa needt� more time to come up with a definitive answer. Mr. Dhupa indicated that from his ers �° p p p�ivie, y feel that they are doing the right thing and that this is a pr' - t party motte� Mr. Reynolds indicated that all c area just got notice last week v posted and that the applicant nev (4) months to discuss whit they property. He also stag Pat process, there wouldn't hae�be�E have known back then that WWas' Chairman , !%poz 'A ed if s wa n that oa. previou 4re owners that have .% erty in the the Notre of Public ring was U t to ,0 within the last four t� the proposed use of the i fil if he ft d con tacted them during this s n Put aring because they would n ttlation o CC &Rs. Hearing got posted the Senior Plan' a Hard i c ' ; d tha =er the City Clerk, the Notice of Public Hearig wa x o so, the Notice of Public Hearing was i nael = side usinesse thin a 300 foot radius, published in the Press En ed a is ten (10) days prior to the Planning Commission W eeting, an tedt the bulletin board at City Hall, all per the Code pie -quirements Gb s•, Mrs Hassle,gave his name and address. He indicated that he and his wif6f own�a�% uilding in the complex immediately adjacent to the crematonum �at)d stated that he knows it is a necessary service but their business pi a beautiful park which raises the value of the City and it is a place they can be proud of. He asked the Commission to not approve this because he believes it will degrade the value of their property. He noted that the smoke and fumes could raise health and safety issues to the air quality. Commissioner Jordan asked Mr. Hassle why he feels that this use is going to degrade the property value. PC February 15, 2011 Item No. 1a Page 8 of 17 Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Meeting Regular Meeting Minutes of January 18, 2011 Page 9 of 17 Mr. Hassle indicated again that they have a beautiful park and spend money to keep the landscaping and the streets up and indicated that it is a very high class neighborhood which he thinks contributes to the City. He said for a business to move in with the connotations that go with animal incineration is not good for the City, the neighborhood, and the surrounding areas. Charles gave his first name only, and address. He indicated that he owns a building that is next door to where they are planning on putting the crematorium. He stated that he has fourteen (1Zagged ployees and asked what they thought about this and they sai did not want the crematorium next door to their building. He in that they were one of the first businesses to come into the area rr a)�anted a business that they can be proud of and do not like the idegof this; " Cam Shan gave her name and everything they owned to buy th with the CC &Rs and are law abk lover but is concerned about the before they are cremated. . She indicated that they sold in this area afid' , Ahey comply s the said shevfs -an animal if the animals will be there Ms. Kay Hassle introduced h'eFp has not been mentioned is ethE building. The b wns the uili stated that th t of o this park a e ve roud o informed t reliable ' S Urce tha the black s 3 We aoin. -t tk>e air. indl' ` ed that that one thing that >Dhupali "` ends to lease or buy the as been repossessed. She t ha nvested a lot of money into She also indicated that they were ation happens at night because of GMs. Hass[e "f& her comment and indicated that they = the property, they are not leasing and it is a n a n the five (5) years that they have been in a ne operated the crematory at night and 99.9% of ]one in broad daylight. They have never had any them. He noted that within the first two (2) months of Department came to the facility once or twice for smoke which came from the human crematory. Commissioner Jordan stated to Mr. Dhupa that she knows he spoke about being a good neighbor but asked how he feels that the nine (9) neighbors around him are in opposition of this. Mr. Dhupa indicated that he understands how people feel about this and it sounds potentially horrible but it is not. They are a discrete and successful operation. He explained the procedures and indicated that is a dignified disposal of someone's family member. PC February 15, 2011 Item No. 1a Page 9 of 17 Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Meeting Regular Meeting Minutes of January 18, 2011 Page 10 of 17 Vice Chairman Mendoza stated that he knew that the facility has the capabilities of cremating horses but confirmed with Mr. Dhupa that they have no intensions of cremating them, and asked if that was correct. Mr. Dhupa said this was correct. Vice Chairman Mendoza asked Mr. Dhupa how the outcome of the Commission's decision regarding the project will affect the escrow of the building. Mr. Dhupa indicated that if they don't get a C, =', they will have to withdraw from the escrow process. Commissioner Jordan asked for clarificatiON" f\andfin g and its intent even though it was approved pre 'sfy. City Attorney Leibold indicated th t not a per is not a specified conditional use but then a catch all pIlows the Planning Commission to evaluate sped' uhat it is consistent with purpos es of the = ing and ultimately it is a determination for the Pla ng Commiss o make. She stated that the existing operation was al e of P in an M -1 zone which doesn't mean that this pajriul" "� wa ion I -ound by that decision, therefore, the C Ission hasfou st #hat this operation, given its particular ^ nces an. arac erfics at that location was consistent I Commisslo Jordr�sk�d Cltyjorney Leibold what the intent of the M- 1.zQning is ai".9f Epty Attorift %, ifYoC indicated that ultimately it is up to the Planning ommission fo<&eva ua the technical reports with respect to odor, air lit y, etc and' term t1;e °whether or not there are impacts, and also if at t ask 1 tion this operation can operate in a manor that is K� '.r• compatible and sistent with the adjacent uses and the purpose of the CUP is s't sp c. She also said that the CUP that is issued on Hunco Way is A� that location. Commissioner Jordan asked if this project is approved by the Commission, will it set precedence for future M -1 s. City Attorney Leibold indicated that the CUP is location specific and looks at the adjacent uses and in order to approve the CUP, which is identified in the Staff Report, there are six (6) mandatory findings that the Planning Commission has to make to support the issuance of the CUP. PC February 15, 2011 Item No. 1a Page 10 of 17 Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Meeting Regular Meeting Minutes of January 18, 2011 Page 11 of 17 Commissioner Morsch indicated that it is his experience that the governing agency doesn't get involved with private CC &Rs and asked if the Planning Commission has any purview over the CC &Rs. City Attorney Leibold indicated that the CC &Rs are only one (1) factual bit of information in the overall analysis and stated that staff felt that the existence of the CC &Rs did affect the ability of the Planning Commission to make the finding in Item E which is at the top of page 5 of the Staff Report. This states that in approving the subject use at the specific location, there will be no adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted and normal use thereof and proceeded aplain this use. Commissioner Morsch stated that he views those two (2) issues which are the CC &Rs and the zoning issue and,1 elieve that approving this would set precedence. He stated that applicant >> -Id go a long way into selling their product into new neigq�§Koods and m a ,n some kind of an agreement. He indicated that,�e`�'i gone by the fact and said it was very clean and there was no Yidence of hat they are ping other than a smokestack coming out of the _op of t e uilding so maybe there is little justification, if any, for discrimina I ainst the use but that is up to the applicant to let the adjo �_= i busines x ' ers know that they are good neighbors. He stated that • els his is to go out ahead of time to counsel their neighbors ha a do grand talk to them so that it doesn't come t ...'s. He q tion - ffs ecommendation. Senior Plane Harris icate t staff didn't analyze all of the uses in the busir park to a what her uses were out there and didn't evaluate hoWg# „would, ; ' of of uses in the park at that time. cate�at he didn't see any Conditions with the that the project spoke for itself and if there were o the Air Quality Reports. Mr Planner H"�'fis indicated that there are Conditions but they held off InclucJj ,g the WVitions into the Staff Report until the Commission decldedkhethefhis was appropriate to evaluate the use or recommend denial wifWi ,eggfds to the CC &Rs. Commissioner Morsch asked Senior Planner Harris how the Commission could consider the project without looking at the Conditions, if they were in a position to approve it. City Attorney Leibold indicated that they would ask that the Commission to continue this item and direct staff to bring forward the appropriate resolutions on the categorical exemption for the CEQA determination and the findings necessary to support the CUP with the appropriate Conditions. PC February 15, 2011 Item No. 1 a Page 11 of 17 Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Meeting Regular Meeting Minutes of January 18, 2011 Page 12 of 17 Commissioner O'Neal apologized to Mr. Dhupa in advance for some of the questions that he would be asking. He stated that Mr. Dhupa indicated that he knew a lot of the Planning Commissioners and asked if he recognized some of the faces that were in attendance at the meeting when it was approved in 2005. Mr. Dhupa indicated that he recognized more than half of the Commissioners. Commissioner O'Neal stated that this wasn't true because he was in attendance of the Planning Commission meeting 'n 2.005 and none of the other Commissioners were in attendance at the at that time. Commissioner O'Neal asked the applicant 1he w �purchasing a larger space so that they could do a larger voles f proces lugg. Mr. Dhupa indicated that this % space. He stated that their pri a bigger building would allow a Commissioner O'Neal day. u�� reason for move= _ 'into a larger is to 1Rprove their ;.�siency and eft` =''abduction. p ts� they would be cremating a Mr. Dhupa i a day. Commisst cremating under twenty (20) pets Mr. Dhupa that they wouldn't be 7 te die `t aiev orse < needed but they are trying to be transparent is what he imed they have been from the outset. Commisc neeal stated to Mr. Dhupa that he appreciated the informat'iot:ejt was trying to understand the nature of their business. Commissi n'eY O'Neal stated to Mr. Reynolds that he realizes that the legal documentation was distributed to the Commission in a timely manner, but the signatures that were gathered protesting the crematorium means very little to him. Mr. Reynolds indicated that if there were letters sent out, his clients didn't get them and he was just hired the week before the Planning Commission meeting. PC February 15, 2011 Item No. 1a Page 12 of 17 Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Meeting Regular Meeting Minutes of January 18, 2011 Page 13 of 17 Commissioner O'Neal indicated that he recognizes that they are not guided by or bound by CC &Rs that may or may not exist but suggested that these issues can be resolved by continuing this item. Vice Chairman Mendoza indicated to Mr. Dhupa that he is glad that they are doing well at their current location, and he understands why they want to move but referred back to the CC &Rs and said that if he was a property owner, he would understand how they feel. He concurs with Commissioner O'Neal to continue this and try to work this out with the property owners. Commissioner Jordan indicated that she a re`s' with Vice Chairman Mendoza and Commissioner O'Neal to he CC &Rs resolved because it would be hard to approve this k ca g' there could possibly be a lawsuit involved if it is approved. Commissioner O'Neal indicated t4,pffi' a and the other bush ess owners respect what Mr. Dhupa is doing < {xt this Isn t v hat the busI s owners bought into. s AW Chairman Mendoza indi( clean and one would nev Mr. Dhupa takes pride in chance that he can:ciet. current Band if th ,y have going by w; @\ they have heard. he werat�oy the building and it is very at it is a crpmatorium. He believes that Ib is „a goo and deserves every of the neighboring owners toured his i smoke or smelled odors or are they said there "wasn't enough time to check out the ing Commission meeting. ested to make a motion to continue this until are affect asked Mr. Dhupa if this item is continued, would it Mr. Dhupa indicated that they extended the escrow and they have to provide the bank with a statement by Friday, January 21 st. He also stated that they welcome the neighboring business owners and any and all of the members present to tour the facility. He indicated that their real estate agent extended the opportunity to meet with them at their convenience but believes that people were so bothered by the concept that they were not willing to go any further and their request to meet with their neighbors was denied. PC February 15, 2011 Item No. 1a Page 13 of 17 Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Meeting Regular Meeting Minutes of January 18, 2011 Page 14 of 17 Vice Chairman Mendoza suggested anyone visiting the facility should have an open mind. Mr. Dhupa indicated that they have data that shows that any hamburger stand in the U.S. produces significantly more emissions than all of their machines combined and hamburger stands are running sixteen (16) hours a day and there are thousands of them. Commissioner O'Neal extended his apologies to Mr. Dhupa for the problems that he was having with the real estate people and the closing of the escrow but there are issues that need to be reseed. Mr. Dhupa indicated that he understands what he has heard that if a continuance Is, to do that. The bank wants to get rldt foreclosure. He indicated that if the „cant then they would appreciate the un neighbors and allow them to tour acilib Commissioner O'Neal noted that Mr and can see what kind ofl@ 1 d' 'd of this. Vice Chairman grant a continui can do is Ms. Dhupa% t iterated What Mr. Nftpa said and indicated that they don't want to be3� Ojsllkec�fx t 'r nei hbors and explained the process of crema ion SFfedids ;a ; fke pride in their work. 1birman�, .anked both sides for their input and indicated that is item woul b con tied to February 1st. ler M, ch indicated that the Commission's decisi on on this s Id be <`' the fundamentals of the zoning, the use, the business t ea, and the impact on the community, etc. The issues eW &Rs he believes to be a civil matter between the parties. MOTION was made by Commissioner Jordan, seconded by Vice Chairman Mendoza and unanimously carried to continue Conditional Use Permit No. 2010, an animal crematory facility within an existing Industrial building located at 18345 Pasadena Street, to Tuesday, February 1, 2011, Planning Commission meeting. AYES: Chairman Gonzales, Vice Chairman Mendoza Commissioner Jordan, Commissioner Morsch, Commissioner O'Neal m and believes from �`optk en they are willing 1e pr y bec ause it is in 3nce is e,"., thing to do to meet witheir potential > represented himself well is not sure what will come PC February 15, 2011 Item No. 1a Page 14 of 17 Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Meeting Regular Meeting Minutes of January 18, 2011 Page 15 of 17 NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Commissioner Morsch asked if the Conditions of Approval will be included in the Staff Report for the February 1 Planning Commission meeting. City Attorney Leibold indicated that the Conditions of Approval will be included in the Staff Report. A 1190 Commissioner Jordan stated that if the C Commission wouldn't be able to approve it, Conditions included for the February 1 PIS not included, the refers to have the Dn meeting. City Attorney Leibold indicated that CEQA, and the CUP resolutions w alternative and the Commission can Planner Harris has; the iitionso they will `haKe it in the STAFF COMMENTS Chairman Gonzales asked would begin at 4 corner , when the striping Public Works Dire Seum I indica Wthat they are not sure and stated that the pavement hash een com ed but work has not been accepted because the asphalt fell ap They ng a ependent lab analyze the final lift of asphalt and will fo theE also indicated that the River Walk V d the will a installing signs and finishing the project protect o~✓In�f�rwa �= Y 9 9 9 ect P 1 by thewe� of the n1 n th. Se Ii nner Harns h no c , ments. Office Spe ;ist Porch ad not comments. City Manager 'ad that the Unity Community Parade that was scheduled for March 5, 20 has been moved up to February 26, 2011. This was announced at the January 11, 2011, City Council meeting. CITY ATTORNEY COMMENTS City Attorney Leibold had no comments. PC February 15, 2011 Item No. 1a Page 15 of 17 Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Meeting Regular Meeting Minutes of January 18, 2011 Page 16 of 17 PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS Commissioner Morsch congratulated staff for the play equipment at McVicker Park. Public Works Director Seumalo thanked Commissioner Morsch for his comment and noted that this was a Parks project and will pass that this information to the Parks & Recreation staff. Commissioner Jordan had no comments. Commissioner O'Neal indicated that he counted between his house and his office. Vice Chairman Mendoza thanked staff for storms. Chairman Gonzales indicated that he m the house down the street from his and and has to be repaired. Al City Manager Brady indicated that Public Works Director Se Manager as well. Chairman those in T The nei Elsinore Center I (49) illegal signs did during the )ember Tisdal`e� regarding road is ready I o collapse of this and indicated with the Public Works Commission meeting in memory of to come before the Planning Commission, meeting at 7:25 p.m. meetg of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake sled f uesday, February 1, 2011, at 6:00 p.m. in the Cultural 183 -f ' ain Street, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530. John Gonzales Chairman Respectfully Submitted, Kristine Herrington Office Specialist PC February 15, 2011 Item No. 1a Page 16 of 17 Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Meeting Regular Meeting Minutes of January 18, 2011 Page 17 of 17 Attest: Robert A. Brady City Manager PC February 15, 2011 Item No. 1 a Page 17 of 17