Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/11/2008 RDA Reports 1 of 2 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA DARYL HICKMAN, MAYOR WWW.LAKE- ELSINORE.ORG GENIE KELLEY, MAYOR PRO TEM (951) 674 -3124 PHONE THOMAS BUCKLEY, COUNCILMAN (951) 674 -2392 FAX ROBERT E. "BOB" MAGEE, COUNCILMAN LAKE ELSINORE CULTURALCENTER ROBERT SCHIFFNER, COUNCILMAN 183 NORTH MAIN STREET ROBERT A. BRADY, CITY MANAGER LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 11, 2008 STUDY SESSION AT 4:00 P.M. CLOSED SESSION AT 5:00 P.M. PUBLIC SESSION AT 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER — 5:00 P.M. ROLL CALL CLOSED SESSION 1(a) CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS (Gov "t Code §54956.8) Properties: APNs 375042027 -4; 375042028 -5; 375031023 -6; 378157040 -1; 363281024 -3; 373082021 -8; 363540003 -4; 378182017 -9; 378182018 -0; 378182035 -5; 378055055 -0; 378100008 -7; 378100009 -8; 378100017 -5; 375201020 -8; 375201019 -8; 375274009 -5; 375274010 -5; 375321029 -8; 375321030 -8; 375321031 -9; 375321032 -0; 375321033 -1; 375223037 -2; 375223036 -1; 375293029 -2; 375293030 -2; 375321006 -7; 375321054 -0; 375321053 -9; 374043014 -8; 374072026 -9; 373132059 -7; 373132058 -6; 373132053 -1; 373132052 -0; 373134026 -3; 373134025 -2; 373134024 -1; 374262011 -2; 374262004 -6 City /RDA negotiator: City Manager / Executive Director Brady Negotiating parties: Redevelopment Agency, City of Lake Elsinore, and the County of Riverside, et al. Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment 1(b) CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956.8) Property: APN 374 - 072 -028, 374 - 072 -030, 374 - 072 -032, 374 - 072 -034, 374 -072- 036 Agency Negotiator: City Manager /Executive Director Brady Negotiating parties: Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency and City of Lake Elsinore Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment 1(c) CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956.8) Property: APN 374 - 072 -018, 374 - 020 -030, 374 - 072 -022 Agency Negotiator: Executive Director Brady Negotiating parties: Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency and Riverside County Flood Control District Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment 1(d) CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956.8) Property: APN 373 - 023 -011, -012, -015, -024, -025 Agency Negotiator: Executive Director Brady Negotiating parties: Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency and L &L Management Services, LLC Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment 1(e) CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956.8) Property: APN 379 - 131 -005, -006, -015, -018, -019 Agency Negotiator: Executive Director Brady Negotiating parties: Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency and Charles and Patricia Pearson Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment 1(f) CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956.8) Property: APN 379 - 050 -035, -036 Agency Negotiator: Executive Director Brady Negotiating parties: Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency and Harbor Grand Apartments Inv. Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment 1(g) CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956.8) Property: APN 374 - 174 -018 Agency Negotiator: Executive Director Brady Negotiating parties: Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency and Elsinore Pioneer Lumber Company Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment 1(h) CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956.8) Property: APN 374 - 174 -017, -013 Agency Negotiator: Executive Director Brady Negotiating parties: Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency and Thomas A. Martin Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment CALL BACK TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. CLOSED SESSION REPORT ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMENTS — NON - AGENDIZED ITEMS —1 MINUTE (Please read & complete a Speaker's Form at the podium, prior to the start of the City Council Meeting.) PUBLIC COMMENTS — AGENDIZED ITEMS — 3 MINUTES (Please read & complete a Speaker's Form at the Podium, prior to the Start of the City Council Meeting. The Chairman will call on you to speak, when your item is called.) CONSENT CALENDAR (All matters on the Consent Calendar are approved on one motion, unless a Board Member or any member of the public requests separate action on a specific item.) (2) Approval of Redevelopment Agency Minutes Recommendation: Approve the following minute(s): a) Joint City Council /Redevelopment Agency meeting — October 14, 2008 b) Joint City Council /Redevelopment Agency meeting — October 28, 2008 c) Regular Meeting — October 28, 2008. (3) Warrant List Dated October 30, 2008 Recommendation: Authorize payment of Warrant List dated October 30, 2008. (4) Agreement and Escrow Instructions for Purchase and Sale of Real Property APN 373 - 023 -011, -012, -015, -024, -025 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Agency Board approve the purchase of the property subject to the satisfaction of appropriate conditions, direct the Agency Counsel to finalize the Agreement and Escrow Instructions for Purchase and Sale of Real Property according to any further Agency direction and authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement in such final form as approved by the Agency Counsel. (5) Agency Compensation Waiver Implementation Recommendation: Receive and File the report explaining the implementation of the pay reduction. PUBLIC HEARING(S) No public hearings scheduled. BUSINESS ITEM(S) (6) BRIDGE Housing Corporation — Affordable Housing development Recommendations: a) Approve the Memorandum of Understanding by and between the Agency and BRIDGE Housing Corporation b) Approve Resolution No. 2008- authorizing an Affordable Housing Development Loan from the Agency's Low and moderate Income Housing fund to BRIDGE Housing Corporation for an affordable housing project known as Pottery Court c) Continue to work with BRIDGE to develop a comprehensive affordable housing strategy for the Redevelopment Agency to fulfill its inclusionary housing obligations. PUBLIC COMMENTS — NON - AGENDIZED ITEMS — 3 MINUTES EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR COMMENTS LEGAL COUNSEL COMMENTS BOARDMEMBER COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT The Lake Elsinore City Council will adjourn to a regular meeting to be held on Tuesday, November 25, at 5:00 p.m. to be held in the Cultural Center located at 183 N. Main Street, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, CAROL COWLEY, Interim Secretary of the City of Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency, do hereby affirm that a copy of the foregoing agenda was posted at City Hall, 72 hours in advance of this meeting. CAROL COWLEY DATE INTERIM SECRETARY LAKE OLSINORE DRAM EXTREME REPORT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO: HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FROM: ROBERT A. BRADY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR DATE: NOVEMBER 11, 2008 SUBJECT: CLOSED SESSION REPORT(S) Discussion (la) CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS (Gov "t Code §54956.8) Properties: APNs 375042027 -4; 375042028 -5; 375031023 -6; 378157040 -1; 363281024 -3; 373082021 -8; 363540003 -4; 378182017 -9; 378182018 -0; 378182035 -5; 378055055 -0; 378100008 -7; 378100009 -8; 378100017 -5; 375201020 -8; 375201019 -8; 375274009 -5; 375274010 -5; 375321029 -8; 375321030 -8; 375321031 -9; 375321032 -0; 375321033 -1; 375223037 -2; 375223036 -1; 375293029 -2; 375293030 -2; 375321006 -7; 375321054 -0; 375321053 -9; 374043014 -8; 374072026 -9; 373132059 -7; 373132058 -6; 373132053 -1; 373132052 -0; 373134026 -3; 373134025 -2; 373134024 -1; 374262011 -2; 374262004 -6 City /RDA negotiator: City Manager / Executive Director Brady Negotiating parties: Redevelopment Agency, City of Lake Elsinore, and the County of Riverside, et al. Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment (1 b) CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956.8) Property: APN 374 - 072 -028, 374 - 072 -030, 374 - 072 -032, 374 - 072 -034, 374 -072- 036 City /RDA Negotiator: City Manager /Executive Director Brady Negotiating parties: Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency and City of Lake Elsinore Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment Agenda Item No. 1 Page 1 of 3 (1c) CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956.8) Property: APN 374 - 072 -018, 374 - 020 -030, 374 - 072 -022 Agency Negotiator: Executive Director Brady Negotiating parties: Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency and Riverside County Flood Control District Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment (1d) CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956.8) Property: APN 373 - 023 -011, -012, -015, -024, -025 Agency Negotiator: Executive Director Brady Negotiating parties: Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency and L &L Management Services, LLC Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment (1e) CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956.8) Property: APN 379 - 131 -005, -006, -015, -018, -019 Agency Negotiator: Executive Director Brady Negotiating parties: Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency and Charles and Patricia Pearson Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment (10 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956.8) Property: APN 379 - 050 -035, -036 Agency Negotiator: Executive Director Brady Negotiating parties: Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency and Harbor Grand Apartments Inv. Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment (1g) CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956.8) Property: APN 374 - 174 -018 Agency Negotiator: Executive Director Brady Negotiating parties: Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency and Elsinore Pioneer Lumber Company Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment (1 h) CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956.8) Property: APN 374 - 174 -017, -013 Agency Negotiator: Executive Director Brady Negotiating parties: Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency and Thomas A. Martin Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment Recommendation Recess prior to adjournment of tonight's meeting in order to conduct an executive (closed) session. Agenda Item No. 1 Page 2of3 Prepared by: Jessica Guzma ), Office Specialist Approved by: Robert A. Brady Executive Director Agenda Item No. 1 Page3of3 CITY OF .tom. LA I L INOI 44. 'IR:' ' DREAM EXTREME REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: ROBERT A. BRADY CITY MANAGER DATE: NOVEMBER 11, 2008 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MINUTES Discussion The following City Council Minutes are submitted for approval as follows: a) Joint City Council /Redevelopment Agency meeting -- October 14, 2008 b) Joint City Council /Redevelopment Agency meeting -- October 28, 2008 c) Regular City Council meeting — October 28, 2008 Recommendation Approve the Minutes as submitted. Prepared by: Carol Cowley \\\ Interim City Cler Approved by: Robert A. Brady City Manager Agenda Item No. 2 Page 1 of 25 MINUTES JOINT CITY COUNCIL /REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STUDY SESSION CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, OCTOBER 14, 2008 ****************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** CALL TO ORDER -- 4:00 P.M. Mayor Hickman called the meeting to order at 4:06 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: MAYOR /MEMBER HICKMAN MAYOR PRO TEM /MEMBER KELLEY COUNCILMAN /MEMBER MAGEE COUNCILMAN/VICE- CHAIRMAN SCHIFFNER ABSENT: COUNCILMAN /CHAIRMAN BUCKLEY Also present were City Manager Brady, City Attorney Leibold, Administrative Services Director Pressey, Parks and Recreation Director Gonzales, City Treasurer Weber, Captain Cleary, Director of Lake and Aquatics Kilroy, Public Works Director /City Engineer Seumalo, Information /Communications Manager Mark Dennis, Acting Director of Community Development Weiner and Office Specialist Herrington PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments. CONSENT CALENDAR (7) Minutes of the Following Meeting(s) a) Joint City Council /Redevelopment Agency Study Session — September 23, 2008. b) Regular Meeting — September 23, 2008. Recommendation: Approve as submitted. Agenda Item No. 2 Page 2 of 25 (8) Warrant List Dated September 30, 2008 Recommendation: Authorize payment of Warrant List dated September 30, 2008. (9) Claims Against the City Recommendation: Reject the claims listed and direct the City Clerk's Office to send a letter informing the claimants of the decision. Councilman Magee questioned whether the insurance company had spoken to the Police Chief regarding this claim noting that on page 8, the description of the incident was quite graphic. Attorney Leibold stated she did not know and confirmed she would try to get an answer before the 7:00 p.m. meeting. (10) Second Amendment to Janitorial Services Contract Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to sign the Second Amendment to Service Contract for janitorial services for City parks and facilities with A & A Janitorial. (11) Second Amendment to Parks Landscape Maintenance Contract Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to sign the Second Amendment Parks Landscape Contract with CTAI Pacific Greenscape to provide park landscape maintenance service to the City of Lake Elsinore. (12) Refund Lake Management Fund Deposit for FY 2008/09 Recommendation: Approve the refund of the $650,000 Lake Maintenance Fund deposit for FY 2008 -09. City Manager Brady responded to Mayor Hickman's question indicating that the Water District's Board would have to approve this request as well. (13) Approval of License Agreement for Use of Old Library Building with California Family Life Center Agenda Item No. 2 Page 3 of 25 Recommendation: Approve the License agreement for the Old Library Building with California Family Life Center and authorize the City Manager to sign the agreement. Councilman Magee asked why this contract was just coming to Council in October if it commenced on July 1, 2008. Parks and Recreation Director Gonzales explained that the contract actually expired last year and was just a matter of playing catch up. Staff contacted the County and the individual organization that actually administers the program. The agreement would be retroactive to July 1St (14) Approval of South Coast Air Quality Management District Lease Renewal Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to execute the contract renewal with South Coast Air Quality Management District extending their lease agreement another five years. (15) Interchange Improvements at Interstate 1 -15 and Central Avenue (SR -74) — Consultant Selection for Surveying and Soils Testing Recommendation: Approve the selection of KDM Meridan for survey work and the firm of City and County Soil Testing for soil testing for Interchange Improvements at Interstate 1 -15 and Central Avenue (SR -74) and allow staff to process the agreement. Councilman Magee asked Public Works Director /City Engineer Seumalo when this project would begin since the funds for the project were authorized six weeks ago. Public Works Director /City Engineer Seumalo advised the contractor will begin putting out K -rail this evening for traffic control and will continue to do so for the coming weeks. Director Seumalo did not have a specific date as to when the contractor would actually begin moving dirt suggesting possibly in 10 days. Mr. Seumalo confirmed for Mayor Hickman that a new lane was being constructed on the south side only. (16) Purchase Authorization to Replace Enterprise E -Mail Server Recommendation: It is determined to be in the best interest of the City to waive the bidding process and authorize the City Manager to sign and issue a purchase order to Hewlett Packard, Inc. and Zones, Inc. for the replacement of the City's Enterprise E -mail System. Agenda Item No. 2 Page 4 of 25 (17) Minor Design Review for K Hovanian Homes Recommendations: a) Receive and file the resolution and conditions of approval. b) Instruct the City Clerk to record the vote on the resolution as 3 -2 in accordance with the vote taken on September 23 c) Authorize the Mayor to execute the resolution. Mayor Pro Tem Kelley advised that she would be pulling this item so she could vote as she had previously voted. The City Attorney clarified that the recommendation is to reflect the vote as it occurred at the last meeting, which was three to two. Therefore, as long as Mayor Pro Tem Kelley concurred with the vote taken at the last meeting the item did not need to be pulled. The Resolution will reflect that Mayor Pro Tem Kelley voted against the recommendation. PUBLIC HEARING(S) (18) General Plan Update and Draft Environmental Impact Report Recommendation: Consider the staff /Planning Commission recommendation and direct staff /Planning Commission accordingly. Mayor Hickman asked Acting Community Development Director Weiner what staffs recommendation is. Director Weiner advised that staff is presenting three options for Council to consider. Option one is the recommendation favored by staff, however staff will wait to receive direction from Council later in the evening. Option one is to make all of the changes that have been made so far, allowing staff to make those changes and bring it back to the Planning Commission for final review. That would require the environmental impact report to be re- circulated and staff adjusting the maps and completing the project. Mayor Hickman advised there were numerous problems with the maps. Director Weiner responded stating that is the direction staff needed to receive so the maps could be changed accordingly and sent back to Council. Joe Huband addressed Council regarding the General Plan as it relates to the Country Club Heights area. He referred to a paper entitled "The Bridge to Nowhere" that he E- mailed to each of the Council Members that specifically identified the General Plan's current plan for Country Club Heights. He stated that It was actually a change in direction from the direction the City has been taking for some time. He stated for over 21 years the City has planned to develop and bring in additional infrastructure into the Agenda Item No. 2 Page 5 of 25 Country Club Heights area. In 1987 the City actually included the Country Club Heights area in a redevelopment area project resulting in the City receiving an additional tax increment for the stated premise of providing additional infrastructure and improving this particular area of Country Club Heights. He discussed the affects rezoning will have on development and the inability to construct the infrastructure required to support development in this area. He also discussed the establishment of the Country Club Heights Committee who met for several months and presented their recommendations to the City Council to zone Country Club Heights Hillside Residential which is 12,000 square feet and to hire a consultant to determine how to get the infrastructure. He presented each Council Member with a packet that included the City Council's earlier intent and goals and articles dating from 2004. BUSINESS ITEM(S) (19) Ordinance Adding Chapter 8.13 to the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Regarding Aggressive Donation Solicitations Recommendation: Waive further reading and introduce an ordinance adding Chapter 8.13 to the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code regarding Aggressive Solicitation of Donations. Mayor Pro Tem Kelley asked about the enforceability of this particular ordinance, explaining her concerns as to whether staff was talking about people in front of markets or people on the streets; and whether there have been complaints about people being accosted. She asked staff for background information. Acting Community Development Director Weiner advised Council that this action arose from two complaints; one from a citizen complaining about solicitation in the right of way particularly on freeway off ramps which was evident on a frequent basis for a short period near the 74 and Railroad Canyon South. He mentioned a second complaint generated by the owner or manager of the Albertson's supermarket in the four corners area, which was made directly to the chair of the PSAC. He advised the ordinance clearly avoids violating free speech issues but enacts a zoned prohibition solicitation within proximity to seven designated locations under three specific conditions, such as at night with a moving vehicle involved, at a public transportation facility or on board a public transportation vehicle such as a bus or shuttle. The seven locations include places where people may feel vulnerable if solicited, such as during the act of an ATM transaction or during the act of loading or unloading their vehicles in a public commercial parking lot such as a supermarket. The conditions are carefully structured not to impede the other groups that often depend on access to these locations, such as girl scouts, Salvation Army or others that have regular fundraising activities that depend on solicitation for donations. The ordinance then makes a careful distinction about locations and conditions rather than differentiating between types of people or types of organizations; therefore, it is non - discriminatory. It also has a coercion clause, which might be the most enforceable action. He explained that the ordinance is primarily self - enforcing. Agenda Item No. 2 Page 6 of 25 Mayor Pro Tem Kelley expressed concern regarding the reaction as a result of two complaints. She added that she did not want to put any more pressure on law enforcement to stop what they are doing to enforce panhandling. She felt the police were already stretched. She indicated that aggressive panhandling is pretty objective. Staff explained that under this ordinance if they are making any gestures or doing anything to get the attention of the driver of a moving vehicle that is pre - emptive. Councilman Magee stated that he was contacted by someone who wanted to go into Jack in the Box to get coffee and read a newspaper, and he was stopped at the front door. He refused to provide the individual with any funds and was attacked for it. The police was called and the assailant was apprehended and taken away. In his opinion, shop owners should have a tool to allow their customers to have safe and easy access in and out of their establishments without fear that their customers will be chased away. He realized it was adding one more responsibility to the police department but it is a safety issue. He also asked if the recommendation from the PSAC was unanimous or whether there were dissenters. Staff advised he would have to defer to the record but he would get that information. Councilman Schiffner expressed his approval with the ordinance citing that it gave law enforcement another tool to use and the police will have to the discretion on how to enforce it. Mayor Hickman asked if a sign posted outside a business that stated the business does not condone anyone who is soliciting outside would give those businesses the strength to move on. Staff explained the test is a distance test and certain venues are clearly restricted by the seven access points which allow those policies to have a greater degree of enforcement than they currently have. Staff confirmed for Mayor Pro Tem Kelley that the Police Department has reviewed the ordinance. (20) Introduction of an Ordinance Adopting Tree Preservation Guidelines Recommendation: Waive further reading and introduce an ordinance, adding Chapter 8.50 to the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code regarding Tree Preservation. Ray Gonzalez explained to Council that the ordinance creates an advisory committee and will coincide with the tree guidelines set in the Community Development Department. It will be a team approach between Public Works and Parks and Recreation. Agenda Item No. 2 Page 7 of 25 In response to a question from Councilman Magee as to the funding source, Director Gonzales explained that the funds come from various sources, including the Lighting and Landscape District and the budget already included the funds. City Manager Brady explained that the funds were included in the budget and were already being spent. He explained further in order to get the Tree City USA designation the City has to spend $2 per capita, which is what the City is already doing and no further funding is required. Thereafter followed a discussion between Council and staff regarding the funding sources, the Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District being in a deficit as a result of Proposition 218 and what staff was doing to reduce the additional costs each year by monitoring the water used and the maintenance of the district. Director Gonzales confirmed that the ordinance would only cover those trees the City is maintaining and paying for. (21) Appeal of TUMF Building Designation of Service Commercial Recommendation: Deny the appeal to change the project TUMF building designation from Service Commercial to Class B Office. Kipp Dubbs addressed Council and expressed his gratitude to the City of Lake Elsinore and special thanks to the Planning, Building and Public Works /Engineering Departments. He advised they have provided a project that they believe is a Class A/Class B project in the City and they are questioning the TUMF fee designation. He felt their project met a Class B in all areas except for one. Technically one building does not equate to 20,000 square feet per floor, which is a requirement for Class B designation. He indicated the square feet per floor are approximately 16,000 per building. Because of the opposition the Holiday Inn Express received from the community they were very sensitive to how the appearance of the structure would be. They worked with planning to break it up and give it a campus feel with a court yard in the middle. They also spent a significant amount of money on pop -ups. He explained the TUMF fee was enacted to provide incentives to developers to develop Class A type projects in the Inland Empire and they feel they have a Class A project. He advised the qualifications they met adding that even the CC &R's do not differentiate between the two buildings. They were challenging the WRCOG criteria because they feel it is flawed. He clarified that he was not asking the City to take on the liability by approving their appeal but they were asking the City to support them in their challenge to the TUMF Board. Gary Washburn addressed Council indicating that he concurs with Mr. Dubbs regarding the quality of the building meeting the definition by WRCOG standards. He read the definition of Class B qualifications indicating that it was typically characterized by high quality design, minimum two stories, central lobby interior, access to suites inside the building use of high -end materials either steel or concrete, state of the art technology for Agenda Item No. 2 Page 8 of 25 voice and data, built in data systems, and is service related such as a restaurant. He felt they met all of those requirements to be classified as Class B except for the 20,000 square feet per floor. He indicated what Mr. Dubbs is saying is that they have met the spirit of the law and land uses to meet the TUMF traffic analysis. He requested that if the Council moved to reject the appeal that language be added indicating they met the spirit of the law even though the square footage was a little Tess than what is required. They hoped this would give the, a little latitude when they formally addressed the WRCOG Board for a reduction in the fee. When asked why staff made the decision to charge the higher TUMF fee, Director Seumalo advised that the TUMF guidelines clearly state the requirements and as Mr. Washburn and Mr. Dubbs pointed out that one of the requirements is to have 20,000 square feet per floor. In his judgment the building did not meet those requirements. He did not feel he had the latitude to make interpretations when the language clearly states 20,000 square feet per floor. Because of that, in his opinion, they fall short of the minimum requirements. Staff understands that the City would have to pay the difference of $230,000.00 if Council approved the appeal and WRCOG found the project was not qualified. Director Seumalo acknowledged that he had placed a call to WRCOG staff regarding that question and has not yet received an answer. Councilman Magee indicated the City was walking a fine line between encouraging business and being in compliance with an overall County plan and also gaining transportation funds for the City's own issues. While he understands the argument being presented, he felt the City had no choice but to allow the developer to appeal to WRCOG Board. He felt staffs interpretation is clear and the record can reflect that the City Council wants this type of investment. Further discussion continued regarding the number of leases that have been signed and when escrows would be closing. Mr. Seumalo advised in response to a question posed by Councilman Schiffner that there was an appeal process for WRCOG, and explained the appeal process to Council. Councilman Schiffner stated he shared Councilman Magee's interest in the City receiving its share of the transportation and concurred with staff's recommendation. Councilman Magee expressed his opinion that the City Council deny the appeal and encourage the applicant to file an appeal with a request for relief of this requirement because Council believes the applicant has met the intent of WRCOG's desire to encourage this type of investment in the County. He explained while he did not want to see the building remain vacant he would not put the taxpayers on the hook for $230,000. Director Seumalo advised that the WRCOG representative was aware of this project and of the appeal and if it's the desire of the council for city staff to work with WRCOG staff to present this project in the most favorable light, then staff would do so. Agenda Item No. 2 Page 9 of 25 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM(S) (2) Approval of Redevelopment Agency Minutes Recommendation: Approve the following minutes: a) Joint City Council /Redevelopment Agency Study Session — September 23, 2008. b) Regular Meeting — September 23, 2008. (3) Warrant List Dated September 30, 2008 Recommendation: Authorize payment of Warrant List dated September 30, 2008. (4) Downtown Master Plan Consultant Selection Recommendation: The City Council authorize the City Manager to enter into a contract with Cooper Carry, Inc. to prepare the City of Lake Elsinore Downtown Master Plan, in an amount not to exceed $207,280. Executive Director Brady advised Vice Chairman Schiffner and the Board that the Downtown Master Plan Consultant was here and he had a brief presentation to give. Rich Fiehrl of Cooper Carry advised Council that their presentation consists of photographs of some of the projects they have done and introduced Sarah Wilkinson, who will be the project manager for the project and provided a brief history of the company and its philosophy. He indicated they think there is a great opportunity to begin to be an example to Southern California on how to take economic opportunities like there are today and regenerate so that cities ultimately come out of this with sustainable communities that have downtowns as their hearts. They opened an office in Southern California three years ago and are working for cities like Sonoma, City of Los Angeles in the port area, the City of Anaheim Redevelopment Agency at the Anaheim Canyon Transit Center, working in Oxnard for a developer to redevelop a part of the Channel Islands Harbor. They found the project in Lake Elsinore to be a wonderful opportunity to collaborate and help the City of Lake Elsinore see the potential as it comes forward out of this economic downturn. They are thrilled with the support from the staff. Member Magee expressed concern with the reimbursable expenses being charged at 1.5 times the actual costs for long distance telephone calls and faxes. He also did not feel it was appropriate for the City to pay for overtime and meals. He requested that those expenses be absorbed by Cooper Carry. He indicated he would like staff to take out the entire back half of the reimbursable expense category which is located on page 94. He also noted that the Schedule provides a start date within 60 days; however, he did not see a completion date. He felt it had to be done within 12 months. Agenda Item No. 2 Page 10 of 25 Mr. Fiehrl confirmed they would work with staff to lower the reimbursable expenses and they could complete the project in 12 months. Executive Director Brady responded to a question posed by Member Hickman why the Downtown Plan was not being done in phases indicating this was brought back to the Redevelopment Agency Board out of the community center process and the board directed staff to move forward with a comprehensive downtown revitalization plan that would include the possible location of the Civic Center. It was realized that it was not just the Civic Center but the revitalization of the entire area from the freeway down to the Lake. This was essentially a result of the process of going through the Civic Center design review process. Member Hickman asked if any consideration had been given to The Shopoff Group who had already done a study of the downtown area. Executive Director Brady said that study was reviewed and it can be included as part of this process, however staff was following the direction of the Board. Member Hickman expressed his concern that the public should have input into what they think downtown should look like. Staff confirmed that there would be a public outreach element to the study. Vice Chairman Schiffner expressed his hope the consultant will not be restricted by the General Plan that was proposed for approval. He would be happy if this would be a specific plan within the General Plan. Thereafter followed a slide presentation of the proposed downtown area by Cooper Carry carrying several of the plans they have created throughout the United States and the functionality of their projects. Chairman Buckley arrived at approximately 5:20 pm. PUBLIC HEARING(S) None. BUSINESS ITEM(S) None. Agenda Item No. 2 Page 11 of 25 PUBLIC COMMENTS — NON - AGENDIZED ITEMS — 3 MINUTES No comments. DARYL HICKMAN, MAYOR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE THOMAS BUCKLERY, CHAIRMAN CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ATTEST: CAROL COWLEY, INTERIM CITY CLERK CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE Agenda Item No. 2 Page 12 of 25 MINUTES JOINT CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENY CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, OCTOBER 28, 2008 CALL TO ORDER — 5:00 P.M. The joint meeting of the City Council and Redevelopment Agency Board was called to order by Mayor Hickman at 4:06 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: MAYOR /MEMBER HICKMAN MAYOR PRO TEM /MEMBER KELLEY COUNCILMAN /CHAIRMAN BUCKLEY COUNCILMAN /MEMBER MAGEE COUNCILMANNICE CHAIRMAN SCHIFFNER ABSENT: NONE Also present were City Manager Brady, City Attorney Leibold, Administrative Services Director Pressey, City Treasurer Weber, Captain Cleary, Public Works Director /City Engineer Seumalo, Information /Communications Manager Dennis, Director of Parks and Recreation Gonzales, Director of Lake and Aquatics Kilroy, Acting Director of Community Development Weiner and Interim City Clerk Cowley DISCUSSION ITEMS Mayor Hickman indicated a certificate would be presented to Bruce McMeans of Broken Arts at the later meeting. PUBLIC COMMENTS No public comments. COUNCIL APPROVES CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NOS. 8 THROUGH 16 (3) Minutes of the Following Meeting(s) (a) Regular Meeting — October 14, 2008 Recommendation: Approve as submitted. 1 Agenda Item No. 2 Page 13 of 25 (4) Warrant List Dated October 15, 2008 Recommendation: Authorize payment of Warrant List dated October 15, 2008. Staff was asked about check No. 94771 and responded that it was the refund and closing costs in the CRS account. Staff also advised the check to Home Depot was reimbursement for State Route 74 Construction. (5) Investment Report — September 2008 Recommendation: Receive and file. Director of Administrative Services Pressey advised the City had $7 million in total investments over 5% and $24 million in LAIF. (6) Risk Assessment and Response Plan for Invasive Mussel(s) Recommendation: Staff recommends approval. Mayor Hickman asked for confirmation that he read that back east they are trying a new system with the mussels that is very successful. Director of Lake and Aquatic Resources Pat Kilroy confirmed that testing is being done on soil bacteria that are toxic to the mussels but a pretty high dose would have to be administered to be lethal. He noted that whenever anything is put into the water supply it has to be extremely well tested, so a solution could be several years away. (7) Award Contract for Roof Replacement for Planet Youth Building Recommendation: Authorize the city Manager to process a purchase order in the amount of $20,621 to Dan's Roofing for the removal of the existing and the installation of a new roof at the Planet Youth Building. City Manager Brady advised the Mayor that staff wished to pull this item from the agenda and not take any action on it. Staff will bring it back at a later date. (8) Safe Candy Night Recommendation: Approve closure of Main Street from Library to Peck for the Safe Candy Night. Mayor Hickman stated that he comes downtown for this event and it is great to see the children running around. (9) Request for Street closure and fee Waiver for the Unity in the Community Parade 2 Agenda Item No. 2 Page 14 of 25 Recommendation: Approve the fee waiver and closure of streets along the parade route for the 12 Annual Unity in the Community Parade. (10) Approval to use Signs of Support funds Recommendation: Approval to use funds from the Signs of Support donation account to assist in the Skate Park program. Mayor Hickman noted the success of this program. (11) Cultural Center Digital Audio Upgrade Recommendation: It is determined to be in the best interest of the City to waive the informal- bidding process and authorize the city Manager to sign and issue a purchase order to On -Trax, Inc., to acquire, install, and configure the Digital Sound Board device. PUBLIC HEARING(S) (12) Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2008 -07, Tentative Parcel Map No. 26066, and Commercial Design Review No. 2008 -01 for the "Greenwald Commercial Center" Recommendations: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2008 -87 adopting Findings of Consistency with the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2008 -88 adopting Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2008 -07 and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program appertaining thereto. 3. Adopt Resolution No. 2008 -89 approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 36066. 4. Adopt Resolution No. 2008 -90 approving Commercial Design Review No. 2008 -01. Councilman Magee asked the City Attorney to address the document that was delivered to Council in the afternoon from an attorney who indicates his client is the Canyon Lake Property Owners Association (POA) since he has not had time to read or review the letter. City Attorney Leibold stated that she did review the letter and essentially the letter claims the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared in connection with the project is insufficient under CEQA and alleges that a full environmental impact report is required. She added staff disagrees and believes that the Mitigated Negative Declaration is sufficient and satisfies all of the CEQA requirements. She advised the issue raised by the POA is primarily a traffic safety issue and a traffic study was prepared as part of the environmental review. Her recollection is that the traffic study does not demonstrate that a signal is warranted where the Canyon Lake POA would like to have a signal. The 3 Agenda Item No. 2 Page 15 of 25 traffic impacts are mitigated below significant thresholds which is the finding under CEQA that is required. While the input is appreciated staff does not believe they have stated sufficient evidence why this project would require an EIR. The city attorney also pointed out that the letter claims that the project is inconsistent with the county's trail system; and a letter was left on the dais this afternoon stating the project relied on the approved County trail system map while the letter from the Canyon Lake POA is referencing a draft County trail system map. She also mentioned there is an issue with respect to golf carts on city streets. Lake Elsinore's Municipal Code does not allow golf carts on city streets so to the extent that the POA would like to see golf carts they will have to appeal to the City Council to amend the Municipal Code. Acting Community Development Director Weiner responded to Mayor Hickman's question regarding the trails on the north gate of Canyon Lake explaining that staff reviewed the trails; the GIS department generated a map that showed the approved County plan that had been submitted to staff. Staff used the approved County plan in conjunction with the trail system for this project. The trails incorporated into this project are in accordance with the approved County trails map. Director Weiner explained that the Homeowners Association is worried about the horses getting hit at the exit gate of Canyon Lake. Director Weiner confirmed that staff was trying to encourage the Canyon Lake residents to create the connection within their jurisdiction. Director Weiner confirmed for Councilman Magee that the POA wanted the trail further away from their gate and have some other type of connection rather than providing the connection from Canyon Lake city limits. APPEAL(S) (13) Consideration of an Appeal of the Planning Commission's Decision Relative to Public Convenience and Necessity Findings for off - Premise Alcohol Sales from a Proposed Convenience Store Located within the Viscaya Village Shopping Center Located at 16665 Lakeshore Drive, Suite 'A' (APN: 379 - 470 -083) Recommendations: 1. Consider the appeal and either uphold the Planning Commission's decision to deny the Public Convenience and Necessity request; or 2. Overturn the Planning Commission's decision and approve the Public Convenience and Necessity request. BUSINESS ITEM(S) (14) Second Reading — Adoption of Ordinance No. 1256, Adding Chapter 5.80 to the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Regarding Tree Preservation Recommendation: Waive further reading and adopt Ordinance No. 1256, adding chapter 5.80 to the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code regarding Tree Preservation. 4 Agenda Item No. 2 Page 16 of 25 (15) Second Reading — Adoption of Ordinance No. 1257, Adding Chapter 8.13 to the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Regarding Regulation of Solicitation Recommendation: Waive further reading and adopt Ordinance No. 1257, adding chapter 8.13 to the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code regarding Regulation of Solicitation. (16) Commercial Design Review No. 2008 -05; A Request for the Renovation and Related Onsite Improvements of the Existing 2,040 Square -Foot "Taco Bell" Restaurant and Associated Drive -Thru Located at 31712 Mission trail Drive (APN: 363- 172 -014 Recommendations: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2008 -91 adopting Findings of Consistency with the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2008 -92 approving Commercial Design Review No. 2008 -05. (17) Residential Design Review No. 2008 -03, for "Jasmine" by Lennar Homes in Rosetta Hills, Tract Map No. 31792 Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2008 -93 approving Residential Design Review No. 2008 -03 for the "Jasmine" products at Rosetta Hills in Tract 31792. Acting Community Development Director Weiner responded to Councilman Buckley's question regarding whether the drawings from the existing homes were included in the staff report, indicating staff did not include the existing homes, only the models being proposed. Councilman Buckley was interested in knowing whether there was an architectural quality difference between the existing homes and these homes. Director Weiner indicated there was a slight difference but staff felt that the four -sided architecture and the site plan allows for this type of unit and does not differentiate between neighborhoods. Jarnee Valdez of Lennar Homes added that Lennar Homes went to a great extent in hearing the homeowners concerns to make the elevations more like Primrose and Magnolia elevations and brought the same architectural elements into this current design. They brought the revised architectural elements back to the homeowners who were happy with the changes. She advised the square footage of the homes ranged from 2,269 square feet to 2,590 square feet. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PUBLIC COMMENTS — NON - AGENDIZED ITEMS 5 Agenda Item No. 2 Page 17 of 25 PUBLIC COMMENTS — AGENDIZED ITEMS CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM(S) (2) Approval of Redevelopment Agency Minutes Recommendation: Approve the following minutes(s): (a) Regular Meeting — October 14, 2008. (3) Warrant List dated October 15, 2008 Recommendation: Authorize payment of Warrant List dated October 15, 2008. (4) Investment Report — September 2008 Recommendation: Receive and file. PUBLIC HEARING(S) No public hearings scheduled. BUSINESS ITEM(S) No business items scheduled. PUBLIC COMMENTS — NON - AGENDIZED ITEMS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR COMMENTS No comments. LEGAL COUNSEL COMMENTS No comments. BOARDMEMBER COMMENTS No comments. CLOSED SESSION Prior to adjourning the joint meeting, City Attorney Leibold announced The Agency and City Council will adjourn to closed session commencing at 5:00 p.m. to discuss the following items as listed on their respective agendas: 6 Agenda Item No. 2 Page 18 of 25 The Redevelopment Agency has three items for discussion which are all real property negotiations and they are listed as Items 1(a), 1(b) and 1(c) on the Agency agenda as follows: 1(a) CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS (Gov't Code §54956.8) Properties: APNs 374 - 072 -028, 374 - 072 -030, 374 - 072 -032, 374 - 072 -034, 374- 072 -036 Agency Negotiator: Executive Director Brady Negotiating parties: Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency and City of Lake Elsinore Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment 1(b) CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS (Gov't code §54956.8) Properties: APNs 374 - 072 -018, 374 - 020 -030, 374 - 072 -022 Agency Negotiator: Executive Director Brady Negotiating parties: Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency and Riverside County Flood Control District Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment 1(c) CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS (Gov't Code §54956.8) Properties: APNs 375 - 350 -012, -035, -036, 057 Agency Negotiator: Executive Director Brady Negotiating parties: Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency and Symantha Pham and Glenda Patton Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment Agency Counsel Leibold noted The City Council has two items for discussion which are Listed as items 1(a) and 1(b) on the city Council agenda as follows: (1 a) CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code § 54956.8) Property: APN 379 - 403 -018 City Negotiator: City Manager Brady Negotiating Parties: City of Lake Elsinore and Jess and Marissa Enriquez Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment (1 b) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) of Gov't Code Section 54956.9: 1 potential case Mayor Hickman announced there was one speaker: 7 Agenda Item No. 2 Page 19 of 25 Randy Hiner of Lake Elsinore Motorcross Park who addressed Council regarding the cost for police services for the Lake Elsinore Grand Prix. He mentioned that last year they organized the Grand Prix in very short notice and paid $30,000 for police services and $4,000 for security and there were no incidents. In June they put on the Lake Elsinore Rodeo that had projections of far more people coming to that event than the Grand Prix and also included two beer gardens, a concert and a rodeo which is more of a party event and police services cost $11,000.00. He was caught off guard when the bill for this year's Grand Prix came in at $28,000.00 which was ultimately reduced to $16,000.00. He indicated that in addition to the police the organization committee is hiring ten security guards in the evening and eight during the day at a cost of almost $5,400.00 for a total security cost of almost $22,000.00. He understood the Police Department was bringing out a two man command center plus an additional six officers beginning on Friday evening. He felt that the command center was not necessary and that the police services were not needed until Saturday. He was hoping that the police service costs could be cut by not using the command unit and reducing the number of officers to six which would reduce the costs to approximately $8,000.00. After a lengthy discussion between Mr. Hiner and the City Council about the economy, the lack of sponsorships and the low registration this year, they would not be able to cover the costs of the event unless the expenses were reduced. Council was informed that on Friday evening nothing goes on because the registrants are setting up their campsites. City Manager Brady advised Parks and Recreation Director Ray Gonzales has been working with Mr. Hiner and the Police Department. He advised the Police Department has indicated that eight is the number they need to respond to this type of event. He advised that if it was found that -that many weren't necessary, there would be a reduction but that decision would be made in the field once it was determined the level of the crowd, the number of people camping, and the number of participants and spectators. Mr. Hiner made several suggestions on how the costs for services could be cut. Councilman Magee expressed his concern with this matter being brought to Council's attention 12 days before the event when the application was submitted in March. He did not feel the City Council should second guess the new Police Chief as to what amount of public safety he feels is necessary to insure a safe and healthy event. Councilman Magee mentioned that he attended the event both days last year and two police officers would have been enough, however, he did not know whether there was no need for more enforcement or whether the amount of enforcement deterred any potential problems. One of the biggest complaints I got last year was spectators had to pay money which is not something the spectators had to do in the past. Mayor Pro Tem Kelley pointed out that this item was not on the agenda, so the City Council could not take any action and suggested the Police Chief look at the issue again to see if anything can be done. 8 Agenda Item No. 2 Page 20 of 25 Councilman Schiffner agreed indicating that he was not inclined to countermand what City Management and the Police Chief have decided. He suggested Mr. Hiner try to work something out with the City Management and the Police Chief directly. The City Attorney reminded Council that because this item was not agendized, Council cannot take an action, provide a consensus or give direction. It is a matter that has to be referred to staff. Parks and Recreation Director Gonzales advised Council that he has been working with Mr. Hiner since May and they have met several times to come to a consensus. It was only a few weeks ago that they were able to identify what the public safety costs were going to be. He advised that after looking at the conditions of approval, the Police Department was able to reduce the fee by $10,000.00. At this point they were at an impasse but he would be willing to continue to work with Mr. Hiner and the Police Department to see if the problem could be worked out. After further discussion, the Council, asked Director Gonzales to meet with the Police Chief to see what could be done. There being no further business to come before the City Council and Redevelopment Agency, the meeting was recessed to closed session at 4:49 p.m., DARYL HICKMAN, MAYOR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, CHAIRMAN CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ATTEST: CAROL COWLEY, INTERIM CITY CLERK CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 9 Agenda Item No. 2 Page 21 of 25 MINUTES REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, OCTOBER 28, 2008 CALL TO ORDER Chairman Buckley called the meeting to order at 8:44 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: CHAIRMAN BUCKLEY VICE CHAIRMAN SCHIFFNER MEMBER HICKMAN MEMBER KELLEY MEMBER MAGEE ABSENT: NONE Also present were Executive Director Brady, Agency Counsel Leibold, Administrative Services Director Pressey, Captain Cleary, Public Works Director /City Engineer Seumalo, Information /Communications Manager Dennis, Director of Parks and Recreation Gonzales, Acting Director of Community Development Weiner and Interim Secretary Cowley CLOSED SESSION REPORT City Attorney Leibold announced that the agency board met in closed session this afternoon to discuss the following three matters all involving real property negotiations under the authority of Gov't Code § 54956.8, the parcels are identified in connection with each agenda item listed as Items 1(a), 1(b) and 1(c) on the Agency agenda; in each case the negotiating parties are the Redevelopment Agency and the owner. 1(a) CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS (Gov't Code §54956.8) Properties: APNs 374 - 072 -028, 374 - 072 -030, 374 - 072 -032, 374 - 072 -034, 374- 072 -036 Agency Negotiator: Executive Director Brady Negotiating parties: Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency and City of Lake Elsinore Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment 1 Agenda Item No. 2 Page 22 of 25 1(b) CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS (Gov't code §54956.8) Properties: APNs 374 - 072 -018, 374 - 020 -030, 374 - 072 -022 Agency Negotiator: Executive Director Brady Negotiating parties: Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency and Riverside County Flood Control District Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment 1(c) CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS (Gov't Code §54956.8) Properties: APNs 375 - 350 -012, -035, -036, 057 Agency Negotiator: Executive Director Brady Negotiating parties: Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency and Symantha Pham and Glenda Patton Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment Agency Counsel Leibold announced with respect to Item 1(a) the City of Lake Elsinore is the owner and under negotiation is price and terms of payment. There is no reportable action in connection with Item 1(a). As to Item 1(b) the negotiating parties are the Redevelopment Agency and the County Flood Control District; under negotiation is price and terms of payment and there is no reportable action as to Item 1(b). As to Item 1(c) the negotiating parties are the Redevelopment Agency and Symantha Pham and Glenda Patton, under negotiation is price and terms of payment and there is no reportable action on Item 1(c). PUBLIC COMMENTS No public comments CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM(S) (2) Approval of Redevelopment Agency Minutes Recommendation: Approve the following minutes(s): (a) Regular Meeting — October 14, 2008. (3) Warrant List dated October 15, 2008 Recommendation: Authorize payment of Warrant List dated October 15, 2008. 2 Agenda Item No. 2 Page 23 of 25 (4) Investment Report — September 2008 Recommendation: Receive and file. Mayor Pro Tem Kelley moved to approve the Consent Calendar consisting of Items 2 through 4; second by Mayor Hickman. The following vote Resulted: AYES: CHAIRMAN BUCKLEY VICE - CHAIRMAN SCHIFFNER MEMBER HICKMAN MEMBER KELLEY MEMBER MAGEE NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE PUBLIC HEARING(S) No public hearings scheduled. BUSINESS ITEM(S) No business items scheduled. PUBLIC COMMENTS — NON - AGENDIZED ITEMS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR COMMENTS No comments. LEGAL COUNSEL COMMENTS No comments. BOARDMEMBER COMMENTS No comments. 3 Agenda Item No. 2 Page 24 of 25 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Agency Board, Chairman Buckley adjourned the meeting at 8:46 p.m. THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, CHAIRMAN CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ATTEST: CAROL COWLEY, INTERIM CITY CLERK CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 4 Agenda Item No. 2 Page 25 of 25 sEryLoL4, LADE aLSINon r DREAM EXTREME,. REPORT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO: HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FROM: ROBERT A. BRADY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR DATE: NOVEMBER 11, 2008 SUBJECT: WARRANT LIST DATED OCTOBER 30, 2008 Discussion The warrant list is a listing of all general checks issued since the prior Warrant List. Recommendation Authorize payment of Warrant List dated October 30, 2008. Prepared By: Matt N. Presse Director Of Adminis ative Services Approved By: Robert A. Brady 1 ( Executive Director' r ` Agenda Item No. 3 Page 1 of 3 OCTOBER 30, 2008 LAKE ELSINORE WARRANT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SUMMARY FUND# FUND DESCRIPTION TOTAL 910 R.D.A. AREA 1 FUND $ 2,255.00 913 DEBT SERVICE FUND AREA 1 2,337.50 914 20% HOUSING SET ASIDE FUND 600.00 920 R.D.A. AREA 2 FUND 2,255.00 923 DEBT SERVICE FUND AREA 2 1,912.50 930 R.D.A. AREA 3 FUND 2,255.00 933 DEBT SERVICE FUND AREA E 12,292.69 952 C.F.D. 90 -2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 17,990.08 GRAND TOTAL $ 41,897.77 11/3/2008 Warrant 103008 1 of 1 Agenda Item No. 3 Page 2 of 3