The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About07/08/2008 CC/RDA Agenda and Reports CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA THOMAS BUCKLEY, CHAIRMAN WWW.LAKE - ELSINORE.ORG ROBERT SCHIFFNER, VICE - CHAIRMAN (951) 674 -3124 PHONE DARYL HICKMAN, MEMBER (951) 674 -2392 FAX GENIE KELLEY, MEMBER LAKE ELSINORE CULTURAL CENTER ROBERT MAGEE, MEMBER 183 NORTH MAIN STREET ROBERT BRADY, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 ****************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** TUESDAY, JULY 8, 2008 STUDY SESSION AT 4:00 P.M. CLOSED SESSION AT 5:00 P.M. PUBLIC SESSION AT 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER -- 5:00 P.M. ROLL CALL CLOSED SESSION (1) CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956.8) Property: APN 379 - 230 -001 Agency Negotiator: Executive Director Brady Negotiating parties: Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency, Corman Leigh Tozai Lakeshore, and Central Valley Coalition for Affordable Housing Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment CALL BACK TO ORDER — 7:00 P.M. CLOSED SESSION REPORT PUBLIC COMMENTS — NON - AGENDIZED ITEMS —1 MINUTE (Please read & complete a Speaker's Form at the podium, prior to the start of the City Council Meeting.) PUBLIC COMMENTS — AGENDIZED ITEMS — 3 MINUTES (Please read & complete a Speaker's Form at the Podium, prior to the Start of the City Council Meeting. The Chairman will call on you to speak, when your item is called.) CONSENT CALENDAR (All matters on the Consent Calendar are approved on one motion, unless a Boardmember or any member of the public requests separate action on a specific item.) (2) Approval of Redevelopment Agency Minutes Recommendations: Approve the following minutes: a) Joint City Council /Redevelopment Agency Study Session — June 24, 2008. b) Regular Meeting — June 24, 2008. (3) Warrant List Dated June 30, 2008 Recommendation: Authorize payment of Warrant List dated June 30, 2008. PUBLIC HEARINGS No public hearings. BUSINESS ITEMS No business items. PUBLIC COMMENTS — NON - AGENDIZED ITEMS — 3 MINUTES EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR COMMENTS LEGAL COUNSEL COMMENTS BOARDMEMBER COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT The Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency will adjourn to a regular meeting to be held on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, at 5 :00 p.m. to be held in the Cultural Center located at 183 N. Main Street, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, VIVIAN M. MUNSON, Agency Secretary of the City of Lake Elsinore, do hereby affirm that a copy of the foregoing agenda was posted at City Hall, 72 hours in advance of this meeting. / /ss // S i ZOO 1 VIVIAN M. MUNSON ? AGENCY SECRETARY CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DARYL HICKMAN, MAYOR GENIE KELLEY, MAYOR PRO TEM THOMAS BUCKLEY, COUNCILMAN ROBERT E. "BOB" MAGEE, COUNCILMAN ROBERT SCHIFFNER, COUNCILMAN ROBERT A. BRADY, CITY MANAGER WWW.LAKE-ELSINORE.ORG (951) 674-3124 PHONE (951) 674-2392 FAX LAKE ELSINORE CULTURAL CENTER 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 ************************************************************************************* TUESDAY, JULY 8,2008 STUDY SESSION AT 4:00 P.M. CLOSED SESSION AT 5:00 P.M. PUBLIC SESSION AT 7:00 P.M. The City of Lake Elsinore appreciates your attendance. Citizens' interest provides the Council and Agency with valuable information regarding issues of the community. Meetings are held on the 2nd and 4th Tuesday of every month. In addition, meetings are televised live on Time Warner Cable Station Channel 29 and Verizon Subscribers can view the meetings on Channel 31. If you are attending this City Council Meeting, please park in the parking lot across the street from the Cultural Center. This will assist us in limiting the impact of meetings on the Downtown Business District. Thank you for your cooperation. The agenda is posted 72 hours prior to each meeting outside of City Hall and is available at each meeting. The agenda and related reports are also available at the City Clerk's Office on the Friday prior to the Council meeting and are available on the City's web site at www.lake-elsinore.orq. Any writings distributed within 72 hours of the meeting will be made available to the public at the time it is distributed to the City Council. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should contact the City Clerk's Office at (951) 674-3124, ext. 262, at least 48 hours before the meeting to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. CALL TO ORDER.. 5:00 P.M. CLOSED SESSION (1) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL--ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) of Gov't Code Section 54956.9: - 1 potential case City Negotiator: City Manager Brady CALL BACK TO ORDER (7:00 P.M.) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE INVOCATION - MOMENT OF SILENT PRAYER ROLL CALL CLOSED SESSION REPORT PRESENT A TIONS/CEREMONIALS (2) Mayor Hickman will present Certificates of Appreciation to David Lewis, Robert Hanson and Victor Hanson. (3) Mayor Hickman will present a proclamation in recognition of Parks and Recreation Month. (4) Rick Bishop, Executive Director of the Western Riverside Council of Governments, will make a presentation to the City Council. PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS - 1 MINUTE (Please read & complete a Speaker's Form at the podium, prior to the start of the City Council Meeting.) PUBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDIZED ITEMS - 3 MINUTES (Please read & complete a Speaker's Form at the podium, prior to the start of the City Council Meeting. The Mayor will call on you to speak, when your item is called.) CONSENT CALENDAR (All matters on the Consent Calendar are approved on one motion, unless a Councilmember or any member of the public requests separate action on a specific item.) (5) Minutes of the Followinq Meetinq(s) a) Joint City Council/Redevelopment Agency Study Session - June 24, 2008 b) Regular Meeting - June 24, 2008 Recommendation: Approve as submitted. (6) Warrant list Dated June 30. 2008 Recommendation: Authorize payment of Warrant list dated June 30, 2008. (7) Approval to Participate in the Riverside County Mortqaqe Certificate (MCC) Proqram Recommendation: Waive further reading and adopt a resolution approving participation with the County of Riverside Mortgage Credit Certificate (MCC) Program. (8) Application for the Name ChanQe of Alderwood Circle in the Alberhill Ranch Development Recommendations: a) Approve the street name change request. b) Direct the City Clerk to notify the County Board of Supervisors of the street name change. (9) Amendment To Resolution Callino And Givino Notice Of Hold Of A General Municipal Election Recommendation: Waive further reading and adopt a resolution amending and restating Resolution No. 2008-52, calling and giving notice of the holding of a General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 4, 2008, for the election of certain officers as required by the provisions of the laws of the State of California relating to General Law cities and requesting the Registrar of Voters of the County of Riverside to conduct said election. (10) Resolution to Approve PlacinQ Delinquent Refuse Bills on FY 2008-2009 Tax Roll Recommendations: a. Waive further reading and adopt a resolution affirming the report of delinquent residential reuse fees and directing their collection on the property tax roll. b. Direct the City Clerk to file with the Riverside County Auditor a certified copy of the resolution along with the 120-days past due accounts report. PUBLIC HEARINGS (11) Citywide Liohtino and Landscapino Maintenance District and the Landscape and Liohtino Maintenance District No.1 for Fiscal Year 2008-09 Recommendations: a) Waive further reading and adopt a resolution confirming a diagram and assessment and providing for annual assessment levy after formation of a district Fiscal year 2008-09 for the Citywide LLMD. b) Waive further reading and adopt a resolution confirming a diagram and assessment and providing for annual assessment levy after formation of a district Fiscal Year 2008-09 for the LLMD NO.1. BUSINESS ITEMS (12) Prooress Report on Abandoned/Foreclosed Property Ordinance Recommendation: Receive and file. (13) Second Readinq - Adoption or Ordinance No. 1255. Amendinq Chapter 17.82 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Reqardinq Time Extensions for Desiqn Review Approvals Recommendation: Waive further reading and adopt Ordinance No. 1255, amending Chapter 17.82 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code regarding time extensions for Design Review approvals. PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS - 3 MINUTES (Please read & complete a Speaker's Form at the Podium, prior to the Start of the City Council Meeting) CITY MANAGER COMMENTS CITY ATTORNEY COMMENTS COMMITTEE REPORTS CITY TREASURER COMMENTS CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT The Lake Elsinore City Council will adjourn to a regular meeting to be held on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, at 5:00 p.m. to be held in the Cultural Center located at 183 N. Main Street, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, VIVIAN M. MUNSON, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, do hereby affirm that a copy of the foregoing agenda was posted at City Hall, 72 hours in advance of this meeting. //ss// VIVIAN M. MUNSON CITY CLERK DATE + LAKE LSINOR-E , I ~ DREAM EXTREME REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: ROBERT A. BRADY CITY MANAGER DATE: JULY 8, 2008 SUBJECT: CLOSED SESSION REPORT(S) Discussion (1) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL--ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) of Gov't Code Section 54956.9: - 1 potential case City Negotiator: City Manager Brady Recommendation Recess prior to adjournment of tonight's meeting in order to conduct an executive (closed) session. Prepared by: Vivian M. Muns~ City Clerk Robert A. Brady () ~ Executive Director Jl,.., Approved by: Agenda Item No. 1 Page 1 of 1 .. LAK]: l;)LSINO~ \ I ~ DREAM E;(TREME REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: ROBERT A. BRADY CITY MANAGER DATE: JULY 8,2008 SUBJECT: PRESENTATION OF CERTIFICATES OF APPRECIATION Discussion Mayor Hickman will present Certificates of Appreciation to David Lewis, Robert Hanson and Victor Hanson. Recommendation Receive and file. Prepared by: Vivian M. MunsW City Clerk Robert A. Brady IJ A\l1 City Manager 'JW Approved by: Agenda Item NO.2 Page 1 of 1 ~-------_..."-'---- _.- --.-- ~ --- ..------- ------ CITY OF ~ LAKi ,6,LSiI10~ Y DREAM EXtREME REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: ROBERT A. BRADY CITY MANAGER DATE: JULY 8,2008 SUBJECT: PRESENTATION Discussion Mayor Hickman will present a proclamation in recognition of Parks and Recreation Month. Prepared by: Vivian M. MunsotJJ / City Clerk ~ Robert A. Brady 0 t> City Manager f! Approved by: Agenda Item No. 3 Page 1 of 1 ~ . LAlZE [3LSIN.O~ \ I ~ DREAME,xtREME REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: ROBERT A. BRADY CITY MANAGER DATE: JULY 8, 2008 SUBJECT: PRESENTATION Discussion Rick Bishop, Executive Director of the Western Riverside Council of Governments, will make a presentation to the City Council. Recommendation Receive and file. Prepared by: Vivian M. Munso~ City Clerk Robert A. Brad' 11 ~ City Manager Y'IlJW Approved by: Agenda Item NO.4 Page 1 of 1 MINUTES JOINT CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STUDY SESSION CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, JUNE 24, 2008 **************************************************************************************************** CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hickman called the Joint Study Session to order at 4:01 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: MAYOR HICKMAN MAYOR PRO TEM KELLEY COUNCILMAN MAGEE COUNCILMAN SCHIFFNER ABSENT: COUNCILMAN BUCKLEY (Arrived at 5:01 p.m.) Also present were: City Manager Brady, City Attorney Leibold, City Treasurer Weber, Administrative Services Director Pressey, Information/Communications Manager Dennis, IT Supervisor Soto, Parks and Recreation Director Gonzales, Director of Lake and Aquatic Resources Kilroy, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Seumalo, Community Development Director Preisendanz, Planning Manager Weiner, Building Division Manager Chipman, Public Works Manager Payne and City Clerk Munson. DISCUSSION ITEMS Mayor Hickman gave an overview of the presentations and confirmed that the presenters would be present at the 7:00 p.m. meeting. PUBLIC COMMENTS CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS (3) Minutes of the Followinq MeetinQ(s) Councilman Magee inquired if the City Clerk received the phone message related to the corrections of the June 10, 2008, City Council meeting minutes. Clerk Munson responded she did receive the message and the corrections were made to the final set of minutes. 1 Agenda Item No. 5 Page 1 of 22 (4) Warrant List Dated June 12. 2008 Mayor Hickman inquired about Check Nos. 96304 and 96235. Administrative Services Director Pressey responded to his inquiry. (5) Investment Report - Mav 2008 No comments. (6) Notice of Completion for Median Modification on Malaqa Road Mayor Hickman thanked Mr. Solomon. (7) Summary Street Vacation for the Riqht-Of-Wav Known as Silver Street Mayor Hickman inquired if there was still access to the outflow channel. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Seumalo responded the vacation request is only for northerly half of the length of the street, so there is still a 30 ft. foot right-of-way on the south side. (8) Resolution of the Fees for the Transportation Uniform Mitiqation Fee (TUMF) Proqram No comments. (9) Professional Enqineerinq Services - Chuck Mackev City Treasurer Weber inquired how much Mr. Mackey will make an hour. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Seumalo responded $75 per hour. (10) Professional Enqineerinq Services - Dave Solomon Councilman Magee stated Mr. Solomon is a real asset to the City. (11) Professional Enqineerinq Services - Peter Ramev Councilman Magee required clarification on when the Rosetta Fire Station would be completed. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Seumalo responded construction will be completed by September 2009. 2 Agenda Item No.5 Page 2 of 22 (12) Alberhill Ranch Sports Park Turf Renovation Mayor Pro Tem Kelley inquired why one of the City's newest park is being closed for renovation as opposed to the older parks in the City. Parks and Recreation Director Gonzales responded this particular park, though new, when the park opened, the turf area was not quite mature enough to sustain the type of use that it has been sustaining over the last ten months. He noted because of the type of use, that being soccer for children and adults is the primary reason why the City must returf the area. He also noted staff plans to meet with the League organizations in order to regulate the amount of use that these fields get. Staff is planning to meet and have discussions on having a field use maintenance use procedure and a calendar to provide a rest time for the fields so that the fields, throughout certain times of the year, will have the time to recover from the high use. He noted the Alberhill Field will be open in mid- October. (13) Railroad Canyon Road Slope Stabilization Proiect - Construction Contract Award City Treasurer Weber inquired if the City was able to get any Federal funding or grants. Councilman Magee responded staff applied to FEMA for Federal Funds and were denied. (14) Contract with Lilburn Corporation to Prepare CEQA Compliance Documents for the Proiect Known as "Alberhill Southwest Shale Mine Reclamation Plan" Mayor Hickman inquired about the identity of the applicant. Director of Community Development Preisendanz responded the applicant is MCA. (15) Contract with HDR. Inc. to Prepare CEQA Compliance Documents for the Proiect Known as "Lake Elsinore Association II" City Manager Brady indicated this item will be pulled from the Consent Calendar and recommended the item be tabled. (16) Contract with David HOQan to Prepare CEQA Compliance Documents for the Proiect Known as "Collier Avenue Auto Center" Mayor Pro Tem Kelley inquired if a conditional use permit was required for this application. Director of Community Development Preisendanz confirmed that a conditional use permit is required. 3 Agenda Item No. 5 Page 3 of 22 Councilman Magee. suggested getting some contributions to landscape the median on Collier. (17) Contract with David Hoaan to Prepare CEQA Compliance Documents for the Proiect Known as "Lake Street Marketplace" Mayor Pro Tem Kelley informed staff that there may be some problem with the residents in the area approving this type of use and indicated that they are sensitive to type of use, especially the sale of alcohol. (18) Annual Adoption of Investment Policy Mayor Hickman complemented Administrative Services Director Pressey. (19) Lake Elsinore Valley Chamber of Commerce 2008-09 Services Aareement Mayor Pro Tem Kelley inquired about the accountability of the Chamber. Administrative Services Director Pressey responded Mr. Cousins has been working on an update for the last quarter; however, it was not ready prior to the distribution of the agenda. Mayor Pro Tem Kelley inquired if Mr. Brady had received any relocation requests. City Manager Brady responded that he had not. Kim Cousins provided a status report on the Chambers goals and objectives for 2008-09. (20) General Plan Update Director of Community Development Preisendanz reported staff is anticipating returning to the Planning Commission on July 15th with the General Plan and recommending taking the Plan to the City Council. (21) Plannina Division Professional Service Contracts 2008-2009 Fiscal Year Councilman Magee noted the staff report shows every City has population greater than Lake Elsinore and noted it would appear our staffing is in-line or even larger. (22) Purchase Authorization For a Web Based Streamina Media Solution Mayor Hickman inquired about the status of the new web site. 4 Agenda Item NO.5 Page 4 of 22 Information/Communications Manager Dennis presented a proposed schedule and indicated staff is still looking at 6-8 weeks of work remaining, with a target date around the early part of August. (23) Aareement with Riverside County to Provide Road Maintenance on Portions of Lost Road and Navaio Sprinas Road Councilman Magee inquired if this would occur after the facilities are fully improved and not taking care of the dirt roads City Manager Brady responded that was correct. PUBLIC HEARINGS (24) Continued Public Hearina - Tentative Tract Map No. 34346 for Condominium Purposes and Residential Desian Review No. 2005-27, for "The Colony" Leonard Leichnitz, President of Lumos Communities, expressed his concerns related to the project one being the designation of R-3, which he noted as a typographical error, and the importance of the density caps under Appendix A. Mayor Hickman inquired of Mr. Leichnitz if he was ok with the density. Leonard Leichnitz, President of Lumos Communities, indicated, if this project is setting a precedent, that Appendix A will not govern this plan or future projects up Mission Trail, and if a seniors' project was not built, then this density would go away. Mayor Hickman inquired if there is a condition that states this project is for senior 55 years and older. Peter Bauchman, representative of the applicant, responded there is a condition that addresses the age; however, the City Attorney drafted an amendment to this condition that makes this condition stronger and he indicated they were fine with the amendment. City Attorney Leibold responded the project is conditioned on being a project for occupancy by persons 55 years and older consistent with applicable State and Federal law. She noted Condition No. 12 already imposes that requirement, but indicated the City Attorney's Office redrafted the condition to make it extremely clear. She also noted in addition, CC&R's will be prepared which will also require and restrict occupancy to person 55 years or older. Peter Bauchman noted the golf carts are an amenity to get around the residential facility itself and to be able for residents to utilize the golf course. 5 Agenda Item NO.5 Page 5 of 22 City Attorney Leibold indicated she can add a new condition saying "in the event that Olive Street is constructed, the applicant shall upon the City's request; make gated pedestrian golf cart and/or vehicular access available from the project's southern boundary to Olive Street. City Attorney Leibold also noted she will add another new condition saying "shall work with staff and shall consult with Northwest Mosquito Vector Control District to create an appropriate landscaping plan for the retention basin." Mayor Pro Tem Kelley stated her concern with this development is that the City is treating each parcel in that area equally, and that the same standards have applied for each applicant. City Attorney Leibold responded one issue is what is the appropriate land use designation for the Colony property which includes Planning Areas 50, 51 and 59. She indicated they encompass R-2 with a sliver of a R-3 designation that has been retained. She also indicated Planning Area No. 59 on the map was designated R-3 and what she recently learned, and had not the opportunity to convey, is that looking to Appendix A, Planning Area No. 59 on the governing land use designation was mislabeled R-2. She also noted the Land Use Map from the 1993 plan forward, the map itself has always identified Planning Area No. 59 as R-3 and has never been changed by subsequent amendments. City Attorney Leibold explained how future development along Mission Trail will be addressed. City Attorney Leibold also stated State law and the City's density bonus ordinance would allow for a density bonus for this type of project because of the senior restriction; however, there is an application process associated with the density bonus including an agreement that the City and the property owner must enter into to ensure those long term convents on the occupancy. Councilman Magee inquired if the project was circulated to the County, with respect to the traffic impacts, and asked if any comments were received. Community Development Director Preisendanz responded it was circulated to the County and no comments were received. Councilman Magee inquired if there will be any cars parked on Mission Trail Community Development Director Preisendanz responded there will be "no parking" signs posted on Mission Trail. Councilman Schiffner stated he does not want to see a precedent for high density in the future. 6 Agenda Item No.5 Page 6 of 22 Community Development Director Preisendanz talked about how staff calculated density and why the open space was included. COUNCILMAN BUCKLEY LEFT TO THE COUNCIL CHAMBER AT 5:22 P.M. (25) Capital Improvement Proaram (CIP) for FY 2008-09 Throuah 2012-13 Councilman Magee indicated he was very disappointed Dexter Street would not be completed until next winter. Councilman Magee complemented Public Works Manager Payne and Public Works Director/City Engineer Seumalo and thanked them for keeping the project under budget. Councilman Magee inquired about pavement condition on Diamond Drive. Public Works Director/City Engineer Seumalo Seumalo responded staff is currently looking for funding for both Diamond Drive between 1-15 and Lakeshore Drive as well as Riverside Drive between Illinois and Stater Bros. shopping center driveway. (26) Zonina Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2008-03: a Request to Amend Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Chapter 17.82 (Desian Review) in Order to Modify Existina Guidelines For Time Extension Related to Desiqn Review Approvals No comments. BUSINESS ITEMS (27) Sub-Committee Recommendations for Planninq Commission Expired Terms Councilman Magee indicated he and Councilman Buckley would like to comment on the applicants during the regular City Council meeting. COUNCILMAN BUCKLEY RETURNED TO THE COUNCIL CHAMBER AT 5:27 P.M. (28) Second Readina - Adoption or Ordinance No. 1254. Approvina Planned Unit Development No. 2008-01 (Grand Solutions) No comments. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS (2) Approval of Redevelopment Aaency Minutes 7 Agenda Item NO.5 Page 7 of 22 No comments. (3) Warrant List Dated June 12, 2008 No comments. (4) Investment Report - May 2008 No comments. (5) Tentative Tract Map No. 34346 for Condominium Purposes and Residential DesiQn Review No. 2005-27. for "The Colony" No comments. PUBLIC HEARINGS There were no public hearings. BUSINESS ITEMS There were no business items. PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS - 3 MINUTES There were no comments. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hickman adjourned the Joint City Council/Redevelopment Agency Study Session at 5:31 p.m. DARYL HICKMAN, MAYOR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE THOMAS BUCKLEY, CHAIRMAN REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ATTEST: VIVIAN M. MUNSON, CITY CLERK CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 8 Agenda Item No. 5 Page 8 of 22 MINUTES CITY COUNCIL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, JUNE 24, 2008 **************************************************************************************************** CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. The Regular City Council Meeting was called to order by Mayor Hickman at 7:05 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: MAYOR HICKMAN MAYOR PRO TEM KELLEY COUNCILMAN BUCKLEY COUNCILMAN MAGEE COUNCILMAN SCHIFFNER ABSENT: NONE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Lorraine Watts led the Pledge of Allegiance. INVOCATION - MOMENT OF SILENT PRAYER Mayor Hickman led the meeting in a moment of silent prayer and also requested to remember the soldiers overseas. ROLL CALL PRESENT: MAYOR HICKMAN MAYOR PRO TEM KELLEY COUNCILMAN BUCKLEY COUNCILMAN MAGEE COUNCILMAN SCHIFFNER ABSENT: NONE Also present were City Manager Brady, City Attorney Leibold, Administrative Services Director Pressey, Director of Lake and Aquatic Resources Kilroy, Captain Fetherolf, Lieutenant Fontneau, Public Works Director/City Engineer Seumalo, Information/Communications Manager Dennis, Director of Parks and Recreation 1 Agenda Item No.5 Page 9 of 22 Gonzales, Community Development Director Preisendanz, Fire Chief Hendershot, Planning Manager Weiner, Finance Manager Riley and City Clerk Munson. PRESENTATION/CEREMONIALS (1) Mayor Hickman presented a proclamation to Deputy Joseph Narciso who was recently recognized by MADD for being one of the top performers in the State of California. (2) Nancy Hunzeker from the lake Elsinore Chamber of Commerce provided an update on Chamber activities. PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS - 1 MINUTE Lorraine Watts, thanked Administrative Services Director Pressey, Supervisor Buster, Mary Venerable and Mayor Hickman for attending and assisting with the Home Preservation Conference sponsored by the NAACP and the City of lake Elsinore. Lewis Davis, Regional Public Affairs Manager of Edison, introduced the new Regional Manager for lake Elsinore and surrounding area Viet Tran as his replacement. Viet Tran, stated it was good to be back and announced Edison will be building a new service center on Clinton Keith which will serve the communities of lake Elsinore, Murrieta, Wildomar, Canyon lake and Temecula. COUNCIL APPROVES CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS. 3 THROUGH 14, AND 16 THROUGH 23, AND CONTINUE CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 15 OFF CALENDAR The following items were listed on the Consent Calendar for Council approval: (3) Minutes of the Followinq Meetinq(s) a) Joint City Council/Redevelopment Agency Study Session - June 10, 2008 b) Regular Meeting -June 10,2008 Recommendation: Approve as submitted. (4) Warrant List Dated June 12. 2008 Recommendation: Authorize payment of Warrant List dated June 12, 2008. (5) Investment Report - Mav 2008 Recommendation: Receive and file. 2 Agenda Item NO.5 Page 10 of 22 (6) Notice of Completion for Median Modification on Malaqa Road Recommendation: Authorize the Mayor to execute the Notice of Completion and allow the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion with the County of Riverside. (7) Summary Street Vacation for the Riqht-Of-Way Known as Silver Street Recommendation: Waive further reading and adopt Resolution No. 2008-66 for the vacation of a portion of Silver Street. (8) Resolution of the Fees for the Transportation Uniform Mitiqation Fee (TUMF) Proqram Recommendation: Waive further reading and adopt Resolution No. 2008-67 amending the applicable Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) applicable to all developments in the City of Lake Elsinore. (9) Professional Enqineerinq Services - Chuck Mackey Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to enter into a contract with Chuck Mackey to provide on-call engineering services on an as needed basis. (10) Professional Enqineerinq Services - Dave Solomon Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to enter into a contract with Dave Solomon to provide on-call project management and engineering services on an as needed basis. (11 ) Professional Enqineerinq Services - Peter Ramey Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to enter into a contract with Peter Ramey to provide Construction Management Services for the Rosetta Canyon Fire Station project. (12) Alberhill Ranch Sports Park Turf Renovation Recommendation: Authorize the Director of Parks and Recreation to temporarily close Alberhill Ranch Sports Park for turf renovation and to accept the materials donated by Cal South. (13) Railroad Canyon Road Slope Stabilization Proiect - Construction Contract Award Recommendation: Reject both bids and direct staff to monitor the slope for any change in conditions.. Concurrently, review the project plans for value engineering and return to City Council for new estimated and additional funding sources if necessary. 3 Agenda Item No. 5 Page 11 of 22 (14) Contract with Lilburn Corporation to Prepare CEQA Compliance Documents for the Proiect Known as "Alberhill Southwest Shale Mine Reclamation Plan" Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to enter into a contract with Lilburn Corporation, Inc. to prepare the CEQA compliance documents for the Alberhill Southwest Shale Mine Reclamation Plan, in an amount not to exceed $25,470. (15) Contract with HDR. Inc. to Prepare CEQA Compliance Documents for the Proiect Known as "Lake Elsinore Association II" Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to enter into a contract with HDR, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $149,200. (16) Contract with David HOelan to Prepare CEQA Compliance Documents for the Proiect Known as "Collier Avenue Auto Center" Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to enter into a contract with David Hogan in an amount not to exceed $20,480. (17) Contract with David HOelan to Prepare CEQA Compliance Documents for the Proiect Known as "Lake Street Marketplace" Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to enter into a contract with David Hogan in an amount not to exceed $22,460. (18) Annual Adoption of Investment Policy Recommendation: Approve the City's Investment Policy. (19) Lake Elsinore Valley Chamber of Commerce 2008-09 Services Aqreement Recommendation: Approve the Agreement subject to any minor modifications as may be approved by the City Attorney. (20) General Plan Update Recommendation: Receive and file. (21) Planninel Division Professional Service Contracts 2008-2009 Fiscal Year Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to enter into a contract with Carole Donahoe, Kirt Coury, Linda Miller and Wendy Worthey to provide specialized planning services on an annual basis. 4 Agenda Item No. 5 Page 12 of 22 (22) Purchase Authorization For a Web Based Streamino Media Solution Recommendation: Waive the informal bidding process and authorize the City Manager to sign and issue a purchase order to Granicus, Inc., to acquire and install the proposed Web based streaming media solution. (23) Aoreement with Riverside County to Provide Road Maintenance on Portions of Lost Road and Navaio Sprinqs Road Recommendation: Approve the Road Maintenance Agreement between the City of Lake Elsinore and Riverside County in substantially the form provided and authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement in such final form as approved by the Director of Public Works and the City Attorney. It was moved by Councilman Magee, and seconded by Councilman Buckley to approve the Consent Calendar Items No. 3 through 14 and 16 through 23, and continue Consent Calendar Item No. 15 off calendar. The following vote resulted: AYES: MAYOR HICKMAN MAYOR PRO TEM KELLEY COUNCILMAN BUCKLEY COUNCILMAN MAGEE COUNCILMAN SCHIFFNER NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE PUBLIC HEARINGS (24) COUNCIL ADOPTS RESOLUTIONS APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 34346 FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2005-27. FOR "THE COLONY" Mayor Hickman opened the public hearing at 7:21 p.m. Community Development Director Preisendanz presented the staff report. He indicated this project was a 211 multi-family condominium community for active seniors and is located in the East Lake Specific Plan. He stated the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the various entitlements. 5 Agenda Item NO.5 Page 13 of 22 Leonard Leichnitz, President of Lumos Communities, stated he was opposed to the project. He indicated there were three problems with project in the way it is presented: 1) it eliminates the density cap for the property imposed by the Specific Plan; 2) the current Land Use Map for the Specific Plan, approved in 2005, clearly shows this area as R-2 density where the applicant has described this project within a R-3 planning area and staff agrees with applicant. He stated if the latest approved map says this project is medium density, then it should be processed as medium density; and 3) staff allows the developer to use the flood storage area in its density calculations and pointed out with prior projects such as his and others, density calculations to exclude not include flood storage space. He requested City Council reverse the decision and vote "no". Peter Buchanan, Project Manager, thanked staff for their assistance with the project, spoke in favor of the project and indicated the process has really been a collaborative effort with a goal of providing a unique and wonderful development with high quality housing and very fine amenities that fulfills a very specific need in the community that is not in the City. He proceeded to outline some of the benefits their project will have for the City. Dan Uhlry, resident, stated he liked the project. He indicated he had the same density concerns as Mr. Leichnitz. City Attorney Leibold stated the East Lake Specific Plan is being implemented and should be implemented in accordance with its definitions, land use map and other provisions and does not feel this project is any variance from the implementation of East Lake SpecifiC Plan and is not receiving any special treatment. She also stated the Land Use Map in the East Lake Specific Plan establishes land use designations throughout the 3,000 acres of the East Lake Specific Plan. She also stated each land use designation in the narrative of the plan articulate a maximum number of dwelling units per acre, calculated as a net density. She indicated the proposed project is well within, in fact, quite a bit below maximum allowable density based on the text of the East Lake Specific Plan. Councilman Buckley inquired if the applicant was getting extra density because it is a seniors' project. City Attorney Leibold responded they were not; however, because of the design review and parking requirements, there may be a lesser parking standard because of the senior restriction which would not be available to an unrestricted project, which would require a higher level of parking, and therefore reduce the overall density. Community Development Director Preisendanz stated it was important for him to mention, when the applicant arrived in the City two years ago, staff had given the applicant density direction, based on what was directed with other applicants, 6 Agenda Item No.5 Page 14 of 22 --~------.,._-----_.-------_.-._--'-------'---"--" ---_._-----~.------.--~---_..--- which was based on the Land Use Plan which was R-2 and R-3 with 14 dwelling units as the goal. He also stated along Mission Trail there is a lot of R-1 zon~ng along with Commercial zoning which many landowners want to change to hl~h density. He also indicated staff has explained to these owners that the City wants a commercial project in the area. He noted this project was presented much different than it is being presented now and per staffs' request, the applicant has changed many items. He stated he would also like to see some continuity with the golf course. Councilman Schiffner stated he felt this project adds value to the City of Lake Elsinore. Mayor Hickman closed the public hearing at 7:47 p.m. Mayor Pro Tem Kelley stated it was a wonderful and beautifully designed needed project. She indicated the area of concern with her is whether or not all of the procedures been applied equitably to the developments in East Lake Specific Plan. Peter Buchanan, Project Manager, indicated Lumos and Laing were their own Specific Plans where they worked with the City to come up with the rules, density, etc. He noted what they are processing is a project under the East Lake Specific Plan. City Attorney Leibold responded it was not technically correct to say they were new Specific Plans, they were amendments to planning areas within the East Lake Specific Plan that established new land use designations, new circulation, etc. and because they're their own amendment with a whole new set of regulations and not the implementation of the existing East Lake Specific Plan, there could be some distinction and that is a distinction worthy of notice. Councilman Magee indicated the applicants have been very good neighbors and stewards of the property and stated he explained to the applicant that he was opposed to high density projects. He also stated the City should establish residential estate zoning in this particular area. He noted the Council set the bar with Laing and Lumos, reduced density, increased public recreational opportunities and this application does none of this. Mayor Hickman indicated this was an excellent project and it must remain a senior project. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Kelley, and seconded by Councilman Magee to continue this item off calendar. 7 Agenda Item NO.5 Page 15 of 22 The following vote resulted: AYES: MAYOR PRO TEM KELLEY COUNCILMAN MAGEE NOES: MAYOR HICKMAN COUNCILMAN BUCKLEY COUNCILMAN SCHIFFNER ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE Motion failed. It was moved by Councilman Schiffner and seconded by Councilman Buckley to waive further reading and adopt Resolution No. 2008-68 adopting findings that ''The Colony" project is consistent with the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). The following vote resulted: AYES: MAYOR HICKMAN COUNCILMAN BUCKLEY COUNCILMAN SCHIFFNER NOES: MAYOR PRO TEM KELLEY COUNCILMAN MAGEE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE It was moved by Councilman Schiffner, and seconded by Councilman Buckley to waive further reading and adopt Resolution No. 2008-69 adopting Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2008-06. The following vote resulted: AYES: MAYOR HICKMAN COUNCILMAN BUCKLEY COUNCILMAN SCHIFFNER NOES: MAYOR PRO TEM KELLEY COUNCILMAN MAGEE 8 Agenda Item NO.5 Page 16 of 22 ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE It was moved by Councilman Schiffner, and seconded by Councilman Buckley to waive further reading and adopt Resolution No. 2008-70 approving Tentative Tract Map No. 34346 to include the following: 1) Amending Condition No.12, strengthening the senior citizen restriction. 2) Add "Condition No. 19.9 to read as follows: "The CC&R's shall designate the project as a senior housing project restricted for occupancy to persons 55 yeas and older except as specifically permitted by Section 51.3 of the California Unruh Civil Rights Act and subdivision (b) of Section 807 of the Federal Housing Act or other applicable State and Federal law." 3) Add a new condition saying "in the event that Olive Street is constructed, the applicant shall upon the City's request; make gated pedestrian golf cart and/or vehicular access available from the project's southern boundary to Olive Street. 4) Add a new condition saying "shall work with staff and shall consult with Northwest Mosquito Vector Control District to create an appropriate landscaping plan for the retention basin." The following vote resulted: AYES: MAYOR HICKMAN COUNCILMAN BUCKLEY COUNCILMAN SCHIFFNER NOES: MAYOR PRO TEM KELLEY COUNCILMAN MAGEE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE It was moved by Councilman Schiffner, and seconded by Councilman Buckley to waive further reading and adopt Resolution No. 2008-71 approving Residential Design Review No. 2005-27 to include the amended and new conditions. The following vote resulted: AYES: MAYOR HICKMAN COUNCILMAN BUCKLEY COUNCILMAN SCHIFFNER 9 Agenda Item NO.5 Page 17 of 22 NOES: MAYOR PRO TEM KELLEY COUNCILMAN MAGEE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE COUNCILMAN BUCKLEY LEFT THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT S:10 P.M. (25) COUNCIL ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 200S-72: APPROVING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) FOR FY 200S-09 THROUGH 2012-13 Mayor Hickman opened the public hearing at 8:10 p.m. Public Works/City Engineer Seumalo presented the staff report. He indicated the CIP identifies projects for both near term development and future development. He also indicated the program for this budget year is approximately $21 million. Mayor Hickman requested testimony from the public. He inquired if there was anyone wishing to speak in favor or against the item. There being none, Mayor Hickman closed the public hearing at 8: 13 p.m. It was moved by Councilman Schiffner, and seconded by Councilman Magee to waive further reading and adopt Resolution No. 2008-72, approving the Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Years 2008-2009 through 2012-2013. The following vote resulted: AYES: MAYOR HICKMAN MAYOR PRO TEM KELLEY COUNCILMAN MAGEE COUNCILMAN SCHIFFNER NOES: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMAN BUCKLEY ABSTAIN: NONE (26) COUNCIL INTRODUCES ORDINANCE NO. 1255. APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 200S-03: A REQUEST TO AMEND LAKE ELSINORE MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 17.S2 (DESIGN REVIEW) IN ORDER TO MODIFY EXISTING GUIDELINES FOR TIME EXTENSION RELATED TO DESIGN REVIEW APPROVALS 10 Agenda Item No.5 Page 18 of 22 --~.~--_..._-_._-_._--_..._-_._---------~--~--~_._-_.---~_._-_. ...--- Mayor Hickman opened the public hearing at 8: 13 p.m. Community Development Director Preisendanz presented the staff report. He indicated this amendment would allow additional time on design review of two years. He also indicated any design review approval granted on or after July 15t 2007 would receive this extension of time. Mayor Hickman requested testimony from the public. He inquired if there was anyone wishing to speak in favor or against the item. COUNCILMAN BUCKLEY RETURNED TO THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS 8:15 P.M. There being none, Mayor Hickman closed the public hearing at 8:15 p.m. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Kelley, and seconded by Councilman Schiffner to waive further reading and introduce Ordinance No. 1255 as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 17.82 OF THE LAKE ELSINORE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING TIME EXTENSIONS FOR DESIGN REVIEW APPROVALS The following Roll Call vote resulted: AYES: MAYOR HICKMAN MAYOR PRO TEM KELLEY COUNCILMAN MAGEE COUNCILMAN SCHIFFNER NOES: COUNCILMAN BUCKLEY ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE BUSINESS ITEMS (27) COUNCIL APPOINTS JOHN GONZALES. PHIL MENDOZA AND MICHAEL O'NEAL TO FILL TERMS EXPIRING JUNE 30. 2012. ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION Councilman Magee stated they had six applicants to include three incumbents, and encouraged the applicants to re-apply again at a future recruitment. He noted they had some very qualified individuals apply. He also indicated based on the performance of the current Commissioners and wanting to continue our 11 Agenda Item No. 5 Page 19 of 22 consistency while the General Plan is being reviewed, for those two reasons they are recommending reappointing John Gonzales, Phil Mendoza and Michael O'Neal. It was moved by Councilman Magee, and seconded by Councilman Buckley to appoint the following three individuals to fill terms expiring June 30, 2012, on the Planning Commission: John Gonzales, Phil Mendoza and Michael O'Neal. The following vote resulted: AYES: MAYOR HICKMAN MAYOR PRO TEM KELLEY COUNCILMAN BUCKLEY COUNCILMAN MAGEE COUNCILMAN SCHIFFNER NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE (28) COUNCIL ADOPTS ORDINANCE NO. 1254. APPROVING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT NO. 2008-01 (GRAND SOLUTIONS) It was moved by Councilman Buckley, and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Kelley to waive further reading and adopt Ordinance No. 1254 as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT NO. 2008-01 The following Roll Call vote resulted: AYES: MAYOR HICKMAN MAYOR PRO TEM KELLEY COUNCILMAN BUCKLEY COUNCILMAN MAGEE COUNCILMAN SCHIFFNER NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE 12 Agenda Item No.5 Page 20 of 22 PUBLIC COMMENTS CITY MANAGER COMMENTS City Manager Brady commented on the following: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) June 26th, Thursday, Farmer's Market, 4-7:00 p.m. at Historic Downtown Lake Elsinore at Main and Peck. June 26th, Thursday, Business Networking Mixer, hosted by Ridgestone Apartments located at 3915 Arden Way, 5:30 p.m. 7:30 p.m. June 28th, Saturday, Lake Elsinore Cruise Day - Car Show, 5-8:00 p.m. Main Street. July 3rd, Thursday, Movies in the Park, After Dark, 7:30 p.m. Summerlake Park and is free to all. July 5th, Saturday, Lake Elsinore's Downtown Merchants Association Celebrates the Cit of Lake Elsinore's 120th Anniversary along with the Fourth of July Celebration, Main Street. July 10th, Thursday, All Chamber Mixer at the Diamond Club. 5) CITY ATTORNEY COMMENTS No comments. CITY TREASURER COMMENTS No comments. CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Schiffner commented on the following: No comments. Mayor Pro Tern Kelley commented on the following: No comments. Councilmember Magee commented on the following: Councilman Magee announced the Rusticana Restaurant is now open. Councilmember Buckley commented on the following: Wished everyone a Happy Fourth. 13 Agenda Item No.5 Page 21 of 22 Mayor Hickman commented on the following: 1) Announced the Breakfast Club located at 19980 Grand Ave. is an excellent place to eat and welcomed everyone to try it out. 2) VFW is re-opening their new bar area. 3) Invited residents to visit Main Street to view the flags. 4) Announced starting July ih, seniors 60 years and older making less than $41,000 are entitled to a property tax rebate. If interested, please call the senior center 674-2526. Mayor Hickman adjourned the meeting at 8:26 p.m. in memory of Cathy Zaitz, wife of Councilman Zaitz for the City of Canyon Lake. DARYL HICKMAN, MAYOR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ATTEST: VIVIAN M.MUNSON CITY CLERK 14 Agenda Item No.5 Page 22 of 22 CITY OF ~ LAKJ:: ,6,LSiIiORJ: Y DREAM E}(TREME... REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: ROBERT A. BRADY CITY MANAGER DATE: JULY 8, 2008 SUBJECT: WARRANT LIST DATED JUNE 30, 2008 Discussion The warrant list is a listing of all general checks issued since the prior warrant list. Recommendation Authorize payment of Warrant List dated June 30, 2008. Prepared By: Acrystal Rsobinson C/K ccount pecialist I Reviewed By: Matt N. Pressey Director of Administrative Services Approved By: Robert A. Bradyfl Ml1 City Manager \LOJI Agenda Item No.6 Page 1 of 6 J1UN E 30. 2008 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE FU N D# 100 105 110 112 118 130 135 205 221 254 352 353 356 357 360 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 381 382 384 385 386 387 605 608 620 650 651 FUND DESCRIPTION GENERALFUNp_ MISC. GENERAL PROJECT FUND STATE GAS TAX FUND TRANSPORTATION/MEASURE A FUND LAKE SIDE FACILITIES DIF FUND LIGHTING/LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE FUND... L.L.M.D. NO.1 FUND TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE FUND PARK C.I.P. FUND ... _ --- A.D. 89-1 RAIL ROAD CANYON IMPROVEMENT FUND A.D. 86-1 DEBT SERVICE FUND A.D. 89-1 DEBT SERVICE FUND A.D. 90-1A DEBT SERVICE FUND C.F.D. 2003-02 DEBT SERVICE FUND A.D. 93-1 DEBT SERVICE FUND C.F.D.95-1 1996-E DEBT SERVICE FUND C.F.D. 88-3 III A/97 SERIES A DEBT SERVICE FUND _____ .._____" __.. _ ______. .____ ___ _____,.....___H C.F.D. 88-3 III B/97 SERIES A DEBT SERVICE FUND ---- -----.-.----..-----..-----------.----- ---- C.F.D. 98-1 SUMMERHILL IMPROVEMENT DEBT SERVICE FUND _____ ,_________.._ _____......___.. _._n_.'..__________ ,----- -- C.F.D. 2005-6 CITY CENTER TOWN HOMES DEBT SERVICE FUND C.F.D. 2006-1 SUMMERL Y DEBT SERVICE FUND C.F.D. 2006-2 VISCAYA DEBT SERVICE FUND --- --- ----- C.F.D. 2004-3 ROSETTA CANYON DEBT SERVICE FUND ___ ___H ____ C.F.D. 2005-1 SERENITY DEBT SERVICE FUND ---- ------ - ---- ----- - C.F.D. 2005-2 ALBERHILL RANCH DEBT SERVICE FUND C.F.D. 2005-5 WASSON CANYON DEBT SERVICE FUND C.F.D. 2005-4 LAKE VIEW VILLAS DEBT SERVICE FUND C.F.D. 2006-4 TR#30698/32129 DEBT SERVICE FUND C.F.D. 2006-3 LA STRADA DEBT SERVICE FUND C.F.D. 2006-6 TESSERA DEBT SERVICE FUND C.F.D. 2006-8 RUNNING DEER ESTATES DEBT SERVICE FUND C.F.D. 2006-10 RIVERWALK VILLAS DEBT SERVICE FUND --- --- --------- --..-----... ..----- C.F.D. 2006-9 TRIESTE DEBT SERVICE FUND C.F.D. 2003-2 SERIES 2006 A DEBT SERVICE FUND C.F.D. 2004-3 SERIES 2006 A DEBT SERVICE FUND ----- ------ C.F.D. 2007-4 MAKENNA COURT DEBT SERVICE FUND C.F.D. 2007-5 RED KITE DEBT SERVICE FUND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND TRUST DEPOSITS & PRE-PAID EXPENSE COST RECOVERY SYSTEM C.F.D.2003-1 LAW & FIRE DEBT SERVICE FUND --- -- . -- C.F.D. 2006-5 PARK, OPEN SPACE & STORM DEBT SERVICE FUND WARRANT SUMMARY TOTAL $ 1,4~9--,~~0.~~. 112,?9~.26 ~9 ,5~~.~g 28,172.00 614.40 44,899.99 1 ,9~.53 2~(),~5L6~. .. .4-,58Q.OQ_ 496.47 -- .--...----.---. 10.50 ---.------...----- 60.50 -----...,-----.-- 461 .1 0 -----....----.-.---- 11,005.79 -- ----- -------- 469.00 750.00 ----- -,.,---- ,-.-- 4Q,~!():~g 522.33 -_.__.--~--~ 1~,jZ3.Q~_ 750.00 ----.....------.....----. 8,250.00 -----",-,----_....,..-- 1 ,486.35 ----------_.-------- ----- 6,901.83 1,781.35 2,429.37 750.00 750.00 750.00 ------_..--------- 750.00 ---~, --.--- 750.00 ----.-.----- 750.00 ---..-".--------- 750.00 ------~---- 750.00 ___"n__________ 421.75 393.63 ------------ 750.00 -- ----,-,------------ 750.00 6,213.00 ---- -------- 500.00 _____n."____ 5,035.73 --___--_--0-_------- 750.00 -------,,-,,---- 750.00 GRAND TOTAL 7/2/2008 Warrant 063008 1 of 1 -------~------~-------------~---~---- ----------- $ 2,091,556.78 Agenda Item No.6 Page 2 of 6 JUNE 30, 2008 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CHECK# 94719 94720 94721 94722 94723 96211 96294 96332 96333 96334 96335 96336 96337 96338 96339 96340 96341 96342 96343 96344 96345 96346-96347 96348 96349 96350 96351 96352 96353 96354 96355 96356 96357 96358 96359 96360 96361 96362-96365 96366 96367 96368 96369 96370 96371 96372 96373 96374-96380 96381 96382 96383 96384 96385-96387 96388 VEN DOR NAME I.C.M.A. RETIREMENT TRUST #302208 LEIBOLD, MCCLENDON & MANN OSCAR MARTINEZ WESTERN BANK OF CHINOOK TERRA COTTA PARTNERS, L.L.C._ VOID-BANK OF AMERICA (3480) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VOID-REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE A & A JANITORIAL SERVICE ACTION PARK ALLIANCE, INC. ADVENTURES IN ADVERTISING ALLIANCE ENVIRONMENTAL & COMPLIANCE AMERICAN EXPRESS AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES AMERICAN SOCIETY COMPOSERS, AUTHORS ERICA ANDERSEN APPLE ONE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES ARCOA INDUSTRIES BACKFLOW CERTIFICATION BIO-TOX LABORATORIES BMLA, INC. BUREAU VERITAS NORTH AMERICA, II'-JC. BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN,LLP CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES,_INC_. JOHN CARLSON CASTANEDA, FRANCISCO CEMC CITY & COUNTY SOIL ENGINEERING, INC. PATRICK CLARK CM WASH EQUIPMENT COACH ELLA VALLEY CHAPTER I.C.C. COACHELLA VALLEY CHAPTER I.C.C. COAST TO COAST WIRELESS, INC. COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS, INC. CONTROL PUMP KIRT A. COURY CRAFCO, INC. CTAI PACIFIC GREENSCAPE CUTTING EDGE STAFFING, lNC. D&B o & SELECTRIC DATA QUICK INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. DAVID EVANS & ASSOCIATES, INC. DISH NETWORK CAROLE K. DONAHOE, AICP 03 EQUIPMENT E. V. M. W. D. ELITE ELEVATOR, INC. ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUPPLY, INC. ELSINORE VALLEY RENTALS ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANING EXCEL LANDSCAPE, INC. EXECUTIVE PLUMBING 7/2/2008 Warrant 063008 1 OF 4 W ARRANT LIST AMOUNT -.-_._~_._----- $ ..__4,!?~~.00 n_3_5,4~.74 500.00 2,607.49 ------ .-,'.---------- 246,~~J.69 . !86.?~) . (677,485.20) 2,6QQ.QO . 4, 1~~~00 ___ ?_,QL4:~g__ 355.25 411.50 - --- 118.50 305.45 - --_._---_._~- -.--- 331.50 _ _ _ 2,!50.?~_6 203.01 1 ,759..00 581 .49 4,58Q..Q0_ __~(), 6()~:4~_ ml~~722.4.L 219.81 _________u',..'.____ 225.00 ----------~-_. . 53.81 410.00 --------_...---_.--- 5,777.00 225.00 580.78 125.00 125.00 146.30 246.20 950.13 - ------_._._._.-._~ _ __~,n!5.00 _ 1,908.70 - -_.._._"-~'----- _ .1~_,828~:3()_ _.?,:3~~.~5 ....1 ~Q70 .!56 560.00 129.50 .1 ,3!>!5_'00 54.99 ... .1.,~J?:!5Q_ 288.95 - .--..------- . 58,4!?:?~_ _ 2!~~Q.OO 82.70 584.71 5..14~.1 0 18,816.96 568.00 Agenda Item NO.6 Page 3 of 6 JUNE 30, 2008 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CHECK# 96389 96390 96391 96392 96393 96394 96395 96396 96397 96398-96400 96401 96402 96403 96404 96405 96406 96407 96408 96409 96410 96411 96412 96413 96414 96415 96416-96441 96442 96443 96444 96445 96446 96447 96448 96449 96450 96451 96452 96453 96454 96455 96456 96457 96458 96459 96460 96461 96462 96463 96464 96465 96466 96467 YEN OOR NAME FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION FIRST AMERICAN CORE LOGIC, INC. FISH PRODUCERS INC. FULLER TRUCK ACCESSORIES-RIVERSIDE GALL'S RETAIL CA GALL'S, IN~. GOLDEN OFFICE TRAILERS, INC. THE GRAPHICS COMPANY LORENA HANCOCK HARRIS & ASSOCIATES, INC. HI-WAY SAFETY, INC. WILLIAM HOUTZ HUNTINGTON BEACH HONDA I.C.M.A. RETIREMENT TRUST #302208 IMPACT PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS INLAND EMPIRE LOCK & KEY INLAND URGENT CARE WILDOMAR INNOVATIVE DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS JON'S FLAGS & POLES, INC. KARVELOT,STEVE ---- . .--.... ..-- LAKE BUICK PONTIAC GMC, INC. LAKE CHEVROLET LAKE ELSINORE FLORIST & GIFTS LAKE ELSINORE TIRE & AUlO, INC. LAKESHORE HOMES & DEVELOPMENT,INC. LEWIS, BRISBOIS'I3ISCAARD & ~_MITH,~LP L1NKLlNE COMMUNICATIOt'-JS, INC. THE MARK FISHER COMPANY SHAWN MCELVOGUE METROPOINTE ENGINEERS LINDA M. MILLER MORROW PLUMBING,INC. MUNISERVICES, L.L.C. RICK MUNYON NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION NBS GOVERNMENT FINANCE GROUP NELSON PAVI_NG,INC. NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS ED NORTH OCB REPROGRAPHICS OMNIS,INC._ ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING, INC. OUTHOUSE, INC. P. F. PETTIBONE & COMPANY PATRIOT COMPONENTS JULIAN CRUZ PEREZ PITNEY BOWES PURCHASE POWER PORT SUPPLY GENARO PRATS PREMIUM PALOMAR MT. SPRING WATER THE PRESS ENTERPRISE PRO PET DISTRIBUTORS 7/2/2008 Warrant 063008 2 OF 4 W ARRANT LIST AMOUNT 267.47 --------_._~.~--- 228.08 ~,,!~8~6~ 689.60 366.30 -- ._-_._--_.__.~._------- 693.33 ------_.------- 269.38 -- - ..-----.----.------ 840.00 390.75 35, 7~0.8~ 144.39 150.00 - - __'_"__.__ _____ '___n_n__ 90.00 ---...----- -----..------- _ 4~~3~~9Q _~5_~~.i5 6.47 -- - --.........-.---..----.- 320.00 -_._-~_._---_.- _ __2-,~,!~.QL },1"[7 .4~ 71.25 428.12 _ 54,~~3..:l5 92.61 -----.. .-----....'-'----- . 28.00 ----.-----.'--- n18,~Q:3.'_~Q_ . __~,740JL 44.95 u_'_"_'__"_ 161.00 ------_..-,----------- 3,205.75 ------------ --- 4.r.~21 }9_ 5,1}X:5Q 12.11 2,<1J2g:~? 750.00 ------- -- ------ 169.45 .-.------.......-- __4.~?5Q.QO ._ _ ?7 ,~~?..?() 5.?!3~.~? 113.13 ------ ..--_._-_._.~._-- _4,61JU~_ __~~f?!50.QQ_ _ _?,!)J.~.()Q 62.75 -..----..----'..------- 328.05 97.00 161.61 u ~,9?.Q.Q1 530.26 1.?!3Q.QQ 261.45 __ ______........_______ n...__ 1?.4 71:~~_ 927.05 Agenda Item No.6 Page 4 of 6 JUNE 30, 2008 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CHECK# 96468 96469-96470 96471 96472 96473 96474 96475 96476 96477 96478 96479 96480 96481 96482 96483 96484 96485 96486-96490 96491 96492 96493 96494 96495 96496 96497 96498 96499 96500 96501 96502 96503 96504 96505 96506 96507 96508 96509 96510 96511 96512 96513 96514 PIE DATE 06/20/08 06/26/08 06/30/08 06/26/08 VENDOR NAME PRODUCTION VIDEO,INC. PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY QUILL CORPORATION REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE REGIONAL CONSERVATION AUTHORITY RIGHTWAY SITE SERVICES, INC. SCOTT RIPPSTEIN -- .. ---- RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ACCOUNTING & FINANCE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE OFFICE OF ASSESSQR.,GABY L. OR?Q ROBBINS PEST MANAGEMENT, INC. -- -- ----.. -- ROTARY CLUB OF LAKE ELSINORE EDGAR SALAS SIEMENS SHAWN SLATER SMART & FINAL KATHLEEN R. SMITH DAVID S. SOLOMON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. DANANJA SOYSA STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE STAPLES CREDIT PLAN STAUFFER'S LAWN EQUIPMENT STEWART TITLE CO. TEAM AUTOAID, INC. TEMECULA MOTORCYCLE SALES & SERVICE TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & SUPPLY TIME WARNER CABLE UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA UNITED PARCEL SERVICE VA CONSUL TIN(3, INC. VERIZON BUSINESS VERIZON CALIFORNIA __'0_- -..- VILLAGE EQUIPMENT RENTALS, INC. VISTA PAINT CORPORATION TOM VO JR. WAL-MART COMMUNITY TOM WEINER WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS WILDLANDS, INC. WENDY WORTHEY YELLOW TRANSPORT A TI9_N,JNC. Z BEST BODY & PAINT SHOPS, INC. PAYROLL CASH PAYROLL TAXES PAYROLL TAXES CALIFORNIA PER.S. W ARRANT LIST AMOUNT -------'---- ------------ 843.75 ~_._.._._._~~.--- 535.65 -----,----------- 205.31 ---.----...-----..----- _ 6?~,~9_9.~4 .?7!~0Q.9.Q 15.95 -- -----_..__.-~----- 150.00 -- ,---- ...---- ."----.-----'-- _ 79ll-'~47.66 18.00 ---..---------.---- 740.00 ----- ----.. ---... - -- - _.._..-----_._~--- 190.00 -- ------_.------ --..--- 118.51 97.00 150.00 70.71 405.00 __3..ll9j).OQ- .1.9.,075:~3 300.00 ---- "-...---.....,----------- 927.41 ----------------.-- 233.52 -------_._~~_._- .~_37.~0_ 300.00 792.82 - ___ __",__.___._n 78.14 112.81 52.32 _________n_u__ . l,!5t39. 00_ 293.13 ----------------- 629.00 ---...--.---'--'-- 575.00 - ----......-.--....---.- 973.08 -------_..,'---- 1 ,045.9il 577.06 -----.--.------- 341.25 229.68 20.01 __90.,_414~QQ _ 27,192.~3_ ___ ___1',35.9.00. 34.00 -- ..... .,-----...---.---....-- n 1.0.1~.4Q_ $ 1,774,882.07 .1t3~,437.06 ~j.427 ..99 . 67,593.85 - ____n_..__.._.__.n.__.._ 54,215.81 GRAND TOTAL 7/2/2008 Warrant 063008 3 OF 4 ._--_.~_._~._~_.--- $ 2,091,556.78 Agenda Item NO.6 Page 5 of 6 JUNE 30, 2008 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE W ARRANT LIST CHECK# VENDOR NAME AMOUNT CHECK STOCK #338362 THRU 338500 VOID CHECK STOCK #338501 & 338502 PRINTER MALFUNCTION 7/2/2008 Warrant 063008 4 OF 4 Agenda Item No.6 Page 6 of 6 CITY OF ~ LAKE ,&,Lsit{o~ V DREAM E;(TREME... REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: ROBERT A. BRADY CITY MANAGER DATE: JULY 8,2008 SUBJECT: APPROV AL TO PARTICIPATE IN THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY MORTGAGE CERTIFICATE (MCC) PROGRAM Summary The Riverside County Board of Supervisors has authorized the County Economic Development Agency (EDA) to apply to the California Debt Limit Allocation Committee for an allocation of Mortgage Credit Certificates on or about July 28, 2008. The City of Lake Elsinore is able to participate in the County MCC Program for mortgage loans available for first-time homebuyers in Lake Elsinore. Adoption of a resolution is necessary for the City to participate in the County's MCC Program. Backaround A Mortgage Credit Certificate (MCC) entitles qualified home buyers to reduce the amount of federal tax liability on a home mortgage. This tax credit allows the buyer to qualify more easily for a loan by effectively increasing the stated income of the buyer. The Riverside County MCC Program allows a 15% rate, which can be applied against the interest paid on the mortgage loan. The borrower can then claim a credit on their taxes equal to 15% of the interest paid during the year. Since the taxes paid by the borrower are being reduced, the annual take-home pay is effectively increased. The borrower can still deduct the remaining part of the interest paid as a standard deduction. When underwriting a loan, a lender takes this potential increase in income into consideration and the borrower is able to qualify for a larger loan than would otherwise be possible. This program can be used with all types of homes, including foreclosures, new and resale single-family and/or manufactured homes, and may be the "extra cushion" future homebuyers will need to purchase in Lake Elsinore. Agenda Item No. 7 Page 1 of 5 Riv. Co. MCC Program July 8, 2008 Page 2 The EDA will be submitting an application for approximately $12 million on or about July 28, 2008 for applicants acquiring homes within the County. Program guidelines include income restrictions, as well as limits to the purchase price of the home. Future Lake Elsinore homebuyers can qualify for the MCC on their own through their lender, even if the City is not providing any down payment assistance. The City of Lake Elsinore has participated in the MCC Program in past years. Staff recommends approval of the attached updated resolution, which will provide another tool for qualified homebuyers to purchase a home in Lake Elsinore. Fiscal Impact No impact to the City or the Redevelopment Agency budget. Potential buyers can qualify through a lender to receive the MCC from the County. Recommendation Waive further reading and adopt a resolution approving participation with the County of Riverside Mortgage Credit Certificate (MCC) Program. Reviewed by: Steven McCarty r\ Redevelopment Project Manager Matt N. Presse~ Director of Admlri~ive Services Robert A. Bradyri M1 City Manager lJ.l{)J Prepared by: Approved by: 2 Agenda Item No. 7 Page 2 of 5 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARTICIPATION WITH THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE MORTGAGE CREDIT CERTIFICATE (MCC) PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Tax Reform Act of 1986 established the Mortgage Credit Certificate Program ("MCC Program") as a means of assisting qualified individuals with the acquisition of new and existing single family housing; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Division 31, Part 1, Chapter 3.5, Article 3.4 of the California Health and Safety Code Sections 50197 et seq, local issuers are authorized to issue Mortgage Credit Certificates ("Certificates") and administer MCC Program; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside adopted Resolution No. 87-564 on December 22, 1987, establishing a Mortgage Credit Certificate Program; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside has authorized the Riverside County Economic Development Agency ("EDA") to administer the MCC Program pursuant to the applicable federal, state and local policies and procedures, and to enter into those agreements necessary for efficient administration of the MCC Program; and WHEREAS, the County of Riverside ("County") will be applying to the California Debt Limit Allocation Committee ("CDLAC") for a mortgage credit certificate allocation in July 28, 2008, or thereabouts; and WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elsinore ("City") wishes to participate in the MCC Program administered by the EDA in connection with mortgage loans it will make available for the acquisition of new and existing single-family housing in Riverside County; and WHEREAS, the adoption of this resolution is necessary to include the City a participating unit of general government under County's MCC Program; and WHEREAS, the City agrees to cooperate with the County of Riverside to undertake the MCC Program within City jurisdiction to assist persons or households of limited income to purchase new and existing single family residences located in the City; and WHEREAS, the City by adopting this resolution, hereby gives notice of its election to participate in the Riverside County MCC Program. 1 Agenda Item No. 7 Page 3 of 5 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, as follows: The City of Lake Elsinore, California, agrees; 1. To participate in the MCC Program administered by the EDA in connection with mortgage loans it will make available for the acquisition of new and existing single-family housing in Riverside County; and 2. To assist the County of Riverside to market the MCC Program within the city's jurisdictional boundary by publishing a general public notice in the local newspaper at least twice a year. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, on the 8th day of July, 2008. DARYL HICKMAN, MAYOR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ATTEST: VIVIAN M. MUNSON CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: BARBARA ZEID LEIBOLD CITY ATTORNEY 2 Agenda Item No. 7 Page 4 of 5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ) I, VIVIAN M. MUNSON, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. was ado~ted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on the 8t day of June 2008, and that the same was adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: VIVIAN M. MUNSON CITY CLERK 3 Agenda Item No. 7 Page 5 of 5 CITY OF ~ LA~ ,6/LSiNO~ Y DREAM EXTREME", REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL FROM: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL ROBERT A. BRADY CITY MANAGER TO: DATE: JULY 8, 2008 SUBJECT: APPLICATION FOR THE NAME CHANGE OF ALDERWOOD CIRCLE IN THE ALBERHILL RANCH DEVELOPMENT Backaround Castle & Cooke Alberhill Ranch, LLC owner of the Alberhill Ranch Specific Plan area located at the northeast end of the City adjacent to Lake Street, has formally requested that Alderwood Circle be changed to Welsh Circle. This new community contains two roadways with the name Alderwood, one with the suffix "Circle" and one with suffix "Place". By changing the name of the street it will reduce confusion and facilitate the response of emergency services. Discussion Staff has notified all appropriate Utility Services and Emergency Services Providers of the request for name change. Their where no objections by the utility companies or emergency service providers, nor were there conflicts with existing street names located within the City. Fiscal Impact None, the applicant is responsible for ordering and installing the new street signs. Recommendations 1 . Approve the street name change request. 2. Direct the City Clerk notify the County Board of Supervisors of the street name change. Agenda Item NO.8 Page 1 of 3 Prepared by: Approved by: Attachment: Ken A. Seumalo '(Jb Director of Public Works Robert A. BradY(i)~ City Manager t.l\V Vicinity map Agenda Item No.8 Page 2 of 3 ~',\ \ ,~\ .~ .' lk:", "~i'_ ' t ' ~"c '..; 'c ... " , ~"'" ,', ' ~ ~~,;,;>, \~:' \ <>~,~ , 'X', . \ ~O i: .....< l'~,~~~ I -};/ f!! I. ~:oz~/ v. / ' 1/ I/LADRILLO si' ;:/ · 1/" //~'7'--"", ,- <", c ,/;. tt)zj/~,l)~;:'. , , A:' '.. . '. ,,,,.,: ; I "c' c';J'.. '--':1 ! (FIRCIR (~~; , ii~~lj~#/~P.._..J .;' F'l~J~NCJR>,. -!l1NIPI~li ~ ";\ B7~!()1YE;;f~. / BA~SACl~'" :,. ...,' /" >" - z.__ /' " " ':::" "\" -"':', '.', , c!~/' o,;y ~,,~/ ~~/ ' /),/ " ,);/ ~. O~il'> c: ' Y>~ i, CITY OF ~ LAKE ,6,LSiNORf: V. DREAM E,XTREME ALDERWOOD CIRCLE TO WELSH CIRCLE STREET NAME CHANGE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE JULY 8,2008 N Base map prepared by: f City 01 Lake Elsinore A end Itmeoflo~Vi~n 9 Data so~ces: aye i GIS a~IL ~n~e GIS Stateplane NAD 83 CITY OF "~ LAKi \6,LSirioRi ~ DREAM EXTREME REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: ROBERT A. BRADY CITY MANAGER DATE: JULY 8, 2008 SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO RESOLUTION CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION Backaround The City will be conducting a General Municipal Election on November 4, 2008, for the purpose of electing three members of the City Council and the City Treasurer for four- year terms. Resolutions were presented and adopted by the City Council on June 10, 2008, as part of the General Municipal Election process. The resolution pertaining to "Calling and Giving Notice" which list the electeds that will be on the November ballot which inadvertently did not include the City Treasurer and therefore the attached resolution is needed to amend and restated the prior resolution to include the City Treasurer. Discussion Prior to conducting a General Municipal Election, resolutions must be adopted which call and give notice of holding the election and request that the Riverside County Board of Supervisors render specific services. Fiscal Impact No fiscal impact. Recommendation Waive further reading and adopt a resolution amending and restating Resolution No. 2008-52 calling and giving notice of the holding of a General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 4, 2008, for the election of certain officers as required by the provisions of the laws of the State of California relating to General Law cities and requesting the Registrar of Voters of the County of Riverside to conduct said election. Agenda Item No.9 Page 1 of 5 Amended Election Resolution July 8,2008 Page 2 Approved by: Vivian M. Muns~~/ City Clerk ~ Robert A. 8rady(}~ City Manager Jt..W Prepared by: Agenda Item No.9 Page 2 of 5 ----- .__.~-----^.._.~.__. ..-- --.-..- - RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING AND RESTATING RESOLUTION NO. 2008-52, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 4,2008, FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS OF THE CITY AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENARAL LAW CITIES AND REQUESTING THE REGISTRAR OF VOTERS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TO CONDUCT SAID ELECTION WHEREAS, under the provisions of the laws relating to General Law cities in the State of California, a General Municipal Election shall be held on November 4, 2008, for the election of Municipal Officers. WHEREAS, on June 10,2008, the City Council adopted Resolution 2008-52 pertaining to "Calling and Giving Notice" which inadvertently did not include the City Treasurer. WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend and restate Resolution No. 2008-52. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That pursuant to the requirements of the laws of the State of California relating to General Law Cities within the State, there is called ordered held in the City of Lake Elsinore, California, on Tuesday, November 4, 2008, a General Municipal Election of the qualified electors of the City for the purpose of electing three (3) members of the City Council and a (1) City Treasurer for terms continuing to November 2012. The three (3) incumbent members of the City Council of the City are Genie Kelley, Robert Magee, and Robert Schiffner and the one (1) incumbent for the City Treasurer is Peter Weber. Section 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 10002 ofthe Elections Code of the State of California, this City Council hereby requests the Registrar of Voters of the County of Riverside to conduct the General Municipal Election for the City of Lake Elsinore. Section 3. That the ballots to be used at the Election shall be, in form and content, such as may be required by law to be used in the Election. 1 Agenda Item No.9 Page 3 of 5 Section 4. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized, instructed and directed to procure and furnish any and all official ballots, notices, printed matter and all supplies, equipment and paraphernalia that may be necessary in order to properly and lawfully conduct the Election. Section 5. That the polls for the Election shall be open at seven o'clock a.m. on the day of the Election and shall remain open continuously from that time until eight o'clock p.m. of the same day when the polls shall be closed, except as provided in Section 14401 of the Elections Code of the State of California. Section 6. That in all particulars not recited in this Resolution, the Election shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding municipal elections in the City. Section 7. That notice of the time and place of holding the Election is given and the City Clerk is authorized, instructed and directed to give such further or additional notice of the Election, in time, form and manner as required by law. Section 8. That the City Council of the said City desires the canvass of said Election to be made by the Riverside County Registrar of Voters. Section 9. That the Riverside County Registrar of Voters shall, on the 4th day of November 2008, commence the canvass of the General Municipal Election to be held in said City on the 4th day of November, and shall certify the results to this City Council. Section 10. That said City shall reimburse the County of Riverside, Registrar of Voters for the cost of services performed relative to the conduct of the General Municipal Election, after completion of all work and upon presentation to the City of a properly detailed bill. Section 11. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to forward a certified copy of this Resolution to said Riverside County Registrar of Voters. Section 12. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions of the City of Lake Elsinore. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, on this 8th day of Julv 2008. DARYL HICKMAN, MAYOR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 2 Agenda Item No.9 Page 4 of 5 ATTEST: VIVIAN M. MUNSON, CITY CLERK CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVED AS TO FORM: BARBARA ZEID LEIBOLD, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ) I, VIVIAN M. MUNSON, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. was adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on the 8th day of July 2008, and that the same was adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: VIVIAN M. MUNSON CITY CLERK CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 3 Agenda Item No.9 Page 5 of 5 CITY OF ~ LAI(f: 5LSINORI: , I Y DREAM EXTREME", REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: ROBERT A. BRADY CITY MANAGER DATE: JULY 8, 2008 SUBJECT: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE PLACING DELINQUENT REFUSE BILLS ON FY 2008-2009 TAX ROLL Backaround On June 9,1992, CR&R, Inc. was awarded an exclusive franchise agreement to provide solid waste collection and recycling services. Due to uncollectible accounts resulting from non-payment from property owners and renters, City Council approved collections via the tax rolls. These collections are for those accounts whose payments are delinquent a minimum of 120-days. These costs are to include the delinquent charges, the appropriate late payments, processing fees and the trash collection and recycling fees for the following year. Discussion As of July 1, 2008, there are 547 new accounts on delinquent tax rolls totaling $119,045.91. Due to these delinquent accounts and CR&R's past actions to collect for services rendered, CR&R submits a list of accounts for City Council's consideration to be placed on the tax roll. Fiscal Impact Payment from delinquent accounts placed on the tax rolls can take as long as 24- months to collect. In addition, CR&R continues to pay the City the franchise fee from the gross revenues. Recommendations 1. Waive further reading and adopt a Resolution affirming the report of delinquent residential refuse fees and directing their collection on the property tax roll. Agenda Item No. 10 Page 1 of 5 2. Direct the City Clerk to file with the Riverside County Auditor a certified copy of the Resolution along with the 120-days past due accounts report. Prepared by: Nicole Fields Environmental Compliance Administrator Ken A. Seumalo ~ Director of Public Works Approved by: Robert A. Brady () rfL City Manager ~ Attachment: Resolution No. 2008- Agenda Item No. 10 Page 2 of 5 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, AFFIRMING THE REPORT OF DELINQUENT RESIDENTIAL REFUSE FEES AND DIRECTING THEIR COLLECTION ON THE PROPERTY TAX ROLLS WHEREAS, according to Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Section 8.16.206, any refuse collection rate or charge shall become delinquent if not paid within thirty days of the time payment is due; and WHEREAS, in that same section, the City Council has established that each delinquent account shall be charged a penalty of ten percent (10%) of the monthly rate for each month the account is delinquent; and WHEREAS, on July 23, 1996, the City Council approved collection of delinquent accounts by way of listing the amount due on the account holder's property tax rolls; and WHEREAS, this collection method was restricted to those accounts which were delinquent for a minimum of one hundred twenty (120) days; and WHEREAS, a written report of residential refuse collection fees delinquent as of July 1, 2008, has been prepared and filed with the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered evidence presented by the Public Works Department, the City Clerk, and other interested parties at a public meeting held with respect to this item on July 8, 2008. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The report of residential refuse collection fees delinquent as of July 1, 2008, attached hereto and incorporated into this resolution is hereby confirmed. The City Clerk is directed to file a certified copy of this resolution and of the report with the County Auditor. The County Auditor is designated and empowered to perform its duties as is customary in its practice. Section 2. The fees set forth in the report shall constitute a special assessment against the respective parcels on which they are levied and are a lien against such property. The assessment shall be collected at the same time and subject to the same procedures that taxes are collected. All laws applicable to the levy, collection and enforcement of ad valorem property taxes shall be applicable to such assessments, except that if any real property to which such fees or changes relate has been transferred 1 Agenda Item No. 10 Page 3 of 5 or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser, prior to the date on which the first installment of such taxes would become delinquent, then a lien which would otherwise be imposed shall not attach to such real property and the fees or charges or interest shall be transferred to the unsecured roll for collection. Section 3. The City shall remit the fees collected to the franchised solid waste collector within fifteen (15) days after receipt thereof. Section 4. That portion of the principal, interest and other costs related to the delinquent trash accounts to be placed on the County Tax Rolls and be collected by the Riverside County Tax Collector. Section 5. That the properties to be assessed and the related amounts are submitted on magnetic tape as requested by the Riverside County Tax Collector, further identified as County Fund No. 68-2370. Section 6. The City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore hereby authorizes the collection of delinquent refuse service fees of customers with unpaid balances of more than one hundred and twenty (120) days to be collected permanently on the annual property tax roll. Section 7. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, on this 8th day of July 2008. DARYL HICKMAN, MAYOR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ATTEST: VIVIAN MUNSON CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: BARBARA ZEID LEIBOLD, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 2 Agenda Item No. 10 Page 4 of 5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ) I, VIVIAN M. MUNSON, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. was adopted by the City Council of the City of Signal Hill at a regular meeting held on the 8th day of July 2008, and that the same was adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: VIVIAN M. MUNSON CITY CLERK 3 Agenda Item No. 10 Page 5 of 5 CITY OF ~ LAKE ,6,LSiNORI: ~ DREAM EjTREME... REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: ROBERT A. BRADY CITY MANAGER DATE: JULY 8,2008 SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING ON THE CITYWIDE LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT AND THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008-09 Background On June 10, 2008, the City Council adopted the appropriate resolutions to commence the proceedings for the annual levy. The Public Hearing was set for July 8, 2008. Discussion Attached are two Resolutions for Fiscal Year 2008-09 providing for an Annual Levy and Collection of Assessments in both Districts. Fiscal Impact The total assessment for FY 2008-09 Citywide LLMD IS $1,275,730. The total assessment for LLMD No.1 is $209,042. Recommendations 1. Waive further reading and adopt a resolution confirming a diagram and assessment and providing for annual assessment levy after formation of a district Fiscal Year 2008-09 for the Citywide LLMD. 2. Waive further reading and adopt a resolution confirming a diagram and assessment and providing for annual assessment levy after formation of a district Fiscal Year 2008-09 for the LLMD NO.1. Prepared by: Matt N. Presse~ Director of Admfrl~tive Services Approved by: Robert A. Brady City Manager Agenda Item No. 11 Page 1 of 88 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING A DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT AND PROVIDING FOR ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY AFTER FORMATION OF A DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2008-09 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, has initiated proceedings for the annual levy of the assessments for a street lighting district pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, in a district known and designated as CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CITYWIDE LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, the City Council has ordered the preparation of a report and the City District Engineer has prepared and filed with this City Council a report pursuant to law for its consideration and subsequently thereto this City Council did adopt its Resolution of Intention to levy and collect assessments for the next ensuing Fiscal Year relating to the above referenced District, and further did proceed to give notice of the time and place for a Public Hearing on all matters relating to said annual levy of the proposed assessment; and WHEREAS, at this time, this City Council has heard all testimony and evidence and is desirous of proceeding with said annual levy of assessments. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. That upon the conclusion of the Public Hearing, written protests filed, and not withdrawn, did not represent property owners owning more than fifty percent (50%) of the area of assessable lands within the District, and all protests are overruled and denied. SECTION 3. That this City Council hereby confirms the diagram and assessment as submitted and order the annual levy of the assessment for the Fiscal Year and in the amounts as set forth in the Engineer's Report and as referred to in the Resolution of Intention as previously adopted relating to said annual assessment levy. SECTION 4. That the diagram and assessment as set forth and contained in said Report are hereby confirmed and adopted by this City Council. 1 Agenda Item No. 11 Page 2 of 88 SECTION 5. That the adoption of this Resolution constitutes the levy of the assessment for the Fiscal Year. SECTION 6. That the estimates of costs, the assessment diagram, the assessments and all other matters, as set forth in Engineer's "Report", pursuant to said "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", as submitted, are hereby approved, adopted by this City Council and hereby confirmed. SECTION 7. That the maintenance works of improvements contemplated by the Resolution of Intention shall be performed pursuant to law and the County Auditor shall enter on the County Assessment Roll the amount of the Assessment and said assessment shall then be collected at the same time and in the same manner as the County taxes are collected. After collection by said County, the net amount of the assessment shall be paid to the City. SECTION 8. That the City has previously established a special fund known as the CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CITYWIDE LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT into which the City shall place all monies collected by the Tax Collector pursuant to the provisions of the Resolution and law and said transfer shall be made and accomplished as soon as said monies have been made available to said City. SECTION 9. That the City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment roll with the County Auditor, together with a certified copy of this Resolution upon its adoption. SECTION 10. That a certified copy of the assessment and diagram shall be filed in the office of the City Engineer, with a duplicate copy on file in the Office of the City Clerk and open for public inspection. 2 Agenda Item No. 11 Page 3 of 88 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, on this 8th day of July 2008. DARYL HICKMAN, MAYOR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ATTEST: VIVIAN MUNSON, CITY CLERK CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVED AS TO FORM: BARBARA ZEID LEIBOLD CITY ATTORNEY STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ) I, VIVIAN M. MUNSON, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. was ado~ted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on the 8 h day of July 2008, and that the same was adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: VIVIAN M. MUNSON CITY CLERK 3 Agenda Item No. 11 Page 4 of 88 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING A DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT AND PROVIDING FOR ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY AFTER FORMATION OF A DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2008-09 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, has initiated proceedings for the annual levy of the assessments for a street lighting district pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, in a district known and designated as CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NO.1 (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, the City Council has ordered the preparation of a report and the City District Engineer has prepared and filed with this City Council a report pursuant to law for its consideration and subsequently thereto this City Council did adopt its Resolution of Intention to levy and collect assessments for the next ensuing Fiscal Year relating to the above referenced District, and further did proceed to give notice of the time and place for a Public Hearing on all matters relating to said annual levy of the proposed assessment; and WHEREAS, at this time, this City Council has heard all testimony and evidence and is desirous of proceeding with said annual levy of assessments. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. That upon the conclusion of the Public Hearing, written protests filed, and not withdrawn, did not represent property owners owning more than fifty percent (50%) of the area of assessable lands within the District, and all protests are overruled and denied. SECTION 3. That this City Council hereby confirms the diagram and assessment as submitted and order the annual levy of the assessment for the Fiscal Year and in the amounts as set forth in the Engineer's Report and as referred to in the Resolution of Intention as previously adopted relating to said annual assessment levy. SECTION 4. That the diagram and assessment as set forth and contained in said Report are hereby confirmed and adopted by this City Council. 1 Agenda Item No. 11 Page 5 of 88 SECTION 5. That the adoption of this Resolution constitutes the levy of the assessment for the Fiscal Year. SECTION 6. That the estimates of costs, the assessment diagram, the assessments and all other matters, as set forth in Engineer's "Report", pursuant to said "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", as submitted, are hereby approved, adopted by this City Council and hereby confirmed. SECTION 7. That the maintenance works of improvements contemplated by the Resolution of Intention shall be performed pursuant to law and the County Auditor shall enter on the County Assessment Roll the amount of the Assessment and said assessment shall then be collected at the same time and in the same manner as the County taxes are collected. After collection by said County, the net amount of the assessment shall be paid to the City. SECTION 8. That the City has previously established a special fund known as the CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NO.1 into which the City shall place all monies collected by the Tax Collector pursuant to the provisions of the Resolution and law and said transfer shall be made and accomplished as soon as said monies have been made available to said City. SECTION 9. That the City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment roll with the County Auditor, together with a certified copy of this Resolution upon its adoption. SECTION 10. That a certified copy of the assessment and diagram shall be filed in the office of the City Engineer, with a duplicate copy on file in the Office of the City Clerk and open for public inspection. 2 Agenda Item No. 11 Page 6 of 88 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, on this 8th day of July 2008. DARYL HICKMAN, MAYOR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ATTEST: VIVIAN MUNSON, CITY CLERK CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVED AS TO FORM: BARBARA ZEID LEIBOLD CITY ATTORNEY STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ) I, VIVIAN M. MUNSON, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. was ado~ted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on the 8 h day of July 2008, and that the same was adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: VIVIAN M. MUNSON CITY CLERK 3 Agenda Item No. 11 Page 7 of 88 Engineer's Report City of lake ELsinore Citywide landscape and Street lighting District FiscaL Year 2008-09 Prepared by: Harris & Associates" May 29, 2008 Agenda Item No. 11 Page 8 of 88 ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CITYWIDE LANDSCAPE AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT Fiscal Year 2008-09 Daryl Hickman Mayor Genie Kelley Mayor Pro-Tern Robert Shiffner Council Member Thomas Buckley Council Member Robert Magee Council Member Robert Brady City Manager Ken Seumalo City Engineer Vivian Munson City Clerk Peter Weber City Treasurer Barbara Leibold City Attorney Joan E. Cox, P.E. Assessment Engineer Harris & Associates Agenda Item No. 11 Page 9 of 88 ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CITYWIDE LANDSCAPE & STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT ~scalYear2008-09 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION II. ENGINEER'S REPORT Part I P art II P art III Part IV Description of Improvements Estimate of Cost Assessment Roll Method of Apportionment of Assessment Exhibit I - Summary of Parcel Data Exhibit II - Summary of Zone-EDU Data Exhibit III - Zone Assessment Summary Part V Part VI APPENDIX A Property Owners List Assessment Diagram County Use Code Information APPENDIX B Zone Map APPENDIX C Page 1 3 5 6 8 9 18 18 16 17 Under Separate Cover Assessment Roll Under Separate Cover Agenda Item No. 11 Page 10 of 88 ENGINEER'S REPORT OF lAKE ELSINORE E & 'rhe undersif,med respectfully the enclosed as by the City CounciL May Harris & Associates I HEREBY CERTIFY that Assessment Diagram thereto with day Roll 2008, I HEREBY CERTIFY that with Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagrarn thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California on the day of_,""_, 2008. Munson, City was with Assessment Roll and Auditor of the of I HEREB Y CERTIFY that Assessment Agenda Item No. 11 Page 11 of 88 City of Lake ELsinore Citywide Landscape & Street Lighting District Engineer's Report - FY 2008-09 May 29,2008 Page 1 SECTION I INTRODUCTION ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CITYWIDE LANDSCAPE & STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT Fiscal Year 2008-09 The City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore approved the formation of an Assessment District with Resolution No. 88-27 on June 28, 1988. The District was formed pursuant to the requirements of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. The District was formed to provide a source of funds for the installation, servicing, maintenance, repair and operation of landscaping, lighting and appurtenant facilities within the District. Prior to the fiscal year 1997-98, the boundaries of the District were coincidental with the boundaries of the City. The Engineer's Report, which was approved by the City Council when the District was formed and as amended, sets forth the methodology to be used in apportioning the assessment to the different land use types and benefit zones within the City based upon the benefit they receive. Based on the proceedings in Fiscal Year 1997-98 and the provisions of Proposition 218, the District is exempt from the requirements of Proposition 218, unless there is an increase in the assessment rates. At the time the District was formed, several benefit zones were established. Citywide benefit zones were established to insure a source of funds for the ongoing maintenance of landscaping and lighting improvements which are of benefit to all parcels or lots within the City. This includes landscaping and street lighting along major thoroughfares, and a portion of the secondary arterials as defined in the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan and on other City owned properties. Several special benefit zones were established to provide a source of funding for the maintenance of improvements that are of local benefit. Currently there are twenty-one (21) special benefit zones, lettered A through U (see Appendix A, Figure 1 - Zone Map). In response to Proposition 218, passed November 5, 1996 and as now provided by California Constitution Article XIIID Section 5(a), this Assessment District will only finance the capital costs, maintenance and operation expenses for sidewalks, streets, flood control and drainage. All other maintenance that is not exempt from Proposition 218 has been removed from this District. The City has determined that by removing the non-exempt costs that the remaining improvements may continue to be paid for through the assessment district without being subjected to the procedures and requirements of Proposition 218. The City has determined that all of the remaining improvements and maintenance are exempt from requirements of Proposition 218. Q:IELSINOREILLMD\f'y08-09IreportslL.E. Citywide LLMD engrep08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 12 of 88 City of Lake ELsinore Citywide Landscape & Street Lighting District Engineer's Report - FY 2008-09 May 29, 2008 Page 2 The City will not increase the assessment district rates for Fiscal Year 2008-09. To the extent any parcel changes its land use, thereby placing the parcel in a different rate category is not deemed to be an increase in rates. Parcels or lots within these special benefit zones are assessed for the maintenance of local improvements including but not limited to tree maintenance, site specific street lighting and site specific landscaping. These improvements provide a special benefit to those parcels due to their nature and location. In addition to their proportionate share of the cost for the maintenance of these local improvements, those parcels within a special benefit zone are also assessed for those improvements designated as of Citywide benefit. As required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, this Engineer's Report describes the improvements to be maintained by the District for FY 2008-09, provides an estimated budget by benefit zone, and lists the assessments to be levied upon each assessable lot or parcel within the District. Q:\ELSINORE\LLMD\fy08-09\reports\L.E. Citywide LLMD engrep08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 13 of 88 City of Lake Elsinore Citywide Landscape & Street Lighting District Engineer's Report - FV 2008-09 May 29,2008 Page 3 SECTION II ENGINEER'S REPORT PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 SECTION 22500 THROUGH 22679 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CITYWIDE LANDSCAPE & STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT Fiscal Year 2008-09 Pursuant to Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and in accordance with Resolution No. 88-27, adopted by the Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, State of California, in connection with the proceedings for: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE LANDSCAPE AND STREET LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT Herein after referred to as the "Assessment District", I, Jeffrey M. Cooper, P.E., the duly appointed ENGINEER OF WORK, submit herewith the "Report" consisting of six (6) parts as follows: PART I Plans and specifications for the proposed improvements are filed herewith and made a part hereof. Said plans and specifications are on file in the Office of the Clerk of the City. P ART II An estimate of the cost of the proposed improvements, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith, is as set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto, and are on file in the Office of the Clerk of the City. PART III An assessment of the estimated cost of the improvements on each benefited lot or parcel of land within the Assessment District. Q:\ELSINOREILLMDlfy08-09IreportslL.E. Citywide LLMD engrep08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 14 of 88 City of Lake Elsinore Citywide Landscape & Street Lighting District Engineer's Report - FY 2008-09 May 29,2008 Page 4 PART IV A proposed assessment of the total amount of the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the several lots and parcels of land within the Assessment District, in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such lots and parcels, is set forth upon the assessment roll filed herewith and made part hereof. Contains a description of the work for the proposed improvements and description of all rights-of-way, easements and lands to be acquired, if necessary. PART V A list of the names and addresses of the owners of real property within this Assessment District, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Riverside, or as known to the Clerk. The list is keyed to the records of the County of Assessor of the County of Riverside, which are incorporated herein by reference. P ART VI A diagram of the Assessment District Boundaries, showing the exterior boundaries of the Assessment District and the boundaries of any zones within the Assessment District, has been submitted to the Clerk of the City, and is incorporated herein by reference. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the Assessment District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside for the year in which this Report was prepared, and are incorporated herein by reference and made part of this Report. Q:\ELSINORE\LLMD\fy08-09\reports\L.E Citywide LLMD engrep08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 15 of 88 City of Lake Elsinore Citywide Landscape & Street Lighting District Engineer's Report - FY 2008-09 May 29, 2008 Page 5 PART I DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS The facilities to be maintained and serviced are more generally described as follows: DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS FOR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CITYWIDE LANDSCAPE AND STREET LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT Improvements to be performed are: installation, construction, operation and/or maintenance of street lights and landscaping, including but not limited to personnel, electrical energy, utilities such as water, materials, contracting services and other items necessary for the satisfactory operation of these services. No detailed plans and specifications are provided herein. STREET LIGHTING Street lighting improvements include but are not limited to: the current payments to Southern California Edison Company (SCE) for electrical energy, installation, maintenance, and operation of approximately 2,422 total lights and 17 traffic signals. LANDSCAPING Landscaping improvements include but are not limited to: irrigation, cultivation, installation and replacement of plant material, tree trimming, and other necessary supplies; personnel, utility, and equipment costs; contract services where applicable; care and maintenance of approximately fifteen (15) acres oflake beaches, and approximately thirty-four (34) acres of streetscapes. Q:\ELSINORE\LLMDlfy08-09\reports\L.E. Citywide LLMD engrep08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 16 of 88 City of Lake ELsinore Citywide Landscape & Street Lighting District Engineer's Report - FY 2008-09 May 29, 2008 Page 6 PART II ESTIMATE OF COST The 2008-09 fiscal year expenditures (or costs) for the proposed district are estimated as follows: STREET LIGHTING The City is currently paying for the operation of approximately 2,422 street lights; 185 are City- owned lights and 2,237 are utility-owned lights. Street lighting also includes costs for maintaining 17 traffic signal lights and traffic signal maintenance within the City. It has been determined that all properties within the City benefit from lighting and signalization on major streets; therefore, a proportional share of the cost are spread to all parcels in the City. It has further been determined that street lights on secondary streets benefit all properties within the City and adjacent local benefit areas. Therefore, these costs are split evenly, half going to major street lighting and the other half to local lighting benefit areas. Therefore, the total amounts to be spread for the Major Street direct benefit of street lighting and for each of the level of services are as follows: MAJOR STREET LIGHTING AND TRAFFlC SIGNALIZA DON TO BE SPREAD: Light Expenses $72,300 Traffic Signals $53,050 Administrative Costs $34,100 Capital Improvements: Street Light Installation - Samuel Avenue Total Major Street Light Expenses = $30,000 $189,450 WESTSIDE AREA LIGHTING TO BE SPREAD: Light Expenses $57,950 MID- TOWN AREA LIGHTING TO BE SPREAD: Light Expenses $43,620 AREA "C" LIGHTING TO BE SPREAD: Light Expenses $3,200 AREA "D" LIGHTING TO BE SPREAD: Light Expenses $11,300 EASTSIDE AREA LIGHTING TO BE SPREAD: Light Expenses $8,450 The total amount that is required for street lighting and traffic signalization in the 2008-09 fiscal year is $313,970. Q:\ELSINORE\LLMDlfY08-09\reportslL.E. Citywide LLMD engrep08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 17 of 88 City of Lake Elsinore Citywide Landscape & Street Lighting District Engineer's Report - FY 2008-09 May 29,2008 Page 7 LANDSCAPING It has been determined that wetlands, landscaping and erosion protection for a levee, major street landscaping, beaches and beach water testing, benefits all properties within the City; therefore, a proportional share of the cost are spread to all parcels in the City whether or not there is local street landscaping. The cost of local site-specific street landscaping not on a major street is spread to those areas that have a local benefit from the site-specific street landscaping. The total amounts to be spread for the Citywide direct benefit of landscaping and for local site specific areas oflandscaping are as follows: MAJOR STREET DIRECT BENEFIT LANDSCAPING TO BE SPREAD: Major Street & Admin. Beach, Levee & Wetlands Capital Improvements: Median Landscaping - Grand Avenue $398,810 $126,590 $50,000 Total Major Street Landscaping $575,400 SITE-SPECIFIC LANDSCAPING AREAS TO BE SPREAD: AREA A AREA B AREA C AREA D AREA E AREA F AREA G AREA H AREA I $2,500 $5,160 $2,790 $4,200 $3,430 $265,290 $3,060 $10,260 $0 Total Site-Specific Landscaping Expenses $296,690 STREET TREE MAINTENANCE AREAS TO BE SPREAD: AREA 1 AREA 2 AREA 3 AREA 4 AREA 5 $11,270 $46,480 $23,400 $5,810 $2,71 0 Total Tree Maintenance Landscaping Expenses $89,670 The total amount required for landscaping assessment in the 2008-09 fiscal year is $961,760. Q:\ELSINOREILLMDlfy08-09\reportslL.E. Citywide LLMD engrep08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 18 of 88 City of Lake Elsinore Citywide Landscape & Street Lighting District Engineer's Report - FY 2008-09 May 29, 2008 Page 8 PART III ASSESSMENT ROLL The proposed assessment and the amount of assessment for Fiscal Year 2008-09 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the latest roll at the Assessor's Office are appended herein and submitted separately as Appendix C of the City of Lake Elsinore Engineer's Report for Citywide Landscape & Street Lighting District, Fiscal Year 2008-09. The description of each lot or parcel is part of the records of the Assessor of the County of Riverside and these records are, by reference, made part of this Report. The total assessment for the 2008-09 Fiscal Year is $1,275,730. Q:\ELSINOREILLMDlfy08-09Ireports\L.E. Citywide LLMD engrep08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 19 of 88 City of Lake ELsinore Citywide Landscape & Street Lighting District Engineer's Report - FY 2008-09 May 29,2008 Page 9 PART IV METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT A. GENERAL Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, permits the establishment of assessment districts by cities for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which includes installation, construction, and maintenance and operation of street lights and street landscaping. The 1972 Act requires that the assessments be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. Section 22573 provides that: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (S&H 22574). Thus, the 1972 Act requires the levy of a true "assessment" rather than a "special tax." Excepted from the assessment would be the areas of all public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, all public easements and rights of way, all public parks, greenbelts and parkways and all public school property, other public property, mineral rights, and designated open space. Public utility owned properties would be included in the assessment district and assessed in accordance with benefits received. B. PARCEL CLASSIFICATION Since the assessment will be levied on the owners of properties as shown on the tax rolls, the final charges must be assigned by Assessor's Parcel Number. If assessments were to be spread by parcel in various zones, not considering land use, this would not be equitable, because a single family parcel would be paying the same as a 50-unit apartment parcel or a large commercial establishment in a similar zone. Q:\ELSINORE\LLMD\fy08-09\reports\L.E. Citywide LLMD engrep08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 20 of 88 City of lake Elsinore Citywide landscape & Street Lighting District Engineer's Report - FY 2008-09 May 29,2008 Page 10 It has been determined that the residential parcels will be assessed by the number of dwelling units on each parcel; commercial and industrial property by the area of the parcel. The single family parcel has been selected as the basic unit for calculation of the assessments. Parcels of other land uses are reduced to Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU), in the manner described below: 1. Multiple Residential parcels, including mobile homes, are adjusted in accordance with a multiple residential factor, determined by statistical proportion of relative trip generation from various types of residential uses, in combination with population density per unit. Studies have found that in multiple residential areas, the primary beneficiaries of street lighting are the tenants rather than the property owners because of increased safety and security. It was concluded that it is proper to "pass through" such an assessment to renters. Therefore, although benefit assessments are normally property related, it is deemed valid to equate a portion of the assessment methodology to the population density of the dwelling units. Based on data from representative cities in Southern California, the multiple residential factor is 80 percent. For example, a 100 unit apartment parcel would be assessed 80 times a single family unit parcel; rather than 100 times. 2. Condominium parcels are adjusted in accordance with the multiple residential factor of 80 percent because of the high population density of dwelling units. 3. Commercial and Industrial parcels are assessed on the basis of the area of the parcel. Seven thousand two hundred (7,200) square feet of land has been equated to one EDU based on the minimum lot size for single family parcels. Therefore, one acre is equivalent to 6 EDU. 4. Nonprofit or Property Tax Exempt parcels such as churches, private schools, private hospitals, boys' clubs, women's clubs, YMCA, etc., receive equal benefits from this type of district and are assessed. 5. Public Utility Owned parcels such as office buildings, plants and yards will be assessed the same as other similar land uses. 6. Vacant parcel assessments are adjusted by a factor of 20 percent. All vacant parcels will receive 0.2 EDUs for the first acre and 1.2 EDUs (6 * 0.2) for each additional acre. Q:\ELSINORE\LLMDlty08-09\reports\L.E. Citywide LLMD engrep08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 21 of 88 City of Lake ELsinore Citywide Landscape & Street Lighting District Engineer's Report - FY 2008-09 May 29, 2008 Page] ] In summary, Equivalent Dwelling Units have been determined to be as follows: Single Family Residential 1 DU = 1 EDU Multiple Residential, Mobile Homes, Condominiums 1 DU = 0.8 EDU Commercial/Industrial (minimum of 1 EDU per parcel) 1 AC = 6 EDU Agricultural (minimum of 1 EDU per parcel) 1 AC = 6 EDU Vacant (minimum of 0.2 EDU per parcel) 1 AC = 0.2 EDU, 1.2 EDU/each add'l acre. Therefore, as previously stated, it is proposed to spread assessments by the number of dwelling units on a parcel in residential areas, and by the area of the parcel in commercial and industrial areas. C. CATEGORIES OF BENEFIT Street Lighting A portion of the benefits for certain improvements may be spread over all parcels of the City on an equitable basis. This applies to street lighting and traffic signals on major streets, since vehicles emanating from all parcels throughout the City use these streets and receive a benefit from the additional safety and security provided by the lights. The cost of street lights on secondary streets are split evenly, half going to Major streets and the other half going to local lighting benefit areas based upon levels of service. The balance of the street lighting costs, which are spread as a benefit assessment to parcels, depend upon levels of service. The levels of service, relative to local lighting benefits, are broken down into six separate categories: Wests ide Lighting westside areas with street lights Eastside Lighting eastside areas with street lights Midtown Lighting midtown and souths ide areas with street lighting Area "C" street lights serving Tract I 9402 Units 1 & 2 Area "D" street lights serving Tract 18719 Units 1 - 5. No lighting street lights are spaced over 300 feet apart. In areas where there is no lighting, there is no local benefit assessment levied. Q:\ELSINOREILLMD\fy08-09IreportslL.E. Citywide LLMD engrep08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 22 of 88 City of Lake Elsinore Citywide Landscape & Street Lighting District Engineer's Report - FY 2008-09 May 29,2008 Page 12 Landscaping Maintaining the street trees and street medians protects the street from erosion, depth and from tree limbs from falling into or blocking the roadway. The costs of landscaping on major streets, wetlands, levee beaches and beach water testing are spread as a direct benefit assessment to all parcels. Costs associated with landscaping on secondary streets are spread both Citywide and to the parcels that receive local benefits. Those costs are split evenly, half going to Citywide and the other half to the site-specific street landscape area. The street landscaping costs on the remaining streets are spread to all parcels in the neighborhoods with local benefits. Major streets are defined as Arterial (110') and Major Streets (100') per City of Lake Elsinore General Plan, they are: Highway 74, Lakeshore Drive, Main Street, Riverside Drive, Robb Road, Grand Avenue, Mission Trail, Railroad Canyon Road, Diamond Drive, Corydon Street, Summerhill Drive from Railroad Canyon Road to Riverside Street, Tuscany Hills Parkways, and Grape Street. Per the "City of Lake Elsinore General Plan 1992 Land Use Map", the following existing streets are classified as secondary (88'): Machado Street from Grand Avenue to Lakeshore Drive, Dexter Avenue, Sixth Avenue from Casino Drive to Lakeshore Drive, Terra Cotta Road from Lakeshore Drive to Nichols Road, Lincoln Street from Lakeshore Drive to Nichols Road, Lincoln Street from Grand A venue to Riverside Drive, Lincoln from Machado Street to Shore Cliff Drive, Chaney Street from Lakeshore Drive to Dexter Avenue, Graham Avenue from Lakeshore Drive to Main Street, and Pottery Street from Main Street to Franklin A venue. The remaining City streets are classified below the secondary street level. There are nine areas with specific local benefits due to landscaping. They are as follows: Area "A" landscaping along Machado at the Grand Ave intersection Area "B" landscaping along Madison & Garfield Streets Area "C" landscaping in Tract 19402 Area "D" landscaping along Terra Cotta Road Area "E" landscaping in Tract 19344 - Serenity Area "F" landscaping and slope maintenance adjacent to Summerhill Drive, but not in the road right-of-way Area "G" landscaping along east side of Machado Street between Lincoln and Lakeshore Area "H" landscaping at Orange Grove Way Area "I" landscaping along Lincoln Avenue Q:\ELSINORE\LLMDlty08-09\reports\L.E. Citywide LLMD engrep08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 23 of 88 City of lake Elsinore Citywide landscape & Street Lighting District Engineer's Report - FY 2008-09 May 29,2008 Page 13 The costs of the Assessment District's incidental expenses are spread as a Citywide direct benefit assessment. The costs for the maintenance of trees in designated areas are spread to the parcels that receive local benefit. See Appendix A, Figure 4 - Tree Maintenance Areas, for the delineation of the five tree maintenance zones. D. BENEFIT ZONES A system of zones, encompassing both street lighting and street landscaping levels of service, has been developed. These zones, combined with an assigned land use based on the County-assigned use code for each parcel, have been used as the methodology for spreading the assessments to each parcel within the City. The County-assigned use codes and a brief description of them are shown in Appendix B. The zones are as follows (See Appendix A, Figures 1-4): ZONE A Major street lighting and Major Street landscape benefits only. ZONE B Major street lighting, Major Street landscape benefits, and site- specific lighting (midtown area), and tree maintenance Area 1. ZONE C Major street lighting, Major Street landscape benefits, and tree maintenance Area 1. ZONE D Major street lighting, Major street landscape benefits, site-specific lighting (midtown area), and tree maintenance Area 2. ZONE E Major street lighting, Major street landscape benefits, and tree maintenance Area 3. ZONE F Major street lighting, Major street landscaping benefits, and tree maintenance Area 4. ZONE G Major street lighting, Major street landscaping benefits, and site- specific lighting (Westside Area). ZONE H Major street lighting, Major street landscaping benefits, site- specific lighting (Westside Area), and tree maintenance Area 5. ZONEr Major street lighting, Major street landscaping benefits, and tree maintenance Area 5. ZONEJ Major street lighting, Major street landscaping benefits, site- specific lighting (Westside Area), site specific landscaping Area A, and tree maintenance Area 5. Q:\ELSINORE\LLMD\fy08-09\reportslL,E, Citywide LLMD engrep08,doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 24 of 88 City of Lake ELsinore Citywide Landscape & Street Lighting District Engineer's Report - FY 2008-09 May 29,2008 Page 14 ZONE K Major street lighting, Major street landscaping benefits, site specific lighting (Wests ide Area), site specific landscaping Area B, and tree maintenance Area 5. ZONE L Major street lighting, Major street landscaping benefits, site specific landscaping Area C, site specific lighting Area C, and tree maintenance Area 5. ZONE M Major street lighting, Major street landscaping benefits, site specific lighting Area D, and site specific landscape Area D. ZONE N Major street lighting, Major street landscaping benefits, site specific landscaping Area E. ZONE 0 Major street lighting, Major street landscaping benefits, and site specific landscaping Area F. ZONE P Major street lighting, Major street landscaping benefits, site specific lighting (Westside Area), site specific landscaping Area G, and tree maintenance Area 5. ZONE Q Major street lighting, Major street landscaping benefits, site specific landscaping Area G, and tree maintenance Area 5. ZONE R Major street lighting, Major street landscaping benefits, site specific lighting, Area D and site specific landscaping Area H. ZONE S Major street lighting, Major street landscaping benefits, site specific lighting (Westside Area) and tree maintenance Area 3. ZONE T Major street lighting, Major street landscaping benefits, site specific lighting (Eastside) and site specific landscaping Area F. ZONE U Major street lighting, Major street landscaping benefits, site specific lighting (Wests ide Area) and site specific landscaping Area 1. E. ASSESSMENT RATES The following tables (Exhibits I, II and III) summarize the parcel information and assessment rates for the budgets shown in Part II for FY 2008-09. Exhibits I and II summarize the parcel data for the District based upon the information obtained from the County of Riverside Assessor's Office and the calculation of EDUs using the methodology described in Section II, Part IV. Exhibit III is a summary of the rates per improvement and benefit zone for determining the assessment rate to be levied per EDU based upon the proposed budget for FY 2008-09. See Appendix C (Assessment Roll) for the preliminary assessments per parcel. Q:\ELSINORE\LLMDlJy08-09\reports\L.E. Citywide LLMD engrep08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 25 of 88 City of Lake ELsinore Citywide Landscape & Street Lighting District Engineer's Report - FY 2008-09 May 29,2008 Page 15 F. ADMINISTRATION It is recognized that using the information on the County Assessor's tapes as the primary source for the assessment formula may lead to circumstances and errors that do not fit the intent of this program when dealing with specific parcels. Where such circumstances are discovered, either by the persons administrating this program or by the owners of the properties affected, such circumstances shall be reported to the Director of Administrative Services, who may make such final corrections or adjustments as are consistent with the concept, intent and parameters of the programs set forth herein. Q:\ELSINORE\LLMDI/)'08-09\reports\L.E. Citywide LLMD engrep08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 26 of 88 City of Lake Elsinore Citywide Landscape & Street Lighting District Engineer's Report - FY 2008-09 May 29, 2008 Page 16 PART V PROPERTY OWNERS LIST The property owner list with the names and addresses of each property owner of each lot or parcel, as shown on the Assessment Diagram in Part VI herein, is the list of property owners shown on the last equalized roll of the County Assessor of the County of Riverside and is, by reference, made part of this report (see Part III, Assessment Roll). Q:\ELSINOREILLMDlfY08-09\reports\L.E. Citywide LLMD engrep08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 27 of 88 City of Lake ELsinore Citywide Landscape & Street lighting District Engineer's Report - FY 2008-09 May 29, 2008 Page 17 PART VI ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the Assessment District has been submitted to the Clerk of the City in the format required under the provision of the Act. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the Assessment District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County of Riverside, for the year when this Report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report. Q:IELSINOREILLMDlfY08-09IreportslL.E. Citywide LLMD engrep08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 28 of 88 City of Lake ELsinore Citywide Landscape & Street Lighting District Engineer's Report - FY 2008-09 May 29, 2008 Page 18 EXHIBIT I SUMMARY OF PARCEL DATA Equivalent Number of Dwelling DescriDtion Parcels Acreaae Units (EOU) Single Family Residential 11,910 N/A 11,910.00 Multiple Residential/Mobile Homes 326 N/A 596.00 Apartments / Condominiums 898 N/A 2,128.00 Commercial/Industrial 564 678.92 4,135.24 Vacant Parcels 10,540 9,456.08 11,623.55 Utility Parcels 20 50.54 310.00 Exempt Parcels 1,915 N/A - TOTAL 26,173 10,185.54 30,704.47 EXHIBIT II SUMMARY OF ZONE - EDU DATA Zone EDU Zone EDU Zone EDU A 18,039.89 H 1,745.12 0 1,202.32 B 218.40 I I 727.48 P 42.00 ~-~ C 1,536.95 J 63.00 Q 43.20 0 1,806.56 K 234.94 R 341.00 E 1,414.30 L 126.00 S 122.06 F 553.86 M 246.53 T 220.09 G 1,713.77 N 89.00 U 218.00 30,704.47 Q:\ELSINORE\LLMDlfy08-09\reports\L.E. Citywide LLMD engrep08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 29 of 88 co o o '" 0>' '" ,., .. :E t ~ i5 en t: .... .r= ~9 ii: CO .; ~ Vl '" oll it ~ '" " c.. c ~ ~ ~-ao. ~~~ ~ GI ~Qj ... :"1 '" " t: .~.- 'g. ........ ... 0\ o I co o o N it > IX =< -::;: ~::;: CQ::) _ In ::z:~ Xz .... .... ::;: In In .... In In < .... Z o N w z <( CD U 0 W U- t9 J: - ~ '" -' ::; z 0 "- 0 '" "' I- ::> 2 ~ M ~ ~ '" '" " N ~ '" '" ~ ~ N '" N N M 0; ~ .. '" '" '" M '" '" '" N '" ~ " " " ~ N '" ~ M ~ 1-::> ~ :;i ~ " '" ~ " :\i g N ::! ;; M :e ;; ~ ;\ '" ~ t- :I 0 ;;; " M " '" '" ;\ ~ ",w N ~ <(iO '" M <( ~ W on '" '" '" '" 0; '" '" N '" 6 6 " 6 " 6 " <( '" " <( ~ " ~ ::!.. " "' w ~ " <( Z '" <( ~ z w <( M M I- ::!M N N ~ Z "' '" ;;: <( :I '" w w '" '" <( M '" I- " ::!N ~ 'i <( :\i '" '" <( '" N N N. ::!~ " " <( <0 <0 '" " " - " 6 '" ~ ~ '" N J: " 6 " '" '" '" '" '" '" Cl ~ ~ " '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" N U- "' ~ :;i ~ '" N '" '" Cl w '" " z ~ M ii: <( '" " '" "' 0 '" z '" .,; :3 0 " " '" '" ~ '" " t- N N N '" ~ '" '" III '" "' N '" ~ g <( '" N ~ '" N " 1:~ " " " ~ " ~ " " " ~ ~ " " " " ~ ~ " " " " " ~ ~ ~ ~ t- t- t- t- ~ t- t- ~ ~ ~ t- t- ~ ~ ~ ~ O~ ~ ~ <ri <ri <ri ~ <ri <ri <ri <ri <ri ~ <ri <ri <ri ~ ~ <ri <ri <ri ~ '" I-w ;; ~ ~e :li ai w'" '" '" '" ~ 0 N N gJ. ~ ~ :: '" '" " " Cl " " N Z :\i M >= '" J: Cl '" ::; I- Z " " '" w 8;: '" '" ~ w :10 N N '" l- I- '" "' I-w ~ ~ '" ~ '" ~ '" '" ~e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :;i ;:'" " ~ :! " :! :! '" t- ~ >-w ::: ::: ::: ::: ::: ::: ::: ::: ::: ::: ::: ::: ::: ::: ::: ::: ::: ::: ::: ::: ::: " 1-0 @- i3~ '" <ri <ri <ri '" <ri <ri <ri <ri <ri <ri <ri '" <ri '" <ri '" '" <ri <ri <ri '" '" " '" '" " '" ~ ~ '" " " " '" " N " " " '" '" " ~ '" ~ '" '" M '" ~ " " '" " '" " '" " N " " " " ~ I- ::> ~ <ri '" ~- ~- ~ 2_ ~- ~ '" ~ '" '" :ll ~ N '" ;;; ~ ~ '" ~ ::; 0 N M '" N " ~ ~ "' w '" N N <( ai - - - - - g- '" " '" w -' ~ z <( CD U W U- -' i'" 0 0 t9 J: - ~ '" ::; z 0 "- a " "' I- ::> 0 ~ N I- Agenda Item No. 11 Page 30 of 88 Engineer's Report for Lake ELsinore Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 City of Lake ELsinore Riverside County, California Prepared by: Hiarris & Ass:ociates" May 29, 2008 Agenda Item No. 11 Page 31 of 88 City landsca and Street May 1 NO.1 directed the ('it',! ('nuncil in the State of California. I)ATED: 200K B'{' I IJEREBY CERTlr;y that the Diagram thereto anaehed, was filed with me on the with Assessment Roll and 2008. of Lake Elsinore . California I IJEREBY CERTII."Y that thereto attached. Elsinore. California. on the her wllh A"sessrnent Roll :me! Council the of Lake elf Lake Elsinore , Cali fornia Agenda Item No. 11 Page 32 of 88 City of Lake ELsinore Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 May 29, 2008 Page ii ENGINEER'S REPORT LAKE ELSINORE LANDSCAPE AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Certificates......................................................................................................... i Report............................................................................................................... 1 Part A - Plans and Specifications .........................................................3 Part B - Estimate ofCost...................................................................... 6 Part C - Assessment Roll................................................................... 17 Part D - Method of Apportionment of Assessment............................ 18 Part E - Property Owner List.............................................................. 33 Part F - Assessment District Boundary .............................................. 33 O:\ELSINORE\LLMD1\fy08-09\reports\L.E. LLMD1 repto8.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 33 of 88 City of Lake ELsinore Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 May 29, 2008 Page 1 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ENGINEER'S REPORT Prepared Pursuant to the Provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (California Streets and Highways Code Section 22500 through 22679), Article XIIID of The California Constitution, and The Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (California Government Code Section 53750 Et Seq.) Pursuant to Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, Article XmD of the California Constitution, the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act and in accordance with the Resolution of Initiation adopted by the Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, State of California, in connection with the proceedings for: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE LANDSCAPE AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District" or "District", I, Joan E. Cox, P .E., the authorized representative of Harris & Associates, the duly appointed ENGINEER OF WORK, submit herewith the "Report" consisting of six (6) parts as follows: P ART A Plans and specifications for the improvements showing and describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements. PART B An estimate of the cost of the proposed improvements for FY 2008-09, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith. PART C An assessment of the estimated cost of the improvements on each benefited lot or parcel of land within the Assessment District. Q:\ELSINORE\LLMD1\fy08-09\reports\L.E. LLMD1 rept08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 34 of 88 City of lake Elsinore landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 May 29,2008 Page 2 PART D The method of apportionment of assessments, indicating the proposed assessment of the total amount of the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the several lots and parcels of land within the Assessment District, in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such lots and parcels. PART E A list of the names and addresses of the owners of real property within the Assessment District, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Riverside. PART F The Diagram of the Assessment District Boundaries showing the exterior boundaries of the Assessment District, the boundaries of any zones within the Assessment District and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the Assessment District. Q:IELSINOREILLMD1Ify08-09IreportslL.E. LLMD1 rept08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 35 of 88 City of Lake Elsinore Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 May 29, 2008 Page 3 PART A PLANS AN 0 SPECIFICATIONS The facilities will be operated, serviced and maintained as generally described as follows: DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS, FY 2008-09 The facilities to be maintained and serviced include landscaping for the specific Maintenance District as described herein. Facilities include but are not limited to: landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees, turf, irrigation systems, hardscapes, fixtures, and appurtenant facilities, in public rights-of-way, parkways, slopes and dedicated easements within the boundaries of said Maintenance District. Zone 1 (original District) - Encompasses the Water Ridge Development and funds landscape and street lighting maintenance and operations. The facilities within the public right-of-way that are to be maintained and serviced include approximately 10,039 square feet of landscaping and 49 street lights. Zone 2 (Annexation No.1) - Encompasses the Elsinore Homes Development and funds landscape and street lighting maintenance and operations. The facilities within the public right-of-way that are to be maintained and serviced include approximately 5,850 square feet of landscaping and 16 street lights. Zone 3 (Annexation No.2) - Encompasses the Pepper Grove Development and funds landscape and street lighting maintenance and operations. The facilities within the public right-of-way that are to be maintained and serviced include approximately 22,560 square feet of landscaping and 4 street lights. Zone 4 (Annexation No.3) - Encompasses the Serenity Development and funds landscape and street lighting maintenance and operations. The facilities within the public right-of-way that are to be maintained and serviced include approximately 630 square feet of landscaping and 63 street lights. The amount of landscaping has been increased to include approximately 9.52 acres of neighborhood park landscaping. Zone 5 (Annexation No.4) - Encompasses the Rosetta Canyon Development and funds street lighting maintenance and operations. The facilities within the public right-of-way that are to be maintained and serviced include 263. street lights. Zone 6 (Annexation No.5) - Encompasses the La Laguna Phase 3 Development and funds street lighting maintenance and operations. The facilities within the public right-of-way that are to be maintained and serviced include 28 street lights. Zone 7 (Annexation No.6) - Encompasses Tract 28214 of the Alberhill Ranch Development and funds street lighting maintenance and operations. The facilities within the public right-of-way that are to be maintained and serviced include 244 street lights. Zone 8 (Annexation No.7) - Encompasses Tract 32670 of the Belcaro Development and funds landscape maintenance and operations. The facilities within the public right-of-way that are to be maintained and serviced include approximately 1,080 square feet of landscaping. Q:\ELSINORE\LLMD1\fy08-09\reports\L.E. LLMD1 rept08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 36 of 88 City of Lake Elsinore Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 May 29, 2008 Page 4 Zone 9 (Annexation No.8) - Encompasses Tract 32077 of the La Strada Development and funds street lighting maintenance and operations. The facilities within the public right-of-way that are to be maintained and serviced include 36 street lights. Zone 10 (Annexation No.9) - Encompasses Tracts 30698 and 32129 of the Clurman-owned development and funds street lighting maintenance and operations. The facilities within the public right-of-way that are to be maintained and serviced include 38 street lights. Zone 11 (Annexation No. 10) - Encompasses Tract 31920-1 of the Summerly Development and funds park landscaping and street lighting maintenance and operations. The facilities within the public right-of-way that are to be maintained and serviced include approximately 4.77 acres of landscaping and 464 street lights. Zone 12 (Annexation No. 11) - Encompasses Tract 31957 of the Running Deer Estates development and funds landscaping and street lighting maintenance and operations. The facilities within the public right-of-way that are to be maintained and serviced include approximately 116,531 square feet of landscaping and 24 street lights. Zone 13 (Annexation No. 12) - Encompasses Tract 33370 of the Tessera Development and funds landscaping and street lighting maintenance and operations. The facilities within the public right-of- way that are to be maintained and serviced include approximately 13,100 square feet of landscaping and 7 street lights. Zone 14 (Annexation No. 13) - Encompasses Tract 31792 of the Wasson Canyon Development and funds street lighting maintenance and operations. The facilities within the public right-of-way that are to be maintained and serviced include 46 street lights. Zone 15 (Annexation No. 14) - Encompasses Tract 34231 of the Trieste Development and funds landscaping and street lighting maintenance and operations. The facilities within the public right-of- way that are to be maintained and serviced include approximately 25,079 square feet of landscaping (along Ardenwood Way) and 9 street lights. Zone 16 (Annexation No. 15) - Encompasses the Ridgestone Apartments Development and funds landscape maintenance and operations. The facilities within the public right-of-way that are to be maintained and serviced include approximately 1,100 square feet of landscaping (along Ardenwood Way), and future maintenance of 10,850 square feet of landscaping along Highway 74 (if maintenance is taken over by the City). Zone 17 (Annexation No. 16) - Encompasses Tract 32503 of the Rosetta Canyon Development and funds street lighting maintenance and operations. The facilities within the public right-of-way that are to be maintained and serviced include 15 street lights. Zone 18 (Annexation No. 17) - Encompasses Tract 32337-1 of the La Laguna Phases 4 & 5 Development and funds street lighting maintenance and operations. The facilities within the public right-of-way that are to be maintained and serviced include 36 street lights. Zone 19 (Annexation No. 17) - Encompasses Tract 32337-2 of the La Laguna Phases 4 & 5 Development and funds street lighting maintenance and operations. The facilities within the public right-of-way that are to be maintained and serviced include 16 street lights. Q:IELSINOREILLMD1Ify08-09IreportsIL.E. LLMD1 rept08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 37 of 88 City of Lake ELsinore Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 May 29,2008 Page 5 Zone 20 (Annexation No. 18) - Encompasses Tract 17413-4 of the Tuscany Hills Estates Development and funds landscape maintenance and operations. The facilities within the public right- of-way (Via De La Valle, Via Del Lago and Via De La Luna) that are to be maintained and serviced include landscaping and a decomposed granite trail. Zone 21 (Annexation No. 19) - Encompasses Tract 33486 of the Makenna Court Development and funds landscaping and street lighting maintenance and operations. The facilities within the public right-of-way that are to be maintained and serviced include approximately 9,800 square feet of landscaping and 22 street lights. Zone 22 (Annexation No. 20) - Encompasses the California Business Condos Development and funds landscape maintenance and operations. The facilities within the public right-of-way that are to be maintained and serviced include approximately 4,150 square feet of landscaping (along Minthorn Street), and future maintenance 00,900 square feet of landscaping along Silver Street. Zone 23 (Annexation No. 21) - Encompasses the Diamond Professional Plaza Development and funds landscape maintenance and operations. The facilities within the public right-of-way that are to be maintained and serviced include approximately 7,500 square feet of landscaping along Diamond Drive. Maintenance for landscaping means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the landscaping and appurtenant facilities, including repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the landscaping or appurtenant facilities; providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing and treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste; and the cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti. Maintenance for street lights means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lights and appurtenant facilities, including repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the street lights or appurtenant facilities. Servicing means the furnishing of water for the irrigation of the landscaping and the maintenance of any of the lighting facilities or appurtenant facilities and the furnishing of electric current or energy, gas or other illuminating agent for the lighting facilities, or for the lighting or operation of the landscaping or appurtenant facilities. The plans and specifications for the improvements, showing and describing the general nature, location, and the extent of the improvements, are on file in the office of the Director of Public Works and are incorporated herein by reference. Q:IELSINOREILLMD1Ify08-09IreportslL.E. LLMD1 repl08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 38 of 88 City of lake ELsinore landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 May 29, 2008 Page 6 PART B ESTIMATE OF COST The estimated cost of the operation, servicing and maintenance of the landscaping and street light improvements for Fiscal Year 2008-09, as described in Part A, are summarized herein and described below. LANDSCAPE AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 Proposed Bud2et - Fiscal Year 2008-09 Zone 1 (Water Ridge) Landscaping (135-4423-436-350) Operations and Maintenance Reserve (10%) Sub- Total $3,546.31 $354.63 $3,900.94 Street Lighting (135-4431-452-350) Operations and Maintenance Reserve (10%) Sub-Total $9,395.73 $939.57 $10,335.30 Total Estimated Costs $14,236.24 2008 Fund Balance (Reserve) ($1.219.56) Total Assessment FY 2008-09 $13,016.68 Zone 2 (Elsinore Homes) Landscaping (135-4423-436-351) Operations and Maintenance Reserve (50%) Sub- Total $2,066.84 $1.033.42 $3,100.26 Street Lighting: (135-4431-452-351) Operations and Maintenance Reserve (50%) Sub- Total $3,068.24 $1.534.12 $4,602.36 District Administration $993.67 Total Estimated Costs $8,696.29 2008 Fund Balance (Reserve) ($2.365.88) Total Assessment FY 2008-09 $6,330.41 Q:\ELSINORE\LLMD1\fy08-09\reports\L.E. LLMD1 rept08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 39 of 88 City of Lake Elsinore Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 May 29, 2008 Page 7 Zone 3 (Pepper Grove) Landscaping (135-4423-436-352) Operations and Maintenance Reserve (50%) Sub- Total $7,814.29 $3,907.15 $11 ,721.44 Street Lighting (135-4431-452-352) Operations and Maintenance Reserve (50%) Sub- Total $752.29 $376.15 $1,128.44 District Administration $974.19 Total Estimated Costs $13,824.07 2008 Fund Balance (Reserve) ($4,036.24) Total Assessment FY 2008-09 $9,787.83 Zone 4 (Serenity) Landscaping (135-4423-436-353) Operations and Maintenance Reserve (50%) Sub- Total $213.94 $106.97 $320.91 Street Lighting (135-4431-452-353) Operations and Maintenance Reserve (50%) Sub- Total $11,900.39 $5,950.20 $17,850.59 Park Landscaping (135-4433-452-353) Operations and Maintenance Capital Reserve Capital Replacement Sub- Total $23,544.25 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 $41,544.25 District Administration $955.09 Total Estimated Costs $60,670.84 2008 Fund Balance (Reserve) ($23,707.80) Total Assessment FY 2008-09 $36,963.04 Q:\ELSINORE\LLMD1\fy08-09\reports\L.E. LLMD1 repl08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 40 of 88 City of Lake Elsinore Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 May 29, 2008 Page 8 Zone 5 (Rosetta Canyon) Phase 1 - Street Lighting(135-4423-436-354) Operations and Maintenance Reserve (50%) Sub- Total $22,478.51 $11,239.26 $33,717.77 Phase 2 - Street Lighting (135-4423-436-354) Operations and Maintenance Reserve (50%) Sub- Total $27,627.86 $13,813.93 $41,441.79 District Administration $955.09 Total Estimated Costs $76,114.65 2008 Fund Balance (Reserve) ($23,868.52) Total Assessment FY 2008-09 $52,246.13 Zone 6 (La Laguna - Phase 3) Street Lighting (135-4423-436-355) Operations and Maintenance Reserve (50%) Sub- Total $5,289.06 $2,644.53 $7,933.59 District Administration $955.09 Total Estimated Costs $8,888.68 2008 Fund Balance (Reserve) ($2,492.00) Total Assessment FY 2008-09 $6,396.68 Zone 7 (Alberhill Ranch) Street Lighting (135-4423-436-356) Operations and Maintenance Reserve (50%) Sub- Total $46,090.39 $23,045.20 $69,135.59 $955.09 District Administration Total Estimated Costs $70,090.68 2008 Fund Balance (Reserve) ($21,716.00) Total Assessment FY 2008-09 $48,374.68 Q:\ELSINORE\LLMD1\fy08-09\reports\L.E. LLMD1 repl08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 41 of 88 City of Lake ELsinore Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 May 29,2008 Page 9 Zone 8 (Belcaro) Landscaping (135-4431-452-357) Operations and Maintenance Reserve (50%) Sub-Total $378.21 $189.11 $567.32 District Administration $530.60 Total Estimated Costs $1,097.92 2008 Fund Balance (Reserve) ($178.20) Total Assessment FY 2008-09 $919.72 Zone 9 (La Strada) Street Lighting (135-4423-436-358) Operations and Maintenance Reserve (50%) Sub- Total $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 District Administration $0.00 Total Estimated Costs $0.00 2008 Fund Balance $0.00 Total Assessment FY 2008-09 $0.00 Zone 10 (Tracts 30698 & 32129) Street Lighting (135-4423-436-359) Operations and Maintenance Reserve (50%) Sub-Total $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 District Administration $0.00 Total Estimated Costs $0.00 2008 Fund Balance $0.00 Total Assessment FY 2008-09 $0.00 Q:\ELSINORE\LLMD1\fy08-09\reports\L.E. LLMD1 rept08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 42 of 88 City of lake ELsinore landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 May 29,2008 Page 10 Zone 11 (Summerly) Park Landscaping (135-4433-452-360) Operations and Maintenance Reserve (50%) Sub- Total $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Street Lighting: (135-4423-436-360) Operations and Maintenance Reserve (50%) Sub- Total $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 District Administration $0.00 Total Estimated Costs $0.00 2008 Fund Balance $77,194.00 Total Assessment FY 2008-09 $0.00 Zone 12 (Tract 31957) Landscaping (135-4431-452-361) Operations and Maintenance Reserve (50%) Sub- Total $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Street Lighting (135-4423-436-361) Operations and Maintenance Reserve (50%) Sub- Total $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 District Administration $0.00 Total Estimated Costs $0.00 2008 Fund Balance $0.00 Total Assessment FY 2008-09 $0.00 Q:IELSINOREILLMD1Ify08-09IreportslL.E. LLMD1 rept08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 43 of 88 City of Lake Elsinore Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 May 29,2008 Page 11 Zone 13 (Tessera) Landscaping (135-4431-452-362) Operations and Maintenance Reserve (50%) Sub- Total Street Lighting (135-4423-436-362) Operations and Maintenance Reserve (50%) Sub- Total District Administration Total Estimated Costs 2008 Fund Balance Total Assessment FY 2008-09 Zone 14 (Wasson Canyon) Street Lighting (135-4423-436-363) Operations and Maintenance Reserve (50%) Sub- Total District Administration Total Estimated Costs 2008 Fund Balance Total Assessment FY 2008-09 Q:IELSINOREILLMD1Ify08-09IreportslL.E. LLMD1 rept08.doc $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $9,164.37 $4,582.19 $13,746.56 $936.36 $14,682.92 ($4,404.25) $10,278.67 Agenda Item No. 11 Page 44 of 88 City of lake ELsinore landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 May 29,2008 Page 12 Zone 15 (Trieste) Landscaping Operations and Maintenance Reserve (50%) Sub- Total Street Lighting Operations and Maintenance Reserve (50%) Sub- Total District Administration Total Estimated Costs 2008 Fund Balance Total Assessment FY 2008-09 Zone 16 (Ridgestone Apartments) Ardenwood Way - Landscaping (135-4431-452-365) Operations and Maintenance Reserve (50%) Sub-Total Future Maint. - Hwy 74 - Landscaping (135-4431-452-365) Operations and Maintenance Reserve (50%) Sub- Total District Administration Total Estimated Costs 2008 Fund Balance Total Assessment FY 2008-09 Q:IELSINOREILLMD1Ify08-09IreportslL.E. LLMD1 rept08.doc $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $393.98 $196.99 $590.97 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $520.20 $1,111.17 ($189.34) $921.83 Agenda Item No. 11 Page 45 of 88 City of Lake Elsinore Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 May 29, 2008 Page 13 Zone 17 (Tract 32503) Street Lighting (135-4423-436-366) Operations and Maintenance Reserve (50%) Sub- Total District Administration Total Estimated Costs 2008 Fund Balance Total Assessment FY 2008-09 Zones 18 & 19 (La Laguna Phases 4 & 5) Zone 18 - Street Lighting (135-4423-436-367) Operations and Maintenance Reserve (50%) Sub- Total District Administration Total Estimated Costs 2008 Fund Balance Total Assessment FY 2008-09 Zone 19 - Street Lighting (135-4423-436-368) Operations and Maintenance Reserve (50%) Sub- Total District Administration Total Estimated Costs 2008 Fund Balance Total Assessment FY 2008-09 Q:IELSINOREILLMD1Ify08-09IreportsIL.E. LLMD1 rept08.doc $2,988.38 $1,494.19 $4,482.57 $936.36 $5,418.93 $0.00 $5,418.93 $7,172.11 $3,586.06 $10,758.17 $520.20 $11,278.37 ($3,446.81 ) $7,831.56 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Agenda Item No. 11 Page 46 of 88 City of Lake ELsinore Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 May 29, 2008 Page 14 Zone 20 (Tract 17413-4) Landscaping (135-4431-452-369) Operations and Maintenance Reserve (50%) Sub- Total Assessments from Citywide LLMD District Administration Total Estimated Costs 2008 Fund Balance Total Assessment FY 2008-09 Zone 21 (Makenna Court) Landscaping 035-4431-452-370) Operations and Maintenance Reserve (50%) Sub- Total Street Lighting (135-4423-436-370) Operations and Maintenance Reserve (50%) Sub- Total District Administration Total Estimated Costs 2008 Fund Balance Total Assessment FY 2008-09 Q:IELSINOREILLMD1Ify08-09IreportslL.E. LLMD1 repl08.doc $7,697.50 $3,848.75 $11,546.25 ($3,916.71) $936.36 $8,565.90 $0.00 $8,565.90 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Agenda Item No. 11 Page 47 of 88 City of lake ELsinore landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 May 29, 2008 Page 15 Zone 22 (California Business Condos) Minthom Street - Landscaping (135-4431-452-371) Operations and Maintenance Reserve (50%) Sub- Total Future Main1. - Silver S1. - Landscaping (135-4431-452-371) Operations and Maintenance Reserve (50%) Sub- Total District Administration Total Estimated Costs 2008 Fund Balance Total Assessment FY 2008-09 Zone 23 (Diamond Professional Plaza) Landscaping (135-4431-452-372) Operations and Maintenance Reserve (46%) Sub-Total District Administration Total Estimated Costs 2008 Fund Balance Total Assessment FY 2008-09 Q:IELSINOREILLMD1Ify08-09IreportsIL.E. LLMD1 rept08.doc $0.00 $749.74 $749.74 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $749.74 $0.00 $749.74 $0.00 $1.240.42 $1,240.42 $0.00 $1,240.42 $0.00 $1,240.42 Agenda Item No. 11 Page 48 of 88 City of Lake Elsinore Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 May 29, 2008 Page 16 Summary FY 2008-09 Zone Assessment 1 $13,016.68 2 $6,330.41 3 $9,787.83 4 $36,963.04 5 $52,246.13 6 $6,396.68 7 $48,374.68 8 $919.72 9 $0.00 10 $0.00 11 $0.00 12 $0.00 13 $0.00 14 $10,278.67 15 $0.00 16 $921.83 17 $5,418.93 18 $7,831.56 19 $0.00 20 $8,565.90 .21 $0.00 22 $749.74 23 $1,240.42 Total $209,042.22 . For Zones 1 through 8, Zone 14, Zone 16 (Ardenwood Way portion) and Zone 18, the Reserve amount was previously collected and therefore is not included in the assessment for FY 2008-09. . For Zones 9 through 13, Zone 19 and Zone 21, no assessment will be collected for FY 2008-09 since no improvements have been completed. . For Zone 17 and Zone 20, the full costs assessed for FY 2008-09 include the Reserve amount and Administration cost. . For Zone 15, Zone 22 and Zone 23, the costs assessed for FY 2008-09 only include the Reserve amount, as improvements are underway, but have not been completed. . The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set up for the revenues and expenditures of the District. Funds raised by assessment shall be used only for the purpose as stated herein. A contribution to the District by the City may be made to reduce assessments, as the City Council deems appropriate. Any balance or deficit remaining on July 1 must be carried over to the next fiscal year. Q:\ELSINORE\LLMD1\fy08-09\reports\L.E. LLMD1 repl08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 49 of 88 City of Lake ELsinore Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 May 29, 2008 Page 17 PART C ASSESSMENT ROLL The proposed assessment and the amount of assessment for Fiscal Year 2008-09 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the latest roll at the Riverside County Assessor's Office, are appended herein and submitted separately as Appendix C of the City of Lake Elsinore Engineer's Report for Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1, Fiscal Year 2008-09. The description of each lot or parcel is part of the records of the Assessor of the County of Riverside and these records are, by reference, made part of this Report. Q:\ELSINORE\LLMD1\fy08-09\reports\L.E. LLMD1 repl08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 50 of 88 City of lake Elsinore landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 May 29, 2008 Page 18 PART D METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT GENERAL Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, permits the establishment of assessment district by cities for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include construction, operation, maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and landscaping. Section 22573 of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the 1972 Act) requires that maintenance assessments be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The 1972 Act permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvements." (Sec. 22574). Thus, the 1972 Act requires the levy of a true "assessment" based on the actual benefit rather than a "special tax." In addition, Proposition 218, the "Right to Vote on Taxes Act" which was approved on the November 1996 Statewide ballot and added Article XmD to the California Constitution, requires that a parcel's assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. Article xmD provides that only special benefits are assessable and the City must separate the general benefits from the special benefits. Article xmD also requires that publicly owned property which benefit from the improvements be assessed. REASON FOR THE ASSESSMENT The assessment is proposed to be levied to pay for the costs of the construction, servIcmg and maintenance of landscaping, street lighting and appurtenant improvements within the District. SPECIAL BENEFIT ANALYSIS Street Landscaping, Slopes and Greenbelts. Trees, landscaping, hardscaping and appurtenant facilities, if well maintained, provide beautification, shade and enhancement of the desirability of the surroundings, and therefore increase property value. In Parkwavs and Land Values, written by John Nolan and Henry V. Hubbard in 1937, it is stated: "... there is no lack of opinion, based on general principals and experience and common sense, that parkways do in fact add value to property, even though the amount cannot be determined exactly.... Indeed, in most cases where public money has been spent for parkways the assumption has been definitely made that the proposed parkway will show a provable financial profit to the City. It has been believed that the establishment of parkways causes a rise in real estate values throughout the City, or in parts ofthe City,..." Q:\ELSINORE\LLMD1\fy08-09\reports\L.E. LLMD1 rept08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 51 of 88 City of Lake Elsinore Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 May 29,2008 Page 19 It should be noted that the definition of "parkways" above may include the roadway as well as the landscaping along side the roadway. The ongoing operation and maintenance of the street landscaping, slopes and green ways within the individual district, as identified in Part A of this Report, provide beautification to the areas that result in a special benefit to the parcels within the tracts adjacent to the improvements. If these landscaped areas were not properly maintained, the tract would be blighted. The City of Lake Elsinore considers the maintenance and upkeep of parkways and adjacent slopes to be the responsibility of the adjacent development due to the added beautification of the local community which extends to the perimeter of the development. Street Lighting. Proper maintenance and operation of the streetlights benefit all properties within the District by providing security, safety and community character and vitality as outlined below. Streetlights provide only incidental benefits to motorists traveling to, from or through the area. BENEFITS OF STREET LIGHTING Security and Safety . Mitigates crime . Alleviates the fear of crime . Enhances safe ingress/egress to property Community Character and Vitality . Promotes social interaction . Promotes business and industry . Contributes to a positive nighttime visual image Improvements that provide a special benefit to an isolated group of parcels of land located within the District are considered to be a localized benefit, and the costs associated with these improvements are assessed to all assessable parcels receiving the localized benefit. Localized benefits include the construction, operation, servicing and maintenance of the improvements that only benefit the parcels located within the localized areas. Localized Improvements - Parcels that have localized landscaping such as entryway landscaping, parkway landscaping, etc., and street lighting adjacent to or near their parcels directly benefit from the improvements and are assessed for the costs of the localized improvements. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY The maximum annual maintenance assessments shall be increased each year by 2%. The actual assessments levied in any fiscal year will be as approved by the City Council and may not exceed the maximum assessment rate without receiving property owner approval for the increase. To establish the special benefit to the individual parcels within the District, an Equivalent Dwelling Unit system is used. Each parcel of land is assigned Equivalent Dwelling Units ("EDU's") in proportion to the estimated special benefit the parcel receives relative to the other parcels within the District from landscaping and/or streetlights. The single-family detached (SFD) residential parcel has been selected as the basic unit for calculation of assessments; therefore, the SFD residential parcel is defined as one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). A methodology has been developed to relate all other land uses within each zone to the SFD residential land use as described below. Q:\ELSINORE\LLMD1\fy08-09\reports\L.E. LLMD1 rept08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 52 of 88 City of Lake Elsinore Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 May 29, 2008 Page 20 Zone 1 The parcels of land in the District are single family residential (SFR) lots, with each of these lots benefiting equally from the improvements being maintained. Therefore, the costs associated with the landscaping and street lighting within and directly adjacent to the development, as shown in Part B of this report, will be apportioned on a residential lot basis. The table below provides the FY 2008-09 assessment apportionment for Zone 1. EDU's 133 Max. Maint. Asmt per EDU $107.04 Actual Asmt per EDU $97.87 Total Asmt For District $13,016.68 Zone 2 The parcels of land in Zone 2 are single family residential (SFR) lots, with each of these lots benefiting equally from the improvements being maintained. Therefore, the costs associated with the landscaping and street lighting within and directly adjacent to the development, as shown in Part B of this report, will be apportioned on a residential lot basis. The table below provides the FY 2008-09 assessment apportionment for Zone 2. EDU's 50 Max. Maint. Asmt per EDU $170.53 Actual Asmt per EDU $126.61 Total Asmt For District $6,330.41 Zone 3 The parcels of land in Zone 3 are single family residential (SFR) lots, with each of these lots benefiting equally from the improvements being maintained. Therefore, the costs associated with the landscaping and street lighting within and directly adjacent to the development, as shown in Part B of this report, will be apportioned on a residential lot basis. The table below provides the FY 2008-09 assessment apportionment for Zone 3. EDU's 29 Max. Maint. Asmt per EDU $476.70 Actual Asmt per EDU $337.51 Total Asmt For District $9,787.83 Zone 4 The parcels of land in Zone 4 are single family residential (SFR) lots. The costs associated with the landscaping and street lighting within and directly adjacent to the development, as shown in Part B of this report, will be apportioned on a residential lot basis as each of these lots benefit equally from the maintenance of these improvements. Equivalent Dwelling Units To establish the special benefit to the individual parcels within Zone 4 of the District, an Equivalent Dwelling Unit system is used. Each parcel of land is assigned Equivalent Dwelling Units ("EDU's") in proportion to the estimated special benefit the parcel receives relative to the other parcels within the District from the streetlights. Q:\ELSINORE\LLMD1\fy08-09\reports\L.E. LLMD1 rept08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 53 of 88 City of lake ELsinore landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 May 29, 2008 Page 21 The single-family detached (SFD) residential parcel has been selected as the basic unit for calculation of assessments; therefore, the SFD residential parcel is defined as one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). A methodology has been developed to relate all other land uses to the SFD residential land use as described below. Developed Non-Residential (Non-Res). Developed non-residential properties are defined as improved commercial, industrial and institutional properties (such as school property or churches). In converting these properties to EDU's, the size of the parcels are compared to the average size of a single-family residential lot, which is 7,200 square feet. This equals approximately 6 SFR lots per acre of land. Therefore, developed non-residential parcels are assigned EDU's at a rate of 6 EDU's per acre. Vacant. Based upon the opinions of professional appraisers, appraising current market property values for real estate in Southern California, the land value portion of a property typically ranges from 20 to 30 percent of the property's total value. Additionally, the utilization of vacant property is significantly less than improved property and vacant property has a traffic generation rate of O. Therefore, vacant parcels will be assessed at the rate of 25% of Non-Res properties, or 1.5 EDU per acre or any portion thereof. Types of Benefit Within the Serenity development (Zone 4) boundary is a 9.52-acre neighborhood park. As a condition of development, the developer must provide for the on-going operation and maintenance of the landscaping improvements for said park. Development Benefit All 233 parcels within the development were classified as having a development benefit, since the creation of this funding mechanism satisfies a condition of approval for the development. Service Benefit A neighborhood park, by definition, is a park of typically 5 to 20 acres in size and serving an area from 1;4 mile up to Yz mile distance, which is generally within walking distance of the park. The park within the Zone 4 boundary is small in size (less than 10 acres); therefore a service area radius of 1;4 mile is used for calculating assessments. All parcels within Zone 4 that are in the 1;4 mile radius will be assessed for service benefit, in addition to the development benefit, due to their proximity to the park. General Benefit Parcels that are within the 1;4 mile radius but not within the District boundaries are considered to receive general, rather than special, benefit and are therefore not assessed. The table below provides the FY 2008-09 assessment apportionment for Zone 4. Max. Maint. Asmt Actual Asmt Total Asmt Benefit Type EDU's per EDU per EDU For District Landscape & St Light 233 $82.07 $57.59 $13,418.79 Park - Development 233 $90.71 $67.88 $15,814.97 Park - Service 158 $65.38 $48.92 $7,729.28 $36,963.04 Q:\ELSINORE\LLMD1\fy08-09\reports\L.E. LLMD1 repl08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 54 of 88 City of Lake ELsinore Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 May 29, 2008 Page 22 Zone 5 The parcels of land in Zone 5 are single family residential (SFR) lots, with each of these lots benefiting equally from the improvements being maintained. Therefore, the costs associated with the street lighting within and directly adjacent to the development, as shown in Part B of this report, will be apportioned on a residential lot basis. The table below provides the FY 2008-09 assessment apportionment for Zone 5. Max. Maint. Asmt Actual Asmt Total Asmt Phase EDU's oer EDU per EDU For District 1 509 $67.28 $46.37 $23,604.31 2 503 $83.23 $56.94 $28,641.82 $52,246.13 Zone 6 The parcels of land in Zone 6 are single family residential (SFR) lots, with each of these lots benefiting equally from the improvements being maintained. Therefore, the costs associated with the street lighting within and directly adjacent to the development, as shown in Part B of this report, will be apportioned on a residential lot basis. The table below provides the FY 2008-09 assessment apportionment for Zone 6. EDU's 98 Max. Maint. Asmt per EDU $90.69 Actual Asmt per EDU $65.27 Total Asmt For District $6,396.68 Zone 7 Equivalent Dwelling Units To establish the special benefit to the individual parcels within Zone 7 of the District, an Equivalent Dwelling Unit system is used. Each parcel of land is assigned Equivalent Dwelling Units ("EDU's") in proportion to the estimated special benefit the parcel receives relative to the other parcels within the District from the streetlights. The single-family detached (SFD) residential parcel has been selected as the basic unit for calculation of assessments; therefore, the SFD residential parcel is defined as one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). A methodology has been developed to relate all other land uses to the SFD residential land use as described below. Condominiums. Condominiums will be assessed equivalent to a single-family detached; therefore 1 EDU per unit. Multi-family Residences (Apartments). Multi-family residential parcel equivalencies are determined by multiplying the number of dwelling units on each parcel by 0.75, due to the relative population density of this type of dwelling unit and reduced unit size compared to the typical density and size of an SFD. Studies have consistently shown that the average apartment unit impacts infrastructure approximately 75% as much as a single-family residence. (Sources: Institute of Q:\ELSINORE\LLMD1\fy08-09\reports\L.E. LLMD1 rept08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 55 of 88 City of lake Elsinore landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 May 29, 2008 Page 23 Transportation Engineers Informational Report Trip Generation, Fifth Edition, 1991; Metcalf & Eddy, Wastewater Engineering Treatment, Disposal, Reuse, Third Edition, 1991). Trip generation and wastewater usage are a function of population density. Based on this, it is concluded that other infrastructure will be similarly impacted at a reduced level. The smaller average unit size of multiple- residential parcels result in a lesser enhancement per unit to property values. Developed Non-Residential (Non-Res). Developed non-residential properties are defined as improved commercial, industrial and institutional properties (such as school property or churches). In converting these properties to EDU's, the size of the parcels are compared to the average size of a single-family residential lot, which is 7,200 square feet. This equals approximately 6 SFR lots per acre of land. Therefore, developed non-residential parcels are assigned EDU's at a rate of 6 EDU's per acre. Vacant/Parks. Parcels that are designated for parks or parcels that are developable but do not have a finalized development map are assessed based upon the acreage of the parcel. These properties receive special benefits based on their land, as this is the basis of their value. Based upon the opinions of professional appraisers, appraising current market property values for real estate in Southern California, the land value portion of a property typically ranges from 20 to 30 percent of the property's total value. Additionally, the utilization of vacant property is significantly less than improved property and vacant property has a traffic generation rate of O. Therefore, vacant parcels (and park parcels) will be assessed at the rate of25% of Non-Res properties, or 1.5 EDU's per acre or any portion thereof. Open Space. Parcels designated as open space do not receive special benefits from the Improvements and are therefore exempt from the assessment. The table below provides the FY 2008-09 assessment apportionment for Zone 7. Max. Maint. Asmt Actual Asmt Total Asmt landuse Acreaae EDU's per EDU per EDU For District SFR -- 486.00 $67.12 $59.04 $28,691.14 Park 22.41 33.62 $67.12 $59.04 $1,984.47 Vacant 199.87 299.81 $67.12 $59.04 $17,699.07 $48,374.68 Zone 8 The parcels of land in Zone 8 are condominium lots, with each of these lots benefiting equally from the improvements being maintained. Therefore, the costs associated with the landscaping within and directly adjacent to the development, as shown in Part B of this report, will be apportioned on a residential lot basis. The table below provides the FY 2008-09 assessment apportionment for Zone 8. EDU's 141 Max. Maint. Asmt oer EDU $7.62 Actual Asmt per EDU $6.52 Total Asmt For District $919.72 Q:\ELSINORE\LLMD1\fy08-09\reports\L.E. LLMD1 rept08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 56 of 88 City of Lake Elsinore Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 May 29,2008 Page 24 Zone 9 Equivalent Dwelling Units To establish the special benefit to the individual parcels within Zone 9 of the District, an Equivalent Dwelling Unit system is used. Each parcel of land is assigned Equivalent Dwelling Units ("EDU's") in proportion to the estimated special benefit the parcel receives relative to the other parcels within the District from the streetlights. The single-family detached (SFD) residential parcel has been selected as the basic unit for calculation of assessments; therefore, the SFD residential parcel is defined as one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). A methodology has been developed to relate all other land uses to the SFD residential land use as described below. Developed Non-Residential (Non-Res). Developed non-residential properties are defined as improved commercial, industrial and institutional properties (such as school property or churches). In converting these properties to EDU's, the size of the parcels are compared to the average size of a single-family residential lot, which is 7,200 square feet. This equals approximately 6 SFR lots per acre of land. Therefore, developed non-residential parcels are assigned EDU's at a rate of 6 EDU's per acre. Vacant/Parks. Parcels that are designated for parks or parcels that are developable but do not have a finalized development map are assessed based upon the acreage of the parcel. These properties receive special benefits based on their land, as this is the basis of their value. Based upon the opinions of professional appraisers, appraising current market property values for real estate in Southern California, the land value portion of a property typically ranges from 20 to 30 percent of the property's total value. Additionally, the utilization of vacant property is significantly less than improved property and vacant property has a traffic generation rate of O. Therefore, vacant parcels (and park parcels) will be assessed at the rate of 25% of Non-Res properties, or 1.5 EDU per acre or any portion thereof. Open Space/Basins. Parcels designated as open space or basins do not receive special benefits from the Improvements and are therefore exempt from the assessment. The table below provides the FY 2008-09 assessment apportionment for Zone 9 EDU's 130.36 Max. Maint. Asmt per EDU $82.75 Actual Asmt per EDU $0.00 Total Asmt For District $0.00 Zone 10 The parcels of land in Zone 10 are single family residential (SFR) lots, with each of these lots benefiting equally from the improvements being maintained. Therefore, the costs associated with the street lighting within and directly adjacent to the development, as shown in Part B of this report, will be apportioned on a residential lot basis. The table below provides the FY 2008-09 assessment apportionment for Zone 10 EDU's 158 Max. Maint. Asmt per EDU $64.53 Actual Asmt per EDU $0.00 Total Asmt For District $0.00 Q:\ELSINORE\LLMD1\fy08-09\reports\L.E. LLMD1 rept08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 57 of 88 City of Lake ELsinore Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 May 29, 2008 Page 25 Zone 11 Equivalent Dwelling Units To establish the special benefit to the individual parcels within Zone 11 of the District, an Equivalent Dwelling Unit system is used. Each parcel of land is assigned Equivalent Dwelling Units ("EDU's") in proportion to the estimated special benefit the parcel receives relative to the other parcels within the District from the streetlights. The single-family detached (SFD) residential parcel has been selected as the basic unit for calculation of assessments; therefore, the SFD residential parcel is defined as one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). A methodology has been developed to relate all other land uses to the SFD residential land use as described below. Developed Non-Residential (Non-Res). Developed non-residential properties are defined as improved commercial, industrial and institutional properties (such as school property or churches). In converting these properties to EDU's, the size of the parcels are compared to the average size of a single-family residential lot, which is 7,200 square feet. This equals approximately 6 SFR lots per acre of land. Therefore, developed non-residential parcels are assigned EDU's at a rate of 6 EDU's per acre. Vacant/Parks. Parcels that are designated for parks or parcels that are developable but do not have a finalized development map are assessed based upon the acreage of the parcel. These properties receive special benefits based on their land, as this is the basis of their value. Based upon the opinions of professional appraisers, appraising current market property values for real estate in Southern California, the land value portion of a property typically ranges from 20 to 30 percent of the property's total value. Additionally, the utilization of vacant property is significantly less than improved property and vacant property has a traffic generation rate of O. Therefore, vacant parcels (and park parcels) will be assessed at the rate of 25% of Non-Res properties, or 1.5 EDU per acre or any portion thereof. Open Space/Basins. Parcels designated as open space or basins do not receive special benefits from the Improvements and are therefore exempt from the assessment. The golf course associated with the development on the northwest side does not have any localized improvements and is not included within the boundaries of the District. The table below provides the FY 2008-09 assessment apportionment for Zone 11. Max. Maint. Asmt Actual Asmt Total Asmt Facility EDU's per EDU per EDU For District Landscaping 796.94 $67.63 $0.00 $0.00 Street Lighting 796.94 $79.51 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Q:IELSINOREILLMD1Ify08-09IreportslL.E. LLMD1 rept08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 58 of 88 City of Lake ELsinore Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 May 29, 2008 Page 26 Zone 12 The parcels of land in Zone 12 are single family residential (SFR) lots, with each of these lots benefiting equally from the improvements being maintained. Therefore, the costs associated with the landscaping and street lighting within and directly adjacent to the development, as shown in Part B of this report, will be apportioned on a residential lot basis. The table below provides the FY 2008-09 assessment apportionment for Zone 12. Max. Maint. Asmt Actual Asmt Total Asmt Facility EDU's per EDU per EDU For District Landscaping 0 $435.21 $0.00 $0.00 Street Liqhtinq 0 $74.27 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Zone 13 The parcels of land in Zone 13 are single family residential (SFR) lots, with each of these lots benefiting equally from the improvements being maintained. Therefore, the costs associated with the landscaping and street lighting within and directly adjacent to the development, as shown in Part B of this report, will be apportioned on a residential lot basis. The table below provides the FY 2008-09 assessment apportionment for Zone 13. Max. Maint. Asmt Actual Asmt Total Asmt Facility EDU's per EDU per EDU For District Landscaping 0 $81.09 $0.00 $0.00 Street Liqhtinq 0 $28.17 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Zone 14 Equivalent Dwelling Units To establish the special benefit to the individual parcels within Zone 14 of the District, an Equivalent Dwelling Unit system is used. Each parcel of land is assigned Equivalent Dwelling Units ("ED D's") in proportion to the estimated special benefit the parcel receives relative to the other parcels within the District from the streetlights. The single-family detached (SFD) residential parcel has been selected as the basic unit for calculation of assessments; therefore, the SFD residential parcel is defined as one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). A methodology has been developed to relate all other land uses to the SFD residential land use as described below. Developed Non-Residential (Non-Res). Developed non-residential properties are defined as improved commercial, industrial and institutional properties (such as school property or churches). In converting these properties to EDU's, the size of the parcels are compared to the average size of a single-family residential lot, which is 7,200 square feet. This equals approximately 6 SFR lots per acre of land. Therefore, developed non-residential parcels are assigned EDU's at a rate of 6 EDU's per acre. Q:\ELSINORE\LLMD1\fy08-09\reports\L.E. LLMD1 rept08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 59 of 88 City of Lake Elsinore Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 May 29, 2008 Page 27 Vacant/Parks. Parcels that are designated for parks or parcels that are developable but do not have a finalized development map are assessed based upon the acreage of the parcel. These properties receive special benefits based on their land, as this is the basis of their value. Based upon the opinions of professional appraisers, appraising current market property values for real estate in Southern California, the land value portion of a property typically ranges from 20 to 30 percent of the property's total value. Additionally, the utilization of vacant property is significantly less than improved property and vacant property has a traffic generation rate of O. Therefore, vacant parcels (and park parcels) will be assessed at the rate of 25% of Non-Res properties, or 1.5 EDU per acre or any portion thereof. Open Space/Basins. Parcels designated as open space or basins do not receive special benefits from the Improvements and are therefore exempt from the assessment. The table below provides the FY 2008-09 assessment apportionment for Zone 14. EDU's 190 Max. Maint. Asmt per EDU $77.28 Actual Asmt per EDU $54.10 Total Asmt For District $10,278.67 Zone 15 The parcels of land in Zone 15 are condominium lots, with each of these lots benefiting equally from the improvements being maintained. Therefore, the costs associated with the landscaping and street lighting within and directly adjacent to the development, as shown in Part B of this report, will be apportioned on a residential lot basis. The table below provides the FY 2008-09 assessment apportionment for Zone 15. Max. Maint. Asmt Actual Asmt Total Asmt Facilitv EDU's per EDU per EDU For District Landscaping 0 $115.65 $0.00 $0.00 Street Liqhtinq 0 $26.53 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Zone 16 The parcels ofland in Zone 16 are multi-family residential (apartment) units, with each of these units benefiting equally from the improvements being maintained. Therefore, the costs associated with the landscaping within and directly adjacent to the development, as shown in Part B of this report, will be apportioned on a residential unit basis. The table below provides the FY 2008-09 assessment apportionment for Zone 16. Dwelling Units 352 Max. Maint. Asmt per EDU $19.72 Actual Asmt per EDU $2.62 Total Asmt For District $921.83 Q:\ELSINORE\LLMD1\fy08-09\reports\L.E. LLMD1 rept08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 60 of 88 City of lake ELsinore landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 May 29, 2008 Page 28 Zone 17 Equivalent Dwelling Units To establish the special benefit to the individual parcels within Zone 17 of the District, an Equivalent Dwelling Unit system is used. Each parcel of land is assigned Equivalent Dwelling Units ("EDU's") in proportion to the estimated special benefit the parcel receives relative to the other parcels within the District from the streetlights. The single-family detached (SFD) residential parcel has been selected as the basic unit for calculation of assessments; therefore, the SFD residential parcel is defined as one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). A methodology has been developed to relate all other land uses to the SFD residential land use as described below. Developed Non-Residential (Non-Res). Developed non-residential properties are defined as improved commercial, industrial and institutional properties (such as school property or churches). In converting these properties to EDU's, the size of the parcels are compared to the average size of a single-family residential lot, which is 7,200 square feet. This equals approximately 6 SFR lots per acre of land. Therefore, developed non-residential parcels are assigned EDU's at a rate of 6 EDU's per acre. Vacant/Parks. Parcels that are designated for parks or parcels that are developable but do not have a finalized development map are assessed based upon the acreage of the parcel. These properties receive special benefits based on their land, as this is the basis of their value. Based upon the opinions of professional appraisers, appraising current market property values for real estate in Southern California, the land value portion of a property typically ranges from 20 to 30 percent of the property's total value. Additionally, the utilization of vacant property is significantly less than improved property and vacant property has a traffic generation rate of O. Therefore, vacant parcels (and park parcels) will be assessed at the rate of 25% of Non-Res properties, or 1.5 EDU per acre or any portion thereof. Open Space/Basins. Parcels designated as open space or basins do not receive special benefits from the Improvements and are therefore exempt from the assessment. The table below provides the FY 2008-09 assessment apportionment for Zone 17. EDU's 60 Max. Maint. Asmt per EDU $90.33 Actual Asmt per EDU $90.32 Total Asmt For District $5,418.93 Q:IELSINOREILLMD1Ify08-09\reportslL.E. LLMD1 rept08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 61 of 88 City of Lake ELsinore Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 May 29, 2008 Page 29 Zones 18 & 19 Equivalent Dwelling Units To establish the special benefit to the individual parcels within Zones 18 and 19 of the District, an Equivalent Dwelling Unit system is used. Each parcel of land is assigned Equivalent Dwelling Units ("EDU's") in proportion to the estimated special benefit the parcel receives relative to the other parcels within the District from the streetlights. The single-family detached (SFD) residential parcel has been selected as the basic unit for calculation of assessments; therefore, the SFD residential parcel is defined as one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). A methodology has been developed to relate all other land uses to the SFD residential land use as described below. Developed Non-Residential (Non-Res). Developed non-residential properties are defined as improved commercial, industrial and institutional properties (such as school property or churches). In converting these properties to EDU's, the size of the parcels are compared to the average size of a single- family residential lot, which is 7,200 square feet. This equals approximately 6 SFR lots per acre of land. Therefore, developed non-residential parcels are assigned EDU's at a rate of 6 EDU's per acre. Vacant/Parks. Parcels that are designated for parks or parcels that are developable but do not have a finalized development map are assessed based upon the acreage of the parcel. These properties receive special benefits based on their land, as this is the basis of their value. Based upon the opinions of professional appraisers, appraising current market property values for real estate in Southern California, the land value portion of a property typically ranges from 20 to 30 percent of the property's total value. Additionally, the utilization of vacant property is significantly less than improved property and vacant property has a traffic generation rate of O. Therefore, vacant parcels (and park parcels) will be assessed at the rate of 25% of Non-Res properties, or 1.5 EDU per acre or any portion thereof. Open Space/Basins. Parcels designated as open space or basins do not receive special benefits from the Improvements and are therefore exempt from the assessment. Zone 18 The parcels of land in Zone 18 are single family residential (SFR) lots, with each of these lots benefiting equally from the improvements being maintained. Therefore, the costs associated with the street lighting within and directly adjacent to the development, as shown in Part B of this report, will be apportioned on a residential lot basis. The table below provides the FY 2008-09 assessment apportionment for Zone 18. EDU's 94 Max. Maint. Asmt per EDU $119.98 Actual Asmt per EDU $83.31 Total Asmt For District $7,831.56 Q:IELSINOREILLMD1Ify08-09IreportslL.E. LLMD1 rept08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 62 of 88 City of Lake Elsinore Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 May 29, 2008 Page 30 Zone 19 The parcels of land in Zone 19 are single family residential (SFR) lots, with each of these lots benefiting equally from the improvements being maintained. Therefore, the costs associated with the street lighting within and directly adjacent to the development, as shown in Part B of this report, will be apportioned on a residential lot basis. The table below provides the FY 2008-09 assessment apportionment for Zone 19. EDU's 105 Max. Maint. Asmt per EDU $50.50 Actual Asmt per EDU $0.00 Total Asmt For District $0.00 Zone 20 The parcels of land in Zone 20 are single family residential (SFR) lots, with each of these lots benefiting equally from the improvements being maintained. Therefore, the costs associated with the landscaping and street lighting within and directly adjacent to the development, as shown in Part B of this report, will be apportioned on a residential lot basis. The table below provides the FY 2008-09 assessment apportionment for Zone 20. EDU's 21 Max. Maint. Asmt per EDU $407.90 Actual Asmt per EDU $407.90 Total Asmt For District $8,565.90 Zone 21 Equivalent Dwelling Units To establish the special benefit to the individual parcels within Zone 21 of the District, an Equivalent Dwelling Unit system is used. Each parcel of land is assigned Equivalent Dwelling Units ("EDU's") in proportion to the estimated special benefit the parcel receives relative to the other parcels within the District from the streetlights. The single-family detached (SFD) residential parcel has been selected as the basic unit for calculation of assessments; therefore, the SFD residential parcel is defined as one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). A methodology has been developed to relate all other land uses to the SFD residential land use as described below. Developed Non-Residential (Non-Res). Developed non-residential properties are defined as improved commercial, industrial and institutional properties (such as school property or churches). In converting these properties to EDU's, the size of the parcels are compared to the average size of a single- family residential lot, which is 7,200 square feet. This equals approximately 6 SFR lots per acre of land. Therefore, developed non-residential parcels are assigned EDU's at a rate of 6 EDU's per acre. Vacant. Based upon the opinions of professional appraisers, appraising current market property values for real estate in Southern California, the land value portion of a property typically ranges from 20 to 30 percent of the property's total value. Additionally, the utilization of vacant property is Q:\ELSINORE\LLMD1\fy08-09\reports\L.E. LLMD1 repl08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 63 of 88 City of Lake ELsinore Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 May 29, 2008 Page 31 significantly less than improved property and vacant property has a traffic generation rate of O. Therefore, vacant parcels will be assessed at the rate of 25% of Non-Res properties, or 1.5 EDU per acre or any portion thereof. The table below provides the FY 2008-09 assessment apportionment for Zone 21. Max. Maint. Asmt Actual Asmt Total Asmt Facilitv EDU's per EDU per EDU For District Landscaping 16.36 $68.33 $0.00 $0.00 Street LiQhtinQ 16.36 $83.80 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Zone 22 Equivalent Dwelling Units To establish the special benefit to the individual parcels within Zone 22 of the District, an Equivalent Dwelling Unit system is used. Each parcel of land is assigned Equivalent Dwelling Units ("ED D's") in proportion to the estimated special benefit the parcel receives relative to the other parcels within the District from the streetlights. The single-family detached (SFD) residential parcel has been selected as the basic unit for calculation of assessments; therefore, the SFD residential parcel is defined as one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). A methodology has been developed to relate all other land uses to the SFD residential land use as described below. Developed Non-Residential (Non-Res). Developed non-residential properties are defined as improved commercial, industrial and institutional properties (such as school property or churches). In converting these properties to EDU's, the size of the parcels are compared to the average size of a single- family residential lot, which is 7,200 square feet. This equals approximately 6 SFR lots per acre of land. Therefore, developed non-residential parcels are assigned EDU's at a rate of 6 EDU's per acre. Vacant. Based upon the opinions of professional appraisers, appraising current market property values for real estate in Southern California, the land value portion of a property typically ranges from 20 to 30 percent of the property's total value. Additionally, the utilization of vacant property is significantly less than improved property and vacant property has a traffic generation rate of O. Therefore, vacant parcels will be assessed at the rate of 25% of Non-Res properties, or 1.5 EDU per acre or any portion thereof. The table below provides the FY 2008-09 assessment apportionment for Zone 22. EDU's 7.5 Max. Maint. Asmt per EDU $162.44 Actual Asmt per EDU $99.97 Total Asmt For District $749.74 Q:\ELSINORE\LLMD 1 \fy08-09\reports\L.E. LLMD 1 repl08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 64 of 88 City of Lake ELsinore Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 May 29, 2008 Page 32 Zone 23 Equivalent Dwelling Units To establish the special benefit to the individual parcels within Zone 23 of the District, an Equivalent Dwelling Unit system is used. Each parcel of land is assigned Equivalent Dwelling Units ("EDU's") in proportion to the estimated special benefit the parcel receives relative to the other parcels within the District from the streetlights. The single-family detached (SFD) residential parcel has been selected as the basic unit for calculation of assessments; therefore, the SFD residential parcel is defined as one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). A methodology has been developed to relate all other land uses to the SFD residential land use as described below. Developed Non-Residential (Non-Res). Developed non-residential properties are defined as improved commercial, industrial and institutional properties (such as school property or churches). In converting these properties to EDU's, the size of the parcels are compared to the average size of a single-family residential lot, which is 7,200 square feet. This equals approximately 6 SFR lots per acre of land. Therefore, developed non-residential parcels are assigned EDU's at a rate of 6 EDU's per acre. Vacant. Based upon the opinions of professional appraisers, appraising current market property values for real estate in Southern California, the land value portion of a property typically ranges from 20 to 30 percent of the property's total value. Additionally, the utilization of vacant property is significantly less than improved property and vacant property has a traffic generation rate of O. Therefore, vacant parcels will be assessed at the rate of 25% of Non-Res properties, or 1.5 EDU per acre or any portion thereof. The table below provides the FY 2008-09 assessment apportionment for Zone 23. EDU's 1.58 Max. Maint. Asmt per EDU $787.57 Actual Asmt per EDU $787.57 Total Asmt For District $1,240.42 Q:IELSINOREILLMD1Ify08-09IreportsIL.E. LLMD1 repl08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 65 of 88 City of lake Elsinore landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 May 29,2008 Page 33 PART E PROPERTY OWN ER LIST A list of names and addresses of the owners of all parcels within this District is shown on the last equalized Property Tax Roll of the Assessor of the County of Riverside, which by reference is hereby made a part of this report. This list is keyed to the Assessor's Parcel Numbers as shown on the Assessment Roll, Part C of this Report. PART F ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Diagrams showing the exterior boundaries of the District and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the District are provided on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside for Fiscal Year 2008-09. The Assessor's maps and records are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this report. Q:\ELSINORE\LLMD1\fy08-09\reports\L.E. LLMD1 repl08.doc Agenda Item No. 11 Page 66 of 88 363-03 ~ . .. . . .. Hn"'4I'""Jw '.T'-~' i.c '-Dr' 'II 0 0 01 ~ ~ 'I .. ~ ~ $ Ae:l: !S A~.:r $ Ae. .; ~ It III " III Nn-",,'Itt'''tv .. \ .1,1'0.' ~ ~ @ 0 @ 0 ~~ ~! j '\ SAe;k S Ac.lt SAr.. IS Ac.~ 41"0 ,# ' r" It U4'.I @ @ @ @ ~ @ @ ;. ,., ., ~ ;; ~ .. S~ SAc,.. .!SAr.1: $ Ac..t SAC'z SAc.:t SAc.;/: ~4".71' //1'1'1.71.' The parcel numbers above correspond to the Assessor's maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside for Fiscal Year 2003-04. Zone 1 of the Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 Assessment Diagram Agenda Item No. 11 Page 67 of 88 379-03 ~o. -----..---&-", r w .. .. :.a @ @ ... ,. III .. III fl. N'" ZONE 2 _."At: '41P." G' The parcel numbers above correspond to the Assessor's maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside for Fiscal Year 2003-04. Zone 2 of the Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 Assessment Diagram Agenda Item No. 11 Page 68 of 88 373-20 ~ (205') '-_./ ~" ~I.l". ;,....'..,., -" : :"'I~"i!I,."';t~~.~...."""..... '~i:'.It::' -a"~ .,.r; .1' pJ. ~'l(fIJ,!jt(.'ir~':' jiP' '~.."':~~.. r....r--:--..,........"., "'1".,..,.., oJ;,' .... 11: .~;.,~" 'r"J"/l -,'!;.l.. ';0',,_ "1'\ ":1 Ci :'n;-'l'l."i!,:-:- --_.. .....-.:-- ~_._.. ......,..-... .."" ...-.-..-. ....-- - ...~. '" :r.~.a. PARK WAY ({Q) I'-- ~ t5 :::=,; <:( ("0\ ~/ (71 '--~./ RAILROAD AVE The parcel numbers above correspond to the Assessor's maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside for Fiscal Year 2003-04. Zone 3 of the Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 Assessment Diagram Agenda Item No. 11 Page 69 of 88 370-412-021 370-415-006 370-415-007 370-415-006 370-415-009 370-415-010 370-415-011 370-415-012 370-415-013 370-415-014 370-415-015 \ APN: 370-120-004 370-120-014 370-120-050 370-120-052 370-120- 056 PROJECT LOCA nON VICINITY MAP NO SCALE LEW:IC. OlSTRICT IlOUNOARY The parcel numbers above correspond to the Assessor's maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside for Fiscal Year 2004-05. Zone 4 of the Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 Assessment Diagram Agenda Item No. 11 Page 70 of 88 PHASE! ~M~9Ot' .\~F~ ~ :'U,I.~.~~I :~,-tl'O:u) " :<41, I~.~j~ :~~-'I2-:u:(lI) :<41, I ~.~~ I :~,-I2':uU~ :<41, lio1l.~~, :~,~~>:u:..t, :<41,~.~~1 :~7..:~':u)("~ :<41,~,~OI :>~7-:~I:UI)I':1 :<41,~,~l) t ~ PHASE 2 :RAe, 25(77 ,;".<BS901' f',..:<lllo.. ::":"~,."j':U)~t :<4'l,~OO,O:1i :~~O:.:u)ll :<4'l,~ .~,OO I :~~I':""')(~ :<4'l,~ IMIOl :~~I':u:":-! :<4'HI~,~.~ :~~:u)(rl :<4H~,~~l :W~:):\..,-:lI:"~ :<4'l,~ioIl,(II~ :~~:):I".I)I\.~ :<4'l,~ioIl,~ 1$ The parcel numbers above correspond to the Assessor's maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside for Fiscal Year 2004-05. :RAe, 25+78 :l\AClM4-76 ~"1- ! \.,/. ~~ -..... "'...... -- ....- -- ZoneS of the Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 Assessment Diagram Agenda Item No. 11 Page 71 of 88 .PROJECT0- SIT[ w '" .. -J !- ~ (1-'5) '\~ " LEGEND: DISTRICT BOUNDARY VICINITY MAP NO SCALE The parcel numbers above correspond to the Assessor's maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside for Fiscal Year 2004-05. Zone 6 of the Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 Assessment Diagram Agenda Item No. 11 Page 72 of 88 f....... VJ ~ ~ '" ....P.N:. 1. 3890200~ 2. Jlll108ooo2 3. Jll909oo01 4. 3119090002 5. 311_0003 6. Jll_0004 7. Jll9121001 II. 3119121002 9. 389121003 10. Jll9122001 11. 389122002 12. Jll912200J lJ. 389122004 14. 389122005 15. JIl912200ll 16. 389122007 17. J89122010 18. 38909000ll f- (f) 0::: W W rn --l o o KINGS HWY VICINITY MAP NO SCALE LEGEND: DISTRICT BOUNDARY The parcel numbers above correspond to the Assessor's maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside for Fiscal Year 2004-05. Zone 7 of the Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 Assessment Diagram Agenda Item No. 11 Page 73 of 88 i i ~I II j:; ~5 PMCEL IU&RS ~ 373-221-057 ~ 373-221-032 ~ ~ N10"l,'25"E 2ln4 N10"lll'25"E 1120.4.2' I ~ ~ _.....~ LEGEND: '1>>F DISTRICT BOUNDARY The parcel numbers above correspond to the Assessor's maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside for Fiscal Year 2004-05. Zone 8 of the Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 Assessment Diagram Agenda Item No. 11 Page 74 of 88 APN: 363-020-008 6;)4 /~ e~ Ii I<IONITY \lAP NO SCAU ~ DtSlJlCT ~y The parcel numbers above correspond to the Assessor's maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside for Fiscal Year 2005-06. Zone 9 of the Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 Assessment Diagram Agenda Item No. 11 Page 75 of 88 TENTATIVE TRACT 32129 APN: 347-110-021 TRACT 30698 APN'S: 347-110-022 347-110-024 347-110-025 347-110-026 . N. r.s. VlONITY ~AP NO SCALE L.EWID. DISTRICT EIOUNOARY The parcel numbers above correspond to the Assessor's maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside for Fiscal Year 2005-06. Zone 10 of the Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 Assessment Diagram Agenda Item No. 11 Page 76 of 88 LAKE B...SN:lAE \ l. SQU'"- 'IT'~~(c'IT' ~<<D. 3~ @~@Q ~ Assessor's Parcel Nos. 370-020-007 370-020-010 370-020-011 370-020-012 370-030-001 370-030-002 371-030-003 371-030-009 371-030-010 371-030-011 371-030-021 371-030-022 371-030-025 371-030-031 371-040-002 371-040-003 371-040-004 371-040-005 371-040-006 371-040-007 I-__Y TllACT NO. 31ll2O-1 w::IIIY loW" II) IOIUI ~ _ DISTRICT BOUNDARY The parcel numbers above correspond to the Assessor's maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside for Fiscal Year 2005-06. Zone 11 of the Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 Assessment Diagram Agenda Item No. 11 Page 77 of 88 1NlfRSTA If 15 SCALE: 1"= 200' IiOOIITAM sr VICINITY lAAP NO SCALe: TRACT 31957 APN'S: 391-790-002 391- 790-003 I..EW:!.O. OlSlRlCT BOlJIjDARY ~ iiZ o ~ f2 (/) "" <<( Ltl ~ ~ ~~ ~I..l ~I The parcel numbers above correspond to the Assessor's maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside for Fiscal Year 2005-06. Zone 12 of the Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 Assessment Diagram Agenda Item No. 11 Page 78 of 88 TRACT JJJ70 APN: 373-071-018 PROJECT SITE ~ '" I :o! ~4p i ~ SCALE: 1". 75' I.N'ESHf)RC 011 VICINITY t.lAP NO SCAl.[ l..EliEI:lll. OISlRtCT 90UN0ARY The parcel numbers above correspond to the Assessor's maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside for Fiscal Year 2005-06. Zone 13 of the Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 Assessment Diagram Agenda Item No. 11 Page 79 of 88 A.P.t\!. 347-033-58 347-033-60 347-033-61 347-036-04 347-036-05 347-036-08 SCALE: l,....3ClO' VlCINnvWAP we SCAU; ~ tIS'lIIlCf ~ The parcel numbers above correspond to the Assessor's maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside for Fiscal Year 2006-07. Zone 14 of the Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 Assessment Diagram Agenda Item No. 11 Page 80 of 88 ^'~ ~ ~~ fJ $i ~ I.....~ '0 c> ~ :..L. ~ ~ % AREA TO BE MAINT AINED .L.EllEtlQ _r 1lOlNl..... SCALE: 1'- 75' VICINITY lolAI' NO SCN..E The parcel numbers above correspond to the Assessor's maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside for Fiscal Year 2006-07. Zone 15 of the Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 Assessment Diagram Agenda Item No. 11 Page 81 of 88 ,,'" ,.i:' ~<f ~ <.} AREA MAINTAINED FU TURE lAAlNTENANCE .....: 347-'20-0J4 377-37J-011 OQ ~Q PROJECT ~ SITE ~ ~ ~ )- WiEIIIl -.- VICINITY MAP NO SCALE t SCAlE: '.0 .00' The parcel numbers above correspond to the Assessor's maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside for Fiscal Year 2006-07. Zone 16 of the Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 Assessment Diagram Agenda Item No. 11 Page 82 of 88 f- W w 1= Vl "PH: 349-...00-005 349-430-011 349-430-012 5 f- tl. ::::;: ::> 0:: u o < o 0:: 0:: ~ Vl :;;: -' SCAlE: ,'. 150' RIVERSIDE STREET PROJECT TR 32503 VICINITY hlAP NO SCAlE wot:riIl DlS1RICT IIOlH)NlY The parcel numbers above correspond to the Assessor's maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside for Fiscal Year 2006-07. Zone 17 of the Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 Assessment Diagram Agenda Item No. 11 Page 83 of 88 SC~LE: 1"& 250' TRACT 32337-2 APN, 391-810-007 ZONE 19 LEGINIl: PROJECT rOT' DISTRICT BOUNDARY - - - - - - ZONE BOUNDARY IJC>1CK(R / !i P~f/k /~"''rON C{ 040 (J VICINITY !lAP NO SCAlE The parcel numbers above correspond to the Assessor's maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside for Fiscal Year 2006-07. Zones 18 & 19 of the Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 Assessment Diagram Agenda Item No. 11 Page 84 of 88 363-35 l , , . .-....:.'.. '. . ...:.... . J - ,.... ....... / I';': ," , , " -,' .. " . . - ',' " :. 'i ::.. : , ., ''y ,', :..:..;~ " /' " ", .....: The parcel numbers above correspond to the Assessor's maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside for Fiscal Year 2006-07, Zone 20 of the Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 Assessment Diagram Agenda Item No. 11 Page 85 of 88 . . /...,... I ....... I '''__ .' ': I " I I : :; : l ',::: l . , . I . . r I . , I , I I l........ ...... ........ " .------....,. "', ........ ...... ............... ',.:'.1 '..., .'----.., .. ". <:: I ," ," ':; .' .------. ------. ,............. ~ ... 7 .~.". /.,------ /.~.': ' ....------.j -............,......i -. ................, I J. l. , A . ~..:.~... II........ : HiI~."'''-1 ...... .. ~ .. . .. L " ., ':":.. ''C', . . . ~ .. ''':t . '''>.,: '. . .....: ,.'" >~. ,.,.:-::-:=:: ...... .;.~ ~""./ '.. . , ......".... ....'" . " '-, .'...-, . ,/ ... ".- : . .' . ,. '" ;. ...... :' " , , ..II......:'!y ..... :. . <,'" ( The parcel numbers above correspond to the Assessor's maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside for Fiscal Year 2007-08. Zone 21 of the Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 Assessment Diagram Agenda Item No. 11 Page 86 of 88 l , I t~t;t,",;!l!: . i fl!IU~(l~M'f The parcel numbers above correspond to the Assessor's maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside for Fiscal Year 2007-08. Zone 22 of the Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 Assessment Diagram Agenda Item No. 11 Page 87 of 88 CJ )> s: o z CJ CJ ;::0 r;;; APN: 363-162-040 8CAlE: ,.. . '~ecJr" ~ ~ o ~ 1> ~ ?' ..... ~ IClUJGl&a The parcel numbers above correspond to the Assessor's maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside for Fiscal Year 2007-08. Zone 23 of the Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District No.1 Assessment Diagram Agenda Item No. 11 Page 88 of 88 CITY OF ~ LAKE ,6,LSiNORf: ~~ DREAM EXTREME... REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: ROBERT A. BRADY CITY MANAGER JULY 8, 2008 SUBJECT: PROGRESS REPORT ON ABANDONED/FORECLOSED PROPERTY ORDINANCE DATE: BackQround On April 8, 2008, the Lake Elsinore City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1252 to protect residential neighborhoods in our community from becoming blighted through the lack of adequate maintenance and security of abandoned properties. Discussion When the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1252, Lake Elsinore, as well as many other jurisdictions in California, were just realizing the severe impact the economy was having on the local housing market. The number of properties going into default, and being foreclosed on was something that local jurisdictions had not encountered in the past. The magnitude of the problems associated with abandoned and foreclosed properties had not been anticipated. The adoption of Ordinance NO.1252 was a starting point to provide a measure of enforcement and the vehicle to ensure that these properties are being maintained in an acceptable condition, consistent with the surrounding neighborhood. As the effort to register, document, and maintain these properties continues, staff faces many new circumstances. Through mutual efforts and communication with surrounding jurisdictions, local Realtors, and local Homeowner's Associations, staff is learning new methods of identifying the responsible parties, and how to better enforce the regulations outlined in the Ordinance. Though the "Abandoned/Foreclosed Properties Ordinance" has only been enforceable since May 8, 2008, this report is intended to inform the City Council of the current status and for staff to receive any further direction and comments. Agenda Item No. 12 Page 1 of 12 Progress Report July 8, 2008 Page 2 Fiscal Impact The budget for operating and maintaining the "Abandoned/Foreclosed Properties" Program was adopted as part of the FY 2008/2009 Code Enforcement budget. Staffing for this program was accomplished by re-assigning these duties to Building Inspector Scott Burns, with assistance provided by other Code Enforcement and Building & Safety Division staff. Recommendation Receive and file. Prepared by: Robin K. Chipman r:--f:!: Building & Safety Manager Robert A. Brady () ~ City Manager Jf4lJ/ Approved by: ATTACHMENTS 1. Statistical Report and graphs 2. Area maps showing Foreclosure activity Agenda Item No. 12 Page 2 of 12 City of Lake Elsinore Abandoned Residential Property Registration Program ACTIVITY FOR MAY 2008 MAY MONTH TOTAL IDENTIFIED 307 307 REGISTERED 23 23 F.I.'s 142 142 N.OV.'S 0 0 CITE'S 0 0 CLOSED 3 3 ACTIVITY FOR JUNE 2008 JUNE MONTH TOTAL IDENTIFIED 108 108 REGISTERED 35 35 F.I.'s 33 33 N.O.v.'S 40 40 CITE'S 15 15 CLOSED 10 10 Total for YTD 2008 MAY JUNE IDENTIFIED 307 108 Year To Date Total: Properties Identified 415 REGISTERED 23 35 Year To Date Total: Properties Registered 58 F.I.'S 142 33 Year To Date Total: Field Inspections 175 N.OV.'S 0 40 Year To Date Total: Notice of Violations Sent 40 CITE'S 0 15 Year To Date Total: Citations Issued 15 CLOSED 3 10 Year To Date Total: Cases Closed 13 Agenda Item No. 12 Page 3 of 12 City of Lake Elsinore Abandoned Residential Property Registration Program TOTALS FOR 2008 Mav Jun IDENTIFIED 307 108 Total: Properties Identified 415 REGISTERED 23 35 Total: Properties Registered 58 F.I.'S 142 33 Total: Field Inspections 175 N.O.v.'S 0 40 Total: Notice of Violations 40 CITE'S 0 15 Total: Cites' Issued 15 CLOSED 3 10 Total: Closed Cases 13 350 300 r i 250 t/ I /- ::: r 1/ 100 50/ I ,~ o . ----.1---------....------ ! ! - , I ~II----- I I l~<::) ~" !v~ ~ ,c, <<.~. ~<::) oC-j ("v ,c, ~. o. ~. <<-c, 6' ~<::) ",~q:. (}c, # ., ( .May . June Agenda Item No. 12 Page 4 of 12 City of Lake Elsinore Abandoned Residential Property Registration TOTALS FOR 2008 MAY JUNE ARPR IDENTIFIED 201 34 Total: ARPR IDENTIFIED CODE ENFORCEMENT IDENTIFIED 78 Total: CODE ENFORCEMENT IDENTIFIED BUILDING DEPARTMENT IDENTIFIED 22 Total: BUILDING DEPARTMENT IDENTIFIED MISC. IDENTIFIED 21 Total: MISC, IDENTIFIED 57 250 r----=- 200 1----- f- 150 100./'; _~--____ 50 --__ l:-/ -=--- o -______ ____-~ -.-- - ARPR IDENTIFIED -, __ ' CODE ENFORCEMENT IDENTIFIED --- ~ -__ / BUILDING DEPARTMENT IDENTIFIED - -i MISC, IDENTIFIED 235 79 23 78 -May - June Agenda Item No. 12 Page 5 of 12 City of Lake Elsinore Code Enforcement Division ACTIVITY OF LOCAL CITY'S ~ IDENTIFIED REGISTERED City of Lake Elsinore 415 City of Murrieta 500 City ofTemecula N/A 500 .(' i ---__~______ 4SO t/ I .- 400 V I.. : lt~- ---------- 250 ./ 200 .~/- 1SO k' 100 l, soI/ ok- 58 40 250 N/A N/A N/A City of Lake Elsinore City of Murrieta CITE'S N/A N/A DATE IMPLEMENTED 15 8-Apr-08 4-Mar -08 23-Jul-08 . IDENTIFIED . REGISTERED . NOV'S . CITE'S ~~~.../' , City of Temecula Agenda Item No. 12 Page 6 of 12 j . I i \ l~'~, I ~" i"c>:'>; ; ,%', ~"" t; I I 0 .,.<.-t.:. -', ~ l : '{}.\'_'~ c.. !p,,;nj !'L.. ~,/ ........"'! ~ ~ti:,;:f-\~V _~,~~_.'~I I <;:; I.. '0>1 - "l">::<' ' · ~ / ..",U"- . '" ' . 1. I ;.t1~ 1: X.........,j \. ':c;'~~ "'l< / . r-ll.i Cl'" ~1liir: i n "'tfCI ~\1 ,~~ ~( ~! V i ~ I. -C. , ! ,,__., ,zr;- ~ "I I .';if - J'-' ZA MODENA- "'.) !- ~ I P' ^-~J: ": 1[3' ~.. r,=l='J I \ ~ ! J -iii. ~i#!# DIl .J'. ,/1 i !" .." "". .,-.. :Ie " I ' L I BEiLA~VIS1A~::;:><> \ij ",--\ i If([NOAN __-",-,,<-r--~--) ((L:-;:: ~r~~ : 1-.. . ~ ~.~ ~$, ,h_'" \ Jl"' /. ' ..~~ · ''ll} ,I ," ,,~._. (._ ." ," . ',"1/ ug~'" iH.~~i' LJi I 0 ''';/ ",'I ,'~ ""', '. .1 "",If ,." ~ ,'",'_ ;\ !i'J!f'Y' <ff' ..;~ '.... "'" t.. c ' "I' ,,'<i /11'0. h;;2:J1- I ..: " . L 1 "", f I ,<'J.- ' -, I ,,\" ' ~ ~ ., "'. .0'1 6, ~I' I'" -f. J.Y, ...." I ""i,J"'. I '-'+""i'~= (""",,{J:Y < v.~ , . ~I'a \ X,,,,""~,~ /1 I' ' '-, ) ,; , '1>, L_~ Jr I. ~.""'''';~; \ III ',jjJ "'~; ;<,~4 r'-~ ' ,,,'V", I " ,~'" . 4 ) 11 5' ;', '#~ I "'5 tJ,v ,?".' ,,' 1-' f' t;i /', I ~ -,., , X'.'" 0' ,,'5' ,c;''''~ : -W,~L '. ~,' ! '?4>~) Il'w," _~,.-. .,<'; ^ !~I' 1 I 'f II~ I - ~- -, - ' ' (,\)~\) '" <<?:~ .: V'" I ~~'V'f .:1 ~-:: -"-r<,.." II I ~i ... ,,----. ' · i' 'IJ<..<f$~ '" l' v " ," 2 U\' ' . I ~, ",I ,,,:' ,~... -<'4>\/ \ .~~;:-.. '\~\) ~..~Y!.i--7--/s",~lY;'1\ I ~"', ~I .; / --. ..."'4> ...." "" .....,,"~. .~t/~ )',;.",:''''<iI''-i,' I I I -I '.", Wil~~"''' ~> ,'>.Y'" /) A~ Pl!,'ljff!j;'tj;'~;' II Li ~I 'Yv';' jJ.l l~ < / ,~~ ",'< /,11 /".j~Ji !?74:"':;;--C'< I \.,~' / :/ (5/ , ~,x \I'V~ '-<,' ,~ i'~(N--I:--:;:;" "'N;.;:<>'-----~ ' I , ~ I & .', h'" ,,,,MI. I · .. "' ( ,~. '" 'u' · .~. I.," ~ .~ . I>*" ....cwJI.U"" .... . "y'" 0 "Jill. ;!' ' ~ ,." ", ,;:.;,.'Ii" " ' , ',/C' " ",., /"" ,', ,! _",~,' ' T " '" ",. " I' ,,~,,~, 'I' ' . ,,- , ".~."\ ~"c,,~i) , . ,,' ~.,.,., iJ>>.'<{,' , ' ! ,,~1;~ 1>~'x<:;"\~!)/~'; ~yj;'J? / \IV .-,,,,\\ . "- ,J.J~'" / (,\) ',,,,', \ $ (,;.--' / \,\~\ (').1.' ,),,~;./ , , >>" ,~,,'Vi ! ' ~ ,~{~~\, )<] ':4 : ' ",' ,'. y' I ~, 4!:i1,~/ ,\;,~, r;. \ -r>.', "," l1!'( A:; ('</J' $-<; . q'?s." ":: ',' ~ ""',: ,,"> rtl-"'''' , _,-f:,~4W l 2.ttl ~ . O'V~t. >'7~'< ~' 4"' mi.},i.! ~t .,>j" '.; "<" ' '""" n".',9 ! " ,.'- J ' , i I iil ""'~~/ ~~/'~( i :.~, < __ ""< '-u '!'<;f(,N..' ' 'k ~ e ~" ,'-, .......~~, ' / <>",,~... i ~' .', ,/' '" ~ ~,J ..", J : ' " f"'~ '.' %,)"" "",,' "',""..-.~ 4~~~i"" friSl:f"~Oi-]N" ''y1~~~~P'",: ,~..~J' jJjjr"" ~'~ + -'~ ! ~f _i;.,>~~SVJNIfOd17V~II'[/'f'rV'" "V, / ~......_.i ,.,__-lIt.L- 1; ", ' '),T- ",.i ,,,V 4"' Ij'f 'it~"rTI .___,---'-'-\' . Y.:,~$1l"L ~~~'/ ~Ii!!! 'l,l-'/~"- r'--::C':\ &~'VO,' .t;" j ".;" cs. \)J/~" ~ >~"' i \-jl ,,'t', ,,'" <.':;C' ~-=1( ~ - -'I ! ! ~:-i I - 'C ' ......,,1 ' n I. ----~' ~,. .;;'1))/ ~ ~ . ~f!\ I, ! i iit'r-! i i ~ //Y i l~~_..J \ ~ , , ......... ~---, '-.... ---....... -- z~ . :> ;1 ,-., 0'\ QQ ~ '-' riJ ~ ;... = riJ o - ~ ~ ;... o ~ .,.. ;... eo: "0 = = o = C U tr) .... ~ ..... eo: ..... riJ ;... ~ ..... = .... -.:r r-- ~ ~ .= ell 63 ~ ..~.. ..' "-, " ,> . " " . ~ G~ j ~,~fJ ~~g ~.~ij]~ ~j~g~~~ ~~~~t~i Qo~88S'B5 f~ # 0 z ~ !:2 ;:S ClJ ~ o = .... r'-l ~ ClJ ~ ~ = ~ ~ ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ o 0 ".~ ... .... u z~ ~ "" '" eo:! lrl ~ "0 - "'" "" = = ~ r- '" = ..... ~ c C eo:! eo:! - = ..... ~ y '" ~ c "" -= "" ~ ell C ..... = == ~ u ..... i ") ~ ) / . f: \, .~ / !!! <:> ~ ~ ..'" ~~ i~ :l.O ct~ ",!!! ,,<:> ~~~ .~~~ "'.!!. 'Cilllt:: -e.-J.5!' ~~i ""'" ~ fg ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ :::: ~ .- ~ == = = ~ 0- >.~ = ~ ~ 0 U~ z~ <~;)~ \:/ -1t 1,,\ -\\\C'~'.'----> 'I 'f' - ' r Ii bf7".. \,.. T._jL c-\\f--J , '---11-- II ~ : ~ : : ~ II \\~f<<) 'E' '-l.!L III II II II.\~ ,..\ ~ aU[(lln@llIoIllf' ~~II,d B~ .IP~I'/ b\[ 1T ~ ~,Vt-- ---';, , ,'- - .) , ))Jj/ ni' \ wj}.;J :JL~ \ '?! ----' nm ?~~~ \, ~J .~ __ -! j \ T(\)i 'f-==011~\~ ' (0;'\ 01 '~, .. - / !,,:=;~~/n;J)1-I \:\- If:::::: l ~I ~ l\~\ \ '," II \ 1 1 ",I /t.:fjj~!..ij-;' ~/ "----~7~11'A~ ~'!~\ \~_ -- I 1IIIIIiI~"r(tjjS~~,{2/.titt. I~~~~ " _,-~' " / _J_~IW~}~~~!~j~tr ~~'~'ji;. '-' ,,; /' WO ..J:J'c~~' , / ffiSi>-l- It ~,I.~/' - I'"~ ~~'~ ~l..1t= "I~ ' / / ;((-,/'1 ~n\')' " ttL(\\.WtT0lIBJ:=J~ "ltf:{~lil~~~~~">\.'...... "~ ~~:. ~[A\..../,~,.r.JJ~'~ >'.' , ,,,,,,,,,, Ii _~~::C" -0Y y<<{ 'i' ;,.' ,~!...,!;~, / '-tI F< 'J~~ /; S0 :;3\ ' ~c@(\ \J I ~-- '};~-'\ ~{pJ0If::. / (j r ~!"~. //~-.-~'.~".'~'~.." liF-.. .'!I~ .. )~../dZ<' ~~\ . \ -........ '\ \~..",..l. / . \~I~/t\~~'f--~~0YN~~;~~-. . T \,\ \~~.~\i~~J>B,(, ~\ --dp<F~~~i \\/~,\.~' ~" \c-,.~ " '\ ~~ -~ __ i~ ! ~ \\ T..~/~ '." ~..~. " '" ~_~0, ~~~ ,~!-! ~f'''"\.\ T ~.~j~..';!fj ~ :"'''''''''''...'' ..-~,.,;"'/'~'~T\Y \\1lI\ \;C\ \ J --. (~l Tf ~ 0/ r r-r f!A:~ "j'." -,-------- ~ :s>~-llT7-.-'/ '0 IW'-YX~i.. IT \/~ -; V y'fTT-N u o 7 >. '" ; II) ~ 't:l - ..". = = ~ t- '" = .... >. o 0 ~ ~ 7j ~ t;l ~ ~ c ~ -= o ...... ......- ~ ~u.s= . . . ,i' ~.) ~.., < ... - G ~G ~ ~ ~(') ~ . .@.~~ ~~~~~~! ~~g~~~! l~l~~&~ . :; o ~ ~I ~~ :'i ~ - ~ == QJ == ; ~~ =..s ~ eJ eJ QJ ~ .. = 0 ~~ I~l~' OB z:: ~ ir~l ~m~(ja Item No. 12 oQ P ~ ~ age 9 of 12 u....l / ~9(1~ II;U ,,~- 1~~jffi17~fj ~, 11 r1IDr~f!liIr '...... '.'."'.1, '~" _ ., . .!T. T}77~.~ '.. .... ~ q,;.;:,;;", i j U I II rtr-;;<,,_ ~~~\ ~~W~. !jfl~~./c ~1 IW~Ft~tj\~q 'rJtr :~llllrY , lTT III [ I l z~ ", / J1 ---J -~I \ \ '\ - , il I ]'-~1 ~7 ] _J _\~" 1111 I.~~~'\\ I r iJ~ T. I'T.)-l.~ ~~ 1III 'f i ~p. - I----... ""--< \..--?\'V\ - ...J L - '= ~v/C}_~ I ~:::-.~ j I- I 1 _CI: I I _~ ---j ~ Ill. ~ I ; '/.00., \ I ~'~~l!i I~l " i nn=r,~! ~JITT I 7~4~';:+':\~:U";f" ~:~~~C~1:;~j~~~ ~~ " '~Rt4j1 \ \B~~f~/~ \, ' .' ~~ ~ ,<.", = --"" __~~ '" ' '. './ / / '! \\ ", ',"N,., . '. I ,/ " \'.. '. . .' ~. '''''''''''' '( ,/., '/ \~~"'~~~'''..,< / /, d':' ,<f>' "". ,'p '-. ~Ifi-~-'~/ 'I 0 ' ','. ~=, '. '-J ~~~ ", i "'''~~~~' \\ . ""~-1/, 1 -;o;;;.;;;;~;;;;~..> ' "" ;' = - tJ h=-<L I .J ~ I '<<Z!m III 1 L 1 I ~ ~T l ~~.' -=: l ;"~I ~, . /'/ \. "iIl" ;; It) ...,. ::-.. / \ /~ 't:l ..... r- '~ \ /~ = ~ ~ ",~ " ==....~ ""\.' '. ~ ~ ~ ~ '''" "'" c:l ~.c ""'-,/ .......~ 0 ~ .~ '\;,.. ~'..........u.s?= ~ . .~'..........~ ') ',. i' .' ~~ -- --. B ~B ~ ~ .~~ ~~ (,).~~~ ~!~~~~~ e~g~co~ i.~~i~~~ CLU""')..... . " ~ G ~~ ~i ;S ,] I = o r'-l ~QJ = l-i ~ = U ~ - ~ ~ ... QJ ... l-i QJ 0 ~~ ~ I~l~ OB z:: ~ _1--4 "" VJ " ....<" ," . 'da Item No. 12 o fZ Page 10 of 12 ~cr: 0....< '" ~ ""' = '" c ~ ~ ""' c ~ >. ""' ~ "0 = = c = .0 U . > ~ ~.., ~ z~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ...., . :> ij lrl .... ~ .... ~ .... '" ""' ~ .... = .... ''') ." "" " ~ ~<3 ~ ~ ~~ ffiQ) ~.~~~ ~~~ ~~!j l~~~t~t ~g~a8GU) i3 ~~ " ~ <.0 ~ :'i ...... rI:J rI:J Q.) Q.) ... ~ ~ Q.) 0 ...- o ~ = ~ .~ 0 ~~ I~l~ OS z:: ~ .c:n ~ .....:l'" 2 ,N " da Item NO.1 o S2 Page 11 of 12 ~<r: 0.....:l '" Cl.I l. = '" Q ~ Cl.I l. Q ~ >> l. ~ Irl 'e - = Cl.I = ..... Q ~ ~ ~ o ~ U == - . "'.. (,# ", z~ ~ '" a GG .~ ~ ~~ ~~g ~ ~~~ i!~i~i~ ~~~~t~i o..u~~8r3~ .. " ~8 ~ ~ ~ ~~ !:! ;S :1 ~ <0 o c .... = QJ .. QJ 00 ~ QJ .. := ~ o - ~ QJ .. o ~ ~ r- >> ~ .E e1) Ei3 ., ,> < , , a Item No. 12 Page 12 of 12 .. LAKJ: LSINORJ: \ I ~ DREAM EXTREME REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: ROBERT A. BRADY CITY MANAGER DATE: JULY 8,2008 SUBJECT: SECOND READING - ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1255, AMENDING CHAPTER 17.82 OF THE LAKE ELSINORE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING TIME EXTENSIONS FOR DESIGN REVIEW APPROVALS Discussion Ordinance No. 1255 was introduced at a regular City Council meeting on June 24, 2008, and is now being presented for second reading and adoption. Recommendation Waive further reading and adopt Ordinance No. 1255, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 17.82 OF THE LAKE ELSINORE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING TIME EXTENSIONS FOR DESIGN REVIEW APPROVALS Prepared by: Vivian M. Munson City Clerk Robert A. Brady OI\R. City Manager \~~ Approved by: Agenda Item No. 13 Page 1 of 4 ORDINANCE NO. 1255 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 17.82 OF THE LAKE ELSINORE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING TIME EXTENSIONS FOR DESIGN REVIEW APPROVALS WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Law authorizes the legislative body of a city to adopt ordinances that, among other things, regulate the use of buildings, structures, and land as between industry, business, residences, and open space; and WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elsinore wishes to provide clear standards for the establishment and implementation of time extensions and expirations for Design Review approvals which can be applied throughout the City of Lake Elsinore; and WHEREAS, based on evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a duly noticed public hearing on May 20, 2008, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the ordinance adopting modifications to Chapter 17.82 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code regarding time extensions for design review approvals; and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing, held on June 24, 2008, the City Council considered the Planning Commission's recommendation and evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties regarding the proposed Text Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Section 17.82.110 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code be amended as follows (additions in underline; deletions in strikethrough): Section 17.82.110. Lapse of Design Review approval and Time Extensions. A. A Design Review approval shall lapse and become void one (1) two (2) year~ following the date on which the Design Review became effective, unless one of the followinq: (1) prior to the expiration of two (2) year~, a building permit related to the Design Review is issued and construction commenced and diligently pursued toward completion, or (2) prior to the expiration of two (2) years. the applicant has applied for and has been qranted an extension of the Desiqn Review approval pursuant to subsections Band C. Notwithstanding conditions to the contrary, a Design Review granted pursuant to this Chapter shall run with the land for this two (2) year period, subiect to any approved extensions. and shall continue to be valid upon a change of ownership of the site which was the subject of the Design Review application. 1 Agfmda Item No. 13 Page 2 of 4 B. The expiration date of an approved Desian Review may be extended for no more than two (2) years. The first extension may be aranted for one (1) year subiect to the approval of the Community Development Director after consultation with other city departments if such Desian Review complies with current law. standards and policies. The second one (1) year extension may be aranted by the approvina body (Le.City Council. Plannina Commission) that approved the underlyina Desian Review so lona as the Desian Review complies with current law. standards and policies. C. Application for extensions of time shall be filed prior to the expiration of the initial Desian Review approval and accompanied by a fee in an amount as established by resolution of the City Council. D. Any Desian Review approval aranted on or after July 1. 2007. up to the effective date of this ordinance. shall lapse and become void two (2) years followina the date on which the Desian Review became effective. unless one of the exceptions set forth in subparaaraph A is satisfied. then. in which case. the life of the Desian Review shall be extended in accordance with subparaaraphs Band C. SECTION 2. Severability. If any provision, clause, sentence or paragraph of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions of this Ordinance and are hereby declared to be severable. SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its final passage. The City Clerk shall certify as to adoption of this Ordinance and cause this Ordinance to be published and posted in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, on this 8th day of July 2008. DARYL HICKMAN MAYOR ATTEST: VIVIAN M. MUNSON CITY CLERK 2 Agenda Item No. 13 Page 3 of 4 APPROVED AS TO FORM: BARBARA ZEID LEIBOLD CITY ATTORNEY STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ) I, VIVIAN M. MUNSON, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 1255 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore on the . 24th day of June 2008, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore held on the 8th day of July 2008 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: VIVIAN M. MUNSON CITY CLERK 3 Agenda Item NCJ. 1:J Page 4 of4