The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About07/07/2005 CC Study Session 1 '....',.,.' ......, .. ,..... .. , . CITy'-OF:cLAK'E~ELSINORE 'CIWYCQIJN~ILSTlJDY'S:ESSI(lN '-r.' ....1\.. "a'E' ND' 'A ":" ..-;,:-,...:.~: ..'~.. -, :'::i (. - : -'-'.;"'.\_"~... ":_:;",:.,.. ROBERTK' "BOS"MAGEE.:MA YOR:,-... ROBERT~. SCHIFF~ER;MAYORPR()TEM THOMAS BUCKLEY' COUNCILMAN DARYL HICKMAN,COUNCILMAN '(;ENIE.KELI,Ey,COUNCILWOMAN ROBERT A..BRADY, CITY MANAGER . , " ~'LAKE-ELSiNpRE.ORG (951)'674-3124 PHONE (951) 674-2392 FAX ;-, ) ;LAKEELSINORE;CULTURAL CENTER 183 NORTH MAIN STREET "[;AKEELSINORE, CA92530 . . . If you are attendingthisCity<;ou.n~ilStudy $e~sionpll!asepark in the Parking Lot acrossthestreet:!rotnthef;ii1tUlJaICenter.Fhiswill assist us in limiting the impact of meetings ont/tei/fj};'nto,;V" Busine;s,District. Thank you for your' cooperation!' . . . CALL TO'ORDER ROLI:CAbL. .'-', ...... -. .,.....' .' , ... .. .. ,'.. . , . . . , ~ ' , ".., .," '; PLEDGE.OF.ALLEGI1\'NCK." . ,,'" . .PUBLI~~OMMENTS~A~ENDrZEDITE1\iS~LlvIINun; .' .<.,.P..Il;:a.., sere.a.. d..'~. ,co..' ippl.et.e;a. S...p..~..., ~,k. ,e.'p. i...s;j;<orrnaQhe;P8di)lm;priotto' the, Start. oftheCity;C()~nc~lS41dy$,essj?Wf . . .",. , .. . PRESEN.TATIONS - ': - .. ~',,~' . A. Boys and Girls Glub. . .' -...' :, :" ";:'. ','-' - '. '. . . "'-. ,," B. Development ImpactEe~$'forB4blicBuildingsin Lake Elsinore. "; >..~;- ~.- ,'>" _.,' . '. ;'. ,;.; !-.' ,I,"~ . "..,.:":'.".;.",.'. , .,,:,:,.,-- JJ~I[ilWNHflPf(JV ': SJ;N[iI,,wWo,::J ~Iq~a03 ALl) , ,,..,'" ,I ,.. ,J", ....._:',....-' ;':0,'.,':.-__,,",,-:-,-, ~J.jN:[WWO;):lI~flSV;rnL1\U:) , ,.... -::-':'-,.." -'" : .' ;:-"~ _ ;<." .' __ A' " , _ :s;JiN~W:WO:::>':\.:>I:NH()~LV ALI:::> ,----.' :. ..\' ~," ,/. " i:SJ;N[iI'-WWt>::YUliIDVNVW;:UI:::>' SOOZ'L;\ 'Info- V<INJlDV,N6ISS:!ISL\<IflLSITIDNflOD ALD - OMl. ;}~ttd CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: ROBERT A. BRADY, CITY MANAGER DATE: . JULY 7, 2005 SUBJECT: BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB BACKGROUND The City Council has on two previous occasions discussed the establishment ofa Boys and Girls Club in the City. A 5.4 acre site on Mission Trail, which is owned by the City, has been suggested as a possible site for the facility. The City Council discussed this site and the need to consider alternate sites for a Boys and Girls Club. Three other vacant parcels of land have been identified as possible locations for the facility as identified on the attached map. The parcels are the former fire station site onLincoln at Terra Cotta, a portion ofthe park in Rosetta Canyon and a privately owned vacant parcel on Summerhill Drive at Scenic Ridge Drive. The value of each parcel has not been determined at this time. A presentation by representatives of the Boys and Girls Club will be made to the City Council during the study session. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City review and discuss the establishment of a Boys and Girls Club in Lake Elsinore. . . PREPARED BY: Robert A. Brady, City Manager APPROVED FOR AGENDA LISTING: Attachement \~V' ~~il~.iil'fifJ. ~I If 0;;2 , "'-, ":-' CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL -~- TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: ROBERTA BRADY, CITY MANAGER ' DATE: JULY 7, 2005 , SUBJECT: STUDY SESSION ON DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FOR PUBLIC BIDLDINGS IN LAKE ELSINORE - BACKGROUND . .; , -' , ' On April 12, 2005, City Council selected the lowest bidding firm, Harris and Associates, to perform the development impact fee study:' There were four tasks outlined in the scope of work:, ' ,Task 1. Review the feasibility of imposing impact fees for the public facilities and service categories listed in Exhibit A ofthe RFP. , Task 2. ' Prepare a nexus study to support the adoption .of impact fees for the public facilities and service categories listed in Exhibit A of the RFP. ' , , ' , - Task 3. Review existing impact fees, which include impact fees fQr traffic, parks, libraries and drainage, and evaluate the need for updating, revising, or enhancing those fees. " . Task 4. Review the feasibility of imposing provisional impact fees during, preparation of final impact fee studies. Task 4 was deemed not necessary at th~kick-offplanning meeting when it was determined that task 1 and 2 could be performed in the same time it would take tQ prepare temporary provisional impact fees for task 4. The results of task I and 2 are , complete and task 3 for the review of existing'impact fees will be perfornied next. AGENDA ITEM NO..-B PAGE-L-OF t.{ d, ; p' REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL JULY 7, 2005 PAGE 2 DISCUSSION Harris & Associates has prepared a Public Building Impact Fee Analysis for the City of Lake Elsinore in accordance with the StateLaw as set forth in California Government Code Section 66000 et seq., also known as the "Mitigation Fee Act". This Act requires that imposed fees cannot be more than the cost of the public facility needed to accommodate such development The fee revenues can only be used for theirintended purpose. The City does not currently impose an impact fee for public facilities necessitated. by new development Current facilities have been funded through the general fund. In order to maintain the existing level of service within the City, a development impact fee should to be established to pay for the new facilities. The proposed development impact fees will cover City Hall facilities, Public Works facilities, community center facilities, expanded recreation facilities at the Lake, an aquatics center facility and an animal shelter facility. . . A summary of these fees are shown below per dwelling unit or 1000 square feet of non-residential buildings: . Public Building Impact Fee Summary Per Dwelling Unit SFDU MF 2-4 MF 5+ $3,601 $3,100 $1,800 Per 1000 Square Feet Office . Retail Industrial $179 $107 . $36 There are five componehts of the fees that 'are summarized in the table below and may be approved or rejected separately~ REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL JULY 7, 2005 PAGE 3 When considering adding impact fees, City Council should consider the future20 years out or more and consider the demand for facilities at that time. Will residents desire and use the public facilities being proposed? Council's actions today are setting a long term course for the future facilities available. The City still has significant development ahead and now is the time to decide the coUrse to take. As an example, the City of Tracy has been very tough on enforcing-their . development impact fee standard and in contrast, the City of Modesto have waived or reduced developer impact fees because they were concerned that the developers would not develop in the City. Tracy is benefiting with fast and healthy growth and Modesto is experiencing fast growth but have limited their capital funding to build the facilities required to service the growth. There aretwo concerns that may be raised by City Council when facing the decision to impose developer impact fees. First, there may be a concern that a h,u:ge developer impact fee will be cost prohibitive for land to be developed and therefore development will never take place. With a long term perspective, thelkd will eventually be developed ifit is not developed by the current developer. Another developer will come along at some point and develop it. As harsh as this may sound' to a developer, the impact fee is vital to providing for the future facility needs ofthe community. The City would best be served by not compromising with a short term perspective. . . Secondly, there may be a concern that the home prices will be too high if the impact fee is charged and then added to the price of the home. Thesignificant nse in real estate market prices at a faster pace than the cost of c.onstruction in the last two years highlights the fact that the price of homes set by the developers is!mainly driven by the market more than the cost of building the home. Developers can only sell the homes for what the market will bear and the developer will sell for the highest price possible. ' . For reference and comparison purposes, a survey of other Cities is attached including Murrieta, Temecula, Corona, and more. ACENDA ITEM NO._~ PAGS ~. OF 'fa. REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL JULY 7, 2005 PAGE 4 The following summarizes the assumptions used in developing the development impact fees for the five components of the public building impact fee: City Ball and Public Works The City Hall and Public Works facilities serve both homes and businesses citywide. Therefore, a service population that includes both residents and workers is - -reasonable. Workers were weighted less than residents to reflect a lower per capita service demand. A weighting factor of 0.24 (40 hour work week divided by 168 hours in a week) was used for workers. Based on this, the existing service population was calculated to be 37,754. It is estimated that the service population in 2025 will be 69,106.. The current city hall and public works facility consists of3 buildings totaling 16,355 square feet on 1.36 acres. These existing buildings form the basis for the current level of service. ' A survey of cities with recently constructed City Halls was conducted to detennine , the replacement cost of the existing facilities. The estimated replacement cost of the existing facilities was divided by the current service population to detennine the facility expansion cost per capita. This cost was then multiplied by the density assumptions to detennine the fee. This method assures that fairness exists between new and existing development based on current levels of service. These fees per dwelling unit or 1000 square feet of non-residential buildings are shown below: SFDU MF 2-4 MF 5+ Office Retail Industrial City Hall & Public Works Impact Fee ,$806 $694 $403 $179 $107 $36 Community Center Community center facilities serve primarily residents in the City by providing space for recreation and similar programs. Therefore, a service population that includes only residents is reasonable. As the population of the City grows with new ACENDA rTEM NO.--B ~ d., PAGE if OF r I I REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL JULY 7, 2005 PAGES development, so does the demand for services provided by these facilities. The' existing service population was calculated to be'35,358 for 2005. It is estimated that. the service population in 2025 will be 65,486. The City's current community center facilities are comprised of3 buildings totaling 14,247 square feet on 18.98 acres. These existing buildings form the basis for the current level of service. A replacement cost of the existing facility was determined based'ontheestimated cost of constrUction, of similar facilities. The estimated cost of the existing facilities was divided by the current service population to determine the facility expansion cost per capita. . This cost was then multiplied by the density assumptions to determine the fee. This methoqassures that fairness exists between new and existing development based on current levels of service. These fees per dwelling unit are shown below: . , Community Center F:acilities Impact Fee SFDU $944 MF 2-4 . MF 5+, $813 $472 Marina Facilitv. ,! Marina facilities serve primarily residents in the City by providing recreation at the lake. Therefore a service population that includes only residents is reasonable. As. the population of the City grows with new development, so does the demand for recreation services provided by these faci!ities. Based on this, the existing service population was calculated to be 35,358 for 2005, It is estimated that the service population in 2025 will be 65,486. The existing facilities consist of boat launch facilities, a campground, and vehicles r. associated with the marina facilities. An inventory of existing facilities was . performed and a cost associated with these facilities was determined. This cost was divided by the current service population to determine a cost per capita. This cost was then multiplied by the density assumptions to determine the fee. This method AGENDA '!EM NO.-.f2> PAGE:S OF '7.:l . . REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL JULY 7, 2005 PAGE 6 assures that fairness exists between new and existing development based on current levels of serVice; These fees per dwelling unit are shown below: Marina FacilitiesImpact Fee SFDU $779 MF 2-4 .$671.. MF5+ $389. Aquatics Facility The City does not currently have an Aquatic facility. Aquatics facilities serve. primarily residents in the City by"providing recreation opportunities. Therefore, a service population that includes only residents is reasonable. As the population of . the City grows with new development, so does the demand for recreation services provided by these facilities. Based on this, the existing service population was calculated to be 35,358. It is estimated that the service population in 2025 will be 65,486. A survey of cities with recently constructed new aquatic facilities was conducted to determine the cost of anew aquatic center. Since there currently are no aquatics facilities in Lake Elsinore, the City will fund the portion of the new facility associated with the existing population. The estimated cost of the facility is $13.2 million. This cost was divided by the projected population in 2025 to determine a cost per capita. This cost was then multiplied by the density assumptions to determine the fee. This method assures that new development is not being required to mitigate an existing deficiency. These fees per dwelling unit are shown below: SFDU MF 2-4 MF 5+ Aquatics Center Facilities Impact Fee $724 $623 $362 There are several factors to consider for making a decision whether to collect for a future municipal aquatic facility. Some factors to consider are: I. Will there be a demand for such a facility in the future? ACENDA ITEM NO. PACE ~ g OFLI;;' REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL JULY 7, 2005 PAGE 7 2. Will the City be able to afford subsidizing the cost of such a facility since user fees typically do not cover the significant operating and maintenance costs of running an aquatic facility? 3. Will joint use agreements with the School District aquatic facilities be sufficient to meet the demand? 4. Would an aquatiC'facilio/ best be developed and operated privately? . 5. What are the surrounding cities' aquatic facility service levels?': .'. . . I , . . - l' . ,', . ." i General answers to the above questi?ns are as follows: , . , 1. The City of Lake Elsinore is a great place to live, workandplay. An aquatic facility would be very popular. 2. {fthe aquatic facility was built in the next 15 years, the City would probably struggle to support the shortfall in revenue necessary to run and maintain the facility. Vista has a public wave water park that incurs a $300,000 amiual shortfall that is subsidized by the General Fund. However, the City will reach a fiscal health at some point where they will be able to support an aquatic .' facility. 3. The new high school on'Riverside Drive has a 25m poolfacility. The. Community Services Department is working with the School District to secure a joint use agreement for about 2 Y2 months during the summer where the City would rent the facility for lessons and recreation swim time. Even with other school pool facilities, the demand for aquatic facilities will most. likely exceed the supply. 4. Regarding certain surrounding city facilities:.. '. · Murrieta has one pool at the California Oaks Sports Park that the . City owns and maintains . . Temecula runs three pools: · CRC Pool - 25 yd. heated - City owns and maIntains · Chaparral HS Pool - City has use June - August only : ' } 1, · Temecula Elementary - City has use June - August only - , . I currently closed for re~ovation . . . . .' . . · Corona - operates no pools according to their website . AGENDA ITEM No._R PAGE 7 OF 'i d.. REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL JULY 7, 2005 PAGE 8 .. Norco has one pool at the Norco Community Center,Pool Plunge - operates mid June through August Animal Shelter Facilitv An Animal Shelter facility serves primarily residents in the City by providing, animal control services and adoption. Consequently, a service population that includes only residents is reasonable. As the population of the City grows with new development, so does the demand for services provided by these facilities. The existing service population was calculated to be 35,358 for 2005. It is estimated that the service population in 2025 will be 65,486. The City's current animal shelter facility is comprised of three 12' by 6{)' modular buildings, one 12' by 20' modular buildings, kennels, livestock'area, and six vehicles located on a three-quartet acre site. A new facility is cUrrently planned that will be shared with 4 other agencies and the existing facility will be abandoned. These fees per dwelling unit are shown below: Animal Shelter Facility. , Impact Fee SFDU $348 MF 2-4 MF 5+ $299$174 Annual Updates An automatic annual update will be applied to the fee using the Engineering News. .Record (ENR) building cost index. Periodically, the City should review the project costs in depth and revise the fee accordingly. ' FISCAL IMPACT The City will be required to fund the portion of the aquatic and animal shelter facilities that is associated with the existing population. It is estimated that the City's contribution for the aquatic facility will be $7,110,907 and the animal shelter ACENDA ITEM NO.~ PACE g OF L/a REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL JULY 7, 2005 PAGE 9 facility will be $3,413,565. These amounts should be programmed into the City's CIP program. Developers are responsible for all other costs related to the project. PREPARED BY: ~~~ MATT N. PRESSEY RECTOR OF ADMINISTRA TI SERVICES AND JIM MILLER, HARRIS AND ASSOCIATES ACEN~:~~EM90.0~Y ~ Il " " ." ;;; f "" E .l! " "6> " ;;; " '" '" ~ 6 :'3 ,,- ~! g '" ~.e -- E"5 " .. Ell! c. .2~ ~- ~ " " QO) ,g 0 0 0 0 0 0 '~ ro ro <ri '" E "' '" " ~ "' .... '" ~ ~ 0 0 0,006000 0 00 0000000 0 .5NMOcico;NNN ~ .r:,vCOO> OC:O~O) '" UN(t)~ .....~ p) "' ~ caoooooooo 0 0 cqqqqqqqq 0 .r= ooor--oor--oo ... u E '" '" "' c '" ., 0 '" 11 N N .; '" " 0 J! 00000000 0 c:qqqqqqqC! q "S 100 o <VIO..... 0 0 ;;; "O:g o;~<O ~ 0 j N .goooooooo 0 _00000000 0 -g ci"';. ci ci ci ci ci ..0 cO o (0 0 co ~ u q ..... <0 N .. w 00 ....00 .... '" U1Q ....00 '" ;; Me; cncrim cO :> ....~.... '" <0 ('I). ....."t~ .... N~ .; COCDO......,..;.OCDoa '" (")ON(\IOIOO(O) .... '3 ~ ci ~~ ci'~ ci ~ cO ., ;:,<0 0:)(0 ..... N '" >- ..: .0 as _00000000 0 \D q q q q q q q,q 0 Et'?COcnCO.....LOLOO .; c>> o lO.......... <0..... 10('1) '" ~It)N"":IO'<tC'!......('f) '" ~ ClC\lCOO.....MC\lCCO '" 'S ~ ""': q t-:'tq Lq q~ ~ UIO<OOCO.....,...O(") ,,; 00..... <0100 ..... '" S.....N "'t<Ot'-:. It) '" (!. '" .; soooooooo 0 Qloqqqqqqqq 0 'E~LO;g;:~g~~ <ri "' i..........~~.....I'--.......... '" .; caOODDDDOQ 0 c:C!:C!:C!:C!C!C!C!C!: 0 OCON<oomt'--coO) cO l5<ON~ ~;g~~ ., " u ..: ..; u5 .,,0 0000 0 f "q 0000 0 " 0 "'" cici,cicri ... '" " 00 001.0 co " '" 'iij ., O:I(~..... ~ .... ..J 0 " iij .l: f C 0000 0 .. 0000 0 0 f cicicia:i 00 '" " '" ;;; ~ 00 It) co '" ..J " O><D~""'''!. '" iij 0 ro .. ~ 'u '" U. ." " '" c c " " E E c. fJ) :i "S ,,'" :g~ II) W .r:. UJ <P rn -g ~~m~ roll)Rl -o:c:e 0 .~:& (I) l::(I)13~ (f)=~ (l3 > (l3 U'- w....u..s ERl~ s.~ijiQ)~ml!!u.> _~EO)(U'_ CD. -13 B ~ ~iSl-:am .b~ 5;'~.Q) ~-g 3t~ cn--oo:::u.. [02'0 !~~E~~-iig~ u.c~5""""Q)..ae 2i~~U5~:3in~u: ~ 1'tI"....000 o.cqC!q o=co<o<o ~~~"'~~ "'......'" '" ...... 0 0 ,.; "' ~ en 0 .. ... ... "' " 0 .. ;i .. .; 0 C! ~ ... .. N 0 .. 0 .. 00 ..: '" '" "' .... N .... "! ;;j .... ,.: '" .... .; ., '" ., ~ .. .. .; 'l5 '" '" '" . ..; '" '" CD ;t .. ..; .. .. ci "' .. '" .. .. ..: '" " en .. 0 ..: .. "' .. 0 0 .. ... '" ... o o N '" "'. ;;; .; ;;; o .. ..: " "! o o ..: ~ o 0 o 0 cQ l() o " '" N 0000 0000 ..ta>Ncxi 'V............. CD....... ...... (") ]j o :0 " (}) 'E " E 1l '" c. " "' "" " o ! g ~ '0 Ow ~~ (; S' o~:ft _Q) ~ lD uE 2i i ~ ~ af ~ ~ lD c{ :a ~(J) .2 ~.?;-LLLLlD~1'tI c_ Q. .?;-=.... c u.. I'IJLL I'IJ c .~ ~-g~~o~c%~ (I) ii:E ~ ::>~~Q)uclDm~....~Em Q"u~~gc~~~u~u~~~~c~ c .... '- ~- (Q CI) 0.- 0 ~ lL~gtfi~~Q~~~~~o~~~ Q~""O~_U~~LL~(J)~-u..00 ~CI)~....b""""I'IJEI'tI~m_~~.Ec .~~S~~~~E~~~~~!~.~ .r=5~c:oQ)Q)l'tIo~a~bCl)~~~ oo::>:>t)(J)cna...t)~<(<((J)O~......q; .. " " u. c o ., '" ~ ~ IS AGENDA ITEM NO.~ ~. PAGE--1lL-OF '-(d.... " '" " " gt;~t::re~~ut; "I 0.. '" E .. ~~~~~m:;t; :8 Ei LO .....0).....0 ..... '" ..... . N .n :l! .00000000 0 ...~.C!:qC!:C!:qqq 0 IGcn.....e>>-.;:tlt).....O..... .; ~~-CO)~S;('I)~, ..... '" ... M 0 00 0 0 ;f 00 0 0 ~g ~ .; 0 a> ;; co~ q I'- lL -- N .n "'ON N a> '" .....Ol<O - '" ci~""; ci oJ .; -"'''' I'- I'- (\lft)Ltt '" - M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ci .; ci .; ~ 0 "I 0 "I "I '" '" 0'" ;g ON "I 1i~ "'I'- a> >1'- .; r..:co:i ... 01'- ~ "'''' I'- -"I '" Z N N .,: 0000000 0 0000000 0 g o..ocicicicici .; ~:g~o;~~~ '" Ci ... N O"'=l{)cQ"': .n "I ... OCf)OLO.....OOit) 0 ~ 0(")00).....000) 0 .. ci~cir::rr;cici; .; '" ~ I'- " "I "'''' "! III fOCOD 0 0 0 0000 ~ ~ 0 CD . . . . .; _CD CO..... 0) I'- '" CO>NOCO '" "I ;; ~ .....ClOIO-ltt~q<(CO .....ZMZ ..: 000 0000 0 0:: 000 0000 0 ,,- cri"":N "":cif.'i<ci .; ..'" 0_1'- o<omoo ;!: lL,l! ... I'- . <0 N CO') lD .,: ..: 0000 0 0 " 0000 0 0 ;; c.;..o<ci""; ..: "I .. v...........<O "I '" a ~.....C")"t "I .... '" .n ;: ~ 000,0000 0 0000000 0 "- "":N<O...tN"":-.t .; to= l;:z: :!~~~~~~ "I ... :l! ~..; N a; 00 00000 0 " 00 00000 ~ ;; do ario:....:cir.ri ;0 0 0 I'- ... '" u ~'" I'- "I I'- .,: .n z - ~ .. E " .l! ~ .. '0 m ;;, U. ~ ." '; ~ .. m to C C l! " " ~ E E 0. m '5 '5 l; .. " <7 W ..- "w .. ." ::~ :cui CD !!! c ~~-~~ m .. '" u.~ ~ " .. -g"i~aJ .21.. " g", m> ~u. ce=n:2 o.~ ,52 ~ fhELLg lEctl-a5 .~ Q:l Q:l ~ m ro u. > - ,g ~ECDftI.......C) ~ 1:'5 13 ~ ~=)-:a m .. .. 1i ro~._oo"OQ)._ E .. u. ..... e' Q) ro C Q):= c.'" " - J2 Cl cr: u. co ~'u ~ 0 ,., .. ~JiEoij~~.2~ 1 ~ a u. C~o~e?~15Q) :E " " is ~ ro...... <<l:9...... ='.!:::: " aU) ...Jcno.....JWQ..u. (f) ~ '" ... I'- "I ;; 0; ... 0 0 q "I '" '" .; '" '" .n <> <> .; '" ... M <> <> .; '" I'- on - <> <> oJ '" ... on <> <> .; '" '" I'- '" '" "'''' ... OU) .; 1'-'" - "I '" on '" '" '" '" oJ ..: '" - on ... <> <> ,.; I'- "! <> <> .; C; ..: <> <> ci '" a> '" <> <> ,.; ill on - <> <> oJ '" '" 1'-' - <> ~ ;0 I'- on - '" ... o 0 o 0 ci ci o '" '" 0 N r-: ~o ",.2 c " E 8 '" 'E. " '" "" c o ... c U ~ g ~U) '0 -(;j ~ E o S- .~m -\1) .~$ 0:0::: g;in ~ ..u..~$Q)c(T3 ~~ o .E z-u. u. Q) B <<l c _ _ -.-....cLLmLL ml: ~ E:OS CD l:o ,9; Qi en [[ CD o ;ro<<JE:::lv~1:enCD ~Een . ~~~~O~CD~~~U~~ CD ~~~ml:oQ)~U=uS_>=l:> COl:~o~l: ~~<<J~ O~O:::l ~~gi~~~Q%<<J~~~~<<Jlg 5~~ug~u~~~~~~~~9~ ~Q)~~b~~roE<<J:::lro_~-~l: O~~$~~~~E~~E$~~~~ ~~l:rooQ)Q)roorou~bQ)e~u um~~uoooo~u~~~oo~~~~ ill " U. 1: ,g .. ~ :E ~ AGEN~:~~~~ L{ ~ l! Cl This page.is intentionally left blank. "; AGENDA ITEM NO.~ PAGE~OF~ ., .j Public Building Impact Fee.. Study for the . i ! I City of lake Elsinore i . I, , i ~ ;' Prepared by: . ":i. I II Harris & Associates . July 5, 2005 ACENDA ITE~ No._B PAceJLoF '-I'J, City of Lake Elsinore July 5, 2005 Pagei PUBLIC BIDLDINGS IMPACT FEE STUDY Table of Contents Chapter 1 . ........... '.......'..:............................................................................. ................. ........... .... .1 Public Building Impact Fee Analysis .......................................................................,...............:.. I Introduction and Smnmary ............................................ ..... ................................. ............:... I Study Objectives....... ... .......................................................................... .........:. ....... .... ........ I Mitigation Fee Act......................................................... ..... ................................................. 1 Organization of the Report .... ....... .......... ......... ................. ..... ........ ...................................... 2 Facility Standards........................................................ ...................................... .................. 3 Fee Calculation and Growth Projections.............................................................................3 Chapter 2 ....................... .................................................................. ............ ............................ .... 6 City Hall and Public Works Facilities ......................................................................................... 6 Service Population. ........................................................ ................. .., .... .......... ..:.............. ... 6 Existing Facilities Inventory ...,.................................,.......................................................... 7 Facility Standards and Fee...................................................................................................8 Facility Costs to Accommodate Growth ........................................................................... 10 Implementation................................. .......................:..... ................. ..... ................... ...... ,.... 10 Chapter 3 ..........................., ................................................... .................................................... 11 .Community Center Facilities...... ...................... ...................................... ................................... 11 . Service Population........................................................................................ .~............. ...... 11 Existing Facilities Inventory ............................ .......... ...... .................................................. 11 Facility Standards imd Fee................................................................................................. 12 Facility Costs to Accommodate Growth ........................................................................... 13 Implementation........................................ ~......................................................................... 13 Chapter 4 ..... .............................................................................................................................. 15 Marina Facilities........................................................................................................................ 15 Service Population.. ..... ......................................................................................... ............. 15 Existing Facilities Inventory ............................................... ....... ...... ....................... ........... 15 Facility Standards and Fee Schedule...........................................................:.....................16 Facility Costs to Accommodate Growth ..................................................:........................17 . Implementation. ............................... ...................... ................... ......................................... 17 Chapter 5 ................................................................................................ ..... .............................. 18 Aquatic Facilities..................................... .................................................. ................................ 18 Service Population................................... ............................................ ................... ............ 18 Existing Facilities Inventory ........ .......................... ... ,............... ...... .............. ..................... 18 Facility Standards and Fee Schedule................................................................................. 19 Facility Costs to Accommodate Growth .,.......................................................................... 20 Implementation.................................................................................................................. 21 Chapter 6 ........... ................... ................. ...................... ......................:........... ....................... ...... 22 Animal Shelter Facilities........................,...............................................,.................................. 22 Service Population........................ ..................................................................................... 22 Existing Facilities Inventory ......... .......................................................................... ........... 22 Facility Standards and Fee Schedule.................................................................................23 Facility Costs to Accommodate Growth ...........................................................................24 Implementation......................... ....................... ..:....:.......................................................... 24 Appendix ......................... ... .... ... ..................... ............. ...................... ...................... .................. 25 W:\Lake Elsinore\finaJ Public Building report\Lake Elsinore Public Bldg ab 1600 report 070505.doc AGENOA ITEM NO.---B I../;}. PAGE-1!i-OF City 01 Lake Elsinore JulyS, 2005 Pageii PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE STUDY List of Tables and Fil!Ures Table I. I: Lake Elsinore GroWth Projections Summary ...................:............................................4 Table I. 2: Public Building Impact Fee Summary .............................................................:..........., 5 Table I. 3: Public Building Impact Fee Revenue Summary ..............................................,............ 6 Table 2. 1: City Han & Public Works Facilities Service Population ...............:..:.....'.....:",......:..... 7 Table 2. 2: City Hall & Public Works Facilities Standards and Unit Costs .................................... 8 Table 2. 3: City Hall & Public Works Facilities'Construction Costs .....:........:..................:............ 9' Table 2. 4: City Han & Public Works Facilities Impact Fee.......:...:...........:...::....;..:.........:...:......... 9 Table 2. 5: City Hall & Public WorkS Facilities Costs to Accommodate Growth ..:..........:.......... 10 Table 3. I: Community Center Facilities Service Population .,................................................:.... II Table 3. 2: Community Center Facilities Standards and Unit Costs............:..............,.................12 Table 3.3: Community Center Facilities Impact Fee....................,......:.:.......:::....:.......::................ 13 Table 3. 4: Community Center Facilities Costs to Accommodate Growth .............,...................., 13 Table 4. I: Marina Facilities Service Population ................................................................'.....,....15 Table 4. 2: Marina Facilities Standardsand Unit Costs ......................................................'.......... 16 Table 4. 3: Marina Facilities Impact Fee.........:....,.:............:..................................:.....:.....,1........::16 Table 4. 4: Marina Facilities Cosis to Accommodate Growth ........,..............:..........:..:......'........:.17 " Table 5. I: Aquatic Facilities Service Population ...............,..................................:.......................18 Table 5. 2: Aquatic Facilities Standards and UnitCosts.::............::..........:......::..................'......:.:.19 Table 5. 3: Aquatic Facilities Construction Costs........::......:.:........:..:.............'........:..........:......... 19 Table 5. 4: Aquatic Facilities Impact Fee............................................................................:.........20 Table 5.5: Aquatic Facilities Costs to Accommodate Growth...........................................;.,....... 20 Table 6. I: Animal Shelter Facilities Service Population.......:......:::....:.........:..............:...,.'....:.... 22 Table 6.2: Animal Shelter Facilities Standards and Unit Costs ,...........................:.........:..:......... 23 Table 6. 3: Animal Shelter Facilities Impact Fee ................................................:......:......:.i.....:... 23 Table 6. 4: Animal Shelter Facilities Costs to Accommodate Growth..:........:......:::...........'......... 24 Appendix Figure I: City Hall & Public Works summary of existing facilities from Table 2.2 .....................25. Figure 2: Community Center summary of existing facilities from Table 3.2 ......................'.......:. 25 Figure 3: Marina summary of existing facilities from Table 4.'2....................:....................1....:.... 26 Figure 4: Aquatic Center summary of existing facilities from Table 5.2............................:......... 26 Figure 5: Animal Shelter summary of existing facilities from Table 6.2.......................:....::........ 27 . " , 1 W:\Lake Elsinore\final Public Building report\Lake'Elsinore Public Bldg ab 1600 report 070;05.doc i AGENDA ITEM No._B 'PAGE I S OF 'i~ City of Lake Elsinore . July 5, 2005 Page 1 PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE STUDY Chapter 1 Public Building Impact Fee Analysis Introduction and Summary . .. . This report presents an analysis of the : need for p~blic building facilities to accommodate new development in the City of Lake Elsinore. Jhe City d~s not currently impose a public building fee on new development. CurrentJacilities have been funded through the general fund. In order to maintain the existing level of service within the City, a development impact fee needs to be established. ! This chapter explains the ~tudy approach and summarizes the. results under the following sections: '.' Studv Objectives The City of Lake Elsinore is a rapidly growing community currently consisting of 38 square miles .with over 100 square miles of planned development. In order to. provide adequate City facilities, it is necessary that the City develop a public building impact fee. The public building impaci fee will cover City Hall facilities, Public Works facilities, community center facilities, expanded recreation facilities at the lake and an aquatics center. . Mitiaation Fee Act Over the last 20 years, the changing fiscal, situation in California has steadily undercut the fmancial capacity of local governments to fund infrastructure. Faced with these changes, many cities have had to adopt a policy of" growth pays its own way", shifting the burden of funding infrastructure expansion onto new development. This funding shift has been accomplished primanly through the 'imposition of public facilities fees, also known as development impact fees. As a result of widespread imposition of public facilities fees, the State legislature passed the Mitigation Fee Act, starting with Assembly Bill 1600 in 1988. The Act, contained in California Government Code Section.66000 et seq.,established ground rules for the imposition and ongoing admiJ1istration of impact fee progr"1"s. TheAct became law in January 1989and requires local governments to document the following when adopting an impact fee: . L Identif'y the purpose of the fee; 2. Identif'y the use of fee revenues; 3. Determine a reasonable relationship betweeri the fee's use and the type of development paying the fee; 4. Determine a reasonable relationship between the need for the fee and the type of development paying the fee;.and 5. Determine a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the facility attributable to development paying the fee. W:\Lake Elsinore\fmal Public Building report\Lake Elsinore Public Bldg ab.1600 report 070505.doc AGENDA ITEM NO.--B . PAGE---L1L. OF L/ ~ PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE STUDY I July 5. 2005 Page 2 City of lake Elsinore In summary. the fee cannot be more than th" cost of the public facility needed to accommodate the development paying the fee, and the fee revenues can only be used for thei,r intende~ purpose. Oraanization of the Report The fIrst step in determining an impact fee begins with the selection of Ii planning horizOn' and the '. development of projects for populationaitd employment. These projections are used throuilhout the analysis of different facility categories. Chapters 2 through 6 are devoted to documenting a fee for each of the following' fIve facility categories: ... . City Hall and Public Works Facilities' . . Community Center Facilities . Marina Facilities . Aquatics Facilities . Animal Shelter Facilities '. . '.,. ",." '. '-",'" Each chapter'is organized nnder the following ~ctions to clearly docum.ent the requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act discussed above: . , . . . The chapter begins willi a statement identifYing the p~ose of the fee by sta'ting' the typ~s of facilities that would be funded. . . The Service Population sectiondefmes what type of development reqUires this type. of facility and whether only residents or both residents and businesses benefIt and gives service population projects I . The Existing Facilities Inventory section summarizes the investment the City has made in this type offacility to date. " . . The Facility Standards and Fee Schedule section establishes a reasonable relationship between the rieed for the.fee and type of development paying the fee. This section also establishes a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the facility attributable to development paying the fee. Using a common factor for facility costs per capita, the schedule ensures that each development project pays its fair share of . total facility costs. , ' I , ., " ", _' .' ',' >'.jl -,.' . The Facility Costs to Accommodate Growth section establishes "reasonabl.e,relationship betWeim. the use of the fee revenues and the type of development paying the fee. This section estimates the total facility costs associated with new development 'over the planning horizon. These costs equal the revenues that would be collected through the impact fee.. Programming of revenues to specifIc projects would be done through the City's annual capital improvement planning and budget process. . The Implementation section provides recommendations for the ongoing administration of the fee. The recommendations are meant to ensure compliance with the Act, and to ensure that fees are updated for facility cost inflation. ' W:\Lake Ehinore\fmal Public Building report\Lake Elsinore Public Bldg ab 1600 report 070505.doc AGENDA ITEM NO.-B PAGEJ2-0F l-/:J. , City of Lake, Elsinore July 5, 2005 Pege 3 PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE STUDY Facilitv Standards New development Camlot be asked to correct an existing facility deficiency. They can only be asked to pay their fair share of facilities necessary to maintain a current level of service. ' By policy, the City can adopt its own reasonable facility standard to reduce, maintain, or increase the existing facility standard. However, basing an impact fee on a standard that is higher than'the existing standard is, only fair to new development if the City uses alternative funds to expand existing facilities tothe satne standard for existing development. This study uses existing facility standards, calculated based on existing facility inventory and the current service population. This method insures fairness to new' development and ensures that new development is not paying for existing facility deficiencies. One facility that the City desires to add is an aquatic center. The City does not currently have a City owned pool and feels this is a facility that would be, widely used by residents. To ensure that new development is paying only their fair share, the City will pay for the portion that is attributable to the existing population. ;' " Fee Calculation and Growth Proiections Estimates of existing development and projections of growth are critical assumptions used, throughout the public facility 'fee chapters that follow in this report. These estimates are used to determine existing facility standards, for example, square feet of City Hall per capita. Growth projections are used to estimate the total fee revenue that would be collected at build-out of the planning horizon.' '" . . , The number of residents and workers are used to, measure existing development and future growth because public ,facilities are built primarily to serve these populations. The greater the population, the more facilities required to provide a given level of service. The base year for this stUdy is 2005. By calculating fees based on facility standards for 2005, we ensure that new development provides expanded facilities at the standard existing when the citywide fee is first imposed.' The population projections are based oninforrnation obtained from the City of Lake Elsinore. ,Table 1.1 shows the current popnlation and number of workers in 2005 and the estimated projections for 2025. , ..1. Residents and workers ,use public facilities at different rates in relation to each other, depending on the services provided. In each succeeding chapter, a specific service population is identified for each facility type to reflect this. The servic~ population ,weighs. worke,rs in, relation to residents based on'the relative demand for services by nonreside"tial compared to"residential developmen! assOcia!edwith a particular facility ,type. ' . " W:\Lake Elsinore\fmal Public Building report\Lake Elsinore Public Bldg ab 1600 r:~ort 070505.doc AGENDA ITEM No.3 PAGE~OF 4~ City of Lake Elsinore PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE STUDY July 5, 2005 Page 4 Table 1.1 Lake Elsinore Growth Projections Summary' Year 2005 Total Existing Development" 35,358 . 9,982 Year 2025 Total New Development (estimated to 2025)' 30,128 5,100 TOTAL DEVEt.:OPMENT 15,082 . 1 Data for existing workers from Lake Elsinore webs/fe and is based on 2002 data 2 Data ;or projected workers from Fire Facility Fee .c;,alcUlatio~ memorandum 2/28/05 Occupant densities ensure that a reasonable relationship exists between the increase in service population and the amount of the fee. Developers pay the fee based on the number of housing units or by building square feet of nonresidential use, so the fee schedule must convert service population estimates to these measures of project size. This conversion is done with the average occupant density factor by land use category, shown in Table 1.2. Table 1.2 also provides a summary of the public building impact cost per capita and the public building impact fee dwelling unit or per 1000 square feet of non-residential buildings. W:\Lake Elsinorc\final Public Building report\Lake Elsinore Public Bldg ab 1600 report 070505.doc ACENDA ITEM NO.---B-- PACE-1.S:-0F 4:J. , PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE STUDY July 5, 2005 Page 5 City of. Lake Elsinore . Table 1.2 Public Building Impact Fee Summary Density' ,Fee' Residential Single Family Unit $ 889.87 3.60 DuplexlMedium-Low $ 889.87 3.10 Apartments/Condos $ 8119.87 1.80 Non-residential Office $ 53.91 300 Retail $ 53.91 500 Industrial' $ '53.91 1,500 $ 3,204 $ 2,759 $ 1,602 $ 180 $ 108 $ 36 1 Density in this table refers to "perscJns per dwelling unit" or "square foot perw,orker". Source: City of Lake Elsinore Developmenf~ Fees - Parkland Dedication Formula Table. l .2 Fee in this fable refers to "fee per dwelling unit" or "fee per 1,000 square feet of non- . residential development". Table 1.3 shows the total revenue that is anticipated to be collected at build-out of the 2025 planning horiZon. . .' . . W:\Lake Elsinore\final Public Building report\Lake Elsinore Public Bldg ab 1600 report 070505.doc AGENDA ITEM NO.--1i..- PAGE d.O OF 4:J.. City of Lake Elsinore July 5, 2005 Pege 6 II PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE STUDY Table 1.3 Public Building Impact Fee Revenue Summary (Year 2005 to 2025) City Hall & Public Works Community Center Marina Facilities Aquatic Facilities Animal Shelter Facilities TotaIFacilities:Cost: . ':::_,/': ..CityWidiiFke , ._': ..,.>.C;~...::,<';: :,',..'_ ...~;_' ",.<-,_;,'. .:, ,Revenue $ 7,042,~13 $ 4,556,860 $ 6,517,590 $ 6,059,093 $ 2,908,645 ,1 ~.'i;()~!i.1.Q.1' Chapter 2 City Hall and Public Works Facilities This chapter presents an analysis of the need for city hall and public works facilities to accommodate new development in the City of Lake Elsinore. A fee is presented based on the cost of these facilities to ensure that new development provides adequate funding to meet its needs. . ' Service Poculation City Hall and Public works facilities serve both homes and businesses citywide. Consequently, the need for these facilities is reasonably represented by a service population that includes both residents and workers. ( W:\Lake Elsinore\final Public Building report\Lake Elsinore Public BidS ab 1600 report 070505.doc ACENDA ITEM NOo_B PACE ~ I OF 'i;;' City of Lake Elsinore July 5, 2005 Page 7 PUBLIC BUILDINGS Il\1P ACT FEE'STUDY Table 2.1 City Hall & Public Works Facilities Service Populatio,,! Year 2005 Total Existirig:Development1 Total lor Existing Development Year 2025 Total New"Oevelop:m"ent (estimated to 2025) Total for New Development 35,358 35,358 2,396. 2,396 37,754 37,754 30,128 30,128 1,224, 1,224 . 31,352 31,352 1 Workers sefl/;ce population is determined by weighing workers at 0.24 (0.24 workers service population equals 1 worker). The 0.24 ratio is basad on a 40 hour work weak that;s divided by a tota/168-hour(7 days x 24 hours per day) week. . . Table 2.1 shows' the estiniated service population for City Hall and Pnblic works faciiities for 2005 and' for 2025.' ht calculating the service population, workers are weighted less than residents to reflect lower per capita 'service demand. Nonresid<mtial bnildings are typically occupied less intensively than dwelIing units, so it is reasonable to assume that average per' , worker demand for services is less than average per-resident demand, The 0.24-weighting factor for workers is based on a 40-hour workweek divided by a total of 168 hours in a week. ,-,. .' Existina Facilities Inventorv The current city balI and public works facility consists of 3 buildings, The existing city hall is a 10,000 square foot building in downtown Lake Elsinore on a 0.46-acre parcel. The cultural center is located down the street and is currently used for council chambers. This building is 4,236 square feet on a 0.18-acre lot The existing public works facility consists of 2,119 sqnare feet and is located on 0.53 acres. Table 2.2 summarizes the existing facilities for city halI and pnblic works facilities, including vehicles and eqnipment that are associated with the various functions. Figure I in the appendix shows a breakdown of the various facilities the City currently owns, W:\LakeElsinore\final Public Building reporl\Lake Elsinore Public Bldg ab J600 report 070505.doc AGENDA ITEM NO. B PAGE ~a. OF 1./;)., City of lake Elsinore PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE STUDY July 5, 2005 Page 8 Tal:Ae 2.2 aty Hall & Pltiic \I\bks Facilities Slanllams and lkit QlSls lHIQlSt' . Land Oty ~ &p,m,SeNices F\.I:lic WII1s B.ildrgs . Oty Hall & p,m, SeNices F\.I:licWll1s & Eq.jlJTlll'i ;r~~I'!;Ij:ClOii.~, ...~9l#j:iei'~\lB1t. Tc:ltaI'Ci.itp,r,w.;~"........ 0..64 ares 37,754 0.53 ares 37,754 14,2:6 oqft 37,754 2,119 "'l.ft 37,754 $ 926,624 37,754 $ 2lJ,OOO . $ 2lJ,OOO $ 444 $ 444 \/aies ~: ",.: " ,-, '-., ",' ". .,- . "'-::"',:'0,:.':,-::.'..'::>/,.-",..- .:> Facilltyi:xpn;la. ~ ptiaipta $. .424 $ 3.51 $ 161.42 $ 24.92 $ .24.55 1 U1tcats~fBmeafHs:JB9b:( lBRIa1a11Eftnukta~\dt8 8.ik11JJidciX:t txHdcnsneydClyfMaRtnabJ . IiDvIhTaI1923 . 2 _as/B'lN:lkrlsba>orJmlN:lkr/B'_wi;llkr;Jfwb'flrmTltie21. Facility Standards and Fee PeT capita facility standaTds aTe used iu calculaliug the impact fee to. ensme a reasonable Telatlo.nship exiSts between new develo.pment and the need fo.T new city hall and public Wo.Tks facilities. The existing facilities weTe iuvento.ried and a sqUaTe fo.o.tage associated ~ith each resident was established. A smvey o.f cities who. Tecently co.nstructed new City Halls was then . undeTtaken to. deter.miue the Teplacement Co.st o.f the existing fadlities, as sho.wn iu Table 2,3. W;\Lakc Ebinore\fmal Public Building rcport\Lake Elsinore Public Bldg ab 1600 report 070505.doc ACEN~~M ~~ofL{~ City of Lake Elsinore July 5, 2005 Page 9 PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE STUDY Table 2.3 City Hall & Public Works Facilities Constructic:'" Costs Walnut Creek E 2003 35000 $ 14.00 $ 400 4113 $ 15.53 $ Ci Hall & Police Tracy N 2005 42000 $ 19.24 $ 458 4563 $ 19.24 $ 458 Ci Hall & Council Chambers Corona E 2005 130000 $ 52.00 $ 400 4243 $ 55.91 $ 430 C. Hall A vera e Cosutf $ 444 Value Used $ 444 Note: .~ ----SuiJding Sizes and square footages are approximate and based on recent projects that Harris & AS.$ociates has been involvedin. All costs updated using ENR to current value (4563) _ The cost per square foot was. used to determine the facility expansion cost per capita. This coSt was then multiplied by the density assumptions to come up with a fee, as sltown in Table 2.4., Table 2.4 City Hall & Public Works Facilities Impact Fee LandlJse . Residential Single Family Unit $ 224.64 3.60 $ 809 Duplex/Medium-Low $ 224.64 3.10 $ 696 Apartments/Condos $ 224.64 1.80 $ 404 Non-residential Office $ 53.91 300 $ 180 Retail $ 53.91 500 $ 108 Industrial $ 53.91 1,500 $ 36 1 Density in this table refers to "persons per dwelling unit" or "square foot per worker". Source: City of Lake E/sinoreDevelopment Fees - ParklandDe.dication Formula Table. 2 Fee in this table refers to "fee per dwelling unit" or "fee per 1,000 square feet of non- residenpaJ development", J W;\Lake ElsinOte\imal Public Building report\Lake Elsinore Public Bldg ab 1600 report 010505.doc AGENDA ITEM NO.~ PAGE~OF Lf.::J. City of Lake Elsinore July 5, 2005 Page 10 PUBLIC BillLDINGS IMPACT FEE STUDY This method of calculation assures that fairness exists between new and existing development and that new development only funds expanded facilities to maintain the current level of service standards. . Fac'i1itvCosts to Accommodate Growth Table 2.5 provides an estimate of the total re~enue' that will be generated ai build-out of the 2025-planning horizon, The City would maintain a reasonable relationship between new development and the use of fee revenues by funding a variety of projects to expand city hall and public works facilities during this period. Table 2.5 City Hall & Public Works Facilities Costs to Accommodate Growth 'Reli~uEl Citywide Fee, Revenue Service Population Growth (2005 to 2(25) Citywide Facilities COst per Capita l'O'fAl,j:QR!!':I't'(Wibi;'.i"i;i;'Ri;Vi;NUE,', 31,352 $ . 224.64 $ 7,042,1I13 Implementation The city hall and public works facilities impact fee would be collected at the time of 'building perritit issuance. To implement the fee the City should: ' . Annually update a capital improvement plan to indicate the specific use of fee revenues , for facilities to accommodate growth; . Comply with the annual and five-year reporting requirements of Government Code 66000 et seq.; and . IdentifY appropriate inflation indexes in the fee ordinance and allow an inflation adjustment to the fee annually. For the inflation indexes, the City should use separate indexes for land and construction costs, Calculating the land cost index may require use of a property appraiser every several years. The construction cost index can be based on the City's recent capital project experience or taken from any reputable source, such as the Engineering News Record (ENR). W:\Lakc Elsinorc\fmal Public Building report\Lake Elsinore Public Bldg ab 1600 report 070505.doc AGENDA ITEM NO.~ PACE d C; OF '-I :J. City of Lake Elsinore July 5, 2005 Page 11 PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE STUDY' Chapter 3' Comrnunity Center Facilities' This chapter presents an analysis of the need for community center facilities to accommodate new. development in the City of Lake Elsinore. A fee schedule is presented based on the cost of these' facilities to ensure that new development provid~s adequate funding to meet its needs. Service Population Community center facilities serve primarily residents in. the' City by providing space for' . recreation and similar programs. Consequently, a service population that only includes residents and not workers reasonably represents the need for these facilities. As population grows with new development, so does demand for recreation services provided by these facilities. . . Table 3.1 shows the estimated service population for community center facilities for.2005and for 2025. Table 3.1 Community Center Facilities Service Population Year 2005 Total Existing Development Total for Existing Development Year 2025 Total New Development (estimated to 2025) Total fOr New Development TOTAL o EVEI.;(;1 PI\II ENT 35,358 35,358 . 30,128 30,128 65,486 Existina Facilities Inventorv The City's community center facilities are comprised of 3 buildings. The existing seniOr center is a 10,000 square foot building on a 239-acre parceL' The community center is a 6000 square foot building on 0.53 acres. The city also owns the Centenuial Station building; a 1,251 square foot building that is located on 035 acres. . Table 3.2 summarizes the existing facilities that currently serve as community center facilities. A detailed breakdown of the facilities is shown in Figure 2 in the appendix. W;\Lake Elsmore\final Public Building report\Lake Elsinore Public Bldg ab 1600 report 070505.doc ACENDArrEM NO.~ PACE d...h_OF3L City of Lake Elsinore PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE STUDY July 5, 2005 Page 12' Table 32 Conm.Ii'ity Cer4er Facilities SIandartIs and l.kJiteoSts Lard EUldlngs $ 23.12 $ i 128. 13 1 lJjf oofis Em P<< a:nJ cr p<<!qJEm foci, based IX! amrt rra1'Ei or repooerrert V1iue, Bdh /HJd:m btildfYJ oofis VoBf9;m.idad by the oty. , Facilitv Standards and Fee Per capita facility standards are used iJ,l, calculatillg the impact fee to ensure a r~asonable relatiouship exists between new development and the need for new community center facilities. ' The existing facilities are inventoried and a square footage associated with each r~sident.is established. A per capita cost was calculated based on the estimated cost of construction of a .. 'community center facility. 'This cost was then multiplied by the density assumptions to come up with a fee, as shown in Table 3.3. W:\Lake Elsinore\fmal Public Building rqiortu..ake Elsinore Public Bldg ab 1600 report 070505.doc , ACENJA ITEM NO.----R PACE ~7 OF Lf~ ---.- PUBLIC BIDLDINGS IMPACT FEE STUDY July 5, 2005 Page 13 City of Lake Elsinore Table 3.3 Community Center Facilities Impact Fee Residential Single Family Unit $ 151.25 3.60 $ 545 DuplexlMedium'Low $ 151.25 3.10 $ 469 Apartments/Condos $ 151.25 1.80 $ 272 1 Density in this table refers to "persons per dwelling unit". Source: City of Lake Elsinore De~e/opment Fee~ - Parkland Dedication Forml.!la Table. 2 Fee in this table refers to "fee per dwelling unit". This method of calculation assures that fairness exists between new and existing development and that new development only funds expanded facilities to maintain the current level of service standards. Facilitv Costs to Accommodate Growth Table 3.4 provides an estimate ofthetotaI revenue that will be generated at build-out'ofthe 2025 plarminghorizon. The City would maintain a reasonable 'relationship between new development and the'use of fee revenues by funding a variety of projects to expand community facilities during' this period. ' Table 3.4 Community Center Facilities Costs to Accommodate Growth Revenue Citywide Fee Revenue Service Population Growth (20~5 to 2025) Citywide Facilities Cost per Capita ";rOTALfOR CITYWIDE. FEERE\lENU E' 30,128 $ 151.25 $4,556,860 Implementation The community center facilities impact fee would be collected at the time of building permit issuance. To implement the fee the City should: W:\Lake Elsinore\final Public Building report\Lake Elsinore Public Bldg ab 1600 report 07050S.doc ACENDA ITEM NO. g PACE ~ r OF Lf:J" . ~ City of lake Elsinore July 5. 2005 Page 14 PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE STUDY . Attnually update a capital improvement plan to indicate the specific use of fee revenues for facilities to accommodate growth; . Comply with the annual and five-year reporting requirements of Government Code 66000 et seq.; and . Identify appropriate inflation indexes in the fee ordinance and allow an, inflation adjustment to the fee annually. For the inflation indexes, the City should use separate indexes for land and construction costs. Calculating the land cost index may require use of a property appraiser every. several years. The construction cost index can be based on the City's recent capital project experience or taken from any reputable source, such as the Engineering News Record (ENR); , W:\Lake Elsinore\final Public Building report\Lake Elsinore Public Bldg ab 1600 report 070S0S.doc ACENDA ITEM NO.-B Lf J. PAOE~OF . City of lake Elsinore July 5, 2005 Page 15 PUBLIC BUILI>INGS IMPACT FEE STUDY Chapter 4 Marina Facilities This ~hapter pr~sents'an analysis 'of the need 'for 'marina facilities to accommodate new development in the City of Lake Elsinore. A fee schedule is presented based on the cost of these facilities to ensure that new development provides adequate funding to'meet its needs. Service Population _,) t Marina facilities serve primarily residents in the City by providing recreation facilities at the lake including boat ramps,. Consequently, a service population that only includes residents and. not workers reasonably represents the need for these facilities, . As population grows with ,new development, so does the demand for recreation services provided by these facilities. . Table 4.1 shows the estimated service population for marina facilities for 2005 and for 2025. Table 4.1 Marina Facilities Service Population Residents Service Population Year 2005 Total Existing Development Total for Existing Development Year 2025 Total New Development (estimated to 2025) Total for New Development TOTAL DEVELOpMENt" 35,358 35,358 30,128 30,128 65,486 ExistinQ Facilities Inventorv The City's marina facilities consist of boat launch facilities, a campground, and vehicles associated with the marina facilities. The City has planned a $5.2 million rehabilitation at the marina facility that is being funded through a combination of City funds and grant money. The City's 60-acre campground facility is not included in the value of the existing facilities, Table 4.2 summarizes the existing facilities for the marina facilities. The facilities include the $5.2 million in rehabilitation money, the 20 acres ofland set aside for expansion, and the vehicles W:\Lake Elsinore\final Public Building"report\Lake Elsinore Public Bldg ab .1600 report070S0S.doc ' AGENDAITEMNO.~ PAGE ..~O OF Lf a City of Lake Elsinore PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE STUDY July 5, 2005 Page 16 used at the marina facility. A detailed breakdown of the items included is shown in Figure 3 in the appendix. Table 4.2 Marina Facilities Standards 'and Unit Costs 20.0 acres $ 449,000 $ 5,200,000 35,358 35,358 35,358 $ 100,000 Varies $ ,5,200,000 Land Vehicles & -Equipment BoatLaunch Facility 10~~fc:C)_st:.p~f-~~~i~~-nf,':"'-" 1 Unit costs are per acre or per square foot, based on current market or replacement value. City owns this land so the laf?d is valued at a reduced rate for tnew development on this faCilitY. . , j' i ' FacilitvStandards and Fee Schedule I Per capita facility standards are used in calculating the impact fee to ensure a reasonable relationship exists between new development and the need for new marina facilities. The existing facilities are inventoried and a square footage associated with each resident is, established, A per capita cost was calculated based on the estimated value of the Marina facilities. This cost was then multiplied by the density assumptions to come up with a fee, as shown in Table 4.3.' Table 4.3 Marina Facilities Impact Fee Land Use Cost per Capita Density! Residential Single Family Unit Duplex/Medium-Low Apartments/Condos $ 216.33 $ 216.33 $ 216.33 3.60 3.10 1.60 $ $ $ , 779 671 369 1 DensitY in this fable refers to "persons per dwelling unit". Source: City of Lake Elsinore: Development Fees - Park/and Dedication Formula Table. ! 2 i=ee in this table refers to "fee per dwe1/ing unit". W:\Lake Elsinore\fmal Public Building rcport\Lake Elsinore Public Bldg ab 1600 report 070S0S.doc ACEN011TEM NO._~ PACE 31 OF 'i do. City 01 Lake Elsinore July 5, 2005 Page 17 PUBLIC BillLDINGS IMPACT FEE STUDY This medlod of calculation assures that fairness exists between new and existing development and that new development only funds expanded facilities to maintain the current level of service standards. Facility Costs to Accommodate Growth Table 4;4 provides an estimate of the total revenue that will be generated at build-out ofthe 2025 planning horizon. The City would maintain. a reasonable relationship between new development and the use uffee revenues by funding a variety of projects to expand marina facilities during this period. Table 4.4 Marina Facilities Costs to Accommodate Growth Citywide Fee Revenue Service Population Growth (2005 to 2025) Citywide FacilitiesCostperCapita 't9'tAIlFQR;i:i'r'fW1DE'FEE.'REYENUE' $ 30,128 216.33 ImDlementation The marina facilities impact fee would be collected at the time of building permit issuance. To implement the fee the City should: . Annually. update a capital improvement plan to indicate die specific use of fee revenues for facilities to accommodate growl!1; , . Comply with the annual and five-year reporting requirements of Government Code 66000 et seq.; and . . . IdentifY appropriate inflation indexes in the fee ordinance and allow an inflation adjustment to the fee annually. . ..' For the inflation indexes, the City should use separate indexes for land and construction costs: Calculating the land cost index may require use of a property appraiser every several years. The construction cost index can be based on' the City's recent capital project experience or taken from any reputable source, such as the Engineering News Record (ENR). . W:\Lake Elsinore\final Public Building report\Lake Elsinore Public Bldg "ab 1600 report 070505.doc AGENDA ITEM No._B PACE 3~ OF Lf ~ City of Lake Elsinore PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE STUDY July 5, 2005 Page 18 Chapter 5 Aquatic Facilities This' chapter presents an analysis of the need for aquatic facilities to acconunodate new development in the City of Lake Elsinore: A fee schedule is presented based on the cost of these facilities to ensure that new development provides adequate funding to meet its needs. Service Population Aquatic facilities serve primarily residents in the City by providing recreation opportunities. Consequently, a service population that ouly includes residents and not workers reasonably represents the need for these facilities. As 'population grows with new development, so does demand for recreation s,ervices provided by these facilities. Table 5.1 shows the estimated service population for aquatic facilities for 2005 and for 2025. Table 5.1 Aquatic Facilities Service Population Year 2005 Total Existing Development Total for Existing Development Year 2025 Total New Development (estimated to 2025) Total for New Development T9TAr.:DEVELPi>ME:Ni" . 35,358 35,358 30,128 30,128 65,486 I I I , The City does not currently have an aquatic center: A new city owned faCility to serve lboth the existing population as well as new development is desired by the City. The City does i have an agreement to lease space from the new facility being constructed at the new high school and will begin to provide aquatic center services at this facility in the interim 'of being able to donstruct their own facility. The City will fund the portion of the facility associated with the existing population and new development will fund the portion associated with their increased population. Existina Facilities Inventorv W:\Lake Elsinore\fmaJ Public Building report\Lake Elsinore Public Bldg ab 1600 report 070505.doc , AGENDA ITEM No._R PAGE "),~ OF y;)... City of lake Elsinore July 5, 2005 Page 19 PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE STUDY Facilitv Standards and Fee Schedule A survey was taken of Cities who recently constructed aquatic facilities to determine the . approximate cost of an aquatic center that would adequately serve Lake Elsinore. It is estimated that a new aquatic center would costjnst over $1I.5M and would be located on approximately 6 acres. This estimated cost was divided by the. total projected population in 2025 to determine a cost per capita. These calculations are shown in Figure 4 in the appendix. The City is responsible for funding the portion of this cost associated with the existing population. The remaining cost will be paid by new development. These standards are shown in Table 5.2. Table 5.2 , Aquatic Facilities Standards and Unit Costs Fa'~_ilitY:':E)(~I1Si()Ii-.- ' CostperCapita . land Facility 2.8 acres '1 ea 30,128 30,128 $ 250,000 . $ 5,368,991 $ 22.91 $ 178.21 1 Projected facility inventory is for the portion of the facility associated with New DevelOpment only. Full Facilitiy costs are shown below. 2 Facility costs based on survey of aquatic facilities shown in Table 5.3 and account for developments fair share based on the split of costs shown in Summary of Existing Faciuties. The survey of aquatic centers is shown in Table 5.3. Table 5.3 Aquallc Facilities Construction Costs ic~; gfS 'Population Siie FacUitleS, ,,; -', "Land Costs .... . r ,Faclllty:Nanie . s~rved '-, ::'(a,~r~) SlIde;S: Pools Wave Child Other Included Construction .project ..:Toclay's.$ . Pools ? ($mlllJon1 '$mlllionl I i$mllllon) Irvine Wild Rivers 2004 180000 3 11 3 2 5 2 Ye, $18.00 $13.50 $13,50 . Antioch Prewett Family 1995 100000 14 5 5 0 1 No $11.00 $14.09 P,ok Vista W~ve Waterpark 1994 9500 4.0 6 2 0 - 1 Ye, n' 2.8-3.0 $4.10 $5.25 . Carlsbad TBD 2005 95000 3.5 2 2 .0 2 1 No $18,00 $18.00 , - Tracy TBD 2005 75000 - . - $7.50 $7.50 . . . Average Size (Ac:res) 6.0 Average Cost (SM) $11.67 W;\Lake Elsinore\fmal Public Building report\LakeElsinore Public Bldg' ab ]600 report 07050S.doc AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE 3Lf B OF L.f d. . . Cityo! lake Elsinore PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE STUDY July 5, 2005 Page 20 The per capita cost was multiplied by the density assumptions to come up with a fee, as shown in. Table 5.4. This metbod of calculation assures that fairness exists between new and existing development and that new development only funds the portion of the facilities attributable to new development. Table 5.4 Aquatic Facilities Impact Fee .' Liuld.Use . . '1 - ..Denslty. CQstperClIpita . Residential Single Family Unit Duplex/Medium-Low Apartments/Condos' $ 201.11 $ 201:11 $ 201.11 3.60 3.10 1.80 . ,-Fee'l $ $ $ 724 623 362 1 Density in this table refers to "persons per dwelling unit". Source: City of Lake Elsinore Development Fees - Parkland Dedication Formula Table. 2 Fee in this table refers to "fS.B per dwelling unit". Facilitv Costs to Accommodate Growth Table 5.5 provides an estimate of the total revenue that will be generated at build-out oftbe 2025 planning horizon. The City would maintain a reasonable relationship between new development and the use offee revenues by funding an aquatics facility during this period. Table 5.5 Aquatic Facilities Costs to Accommodate Growth Description Citywide Fee Revenue Service Population Growth (2005 to 2025) Citywide Facilities Cost per Capita TOTAL FOR CITYWIDE FEE REVENUE Existing Service Population CITY CONTRIBUTION .' . TOTAL FACILITY COST W:\Lake Ebinore\fmal Public Building report\Lake Elsinore Public Bldg ab 1600 report 070S0S.doc Revenue 30,128 $ 201.11 $ 6,059,093 35,358 $ 7,110,907 $ 13,170,000 AGENDA ITEM No._R PACE !- C; OF L.f d.. City of Lake Elsinore July 5, 2005 Page 21 PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE STUDY . ImDlementation The aquatic facilities impact fee would be coHected at the time of building permit issuance. .To implement the fee the City should: . AnnualIy update a capital improvement plan to indicate the specific use of fee revenues . for facilities to accommodate growth; . . Comply with the annual and five-year reporting requirements of Government Code 66000 et seq.; and . Identify appropriate inflation indexes in the fee ordinance and allow an inflation adjustment to the fee annually. For tIie infIationindexes, the City should use separate iridexes for land . and construction costs. Calculating the land cost index may require use of a Property appraiser every several years. The construction cost index can be based on the City's recent capital project experience or tai<:en from any reputable source, such as the Engineering News Record (ENR). ,,"" ,. f'.' W:\LakeElsinore\final Public Building report\Lake Elsinore Public Bldg ab 1600 report 070505.doc ACENDA ITEM No._B PACE 1, ~ OF L..J.:2 , City of lake Elsinore. July 5, 2005 Page 22 PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE STUDY Chapter 6 Animal Shelter Facilities This chapter presents an analysis of the need for animal shelter facilities to accommodate new development in the City of Lake Elsinore. A fee schedule is presented based on the cost of these facilities to ensure that new development provides adequate funding to meet its needs. Service Population Animal shelter facilities serve primarily residents in the City by providing animal control services and adoption.' Consequently, a service population that only includes residents and not workers reasonably represents the need for these facilities. As population grows with new development, so does the demand for animal control services provided by these facilities. Table 6.1 shows the estimated service Population for animal shelter facilities for 2005. and for. 2025. Table 6.1 Animal Shelter Facilities Service Population .. Residents, Service 'Population : Year 2005 Total Existing Development Total for Existing Development 35.358 35,358 Year 2025 TotafNew Development (estimated to,2025) Total for New Development 'To'fALJ)EVElPPI\IIENl' . 30,128 30,128 65,486 Existina Facilities Inventorv The City's current animal shelter facilities consist three 12' by 60' modular buildings, one 12' by 20' modular buildings, kennels, livestock area, and six vehicles located on a three-quarter acre site. A new facility is currently planned that will be shared with 4 other agencies and the existing facility will be abandoned. W:\Lake Elsinore\fmal Public Building report\Lake Elsinore Public Bldg ab 1600 report 070505.do,c AGEN'DA ITEM No._R PAGE 37 OF '1;), . -----~_. ..-..- --- - , PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE STUDY July 5, 2005 Page 23 City of Lake Elsinore Facilitv Standards and Fee Schedule Table 6.2 summarizes the standards for the animal shelter facilities. This facility will include a 32,357 square foot facility located on 2.71 acres and will be shared with Canyon Lake, Murrieta, Temecula, and County of Riverside. A detailed breakdown of. the items included and share of cost is shown in Figure 5 in the appendix. - . Table 6.2 Animal Shelter Facilities Standards and Unit Costs Facility . r~tlirq~stp~rg~plta Total~~st per:Resldent::. 1 ea 30,128 _ $ 2,908,645 96.54 De,scrip~iOI) 1 Projected faciury inventOry is for the portion of the facility .a&&oclated with New Development onft. Full Fecl#tft co'staere shown beloW. 2 Fee/Hty costs besed on Cffy's share (28.58") offullcostof'22;121, 100.00 for shared faeillty and aeeountfordeveJopments fair share based on the split of costs shown in Summary of Existing FacIJ/tJes. This amount assumes 2.71 acres of land Is Included. Per capita facility standards are used in calculating the impact fee to ensure a reasonable relationship exists between new development and the need for new animal shelter facilities. The City's share of cost was divided by the total projected population in 2025 to determine a cost per capita. The per capita cost was multiplied by the density assumptions to corne up with a fee, as shown in Table 6.3. Table 6.3 Animal Shelter Facilities Impact Fee -Land Use - - - Cost per Capita Density1 Residential Single Family Unit Duplex/Medium-Low Apartments/Condos $ $ $ 96.54 96.54 96.54 3.60 3.10 1.80 $ $ $ 348 299 174 1 Density in this table refers to "persons per dwelling unit". Source: City of Lake Elsinore Development Fees - Parkland Dedication Formula Table. f ! 2 Fee,in this table refers to "fee per dwelling unit". W;\Lake Elsinore\fmal Public Building report\Lake Elsinore Public Bldg ab 1600 report 070S05.doc ACENDA ITEM NO. B PACE .5 ~ OF~ City of Lake Elsinore July 5, 2005 i' Page 24 PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE STUDY This method of calculation assures that fairness exists between new and existing develo~ment and that new development only funds expanded facilities to maintain the current level of service standards. FacilitvCosts to Accommodate GroWth Table 6.4 provides an estimate of the total revenue that will be generated at build-out o(the 2025 planning horizon. The City would maintain a reasonable relationship b,etween new dev~lopment and the use of fee 'revenues by funding a variety of projects to expand animal shelter' facilities during this period. Table 6.4 Animal Shelter Facilities Costs to Accommodate Growth Citywide Fee Revenue . SerVicePopulatio,"! Growth (2005 to 2025) . Citywide.F,acilities Cost per Capita totAt: Fdln:iTYWIDE FEE REVENUE 30,128 $ 96.54 $ 2,908;645 Implementation The animal control facilities impact fee would. be collected at the time of building permit issuance. To implement the fee the City should: ;. Annually update a capital improvement plan to indicate the specific use of fee reveuues for facilities to accommodate growth; , i . Comply with the annual and five-year reporting requirements of Government Code 66000 et seq.; and . IdentifY appropriate infl~tion indexes in the, fee ordinance and allow .an inflation adjustment to the fee annually. For the inflation indexes, the City should use separate indexes for land and construction costs. Calculating the land cost index may require use of a property appraiser every several years: The construction cost index can be based on the City's recent capital project experience or taken from any reputable source, such as the Engineering News Record (ENR). W:\Lake Elsinore\fmal Public Building report\Lake Elsinore Public BIdgab 1600 report 07050S.doc , ACENDA:ITEM NO..,-J> a PAGE~OF lf City. of Lake Elsinore July 5, 2005 Page 25 PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE STUDY Appendix Summary of ExistinQ Facilities City Hall & Parks Services Existing City Hall . Cultural Center Total Buildina Size {ffl ' 10,000 4,236 14,236 Land lacrel. 0.46 . 0.18 . 0.64 Public Works Existing Public Works . BuildinQ Size (WI 2,119 . Land (acrel 0.53 Vehicles & Equipment 30 Vehicles 7 Misc. Equipment Total $' $ Unit Value 28,460.00 10,432.00 $ $ $ Value 853,800.00 73,024.00. 926,824.00 Figure I: City Hall & Public Works summary of exutiog facilities from Table 2.2 .. . ._ u _ Summary of Existir'la Facilities Community Center Facilities Buildina Size IWI. I . Senior Cenier 6,996 Community Cenier 6,000 Ceniennial Station 1 ,251 Total 14,247 ~ \; , .' Land lacrel 2.39 0.53 0.35 3.27 . , Figure 2: Co~munitY'Cen.ter summary of existing facilities from Table 3:~, ," W:\Lake Elsinore\final Public Building report\Lake Elsinore Public Bldg ab1600 report 070505.doc ACENDA ITEM NO.--B PACE Lf(J. OF t..f;;;" /-- I \ I ,- City ol,Lake Elsinore PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE STUDY July 5, 2005 ' Page 26 Summary of Existinll Facilities Marina Bulldlnll Size 1ft') Boat launch' Vehicles 7 Vehicles 10 Vessels 4 PWC 28 Equipment , Vehicle Total Boat Launch Rehabilitation Total Rehabilitation Cos1 $ $ $ $ $ U nit Value 25,000 20,000 8,000 1,500' Value 5,200,000 Figure 3: Marina summary of existing facilities from Table 4,2 Land lacre) 20.0 $ $ $ $ $, Value 175,000 200,000. 32,000 ' 42,000 449,O~0 Sunmarv of Existina Facilities Estimated Aouatic Center COst Land Cost (6 acres) $ Facility Costs $ Total COst $ Current Population Projected New Development Projected 2025 Population Total Cost 1,500,000 11,670,000 13,170,000 , CUrrent Poculation Portion 2025 Pooulation, Portion $ 809,898 $ 690,102 $ 6,301,009 $ 5,368,991 $ 7,110,907 $ 6,059,093 35,368 30,128 65,4&6 %. of Totill 54% ,46% , 100% Figure 4: Aquatic Center summary of existing facilities from Table 5.2 W:\Lake Elsinoce\final Public Buildingreport\Lake Elsinore Public Bldg ab 1600 report 070505.doc ACENDA ITEM NO. PACE '-( I H OF L.f d.. --_.'-,,- City of Lake Elsinore PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE STUDY July 5, 2005 Page '0' Summary of Exlstlna Facilities Estimated Animal'Center Cost Facility Costs Total Cost Tolal Cost Current Poculation Portion - 2025 Poculation P.ortion $ $ 6,322.210 6,322.210 $ 3.413,565 $ 3.413,665, $ 2,908,645 $ 2,908,646 Current Population Projected New Development Projected 2025 Population 35,358 30,128 65.486 % 01 Total 54% 46% 100% Figure 5: Animal Shelter summary of existing facilities from Table 6.2 '- W:\Lakc Elsinore\final Public Building report\Lake Elsinore Public Bldg ab 1600 report 070S0S.doc ACENDA ITEM NO.~ PACE I-f d... OF L.[ ~ ~ .