HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011-05-24 City Council Item No. 11CITY OF
LSINORE
DkEAM FXTREME
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: ROBERT A. BRADY, CITY MANAGER
DATE: MAY 24, 2011
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
BOAT LAUNCH FACILITY IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO. 4237
Background
The Environmental Report for the Lake Elsinore Boat Launch Facility
Rehabilitation Project (specifically called the Initial Study (IS)/ Mitigated Negative
Declaration (MND)) is comprised of the following:
• Draft IS and MND (August 2007-SCH No. 2007081016)
• Final IS/MND document, dated October 2007, which incorporates the
information required by CEQA Guidelines Section 15074.
• A mitigation Monitoring and report Program, dated March 2008.
When adopting a mitigated negative declaration, the lead agency (City of Lake
Elsinore) is required to adopt a program monitoring the changes which it has either
required in the project or made a condition of approval to mitigate significant
environmental effects. The mitigation monitoring measures include air quality
emission limits which are below SCAQMD threshold and Cultural Resources which
requires archaeological monitoring during all ground disturbing activities. The
scope of services requires a biological pre-disturbance survey, biological
resources monitoring during construction activities and archaeological monitoring
during any ground disturbance activities.
Discussion
On April 25, 2011 proposals seeking an environmental monitoring consultant
where sent to HDR Engineering, Inc. LSA Associates, Inc, and Leighton
Consulting with a due date of May 16, 2011. These companies were selected
because of their familiarity with this project. HDR Engineering, Inc. is the only firm
to provide a response to the proposal. Staff has reviewed HDR proposal and
found it to be consistent with the requirements of the Request for Proposal. HDR
Engineering, Inc. is the consultant that prepared the Initial Study/Mitigated
AGENDA ITEM NO. 11
Page 1
Environmental Services
May 24, 2011
Page 2
Negative Declaration for this project and is very knowledgeable of the stated
requirements of the IS/MND.
Fiscal Impact
The project budget is $8,292,335.00 and the funding sources are shown below:
Fund 221-Park CIP
RDA Tax Increment
RDA Bond Issue for Construction
Grant-CA Department of Boating &Waterways
The following are the expenditures to date:
Design / Environmental services
Purchased material
Design Administration
Budget remaining for the project
Recommendation
$ 313,881.00
$ 450,000.00
$4,528,453.00
$3,000,000.00
$8,292,335.00
$ 773,134.00
$ 513,969.00
$ 79.287.00
$1,366,390.00
$6,925,945.00
1. Award the Environmental Services to HDR Engineering, Inc. for an amount not to
exceed Fee of $78,000
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the contract with HDR Engineering, Inc.
Prepared by: Peter Ramey (?IZ,
Project Manager
Approved by: James Riley
Director of A mistrative Services Department
Approved by: Ken A. Seumalo
Director of Public Works
Approved by: Robert A. Brady
City Manager
Attachments: Vicinity Map
Agreement for Professional Services
Exhibit "A" HDR Engineering, Inc. Proposal
Exhibit "B" Schedule of Charges
Page 2
VICINITY MAP
BOAT LAUNCH IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NUMBER 4237
PROJECT SITE
CITY COUNCIL
MAY 24, 2011
Page 3
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
This Agreement for Professional Services (the "Agreement") is made and entered into as of
the _ day of , 2011, by and between the City of Lake Elsinore; a municipal
corporation ("City") and HDR Engineering. Inc. ("Consultant").
RECITALS
A. Consultant is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform the special services
which will be required by this Agreement.
B. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and knowledge to
provide the services described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions described herein.
C. City desires to retain Consultant to render professional consulting services and related work as
set forth in this Agreement.
AGREEMENT
1. Scope of Services. Consultant shall perform the services described on Exhibit A which is
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant shall provide said services at the
time, place, and in the manner specified in Exhibit A, subject to the direction of the City through its
staff that it may provide from time to time.
2. Time of Performance. The services of Consultant are to commence upon execution of this
Agreement and shall continue for a period of one (1) year or as specified in the Consultants proposal.
3. Compensation. Compensation to be paid to Consultant shall be in accordance with the
Schedule of Charges set forth in Exhibit B, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference. In no event shall Consultant's compensation exceed $78,000 without additional
authorization from the City. Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of
defects, even if such defects were known to the City at the time of payment.
4. Method of Payment. Consultant shall submit monthly billings to City describing the work
performed during the preceding month. Consultant's bills shall include a brief description of the
services performed, the date the services were performed, the number of hours spent and by whom,
and a description of any reimbursable expenditures. City shall pay Consultant no later than 30 days
after approval of the monthly invoice by City staff. When payments made by City equal 90% of the
maximum fee provided for in this Agreement, no further payments shall be made until the final work
under this Agreement has been accepted by City.
5. Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Consultant
perform Extra Work. As used herein, "Extra Work" means any work which is determined by City to be
necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the parties did not reasonably anticipate
would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform, nor be
compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from City. Extra work will be invoiced
separately from services performed in accordance with the Scope of Services.
Page 4
6. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by the City immediately for cause or by
either party without cause upon thirty (30) days' written notice of termination. Upon termination,
Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for services performed up to the effective date of
termination.
7. Ownership of Documents. All plans, studies, documents and other writings prepared by and
for Consultant, its officers, employees and agents and subcontractors in the course of implementing
this Agreement, except working notepad internal documents, shall become the property of the City
upon payment to Consultant for such work, and the City shall have the sole right to use such materials
in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or to any other party. Consultant shall, at
Consultant's expense, provide such reports, plans, studies, documents and other writings to City upon
written request. City acknowledges that any use of such materials in a manner beyond the intended
purpose as set forth herein shall be at the sole risk of the City. City further agrees to defend,
indemnify and hold harmless Consultant, its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers from
any claims, demands, actions, losses, damages, injuries, and liability, direct or indirect (including any
and all costs and expenses in connection therein), arising out of the City's use of such materials in a
manner beyond the intended purpose as set forth herein.
a. Licensing of Intellectual Property. This Agreement creates a nonexclusive and
perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs,
and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and
other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not
limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which
are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data").
Consultant shall require that all subcontractors agree in writing that City is granted a nonexclusive and
perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement.
Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all
Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents &
Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by
the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents & Data at any time, provided
that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk.
b. Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings,
descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents &
Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this
Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written
consent of City, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the services
under this Agreement. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected
with the performance of the services under this Agreement. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is
otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry
shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City's name or insignia, photographs relating to
project for which Consultant's services are rendered, or any publicity pertaining to the Consultant's
services under this Agreement in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio
production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City.
Page 5
8. Consultant's Books and Records
a. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers,
canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for services, or
expenditures and disbursements charged to City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any
longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant to this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall maintain all documents and records which demonstrate performance
under this Agreement for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by
law, from the date of termination or completion of this Agreement.
C. Any records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this Agreement shall
be made available for inspection or audit, at any time during regular business hours, upon written
request by the City Manager, City Attorney, City Auditor or a designated representative of these
officers. Copies of such documents shall be provided to the City for inspection at City Hall when it is
practical to do so. Otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, the records shall be
available at Consultant's address indicated for receipt of notices in this Agreement.
d. Where City has reason to believe that such records or documents may be lost or
discarded due to dissolution, disbandment or termination of Consultant's business, City may, by
written request by any of the above-named officers, require that custody of the records be given to the
City and that the records and documents be maintained in City Hall. Access to such records and
documents shall be granted to any party authorized by Consultant, Consultant's representatives, or
Consultant's successor-in-interest.
9. Independent Contractor. It is understood that Consultant, in the performance of the work and
services agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent contractor and shall not act as
an agent or employee of the City. Consultant shall obtain no rights to retirement benefits or other
benefits which accrue to City's employees, and Consultant hereby expressly waives any claim it may
have to any such rights.
10. Interests of Consultant. Consultant (including principals, associates and professional
employees) covenants and represents that it does not now have any investment or interest in real
property and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the area covered by this Agreement or
any other source of income, interest in real property or investment which would be affected in any
manner or degree by the performance of Consultant's services hereunder. Consultant further
covenants and represents that in the performance of its duties hereunder no person having any such
interest shall perform any services under this Agreement.
Consultant is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act
because Consultant:
a. will conduct research and arrive at conclusions with respect to his/her rendition of
information, advice, recommendation or counsel independent of the control and direction of the City or
of any City official, other than normal agreement monitoring; and
b. possesses no authority with respect to any City decision beyond rendition of
information, advice, recommendation or counsel. (FPPC Reg. 18700(a) (2).)
Page 6
11. Professional Ability of Consultant. City has relied upon the professional training and ability of
Consultant to perform the services hereunder as a material inducement to enter into this Agreement.
Consultant shall therefore provide properly skilled professional and technical personnel to perform all
services under this Agreement. All work performed by Consultant under this Agreement shall be in
accordance with applicable legal requirements and shall meet the standard of quality ordinarily to be
expected of competent professionals in Consultant's field of expertise.
12. Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall use the standard of care in its profession to comply
with all applicable federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations.
13. Licenses. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has the licenses, permits,
qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required of Consultant
to practice its profession. Consultant, represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole
cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement, any licenses,
permits, insurance and approvals which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession.
14. Indemnity. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers,
officials, agents, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, actions,
losses, damages, injuries, and liability, direct or indirect (including any and all costs and expenses in
connection therein), arising out of the performance of this Agreement or its failure to comply with any
of its obligations contained in this Agreement, except for any such claim arising out of the sole
negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers.
15. Insurance Requirements.
a. Insurance. Consultant, at Consultant's own cost and expense, shall procure and
maintain, for the duration of the contract, the following insurance policies.
i. Workers' Compensation Coverage. Consultant shall maintain Workers'
Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his/her employees in
accordance with the laws of the State of California. In addition, Consultant shall require
each subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance and
Employer's Liability Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of California for
all of the subcontractor's employees. Any notice of cancellation or non-renewal of all
Workers' Compensation policies must be received by the City at least thirty (30) days
prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against
City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work
performed by Consultant for City. In the event that Consultant is exempt from Workers'
Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance for his/her employees in
accordance with the laws of the State of California, Consultant shall complete and
submit to the City a Certificate of Exemption from Workers Compensation Insurance in
the form attached hereto and included in Exhibit C if applicable. (N.A.)
ii. General Liability Coveraoe. Consultant shall maintain commercial general
liability insurance in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per
occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If a commercial
general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used,
either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed
under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required
occurrence limit.
Page 7
iii. Automobile Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain automobile liability
insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant
arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement,
including coverage for owned, hired and non-owned vehicles, in an amount of not less
than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence.
iv. Professional Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain professional errors
and omissions liability insurance for protection against claims alleging negligent acts,
errors or omissions which may arise from Consultant's operations under this
Agreement, whether such operations by the Consultant or by its employees,
subcontractors, or subconsultants. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than
one million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims-made annual aggregate basis, or a
combined single limit per occurrence basis.
b. Endorsements. Each general liability and automobile liability insurance policy shall be
with insurers possessing an AM Best rating of no less than A: VII and shall be endorsed with the
following specific language:
i The City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and
volunteers are to be covered as additional insured's with respect to liability arising out
of work performed by or on behalf of the Consultant, including materials, parts or
equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations.
ii. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the City, its
elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any
insurance maintained by the City, including any self-insured retention the City may
have shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with it.
iii. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a
separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of
the insuring company.
iv. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the City, its elected or
appointed officers, officials, employees or agents.
V. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect
coverage provided to the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees,
agents, or volunteers.
vi. The insurance provided by this Policy shall not be suspended, voided,
canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days written notice
has been received by the City.
C. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions
must be declared to and approved by the City. At the City's option, Consultant shall demonstrate
financial capability for payment of such deductibles or self-insured retentions.
Page 8
d. Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance with
original endorsements to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Certificates of
such insurance shall be filed with the City on or before commencement of performance of this
Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with the City at all times during the
term of this Agreement.
16. Notices. Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and either
served personally or sent prepaid, first class mail. Any such notice shall be addressed to the other
party at the address set forth below. Notice shall be deemed communicated within 48 hours from the
time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section.
If to City: City of Lake Elsinore
Attn: City Manager
130 South Main Street
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
If to Consultant: HDR Engineering, Inc.
Attn: Tim Gnibus
8690 Balboa Avenue
San Diego, Ca 92123-1502
17. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of
Agreement between the City and Consultant. All prior written and oral communications, including
correspondence, drafts, memoranda, and representations, are superseded in total by this Agreement.
18. Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document
executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney.
19. Assignment and Subcontracting. The parties recognize that a substantial inducement to City
for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation, experience and competence of
Consultant and the subcontractors listed in Exhibit A. Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for
all acts or omissions of any subcontractors. Assignments of any or all rights, duties or obligations of
the Consultant under this Agreement will be permitted only with the express consent of the City.
Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement except
as provided in Exhibit A. without the written authorization of the City. If City consents to such
subcontract, Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of those
subcontractors. Nothing in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between City and
any subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of the City to pay or to see to the
payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise is required by law.
20. Waiver. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing
waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision under this Agreement.
21. Severability. If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise
unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall
continue in full force and effect.
22. Controlling Law Venue. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the
laws of the State of California and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be held
exclusively in a state court in the County of Riverside.
Page 9
23. Litigation Expenses and Attorneys' Fees. If either party to this Agreement commences any
legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled
to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including court costs, expert witness fees, discovery
expenses, and attorneys' fees.
24. Mediation. The parties agree to make a good faith attempt to resolve any disputes arising out
of this Agreement through mediation prior to commencing litigation. The parties shall mutually agree
upon the mediator and share the costs of mediation equally. If the parties are unable to agree upon a
mediator, the dispute shall be submitted to JAMS/ENDISPUTE ("JAMS") or its successor in interest.
JAMS shall provide the parties with the names of five qualified mediators. Each party shall have the
option to strike two of the five mediators selected by JAMS and thereafter the mediator remaining
shall hear the dispute. If the dispute remains unresolved after mediation, either party may commence
litigation.
25. Execution. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall
constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one
copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not
be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart.
26. Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its
business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each party warrants that the individuals
who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement
and to bind each respective party.
27. Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained
any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or
secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any
company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee,
commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from
the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the
right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or
employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this
Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising there from.
28. Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity
employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for
employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such
non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment,
upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant
shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City's Minority Business Enterprise program,
Affirmative Action Plan or other related programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter
enacted.
Page 10
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date
first written above.
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE: CONSULTANT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
Page 11
EXHIBIT A
CONSULTANTS PROPOSAL
Page 12
® e ® e
May 16, 201 Y
Peter Ramey
Department of Public Works, Engineering Division
City of Lake Elsinore
130 S. Main Street
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
RE: Proposal for Construction Environmental Monitoring Services for the Rehabilitation of the Lake
Elsinore Boat Launch Facility
Dear Mr. Ramey:
HDR is pleased to submit this proposal for the implementation of construction environmental monitoring
services associated with the demolition and reconstruction of the Lake Elsinore Boat Launch Facility. Under this
work effort, HDR would provide environmental construction monitoring services related to biological resources,
cultural resources, and lake water quality monitoring. HDR will provide the expertise and resources necessary to
ensure mitigation monitoring and regulatory permit compliance for this project.
As shown in our attached proposal, HDR has extensive experience and is very familiar with the City's
environmental review process, having successfully completed numerous projects in the City. We are uniquely
qualified for this work program as HDR prepared the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and
supporting regulatory documentation for the Lake Elsinore Boat Launch Facility Rehabilitation Project for the
City's Lake and Aquatic Resources Department.
Mr. Tim Gnibus, AICP, will serve as the Principal-in-Charge for this effort providing overall strategy and quality
control for the project. Ms. Melyssa Sheeran will serve as the Project Manager and will coordinate all monitoring
efforts between environmental disciplines. Ms. Sheeran has worked on several projects for the City including
preparation of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed project.
As requested in the RFP,.HDR's agrees to the following statements:
• (Item A) This RFP shall be incorporated in its entirety as a part of our proposal.
• (Item B) This RFP and the attached proposal will jointly become part of the Agreement for Professional
Consultant Services for this project when said Agreement is fully executed by HDR and the Mayor or
City Manager of Lake Elsinore.
• (Item ;C) HDR's services are to be provided, and fees therefore, will be in accordance with the City's
RFP except as otherwise specified in the attached proposal under the heading, Additions or Exceptions
to the City's Request for Proposal.
• (Item H). All charges for HDR's services are based on a Not-to Exceed Fee which must include
conservatively estimated reimbursable expenses, as submitted with and made a part of HDR's proposal.
o6So Ba ns Ave Phone: (6661 712.6400
40A Engineering, Inc, SUNOM F.-(~~3~34
San Diego, CA 021239502 www.h n m
Peter Ramey
City of Lake Elsinore
May 16, 2011
Page 2
• (Item I) HDR will document and provide the results of the work to the satisfaction of the City. This
may include preparation of field and final reports, or similar evidence of attainment of the Agreement
objectives
+ (Item J) HDR will immediately document and notify the City of any defects or hazardous conditions
observed in the vicinity of the project site prior, during, or after the survey work
• (Item Q HDR will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race,
color, religion, sex, or national origin.
• (Item M) All federal laws and regulations shall be adhered to notwithstanding any state or local laws and
regulations. In a case of conflict between federal, state or local laws or regulations the strictest shall be
adhered to.
• (Item N) HDR shall allow all authorized federal, state, county and City officials access to place of work,
books, documents, papers, fiscal, payroll, materials, and other relevant contract records pertinent to this
special project. All relevant records shall be retained for at least three years.
• (Item O) HDR shall comply with the Davis-Bacon Fair Labor Standards Act (40 USC 276-a through
a-7) and the implementation regulations issued pursuant thereto (29 CFR Section 1, 5), and
amendments thereof and the California Labor Code. Pursuant to the said regulations, entitled "Federal
Labor Standard Provisions," "Federal Prevailing Wage Decision" and State of California prevailing wage
rates, respectively.
• (Item P) HDR shall comply with the Copeland Anti-Kickback Act (18 USC 874) and the
Implementation Regulation (29 CFR 3) issued pursuant thereto, and any amendments thereof.
• (Item Q) HDR offers and agrees to assign to the City all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of
action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 USCC Sec. 15) or under the Cartwright Act
(Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 16700] of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions
Code), arising from purchases of goods, services, or materials pursuant to the public works or the
subcontract. This assignment shall be made and become effective at the time the City tenders final
payment to HDR, without further acknowledgment by the parties.
• Because HDR has not included subconsultants within this proposal, the contents of Item R related to
DBE firms are not applicable.
We look forward to the opportunity to work with the City on this project. I can be reached at 714-730-2329
and Tim can be reached at 714-730-2300 or 760-845-9258 (cell).
Sincerely,
HDR Engineering, Inc.
`Richard R. Coles
Vice President
HDR Engineering, Inc.
Tim ibus, AICP
Environmental Business Class Lead
Page 15
FIRM QUALIFICATIONS
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
MAIN STREET BOAT LAUNCH FACILITY
INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION (IS/MND) AND PERMITTING,
LAKE EISLNORE, CA
Reference: Pat Kilroy
City of Lake Elsinore
Director, Parks and Recreation
Phone: (951) 674-7730
pkilroy@lake-ehinore.org
HDR prepared an Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative
Declaration (IS/MND) and aquatic habitat assessment for the
construction of the Lake Elsinore Main Street Boat Launch
Facility and associated components, including an adjacent
park area, launch ramp staging area, gate house, restroom
facilities, and laundry facilities. The Main Street Boat Launch
Facility replaced the aging state park boat ramp facilities at the
south end of Lake Elsinore and provided economic
development opportunities in the vicinity of the project.
Primary issues included water quality assessment and
enhancement, lake level stabilization, flood control facilities,
traffic queuing analysis, and boat trailer staging! park facilities
design. HDR was responsible for preparing the Draft
ISWND and Final IS/MND including response to comments
and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. HDR
also managed the permitting process including obtaining the
Section 404 permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
the Streambed Alteration Agreement from the California
Department of Fish and Game, and Section 401 Water
Quality Certification from the Regional Water Quality
Control Board.
EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.
8 SUPPLEMENTAL, EIR, LAIfE EISINORE, CA
Reference: Carole Donahoe
City of Lake Elsinore
Planning Consultant
Phone: (951) 674-3124x. 287
cdonahoe@lake-elsinore. org
The East Lake Specific Plan area, approved in 1993, has been
amended multiple times with this amendment focusing on •a
340-acre parcel within the original 3,000 acre plan area.
LUMOS Communities is proposing a project that would
include 14 separate planning areas and includes 1,763
dwelling units, as well as flood storage, and active and passive
recreation. HDR prepared an Initial Study and Supplemental
EIR, as well as Response to Comments, Findings of Fact and
Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program (MMRP). This
project also includes an amendment to the City of Lake
Elsinore Circulation Element in order to modify the
alignment of Bundy Canyon Road as it passes through the
project site.
DIAMOND SPECIFIC PLAN EIR, LAKE
ELSINORE, CA
Reference: Carole Donahoe
City of Lake Elsinore
Planning Consultant
Phone: (951) 674-3124x. 287
edonahoe@alake-ehinore.org
HDR prepared environmental documents for the 87.2 acre
Diamond Specific Plan project in the City of Lake Elsinore.
The project included an amendment to the East Lake Specific
Plan (EISP) to remove 86.4 acres from the ELSP and platy
the majority of that acreage within the new Diamond Specific
plan. The Diamond Specific Plan consists of a mined use
commerciaUentertainment development adjacent to the
Diamond Stadium. HDR was hired by the City of Lake
Elsinore to prepare a Draft EIR and Final EIR, including
Response to Comments, Findings of Fact, and a. Mitigation
Monitoring Reporting Program (MMRP).
Page 16 Page 1
WATERS EDGE SPECIFIC PLAN EIR, LAKE
ELSINORE, CA
Reference: Linda Miller
City of Lake Elsinore
HDR was retained by the City of Lake Elsinore to prepare an
EIR for the 176-acre WatersEdge Project, consisting of the
following three components: the Marina Specific Plan (Marina
SP), the Cottages by the Lake (Cottages), and the Weiland
Enhancement Site. The 76-acre Marina SP provides for a
development complex that combines pleasure-craft marina
uses with recreational watercraft sales, service, and storage,
retail commercial, restaurants, multi-family attached
condominiums, hotel, and private event viewing
opportunities. The Cottages is proposed as a single family
residential condominium development with the intent of
meeting the affordable housing requirement of the City for the
Marina SP. The Weiland Enhancement Site, approximately
87 acres, is proposed to provide compensatory mitigation for
permanent, temporary, and off-site impacts for the Marina SP
and Cottages and possibly other development projects within
the watershed. Major environmental issues included water
quality, wedand impacts, land use compatibility and
aesthetics. HDR prepared the Draft EIR, Final EIR,
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), and
the Findings of Fact. The project was placed on hold prior to
Planning Commission and City Council meetings.
SHOPPES AT CENTRAL CROSSROADS EIR,
LABS Eiswou, CA
Reference. Carole Donahoe
City q fLahe Elsinore
Planning Consultant
Phone: (951) 6743124x. 287
cdonaboeWake-eleinore. org
HDR prepared an EIR for a 14-acre commercial project
including a controversial anchor tenant. Project issues include
;land use compatibility due to residential uses located adjacent
to the proposed commercial uses, traffic, air quality and noise
impacts. This project has been placed on hold by the client.
SPYGLASS RANCH EIR, LAxE ELSINORE, CA
Reference. Matt Harris
City of Lake Elsinore
Senior Planner
Phone: (951) 6743124x279
mbarris@lake-elsinore.org
HDR prepared an EIR for a 260-acre residential development
within a hillside development district. Project issues included,
but were not limited to, aesthetics, biological resources,
cultural resources, traffic and transportation. HDR was hired
by the City of Lake Elsinore to prepare environmental
documentation for the 260 acre Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan.
HDR was responsible for conducting a public scoping
meeting, the preparation of the Draft EIR, Final EIR,
including Response to Comments, Findings of Fact and a
Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program (MMRP). HDR
also attended public hearings to address environmental
questions about the project.
ANNEXATION NumBER77: MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION, WE ELSINORE,
CA
Reference: Linda Miller
City ofLake Elsinore
HDR prepared a MND in support of the Annexation Number
77 project. The project included a request to annex the
154 acre property, from the unincorporated County of
Riverside into the City of Lake Elsinore at the request of the
Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO). This area is
comprised of 26 parcels already developed with single family
houses and 19 vacant parcels. Development plans were not
being proposed concurrently with this action. In addition to
preparing the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), HDR
assisted the City with facilitating a public scoping meeting,
and responding to existing residents` questions and concerns
regarding the annexation process.
Page 17 Page 2
FAIRWAY BUSINESS PARK INITIAL STUDY /
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, LAKE
ELsINoRE, CA
Reference: Matt Harris
City of Lake Elsinore
Senior Planner
Phone. (951) 6743124x279
mharris pa lake-elsinore. org
HDR has prepared an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative
Declaration (IS/MND) for an 18-acre industrial project.
Project issues included land use compatibility due to a high
school located across the street from the industrial project,
amendments to the General Plan Circulation Element, and
wetland /vernal pool impacts. HDR also managed the
preparation of cultural resources, air quality and noise
technical report s for the project. HDR was responsible for
preparation of the Draft IS/MND and Final IS/MND,
including Response to Comments and a Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). HDR also
attended public hearings to address environmental questions
about the project. The project was approved by the Lake
Elsinore City Council on November 27, 2007.
Page 18 page 3
PROJECT TEAM
The following summarizes the key personnel for the
proposed monitoring services. Detailed resumes are
included in this. proposal.
Page 19 page 4
MR. TIM GNMUS, AICP
Mr. Tim Gnibus, AICP, will serve as the Principal-in-Charge
for this effort. Mr. Gnibus has over 20 years of experience in
preparing environmental documentation and regulatory
permitting for a wide variety of projects throughout Southern
California. He will provide overall strategy direction and
quality control for the project and will maintain daily
involvement in the project from its inception to project
completion.
MS. MELYSSA SHEERAN, MA
Ms. Sheeran will be the dedicated project manager to this
specific work effort. Ms. Sheeran also has worked on
numerous CEQA documents for projects throughout
California, and her experience includes several projects for the
City of Lake Elsinore, including the Initial Study/Mitigated
Negative Declaration for the proposed Lake Elsinore Boat
Launch Facility Rehabilitation Project
MS. SARA CLOWERY, MA.
Ms. Clowerywill be responsible for the archaeological
monitoring during construction of the Boat Launch. Ms.
Clowery has over 11 years of experience in cultural resources
management. She directs cultural resource inventory projects
in compliance with.CEQA, Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act, Archaeological and Historic
Preservation Act and various state and local agencies'
guidelines and regulations. Ms. Clowery and the
archaeological field team have extensive construction
monitoring experience.
MS. INGRID CHLUP, MS
Ms. Chlup will be responsible for the biological monitoring
during construction of the Boat Launch. Ms. Chlup has over
nine years of industry experience specializing in
biological/regulatory arenas. She has vast experience in
conducting impact analysis and completing appropriate
documentation for purposes of the Western Riverside
Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan, CEQA, NEPA,
Section 1602 of the California Department of Fish and.Game
Codes, and Sections 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act, and
the Endangered Species Act. Ms. Chlup and the biological
field team have extensive experience in construction
monitoring.
M.R. RICHARD HAIMANN, PE
Mr. Haimann is HDR's water/stormwater section leader and
national technical advisor. He has successfully formed and led
teams to complete numerous envimn nental a ginearing and
environmental resource management projects throughout the
world. He has been involved in stormwater, water
management, watershed management, groundwater
management, contaminated land management, natural
resource management, multimedia environmental compliance,
regulatory negotiations, and environmental management
throughout his career and has published in several areas of
environmental engineering including stormwater quality
compliance, watershed management and environmental
management.
Full resumes are located in the Appendix
Page 20 Page 5
PROJECT
UNDERSTANDING
In the spring of 2008, the City of Lake Elsinore Lake and
Aquatic Resources Department approved the proposed Lake
Elsinore Boat Launch Facility Rehabilitation Project. The
project site is located along the shoreline of Lake Elsinore, the
largest natural lake in southern California. More specifically,
the project site is located south of, and also adjacent to, the
existing City, of Lake Elsinore Campground. The Lake
Elsinore Boat Launching Facility (BLF) was originally
constructed by the California Department of Parks and
Recreation in 1965. The BLF is currently owned by the City,
and is used for providing public access to various water-related
recreational activities. However, the BLF is in a state of
disrepair and is only accessible when the lake elevation is
between 1,232 and 1,240 feet. The City received,grants from
the California Department of Boating and Waterways to
rehabilitate the launch facility. Components of the
rehabilitation project include:
• Demolition and removal of the existing boat ramp;
• Approximately 150,000 cubic yards of fill from one,
or a combination of two excavation sites
(approximately 40-acre area);
The construction of various improvements including
a new boat launching ramp and staging area, floating
breakwater/dock system, parking lot, boat wash,
restroom facility, fish cleaning station, picnic area,
and two 100-foot boarding floats (approximately
12.6-acrearea)..
Estimated construction time is approximately six months
The City adopted a Revised Initial Study/Mitigated Negative
Declaration (SCH#: 2007081016) and Mitigation Monitoring
and Reporting Program in conjunction with the project
approval. Additionally, regulatory permits were obtained for
the project including Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit and
California Department of Fish and Game Streambed
Alteration Agreement. Together, these documents identify the
specific conditions and mitigation measures that need to be
implemented as part of the project construction. All of these
documents were prepared by HDR on behalf of the City.
The City is seeking a consultant to provide construction
monitoring services for biology and cultural resources as it
relates to the proposed project. These surveys include pre-
disturbance surveys for burrowing owls and migratory nesting
birds, preparation of a summary report, and, if necessary, a
passive relocation program or active relocation. Also, an
archaeological monitor is required to monitor all ground
disturbing activities and submit a Cultural Resources
Treatment and Monitoring Agreement to the appropriate,
Tribe and submit a summary report and mitigation plan if
applicable.
PROJECT APPROACH
AND SCOPE OP WORK
HDR is pleased to provide this proposal for construction
monitoring services. We are intimately familiar with the
proposed project having been responsible for the preparation
of the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and
regulatory permits for the proposed project. We offer full in-
house capabilities to provide the required biological and
cultural resources, and lake water quality monitoring services
for the proposed project.
TASK 1: PROJECT MANAGEMENT
This task will involve overall management of the
environmental construction monitoring services. This task
assumes one kick-off meeting with the client, one internal
kick-off meeting, coordination and communication with the
City, and on-going management of the monitoring program.
Weekly communication with the City will be provided in a
weekly project status report .
Task 1 DeBverables:
• Weekly Monitoring Status Reports
TASK 2: BIOLOGICAL. RESOURCES
MONITORING
This task will include attendance at construction meetings as
necessary, monitoring construction activity adjacent to
riparian habitat, demarcating the impact zone, conducting
pre-construction burrowing owl surveys and preparing a report
to document survey results, conducting contractor education
Page 21 page 6
and documenting construction activities. The Final Initial
Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Measure
BIO-1 indicates that vegetation clearing will occur outside of
the bird nesting season; therefore; extensive nesting surveys are
not anticipated. However, nest surveys required for adjacent
riparian habitat and palm trees are included in this task.
Task 2 Deliverables:
• Pre-construction Burrowing Owl Survey Report
(three hard copies and one electronic copy)
• Draft Biological Monitoring Report (one hard copy
and one electronic copy)
• Final Biological Monitoring Report (three hard
copies and one electronic copy)
TASK 3: CULTURAL RESOURCES
MONITORING
The proposed Scope of Work for the cultural resource
component of this Lake Elsinore Boat Launch Improvements
is as follows:
SUBTASK 1: Cultural Resources Treatment and
Monitoring Agreement - An HDR archaeologist will review
the prior studies, Eastern Information Center (EIC) records
search results, and Native American Heritage Commission's
(NAHC) Sacred Land Files (SLF). An HDR archaeologist will
contact the appropriate listed Native American contact for the
project area (most likely the Pechanga Band of Luiseno
Indians) to notify the tribe of the grading, excavation and
monitoring program in order to coordinate and complete a
Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement
between the tribe, City, and consultant.
SU$TASK 2: Archaeological monitoring- Prior to the
commencement of construction an HDR archaeologist will
provide contractor cultural resources education training.
Qualified archaeological monitors will provide monitoring
services for all ground disturbing activities associated with the
Lake Elsinore Boat Launch Improvements project. As the
construction will occur over a one year period, this Scope of
Work estimates that the maximum amount of monitoring
required will be 20 10-hour days. An HDR archaeologist will
coordinate contractor, consultant, and sub-consultant
scheduling with respect to archaeological/cultural resources.
The archaeological monitoring will be conducted in
accordance with the established Cultural Resources Treatment
and Monitoring Agreement as well as CEQA and the City of
Lake Elsinore guidelines. Daily photographs and field notes
will be taken to document construction monitoring activities.
Inadvertent discoveries will be mapped using the Magellan IvMobileMapperTM CX field unit and photographed. Should
an inadvertent discovery require cultural resource testing, data
recovery, evaluation, laboratory analysis, or curation then a
modification to the 1cope of work/conttact will be necessary.
The modification to the contract will include the cost for
formal cultural resource evaluation according to Cultural
Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement as well as
CEQA and City of Lake Elsinore regulations and guidelines.
The scope of the formal cultural resource evaluation could
include subsurface testing, laboratory analysis, site significant
evaluation, new or updated site form submittals, mitigation
recommendations, and artifact curation.
SUBTASK 3: Reporting - The result of the archaeological
monitoring will be presented in a professional quality report.
HDR's report will follow California of Historic Preservation's
Archaeological Resource Management Reports (ARMR):
Recommended Content and Format Guidelines. A draft
report will be submitted fast for review. Once comments are
received on the draft report a final report will be prepared and
submitted. The report will meet CEQA and City of Lake
Elsinore standards.
Task 3 Deliverables:
• Cultural Resource Treatment and Monitoring
Agreement (three signed final copies)
• Draft Archaeological Monitoring Report (one
electronic copy)
• Final Archaeological Monitoring Report (three hard
copies and one electronic copy)
NOTE: Cost estimate does not include Tribal Monitoring.
The minimum standard rate is normally $50/hour (subject to
change).
Page 22 Page 7
TUSK 4: LAKE WATER QUALITY
MONITORING
Lake Elsinore is impaired for nutrients, organic enrichment
(low DO), PCBs, and tonicity. Total Maximum Daily Loads
(TMDLs) have been adopted for nutrients and organic
enrichment. TMDLs are in planning.for PCBs and toxicity.
The Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (HMMP) does
not specify lake quality monitoring requirements. However,
based on the Regional Water Quality Control Board's
(RWQCB's) 401 Certification for the proposed project,
monitoring would be required for pH, DO, and turbidity.
Specifically, the 401 Certification requires:
• Dredge activities must not depress the dissolved
oxygen content of any part of Lake Elsinore below 5
mg/L as a result of controllable water factors. When
natural dissolved oxygen content is less than 5 mg/L,
the discharger must not cause further depression.
• Dredge activities must not raise the pH of any area of
Lake Elsinore above 8.5 or lower pH below 6.5 as the
result of controllable water quality factors.
• Dredge activities shall not cause the background
natural turbidity, as measured in Nephelometric
Turbidity Units (NTUs), in any area of Lake
Elsinore to be increased by values greater than the
following Basin Plan objectives at a distance of 100
feet from the activity-
o If natural turbidity is between 0 and 50
NTU, the maximum increase shall not
exceed 206/b of the measured natural
turbidity
o If natural turbidity is 50 to 100 NTU, the
increase shall not exceed 10 NTU
o If natural turbidityis greater than 100
NTU, the maximum increase shall not
exceed 10% of the measured natural
turbidity
Under this Task, HDR will prepare and implement a lake
water quality monitoring plan in order to satisfy this
,provision. Preparation of the lake water quality monitoring
plan will include review and approval of the Water Quality
Management Plan supplied by the contractor. This plan will
include provisions for reporting of violations to the RWQCB,
consistent with permit requirements. Lake water quality
monitoring would be conducted at times where.sediment
disturbance associated with the construction of the boat ramp
would occur. Samples would be taken from shoreline and
from boat (assumed to be provided by City). Monitoring
would be conducted using a YSI ProPlus Multi Parameter
Water Quality Meter for monitoring 02 and PH and a Secchi
Disc for monitoring turbidity. Records of all monitoring
activities will be maintained.
Task 4 Deliverables:
• Lake Water Quality Monitoring Plan
• Weekly Monitoring Reports (1-page, maximum of
10 reports assumed)
Page 23 Page 8
ADDITIONS OR
EXCEPTIONS TO THE
CITY'S REQUEST FOR
PROPOSAL,
ASSUMPTIONS:
1. This scope of work provides a time and materials
estimate for the various monitoring activities based
on the known construction parameters. Any
exceedance of the level of effort required for
monitoring activities specified in this proposal would
not be performed without prior approval from the
City.
2. This scope and cost estimate provides for a Cultural
Resource Treatment and Monitoring Agreement and
Archaeological Monitoring according to CEQA and
City of Lake Elsinore regulations and guidelines. No
provisions for archaeological excavations (testing or
data recovery), cultural resource evaluations,
laboratory work, or cumtion are provided herein.
Should inadvertent discoveries that require
archaeological excavation, cultural resource
evaluation, laboratory work, and curation be
encountered then a modification to the scope of
work should undertaken.
3. Only one archaeological monitor (and one tribal
monitor) will be necessary per day. Tribal
monitoring is not included in cost estimate. The
minimum standard rate is normally $50/hour
(subject to change).
4. Although construction will take one calendar year, it
is assumed that maximum work days will number 20.
5. One day of construction monitoring consists of 10
billed archaeological monitoring hours that include
travel time, this may vary daily.
6. A total of 100 hours is allocated for water quality
monitoring activity by one biologist.
7. Boat would be provided by City for lake water
quality monitoring effort.
8. A maximum of 240 hours is assumed for the
biological monitoring services task. If more extensive
nesting bird surveys become necessary, project
phasing requires more than one burrowing owl pre-
construction survey, or other unforeseen
circumstances require that the biologist conduct sites
visits more often than biweekly, an additional scope
will be prepared.
9. This scope of work does not include implementation
of a revegetation plan or monitoring of such plan..
Page 24 Page 9
APPENDIX
w
It
N I
a.:
.J F lQ IO
c C
✓,1
y '
fn J
Q V N
W
c~
Ow
J O
aOZ C C
C I C I C I N
cl~
2 I'T I co
INI~I=I
0
U
-
m
m
p
2
o
N
m
,
C
Q
y
0
2
M
N
N
N
O
.
,J.
C
N
C
C
C
0
_
Bd
M
OD
V
V
N
N
3~
Q
n.p
ix
N
O{
- N
N
N
N
O
C
O
CL
OWN
N
ate, E
U N C
N C C
0)
N Ol
.
go
0 0)
0 7 0
7 7 0'
O
E
2
2
Y"
Q C
O N.:G
U N N C N.
.
Q •C
.
Q YG
N l0
a W
m N O
< N `1 O O~
N O
M O
7
NQ's
C6 2^ Q
M.2
vi 2
-40
G
ai
a
0
C
a
M
G/
d
a
d
N
N
t
ho
f0
N
O
CL
O
L
CL
V
0
v
L
7
0
u
C
L
N
d
CL
d
7
D
d
V
h
N
V
G!
d
41
9
N
L
w
d
O
C
N
d
a
Page 26
HDR ENGINEERING, INC.
Southern California Operations
STANDARD CHARGES FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Effective January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011
Scientists and Environmental Planners
$/hr
Sr. Company Officer
338.00
Principal in Charge
300.00
Env & Water Res Sr PM
241.00
Env & Water Res PM
225.00
Sr. Project Mgr/PM
209.00
Water Res Sr Engineer
199.00
Sr. Env Planner/Sr. Biologist
179.00
Water Res PE
174.00
Sr GIS/Sr. Designer _
127.00
CADD
123.00
GIS Analyst
107.00
Staff Engineer/Blologist/Planner
106.00
Project Administrator
100.00
Document Production Specialist
96.00
Err
92.00
* Billing rates subject to 5% escalation effective January 1, 2012
Reimbursable Expenses
Technology Charge $ 3.70 per hour
Vehicle Mileage $ 0.51 per mile (or per IRS Regulations)
Page 27
SAMPLE INSURANCE CERTIFICATE
AE9~R°' CERTIFICATE OF LIA
BILITY INSURANCA
0
'
ou
12
10
snsaolo
PaOMMR Lcekton Companies, LLC.1 Kaams CRY
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION
444 W. 47th Suet Suite 900
ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE
KwanCity MO641124906
HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR
(816) 960-90M
ALTER THE. COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE MAIO
We`n NOR ENGINEERING, INC.
INWRVIN Hadfald Fimlgw Com 19682
1013472 ATTN: LOUIS 1. PACHMAN
INSURER a St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co 24767
8404 WDIAN HILLS DRIVE
OMAHA
HE 68114-4049
WSURERO Nmv hIwWurence Company 23841.
,
INSURER D: InsermMC Com ofNe State ofPA 19429
wsulffAE Zurich 'mnI umnce Co an 6535
COVERAGES HDRINOI SA
v 'L o A ~ nw~"' ~Nn'^.m, 'te °°vRwe
THE P
OUCIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMEDABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING
ANY R
EQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDMON OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED
OR
MAY P
ERTAIN. THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED H
.
EREIN IS SUBJECT TO,ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH
POLICI
ES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
INSR
LM N9
TpE0Pw3UMNCE POMCVNUMSEi!
MTEMMMNPWD~ D Tere°w M NITS
GENEAALYAWLHT
FA RRENCE L000.000
A
A84ERCIALGEt1ERALLMIM 37CSB000950
6/12010 6/V2011 Dn1aACE TO mEO 6 1,000,000
CtAIM3MPDE ❑X OCCUR -
T
MEp EXP (PnyatMppaM $ 10,000
CGwlaftW Liab.
X
PEASOMLLA VIWURY $ 1 ODO
G04E LAGCaREGATE S 2,0110,000
GENLA MoATEUMIAMUESPER:
PRODUCTS-OOMPNIP AGO S 000,000
POLICY XT X LDc
AV
TDMDWLElIHB1[I}Y
X
CG1aIINED SINGLE LIMB
i 2,000,000
A
pNYAUfO
37CSEQUO951(AOS)
6/12010
672011
(FAaaMaM7
A
ALLOWNEDAUTOS
37CSE0009S2(HI)
6/1)2010
6112011
6omLY IWURr
6
xxxxxxx
SCI&DULEDAUTDS
IPMP~uT)
X
NWFAAUMS
-
X
-
BpDSY wJURY
-
1 XXXX3=
NOHAWNFmAUTOS
0wam6eml
PROPERY O
N
OE
P
A
ryreceMeMl
6 XXXXXXX
GARAGE W&lfiY
AIROONLY-FAACCIOEM
3 30000=
wrcaurD
NOT APPLICABL
E
EA
3 XX7OpO0(
F.
AUTOONLY: AGO
3 XXXXXXX
EI(CES3I UMBRELLA WISIUTY
FACH OCCURRENCE
i IMQQD
B
X OCCUR EICLWS MPDE
QIC08000712
611,2010
6112011
AGGREGATE
6 1,000mo
umaREUA
(EXCLUDES PROF. LIAS)
1 X7D0=
DEWCTMLE OFORM
S
X ~RETENaON 0
770DDOCC
YIORN
RSWMPEl TON
NCSTATU. DTH-
X
'
O
AxD t
aAPLOYEgb'YPBRJTY Y
3621195 (ADS)
6/12010
7/1/2011
YLIM
D
N
ANr PRWRMTOmPNDNER&XECUIIVE
CUAEO! N
3621196 (CA)
6112010
7112011
ELEACHACCIOENT
_ 1000000
XM~dvpx~IX
ELDISEA4E-EAEMPI-M
1 1000000-
SPECNLPROVISIONSI
EL OISEISE-PoLICYIJMR
6 1,00000
-E
DTHER
EOC9260026-03
6tta010
6112011
PERCLAB.1: S1,Offl M. ADO:
AROIS@WTUS
SLOW,DOD.
PROPESSTONAIL-
LIABILITY
DESCRIPTION OFOPEMTIDHSILOGTH)XSIVFHICLEBIIXCLVSMwSA00EO BYENOOaSEMENTI6PEQALPRONSI0N9
312368 8NWIDpNYOFIxeAaWE0E3CPoaEDPOLLpESBECNICELLEDBEFOeEMEFXPIMTXN!
FORINFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY - WTE THEREOF TxE ISBUNxi a16URER WILL3DIDfA9QRX1rMNL 30 DAYSwmTTEx' -
xonceidTxecExTLHpATExoLOERxaMEDTDTxeLesr,
)WAMBMMK
AUIR ATNE.
LCORD 26 (2009107) 0119118-20MAGORD CORPORATION. All TightgL maQ s
The ACORD name and logo are legislated marks of ACORD age g
Fsa~wmwekv:eMVMeanntlY~smua9+ofinew6webwRmwr4flW4n.wn.mwKbunsamma,TmRPaT'.
Approved by OMB
0348-0046
Disclosure of Lobbying Activities
Complete this form to disclose lobbying activities pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1352
(See reverse for public burden disclosure)
1. Type of Federal Action:
2. Status of Federal Action:
3. Report Type:
a. contract
a. bid/offer/application
a. initial filing
b. grant
b. initial award
b. material change
c. cooperative agreement
c. post-award
d, loan
For material change only:
e. loan guarantee
Year quarter
f. loan insurance
Date of last report
4. Name and Address of Reporting Entity:
5. If Reporting Entity in No. 4 is Subawardee,
_X_ Prime Subawardee
Enter Name and Address of Prime:
Tier if Known:
HDR Engineering, Inc.
8690 Balboa Ave, Suite 200
San Diego, CA
Congressional District, i known:
Congressional District, i known:
6. Federal Department/Agency:
7. Federal Program Name/Description:
n/a
n/a
CFDA Number, ifapplicable:
8. Federal Action Number, ifknown:
9. Award Amount, if known:
$ n/a
10. a. Name and Address of Lobbying Registrant
b. Individuals Performing Services (including address if
(if individual, last name, first name, MI):
different from No. 10a)
n/a
(last name, first name, MI): .
n/a
11. Information requested through this form is authorized by
title 31 U.S.C. section 1352. This disclosure of lobbying
Signature:
activities is, a material representation of fact upon which
reliance was placed by the tier above when this transaction
Print Name: - Richard Coles
was made or entered into. This. disclosure is required
pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1352. This information will be reported
Title: Vice-President
to the Congress. semi=annually and will be available.for public
inspection. Any person who fails to file the required
disclosure shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than
Telephone No.: 714.730.2300 Date: 5/16/2011
$10 000 and not more than $100 000 for each such failure.
Authorized for Local Reproduction
Standard Form - LLL (Rev. 7-97)
Page 29
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETION OF SF-LLL, DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES
This disclosure form shall be completed by the reporting entity, whether subawardee or prime Federal recipient, at the
initiation or receipt of a covered Federal action, or a material change to a previous filing, pursuant to title 31 U.S.C. section
1352. The filing of a form is required for each payment or agreement to make payment to any lobbying entity for influencing
or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress,
or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with a covered Federal action. Complete all items that apply for both
the initial filing and material change report. Refer to the implementing guidance published by the Office of Management and
Budget for additional information.
I. Identify the type of covered Federal action for which lobbying activity is and/or has been secured to influence the
outcome of a covered Federal action.
2. Identify the status of the covered Federal action.
3. Identify the appropriate classification of this report. If this is a followup report caused by a material change to the
information previously reported, enter the year and quarter in which the change occurred. Enter the date of the last
previously submitted report by this reporting entity for this covered Federal action.
4. Enter the full name, address, city, State and zip code of the reporting entity. Include Congressional District, if
known. Check the appropriate classification of the reporting entity that designates if it is, or expects to be, a prime or
subaward recipient. Identify the tier of the subawardee, e.g., the first subawardee of the prime is the Ist tier.
Subawards include but are not limited to subcontracts, subgrants and contract awards under grants.
5. If the organization filing the report in item 4, checks "Subawardee," then enter the full name, address, city, State and
zip code of the prime Federal recipient. Include Congressional District, if known.
6. Enter the name of the federal agency making the award or loan commitment. Include at least one organizational level
below agency name, if known. For example, Department of Transportation, United States Coast Guard.
7.. Enter the Federal program name or description for the covered Federal action (item 1). If known, enter the full
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number for grants, cooperative agreements, loans, and loan
commitments.
8. Enter the most appropriate Federal identifying number available for the Federal action identified in item I (e.g.,
Request for Proposal (RFP) number; Invitations for Bid (IFB) number; grant announcement number; the contract,
grant, or loan award number; the application/proposal control number assigned by the Federal agency). Included
prefixes, e.g., "RFP-1)E-90-001."
9. For a covered Federal action where there has been an award or loan commitment by the Federal agency, enter the
Federal amount of the award/loan commitment for the prime entity identified in item 4 or 5.
10. (a) Enter the full name, address, city, State and zip code of the lobbying registrant under the Lobbying Disclosure Act
of 1995 engaged by the reporting entity identified in item 4 to influence the covered Federal action.
(b) Enter the full names of the individual(s) performing services, and include full address if different from I0(a).
Enter Last Name, First Name, and Middle Initial (MI).
11. The certifying official shall sign and date the form, print his/her name, title, and telephone number.
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act, as amended, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays
a valid OMB control'Number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is OMB No. 0348-0046. -Public reporting
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 10 minutes per response, including time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.
Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any otheraspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this
burden, to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0348-0046), Washington, DC 20503
Page 30
Tim Gnibus, AICP
Pri ncipal-in-Charge
Education
Professional Experience
University of California, Irvine
Tim Gnibus has over 20 years of professional experience in preparing environmental
1989 - Bachelor of Arts in Social Ecology -
documentation pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the
Environmental Health and Planning
National Environmental Policy Act(NEPA) for a variety of agencies in southern California.
His experience also includes the preparation of a variety of land use and planning documents
Professional Affiliations
including General Plans, Housing Elements, Specific Plans, and Master Plans.
American Planning Association
American Institute of Certified Planners
(AICP)
Project Experience (Partial List)
Association of Environmental Professionals
Bayshore Bikeway EIR/EA. Senior Project Manager for the preparation of an EIR/EA for
the proposed South Bay Salt Works Segment of the Bayshore Bikeway. The proposed
office Location
project would construct a new Class I (off-street) segment of the Bayshore Bikway to
Irvine, California
upgrade the existing Class II (on-street) bike lanes currently located on city of San Diego
streets. The new Class I segment is approximately 1.8 miles in length, and is located along
Industry Tenure
the existing Otay River berm and Main Street Dike in the southeastern area of San Diego
20 Years
Bay. Key environmental issues associated with the project include biological resources and
cultural resources.
San Diego Crossroads Redevelopment EIR. Project Manager for the preparation of the
San Diego Crossroads Redevelopment Plan EIR in the City of San Diego. The EIR
addresses the potential environmental impacts associated with the implementation of a
redevelopment plan in an approximately 1,032 acre area.
Orange County Great Park EIR. Project Manager for the Program EIR that addressed the
proposed Orange County Great Park in the City of Irvine and County of Orange. The
proposed project is the reuse of the former
MCAS El Toro with a variety of uses including a university, residential, industrial, golf
course, and significant amounts of open space.
South San Diego Pipeline No. 2'EIR. Project Manager for the preparation of an EM for
the South San Diego Pipeline No. 2 project. The proposed pipeline extends approximately
12 miles through the south portion of the City of San Diego and the City of Chula Vista.
Hidden Valley Ranch EIR. Project Manager for the preparation of the Hidden Valley
Ranch EIR in the City of Poway. The project involves a 41-lot residential subdivision, the
expansion of a small private golf course, and the continuance of agricultural activity on a
420-acre site.
NCTD Field Administration Office EA. Senior Project Manager for the preparation of an
EA for the proposed NCTD Field Administration Office. The EA analyzes the potential
environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a Field
Administration Office location within the NCTD right-of-way and in the coastal zone. The
project involves the construction of a 10,000 square foot facility, parking, and storage, areas
on an approximately two-acre site. Key environmental issues analyzed in the EA include
biology, cultural resources, noise, and aesthetics.
Page 31
Melyssa L. Sheeran
Project Manager
Education
Professional Experience
Master of Arts, Public Policy (Political
Ms. Sheeran brings 10 years of experience in environmental consulting and client
Science), San Diego State University
management. She has three years experience as an HDR project manager preparing
Bachelor of Arts, Political
SGovernment, Mary Washington
environmental documents for a variety of public and private projects entailing impacts in
College
urban, built-out locations to site-specific impacts in undeveloped lands. Her experience
ranges from Negative Declarations (ND), Environmental Impact Reports (EIR), and joint
Professional Affiliations
CEQA/NEPA (EHVEIS) projects. Her projects have included a diverse background
Association of Environmental Professionals,
including a Multiple Species Conservation Program Subarea Plan EIS/EIR, a controversial
San Diego, Member, 2005-Present
Mitigated Negative Declaration for an annexation project and multiple land development
Toastmasters International, San Diego,
EIRs in Lake Elsinore and Calexico.
Member, 2005-Present
Women's Environmental Council (WEC),
Project Experience (Partial List)
San Diego, Member, 2005-Present .
City of Lake Elsinore, Main Street Boat Launch Facility IS/ MND and Permitting,
Office Location
Lake Elsinore, CA. Environmental Scientist. HDR prepared an Initial Study/ Mitigated
San Diego, California
Negative Declaration (IS/MND) and aquatic habitat assessment for the construction of the
Lake Elsinore Main Street Boat Launch Facility and associated components, including an
Industry Tenure
adjacent park area, launch ramp staging area, gate house, restroom facilities, and laundry
10 Years
facilities. The Main Street Boat Launch Facility replaced the aging state park boat ramp
facilities at the south end of Lake Elsinore and provided economic development
opportunities in the vicinity of the project. Primary issues included water quality assessment
and enhancement, lake level stabilization, flood control facilities, traffic queuing analysis,
and boat trailer staging / park facilities design. HDR was responsible for preparing the Draft
IS/MND and Final IS/MND including response to comments and Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program. HDR also managed the permitting process and is in the process of
securing a Section 404 permit from the USAGE.
City of Lake Elsinore, Diamond Specific Plan, Lake Elsinore, CA. Project Manager.
HDR is prepared environmental documents for the 87.2 acre Diamond Specific Plan project
in the City of Lake Elsinore. The project included an amendment to the East Lake Specific
Plan (ELSP) to remove 86.4 acres from the ELSP and place the majority of that acreage
within the new Diamond Specific plan. The Diamond Specific Plan consists of a mixed use
commercial/entertainment development adjacent to the Diamond Stadium. HDR was hired
by the City of Lake Elsinore to prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and
Final EK including Response to Comments, Findings of Fact, and a Mitigation Monitoring
Reporting Program (M MP).
City of Lake Elsinore, Fairway Business Park PA", Lake Elsinore, CA. Project
Manager. HDR has prepared an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for
an 18-acre industrial project. Project issues included land use compatibility due to a high
school located across the street from the industrial project, amendments to the General Plan
Circulation Element, and wetland /vernal pool impacts. HDR also managed the preparation
of cultural resources, air quality and noise technical report s for the project. HDR was
responsible for preparation of the Draft IS/MND and Final IS/MND, including Response to
Comments and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (NEYMP). HEIR also
attended public hearings to address environmental questions about the project.
Page 32
Ingrid L. Chlup
Biologist
Education
Professional Experience
Master of Science, Environmental Studies,
Ms. Chlup has 9 years of industry experience specializing in biological / regulatory arenas.
California State Un Fullerton
Ms. Chlu has vast experience in conducting impact analysis and completing appropriate
P
Bachelor of Science, Environmental
documentation for purposes of Western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation
Biology/Ecology, University of CA Irvine,
Plan (MSHCP), California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), National Environmental
Office Location
Policy Act (NEPA), Section 1602 of the California Department of Fish and Game Code,
Irvine, California
Sections 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act, the Porter-Cologne Act and the Endangered
Species Act. She is also an experienced teacher and has conducted presentations for the
Industry Tenure
Southern California Academy of Science and the Wildlife Society.
7 Years
Project Experience(Partial List)
DMB Ladera, Arroyo Trabuco Golf Course, Mission Viejo, CA. Biologist. Developed
and implemented a quantitative Riparian Habitat Monitoring Plan, including measuring
water potential and developed and implemented a Brodiaea filifolia Pollination Monitoring
Plan for the Arroyo Trabuco Golf Course in Orange County.
Parsons Transportation, Bundy Canyon road Improvement Project, Riverside County,
CA. Task Manager. Served as task manager for base line biological surveys and
jurisdictional delineation. Conducted biological surveys including vegetation mapping,
jurisdictional delineation and general and focused floral and faunal surveys associated with
the 6-mile long Bundy Canyon Road Improvement Project in Riverside County. Prepared
biological technical report and jurisdictional delineation. Provided review and comment on
draft Biological Section of Bundy Canyon Road EIR.
AERA Energy, AERA Master Planned Community, Orange and Los Angeles Counties,
CA. Task Manager. Served as task manager and conducted jurisdictional delineation for the
2,935-acre Area Master Planned Community in Orange and Los Angeles Counties. Duties
included directing team members during the wetland.delineation, preparation of delineation
reports and digital analysis of jurisdictional totals, and performance of wetland delineation,
preparation of delineation reports and analysis of data. Delineation experience includes
application of Arid Southwest Manual and Rapanos Guidance. Prepared Significant
Ecological Area Technical Advisory Community Biota Report. Assisted with preparation of
Draft Biological Resource Section for Area Master Planned Community E1R Developed
riparian and coastal sage scrub mitigation plans.
Allen Matkins Leek Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP, Centennial Project, Los Angeles
County, CA. Task Manager. Served as task manager and conducted jurisdictional
delineation for the 11,680-acre Centennial Project in Los Angeles County. Duties included
directing team members during the wetland delineation, preparation of delineation reports
and digital analysis of jurisdictional totals, and performance of wetland delineation,
preparation of delineation reports and analysis of data. Delineation experience includes .
application of Arid Southwest Manual and Rapanos Guidance. Prepared conceptual
mitigation plan for aquatic resources.
Page 33
James E. Whitaker
Cultural Resource Specialist
Education
Professional Experience
Bachelor of Arts, Anthropology, State
University of NY Oneonta, 2001
Mr. Whitaker has 9 years of cultural resources management experience. Mr. Whitaker has
participated in over 100 survey, testing and mitigation level cultural resources inventory
HDR Tenure
projects (data recovery and monitoring) in compliance with various city requirements,
6 Years
county requirements, CEQA, NEPA, NAGPRA, and Sections 106 and 110 of the National
Preservation Act (NHPA) for federal, state, and local agencies primarily in southern
Industry Tenure
California. His experience includes many phases of project planning and execution
9 Years
including record searches, survey, excavation and monitoring, management
recommendations, report preparation, and curation. Documents he has prepared have been
reviewed by local, State and Federal agencies. As the Lead Collections Specialist at the San
Diego Archaeological Center (a federally recognized repository for DOD collections), he
gained invaluable experience in collection curation and NAGPRA assessment of numerous
orphan collections donated to the repository.
Project Experience (Partial List)
Cultural Monitoring for the Fallbrook Community Library Project (2009). Associate
Archaeologist/Lab Director. Archaeological monitor that provided an immediate on-site
response in the event that cultural material was discovered during excavation work. Duties
included identification and significance assessment of any unrecorded, subsurface resources
identified during ground disturbance activities.
Cultural Resources Survey for the Calexico Border Patrol Station Off-Site
Improvements Project (2010). As a Staff Archaeologist studies included review of
available data, survey, and contribution to final report in support of a proposal by City of
Calexico for off-site utility improvements related to the Calexico Border Patrol Station
development.
Cultural Resources Monitoring Results for the Proposed Remote Video Surveillance
System Tower W-15 at Monument Mesa, San Diego County (2010). As a Staff
Archaeologist, studies included review of available data, monitoring during construction
activities and preparation of final report in support of a proposal by the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS), United States Border Patrol (USBP), San Diego Sector to install
security cameras along the United States/Mexico International Border fence.
Cultural Resources Monitoring Results for the Proposed Remote Video Surveillance
System Tower W-9 at Russian Hill, San Diego County (2010). As a Staff Archaeologist;
studies included review of available data, monitoring during construction activities and
preparation to final report in support of a proposal by the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS), United States Border Patrol (USBP),'San Diego Sector to install security cameras
along the United States/Mexico International Border fence.
Cultural Resources Study for Construction, Maintenance, and Operation of Tactical
Infrastructure: El Centro Sector-, California (2007). As an Associate Archaeologist,
studies included preparation of draft work plan, review of available data, field excavations,
laboratory analysis, and preparation of final report. ,
Page 34
Sara C. Clowery
Archaeological / Cultural Resources
Education Professional Experience
Master of Ads, Anthropology (M.A.,
Ms. Clowery is a Cultural Resource Specialist III with over six years of experience in
Anthropology, Archaeology specialization),
San Diego State University
cultural resource management across three states (California, Louisiana, and Washington).
Bachelor of Arts, Anthropology(B.A.
She is the on-site San Diego, California, Cultural Resources Program Manager and
,
Anthropology Honors, Archaeology
responsible for all phases of project management and implementation from field supervision,
Specialist), University of Toronto
survey, and excavation to laboratory analysis, report production, budget creation and
implementation, scheduling and communication. Ms. Clowery directs cultural resource
Professional Registrations
inventory projects in compliance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),
The Hazardous Waste Operations and
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NAPA), Archaeological and Historic
Emergency Response Standard
Preservation Act (AHPA), and the various state and local agencies' guidelines and
(HAZWOPER), US National Registration
regulations. Also, she prepares technical reports documenting background research,
findings, and management recommendations; evaluates effects of proposed projects on
Professional Affiliations
Register of Professional Archaeologists
,
archaeological sites; and provides management recommendations for site stewardship.
Member, 2007-Present
Society for American Archaeology, Member,
Project Experience (Partial List)
2007-Present
A Phase 1 Archaeological Assessment for the Hayes Avenue Pipeline Project, Riverside
County, CA (2008). As project archaeologist authored technical report detailing the survey,
Office Location
evaluation, and mitigation recommendations for located cultural resource(s) according to
San Diego, California
CEQA and County of Riverside guidelines.
Industry Tenure
A Phase 1 Archaeological Assessment for the Newport Town Square Project (2008). As
11 Years
project archaeologist authored technical report detailing the survey, evaluation, and
mitigation recommendations for located cultural resource(s) according to CEQA and County
of Riverside guidelines.
A Phase i Archaeological Assessment for the Rancho Paseo de Valencia Project,
Riverside County (2007). As project archaeologist authored technical report detailing the
survey, evaluation, and mitigation recommendations for located cultural resource(s)
according to CEQA and County of Riverside guidelines.
A Cultural Resource Report for the Frulla-Fallbrook Ranch Project, San Diego
County, CA (2007). Conducted and supervised survey that located one historic resource. As
project archaeologist authored technical report detailing the survey, evaluation, and
mitigation recommendations for located cultural resource(s) according to CEQA and County
of San Diego guidelines.
A Cultural Resource Report for the Gainer Stable Project San Diego County, CA APN
127-350-02, MPA 08-074 (2008). As project archaeologist supervised a field survey that
located historic cultural resources. Authored technical report detailing survey results and
recommended testing and archival research in order to evaluate the located resources
according to CEQA and County of San Diego guidelines.
A Cultural Resource Study for the Daniels Residence APN 346-451-01-00; Project No.
153921, City of San Diego, CA (2008). As project archaeologist supervised survey and
authored technical report detailing the survey results and mitigation recommendations
according to CEQA and City of San Diego guidelines.
Page 35
Nicole B. Morgan
Cultural Resource Specialist
Education
Professional Experience
Master of Arts, Arts (Classical
Archaeology), Tufts University, 2009
Ms. Blotner Morgan has over seven years of experience in cultural resources management.
Ms. Morgan is responsible for all phases of project management and implementation from
Bachelor of Arts, Arts (Archaeology &
field supervision, survey, and excavation to laboratory analysis, report production,
Environmental Studies), Tuns University,
2003
marketing> budget assessment; scheduling and communication. She has participated in
numerous survey, testing, and mitigation level cultural resource inventory projects (data
Professional Registrations
recovery and monitoring) in compliance with various city requirements, county
Registered Professional Archaeologist, US
requirements, CEQA, NEPA, NAGPRA, SB-18, and Sections 106 and 110 of the National
National Registration Issued: 01/01/2011,
Historic Preservation Act (NBPA) for federal, state, and local agencies throughout southern
Expires: None Listed
California. Her experience includes many phases of project planning and execution including
background/record checks, survey/excavation, management recommendations, report
Professional Affiliations
preparation, editing, and production. Ms. Morgan has instructed hundreds of students from
various public and private institutions, focusing on cultural and natural resources in Europe
HDR Tenure
and the Middle East. Her field experience spans not only the southern California region, but
Less than a year
also includes Italy, Cyprus and Israel.
Industry Tenure
3Years
Project Experience (Partial List)
Class III Cultural Resources Inventory for the Polo Club at Vista Valley Project, San
Diego County, California (2011). Project Archaeologist. Conducted a field survey and
evaluation in support of a proposal by U. S. Army Corps of Engineers in the community of
Bonsall, San Diego County, CA. Authored a technical report detailing the survey,
recordation, and mitigation recommendations for located cultural resources according to
NEPA and Section 106 guidelines.
Cultural Monitoring for the Falibrook Community Library Project, San Diego County,
CA (2009). Associate Archaeologist. Served as archaeological monitor, providing an
immediate on-site response in the event that cultural material was discovered during
excavation work. Duties included identification and significance assessment of any
unrecorded subsurface resources identified during ground disturbance activities. Authored a
technical letter report detailing field results and management recommendations.
Mitigation Monitoring for the Bayside Project, San Diego, CA (2007). Served as
archaeological monitor, providing an immediate on-site response in the event that cultural
material was discovered during excavation work. Responsibilities included identification and
significance assessment of any unrecorded historic and prehistoric subsurface resources
identified during ground disturbance activities. Provided critical support in all aspects of
laboratory analysis, including sorting, photographing and cataloguing artifacts.
Mitigation Monitoring for the El Capitan Golf Course Project, San Diego, CA (2005).
Served as archaeological monitor, providing an immediate on-site response in the event that
cultural material was discovered during excavation work. Responsibilities included
identification and significance assessment of any unrecorded historic and prehistoric
subsurface resources identified during ground disturbance activities.
Page 36
Kristin N. Tennesen
Archaeological Crew Chief
Education
Professional Experience
Master of Arts, Anthropology (Anthropology,
Ms. Tennesen's experience includes many phases of project planning and execution
Emphasis in Archaeology), San Diego State
University, 2010
including background/record checks, survey/excavation, management recommendations,
Bachelor of Arts, Anthropology
report preparation, editing, and production. She has participated innumerous survey,
(Anthropology, Minor in Chemistry), San
testing, and mitigation level cultural resource projects (data recovery and monitoring) in
Diego State University, 2007
compliance with various city requirements, county requirements, CEQA, NEPA, NAGPRA,
SB-18, and Sections 106 and 110 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) for
Professional Registrations
federal, state, and local agencies throughout southern California. Through her previous work
OSHA 10-Hour Construction Safety,
at the South Coastal Information Center Ms. Tennesen gained knowledge of record search
California Issued:
procedures and requirements, referencing USGS maps, and the processing of cultural
resource investigation reports and archaeological site forms. She also has experience in local
Professional Affiliations
faunal analysis and expertise with the identification and exhumation of human remains.
Phi Kappa Phi Academic Honor Society,
San Diego, Member, 2010-2012
HEIR Project Experience
HDR Tenure
Calexico Border Patrol Station, City of Calexico, Imperial County (November-
Less than a year
December 2010). Staff Archaeologist. Lead a Phase I survey for proposed off-site
improvements. Conducted background research, reviewed archaeological records search
Industry Tenure
information, completed a pedestrian survey, and wrote the final report for sewer and water
5 Years
line improvements in the City of Calexico, California.
Calexico Town Center, City of Calexico, Imperial County (August-September 2010).
Staff Archaeologist. Assisted in a Phase I survey for a proposed road re-alignment.
Conducted background research and pedestrian survey for proposed roadway improvements
in southern California.
San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E) On-Call Cultural Resources, San Diego County
(2010-Present). Staff Archaeologist. Supported the undertakings of SDG&E for new
construction, ongoing maintenance, and repair projects by conducting cultural resources
oversight for various projects throughout the company service territory. As a staff
Archaeologist, specific responsibilities included records search review, survey, field
excavations, preparation of final report, and recommendations for resource significance and
stewardship. Coordinated with other cultural resources staff, clients, and their subcontractors
to implement, organize, conduct, and complete numerous small- to large-scale projects with
overlapping schedules for Sempra Energy/SDG&E. Examples of projects include:
Wood to Steel Pole Conversion TL 678, San Diego County, California
Wood to Steel Pole Conversion TL 685, San Diego County, California
Wood to Steel Pole Conversion TL 13826, San Diego County, California
Long Span 4-Pole Replacement, Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton
4 Camp Pendleton Helicopter Platforms, Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton
Page 37
Richard Haimann, PE, D.WRE
Water Quality
Education Professional Experience
Master of Business Administration, Mr. Haimann is HDR's Stormwater Quality Section leader and national technical advisor.
Technology Management, He has been involved in stormwater, water management, watershed management,
Pepperdine University - 2003 groundwater management, contaminated land management, natural resource management,
multimedia environmental compliance, regulatory negotiations, and environmental
Master Science, Environmental in
m
and Ecological Studies, Stanford anagement throughout his career and has published in several areas of environmental
University - 1989 engineering including stormwater quality compliance, watershed management and
environmental management.
Bachelor of Science, Civil
Engineering, University of Alaska,
Project Experience(Partial List)
Fairbanks - 1988
Stormwater Department Master Plan Framework Development, City of San Diego;
Professional Registrations
CA. Project Manager. Mr. Haimannled a team to develop a Storm Water Master Plan for
the City of San Diego Stormwater Department. This was developed through a series of
Professional Civil Engineer,
workshops with City of San Diego Stormwater Department staff and provided a guide for the
California No. 48774
Department to plan drainage, storm water quality management and TMDL compliance
projects throughout the City. Mr. Haimann used the tools of Asset Management to help
Diptomate, Water Resources
guide City staff to create this plan that would result in the lowest life cycle costs for the
Engineer
storm water management assets that the City is investing in to lower flood risks, allow future
development in accordance with the general plan, and comply with storm water quality
Firm/industry Tenure
regulations and TMDLs.
1 Yearl7 Years
TMDL Special Services for the City of Los Angeles. Contract Manager. Mr. Haimann
led a team that provided special studies, review and analysis of regulations, review and
analysis of TMDL developments, and scientific and consulting services related to TMDLs
and NPDES regulatory developments in the City of Los Angeles.
Stormwater Compliance for a Private Aerospace Manufacturer. Project Manager. Mr.
Haimann worked closely with a Fortune 50 industrial client in helping them both comply
with a site-specific stormwater NPDES permit and negotiate with the RWQCB and SWRCB
regarding the feasibility and practicability of the conditions in the permit. Conditions
included very low numerical effluent limits for stormwater discharges from the facility. Mr.
Haimann testified before the RWQCB regarding the efficacy of BMP technologies and the
time needed to permit, install, test, evaluate, and upgrade BMPs to attempt to achieve
California Toxics Rule effluent limits in response to TMDLs. Mr. Haimann further designed
structural BMp upgrades, developed effectiveness monitoring programs, developed
hydrologic models for the site, and established technical bases for attempting to achieve
compliance.
Stormwater Harvesting Master Planning - Confidential Client, Los Angeles County,
CA. Technical Leader. Mr. Haimann is developing master plan for storm water harvesting
for a confidential Los Angeles County based water agency client to evaluate opportunities
for capturing and harvesting stormwater and urban runoff as a supplemental water supply
across a 270-square-mile area of urban Los Angeles County. The project includes evaluating
models and cost data to assess feasibility and value of harvesting stormwater as a water
supply.
Page 38
EXHIBIT B
SCHEDULE OF CHARGES
Page 39
HDR ENGINEERING, INC.
Southern California Operations
STANDARD CHARGES FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Effective January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011
Scientists and Environmental Planners
Sr. Company Officer
Principal in Charge
Env & Water Res Sr PM
Env & Water Res PM
Sr. Project Mgr/PM
Water Res Sr Engineer
Sr. Env Planner/Sr. Biologist
Water Res PE
Sr GIS/Sr. Designer
CADD
GIS Analyst
Staff Engineer/Biologist/Planner
Project Administrator
Document Production Specialist
Err
$Ihr
338.00
300.00
241.00
225.00
209.00
199.00
179.00
174.00
127.00
123.00
107.00
106.00
100.00
96.00
92.00
`Billing rates subject to 5% escalation effective January 1, 2012
Reimbursable Expenses
Technology Charge
Vehicle Mileage
$ 3.70 per hour
$ 0.51 per mile (or per IRS Regulations)
Page 40