HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem No. 09CITY OF /
LAKE ^ LSINOR E
DREAM EXTREME.
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR
AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROBERT A. BRADY
CITY MANAGER
DATE: JANUARY 11, 2011
SUBJECT: VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36115: A REQUEST TO
SUBDIVIDE APPROXIMATELY 124 ACRES OF LAND INTO 341
PARCELS (293 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS) WITHIN .
THE CANYON HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN
Background
The applicant has submitted to the Community Development Department an application
for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36115. Vesting Tentative Tract Map review is
necessary to ensure that all new subdivisions conform and are consistent with the City's
General Plan, Zoning Code, and applicable Specific Plan. The applicant has worked
diligently with staff in resolving issues relating to the proposed map.
The proposed subdivision is located within, and regulated by, the Canyon Hills Specific
Plan. The Specific Plan intends for those uses proposed with the Vesting Tentative
Tract Map, including detached single-family residential development and open space
areas, to be constructed within the identified Planning Area locations. The proposed
Vesting Tentative Tract Map does not conflict with the intended land uses and their
respective locations, nor does the map conflict with the standards, objectives, and
guidelines contained in the Canyon Hills Specific Plan.
Discussion
The project was presented to the Lake Elsinore Planning Commission on December 7,
2010, for review and consideration. Items for discussion at this meeting included lot size
and project location. The Planning Commission expressed satisfaction with the
proposed project and voted unanimously to recommend that the City Council adopt
findings that the project is exempt from the MSHCP and approve the Tentative Tract
Map.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9
Page 1 of 34
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36115
January 11, 2011
Page 2 of 3
The Vesting Tentative Tract Map proposes 341 parcels (293 single-family residential; 20
streets; 10 slopes and landscape; 3 open space; 2 basins; 1 paseo; and 1 lettered lot
for a sewer lift station). The proposed residential lots range in size from 4,583 square
feet to 17,359 square feet, with an average lot size of 6,908 square feet. Staff has
determined that the application complies with Chapter 82, (SF2) & (SF3) Single-Family
Detached Residential 2 & 3 Districts of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan, and Section 16
"Subdivisions" of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, and the California Subdivision Map
Act (CSMA). Environmental clearance for the requested application is provided by the
2010 Addendum #3 to the Final Canyon Hills Specific Plan EIR. City Planning and
Engineering staffs have reviewed the project, and have no concerns regarding the
proposed request.
Since the applicant is only considering subdivision of the project site, architectural
and/or building plans for future residences, plotting plans, preliminary wall and fence
plans, etc, have not been submitted for review at this time. These issues will be
addressed when the applicant submits for Design Review approval in the future.
Fiscal Impact
Ultimately, the proposed project will have a positive fiscal impact to the community and
the City. It is estimated that the future residents residing within Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 36115 will ultimately generate sales tax revenues for the City of Lake Elsinore.
In addition to the sales tax revenue that will be generated, it is anticipated that the
development of the project will provide necessary construction jobs.
Finally, the project has been conditioned to require that the applicant contribute fees
toward traffic improvements, school facilities, park facilities, fire services, police
services, water facilities, and sewer facilities.
Recommendation
1. Adopt a Resolution No. 2011-_ adopting findings that the project is consistent
with the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan; and,
2. Adopt a Resolution No. 2011-_ recommending to the City Council approval of
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36115 based on the Findings, Exhibits, and
proposed Conditions of Approval.
Prepared by: Kirt A. Coury KG
Project Planner
Reviewed by: Matt Harris 0
Senior Planner
Page 2 of 34
Vesting Tentative
January 11, 2011
Page 3 of 3
Approved by:
Attachments:
Tract Map No. 36115
Robert A. Brady
City Manager
1. Vicinity Map
2. City Council Resolutions
3. Conditions of Approval
4. Planning Commission Staff Report with Exhibits dated December 7, 2010
5. Planning Commission Minutes
6. Full Sized Plans
Page 3 of 34
Page 4 of 34
Z
_U
L-
/I
I
C
~0
°o
a~
o.
I"
0-
Z
w
w
m
p
Z
o
$
m
a
0
w
¢
p
Z
Z
>
~
Q
a
>
>
w
p
Z
$
U
H
O
O
z
Z
$
5
3
~
Z
d
a
w
~
~
~
T
■
f
s
m
u
s
m
i
~
a
a
z
J J O
Q Q
Z U ~ V ~ U
W Q W a ~ N d
p ~ p J VI ~
V17 Np Z Q
W O W J d W
~ m ~ N R
p Q ~ O
w Q
Qu Qa 3 ~ rc
po am o ~ Q
z
0 0
o OCOC
~ o -
0 0
Canyon
Hills
Page 5 of 34
Page 6 of 34
RESOLUTION NO. 2011-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING FINDINGS THAT THE
PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE MULTIPLE SPECIES
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP)
WHEREAS, Pardee Homes has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore
requesting approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36115, which subdivides
approximately 124 acres of land within the Canyon Hills Specific Plan into 341 lots, (293
single-family residential; 20 streets; 10 slopes and landscape, 3 open space, 2 basins; 1
paseo; and 1 lettered lot for a sewer lift station) (the "Subdivision"); and
WHEREAS, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP requires that all discretionary projects
within an MSHCP criteria cell undergo the Lake Elsinore Acquisition Process ("LEAP")
and Joint Project Review ("JPR") to analyze the scope of the proposed development
and establish a building envelope that is consistent with the MSHCP criteria; and
WHEREAS, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP further requires that the City of Lake
Elsinore adopt consistency findings demonstrating that the proposed discretionary
entitlement complies with the MSHCP cell criteria, and the MSHCP goals and
objectives; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Section 16, requests for
subdivision of land are a discretionary action to be considered, reviewed, and approved,
conditionally approved or denied by either the Lake Elsinore Planning Commission
and/or the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the recommendation of Planning
Commission following its consideration on December 7, 2010, as well as evidence
presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a
public hearing held with respect to this item on January 11, 2011.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the Subdivision and its
exemption from the MSHCP "Plan Wide Requirements" prior to making findings that the
project is indeed exempt.
SECTION 2. That in accordance with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and the
MSHCP, the Planning Commission makes the following findings:
1. The Project is a project under the City's MSHCP Resolution, and the City must
make an MSHCP Consistency finding before approval.
The Subdivision is exempt from the City's MSHCP Resolution. On July 9, 1990,
the City and Pardee-Grossman/Cottonwood Canyon entered into that certain
Page 7 of 34
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2011-
PAGE 2 OF 4
development agreement (the "Development Agreement'), which expressly
exempted the Developer from responsibility for any new development impact
fees. The Development Agreement was amended by Amendment No. 1 dated
January 12, 2010, approved by Ordinance No. 1270 which extends the project's
exemption from MSHCP requirements.
Even though the Subdivision is exempt from the MSHCP, the Developer must
comply with other state and federal laws. Consistent with federal law, the
applicant had prepared a project-specific Habitat Conservation Plan and has a
history of extensive coordination with the wildlife agencies. Where approved for
development, the project site has already been graded, cleared, or developed in
accordance with the Project HCP. Given the foregoing, no further action
regarding the MSCHP is required.
2. The proposed project is subject to the City's LEAP and the County's Joint Project
Review processes.
See Response #1 above.
3. The proposed project is consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal
Pools Guidelines.
See Response #1 above.
4. The proposed project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant
Species Guidelines.
See Response #1 above.
5. The proposed project is consistent with the Urban/Wildlands Interface
Guidelines.
See Response #1 above.
6. The proposed project is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements.
See Response #1 above.
7. The proposed project is consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and
Procedures.
See Response #1 above.
8. The proposed project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines.
See Response #1 above.
9. The proposed project will be conditioned to pay the City's MSHCP Local
Development Mitigation Fee.
Developer is exempt from payment of the City's MSHCP Local Development
Mitigation Fee by virtue of the Development Agreement.
Page 8 of 34
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2011-
PAGE 3 OF 4
10. The proposed project is consistent with the MSHCP.
See Response #1 above.
SECTION 3. Based upon the evidence presented, the City Council hereby
adopts the findings above regarding the Project's consistency with the MSHCP.
SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, this 11th day of January, 2011.
AMY BHUTTA
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CAROL COWLEY
INTERIM CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BARBARA LEIBOLD
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
Page 9 of 34
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2011-
PAGE 4 OF 4
I, Carol Cowley, Interim City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby
certify that Resolution No. was adopted by the City Council of the City
of Lake Elsinore, California, at a regular meeting held on the 11th day of January 2011,
and that the same was adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
CAROL COWLEY
INTERIM CITY CLERK
Page 10 of 34
RESOLUTION NO. 2011-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36115
WHEREAS, Pardee Homes has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore
requesting approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36115, which subdivides
approximately 124 acres of land within the Canyon Hills Specific Plan into 341 lots, (293
single-family residential; 20 streets; 10 slopes and landscape; 3 open space; 2 basins; 1
paseo; and 1 lettered lot for a sewer lift station) (the "Subdivision"); and
WHEREAS, the Subdivision is located within the Canyon Hills Specific Plan
(Planning Areas 16, 28A, 28C, and 32), which is located near the southeast corner of
Canyon Hills Road and Piedmont Drive within the Canyon Hills Specific Plan area.
Direct access to the project site is available from Canyon Hills Road; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated
with the responsibility of making decisions to the pertaining to the subdivision of land;
and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res.
Code 21000 et seq.: "CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R. 15000 et
seq.), public agencies are expressly encouraged to reduce delay and paperwork
associated with the implementation of CEQA by using previously prepared
environmental documents when those previously prepared documents adequately
address the potential impacts of the proposed project (CEQA Guidelines Section
15006); and
WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a) states that "When an EIR has
been certified or negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be
prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial
evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following:
1. Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major
revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new
significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously
identified significant effects;
2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which
the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or
negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or
a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
3. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and
could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the
previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows
any of the following:
Page 11 of 34
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2011-
PAGE 2 OF 5
(A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the
previous EIR or negative declaration;
(B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more sever
than shown in the previous EIR;
(C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible
would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects
of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or
alternative; or
(D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from
those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant
effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation
measure or alternative."; and
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 3 to the certified Final Environmental Impact Report,
(the "FEIR") for the Canyon Hills Specific Plan was prepared and approved by the City
Council in July 2010 to provide environmental analysis and information necessary to
support approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Maps 36115 and 36116; and
WHEREAS, the Subdivision was contemplated by Specific Plan Amendment No.
3 and does not present substantial changes or new information regarding the potential
environmental impacts that were analyzed in the FEIR or the changes addressed in
Addendum No 3; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the recommendation of Planning
Commission following its consideration on December 7, 2010, as well as evidence
presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a
public hearing held with respect to this item on January 11, 2011.
NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE
ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council has considered the Subdivision prior to making a
decision to approve the application. The City Council hereby finds and determines that
the Subdivision complies with the requirements of Title 16 of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code.
SECTION 2. The City Council finds and determines that in accordance with
CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, the Subdivision does not present a substantial
change or new information that would require further CEQA analysis. The
environmental impacts associated with Subdivision were contemplated by the FEIR and
were fully analyzed and mitigated therein. No new CEQA documentation is necessary
for the Subdivision.
Page 12 of 34
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2011-
PAGE 3 OF 5
SECTION 3. That in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and requirements
of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the City Council makes the following findings for
the approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36115:
1. The Subdivision, together with the provisions for the design and improvement, are
consistent with the General Plan; Zoning Code; Title 16 of the Municipal Code
relating to Subdivisions; and the State Subdivision Map Act.
Canyon Hills Specific Plan Amendment No. 3 designates the Subdivision site as
Single Family Residential 2 (SF2) and Single Family Residential 3 (SF3). Consistent
with that designation, the Subdivision will accommodate a detached single-family
residential project. The Subdivision is consistent with the designated land use,
development and design standards, and all other appropriate requirements
contained in the General Plan, Canyon Hills Specific Plan Amendment No. 3, and
Subdivision Map Act.
2. The Subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and
programs specified in the General Plan (Government Code Section 66473.5).
The Subdivision is consistent with the land use plan, development and design
standards and programs, and all other appropriate requirements contained in the
General Plan and Canyon Hills Specific Plan Amendment No. 3. Vesting Tentative
Tract Map No. 36115 is consistent with the SF2 and SF3 designations and
applicable development and design standards.
3. The effects this Subdivision is likely to have upon the housing needs of the region,
the public service requirements of its residents, and the available fiscal and
environmental resources have been considered and balanced.
The Subdivision is consistent with the City's General Plan, Zoning Code, and the
Canyon Hills Specific Plan Amendment No. 3. The Subdivision will provide
necessary public services and facilities, will pay all appropriate fees, and will not
result in any adverse environmental impact.
4. The design of the Subdivision provides to the greatest extent possible, for future
passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision (Government
Code Section 66412.3).
The Subdivision will comply with all appropriate conservation requirements of the
City and Uniform Building Code.
SECTION 4. Based upon all of the evidence presented, the above findings, and
the conditions of approval imposed upon the subdivision, the City Council hereby
approves Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36115.
SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its
passage and adoption.
Page 13 of 34
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2011-
PAGE 4 OF 5
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Lake Elsinore, California, this 11th day of January, 2011.
AMY BHUTTA
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CAROL COWLEY
INTERIM CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BARBARA LEIBOLD
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
Page 14 of 34
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2011-
PAGE 5 OF 5
I, Carol Cowley, Interim City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby
certify that Resolution No. was adopted by the City Council of the City
of Lake Elsinore, California, at a regular meeting held on the 11th day of January 2011,
and that the same was adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
CAROL COWLEY
INTERIM CITY CLERK
Page 15 of 34
Page 16 of 34
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36115
GENERAL
1. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold
harmless the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, and Agents from any claim, action, or
proceeding against the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees or Agents to attach, set
aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or
legislative body concerning Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36115, located within Canyon
Hills Specific Plan (Planning Areas 16, 28A, 28C, and 32), near the southeast corner of
Canyon Hills Road and Piedmont Drive, project attached hereto.
PLANNING DIVISION
2. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36115 will expire two years from date of approval unless
within that period of time a Final Map has been filed with the County Recorder, or an
extension of time is granted by the City of Lake Elsinore City Council in accordance with
the Subdivision Map Act.
3. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36115 shall comply with the State of California
Subdivision Map Act and shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Lake Elsinore
Municipal Code (LEMC), unless modified by approved Conditions of Approval.
4. Future development shall comply with those standards and guidelines of the Elements
contained in the Canyon Hills Specific Plan document.
5. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36115 shall comply with the State of California
Subdivision Map Act and applicable requirements contained in the Canyon Hills Specific
Plan document and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), unless modified by
approved Conditions of Approval.
6. Future development shall comply with those requirements and provisions contained in the
Canyon Hills Development Agreement; 2004 Funding, Construction, and Acquisition
Agreement.
7. The applicant shall participate in the City of Lake Elsinore Citywide Lighting and Landscape
and Street Maintenance District, as appropriate.
8. The applicant shall provide all project-related onsite and offsite improvements as described
in the Canyon Hills Specific Plan document and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36115.
9. The applicant shall implement those mitigation measures identified in the 1989 Final
Canyon Hills Specific Plan EIR and the 2010 Addendum No. 3 to the Final Canyon Hills
Specific Plan EIR.
10.All future proposals shall be reviewed by the City on a project-by-project basis. If
determined necessary by the Community Development Director or designee, additional
environmental analysis will be required.
Page 17 of 34
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PAGE 2 OF 9
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36115
PRIOR TO FINAL TRACT MAP
12.All lots shall comply with minimum standards contained in the Canyon Hills Specific Plan.
13.A precise survey with closures for boundaries and all lots shall be provided per the LEMC.
14. Street names within the subdivision shall be approved by the Community Development
Director or Designee.
15.All of the improvements shall be designed by the applicant's Civil Engineer to the
specifications of the City of Lake Elsinore.
16.The applicant shall meet all requirements of Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
(EVMWD).
PRIOR TO DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL
17.All future structural development associated with this map requires separate Design
Review approval.
18. Design for all drainage basins proposed with Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36115 shall
be approved by the City Engineering Manager and Community Development Director or
designee. Security fencing shall also be shown. Chain-link fencing is prohibited.
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT/GRADING PERMITS
19. Prior to issuance of any grading permit and/or building permit, the applicant shall sign and
complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the
Community Development Department.
20.The applicant shall obtain all necessary State and Federal permits, approvals, or other
entitlements, where applicable, prior to each phase of development of the project.
21. Prior to issuance of building permit, a Fuel Modification Plan and Program shall be
approved by the Fire Department for future development. Said Plan and Program shall
show those special treatments necessary to achieve an acceptable level of risk in regard to
the exposure of structures to flammable vegetation and shall describe the method of
removal and installation, and provisions for maintenance. The City's Landscape Architect
shall ensure compliance of said program.
22. Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall submit a letter of verification (will-
serve letter) to the City Engineer, for all required utility services.
Page 18 of 34
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PAGE 3 OF 9
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36115
23.The applicant shall meet all requirements of Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
(EVMWD).
24.The subject Vesting Tentative Map shall annex into the existing Canyon Hills Homeowner's
Association.
25.The applicant shall pay applicable fees and obtain proper clearance from the appropriate
School District prior to issuance of building permits.
26.The applicant shall provide connection to public sewer for each lot within any subdivision.
No service laterals shall cross adjacent property lines and shall be delineated on
engineering sewer plans and profiles for submittal to the EVMWD.
27. Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall prepare a Final Wall and Fence Plan
addressing the following:
• Show that a masonry or decorative block wall will be constructed along the entire tract
boundary.
• Show materials, colors, and heights of rear, side and front walls/fences for proposed
lots.
• Show that front return walls shall be decorative masonry block walls. Front return wood
fences shall not be permitted.
Show that side walls for corner lots shall be decorative masonry block walls.
• Show that those materials provided along the front elevations (ie. brick, stone, etc.) will
wrap around the side elevation and be flush with the front return walls.
28.The applicant shall submit plans to the electric utility company for a layout of the street
lighting system. The cost of street lighting, installation as well as energy charges shall be
the responsibility of the developer and/or the association. Said plans shall be approved by
the City and shall be installed in accordance with the City Standards.
29. The applicant shall meet all requirements of the providing electric utility company.
30. The applicant shall meet all requirements of the providing gas utility company.
31. The applicant shall meet all requirements of the providing telephone utility company.
32.A bond is required guaranteeing the removal of all trailers used during construction.
33.All signage shall be subject to Planning Division review and approval prior to installation.
Page 19 of 34
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PAGE 4 OF 9
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36115
34. Any alterations to the topography, ground surface, or any other site preparation activity will
require appropriate grading permits. A Geologic Soils Report with associated
recommendations will be required for grading permit approval, and all grading must meet
the City's Grading Ordinance, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and the Planning
Division. Analysis of impacts of fills and cuts greater than 60 feet shall be provided. Interim
and permanent erosion control measures are required. The applicant shall bond 100% for
material and labor for one year for erosion control landscaping at the time the site is rough
graded.
35.The City's Noise Ordinance shall be met during all site preparation activity. Construction
shall not commence before 7:00 AM and cease at 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday.
Construction activity shall not take place on Saturday, Sunday, or any Legal Holidays.
36.The applicant shall place a weatherproof 3' x 3' sign at the entrance to the project site
identifying the approved days and hours of construction activity (i.e., 7:00 A.M. - 5:00 P.M.,
Monday through Friday with no construction activity to occur on Saturdays, Sundays or
legal holidays) and a statement that complaints regarding the operation can be lodged with
the City of Lake Elsinore Code Enforcement Division (951) 674-3124. The sign shall be
installed prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
37.The applicant shall restrict all construction traffic from using Lost Road, south and west of
the project boundary. All construction traffic will access the project area from Canyon Hills
Road.
38. Throughout construction, as deemed appropriate by the City and the applicant, fugitive dust
suppression to minimize fugitive dust generation shall be applied. Fugitive dust
suppression techniques may include soil watering, application of soil binders, and/or
placement of gravel or other appropriate material to minimize vehicle generated dust.
39.Open space lots shall be retained by the applicant or dedicated to a Conservancy.
Maintenance of these open space lots shall be the responsibility of either the Conservancy
and/or HOA.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
40.All roads shall be constructed to be consistent with the Canyon Hills Specific Plan cross
section for local roads.
41. The applicant shall confirm that the capacity of the detention basin is designed to detain the
additional lots for this project.
42. Grading on adjacent property shall require a "notarized permission to grade" letter from the
affected property owner.
Page 20 of 34
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PAGE 5 OF 9
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36115
43.All slopes, cut or fill, shall comply with UBC requirements for setback from adjacent
property lines. Diversion of storm water flows shall not be allowed.
44.All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as
specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to final map approval.
45. Underground water rights shall be dedicated to the City pursuant to the provisions of
Section 16.52.030 (LEMC), and consistent with the City's agreement with the Elsinore
Valley Municipal Water District.
46. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (LEMC 16.34, Resolution 85-26).
47. Submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water
agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project.
Submit this letter prior to final map approval.
48. Construct all public works improvements per approved street plans (LEMC 12.04). Plans
shall be approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to final map approval (LEMC
16.34).
49.Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City for the construction of public works
improvements and shall post the appropriate bonds prior to final map approval.
50.Desirable design grade for local streets should not exceed 9%. The maximum grade of
15% shall only be used because of design constraints approved by the City Engineer and
Fire Department.
(As
amended by the Planning Commission at the December 7, 2010 meeting).
52. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment permit issued by the Engineering
Division for construction of public works improvements (LEMC 12.08 and Resolution 83-
78).
53.All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes
delineated on 8 ''/z" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final
inspection of public works improvements will be scheduled and approved.
54-The applicant shall install permanent survey monuments in compliance with the City's
municipal code.
55-Applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site easements for off-site grading from the adjacent
property owners prior to issuance of grading permit.
Page 21 of 34
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PAGE 6 OF 9
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36115
56. Provide street lighting and show lighting improvements as part of street improvement plans
as required by the City Engineer.
57. Relocate stFeet light away from thp rn;;iRtPnRnGe read Fight ef way betweeR lets 1 and 2 (As
amended by the Planning Commission at the December 7, 2010 meeting).
58.Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the
roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent.
59. Developer shall install blue reflective pavement markers in the street at all fire hydrant
locations unless this has been previously provided.
60. Applicant shall submit a traffic control plan showing all traffic control devices for the tract to
be approved prior to first certificate of occupancy of the project. All traffic control devices
shall be installed prior to final inspection of public improvements. This includes No Parking
and Street Sweeping Signs for streets within the tract.
61.AII improvement plans and tract maps shall be digitized. At Certificate of Occupancy
applicant shall submit tapes and/or discs which are compatible with City's ARC Info/GIS or
developer to pay $300 per sheet for City digitizing.
62.Apply and obtain a grading permit with appropriate security prior to building permit
issuance. A grading plan signed and stamped by a Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall be
required if the grading exceeds 50 cubic yards or the existing flow pattern is substantially
modified as determined by the City Engineer. If the grading is less than 50 cubic yards and
a grading plan is not required, a grading permit shall still be obtained so that a cursory
drainage and flow pattern inspection can be conducted before grading begins.
63. Provide soils, geology and seismic report including street design recommendations.
Provide final soils report showing compliance with recommendations.
64.An Alquis-Priolo study shall be performed on the site to identify any hidden earthquake
faults and/or liquefaction zones present on-site. In the event a study has been previously
completed or the project is outside the study zone, a letter shall be submitted by a licensed
geologist or geotechnical engineer stating such a condition does not apply.
65.AII grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer and shall certify
all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and proper erosion control. All manufactured
slopes greater than 30 ft. in height shall be contoured with a drainage "V" ditch for every
30-foot of vertical slope.
66.Applicant to provide to the City a photographic baseline record of the condition of all
proposed public City haul roads. In the event of damage to such roads, applicant shall pay
full cost of restoring public roads to the baseline condition. A bond may be required to
ensure payment of damages to the public right-of-way, subject to the approval of the City
Engineer.
Page 22 of 34
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PAGE 7 OF 9
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36115
67. Individual lot drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility or accepted by adjacent
property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance or conveyed to a drainage easement.
68.The finish floor elevation for all buildings shall be 1-foot above the 100-year flood elevation.
69.On-site drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way should be contained within
drainage easements shown on the final map. A note should be added to the final map
stating: "Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions".
70.AII natural drainage traversing site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected
and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer.
71. Meet all requirements of LEMC 15.64 regarding flood hazard regulations.
72. Meet all requirements of LEMC 15.68 regarding floodplain management.
73. If all or portions of a project encroaches into the flood plane, the applicant to provide FEMA
elevation certificates prior to certificate of occupancies.
74. Submit Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports for review and approval by City Engineer prior to
approval of the grading plan. Developer shall mitigate any flooding and/or erosion caused
by development of site and diversion of drainage.
75.All drainage facilities in this tract shall be constructed to Riverside County Flood Control
District Standards.
76. Storm drain inlet facilities shall be appropriately stenciled to prevent illegally dumping in the
drain system, the wording and stencil shall be approved by the City Engineer.
77. Roof and yard drains shall not be allowed to outlet directly through cuts in the street curb
without first traversing a minimum 20-feet through a landscaped area.
78.10 year storm runoff should be contained within the curb and the 100 year storm runoff
should be contained within the street right-of-way. When either of these criteria is
exceeded, drainage facilities should be installed.
79. Developer shall be subject to all Master Planned Drainage fees and will receive credit for all
Master Planned Drainage facilities constructed.
80. Developer shall agree to participate in and join a Mello Roos Community Facilities District
(CFD) for infrastructure improvements and operation in the event these projects are not
included with the underlying development.
Page 23 of 34
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PAGE 8OF9
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36115
81.Applicant will be required to install BMP's using the best available technology to mitigate
any urban pollutants from entering the watershed.
82.Applicant shall provide the city with proof of his having filed a Notice of Intent with the
Regional Water Quality Control Board for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) program with a storm water pollution prevention plan prior to issuance of
grading permit.
83.Applicant shall obtain approval from Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board for
their Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) including approval of erosion control
for the grading plan prior to issuance of grading permits. The applicant shall provide a
WQMP for post construction which describes BMP's that will be implemented for the
development and including maintenance responsibilities.
84. Education guidelines and Best Management Practices (BMP) shall be provided to residents
of the development in the use of herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers as well as other
environmental awareness education materials on good housekeeping practices that
contribute to protection of stormwater quality and met the goals of the BMP in Supplement
"A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan.
85.Applicant shall provide first flush BMP's using the best available technology that will reduce
storm water pollutants from parking areas and driveway aisles.
86.Applicant shall record CC & R's for the tract prohibiting on-street storage of boats, motor
homes, trailer, and trucks over one-ton capacity, roof mounted or front yard microwave
satellite antennas. The CC & R's shall be approved by the Community Development
Director prior to first Certificate of Occupancy.
87.Applicant shall cause to be recorded a CC&R's prior to first Certificate of Occupancy which
provides for irrevocable reciprocal parking, circulation, loading and landscape maintenance
easement in favor of all lots subject to the approval of the director of Community
Development & the City Attorney. The CC& R's shall enforce standards of building
maintenance, participation in landscape maintenance, prohibition of outside vehicle or
material storage.
88.Applicant shall provide a homeowner's association with CC & R's for maintenance of the
open space.
89.All open space and slopes except for public parks and schools and flood control district
facilities, outside the public right-of-way will be owned and maintained by either a home
owner's association or private property owner.
90. Process required access easements prior to first Certificate of Occupancy.
Page 24 of 34
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PAGE 9 OF 9
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36115
91. Developer shall provide funding for the re-appropriation calculations of the assessment due
to the increase in lots in the appropriate assessment district.
92. In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal & recycling, the
applicant shall be required to contract with CR&R Inc. for removal and disposal of all waste
material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear
and grubbing or all other phases of construction.
93. Place two inch (2") asphalt or compacted native soil on Holland Road from project limits to
connect with existing asphalt in the City of Menifee. Or pay cash in lieu for an amount
equal to the construction cost.
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT
94. Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall annex into City of Lake Elsinore
Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 to offset the annual negative fiscal
impacts of the project on public right-of-way for public landscaping within the public right of
way for which the City will pay for irrigation and maintenance. Applicant shall pay to the
City a non-refundable deposit in the amount of five thousand dollars ($5,000) to cover the
cost of the annexation process.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
95. The Developer shall pay all applicable park fees.
96. Developer shall comply with all City Ordinances regarding construction debris removal and
recycling as per Section 8.32 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT
97. The applicant shall comply with all Riverside County Fire Departments requirements and
standards. Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by the Riverside County
Fire Department.
Page 25 of 34
CITY OF ins
LADE PLSII`IORE
r` DREAM EXTREME„
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
TO: HONORABLE CHAIRMAN
AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: ROBERT A. BRADY,
CITY MANAGER
DATE: DECEMBER 7, 2010
SUBJECT: VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36115: A REQUEST
TO SUBDIVIDE APPROXIMATELY 124 ACRES OF LAND
INTO 341 PARCELS (293 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
LOTS) WITHIN THE CANYON HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN
APPLICANT: MAYERS & ASSOCIATES, CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC., 19
SPECTRUM POINTE DRIVE, SUITE 609, LAKE FOREST, CA
92630
OWNER: PARDEE HOMES, 10880 WILSHIRE BLVD, SUITE 1900,
LOS ANGELES, CA 90024
Project Request
The applicant is proposing to subdivide approximately 124 acres of land into 341 parcels
(293 single family residential lots) pursuant to the requirements of the Canyon Hills Specific
Plan, Section 16 "Subdivisions" of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), and the
California Subdivision Map Act (CSMA).
Proiect Location
The proposed map is located near the southeast corner of Canyon Hills Road and
Piedmont Drive within the Canyon Hills Specific Plan area (Planning Areas 16, 28A, 28C,
and 32). Access to the project site is available from Canyon Hills Road.
Page 26 of 34
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36115
December 7, 2010
Page 2 of 3
Environmental Setting
The site is bounded on all sides by the following uses.
EXISTING LAND
ZONING
GENERAL`PLAN
USE
Project
Single Family
SF2 & SF3 (Single Family
Canyon Hills Specific
Site
Residential/Vacant
Detached Residential)
Plan
North
Open Space
Open Space
Canyon Hills Specific
Plan
South
Residential/Open
Riverside County
Riverside County
Space
East
Residential
Riverside Count
Riverside Count
West
Residential
SF2 & SF3 (Single Family
Canyon Hills Specific
Detached Residential)
Plan
Project Description
The proposed subdivision is located within, and regulated by, the Canyon Hills Specific
Plan. The Specific Plan intends for those uses proposed with the Vesting Tentative Tract
Map, including detached single-family residential development and open space areas, to
be constructed within the identified Planning Area locations. The proposed Vesting
Tentative Tract Map does not conflict with the intended land uses and their respective
locations, nor does the map conflict with the standards, objectives, and guidelines
contained in the Canyon Hills Specific Plan.
Since the applicant is only considering subdivision of the project site, architectural and/or
building plans for future residences, plotting plans, preliminary wall and fence plans, etc,
have not been submitted for review at this time. These issues will be addressed when the
applicant submits for Design Review approval in the future.
Analysis
The Vesting Tentative Tract Map proposes 341 parcels (293 single-family residential; 20
streets; 10 slopes and landscape; 3 open space; 2 basins; 1 paseo; and 1 lettered lot for a
sewer lift station). The proposed residential lots range in size from 4,583 square feet to
17,359 square feet, with an average lot size of 6,908 square feet. Staff has determined
that the application complies with Chapter 8.2, (SF2) & (SF3) Single-Family Detached
Residential 2 & 3 Districts of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan, and Section 16 "Subdivisions"
of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, and the California Subdivision Map Act (CSMA).
Environmental clearance for the requested application is provided by the 201 ~~,c!5ngup
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36115
December 7, 2010
Page 3 of 3
#3 to the Final Canyon Hills Specific Plan EIR. City Planning and Engineering staffs have
reviewed the project, and have no concerns regarding the proposed request.
Environmental Determination
Environmental clearance and analysis for the proposed application is provided by
Addendum No. 3 to the certified Final Environmental Impact Report, for the Cottonwood
Hills Specific Plan. Addendum No. 3 was approved by the City Council in July 2010 to
address minor changes associated with Specific Plan Amendment No. 3 to the Cottonwood
Hills Specific Plan (renamed the Canyon Hills Specific Plan as part of Specific Plan
Amendment No. 1). In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, the Project does
not present a substantial change or new information that would require further CEQA
analysis. The environmental impacts associated with development of the Project were
contemplated by Addendum No. 3 to the certified Final Environmental Impact Report, (the
"FEIR") for the Canyon Hills Specific Plan and were fully analyzed and mitigated therein.
No new CEQA documentation is necessary for the Project.
Recommendation
Adopt Resolution No. 2010-_ adopting findings that the project is exempt from the
Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan; and,
b. Adopt Resolution No. 2010- recommending to the City Council approval of
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36115 based on the Findings, Exhibits, and
proposed Conditions of Approval.
Prepared By: Kirt A. Coury,
Project Planner
Reviewed By: Matthew C. Harris,
Senior Planner
Approved By: Robert A. Brady,
City Manager
Attachments:
1. Vicinity Map
2. Planning Commission Resolutions
3. Planning Commission Conditions of Approval
4. Draft Acknowledgement of Conditions of Approval
5. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36115 (reduction)
6. Full Size Plan
Page 28 of 34
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Meeting
Regular Meeting Minutes of December 7, 2010
Page 12 of 19
(4)
Recommendation:
a.
b.
(5)
Recommendation:
a.
b.
W"4 view of Vesting Tentative Tract Maps
reques • at Planning Consultant Coury review
d answer any questions they may.
nning Cons nt = provided an overview of Vesting Tract Map
36115 and 116. He noted to the Commission that regarding Tract
Ma 115, Ite No. 4 on page 17 and 18 of the Staff Report,
Engine g S s proposing to strike Condition No. 51 and Condition
No. 57 re not applicable and indicated that those are the only
changes to a Conditions. He stated that the applicant was in attendance
and staff recommended approval of the applications.
The applicant, Mike Taylor, President of Pardee Homes, gave his name
and address. He indicated that Tract Maps 36115, 36116 and a couple of
additional Tract Maps and Specific Plan Amendments would be the final
lots submitted for Canyon Hills within the next month. Also, he stated
these Tract Maps will provide future maintenance assessments that are a
part of a maintenance CFD that was just recently worked on and will have
subsequent CFDs, in addition to providing future maintenance with a
Page 29 of 34
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Meeting
Regular Meeting Minutes of December 7, 2010
Page 13 of 19
community park as well as community services in the City. He stated that
he and the Engineering Consultant would be happy to answer any
questions that the Commission may have.
Commissioner O'Neal asked how the Smart Homes are selling.
Mr. Taylor indicated that their Living Smart Community has been opened
for over a year in Canyon Hills and they sold and closed approximately
seventy five (75) homes and still have a number of homes under
construction and plan on selling the homes for the remainder of 2011 as
well. He stated that sales have been good and t a good price point
and offer affordability for first time home buyer ell as people seeking
their second or third home in terms of size. . .
Commissioner O'Neal asked if they
solar options.
with the
Mr. Taylor indicated that they h' old a f f the sola ions. He
stated that they are not the most da r everyone b there are
some good tax credits that are still a They are marketing those
options to show the publi - Glue in th ar systems.
Commissioner Morsch
of the Smart Liviw H.o
planning on doing any
Mr. Taylor dd that rdee es new actual brand "Living Smart" will
be a feat hat will c inue th hout Canyon Hills and throughout all
of the Inla pire that build which is a new standard and
indic d tha I ing on many "Green" features and
t ov s many o e "Green" features into their standard % ding p es. stated that his vision is that the new products being
resented to Co ission in the future would have many. of the
tures of the ving art" product but will have a different style and
s 11 e footage nding on the lot size.
Comm ner sch indicated that they are going in the right direction
Mr. Taylor indicated that Canyon Hills has a wide variety of terrain and
had graded the projects in five (5) or six (6) phases to date. The
import/export issues have all occurred within the project boundaries so
they haven't had to import or export dirt outside of their project boundary
and some of the lots in Canyon Hills will eventually be some of the most
costly lots to develop with all of the grading that has to occur. Therefore,
and stat a was highly impressed with the models with the limited
irrigation a the solar installations, etc. He asked for clarification
regarding the amount of import and export of dirt there would be for both
tracts.
Page 30 of 34
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Meeting
Regular Meeting Minutes of December 7, 2010
Page 14 of 19
they have broken the project into phases so that they don't have to move
several million yards of dirt and produce 2,000 lots at one time. He also
indicated that they will review the grading phases and determine how to
limit the amount of import and export per phase as they do it.
Mr. Taylor indicated that their Engineer, Mr. Fred Pugh could address any
additional issues that Commissioner Morsh may have regarding grading
and import/export.
Mr. Fred Pugh, Engineer for Mayers and Asso
and address. He stated that they experienced
of rock and some of it bulks 25%. He indicate(
for this correctly for the grading operatio
southeast corner which are the largest of t
to be the most expensive lots constru and
Tract Map 36116 is set to balance a dir
then at the location of Piedmont rive, it
be completed at a later time bec of the cq2
Commissioner Morsch ind
going up and down Canyl
Mr. Pugh reassured
would not happen.
No. 60 for Tract Maps
he would correct Condition No.
asked why Condition No. 62 is included in the
Seumalo indicated that this is a standard Condition
if a project doesn't necessarily need a grading plan,
Commission Morsch requested that the language on Condition No. 66
be revised to read: Applicant to provide to the City a photographic
baseline record of the condition of all proposed public City haul road prior
to the issuance of any permits.
Commissioner O'Neal indicated that he agreed with the revised language
to Condition No. 66 that Commissioner Morsch requested.
and gave his name
gh prior phases a lot
hey have to prepare
"Estate" lots in the
nyon Hills are going
that the dirt for
ra ap 36115 and
I to itself and
want to see several trucks
Page 31 of 34
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Meeting
Regular Meeting Minutes of December 7, 2010
Page 15 of 19
Commissioner Jordan indicated that in the Staff Report, there is reference
to SF2 and SF3, and stated that she didn't find that zoning in Title 17 and
asked if it was in the Specific Plan.
Planning Consultant Coury indicated yes.
Commissioner Jordan asked if that has special minimum lot square
footages and minimum lot frontage and what they are.
Planning Consultant Coury indicated that the minimum lot size for SF2
and SF3 was 4,500 square feet.
Commissioner Jordan referred to lot front indicated that there
were a few lots that were thirty (30) feet h 275 that was forty
seven (47) feet that has a twenty (20) storm d asement in it so
the actual frontage will only have tw even (27) fe d asked if this
was sufficient.
Planning Consultant Coury ind
that they allowed for that ease
SF3 area was carried o
4,500 and minimum lot M
thirty (30) feet. He stated l
(3) times prior toil final su
the final
Ilated that thisTaas the lot
rded. He also stated that
3 and minimum lot size is
de sac Street frontage is
6,planned checked three
she wanted to make sure that it met
at there is a legend on one of the
the lot Waage on that street and added it for the
address any concerns.
an d a typo in the Resolution for Tract Map 36115
ad Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found
and would substantially reduce one or more significant
act, but the project proponents decline to adopt the
or alternative; or.
Passed and adopted the following Resolution:
"Resolution No. 2010-50 for Vesting Tentative Tract Map 36115 - A
Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore,
California, adopting findings that the subdivision is exempt from the
Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP).
Page 32 of 34
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Meeting
Regular Meeting Minutes of December 7, 2010
Page 16 of 19
MOTION was made by Commissioner Morsch, and seconded by
Commissioner Jordan adopting findings that the subdivision is exempt
from the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP).
AYES: Chairman Gonzales, Commissioner Jordan,
Commissioner Morsch, Commissioner O'Neal
NOES: None
ABSENT: Vice Chairman Mendoza
Passed and adopted the following Resolutions:
Resolution No. 2010-51 - A Resolution of thitnr ommission of the
City of Lake Elsinore, California, recomm ng City cil approval of
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36115 the mod! r onditions of
Approval as discussed by the Plan Commission whr - "nclude the
following: The elimination of Conditio o. 51, t lamination ondition
No, 57, the deletion of the reference to ( .ojects and Co dition No.
60 so that it reads occupancy of the pro d Condition No. 66 would
provide for the photographi ine reco for to the issuance of any
permits.
MOTION was mad Com si a , and seconded by
Commissioner Mo mme ity cil approval of Vesting
Tentative Tract No. 15 wi odified Conditions of Approval as
discussed by t= lanning mmis _ which include the following: The
elimination of itio th limination of Condition No. 57,
Condition . 60, a to three (3) projects and should
read o f t oject and ndition No. 66 would provide for the
pho hic b e d prior to the issuance of any permits.
AYES: Ch an Gonzales, Commissioner Jordan,
Commissioner Morsch, Commissioner O'Neal
None
Vice Chairman Mendoza
Resolution No. 2010-52 for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No 36116 - A
Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore,
California, adopting findings that the subdivision is exempt from the
Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan.
MOTION was made by Commissioner O'Neal, and seconded by
Commissioner Jordan adopting findings that the subdivision is exempt
from the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan.
Page 33 of 34
Lake Elsinore Planning Commission Meeting
Regular Meeting Minutes of December 7, 2010
Page 17 of 19
AYES: Chairman Gonzales, Commissioner Jordan,
Commissioner Morsch, Commissioner O'Neal
NOES: None
ABSENT: Vice Chairman Mendoza
Resolution No. 2010-53 - A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the
City of Lake Elsinore, California,_ recommending _City _Council approval of
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 36116 with m, 'ed Conditions of
Approval as discussed by the Planning Comm' which include the
following: Condition No. 60, the deletion of erence to three (3)
projects and should read occupancy of the . cf, Condition No. 66
would provide for the photographic baselin ord pri the issuance of
any permits.
MOTION was made by Con
Commissioner Jordan adopting
from the Multiple Species Habitat
and s ded by
subdivisions exempt
Jordan,
ter O'Neal
Page 34 of 34