Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/26/2004 CC Reports , ,'. ':, CITY:OFLAKEELSlNoU C, 'I,'~'C',O','UN. "C"'I'L', 'A"G"E'AT,h,4. _' '~;JI/,\/:__/",'- ,-- ",-- '". '::~':_,~":" ,,<'_,,;\-~~ " -,'_""';:'. -.', '- '-< -;,> / ,- ,.1.;~;U^ r 11IOMAS BUCKLEY, MAYOR WWW.LAKE-ELSlNORLORG '. GEfIOEKEWY,MAYOR,PROTEM (951) 614-31*", PhONE DA.RVL mCKMAN. CCJ'tfNCII:MAN (951) 6'1"'~ '.:r~ 'ROBERT&. "BOB" MAGEI,c;~ LAKE IlOBERTL~~ 183 NORm RlCHARDWATENPAUGH, crrYMANAGER . LAIO:ELSJNORE.cA ~'. " - - , -,,- , .~ > " '.. ' , ' ",', ' "".. - ,-_, ,,:-^:: :":" :'. ",',-, ;::<., ::., ',.' '_,_' '-", __, _' 1, ,_: "," "" **************************************************.************.** - -, '-', ' ' " . . , ' 'TUESD~ Y, OCTOBER 26, ,2004 - 5:00 P.M. <:ALLro,ORD~R If you tll'esttemlingtjis City COllncil Meeting, please pint' in the, R IICI'OSS thestreetfrtmi the Cultural Center. This wilfilSsist lIS in" , , ,the ". impsctol meetings on the Downtown Busine8$ District, Thll1lkytlU!or,olll' ctJOperation! " . . ~1Il8'~ON <-.' ',>,-.,-"'. ' CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-E .G . .: , ' , ' " ,(. , . LI'I~GATlO~ '(Subdivision (a) ofGov't Code ~54956.9) County of Riverside, et al v. City ot Lake Elsinore ,and Lairtg-CP Lake BI~oreLLC (Riverside County Superior Court Cas " . .RlC4i8775) I ROLL CALL ~~_A;q9~~/C~~MONIALS . , -.' /~""'.' '" - ' , " " A. Procbvnatiim - Constitution Week. . ( Proclamation ~ 50th Anniversary - Lake Providence Missioqary Church.' ',' -~ '" : ,", '.-" ".:'- Page Tllree - Cityc....1Ap.da -Oetoblu" 26tZOO4 . Approv@ Transfer.~..Traffic Safety Funds, & Direct Siaff to Deslan~&Construct Traffie, Signal. .. Claim Agaiustthe City - Salvador Linares (CL#2004~ 1). RECOMMENDATION: ",' '--, '-,." " "Reject & Refer to ClaimsAdmin~strator for Handling. " , ' 6. Comet Servic,e Level Contract for Fiscal Year 2004-05. RECO~ATION: ApprQve Contract &. Authorize City MWlf,lger to Sign. ' '. 7 . Yearly Software Maintenance Agreement and License for Sungard H.T.E., ~. ' . RECOMMENDATION: Approve Agreement & License. " 21. , , .$ Market Place ~ Commercial Design Review Nos. 2004.;.02 & ",' - - - - . .:.-. ,'- ,..._--,. , , yon Hills Specific Plan.' ' ' RECOMMENDATION: ' ~USINESS~S, Approve Commercial DesignR.eviewNo. ' , 2004-02 and 20041"10, baSed, on the AttachmentS & Fin ~.", :bj~ to Conditions of Appr . - ' " ,,31.SecoudR~ing -7 Ordinance No. 1129 - Zone Change 2004~1~,~Sauls Co~y.. - ~' - . ( " RECOMMENDATION: . . . .~. Five -Cit1'.co..dJApJada- Oetober 2',2004" " " " City Council MeetiJig). ... ----~--~. -.. . _~"""'C:P'" .~--~. PAGE-!-OF-1- /"" MINUTES JOINT CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STUDY SESSION CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2004 ************************************************************* CALL TO ORDER Mayor Pro Tern Kelley called the Joint Study Session to order at 4:00 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: HICKMAN, MAGEE, SCHIFFNER, KELLEY ,,- ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCKLEY Also present were: Assistant City Manager Best, City Attorney Leibold, Administrative Services Director Pressey, Community Development Director Brady, Community Services Director Sapp, Lake & Aquatic Resources Director Kilroy, Information/Communications Manager Dennis, Public Works Manager Payne, RecreationlTourism Manager Fazzio, Parks & Open Space Manager Fazzio, Building & Safety Manager Chipman, City Treasurer Weber, and Deputy City Clerk Ray. DISCUSSION ITEMS Mayor Pro Tern Kelley indicated that Councilman Hickman requested to be added to the Presentations to do a presentation regarding the League of Cities Conference. She requested confirmation from staff that a representative would be present to accept the proclamation for Item C. /"" AQENOA .TEM NO. I.c.-. PAGE-LOF.-ill- PAGE TWO - STUDY SESSION MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 28,2004 "-'" PUBLIC COMMENTS Bill Titto, Lake Elsinore, commented on the minutes. He indicated that the minutes were published a month after the actual meeting, after Council had made decisions. He suggested having the minutes before the Study Session so someone could answer the questions. He commented that he spoke on the Laing Project a few weeks ago; and Council went into Closed Session and voted to approve the Laing project, so by the time the Minutes were available Council had already made a decision. Assistant City Manager Best responded that in Closed Session or Open Session Council reviews a staff report that is presented publicly in Open Session and then Council takes action and the Minutes of that meeting are composed following the end of the meeting, so staff can track for historical purposes of what actually occurred during the meeting. She indicated that staff transcribes the minutes from an audio tape after the meetings; and once those minutes are transcribed they are brought back to Council to reaffirm in fact that was what "-'" they recall taking place. Mayor Pro Tern Kelley commented that Mr. Titto had completed another request to speak form and asked ifhe would like to make his comments now rather than later. Mr. Titto commented that the request to speak form was in reference to the fees for the consultants and attorneys. He indicated that he had received information from Administrative Services Director Pressey. He indicated that Mr. Pressey had given him information on the bond issue; and he requested an answer for the amount the City Attorney charged for the Stadium program. He commented that the newspaper had reported $5.9 million. He further commented that there were three lawyers' legal fees on one bond; and City Attorney Leibold was not on there. Mayor Pro Tern Kelley suggested Mr. Titto schedule a meeting with Mr. Pressey. .....", AQENDA ITEM NO. J · c;... PAGE ?-.. OF to . . -- . ----'..- /'""" PAGE THREE- STUDY SESSION MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 28, 2004 Administrative Services Director Pressey explained that City Attorney Leibold would have been on the list if she had incurred cost related to those. He indicated that he had provided all of the costs of issuance for each bond issue back to 1992. He explained that City Attorney Leibold charged nothing, because there were other attorneys. He indicated that he referred Mr. Titto to City Treasurer Weber to reconcile Mr. Weber's $5.3 million that was quoted in the newspaper as issue cost compared to what he had given Mr. Titto. City Treasurer Weber commented that Mr. Pressey's figures did not have the underwriter cost. He commented that City Attorney Leibold receives $20,000 a pop at six bonds that would be $80,000. Administrative Services Director Pressey indicated that City Treasurer Weber was incorrect. He indicated that he had studied all of the bonds and the only bond he was aware of was the Series H in which it did reflect a cost; but City Attorney Leibold was not involved with all of the bonds. r-- Frederick Ray, 15168 Camphor Way, thanked the Community Services Department and commended Community Services Coordinator Arline Gulbransen on the excellent work done by the Lake Elsinore Senior Center. He commented that his wife's grandmother who currently resides with his family had been attending the Senior Center for the past month; and it was great to see her once again organize her day with functions she enjoyed. He further commented that the Center had welcomed her and she felt appreciated. He indicated although the Senior Center might not generate revenue for the City it did generate life for those individuals that utilized the facility. He again thanked Arline Gulbersen, Teri Fazzio, and Community Services Director Sapp for their outstanding work with the Senior Center. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes. No comments. /"'" AGENDA ITEM NO. ,. ~. PAGES OF--1J.2... PAGE FOUR - STUDY SESSION MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 28, 2004 ".." 2. Warrant List: September 15,2004. Councilman Hickman requested clarification on various checks issued on the warrant list. Councilman Magee requested clarification on check #79157 issued on the warrant list. Administrative Services Director Pressey explained that it was for Stadium security during baseball games. 3. Authorization to Prepare CEQA Compliance Documents for Tentative Tract Map No. 31957. Councilman Hickman asked for the location of the Project. Community Development Director Brady explained that it was adjacent to Rice Canyon Elementary School. Councilman Magee indicated that on page 3 the description indicated that it was a 100 lot subdivision located adjacent to a levee. He inquired if there was a levee in that area. Community Development Director Brady indicated that there was going to be a levee constructed as part of that development. ".." 4. Correction to Original Report to Council dated June 22, 2004 - Appropriation Limits FN 2004-05 (Proposition 4) - Resolution No. 2004- 61. Councilman Hickman requested that Administrative Services Director Pressey explained the item. . Mr. Pressey commented that it represented the annual appropriation limits, which was a limit that each City adopted on an annual basis, indicating the maximum tax the City could assess and collect. He further explained that it increases each year based on the growth of the population and inflation and is reestablished each year. ......, ..1. A.. AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE.-:L<OF~ ~ PAGE FIVE - STUDY SESSION MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 28, 2004 5. Street Maintenance - Slurry Seal Contract - American Asphalt South, Inc. $219,923.48. Councilman Magee indicated that page No. 1 listed Collier Avenue from Nichols to Hwy 74. He inquired if that covered the area from Riverside Drive to Central. Public Works Manager Payne responded that it did not, as that area belonged to the State. 6. Over Seeding of Parks - $25,740. Councilman Hickman questioned seeding now instead of ~n the Spring. Parks & Open Space Manager Fazzio explained that the seeds would be purchased now and overseeded at the end of October. Mr. Fazzio explained that during Spring there would be heavy play on the turf. Councilman Magee commented that the staff report indicated that planting would be at a ~ rate of 8 lbs. per square foot. Mr. Fazzio indicated that was incorrect. Councilman Magee requested an answer before the 7:00 p.m. session. PUBLIC HEARINGS 21. Zone Change No. 2004-09, Tentative Tract map No. 31792. Councilman Hickman questioned if this went along with the General Plan. Community Development Director Brady indicated that it was just a zone change and it was consistent with the General Plan. Councilman Magee commended staff on Condition of Approval No. 12. He indicated that phase 2 was in the County and inquired if that was planned for annexation. Community Development Director Brady indicated that it had not been submitted, but that would be annexed into the City. Councilman Magee inquired if their goal was to annex into the City. Mr. Brady confirmed that was correct. Councilman Magee inquired about the plans for Third Street which was labeled E Street on the Map; whether it would be left as an access or would be left as dirt once it entered into the /'"""' County. Assistant City Manager Best commented that in addition to the response being prepared by staff; the developer and the Water District had AGENDA .TEM NO.~ ~. . PAGE-5:- OF ~ PAGE SIX - STUDY SESSION MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 28, 2004 '-' been working together on large main water sewer service that would be coming up Third Street, so it would have utilities. Councilman Magee questioned when it would begin construction. Assistant City Manager Best indicated it should be soon. She commented that staff was working on a large reservoir that would be on the southwestern side of the freeway due to some of the potential flooding in the future that might occur in that area during the 100 or 500 year storm at the end of Third Street, but the main trunk line for the water and sewer service was critical for the City, because it would serve properties on the east side of HWY 74 and the 15 Freeway including the new COSTCO/LOWE's Center as well as the Ramsgate project and the project currently before Council. Mr. Brady indicated that this project would not be surfacing the portion outside the project area. Engineering Manager Seumalo indicated to Mr. Brady that according to Condition No. 42, that it would have to be the City standards for that street, which meant they would have to pave it. Councilman Magee indicated that according to the map it would only be paved within the confines of the tract. Mr. Brady indicated that he would check on that issue. """ Councilman Magee referred to Condition No. 90 Item B regarding traffic signalization on Central Avenue and Conard. He inquired why dwelling unit No. 20 was picked. Community Development Director Brady explained that staff felt the need would be there as soon as the project was open. Community Development Director Brady indicated that there were a couple of conditions that the applicant did request modifications to. He indicated those conditions were 25, 77, and 78; and staffhad reviewed these modifications and was in concurrence with the requested modifications by the applicant. Mayor Pro Tern Kelley inquired if there was a timeline for the model homes to be available for viewing. Mr. Brady commented he did not know the timeline. ......", AGENDA ITEM NO. -l · c-. · PAGE f.o OF' 0 ~ PAGE SEVEN - STUDY SESSION MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 28, 2004 22. Tentative Parcel Map No. 32575 - Alicia Graff. Councilman Hickman inquired about the location of the project. Assistant City Manager Best indicated that the specific area was located southwest of Lincoln Street and Machado Street. Community Development Director Brady commented that the location of the project was on page 10 of the staff report. 23. Tentative Condominium Map No. 32670 & Residential Design Review No. 2004-10 - D. R. Horton. Councilman Magee indicated that on page 15 they indicated the permanent wall would be 6 feet high and on the grading and drainage plan the general note no. 17 indicated it would be 6 inches high. Mr. Brady explained that six feet was the City standard. Councilman Magee inquired if there would ~ be accessed to the levee. Mr. Brady advised there would not. Mayor Pro Tern Kelley question having a block wall completely around the project if it backs up to the channel. Councilman Schiffner inquired if there was a retention basin between the development and the channel. Mayor Pro Tern Kelley indicated that there was one designed in the development at the back. Mr. Brady indicated that there was a retention base in the back portion that needed to be protected. BUSINESS ITEMS 31. Public Safety Advisory Committee Resignation & Appointment. Councilman Hickman asked if anyone had contacted Bill Arnold. Councilman Magee commented that he had contacted Mr. Arnold, but was not aware if he would be present at the 7 :00 p.m. meeting. He indicated that Mr. Arnold was willing to serve if appointed. 32. Biennial Review of The Conflict of Interest Code for the City of Lake Elsinore and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore. ~ No comments. AGENDA JTEM NO..::b", . PAGEJOF l OUI. PAGE EIGHT - STUDY SESSION MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 28, 2004 ~ REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes. No comments 2. Warrant List- September 15,2004. No comments. 3. Tentative Condominium Map No. 32670 & Residential Design Review No. 2004-10. No comments. ......, 4. Biennial Review of The Conflict of Interest Code for the City of Lake Elsinore and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore. No comments. 5. Request to Proceed - Laing - C.P. Lake Elsinore, L.L.C. Boardmember Magee commented that this was a procedural matter that was required through the execution of the Disposition and Development Agreement executed December, 2002 and it was something the City required upon itself. Chairman Hickman inquired if there was any way to stop it. He suggested stopping it until after the lawsuit. Legal Counsel Leibold explained that the lawsuit did not change the fact that the developer had received the entitlements from the City; the City had approved the entitlements. ......, AGENDA ITEM No.1..,. PAGE~ OF.J.iL ,-. PAGE NINE - STUDY SESSION MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 28, 2004 Chairman Hickman commented that he had heard about a $68 million CFD the developer was requesting. Legal Counsel Leibold indicated that there was some misinformation and clearly staff and the finance team would not support what they call dirt bonds. She indicated it was in violation of policy. She noted they do not authorized nor would they ever recommend the City Council approve CFD' s on bare land. She indicated that they had not received any written verification of this rumor; and there was nothing received from Laing suggesting CFD's on bare land; and even if so staff and the finance team would not approve it and it was not part of their request to proceed. Chairman Hickman asked Mr. Filler of Laing Homes if there were any CFD's Laing was generating. Mr. Filler indicated that in March, 2004 they had filed an application regarding the potential of a CFD and they had been working with staff periodically, but they did put it on hold until they were ,-. approved. He commented that in the next couple of months they would be starting that process again and reevaluating their phasing plan; and cost estimate to figure out where they needed to be, but there was no truth to the $68 million. BUSINESS ITEMS 6. Request for Proposals - Professional Redevelopment Consultants. Boardmember Magee commented that his sensitivity would be towards the reinstatement of eminent domain powers. He commented on Item 3(1) and inquired if that was owner occupied or any occupied. Legal Counsel Leibold indicated that the purpose of the RFP was to highlight that the number 1 priority and goal of the Redevelopment Plan Amendment was scope of services. She indicated that they were asking the consultants to provide the RDA with a cost estimate and proposed schedule in the event the RDA board elected to pursue scope of services 2 or 3. Boardmember Magee indicated that he would like to hear from the RDA Committee on the direction they would like to pursue, but he indicated that he felt private ,-. property owner rights were very sacred in this country and he would not be , .~. AQENDA nEM NO. PAGE~OF~ "\ PAGE TEN - STUDY SESSION MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 28, 2004 ......." able to vote for eminent domain authority on owner occupied residential structures. ADJOURNMENT THE JOINT CITY COUNCILIREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STUDY SESSION WAS ADJOURNED AT 5:00 P.M. GENIE KELLEY, MAYOR PRO TEM CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DARYL HICKMAN, CHAIRMAN REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ....., Respectfully submitted, FREDERICK RAY, DEPUTY CITY CLERK ATTEST: VICKI KASAD, CMC, CITY CLERK! HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ....." AQENOA ITEM NO. \. " PAGEJ...Q.OFJ D ,..... MINUTES REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12,2004 ****************************************************************** CALL TO ORDER The Regular City Council Meeting was called to order by Mayor Buckley at 5: 10 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: HICKMAN, KELLEY, MAGEE, SCHIFFNER, BUCKLEY r"' ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE Also present were: Assistant City Manager Best, City Attorney Leibold, Community Development Director Brady, Community Services Director Sapp, Lake & Aquatic Resources Director Kilroy, Engineering Manager Seumalo, Finance Manager Magee, Information/Communications Manager Dennis, Planning Manager Villa,'Public Works Manager Payne, City Treasurer Weber and City ClerklHuman Resources Director Kasad. CLOSED SESSION a. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL--EXISTING LITIGATION (Subdivision (a) of Gov't Code ~54956.9) County of Riverside, et al v. City of Lake Elsinore and Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC (Riverside County Superior Court Case No. RlC418775) City Attorney Leibold announced the Closed Session discussion as listed above. r-- Agenda Item No. I, b. Page \ of L\ ~ Page Two - City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 ...., THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS RECESSED TO CLOSED SESSION AT 5:12 P.M. The Closed Session discussion was completed at 6:00 p.m. RECONVENE IN PUBLIC SESSION (7:00 P.M.) Mayor Buckley reconvened the Regular City Council Meeting in Public Session at 7 :06 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Boy Scout Troop 912. INVOCATION - MOMENT OF SILENT PRAYER ....." Mayor Buckley led the audience in a moment of silent prayer. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: HICKMAN, KELLEY, MAGEE, SCHIFFNER, BUCKLEY ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE Also present were: Assistant City Manager Best, City Attorney Leibold, Community Development Director Brady, Community Services Director Sapp, Fire Chief Gallegos, Lake & Aquatic Resources Director Kilroy, Police Chief Fetherolf, Engineering Manager Seumalo, Finance Manager Magee, Information/Communications Manager Dennis, Planning Manager Villa, Police Lt. Anderson, Police Lt. Koepp, Public Works Manager Payne, City Treasurer Weber and City Clerk/Human Resources Director Kasad. ...."" Agenda Item No. ,. b9 Page dl of~ "...... Page Three - City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 PRESENTA TIONS/CEREMONIALS A. Proclamation - Constitution Week. This item was postponed to the next Regular City Council Meeting, as there was no representative present to accept it. B. Presentation - Watershed Clean-up Recognition. ~ Code Enforcement Officer Gordon noted the participation in the Santa Margarita Watershed Clean-up by hundreds of volunteers. She commented that this effort brought out the best in area residents. She advised that this year's event was held on September 25 and noted that while no totals were known yet, they were hoping that overall it would be less than last year. She introduced the representatives of Boy Scout Troop 912 from Wildomar. She thanked the Scouts for their participation and noted the bar-be-que at the park after the work. C. Presentation - Stolen Vehicle Recovery Awards. Mayor Buckley requested that Chief Fetherolf , Lt. Anderson, and Lt. Koepp forward to assist with the presentations. Chief Fetherolf noted that there were four officers recognized by the State for the recovery of stolen vehicles. He detailed the requirements for this recognition and recognized Deputies Topete, Darling and Morin, and Inspector Dekker. Mayor Buckley read and presented the Proclamations to each officer. D. Presentation - Chamber of Commerce Update. ,,-... Kim Cousins, President and CEO for the Chamber of Commerce, displayed their first monthly newsletter in two years and noted the availability of additional copies. He indicated that the newsletter would be presented on a monthly basis and was available from the Chamber website. He announced Agenda Item No. I ,b. Page 3 of <-f ~ Page Four - City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 '-' the upcoming EDC Luncheon at the Diamond on Thursday and indicated that it would be an Education Summit followed by an afternoon program for high school juniors and seniors. He also announced that the last Chamber Mixer of the year would be held at Coco's Restaurant on October 28th. He further announced that the Chamber would be doing a non-perishable food drive to benefit HOPE, and assist in helping needy families. He indicated that more information was available from the Chamber office of their website. PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS - 1 MINUTE Edith Stafford, 29700 Hursh Street, noted that she attended the Ad Hoc Electoral Reform Committee Meeting last night, and indicated that she was not afforded an opportunity to speak on the agendized items. She commented that she brought the point up and the Attorney was asked to speak on the matter and said while there was a requirement to give comment time, there was not a requirement to give comment time on agendized items. Mrs. Stafford stressed that there was a requirement that people be allowed to speak on the items on the agenda, and read from the Brown Act. '-' Donald Ash, 1131 Mill Street, noted that he had been at the same address for 21 years and had seen a lot happen in the City. He addressed the comments by Mrs. Stafford and reiterated that people were allowed to speak at any meeting, except closed meetings. He questioned what people could do when the lawyers said they could not speak. He suggested that the lawyers made decisions based on the financial awards. He noted the loss of the deal to sell the Diamond and suggested that the Council did not look into that business and determine they had a right to bid on the Stadium. George Alongi, commented on the Railroad Canyon of:f-ramp and noted that it took him 54 minutes to get off the ramp. He indicated that situation was not good for people coming to the City and spending a lot of money on their homes. He stressed the danger at this location, noting that the cars were backed up onto the freeway and then blocking the intersection. He expressed understanding of the,-, Agenda Item No. I.b. Page-Lof 4 k, ~ Page Five - City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 cost factors, but suggested looking at the use of reserve officers or the posse to assist in this area. He further commented that the City's public relations person should make positive comments about the community, and not comments that are contradictory to the Council. Mayor Buckley noted that there was a situation on Railroad Canyon Road on Tuesday afternoon, when another water district was digging it up during the day instead of at night, which complicated the existing problems. He noted that the interim renovations would be starting soon. Community Development Director Brady indicated that staff was waiting for Caltrans approval, but the plans were ready to go and would go to bid upon approval. Mayor Buckley noted the new motorcycle officers which also were assisting in areas such as this. ",........ PUBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDIZED ITEMS - 3 MINUTES Requests were received to address the following items and deferred to those discussions: Item Nos. 5,37. CONSENT CALENDAR The following items were pulled from the Consent Calendar for further discussion and consideration: Item Nos. 4 and 5. MOVED BY SCHIFFNER, SECONDED BY HICKMAN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR, WITH THE MINUTES CORRECTED AS NOTED EARLIER AND MAYOR BUCKLEY ABSTAINING FROM VOTE ON ITEM 1.C. ",........ 1. The following Minutes were approved: Agenda Item No. Page 5' of ,.~ . t.fb Page Six - City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 ""-" a. Joint Study Session - September 14,2004. b. Special City Council Meeting - September 22, 2004. c. Regular City Council Meeting - September 28, 2004. 2. Ratified Warrant List for September 30, 2004. 3. Approved Supplemental Law Enforcement Service Fund (SLESF) Expenditure Plan For 2004-2005, and authorized City staff to submit the plan to the Riverside County Sheriff s Department Grants Unit. 4. Authorization to Amend the Contract for CEQA Compliance Documents for North Tuscany Hills Project - HDR Engineering. (This item was pulled from the Agenda for further work prior to approval.) PUBLIC HEARINGS "-' 21. Tentative Tract Map No. 31106 (Canyon Hills Specific Plan) - Pardee Homes. Mayor Buckley opened the public hearing at 7:27 p.m. Community Development Director Brady detailed the project and noted that the applicant had previously agreed to put in detached single family homes and have abided by that agreement. He advised that the Planning Commission had recommended approval, and detailed the recommendations. Jim Stringer, representing Pardee Homes, offered to answer questions. Mayor Buckley asked those persons interested in this project to speak. There were no public comments. Councilman Hickman indicated that he liked this project, and noted that they had done an excellent job so far. -....,,; Agenda Item No. I. b · Page Co of ~ "'" Page Seven - City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 Councilman Schiffner indicated that he was ready to move for approval. "'" Councilman Magee noted that he understood from the Community Development Director that the original plan was for multi-family attached units, but now the project was single family detached homes. Community Development Director Brady indicated that the options were from single family to condos or apartments. He noted that at the suggestion of Mayor Pro Tern Kelley, he had toured phase one of the Riverbend Property, and confirmed that Pardee provided a quality project. He indicated that they had created a beautiful environment, and had been sensitive to the unique terrain. He commented that he was still concerned with the lot sizes in the area and while it looks great he would be watching the balance of the property develop. He noted that there were still several opportunities to change the project, and indicated that he would look at the Riverbend project as the high water mark. He expressed appreciation to Pardee Homes for their work in the area and expressed hopes that this project would be a continuation of their good work. Councilman Hickman thanked them for the fire station and noted that the project was ahead of schedule. Mayor Buckley addressed the remaining nodes of multi-housing density. Community Development Director Brady pointed out the four additional areas and their locations on the map. Mr. Stringer addressed the plans and pointed out that the last two planning areas would most likely be condominiums. He noted that they would be processing townhomes on project area five in the next couple of weeks. Mayor Buckley noted that they had built a good product and Canyon Hills was still working out, in spite of the lots under 4,000 square feet. '" Mayor Pro Tern Kelley added that the reason the project worked was the design, the mix of units, and the homeowners association. She noted that the streets in this area were private and the Riverbend project was very popular. Agenda Item No. ,. b. Page 7 of 4 G Page Eight - City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 .....". She indicated that it was still somewhat affordable and very attractive thanks to the efforts by Pardee on design and layout. MOVED BY SCHIFFNER, SECONDED BY MAGEE AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31106, BASED ON ATTACHMENTS A THRU E AND THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, AND SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Findings 1. The Proiect is Consistent with Desien Standards Contained in the Canvon Hills Specific Plan: City Planning and .Engineering have reviewed the proposed tentative tract map and have no concerns, if required conditions of approval are satisfied. The proposed tentative tract map is consistent with standards contained in the Canyon Hills Specific Plan relating to lot size, lot width, lot depth, street widths, and other Planning and Engineering standards and requirements. In addition, the proposed tentative tract map is consistent with the lot configuration that was designed with TfM No. 30754. '-'" The proposed tract map will construct smaller lots. The 1 08 individual detached residential lots measure between 3,273 sf. to 7,202 sf.; average lot size is 4,298 sf. It should be noted that the Canyon Hills Specific Plan permit 3,000 sf. minimum small-lot subdivisions within the MF2 Zone. The proposed tract map complies with the minimum lot size standard contained in the Canyon Hills Specific Plan. 2. Proposed TTM No. 31106 Complies with Conditions Established with TIM No. 30754: As discussed, proposed TfM No. 31106 further subdivides a large lot that was originally created with TIM No. 30754, which was approved by the City in 2003. TIM No. 30754 included a Condition of Approval (COA No. 14), which required the applicant to subdivide the proposed TfM No. 31106 into individual single-family residential lots. Said Condition reads as follows: "Prior to construction of Lot 128 (which is the TIM No. 311 06 area), the applicant shall final a new tract map for the Lot 128 area, which subdivides said lot for single-family detached residential units." Proposed TIM No. 31106 implements the Condition of Approval since it further subdivides the project area (Lot 128) into individual single-family residential lots. 3. Proposed TTM No. 31106 is an Extension of the Riverbend Development: As discussed, the applicant is presently constructing the Riverbend development which was subdivided by TfM No. 30754. Proposed TfM No. 31106 is contiguous to the Riverbend development area and will .~ Agenda Item No. '.b. Page R' of Lf " /""" Page Nine - City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 therefore, extend and continue construction of the Riverbend development. The Planning Commission reviewed and approved design of the Riverbend development in July 2003. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the project, though they expressed concerns regarding the lots' small size. They understood that the lot sizes were consistent with the development standards contained in the Canyon Hills Specific Plan. No one from the public spoke. The applicant accepted the Conditions of Approval during the Planning Commission meeting. Conditions of Approval PLANNING DMSION CONDITIONS GENERAL 1. Tentative Tract Map No. 31106 will expire two years from date of approval unless within that period of time a Final Map has been filed with the County Recorder, or an extension of time is granted by the City of Lake Elsinore City Council in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act. Additional extensions of time (36 months maximum time per the Subdivision Map Act) may be granted per City ~ Council approval. 2. Tentative Tract Map No. 31106 shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), unless modified by approved Conditions of Approval. 3. Future development shall comply with those standards and guidelines contained in the Residential Element, Commercial/Institutional Element, Public Facilities and Services Element, Resources Management Element, Circulation Element, Zoning Element, and Community Wide Implementation Element as contained in the Canyon Hills Specific Plan document. 4. Tentative Tract Map No. 31106 shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and applicable requirements contained in the Canyon Hills Specific Plan document and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), unless modified by approved Conditions of Approval. 5. Future development shall comply with those requirements and provisions contained in the Canyon Hills Development Agreement and Canyon Hills Public Facilities and Services Financing Agreement. 6. The applicant shall participate in the City of Lake Elsinore Citywide Landscaping and Street Lighting District, as appropriate. 7. The applicant shall provide all project-related onsite and offsite improvements as described in the Canyon Hills Specific Plan document. r-. Agenda Item No. '.b. Page q of Lf {., Page Ten - City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 """ 8. The applicant shall implement those mitigation measures identified in the 1989 Final Canyon Hills Specific Plan EIR and the 2003 Addendum to the Final Canyon Hills Specific Plan EIR. 9. All future proposals shall be reviewed by the City on a project-by-project basis. If determined necessary by the Community Development Director or designee, additional environmental analysis will be required. 10. Future construction of TIM No. 31106 shall meet all Riverside County Fire Department standards for fire protection and any additional requirements requested by the County Fire Department. II. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, Agents, and its Consultants from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning implementation and construction of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan, which action is bought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Sections 65009 and/or 66499.37, and Public Resources Code Section 21167. The City will promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City and will cooperate fully with the defense. PRIOR TO FINAL TRACT MAP """ 12. All lots shall comply with minimum standards contained in the Canyon Hills Specific Plan. 13. A precise survey with closures for boundaries and all lots shall be provided per the LEMC. 14. Street names within the subdivision shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Designee. 15. All of the improvements shall be designed by the applicant's Civil Engineer to the specifications of the City of Lake Elsinore. 16. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Riverside County Fire Department. 17. The applicant shall meet all requirements of Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). PRIOR TO DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL 18. All future structural development associated with this map reqUires separate Design Review approval. 19. Prior to Design Review approval, the applicant shall show the following: · Prepare Conceptual Landscape Plan for Model Home Complex which describes species, size, and location of trees, shrubs, groundcover, hardscape, etc. to be provided. ......, Agenda Item No. '~b ~ Page~of l( " ,.... Page Eleven - City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 . Show that architectural treatments and articulation will be provided along all elevations, not only the front elevations. At a minimum, foam surrounds will be provided around all windows located along the side and rear elevations. . Those side and rear elevations that are within the public view will be provided with additional architectural enhancements and articulations. . Show that those materials provided along the front elevations (ie. brick, stone, etc.) will wrap around the side elevation and be flush with the front return walls. . All front return walls shall be constructed of decorative masonry concrete block. Wooden front returns are not allowed. . Perimeter walls around the subdivision shall be of decorative masonry concrete block. Desi1!n for all draina1!e basins proposed with Tentative Tract Map No. 31106 shall be approved bv the Citv En1!ineer and Communitv Development Director or desi1!nee. Securitv fencin1! shall also be shown. Chain-link fencin1! is prohibited. ,.... PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT/GRADING PERMITS 20. Prior to issuance of any grading permit and/or building permit, the applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department. 21. The applicant shall obtain all necessary State and Federal permits, approvals, or other entitlements, where applicable, prior to each phase of development of the project. 22. Prior to issuance of building permit, a Fuel Modification Plan and Program shall be approved by the Fire Department for future phases. Said Plan and Program shall show those special treatments necessary to achieve an acceptable level of risk in regard to the exposure of structures to flammable vegetation and shall describe the method of removal and installation, and provisions for maintenance. 23. The applicant shall comply with the following City programs: the City Source Reduction and Recycling Element and Household Hazardous Waste Element, the County Solid Waste Management Plan and Integrated Waste Management Plan. 24. Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall submit a letter of verification (will-serve letter) to the City Engineer, for all required utility services. 25. The applicant shall meet all requirements of Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). ",-... 26. All subdivision tracts shall annex into the existing Canyon Hills Homeowner's Association. Agenda,Item No. , · b. Page ~of Lf b Page Twelve - City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 ~ 27. The applicant shall pay applicable fees and obtain proper clearance from the Lake Elsinore Unified School District (LEUSD) prior to issuance of building permits. 28. Pay all applicable fees including park fees. 29. The applicant shall provide connection to public sewer for each lot within any subdivision. No service laterals shall cross adjacent property lines and shall be delineated on engineering sewer plans and profiles for submittal to the EVMWD. 30. Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall prepare a Final Wall and Fence Plan addressing the following: · Show that a masonry or decorative block wall will be constructed along the entire tract boundary. · Show materials, colors, and heights of rear, side and front walls/fences for proposed lots. · Show that front return walls shall be decorative masonry block walls. Front return wood fences shall not be permitted. · Show that side walls for comer lots shall be decorative masonry block walls. ....., · Show that those materials provided along the front elevations (ie. brick, stone, etc.) will wrap around the side elevation and be flush with the front return walls. 32. The applicant shall submit plans to the electric utility company for a layout of the street lighting system. The cost of street lighting, installation as well as energy charges shall be the responsibility of the developer and/or the association. Said plans shall be approved by the City and shall be installed in accordance with the City Standards. 33. The applicant shall meet all requirements of the providing electric utility company. 34. The applicant shall meet all requirements of the providing gas utility company. 35. The applicant shall meet all requirements ofthe providing telephone utility company. 36. A bond is required guaranteeing the removal of all trailers used during construction. 37. All signage shall be subject to Planning Division review and approval prior to installation. 38. Any alterations to the topography, ground surface, or any other site preparation activity will require appropriate grading permits. A Geologic Soils Report with associated recommendations will be required for grading permit approval, and all grading must meet the City's Grading Ordinance, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and the Planning Division. Analysis of impacts of fills and cuts greater than sixty feet (60') shall be provided. Interim and permanent erosion control ....., Agenda Item No. 1.1.. Page~of l.{ ~ ,-.. Page Thirteen - City Council Minutes - October 12,2004 measures are required. The applicant shall bond 100% for material and labor for one (1) year for erosion control landscaping at the time the site is rough graded. 39. The City's Noise Ordinance shall be met during all site preparation activity. Construction shall not commence before 7:00 AM and cease at 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday. Construction activity shall not take place on Saturday, Sunday, or any Legal Holidays. 40. The applicant shall post a $5,000.00 performance bond or other acceptable form of security to address future law enforcement needs that may be caused by potential project construction violations. The performance bond shall remain in effect for the term of construction and shall be: (1) acceptable to the applicant, (2) in a form approved by the City Attorney, and (3) reasonably addresses additional enforcement requirements that are not feasibly addressed by the Sheriff's Office. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 41. The applicant shall restrict all construction traffic from using Lost Road, south of the project boundary. All construction traffic will access the project area from Canyon Hills Road. ,-... 42. Throughout construction, as deemed appropriate by the City and the applicant, fugitive dust suppression along Lost Road to minimize fugitive dust generation shall be applied. Fugitive dust suppression techniques may include soil watering, application of soil binders, and/or placement of gravel or other appropriate material to minimize vehicle generated dust. ENGINEERING DIVISION CONDITIONS 43. Dedicate and improve full half-width street cross section of Canyon Hills Road. Cross section shall comply with Canyon Hills Specific Plan requirements. 44. Cedar Creek Lane street improvements shall be consistent with alignment and grade of existing street. 45. Show cross section along tract boundary with existing tract. 46. Grading or altered drainage into the jurisdictional areas shall require a permit from the appropriate agency. 47. Street lights shall comply with the Mount Palomar Lighting Requirements. 48. Graded slopes shall not exceed a 2: 1 ratio. 49. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to final map approval. ,-.. Agenda Item No. I. b. Page I 3 of t.f (, Page Fourteen - City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 ......, 50. Underground water rights shall be dedicated to the City pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.52.030 (LEMC), and consistent with the City's agreement with the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. 51. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (LEMC 16.34, Resolution 85-26). 52. Submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project. Submit this letter prior to final map approval. 53. Construct all public works improvements per approved street plans (LEMC 12.04). Plans must be approved and signed by the Engineering Manager prior to final map approval (LEMC 16.34). 54. Street improvement plans and specifications shall be prepared by a Calif. Registered Civil Engineer. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Riverside County Road Department Standards, latest edition, and City Codes (LEMC 12.04 and 16.34). 55. Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City for the construction of public works improvements and shall post the appropriate bonds prior to final map approval. 56. Interior streets shall be designed with 9 percent as the desired grade and intersecting streets shall meet at a maximum grade of 6 percent. ......, 57. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Division for construction of public works improvements (LEMC 12.08 and Resolution 83-78). 58. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 W' x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of public works improvements will be scheduled and approved. 59. Applicant shall install 2 permanent bench marks to Riverside County Standards and at a location to be determined by City Engineering Manager. 60. Applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site easements for off-site grading from the adjacent property owners prior to final map approval. 61. Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. 62. Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by Riverside County Fire. 63. Provide street lighting and show lighting improvements as part of street improvement plans as required by the City Engineering Manager. ......, Agenda Item No. 1.10. Page f l{ of 4 b /"'"" Page Fifteen - City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 64. Applicant shall annex to the City's Street Lighting and landscaping Maintenance District. 65. Applicant shall install blue reflective pavement markers in the street at all fire hydrant locations. 66. Applicant shall submit a traffic control plan showing all traffic control devices for the tract to be approved prior to final map approval. All traffic control devices shall be installed prior to final inspection of public improvements. This includes No Parking and Street Sweeping Signs for streets within the tract. 67. All improvement plans and tract maps shall be digitized. At Certificate of Occupancy applicant shall submit tapes and/or discs which are compatible with City's ARC Info/GIS or applicant to pay $300 per sheet for City digitizing. 68. All utilities except electrical over 12 kv shall be placed underground, as approved by the serving utility . /"'"" 69. Apply and obtain a grading permit with appropriate security prior to building permit issuance. A grading plan signed and stamped by a Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall be required if the grading exceeds 50 cubic yards or the existing flow pattern is substantially modified as determined by the City Engineering Manager. If the grading is less than 50 cubic yards and a grading plan is not required, a grading permit shall still be obtained so that a cursory drainage and flow pattern inspection can be conducted before grading begins. 70. Provide soils, geology and seismic report including street design recommendations. Provide final soils report showing compliance with recommendations. 71. An Alquist-Priolo study shall be performed on the site to identify any hidden earthquake faults and/or liquefaction zones present on-site unless previously performed by the underlying development. In the event the project is outside the study area, a stamped letter from a Licensed Geologist or Geotechnical Engineer. 72. All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer and he shall certify all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and proper erosion control. All manufactured slopes greater than 30 ft. in height shall be contoured. 73. Prior to commencement of grading operations, applicant to provide to the City with a map of all proposed haul routes to be used for movement of export material. Such routes shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineering Manager. /""" 74. Applicant to provide to the City a photographic baseline record of the condition of all proposed public City haul roads. In the event of damage to such roads, applicant shall pay full cost of restoring public roads to the baseline condition. A bond may be required to ensure payment of damages to the public right-of-way, subject to the approval of the City Engineering Manager. Agenda Item No. '.b. Page~of 't.f, Page Sixteen - City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 "-'" 75. Individual lot drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility or accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance or conveyed to a drainage easement. 76. On-site drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way should be contained within drainage easements shown on the final map. A note should be added to the final map stating: "Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions". 77. All natural drainage traversing site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineering Manager. 78. Meet all requirements ofLEMC 15.64 regarding flood hazard regulations. 79. Meet all requirements ofLEMC 15.68 regarding floodplain management. 80. Applicant to provide FEMA elevation certificates prior to certificate of occupancies 81. Site development along the lake perimeter will require special grading and flood proofing requirements (LEMC 15). 82. Submit Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports for review and approval by City Engineering Manager and the Riverside County Flood Control District prior to approval of final map. Applicant shall mitigate any flooding and/or erosion caused by development of site and diversion of drainage. "-'" 83. All drainage facilities in this tract shall be constructed to Riverside County Flood Control District Standards. 84. Storm drain inlet facilities shall be appropriately stenciled to prevent illegally dumping in the drain system, the wording and stencil shall be approved by the City Engineering Manager. 85. Roof and yard drains will not be allowed to outlet through cuts in the street curb. Roof drains should drain to a landscaped area when ever feasible. 86. 10 year storm runoff should be contained within the curb and the 100 year storm runoff should be contained within the street right-of-way. When either of these criteria is exceeded, drainage facilities should be installed. 87. A drainage acceptance letter will be necessary from the downstream property owners for outletting the proposed stormwater run-off on private property. 88. Applicant will be required to install BMPs using the best available technology to mitigate any urban pollutants from entering the watershed. Agenda Item No. \ · b · Page J ~ of!:IG ~ ~ Page Seventeen - City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 89. Applicant shall provide the city with proof of his having filed a Notice of Intent with the Regional Water Quality Control Board for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program with a storm water pollution prevention plan prior to issuance of grading permits. The applicant shall provide a SWPPP for post construction which describes BMPs that will be implemented for the development including maintenance responsibilities. 90. Applicant shall obtain approval from Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board for their storm water pollution prevention plan including approval of erosion control for the grading plan prior to issuance of grading permits. 91. Education guidelines and BMPs shall be provided to residents of the development in the use of herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers as well as other environmental awareness education materials on good housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of stormwater quality and met the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. 92. Applicant shall provide first flush BMPs using the best available technology that will reduce storm water pollutants from parking areas and driveway aisles. .,,-... 93. All waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or other phases of the construction shall be disposed of at appropriate recycling centers. The applicant should contract with CR&R Inc. for recycling and storage container services, but the applicant may use the services of another recycling vendor. Another recycling vendor, other than CR&R Inc., cannot charge the applicant for bin rental or solid waste disposal. If the applicant is not using CR&R Inc. for recycling services and the recycling material is either sold or donated to another vendor, the applicant shall supply proof of debris disposal at a recycling center, including verification of tonnage by certified weigh master tickets. 94. In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal & recycling, the applicant shall be required to contract with CR&R Inc. for removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of construction. Mayor Buckley closed the public hearing at 7:36 p.m. 22. Zone Change No. 2004-01. Tentative Tract Map No. 32129 and Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2004-05 - Resolution No. 2004-63 and Ordinance No. 1129 - The Sauls Company. Mayor Buckley opened the public hearing at 7:37 p.m. ,,-... Agenda Item No. , · b. Page~of~ Page Eighteen - City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 ......, Community Development Director Brady detailed the items for consideration and noted the location of the property. He advised that the proposal divided the land into 27 homes and 10 open space lots, with a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet. He indicated that this plan was consistent with the Ramsgate project. He advised that the Planning Commission had reviewed this project and recommended approval. Mayor Buckley questioned the typical lot size. Ed Sauls, applicant, indicated that the average lot size was 9,2QO square feet. He noted that they had been working with staff and requested approval of the project. He offered the project engineer Chris Weber or himself to answer further questions. Adel Abusamara, 32655 Rachel Circle, Dana Point, indicated that he owned 50 acres in the middle of the Ramsgate Project. He expressed his thanks and support for Mr. Sauls' cooperation on his tract map. He also thanked the City for their efforts and help. ....." Dick Sharma, 19700 Sharon St., Perris, noted that he was a property owner on the adjacent property. He indicated that his street had never existed and would no longer exist with this project. He clarified that in spite of that, he was not opposed to the project; he only had serious concerns about what this project would do to the area in the future. He commented that the area was meant to be a rural buffer along the County line, and questioned where the development would stop. He indicated that his property was in limbo, as this project was coming up to his fence. He noted that the Sauls Company has set it out and planned the project well, but the next set of houses would look right into his property and he would look into theirs. He indicated that this would take away his public access to his property, but noted that he still had private access via a right-of-way through another property. He expressed concern that Highway 74 would have the same problems as Railroad Canyon Road. Mayor Buckley inquired if Mr. Sharma had discussed his concerns with Community Development Director Brady. Mr. Sharma indicated that he had met with Mr. Sauls and received answers to Agenda Item No. , · \... Page~of 46 ....." r--- Page Nineteen - City Council Minutes - October 12,2004 some of his questions and Mr. Sauls recognized his concerns. Mayor Buckley addressed the future concerns and suggested that Community Development Director Brady could assist him. Mr. Sharma expressed concern that this was a tentative map with no rural connection but a row of trees. Councilman Magee questioned the access issues and suggested that he meet with the Community Development Director and the 5th District Supervisor to resolve his concerns. He commented that everything was coming toward the property and encouraged Mr. Sharma to maintain his legal access. Mr. Sharma noted a wildlife refuge to the east of his and suggested that would be another concern that would need to be buffered from the homes. He noted that the property along Trellis Road would be prime for annexation to the City, particularly in light of the City's growth. He indicated that the County/City line was down the center of Sharon Street, and questioned the City's ability to abandon ~ of the right-of-way. r--- Councilman Schiffuer addressed the map and indicated that unless he was incorrect, the right-of-way would remain as it was, as there were no lots in the area. Mr. Sharma clarified that he was not concerned with the location of a house, but suggested that it was impractical to build a road there, however it was the only possible public access. Councilman Schiffuer indicated that the road would still exist. Mr. Sharma indicated that he was not sure how it would exist. He stressed that his concern was for the future access to his property. Councilman Schiffuer questioned the access via Sharon Street. Mr. Sharma indicated that his main access was a deeded right-of-way, up a steep hill. Councilman Schiffuer noted that on the diagram it would appear that the existing roads would continue to exist. Assistant City Manager Best suggested that it would be best for Mr. Sharma to meet with Community Development Director Brady to address the access issues. Councilman Schiffner indicated that he was sympathetic to Mr. Sharma's concerns, but he was not sure this project would impact him as much as anticipated. Mr. Sharma stressed the potential impacts of future developments. ~ Agenda Item No. , -~. Page~of L{~ Page Twenty - City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 '''''''; MOVED BY KELLEY, SECONDED BY SCHIFFNER AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2004-63, ADOPTING MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-05 AND THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM. RESOLUTION NO. 2004-63 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING MITIGATED NEGAT.VE DECLARATION NO. 2004-05 AND THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM THERETO, FOR ZONE CHANGE NO. 2004-01, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32129, ON . APPROXIMATELY 10+ ACRES LOCATED APPROXIMATELY TWO MILES NORTHEAST OF THE INTERSTATE IS/STATE HIGHWAY 74 (CENTRAL AVENUE) INTERCHANGE, AT THE SOUTHERN END OF TRELLIS LANE, SOUTH OF SHARON STREET, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 347-110- 021 AND A PORTION OF 347-110-022. .-..,J MOVED BY KELLEY, SECONDED BY SCHIFFNER TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 1129, UPON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE NO. 2004-01: ORDINANCE NO. 1129 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE NO. 2004-01, CHANGING THE ZONING DESIGNATION FROM "RR-RURAL RESIDENTIAL" TO "Rl- SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL," UNDER THE ZONING ORDINANCE, ON 10+ ACRES LOCATED APPROXIMATELY TWO MILES NORTHEAST OF THE INTERSTATE IS/STATE HIGHWAY 74 (CENTRAL A VENUE) INTERCHANGE, AT THE SOUTHERN END OF ~ Agenda Item No. ,.~. Page.2tL of 4 {, /"'" Page Twenty-One - City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 TRELLIS LANE, SOUTH OF SHARON STREET, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 347-110-021. UPON THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES; COUNCILMEMBERS: HICKMAN, KELLEY, MAGEE, SCHIFFNER, BUCKLEY NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ,..-- MOVED BY KELLEY, SECONDED BY SCHIFFNER AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32129, BASED ON EXHIBITS' A', 'B' AND 'D' AND THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, AND SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROV AL. FINDINGS Findings - Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2004-05 and the Mitigation Monitoring Program 1. Based on evaluations and discussions contained in the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration, the proposed project has limited potential to degrade the quality of the environment. The proposed project will not significantly affect the environment with mitigation measures in place. 2. The proposed project will not have impacts that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable with mitigation measures in place. Given that the project impacts are insignificant, cumulative impacts are not foreseen. /"'" 3. The proposed project does not have the potential to significantly adversely affect humans, either directly or indirectly with mitigation measures in place. Agenda Item No. \ ebe Page~of t-fb Page Twenty-Two - City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 ......" Findings - Zone Change No. 2004-01 : 1. The proposed amendment will not be (1) detrimental to the health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment or within the City, (2) injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City. a. The proposed zoning of R-l Single Family Residential is the most similar zoning to the residential development occurring within the adjacent Ramsgate Specific Plan. If the subject property had remained part of a future specific plan, there is every likelihood that a transition such as the one proposed would have been designed for the area. b. The proposed R-I zone provides development standards that protect the public health, safety and. general welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhoods in the area or within the City. The proposed project shall comply with these standards. 2. The proposed amendment will be consistent with the latest General Plan. ......" a. The proposed R-l zoning is consistent with the existing General Plan designation of "Future Specific Plan F," which accommodates residential development at a maximum density of 6 dwelling units per acre. The General Plan identifies issues to be addressed in this area, namely hillside grading, compatibility of development to adjacent uses, and impacts to biological resources. These issues were reviewed, addressed and considered by the Initial Environmental Study and within the design of this project. Findings - Tentative Tract Map No. 32129 1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvements, is consistent with the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan (Government Code Section 66473.5). a. The design of the subdivision and density of 2.5 dwelling units per acre are consistent with the General Plan designation of "Future Specific Plan F," which accommodates residential development up to 6 dwelling units per acre. ....., Agenda Item No. \ · b. Page d--2 of 4 ~ ,...... Page Twenty-Three - City Council Minutes - October 12,2004 b. The project proposes single family residential lots ranging in size from 6,000 square feet to 31, 000 square feet, which meet the R -1 zoning minimum. 2. The site of the proposed division of land is physically suitable for the proposed density of development in accordance with the General Plan. a. The overall density proposed by this project is consistent with the adjacent Ramsgate Specific Plan. b. The map provides open space areas that protect the natural topography and views. 3. The effects that this project is likely to have upon the housing f!.eeds of the region, the public service requirements of its residents and the available fiscal and environmental resources have been considered and balanced. "......... a. The project is consistent with the City's General Plan. During the approval of City's General Plan, housing needs, public services and fiscal resources were scrutinized to achieve a balance within the City. b. The map has been conditioned to annex into Community Facilities District 2003-1 to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on public safety operations and maintenance issues in the City. c. The map has been conditioned to annex into Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on public right-of-way landscaped areas to be maintained by the City, and for street lights in the public right-of-way for which the City will pay for electricity and a maintenance fee to Southern California Edison. 4. Subject to the attached conditions of approval, the proposed division is not anticipated to result in any significant environmental impact. a. An Initial Study was prepared for this project which identified potentially significant environmental effects, but proposals made or agreed to by the applicant would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur. "......... b. There is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environmental. Agenda Item No. l.b · Page 0- 3 of L{ (, Page Twenty-Four - City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 ........, c. Mitigation measures are required to ensure all potentially significant impacts are reduced to levels of insignificance. Tentative Tract Map No. 32129 has been conditioned to comply with these mitigation measures. 5. The design of the proposed division of land or type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. a. Tentative Tract Map No. 32129 is conditioned to comply with all development standards of the Rl Single Family Residential Zone. These standards are in place to benefit the public health, safety and welfare. 6. The design of the proposed division of land or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed division of land. a. All known easements or requests for access have been incorporated into Tentative Tract Map No. 32129. b. The adjacent property owner to the east requested access through Tentative Tract Map No. 32129. This map has been designed with "B" Street to stub at the easterly boundary, thereby allowing this connection. ........, c. The map has been circulated to City departments and outside agencies, and appropriate conditions of approval have been applied for their approval during construction. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PLANNING DMSION 1. Tentative Tract Map No. 32129 will expire two (2) years from date of approval unless within that period of time a final map has been filed with the County Recorder, or an extension of time is granted by the City of Lake Elsinore City Council in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act (SMA). Additional extensions of time (36 months maximum time per the SMA) may be granted with City Council approval. 2. Tentative Tract Map No. 32129 shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Title 16 unless modified by approved Conditions of Approval. 3. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, and Agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against Agenda Item No. '.to, Page ~LLof~ ""'" ~ Page Twenty-Five - City Council Minutes - October 12,2004 the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Tentative Tract Map No. 32129, which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Sections 65009 and/or 66499.37, and Public Resources Code Section 21167. The City will promptly notify the Applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City and will cooperate fully with the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any such claim or proceeding, the Applicant shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. 4. The applicant shall sign and return an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" to the Community Development Department within 30 days of the Tentative Tract Map approval by the City Council. PRIOR TO FINAL TRACT MAP: 5. The applicant shall comply with all Conditions of Approval prepared by the Riverside County Fire Department as listed in their transmittal dated March 11, 2004 attached. 6. All lots shall comply with minimum standards of the Rl Single Family Residential zone. ,..-- 7. A precise survey with closures for boundaries and all lots shall be provided per the LEMC. 8. Street names within the subdivision shall be approved by the Community Development Director or designee prior to final map approval. 9. All of the improvements shall be designed by the developer's Civil Engineer to the specifications of the City of Lake Elsinore. 10. The applicant shall comply with the Mitigation Monitoring Program prepared for Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2004-05. 11. The applicant shall initiate and complete the formation of a homeowners' association, approved by the City, recorded and in place. All Association documents shall be reviewed and approved by the City and recorded, such as the Articles of Incorporation and Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC & R's). The HOA shall be responsible for the maintenance of all open space areas and maintenance easement areas. a. In the event that the Homeowners' Association fails to meet its responsibilities with regards to the maintenance of open space areas, the Lighting, Landscaping and Maintenance District shall automatically provide such maintenance and assess the individual property owners for such service. ,..-- 12. The Final Map shall identify downslopes adjacent to streets as HOA Maintenance Easements. All HOA Maintenance Easements shall be planted, irrigated and maintained by the HOA. Agenda Item No. I,b. Page ?. ~ of '-f (, Page Twenty-Six - City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 ~ PRIOR TO GRADING AND BUILDING PERMITS: 13. Construction shall be restricted until adjacent subdivisions have developed or the applicant obtains arrangements with adjacent property owners to provide fuel modification zones for this project. 14. The City's Noise Ordinance shall be met during all site preparation activity. Construction shall not commence before 7:00 a.m. and shall cease at 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Construction activity shall not take place on Saturday, Sunday or any legal holidays. 15. Upon violation by applicant of the City's Noise Ordinance or Condition of Approval #14, applicant shall cease all construction activities and shall be permitted to recommence such activities only upon depositing with the City a $5,000 cash deposit available to be drawn upon by the City to fund any future law enforcement needs that may be caused by potential project construction violations and the enforcement of the City's Noise Ordinance and Condition of Approval # 14. The applicant shall replenish the deposit upon notice by the City that the remaining balance is equal to or less than $1,000. 16. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Lake Elsinore Unified School District under the provisions of SB 50, wherein the owner or developer shall pay school fees or enter into a mitigation agreement prior to the issuance of a certificate of compliance by the District. ~ 17. The applicant shall provide connection to public sewer for each lot within the subdivision. No service laterals shall cross adjacent property lines and shall be delineated on engineering sewer plans and profiles for submittal to the EVMWD. 18. All storm drains are to be maintained in accordance with the cooperative agreement with the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. a. The homeowners' association shall maintain water quality basins, landscaping, and open space drainage. 19. The developer shall submit plans to the electric utility company for a layout of the street lighting system. The cost of street lighting, installation as well as energy charges shall be the responsibility of the developer and/or the Association until streets are accepted by the City. Said plans shall be approved by the City and shall be installed in accordance with City Standards. 20. The applicant shall meet all requirements of the providing electric utility company. 21. The applicant shall meet all requirements of the providing gas utility company. 22. The applicant shall meet all requirements of the providing telephone utility company. 23. A bond is required guaranteeing the removal of all trailers used during construction. .....", Agenda Item No. \. b. Page 2. b of \.f 6 _____ Page Twenty-Seven - City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 24. All signage shall be subject to Planning Division review and approval prior to installation. 25. Landscape Plans for the tract shall include vegetative screening of all retention basins. 26. Any alterations to the topography, ground surface, or any other site preparation activity will require appropriate grading permits. A Geologic Soils Report with associated recommendations will be required for grading permit approval, and all grading must meet the City's Grading Ordinance, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and the Planning Division. Analysis of impacts of fills and cuts greater than sixty feet (60') shall be provided. Interim and permanent erosion control measures are required. The applicant shall bond 100% for material and labor for one (1) year for erosion control landscaping at the time the site is rough graded. 27. Prior to the approval of any final map, the applicant shall submit a phasing plan if multiple final maps are proposed, which show all phasing lines and the primary and secondary access for each phase. PRIOR TO DESIGN REVIEW: ----- 28. All future structural development associated with this map requires separate Design Review approval. 29. Elevation drawings for Design Review shall include four-sided architectural features. 30. Slopes on individual lots that are in excess of three feet in height shall be installed, landscaped and irrigated by the developer prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 31. A detailed fencing plan shall be required for review and approval during the Design Review process. 32. A detailed phasing plan shall be required for review and approval during the Design Review process. a. Construction phasing plans shall include the location of construction fencing for each phase. b. Construction phasing plans shall indicate primary and secondary access and the location of all utilities for each phase. ENGINEERING DIVISION 33. Provide permission to construct and permission to drain onto adjacent property from the affected properties. ----- 34. Process a lot line adjustment to include the boundaries of Lot 27 into this subdivision. Agenda Item No. I. b. Page ~ 1 of 4 ~ Page Twenty-Eight - City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 ""'" 35. Provide documentation that Lot 27 is not a requirement as an open space lot for the adjacent development. 36. Provide drainage information including outlet details for Lots "C", "D", "E" & "F". 37. Provide permission to construct the termination point of"B" Street. "B" Street shall be barricaded and signed as the temporary end of the street. 38. Verify that detention and first flush provisions are provided either on-site or accounted for on the adjacent project. 39. Modifications to "J" Street shall require permission from affected property. 40. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to issuance of building permit. 41. Underground water rights shall be dedicated to the City pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.52.030 (LEMC), and consistent with the City's agreement with the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. 42. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (LEMC 16.34, Resolution 8>26). ......, 43. Submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project. Submit this letter prior to issuance of building permit. 44. Construct all public works improvements per approved street plans (LEMC 12.04). Plans must be approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to final map approval (LEMC 16.34). 45. Street improvement plans and specifications shall be prepared by a Calif. Registered Civil Engineer. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Riverside County Road Department Standards, latest edition, and City Codes (LEMC 12.04 and 16.34). 46. Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City for the construction of public works improvements and shall post the appropriate bonds prior to issuance of Building Permit. 47. Interior streets shall be designed with 9% as the desired grade and intersecting streets shall meet at a maximum grade of 6 % 48. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Division for construction of public works improvements (LEMC 12.08 and Resolution 83-78). 49. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 W' x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of public ~ Agenda Item No. '.Ie.. Page :l ~ of L{ " ~ Page Twenty-Nine - City Council Minutes - October 12,2004 works improvements will be scheduled and approved. 50. The applicant shall install two (2) permanent bench marks to Riverside County Standards and at a location to be determined by City Engineer. 51. Applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site easements for off-site grading from the adjacent property owners prior to final map approval. 52. Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. . 53. Provide street lighting and show lighting improvements as part of street improvement plans as required by the City Engineer. 54. Developer shall annex to the City's Street Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District. 55. Developer shall install blue reflective pavement markers in the street at all fire hydrant locations. /"'"""' 56. Applicant shall submit a traffic control plan showing all traffic control devices for the tract to be approved prior to final map approval. All traffic control devices shall be installed prior to final inspection of public improvements. This includes No Parking and Street Sweeping Signs for streets within the tract. 57. All utilities except electrical over 12 kv shall be placed underground, as approved by the serving utility . 58. Apply and obtain a grading permit with appropriate security prior to building permit issuance. A grading plan signed and stamped by a Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall be required if the grading exceeds 50 cubic yards or the existing flow pattern is substantially modified as determined by the City Engineer. If the grading is less than 50 cubic yards and a grading plan is not required, a grading permit shall still be obtained so that a cursory drainage and flow pattern inspection can be conducted before grading begins. 59. Provide soils, geology and seismic report including street design recommendations. Provide final soils report showing compliance with recommendations. 60. An Alquist-Priolo study shall be performed on the site to identify any hidden earthquake faults and/or liquefaction zones present on-site or provide documentation from a Professional Geologist or Geotechnical Engineer that this is not required. 61. All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer and he shall certify all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and proper erosion control. All manufactured slopes greater than 30 ft. in height shall be contoured. ~. Agenda Item No. ,.~. Page~of~ Page Thirty - City Council Minutes - October 12,2004 ......, 62. Prior to commencement of grading operations, applicant to provide to the City with a map of all proposed haul routes to be used for movement of export material. Such routes shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 63. Applicant to provide to the City a photographic baseline record of the condition of all proposed public City haul roads. In the event of damage to such roads, applicant shall pay full cost of restoring public roads to the baseline condition. A bond may be required to ensure payment of damages to the public right-of-way, subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 64. On-site drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way should be contained within drainage easements shown on the final map. A note should be added to the final map stating: "Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions". 65. All natural drainage traversing site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer. 66. Meet all requirements ofLEMC 15.64 regarding flood hazard regulations. 67. Meet all requirements ofLEMC 15.68 regarding floodplain management. 68. The applicant to provide FEMA elevation certificates prior to certificate of occupancies ......, 69. Submit Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports for review and approval by City Engineer and the Riverside County Flood Control District prior to approval of final map. Developer shall mitigate any flooding and/or erosion caused by development of site and diversion of drainage. 70. Storm drain inlet facilities shall be appropriately stenciled to prevent illegally dumping in the drain system, the wording and stencil shall be approved by the City Engineer. 71. Roof and yard drains shall not be allowed to connect directly through cuts in the street curb. Roof drains should drain to a landscaped area when ever feasible. 72. 10 year storm runoff should be contained within the curb and the 100 year storm runoff should be contained within the street right-of-way. When either of these criteria is exceeded, drainage facilities should be installed. 73. Applicant will be required to install BMP's using the best available technology to mitigate any urban pollutants from entering the watershed. 74. Applicant shall provide the city with proof of his having filed a Notice of Intent with the Regional Water Quality Control Board for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program with a storm water pollution prevention plan prior to issuance of grading permits. The applicant shall provide a SWPPP for post construction which describes BMP's that will be implemented for the development including maintenance responsibilities. ......, Agenda Item No. , .~. Page 3 b of ~ h ~ Page Thirty-One - City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 75. If required, the applicant shall obtain approval from Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board for their storm water pollution prevention plan including approval of erosion control for the grading plan prior to issuance of grading permits. The applicant shall provide a SWPPP for post construction which describes BMP's that will be implemented for the development and including maintenance responsibilities. 76. Education guidelines and Best Management Practices (BMP) shall be provided to residents of the development in the use of herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers as well as other environmental awareness education materials on good housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of stormwater quality and met the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. 77. Applicant shall provide first flush BMP's using the best available technology that will reduce storm water pollutants from parking areas and driveway aisles. r" 78. Intersection site distance shall meet the design criteria of the CAL TRANS Design Manual (particular attention should be taken for intersections on the inside of curves). If site distance can be obstructed, a special limited use easement must be recorded to limit the slope, type of landscaping and wall placement. 79. Arrangements shall be made between the City and the applicant for fiscal impacts by the project prior to issuance of the first building permit. The applicant shall participate in a Cost Recovery Program or make other arrangements with the City to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on public safety and maintenance issues in the City, including city-wide improvements and facilities relating to fire and police protection and maintenance of roadways. 80. In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal & recycling, the applicant shall be required to contract with CR&R Inc. for removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of construction. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 81. The applicant shall pay park mitigation fees of$I,600 per lot, totaling $43,200 for the project. 82. The developer shall comply with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal and recycling. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT 83. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the developer shall annex into Community Facilities District No. 2003-0 I to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on public safety operations and maintenance issues in the City. ~ Agenda Item No. , .b. Page 3) of L( " Page Thirty-Two - City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 ...., 84. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the applicant shall annex into Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District No.1 to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on public right-of-way landscaped areas to be maintained by the City, and for street lights in the public right- of-way for which the City will pay for electricity and a maintenance fee to Southern California Edison. BUSINESS ITEMS 31. Second Reading - Ordinance No. 1128 - Zone Change 2004-09 - Wasson Canyon Investments. L.P. MOVED BY KELLEY, SECONDED BY SCHIFFNER TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 1128, UPON SECOND READING BY TITLE ONLY: ORDINANCE NO. 1128 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE NO. 2004-09, CHANGING THE ZONING DESIGNATION FROM "RR- RURAL RESIDENTIAL" TO "R1- SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL," UNDER THE ZONING ORDINANCE, ON APPROXIMATELY 31.25:t ACRES LOCATED SOUTHEAST OF HIGHWAY 74, NORTHEAST OF INTERSTATE 15, AND EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF CONARD A VENUE AND THIRD STREET, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 347-330- 019, -045, -046, -050 THRU - 053. '-' UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: HICKMAN, KELLEY, MAGEE, SCHIFFNER, BUCKLEY NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE '-'" Agenda Item No. I. b. Page is '2 of <-f k, ~ Page Thirty-Three - City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE 32. Proposal by Country Club Heights Committee to Address Area Concerns. Assistant City Manager Best noted that the Committee had been meeting since April to review issues on development for Country Club Heights. She indicated that they had reviewed a variety of issues including encouraging appropriate development in the area. She indicated that the Chairman Ray Tamargo and Community Development Director Brady were . prepared to make a presentation on the Committee's recommendatims. Chairman Tamargo detailed the Committee recommendations as follows: 1. Views from existing homes should be protected through the design review process for new structures. A view shed ordinance should not be adopted. .r"' 2. The design of public improvements and private development should address public safety issues, particularly fire safety. The minimum road width should be 20 feet and whenever possible should be developed to 24 feet. 3. The study area should be rezoned to R-H and the Hillside Planned Development Overlay District (Chapter 17.10) be applied to the area. 4. The historic character of the area should be preserved. The cast concrete street lamps should be preserved and restored along Lakeshore. Entry monument signs should be located at main entrances to identify Country Club Heights as a unique residential area of the City. 5. The study area boundaries should be revised to include an additional area along Gunder to Pike Street and to remove the area bounded by Dryden, Lakeshore, Lash and Wise Streets. .r"' Agenda Item No. \. '0. Page 3 J of Lf-' Page Thirty-Four - City Council Minutes - October 12,2004 ~ 6. City fees associated with development should be eliminated or reduced as an incentive to combine lots and encourage the development of larger homes. 7. A consultant should be hired to analyze various methods of funding public improvements such as water and sewer lines, street lights, entry monument signs and road improvements through the use of CFDs, assessment districts, or other funding mechanisms. An estimated cost of providing the improvements should be derived through this process. Ron La Pere, 16867 Wells Street, Country Club Heights, requested that all of the residents of the Country Club Heights areas be able to request a copy of the recommendations for discussion as a group. He indicated that what he heard sounded good and very thorough. ~ Mayor Buckley noted the presence of another Committee Member, Mr. Boose. He thanked the Committee for their work. Mayor Pro Tem Kelley thanked the Committee members for their hard work, and noted that she had been kept abreast of their work via her member on the Committee. She indicated that she was pleased with the results of their work and expressed hopes that the Council would move forward on as many issues as were possible. She noted the frustrations in the area and indicated that this was the beginning of the solution. She supported the recommendations, but noted that she was at first worried about a couple of items. She encouraged action to be taken wherever possible, with other items being moved forward for study. Councilman Magee thanked the Committee Members and the staff that assisted them. He indicated that this was a monumental task and commented that the Committee had done a fine job. He suggested that staff could implement the majority of the recommendations and bring required items back to the City Council for approval. Councilman Schiffner offered ......., Agenda Item No. '.b. Page 3LLof L{ ~ ____ Page Thirty-Five - City Council Minutes - October 12,2004 to second that suggestion as a motion, assuming things could not be done directly that quickly. He indicated that he would like to see these recommendations move forward with a formal plan. Councilman Magee commented that items 1 and 2 were policy issues, but items 3 through 6 would require administrative approval by the Council, so staff would have to bring them back. He indicated that item 7 was for development of a request for proposal, which would also have to come back. MOVED BY MAGEE, SECONDED BY SCHIFFNER TO DIRECT STAFF TO WORK ON THOSE ITEMS AND RETURN WITH THE COMPONENTS AS THEY WORK THROUGH THEM. ---- Councilman Hickman offered kudos and indicated that he was anxious to see how the CFD would be handled. He indicated that he was not crazy about the area, noting the narrow streets, but concurred that it was a beautiful area. He commented that the Council would love to assist with development. Mayor Buckley suggested that all seven items could come back by the second meeting in November. City Attorney Leibold clarified that the Zoning Ordinance would require public notices, Planning Commission hearing and hearing by the City Council. She suggested that it be provided as quickly as possible, unless the Council wanted the whole thing at once. THE FOREGOING MOTION CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE. 33. Request for Funding - H.O.P.E. - $5.000. Assistant City Manager Best deferred to Community Services Director Sapp, noting that he had been working with the applicant. She noted that HOPE regularly provided a variety of services to the community. .~ Agenda Item NO.~~. Page ~5 of Page Thirty-Six - City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 '-" Ron Hewison, representing HOPE, offered to answer questions and noted that the population HOPE was serving, was increasing and hence had submitted this supplemental request. Councilman Hickman indicated that HOPE should be commended, as they serve about 70,000 people. He noted that some of the money came from CDBG as seed money, but they received nothing from the City. Councilman Schiffner commented that he was in favor of HOPE, and noted that it was one of his two favorite charities. He indicated that he had some thought on the issue, but was somewhat uncomfortable about the separate allocation. He expressed concern that this looked like a prejudice in favor of this charity. Councilman Hickman indicated that it was important to know the reason they were coming forward at this time. He indicated that Mr. Butension had run the operation for years, but Mr. Hewison had taken on the position and the program was running short of funds. '-" Mayor Pro Tern Kelley indicated that she was also a strong supporter of HOPE, and intended to vote in favor of approval. She noted that many years ago, when there were many worthwhile causes before the Council for funds and the Council had to decide how much to give to who. She noted that there were also requests to waive fees and the Council backed off and determined that they would take the standard operating procedure of putting just charity, once a year requests in the budget so they were not in a position of favoring one over another. She noted the second requests were not approved in the budget, and expressed concern with opening the flood gates. She indicated that she would approve this request, but would want to come up with a policy on funds and waivers of fees, for solid guidance in the future. '-" Agenda Item No.l.b. Page ~ b of 4 ,-- Page Thirty-Seven - City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 MOVED BY KELLEY, SECONDED BY HICKMAN TO APPROVE THE DONATION OF $5,000 TO H.O.P.E. FROM THE CITY'S UNALLOCATED REVENUES. Mayor Buckley noted that spending money outside the budget cycle was not the best process, but indicated that he thought it would be acceptable to give to the needy. THE FOREGOING MOTION CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE. 34. Purchase Authorization - Diamond Stadium Furniture - Fullerton Restaurant Equipment - $42.330.52. .".--.. Assistant City Manager Best noted that this item came to the Council in the early summer, but was postponed due to the potential lease of the Stadium. She commented that the deal had been terminated and staff would be looking at the needs to allow use in the future. She indicated that a number of items would be before the Council with regard to the needs at the Stadium. She advised that overall, the cost of this bid had not changed. She noted the detailed accounting and final balance of funding as provided for the Council. Councilman Magee thanked the Finance Manager for addressing the unallocated revenue balance sheet between meetings. He inquired of Community Development Director Sapp, as to whether the furniture would be delivered prior to the opening of next season. Community Development Director Sapp confirmed. ,-- MOVED BY KELLEY, SECONDED BY SCHIFFNER TO AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF $42,330.52 FOR THE PURCHASE OF NEW STADIUM FURNITURE FROM FULLERTON RESTAURANT EQUIPMENT AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE PURCHASE ORDER. Agenda Item No. , · b. Page .3 7 of Y (, Page Thirty-Eight - City Council Minutes - October 12,2004 "WIll Councilman Hickman questioned if this would get rid of the plastic chairs. Community Development Director Sapp indicated that the plastic chairs would remain outside. THE FOREGOING MOTION CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE. 35. Memorandum of Understanding for the Acquisition of Property within the City of Lake Elsinore for Conservation Purposes. Mayor Buckley requested that this item be pulled and rescheduled for the next meeting. 36. Cultural Center Renovations. Assistant City Manager Best advised that this item would allocate funds to allow for additional improvements to the basement for plastering and painting, so the museum could be open by the beginning of December. She noted the work completed by the Historical Society to date, and indicated that they could not complete the work without assistance. She indicated that since it was a City owned building, staff would like to be able to assist them. "WIll Mayor Buckley inquired if this work would include the handicapped ramp, electrical work, etc. Assistant City Manager Best clarified that it would include plastering, painting and water damage repair. George Alongi, noted that he was working with the Historical Society on this project, and indicated that the best investment was in life, self and family. He suggested that this was home to the Lake Elsinore family and would make the building more valuable. He indicated that it was still a great building, and the group had saved a lot of money on electrical work, as he supervised the work himself. He advised that the plastering would be quite extensive because they were not sure how much was involved; and the "WIll Agenda Item No. \. b . Page 38' of if " /"" Page Thirty-Nine - City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 painting would be no problem. He stressed the dedication of the volunteers, and requested that the Council consider this item. Councilman Magee noted the presence of Historical Society representatives and inquired if they had any input on this matter. Donna Morin indicated that they greatly appreciated what the City was considering doing, and noted that they were hoping to be open for Christmas. She noted that it might not be as elaborate as they would like it to be, but advised that their funds would provide the finishing touches. She advised that the people of Lake Elsinore had provided great support to the museum, and looked forward to displaying the exhibits with pride. She requested consideration of this item and thanked the Council for their consideration. /"" J.J. Swanson, noted that the museum will also be a research library. She commented that the current library was heavily used on issues of Lake Elsinore. She stressed that this was a much needed facility for the community. She expressed appreciation for this consideration. Councilman Schiffner indicated that he had no strong feelings on this, but inquired when the facility was open, if there was a separate access. Assistant City Manager Best indicated that it would be a separate entrance and the Council facility could not be accessed from the downstairs. Councilman Hickman noted that he went into the building when the Historical Society first moved in, and commented that they had done a lot of hard work. He offered his support to their efforts. Mayor Pro Tern Kelley indicated that the Historical Society had already invested $30,000 of their own dollars; so she concurred with Mr. Alongi that the City needed to invest in the project. /"" Agenda Item No. \ · b. Page 3 q of L/ 50 Page Forty - City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 ...." MOVED BY KELLEY, SECONDED BY SCHIFFNER AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO AUTHORIZE STAFF TO PROCEED WITH THE ANTICIPATED REPAIRS, AND THAT THE FUNDING BE ALLOCATED FROM THE GENERAL FUND UNALLOCATED RESERVES TO COVER THE COST OF IMPROVEMENTS. 37. Update on Special Audit - Verbal Report. Mayor Buckley noted that the sub-committee was handling this item, and deferred to Councilman Magee. Councilman Magee commented that four weeks ago, the sub-committee came to the Council with recommendations to choose a contractor to respond to the request for proposal to audit benefits and expenditures in the City. He advised that late last week the auditing firm quit. He indicated that he and the Mayor had discussed it briefly and they looked at the other four bidders and placed a call to the second choice fund. He indicated that between 4 and 6 p.m. today he received a phone message from a representative of Conard & Associates, indicating that they would be interested in continuing with the audit. He requested that Council allow them to meet with Conard and bring back a recommendation in two weeks for approval. '"""'" Ron LaPere, 16867 Wells, expressed hopes that the sub-committee would spell out with due diligence the scope, and depth of the audit, and the fees attached, so the City could get on with the normal work of the City. Mayor Buckley indicated that they had already written a clear and proper scope of work. He advised that they would be back in a couple of weeks with a recommendation. ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR 5. Award of Contract - Dust Control- South Western Sealcoating. Inc. - '-' Agenda Item No. I.b. Page ~of Lf.b ,,- Page Forty-One - City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 $72.483.84. /'"'" Edith Stafford, 29700 Hursh, indicated that she wanted to speak on this item, but she didn't know quite what it was. She advised that she was having a dust problem for the last four months, that did not seem to get better. She indicated that she had spoken with the Public Works Inspector Mr. Stover, and he was very nice, but the dust kept coming. She noted that she did not even wash her car anymore, because it was dusty the next day. She suggested that the Council look at developers doing a project in the City, and make sure it was stipulated that they watered their property down. She noted she followed a truck on Machado that left a dust cloud, and stressed that something needed to be done about the dust. She stressed the problems with dust in her house, her computers, etc. She reiterated that she was not quite sure what this issue was about and requested strong stipulations to developers, since no one wanted to take responsibility. Assistant City Manager Best clarified that this item was to provide magnesium-chloride on the dirt streets to alleviate some of the problems on dirt roads throughout the City. Councilman Hickman clarified for Mrs. Stafford that the magnesium- chloride would be spread on the roads in the Spring. He indicated that he was sorry it wouldn't help right now, but he would make sure the developers watered the ground. MOVED BY BUCKLEY, SECONDED BY KELLEY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT AGREEMENT WITH SOUTH WESTERN SEALCOA TING, INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $72,483.84, TO PROVIDE DUST CONTROL SERVICES. THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS RECESSED AT 8:25 P.M. ,,- Agenda Item No. '.10.. Page~of L{~ Page Forty-Two - City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 "-" THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS RECONVENED AT 8:26 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS - 3 MINUTES No Comments. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS Assistant City Manager Best commented on the following: 1) Extended Congratulations to Administrative Services Director Pressey on the birth of their sixth child, daughter Shannon Hope Pressey. 2) Announced that Mr. Bill Arnold would be installed on the Public Safety Commission, tomorrow evening. She noted his presence at this meeting. ......, 3) Extended Congratulations to the Country Club Heights Committee on their hard work. 4) Announced that the City Council would have a Study Session on Ethics and Conflicts of Interest this Thursday at 5 p.m. 5) Announced that the City Council would have a Study Session regarding Branding/City Logo next Thursday at 5 p.m. 6) Requested clarification on the request for a policy regarding group requests for additional funding. She inquired if it was the consensus of the Council to move forward on that item. Mayor Pro Tern Kelley confirmed that it was part of the motion. "-"" Agenda Item No. , . b · Page~of~ r'" Page Forty-Three - City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 7) Thanked the staff for filling in during the absence of the City Manager. CITY ATTORNEY COMMENTS City Attorney Leibold commented on the following: ,-... 1) Announced that the Council met in Closed Session regarding one case of anticipated litigation with no reportable action. 2) Responded to questions regarding last night's Electoral Reform Committee Meeting, and clarified that it was an ad hoc advisory committee, subject to the Brown Act requirements. She indicated that the posting was in compliance and provided the opportunity at the beginning of the meeting for public comments. She indicated that the Chairwoman had made it very clear that there was only one opportunity for public comment. She clarified that the attorney had not said she could not discuss individual items, but rather the will of the Chairwoman and the Committee. She explained that the noted portion of the Brown Act required that there be allowance for the public to speak before or during the consideration of the item. She clarified that there was no policy requiring the same format for committees as the City Council. She noted that the Committee was considering a policy on ad hoc committees to address this issue, but stressed that their meeting was conducted professionally with no violations. COMMITTEE REPORTS No Reports. CITY TREASURER COMMENTS r'" City Treasurer Weber commented on the following: Agenda Item No. \ .b. Page~of y ~ Page Forty-Four - City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 ...., 1) Noted that at the 4 p.m. meeting he discussed the Southshore and Wasson Canyon items, and advised that he would be meeting with the Finance Team next week to decide what to do with the $2.6 million that will be coming in. He indicated that they would be moving forward to make sure it went where it belonged. CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilman Schiffner had no comments. Councilman Hickman commented on the following: 1) Offered kudos to the citizens that dropped off trash at the Diamond Stadium. He suggested that if anyone missed the event, they could call CR & R to schedule a special pick up. '-"" 2) Encouraged the public to work with the Chamber of Commerce on the food drive for HOPE. Mayor Pro Tern Kelley commented on the following: 1) Thanked the Country Club Heights Committee members, and noted that they worked hard and did an excellent job. 2) Offered congratulations to Pastor Rodriguez and the First Assembly of God Church, noting the grand opening of the new church on Grand Avenue. She noted that it was a beautiful church. 3) Noted that the Art and Wine Festival was well attended. 4) Noted that the Cancer Society Walk for Life was held the same day and was a very successful, moving event. She noted that she and the Mayor had attended the event; and the Mayor handed out medals. She indicated that the event was held in honor of a past student of hers. Agenda Item No. \ .10- Page 44 of~ '-"" ~ Page Forty-Five - City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 Councilman Magee commented on the following: 1) Indicated that he needed help from staff, as he had been inundated by concerns regarding the motocross race track. He indicated that he had been accosted by students, business owners and patrons of the park, as there is some sort of rumor that the park was closing or that the City Council took action to close the park. He indicated that needed to be corrected, as it was not the case. He suggested that the Press could help correct that interpretation, and recommended that the staff do a release to clarify the facts. He indicated that for all of the motocross enthusiasts, the park was staying, and noted that there would also be the Grand Prix in November. Mayor Buckley commented on the following: ~ 1) Noted that he did not attend the last Council Meeting as he was attending a Vector Control Conference in Boston. He noted that no "' humans or horses had been found in this area with the virus so far, and indicated that California was doing a good job compared to other States. 2) Noted a copy of a letter from Rancho Santa Margarita regarding the road from Riverside County to Orange County and indicated that he would like to send a letter in response. The other Councilmembers concurred that he should send a letter. ~ Councilman Schiffner noted that at the last meeting regarding the road to Orange County, the organization was doing a study and had eliminated the existing Highway 74 from consideration; however Supervisor Buster, an Orange County Supervisor and himself had insisted that it be considered as an option. He stressed that it might be a better choice and the improvement would remove an existing danger. Agenda Item No. ,. b. Page~of y~ Page Forty-Six - City Council Minutes - October 12,2004 ....., 3) Announced the following upcoming events: October 22 - Red Ribbon Carnival - Lake Community Center October 23 - Cruise Night - Downtown October 31 - Safe Candy Night - Downtown November 2 - Election Day November 6 - Household Hazardous Waste Collection November 7 - Open Air Market November 12-14 - Elsinore Grand Prix November 20 - Unity in the ~ommunity Run and Parade December 3 - Snow on Main Street at Winterfest December 5 - Open Air Market 4) Addressed the audit and indicated that he and Councilman Magee were committed to make sure the audit happens. He indicated that they still did not have an adequate explanation as to what happened. He noted a memo from Assistant City Manager Best that suggested shelving the audit. He further noted that there were a great deal of very good people in City Hall, but commented that with regard to the audit, it was absolutely inappropriate for staff to malign the elected board. ....., ADJOURNMENT MAYOR BUCKLEY ADJOURNED THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 8:40 P.M. ATTEST: THOMAS BUCKLEY, MAYOR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE VICKI KASAD, CMC, CITY CLERK! HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR ....,. Agenda Item No. \. b ' Page~of L( 10 MINUTES r--- PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 2004 CALL TO ORDER; O1airman LaPere called the Regular Planning Cormnission Meeting to order at 6:01 PM. Vice O1airman O'Neal led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: LAPERE, LARIMER, O'NEAL, RYAN, AND UHLRY ~ ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None Also present were: Director of Community Development Brady, Planning and Code Enforcement Manager Villa, Engineering Manager Seumalo, Planning Consultant Donahoe, Associate Planner Coury, Associate Planner Miller, Associate Planner Preisendanz, Office Specialist Porche and Deputy Gty Attorney Miles. PUBLIC COMMENTS Jack Martin, 17454 Ryan, Lake Elsinore stated that he was in the process of moving his business which is currently located on Riverside Drive, due to the request of the new owner. He indicated that because he was moving to a different location, he needed to pay fees of $6,000 for the aJP. He requested that the fees be waived or lowered. He stated that he had not had any complaints, and would like his request to be considered. Chairman LaPere asked Mr. Martin how long he had the first CUP. Mr. Martin stated that he has had it for two years. Director Community Development Brady stated that the CUP fees were not transferable. r--- Cormnissioner Uhlryasked if the CUP could be changed to a Minor aJP. Agenda Item No \ .(,. page-Lo~ PAGE 2 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - September 07,2004 Director Commnnity Development Brady stated that the Gty did not have a Minor QJP process. He indicated that only the Gty Council could change the fee schedule. He stated that he would be happy to speak with Mr. Martin after the meeting to discuss his issues further. ......, Mr. Martin had no further comments. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes · August 17, 2004 - Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Chairman LaPere asked the Commission if there were any changes to the Minutes. Vice Chainnan O'Neal indicated that there was a correction to the August 17th Planning Commission Minutes, on page 15 of 16, under his comments. He stated that he would like to change the word "Recommendations" to "Opinion". Commissioner Larimer stated that she would like to make a change to the same Minutes, on page 7 of 16, paragraph 10. She stated that she would like to change the wording from "Should" to "She ......, 'l.R.aIld like ({) haw the tattoos limited to those that are not considered to be negative. She also indicated that on page 3 of 16, line 7, she would like the sentence to read; "What happened to the Open Space". She had no further corrections. Office Specialist Porche also indicated a necessary change to the same Minutes on page 9 of 16, the Motion should read; "Passed by a 3-0 vote with Larimer abstaining & Uhlry absent" . There were no other changes to the Minutes. Chairman LaPere asked the Commission if they would like to have any Consent Items pulled from the Calendar. Commissioner Uhlry requested to pull item No.3 from the Consent Calendar. Commissioner Larimer requested to pull item No.2 from the Consent Calendar. MOVED BY O'NEAL, SECONDED BY LARIMER AND PASSED BY A UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR, WITH THE NOTED CORRECTIONS TO THE MINUTES. Agenda It5: No I. t.. Page o~ ......, PAGE 3 - PLANNING COMMISSIONMINUfES - September 07, 2004 ,........., The following G:msent Calendar items were approved: 4. Minor Design Review of two (2) Single-Family Residences located at 32407 and 32545 Machado Avenue. APN 379-300-014. RESOLUTION NO. 2004-124 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF TWO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES LOCATED AT 32407 AND 32545 MACHADO AVENUE, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S) 379-300-009 AND 379-300-014. ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR 2. Minor Design Review for a Single Family Residence to be located at 16907 Sannelle r--. Stree~ APN 387-182-044.045. & 046. Chairman LaPere requested the reading of the Staff Report. Director of Community Development Brady stated that this was a request for a single-family residence to be located in the area known as Country Qub Heights, and requested that Associate Planner Miller review the project with the Commission. Associate Planner Miller stated that the applicant was requesting approval to place a 2,376 square foot pre-manufactured home and to build a 484 square foot detached garage on a 11,000 square foot lot. She indicated that the architectural design was a typical California Ranch with horizontal siding. She noted that all windows would have wide trim, and it would have an extended covered porch. She indicated that the applicant would provide an automatic irrigation system and landscaping for the front setback area, and a 6- foot Gty standard wooden fence would be provided. Associate Planner Miller indicated that this project met the minimum requirements of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, and had been deemed exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. She stated that Staff recommended that the Planning Commission approve and adopt a Resolution based on the Findings, Exhibits, and subject to the Conditions of Approval. She stated that the applicant was available to answer any questions that the Commission might have. Chairman LaPere requested the applicant to approach the podium. Agenda \m No 1., · Page o~ ",....-. PAGE 4 - PlANNING CDMMISSION :MINUTES - September 07,2004 Raul Hernandez, 217 Laurel Wood Court, Lake Elsinore, stated that he did not have anything to add to the report, and that he would be available to answer any questions. ....." Chainnan LaPere asked the applicant if he agreed to the Conditions of Approval. Mr. Hernandez stated "Yes". There being no further comments from the applicant, the discussion was brought back to the Commission. Commissioner Larimer stated that the landscape was fine, however she stated that she had concerns with the paperwork that she received. She asked the applicant if he had any other drawings to submit. Mr. Hernandez stated that he did not have anything else to submit, other than what his contractor had already submitted. Commissioner Larimer had no further comments. Vice Chairman O'Neal had no comments. Commissioner Uhlry indicated that he found the Design Review acceptable, as this was a manufactured home. He stated that he drove by the property today and noted that the applicant will ...." have some extensive grading to do. He had no further comments Commissioner Ryan had no comments. Chainnan LaPere stated that the manufactured home would need to meet the same requirements as a stick built home. He noted that the porch was not shown on the drawings. He asked the applicant if he would be providing a wrought-iron fence. Associate Planner Miller stated "No, just a standard wooden fence" . Chainnan LaPere asked if there would be additional landscaping. Associate Planner Miller stated, "Just the standard requirements" . Chairman LaPere had no further comments. Mr. Hernandez stated that he would like to upgrade the wooden fence to a block wall. There being no further comments from the Commission, Chairman LaPere requested the reading of the Resolution. Agenda Item No ,. c, . Page~o~ ...." PAGE 5 - PLANNING CO:MMISSION MINUTES - September 07,2004 /"" MOVED BY UHLRY, SECONDED BY O'NEAL AND PASSED BY 4-1 VOTE WITH LARIMER OPPOSING TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2004-122, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 16907 SANNELLE STREET - APN 378-182-044 & 046. 3. Minor Design Review for a Single Family Residence to be located at 29425 Pinnell Street APN 378-161-016. 017. & 018. Chairman LaPere requested the reading of the Staff Report. Director of Community Development Brady stated that this was a request for a Minor Design Review of a single-family residence, and requested that Associate Planner review it with the Commission. Associate Planner Miller stated that the applicant was proposing to 'construct a conventionally built 3,011 square foot two-story residence with an attached 451 square foot garage. She stated that the structure would be constructed on a 15,316 square foot irregularly shaped lot. She indicated that the architecture proposed was Italianate. She noted that the applicant proposed to use a flat roof for both the main residence and the attached garage, which was typical of the Italianate style. She /"" stated that the applicant would provide automatic sprinkler system in the front yard, and a 6-foot decorative masonry wall with pilasters around the entire rear and side property lines. She indicated that the applicant would also propose constructing a 3-foot masonry wall with 3 feet of tubular steel fencing along the front property line. Associate Planner Miller stated that Staff supported this project and recommended that the Planning Commission approve and adopt a Resolution, based on the Findings, Exhibits, and subject to the Conditions of Approval. She stated that the applicant was available to answer any questions that the Commission might have. Chairman LaPere requested that the applicant approach the podium. Mr. John T. Oswell, 123 South Roosevelt Avenue, Pasadena stated that he would be available to answer any questions that the Commission might have. Chairman LaPere asked the applicant if he had read and agreed to the Conditions of Approval. Mr. Oswell stated "Yes". There being no further comments, Chairman LaPere brought the discussion back to the table. /"" Agenda Ite~o , . ~ · Page~o~ PAGE 6 - PLANNING CD:MMISSION MINUTES - September 07,2004 Commissioner Uhhy asked Staff to clarify why they were asking for a 6- foot block wall and the wrought-iron fence. He stated that he would prefer to see a J.- 2 foot block wall with ~ 3 feet of tubular steel. ......" Mr. Oswell indicated that on the plans it showed that there would be a J.- 2 foot block wall and ~ 3 feet of tubular steel, so he stated that it must have been a typo in the report. Commissioner Ryan asked for clarification of the set backs. He asked if the rear set back would be adjusted for the 16 feet. Mr. Oswell stated that the lot was "L" shaped, so the side yard would be 5-foot set back, and the rear would be 15- foot set back Commissioner Ryan had no further comments. Vice Chairman O'Neal had no comments. Commissioner Larimer stated that she really liked the look of the project. She had no other comments. Chairman LaPere had no comments. There being no further comments, Chairman LaPere requested the reading of the Resolution. '-' MOVED BY UHLRY, SECONDED BY RYAN, PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 2004- U3, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 29425 PINNELL STREET, APN 378-161-016, 017, & 018. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. Tentative Parcel Map No. 32575, Ms. Alicia Graff Chairman LaPere opened the Public Hearing at 6:35 P.M and requested the reading of the Staff Report. Director of Community Development Brady stated that this project was a request to subdivide two vacant parcels of land into 4 single-family lots, and requested that Planning Manager Villa review it with the Commission. Agond. I'f" No \. L-. Page~o~ ......" PAGE 7 - PLANNING CDMMISSIONMINUI'ES - September 07, 2004 ".-... Planning and Code Enforcement Manager Villa stated that the applicant requesting to subdivide 2.78 acres into four single-family residential lots. He stated that the two separate parcels of land were located at the terminus of Larson Road, approximately 850 feet northwest of the intersection of Larson Road and Machado. He stated that the subdivision would create 'l2-acre lots for an overall density of .70 dwelling units per acre. He noted that the proposed subdivision met and exceeded the development standards of the &1 Zoning District. He noted that Staff supports this project,. and recommends that the Planning Commission approve and adopt a Resolution, based on the Findings, Exhibits and was subject to the Conditions of Approval. He stated that the applicant was available to answer any questions that the Commission might have. Chairman LaPere requested that the applicant approach the podium. Ms. Alicia Graff, 3580 Gerry Blossom Lane, stated that she agreed with the Staff Report. She asked Staff if she was still required to provide curbs and gutters, per Condition No. 23, even though the rest of the street did not have curbs and gutters. Director of Community Development Brady stated that the Condition was per the Oty's Standards. Chairman LaPere asked the applicant if she agreed to the Conditions of Approval. ..r-. Ms. Graff stated "Yes". Chairman LaPere requested comments from the public. Mr. John Hawkins, 15040 Larson Road, Lake Elsinore, indicated that he had lived in the city for 2 'l2 years near the project. He indicated that most of the parcels in the area are one acre or more. He noted that this project would not be consistent with the surrounding area. He asked if the lots would be consistent with the approach to the driveway. He also asked if the bridge would support the heavy equipment that would be used for constructing this project. Lastly, he stated that the area was located in the flood plain. He asked if this project would cause potential flooding. Lee Tompkins, Larson Road, Lake Elsinore stated that he had the same concerns that Mr. Hawkins had. He stated that in addition to the concerns mentioned, he also had concerns with the road conditions, and if there were any plans for street improvements. There being no further comments from the public, Chairman LaPere brought the discussion back to the table. Commissioner Uhlry noted that the lot sizes were governed by the existing Zoning. He stated that with regard to the designs of the driveways, it would be up to the individual person. He noted that he too had concerns with the bridge. He indicated that Engineering would need to look at the bridge. He noted that the flood control channel was also a concern, however this was just a Agenda Item No \ · c.. Page+o~ .r- PAGE 8 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - September 07, 2004 Tentative Parcel Map, and there were still issues that would need to be worked out before Design Review. He asked for the Engineering Manager to address this concern. He had no further comments. ......" Engineering Manager Seumalo stated that the Hydrology Analysis would give the details of what effect it would have on the project. Commissioner Larimer stated that she concurred with Commissioner Uhlry's concerns. She asked if there were any other questions from the public. Mr. Hawkins asked Staff if the area would ever be considered for sewer. Director of Community Development Brady stated that the sewer would be provided by EVMWD which was not part of the Gty, and if the property is beyond 200 feet from the existing sewer line, they would not be able to hook up. Commissioner Larimer asked if the applicant would be occupying any of the homes. Ms. Graff stated that all family members would be occupying the homes that would be built on the lots. Commissioner Larimer asked if they would be custom or tract homes. ....., Ms. Graff stated that they would be custom homes. Commissioner Larimer had no further comments. Vice Chairman O'Neal concurred with Commissioner Uhhy recommendations. He also advised Mr. Hawkins that this was not a Design Review. He stated that he concurred with Staff's recommendations, and had no further comments. Commissioner Ryan asked Staff who maintained the bridge. Director of Community Development Brady stated that it was a public street. Commissioner Ryan stated that he too had concerns with the potential flooding and the bridge. He had no further comments. Chairman LaPere had no comments. There being no further comments, Chairman LaPere closed the Public Hearing at 6:50 P.M., and requested the reading of the Resolution. Agenda I~ No \.t.... . Page~ o~ ....., PAGE 9 - PLANNING COMMISSION:MINUTES - September 07, 2004 r"' MOVED BY O'NEAL, SECONDED BY RYAN AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 2004-124, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE aTY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 32575. 6. Zone Change No. 2004-09. Tentative Tract Map No. 31792 and Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2004-06 for Wasson Canyon Investments. L.P. (Eastbridge Partners). O1ainnan LaPere opened the Public Hearing at 6:51 P.M, and requested the reading of the Staff Report. Director of Community Development Brady stated that this was a request for a TIM No. 31792, Zone O1ange and a Mitigated Negative Declaration, and requested Planning Consultant Donahoe review it with the Commission. Planning Consultant Donahoe stated that the applicant was requesting approval of a Tentative Tract Map which subdivided approximately 59.4 acres of vacant property into 191 single family residential lots and 9 Open Space lots. She stated that in order to accommodate this process, it would be necessary to have this project accompanied by a Zone O1ange for a portion of the property from r"' Rural Residential to R-1 Single-Family Residential. She stated that a Mitigation Monitoring Program was prepared for this project, and the applicant requested adoption of those documents. She stated that this project was an extension of the Ramsgate Specific Plan, and the two Tentative Tract Maps that were adjacent to the project. Planning Consultant Donahoe stated that the proposed lot sizes were at a minimum of 6,000 square feet, rather than the 4,000 and 5,000 square feet in the Specific Plan. She stated that the frontages would have widths of 60 feet, which is also larger than the 50 feet in the Specific Plan, which complied with the R-1 Zoning Code standards. Planning Consultant Donahoe read a letter into the record from the Henry's that gave support to the project. She also received a letter from Bruce Eichorn with Dud's Ranch who was opposed to the project. She stated that a copy of Mr. Eichorn's letter was forward to the Otis Attorney Office. She stated that Staff supported this project, and recommended that the Planning Commission approve and adopt a Resolution based on the Findings, Exhibits, and subject to the Conditions of Approval. She indicated that she would like to make a change to the Conditions of Approval. She stated that Commissioner Uhlry had brought to her attention that Condition No. 88 and 89 were repetitious, and recommended that Condition No. 89 be deleted, and the wording in Condition No. 88 modified. O1airman LaPere requested Deputy Oty Attorney Miles to address the opposition letter from Mr. Eichorn that addressed a number of improvements that should have been completed on the r- Agenda I~ No \ .~. page~o~ PAGE 10 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUfES - September 07,2004 property, arising out of Community Facilities District No. 90-3. He stated that this property was subject to a workout agreement with respect to CFD 90-3. He stated that there was a land development agreement for this property that would provide this property with the appropriate terms on how the project would proceed. '-' Chairman LaPere requested that Mr. Fitzpatrick to approach the podium. Mr. Fitzpatrick, Director of Development with Eastbridge Partners stated that he submitted an aerial photo, which outlined three areas. He pointed that the one area called Rosetta Canyon Estates, Wasson Canyon, Phases 1 and 2. He stated that the project is an older project that was approved in 1990. He stated that he had no objections to the Staff Report and would be available for comments. Chairman LaPere asked Mr. Fitzpatrick if he agreed to the Conditions of Approval. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated "Yes". Chairman LaPere asked Mr. Shopoff to approach the podium Mr. Bill Shopoff, 114 Pacifica, Irvine, stated that he concurred with Deputy Gty Attorney Miles comments regarding the workout agreement. He stated that Mr. Eichorn was not fully informed of all of the issues. ~ There being no further comments from the public, discussion was brought back to the Commission for comments. Vice Chairman O'Neal stated that Staff's presentation was very thorough, and concurred with Staff recommendations. Commissioner Larimer also concurred with Staff recommendations, and had no further comments. Commissioner Ryan asked if there would be a traffic signal provided. Mr. Fitzpatrick indicated "Yes". Commissioner Ryan had no further comments. Commissioner Uhlry stated that he felt that the placement of the traffic signal was too close to the other signal. He stated that he did not want to create a Wmchester Road situation. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that it would improve the traffic. Commissioner UhIry stated that he would still like to see the traffic signal removed. Agenda Item No \. t. . Page~o~ '-' PAGE 11- PLANNING COMMISSIONMINUfES - September 07, 2004 ~ Engineering Manager Seumalo stated that the traffic signal conformed with the GIS program. He stated that spacing was sufficient between signals. He stated that it would help with the flow of traffic. He indicated that Staff was working with Cal- Trans, but Cal- Trans was in Control. Commissioner Uhlry stated that he is still not convinced that a traffic signal was needed. Engineering Manager Seumalo stated that he would be more than happy to discuss the issue further. Planning Consultant Donahoe stated that a Traffic Study was conducted. She stated that the traffic signal would help mitigate the impacts of the project. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that he did not object to providing the signal. He stated that this project would connect with 3'd Street from Rosetta Estates and, there would be more traffic flow. Commissioner Uhlry stated that he would withdraw his objection to the traffic signal. He had no further comments. Chairman LaPere asked the estimated size of the Open Lots. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that they consisted of 11.3 acres. He stated that primarily the open space consisted of slopes. r- Chairman LaPere asked if the HOA would maintain this area. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated "Yes they would" . Chairman LaPere asked if there were plans for a school in the project. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated, "Yes, that the School District has purchased 14 acres". Chairman LaPere had no further comments. Commissioner Uhlry asked if the improvements would be done some time during the development of the project. Mr. Shopoff stated that the improvements would be about the same time, but not exactly. There being no further comments Chairman LaPere closed the Public Hearing at 7:24 P.M and requested the reading of the Resolutions. ~ Agenda Item No \. ( . Page-l-!- o~ PAGE 12 - PLANNING CDMMISSION MINUI'ES - September 07,2004 MOVED BY O'NEAL, SECONDED BY RYAN AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 2004-126, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE aTY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE aTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ADOPTION OF MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-06 AND THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM THEREOF, FOR ZONE CHANGE NO. 2004-09, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 31792, ON APPROXIMATELY 59.4:t ACRES LOCATED SOUTHEAST OF HIGHWAY 74, NORTHEAST OF INTERSTATE 15, AND EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF CONARD AVENUE AND THIRD STREET, AND KNOW AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS 347-330-045, 046, 050 THRU 053; 347-330-019; 347-360-003, 004 AND 005. MOVED BY RYAN, SECONDED BY O'NEAL AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 2004-127, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE aTY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE aTY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. 2004-09, CHANGING THE ZONING FROM "RR- RURAL RESIDENTIAL" TO "R-1 - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL," ON APPPROXIMATELY 31.24:t ACRES LOCATED SOUTHEAST OF HIGHWAY 74, NORTHEAST OF INTERSTATE 15, AND EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF CONARD AVENUE AND THIRD STREET, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 347-330-045, 046,016,018 AND 019. MOVED BY UHLRY, SECONDED BY O'NEAL AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 2004-128, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE aTY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE aTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 31792, A SUBDIVISION OF 191 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND NINE OPEN SPACE LOTS, ON APPROXIMATELY 59.4:t ACRES LOCATED SOUTHEAST OF HIGHWAY 74, NORTHEAST OF INTERSTATE 15, AND EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF CONARD AVENUE AND THIRD STREET, AND KNOW AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS 347-330-045, 046, 050 THRU 053; 347-330-019; 347-360-003, 004 AND 005. Commissioner Larimer reconnnended to the applicant that when this project came back for the Design Review that the homes be unique. 7. Tentative Gmdominium Map No. 32670. Residential Design Review No. 2004-10 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-24 for "Belcaro". Chairman LaPere opened the Public Hearing at 7:28 P.M., and requested the reading of the Staff Report. Agenda Ile~ No \ · c, . Page---I-.L- o~ ....."" ......" ...., PAGE 13 - PLANNING mMMISSION :MINUTES - September 07, 2004 .-... Director of Community Development Brady stated that this was an application for a Design Review, CUP and a TCM and requested Associate Planner Preisendanz to review it with the Commission. Associate Planner Preisendanz stated that the project consists of 141 units Condominium Community located on the south side of Lakeshore Drive between Lake Park and Elm Street within the East Lake Specific Plan. He indicated that this project would consist of twenty-seven two story wood framed buildings, for 141 individually owned units. He stated that the access to the site would be made available by way of a non-gated central driveway located off Lakeshore Drive. He noted that a gate controlled emergency secondary access would be provided on the east boundary of the property towards the rear of the complex. Associate Planner Preisendanz indicated that the Recreation Area would consist of a swimming pool, Jacuzzi, Tot-Lot and a bathroom/maintenance building. He indicated that two issues had been resolved with the applicant. He stated that one of the issues was regarding the secondary access. He stated that the second issue that had been resolved concerned the 60 LDN (Interior Day- Night average sound level) noise standards. He stated that the project was consisted with the subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations and the conservation goals and maintenance of the habitat connections to the adjacent Cells. Associate Planner Preisendanz stated that Staff supported this project, and recommended to the Planning Commission that they approve and adopt a Resolution based on the Findings, Exhibits, and was subject to the Conditions of Approval. He .-.... indicated that the applicant was available to answer any questions that the Commission might have. Chairman LaPere requested the applicant to approach the podium. Mr. Chris Faber, Senior Project Manager with DR Horton, 119 N. Maple Street, Ste. A, Corona stated that his team was available to answer any questions that the Commission might have. Chairman LaPere asked the applicant if he agreed to the Conditions of Approval. Mr. Faber stated that he would like to discuss Condition No.6. Associate Planner Preisendanz stated that the wording could be changed to state, "Prior to the first Certificates of Occupancy' . Chairman LaPere asked the applicant if he agreed to this change. Mr. Faber stated that he agreed to the Conditions of Approval to include the amended Condition No.6. There being no further comments from Mr. Faber, Chairman LaPere requested Mr. Peck to give his presentation. .-.... Ag,oda ",to 1.~. Page I o~ PAGE 14 - PLANNING CDMMISSIONMINlJfES - September 07, 2004 Mr. Peck gave a brief overhead presentation. After the presentation, Chainnan LaPere brought the discussion back to the Commission. """" Commissioner Uhlry indicated that he questioned the 1,266 Flood elevations. He indicated that FEMA has established the elevation at 1,267. He noted that the Staff report stated that the finished floors would be at 1,264 feet plus a J 2-foot wave wash. He stated that he had concerns with the potential flooding. He stated that he would be a lot happier to maintain the elevation at 1,267'. Engineering Manager Seumalo stated that he had been working with the Engineer for this project. He indicated that 1,264' was the minimum, and 1,267' was the elevation that he had required around the lake unless they had provided a wave run up study. He indicated that this project did complete a wave run up study. He noted that he read the study and felt very comfortable with the results as it pertained to the FEMA elevations and the Ordinance that the Gty had in place. Commissioner Uhlry stated that he did not like the idea of lowering the elevation. He indicated that he hoped that this would not set precedence on any new projects coming into this area. Commissioner Uhlry asked about Condition No. 15, which stated that the applicant would either provide in-lieu fees or provide affordable units. He asked the applicant which one they would be doing. Mr. Faber indicated that they would be paying the in-lieu fees. Commissioner Uhlry asked if the water rights were deeded to the Gty or if they belonged to Elsinore Water District. ......, Engineering Manager Seumalo stated that per the Ordinance, the water rights were deeded to the Gty, and since the water district was no longer a part of the Gty, the Gty deed it back to the Water District. He stated that they had an agreement with the developer to provide water. Commissioner Uhlry asked if the Ordinance needed to be modified. Engineering Manager Seumalo stated that he would need to review the Ordinance. Deputy Gty Attorney Miles stated that there was a conveyance with the Gty's water system to Elsinore Valley. He stated that it was a subject matter that EVMWD handled with the property owners. Commissioner Uhlry indicated that Condition No. 68 stated that there would be signs posted in the complex to include No Parking and Street Sweeping Signs. He asked if the Gty now allowed street sweeping in Condominiums. Agenda Item No \.c, · Page-1.Y-o~ ~ PAGE 15 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - September 07, 2004 ~ Engineering Manager Seumalo stated that this was a standard condition that was overlooked, and would not have the street sweeping signs placed within the complex. Commissioner Uhlry had no further comments. Commissioner Ryan stated that he too had concerns with the in-lieu fees versus affordable housing, however noted that the RDA was addressing some of the concerns. He concurred with the flood issues as well. He had no further comments. Vice Chairman O'Neal thanked Staff and the applicant for the professional presentation. He stated that the drawings and the rendering of the project were the best he had seen, since he had been a Planning Commissioner. He stated that he supported Staff's recommendations. Commissioner Larimer concurred with Commissioner Uhlry's comments. She indicated that she did not like lowering the standards. She asked the applicant where the name "Belcaro" came from. Mr. Fabe'r stated that it was a management decision. Commissioner Larimer inquired that the entry sign was not on the plans. Mr. Faber indicated that the entry sign was still under design. ,-... Commissioner Larimer had no further comments. Chairman LaPere asked the applicant if they were going to be bringing in any dirt for grading purposes. Mr. Faber stated "No", that this was a non-import job. Chairman LaPere asked if the wave run-off would be at 1,267'. Engineering Manager Seumalo stated that it was 1,267' unless they provided a wave run-up study. Chairman LaPere stated that he would prefer to stick with 1,267' to be consistent. Deputy Gty Attorney Miles stated that the Ordinance states that the elevation is 1,264' plus 3 feet for wave run-up, and within those 3 feet there was a discretionary allotment for Staff to make a determination that it could be reduced from 3 feet. He stated that technically it would not be lowering the standard. He noted that Staff was dealing with requirements plus a discretionary 3 feet for wave run up. He asked the Engineering Manager if there was a fonnal wave run-off analysis, and if so, then it should be entered into the record. Engineering Manager Seumalo concurred. ,-... Agenda Item No , .c,.. Page-1..S- o~ PAGE 16 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - September 07, 2004 ~ Vice Chairman O'Neal stated that he was comfortable with the elevation at 1,266'. Chairman LaPere thanked Deputy Gty Attorney Miles for that explanation. He asked Staff if a traffic signal would be provided. En~ineering Manager Seumalo stated that there would not be one provided for this particular project. Chairman LaPere had no further comments. Commissioner Uhlry asked the applicant how many pads would be at 1,268 ' verses 1,266'. Mr. Faber stated that only one pad would be at 1,266' and 8 pads would be at 1,267' or above. Commissioner Larimer asked the Commission if they had made a decision. to what the elevation should be. Chairman LaPere stated that Staff recommended the elevation at 1,266'. There being no further comments, Chairman LaPere closed the Public Hearing at 8:14 P.M., and requested the reading of the Resolutions. '-'" MOVED BY RYAN, SECONDED BY O'NEAL AND PASSED WITH A 4-0 VOTE WITH UHLRY ABSTAINING, RESOLUfION NO. 2004-129, A RESOLUfION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP NO. 32670 FOR "BELCARO" A RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM COMPLEX TO BE LOCATED WITHIN PLANNING AREAS(S) AND 4 AND 5 OF THE EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S) 373-221-032-057. MOVED BY O'NEAL, SECONDED BY RYAN AND PASSED WITH A 4-0 VOTE WITH UHLRY ABSTAINING, RESOLUTION NO. 2004-130, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE OTY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2004-10 FOR THE DESIGN CONSTRUCTION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF "BELCARO" A RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM COMPLEX TO BE LOCATED WITHIN PLANNING AREA(S) 4 AND 5 OF THE EAST LAKE SPEOFIC PLAN, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S) 373-221-032-057. Agenda Item No , · c. · Page~ or.=:n=- '-'" PAGE 17 - PLANNING COMMISSIONMINUIES - September 07, 2004 ~ MOVED BY O'NEAL, SECONDED BY LARIMER AND PASSED WITH A 4-0 VOTE WITH UHLRY ABSTAINING, RESOLUTION NO. 2004-131, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2004-24 FOR THE EST ABLISHMENT OF "BELCARO" A RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM COMPLEX TO BE LOCATED WITHIN PLANNING AREA(S) 4 AND 5 OF THE EAST LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S) 373-221-032-057. BUSINESS ITEMS None INFORMATIONAL /"" Director of Community Development Brady reminded the Commission of the EDC luncheon that would be held on Thursday. STAFF COMMENTS Director of Community Development Brady commented on the following: . He welcomed Commissioner Uhlry back . He also congratulated Associate Planner Coury on his new daughter that was born the last week of August. He stated that this was the third child for Associate Planner Coury. Office Specialist Porche commented on the following: . She indicated that she received a call from Lake Elsinore San Jacinto Watershed Authority, requesting responses from the Commission on who would be attending the Lake Mixer Dedication to be held on September 16. Commissioner Larimer and Ryan stated that they would be attending the Mixer. r-- Agenda Iiem No \.~ · pageno~ PAGE 18 - PLANNING CDMMISSION:MINUTES - September 07, 2004 Planning & Code Enforcement Manager Villa commented on the following: """" · He wanted to thank Staff for all of their hard work preparing the packages for the Commission. PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS Chairman LaPere commented on the following: · He briefly discussed an article that was printed in the newspaper regarding Director of Community Development Brady, and expressed his support for Mr. Brady on how well he did his job Vice Chairman O'Neal commented on the following: . He welcomed Commissioner Uhlry back · He l\'ilnted to cxpress that he was pleased to hcar that after voting against the Laing Homes project, due to the size of the lots, that Laing Homes had decreased the number of homes, and increased the a","Cmge si3c of lots to 6,000. Howcy-cr, he did not appfO"."C of the artide that WllS written up with regard to Mr. :Brady. Cffer the fdkming CXJn1lrEJ1ts: 'c.4s Sam! if}aJ are awre, I did na support the first Jdm Lai"6 Ham:s prefect for the h:uk !::usin nor did I support the rrcxJification if the East Lake Spedfic Plan I me to me na for the Prqect primlrily!::used on the niserly fa: size5, zero fa: 1m and ninimd public sCOfJin& I purjX$ely did na express n:sercations abaa the scierre I WlS happy txJ sre that fdkming Canril action Laing cam! h:uk txJ the table Wth 500 feuer hom:s am 6000 square fax minirrnm fa: size5. Gorx: uere the zero fa: 1m. The glf crurse WlS king ronstrua:ed at the /;egjnning if phase on:! rxx seren ;ears later. Certainly na erer;thing I had hq;ed for but a ~ wnpranise Sony for the narratiw I'D fP txJ the JXint here in a socond Enter at the last 11VfJ'I?r1t the Camty if Riwrside; rmking 'lRhat is a ~ if Wid dam, rmranic dJsercations, threatening and rather afte innuenda, and ~ Wth 'lRhat am anly k Ueued as a suspect and sperims daim if assault. Frequently Mr. Brady and I disagree. Neu;r 0/1(I! has Mr. Brady eu;r display:d any frustration or a11[p- quite the oppaite. He is ~,jrierK1ly am a true prrfe5sional. He mifi;t k surprised howrrany people acras the bo::J.rd find him txJ k an excellent public errplayee, and excellent rrana[p. But dm't tell himl said " sa """" Commissioner Larimer commented on the following: · She concurred with Commissioner O'Neal and LaPere's comments. · She indicated that she was glad to see Commissioner Uhlry back Agenda Item No '.t. Page-lt- o~ "" PAGE 19 - PLANNING CDMMISSION MINUTES - September 07,2004 I"'"'"' Corrunissioner Ryan commented on the following: . He concurred with the comments toward Director of Community Development Brady. . He welcomed Commissioner Uh1ry back Corrunissioner Uh1ry commented on the following: . He wanted thank everyone for all the support. He indicated that he was feeling much better and was glad to be back . He also concurred on Vice Chairman O'Neal's comments toward Director of Community Development Brady and was very upset to read the comments that were written about Mr. Brady. ADJOURNMENT THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, CHAIRMAN LAPERE ADJOURNED THE MEETING AT 8:30 PM ON SEPTEMBER 7,2004. /"' Ron LaPere, Chairman Respectfully Submitted, Dana C Porche Office Specialist III A TrEST: Robert A Brady, Secretary to the Planning Corrunission ,~ ltalKs indicates addition to text, strilt-ethrough indicates removal from text. I"'"'"' AgendaItemNO~ Page ~ of--'--!- MINUTES ~ PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 21, 2004 CALL TO ORDER: Chainnan LaPere called the Regular Planning Commission Meeting to order at 6:01 PM. Commissioner Larimer led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: LAPERE, O'NEAL, AND LARIMER RYAN AND UHLRY ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ,.......... Also present were: Director of Community Development Brady, Planning and Code Enforcement Manager Villa, Engineering Manager Seumalo, Senior Planner Morita, Associate Planner Miller, Community Development Technician Hennings, Office Specialist Porche and Deputy Gty Anomey Miles. PUBLIC COMMENTS None CONSENT CALENDAR The following item was pulled from the Consent Calendar for further discussion and consideration: Item No.3. MOVED BY O'NEAL, SECONDED BY LARIMER, AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE TO APPROVED THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. The following Minutes were approved: ~ Agenda Itim No. ,.~. page~o~ PAGE 2 - PLANNING CD:M1v1ISSIONMINUfES - September 21,2004 1. September 7, 2004 Regular Planning Corrunission Minutes will be considered at the October 5, 2004 Planning Corrunission Meeting. ...." The following Consent Calendar items were approved: 2. Minor Design Review of a Single Family Residence located at 16846 McPherson Avenue (APN 378-234-001). RESOLUTION NO. 2004-132 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO BE LOCATED AT 16846 MCPHERSON AVENUE (APN 378-234-001). 4. Minor Design Review of a Single Family Residence to be located at 111 Mohr Street (APN 374-191-009). ...." RESOLUTION NO. 2004-133 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE aTY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TOBE LOCATED AT 111 MOHR STREET (APN 372-191-009). ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR 3. Minor Design Review for a Single Family Residence to be located at 413 Kellogg Street. APN 374-041-009. Chairman LaPere requested the reading of the Staff Report. Director of Community Development Brady stated that this was a request for a single-family residence and requested Associate Planner Miller to review the project with the Corrunission. Agenda Item No \.f)... Page~o~ ...." PAGE 3 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - September 21,2004 /"""' Associate Planner Miller stated that the applicant was requesting approval to construct a 1,008 square foot single-family residence with two attached covered porches on a 9,000 square foot lot. She stated that a 400 square foot 2 car garage would also be attached to the main dwelling. She noted that the applicant was also requesting approval to construct the same unit on the adjacent lot at 411 Kellogg Street. Associate Planner Miller stated that the architectural design of this home was a traditional log style. She stated that this type of architecture was typically plain with few windows. She indicated that Staff has requested that the applicant enlarge and add windows. She noted that the applicant also added wider trim to all windows. She noted that the applicant would provide an automatic irrigation system and landscaping for the front setback. She stated that the applicant would also provide a 6- foot wooden fence around the site. She indicated that Staff supported this project and recommended that the Planning Commission approve and adopt a Resolution based on the Findings, Exhibits, and was subject to the Conditions of Approval. She noted that the applicant was present to answer any questions that the Commission might have. Chairman LaPere requested that the applicant approach the podium. Beverley Hodges, 3261 Jancey Way, San Ysidro owner of the property stated that she would be available to answer any questions that the Commission might have. /"""' There being no further comments, Chairman LaPere brought the discussion back to the table for Commissioner comments. Vice Chairman O'Neal stated that he had no comments. Commissioner Larimer asked the applicant if this would be their primary residence. Ms. Hodges stated that the project was for an investment. Commissioner Larimer asked the applicant if there would be central air conditioning. Ms. Hodges stated "No". Commissioner Larimer asked the applicant what method they would be using to cool the home. Mr. Hodges indicated that log homes stay cool under most conditions. Commissioner Larimer asked what type of wood they would be using. Mr. Hodges stated, "They would be using 8- foot Pine logs". /"""' Agenda I~..m No \.1. Page . o~ PAGE 4 - PLANNING COMMISSION :MINUTES - September 21, 2004 GHnmissioner Larimer asked the applicant about the landscaping. She wanted to know what the applicant would be providing. '-' Ms. Hodges stated that they would provide landscaping that would work best with this location. Commissioner Larimer stated that she ,,,QuId like to see something unique, such as a namml setting, that L c:g Ham'S are unique, and shadd Ix? in a natural setti?7g Ms. Hodges stated that she would follow these reconunendations. Commissioner Larimer stated that she felt that the home did not have too much visual interest. Ms. Hodges asked Commissioner Larimer what she meant byvisual interest. Commissioner Larimer stated that it looked like a small log home. Mr. Hodges stated that the home would be a two bedroom, one bath. He stated that it would enhance the area. He also noted that there would be another identical log home next door. Commissioner Larimer stated that she felt differently. She indicated that the home looked plain, and identical homes were not creative. She had no further comments. Vice O1ainnan ONeal indicated that he enjoys the fact that not every home is the same. He '-' concurred with Staff's recommendations. O1ainnan LaPere asked the Staff to clarify the applicant's request for approval of the same unit on the adjacent lot, as an Administrative Review. Director of Community Development Brady stated that this procedure had been done before. He indicated that when an applicant constructed another home that was very similar, the Community Development Director could approve it. O1ainnan LaPere stated that the home was unique and different. He had no further comments. There being no further comments, Olairman LaPere requested the reading of the Resolution. MOVED BY O'NEAL, SECONDED BY LAPERE, AND PASSED BY AVOTE OF 2-1, WITH LARIMER OPPOSING, AND RYAN AND UHLRY ABSENT TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 2004-133, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSIONER OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 413 KELLOGG STREET - APN 374-041-009. Agenda Itefl No \ .1. . Page--4- o~ '-' PAGE 5 - PLANNING CDMMISSIONMINUTES - September 21,2004 r" PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. Tentative Tract Map No. 31106. Pardee Homes. Chainnan LaPere opened the Public Hearing at 6:25 PM, and requested the reading of the Staff Report. Director of OmmlUnity Development Brady stated that this was a request for a Tentative Tract Map No. 31106 by Pardee Homes, and requested that Senior Planner Morita to review the project with the Commission. Senior Planner Morita stated that the applicant was requesting approval to subdivide a 16-acre area into 122 separate lots for 108 single-family detached residential lots, nine lettered HOA landscaping, open space, and drainage lots; and five lettered HOA street lots pursuant to the Canyon Hills Specific Plan. He stated that the site was located within the Canyon Hills Specific Plan area. He noted that the residential lots measured between 3,273 square feet and 7,202 square feet, and the average lot size was 4,298 square feet. He commented that the Canyon Hills Specific Plan pennit 3,000 square feet minimum small-lot subdivisions within the MF2 Zone. He noted that the proposed tract map complies with the minimum lot size standards. r-- Senior Planner Morita stated that Staff supported Tentative Tract Map No. 31106, and recommended that the Planning Commission approve and adopt a Resolution based on the Findings, Exhibits, and was subject to the Conditions of Approval. He indicated that the applicant was available to answer any questions that the Commission might have. Chairman LaPere requested that the applicant approach the podium. Mr. Dennis Raime, 1502 Lakeside Lane, Huntington Beach, stated that he was the representative for Pardee Homes. He stated that he would be available to answer any questions that the Commission might have. Chairman LaPere asked the applicant if he had read and agreed to the Conditions of Approval. Mr. Raime stated "Yes". There being no further comments from the public, Chairman LaPere brought the discussion back to the table for Commissioner comments. Commissioner Larimer stated that the Canyon Hills area was beautiful. However, she indicated that the lots were too small. She stated that many of the new homeowners were coming from San Diegotand Orange County, and were used to larger lots. She had no further comments. ,-.... Agend. ItS No \.'\. Page o~ PAGE 6 - PLANNING mMMISSION:MINUfES - September 21,2004 Vice Cl1ainnan ONeal stated that he had opposed some developments in Lake Elsinore with what he considered small lot sizes. However, he noted that those lots were in a different development and area that he viewed differendy than this project. He stated that this project was approved by GtyCouncil over a year ago and therefore he fully supported Staffs recommendations. '-' Cl1airrnan LaPere stated that he concurred with the Commission views on the lot sizes. He asked Staff about Condition No. 41, which discussed the use of Lost Road for the construction. He stated that he did not feel that the Condition was strong enough. He indicated that he would like to see that the applicant prohibit construction traffic from using Lost Road. Mr. Raime indicated that should the construction traffic use Lost Road they could receive a penalty. He noted the comments for the smaller lots. He stated that the smaller lots were market driven, and very reasonable. He stated that there was already a waiting list for these lots. He stated that they were a hot item on the market. Cl1ainnan LaPere stated that Pardee Homes does an excellent job. He asked the applicant if there would be a park Mr. Raime state that there would be a 25 acre park across the from the residential area. Cl1airrnan LaPere had no further comments. There being no further comments, Cl1airman LaPere closed the Public Hearing at 6:37 PM, and ~ requested the reading of the Resolution. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY O'NEAL AND PASSED BY A2-1 VOTE, WITH LARIMER ABSTAINING, AND RYAN AND UHLRY ABSENT, TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 2004-135, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 31106 WI-UCH SUBDIVIDES APPROXIMATELY 16 ACRES OF THE CANYON HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN AREA INTO 122 TOTAL LOTS. BUSINESS ITEMS None Agenda Jr. No Ll. Page ,. o~ ~ PAGE 7 - PLANNING OOMMISSIONMINUTES - September 21,2004 ,........ INFORMATIONAL None ST AFF COMMENTS Director of Community Development Brady commented on the followin~: . None. PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS Chairman LaPere commented on the following: . He thanked Staff for all their help Vice Chairman O'Neal commented on the following: . None ,,--. Commissioner Larimer commented on the following: . None ADJOURNMENT THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, CHAIRMAN LAPERE ADJOURNED THE MEETING AT 6:40 PM ON SEPTEMBER 21,2004. Ron LaPere, Chairman ~ Agenda Item No \ · .\. page~o~ PAGE 8 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - September 21, 2004 Respectfully Submitted, """" Dana C Porche I Office Specialist III ATTEST: Robert A Brady, Secretary to the PlannjIlg Commission ,~ ltalicr indicates addition to text, strilrethrough indicated removal from text. """" Agenda It~No \. !. Page-L o~ """" OCTOBER 14. 2004 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE r-. FUND# FUND DESCRIPTION 100 GENERAL FUND 101 SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICE FUND 110 STATE GAS TAX FUND 130 LIGHTING I LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE FUND 150 C.D.B.G. FUND 221 PARK C.I.P. FUND 231 LIBRARY C.I.P. FUND 608 TRUST DEPOSITS & PRE-PAID EXP. FUND 620 COST RECOVERY SYSTEM GRAND TOTAL ~ r-. 10/20/2004 P:\WARRANT LIST MASTER\WARRANT 101404 WARRANT SUMMARY TOTAL 1,403,412.18 127,342.05 150,473.01 33,284.73 866.56 65.00 1,525.65 5,569.38 25,370.62 1,747,909.18 AENDA lTEU NO. ~ ~ PAGE-LOF~ OCTOBER 14, 2004 CHECK# 78812 79275 79436 79437 79438 79439 79440 79441 79442 79443 79444 79445 79446 79447 79448 79449 79450 79452 79453 79454 79455 79456 79457 79458 79459 79460 79461 79462 79463 79464 79465 79466 79467 79468 79469 79470 79471 79472 79473 79474 79475 79476 79477 79478 79479 79480 79481 79482 79483 79484 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE VENDOR NAME VOID-(D.M.W.) UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA P.E.R.S. CALIFORNIA P .E.R.S. POSTAGE BY PHONE VISION SERVICE PLAN I.C.MA RETIREMENT TRUST RIVERSIDE COUNTY'S CREDIT UNION STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY L1UNA LOCAL 777 THE L.I.U. OF NA STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND FORTIS BENEFITS CALIFORNIA P.E.R.S. ACEVES, NORMA LAKE ELSINORE VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE VOID A & A JANITORIAL SERVICE ALBERT WEBB & ASSOCIATES PAUL A. ALBERT ALL PHASE REFRIGERATION & AIR CONDITIONING, INC. ALLIED TRAFFIC EQUIPMENT ALPINE PREMIUM WATER-NATHAN GARNER AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES ERICA ANDERSEN ANIMAL FRIENDS OF THE VALLEY APPLE ONE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES BANK OF AMERICA (0601) (BEST) BANK OF AMERICA (0619) (BRADY) BANK OF AMERICA (0627) (BUCKLEY) BANK OF AMERICA (0650) (KASAD) BANK OF AMERICA (0676) (SAPP) BANK OF AMERICA (0684) (SCHIFFNER) BANK OF AMERICA (0692) (WATENPAUGH) BANK OF AMERICA (6707) (PRESSEY) BEE CARE BERRYMAN & HENIGAR, INC. BIO-TOX LABORATORIES CYNTHIA BLOOD-WILSON BLUE HAVEN POOLS BOATS PLUS BUILDING PERMITS LAW BULLETIN BUY ONLINE NOW.COM CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFFICIALS STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CAPITOL PACIFIC HOMES ROBIN CHIPMAN KIRT A. COURY 10/20/2004 P:\WARRANT LIST MASTER\WARRANT 101404 1 OF 3 WARRANT LIST AMOUNT (65.00) -."""I 18,192.98 58,766.57 3,068.92 5,000.00 1,160.71 4,089.56 1,325.00 376.85 506.00 2,197.20 2,119.75 21,928.87 6,539.15 30,433.73 2,755.91 84.00 0.00 150.00 8,677.00 112.00 803.50 85.67 399.30 426.40 166.87 .....", 7,100.00 1 ,448.40 1,010.89 494.96 771.97 2.95 213.03 474.64 234.81 339.00 484.45 37,968.21 477.04 181.62 315.26 1 ,848.45 87.99 96.80 364.00 1 ,820.00 560.00 3,000.00 75.00 4,474.80 .....", AClll!NDAlTEMNO. k PAGE 1 OF ' OCTOBER 14, 2004 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE WARRANT LIST ,..-..CHECK# VENDOR NAME )485 D & SELECTRIC 79486 DANIEL'S TIRE SERVICE, INC. 79487 DELL MARKETING, L.P. 79488 MARK DENNIS 79489 DESIGN CONCEPTS, INC. 79490 DI PASQUALE, KATIE 79491 DIEHL, EVANS & COMPANY, L.L.P 79492 DO IT CENTER 79493 DRAGON FLYER PRESS 79494 DRIVER ALLlANT 79495-79496 E. V. M. W. D. 79497 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUPPLY, INC. 79498-79499 ELSINORE PIONEER LUMBER CO. 79500 ELSINORE VALLEY SELF STORAGE 79501 ENVIRONMENTAL RECOVERY SOLUTIONS 79502 EXCEL LANDSCAPE, INC. 79503 TERI F AllIO 79504-79505 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 79506 FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTATE SOLUTION 79507 MAUREEN FOSTER 79508 SANDRA GARRY 79509 GEO SEC, INC. 79510 GOLDEN STATE CONCESSIONS & CATERING 79511 GOLF VENTURES WEST "'-"Q512 GRAINGER, INC. J513 ARLINE GULBRANSEN 79514 ALEX GUTIERREZ 79515 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 79516 HDR ENGINEERING, INC. 79517 DARYL J. HICKMAN 79518 INLAND EMPIRE LOCK & KEY 79519 INLAND VALLEY BABE RUTH BASEBALL 79520 KEVIN JOHNSON 79521 LAKE CHEVROLET 79522 LAKE ELSINORE FORD 79523 LAKE ELSINORE TIRE & AUTO, INC. 79524 LAKE STEREO SHOP 79525 LIBRARY SYSTEMS & SERVICES, L.L.C. 79526 RAYMOND LOSEY 79527 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC. 79528 KIM MAGEE 79529 LINDA M. MILLER 79530 DUANE A. MORITA 79531 MORROW PLUMBING, INC. 79532 NEILL'S CONTRACTING 79533 WILLIAM PAYNE 79534 POWERLAND EQUIPMENT, INC. 79535-79536 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 79537 QUAID TEMECULA HARLEY DAVIDSON "'-"'1538-79539 QUILL CORPORATION AMOUNT 1,665.50 450.94 4,870.09 48.93 104.63 30.00 107.75 221.92 542.25 1,569.38 9,111.65 76.69 550.66 65.45 5,200.00 2,762.00 75.00 216.15 310.85 98.70 30.00 944.85 1,875.00 15.85 336.18 192.72 34.50 25,408.27 13,580.45 57.00 376.54 1,000.00 334.60 1,999.40 352.20 437.89 56.55 1,525.65 35.00 318.86 10.00 3,925.00 4,091.85 28.07 150.00 75.00 6,554.30 285.49 55.66 2,029.41 10/20/2004 P:\WARRANT LIST MASTER\WARRANT 101404 2 OF 3 AENDA ITEM NO ~ '" PAGE 3 ~F~ OCTOBER 14, 2004 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE WARRANT LIST CHECK# VENDOR NA1v1E 79540 R.J. NOBLE COMPANY, INC. 79541 RANCHO REPROGRAPHICS, INC. 79542 REGENTS-UC UCR EXTENSION 79543 RIGHTWAY 79544 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF 79545-79546 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF 79547 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR-CONTROLLER 79548 JESUS ROQUE 79549 ROTARY CLUB OF LAKE ELSINORE 79550 SAFETY-KLEEN SERVICES, INC. 79551 SHARE CORP. 79552 TRACI SIGW AL T 79553 SMART & FINAL 79554 DAVID S. SOLOMON 79555 SOUTH WESTERN SEALCOATING,INC. 79556-79558 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 79559 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. 79560 STAUFFER'S LAWN EQUIPMENT 79561 STENO SOLUTIONS 79562 BOB STOVER, INC. 79563 TEAM AUTOAID, INC. 79564 TOMARK SPORTS, INC. 79565 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 79566 VALLEY CENTER AUTO PARTS NAPA 79567 VERIZON 79568-79571 VERIZON CALIFORNIA, INC. 79572 VERIZON INTERNET SOLUTIONS 79573 ARMANDO VILLA 79574 RICHARD WATENPAUGH 79575 WEST COAST COMPUTER SERVICE 79576 WEST COAST WINDOW CLEANING 79577 WEST GROUP 79578 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS, INC. 79579 WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS 79580 MAGDALENA ZEPIEN AMOUNT 147,925.80 "-" 86.56 1 ,580.00 120.00 4,857.60 1,015,322.44 2,475.00 480.00 315.00 153.92 633.41 33.75 109.33 3,120.00 8,206.00 30,732.63 41~.99 12.93 945.03 4,618.24 178.15 398.77 48.57 428.54 22.47 '-" 3,660.30 164.40 75.00 150.00 315.00 450.00 258.60 1,834.43 46,550.00 40.00 TOTAL 1,604,054.90 PIE DATE: 10/01/04 PAYROLL TAXES 10/01/04 PAYROLL CASH 40,713.49 103,140.79 GRAND TOTAL 1 ,747,909.18 ......, 10/20/2004 P:\WARRANT LIST MASTER\WARRANT 101404 3 OF 3 AQENOA ITEM NO. 2. ". PAGE~OF~ ,-.., CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Richard J. Watenpaugh, City Manager DATE: October 26,2004 SUBJECT: Notice of Completion for Machado Street Pavement Rehabilitation BACKGROUND ,-.., Fiscal Year Budget 2003/2004 Capital Improvement Projects included three pavement rehabilitation projects for: Lakeshore Drive - from Riverside Drive to Machado Street; Machado Street - from Lakeshore Drive to Lincoln Street; and Franklin Street - from Avenue 6 to Main Street. Total gas tax funds budgeted for the three street projects was $288,000. The preliminary budget estimate was based on the City's pavement project management system to only remove and replace severely distressed areas and to perform minimal repairs on each street. Staff determined that the complete repair of one street would provide greater benefit to the City than to perform minor repairs to all three street projects. Based on various criteria, it was determined that rehabilitation of Machado Street would provide the greatest benefit to the City. R.J. Noble completed the pavement rehabilitation project in accordance with plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City's chief inspector. FINDINGS On July 6, 2004, the City received five (5) bids from qualified companies to construct improvements on Machado Street. RJ. Noble Company was the low bidder with a $329,607 proposal. On July 13,2004, the contract was awarded to R.J. Noble Company for construction of improvements. During construction, there was a reduction of quantities for five (5) construction contract items resulting in contract deductions of $18,298.92. There was also an increase of five (5) quantities for other construction items resulting in a contract increase of $4,621. The total Change Order No. 1 had a net decrease of $13,777.92. The original contract of $329,607 was reduced to $315,829.08. The contractor completed the work on September 27, 2004. The work was done in compliance with approved plans and specifications. ,-... AQENDA ITEM NO. 3 PAGE-L. OF ~ City Council Report Page 2 of2 ...." FISCAL IMPACT Fiscal Year 2003/2004 Capital Improvement Budget allocated $288,000 for Lakeshore Drive, Machado Street and Franklin Street. An additional $117,000 was transferred from the Gas Tax revenue to finance the estimated cost. The final cost of this project was $372,672.91, which included engineering, construction, contingencies, geotechnical services, surveys, inspection and administration. Expended project costs are as follows: Design Construction Surveys and Soils Testing Inspection and Project Administration Total Project Costs Budgeted Amount Balance/Savings $29,953.00 $315,829.08 $12,550.00 $14,340.83 $372,672.91 $405.000.00 $32,327.09 RECOMMENDATION ...., Staff recommends the following to the City Council: 1. Approve Change Order No.1 for a net project decrease of $13,777.92. 2. Authorize the City Manager to executive Change Order No.1. 3. Authorize the Mayor to sign the Notice of Completion and have the City Clerk file the Notice of Completion for recordation. PREPARED BY: David Solomon, Associate Civil Engineer REVIEWED BY: Ken A. SeumaIo, Engineering Manager vJ!. APPROVED BY: APPROVED FOR ":11b~ AGENDA LISTING: ~ . CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE ~ AQENDA ITEM NO. PAGE ~ OF ~ '-' ".-- CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Richard J. Watenpaugh, City Manager DATE: October 26,2004 SUBJECT: Grand Avenue / Broadway Street Traffic Signal BACKGROUND r-- Current traffic warrants for the intersection of Grand Avenue and Broadway Street meets demands for installation of a traffic signal. Once the traffic signal is installed, students attending Terra Cotta Middle School will be able to cross the intersection safely, with the . aid of a crossing guard. Currently, the school has identified this intersection as hazardous, principally during morning rush hour. Summerlake Park, adjacent to the middle school operates as a pedestrian feed for the school. FINDINGS The proposed traffic signal is not budgeted in the current fiscal year 2004/05. Due to an increase in signal warrants as a result of new residential development, a traffic signal is recommended. The intersection of Grand Avenue and Broadway Street has been identified as an eligible location for funding from Traffic Impact Fees. FISCAL IMPACT The total cost to construct the proposed signal, including design, construction, inspection, contingency and project administration is $150,000. The majority of funding is identified from Traffic Impact Fees (T.I.F. Fund No. 205) in the amount of $108,476. Traffic Safety Funds (Fund No. 115) of $41,524 will supplement the total project funds for a totalof$150,000. ,-.... AGENDA ITEM NO.~ PAGE J OF ~ City Council Report Page 2 of2 ~ RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Approve the use of $108,476 Traffic Impact Fees (TJ.F. Fund No. 205) for the proposed traffic signal. 2. Approve the transfer of$41,524 from Traffic Safety Funds (Fund No. 115) for the proposed signal. 3. Direct staff to implement the design and construction of a traffic signal at Grand Avenue and Broadway Street. PREPARED BY: David Solomon, Associate Civil Engineer REVIEWED BY: Ken A. Seumalo, Engineering Manager ,pi. ~ APPROVED FOR ~ AGENDA LISTING: ~ It ~ CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE APPROVED BY: ~ AGENDA ITEM NO. Ii PAGE ').. ~ ~ CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL FROM: RICHARD J. W ATENP AUGH, CITY MANAGER DATE: October 26, 2004 SUBJECT: Claim Against the City BACKGROUND Claims filed against the City of Lake Elsinore are reviewed and handled by Carl Warren & Company, Claims Administrators. When received, each claim is logged in the City Clerk's Office and forwarded to this company for investigation. After initial review and investigation, direction is issued to the City to take one of several actions such as rejection, notification of late claim or reservation of action until further information is obtained. The following claim has been.recommended for rejection by Carl Warren & Company: ~ CL#2004-7 - Salvador Linares FISCAL IMP ACT None. RECOMMENDATION Reject the Claims listed above and direct the City Clerk to send letter informing the Claimant of this decision. PREPARED BY: VICKI KASAD, CMC, CITY CLERK! HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR APPROVED FOR AGENDA LISTING: RICHARD J. WATENPAUGH, I.J AGER ~ ACilENOA ITEM NO. ". . PAGE....L;I City of J}akE EL1-ino7-E August 23,2004 Dwight Kunz Carl Warren & Company P. O. Box 25180 Santa Ana, CA 92799-5180 Dear Dwight: "'WJII' Enclosed for your handling is a Summons received yesterday from Salvador Linares (CL #2004-07). Please keep me advised of appropriate City Council '-' Action. As always if you have any questions or need additional information, please don't hesitate to call. t~. . VICKI KAskl CLERK CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE Enclosure cc: City Manager Finance ,- ~ AQENDA ITEM NO. "- PAGE~OF - "'WJII' ~outh dl1ain ~hu.t, ..f!akE. El1.ino'Le., Cc:II92530 · Clde.P.hone.: (909) 674-3124 'Jax: (909) 674-2392 RECEIVED 1~~~It'\Wn:~ AUG 1 8 2004 BY: L4------- AUG 1 8 2004 ~ ClEIWBAJBtQ&;AINST THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE (For Damages to Persons or Personal Property) Received by: 150v -of/pAy (TimelDate Rtc~lved) A claim must be filed with the CityClerkofthe City 9fLakeElsinore, within six (6) monthsaftet the incident ()re event occurred. Be sure your claim is against the City of Lake Elsin()re, not ano1tlerpublie entity. Where space is insufficient, please use additional paper and identify information by paragraphn\UJ1Per Cpmpletedclaimsmust be mailed or delivered to the City Clerk, City of Lake Elsinore, 130 South Main Street, Lake Elsinore, California, 92530. TO THE HO!'OR4BLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,CALIFORNIA: ~ The undersigned respectfully submhs the following claim and informationtelative to damage to persons and/or J;lersonal property: . 1. ~AMEOFCLAIMANT . So..,lunc!OR-.. hl~n.()..JR~ ' a. Addreslfli{aimant--B~2 -tAGS. b. Phone No. ( )165- 2oQY. c. qd~ 5~<jlsg~~:!lD2DfDq(Q(ol/ e. 2. !':ame. post office address and telephone to which claimant desires notices to be sent, if other than the above: ~m~% C1b()1~~ /"'" a. Date b. jime~ : ~~'\kA , c. Place {Exa"...d spe<ific location).J.B:hef'A~'C.tUl\? 9. · ~. ... .. Cr!>m{d~tr)JD4'8 ...< <.. . d. How and under what CIrcumstances dId damage or IJ1JUfyoecur'l SpeCify the panu:ular occurrence, event, act or omission you claim caused the injury or damage (use additional paper if necessary). ~-kt:~~~~::~ci.~~~~~n0Q ~J' ~- ~irJ bA.~ Iln'6tb'lliJO rol~((~~' e. What particular action by the City ofitSemployees,c;au~"thea)Jeged damage or jnJury? ~~n~.g~~L~~f)\+~~ .l;;h D r~~ ~. AQENOA ITEM NO. . a. .. - - PAGE.-3.- OF--:L- 3. ......, 4. \\'ere there any injuries at the time of this accident? Ifnot, state "No injuries". no ( n,.'~ UK ,0R 5. Give the name(s) of the City employee(s) causing the damage or inj1JTY: ~(J+<P rAS,flDrJ2. (L;4K--Y~ 6. Name and address of any p'crson injured: rJJA- 7. Name and address of the owner of any damaged property: ~f L5...LtdJJ(/ Li nllil OL'\ 2qCSJ-ff)O<~ fYf(. t~ l'lJ \ O :Xz:- " q 7 (') (~ 8, Damages claimed: a. b. c. d. Amount claimed as of this date Estimated amount of future costs $ wl(o? <:~ $ ~ Total amount claimed $ (() I {O -~ Basis for computation of amounts claimed (Include copies ofall bills, invoices, estimates, etc): 95-~ t ((n A-ip-> .....,., 9. Names and addresses of all wimesses, hospitals, doctors, etc: c. 10. Any additional information that might be helpful in~~onsidering this claim: .-:> " ,1\ WAR"iING: IT IS A CRIMINAL OFFE E TO FILE A FALSE CLAIM! (Penal code 72llnsurance Code 556.1) I have read the matters and statements made in the above claim and I know the same to be true of my own knowledge, except as to those matters state upon information or belief as to such matters, I believe the same to be true. I certify under penalt)' of perjury that the foregoing is TRUE AND CORRECT. SlGNED THIs_1 B ~A Y OF -1\, it ;20ii:JAT 1 "" 4 ~ ~CALlFORNIA. CLAIMANT'S ~.\ J L ~ ~ SIGNATURE: ~ ~ \)GC1JC')Y .\. vlrt -{~ ~ '-" AGENDA ITEM NO. '\. PAGE I.f OF . - ro ~; ~ . ~ . . . . H ~ . . . . O~ ~ I~ f+\~ J -." ~ IQ . . . . ( lr~ ,2. . . 2' ;~ I "" ~V'lVlVlW Q!;g<dor:: z-S;<'JZ O(riClJ>Cl 11. m Q .. ~~nmD ~~~~8 mClmAJO >m""QO CI ~ :is ,m ~'~F 2 s CI CD )> mmm ;:v Z 0'" Cl =-1" ~ m --;v>m Iw"" "'0"" Zo8 coo ~~z m"'> nOr -1)>~ -1,-< --l OOlm .~~~ z"-,, mCD ~<2I roo !'lOc --;OAJ ~11~ ",w" mO-l >om ::'1>'" mlA8 "':"s ol v --; r mm AJ::j nO OZ so vOl r 'T' , I ; ~ r-' ;':;) l r~ o l/\ {~ (1) J-\ I'n " ,I ( ~,' 0' "-:J ~ ~ " <- 1;)" 0 I)> 1-1 1--1 ~ V> m --; ;g () 0 0 > c ~ ;;; c ~ ~ ~ ~ s: OJ G:: ~ V> 0 -'< I .:., ~ fg 0 ~ ~ c 0 c z ~ 0 OJ ~ ::g ;v ~ 0 --I r " G:: ;:.v m VI ;::0 ~ '" '" V) f)... ~'\\ ~ V\l VI -::-'-'. ')J \. , . ............. e>..;-.j ','( ~< 0 ~o I I 0- Ol--.cg lVT <;: I~,. \ I- ",,\ C -/ I"{ {.tf~" k ~ :_~~Ik ~.t~. ~.. ~ ~i1~ ; .. ~. " , r~ ...., b -\ <:>' ~ '''K ::-z C) ,,........ c:: '" l't.. ~ ';::\' I 'C r t~ ?~\ 1- l\;" <::. ......... I'-- " ~ k. \. "<'" P--;1 , ..., " -, ~l\ '-, I <'i ~; \'-' ~ '7';- ,'\,~ ., ''''""'''J --. I'................ -,\ f..Z;, '" , ---- \ :,~ \ \ '\' (~ -l ~I -< (J )> ~ ':; ~~ ~ ~ ~ {...,1 ''l' m . -.L "-~ ..;... \ ~ (" ~ /"j f' V\ o .< :zr 1.. S (1) ~l l 6:.~ r: q.t (t';~. ' -. r-- <",,- ~,"') I {- i' ni ~ '" ~ -) L ~ ,->; ~ '" Vl\. V (rl """ gj"t't 8 '> C, o r ~ AJ Z...V ~ ~ '~,,) t' 0;;: fg L't ?g AJ f"" , AJ ~~ '.I <:7' ~ ~ j! ~~~ ~ m. Z m Z '2.0 ~ ~:o :;,;; ~ .....J u~ ~, -D ::. ..s:- O:;, '-\ '-'<Ii (') ~o 1~ "'> m m (;;;:,.-'9""'- """ :j'=;;.- AGEN' i .tel r ~ -r{5i m I o C AJ Vl -<. {V (0 ~ - ~ 1:- f- 't '1-) '6 .~ " ~. r.>: I~; t - {, ".l ,- ,\ P\ ,,- t-,,,\ ......j ....),(~\ '\; (v .j:, 0 . <) I " -::0 o .:Q ~ '-J ...... ':€ ;Xi ~ 3;~~ n; C1' ro ro ::::., . N~ "'" ~ . ~~ ~ ;? ~ ~ ';s i~~~ 2~' ~ ~ !" o -0 ~- ~ ,~ ~ ::i~~:;:::'"":'-';"-~'"-~ ,,-'" - ~:-=-.- J ~ ~ ~ ;g>b;f;~ "",.,.......""'-~ ~ ~ 7 ~ AQENDA ITEM NO. PAGEL OF2\~w. '. ~ AaENOA ITEM NO.~ , PAGE-1- OF-L. ,,-... CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: DICK W ATENP AUGH, CITY MANAGER DATE: OCTOBER 26, 2004 SUBJECT: CORNET SERVICE LEVEL CONTRACT FY04-05 BACKGROUND Riverside County Information Technology (RCIn is formalizing its high speed Internet and network service provisions for CORNET users under a new Service Level Contract for FY 2004- 05. The new pricing formula is more equitable and should result in cost savings to the City of Lake Elsinore based on actual Internet bandwidth use. ~- DISCUSSION For over five years, the City's Tl and high speed Internet services have been provided through the Riverside County Information Technology division's CORNET network. As a result of significant policy and service changes by RCIT, a new Service Level Contract (SLC) for fiscal year 2004-05 has been issued. The SLC contract has an automatic renewal clause up to a maximum of four additional years, but may be reviewed or cancelled by each party with 30 days notice. CORNET pricing is now based on actual bandwidth used, a more equitable billing method. For the past two months, the City has realized significant savings compared with prior CORNET billings. The City's IT master plan recommends comparing CORNET cost of service with charges by private high-speed Internet providers. Staff intends to monitor CORNET billings to determine if the savings realized so far are more cost competitive. FISCAL IMPACT Estimated annual cost calculated by RCIT is $19,559.82, or $1,629.98 per month. Actual use for past two billings has dropped from $1,907 to $112 per month. In comparing actual charges to estimates, sufficient funds are available in the FY 04-05 operating budget for CORNET services. RECOMMENDATION Approve RCIT CORNET Service Level Contract for FY 2004-05 and authorize City Manager to execute the contract with the County of Riverside. PREPARED BY: MARK DENNIS, INFORMATION/COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER ,,-... APPROVED FOR AGENDA BY: lnLilb~111kJ- CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE A~::.r-;~ ~RCI~=:' TECHNOLOGY /' ~ ('~~ Matthew W. Frymire Chief Information Officer We help malee Riverside County run. ~ City of Lake Elsinore 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 ~ ~ s~p ~ : :04~ ~ CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ENGINEERING DIVISION Dear Valued Customer In an effort to better communicate the types of services offered to our customers, Riverside County Information Technology (RCIT) has developed a Service Level Contract (SLC) document to assist with in understanding, planning and budgeting for the technology services you receive from us. This document will be updated and presented to you each fiscal year and will contain the services that you have opted to have provided to you by RCIT, as well as the estimated monthly and annual charges for these services. Please find attached your RCIT Service Level Contract for fiscal year 2004/2005. We ask that you review the document to assure that it is accurate and complete. Once you have determined that the SLC is to your satisfaction, please approve and return to the following address: Riverside County Information Technology Attention: Debbie Hill 6147 Rivercrest Drive, Suite A Riverside, CA 92507 ......, -...:.. If you have any questions regarding the service offerings identified in your SLC, please contact Debbie Henley at (951) 955-6915. If you have any invoice questions, please contact Debbie Hill at (951) 486-7781. RCIT appreciates your continued business and support. If there is anything further that we can do to assist you, please do not hesitate to contact me by phone at (951) 955-6934 or email me at gstoddar@RiversideCountvIT.org . Sincerely, ~ "">. e d_\d~",^- & Greg R. S~oddard Chief Technology Officer AQENOA ITEM NO.-'-- , PAGE~ OF.I:l "-"" - -.. --- - - County AdministraTive Center 4080 L em 0 n S t r e e t, lOt h F [00 r, P.O. Box 1 589, R i ve r sid e, C a I if 0 r n I a 92502 - 1 589 phone: 951955-3735 fax: 951955-3611 ".--.. SERVICE LEVEL CONTRACT BETWEEN COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE This Agreement is made and entered into the _day of , 2004 by and between the County of Riverside ("COUNTY") and City of Lake Elsinore ("CLIENT"). The parties agree as follows: 1. Documents Made Part Of This Contract: This Contract is comprised of the following documents: (A) This Contract; (B) EXHIBIT A - TERMS OF REFERENCE; (C) EXHIBIT B - ADDENDUMS; ADDENDUM CDOO (Data Communications) All of these documents are attached to this Contract. 2. Services to Be Provided: ".--.. COUNTY shall provide CLIENT with the services described in: Addendum CDOO Service Summary Data Communications 3. Payment: A. CLIENT shall pay COUNTY for these services as described in: Addendum Service Summary Amount CDOO* Data Communications $ 19,560 Total Annual Service Charges $ 19,560 ... The amount listed for this service is an estimate and will vary with actual usage B. COUNTY shall invoice CLIENT for payments due. CLIENT shall make payment to COUNTY no later than 30 days after receipt of invoice. 4. Term and Termination: A. The term of this Contract shall be as stated in the Terms of Reference. Following that tenn, the Contract shall automatically renew on an annual basis for up to four (4) additional years. Any rate changes shall be stated in a change control document signed by both parties. B. Either party may terminate this Contract or any individual addendum at any time, with or without cause, upon 30 days written notice to the other party. ".--.. c. In the event of termination by CLIENT, COUNTY shall be entitled to compensation for all services rendered prior to the effective date of the termination. (., AQENOA ITEM NO. PAGE 3 OF~ 5. Client Representative: The following person shall be CLIENT'S designated representative for this Contract: . This person shall be authorized by CLIENT to make all decisions in connection with the services to be provided by COUNTY under this Contract. ...., 6. Security: CLIENT shall take all necessary actions and precautions to protect the security of COUNTY systems. COUNTY shall have the right to immediately discontinue CLIENT'S access to any COUNTY system if CLIENT does not comply. 7. Changes: For any changes within the general scope of the services to be provided under this Contract which do not significantly increase the total cost (beyond that expected for these types of services), the parties shall sign a "change control document" which states all changes in prices or services. This document shall be signed by the COUNTY Information Technology Department Head and the required CLIENT representative. 8. Insurance: COUNTY maintains self-insurance programs for the following types of coverage: (a) Workers compensation as required by California law; (b) Commercial general liability; and (c) Vehicle insurance. 9. Limitation of Liability: COUNTY'S entire liability to CLIENT for any damage incurred by CLIENT related in any way to this Contract shall be limited to the actual direct damage incurred by CLIENT not to exceed the total paid by CLIENT to COUNTY under this Contract during the prior one year period. COUNTY shall not be liable for any consequential, special or incidental damages, including but not limited to any damages for lost profits, lost revenue, lost data, lost use, lost software or business interruption, even if COUNTY has been advised of the possibility of such damages. B. COUNTY shall provide only those services stated in this Contract. Beyond what is specifically stated in this Contract, COUNTY does not otherwise warrant that it will meet CLIENT'S needs or expectations. A. ...., ,~ 10. Force Maieure: Either party shall be excused from performance under this Contract for any period of time that party is prevented from fulfilling its obligations as a result of an act of God, war, natural disaster, earthquake, terrorist act or threat, civil disobedience, power outage, computer failure, court order, labor dispute, or other cause beyond that party's control. AQENOA ITEM NO. " PAGE~OF.J..:l '-' 11. Miscellaneous: ,-. A. This Contract constitutes the entire agreement between the parties regarding the services to be provided by COUNTY. This Contract may not be modified or altered without a written document signed by both parties. B. COUNTY and CLIENT shall at all times be acting in independent capacities. There shall be no agency, employment or similar relationship between the parties. Neither party shall have the authority to bind the other party with respect to third parties or in any other manner. C. This Contract shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Any legal action related to the performance or interpretation of this Contract shall be filed only in the Superior Court for the State of California located in Riverside, California. Prior to the filing of any legal action related to this Contract, the parties shall be obligated to together attend a formal mediation session (with a neutral mediator) to attempt to resolve the dispute. D. Either party's failure to enforce strict perfonnance of the terms of this Contract shall not constitute a waiver by that party of any subsequent or other breach of that term. E. If any provision of this Contract is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, and then the remaining provisions of the Contract shall continue in full force and effect. F. This Contract may not be assigned without the prior written consent of the other party. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ("COUNTY") ~ By: Dated: Chairman, Board of Supervisors ATTEST: By: Dated: Nancy Romero, Clerk of the Board City of Lake Elsinore ("CLIENT") By: Dated: Name and title: ATTEST: By: Dated: ~ AQENDA ITEM NO.-r-. '" PAGE --.S... OF --I-J.;. TABLE OF CONTENTS """ EXHIBIT A - TERMS OF REFERENCE ... ..... ......... ..... .......... ..... .................. ....... ..... ..... .......... ........ ........ ..... .......... ...5 ROLES AN 0 RESPONSIBILITIES................ .................................................................. ...................................5 ADDITIONAL SERVICES ... ... ............... ... ........ .... ...... .......... .... ......... ........ .... ... .............. ..... ...... ................. .... .....5 . CHANGE ORDER ADMINISTRATION ......... ............. .... ..... ... ......... ...... ... ........ ............. ....... ........... ........ ..... .......5 PRICES AND TERMS OF PAYMENT ............... ..... ............. .... ........ ..... ................ .......... ..... .... ....... ..... ...............7 SECU RITY ........ ..... ............................................................................................................................................. 7 PROBLEM NOTIFICATION AND RESPONSE TIME.......... .... ..... ...... ....... ............... .... ... ..... ........ ........ .............. 7 ESCALATION........... ........................................................................................................................................ ..8 SERVICE UPGRADE/OUTAGE NOTIFICATIONS. ............ ......... ......... ....... ... ...................... ..... ..... ........ ........ ...9 INITIAL TERM AND RENEWAL ... ......... ....... ............ ..... ....... ................ ........ ..... ...... ........ ..... ...... ........... ....... ......9 CANCELLATION POLiCy..................................... ............................................................................................. 9 EXHIBIT B - ADDENDUMS ................. ........ ......... ..... ............ ........ .... .............. ..... ................... ........ ............. ........... 1 0 ADDENDUM CDOO (DATA COMMUNICATIONS) ........ .... ..... ........ ............. .......... ....... ......... ............ ................ ...... 1 0 SUMMARY OF SERVICES ........... ..... ........ ...................... ............. ..... ........ ..... ..... ........ .... ...... .............. ....... ......1 0 Standard Services .............. ......... ................ ........... .......... ..... ....... ............ .......... ......... ..... .................. ...... ..10 Custom Services .......... ....... ... ............ ......... .......... ..... ........... ...... .............. ............................... .......... .........11 Conditions of Service ....... ....................... .................. ..... ............... ........................ ...... .... .... ......... ............. .11 System Availability................ ..................... ................. .............. ........ ....... .......... ....... .......... .............. .........11 Performance ... ....... ........... .............. .... ....... ......... .... ...... ...... ................... ...... .... .......... ....... ......... ........... .......12 Support Services and Contact Procedures ........ ...... ...... ...................... .... ................... ................ ............12 Services not included in this Contract .....................................................................................................13 CUSTOMER RESPONSIBILITIES .......... ...... ..... .... ....... ..... ....... ..... .................. ...... ........ ........... .......... ..... ........14 COST OF SERVICE ... .......... ..... ... ........... .......... ....... ............. .... ...................................... ... ......... .......... ..... ....... 14 Service Rates ......................... ..................................................................................................................... 14 Price Breakdown...... ......................................................................................................................... ......... ..15 BILLING IN FORMATION................................................................................................................................ ..15 Billing Definitions. ... ....... ....... ............. .... ...... ........ ..... ........ ................. .... ....... ..... ....... ........... ......... ............. 15 """ .....", AGENDA ITEM NO. (. --= '. PAGE.lL;n ~ EXHIBIT A - TERMS OF REFERENCE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES It is critical for the success of any service contract that all parties understand their roles and responsibilities in the service delivery process. This section of the SLC defines the specific roles and responsibilities of the various parties to this contract. Detailed services for each IT division are attached as addenda. Based on local circumstances, roles may be appropriately modified. In order that all parties share the same expectations, any modifications that may be required will be documented as addenda to this contract. ~ Information Technology Role: · Perform duties as set forth in the service level contract and addenda. · Keep servers current and operational with respect to product life cycle, by following county adopted standards. · Provide Enterprise services on the County's behalf. . In the event of a planned service upgrade, provide prior notification. · In the event of a planned outage for maintenance purposes, provide notification five business days prior to the outage. · In the event of unanticipated outages, provide notification to the CUSTOMER liaison within 15 minutes of any known outage. Updates to notifications will occur at 60- minute intervals until the problem is resolved. Customer Role: · Provide customer liaison(s) for support and-Service management. · Provide training on procedures and use for new end-users of the system. · Authorize appropriate accounting structure for billing purposes. · Request service using the County IT Call Center at (951) 955-9900 or direct on-line access. · CUSTOMER agrees to have IT review all proposals that utilize or involve the services that are provided via this SLC. ADDITIONAL SERVICES The IT Department shall not perform services requested by CUSTOMER which are not included as part of this SLC without a written agreement from CUSTOMER. CHANGE ORDER ADMINISTRATION Any modifications to the specifications in the addendums shall require execution of a written change order by both parties to this contract ("Change Order Form") which shall substantially conform to the format of the document attached hereto. Each Change Order complying with this section shall substantially conform to the format of the applicable statement of work specified in the addendums and will become part of this contract. ,--... Information Technology Service Level Contract Page 5 of 15 S. LC Date: 7/0112004 ;h. . MEHOA: I9'eta>NO. , PAGE::L OF CHANGE ORDER FORM "-"" Change order no. to SLC No. IT shall complete this form upon a change request from Customer. Each section may be as long or short as the circumstances require. Additional pages may be attached as necessary. 1. Describe changes, modifications, or additions to the services. "'-, 2. Modifications, clarifications or supplements by IT or Customer to description of desired changes or additions requested in Section 1 above. 3. Necessity, availability and assignment of requisite IT personnel and/or resources to make requested modifications or additions. 4. Impact on costs, delivery schedule and other requirements. a) Changes in costs "-"" b) Changes in schedule c) Changes to any other requirements Change Order Is: _ Approved and Accepted Rejected Signature of Executive Sponsor Date Print Name Signature of Deputy CIO Date Print Name "-"" ~::Mf.OFh r-- PRICES AND TERMS OF PAYMENT Prices set forth on the SLC apply to the initial term of one year. The IT Department will advise CUSTOMER at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of a term of the prices applicable to the subsequent term. Each invoice is due net thirty (30) days from the invoice date. SECURITY . CUSTOMER has the responsibility to adhere to the County Enterprise Information Systems Security Policy as approved by the County Board of Supervisors. In the event of a breach of security, the County Chief Information Security Officer and associated staff will take all measures necessary to secure County resources and the CUSTOMER will be responsible for the related costs. PROBLEM NOTIFICATION AND RESPONSE TIME Problem notification will come from CUSTOMER liaison(s). The CUSTOMER can add a Trouble Ticket or Service Request directly into the REMEDY Plus system through the Riverside County Intranet or call the IT Call Center at (951) 955-9900. The REMEDY Plus system assigns your call a number and generates an e-mail to you with the ticket number. r-- If your call cannot be resolved immediately, an assigned technician will call you back based on the Call Back schedule found in the individual Service Addendums that are part of the SLC. TROUBLE TICKETS A Trouble Ticket is defined as an issue that impacts any customer due to a failure in a system that was pre-cJiously working. To initiate support, the CUSTOMER adds a Trouble Ticket directly into the REMEDY Plus system or calls the IT Call Center at (951) 955-9900. ,-... Infoonation Technology Service level Contract Page 7 of 15 A~TII1ijtl.~ " PAGE~ OF..l1... Component/service is unusable; bypass or work around is possible with no operational impact; non- critical; deferred maintenance acce table Component is down/degraded; service is unusable or difficult to use; non-critical but restricted function; some 0 erational im act System component is down; service is unavailable; critical im act; alternative or b ass is unavailable Critical System component is down; service is unavailable; critical impact; alternative or bypass is unavailable Any individually contracted performance criteria will be detailed within the service division's addendum. Trouble Ticket Call Backs ......" 1 working day 2 hours 1 hour SERVICE REQUESTS A Service Request is defined as a request for a ne-UJ service or new access to an existing service. To request a service, the CUSTOMER adds a Service Request directly into the REMEDY Plus system or calls the IT Call Center at (951)955-9900. Service Request Call Backs Operational impact to end user productivity Operational impact to production system "-" ;.;.:. 5 working da s 4 working da s 2 working da s 1 workin da within the service ESCALATION If the above performance criteria are not met, the trouble ticket/service request will be escalated and a notification will be sent to the associated service group manager for resolution. If the Call Back still has not been made, a second notification will be sent to the Information Technology Division Information Technology Officer (ITO). Continued lack of response triggers a third escalation to the Chief Technology Officer (erO) and finally to the Chief Information Officer (CIO) within the timeframes set forth by IT. Infonnation Technology Service Level Contract Page 8 of 15 ......" ~LC Date: 7J0112004~ AQE~X~lfE~1~~ PAGE~OF 1 ,-... SERVICE UPGRADE/OUTAGE NOTIFICATIONS In the event of a planned service upgrade, prior notification will be required. In the event of unanticipated outages, your liaison will be notified within 15 minutes of any known outage. Updates to notifications will occur at 60-minute intervals until the problem is resolved. In the event of a planned outage for maintenance purposes, notification will be given five business days prior to the outage. INITIAL TERM AND RENEWAL This Service Level Contract shall have an initial term of one (1) year. The IT Department shall furnish CUSTOMER a new Service Level Contract at least thirty (30) days prior to the anniversary date of the commencement of Maintenance Services. EFFECTIVE PERIOD The terms of this contract are effective as of: Begin Date: End Date: July 1, 2004 June 30, 2005 ,-... Any modifications to this contract must first be agreed upon by IT and the CUSTOMER then an IT Change Order form must be executed and signed by an officer of each department. The CUSTOMER will be given the opportunity to rene\\T contractual services during the quarter prior to fiscal year 2005-2006 with fee modifications as set forth by the County of Riverside Board of Supervisors. CANCELLATION POLICY For the life of the contract, CUSTOMER may not reduce the level of service in which IT has made any third party purchases on CUSTOMER'S behalf. Upon receipt of this contract, CUSTOMER has up to thirty (30) days to authorize and accept the contract. If authorization is not obtained, IT may discontinue any services being extended to CUSTOMER. < ,-... Information Technology Service Level Contract Page 9 of 15 SLC Date: 7/01/2~~ ,_ AQEN6}ftrt~~eP.~ PAGElLoFi.:L EXHIBIT B - ADDENDUMS ......" ADDENDUM CDOO (Data Communications) Customer: Service Agency: Service: City of lake Elsinore Information Technology - Communications Bureau Data Communications SUMMARY OF SERVICES The Information Technology Department (IT) will provide full support services for County of Riverside Network (CORNET) under the following terms: Standard Services CORNET Support 1. Ongoing network health review. a. Monitor utilization graphs. b. Monitor equipment status indicators. . c. Enterprise Networking Services (DNS, FTP, and SMTP Gateways, VPN and RAS). 2. Growth development and research. a. Periodically review network capacity. b. Research growth management options. 3. Maintain CORNET support, growth, and technology changes. 4. Mainta),n DMZ growth and capacity planning within County of Riverside Data Center. 5. Work with outside customers for transfer of data to and from the County of Riverside. 6. Provide change control and scheduled maintenance in support of CORNET and enterprise services. 7. Departmental (agency) support interface with customers to provide engineering services for problem resolution and growth administration of IP addressing within CORNET and the DMZ. 8. Documentation management. 9. Network hardware and software configuration information and provide ad hoc support. 10. Problem resolution and coordination for 2nd and 3rd level support. ......" .. CORNET Communications Technical Support 1. Troubleshoot and repair all reported router and circuit troubles relating to CORNET, any ancillary equipment and infrastructure. 2. Perform pre-fields to determine the actual network work order requirements. 3. Meet with customer to clarify any discrepancies on work order requests. 4. Provide on-call services 24 X 7. 5. Provide end-user post cut support. ~ Information Technology Addendum CDOO - Data Communications Page 10 of 15 Addendum Date: 711/2004 " Printed on: 9/1512004 AQENDA ITEM NO. PAGEj~ OF-U ,.......... Custom Services ,.......... Infrastructure Diagnostic Services Design Engineering Support 1. Perform tactical and strategic planning fordata networks and DMZ Enterprise Services. 2. Develop and document network plans, identify current conditions and make recommendations to ensure that the network infrastructure is positioned to meet emerging business requirements. 3. Perform network modeling for performance assessment, enterprise network architecture and "what-if" scenario analysis. 4. Network security. 5. Evaluate network solution alternatives. 6. Construct, review and/or coordinate requests for proposal. 7. Direct and coordinate the preparation of cost and service studies to determine and evaluate the communications needs of customers. 8. Develop technical specifications and evaluate vendor proposals for new networking systems. 9. Ensure the continued operation of all County data communications infrastructure services to include Wide Area Network, Local Area Network interface, remote access services, service providers, alliance partners, DMZ etc. 10. Ongoing analysis of County data communications infrastructure to identify and eliminate cost or technology inefficiencies. Conditions of Service · All customer service request costs will be reflected in the monthly billing invoice provided by Information Technology Accounting. · Monthly CORNET costs will be reflected in the billing invoice provided by Information Technology Accounting and will vary based upon usage. · Design engineering will be billed based on Time and Materials billing rates in addition to normal maintenance and service calls. · All third party services and costs will be billed directly to the customer. System Availability The CORNET network will be available to end-users 24 X 7. When upgrades or maintenance is necessary, IT reserves the hours from 3:00 p.m. - 8:00 p.m. Pacific Standard Time (PST) on Sundays to perform these functions. There will be a maintenance window for Enterprise DNS and SMTP on a daily basis in order to implement changes in support of the County of Riverside. This maintenance will occur Monday through Friday at 06:30 a.m. PST. Due to design redundancy within the network, no impact to the user should be experienced. This Service level Contract serves as notification for scheduled downtimes. IT will notify all end- users via email of upcoming system maintenance and will report anticipated downtime. --- Information Technology Addendum CDOO - Data Communications Page 11 of 15 Addendum Date: 71112004~ Printed on: 9/1512004 AQENDA ITEM NO. PAGEll OF..J.1. Performance ....., Customer Satisfaction Definition Ratings against customer defined objectives that measure the satisfaction of the end users with the consultina services. Reauirement Surveys will be provided to identify key client personnel. Defect Threshold >=3.5 on a scale of 5.0 Calculations Number of customers surveyed with a very satisfied or satisfied rating I total number of customer surveyed *100 = "Service Level Attained" Measurement Interval Survey may be conducted at major milestones and at conclusion of service. Data Sources IT Customer Survey For the purposes of measuring performance, standard business operational hours are 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on county business days. Metrics are gathered on a monthly basis and submitted to the CIO each quarter. Reported metrics show target and actual figures for each month. Support Services and Contact Procedures The IT Communications Bureau provides support for all service interruptions. End-users can contact the Communications Bureau by: 1. Submitting a Trouble Ticket in Remedy as described in the Terms of Reference, 2. Calling (951) 955-9900 or, 3. Sfilnding an email toITCOMM-HELP@co.riverside.ca.us ,.." For custom services: 1. Submit a Service Request in Remedy as described in the Terms of Reference, 2. Call (951) 486-7700 or, 3. Send an email toITCOMM-SERVICE@co.riverside.ca.us ....., Information Technology Addendum CDOO - Data Communications Page 12 of 15 Addendum Date: 7/112004 ~. Printed on,' .Jl1j.5l2004.. AGENDA TEM NU. PAGE~OF ... .---.. Support Hours for Trouble Tickets and Service Requests: .---.. Communication Engineering Services - 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM · CORNET Infrastructure Design & Installation · CORNET Design Consulting Communication Installation Services - 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM · CORNET Systems or Security Service · CORNET or Security System or Network configurations · CORNET Equipment or Security System service moves · CCRNET EquipmenUSoftware or Security System service adds · CORNET Infrastructure or Security System service changes Communication Coordination Services - 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM · Write work orders for in-house technicians as well as to Service Providers companies · System configuration and design Communication Repair Services - 6:00 AM to 6:00 PM · First-Point-of-Contact (FPOC) for reporting and resolution of trouble tickets, call the Communications Bureau Help Desk at (951) 955-9900. · CORNET Systems or Security Service · CORNET or Security System or Network configurations · CORNET Equipment or Security System service moves · CORNET EquipmenUSoftware or Security System service adds · CORNET Infrastructure or Security System service changes Communication Emergency Repair Services - 24 X 7 · Mission critical equipment · Mission critical services PRIORITY RESPONSE/COMPLETION FOR REPAIR ISSUES: LOW MEDIUM HIGH URGENT **Note** Services not included in this Contract Additional data communication services that are not explicitly defined in this contract can be obtained by contacting the IT Communications Bureau at (951) 486-7700. A separate agreement between the City of Lake Elsinore and IT will be written for these services. .---.. Infonnation Technology Addendum CDOO - Data Communications Page 13 of 15 Addendum Date: 7/112004 I A8eNB~ W~O. .. " PAGEAOFlr CUSTOMER RESPONSIBILITIES ..."., While IT provides the network support services as outlined above, it is necessary for the customer to provide certain information and resources as follows: . Provide new users with initial training in basic WAN access. . Initiate detailed accurate requests to IT for W ANI LAN access requirements. . Purchase hardware and software as required per specifications as confirmed by DTSC. . Maintain customer disaster recovery plan. . Services that are not covered under the core components will be billed on a time and materials basis. Standard or overtime billing will apply where applicable. . Identify a departmental liaison for coordination of services for the duration of this SLC. Please refer to the Terms of Reference for additional explanation of Roles and Responsibilities. COST OF SERVICE Service Rates The following Board Approved Rates are used to calculate the costs for the services provided under the terms of this contract: DATA NETWORKS FY04/05 Rate Schedule ITEM SERVICE UNIT COST 1 IBM Network Per device, per month $12.50 2 Codex Network Per device, per month $100.00 3 Independent Network Per device, per month $30.00 4 Advanced Diaital Network Per month, per circuit . $60.00 5 Virtual DMZ Per device, per month $400.00 6 CORNET Per MB, per month $0.0687 7 VPN Per user, per month $10.00 8 Internal VPN Per month, per connection $50.00 9 RAS Per hour, per user $2.00 '-' Standard Service Rates - Bandwidth utilization across CORNET will be measured on a per megabyte basis for internet and intranet. Additional services will be billed at the rates specified above. Charges will be calculated monthly based on the actual bandwidth amount utilized and the totals for other additional services provided during that month. Monthly costs could vary based on actual usage. Custom Service Rates - Custom services are quoted on a time and material basis at $75 per hour and $90 per hour for overtime. Quotes will include all costs including third party providers such as telephone companies. '-' Infonnation Technology Addendum COOO - Data Communications Page 14 of 15 Addendum Date: 7/112004 AQ";;:;:e'~..i- PAGE.ll.. OF..ill ~ Price Breakdown Bandwidth utilization across CORNET will be measured on a per megabyte basis for internet and intranet. Bandwidth usage will be billed at a rate of $.0687 cents per MB per month. RAS will be billed at $2 per hour per user. VPN will be billed at $10 per month per user and Internal VPN will be billed at $50 per month per connection. The total will be calculated monthly based on the amount actually utilized during that month. Monthly costs may vary based on this usage. Customer: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE Date Information Provided: Date Complete: 06/30/2004 06/30/2004 OAT A NETWORKS CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE - FY04I05 Estimated Price Breakdown Chart ITEM SERVICE RATE UNIT TOTAl UNIT~ MONTHL) ANNUAl 1 IBM Network $12.50 Per device, per month 0 $0.00 $0.00 2 Codex Network $100.00 Per device, per month 0 $0.00 $0.00 3 Independent Network $30.00 Per device, per month 0 $0.00 $0.00 4 Advanced Digital Network $60.00 Per month, per circuit 0 $0.00 $0.00 5 Virtual DMZ $400.00 Per device, per month 0 $0.00 $0.00 6 CORNET $0.0687 Per MS, per month 284714 $1,629.98 $19,559.82 7 VPN $10.0000 Per user, per month 0 $0.00 $0.00 8 Internal VPN $50.0000 Per month, per connection 0 $0.00 $0.00 9 RAS $2.0000 Per hour, per user 0 $0.00 $0.00 Total Estimated Cost based on Current Services: $1,629.98 $19,559.82 r"' Date Infonnation Provided: 06/3012004 If at any time bandwidth utilization becomes immeasurable, an Executive-Technology Committee (ETC) approved billing methodology will be implemented. BILLING INFORMATION Billing for Data Communications Services provided to the City of lake Elsinore covered under this contract will be generated during the month following the date of service. Fixed Total: $ 0.00 Monthly Total (estimated): $1,629.98 Time and Materials: Per customer request A County of Riverside Department of Information Technology invoice will then be forwarded to the City of Lake Elsinore for all billed services at the end of the billing month or the end of the month following the date of service. Each invoice is due NET 30. Purchase Order information must be furnished by the City of lake Elsinore prior to any work being initiated. Billina Definitions Fixed Total: Monthly Total: Time and Materials: r"' A one-time charge billed during implementation or a recurring charge that does not change. Allocation of annual charges per month. labor and parts based on service requests or work orders. Infonnation Technology Addendum CDOO - Data Communications Page 15 of 15 Addendum Date: 7/1/2004 (, Printed on: 9/15/2004 AQENOA nEM NO. '" PAGE.l10F~ ~ CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: DICK W A TENP AUGH, CITY MANAGER DATE: OCTOBER 26,2004 SUBJECT: YEARL Y SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT AND LICENSE FOR SUNGARD H.T.E. INC. BACKGROUND: ~ Sungard H.T.E. Inc. is the software company that is responsible for all of our programs on the IBM AS400. These include: Asset Management 1, Cash Receipts, GMBA, Payroll/Personnel, Building Permits, Business Licenses, Code Enforcement, LandlParcel Management, Planning and Zoning and all the program modifications for these programs. DISCUSSION: We have been utilizing this software since 1992 and should continue with our maintenance of these programs in order to get the latest program updates. This also covers phone and dial in service for all programs. FISCAL IMPACT: This expense was budgeted in the Economic Development & Information Technology Division under the Equipment Maintenance and Repair line item. There is no additional Fiscal Impact to the City at this time. ~ AQENOA ITEM NO. ..., , PAGE-L~ RECOMMENDATION: ""'" Staff recommends that Council approve this expense. This is a sole source vendor and as long as we use the software we must continue to use Sungard H. T.E. Inc. for the maintenance of this software. REVIEWED BY: PREPARED BY: Administrative Services APPROVED FOR AGENDA LISTING: ~lJVd~~ ~~ ;(1. tuJ. Dick Watenpaugh, City Manag '-'" ""'" AQENDA ITEM NO.-L.. "'. PAGE10F~ SUNGARD@ INVOICE Company 100 Invoice No 849781 Date 28/Sep/2004 Page 10f2 HTE INC. /'"" RECE\VED OCI 0 7 200~ ,,,--.,......;-'.: !NTS DAYAP.I E Bill To: City of lake Elsinore 'u,-,,_,! I '-Sfilp To: 130 South Main Street LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 United States Attn: Accounts Payable 909-674-3124 1000 Business Center Dr. Lake Mary, Florida 32746 407-304-3235 www.hteinc.com City of lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 United States Attn: Accounts Payable 909-674-3124 .Dqe Date~~' 2'" ,"". ,l-'::t':;, 3 '''';''''.' 4., '.,>~,: -~; .~" ,'. '5: ".".. ~ :~<,---; . ,~~",; ,,:~,. :-... ~ ~~. ; --: ,~, " ~l}1'l.CJt\R1.? HTE I~C. · ~ank of ~rnerica n / _ /, _ SUNGARD@ INVOICE HTE INC. Company 100 Invoice No 849781 Date 28/Sep/2004 Page 2of2 1000 Business Center Dr. Lake Mary, Florida 32746 407-304-3235 www.hteinc.com ~ Bill To: City of lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 United States Atto: Accounts Payable 909-674-3124 Ship To: City of lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 United States Atto: Accounts Payable 909-674-3124 9 ,<-,-"~ V'f r;.,,~:'~.. ';;-::-:',: ,-,--~,~~-~t~.,;.. REMIT PAYMENT TO: SUNGARD HTE INC. · Bank of America 1?7n0 rnl1prtif'\n rpnt.....:>.r Tlr;r(~ _ rhlr10n 1T hnhC)~ ~ CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: RICHARD J. WATENPAUGH, CITY MANAGER DATE: CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 12,2004 SUBJECT: CANYON HILLS MARKET PLACE - COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NOS. 2004-02 AND 2004..10 (CANYON HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN) APPLICANT Sudberry Properties. 5465 Morehouse Drive Suite 260 San Diego, CA 92121-4714 Attention: Mr. Colton Sudberry REQUEST Request that the City Council approve the following applications: ,-..... 1. Commercial Design Review No. 2004-02 for portion of proposed Canyon Hills Market Place commercial center that is located within Planning Area 3 of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan. 2. Commercial Design Review No. 2004-10 for portion of proposed Canyon Hills Market Place commercial center that is located within Planning Area 4 of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan. BACKGROUND Staff presented the application at the October 19, 2004 Planning Commission meeting. The Planning Commission heard staff's report, accepted public testimony, considered the application, and adopted Resolution Nos. 2004-143 and 2004-144, which recommended that the City Council approve the two commercial design review applications for the proposed Canyon Hills Market Place commercial center. In addition, the Planning Commission also adopted Resolution Nos. 2004-145 through 2004-148, which approved four conditional use permit applications for a proposed drive-through for a future drug store; an outdoor dining area; a gas station, food mart, and car wash; and a lube center; respectively. Please refer to Attachment A for the staff report from the October 19, 2004 Planning Commission meeting. The Planning Commission staff report further describes the proposed project and applications. PROJECT LOCATION The proposed Canyon Hills Market Place is located within the Canyon Hills Specific Plan area, which is located within the eastern boundaries of the City of Lake Elsinore, east of the 1-15 Freeway. Direct access to ,-..... the Specific Plan area is from the 1-15 Freeway to Railroad Canyon Road, which crosses the northwest comer of the Specific Plan area. AGENDA IlEM NO. I)~ i $1 'I ,.. 1:1 i) : REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 26, 2004 PAGE 2 ....." SUBJECT: CANYON HILLS MARKET PLACE - COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NOS. 2004-02 AND 2004-10 (CANYON HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN) The Canyon Hills Market Place, is comprised of two separate areas which are defined as Planning Areas 3 and 4 by the Canyon Hills Specific Plan. Planning Area 3 is located along the northwestern side of Railroad Canyon Road; Canyon Hills Road presently "Ts" along its southern boundaries. Planning Area 4 is located along the southeastern corner of Railroad Canyon Road at Canyon Hills Road. Planning Area 4 is currently graded and was previously utilized as a temporary school site in 2002. Refer to Attachment B, which presents the location of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan area and location of Planning Areas 3 and 4 in relationship to the overall Canyon Hills Specific Plan. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed Canyon Hills Market Place is comprised of two separate areas which are defined as Planning Areas 3 and 4 by the Canyon Hills Specific Plan. There are two Commercial Design applications being requested for City Council consideration. The application for considering the proposed commercial development within Planning Area 3 (7.82 acres) is Commercial Design Review 2004-02. The application for considering the proposed commercial development within Planning Area 4 (14.05 acres) is Commercial Design Review 2004- I O. The following describes the proposed commercial center according to Planning Areas. I. Plannin2 Area 3 (Commercial Desi2n Review 2004-02): The commercial development proposed within Planning Area 3 relates more to automotive uses and includes eight separate pad areas. The following Table describes proposed uses and building area for each pad location. It should be noted at this writing, the applicant has not yet determined the actual uses for all the pads. The anticipated use will be indicated ~ if known by the applicant. Attachment C presents the site plan for Planning Area 3. TABLE PAD NUMBER, PROPOSED USES, AND PAD SIZES PAD NUMBER 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 PROPOSED USE Auto Repair Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Gas StationIFood Mart/Car Wash Lube/Tune Commercial BUILDING AREA (SF) 5,410 6,050 6,050 4,500 4,500 6,190 3,450 4,000 40,150 SF The main entry will be via a signalized driveway located at Railroad Canyon Road and Canyon Hills Road. An additional driveway will be located off of Railroad Canyon Road to the west and will be restricted to "right-in" and "right-out" only. Each of these entrances will be designed with deceleration lanes to facilitate entry to the project off of Railroad Canyon Road. Future access for emergency vehicles to the northeast will also be provided. Internal circulation will be made available by a central circulation spine that connects with each building pad. Parking is provided in accordance with parking standards contained in the Canyon Hills Specific Plan and Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requirements) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. Based on applicable standards, the ultimate commercial development within Planning ~ AGENDA I1BI NO. 81 ~ PAGE ~._OF l~O; REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 26, 2004 PAGE 3 r'"' SUBJECT: CANYON HILLS MARKET PLACE - COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NOS. 2004-02 AND 2004-10 (CANYON HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN) Area 3 requires a total of211 parking spaces. The applicant is providing 224 parking spaces. In addition, "Streetprint" will be provided at all vehicular driveway entrances. The architectural style for the Planning Area 3 commercial center is a "California Winery" -influenced design. All the buildings incorporate common and distinct architectural elements that provide a sense of continuity. The scale of the buildings has been kept intentionally small to be compatible with the rural setting. The buildings will be constructed of concrete masonry, wood framing, or metal in the case of the gas station with predominantly plaster finishes. The buildings will feature stone veneer that will extend up to the roof in gabled areas. Attachment D presents building elevations for the proposed buildings within Planning Area 3. 2. PlanniDl~ Area 4 (Commercial Desi2n Review 2004-10): The commercial development proposed within Planning Area 4 includes a supermarket, drug store, and general commercial uses, and includes seven separate pad areas. The following Table describes proposed uses and building area for each pad location. It should be noted at this writing, the applicant has not yet determined the actual uses for all the pads. The anticipated use will be indicated if known by the applicant. Attachment E presents the site plan for Planning Area 4. /"'" TABLE PAD NUMBER, PROPOSED USES, AND PAD SIZES PAD NUMBER 12 14 15 16 17A 17B 19 PROPOSED USE Commercial Drug Store Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Market BUILDING AREA (SF) 5,000 13,500 2,673 7,700 11,450 9,150 58,000 107,473 SF The main entry will be via a signalized full entry driveway (right-turn in/out and left-turn inlout) located at Canyon Hills Road. Another driveway will be located off of Railroad Canyon Road and will be restricted to "right-in" only. In addition, two additional driveways will be located off of Canyon Hills Road and will be restricted to "right-in" and "right-out" only. The entrance off of Railroad Canyon Road will be designed with a deceleration lane along Railroad Canyon Road. Internal circulation will be made available by two drive aisles that connect with each building pad. Truck routes and loading zones are provided and will be screened. Parking is provided in accordance with parking standards contained in the Canyon Hills Specific Plan and Chapter 17.66 (parking Requirements) ofthe Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. Based on applicable standards, the ultimate commercial development within Planning Area 4 requires a total of 444 parking spaces. The applicant is providing 570 parking spaces. In addition, "Streetprint" will be provided at all vehicular driveway entrances. r'"' The architectural style for the Planning Area 4 commercial center is a "California Winery"-influenced design. All the buildings incorporate common and distinct architectural elements that provide a sense of AGENDA I1BI NO. 81 ~ PACE 3__OF I~O; REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 26, 2004 PAGE 4 """"" SUBJECT: CANYON HILLS MARKET PLACE - COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NOS. 2004-02 AND 2004-10 (CANYON HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN) continuity. The scale of the buildings has been kept intentionally small to be compatible with the rural setting. The buildings will be constructed of concrete masonry or wood framing with predominantly plaster finishes. The buildings will feature stone veneer that will extend up to the roof in gabled areas. Attachment F presents building elevations for the proposed buildings within Planning Area 4. DISCUSSION The Commercial Design Review applications were reviewed in accordance with criteria contained in the Canyon Hills Specific Plan and City's Zoning Code, including Chapter 17.82 (Design Review), Chapter 17.38 (Non-Residential Development Standards) and Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requirements) from the Zoning Code; and the C 1 and C2 development standards from the Canyon Hills Specific Plan. The Planning Commission supported the proposed Commercial Design Review applications and recommended- approval because it was determined that the proposed Canyon Hills Market Place project was generally well- designed and incompliance with design guidelines and criteria contained in the Canyon Hills Specific Plan and City Zoning Code. The applications adequately addressed the following design elements and ~riteria: Siting; Access, Circulation and Parking Layout; Pedestrian Accessibility; Landscaping; and Architecture, Color, and Materials. The Commercial Design Review applications also satisfied appropriate findings that are described in the Planning Commission staff report and resolutions. It should also be noted that the Planning Commission approved four Conditional Use Permits (CUP) which '-"" were requested by the applicant for both Planning Areas 3 and 4, to allow: (l) a drive-through at a future drug store; (2) an outdoor dining area; (3) a gas station, food mart, and car wash facility; and (4) a lube and tune center. Please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff report which further describes these CUP applications. As discussed above, the Planning Commission recommended approval ofthe two Commercial Design Review applications, which together comprise the Canyon Hills Market Place commercial shopping center. The Planning Commission was complimentary of the project's overall design and architecture. The Planning Commission did ask some minor clarification questions on the project's design and ofthe project's signage. The applicant adequately responded to the Planning Commission's questions. The applicant requested revision of the two following conditions: · Condition No. 13: The condition read, "All trash enclosures shan incorporate stone veneer into the side wans and provide wooden trellises, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee." Staffbelieved that one of the primary design components which visually connects the various commercial buildings is the use of stone veneer. Since numerous trash enclosures will be constructed throughout the commercial center, staffbelieved stone veneer should be incorporated into the design of the trash enclosures to further connect the buildings and structures. The applicant, however, preferred that landscaping be provided to screen views of the trash enclosures. The applicant believed that trucks and vehicles backing from parking spaces would damage the stone veneer and therefore, the use oflandscaping would be a better and more practical buffer. The condition was revised as follows: ....." AGliNDA ~ JIO. f) 1 , PACE if.. OF I~D; REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 26, 2004 /"" PAGE 5 SUBJECT: CANYON HILLS MARKET PLACE - COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NOS. 2004-02 AND 2004-10 (CANYON HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN) "All trash enclosures shall comply with the City's detail for trash enclosures and shall provide other enhancements deemed appropriate by the applicant and the Community Development Director or designee." . Condition No. 16: The condition read, "No outdoor storage of materials/merchandise is permitted." The applicant believed the condition was too restrictive for prospective tenants. Staff reminded the applicant and Planning Commission that the intent of the condition is to restrict permanent storage of materials and merchandise; however, the City does allow storage associated with temporary uses and events. Therefore, the condition was revised as follows: "No outdoor storage of materials/merchandise is permitted, except if related to those temporary uses and/or events that are allowed by issuance of a City temporary use permit." No one from the public spoke. The applicant accepted the revised Conditions of Approval during the Planning Commission meeting. ENVIRONMENTAL /"" The Addendum to the 1989 Final Canyon Hills Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report, which was prepared in accordance with Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines, provides the necessary environmental clearances for the proposed applications. The proposed commercial uses are either permitted by right or conditionally permitted by the Canyon Hills Specific Plan. Accordingly, staff believes the proposed applications implement the land use objectives and requirements of the Specific Plan and finds that further environmental evaluation is unnecessary. FISCAL IMPACTS All areas within Canyon Hills, including the project sites, are currently annexed into Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 2003-01 (City-Wide CFD for Police, Fire and Paramedics) and CFD No. 2003-02 (Funding, Construction, and Acquisition Agreement between the City and Pardee Homes). These CFDs offset the annual negative fiscal impacts on public safety operations and maintenance including City-wide improvements and facilities relating to fire and police protection, and City-maintained lighting and landscaping. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the following applications: 1. Commercial Design Review No. 2004-02. 2. Commercial Design Review No. 2004-10, based on Attachments A through F; the Planning Commission Findings; and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. /"" AGENDA ITEM NO. 81 ~ PAGE 5__OF J~u; REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 26, 2004 PAGE 6 """'" SUBJECT: CANYON HILLS MARKET PLACE - COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NOS. 2004-02 AND 2004-10 (CANYON HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN) PREPARED BY: Duane Morita, Senior Planner 4!~i1la Planning and Code Enforcement Manager REVIEWED BY: APPROVED BY: APPROVED FOR AGENDA LISTING: ~ I (l1.h44 e- t/4r Ci Manager's Office ATTACHMENTS .~ Attachment A: October 19, 2004 Planning Commission staff report Attachment B: Location Map for Planning Areas 3 and 4 Attachment C: Site Plan for Planning Area 3 Attachment D: Building Elevations for Planning Area 3 Attachment E: Site Plan for Planning Area 4 Attachment F: Building Elevations for Planning Area 4 Full-size set of Architectural Plans for Planning Areas 3 and 4 ....., ,.,eNDA ItEM NO. d..J PAOE ~ OF J -::l.n ~ ".-- REVISED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CANYON HILLS MARKETPLACE COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NOS. 2004-02 AND 2004-10 Recommended revisions to the Conditions of Approval are indicated by strilte 9Ut for deleted text and italics for new text. PLANNING DIVISION General Conditions 1. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, Agents, and its Consultants from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, Consultants or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning implementation and construction of the Canyon Hills Marketplace, which action is bought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Sections 65009 and/or 66499.37, and Public Resources Code Section 21167. The City will promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City and will cooperate fully with the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, or proceeding, the applicant shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. 2. Future development shall comply with those standards and guidelines contained in the Canyon Hills Specific Plan. ".-- 3. Those issues, standards, guidelines, etc. not addressed in the Canyon Hills Specific Plan will revert to the City Municipal Code and/or Zoning Code in effect at the time future projects are constructed. t. ,~ 4. The applicant shall provide all applicable project-related onsite and off site improvements as described in the Canyon Hills Specific Plan document and Tentative Tract Map No. 30496. 5. The applicant shall implement appropriate mitigation measures contained in the Mitigation .Monitoring Program for the Canyon Hills Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report. 6. All future proposals shall be reviewed by the City on a project-by-project basis. If determined necessary by the Community Development Director or designee, adgitional environmental analysis will be required. 7. Provisions of the City's Noise Ordinance shall be satisfied during all site preparation and construction activity. Site preparation activity and construction shall not commence before 7 :00 AM and shall cease at 7 :00 PM, Monday through Friday. Construction activity shall not take place on Saturday, Sunday, or any Legal Holidays. 8. Throughout construction, as deemed appropriate by the City and the applicant, fugitive dust suppression along project and perimeter streets and other connecting roads shall be applied to minimize fugitive dust generation. Fugitive dust suppression techniques may include soil watering, application of soil binders, and/or placement of gravel or other appropriate material to minimize vehicle generated dust. ".-- AGENDA ITEM NO. PACt! J 31. OF I~O ~ REVISED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CANYON HILLS MARKETPLACE COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NOS. 2004-02 AND 2004-10 (Continued) ....., Conditions For Commercial Design Review Nos. 2004-02 and 2004-10 9. Approval for Commercial Design Review Nos. 2004-02 and 2004-10 will lapse and be void unless a building permit is issued within two years of the approval date. An extension of time, up to one (l) year may be granted by the Community Development Director prior to the expiration of the initial Commercial Design Review approval upon application by the applicant and payment of required fees one (l) month prior to expiration. 10. All site improvements approved with this request shall be constructed as indicated on the approved site plan and elevations. Revisions to approved site plans or building elevations shall be subject to the review of the Community Development Director. All plans submitted for Building Division Plan Check shall conform to the submitted plans as modified by Conditions of Approval, or the Planning Commission/City Council through subsequent action. 11. Any alteration or expansion of this Design Review approval shall be reviewed according to the provisions of Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) ofthe Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 12. Mechanical equipment will be sufficiently screened by the building parapets or other screening materials or methods to ensure said equipment is not publicly visible, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. 13. An trash enclosures shan iDeorporate staDe yeDeer iDto the side wans aDd pro'/ide woodeD tnUises, subjeet to the approval of the CommuDity DeYelapmeDt Direetor or desigDee comply with the City's detail for trash enclosures and shall provide other enhancements deemed appropriate by the applicant and the Community Development Director or designee. ....." 14. Materials and colors depicted on the plans and materials board shall be used unless modified by the Community Development Director or designee. 15. The Planning Division shall approve the location of any construction trailers utilized during construction. All construction trailers shall require a cash bond in the amount of$l ,000.00 to be processed through the Planning Division. 16. No outdoor storage of materials/merchandise is permitted, except ifrelated to those temporary uses and/or events that are allowed by issuance of a City temporary use permit. 17. All exterior lighting shall be shielded and directed onsite so as not to create glare onto neighboring property and streets or allow illumination above the horizontal plane of the fixture. All light fixtures shall match the architectural style of the building. 18. All exterior downspouts shall be concealed or architecturally screened and painted to match the exterior color of the building as approved by the Community Development Director or Designee. ....., AGENDA ITEM NO. () 1 -.q PACE ~OF~ /'" REVISED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CANYON HILLS MARKETPLACE COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NOS. 2004-02 AND 2004-10 (Continued) 19. The Community Development Director or designee shall review and approve final architectural plans to ensure all cornice elements shall be raised, the number of diamond ceramic tiles are reduced on certain elevations, and the back sides of those parapets that are exposed to public view are architecturally enhanced. 20. All drive aisles and loading areas shall be kept and maintained free and clear of any materials/merchandise so as not to obstruct onsite circulation and deliveries. 21. All parking stalls shall be double-striped with four-inch lines, that are two feet apart. 22. A l2-inch concrete paver along the side of parking stalls that are adjacent to planters (paver to include curb width) shall be provided. 23. All exposed slopes in excess of three feet in height shall have a permanent irrigation system and erosion control vegetation installed, approved by the Planning Division. 24. Streetprint shall be provided at all driveway entrances. Onsite landscaping shall be enhanced at all entry areas and major intersections and shall be subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director or designee. /'" 25. The applicant shall meet ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) requirements. 26, No exterior roof ladders shall be permitted. 27. All service and loading doors shall be painted to match the building. 28. Onsite surface drainage shall not cross sidewalks. Prior to Buildinf!/Gradim! Permit Issuance 29. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building permits, the applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgement of Conditions" form and shall return the executed original to the Planning Division for inclusion in the case records. 30. Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced on page one of building plans submitted to the Building Division Plan Check. All Conditions of Approval shall be met prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. 31. Prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for each Planning Area, the entire site parking lot, entry driveways, perimeter and internal landscaping, offsite improvements, etc. shall be completed as indicated on the approved plans, or a construction/site improvement phasing plan for that particular Planning Area as approved by the Community Development Director. r-- AGENDA ITEM ~o. 81 "! PACE ,___OF J~D; REVISED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CANYON HILLS MARKETPLACE COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NOS. 2004-02 AND 2004-10 (Continued) """" 32. Three (3) sets of the Final Landscaping/Irrigation Detail Plan shall be submitted, reviewed and approved by the City's Landscape Architect Consultant and the Community Development Director or designee, prior to issuance of building permit. A Landscape Plan Check & Inspection Fee will be charged prior to final landscape approval based on the Consultant's fee plus forty percent (40%) City fee. · All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic sprinkler system with I 00% plant and grass coverage using a combination of drip and conventional irrigation methods. · Applicant shall plant street trees selected from the City's Street Tree List, a maximum of forty feet (40') apart and at least twenty-four-inch (24") box in size. · All planting areas shall be separated from paved areas with a six inch (6") high and six inch (6") wide concrete curb. · Planting within fifte'en feet (15') of ingress/egress points shall be no higher than thirty-six inches (36"). · Landscape planters shall be planted with an appropriate parking lot shade tree pursuant to the LEMC and Landscape Design Guidelines. · Any transformers and mechanical or electrical equipment shall be indicated on landscape plan and screened as part of the landscaping plan. """" · The landscape plan shall provide for ground cover, shrubs, and trees and meet all requirements of the City's adopted Landscape Guidelines. Special attention to the use ofXeriscape or drought resistant plantings with combination drip irrigation system to be used to prevent excessive watering. · All landscape improvements shall be bonded 100% for material and labor for two years from installation sign-off by the City. Release of the landscaping bond shall be requested by the applicant at the end of the required two years with approval/acceptance by the Landscape Consultant and Community Development Director or Designee. · All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed within affected portion of any phase at the time a Certificate of Occupancy is requested for any building. All planting areas shall include plantings in the Xeriscape concept, drought tolerant grasses and plants. · Final landscape plan must be consistent with approved site plan. · Final landscape plans to include planting and irrigation details. 33. The applicant shall establish and record a reciprocal shared parking agreement with the County of Riverside which allows all future commercial tenants and users to share parking onsite. 34. The applicant shall comply with the requirements ofthe Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. Proof shall be presented to the Chief Building Manager prior to issuance of building permits and final approval. '-' AGENDA ITEM NO. 81 ".. PACE lQ__OF 1~c); /"""'- REVISED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CANYON HILLS MARKETPLACE COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NOS. 2004-02 AND 2004-10 (Continued) 35. The applicant shall prepare a signage program which illustrates community theme signage, directional signs, monuments, etc., subject to approval by the Community Development Director or designee. 36. The applicant shall obtain all necessary State and Federal permits, approvals, or other entitlements, where applicable, prior to each phase of development of the project. 37. The applicant shall comply with the following City programs: the City Source Reduction and Recycling Element and Household Hazardous Waste Element, the County Solid Waste Management Plan and Integrated Waste Management Plan. 38. Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall submit a letter of verification (will-serve letter) to the City Engineer, for all required utility services. 39. The. applicant shall meet all requirements of the providing electric utility company. 40. The applicant shall meet all requirements of the providing gas utility company. 41. The applicant shall meet all requirements of the providing telephone utility company. ,.-. 42. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall provide assurance that all required fees to the Lake Elsinore Unified School District have been paid. 43. Bus shelters shall be designed consistently with the materials and colors of the proposed Canyon Hills Market Place. ENGINEERING DIVISION 44. Construct fourth leg of existing signal at Canyon Hills Drive and Railroad Canyon Road to provide access to this site. Signal shall be operational prior to first Certificate of Occupancy. 45. Provide deceleration lane at southerly entrances for both the eastbound and westbound sides of Railroad Canyon Road. Deceleration lane shall be designed and constructed to Caltrans standards. 46. All landscaping and signage for both planning areas shall be designed and constructed to preserve traffic sight distances consistent with Caltrans standards. 47. Provide for long-term barricade and erosion control methods at the stubbed street at the southwest end of the property in Planning Area 3. 48. Entrance drive aisles for both Planning Areas shall be clear from parking spaces or intersecting drive aisles for a minimum of 40 feet measured from the curb line of the project entrance. 49. Building structures shall not encroach onto established easements. ,.-.. 50. Provide a detention / desiltation basin to mitigate for the difference in flows (developed and undeveloped) for the 1 OO-year storm. AGENDA ITEM NO. PACt; II 81 OF 1~() REVISED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CANYON HILLS MARKETPLACE COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NOS. 2004-02 AND 2004-10 (Continued) ~ 51. All. off-site grading, non-historic drainage and/or construction shall be notarized and have recorded letter(s) of pennission. 52. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to final map approval. 53. Underground water rights shall be dedicated to the City pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.52.030 (LEMC) and be consistent with the City's agreement with the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. 54. All street improvements, including traffic signals, shall be installed and functioning prior to certificate of occupancy. 55. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (LEMC 16.34, Resolution 85-26), mitigation fees, area drainage fee, traffic impact fee (TIF), encroachment permit fees and inspection fees associated with the project and its development. 56. Submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project. Submit this letter prior to final map approval. 57. Construct all public works improvements per approved street plans (LEMC 12.04). Plans must be approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to final map approval (LEMC 16.34). ......, 58. Street improvement plans and specifications shall be prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Riverside County Road Department standards, latest edition, and City Codes (LEMC 12.04 and 16.34). 59. Enter into an agreement with the City for the construction of public works improvements and post the appropriate bonds prior to final map approval. 60. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 W' x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of public works improvements will be scheduled and approved. 61. Install permanent survey monuments in compliance with the City's Municipal Code. 62. Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. 63. Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by the Riverside County Fire Department. 64. Provide street lighting and show lighting improvements as part of street improvement plans as required by the City Engineer. 65. Install blue reflective pavement markers in the street at all fire hydrant locations. ......., AGENDA ItEM NO. 81 ~ PACE lLOF J~O ~ ~ REVISED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CANYON HILLS MARKETPLACE COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NOS. 2004-02 AND 2004-10 (Continued) 66. Submit a traffic control plan showing all traffic control devices for the tract to be approved prior to final map approval. All traffic control devices shall be installed prior to final inspection of public improvements. This includes No Parking and Street Sweeping Signs for streets within the development. 67. All improvement plans and tract maps shall be digitized. At Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall submit tapes and/or disks which are compatible with City's ARC Info/GIS or the applicant shall pay $300 per sheet for City digitizing. 68. All utilities except electrical over 12 kv shall be placed underground, as approved by the serving utility. 69. Apply and obtain a grading permit with appropriate security prior to building permit issuance. A grading plan signed and stamped by a California Registered Civil Engineer shall be required if the grading exceeds 50 cubic yards or the existing flow pattern is substantially modified as determined by the City Engineer. If the grading is less than 50 cubic yards and a grading plan is not required, a grading permit shall still be obtained so that a cursory drainage and flow pattern inspection can be conducted before grading begins. 70. Provide soils, geology and seismic report including street design recommendations. Provide final soils report showing compliance with recommendations. ~ 71. An Alquist-Priolo study shall be performed on the site to identify any hidden earthquake faults and/or liquefaction zones present on-site. A letter certifying that the site is clear of these hazards will be required if mitigation is not identified. 72. All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer and he shall certify all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and proper erosion control. All manufactured slopes greater than 30 ft. in height shall be contoured. 73. Prior to commencement of grading operations, applicant shall provide to the City with a map of all proposed haul routes to be used for movement of export material. Such routes shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 74. Provide to the City a photographic baseline record of the condition of all proposed public City haul roads. In the event of damage to such roads, the applicant shall pay full cost of restoring public roads to the baseline condition. A bond may be required to ensure payment of damages to the public right-of-way, subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 75. Individual lot drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility or accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance or conveyed to a drainage easement. 76. On-site drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way should be contained within drainage easements shown on the final map. A note should be added to the final map stating: "Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions". ~ 77. All natural drainage traversing the sites shall be conveyed through the sites, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer. AGENDA REM NO. PACE )3 81 OF l;JO REVISED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CANYON HILLS MARKETPLACE COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NOS. 2004-02 AND 2004-10 (Continued) '-" 78. Meet all requirements ofLEMC 15.64 regarding flood hazard regulations. 79. Meet all requirements ofLEMC 15.68 regarding flood plain management. 80. Submit Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports for review and approval by City Engineer and the Riverside County Flood Control District prior to approval of final map. The applicant shall mitigate any flooding and/or erosion caused by development of the sites and diversion of drainage. 81. All drainage facilities shall be con~tructed to Riverside County Flood Control District Standards. 82. Storm drain inlet facilities shall be appropriately stenciled to prohibit illegal dumping in the drain system; the wording and stencil shall be approved by the City Engineer. 83. 10-year storm runoff shall be contained within the curb and the I DO-year storm runoff shall be contained within the street right-of-way. When either of these criteria is exceeded, drainage facilities shall be installed. 84. Install BMP's using the best available technology to mitigate any urban pollutants from entering the watershed. 85. The applicant shall obtain approval from Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board for their Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan including approval of erosion control for the grading plan prior to '-" issuance of grading permits. The applicant shall provide a SWPPP for post construction which describes BMP's that will be implemented for the development and including maintenance responsibilities. 86. Provide first flush BMP's using the best available technology that will reduce storm water pollutants from parking areas and driveways. Grading plans shall include details of the erosion control provisions. 87. Intersection site distance shall meet the design criteria of the CAL TRANS Design Manual. If site distance can be obstructed, a special limited use easement must be recorded to limit the slope, type oflandscaping and wall placement. 88. All parcels shall have direct access to public rights-of-way or be provided with a minimum 3D-foot ingress and egress easement to public right-of-way by separate instrument or through map recordation. 89. In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal and recycling, the applicant shall be required to contract with CR&R, Inc., for removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of construction. RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 90. The applicant shall comply with all comments and conditions of approval from the Riverside County Fire Department (as attached). '-" AGENDA ITEM NO. 81, PAGE JLJ__Ot= J1D; /"'"' REVISED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CANYON HILLS MARKETPLACE COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NOS. 2004-02 AND 2004-10 (Continued) 'POLICE DEPARTMENT 91. The applicant shall comply with all comments and conditions of approval from the Police Department (as attached). COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 92. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fee in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 93. The applicant to maintain all onsite landscaping. 94. The applicant to comply with all City Ordinances regarding construction debris and removal (Chapter 8.16 LEMC). 95. The applicant to comply with all NPDES regulations. OUTSIDE AGENCIES /"'"' 96. The applicant shall comply with all recommendation and requirements identified in the attached letter from Riverside Transit Agency dated April 29, 2004. /"'"' AGENDA ITEM NO. '. 81 '.. PAGE IS~f1I l~O: . __~~-1:.:.!L~~.!._L!...:_~.Y. 11111 Tom Tisdale i'lfeUlfel l'rolldll. ~l!nilll! Ihe: UmllC\)rp~)r;:l~ll ,1rC;I.~ II(Rlt..:r.Clc!C COlin!' 81la the C:!ic,llf. BlIlll\lII~ IiClUlllOnl .:. C::ij;::':'CI .:. C:m\\411 i-;I~,: .;- t' o~(;hdla .,;. I>...-scrl lJul Sprill,:.- .:. In,klll \'\"<:lh ImJio .:. La!..: l.:!s:l:lJr.: .:. La Ou.uw .:. MorellO V~ik\" ':. 1';1!J~! L\::r.:n .~. l\:IlJS .:. RandJl" Mrr.1l!i! <;,on .!,Icilll(\ -:. rCIIl\:;;ulil Bn"r(i I'll Sllr~n'f.\"or_" i.l,.;' t~'~'('r_ Di"l,;n! r"f',~ T.n.'~Ii'~n\:. I)I~hh.:1 ~ .in.. \'~...:,I.i~. niMri.:-. 1 n...~. \,'a:i"'ll 1)bLn,~ 4 .\.I~,u.l # \}Itl..:'. :>r"'1r-:(1 Co l\11 l.iV f1l\C [I)IC r itA IW. :JU:J:JJJ'tooo ~ "~~""!.~__~_""-.r.~~ r. J RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMEN~ In cooperation with the California Denaltmcnt of Forest'"" and fire Protec.tion 408Cl t emon SI., :?'~ FL. P.O. Box 1549, Riverside, Ca. 92502.1549. (909) 955-4777' (909) 955.488/1 fira PrOlectio.. P1i1nningand Engineering Service Seclion ~ LE -o~-j='fOgc.. DATE: l-/~7-[)_~LRE: ~~();J-M-- PLANNERllic."e ~cr..\c, The Riverside County Fire Departme~t requests an amended map with the following changes prior to issuance ofIetter of conditions: _ Show vicinity map with 2003 or later Thomas Brothers coordinates _ List all utility companies _~vcway width 00' "'O~nimum widtlJ2!i. __ Driveway grade not shownlincorrect maximum grade 15% ... Driveway surface notshownlincorrect. show asphalt or concrete -- Driveway radius not-shoWMncorrect. Contact Fire Dept. for guideline handout - Fire Dept lumaround not shown/incorrect Contacl Fire Dept. for guideline handout .--- Fire Dcpt. tumout not shownlincorrect.Contact Fire Dept. for guideline handout ~~P' classification"", 200l CB(ii<it'9= for bldg(s) ~?nstruction per 2001 CB(ii,;! ~m:ct for bldg(s) ~ow square footage per floor, mezzanines and total for building, for each building shown .~ .._ Label all buildings as proposed or existing. Label existing building either to remain or to be removed .~lans and elevations needed for buildings ~ow all ~ ,loading, unloading zones. etc ~tion and sizein galtons for aU above/underground fuel tanks, waste oil, LPG and chemical tanks. (If no tanks state on plans) 1._6edians must be setback 35 feet from face of cur~ I ~ AGENDA ITEM Nqr ..:J t . l PACE. I~f;~~ Of J~ ;. ~t:'.. . --'........";..... ;:,~ '"<'..., Afl- L-U' fl! 1!.Ul AM 11V ~u flAC f~C fAA nu. jUjjJJ.OOU f. . ~ ~. ,-. ._ Gate width and/or type of gate flot shown or incorrect. Gate must be a minimum _ teet in width. automatic and/or manual with a Rapid Emry System(s) Gale must be setback 35 feet from face of curb/road right of way. (lfno gates state on plans) '_"_ J)roject will require water service from a public water supply ___ Cul-de-sac length too long for High Fire Hazard area maximum length 660 feet _ Cul-de-sac exceeds maximum length of 1320 feet __.__ Cul-de-sac length too long fOT State Responsibility Area maximum length 800 feet. __ Primary and secondary access not shown/incorrect __ Driveways must take their access from a public or private street. NOT an easement ___ Vehicular access required within 150 feet of any portion of any building as measured along approved vehicular travel ways. Access shall be a minimum 24 feet in width, asphalt or concrete surface ._ State on plans if this is a "SHELL BUILDING NO TENANT';: /"'" __ ^ Fire Protection Engineers Report shaH be submitted for review and approval. prior to conditioning of the project. Fire flow letter was-faxed/mailed on date: to Letter must be retu~nedto fire Dept. prior to conditioning of project. Other All question regarding these corrections contact the Fire Department Planning Section at 909-955-4777. 3-6-03/enml /"'" AGENDA ITEM NO. f) I PAGE_/7 ~ OF ' /~~ """ September 14, 2004 Duane Morita, Senior Planner City of Lake Elsinore 130 S. Main 8t. Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 RE: CUP No. 2004-34, 2004-35, 2004-36 Dear Mr. Morita, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the above described project. The following issues of concern related to public safety and law enforcement are presented. PRE-CONSTRUCTION & CONSTRUCTION PHASES: To reduce thefts and burglaries during the construction phases of this project, the developer and builders need to provide site security. The Coachella Police Department recommends the developer and builders use bonded security guards licensed by the State of California Bureau of Security & Investigative Services Department to handle project security. ....."" Prior to project completion, the surface of walls, fences, buildings, logo monuments, etc. should be graffiti resistant through either surface composition, applied paint type and/or planned shielding by landscaping or plants. Prior to construction on any structure, a material storage area should be established and enclosed by a six-foot chain link fence to minimize theft of materials and/or equipment. A list of serial and/or license numbers of equipment stored at the location be maintained both, at the site and any off-site main office. The public and non- essential employees should be restricted in access to the construction areas. Current emergency contact information for the project should be kept on file with the Lake Elsinore Police Department, 333 W. Limited Ave., Lake Elsinore, CA 92530, phone number 951-245-3322. The developer and/or builder's name address, and phone number should be conspicuously posted at the construction site. Visibility into the construction site ....."" AGENDA ITEM NO. :J.;( td . /-:hP PAGE..;.U).;;.. OF .- ",..-- should not be intentionally hampered. Areas actually under construction should be lit during hours of darkness. All entrances and exits should be clearly marked. ADDRESSING: Address numbers should be illuminated during the hours of darkness and positioned to be readily readable from the street. Position the address numbers at a strategic and elevated section on the building to facilitate unhampered views from vehicular and pedestrian vantage points. Numbers that are a minimum height of 12" are recommended. SECURITY SYSTEMS: Silent or audible alarm systems should be installed. Comprehensive security systems should be provided for the following: perimeter building and access route protection, high valued storage areas, and interior building door to shipping and receiving area. Closed Circuit TV security cameras are recommended. DOORS: ",..-- Adequate security hardware, such as dead bolt locks, should be installed. All glass doors should be secured with a dead bolt. Dead bolt locks shall be the type whose dead bolt and deadlocking latch can be retracted by a single action of the inside door knob/lever/turn piece. WINDOWS: Louvered windows should not be used. Large windows and any window accessible from the side and rear but not visible from the street shall consist of rated burglary-resistant glazing or its equivalent. The type that attaches to the window frame is recommended. ROOF TOPS AND OPENINGS: If the building has skylights, one of the following shall be utilized for every skylight: -Rated burglary resistant glass or acrylic material, -Iron bars of at least one half-inch diameter, flat steel bars of at least one quarter- inch width, spaced no more than five inches apart under the skylight and securely fastened, or -Grill of at least one eighth-inch steel and two-inch mesh. All hatchway openings on the roof of any building shall be secured as follows. If the hatchway is wooden, it shall be covered on the outside with at least 16-gauge ",.-., sheet steel or its equivalent, attached in a manner making removal difficult. The AGENDA ITEM NO. ~I , PAGEdl- OF JdJ;J hatchway shall be secured from the inside with a slide bar or slide bolts. Only a crossbar or padlock provided by the fire marshal shall be used. Outside pin-type hinges on all hatchway openings shall have non-removable pins. ~ Exterior rooftop ladders should be eliminated or incorporated into the interior design. All air duct or air vent openings exceeding 8" by 12" on the rooftop or exterior walls of any building shall be secured by means of: -Iron bars or at least one half-inch diameter, or flat steel bars of at least one quarter-inch width, spaced no more than five inches and securely fastened, -Grill of at least one eighth-inch steel and two-inch mesh, and/or -If the barrier is on the outside, it shall be secured with galvanized rounded-head, flush bolts of at least 3/8" diameter. LIGHTING: Interior night-lights shall be used during hours of darkness when premises are closed for business. Parking lots and associated car ports, driveways, circulation areas, aisles, passageways, recesses, and grounds contiguous to buildings shall be provided with lighting of sufficient wattage to provide adequate illumination to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises from atleast 25 feet away during the hours of darkness. ~ All exterior doors shall have their own light source, which will adequately illuminate entry/exit areas at all hours in order to: -Make any person on the premises clearly visible, and -Provide adequate illumination for persons entering and exiting the building. LANDSCAPING: Landscaping shall be of the type and situated in locations to maximize observation while providing the desire degree of aesthetics. Security planting materials are encouraged along fence and property lines and under vulnerable windows. Landscaping shall not conceal doors or windows from view, obstruct visibility of the parking lot from the street or business buildings, nor provide access to the roof or windows. LINE OF SIGHT/NATURAL SURVEILLANCE: Wide-angled peepholes should be designed into solid doors, which are located in areas where natural surveillance is compromised, and which will be utilized by employees to access parking lots and pedestrian paths during the hours of darkness. ~ A(lENOA ITEM NO. ~ I . PAGE~OF Id:b ~ Single and double-binned trash enclosures should be located at the perimeter of the parking lot, not adjacent to buildings or contiguous to exterior building doors. Other line of sight obstructions (including recessed doorways, alcoves, etc.) should be avoided on building exterior walls, and interior hallways. Employees and/or security personnel should be positioned in areas where they cannot only monitor subjects entering and exiting the businesses but can survey restroom entrances. SIGNAGE/PARKING LOT: All entrances to parking areas shall be posted with appropriate signs per 22658(a) C.V.C., to assist in removal of vehicles at the property owners/managers request. Should the community development department, developer or construction staff have any questions regarding the listed law enforcement and public safety concerns, please contact Officer DeCou @ (951) 245-3322. /"'" Sincerely, Officer Beth DeCou Crime Prevention Officer CPTED Specialist /"'" AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ J ;>. " PAGE~J 01=');;;0 ~ Riverside Transit Agen" 1825 Third Street P.O. Box 59968 Riverside, CA 92517-1968 Phone: (909) 565-5000 Fax: (909) 565-5001 ~ April 29, 2004 Duane Morita, Senior Planner Planning Division, City of Lake Elsinore 130 S Main St Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 SUBJECT: - Canyon Hills MarketPlace, Case C2004-02 - Comments from RT A Thank you for the opportunity to review the site plan for the proposed 135,000 sq ft Canyon Hills MarketPlace retail project at the intersection of Railroad.Canyon and Canyon Hills Rds. A copy of RT A's internal staff report regarding the project is attached for your information. RT A Bus Route 40 currently operates along Railroad Canyon in front of the now-vacant site but the buses do not stop there now. Due to the street's designation as an urban arterial along most of its length, the Railroad Canyon - Newport Rd - Domenigoni Pkwy will be a busy highway and transit corridor connecting Hemet, Winchester, Menifee and Sun City to Lake Elsinore. Additional routes will probably be established in the future along Railroad Canyon due to continued residen- tial and commercial growth in the area. Because of the anticipated increased transit use, RT A staff believes it would be appropriate to have safe and conveniently located bus stops with bus turnouts at this signalized location. Regular bus service along Canyon Hills Rd is somewhat doubtful, as explained in the staff memo. ....." Riverside TransU Agency finds the project's design generally acceptable but would make the following requests: To provide more safe and convenient access to the transit option, RTA recommends the site plans or street improvement plans be modified to ensure the following features are indicated: · A paved, lighted and ADA-compliant bus stop turnout with space for related amenities should be indicated along the westbound Railroad Canyon Rd, just past the main inter- section. RT A advises the turnout be placed where Bldg 9 is closest to the street, and about midway between the intersection and the monument sign indicatedjust prior to Bldg 10. The turnout is not intended to interfere with visibility of the monument sign and would benefit from the ADA-compliant pathway out to Railroad Canyon that is already shown on the plans. The bus stop should incorporate a paved passenger waiting area and adequate space for installation of passenger benches, shelters and bus route signage by RT A, the City or others, at a future date. . A paved, lighted and ADA-compliant bus stop turnout with space for related amenities should be indicated along eastbound Railroad Canyon Rd, just prior to the first right turn into the parking lot. RT A advises the turnout be placed where Bldg 4 is closest to the Street. The turnout is not intended to interfere with visibility of the monument sign. The bus stop should incorporate a paved passenger waiting area and adequate space for installation of passenger benches, shelters and bus route signage by RT A, the City, RT A's designee, or others at a future date. ~ F:\data\Planning\MikeM\Word\Dev Review\lake Elsinore\2004\RTA Itr - CanyonHlsMarktpl.doc 2-7 AGENDA ITEM NO. /Jj , PAGE~ OF~- .flw ':tWiilrt .~ .~ " "",ff;4~~%" . '.~'?~ Ir' :1' ~~ (/{:.~' "6ft!, ';'l;j'~~ *1<"'" h / ," "" \ i1(*!. ~ ~~~~~~ 1825 Third Street P.O. Box 59968 Riverside. CA 92517-1968 Phone: (909) 565-5000 Fax: (909)565-5001 · The site or landscape plans should designate an ADA-compliant path for pedestrian travel from the main entrance of Bldg 4 out to Railroad Canyon Rd. · RT A advises that pathways to the bus stops be set off by special pavement or hardscape treatment or markings. · Information note: Sufficient right-of-way appears available for these turnouts without significant adjustment to sidewalks or required landscaping and with minimum distur- bance of future street tree or utility structure installations. The "related amenities" for bus stops should incorporate a concrete bus parking pad, a paved passenger waiting area and adequate space for future installation of bus rider benches, shelters and bus route signage. · Note: Regarding bus service along Canyon Hills Dr, RT A will not require bus turnouts along that street. Eastbound buses would stop just past the easternmost driveway, near the existing pavilion structure where a red-painted curbside bus stop would suffice. If the pavilion remains at that site, it could allow for some shaded passenger waiting benches (installed by RT A) when and if service starts up. This curb stop cannot be close to the driveway and would have to extend eastward, somewhat in front of the adjacent property. ~ . RT A staff observes that the pavilion seems to be an attractive, pedestrian-oriented amenity and wonders if it would be possible for the developer to perhaps relocate the pavilion to one of the recommended bus turnout sites where it could serve as an attractive and architecturally compatible bus passenger shelter and waiting area. It would make a positive roadside entry statement for Canyon Hills MarketPlace and would actually 'get more use' than where it is now situated. RT A respectfully requests these bus turnout and pedestrian pathway recommendations be made Conditions of Approval for any further plot plan reviews, related cases or Planning Commission action. The applicant's engineers are invited to contact RT A staff for further advisory information regarding these requests. RT A staff is also open to Lake Elsinore staff's suggestions for alternative means of providing transit-friendly amenities relative to this project. If you need further clarification or I can be of further assistance, please call me at (909) 565-5164 or contact me online at mmccoy@riversidetransit.com. Sin;;;1J;2 JHc Hichael McCoy tt Senior Planner / ~ F:\data\Planning\MikeM\Word\Dev Review\lake Elsinore\2004\RT A Itr - CanyonHlsMarktpl.doc d-l AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ '-. PA~().3 ,OF J;).J2ft April 29, 2004 ~ir ......., PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW From: Anne Palatino, Director of Planning _ Michael McCoy, Senior Planner ~ City of Lake Elsinore, Non-residential project - C2004-02, Site Plan & related cases for Canyon Hills MarketPlace, a 135,000 sq ft commercial center, at the intersection of Railroad Canyon and Canyon Hills Rds - RT A Comments Bus routes involved: #40, plus potential for future transit. To: Subject: Summary: Colton Sudberry Properties Inc proposes case C2004-02, a site plan for Canyon Hills Market Place, a 14-bldg, 135,000 sq ft project on 22.5 vacant acres, featuring a large grocery market, fast-food restaurants and other businesses on both sides of Railroad Canyon Rd at its intersection with Canyon Hills Rd (identified in the Thomas Guide as "Cottonwood Hills Rd") in Lake Elsinore. This large project includes a generous number of parking spaces, 750, and is located about 2% mi from Interstate 15. A large and architecturally distinct 'pavilion' structure is located almost at curbside and adjacent to the easternmost parking lot entrance along Canyon Hills Rd. ......., RT A local Route 40 currently serves this portion of Railroad Canyon and Newport Rds between the Diamond Stadium and the Menifee Town Center, at one-hour frequencies, however, the buses do not now stop at the project site. As the area builds out, and shop- ping areas such as Canyon Hills MarketPlace are established, additional transit will likely operate along this lengthy Railroad Canyon-Newport-Domenigoni Pkwy urban arterial that will soon directly connect Lake Elsinore to Hemel. According to RT A staff esti- mates, by 2014, about 4 buses an hour are expected to stop along Railroad Canyon Rd at Canyon Hills MarketPlace Future transit operations "are less likely on CanyonHillsRd because that street tends to lead into a 'pocket' of denser development that is unlikely to warrant bus service. Local shuttles and dial-a-ride services may operate there, but since the Menifee area to the east along Murrieta Rd is likely to remain semi-rural, there will be only minimum demand for transit originating in that area and using Canyon Hills. With Canyon Hills Marketplace situated at a major, signalized intersection along a designa- ted urban arterial such as Railroad Canyon, it is the logical and appropriate place, accord- ing to transit industry standards, to install new or upgraded bus stops. RT A will request new bus turnouts here on either side of Railroad Canyon and for some minor improvement to pedestrian access from the major buildings out to the bus stops. The typical bus turnout (or bus bay) is 150 feet long, including entrance and exit tapers. There should be a 50-ft long concrete pad to park the bus, according to industry standards. The turnout should be a minimum 10 ft deep, though 12 ft is preferred on an ......., F:\data\Planning\MikeM\Word\Dev Review\Lake Elsinore\2004\CanyonHlsMarktpl.doc "/ ) AGENDA ITEM NO. .0\ PAGrd!L. OF.ld:o ~ ...-.. urban arterial such as Railroad Canyon Rd. If a bike lane is planned along the shoulder and designated on the street plans, it may be used for turnout space, reducing the curb cut depth needed to 5 ft. The curb cut depth may also be reduced if street plans clearly indicate enough excess shoulder area will be available, outside of regularly traveled lanes to ensure the parked bus does not block traffic. RTA staff has reviewed the plans.supplied by Mr Duane Morita of the City of lake Elsinore Planning Dept and believes suitable sites for the bus turnouts can be located at Canyon Hills MarketPlace. To enhance safe and convenient transit use in this area, RTA will request the street improvement, grading, landscape plans or the plot plan for the project be revised slightly to specify installation of the following bus turnouts: . Westbound (north side of) on Railroad Canyon Rd, just past the main intersection. RT A advises the turnout be placed where Bldg 9 is closest to the street, and about midway between the intersection and the monument sign indicated just prior to Bldg 10. The turnout should avoid interfering with the monument sign. A turnout here would benefit from the indicated ADA-compliant pathway from Bldg 10 out to Railroad Canyon; . Eastbound (south side of) on Railroad Canyon Rd, just prior to the first right-turn driveway into the parking lot. RT A advises the turnout be placed where Bldg 4 is closest to the street. The turnout should avoid interfering with the monument sign. . Note: This eastbound bus turnout requires. an ADA-compliant pedestrian pathway from Bldg 4 out to Railroad Canyon; ...-.. . Note: RT A requests the plans specify designated pedestrian-oriented pathways from MarketPlace stores out to the bus stop be set off by special pavement or hard-scape treatment or markings. Regarding bus service along Canyon Hills Dr, in the event service is established, RT A will not require bus turnouts at the MarketPlace along that street. Eastbound buses would stop just past the easternmost driveway, near the existing pavilion structure where a red-painted curbside bus stop would suffice. If the pavilion remains at that site, it could allow some shaded passenger waiting benches (installed by RT A) when and if service commences. This curb stop cannot be close to the driveway and would have to ....- extend. eastward, somewhat in front of the adjacent property to the east. RT A staff observes that the pavilion seems to be an attractive, pedestrian-oriented amenity, although staff has not visited the site to be sure. The staff wonders if it would be possible for the developer to perhaps relocate the pavilion to one of the recom- mended bus turnout sites where it could serve as an attractive and architecturally compatible bus passenger shelter and waiting area. It would make a positive roadside entry statement for Canyon Hills MarketPlace and would actually 'get more use' than the current siting provides. A letter will be sent to the City of lake Elsinore referring to these observations and requesting the two bus turnouts and the pathway from Bldg 4 be made Conditions of Approval for any further plot plan reviews and related cases. "...... F:\data\Planning\MikeM\Word\Dev Review\lake Elsinore\2004\CanyonHlsMarktpl.doc ?1 ..- AGENDA ITEM NO.tr - "'-. PA~ OF JiliP , INITIAL REVIEW INFORMATION - Review completed date: April 29, 2004. Documents received at RT A: April 22, 2004; Reply-by Date: April 29, 2004; County Planning Commission hearing Date: unknown; City Council Agenda Date: Unknown or N/A; Thomas Guide Map pg and grid: 867, C,D-5; Case Number(s): C2004-02; Case Planners: Duane Morita (909) 674-3124, ext 279; Applicant: Colton Sudberry Properties Inc of San Diego CA ......" RT A PLANNING FOllOW-UP: Standard "Acceptable" letter to jurisdiction without comments / Letter with comments advising project modifications re transit & circulation issues Verbal conversation with Case Planner and appropriate letter follow-up letter sent: Date: ~~~ File name: F:\data\Pla in M. eM\Word\Dev Review\Lake Elsinore\2004\RTA Itr - CanyonHlsMarktpl.doc SECOND REVIEW: Review materials placed in archive files: Date: ......" F:\data\Planning\MikeM\Word\Dev Review\Lake Elsinore\2004\CanyonHlsMarktpl.doc '-' AGENDA ITEM NO. dJ _ .~ '-. PAGE ;lVz-- OF I ;).{)--, ~, ATTACHMENT A OCTOBER 19, 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ,-.... ,..... AGENOA,ITElVi r.v, () I PAGE rn Of /:).t) ~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT City or Lake Elsino<e PI"nlli,,!. DiviJj(Jn 130 S. Main Street Lake Els.lOCe, CA 92530 (909) 674-3124 (909) 471-1419 fax DATE: October 19, 2004 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Robert A. Brady, Community Development Director PREPARED BY: Duane Morita, Senior Planner PROJECT TITLE: Canyon Hills Market Place - Commercial Design Review Nos. 2004- 02 and 2004-10, and Conditional Use Permit Nos. 2004-32,2004-33, 2004-35, and 2004-36 APPLICANT: Sudberry Properties; 5465 Morehouse Drive; Suite 260; San Diego, CA 92121-4714; Mr. Colton Sudberry '--' PROJECT REQUEST: Request that the Planning Commission: 1. Recommend to the City Council approval of Commercial Design Review No. 2004-02 for a portion of the Canyon Hills Market Place commercial center to be located within Planning Area 3 of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan. 2. Recommend to the City Council approval of Commercial Design Review No. 2004-10 for a portion of the Canyon Hills Market Place commercial center to be located within Planning Area 4 of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan. 3. Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-32 for proposed drive-through at Planning Area 4. 4. Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-33 for proposed outdoor dining area at Planning Area 4. 5. Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-35 for proposed gas station, food mart, and car wash at Planning Area 3. 6. Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-36 for proposed lube-n-tune facility at Planning Area 3. ......, '.. 0 d-J AGENDA ITEM N . -= '- DAnJ: ~ OF 7:+.-.0 ,-.. REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 19, 2004 PAGE 2 PROJECT: CANYON HILLS MARKET PLACE - C2004-02 AND C2004-10, AND CUP2004-32, CUP2004-33, CUP2004-35, AND CUP2004-36 BACKGROUND: The Lake Elsinore Planning Commission and City Council approved the revised Canyon Hills Specific Plan in May 2003 which allowed for the proposed Canyon Hills Market Place commercial center. In July of this year, the Planning Commission and City Council then approved Tentative Tract Map No. 30496, which subdivided the affected areas into individual lots to accommodate the proposed corrimercial uses. PROJECT LOCATION: The proposed Canyon Hills Market Place is located within the Canyon Hills Specific Plan area; which is located within the eastern boundaries of the City of Lake Elsinore, east of the 1-15 Freeway. Direct access to the Specific Plan area is from the 1-15 Freeway to., Railroad Canyon Road, which crosses the northwest corner of the Specific Plan area.'" ;--. The Canyon Hills Market Place, is comprised of two separate areas which are defined as Planning Areas 3 and 4 by the Canyon Hills Specific Plan. Planning Area 3 is located:;ilong the northwestern side of Railroad Canyon Road; Canyon Hills Road presently "Ts" at its southern boundaries. Planning Area 4 is located along the southeastern corner of Railroad Canyon Road at Canyon Hills Road. Planning Area 4 is currently graded and was previously utilized as a temporary school site in 2002. Refer to Exhibit A, which presents the location of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan area and location of Planning Areas 3 and 4 in relationship to the overall Canyon Hills Specific Plan. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Planning Commission is being requested to review and recommend approval of the following Commercial Design Review applications to the City Council and approve the following Conditional Use Permit applications: 1. COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW FOR CANYON HILLS MARKET PLACE: The proposed Canyon Hills Market Place is comprised of two separate areas which are defined as Planning Areas 3 and 4 by the Canyon Hills Specific Plan. There are two Commercial Design applications being requested for Planning Commission consideration. The application for considering the proposed commercial development within Planning Area 3 (7.82 acres) is Commercial Design Review 2004-02. The application for considering the proposed commercial development within Planning Area 4 (14.05 acres) is Commercial Design Review 2004-10. ,-.. The following describes the commercial development being proposed within Planning Areas 3 and 4. To assist the Planning Commission in better understanding the proposed designs, this staff report describes the commercial development proposed for each Planning Area according AGENDA ITEM NO. ~I nAN~:J...ct he /eJD REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 19, 2004 PAGE 3 PROJECT: ,...." CANYON HILLS MARKET PLACE - C2004-02 AND C2004-10, AND CUP2004-32, CUP2004-33, CUP2004-35, AND CUP2004-36 to criteria contained in the City's Zoning Code and the Canyon Hills Specific Plan. These include Chapter 17.82 (Design Review), Chapter 17.38 (Non-Residential Development Standards) and Chapter 17.66 (parking Requirements) from the Zoning Code; and the C1 and C2 Districts from the Canyon Hills Specific Plan. The commercial development proposed for each Planning Area is described according to the following elements and criteria: Siting; Access, Circulation and Parking Layout; Pedestrian Accessibility; Landscaping; and Architecture, Color, and Materials. Planning Area 3 (Commercial Design Review 2004-02) · Siting: The commercial development proposed within Planning Area 3 relates more to automotive uses and includes eight separate pad areas. The following Table 1 describes proposed uses and building area for each pad location. It should be noted at this writing, the applicant has not yet determined the actual uses for all the pads. The anticipated use will be indicated if known by the applicant. Exhibit B presents the site plan for Planning Area 3. TABLEt PAD NUMBER, PROPOSED USES, AND PAD SIZES PAD NUMBER 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ,...." PROPOSED USE Auto Repair Retail Retail Retail Retail Gas Station/Food Mart/Car Wash Lube/Tune Retail BUILDING AREA (SF) 5,410 6,050 6,050 4,500 4,500 6,190 3,450 4.000 40,150 SF · Access, Circulation and Parking Layout: The main entry will be via a signalized driveway located at Railroad Canyon Road and Canyon Hills Road. An additional driveway will be located off of Railroad Canyon Road to the west and will be restricted to "right-in" and "right-out" only. Each of these entrances will be designed with deceleration lanes to facilitate entry to the project off of Railroad Canyon Road. Future access for emergency vehicles to the northeast will also be provided. Internal circulation will be made available by a central circulation spine that connects with each building pad. Parking is provided in accordance with parking standards contained in the Canyon Hills Specific Plan and Chapter 17.66 (parking Requirements) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal ,...." ~J AGENDA ITEM NO.- ~j') __ 12n ,-.... REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 19, 2004 PAGE 4 PROJECT: CANYON HILLS MARKET PLACE - C2004-02 AND C2004-10, AND CUP2004-32, CUP2004-33, CUP2004-35, AND CUP2004-36 Code. Based on applicable standards, the ultimate commercial development within Planning Area 3 requires a total of 211 parking spaces. The applicant is providing 224 parking spaces. For buildings located on parcels that require additional parking, a reciprocal access agreement will be recorded with the County of Riverside Recorder's Office in order to allow for "shared parking". Parking spaces will be designed at 90-degree angles, with minimum 24-foot, two-way drive aisles. The typical parking space has a minimum dimension of nine feet by 18 feet. All parking spaces will be double stripped. Handicap parking spaces will be provided in accordance with applicable code requirements. ,.--.. · Pedestrian Accessibility: Pedestrian walkways will be provided throughout the site and along the perimeter of the project site. An RTA Bus Stop will be provided along Railroad Canyon Road, west of Canyon Hills Road and will be designed in accordance with ADA requirements. The bus stop and public access to the site will be located between the main upper level and the proposed gas station/car wash pad. Accessible ramps will be provided. The Pad 11 area will be accessible from Railroad Canyon Road along the east side of the signalized entry. Concrete paving will be provided between various buildings to allow for safe pedestrian movement from one building to another and to the parking areas. · Landscaping: The project's landscaping plan meets the requirements of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan and Chapters 17.48 (C-2, General Commercial Development Standards) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. The project provides landscaping within parking areas, along the project's perimeter, and along the building frontages. Based on uses proposed within Planning Area 3, 34,787 sf. of landscaping is required; the project will provide 129,918 sf. of landscaping. Within the parking areas, 8,000 sf. is required; the project will provide 8,280 sf. of landscaping within the parking areas. A landscape buffer will be provided along street frontages on both Railroad Canyon Road and Canyon Hills Road that measures between 15 to 30 feet in width. The landscape palette consists of a mixture of both deciduous and evergreen trees. The drive aisles will be lined with evergreen oaks; the parking areas will be planted with a grove of evergreens. As required by City standard, trees will be planted at one tree for every 10 parking stalls. Six- by 18-foot long parking islands will be planted with shrubs and other landscaping. These planters will be spaced every three to four stalls to visually break up the parking areas into smaller "pockets" Enhanced colored concrete will be used in all pedestrian areas at the front of buildings. In addition, "Streetprint" will be used at all vehicular driveway entrances. The landscape palette for the perimeters of Planning Area 3 is designed to blend into the surrounding hills and areas along Railroad Canyon Road and Canyon Hills Road. · Architecture. Color. and Materials: The architectural style for the Planning Area 3 ,.--... commercial center is a "California Winery" -influenced design. All the buildings incorporate AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ I " PAGE.} L OF I~o REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 19) 2004 PAGE 5 ~. PROJECT: CANYON HILLS MARKET PLACE - C2004-02 AND C2004-10, AND CUP2004-32) CUP2004-33) CUP2004-35) AND CUP2004-36 common and distinct architectural elements that provide a sense of continuity. The scale of the buildings has been kept intentionally small to be compatible with the rural setting. The buildings will be constructed of concrete masonry, wood framing, or metal in the case of the gas station with predominantly plaster ftnishes. The buildings will feature stone veneer that will extend up to the roof in gabled areas. The color palette is predominantly earth tones, but with accents of wheat, clay red, brown and dark green. Wainscot treatment, wood trellises, and decorative light ftxtures will also be provided. Exhibit C presents building elevations for Planning Area 3. The applicant proposes consistent architectural elements and colors and materials throughout the shopping center. The following is a compilation of the colors and materials proposed for Planning Area 3: PLASTER BUIWING FACADES, METAL PANELING, METAL AWNINGS, DECORATIVE METAL STONE VENEER GLAZING ROOFING ITCHED ROO WOOD TRELLISES AND TRIM HARDSCAPE RETAINING WALLS ENHANCED TRAFFIC PAVING ICI - CLAY POT, 209 SW - HARVEST GOLD, SW2858 ICI - CENTURY BROWN, 322 FRAZEE - SEPTEMBER LEAF, 7744M SW - JERSEY CREAM, SW 6379 SW HAMMERED SILVER SW2840 FRAZEE - NATURAL BISQUE, CW053W FRAZEE - HERBIVORE, 8173M SW-ROCKWOOD DARI<' GREEN, SW2816 "CORONADO STONE" MOUNTAIN SUNSET BRONZE ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM WITH CLEAR GLASS AEP SPAN, COOL ANTIQUE PETINA COUNTRY SLATE TUTOR GRAY CfT SW SOLID STAIN, CEDAR SW3034 ~ NATURAL GREY DAVIS COLORS - BAJA RED DAVIS COLORS - PALOMINO DAVIS COLORS - WILLOW GREEN ANGELUS BLOCK, SPLIT FACE, TAN STREET PRINT, ASHLAR SLATE, TERRACOTTA ~ AGENDA ITEM NO. ;< / rUl"e ,~/)__"c fA; ,;-... REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 19, 2004 PAGE 6 PROJECT: CANYON HILLS MARKET PLACE - C2004-02 AND C2004-10, AND CUP2004-32, CUP2004-33, CUP2004-35, AND CUP2004-36 Planning Area 4 (Commercial Design Review 2004-10) . Siting: The commercial development proposed within Planning Area 4 includes a supermarket, drug store, restaurants, and general retail uses, and includes seven separate pad areas. The following Table 2 describes proposed uses and building area for each pad location. It should be noted at this writing, the applicant has not yet determined the actual uses for all the pads. The anticipated use will be indicated if known by the applicant. Exhibit D presents the site plan for Planning Area 4. TABLE 2 PAD NUMBER, PROPOSED USES, AND PAD SIZES /""""' PAD NUMBER 12 14 15 16 17A 17B 19 PROPOSED USE Retail Drug Store Retail Retail Retail Retail Market BUILDING AREA (SF) 5,000 13,500 2,673 7,700 11,450 9,150 58.000 107,473 SF . Access. Circulation and Parking Layout: The main entry will be via a signalized full entry driveway (right-turn in/out and left-turn in/out) located at Canyon Hills Road. Another driveway will be located off of Railroad Canyon Road and will be restricted to "right-in" only. In addition, two additional driveways will be located off of Canyon Hills Road and will be restricted to "right-in" and "right-out" only. The entrance off of Railroad Canyon Road will be designed with a deceleration lane along Railroad Canyon Road. Internal circulation will be made available by two drive aisles that connect with each building pad. Truck routes and loading zones are provided and will be screened. Parking is provided in accordance with parking standards contained in the Canyon Hills Specific Plan and Chapter 17.66 (parking Requirements) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. Based on applicable standards, the ultimate commercial development within Planning Area 4 requires a total of 444 parking spaces. The applicant is providing 570 parking spaces. For buildings located on parcels that require additional parking, a reciprocal access agreement will be recorded with the County of Riverside Recorder's Office in order to allow for "shared parking". Parking spaces will be designed at 90-degree angles, with minimum 24-foot, two-way drive aisles. The typical parking space has a minimum dimension of nine /""""' feet by 18 feet. All parking spaces will be double stripped. Handicap parking spaces will be provided in accordance with applicable code requirements. AGENDA ITEM NO. J. J '" _" __ .1< ^r- 7Q./) REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 19, 2004 PAGE 7 ""-'" PROJECT: CANYON HILLS MARKET PLACE - C2004-02 AND C2004-10, AND CUP2004-32, CUP2004-33, CUP2004-35, AND CUP2004-36 · Pedestrian Accessibility: Pedestrian walkways will be provided throughout the site and along the perimeter of the project site. An RTA Bus Stop will be provided along Railroad Canyon Road, west of Canyon Hills Road and will be designed in accordance with ADA requirements. Concrete paving will be provided between various buildings to allow for safe pedestrian movement from one building to another and to the parking areas. · Landscaping: The project's landscaping plan meets the requirements of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan and Chapters 17.44 (C-1, Neighborhood Commercial Development Standards) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. The project provides landscaping within parking areas, along the project's perimeter, and along the building frontages. Based on uses proposed within Planning Area 4, 60,766 sf. of landscaping are required; the project will provide 102,258 sf. of landscaping. Within the parking areas, 14,231 sf. is required; the project will provide 16,689 sf. of landscaping within the parking areas. A landscape buffer will be provided along street frontages on both Railroad Canyon Road and Canyon Hills Road that measures between 15 to 30 feet in width. The landscape palette consists of a mixture of both deciduous and evergreen trees. The drive aisles will be lined with evergreen oaks; the parking areas will be planted with a grove of evergreens. As ""-'" required by City standard,trees will be planted at one tree for every 10 parking stalls. Six- by 18-foot long parking islands will be planted with shrubs and other landscaping. These planters will be spaced every three to four stalls to visually break up the parking areas into smaller "pockets". A north/south pedestrian 'spine' walkway links the northern pads with the shops and market on the south end. A large dining patio area with an outdoor fireplace, wood trellis and small fountain is located between Pad Area 17 A and 17B. TIlls patio area will be shaded by a large specimen elm tree and will be buffered from the parking area by low masonry walls and landscape. Enhanced colored concrete will be used in all pedestrian areas at the front of buildings. In addition, "Streetprint" will be used at all vehicular driveway entrances. · Architecture. Color, and Materials: The architectural style for the Planning Area 4 commercial center is a "California Winery" -influenced design. All the buildings incorporate common and distinct architectural elements that provide a sense of continuity. The scale of the buildings has been kept intentionally small to be compatible with the rural setting. The buildings will be constructed of concrete masonry or wood framing with predominantly plaster finishes. The buildings will feature stone veneer that will extend up to the roof in gabled areas. The color palette is predominantly earth tones, but with accents of wheat, clay red, brown and dark green. Wainscot treatment, wood trellises, and decorative light fixtures will also be provided. Exhibit E presents building elevations for Planning Area 4. ""-'" AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ "'-. PAGE3!l:.- OF l~b ,....... REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 19, 2004 PAGE 8 PROJECT: CANYON HILLS MARKET PLACE - C2004-02 AND C2004-10, AND CUP2004-32, CUP2004-33, CUP2004-35, AND CUP2004-36 The applicant proposes consistent architectural elements and colors and materials throughout the shopping center. The following describes the colors and materials proposed for Planning Area 4: PLASTER BUILDING FACADES, METAL PANELING, METAL AWNINGS, DECORATIVE METAL STONE VENEER ~, GLAZING ROOFING ITCHED ROO WOOD TRELLISES AND TRIM HARDSCAPE RETAINING WAILS ENHANCED TRAFFIC PAVING ICI - CLAY POT, 209 SW - HARVEST GOLD, SW2858 ICI - CENTURY BROWN, 322 FRAZEE - SEPTEMBER LEAF, 7744M SW - JERSEY CREAM, SW 6379 SW HAMMERED SILVER SW2840 . FRAZEE - NATURAL BISQUE, CW053W FRAZEE - HERBIVORE, 8173M SW-ROCKWOOD DARK GREEN, SW2816 "CORONADO STONE" MOUNTAIN SUNSET BRONZE ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM WITH CLEAR GLASS AEP SPAN, COOL ANTIQUE PETINA COUNTRY SLATE TUTOR GRAY CfT SW SOLID STAIN, CEDAR SW3034 NATURAL GREY DAVIS COLORS - BAJA RED DAVIS COLORS - PALOMINO DAVIS COLORS - WIlLOW GREEN ANGELUS BLOCK, SPLIT FACE, TAN STREET PRINT, ASHLAR SLATE, TERRACOTT A 2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS: A total of four Conditional Use Pennits (CUP) are being requested by the applicant for both Planning Areas 3 and 4, to allow a drive-through at a future drug store, outdoor dining, a gas station/food mart/car wash, and a lube and tune. The Canyon Hills Specific Plan designates Planning Areas 3 and 4 as C2, General Commercial and C1, Neighborhood Commercial, respectively. The following further describes these CUP applications. Within Planning Area 4 ,....... . Drive-Through for Drug Store (CUP 2004-32): A future drug store is proposed for Pad Area 14. Chapter 8.6(c)(E) (Uses Subject to Conditional Use Pennit) of the Canyon Hills AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ I " PAGE 3S OF JP.O REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 19, 2004 PAGE 9 "wtJI PROJECT: CANYON HILLS MARKET PLACE - C2004-02 AND C2004-10, AND CUP2004-32, CUP2004-33, CUP2004-35, AND CUP2004-36 Specific Plan, requires any drive-through to acquire a CUP. The requested CUP will allow a drive-through for the future drug store. The proposed drive-through will be dual-lane to reduce stacking, and will allow prescription medication to be dispensed through the pharmacy window. The applicant indicates that drive-through customer trips average about four per hour. The average duration of a pharmacy pick-up transaction is about three to five minutes; drop-off transactions typically take about two minutes. The drug store will be open 24 hours per day, seven days a week. The drive-through will be operational during these times. The drive-through canopy will be cantilevered, which means that the canopy will be small and mounted to the building above the pick up window. The canopy will not be so large that it spans both lanes and is supported by columns. The clearance requirement from grade to the bottom of the canopy is 11 feet. The lanes will be 11 to 12 feet in width for both the pick-up and drop-off lanes. Refer to Exhibit F which provides a view of the proposed drive-through. Exhibit D presents the location of the drive-through. · Outdoor Dining Area. (CUP 2004-33): An outdoor dining area will be provided to accommodate future restaurants located near Pad Area 17. Chapter 8.6(c)(M) (Uses Subject"wtJI to Conditional Use Permit) of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan, requires any outside dining area to acquire a CUP. The proposed outdoor dining area is approximately 5,000 sf. and includes a fireplace, fountain, trellises, tables and chairs with umbrellas, enhanced landscaping and hardscape, potted plants, seat walls, and decorative flat work. The outdoor dining area will be screened and shielded from the parking areas by bermed plants and landscaping. Refer to Exhibit G which provides a reduction of the proposed outdoor dining area. Exhibit D presents the location of the outdoor dining area. Within Planning Area 3 · Gas Station. Food Mart. and Car Wash (CUP 2004-35): A gas station, food mart, and car wash will be located at Pad Area 9. Chapter 8.6(c)(A)(G) (Uses Subject to Conditional Use Permit) of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan, requires a gas station, food mart, and car wash to acquire a CUP. The proposed food mart will sell candies, soda, coffee, snacks, milk, bread, and beer and wine. The applicant expects that beer and wine sales will be less than five percent of the store's overall gross sales. The facility will be open 24 hours a day, seven days a week, and will employ about 14 attendants. The gas station includes an architectural canopy that spans six lanes of pump islands with three pumps per lane. The canopy is supported by nine columns next to each pump; stone veneer that is consistent with the overall theme of the commercial center will be provided along the columns. The clearance from grade to the canopy is about 16.5 feet; the overall "wtJI AGENDA ITEM NO. ~I '" PAGE~OF /Qij /""' REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 19, 2004 PAGE 10 PROJECT: CANYON HILLS MARKET PLACE - C2004-02 AND C2004-10, AND CUP2004-32, CUP2004-33, CUP2004-35, AND CUP2004-36 height to the top of the roof is 25 feet. The drive aisles will be 13 feet wide; the pump islands will be 26 feet apart. The car wash will be a self-serve conveyor-type facility. The car wash canopy will be designed into the food mart building and will be 18 feet wide by 60 feet long with a parapet and flat roof. The car wash opening will be screened from Railroad Canyon Road due to it's distance from the street, the natural berms, and additional landscaping. The automatic car wash allows patrons to drive through the car wash in about three to five minutes. The drive- through lane width for the car wash is 12 feet wide; the entrance is 10 feet wide by 11 feet high. Refer to Exhibit H which provides a view of the proposed facilities. Exhibit B presents the location of the facilities. r' . Lube-N-Tune (CUP 2004-36): A Lube-N-Tune will be located at Pad Area 10. Chapter 8.6(c)(E) (Uses Subject to Conditional Use Permit) of the City Zoning Code, requires the Lube- N-Tune to acquire a CUP. The proposed use will be a standard lube center with three bays, waiting area, and sales counter. There will be about 12 employees. Hours of operation will be from 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM, seven days a week. The applicant estimates that the facility will service about 20 to 25 customers per day. The lube-n-tune will have three service lanes with a capacity for tWo cars per lane. The building is 65 feet wide by 53 feet long with a combination of gable elements and a parapet with flat roof as part of the overall building design. The service bay openings will be screened from Railroad Canyon Road due to it's distance from the street, the natural berms, and additional landscaping. Drive-through lanes will be 12 feet wide. There is adequate space to allow turnaround and stacking for cars two deep. The glass roll-up doors are 10 feet wide by 10 feet high. Refer to Exhibit I which provides a view of the proposed facility. Exhibit B presents the location of the facility. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING: EXISTING LAND USE ZONING GENERAL PLAN Project Site Vacant C2 (PA 3) and Cl (PA 4) Canyon Hills Specific Plan North Vacant OS Canyon Hills Specific Plan East Vacant OS Canyon Hills Specific Plan South Vacant OS Canyon Hills Specific Plan West Vacant MF2 Canyon Hills Specific Plan /""' AGENDA .'fE:"l ~'r.. ~.I , ".. '! .'..;;(. ' . " DAI"..I: c1~"/ nE:) -:J.1J REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 19, 2004 PAGE 11 ......" PROJECT: CANYON HILLS MARKET PLACE - C2004-02 AND C2004-10, AND CUP2004-32, CUP2004-33, CUP2004-35, AND CUP2004-36 DISCUSSION: The applicant has worked diligently with staff in resolving issues relating to the requested applications. At this writing there are no major issues to report. All issues have been resolved either through revision of the submitted plans or through conditions of approval. The following summarizes some of the major issues that were resolved during the review process. 1. Views of Mechanical Equipment: The applicant has prepared line-of-sight cross sections of the proposed project. Their analysis shows that the mechanical equipment located on the top of roofs will not be seen by motorists traveling along Railroad Canyon Road. The applicant, however, is aware of staffs concerns that given the hilly slopes of the project sites and the grade of Railroad Canyon Road that additional assurances are required to ensure mechanical equipment on any of the roof tops will not be seen. Therefore, Condition of Approval No. 12 is recommended to ensure mechanical equipment will not be seen by the public. The Condition reads, "Mechanical equipment will be sufficiently screened by the building parapets or other screening materials or methods to ensure said equipment is not publicly visible, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee". ......", 2. Architectural Features are Enhanced for Those Elevations Within the Public View: The applicant has submitted architectural plans that present building elevations for all four sides of the various buildings. The applicant has provided substantial architectural articulation for those elevations within the public view, including stone veneer, varying roof styles, arch features, etc. Given the hilly topography of the project sites, less treatment is provided for those elevations that are blocked from public view as a result of the hilly slopes. Staff and the applicant have reviewed these particular elevations on a case-by-case basis and agree that it is appropriate that less design articulation be provided for those elevations that will ultimately be blocked and screened by the hillside. 3. Trash Enclosures to Include Stone Veneer: Staff believes that the one of the primary design components which visually connects the various commercial buildings is the use of stone veneer. Numerous trash enclosures will be constructed throughout the commercial centers and therefore, staff believes stone veneer should be incorporated into the design of the trash enclosures to further connect the buildings and structures. Therefore, Condition of Approval No. 13 is recommended to ensure all trash enclosures incorporate stone veneer into the side walls. The Condition reads, "All trash enclosures shall incorporate stone veneer into the side walls and provide wooden trellises, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee". '-' AGENDA ITEM NO. ..i~J '" DA~ ~ __ -1"'J.1f} "",..... REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 19, 2004 PAGE 12 PROJECT: CANYON HILLS MARKET PLACE - C2004-02 AND C2004-10, AND CUP2004-32, CUP2004-33, CUP2004-35, AND CUP2004-36 ANALYSIS: Staff supports the requested applications for the following reasons: 1. Commercial Design Review 2004-02: Staff recommends approval of the requested Commercial Design Review based on the following: . Siting: The proposed uses are allowable based on the Canyon Hills Specific Plan, which lists those uses that are either pennitted by right or conditionally pennitted. In addition, the location of the building pads are also consistent with design criteria contained in the Specific Plan relating to lot design, setbacks, etc. and the lotting design that was approved with 1TM No. 30496. Staff believes the proposed commercial uses are acceptable for the area. . Access. Circulation. and Parking Layout: The project's proposed access driveways are consistent with the driveway locations that were approved with TIM No. 30496. 1TM No. "",..... 30496 subdivided the project site into individual parcels to accommodate the proposed pads for the Canyon Hills Market Place project. The circulation and parking layout meets the requirements of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan and Chapter 17.66 (parking Requirements) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, which states, "all parking shall be designed to provide complete and through circulation wherever possible. In any case, adequate turning radii and turnarounds shall be provided for emergency vehicles and trash and delivery trucks." The project complies with the foregoing criteria and provides sufficient parking spaces. Based on uses proposed within Planning Area No.3, 211 parking spaces are required; the project will provide 224 parking spaces. In addition, adequate movement for delivery trucks and emergency vehicles will be accommodated. Staff believes the project's plans and design of driveway access points are acceptable and will not create any hazardous conditions and the project's circulation and parking layout is acceptable and satisfies applicable design standards. . Pedestrian Accessibility: The project's pedestrian accessibility design meets the requirements of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan and Chapter 17.38 (Non-Residential Development Standards) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. The project includes enhanced paving between the parking areas and building entrances for pedestrian walkways. Staff believes the project provides adequate pedestrian accessibility and walkways through the project area. r-- . Landscaping: The project's landscaping plan meets the requirements of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan and Chapters 17.48 (C-2, General Commercial Development Standards) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. The project provides landscaping within parking areas, along AGENDA ITEM NO... r9J.. ". ~U_ '7. .~ - /;7i:)\ REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 19, 2004 PAGE 13 ......" PROJECT: CANYON HILLS MARKET PLACE - C2004-02 AND C2004-10 AND CUP2004-32 - , , CUP2004-33, CUP2004-35, AND CUP2004-36 the project's perimeter, and along the building frontages. Based on uses proposed within Planning Area No.3, 34,787 sf. of landscaping is required; the project will provide 129,918 sf. of landscaping. Within the parking areas, 8,000 sf. are required; the project will provide 8,280 sf. of landscaping within the parking areas. Staff believes the project provides sufficient landscaping and satisfies applicable design standards. · Architecture. Color and Materials: The commercial buildings being proposed are visually and architecturally pleasing. There is design consistency between all buildings being proposed within Planning Area 3. The buildings all incorporate stone veneer along the front and some side elevations. Staff believes the use of this particular material on all buildings not only "ties" the buildings together within Planning Area 3, but also with the rest of the Canyon Hills area, which also utilizes stone veneer on monumentation structures, signs and other project buildings. The buildings also feature flat cornice parapets with select architectural enhancements that are consistent throughout. The roof design also includes peaks which helps to provide a vertical "feel" to the particular building's design. The applicant also proposes a commercial center that will have common architectural """" elements, colors, and material throughout. The project will utilize brown and green colors that will blend with -the natural landscape and hillsides along Railroad Canyon Road. As discussed, the project will utilize stone veneer and stucco materials. Staff believes the project's architecture is consistent with the design guidelines contained in the Canyon Hills Specific Plan and other existing and future development within the overall Canyon Hills area. 2. Commercial Design Review 2004...10: Staff recommends appr(wal of the requested Commercial Design Review based on the following: · Siting: The proposed uses are allowable based on the Canyon Hills Specific Plan, which lists those uses that are either permitted by right or conditionally permitted. In addition, the location of the building pads are also consistent with design criteria contained in the Specific Plan relating to lot design, setbacks, etc. and the lotting design that was approved with TIM No. 30496. Staff believes the proposed commercial uses are acceptable for the area. · Access. Circulation and Parking Layout: The project's proposed access driveways are consistent with the driveway locations that were approved with TIM No. 30496. TIM No. 30496 subdivided the project site into individual parcels to accommodate the proposed lots for the Canyon Hills Market Place project. ......." .- - ~j AeENOA ITEM NO. -~- -~ U^ ) ""1 /) ---- REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 19, 2004 PAGE 14 PROJECT: CANYON HILLS MARKET PLACE - C2004-02 AND C2004-10, AND CUP2004-32, CUP2004-33, CUP2004-35, AND CUP2004-36 The circulation and parking layout meets the requirements of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan and Chapter 17.66 (parking Requirements) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, which states, "all parking shall be designed to provide complete and through circulation wherever possible. In any case, adequate turning radii and turnarounds shall be provided for emergency vehicles and trash and delivery trucks." The project complies with the foregoing criteria and provides sufficient parking spaces. Based on uses proposed within Planning Area No.4, 444 parking spaces are required; the project will provide 570 parking spaces. In addition, adequate movement for delivery trucks and emergency vehicles will be accommodated. Staff believes the project's plans and design of driveway access points are acceptable and will not create any hazardous conditions and the project's circulation and parking layout is acceptable and satisfies applicable design standards. -- . Pedestrian Accessibility: The project's pedestrian accessibility design meets the requirements of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan and Chapter 17.38 (Non-Residential Development Standards) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. The project includes enhanced paving between the parking areas and building entrances for pedestrian walkways. An outdoor eating area, which includes a fire place, wood trellis, seat walls, enhanced landscaping, umbrellas, and fountain will also be provided which links with the pedestrian walkway. Staff believes the project provides adequate pedestrian accessibility and walkways through the project area. . Landscaping: The project's landscaping plan meets the requirements of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan and Chapters 17.44 (C-1, Neighborhood Commercial Development Standatds) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. The project provides landscaping within parking areas, along the project's perimeter, project entry, and along the building frontages. Based on uses proposed within Planning Area No.4, 60,766 sf. of landscaping is required; the project will provide 102,258 sf. of landscaping. Within the parking areas, 14,231 sf. is required; the project will provide 16,689 sf. of landscaping within the parking areas. Staff believes the project provides sufficient landscaping and satisfies applicable design standards. ---- L . Architecture. Color and Materials: The commercial buildings being proposed are visually and architecturally pleasing. There is design consistency between all buildings being proposed within Planning Area 4. The buildings all incorporate stone veneer along the front and some side elevations. Staff believes the use of this particular material on all buildings not only "ties" the buildings together within Planning Area 4, but also with the rest of the Canyon Hills area, which also utilizes stone veneer on monumentation structures, signs and other project buildings. The buildings also feature flat cornice parapets with select architectural enhancements that are consistent throughout. The roof design also includes gables and peaks which helps to provide a vertical "feel" to the particular building's design and offer a variety of roof lines. AGENDA ITEM NO. :if -, hi ~ REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 19, 2004 PAGE 15 "'wIllI' PROJECT: CANYON HILLS MARKET PLACE - C2004-02 AND C2004-10, AND CUP2004-32, CUP2004-33, CUP2004-35, AND CUP2004-36 The applicant also proposes a commercial center that will have common architectural elements, colors, and material throughout. The project will utilize brown and green colors that will blend with the natural landscape and hillsides along Railroad Canyon Road. As discussed, the project will utilize stone veneer and stucco materials. Staff believes the project's architecture is consistent with the design guidelines contained in the Canyon Hills Specific Plan and other existing and future development within the overall Canyon Hills area. 3. Conditional Use Permit 2004-32 (Planning Area 4): This requested CUP is for a drive- through for a future drug store at Pad Area 14. Staff supports the requested CUP. The proposed design of the drive-through, stacking areas, and hours of operation are acceptable and comply with guidelines contained in Chapter 8.6 (Cl, Neighborhood Commercial) of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan and Chapter 17.38 (Non-Residential Development Standards) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. In addition, the requested CUP is supported by those findings described in Chapter 17.74 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and this staff report. The requested CUP will not jeopardize the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of the community or Canyon Hills area. "'wIllI' 4. Conditional Use Permit 2004-33 (planning Area 4): The requested CUP is for an outdoor dining area for restaurants near Pad Area 17. Staff supports the requested CUP. The proposed outdoor dining area, which includes a fire place, wood trellis, seat walls, enhanced landscaping, umbrellas, and fountain, is visually attractive and will be located in an area that will be well- utilized. The outdoor dining area complies with guidelines contained in Chapter 8.6 (Cl, Neighborhood Commercial) of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan and Chapter 17.38 (Non- Residential Development Standards) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. In addition, the requested CUP is supported by those findings described in Chapter 17.74 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and this staff report. The requested CUP will not jeopardize the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of the community or Canyon Hills area. 5. Conditional Use Permit 2004-35 (Planning Area 3): The requested CUP is for a gas station, food mart, and car wash to be located on Pad Area 9. Staff supports the requested CUP. The proposed gas station, food mart, and car wash will sell candies, soda, coffee, snacks, milk, bread, and beer and wine. The applicant expects that beer and wine sales will be less than five percent of the store's overall gross sales. The car wash will be a self-serve conveyor-type facility. The gas station includes an architectural canopy that spans six lanes of pump islands with three pumps per lane. The facility will be open 24 hours a day, seven days a week, and will employ about 14 attendants. The gas station, food mart, and car wash comply with guidelines contained in Chapter 8.7 (C2, General Commercial) of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan and Chapter 17.38 (Non-Residential Development Standards) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. In addition, "'wIllI' AGENDA ITEM Nu. , . ;AI ftA ^r- l.J.;-J ....._ 1"2. ^ ~ REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 19, 2004 PAGE 16 PROJECT: CANYON HILLS MARKET PLACE - C2004-02 AND C2004-10, AND CUP2004-32, CUP2004-33, CUP2004-35, AND CUP2004-36 the requested CUP is supported by those fmdings described in Chapter 17.74 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and this staff report. The requested CUP will not jeopardize the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of the community or Canyon Hills area. 6. Conditional Use Permit 2004-36 (Planning Area 3): The requested CUP is for a lube-n-tune facility to be located on Pad Area 10. Staff supports the requested CUP. The proposed lube-n- tune will be a standard lube center with three bays, waiting area, and sales counter. There will be about 12 employees. Hours of operation will be from 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM, seven days a week. The applicant estimates that the facility will service about 20 to 25 customers per day. The lube- n-tune complies with guidelines contained in Chapter 8.7 (C2, General Commercial) of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan and Chapter 17.38 (Non-Residential Development Standards) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. In addition, the requested CUP is supported by those findings described in Chapter 17.74 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and this staff report. The requested CUP will not jeopardize the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of the community or Canyon Hills area. /""' ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The Addendum to the 1989 Final Canyon Hills Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report, which was prepared in accordance with Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines, provides the necessary environmental clearances for the proposed applications. The proposed commercial uses are either permitted by right or conditionally permitted by the Canyon Hills Specific Plan.. Accordingly, staff believes the proposed applications implement the land use objectives and requirements of the Specific Plan and fmds that further environmental evaluation is therefore, unnecessary. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the following resolutions: 1. Resolution No. 2004-_, which recommends that the City Council approve Commercial Design Review No. 2004-02, to allow for the design and development of a total 40,150-square foot commercial center to be located on Planning Area 3 of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan; 2. Resolution No. 2004-_, which recommends that the City Council approve Commercial Design Review No. 2004-10, to allow for the design and development of a total107,473-square foot commercial center to be located on Planning Area 4 of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan; /""' AGENDA ITEM NO. _01--./ ........ "'A^~ (f-:j. nr: /;J::o REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 19, 2004 PAGE 17 ,..." PROJECT: CANYON HILLS MARKET PLACE - C2004-02 AND C2004-10, AND CUP2004-32, CUP2004-33, CUP2004-35, AND CUP2004-36 3. Resolution No. 2004-_, which recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-32, which will allow a drive-through for a future drug store on Pad Area 14 within Planning Area 4 of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan; 4. Resolution No. 2004-_, which recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-33, which will allow outdoor dining facilities near Pad Area 17 within Planning Area 4 of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan; 5. Resolution No. 2004-_, which recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-35, which will allow a fufure gas station, car wash, and food mart on Pad Area 9 within Planning Area 3 of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan; 6. Resolution No. 2004-_, which recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-36, which will allow a future lube center on Pad Area. 10 within Planning Area 3 of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan, based upon the following Findings, and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. FINDINGS: ....." COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NOS. 2004-02 AND 2004-10 1. The project, as approved, will complY with the goals and oqectives rif the General Plan and the Zoning District in which the prryect is located. Commercial Design Review Nos. 2004-02 and 2004-10 comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan. The General Plan designates the affected sites as "Canyon Hills Specific Plan". The Zoning classifies the affected sites as "C2, General Commercial" and "C 1, Neighborhood Commercial", respectively. The proposed Commercial Design Review applications evaluate design of the Canyon Hills Market Place which implements the intended land use of the affected sites. 2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions rif the Municipal Code. Commercial Design Review Nos. 2004-02 and 2004-10 propose the Canyon Hills Market Plan which has been designed in accordance with the size and shape of the property, thereby creating interest and varying views as a person moves along Railroad Canyon Drive and Canyon Hills Road. The projects complement the design quality of existing and future development by creating a visually-pleasing commercial center. The projects' architectural design, color and materials, and site design are original and attractive. ....." AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ I " PA~ (Jy nc T2l> ,-... REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 19, 2004 PAGE 18 PROJECT: CANYON HILLS MARKET PLACE - C2004-02 AND C2004-10, AND CUP2004-32, CUP2004-33, CUP2004-35, AND CUP2004-36 3. Suo/ecI to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed p"!Ject is not anticipated to result in a'!} significant adverse environmental impacts. The Addendum to the 1989 Final Canyon Hills Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report, which was prepared in accordance with Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines, provides the necessary environmental clearances for the proposed applications. The proposed commercial uses are either permitted by right or conditionally permitted by the Canyon Hills Specific Plan. Accordingly, staff believes the proposed applications implement the land use objectives and requirements of the Specific Plan and finds that further environmental evaluation is therefore, unnecessary. ,.-- 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the suo/eel p"!Ject to ensure development of the properry in accordance with the oijectives of Chapter 17.82. Pursuant to Section 17.82.070 (Action of the Planning Commission) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) , Commercial Design Review Nos. 2004-02 and 2004-10 include conditions of approval to ensure proper development and that hazards to the general public will not result. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOS. 2004-32, 2004-33. 2004-35, AND 2004-36 ,. The proposed use, on its own merits and within the context of its setting, is in accord with the oo/ectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the site is loeated. The proposed drive-through for the future drug store; outdoor dining area; gas station, food mart, and car wash; and lube-n-tune uses are allowed by the Canyon Hills Specific Plan with a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed conditional uses will support future commercial uses to be constructed within the Canyon Hills Market Place, which is consistent with its underlying zoning as defined by the City's General Plan. 2. The proposed use will nol be detrimental to the general health, sqft!J, comftrt, or general welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or the Ci!J, or i,!jurious to properry or improvements in the neighborhood or the Ci!J. ~ In accordance with Chapter 17.74 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the City realized that the proposed conditional uses may have potential impacts to the general welfare of the public. All applicable City departments and public agencies were afforded the opportunity to review the conditional uses. Their comments related to installation and maintenance of landscaping, street dedications, regulations of points of vehicular ingress, and egress and control of potential nuisances have been incorporated as conditions of approval, to AGENDA llb'l' ...~...ilJ " PAGE I.f r OF 7@J REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 19, 2004 PAGE 19 '-"'" PROJECT: CANYON HILLS MARKET PLACE - C2004-02 AND C2004-10, AND CUP2004-32, CUP2004-33, CUP2004-35, AND CUP2004-36 ensure the City's and surrounding neighborhood's general health, safety, comfort, and general welfare will not be jeopardized. 3. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, and for all the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, bufftrs and other features required fry Title 17 of the LEMC. The proposed conditional uses have been designed in consideration of the size and shape of the property, thereby strengthening and enhancing the immediate commercial areas. Furthermore, the project will complement the quality of existing and future development by creating a visually-pleasing commercial center. The projects' architectural design, color and materials, and site design are original and attractive. 4. The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highwqys with proper design both as to width and !)'pe of pavement to carry the !)'pe and quantifY of trqfjic generated Iry the suiject use. The proposed conditional uses have been reviewed in relationship to the width and type of pavement needed to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated. The City has adequately evaluated the potential impacts associated with the proposed uses prior to its approval and has conditioned the project to be served by roads of adequate capacity and design standards to provide reasonable access by car, truck, transit, and bicycle. ,..."", 5. In approving the su~ject uses, there will be no adverse affect on abuttingproperry or the permitted and normal use thereof. The proposed conditional uses have been thoroughly reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City departments and public agencies, thus, eliminating the potential for any and all adverse effects on any abutting property. 6. Adequate conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.74.50 of the LEMC have been incorporated into the approval of the Conditional Use Permits to ensure that the uses continue in a manner envisioned Iry these findings for the term of the uses. Pursuant to Section 17.74.050 (Action of the Planning Commission) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), Commercial Design Review Nos. 2004-02 and 2004-10 include conditions of approval to ensure proper development and that hazards to the general public will not result. ,..."", ACiENDA ITEM NO~ fAl PAGE~OF/~ ,...... REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 19, 2004 PAGE 20 PROJECT: CANYON HILLS MARKET PLACE - C2004-02 AND C2004-10, AND CUP2004-32, CUP2004-33, CUP2004-35, AND CUP2004-36 REVIEWED BY: ~ Armando G. Villa, Planning and Code Enforcement Manager APPROVED BY: ,......... EXHIBITS Exhibit A: Location Map for Planning Areas 3 and 4 Exhibit B: Site Plan for Planning Area 3 Exhibit C: Building Elevations for Planning Area 3 Exhibit D: Site Plan for Planning Area 4 Exhibit E: Building Elevations for Planning Area 4 Exhibit F: Proposed Drive-Through Exhibit G: Proposed Outdoor Dining Area Exhibit H: Proposed Gas Station, Food Mart, and Car Wash Exhibit I: Proposed Lube-N-Tune Full Size Set of Plans ,......... AaENDA ITEM NO. ~J " PAGE. rr OF 1 :;)..V '/ ~ 0:: '0:: W W m 0 ::E 0:: ::> 0 z m l- I- 0 0 z z .~ ~ ::> ::> 0 c). C) 0:: 0:: !E' z. a:: 0:: z Z 0 0 z z -. z ~ j ~ :::i :::i D- D- , I . . , , . . G . . - . . ~ . . . \ tid"" . , , , 'f'f') ~ I- ~ If) .... z ~ 0 w w ~ ::It 0:: D- D- '~ ~ If) w 0 ...J I- Z If) w Z Z ,0:: i:; W '::> ::> D- O Q ...... 0 0 ~ C) ...J C) ~ ~ ,0:: Z :z 0:: &.I ~ I- :z ::> ~ !!! j I- ~ >< ~ D- :z w ~ , . . ~ . p... . ~ . . . -0 . . . . ~ . + + + . . . ~ + . . ~ . + y . 0 . . . . + + .~ . . + ~ . + ... ~ + . + + + . . .. . + . , .. ClJ + ~ . y ~ + . + . . . -..1 , . + . + y . . . . . , . . . . . ::s . + ,- < ~ f--4 ...... ~- ~ ..... ~ ~ ~ AGENDA ITEM NO. '--~ 1 .- " PAf.U= ~~ OFZ2)) ~ I ~ I ! ------- /'"" { ~~ ~ ~~nl ~ ~ ~f59! 8 ~ ~ ~iUs ~ ~ a ::: ~~131 ~ ~ g ~ g i ~b:~ g i ~ ~ 3 ~ ~\ -<ti!~~ ~ '" Q I~~ ~ ~ o ~II~ ~ t- ~ : ~H5 ~ ~~~~ \! 'z r----'L-u__. / /-~--.rr~--~-- - ;- : J...- · ~/-.:::-.:.. ~ ,i' \j=====- \: . i\ _ : :. ~ : :"\ : I I ~o__ ; --~ I I iJ-.j /. I I: ~ i ",./ l ..~"tl ! ",t~::::t... I /'--' o , /.! ~ /: .5:. ~ " ....:-.:::-.. , 01 jl .. I ~ j: k~_: ..~ . --.. ~: I 1;--: : I ! j.. o I t ~ : I \\ O. o. \ \==- \\1 : \ ~ i!!llo~ Ill~ ~:&..; ~;;: ~~ ...0- ,..: ~.o Oa ~ SlllH NOANV::> ~ ~ ~ :; ~o => ~ ~S en ~~ !iH ~ ~~~ n~ in en_IlL. ........ r" J _ o~ i ~ ~2 ~ o I'i~ ~lli Z a~ 5~ z iil12 iC~ ~ ~~~::: .c: s~ vI!! l;;: f;l.~ ~~ ~ ;0 '5~ ~ ~~ g~ ~g ~a _ N '" oZ -,._0 "-;--'~ 0~~ E~w ~.'" wwO "-,,,u.. :;)'" ~W'- :;)~u.. --,1-0 <(00 Z:1;- 00t:; i=t-UJ O:;)I z<", o"'w u2~ o .<e( o D! z o >- z <e( u <Xl 06 r-. ~o WW UO "':;) <(--' "-Uz .~o 1-1-- ~O':;( :1;ZU "-I:J OC)lt u1:J<( rr;~~ OIU WI-", "'WI ~~I- :;)"'z u..0_ o I <e( o D! -' <e( D! '" _ z a: I~ 0 ::i~Vl ~ ~3:~ it I-- Q!a- o.....J '5 <(!!!--,W Q2Uow'" ~~~~2 w':;(O~'" Vl~1- .- :J tI)~u- ;tl2z~o Z~~::E:o- o --.z J: t:; i= ~W!!!w oC>~~~ Oz"'OO~w U"'W Uu............WVl en Z -,.....0 "-;--'~ ~u(t u"'--, E~w ~.'" wwO "-,,,u.. =>", ~w"- :;)2:;u.. --,1-0 <(0_ Z::E:- Ql2tu !:::;)w ~<(~ o"'w u2~ ml -- (; B ~S C)O v " z~ -v - Zz z~ ~I <~ --'z -< "-~ . Z w :S '" "- :J >- I- w ~ Z U :S w "- I- w l- I in U M '" ~~ ~ <0 ~ll " "l; <( <~ ~ "-0 C> C)z ~. Z -< ~. "'0 .0 z 3 "- M <( a.. w U <( -I a.. J- w~ z ~o< o c!~ <(~ u ~:" o z (/')- '" -,.~ -I'" '" -~ I z o >- z <( u f'f") < ~ o Z 11-I Z ~ ~ ~ ~.' ~.. - W. 92 0 ~ "'~ . ~ n m l E.{E ~ ~ ~~ m.~.... II-I.......l ()~~ ~~ U~ ~ ~ ~ _ (.) >< ~ ~~ .; ~ AGENDA ITEM NO. ." PAGE /f1~ OF i~ w z ii: "' z < ~ Ifi o w "- ~ ~ {! Z C' .! g ~i !! ~ .- g => ~S · · ~ .Iij ~U iu ~ :11: ill ~n l3 Ii~h lilili m 3 m~ In m li~ i Jlh h i ;~I~ i' >. ~ hl~ .11 ~ i ; ~ nli 0; III ~ Ii! ! ~illnfihls~id~1 m I II [] i g I i> ~ I II I Iii is ! U I .. ii~h ~ ~ Illhl ~ '1I1h J flhllh Jdnlil i III . Ell iU h ~ 0; 151 n liil i I!I~ ~ IU..d, ~ tilth ~ IUdli1 .r, ~!u II l !suinh .:~ ~ 0 a ~ V' .~g ~ I I J:l 0 ~ I ~. ~ :i I I j m ~ I '; ~ !; g 0; a .. ~ g il ~ s ~ t ~ i ! ~ i ~ j Hi H~ !!I HI ~ ~0(t)000 ! I i ., ;:! I: I i AGENDA 1,1:;.,... ..'-6 (;t..l .~-- " ~ II " El C)O ~I u Z~ -u :~ zz z~ <~ ......z < a..~ . w "" ::l ~ .... u w .... Z - :s J: a.. U Ii: "" ~ w <(0 :! U " li Z <(W 8 a..a w ClZ . ~ eIl~ 0 ell 0 3 (Y) M ~ :is "" <( Cl W Z U z z <( :s a.. -I a.... I- w~ z ~'" 0 ~~ <(~ ~ (/)~ -1-' .. -I" "" -< :c z 0 >- Z <( J Ifi · U :( ~ 011 Ii 06 !~ ~i ~ 0<111 !3 ::lr If ~a ~ o " z~ . m ~ ~ ~ I ~ i - .~ ,.- . eno 1- .... -'" _0 III~ "tJ~ "z 0< .co \r' I. C5~ at U ,...... ,...... Q) u C - a. ~...--.. ~~ ~(V) c<( ~~ U)~ _Z .- z I~ co.. o >... c c U ,...... O_N .....".o"'tOo---- ~ d ~:;~~~ I;;~ ~~~-~ ~.. ~~~~~ 03 mat_.acD ~UU~U~ ~~ l*d~~~~~~ g H iiiiiiiii ~ !ii~!Z Cl"""ClClClCl" I- r::l~ ~.~.~.~.~ ~ i~~ HH!!H~ ...... 0- :J: za.. ~ <::i 3: ~!:i ~ I- -I- U Z ~~ olli!~ zw~~g:J: !,2:::;::>O"'I-~ U')cI)~r- CD (j ~~~o/l~~ u. .....<O~zl3.,.. z ;:!;z::!:~~)c-' Q ~QO~z~~ '< wt::5"'OZ!", !d ::!:O<~V w ~ -' ~Z -"a.. :t OOOZ~~Z < VVu.OClOO i ~ 3' ~ g ~ 5m~ ~ ~t1~ i= ~1u::! =:I >~o U ::txz ::i ffio:;::;! ~ t(~~~ a... ~wM.:5 o z~ ~~ ~~:! wi!1 .... - o ~ "'llINg ~~~C"! <<m ..-0 ffio~3 ~~o:g ~~3~ i~ z ae- < Ol-lt u z a i2 gl a.. 0.. < vu a a ~ 3' ~ 0 ~!:<l i ~ ~ ~1u::! >~~ ::tv'" lilo",iil ~z_~ lI)a~:5 Cl Z Z z ~~ 0& ~~ lli! - ~~2 WMN I- ..- I ~1; ~... .."': <5~~ -<(xo.... O~~~ V):!!~i!! E t ~i W l211' t:: ~~ :I: a..l) l;ln < !Ii..e- f;j Z e ~ v 51 g ~ a Z .. g ~ i: Z e ~ 6~ ~ 0:2' o ftio o iliz ..c( o~ w v~ !::3' "'z >- ~ ~ o Vw ~~~ HO: l2::;6.g ~.3~::; vo..,... iliil!~!.:; ~8J!!~ ~~~~~ WI;; 5~ S. w~l ~~~ "JZo ~~~ ~ o M ~ Clil ~~ ~Ks z~;:; 6~0:~ ZQ...U--: u.J~g_~ ~~!!!~ :::J"'o'O ln~~~ '" ~ ] 6 lill ~ ~.5 == z~ > 1i\-" U <= rf") < ~ o z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rJ) ~ ...... ~ g t= OUI;;...o tj ~ V)~- tci"~ ........... ~J:~~~ V)E~~ ~ rTl ~~~~~ ~~6.~ ~ 1-'04 ~~m ~~n ~ W" ~ :":' sm ! a:it ~ ~ Ei ~ ~ III Q .~ 0 ~~f. ~IX! ~ UB~ g ~ ~t ~ ~l ~ ~ ~ :'5 AGEND~ ITEM NO ~ 7 .. , a~"-,=~S! nc /2ZJ ~ B ~I \j:j w :r: en w .-> l- f:: !lI-,.,.h ~tl~j i.. I jj" ~~ :;:0 $~ .~ ~~ 0- ~~ ~5 wV ~Jl'>~2 z u~~o~ o l'>~~:::ili i= ~tz~~~ i:L :J~<II("'~ (5 dl:!~L ~ ~~~gti o ~~i~~ ~~"'z'" Vw ~o~ ~ ~l'>~*3 ... ~ 3 l Zl~ OW Nil; w" '" . =:Iv ~ I;;~;! ~~t::; UJtiO;!. ~a~~~ ~~iiii 0- ~a~~ .. v~~~~ Z Sl 6i ~~!!! l20~- 3wlSG UH.:ol"i uU3~ "i!; gO li! !rl5_~-" ~O-oOw WU')Nal:"- II <:)0 U Z~ -v ZZ Z~ <~ -,Z .. a.. .. . W '" :::> l- V w I- :I: U '" <0 " <w Q.a ClZ .. en.. ~~ ~~ ('f') ~ w U <( --l 0.. ...... -< w- z ~c< o ~~ <{~ ~~.. o z U);;; --l;;: --l~ - -< ~ I z o >- z <( u m1 II l'> El ~ c)o Z:;: ft ~~ -<:; Zz ?<efl1 Z~ ~ iliz . ~ ~~ .(~ .. -,z ...." or 0..:; ;;! ~ o 0 . t ,~o~ ; <I) W ft~~ .-- .-- Z a<: .-- 0 ::J \ r- ~~ ~ ~ Q I ~ ~ u 0\ L z~ Z w 0> w ~ . 0 . o' =~ -J (") :z: 0\ ::>0 ::> ~ u , 0, COo::: CO a<: ~~ I .(0 0.' . IL C) Rll zo Z " ft!; Z Z .(~ ,; ow 0 0..0 % _0::: 3 C)Z .!.. ~::> ~ < ~; 0.. <I).. LO >U wen > -JCO w wO -J W I i I (Y) 1 ~ I- ~ 0 ::> 0 Z en w U 0- <( ~ .-- -.J .-- 0 r- a.. ~ 0::: ~ 1-< Zz , z_~ ~ ~ w- oO n z 9~- H! g! ~ ~~ =>- -z> i~~ ~ ~~ o! ::>Z ::>o~ ~:; co~ CO-J J s~ % ~~ - ~ ~ ~I <(~ u o 8 ~ ~ "''' ll!;~ ~ , · -0 Z '!~ _ gg I'i~ ~ ~~ ! z 0 z::>o::: ~ ~r lil ~~ s ~ill ~~ ~~ '-" O~ OCOIL w L ~ -I ~8 :E!l 8 % _ILO ~ '! ~ ~ tq s f 0 -0 9 B~~ fiz I~ ~ai~'i~~~I~ z ~o::: 0' ~O~ 011 en;;; G:i= o:r G:i~::> o 'l!~ ~ ~ oi~ Iii !;I~:ll~ ~~L1O ~~I -.J;;: -J~ -JUu ~1!1!11!'I:i !i I' ,I ,llljii :l~ -.Jw !!o >< W I w~en ~ ~ ~<~~ ~ ~zl'l"'n"'':'fu u ~~ -< i ' J ~ ~~~~~~~~~!!I!~ ~:~:~::~~~~!! I-~ ' I ... . " I- _CO d!l'i :c ~z i~ en 0 5 w wU ~ z ~ ?< I~ z ~ '" 0 II ili~ ~ ~I >- a ;' z !i ~ ~ 01; <( u ~ ~ :If I ~ i AGENDA ITEM NO. ~I ~ " DA~ 5~ OF /:Jl2 W3 a:~ m~ U~ ...." ~ ~ 61 ~ ~ '- a 0 0. U El 0 ... >- :;; VI ... Z ~ ~ VI '" ;;; F '" z ~ W ~ .. iil 0 ~ :\ c)o . ~ tI 0 CJ ~ ~ z ~ ~ z~ W ~ ~ 'I ~ ~ -ij :< z .. ... . 5 ....I w ~ VI ~ ::II ! .. :a Zz "..... ~ ~ ... .. '" i z~ ::II N 0 VI .. " a: z .. ~ 51 ~ 0 if 0 ... ~ iiI u ~ .. <~ 0 >- a: .. g ':( w ~ 0 0. l!' CD i5 ~ b ....z ~ .. ~ 0 ~ z "-~ ....I z .. " t .. l;! ii ... 0 a 0 ~ .. a: >- iii 5 u 0 0 3 ~ ... liI 1lI ... w 0 0 . ~ .. ::II ~ ~ g ... z Z w U ~ I i5 0 IE en ~ ... ::II '" ~ '" 2 g ~ ::J ld z x ~ lo! III x ii! ! '" ~ 0 0:: '" VI 3 g 0. -J. "- ~ IE a: ~ I I I ~ I < ~ ::J <( ~ F u ~ ;i '" 0 III z X lD 0. >- en . ~ ~ i5 .. Ii VI .. .. w Z l- ii: ... ~ ... :;; ...I .. ~ ~ ~ I ~ I I I ~ 0 ili ::II a: ::II F 0 ri u ... .. ::II w I ~ ~ ~ i ~ 3 .. .. :I .. .. en ~ W z 0 '" ... 0 z a: ~ 0 i! z z 3 l!i l!i w l;; lo! z lo! ! ~ ii! ::II w .. IE '< :c IE ~ ~ l=! ~ ~ F >< ~ ~ :x: a z Q. 0. 0. d 8 d ~ I- a: ... I ;;: e: ~ UJ z l:f ... z j ... z u u ):! ::> l'l w ::> ~ w lIE ld IE ~ ~ IE .. en en I ~ a: ~ ~ ... ~ B 0 Z I 15 a: a: '" w :e ~ i5 G 6 ~ ~ ... ~ w 5' 5' 5' U ... ii: Q ai Q e: ili l!: l!: ili ~ ~ ~ a- u VI ::II ::J VI ill x 0 0 0 'lI> 0:: ~~ 0~~0~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~0~ C> <0 ~~ Z " ll& C C Ci <~ C C .... "-0 0 0 5 C)Z , 0 0 m < en.. 0 "" "" I: ' 0 *! 0 > >-:U (V) 0 ~ w w 0 0:: W C W 0 W >. "0 c U 0 0 ,...., G- U - ()\ <( C "0 - "0 (I);g (I) c (I) 0 ...J 0 0 w~ .... 0- w 0'0 3= 0 3: I 0:: 1--< W 0> ()\ w- .>t C C Z U 'u 'u ~~ L: 0 L: 0 L: 0 lD u... u... ~:; ,--.. - r - ......, - ~ 0 I .' <(~ '- :J .. ::JJ S '- os. ~::: 0 oS z~ If)~ (/)~ 0 z V>;;; ...J;;: ...J~ -< .... C C :c "O~ "O~ Co cO 0L: oL: Z :Elf) :Elf) "(I) -(I) 0 ~<( ~ 0 0, >- I I Z CC cC <( I ! 00 00 u ~ " t i -- - ...... I " 00 00 ~ ' . >> >> .. li ww WW C 0 ww WW 0.. -- ........... ~ ~ (1)(1) 1II111 ~ W3 '- Wo wO .. 3:w ! .. oj 3:w m::~ '" .. "..... ;:; 0'- S :~ L:L: L:L:. j mg ........... of ......-+-'~ kS> :J'-' \... :J ; U~ "- oo~ 00: If)Z~ Z(/)~ AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGES;3~ OF !GJD .. ;;; N . o '" iI "'i ~ i ! i ; I ! 9 ,... ~ ~ :11 ~ 8 ~5~~::!8 ;3 ~N; bj;.: ioort ~::;~It::~~gJ;!;!;. ~ili:IIj:l:~i!~~~~ Ii! Olll I ,z~ ",..:11 ..il i!,,:'11 ~3;!i _;!i!i 333::1 ~ /I z ~ ~ ~ /I d d d 1!~j;Jj!j;ji;!!~~~ QiQf ii~f :i~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~ c o c o o > <U o > <U w w III ,.... 0- ...... C 1Il~ <U~ 3:0 o w ~ u .c a (D .......- ""'-j ......;. os. z~ .c ......b .' ,-".i os. z! li e c o a. ~ o~ o~ S .. ~ =~ ,Q-n ~ II 0 [g] J c)o 0 Z~ -<:; - Zz z~ <- -,z ~ a..:; . w Z "" ~ :J a.. <I) I- >- Z ~ 0 U ~ w ~ I- ... J: w U 0 i "" ~ <0 C) " " Z <~ 0 a.. 0 ... C)Z 5 < /XI <I).. Q ('I) <( a... w U <( -J a... 1-< w- z ~;; ~:; <(~ ~~ ~ 0 z V);;; -J;;: -J~ -< ~ :c Z 0 >- Z <( U W3 a:~ mg U~ ...., ! S ~ ... ~ ... Q a .. iii z < ~ i fi z W it 0 CJ 3 z \j g ~ ~ z W u z ~ ..J ~ Io! a \I;l ... < ::II 0 a: III ill ..; ~ ~ 0 .. ~ I!; e: .. ..J " ... c z '" : 0 I a 0 ~ ::l u ~ 0 . 0 ~ I S 8 rii :::J It: '" N Z ~ ~ ~ i /I II: <C It: ~ ~ ... ~ 0 ~ ... ~ ... ili ..J ili ::II 15 ::II " ... ~ 0 ::II Ii! I ~ W i 0 It: ... 0 I ~ 0 ... Io! z Io! ~ ii! ::II ... I- ! c Io! !l! c c 1= .. i! ~ J: " ... " c ;:: ~ f/) <C I l'i ... ii1 ~ ~ g ~ ~ 8 0 Z == ~ 3 ... ~ i ~ ~ ii: '" u ::II ... '" :I: 0~~0~~~~~~~~ C C 0 0 0 0 ,.... >1J > a <U 0 <U 0:: c W g, W c a U -1J - a III 0 III '- 0'(5 <U wO:: 3: 0- C .0 .c a LL .c ...... r ......10 :l .' :. :l~ 0> oS ud Uli ~ ~ ~ l . i tIS AGENDA ITEM NO.~ tiI PAGEs.!:{OF l:lp OYOll NOANY~ OYOll'IYlI """'" 1111I11I11I .--. ~2i I! . jU ~ g~ j o dl ~ ii i si I ~ fh ~a ~i ~ :I! 3 ~ ~~ 11 i~ ~ ~i1I~ B I 9 B~I ~i ia ~!i~~ .I~~;h 8 Ill,IIIII!1 ~i . !lllllllliii ~ !11~lil~l~ll'i 1~lg!lil!lll! ~ ..:C'i...."'.."..::!::=t!: .(..ua.a-=o:...w1..J~ e~ i ~ It / ~, / ~~ i ~ Ii ~I ~~ n~ lit; - \) z o ~ ~ w :I: Ii o z ~~ ~> \ z9-~ o ~ ~5u- ;,.:<00 :::sU-::;! wo::> t;~U w~~ ~~o Q ~ z o ~ z~ Q~ !;(~ ~C) wZ ......- ~~ Dh. :1 r _,hi Q~I Ii' :Ii ;ta' a inll~l I II ;1 ~ - ~ [8 :\ e>e . . Z~ M _u zZ: < z: <z: ....< ...... en . Z w 0 '" ~ ::> ...... ~ U w w , ...... M - ~ :I: U' '" ~:! C> <0 ~~ z 0 Z <~ . 3 ....a z C)Z: ~, < ~: Q.. en.. ~ W U <( ....J a... 1-< w- z ~,;; o::~ .... <(~ ~: 0 z (/);;; ....J;;: ....J... '" -< .... J: Z 0 >- Z <( U 3 Q.. ~ ~ I ~ Ii Ill! I I! !lIi II !~ih n III I n n l I {II a nIl Ih m ~ ..!I III nil. · _~ · II . . _." PAGE.J'J:OF 1:JiJ w~ ~i 11I0 U':, . 'U ~1 %;0 l ~I 2 o~ 5 il! !\' ; -0 <!> z3: Ow --' - -> ~~ '0 ZD! ou.. -0 ~w ~:5 --,U wen :cCO .-0 D! o Z , ~~ .. ,.~ ~ ~, ~ ~~ ~ ~ II 0 ~ -0 1 c)o <!> z~ " -u Z Zz 0 z~ . --' <("" --,z .....", ::> < 11.... co V> . Z w 0 00: Z ~ => 0 Z ~ t- ~ ::s u 11.. W W ~ t- G:i (') - lo<: ~ J: --' U W <( ~x 00: :c C) <(0 U I- Z " ::> z <(~ , 0 3 11..0 . C)Z ~. en 11.. < ~~ V>.. -0 <!> z_~ 9<!>- -z> ::>0< co --' ...:::; .-0 z::> D! O co u.. _u..o ~o~ G:i ~ ::> --,Uu w~~ tn-o w 3: It') It') <!> <!> z z 0 0 --' --' ~~ ::> co z> Z o~ 0 -0 ~ ~~ ~u.. > w --,0 --' Ww w D! :c::> :c I-U ~ ::>en OCO 0 enO Z /'1-., ~ ~ ht1 ~ ~I ; i~ Ii! ~ !i li 0- <( -00 <!>D! ZZ 00 --')- -Z ~<( .U ZO 0<( -0 !;(D! ~::::! --'~ w<!> tiz <(- wU ~ , , , , ri .. , , f .. ! .. ~ ~ .. '<7 .. I , .. f I .. I I .. I .. I.-I' .. I fJ:, ~ ~~ r~ ~ ~ ('t) ~ w ~I u <( I; ...... 0... 12. J-< w- ~II z ~~ ;;1 Ct!:; rli <(~ ... ~~ .....", I; z 0 z (/);;; ......;;: ......"' " -< ~ J: Z 0 >- Z <( U ~ ~ ~5!;j ~ ~ ~g~ ~ ~~ ~ (j ~ ~ ~~ o g~~ ~:O:" z ~~g l'lg I"~ el ~~g ~!l~ ~3 ~ ~ ~t; ~ .is "" ,all 0 'I!~ o ~. ~ o~~,; ...J Illljl1 !Ii dl o ~~~i~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~I1..oz!f~ '~ ~6 <( ~~~~~il~~~~9iili Q! ~~5!~:;! gll!83 ~u ~ ~o8~v~ ~~~a ~~ ~ ~NM~~.~_~2=~~~ ~ o z ids 9 i~l! IR~!I~~i~~! 'B~..~G,~~~ ;' ;~~Inil~~j~ ~i~"'n"'.;.~ uu Q!iQhdh~H ~ <""'uci.....:d:i-illl-l:i ;t ~ ~ ! i t.Q AGENDA ITEM NO..i2:,/ ~ ~. PAQE~ OF 1;)D ~1 ~i 1< ~i ~ Ii 3 0- <( o D! tOz e>o z>- OZ --'<( ::>u COo '<( ZO OD! - --' ~~ G:ie> Ldz I-U en<( <(u.. w_ ;''', oli I ~ 1\ .1 _to - --1. .. -r1 .. .. .. .. ~ .. 'Q' .. .. h- ~ .. .., .. - ct- i to e> z o ~-~ co<!>- . > zZ~ 090 --D! ~::>u.. >coo wu..w --' 0 D! w ::> I-~U enUr.n w<(co 3:~o W3 a=~ m~ U~ ~ ,,-.. d ~ 0" 'i ~ ~~ ~ o 12~ ~ili Z ~~ 8~ ~ ~I ~"'5 w 0'" 0 ~ ~g ~ It: O'i t>!t ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~u ~~ ~ o~ oz ~< g~ ~ ~g ~(j tL::- N i z ,j~ 'i ~~Ui ~ ~ ~~~i! ~ 0 ~ ~~~; r1 z il! ~ adl~ ~ ~ II ~ ~ g 19R~~~ a ~ ~ ~ w ~ il 'Ill" H ,I : iUn : ~ ~ ~J l3 ; ,,-.. 10 V) ~z I- ~~ ~O WW VO IX=> ~d .Z 1-- zl- wOz :EZo "-:r: go~ w=>v it~::; Q:r::t lli!1-~ ;:)w,,- 1-> ' ;:)ii1!~ u...ov !t ~~Ii ,,-..J ~ ig ~~'l:{% /;tj.:;!.~?.::::-~: ~ \ ~ ~ : ---\ ~~ ~ ~'~-----, \ gjg ~ a:.-O \ ::i i:5!;( 0 ~~~~ I t-O-w:J I 1'5 0 ~.~:::::::1 ffi~C5 IX 1 I ,,--u...0 ! J' ~~~~ , -<(000 , .- zo~-o ~ : ( QI-I-I- J ~ I t-:Jww ~ ; ; 50~~ i ! ~ ~ zoV)(/) -i-i,-I-,.-,.:lOzw W 1 'v--"WW . =::~ ~ \1 -. (/) (/) I' , i9~~ ft ~~~ i ;~ OJ I ~ ~g V) :i~ ,,;';~ ~ ~9'" ~~~ v; ~~~ ::~~ ~ 0- Ell! ~~~ .....-...! I il I g 1 H: ~~ ' ~" , , , I" .,,-J :.' --, I fa (; G ~s ~ - Z ~ "- W l- v; 'f ~ IX -<( Cl Z Z Z ~ 0.. ClO u Z~ -u Zz z~ -<(~ -,z < o..~ . W IX ;:) l- V W I- :r: v IX -<(0 o -<(~ "-0 Clz V>~ ~~ s" l!~ ~ !~ ~ a... w U <( ~ a... I- w~ z ~a< o ~~ <(3 ~~ o z t/)- '" ~;;; ~~ '" -< -' :r: z o >- z <( u "<:t" < ~ C-' Z ...... Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w~ ~ ! a:~ ~ ~ ~ tI:......~ .6 m<( ~ ~ aVO"lIV" ] Q. ~ I tI) UtI: ~ ~ AGENDA ITEM No.$-~ l'l ~ ~ '" PAGEllOF J;)/J .. ' ! . '. . ' .~ f I ! I . I" II' ii' ' ' H! ! II I ! .11 . II "i I' II 0 Ii' ! ! ~ !I j !I U i' ;1 t!lii HIl !lli II !! !11,lli!d! Illl n I , t ~! ~ H! j! d il flUI! f !11!ill! ~ I II U!liil !1!llil UIIll!i l hi ~ 0 e (i) (;) O. .1 ",i.! .! sl mdh dlllli ~III! ill ~Ii! ! o e < II "I sl,' .! o ~ II II c~ ~ I ~ . ~ It] ~BI ~ c>0 u Z~ ll~ z~ z~ <~ II ~z o..~ . w o '" :J ~~ I- ~ ~ r ~ _~!i u Q ~s~,,- '" ~ 3 !!l ,,~ f <0 ~~ B lI!;o ~i ~ <~ ! < ..hi;U ~,,~ 0..0 ~ ~ Uu:u In ~~ Ii @ liH~ n!i n~ :S ~~h ul iliij ~. -.::t ~ PAGElk.: Of - f".:;tD w U <( ....J 0- I- w~ ~~ o CI::~ 3 <(~ 0.. U Ii: ~ w U Z o u W 0.. < ~ ~ I :S (/);;; ....J;;: ....J~ '" -< "<t Z ~ 0 < C> >- z Z Z 3 <( 0.. U t3 ~ < ~ g~ iE ::l~ d ~~ Ii ~ii~ ~H; ~ ~ ~ ~ ! r' r' (]) u o - Q. +- (])- ~~ 0:;- ~~ ~ V)<C -~ ;-:: z I~ c~ 00.... >.. c o U r' 0- ....on-or-..llOo---- m ~ ~~ 2;~E -.. ~~5 ~~~ 1i:l3~ H?; ~3" 999 o ~:J:> u~~~ .~~ aW~Qon:2z ~~~~Mh~ ~~ ~!3~~~~~ g H ~~i~H~~ ~ Iil~i """""""" ~ "'~ ?;;!;?;?;?;?;?;;!; lU W zzzl:zzzz ~ ~o~ ~H~HH ","- 2~ '" a '7~ 0 ~~~-rg ~uO~5~ ~!:;!!;~Oiil ",~l.']"':I:U zW(/)~!:::'" C)"-~z~~ v;~"-o~z 2 ~:nwzo ;:J<z-'gQ~t5 5 OO$JVi<::S ;;:: "'i=:I:C)t;"- ~ W_.-~wC) U ~ow"''''z it oa~ooz ~ UU~~~O t ., g ~ ~ ~ o 0 KJ ~Iii~ E :[~~~ :! ~ >- ~1ulll"! :J >I~~ g .SUVl~ to ~z~lIl5! ~ ,<~::i!:!.. 0... ~wC"):5~ u zo -~ fff~ i=~;! ~~! oa~ g:3~~ >,!)lS"l gzi/ .'" w~~~ ~,"a:3 a::~~ ~u 02 OlD. ~~ z- ~ gt "- 0-" <( vu i o ~ ~ ~ o 0 - .., zli;~ i~5: ili1ul:l;;; ~~2~ .SU:l~ 15z~ .. ~-::i!:!Oi "'ijJC'f:S.... Cl Z Z 38 "-... OQ zo ~~ '" - j:!58 u2_ ~~&!c:; OO(Jq ""i!! -I;: <08... -c(:f:W!: 0...,"0-0 ~H~ ~ t Ii!' ~ 12 i In ~ Ei ..0( ~-'" Ii! z g ~ ~ g ~ ~ ; ! z . g 2 ~ ~<5 ul ~ ~l:l~ 8 ~2 ~ ~ ~~ ~ 5i ~~ ~ ~ :[ o ~~.. OQ~ ~~- ~L~ 12w -8 5~~~ ~gi~ ..~~~2 ~~~~~ m o .., ~ ClOl z.. m~a z~;;; -50-0 ~2lS~ w2g-: ~~Ql~ ::>,"0-0 tn~~~ '" ~ ~ a tlt ~ ?i.s :! z<if ~ ~1 ; ~~ Ig .$ ~i 0- !;i(j ~o wv 5io~~ z o~aSl~ o ~!(fi~~ ii: ~~~~::l (5 ~5~g ~ ~~~,,:t; o c:.~.o::~ ...J ~~~z: i:3 l'J~"'o", ~ ~og~~ ~Ii; ~~ "rl"O ~~~ ~zo ~o~ o M ~ ... .. Ii;~~ w~~~ ~5~~~ ~~IO 0- '1lfil~!:! .. u~=t:s~ [8 B 0; l .. ~ $ lil l o v a o o wQ zg oe NO! wZ Vl . ~G z Sl iii " <> ~Q~ 120~- ;I<<\5g vI!: ... v~n~ ~";80& (j5_~i!! "'O~O mtt)NIIC ... o .., g Iri"~ cf)~~= z~lS~ Cl ... - 20': '!)olll..; ~UcW'l t:i~~~ :J,";\~ - I- w w :I: en w -' I- i= C)O V z~ -v zz z~ ~~ -'z -< "-~ . w '" ::J .- U w .- ~ ~ is . o ~ < ~ o z ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ en -5 ~ ~ ;> ~ ~ ~ ~0 1-4Z ~~ ~o ~~ ~s ~~ Vl ~ g~B Vlt;- ~o~~~ olS~U",,:--: :::t9Q~i!i ~g~;~ 05~:;~ Z"",;S~u. :I: U '" <0 '" <~ a.. 0 C)Z -< (/) ~ ~ w U <( ....J a.. I- w~ z ~o ~~ <(~ ~::: o z (/);;; ....J;;: ....J~ -< ~ :r: z o >- z <( u ~ ~ f W3 ~ a:~ g ~ ~ IDI()<C is 131 e Ji ~!<"8 g ~ ua: ~ ~1 ~I ~i ~ ~ A ~ AlA lT~to~~ PAGE..st..OF 120 0- 0- ..... C> 0 z 0 C> 0 Z -.J 0 0 :::> -.J 0 :::> CO 0 CO 0 Z Z 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 > w > -.J W W -.J 0 I- w ~ I- 0 Vl w w ~ 0 ~J . 0 I 1< "2 , ~ ~~ , 0 ~ is lil " 0 ~ l;; Ii IT n tl K------- " 0- f "r^'-- 0- ..... I ' C> I I " l~ C> Z I I z Q , I 9-~ I I -.J I Z -C>w :::> I I ~ :::>z> co I I / co_~ I I / / a... IQ / I / u. Z:::!O Z l-1-1/ I 0 I 0 O:::>~ t------ I 0 _cou. ~ I-u.O rl--1' ~ ~O~ > -.J W I I ", <( ~~:::> -.J I I '" ~ wUU w I<(Vl I 1 I ~ I I-COCO ~ I :::>-0 I I 0 , I 0 Z I Vl I I / f /^,// / I I / I ~---- J Jll 0 --"""[ UI 0 1 0 I 111 r. -~ 0 ,: 0 I: ,: i ,: Il n ~ 8 ~ 5~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~! ~ ~ ~ ~ lei o g~~ ~ ~~ Z -;:j !)iD j!!O C) ~i~ ~~~: ~ ;';8i~ ;~ ~~ '" 1'i=, ~~ 9 S~ r;~ ~~ o ~F8~ ~ a~3 ~~ u i!B~~a~ ~~8 ~~ ~ ~~~!~!II~~;I~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~!~~!~ . ~ o iii . ",;:II ~ ~ d ! g !~I~I ~ z ~:::::~ u~ QI!~ ~"~.. il- "3!~ lS'r"!I.'n~ Id~nIIU8~~ illfj-I ".I~Ull ~ :::~:~~!~!!! .. fa &I ~ EJ 1 c)o z:;: " z~ .. z~ <(.... " ~z ....., a..~ . V') w Z '" 0 ~ ::> t- > U w ~ w w I- .... :I: :5 u '" <( '" C) <(0 g Z " ~ z <(W Z a..c :s c)z . a.. V')~ 0 ~ a... w U <( -I a... J-< w- z ~.. 0 ~:; <(~ ~~ "'-" 0 z (/);;; -I;;: -IW >l -< .... :r: z 0 >- z <( u ~I II ~u I~ g~1 :5; ~D 3~ d!li I; z ",. ~ ~ ! ~ i t.ii W~ a:~ m~ UB ....., Z :s Cl.. >- ~ . ~ AGENDAITEMNO~/ " PAGE "ti) " OF /2.J> ,...-.- ,...-.- ,...-.- z :s a.. u.. o o . O!: -1 <( b2 <(. a.. o Z <( Z . t -nt I I I Ul I I ~ ~ .-1 I ,- I. ~ en " o z <( <( " "o::t~ .- I b2 o ~ g 1 ~h ~ ~ ~~ goil ~~" ",::!~ li ~ z tl~" G i-l~ o ~~~ z ~~ <> ~ i'&' Z ~~~ ~ ",::; il ~i ~ ~: <:; ~~i U ~~ ~~;! ~ ~~ ~ LZ~ G~ ~3 M ~~~ 0 ~o (j ~ ~~ h d Iii !u~g ~ ~ ~~ o h~~ ~ ii ~g ~li~~hnd~ 5i~ ~ dB!!~!f ~;~ i~ ~dn~~~jH~ g;J~ <( ~~8~~~~n~9~':1l f~/;;~JF!:t~SS~ 9ll;~ ~ ~!!!!!!!~!!!!! 1~1!l!!lilm !~ ... .uO......Oz:....>l...J:l: ~ I I 1 "<t .- ~ Z <> 0 ....J <> :J co <> <> z 0 <> ~ <) ~ ....J W <> tn r, <( I I W <( ....... o z o ....J :J co 1 :I V) ~ z 0 <> ~ ~ <> ~ > w ...... w <) <> <> <> I1t ~ ~ ~ Ii ....~ . w '" :::> l- v w I- ..a- ~ -<( C) z Z z ~ .... :I: V '" -<(0 ., -<(~ ....0 C)z V)~ ~ll ~~ ~S , z . . .0 ~ a.. en " w u <( -I a.. ~ w~ z ~'" o Ck::~ <(S ~~ o (/)= on. -I;;: -IW >< -< ... I z o >- z <( u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I AGENllTEM o.~ ~ .,I-J _ 'J-,7:) <> '" <> <> o z <(- <(0 "Z .-0 ,-1 "o::t- :J :I .- m ~ 0u.. - zO ~ - - o~ ::::!U :J<( m!:e.. z o I- ~ W -1 W I I- :J o en f[ o t; Cl ~ 9- ~ W3 a:~ m~ u; o -..r<( .....0 ~O! zz -0 9>- -z :::::><( ~u z~ 00 ~O! >~ ~~ W~ tnz w- .:;:u ~ ~ 11 l'i EI 1 ~o z:;: " -u ;" Zz .. z~ . <~ b --,z "'-'If a...~ (/) . Z w 0 "" ~ ::J ~ l- V w w . I- 't ~ I ~I v <( "" ~3 ~ <0 2l'1 Z " 21: I~ Z <~ , 3 a... 0 . ~z .:" i~ a... -< ::. (/)w ~a -Ii! 13~ ~gS ~ 1II~~ !I~g ~~~ 0- :!z ~O 11 w Z U <( ..... 0- .-< w- z ~~ ~:; <(~ ~::: ....." 0 z U'>;; .....;;: .....;:: -< .... J: Z 0 >- Z <( U 3 a... >- w ~ ~ ~5!ii f! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ g" ~ a;; ~U z: ilili o 8-0 ~ ~~ ~ a'~ ~~ ~~ C> ~ l;:l! 15" .... w : ~~ ::\~ ~i;l ;;: ~8g L ~~ o B'~ 2~ i. o ~~B;t ;t g~i5 ~~ u li~B:i~~i ~~5 ~~ ~ ~U!i!!UU~~~ ~ ~~~:~~:::~~~;~ . ~ ~ Z ..- i ~ a~ " 9 li~~ ~ g !~"g 8 Z ~~~dldil; !i~hu~~~~~~ (. g~~~~~~HllSll ~~tJ"d"-~~~~ o"o~--~~!Hi Ii _"__lili~__"",, ~ <..uciu.i..:tS.:i..OlJ~ z o ~ ---! W AGENDA I~M NO. t We" . ".PA9E~ OF /;o;J_ I ~ ~ z o ---! :::::> aJ z o I- ~ W ---! W J: I- :::::> o V) ~ ~ z o ---! :::::> aJ ~ ~ ~ W~ ! a:~ Im~ tIS UB ....." r r i /""'" => u . 0 . <( 00 t(0! ~-' -'~ we> t;z w- .~~ u.. -.0_ '-0 e><( zO :::::iQ! - V) :::>-' co:::! 'I Zz 00 t(~ ><( ~U we> IZ l;!- O~ z~ -.0 e> z o -' :::> co z o ~ --I W l- V) w ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'l;. Z ::S 0... >- W ~ l8 61 ~ El ~ c)o z~ -;:; Zz .. z~ <(L b ....z 0...: ." . Z w 0 co: ~ ::J ~ I- U w w ~ I- - ~ J: ;1 co: u <( co: ~~ C) <(0 Z ~~ J z " R~ ~E <("' . Z 0...0 Z 6J ::S " ..'I; C)Z wO !..- ~:: 0... ~ ~; ." .. ~O 'I'll Ig~ ~~ll "'''2 ~ ~l;a ~~~ I!Z ~~O .. l> W Z U .<( ....J 0.... t-~ w- z ~'" 0 0::::; <(~ ~~ 0 Z V)- .. -1;;: ....Jw '" -~ ~ I ~ S ~5!ii ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ Q Z o ~~~ ~ ~li ~ ~~ ~ Z -:i"- 1:10"'0 i);..; ~ ~ h'" ~~~: @ ~,a 0 ~ ~~~ li~ ~~ ~ !u~~ ~ ~ S a~~ ~i~; ~!;~~hU!n o r8~ t ~w~ ~w l;d:lHiitah il~~hlh~;B ~11~1~1~~~'l'~~~i ~ !~~~~~~i~~~ib _ n~~n~~n~~ .~ _N.................e_:!:!;! -<...uo,.;,,:ox-;;llJ1 ::c 8 ~ J:: f-4 . ~ ~ ~ i:2 ~ ~ wsa 0 l ~ ~O 6 ~ lI:it ~ ~ ~ mo ~ 0 trl ~tI) U= ~ ~. t; ~ ..(J><~ J\iENOA ITEM N..' ~ ~ PAGE (..{-=? -OF t;ilJ -.0 " z o ........ :::> (0 z o t( > W --I W :r: I- :::> o (/) -.0 " z o --I z o >- z <( u ~ ~ ;; ~ ~ z w ~ I-' '" :S ~ 0 z ~ ~ 0 .... ~ " ~ ~ .... ;; ~ ,,'f "'t -t..~ z -< ii1 iii o w "- < ~ I z ...... z ...... o ~ o 8 00 ~~ ...... OV'l ~ ~.~ ~O ~g: ~ z ~ ~ ~ m z ~ Z ::> f2 ~ .... ~ 1 & EI II 0 EI ..... . z w ~ :: ~ Z ~ w w .... .... l5 ;; ~ II) 0 z :S '<t - ~ J: '" U <( '" i~ C) Z <(0 ~ Z C> Z <(~ , :S ....0 z C)z ~. .... -< !; "'~ .0 ~ m :::< w I-' '" ~ ~ w w u :s lb w '" u: - U 3 w <( e: -J 0... I- w~ ~ z ~o ~ a:::~ ~ <(~ u - ;lf1 -J;;; -J" "" -< ~ :r: z 0 >- Z <( fa I U < ~ u- Ii !ill !~ -< . oil!d; ~ ~ I' ~r _ wg . ~ ~ Oz.; ZSu B ~ cnh ~ =~ ~ iEi~ j. "E .,~ ~ 0< z i:!-.c ~ ~ i ,,. '!; i~'" ~ ;t U ~ NDA ITEM ~. .,4v1 "', PAGF;J:, <f ~fliJ' z w :::< w I-' '" -< t w o ~ "- "" "* ~ z t; ~ ... ~ CL ~ ~ El c ... ~ .... .. Z ~ "" 1lI ~ .. ~ fi ~ ;;; 0 ~ W 5 11 J e" ! 0 .. g ;! z ~ .. :Ii z ~ W ~ " 11 !I: ... z 00 ... is ..J ... ~ .. 11 2 I .. :l ~ < 2 ... :: ~ i ... g ... .. >< a: ;If 6 " 91 ~ ~ ~ " ~ .. U ~ 0 ~ a: ~ ill ... ~ 0 lL I! ID .. is ~ ~ ..J ':i >< ~ 0 ~ ~ Z ... ~ ~ ... 0 ~ 0 ~ .. Iii ~ a: : ~ is 0 0 i ~ N 1lI ... e 0 0 ~ "" N 2 ~ Z Z , 6 0 en ~ ... a a: f a: :i g =5 I:l .., a: _ ::J a: .. l!i I r ! .... r :> ID a: 1 g g a: lL ~ a: "- ~ ~ . I I "" ... . "" ~ c( ~ F u ~ ~ a: 0 III z r ID lL >- V) , ~ i ~ .. i on on on W z a: ... B ... i ...J .... f I f I . I ~ I . I ~ 0 ili 2 a: 2 u F 0 0 r. .... on on .. Z 0 ... 0 3!: ~ I ~ 0 lL i z 3 i i 3 l!i lIS a: ~ W ... ~ ~ c; ... z ~ i !S! 2 ~ >- C If If 0 ~ ~ ... !S! ~ F >C ~ x d z CL lL lL d 6 5 ~ a: .... "" f I tf z I ... I u u u I:! 5 "" c; ~ en ... ~ j;J :> ~ I ~ ~ ... ~ .. on on ~ a: 3 ~ ~ 0 Z I IS . IS ~ IS w :e ~ 8 is ~ ;;: "" s s s It J l:l u: Q i Q II< ili f f ili "" "" "" 0- ... :J on ill x ... 0 0 0 .. 0~~0~0~00~~~ 0~~~~~~~0~0~ 0 Z c c c 0 c ;;4. 0 0 :::> 0 10 .... 0 *~ 0 > > Q) ,l Q) II w . .i..~ w u 0 fi ........ Q.. U a> .- c u ...... .-0' . VI lIl~ III C lIle~ 0 0 Q)~ Q) o =e ~ 3: a 3: J: wa::~ w 0> l~ ~ c u 'u .c .c 0 .c 0 -- m ..... .....0 .- '-'" - ....... 0 J . :Jl ~ ~ ~ ;; :J i S I- 0 oS oS z zS UlS UlS .. li c c -o=: -o=: Co cO O.c OJ:;;: IUl IUl "lIl -lIl 8:<( ~ 01 0, ~ I I CC cC I 00 i ~ " , ~ ~ -- ~ h; 00 i) >> iii) Q)Q) ~ C Cj 0 ww a. -- ~ lIllll III C .... Q)o Q) 0 3:w 3: ~ 0 .c.c .c.c . ~ It.. -- ..... i~ kP :J~ 00 00:: UlZ z ~ AGENDA ITEM NO., /- /"'" .. ~ .. ;:. ~ ~ ~ I I I -. I II 00 . z~ 0 -lj Zz z~ . <~ -,z o...~ . w ~ :::> .... u w .... J: U ~ S ~3 <0 ~~ 0 "to <~ "-0 oz "" en.. 0 M ~ w U <( -J a.. ::r:: ....< ~ w- z ~6 ~~ ~ ... <(j ~~ 0 z ~ (/);;; -J;;: " -J'" ~ '" -< ... J: Z 0 0 >- 8 z <( ~ ... U ~ l-I ~ ~ rJ) ~ w~ :x: 0 fWII rd..... ~ ~ .... 0 l-I ~ m~~".... I l-I ....... Q~O UtI: >< ~ tJ ~ ~ ~ ~ III ~ '- ~ a.. u ~ C'; c ... .. ~ .. ~ " ~ .. z <> Ii z ~ ii ~ W ~ ~ ill tl II CJ z <> .. 00 g ~ ~ z i Ie ~ Zi J z~ 0 W u z ~ II ~ ... ..J l'! ~ :II ... .. '" -u ~ ~ .. II . I <> ~ :II <> .. . .. '" K " Zz a: ill ~ ... !l! 9i ~ <> ... '" z~ 0 .. J Ii it ~ iil :II ~ . IL ~ ... <> <L ....., ..J ~ ~ .. ~ is <> Sf ~ 8 Zi .....2 2 III ~ ~ ~ ... ii 0 I ~ 0 .. '" .. '" . w 5 ....~ u <> :J !l! ... iii 1lI ~ ... <> 0 0 ~ ~ <> . ~ ... ~ :i ~ 8 ... 2 . , ~ ... U) ... :II '" ~ '" ~ il w ::J II: III ~ N Z :z: ! l:! "l :z: ii '" ~ ~ z a . e; '" o! ~ a: .. J I I ~ ... J ~ ~ c( ~ ~ ~ ~ l 15 0 0 ili .. Z. :I: CD IL . ::> I i ~ ... III OJ III .. .... <I) ... ~ ..J ~ ~ ~ ~ , I ~ I , I t- o: i ::0 '" :II <> ... r: 0 0 .. f- ~ .. III .. >- z ::: '" ~ 8 IL :J II: i :J 3 :j ~ 0 u W ~ <> II: <> Z ~ 0 . i? il i Z 5 5 '" l'! Z l'! ! ~ i? ;! ... .. . ~ . g ~ w ~ ~ ... !l! 3 >C ... ~ x a Z IL IL IL 8 8 0 ~ ~ '" ~ I Ij I I tf I u t- o ... 3 ;;: ... , th ... ... ~ ~ :5 ... " ... ~ I:l i III III .. ~ ~ II: ~ .. I <> Z I II: , i '" : i :I: ::s ~ 3 ~ u 3 I I ... ~ s ~ ~ w ... l!l it Q i Q f I ... ~ u u OJ :II :J '" <> <> <> 0 0~00~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~0~~~ i o! i! <0 0 " "~ Z <~ . Ci ....0 z c: c: ..... c: c: :5 oz ~. 0 0 ~ ~; to <I).. ~O 0 0 0 0 0 >1J 0 ('t) > ~ > 0 > Q) 0 Q) Q) Q: Q) C W w 0 w W >. c: U 0 u <( ..... "0 ..... 0 -J III 0 a.. III ... 0'0 1-< Q) Q: W w- 3: a> z c: ~~ 'u J:: 0 ~~ J:: ...... .... ..... r <(~ :J :. ~~ ~. :J oS 0 0 Ul~ z V);;; Ul -J;;: -JW >C -< .... ::c c: o ~ ~ }--4 Z . ~ ~ ~ ~ W~.I-I 0 ! II: ~t ~ f mu!~ ~ .o~P-4 AGENDA ITeM "'v. ~ " _ __ _ 1'.../ _ "- _1-:::JlJ z o ~ z <( u ~ . 0.. '- .. ~ o~ 0': S :S ~ ~ ~ .' ~ss ,,-- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CANYON HILLS MARKETPLACE COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NOS. 2004-02 AND 2004-10 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOS. 2004-32, 2004-33, 2004-35, AND 2004-36 PLANNING DIVISION General Conditions 1. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, Agents, and its Consultants from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, Consultants or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning implementation and construction of the Canyon Hills Marketplace, which action is bought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Sections 65009 and/or 66499.37, and Public Resources Code Section 21167. The City will promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City and will cooperate fully with the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, or proceeding, the applicant shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. 2. Future development shall comply with those standards and guidelines contained in the Canyon Hills Specific Plan. - 3. Those issues, standards, guidelines, etc. not addressed in the Canyon Hills Specific Plan will rev~rt to the City Municipal Code and/or Zoning Code in effect at the time future projects are constructed. 4. The applicant shall provide all applicable project-related onsite and offsite improvements as described in the Canyon Hills Specific Plan document and Tentative Tract Map No. 30496. 5. The applicant shall implement appropriate mitigation measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Canyon Hills Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report. 6. All future proposals shall be reviewed by the City on a project-by-project basis. If determined necessary by the Community Development Director or designee, additional environmental analysis will be required. 7. Provisions of the City's Noise Ordinance shall be satisfied during all site preparation and construction activity. Site preparation activity and construction shall not commence before 7:00 AM and shall cease at 7:00 PM, Monday through Friday. Construction activity shall not take place on Saturday, Sunday, or any Legal Holidays. ,,-- 8. Throughout construction, as deemed appropriate by the City and the applicant, fugitive dust suppression along project and perimeter streets and other connecting roads shall be applied to minimize fugitive dust generation. Fugitive dust suppression techniques may include soil watering, application of soil binders, and/or placement of gravel or other appropriate material to minimize vehicle generated dust. AGENDA ITEM NO.d-J ,--- _.~_ I,,~ ne 1"21; CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CANYON HILLS MARKETPLACE COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NOS. 2004-02 AND 2004-10 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOS. 2004-32, 2004-33, 2004-35, AND 2004-36 (Continued) '-" Conditions For Commercial Design Review Nos. 2004-02 and 2004-10 9. Approval for Commercial Design Review Nos. 2004-02 and 2004-10 will lapse and be void unless a building permit is issued within two years of the approval date. An extension of time, up to one (1) year may be granted by the Community Development Director prior to the expiration of the initial Commercial Design Review approval upon application by the applicant and payment of required fees one (1) month prior to expiration. 10. All site improvements approved with this request shall be constructed as indicated on the approved site plan and elevations. Revisions to approved site plans or building elevations shall be subject to the review of the Community Development Director. All plans submitted for Building Division Plan Check shall conform to the submitted plans as modified by Conditions of Approval, or the Planning Commission/City Council through subsequent action. 11. Any alteration or expansion of this Design Review approval shall be reviewed according to the provisions of Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 12. Mechanical equipment will be sufficiently screened by the building parapets or other screening materials or methods to ensure said equipment is not publicly visible, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. ......, 13. All trash enclosures shall incorporate stone veneer into the side walls and provide wooden trellises, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. 14. Materials and colors depicted on the plans and materials board shall be used unless modified by the COlllmunity Development Director or designee. 15. The Planning Division shall approve the location of any construction trailers utilized during construction. All construction trailers shall require a cash bond in the amount of $1,000.00 to be processed through the Planning Division. 16. No outdoor storage of materials/merchandise is permitted. 17. All exterior lighting shall be shielded and directed onsite so as not to create glare onto neighboring property and streets or allow illumination above the horizontal plane of the fixture. All light fixtures shall match the architectural style of the building. 18. All exterior downspouts shall be concealed or architecturally screened and painted to match the exterior color of the building as approved by the Community Development Director or Designee. .....", ACENDA ITEM NO. ~ ,- _c.~_ .,"~, ~r~ Of.. 1;;uJ ~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CANYON HILLS MARKETPLACE COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NOS. 2004-02 AND 2004-10 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOS. 2004-32,2004-33,2004-35, AND 2004-36 (Continued) 19. The Community Development Director or designee shall review and approve final architectural plans to ensure all cornice elements shall be raised, the number of diamond ceramic tiles are reduced on certain elevations, and the back sides of those parapets that are exposed to public view are architecturally enhanced. 20. All drive aisles and loading areas shall be kept and maintained free and clear of any materials/merchandise so as not to obstruct onsite circulation and deliveries. 21. All parking stalls shall be double-striped with four-inch lines, that are two feet apart. 22. A 12-inch concrete paver along the side of parking stalls that are adjacent to planters (paver to include curb width) shall be provided. 23. All exposed slopes in excess of three feet in height shall have a permanent irrigation system and erosion control vegetation installed, approved by the Planning Division. 24. Streetprint shall be provided at all driveway entrances. Onsite landscaping shall be enhanced at ~ all entry areas and major intersections and shall be subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director or designee. 25. The applicant shall meet ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) requirements. 26. No exterior roofladders shall be permitted. 27. All service and loading doors shall be painted to match the building. 28. Onsite surface drainage shall not cross sidewalks. Prior to Building/Grading Permit Issuance 29. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building permits, the applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgement of Conditions" form and shall return the executed original to the Planning Division for inclusion in the case records. 30. Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced on page one of building plans submitted to the Building Division Plan Check. All Conditions of Approval shall be met prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. ,-.... 31. Prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for each Planning Area, the entire site parking lot, entry driveways, perimeter and internal landscaping, offsite improvements, etc. shall be completed as indicated on the approved plans, or a construction/site improvement phasing plan for that particular Planning Area as approved by the Community Development Director. AGENDA ITEM NO. ~.~ " _ _ __ tfl ,...roo" /"7 () CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CANYON HILLS MARKETPLACE COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NOS. 2004-02 AND 2004-10 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOS. 2004-32, 2004-33, 2004-35, AND 2004-36 (Continued) ......" 32. Three (3) sets of the Final Landscaping/Irrigation Detail Plan shall be submitted, reviewed and approved by the City's Landscape Architect Consultant and the Community Development Director or designee, priorito issuance of building permit. A Landscape Plan Check & Inspection Fee will be charged prior to final landscape approval based on the Consultant's fee plus forty percent (40%) City fee. · All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic sprinkler system with 100% plant and grass coverage using a combination of drip and conventional irrigation methods. · Applicant shall plant street trees selected from the City's Street Tree List, a maximum of forty feet (40') apart and at least twenty-four-inch (24") box in size. · All planting areas shall be separated from paved areas with a six inch (6") high and six inch (6") wide concrete curb. · Planting within fifteen feet (15') of ingress/egress points shall be no higher than thirty-six inches (36"). ......" · Landscape planters shall be planted with an appropriate parking lot shade tree pursuant to the LEMC and Landscape Design Guidelines. · Any transformers and mechanical or electrical equipment shall be indicated on landscape plan and screened as part of the landscaping plan. · The landscape plan shall provide for ground cover, shrubs, and trees and meet all requirements of the City's adopted Landscape Guidelines. Special attention to the use of Xeriscape or drought resistant plantings with combination drip irrigation system to be used to prevent excessive watering. · All landscape improvements shall be bonded 100% for material and labor for two years from installation sign-off by the City. Release of the landscaping bond shall be requested by the applicant at the end of the required two years with approval/acceptance by the Landscape Consultant and Community Development Director or Designee. · All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed within affected portion of any phase at the time a Certificate of Occupancy is requested for any building. All planting areas shall include plantings in the Xeriscape concept, drought tolerant grasses and plants. · Final landscape plan must be consistent with approved site plan. ......., AGENDA ITEM NO. d-J /' " _......- 7/), _ nr: 7;;;J.;JJ ~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CANYON HILLS MARKETPLACE COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NOS. 2004-02 AND 2004-10 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOS. 2004-32,2004-33,2004-35, AND 2004-36 (Continued) . Final landscape plans to include planting and irrigation details. 33. The applicant shall establish and record a reciprocal shared parking agreement with the County of Riverside which allows all future commercial tenants and users to share parking onsite. 34. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. Proof shall be presented to the Chief Building Manager prior to issuance of building permits and fmal approval. 35. The applicant shall prepare a signage program which illustrates community theme signage, directional signs, monuments, etc., subject to approval by the Community Development DireGtor or designee. 36. The applicant shall obtain all necessary State and Federal permits, approvals, or other entitlements, where applicable, prior to each phase of development of the project. ~ 37. The applicant shall comply with the following City programs: the City Source Reduction and Recycling Element and Household Hazardous Waste Element, the County Solid Waste Management Plan and Integrated Waste Management Plan. 38. Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall submit a letter of verification (will-serve letter) to the City Engineer, for all required utility services. 39. The applicant shall meet all requirements of the providing electric utility company. 40. The applicant shall meet all requirements of the providing gas utility company. 41. The applicant shall meet all requirements of the providing telephone utility company. 42. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall provide assurance that all required fees to the Lake Elsinore Unified School District have been paid. Conditions For Conditional Use Permit Nos. 2004-32,2004-33.2004-35. and 2004-36 43. The approved Conditional Use Permits shall run with the land and shall continue to be valid upon a change of ownership of the site or structure which was the subject of this approval. 44. The conditional use permit approval shall apply only to the particular pad area for which it was approved. ~ 45. Bus shelters shall be designed consistently with the materials and colors of the proposed Canyon Hills Market Place. AGENDA ITEM NO. ~/ ...... ____ "'r:!j3J _ }....., i'\ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CANYON HILLS MARKETPLACE COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NOS. 2004-02 AND 2004-10 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOS. 2004-32, 2004-33, 2004-35, AND 2004-36 (Continued) ......" / ; 46. The Conditional Use Permits shall comply with the all applicable requirements of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Title 17 unless modified by approved Conditions of Approval. 47. Prior to final certificate of occupancy of the Conditional Use Permits, all improvements that are approved by the Planning Commission and the City Council shall be installed, or agreements for said improvements shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval. All other stated conditions shall be complied with. All uncompleted improvements must be bonded for as part of the agreements. 48. The hours of operation for the project shall be limited to the hours. of operation expressed within the Business Plan and business license that are submitted to the City, subject to approval by the Community Development Director or designee. 49. The applicant shall at all times comply with Section 17.78 (Noise Control) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 50. Outdoor public address systems shall not be allowed. 51. No outdoor food vending shall be permitted with the proposed project. ....." 52. Security lighting shall be required. All exterior on site lighting shall be shielded and directed on- site so as not to create glare onto neighboring property and streets or allow illumination above the horizontal plane of the fixture. The light fixture proposed is to match the architecture of the building. A photometric Plan illustrating this condition shall be required subject to the review and approval by the Community Development Director or designee. 53. Approval of CUP Nos. 2004-32, 2004-33, 2004~35, and 2004-36 is contingent upon City Council approval of Commercial Design Review Nos. 2004-02 and 2004-10. ENGINEERING DIVISION 54. Construct fourth leg of existing signal at Canyon Hills Drive and Railroad Canyon Road to provide access to this site. Signal shall be operational prior to first Certificate of Occupancy. 55. Provide deceleration lane at southerly entrances for both the eastbound and westbound sides of Railroad Canyon Road. Deceleration lane shall be designed and constructed to Caltrans standards. 56. All landscaping and signage for both planning areas shall be designed and constructed to preserve traffic sight distances consistent with Caltrans standards. ....." AGENDA ITEM NO. '- tAl /' PAGE 7;2- Ot= l2/2 . " CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CANYON HILLS MARKETPLACE COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NOS. 2004-02 AND 2004-10 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOS. 2004-32, 2004-33, 2004-35, AND 2004-36 (Continued) 57. Provide for long-term barricade and erosion control methods at the stubbed street at the southwest end of the property in Planning Area 3. 58. Entrance drive aisles for both Planning Areas shall be clear from parking spaces or intersecting drive aisles for a minimum of 40 feet measured from the curb line of the project entrance. 59. Building structures shall not encroach onto established easements. 60. Provide a detention / desiltation basin to mitigate for the difference in flows (developed and undeveloped) for the 100-year storm. 61. All off-site grading, non-historic drainage and/or construction shall be notarized and have recorded letter(s)of permission. 62. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to final map approval. ~ 63. Underground water rights shall be dedicated to the City pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.52.030 (LEMC) and be consistent with the City's agreement with the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. 64. All street improvements, including traffic signals, shall be installed and functioning prior to certificate of occupancy. 65. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (LEMC 16.34, Resolution 85-26), mitigation fees, area drainage fee, traffic impact fee (TIF), encroachment permit fees and inspection fees associated with the project and its development. 66. Submit a ''Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project. Submit this letter prior to final map approval. 67. Construct all public works improvements per approved street plans (LEMC 12.04). Plans must be approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to final map approval (LEMC 16.34). 68. Street improvement plans and specifications shall be prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Riverside County Road Department standards, latest edition, and City Codes (LEMC 12.04 and 16.34). ",.-. 69. Enter into an agreement with the City for the construction of public works improvements and post the appropriate bonds prior to final map approval. AGENDA ITEM Nv. ~. J ftA ^r- r:< -.J~ h . CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CANYON HILLS MARKETPLACE COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NOS. 2004-02 AND 2004-10 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOS. 2004-32, 2004-33, 2004-35, AND 2004-36 (Continued) """. 70. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 %" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of public works improvements will be scheduled and approved. 71. Install permanent survey monuments in compliance with the City's Municipal Code. 72. Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. 73. Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by the Riverside County Fire Department. 74. Provide street lighting and show lighting improvements as part of street improvement plans as required by the City Engineer. 75. Install blue reflective pavement markers in the street at all fue hydrant locations. 76. Submit a traffic control plan showing all traffic control devices for the tract to be approved prior to final map approval. All traffic control devices shall be installed prior to final inspection of public improvements. This includes No Parking and Street Sweeping Signs for streets within the development. """ 77. AU improvement plans and tract maps shall be digitized. At Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall submit tapes and/or disks which are compatible with City's ARC Info/GIS or the applicant shall pay $300 per sheet for City digitizing. 78. All utilities except electrical over 12 kv shall be placed underground, as approved by the serving utility. 79. Apply and obtain a grading permit with appropriate security prior to building permit issuance. A grading plan signed and stamped by a California Registered Civil Engineer shall be required if " the grading exceeds 50 cubic yards or the existing flow pattern is substantially modified as determined by the City Engineer. I,f the grading is less than 50 cubic yards and a grading plan is not required, a grading permit shall still be obtained so that a cursory drainage and flow pattern inspection can be conducted before grading begins. 80. Provide soils, geology and seismic report including street design recommendations. Provide final soils report showing compliance with recommendations. 81. An Alquist-Priolo study shall be performed on the site to identify any hidden earthquake faults and/ or liquefaction zones present on-site. A letter certifying that the site is clear of these hazards will be required if mitigation is not identified. ......., .... .; rL) AP~..pAnEM 110._. J~ ~ ..' .7tf... ~ ~'L ,p! ..-" . ----::.~,. . . ~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CANYON HILLS MARKETPLACE COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NOS. 2004-02 AND 2004-10 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOS. 2004-32, 2004-33, 2004-35, AND 2004-36 (Continued) 82. All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer and he shall certify all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and proper erosion control. All manufactured slopes greater than 30 ft. in height shall be contoured. 83. Prior to commencement of grading operations, applicant shall provide to the City with a map of all proposed haul routes to be used for movement of export material. Such routes shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 84. Provide to the City a photographic baseline record of the condition of all proposed public City haul roads. In the event of damage to such roads, the applicant shall pay full cost of restoring public roads to the baseline condition. A bond may be required to ensure payment of damages to the public right-of-way, subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 85. Individual lot drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility or accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance or conveyed to a drainage easement. ,-... 86. On-site drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way should be contained within drainage easements shown on the fmal map. A note should be added to the flnal map stating: "Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions". 87. All natural drainage traversing the sites shall be conveyed through the sites, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer. 88. Meet all requirements ofLEMC 15.64 regarding flood hazard regulations. 89. Meet all requirements ofLEMC 15.68 regarding flood plain management. 90. Submit Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports for review and approval by City Engineer and the Riverside County Flood Control District prior to approval of fmal map. The applicant shall mitigate any flooding and/or erosion caused by development of the sites and diversion of drainage. 91. All drainage facilities shall be constructed to Riverside County Flood Control District Standards. 92. Storm drain inlet facilities shall be appropriately stenciled to prohibit illegal dumping in the drain system; the wording and stencil shall be approved by the City Engineer. 93. to-year storm runoff shall be contained within the curb and the 100-year storm runoff shall be contained within the street right-of-way. When either of these criteria is exceeded, drainage facilities shall be installed. ~ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ I PAGE 75' OF -JaiL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CANYON HILLS MARKETPLACE COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NOS. 2004-02 AND 2004-10 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOS. 2004-32, 2004-33, 2004-35, AND 2004-36 (Continued) '-"" 94. Install BMP's using the best available technology to mitigate any urban pollutants from entering the watershed. 95. The applicant shall obtain approval from Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board for their Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan including approval of erosion control for the grading plan prior to issuance of grading permits. The applicant shall provide a SWPPP for post construction which describes BMP's that will be implemented for the development and including maintenance responsibilities. 96. Provide fIrst flush BMP's using the best available technology that will .reduce storm water pollutants from parking areas and driveways. Grading plans shall include details of the erosion control provisions. 97. Intersection site distance shall meet the design criteria of the CALTRANS Design Manual. If site distance can be obstructed, a special limited use easement must be recorded to limit the slope, type of landscaping and wall placement. 98. All parcels shall have direct access to public rights-of-way or be provided with a minimum 30- foot ingress and egress easement to public right-of-way by separate instrument or through map recordation. ......" 99. In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal and recycling, the applicant shall be requited to contract with CR&R, Inc., for removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of construction. RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 100. The applicant shall comply with all comments and conditions of approval from the Riverside County Fire Department (as attached). POLICE DEPARTMENT 101. The applicant shall comply with all comments and conditions of approval from the Police Department (as attached). COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 102. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fee in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 103. The applicant to maintain all onsite landscaping. "-tIll AGENDA ITEM NO. ~I ru~c 7~ (\I:.l7J.O /"'"' CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CANYON HILLS MARKETPLACE COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NOS. 2004-02 AND 2004-10 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOS. 2004-32, 2004-33, 2004-35, AND 2004-36 (Continued) 104. The applicant to comply with all City Ordinances regarding construction debris and removal (Chapter 8.16 LEMC). 105. The applicant to comply with all NPDES regulations. OUTSIDE AGENCIES 106. The applicant shall comply with all recommendation and requirements identified in the attached letter from Riverside Transit Agency dated April 29, 2004. ~ r--. AGENDA ITEM NO. ~I __ PAGE ,77 .OF 7:21; Ar~- L-U4 ~KJ II :UU AM KJV ~V rlK~ r&~ . ----_._~-------....__..- T om Tisdale :'lreCtllel "'mldl\ s~r\'Jllt! I ile: IUll11col1l\:r;;t;:u 11r~J~ or' Rn\:r~fctc C 01"111. 81Ki lhe Cil.it.":; \l{ ijlllmlll~ Bc:lumo11l '.' C;:ii;::'::~1 ".' C:IH",'1t i-1J~,,: .:. roa~hdl" .,:, j')'.:scrl 1101 Sprill,::, .. hl,h;tl1 W<;a~ '.' ImJi11 '.' l.a!...: rh:J:I)I',' :.~ (JUHfW MorellO V~ik, 1';11J:! 1."':"1'1 .:. ]'ans .:. x;mdlt' Mlr.1f'~ ";tn .T:tciJ1l(\ " T':lIl.:<:uJa H'~"ra "1 Sllp<:,n~'~on: i.Jt'i'lh."It1'. Di"1n'Q! r"h~ T.,\ .t~fi'\f"'. J)r.\hn.:1 ~ ,.,m \'i:lql,;c. rh~.I";':'1 1 n....\.\\.it:i...fl 1)'~ln....l ~ ).!;,lJ1ul' .\}I,r,\. :)l'.t~\'t ... rAA !'IV. ~U~~:):)IHHjD r. j -_~~~rr-__:'"' "-- RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMEN~ In cooperation with the C:tlifomi3 Den.lttJnent ofForestrv and fire Protec.tion 408Cll emon St., 2'M Fl. P.O. 60x1549, Riv~rsidp., Ca. 92502-1549' (909) 955-4777' (909) 955-4886 Fira ProtecticmPJanning and EngineerIng Service Seclion ~ LE -0 t{ - f~P- OOl- Q. DA TE: ~~7-0~~L RE: 0..-M()J/-[)CJ- PLANNER:lli~ e ~cr'.\s The Riverside County Fire Department requests an amended map with the following changes prior to issuance of letter of conditions: - Show vicinity map with 2003 or later Thomas Brothers coordinates _ List all utility companies _~vcway width not sho~um widt~_ ,__ Driveway grade not shownlincorrect maximum grade 15% -- - .. Driveway surface notshownlincorrect. show asphalt or concrete -- Driveway radius not'sbownlincorrect. Contact Fire Dept. for guideline handout - Fire Depe. turnaround not shown/incorrect. Contact Fire Dept for guideline handout '___ Fire Dcpr. tumout not shownlincorrect..Contact Fire Dept. for guideline handout ~"P. classification P"- 2001 CB~t~ncorrect for bldg(s) ~~nstruction per 2001 CB~ for b1dg(s) ~ow square footage per floor. mezzanines and total for building. for each building shown ~ Label all buildings as proposed or existing. LabeJ existing building either to remain or to be removed . .~Ians and elevations needed for buildings ~ow all ~ , loading, unloading zones. ete ~tion and sjzein gallons for all above/underground fuellanks, wa...te oil, LPG and chemical tanks. (If no tanks state on plans) .-6edians must be setback 35 feet from face of curb , ;! " ,. ,I r I: ~ AGENDA 'TEM NO. '-;:zJ ..,.. DAne."/t;7' "'_ 7..y~ ArK- L-Uq fKl II.Ul AM KIV ~V flKt r&t t^A fi~ ~U~~JJ'OOU '. "l ~ 'w;,,)1' ~ _ Gate width and/or type of gate flot shown or incorrect. Gate must be a minimum _ teet in width. automatic and/or manual with a Rapid Entry System(s). Gate must be setback 35 feet from face of curb/road right of way. (Ifno gates state on plans) ...._ Project will require water service from a public water supply ___ Cui-dc-sac length too long for High Fire Hazard area maximum length 660 feet __ Cul.de-sac exceeds maximum length of 1320 feet ..___ Cul-de-sac length too long for State Responsibility Area maximum length 800 feet. __ Primary and secondary access not shown/incorrect __ Driveways must take their access from a public or private street. NOT an easement ___ Vehicular access required within 150 feet of any portion of any building as measured atong approved vehicular travel ways, Access shall be a minimum 24 feet in width, asphalt or concrete surface ._ State on plans if this is a "SHELL BUILDING NO TENANr>~ ~ __ A Fire Protection Engjneers Report shan be submitted for review and approval. prior to conditioning of the project. Fire flow letter was-faxed/mailed on date: to Letter must be returpedto fire Dept. prior to conditioning of project. Other All question regarding these corrections contact the Fire Department Planning Section at 909-955-4777. 3-6-03/enml r__. AGENDA ITEM NO. :J-J PAC'J;.71 _ OF . /::ED ...., September 14, 2004 Duane Morita, Senior Planner City of Lake Elsinore 130 S. Main St. Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 RE: CUP No. 2004-34, 2004-35,2004-36 Dear Mr. Morita, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the above described project. The following issues of concern related to public safety and law enforcement are presented. PRE-CONSTRUCTION & CONSTRUCTION PHASES: To reduce thefts and burglaries during the construction phases of this project, the developer and builders need to provide site security. The Coach ell a Police Department recommends the developer and builders use bonded security guards licensed by the State of California Bureau of Security & Investigative Services Department to handle project security. ......." Prior to project completion, the surface of walls, fences, buildings, logo monuments, etc. should be graffiti resistant through either surface composition, applied paint type and/or planned shielding by landscaping or plants. Prior to construction on any structure, a material storage area should be established and enclosed by a six-foot chain link fence to minimize theft of materials and/or equipment. A list of serial and/or license numbers of equipment stored at the location be maintained both, at the site and any off-site main office. The public and non- essential employees should be restricted in access to the construction areas. Current emergency contact information for the project should be kept on file with the Lake Elsinore Police Department, 333 W. Limited Ave., Lake Elsinore, CA 92530, phone number 951-245-3322. The developer and/or builder's name address, and phone number should be conspicuously posted at the construction site. Visibility into the construction site ......." AGENDA ITEM NO. a I _ DAm:' ~. OF J;)/) ~ should not be intentionally hampered. Areas actually under construction should be lit during hours of darkness. All entrances and exits should be clearly marked. ADDRESSING: Address numbers should be illuminated during the hours of darkness and positioned to be readily readable from the street. Position the address numbers at a strategic and elevated section on the building to facilitate unhampered views from vehicular and pedestrian vantage points. Numbers that are a minimum height of 12" are recommended. SECURITY SYSTEMS: Silent or audible alarm systems should be installed. Comprehensive security systems should be provided for the following: perimeter building and access route protection, high valued storage areas, and interior building door to shipping and receiving area. Closed Circuit TV security cameras are recommended. DOORS: Adequate security hardware, such as dead bolt locks, should be installed. All glass doors should be secured with a dead bolt. Dead bolt locks shall be the ~ type whose dead bolt and deadlocking latch can be retracted by a single action of the inside door knob/lever/turn piece. WINDOWS: Louvered windows should not be used. Large windows and any window accessible from the side and rear but not visible from the street shall consist of rated burglary-resistant glazing or its equivalent. The type that attaches to the window frame is recommended. ROOF TOPS AND OPENINGS: If the building has skylights, one of the following shall be utilized for every skylight: -Rated burglaryresistant glass or acrylic material, -Iron bars of at least one half-inch diameter, flat steel bars of at least one quarter- inch width, spaced no more than five inches apart under the skylight and securely fastened, or -Grill of at least one eighth-inch steel and two-inch mesh. ~ All hatchway openings on the roof of any building shall be secured as follows. If the hatchway is wooden, it shall be covered on the outside with at least 16-gauge sheet steel or its equivalent, attached in a manner making removal difficult. The AGENDA ITEM NO. J..} DAl'.J= ,9;L OF .~1::iD hatchway shall be secured from the inside with a slide bar or slide bolts. Only a crossbar or padlock provided by the fire marshal shall be used. Outside pin-type hinges on all hatchway openings shall have non-removable pins. '--' Exterior rooftop ladders should be eliminated or incorporated into the interior design. All air duct or air vent openings exceeding 8" by 12" on the rooftop or exterior walls of any building shall be secured by means of: -Iron bars or at least one half-inch diameter, or flat steel bars of at least one quarter-inch width, spaced no more than five inches and securely fastened, -Grill of at least one eighth-inch steel and two-inch mesh, and/or -If the barrier is on the outside, it shall be secured with galvanized rounded-head, flush bolts of at least 3/8" diameter. LIGHTING: Interior night-lights shall be used during hours of darkness when premises are closed for business. Parking lots and associated car ports, driveways, circulation areas, aisles, passageways, recesses, and grounds contiguous to buildings shall be provided with lighting of sufficient wattage to provide adequate illumination to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises from at least 25 feet away during the hours of darkness. '--' All exterior doors shall have their own light source, which will adequately illuminate entry/exit areas at all hours in order to: -Make any person on the premises clearly visible, and -Provide adequate illumination for persons entering and exiting the building. . LANDSCAPING: Landscaping shall be of the type and situated in locations to maximize observation while providing the desire degree of aesthetics. Security planting materials are encouraged along fence and property lines and under vulnerable windows. Landscaping shall not conceal doors or windows from view, obstruct visibility of the parking lot from the street or business buildings, nor provide access to the roof or windows. LINE OF SIGHT/NATURAL SURVEILLANCE: Wide-angled peepholes should be designed into solid doors, which are located in areas where natural surveillance is compromised, and which will be utilized by employees to access parking lots and pedestrian paths during the hours of darkness. ....." ~, AeENDA ITEM NO. ~_ PAGE 12,::. OF I?V "'"' Single and double-binned trash enclosures should be located at the perimeter of the parking lot, not adjacent to buildings or contiguous to exterior building doors. Other line of sight obstructions (including recessed doorways, alcoves, etc.) should be avoided on building exterior walls, and interior hallways. Employees and/or security personnel should be positioned in areas where they cannot only monitor subjects entering and exiting the businesses but can survey restroom entrances. SIGNAGE/PARKING LOT: All entrances to parking areas shall be posted with appropriate signs per 22658(a) C.V.C., to assist in removal of vehicles at the property owners/managers request. Should the community development department, developer or construction staff have any questions regarding the listed law enforcement and public safety concerns, please contact Officer DeCou @ (951) 245-3322. ,....... Sincerely, Officer Beth DeCou Crime Prevention Officer CPTED Specialist ~. AGENDA ITEM NO. g..,.... '- bAl"-,=,_~$ ne-l!:l:D :i:. ''', "f~'iJiI . Et"" 'j~k:lt ;;; .I-t"'z, ,,<:( &,,<f 2. r / %-m ~}0ZfT~ i~f'I i:_ April 29, 2004 Riverside Transit Age!': 1825 Third Street '-"" P.O. Box 59968 Riverside, CA 92517-1968 Phone: (909) 565-5000 Fax: (909) 565-5001 Duane Morita, Senior Planner Planning Division, City of Lake Elsinore 130 S Main St Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 SUBJECT: - Canyon Hills MarketPlace, Case C2004-02 - Comments from RTA Thank you for the opportunity to review the site plan for the proposed 135,000 sq ft Canyon Hills MarketPlace retail project at the intersection of Railroad Canyon and Canyon Hills Rds. A copy of RT A's internal staff report regarding the project is attached for your information. RT A Bus Route 40 currently operates along Railroad Canyon in front of the now-vacant site but the buses do not stop there now. Due to the street's designation as an urban arterial along most of its length, the Railroad Canyon - Newport Rd - Domenigoni Pkwy will be a busy highway and transit corridor connecting Hemet, Winchester, Menifee and Sun City to Lake Elsinore. Additional routes will probably be established in the future along Railroad Canyon due to continued residen- tial and commercial growth in the area. Because of the anticipated increased transit use, RT A staff believes it would be appropriate to have safe and conveniently located bus stops with bus turnouts at this signalized location. Regular bus service along Canyon Hills Rd is somewhat '-"" doubtful, as explained in the staff memo. Riverside Transit Agency finds the project's design generally acceptable but would make the following requests: To provide more safe and convenient access to the transit option, RTA recommends the site plans or street improvement plans be modified to ensure the following features are indicated: · A paved, lighted and ADA-compliant bus stop turnout with space for related amenities should be indicated along the westbound Railroad Canyon Rd, just past the main inter- section. RT A advises the turnout be placed where Bldg 9 is closest to the street, and about midway between the intersection and the monument sign indicated just prior to Bldg 10. The turnout is not intended to interfere with visibility of the monument sign and would benefit from the ADA-compliant pathway out to Railroad Canyon that is already shown on the plans. The bus stop should incorporate a paved passenger waiting area and adequate space for installation of passenger benches, shelters and bus route signage by RT A, the City or others, at a future date. · A paved, lighted and ADA-compliant bus stop turnout with space for related amenities should be indicated along eastbound Railroad Canyon Rd, just prior to the first right turn into the parking lot. RT A advises the turnout be placed where Bldg 4 is closest to the Street. The turnout is not intended to interfere with visibility of the monument sign. The bus stop should incorporate a paved passenger waiting area and adequate space for installation of passenger benches, shelters and bus route signage by RTA, the City, RT A's designee, or others at a future date. '-"" F:\data\Planning\MikeM\Word\Dev Review\Lake Elsinore\2004\RTA Itr - CanyonHlsMarktpl.doc ;z.,J AGENDA ITEM NO. ',' , _ _ __,?'4 nc JU2 !:t1ll'41 ,~,u ... ,-.... Riverside Transit Agency 1825 Third Street P.O. Box 59968 Riverside. CA 92517-1968 Phone: (909) 565-5000 Fax: (909) 565-5001 . The site or landscape plans should designate an ADA-compliant path for pedestrian travel from the main entrance of Bldg 4 out to Railroad Canyon Rd. . RT A advises that pathways to the bus stops be set off by special pavement or hardscape treatment or markings. . Information note: Sufficient right-of-way appears available for these turnouts without significant adjustment to sidewalks or required landscaping and with minimum distur- bance of future street tree or utility structure installations. The "related amenities" for bus stops should incorporate a concrete bus parking pad, a paved passenger waiting area and adequate space for future installation of bus rider benches, shelters and bus route signage. .. Note: Regarding bus service along Canyon Hills Dr, RTA will not require bus turnouts along that street. Eastbound buses would stop just past the easternmost driveway, near the eXisting pavilion structure where a red-painted curbside bus stop would suffice. If the pavilion remains at that site, it could allow for some shaded passenger waiting benches (installed by RT A) when and if service starts up. This curb stop cannot be close to the driveway and would have to extend eastward, somewhat in front of the adjacent property. ,-.... . RT A staff observes that the pavilion seems to be an attractive, pedestrian-oriented amenity and wonders if it would be possible for the developer to perhaps relocate the pavilion to one of the recommended bus turnout sites where it could serve as an attractive and architecturally compatible bus passenger shelter and waiting area. It would make a positive roadside entry statement for Canyon Hills MarketPlace and would actually 'get more use' than where it is now situated. RT A respectfully requests these bus turnout and pedestrian pathway recommendations be made Conditions of Approval for any further plot plan reviews, related cases or Planning Commission action. The applicant's engineers are invited to contact RT A staff for further advisory information regarding these requests. RT A staff is also open to Lake Elsinore staffs suggestions for alternative means of providing transit-friendly amenities relative to this project. If you need further clarification or I can be of further assistance, please call me at (909) 565-5164 or contact me online at mmccoy@riversidetransit.com. Si7;:tJ;jJ ~ Hichael McCoy tt Senior Planner / ,-.... F:\data\Planning\MikeM\Word\Dev Review\lake Elsinore\2004\RTA Itr - CanyonHlsMarktpl.doc . I AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ . .-.,.. ~ __"" Q) ....... ~ l.::u) }I 'f - Riverside Transit Agency April 29, 2004 '-' PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW From: Anne Palatino, Director of Planning _ Michael McCoy, Senior Planner ~ City of Lake Elsinore, Non-residential project - C2004-02, Site Plan & related cases for Canyon Hills MarketPlace, a 135,000 sq ft commercial center, at the intersection of Railroad Canyon and 'Canyon Hills Rds - RT A Comments Bus routes involved: #40, plus potential for future transit. To: Subject: Summary: Colton Sudberry Properties Inc proposes case C2004-02, a site plan for Canyon Hills Market Place, a 14-bldg, 135,000 sq ftproject on 22.5 vacant a~res, featuring a large grocery market, fast-food restaurants and other businesses on both sides of Railroad Canyon Rd at its intersection with Canyon Hills Rd (identified in the Thomas Guide as "Cottonwood Hills Rd") in lake Elsinore. This large project includes a generous number of parking spaces, 750, and is located about 2% mi from Interstate 15. A large and architecturally distinct 'pavilion' structure is located almost at curbside and adjacent to the easternmost parking lot entrance along Canyon Hills Rd. '-' RT A local Route 40 currently serves this portion of Railroad Canyon and Newport Rds between the Diamond Stadium and the Menifee Town Center, at one-hour frequencies, however, the buses do not now stop at the project site. As the area builds out, and shop- ping areas such as Canyon Hills MarketPlace are established, additional transit will likely operate along this lengthy Railroad Canyon-Newport-Domenigoni Pkwy urban arterial that will soon directly connect lake Elsinore to Hemet. According to RT A staff esti- mates, by 2014, about 4 buses an hour are expected to stop along Railroad Canyon Rd at Canyon Hills MarketPlace Future transit operations-are less likely on Canyon Hills Rd because that street tends to lead into a 'pocket' of denser development that is unlikely to warrant bus service. local shuttles and dial-a-ride services may operate there, but since the Menifee area to the east along Murrieta Rd is likely to remain semi-rural, there will be only minimum demand for transit originating in that area and using Canyon Hills. With Canyon Hills Marketplace situated at a major, signalized intersection along a designa- ted urban arterial such as Railroad Canyon, it is the logical and appropriate place, accord- ing to transit industry standards, to install new or upgraded bus stops. R"fA will request new bus turnouts here on either side of Railroad Canyon and for some minor improvement to pedestrian access from the major buildings out to the bus stops. The typical bus turnout (or bus bay) is 150 feet long, including entrance and exit tapers. There should be a 50-ft long concrete pad to park the bus, according to industry standards. The turnout should be a minimum 10 ft deep, though 12 ft is preferred on an '-' F:\data\Planning\MikeM\Word\Dev Review\Lake Elsinore\2004\CanyonHlsMarktpl.doc . ~I AGENDA ITEM NO. -- . PAGEA OF:J.2i;. urban arterial such as Railroad Canyon Rd. If a bike lane is planned along the shoulder ,...... and designated on the street plans, it may be used for turnout space, reducing the curb cut depth needed to 5 ft. The curb cut depth may also be reduced if street plans clearly indicate enough excess shoulder area will be available, outside of regularly traveled lanes to ensure the parked bus does not block traffic. RT A staff has reviewed the plans supplied by Mr Duane Morita of the City of lake Elsinore Planning Dept and believes suitable sites for the bus turnouts can be located at Canyon Hills MarketPlace. To enhance safe and convenient transit use in this area, RTA will request the street improvement, grading, landscape plans or the plot plan for the project be revised slightly to specify installation of the following bus turnouts: . Westbound (north side of) on Railroad Canyon Rd, just past the main intersection. RT A advises the turnout be placed where Bldg 9 is closest to the street, and about midway between the intersection and the monument sign indicated just prior to Bldg 10. The turnout should avoid interfering with the monument sign. A turnout here would benefit from the indicated ADA-compliant pathway from Bldg 10 out to Railroad Canyon; . Eastbound (south side of) on Railroad Canyon Rd, just prior to the first right-turn driveway into the parking lot. RT A advises the turnout be placed where Bldg 4 is closest to the street. The turnout should avoid interfering with the monument sign. . Note: This eastbound bus turnout requires an ADA-compliant pedestrian pathway ,...... from Bldg 4 out to Railroad Canyon; . Note: RT A requests the plans specify designated pedestrian-oriented pathways from MarketPlace stores out to the bus stop be set off by special pavement or hard-scape treatment or markings. Regarding bus service along Canyon Hills Dr, in the event service is established, RT A will not require bus turnouts at the MarketPlace along that street. Eastbound buses would stop just past the easternmost driveway, near the existing pavilion structure where a red-painted curbside bus stop would suffice. If the pavilion remains at that site, it could allow some shaded passenger waiting benches (installed by RT A) when and if service commences. This curb stop cannot be close to the driveway and would have to p~.extend eastward, somewhatin front of the adjacent property to the east. RT A staff observes that the pavilion seems to be an attractive, pedestrian-oriented amenity, although staff has not visited the site to be sure. The staff wonders if it would be possible for the developer to perhaps relocate the pavilion to one of the recom- mended bus turnout sites where it could serve as an attractive and architecturally compatible bus passenger shelter and waiting area. It would make a positive roadside entry statement for Canyon Hills MarketPlace and would actually 'get more use' than the current siting provides. A letter will be sent to the City of lake Elsinore referring to these observations and requesting the two bus turnouts and the pathway from Bldg 4 be made Conditions of ,...... Approval for any further plot plan reviews and related cases. F:\data\Planning\MikeM\Word\Dev Review\Lake Elsinore\2004\CanyonHlsMarktpl.doc .. . AGENDA ITEM NU. :J..J .. ~ ,/ " ftA~f) 7 nc/2..ll INITIAL REVIEW INFORMATION - Review completed date: April 29, 2004. Documents received at RT A: April 22, 2004; Reply-by Date: April 29, 2004; County Planning Commission hearing Date: unknown; City Council Agenda Date: Unknown or N/A; Thomas Guide Map pg and grid: 867, C,D-5; Case Number( s): C2004-02; Case Planners: Duane Morita (909) 674-3124, ext 279; Applicant: Colton Sudberry Properties Inc of San Diego CA ~ RT A PLANNING FOllOW-UP: Standard "Acceptable" letter to jurisdiction without comments / letter with comments advising project modifications re transit & circulation issues Verbal conversation with Case Planner and appropriate letter follow-up letter sent: Date: i~~ File name: F:\data\Pla in M. eM\Word\Dev Review\Lake Elsinore\2004\RTA ltr - CanyonHlsMarktpl.doc SECOND REVIEW: Review materials placed in archive files: Date: " F:\data\Planning\MikeM\Word\Dev Review\Lake Elsinore\2004\CanyonHlsMarktpl.doc ~ ;LJ AGENDA ITEMNO.~. l:ii '-.. PAGE~OF . ~ RESOLUTION NO. 2004- '" A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2004-02 TO ALLOW FOR THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF A 40,150- SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL CENTER TO BE LOCATED ON PLANNING AREA 3 OF THE CANYON HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN WHEREAS, Sudberry Properties has initiated proceedings to allow for the design and development of a 40,150-square foot commercial center located on Planning Area 3 of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council for Commercial Design Reviews; and WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Commission has co~sidered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on October 19,2004; ".-- NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered proposed Commercial Design Review No. 2004-02 prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve the proposed Commercial Design Review. The Planning Commission finds and determines that the Addendum to the Final Canyon Hills Specific Plan EIR is adequate and prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which analyzes environmental effects of Commercial Design Review No. 2004-02. SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of Lake Elsinore the following fmdings for the approval of Commercial Design Review No. 2004-02 have been made as follows: 1. The project, as approved, will complY with the goals and ol?;ectives of the General Plan and the Zoning District in which the prq;ect is located. Commercial Design Review No. 2004-02 complies with the goals and objectives of the General Plan. The General Plan designates the affected site as "Canyon Hills Specific Plan". The Zoning classifies the affected site as "C2, General Commercial". The proposed Commercial Design Review application evaluates design of the Canyon Hills Market Place which implements the intended land use of the affected site. ".-- 2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. AGENDA ITEM NO. ~J-, PAGE 12- Of'l~ RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 2 "-' Commercial Design Review No. 2004-02 proposes the Canyon Hills Market Plan which has been designed in accordance with the size and shape of the property, thereby creating interest and varying views as a person moves along Railroad Canyon Drive and Canyon Hills Road. The project complements the design quality of existing and future development by creating a visually-pleasing commercial center. The project's architectural design, color and materials, and site design are original and attractive. 3. S ul?ject to the attached Conditions rif Approval, the proposed prqject is not anticipated to result in atry significant adverse environmental impacts. The Addendum to the 1989 Final Canyon Hills Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report, which was prepared in accordance with Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines, provides the necessary environmental clearances for the proposed application. The proposed commercial uses are either permitted by right or conditionally permitted by the Canyon Hills Specific Plan. Accordingly, staff believes the proposed application implements the land use objectives and requirements of the Specific Plan and finds that further environmental evaluation is therefore, unnecessary . 4. Conditions and scifeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 rif the Zoning Code, including guarantees and evidence rif compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval rif the suo/cct p1r!Jcct to ensure "-' development rif the properfY in accordance with the oijectives rif Chapter 17.82. Pursuant to Section 17.82.070 (Action of the Planning Commission) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), Commercial Design Review No. 2004-02 includes conditions of approval to ensure proper development and that hazards to the general public will not result. NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore approve Commercial Design Review No. 2004-02. Ron LaPere, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a meeting thereof conducted on October 19, 2004 by the following vote: ;~; AGENDA ITEM NO.J / PAl'.F 90' ~ OF' /96 ~ /'"" /'"" RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 3 AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: ATTEST: Robert A. Brady, Secretary to the Planning Commission AGENDA ITEM NO. .::L I / ~. PAGE~ OF !;;J...-P .. RESOLUTION NO. 2004- ......" A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2004-10 TO ALLOW FOR THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF A 107,473- SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL CENTER TO BE LOCATED ON PLANNING AREA 4 OF THE CANYON HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN WHEREAS, Sudberry Properties has initiated proceedings to allow for the design and development of a 107,473-square foot commercial center located on Planning Area 4 of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council for Commercial Design Reviews; and WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on October 19,2004; ......" NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered proposed Commercial Design Review No. 2004-10 prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve the proposed Commercial Design Review. The Planning Commission finds and determines that the Addendum to the Final Canyon Hills Specific Plan EIR is adequate and prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which analyzes environmental effects of Commercial Design Review No. 2004-10. SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Commercial Design Review No. 2004-10 have been made as follows: 1. The project, as approved, will complY with the goals and oqectives if the General Plan and the Zoning District in which the project is located. Commercial Design Review No. 2004-10 complies with the goals and objectives of the General Plan. The General Plan designates the affected site as "Canyon Hills Specific Plan". The Zoning classifies the affected site as "C1, Neighborhood Commercial". The proposed Commercial Design Review application evaluates design of the Canyon Hills Market Place which implements the intended land use of the affected site. ......"t A t' ~I AGEND I [;;,.. t. - . - ,--' ,... 'DA(.F<~OFlJ-f) . ,-.... RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 2 2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. Commercial Design Review No. 2004-10 proposes the Canyon Hills Market Plan which has been designed in accordance with the size and shape of the property, thereby creating interest and varying views as a person moves along Railroad Canyon Drive and Canyon Hills Road. The project complements the design quality of existing and future development by creating a visually-pleasing commercial center. The project's architectural design, color and materials, and site design are original and attractive. 3. Suiject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result in a'!} significant adverse environmental impacts. The Addendum to the 1989 Final Canyon Hills Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report, which was prepared in accordance with Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines, provides the necessary environmental clearances for the proposed application. The proposed commercial uses are either permitted by right or conditionally permitted by the Canyon Hills Specific Plan. Accordingly, staff believes th'e proposed application implements the land use objectives and ~ requirements of the Specific Plan and finds that further environmental evaluation is therefore, unnecessary. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the sul?;ect project to ensure development of the propertY in accordance with the ol?;ectives of Chapter 17.82. Pursuant to Section 17.82.070 (Action of the Planning Commission) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), Commercial Design Review No. 2004-10 includes conditions of approval to ensure proper development and that hazards to the general public will not result. NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore approve Commercial Design Review No. 2004-10. Ron LaPere, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a meeting ~ thereof conducted on October 19, 2004 by the following vote: . . . ~1 . AGENDA I' t".IVI ..."'.... ___ " PAGE.!l3.. OF . ~'- RESOLUTION NO. ~ PAGE 3 AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: ATTEST: Robert A. Brady, Secretary to the Planning Commission '-' '-' AGENDA II t:".. ",_...d1. . " PAGE2!L OF..l22- "..-. RESOLUTION NO. 2004- A.RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2004-32 FOR THE ESTABUSHMENT OF A DRIVE-THROUGH FOR A DRUG STORE LOCATED ON PAD AREA 14 WITHIN PLANNING AREA 4 OF THE CANYON HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN WHEREAS, Sudberry Properties has initiated proceedings to request approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-32 for the establishment of a drive-through for a drug store located on Pad Area 14 within Planning Area 4 of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of approving Conditional Use Permits; and WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on October 19, 2004; "..-. NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered proposed Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-32 prior to making a decision to approve the proposed Conditional Use Permit. The Planning Commission finds and determines that the Addendum to the Final Canyon Hills Specific Plan EIR is adequate and prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which analyzes environmental effects of Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-32. SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-32 have been made as follows: 1. The proposed use, on its own merits and within the context of its setting, is in accord with the oi?jectives of the General Plan and the putpose of the planning district in which the site 15 located The proposed drive-through for the future drug store is allowed by the Canyon Hills Specific Plan with a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed conditional use will support future commercial uses to be constructed within the Canyon Hills Market Place, which is consistent with its underlying zoning as defined by the City's General Plan. ",.--. AGENDA ITEM NO.~ PAGE CfS OF J~ RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 2 ~ 2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare 0/ persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or the City, or i,!jurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or the City. In accordance with Chapter 17.74 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the City realized that the proposed conditional use may have potential impacts to the general welfare of the public. All applicable City departments and public agencies were afforded the opportunity to review the conditional use. Their comments related to installation and maintenance of landscaping, street dedications, regulations of points of vehicular ingress, and egress and control of potential nuisances have been incorporated as conditions of approval, to ensure the City's and surrounding neighborhood's general health, safety, comfort, and general welfare will not be jeopardized. 3. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, and for all the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaPing, btiffers and other features required ry Title 17 0/ the IEM C. The proposed conditional use has been designed in consideration of the size and shape of the property, thereby strengthening and enhancing the immediate commercial areas. Furthermore, the project will complement the quality of existing and future development by creating a visually-pleasing commercial center. The projects' architectural design, color and materials, and ....., site design are original and attractive. 4. The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highwqys with proper design both as to width and type 0/ pavement to carry the type and quantity 0/ trtiffic generated ry the suo/ect use. The proposed conditional use has. been reviewed in relationship to the width and type of pavement needed to carty the type and quantity of traffic generated. The City has adequately evaluated the potential impacts associated with the proposed use prior to its approval and has conditioned the project to be served by roads of adequate capacity and design standards to provide reasonable access by car, truck, transit, and bicycle. 5. In approving the sul!ject uses, there will be no adverse qffict on abuttingproperry or the permitted and normal use thereqf. The proposed use has been thoroughly reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City departments and public agencies, thus, eliminating the potential for any and all adverse effects on any abutting property. 6. Adequate conditions and sqfeguards pursuant to Section 17.74.50 0/ the LEMC have been incorporated into the approval 0/ the Conditional Use Permits to ensure that the uses continue in a manner envisioned ry these findings fr~~o/~~ ....., AQENDA ITEM NO.~J PAGE~_OFJ~ r" RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 3 Pursuant to Section 17.74.050 (Action of the Planning Commission) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-32 includes conditions of approval to ensure proper development and that hazards to the general public will not result. NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commissic)fi of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-32. Ron LaPere, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a meeting thereof conducted on October 19, 2004 by the following vote: /"""' AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: ArrEST: Robert A. Brady, Secretary to the Planning Commission .---. AGENDA ITEM NO. ~, ru~cl..c97 or: I~D RESOLUTION NO. 2004- "'" A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2004-33 FOR AN OUTDOOR DINING AREA FOR RESTAURANTS NEAR PAD AREA 17 WITHIN PLANNING AREA 4 OF THE CANYON HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN WHEREAS, Sudberry Properties has initiated proceedings to request approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-33 for the establishment of an outdoor dining area for restaurants near Pad Area 17 within Planning Area 4 of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of approving Conditional Use Permits; and WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on October 19, 2004; NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows: "'" SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered proposed Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-33 prior to making a decision to approve the proposed Conditional Use Permit. The Planning Commission finds and determines that the Addendum to the Final Canyon Hills Specific Plan EIR is adequate and prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which analyzes environmental effects of Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-33. . SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-33 have been made as follows: 1. The proposed use, on its own merits and within the context of its setting, is in accord with the ol?jectives of the General Plan and the put pose of the planning district in which the site is located. The proposed outdoor dining area is allowed by the Canyon Hills Specific Plan with a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed conditional use will support future commercial uses to be constructed within the Canyon Hills Market Place, which is consistent with its underlying zoning as defined by the City's General Plan. "'" d-./ AGENDA I' '-h. ..~.. -'""'~~7 BAlM: 7~ OF {~> ,....... RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 2 2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the general health, scifery, comfort, or general welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or the Ciry, or if!jurious to properry or improvements in the neighborhood or the Ciry. In accordance with Chapter 17.74 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the City realized that the proposed conditional use may have potential impacts to the general welfare of the public. All applicable City departments and public agencies were afforded the opportunity to review the conditional use. Their comments related to installation and maintenance of landscaping, street dedications, regulations of points of vehicular ingress, and egress and control of potential nuisances have been incorporated as conditions of approval, to ensure the City's and surrounding neighborhood's general health, safety, comfort, and general welfare will not be jeopardized. ,....... 3. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, and for all the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, btiffirs and other features required try Title 17 of the LEMC. The proposed conditional use has been designed in consideration of the size and shape of the property, thereby strengthening and enhancing the immediate commercial areas. Furthermore, the project - will complement the quality of existing and future development by creating a visually-pleasing commercial center. The projects' architectural design, color and materials, and site design are original and attractive. 4. The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highwqys with proper design both as to width and !JjJe of pavement to carry the rype and quantiry of trciffic generated try the suo/ect use. The proposed conditional use has been reviewed in relationship to the width and type of pavement needed to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated. The City has adequately evaluated the potential impacts associated with the proposed use prior to its approval and has conditioned the project to be served by roads of adequate capacity and design standards to provide reasonable access by car, truck, transit, and bicycle. 5. In approving the suo/ect uses, there will be no adverse qffect on abutting properry or the permitted and normal use themf. The proposed use has been thoroughly reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City departments and public agencies, thus, eliminating the potential for any and all adverse effects on any abutting property. ,....... 6. Adequate conditions and scifeguards pursuant to Section 17.74.50 of the LEMC have been incorporated into the approval of the Conditional Use Permits to ensure that the uses continue in a manner envisioned try these findings fr~~of~~ j AGENDA ITEM ''6v. :21 PAGEr:lL OF lGO_ RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 3 ,..., Pursuant to Section 17.74.050 (Action of the Planning Commission) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-33 includes conditions of approval to ensure proper development and that hazards to the general public will not result. NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-33. Ron LaPere, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a meeting thereof conducted on October 19, 2004 by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: ......" NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: ATTEST: Robert A. Brady, Secretary to the Planning Commission ,..., AGENDA ITEM NO. ;9J " D4t.U: 100- ns: 1PJ2_ ,....... RESOLUTION NO. 2004- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2004-35 FOR A GAS STATION, FOOD MART, AND CAR WASH FACILITY ON PAD AREA 9 WITHIN PLANNING AREA 3 OF THE CANYON HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN WHEREAS, Sudberry Properties has initiated proceedings to request approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-35 for the establishment of a gas station, food mart, and car wash facility on Pad Area 9 within Planning Area 3 of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of approving Conditional Use Permits; and WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on October 19, 2004; r"' NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered proposed Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-35 prior to making a decision to approve the proposed Conditional Use Permit. The Planning Commission finds and determines that the Addendum to the Final Canyon Hills Specific Plan EIR is adequate and prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which analyzes environmental effects of Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-35. SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-35 have been made as follows: 1. The proposed use, on its own merits and within the context of its setting, is in accord with the ol?;"ectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the site is located. The proposed gas station, food mart, and car wash facility is allowed by the Canyon Hills Specific Plan with a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed conditional use will support future commercial uses to be constructed within the Canyon Hills Market Place, which is consistent with its underlying zoning as defined by the City's General Plan. r"' AGENDA ITEM Nv. ~l " PAGE 16/ OF ,./;;il2 J RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 2 "-'" 2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the general health, scifety, comfOrt, or general we!fare 0/ persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or the City, or hyurious to properry or improvements in the neighborhood or the City. In accordance with Chapter 17.74 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the City realized that the proposed conditional use may have potential impacts to the general welfare of the public. All applicable City departments and public agencies were afforded the opportunity to review the conditional use. Their comments related to installation and maintenance of landscaping, street dedications, regulations of points of vehicular ingress, and egress and control of potential nuisances have been incorporated as conditions of approval, to ensure the City's and surrounding neighborhood's general health, safety, comfort, and general welfare will not be jeopardized. 3. The site Jor the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, and fOr all the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaPing, btdftrs and other features required ry Title 110/ the LEMC. The proposed conditional use has been designed in consideration of the size and shape of the property, thereby strengthening and enhancing the immediate commercial areas. Furthermore, the project will complement the quality of existing and future developmeQ.t by creating a visually-pleasing commercial center. The projects' architectural design, color and materials, and site design are original and attractive. "-'" 4. The site Jor the proposed use relates to streets and highwqys with proper design both as to width and !JjJe 0/ pavement to carry the !JjJe and quantity 0/ trqffic generated ry the su~ject use. The proposed conditional use has been reviewed in relationship to the width and type of pavement needed to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated. The City has adequately evaluated the potential impacts associated with the proposed use prior to its approval and has conditioned the project to be served by roads of adequate capacity and design standards to provide reasonable access by car, truck, transit, and bicycle. 5. In approving the suo/cct uses, there will be no adverse qffect on abuttingproperry or the permitted and normal use thereof. The proposed use has been thoroughly reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City departments and public agencies, thus, eliminating the potential for any and all adverse effects on any abutting property. 6. Adequate conditions and sqfeguards pursuant to Section 11.14.500/ the LEMC have been incotporated into the approval of the Conditional Use Permits to ensure that the uses continue in a manner envisioned ry these findings Jor the term of the uses. '-'II' AGENDA ITEM NO. ::LJ PAGE ~'I::J.i) ~ RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 3 Pursuant to Section 17.74.050 (Action of the Planning Commission) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-35 includes conditions of approval to ensure proper development and that hazards to the general public will not result. NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-35. Ron LaPere, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a meeting thereof conducted on October 19, 2004 by the following vote: ",.--.. AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: ATTEST: Robert A. Brady, Secretary to the Planning Commission ~ AGENDA ITEM NO. a..,1 PAGE 'ltR OF /Gfp RESOLUTION NO. 2004- ....., A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2004-36 FOR A LUBE-N-TUNE FACILITY ON PAD AREA 10 WITHIN PLANNING AREA 3 OF THE CANYON HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN WHEREAS, Sudberry Properties has initiated proceedings to request approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-36 for the establishment of a lube-n-tune facility on Pad Area 10 within Planning Area 3 of the Canyon Hills Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of approving Conditional Use Permits; and WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on October 19, 2004; NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered proposed Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-36 prior to making a decision to approve the proposed Conditional Use Permit. The Planning Commission finds and determines that the Addendum to the Final Canyon Hills Specific Plan EIR is adequate and prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which analyzes environmental effects of Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-36. ....., SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-36 have been made as follows: 1. The proposed use, on its own merits and within the context of its setting, is in accord with the oijectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the site is located. The proposed lube-n-tune facility is allowed by the Canyon Hills Specific Plan with a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed conditional use will support future commercial uses to be constructed within the Canyon Hills Market Place, which is consistent with its underlying zoning as defined by the City's General Plan. ....., AGENDA ITEM NO. ~l_ DAr.s: lott. OFl;;J.O_ ~ RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 2 2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the general health, safe!}, comfort, or general welfare oj persons residing or working within the neighborhood oj the proposed use or the Ci!}, or it!Junous to proper!J or improvements in the neighborhood or the Ci!}. In accordance with Chapter 17.74 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the City realized that the proposed conditional use may have potential impacts to the general welfare of the public. All applicable City departments and public agencies were afforded the opportunity to review the conditional use. Their comments related to installation and maintenance of landscaping, street dedications, regulations of points of vehicular ingress, and egress and control of potential nuisances have been incorporated as conditions of approval, to ensure the City's and surrounding neighborhood's general health, safety, comfort, and general welfare will not be jeopardized. ~ 3. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, and for all the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, btiffers and other features required ry Title 17 oj the LEM C. The proposed conditional use has been designed in consideration of the size and shape of the property, thereby strengthening and enhancing the immediate commercial areas. Furthermore, the project will complement the quality of existing and future development by creating a visually-pleasing commercial center. The projects' architectural design, color and materials, and site design are original and attractive. 4. The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highwqys with proper design both as to width and !JjJe oj pavement to carry the !JjJe and quanti!} oj trtiffic generated ry the sul?;ect use. The proposed conditional use has been reviewed in relationship to the width and type of pavement needed to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated. The City has adequately evaluated the potential impacts associated with the proposed use prior to its approval and has conditioned the project to be served by roads of adequate capacity and design standards to provide reasonable access by car, truck, transit, and bicycle. S. In approving the suo/ect uses, there will be no adverse tiffect on abuttingproper!J or the permitted and normal use theretif. The proposed use has been thorougWy reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City departments and public agencies, thus, eliminating the potential for any and all adverse effects on any abutting property. 6. Adequate conditions and stifeguards pursuant to Section 17.74.50 oj the LEMC have been incotporated into the approval oj the Conditional Use Permits to ensure that the uses continue in a manner envisioned ry these findings for the term oj the uses. ~ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~1 PAGE .10$ OF J.;;b, a RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 3 ....." Pursuant to Section 17.74.050 (Action of the Planning Commission) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-36 includes conditions of approval to ensure proper development and that hazards to the general public will not result. NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above ftndings, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY APPROVE Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-36. Ron LaPere, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a meeting thereof conducted on October 19, 2004 by the following vote: . AYES: Commissioners: ....." NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: ATTEST: Robert A. Brady, Secretary to the Planning Commission '--' AaENDA ITEM NO. ~I " PAGE /~ OF /;Jj? - ..,-.. ;.:'; . ~ r' r o .c( o a:: a:: o ..., .c( ~ o .c( o a:: a:: o :z :i , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , ~:.- a:: w m ::E. =,. :z I- Z :> 0. z: z: z :s Q.. a:: w o 0: o m I- Z :> C) ~. z: :z :s Q.. 10 - I I . \ l- V) w ::it .c( 0 l.d w .c( ~ 0: Q.. Q.. 4: V) W 0 -$ !:: :z V) ~ >.0: :z w ':> i :> Q.. 0 0 0 C> J I ::z .c( 0: ::z 0: w :z :> I- :s I- .c( ! .c( ~ Q.. ::z . . + I ~ . -0 . + - + . . . . + + + + . . . I . ai . . + ~ . - . . .~. + . . . 11 + . + + + - + . . . ,. + . + + . . . .. Cl.) ~ . + ~ . + . .. + . . . . . . .. --.a . + . . . . . .J + + + . . . . AGENDA ITEM NO. ftAl'!e/b'"J .... ~ ~ ~ ~ , c,,:, Z """'" Z Z -< ~ ~ =: o ~ ~~ E-4< Z~ ~Z =~ :E-4 ~< E-4V ~O <~> 81 ~ nil: J~ () ~, ~. -< = -< ~ z ~ i: ~ ~ u~ E-4~ zO ~~ ~~ u~ <~ E-4~ E-4E-4 <t;J i~l ~ . J .... ;; ~ ll! ~ -t. -4\ Jl J ~ ~t ~~ w -'{.' z ii: '" z ~ e: ;a 0 w CL - ~ i l- ~ I! IL ~ ill! in iii ~ nli !II In ~ ml III In Ip i ,i'ih hi, WI I- ~; ii ~I, ~II \j ~ , ~ nil" II' ~ Ii! ! JIlin jlhi ~ ~!d ~ I m I B fJ i~ I -hi 'I II I I~III t ii I II I .. '11'1' 'll i IUhl i litl ~ I flhllh Himll i I I ~ ~i' Ii i "I~i il liil t JIll ~ In ~~II ~ lilh j IlIldll Iluln ! nlhuh <:) e .... I I t -~ r I t ..I ;; ~ "I ~ ! iill;!!I~lii I i HI i Ii I!! Hi :'i ; 0 ~ (;) (:) <:> i "I .~ .a '~ , ~ ~ ~ I ~~l ~- El_ tl e>3 Z~ -v ll~ z~ z.. -<~ ~ ~~ . w <Ii! - => ~~ ~ 3 r "- u Ii: <Ii! ~a ~ -<g U Z -<(W ~ o "-0 ~ C>~ ~; 6 <l)w .0 <I) o z :5 ('f) '" ~ ~ "" -< C) W ~ u 3 <( "- --' a.. I- w~ z ~o ~~ <(3 -<' 4 !.l ~ ~ ! i!' i ~ (/);;; --'~ --'~ -~ I I III · ~ G gl! Ii d!! ...111- ::Jr if ~g ~~ ~H; & z o >- z <( u . enD -.... -'" _0 III~ '2~ 0< .cC) ,. z ~ lID U 1 A9ENDA ITEM NO. PACE ~ ,--.. CD u o - Q... ....... - ~~ ~(Y) 0<( ~~ V)C) -Z :-= z I3 co.. o >- c o U ~ O_N ....."''0....100.--- ~ d -~-..~ a! nn~ ~ ~~~~iil v~!' . . . . ~~,,~~2~gg E8~hi:<~;<!i~ ~! ~~h~~~5~ ~ ~a iiiiiiiii ;?; m!llli; """"",,""" Iii ilj,H l;~l;uun ~ n~ ~~H~~n! ....... 0- r ~~ ~ ~~ ~ I- -I:: U Z ~~ o~~ z~~~8~ C>w::>ol/)::J U;CI)~_I-I:O ~ ~::>Folli1i< 2 ~<i!o""z~o- Z 5Z~~~>-...J o UOowz~w ~ ~EI-~OCIJ~ U ~o~<uz< -~z o..;..........wo.; it oooz~~z <( uu....oc>oO t; ~ ~ 3' ~ Q Ii! V) z!ii'" ~ ~~~~ i= ~1u1ll;;; ::> ~~ort u ::Ii!Z"! ii: !i(2:;:::!~ i? ~:a~~~ u z~ ~E ~~:! ~. ~,... w~'T "-3- ~w~ 4.~o-~ >-Q6. ~82~ ~~!Y:; Oono:J ~~~~ ~~ ziH << Oli u z. - o@ ~ tij "- Oll << vu i o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :>!ii~ "~IS~ ~1u1ll::; >~~~ .5:;:Dl~ I~~~~ C> Z Z ~8 "-N OQ ~~ ~- t~g W~N ~lilo.- :1:065 ~~ ~...: <5~~ <xo- (;~~ ~ V)=U\~ ~ t> Ii! ' w ~! I:: I'-!" :r: ti: ~ l;;?El << !:!~ f;j Z g ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. ~ ~ o 0 ~ ~IS ~ l:;1llilll ~ o mo ~ ~H~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ " o v *h ::s~- ~~5 gs~~ ~~~~ u~g ~5 ~ 0 ~ "Sl-".... o ~ C>0l ~~ tl1~S z~;:; -50.0 ~~IS~ wo ,-0 ~I:!g~ <:f!!!~ ::>",,0-<) ln~3~ ~ ~ ] C5 llll ~ soS: ~ zy > /ol- U =<: ~ ~ .. :llil ili!il ~ ~I li!1i- u ~~ 5 !;5 ::I wV ';lit; 2~a~ ..~-e~" ~~ ~ ~ ~ ;r~~.,)~ llj~d" l!!,,- L j!l !-..,,h rtlt!! 5~~~~ ~ lli~g~! Ii: ~~Q~::: 5 d::liH ~ ~~~~IB o -ia --~ ...J ;~~z.~ ;; 13:s",Ol!jo w ~0~o!d2;iR .....J CL z.,,~~ ~ IS:! ! -~ ll!, w 0;:' ~a~~~ ~~ua 0- ~";&\:l;ij u~",3.... on w < ~!2 ~J:t:o ad~~; .....J II: ,on uj9s::? ~g-~ ooo~ z~~1!! tJ w E I:: 8 is lll~ ~ g'l w ~-'! ~ ~1 u "0 l3 ~~ ~ ~l ~ B ~i Ii:; w :x: <I) w -' I- i= '" ~ i o ....v z~ 2~ w" II) " =>u z g "Ii! ::s 0 ~!l:; 201:.... 3i~s uU~~ e5~~~ :i~~2~ .... Ii! E! Iri"~ V)~i: z~1S C>~- ~8~ 1-00 5~a ~ ~ :fi i ~ .I i ~I~! - z ~~ ~ ~i AGENDA ITEM , D~S: J -- 00 u z.. -u ZZ Z~ <... .....z . a... . w '" ::J l- V w J- :I: U '" <0 " <~ 0.0 OZ . on.. M ~ w U <( -I 0.. I- W~ z ~"' o ~~ <(~ ~::: o z (/);;; -I;:: -I'" .. -< .... :c z o >- z <( u Wa ~~ m~ U~ 3 t ~ t") < ~ < c..? Z ~ Z Z < ~ ~ ~ o ~ 00 Z o ~ ~ ~~ ~~ Z..J ~~ ~~ =Z U~ <~ ~= ~;J <= 1 1~C) ~ II a EJ ~ c)o 0 z~ Il -;:; Zz ~ I z~ !i <.. . "oli .....z '-" ~r ...~ 51 ~ . ~ ,~ ~ r ." w ~~ 0- 0- Z '" 0- 0- 0 ::> ~ r- <'~ <' ~ I- ~ U Z_ Z w 0> w I- 0 Of . - ~~ ....J M :I: ::::>0 ::::> ~ u lXl~ lXl ~ '" !~ I u.. C) <0 ~:; Z ., 01; zo Z Z <w . OW 0 0..0 % -~ 3 c)z ~. ~::::> ~ 3 .,,~ .- o' 0.. .0 >U [t 0.. WV> .~ ....JlXl wO ....J :><: w J: i J: (Y) i b2 .- ~ 0 ::::> 0 z V> w U 0" ~ 4:: 0- -I 0-0 0- a.. r <'~ r <' 1-< Zz ~5"~ hI I w- oo ~I z ~ ~~ ~>- ~z> ~~ ~ <2 ~ ::::>Z ::::>o~ ~ ~ ~~ 0 er:::~ lXl4:: lXl....J 01 ~g! f~' iI d ~ II <(~ I U .-0 m ~~. r ~g ~ 1\;1 ~ Zo z::::>~ C> ~!~ ~ ~ ~ ~ifl i ~::: '-" 04:: OlXlu.. :g~ 0 -0 _u..o ~ ~'I d ~~ IR~il ~ ~d III z ~~ ~O~ tI);;; 0' g ~;.~ I III IB ~,II'~~~~~'~ -I;;: [t~ o.r [t~::::> ~~I II~ -I'" ....J~ ....JUU ~ llililllllllil 1111.!iili!!! ;'3 .. I w~v> -< i w i I 7 .-<' .... I I .- _ lXl ~ dRtu ~g 2 lib h~H :I: I , v>z l~ V> 0 ~ ~~"~~~~..~==~~ ~~_~d~~dr~vj~ 5 4::- w wU ~ z 4:: 'Z ~ ?c I~ ~ 3' 0 ; it >- ~ Ii z ~ u ~ ~ ~ w~ ! IE:~ ~ m g ,..." ~ Ua: ~ B AGENDA 1lEM. 1 DM:C 11'0 .. JQ(): " c z w C) W ..J a: o ..J o o :J c:( 0: w ~ :E . ~ s i ~ ~ ~ ~ '" IS ~ 0 ~ 3 I:l O~~! z I:! a ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ 3 III ~ ~ _ ~ ~ z ~ i i , ~ ~ ~ t ~~i II ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ IS i5 9 ili~~15~..1 ,ili", 0 ~~:~ i!~lil!~ ~ ~~IIB~I~~Sil~ 0~00~~~~~~~~ c o " o > v w III o w .s:: - ~ o Z .. Ii y ~ " >;- i; .0-'" a.. ~ OJ i 0\0 5 =~ .. iii ~ !II Ie ~ : is 2i!; i ! ~..;~ i ~ ~!iiI...P1o l.dHiI.d ll!,!IlI...,I....,~:ic l<O Ii lQ..zJ:.......,. ... i.. ::z ~ ' , ~ ' , , ~i~! it!! ill~ ~I~s!!~s!~~~ giiQf I~f~ i~~i1 0~~~~~~~0~0~ c o o > v w " 0> -- c: 111'0 v~ ~o ~ u .s::~ -~ ,-;i oS zB Ii: ~ i) c o c o - "0 o a. "0 III 5 V ~J: 0> c: 'u .s::~ --~ .' :J~ 05 UlB c U;t Co O.s:: ::r:Ul '111 8:4: 01 I CC 00 -- 00 >> vv ww --- 111111 vo ~w .s::.s:: -- :J~ 00 UlZ ~ ~ ~ I ~ j ~ AGENDA ItEM ft_e III C o -- o >-=U o v 0 0: c: wg, c: o U --"0 III 8 '- 0'5 wO: 0> C 'u .s:: 0 IL. +J~ :J i o~ UlS C u;t cO o.s:: ::r:Ul .111 ~ 01 I CC 00 -- - 00 >> Vv ww --- 111111 vO ~w .s::.s::. ~"""'l L-:Ji ~ 00:: ZUla 3 ... fu ~ ~ a ~ 61 . o C)o z~ -u Zz z~ -<0'- -1Z a..~ . w '" ::J I- U w l- X U '" -<0 " -<'" a.. 0 C)~ en.. en Z o ~ ~ W 0- 'II: C) Z a -I 5 at ~~ !~ n~ . z .~; ~O (Y) ~ w U <( ...J CL. 1-< w- z ~~ 0::::; <(~ ~:::- o z en;;; ...J~ ...JW '" -< .... :r: z o >- z <( u W~ It~ m~ U~ . u 1 V],) ,. Q Z W ~ W ..J a: o ..J o o :J c:( ii: w ~ :E ~ , ~ ~ u ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ a ! ~ g ~ ! ~ ~ ~ i ~ ; 91 ill . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ iii , a i ! ~ ~ ' ! B - ;~ft NI ~ ai~~~~i~ ~i! ~ !~a:~ ~z\!~~~lS... 0 a:i1I!!!l! g~~~~~"'~:J: ~11~B~D~lil!~ 0~~0~~~~~~~~ c o a > Q) w .... 1/1 Q) ~ .c ""l> .' :J~ oS Ula c o a ,...,. >-0 o Q) 0 0:: c wg, c o u --0 o 1/1 0 L- a .0 wO:: 0> C .u .c 0 u... -t-J~ :J' o~ Ul~ .. ;0 o ~ a Ie:; Z i ~ i : i i 9 ~~Gl"'iIl! 8 ~~o~~8 z ILl~il:~~~~! g~I;7~~a7l~~ :i 'ii~~~i~~~ ~t~~ ii~~ !Ial :1!~II~~i~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~ c o a > Q) w - 1/1 a w .c .....l> .' .....;. 05 z~ ~ .. ~ .0--" " e c a (L L.. o~ i 010 S =~ ~ II (; ~ J c)o 0 z~ -u Zz z~ . ~~ ....z ....., ....~ . 3 w D/: ::> "- ." I- >- Z w 0 U ~ ~ w I- ~ :c w u 0 i D/: i~ C) ~o h " z ~~ . 9 ....0 % 5 C)Z ~. -< ~~ In tI) .. ('I) ~ W u <: ...J a.. 1-< w- z ~o ~3 <:~ ~::: ....." 0 z U);;; ...J;;; ...J~ -< ... J: Z 0 >- Z <( U ~ ~ ~ ! i ti AGENDA l1BI N . c o a > Q) w ,...,. 0> - c 1/1'0 Q)~ ~o ~ o .c~ ...... _l> .' ,-:a 05 za W3 D:@ m~ U~ '-'" ft_1! j I/}_ ftI: 1 JiJ t1 0"011 NOANY~ OYOll'IYlI ~ - h5j I ~ . ih 1 ~ alii II; i.1 I ~ (IlIa b R ;11 ~ ~ iil Ii!i llbll~ilil i lllllllmlili-iilmillHI ~ ,.:.;"'......."...:~=~:!;! i<l"Ug.h':O':"""~ "....... ~111 2 ! ! i ! I Z o ~ ~ '" ~ o Z Ii -~ 0:> z~~ 09~ ~5'" >.:CDQ ~"'l:i! ",0:;) I;;lj~ "';:I CD ~~O ~ Z o ~ Z~ o~ ~~ ~b wZ 1-0 ~~ ni. :11 ill! QI li' :lIll-eul I R Li-I- E1- 1 08 : ~~ ~ :~ i~ ~ <; -'< a." ~ ~ o ~ ~ :;) ~ ::; '" w . I- M :I: ~ ~' ~ <0 t~ Z ,,~s Z <~ : 3 ~~ ~. Q.. CII~ !:. I 'tJ.1 m!1 II'" illi d! ~ ~ 11M lid !III.. · ~.. II - : ~ .-tt l iii'. .. I .... _~ ~: -- AGENDA ITEM N ','II I i'l 11'1. Ii I il } h IPJ t I I 111111 !~lh H III I I~ li l , tli U u ~ J I'~ !If t2Z It~C J I-? (t) ~ I . w U <( -I 0- i-< w- z ~.. ,0 cC: -' <(~ ~::: o z tI);;; -I;&; -I'" >t -< ... J: z o >- z <( u Wl't.l :i -il EO .. ~ n U'~, , '0 ~ ~ II -0 C> ~~ ....J_ -> ~~ '0 z'" ou.. -0 I::;w ~~ ....JU W (/) :r:m 1-0 ~ o Z a, , 1\ I ; o 4: -00 C>'" zz -0 9>- -z :J4: ~u zo 04: -0 !;('" ~:::! ....J~ w<-, Inz 4:- wU ~ ~ II l'; ~ -0 J C)o ~ 0 z~ 0 C> -ij z Zz 0 z~ . ....J <"" ....z ~ :J o..~ m <I) . z w Z 0 ~ ~ :J 0 ~ ~ I- !;( U a.. w w 1::; . I- ~ (') - ~ ~ J: ....J U W ~ i~ :r: C) <0 ~ I- z :J Z " <~ . 0 Z 0..0 z (/) :5 c)z ~, a.. <I)~ ~~ , , , I I ~ .. , I .. I I .. ft ^- .. v .. I I .. I I .. I I .. I .. J.. .. ...1:, ~ ~~ r/t ~ ~ -0 C> z_~ 9<-'- -z> ~o~ , :::! 0 z:J'" omu.. _u..o !;(o~ ~~ :J ....JUU w 4: (/) I-m m (/)-0 w 3 0 4: lO lO 0 C> <-' '" z Z lOZ 0 0 ~o ....J ....J z>- ~~ ::> oZ m ....J4: :JU ~> Z mo o~ 0 '4: -0 ~ zo !;('" 0'" _....J >u.. rti !;(~ WO ....Jw ....J rti~ w", w :r:::> I i:dz I-U ~ InU :J(/) Om 0 4:~ (/)0 Z w_ f'/.-. ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ 1< 111 ~ !5i ~r 9 ~ z ~ " - ~L, s~ ~ ~, ~ ;~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W~ 'I[~ ~ mg i Ua: ~ ~ AGENDA ITEM . ftAl'!e II J ftI: ~~i I ~ . :! ~I ~~! ~ ~~ 0 i ~~ ~l!~ z~, _.:&!Ii I a iF~ ~ I'! X :.I a~ ! z ~~~ i'lg ~~ ~ ~~ ~ I ~ ~d ~; ~~ ~ ~~jjl~ H ~ i2 ~ ~~~. h ~~ ra~i -~ai!~~ ~g~ 9 Sl~a g~ i~ 'I~..S-'d" ~~a ~ IISihhUI ~i mihnUn~ii 1;1 ~ ~~~~~~~!~!!~h ~:~:~~:!~~!~! Ii! ~~ :E; ?c ~! ~ ,,~ II i~ ~ . fil ;'" 01O!i ~ " "- II ~, .1 .. hl .. .. .. .. """ .. "Q' v .. "1- ^- .. "Q' .. lO ~ Z o ::;-~ m<-,- , > zz~ 090 -- '" !;(:Ju.. :>mo [uu..w ....Jo'" w :J I-~U (/)u(/) W4:m 3~0 i M ~ w U ~ ...J 0- J-... w- z ~~ ~~ ~~ ~: ~ 0 z V>;;; ...J;;: ...JW " -... .... I Z 0 >- Z ~ U ""'-'" 1 JJ] () : """' r -.::t < ~ < Co-' Z ~ .z z -< ~ ~~ ~~ zO ~~ ~z :=< u~ <~ f'.~~ ~~ <;) ~ I I" "I ,I 'I · Ii i i I!" , ~ I' I. I I. "I . Ii 1"'1 i 1111 I. i II' Ii ~ i Ii II h jl !I pll, ~;.II! ;11111 !l 11 II I !llihl ; 'Ih ~~ ht ... 01 < I!'; _I :! "lib .111011 "! .1 ~II" . ..1'IR' -lili h ~"Ii I j i!l! it U it jilin ihidlil U il !Illlld ill'll! ~ iil 111 Jill ' ~ 0 e fb 0 0 0 - - 8 fill Ii ,I Iii din III IIII ~ i e 0<111 I I . ~ ~ 811" a e>e Z~ -u ~ lJ~ ~~ <(~ , ~~ . w ~ '" ::> ~~ ... :r: u ~3 U ~ I~ -.::t ~ . w U <{ -I c... I- w~ ~~ o O!:= <{~ u l;: ~~ w U 0 Z .'" z o v,;;; ~ ....J~ 0.. -IOU 6 -~ <I) ... i I ~ "<t Z ~ 0 <( e> >- ~ Z 3 <{ 0.. U ~ I < 3 gill ~ !- < ~ ..sill! -I <C 11:' ~ab !t ~ If B ~ . ~ .sa 9 ~ m~ I "2 ~ ~- D ~ ~ .cC) :2 .!l! ~ ~ ~ C) ~ ~~ AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 ftlU'!l! I /<\ tW J ). ( . .. l!.V~H NO^N~? -cV~2!;~ll .. Q) u o - a. +- Q) ~ ~ o ~ ....;t <( w ~ cn<( ~ :-= z Iz z c::i 00.. >.. c o U ~ - 0_ ...."......0-__ ~ ~ Ii! .. ~I~ ~~~ a J In z" s~ 8 ~2' ~~ !2 ~ninll -~ ........ ~ ~i ...""................... ~ M~~ !!~!U!! Ii:; ;3~ ;l;;&zU_;l;:i; i!i ~~i H~~Bn ",0.. o=? lL~ '" o...,.u 0 zo..ii: 0 <::iz..o ~uO~I-" w~....::>~ 5=t::b..uwo.... !:t~ii2 W zwM~i!:~ c>o..~z~"" iii~o..O~Z ~ ~::>xw?;O u:. ....C>"'ii:!~ z ~~::>~::> o UO~I/)< ~ ffi15i!:~~~ ::; ~z~oo~ It 0052....Z_ < uuo<<o i ~ 3' :;/. !:! 0 I/) zlii:! ~ ~I:;a~ ~ ~~~~ ::; ~S..::I~ i2 ~~~~~ u ~~ ~~.. lit. ~;:: wjil ~ ~!f~~~ ~ig~~ ~!ll!l$ii 0.. ~~~~~ ~ It 6 ~@ ::; 12t lt5 <u ~ i ~ ~ o ~ !i! ::: ;J ~ J: " a .. :a ~~ ~ ~ l'l~~ ~ !::!~ w 8~ Xl l1i::l:\ ~ i ~ i 3' u ~!~ ~h ~ ~ ~~~ Ii; ~~ g~~~ ~2~.. ug..... i~::I~ ~8U I~~~~ ~~~~~ Cl Z Z 38 ..... ~g <jji !:t. b~! ws" I:: ~- is ~~ ~i!! .~ <2g~ o...",i!; Sl:H~ 1!! ~ C>iil z . m~l'l ~~~o ~2~~ Wo ~-O l;ti~~ <",,0; t;~~~ i t; fa . ~ ~i :J: Lt l;1n <iU '" tt: l z ... (; tit Zw Zc ..... ~.- :> ~J - 8 U . ~Iii,..~ :I:~a~ ..u9t1!o.f;; z~t")6" U3 .~ ~~!!!Ii!! ~ I~ I~ : ~I 6l 0.... u !i~ :> !;~ ~ ..8 5i~~~ z l'l~QSli o ~~~:i Ii: 3%2;:.. t'j ~~~~~ tn 0. '7'4!t-, W _DID _ o ~iai:: . ..... ::B!<~Z" ~ ~ eI:\~~~o ~ ~l'l~:lln i ! ;!) i 8 o 8 will zlil 2~ wZ 11)' :;)u o ; ~ :S:i !ii~;! ~~l:;;; ~lli~ 5ll!~5 ~~d~ ~IU~ 5~:::~i!! :!~~~~ II) ~ g!!! ~:Z::;:g: olI~~- -Iii: _wi .....9Q.. ~g~2 00 .. z~~i!! ti ~ i :J: . l;11!!1 ~ ~1 u ..c I/) ;;!@ o ~= 321 El B = 08 i ~~ zz I- z~ lU <(L W .....~ J: 0.... II) . ~ w I- '" i= :> I- u w l- X U ~o h o <~ ; 0..0 o~ ~; tI).,. ..0 ,. ~ ~ ~ C-' Z 1"'-4 Z Z -< ~ ~. ~ o ~ 00 z o 1"'-4 ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ z~ ~ CJ) ~~ I W~ ~ C-' ~ 11:0 = Z i m~ ~) ., _U~~ 1 .. if l:> " E: V)l~~ z~~!<! C> ~ .~ ~8~~ 5~~~ ~ t ~I~l ~ ~ ~ si AGENDA ITEM lit ~ a.; w U <( -I 0- .... w~ z ~~ ~:; <(.~ ~::: o z (/);;; -I;;: -1~ -< .... :c z o >- z <( u ......." 'U~II! 11/ _ ,.. f/) I) , ~ /""' o o o o o ~ o o o o 0- r- C) z o ....I ::::> m , , , , Ii tr n tl z o ~ rt ....I W ::r: ~ o z r,----- , I I I I I I I I I I I I / / I 1// I l-i-I/ .1 1--____ I I rL-1'" I I I' I I " I I I I I I , I I I I / I ^ // I / '" ~--- --, UI I I Jl1 0- C) z o ....I ::::> co o o o o o z o ~ rt ....I W I- ~ w ~~ i xi ~ ~~ ~I~ iii ;;j 'Ii t; z ~ a... u... o o ~ ....I <( ~ <( a... 0- r- C) Z o ....I ::::> co z o ~ > W ....I W l- V) w ~ !..> ~ ~ W~ ! II:~ ~ ID~ ~ Ua: ~ .~ AGENDA naI ftA_ II 1 0- r- C) z 9-~ ::::>C)- mZ> , o:E z:::!O O::::>~ mu... '::;:: u... 0 >O~ w~::::> u1uu "'T'"<(V) .......mm ~-O o V) o ~ ,: o I: 'I i ,: ,: II < ~51ii ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ <~ ..i; rJ B~ ~U z ~5i ~ ~~~ S~;H w ~ '" !i~ ~al ~ ;~~ ~t ~~ ~ . S& ~3 ~~ o ll.~ lJ~~' .... ll'lll -~ ~g o ~F8~ ~ 8~~ ~al U tiB~~U! ~~B ~E ~ ~h~U~~~!~~!i~ m ~ft~~BI~~~~~I~~ ~ ~Nri~~~~..g=~~: ~ o Z ~ ~~ s ~ l~ ! ~ !~il ~ ~ ~~~~hU~U r;~IIlIH.St ~L ~ I. ~~~h~l~i~~g ~!rJ"'H"'~fuul! r Qi:Qhdh~n ~ -<(aiuo......:c>x...::J.J'1 z ~ >- w :><: ~ ~ 8 ~ -- (/) z o ~ ~ w C)o z~ -ij Zz z~ <'" .....z "-~ . w <>: :) I- U w l- X U DC <0 " <~ "-0 C)z <I)~ . , E~ 't ~ C) z Z Z :5 "- ~3 Sri l!~ . z ~ a.. w U <( ...... a.. .....< w- Z ~o ~~ <(~ ~: o z tI);;; ......;;: ......... '" -< ... ::c ~I II 11- ~2 ~.i !!. 1lIt;~ ;Ii ~ z o >- z <( u 1 1.1) ,) /~" /', ~ / OJ. 12li I ~ . ~i ~. ~~~ A"~ i ~~ ~ 0 U~ i I~ il ~i i ~5 ~ ~!~i n d I !;I;~ I ~ II ~ ~ B~~ ~i ~~ ~ar:i ~~~!ij2l! Ig~ o ~~ft~ ~ Ih!g fidl~iiBi .dl ~g!! u dBhlil~iB ~8 ~~I idd~u iil ~ ~!!!!!!m!!!! I!~~!~~!~~~~! I" ~ z o .....I z ::s D- u... o .0 .~ .....I ~ ~ ~. D- o Z ~ Z ,- - r~ I I I I LJ A. 0 0 A. 0 V' . 0 '" v <> <> A. <> ~ ~1 X I I X ~J V ~ ~ z o .....I => OJ z o ~ ~ .....I W l- V) ~ w 1 <> o <> ~ II li ~ ~ C)o z~ -u Zz z~ .ceL ~z "-" a...~ '" . :::r Z w i 0 ex: ~ ;:) CD .... ::: ~ u w w . .... "" - ~ :t: U ex: ~~ C) .ceo fili Z I) Ii Z .ce" . 3 a... 0 z C)Z .:. a... -< :~ "'- ~ a.. OJ w " ..- u 0 <( z ~- -.J ~~ a... "z 1-< ..-0 ~.....I w- ~- z ..-=> ~"" :::r co 0 ~ ~ u... ~:: - ZO <(~ < - ~ O~ ~: =U "-" =>~ 0 z co_ (/)- '" Z -.J;&: -.Jw 0 '"' -< ~ .... J: ~ .....I Z w :r: 0 l- => >- 0 z V) <( u ~ " ~ z 0 ~ .....I '[ -nt => ~ OJ " ~ I iil I I <> ~ Ul Z e. ~ ~ W~ I 0 <> I ~ nl <> ! m::~ I I ~ I ,__ r-rq .....I l;::b a: I. -l w i m~ ~. . I I- -....; V) w ~ ~U~ i 1 DA . DM'~ 1'xI OF I~D: /""'"' 5" "l:t<: .....0 ~l:k:: zz -0 9>- -z ::><: ~u ZO . <: 00 !:(~ ?i- ....J~ w~ li;z w- .5;~ u... hi I ~ . ~h ~ ~~ i !gll ~~,. ~~ Ii o gE~ ~ ~1{ ~ a~ <> z ~~~ l'l0 rig ~ ~~ ~ g ~d ~~ ~i g !~;I i 0 i!i '" . ~~ !~ ~~ ~ll~~~u~ 0%8; 9 S;ia fl% ~~ ~i~"!~~. .~~ o ~"8~ ~ ~~li;~ UaU~t~I:Ii~ ~IIS~III~~!I ~~ 1!~I~~~~li~~~ '< ~~~~Ih~~li!i!~~~~ ~~B"n",:,~ ~ ~~~~~~:~~!~!!~ ~:~:!~:~!:~!! ~ JII ~ El ~ 00 . 0 z~ -u Zx z: . <(.. -'x "-~ tI) . z w 0 '" ~ ::) ~ t- U w W t- ~ - ~ J: % u !I <( '" ~3 0 <(0 !li Z ., II!: b Z <("' . 3 "-0 % ..~ ox .!.il a.. < !~ ~K en.. u12 Iii ~ i~1 ~i% a.. CLO ~ W % U <( -l a.. ......< w- z ~:; ~~ <(~ ~::: 0 z tI);;; -l;;: -lW '" -< -' J: Z 0 >- z <( u Z :S a.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ AGENDA ITEM D~S: 11 -.0 ~ z o ....J ::> co z o !:( G:i ....J W :c I- ::> o V) -.0 ~ z o ....J ::> co z o ~ G:i ....J W l- V) <: w W3 a:~ m~ U~ 1 J~D ; It ~t\ Jl~1 J '" ..:t "I~ -----.j.... ~ '" z :S '" in 6l ... J >- z ~ C> ~ m o z ~ '" o z w ~ . .... ~ ~ . .... ,;; ~ >- z w :::; w C> ~ m z ~ z 2 ~ .... ,;; ~ l?1I 8 ~ 00 ~ z u w z~ ~ -v ~ Zz z~ <.. z -'z w .. ~ ....w W . . S ... w ~ "" II) ::> 0 ~ ~ u . w ..., ~ ~ - J: ~ U 0 "" ~~ z <0 ~~ z " "8 ~ <=: . ....0 % .... OZ ~. II)~ !~ ~ ~ W U <( -J a... I- W~ z ~.. 0 ~~ <(~ U <' -< tJ)- '" -J~ ... -J'" "" -< ~ I Z 0 >- Z <( I llJ ~ U < 3 g~ Ii ~g !~ .J Ii ::J ~ II wr - ~* ~ ~H: B ~ ~ C> ~ z w w U ~ ... w '" ii: - 3 w e: ~ '" ~ ~ ! ~ .!l9 -"" ~ ii:i ~ I 1! ~ ~ 0< ~ j ~ ~ W )I.. ! ti ~ AGSIDA.m. NO. ~ I. DAtS I v;Jf\ ~ I D; >- z w :::; l' ~. z w o ~ ... ORDINANCE NO. 1129 /"" AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE NO. 2004-01, CHANGING THE ZONING DESIGNATION FROM "RR-RURAL RESIDENTIAL" TO "Rl - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL," UNDER THE ZONING ORDINANCE, ON 10:!: ACRES LOCATED APPROXIMATELY TWO MILES NORTHEAST OF THE INTERSTATE IS/STATE HIGHWAY 74 (CENTRAL AVENUE) INTERCHANGE, AT THE SOUTHERN END OF TRELLIS LANE, SOUTH OF SHARON STREET, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 347-110-021. WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by The Sauls Company to change the zoning designation on approximately 1Oi: acres of unimproved property from "RR - Rural Residential" to "R-l" Single Family Residential;" and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular ,-- meeting held on August 17, 2004, made its report upon the desirability of the proposed project and made its recommendations in favor of Zone Change No. 2004-01 by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 2004-116 recommending to the City Council approval of Zone Change No. 2004-01; and WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the City Council has considered evidence presented by the Cbmmunity Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on October 12, 2004; NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RESOLVEas follows: SECTiON 1. The City Council has considered proposed Zone Change No. 2004- 01 prior making a decision. The City Council finds and determines that Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2004-05 is adequate and prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which analyzes environmental effects of the proposed project. Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. ,-- ,AIilENDA ITEM NO. ~ \: 'PAGE..l-~' ORDINANCE NO. 1129 ZONE CHANGE NO. 2004-01 OCTOBER 12, 2004 PAGE 20F4 '-" SECTION 2. That in accordance with State PlaMing and Zoning law and the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the following findings for the approval of Zone Change No. 2004-0 I have been made as follows: 1. The proposed amendment will not be (l) detrimental to the health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment or within the City, (2) injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City. a. The proposed zoning of R-I Single Family Residential is the most similar zoning to the residential development occurring within the adjacent Ramsgate Specific Plan. If the subject property had remained part of a future specific plan, there is every likelihood that a transition such as the one proposed would have been designed for the area. b. The proposed R-I zone provides development standards that protect the public health, safety and general welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhoods in the area or within the City. The proposed project shall comply with these standards. '-" . '2. . The proposed amendment will be consistent with the latest General Plan. a. The proposed R-I zoning is consistent with the existing General Plan designation of "Future Specific PlanF," which accommodates residential development at a maximum density of 6 dwelling units per acre. The General Plan identifies issues to be addressed in this area, Q,aWely hillside grading, compatibility of development to adJacent uses, and impacts to- biological re&ources. These issue~ were reviewed, addressed and considered hy the Initial Environmental Study and within the design of this project. - SECTION 3: ZONING RECLASSIFICATION The Official Zoning Map of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, is her~by amended by changing, 'I;"eclassifying and rezoning the following described pr9perty, to wit: . . Assessor's Parcel Numbers 347-110-021 to "Rl - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL" UNDER THE ZONING ORDINANCE '-" . AQENOA nEMNO...=3.L '" PAGE~eF~ ~ ORDINANCE NO. 1129 ZONE CHANGE NO. 2004-01 OCTOBER 12, 2004 PAGE 30F4 Approval is based on the following: 1. The proposed Zoning is consistent with the Goals, Policies and Objectives in the General Plan. 2. The proposed Zoning is consistent with the General Plan, and the various land uses authorized by the Ordinance are compatible with the objectives, polici~s, general land uses, and programs specified in the Plan. (Government Code Section 65860). 3. The City has considered the effect of Zoning Ordinances on the regional housing needs in which the City is located, and has balanced these needs against the public service needs of its residents and available fiscal and environmental resources. (Government Code Section 65863.6). 1. SECTION 4: This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of L---- its final passage. The City Clerk shall certify as to adoption of this Ordinance and cause .' J this Ordinance to be published and posted in the manner required by law. INTRODUCED AND APPROVED UPON FIRST READING this lih day of October, 2004 by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: HICKMAN, KELLEY, MAGEE, SCHIFFNE~, BUCKLEY NONE NOES: . COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE i !............. AQENOA ITEM NO. 3 J "'PAGE ~ OF Lf ORDINANCE NO. 1129 ZONE CHANGE NO. 2004-01 OCTOBER 12, 2004 PAGE 40F4 ....." I PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED UPON SECOND READING this 12th day of October, 2004, upon the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: Thomas Buckley, Mayor City of Lake Elsinore ....." ATTEST: Vicki Lynne Kasad, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: . Barbara Leibold, City Attorney (SEAL) ....." ACIEN)A ITE:\~ NO.~ " PAGE~OF~. "" CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SUBJECT: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RICHARD 1. W A TENP AUGH, CITY MANAGER CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING OF OCTOBER 26, 2004 DESIGN REVIEW OF RESIDENTIAL PROJECT NO. R 2004-06 TO: FROM: DATE: APPLICANT/OWNER Mr. Ali Salman 1369 Tanglewood Drive Corona, California 92822 "" REQUEST Design Review approval to construction seven (7) apartment units to be added to an existing six (6) unit apartment complex pursuant to Chapter 17.82, Design Review, Chapter 17.28 (R-3, High Density Residential) and Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). BACKGROUND At their regular meeting of October 5, 2004 the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2004-138 recommending to the City Council approval of Design Review of Residential Project No. R 2004-06 subject to revised Conditions of Approval (Minutes, Staff Report, Resolution No. 2004-138 and Conditions of Approval attached). FISCAL IMP ACT Residential development of this nature generates a negative fiscal impact to the City. Staff has added a Condition that requires the project to annex into Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 2003-1 (Condition No. 35). The project has been conditioned to also annex into the Street Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District (LLMD) No.1. These requirements will offset the annual negative fiscal impacts on public safety operations and street light and landscape maintenance. "" The applicant has also been conditioned to mItigate any traffic impacts by paying the Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) and Traffic Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). All other AQE. cJ<<)A neu NO. 11 ~'PAGE , ;-:ss REPORT TO THE aTY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OCTOBER 26, 2004 Page 2of2 SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW OF RESIDENTIAL PROJECT NO. R 2004-06 LOCATED AT 16420 JOY STREET - APN 379-131-008 ......, standard development fees, such as capital improvement fees, drainage fees and library fees are also Conditions of Approval of the project. ENVIRONMENTAL The proposed project has been determined to be exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15332, Class 32, In-Fill Development Projects. This exemption allows development to occur within city limits on projects sites of less than 5 acres that are substantially surrounded by urban development. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council approve Design Review for Residential Project No. R 2004- 06 for seven (7) apartment units to be added to a six (6) units apartment complex and related improvements to be located at 16420 Joy Street - APN 379-131-008. Approval is based on Exhibits, the Planning Commission's Findings, and subject to the attached revised Conditions of Approval. The project site is located in Project Area No.2, Area A of the Redevelopment Agency Project Area Boundary; therefore, it is also recommended that the Redevelopment Agency concur with City Council Action. ......, Approved for Agenda Listing by: Prepared by: Review by: Reviewed by: tJ. Exhibit 'A' Exhibit 'B' Exhibit 'C' Exhibit'D' Exhibit 'E' Minutes from Planning Commission October 5, 2004 Planning Commission's Staff Report, October 5, 2004 Full Size Plan Full Sized Color Exhibits (presented at Hearing) Color Material Board (presented at Hearing) 3l.~ AENDA ITEM NO. ... PAGB F~"f:: eF~S= ~. REVISED CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECT NO. R 2004-06 LOCATED AT 16420 JOY STREET- APN 379-131-008 N (i:e; F res lisud in the Corrlitions if A pprautl are the ret estimttes amilable at the tinr if apprautl 7be exad Ire anumts Wlllx: 'Yf?Cier.eHl at the tinr if pernit issuarx:e arxl mty Ix: rerised. GENERAL CONDITION 1. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the Gt0, indemnify, and hold hannless the Gty, its Official, Officers, Employees, and Agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the Gty, its Official, Officers, Employees, or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the Gty, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning the Tentative Condominium Map, which action is bought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Sections 65009 and! or 66499.37, and Public Resources Code Section 21167. The Gty will promptly notify the Applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the Gty and will cooperate fully with the defense. If the Gty fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any such claim, or proceeding, the Applicant shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the Gty. PLANNING DIVISION ,.,-.. 2. Design Review approval for Residential Design Review No. R 2004-06 will lapse and be void unless building permits are issued within one (1) year of Gty Council approval. The Community Development Director may grant an extension of time of up to one (1) year per extension, prior to the expiration of the initial Design Review approval. Application for a time extension must be submitted to the Gty of Lake Elsinore one (1) month prior to the expiration date. 3. Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced on page one of building plans submitted to the Building Division Plan Cl1eck. All Conditions of Approval shall be met prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. 4. All site improvements approved with this request shall be constructed as indicated on the approved site plan and elevations. Revisions to approved site plans or building elevations shall be subject to the review of the Community Development Director. All plans submitted for Building Division Plan Cl1eck shall conform to the submitted plans as modified by Conditions of Approval, or the Planning Commission! Gty Council through subsequent action. 5. All roof mounted or ground support air conditioning units or other mechanical equipment incidental to development shall be architecturally screened or shielded by landscaping so that they are not visible from neighboring property or public streets. Any material covering the roof equipment shall match the primary wall color. Wall or window mounted air conditioners shall not be allowed. ~ Page 1 of 9 ~L AGENDA ITEM NO. S .. "'-- PAGE ~ OF~ CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENfIAL PROJECT NO. R 2004-06 LOCATED AT 16420 JOY STREET- APN 379-131-008 ~ 6. All exterior on-site lighting shall be shielded and directed on-site so as not to create glare onto neighboring property and streets or allow illumination above the horizontal plane of the fixture. All light fixtures shall match the architectural style of the building and shall be approved by the CDD or Designee. . 7. Applicant shall meet ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) requirements. 8. Trash enclosures shall be constructed per Oty standards as approved by the Community Development Director or Designee. 9. Applicant shall use roofing materials with Oass "A" fire rating. 10. The applicant shall meet all Building and Safety Division requirements. 11. A cash bond of $1,000.00 shall be required for any construction trailers placed on the site and used during construction. Bonds will be released after removal of trailers and restoration of the site to an acceptable state, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. 12. The applicant shall comply with the Oty's Noise Ordinance. Construction activity shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday, and no construction activity shall occur on Saturdays, Sundays or legal holidays. ......, 13. Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Oty's Grading Ordinance. Construction generated dust and erosion shall be mitigated in accordance with the provisions of Municipal Code, O1apter 15.72 and using accepted control techniques. Interim erosion control measures shall be provided thirty (30) days after the site's rough grading, as approved by the Oty Engineer. 14. Materials and colors depicted on the plans and materials board shall be used unless modified by the Community Development Director or designee. 15. A decorative rnasomy 6 foot block wall shall be installed along all side and rear property lines. This wall shall include pilasters at comers and every 50 feet. A 5 foot tubular steel fence shall be installed along the front property line. The Gty standard 6 foot wood fence shall be installed between each unit's rear private open space areas. 16. The applicant shall install the Oty standard 6 foot wood fence between the existing unit's rear pnvate open space areas. 17. Decorativeipaving shall be included at the drive entryways and shall be shown on the construction drawings submitted to Building and Safety. 18. On-site surface drainage shall not cross sidewalks. Page 2 of 9 ......". 12- AGENDA ITEM NO. ",.1t 1 PAGE~OF~ ",.-- CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECT NO. R 2004-06 LOCATED AT 16420 JOY STREET- APN 379-131-008 19. Any exterior downspouts shall be painted to match the exterior colors of the building. 20. No outdoor storage shall be allowed for any tenant. 21. Parking stalls shall be double-striped with four-inch (4") lines two feet (2') apart. 22. Any proposed mailboxes shall be located in decorative housings which incorporate similar materials, colors, and textures utilized on the proposed building. The area for mailboxes should be of sufficient size to enable residents to pick up or deposit mail without encroaching on landscaping or parking. 23. All exposed slopes in excess of three feet (3') in height shall have a permanent irrigation system and erosion control vegetation installed, approved by the Planning Division. 24. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of $64.00 made payable to the County of Riverside for a Certificate of Fee Exemption "de Minimis Impact Finding. The check shall be submitted to the Planning Division for processing within 48 hours of the projects approval. PRIOR TOBUILDING/GRADINGPERMITS ,,-.... 25. Prior to issuance of any grading pennit or building pennits, the applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgement of Conditions" form and shall return the executed original to the Planning Division for inclusion in the case records. 26. The building addresses shall be a minimum of four inches (4") high and shall be easily visible from the public right-of-way. Developer shall obtain street addresses for each unit prior to issuance of building pennits. The addresses shall be displayed near the entrance. 27. Three (3) sets of the Final Landscaping/Irrigation Detail Plan shall be submitted, reviewed and approved by the Oty's Landscape Architect Consultant and the Community Development Director or designee, prior to issuance of building pennit. A Landscape Plan Check & Inspection Fee will be charged prior to final landscape approval based on the Consultant's fee plus forty percent (40%) Oty fee. The applicant shall include plans to include revising the existing unit's front landscaped areas. a) All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic sprinkler system with 100% plant and grass coverage using a combination of drip and conventional irrigation methods. b) Applicant shall plant street trees, selected from the Oty's Street Tree List, a maximum of forty feet (40) apart and at least twenty-four-inch (24") box in size. c) All planting areas shall be separated from paved areas with a six inch (6 ") high and six inch (6") wide concrete curb. ,,-.... Page 3 of 9 ACIENJ~;I~M NO.o,_'3 ~ P,. ~-_. ~,=_~ ~ CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECT NO. R 2004-06 LOCATED AT 16420 JOY SfREET- APN 379-131-008 ....., d) Planting within fifteen feet (15' of ingress/egress points shall be no higher than thirty- six inches (36"). e) Landscape planters shall be planted with an appropriate parking lot shade tree to provide for 50% parking lot shading in fifteen (15) years. f) Anytransfonners and mechanical or electrical equipment shall be indicated on landscape plan and screened as part of the landscaping plan. g) The landscape plan shall provide for ground cover, shrubs, and trees and meet all requirements of the Oty's adopted Landscape Guidelines. Special attention to the use of Xeriscape or drought resistant plantings with combination drip irrigation system to be used to prevent excessive watering. h) All landscape improvements shall be bonded 100% for material and labor for two years from installation sign-off by the Oty. Release of the landscaping bond shall be requested by the applicant at the end of the required two years with approval! acceptance by the Landscape Consultant and Community Development Director or Designee. ~ All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed within affected portion of any phase at the time a Certificate of Occupancy is requested for any building. All planting areas shall ....., include plantings in the Xeriscape concept, drought tolerant grasses and plants. j) Final landscape plan must be consistent with approved site plan. k) Final landscape plans to include planting and irrigation details. 28. Applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. Proof shall be presented to the Ollef Building Official prior to issuance of building permits and final approval. 29. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall provide assurance that all required fees to the Lake Elsinore Unified School District have been paid. 30. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall provide assurance that all requirements of the Riverside County Fire Department have been met. 31. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fee in effect at time of building pemnt ISsuance. Page 4 of 9 ....., AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 ) PAGEi OF ~.t ",-- CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECf NO. R 2004-06 LOCATED AT 16420 JOY STREET- APN 379-131-008 32. The applicant shall pay the Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHcr) Local Development Mitigation Fee of $859.00 per dwelling unit (fee for density greater that 14.1 dwelling units per acre) prior to obtaining building permits. PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL 33. The applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval prior to final approval. 34. The landscaped areas noted on the Landscape and Irrigation Plan shall be installed and approved prior to final approval. Approval is based on the completion of all irrigation and planting as noted on the Landscape and Irrigation Plans. 35. The applicantshaU annex into the Community Facilities Dismct(CFD) No. 2003-01 thereby offsetting the annual negative fiscal impacts on public safety operations. Added to Conditions of Approval at Gty Council 10-26 2004 ENGINEERING DIVISION /""" 36. Pay all development fees, including area drainage, TIF and TIJMF. 37. Provide drainage plan including hydrology and hydraulic information. 38. Provide clean water mitigation for construction activities as well as post construction operations. 39. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMq prior to issuance of building permit. 40. Underground water rights shall be dedicated to the Gty pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.52.030 (LEMq, and consistent with the Gty's agreement with the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. 41. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (LEMC 16.34, Resolution 85-26). 42. Submit a "Will Serve" letter to the Gty Engineering Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project. Submit this letter prior to issuance of building permit. 43. Construct all public works improvements per approved street plans (LEMC 12.04). Plans must be approved and signed by the Gty Engineer prior to final map approval (LEMC 16.34). ~ Page 5 of 9 AGENDA ITEM NO. S 1.. -, PAGE , OF..35.. CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECT NO. R 2004-06 LOCATED AT 16420 JOY STREET- APN 379-131-008 '-' 44. Street improvement plans and specifications shall be prepared by a Calif. Registered Gvil Engineer. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Riverside County Road Department Standards, latest edition, and Gty Codes (LEMC 12.04 and 16.34). 45. Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the Oty for the construction of public works improvements and shall post the appropriate bonds prior to issuance of Building Pennit. 46. Interior streets shall be designed with 9% as the desired grade and intersecting streets shall meet at a maximum grade of 6 % 47. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment pennit issued by the Engineering Division for construction of public works improvements (LEMC 12.08 and Resolution 83-78). 48. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 ~" X 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of public works improvements will be scheduled and approved. 49. The applicant shall install two (2) pennanent bench marks to Riverside County Standards and at a location to be determined by Gty Engineer. 50. Applicant shall obtain all necessary off site easements fDr off site gmding from the adjacent property owners prior to final map appro~:al. (Deleted, does not apply to project) '-"'" Revised at Planning Commission Meeting October 5, 2004 51. Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. 52. Provide street lighting and show lighting impfOvemems as part of street improT:emem plal15 as required by the Oty EngiBeer. (Deleted, does not apply to project) Revised at Planning Commission Meeting October 5, 2004 53. Developer shall annex to the Oty's Street Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District. 54. Developer shall install blue reflective pavement markers in the street at all fire hydrant locations. 55. Applicant shall submit a traffic control plan showing all traffic control devices for the tract to be approved prior to final map approval. All traffic control devices shall be installed prior to final inspection of public improvements. This includes No Parking and Street Sweeping Signs for streets within the tract. 56. All utilities except electrical over 12 kv shall be placed underground, as approved by the serving utility. Page 6 of 9 1). AQENOA ITEM NO. .li. PAGE~OF ~ ~ CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECf NO. R 2004-06 LOCATED AT 16420 JOY STREET- APN 379-131-008 57. Apply and obtain a grading permit with appropriate security prior to building permit issuance. A grading plan signed and stamped by a Calif. Registered Gvil Engineer shall be required if the grading exceeds 50 cubic yards or the existing flow pattern is substantially modified as determined by the Gty Engineer. If the grading is less than 50 cubic yards and a grading plan is not required, a grading permit shall still be obtained so that a cursory drainage and flow pattern inspection can be conducted before grading begins. 58~ Provide soils, geology and seismic report including street design recommendations. Provide final soils report showing compliance with recommendations. 59. An Alquis- Priolo study shall be performed on the site to identify any hidden earthquake faults and! or liquefaction zones present on-site. 60. All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer and he shall certify all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and proper erosion control. All manufactured slopes greater than 30 ft. in height shall be contoured. 61. Prior to commencement of grading operations, applicant to provide to the Gty with a map of all proposed haul routes to be used for movement of export material. Such routes shall be subject to the review and approval of the Gty Engineer. ~ 62. Applicant to provide to the Gty a photographic baseline record of the condition of all proposed public Gty haul roads. In the event of damage to such roads, applicant shall pay full cost of restoring public roads to the baseline condition. A bond may be required to ensure payment of damages to the public right-of-way, subject to the approval of the Gty Engineer. 63. On-site drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way should be contained within drainage easements shown on the final map the pnrise grade plan A note should be added to the final map pnrise gradingplan stating: "Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions." Revised at Planning Commission Meeting October 5, 2004 64. All natural drainage traversing site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the Gty Engineer. 65. Meet all requirements of LEMC 15.64 regarding flood hazard regulations. 66. Meet all requirements of LEMC 15.68 regarding floodplain management. 67. The applicant to provide FEMA elevation certificates prior to certificate of occupancies ,... Page 7 of 9 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 l '" PAGE-3. OF , $ CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECT NO. R 2004-06 LOCATED AT 16420 JOY STREET- APN 379-131-008 '-' 68. S';1bmi~ Hydrology and HydmWle RepOlts for Fe7iew and appro,.:ill by at)' Engineer and the RrlCfStde Colmty Flooa Coatrol District prior to appf<Y.o:al of final map. Developer shall mitigate any flooding llfKI/ or erosion eaasea b-y GevelopmeBt of site a:nd di~:elSioB of dmiBage. Delete, condition has been covered by Conditions No. 36 and 63. Revised at Planning Commission Meeting October ~ 2004 69. Storm drain inlet facilities shall be appropriately stenciled to prevent illegally dumping in the drain system, the wording and stencil shall be approved by the aty Engineer. 70. Roof and yard drains shall not be allowed to connect directly through cuts in the street curb. Roof drains should drain to a landscaped area when ever feasible. 71. 10 year storm runoff should be contained within the curb and the 100 year storm runoff should be contained within the street right-of-way. When either of these criteria is exceeded, drainage facilities should be installed. 72. Applicant will be required to install B:MP's using the best available technology to mitigate any urban pollutants from entering the watershed. 73. Applicant shall provide the city with proof of his having filed a Notice of Intent with the Regional Water Quality Control Board for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program with a storm water pollution prevention plan prior to issuance of grading permits. The applicant shall provide a SWPPP for post construction which describes BMP's that will be implemented for the development including maintenance responsibilities. ~ 74. Applicant shall obtain approval from Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board for their storm water pollution prevention plan including approval of erosion control for the grading plan prior to issuance of grading permits. The applicant shall provide a SWPPP for post construction which describes BMP's that will be implemented for the development and including maintenance responsibilities. 75. Education guidelines and Best Management Practices (BMP) shall be provided to residents of the development in the use of herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers as well as other environmental awareness education materials on good housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of stormwater quality and met the goals of the BMP in Supplement" A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. 76. Applicant shall provide first flush BMP's using the best available technology that will reduce storm water pollutants from parking areas and driveway aisles. Page 8 of 9 ....., AGENDA nEM NO. , ~ , PAGE_ULOF~ ,...... ,- ~ CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECf NO. R 2004-06 LOCATED AT 16420 JOY SfREET- APN 379-131-008 77. Intersection site distance shall meet the design criteria of the CAL mANS Design Manual (particular attention should be taken for intersections on the inside of curves). If site distance can be obstructed, a special limited use easement must be recorded to limit the slope, type of landscaping and wall placement. End of Conditions )~ Italics indicates addition to text, strikethrough indicates removal from text. Page 9 of 9 AQENOA ITEM NO. 3 2- " PAGE " OF' s:.. PAGE 5 - PLANNING COMMISSION :MINUTES - October 5, 2004 There being no further comments from the applicant, the discussion Commission. ""-tIJ' rought back to the Commissioner Uhlry's only comments was that Condition No. would need have the same changes to the Condition as in the previous item. He had no f er comments. Commissioner Ryan had no comments. Commissioner Larimer indicated that she thought at the homes looked quite charming, and had no funher comments. Vice Chairman O'Neal stated that these are a ctive homes, and had no further comments. e identical homes; however, they do have some variation, er comments. Chairman LaPere stated that these are t and likes the treatments. He had no f There being no further comments, ainnan LaPere requested the reading Resolution. MOVED BY RYAN, SE NDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY A UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADOPT SOLUTION NO. 2004-137, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMI ION OF THE aTY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, '--' APPROVING MIN R DESIGN REVIEW FOR THREE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES L TED AT 29910, 29930, 29950 REID STREET - APN 275-024- 001,002,003,004,005 & 006 TO INCLUDE THE NOTED CORRECTIONS TO CONDITION N .23. ?Do4-O' ~ ~.- e:x.H\B\1' ~,o4 c,c., 10- 4. Design Review for Residential Project No. R 2004-06. PUBLIC HEARNINGS None BUSINESS ITEMS Chairman LaPere requested the reading of the Staff Repon. Agenda Item No 1 ).. Page---1.Ao~ ""-"" PAGE 6 - PLANNING CDMMISSIONMINUfES - October 5,2004 ~ Director of Community Development Brady stated that this was a request a Design Review of a Residential Project and requested Associate Planner Miller to review it with the Commission. Associate Planner Miller indicated that there are a few corrections .to the Conditions of Approval that she had handed out to the Commission prior to the Planning Commission. She stated that the applicant was proposing to construct seven (7) multi-family units to an existing six (6)-unit apartment complex. She noted that the six of the multi-family units are identified as Type ".A!' units with 1,165 square feet of living area and attached 229 square foot garage. She stated that the Type "B" unit is 1,228 square foot with attached 220 square foot garage. She stated that each apartment unit was two stories. She noted that the General Plan allows up to 18 units per acre, and therefore the project complies with the General Plan's Land Use requirements. She indicated that each unit would have 260 square feet of private open space and approximately 3,040 of common open space divided into twO areas, each would have a playground and picnic tables with barbeque. Associate Planner Miller stated that Staff recommends that ht Planning Commission adopt a Resolution recommending that the Gty Council approve Residential Project No. R 2004-06 based on the Findings, Exhibits, and subject to the Conditions of Approval. She stated that the Engineering Division rechecked the Conditions of Approval and determined that four of them needed to be corrected. She stated that the corrections have been made, and passed out to the Commission. ,-- Associate Planner Miller indicated that the applicant was available to answer any questions that the Commission might have. Chairman LaPere requested that the applicant approach the podium. Ali Salman, Elsinore Estate LLC, 16420 Joy Street, Lake Elsinore stated that he would be available to answer any questions that the Commission might have. Chairman LaPere asked the applicant if he has read and agreed to the Conditions of Approval. Mr. Salman stated "Yes". There being no further comments, Chairman LaPere brought the discussion back to the Commission. Vice Chairman O'Neal indicated that he concurred with Staff's recommendations, and had no further comments. Commissioner Larimer stated that she likes the design of the homes. However, she did indicate that the common open is noted at 3,040 square feet, which is just below the requirement. She stated that she understood why the applicant has felt that this substantially meet the intent of the Code, ~ Agenda Item No ~ ~ page--11-o~ PAGE 7 - PLANNING ffiM11ISSION MINUTES - October 5, 2004 however, it is her preference not to go below the Gty's Standards or requirements. She had no further comments. ""'" Commissioner Ryan had no comments. Commissioner Uhlry stated that he is impressed with the treatment on Joy Street. He stated that he understands why he has reduced the common space 210 square feet. He stated that he felt that the applicant is doing a tremendous job, and had no further comments. Chairman LaPere stated that he too agreed with Commissioner O'Neal on the design of the project. He requested to speak with the Architect of the project. Michael Morcos, 1150 E. Orangethrope # 109, Placencia, stated that he had been working with Staff and felt that this was a good project. He had no other comments. Chairman LaPere had no further comments. There being no further comments, Chairman LaPere requested the reading of the Resolution. MOVED BY UHLRY, SECONDED BY O'NEAl. AND PASSED BY A UNANIMOUS VOTE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2004-138, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE OTY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, '" RECOMMENDING TO THE OTY COUNOL OF THE OTY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAl. OF THE DESIGN REVIEW OF RESIDENTIAl. PROJECT NO. R 2004-06 FOR THE ADDITION OF SEVEN APARTMENTS TO AN EXISTING APARTMENT COMPLES LOCATED AT 16420 JOY STREET - APN 379-131-008 TO INCLUDE THE CORRECTIONS TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAl.. commented on the followin : Agenda 111ri No ,). PageJ.1O~ '" ,.-.-. City of Lake Elsinore Planning Division 130 S. Man Street LIke EisnoR; CA 92530 (909) 674-3124 (909) 471-1419 fax PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATE: October 5, 2004 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Robert A Brady, Olmmunity Development Director PREPARED BY: Linda M Miller, Associate Planner, Ala " PROJECT TITLE: Design Review for Residential Project No. R 2004-06 APPLICANT: Ali Salman, 1369 Tanglewood Drive, Corona, California 92882 (Owner: Same) 0'- ~ 0".... ... R ~,. ~ ~..o t.t PROJECf REQUEST E)(\"\\ a - \ 0 .. '1.fD The applicant is requesting Design Review consideration for the~menr of a Residential Project consisting of the addition of seven (7) multi-family units to an existing six (6) unit apartment complex. Review is pursuant to Chapter 17.82 (Design Review), Chapter 17.28 (R-3, High Density Residential) and Chapter 17.14, Residential Development Standards of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMq. PROJECT LOCATION The project is located in the northwestern section of the Gty of Lake Elsinore at 16420 Joy Street - APN 379-131-008. The area consists of primarily multi- family units. A public school is adjacent to the site at the northwest boundary. "" AGENDA IT.EM NO. .~ -...... PAGEl1.. OF " PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OCTOBERS, 2004 Page 2 of 5 ~ PROJECf TITLE: DESIGN REVIEW FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECf NO. R 2004"06 LOCATED AT 16420 JOY STREET - APN 379-131-008 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Northeast Southeast Southwest Northwest EXISTING LAND USE Existing Multi- famil & Vacant Vacant Multi- famil ReSL Church School ZONING GENERAL PLAN Project Site R-3, High Density ReSL MeditUll High Density Resi. Resi. PROJECf DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting to construct 7 new multi- family units with attached single car garages on a partially developed .87 acre site. The site currently consists of 6 multi-family units with parking, and minimal landscaping. Six of the proposed seven units are attached in one building. The seventh unit is placed perpendicular at the end of this building. According to Section 17.28.090, Lot Coverage, LEMC, the maximwn lot coverage shall be 60% including structures, drive-aisles, and parking areas. The total building footprint (existing and proposed) is 9,660 square feet, the total paved area including parking is 12,750 square feet for a total of 22,410 square feet or 59% of the total lot area which meets the maximwn lot coverage allowed in the R- 3 District. ~ Six of the multi-family units are identified as Type 'A' units with 1,165 square feet of living area and attached 229 square foot garage. The single Type "B" unit is 1,228 square feet with attached 220 square foot garage. Each apartment unit is two stories. The first floor consists of an entry, living room, dining room, and bath with a washer and dryer closet. The second floor consists of three bedrooms, two bathrooms and an open area that could be used as a computer work area. The garage is provided with 85 cubic feet of storage area in compliance with Section 17.28.170, Storage, of the LEMC The garage can easily be accessed from a door off of the entry of the apartment. Zoning Consistency The project is located in an R-3, High Density District that would allow for up to 24 dwelling units an acre, however, the General Plan's Land Use designates the area as Medium High Density that allows up to 18 units per acre, therefore, the maximum dwelling units allowed for this project site is 18 dwelling units per acre. As mentioned, the project site is 37,900 square feet or .87 acre which would allow up to 16 dwelling units (.87 x 18 = 15.6 dwelling units). The applicant is proposing to increase the total number of units to 13 unit (6 existing/7 proposed = 13 units), therefore the project complies with the General Plan's Land Use requirements. ....., ~ )-. AGENDA ITEM.NO. ...J..7... & ,- :l~ PAGE.L!I!. Of _,__ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OCTOBER 5, 2004 ~ Page 4of5 PROJECT TITLE: DESIGN REVIEW FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECT NO. R 2004-06 LOCATED AT 16420 JOY STREET - APN 379-131-008 Private Outdoor Open Space Each unit is required to be provided with a minimum of 100 square feet of private open space in the form of a patio or balcony. 1his area shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide. Each new unit is provided with an approximately 260 square foot area of private open space on the ground level that will be accessed from the dining room. This provision meets and exceeds the LEMC's requirement. Common Open Space The LEMCrequires that 250 square feet of common open space shall be provided for each unit for projects with more that 4 units. Therefore, Staff determined that the project requires a minimum of 3,250 square feet of common open space (13 units x 250 sJ. = 3,250 sJ.). Common open space can include activities for both active and passive recreational uses. Uses can include pools, court games, children's play equipment, and picnic. tables with barbeques. The applicant is providing two common open space areas as shown on the site plan. The total common open space area is approximately 3,040 square feet which is just below the requirement. However, since the applicant is providing play equipment, and picnic tables with barbeque, Staff feels that this substantially meets the intent of the Code. /"""" ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The project has been found to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15332, Qass 32, In-Fill Development Projects. This exemption allows development to occur within city limits on project sites of less than 5 acres that are substantially surrounded by urban development. ANALYSIS Staff finds that the proposed seven unit addition to the existingapanment complex substantially meets and sometimes exceeds the minimum requirements of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and therefore, can recommend approval. STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2004-_ recommending that Gty Council approve, Residential Project No. R 2004-06 located at 16420 Joy Street - APN 379-131-008, based on the Findings, Exhibits and subject to the Conditions of Approval FINDINGS ~ 1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the Zoning District in which the project is located. AGENDA ITEM NO. ~, i PAGE.J.lOF 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OCTOBER 5, 2004 Page 3 of 5 ......., . PROJECT TITLE: DESIGN REVIEW FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECT NO. R 2004-06 LOCATED AT 16420 JOY STREET - APN 379-131-008 Architectu131 Design The applicant has designed the buildings in a similar configuration as the existing building with two entries adjoining each other and then two garages adjacent. The architectural style of the existing building is generally a flat walled, flat roofed box. The proposed buildings have more features and dimensions that include shutters, tubular steel balconies, and trellised patio type covers with column support at each entry. The entries will also be provided with a small landscaped area. The site plan and elevations show wall projections and recesses that break up the long expanse of building plane. These projections will create light and shadow patterns to the elevations. The roof line varies with the changing roof direction from gable to hip and opposite gable. All windows will have wide surround-type trim. Colors and Materials A rrhita:tural Feature Walls Trim Accent-Shutters Roof Material Cdor Stucco Wood Wood Dimensional Asphalt River Rock Deep Oearn Red Pine Multi-colored Browns Fencing and Landscaping Section 17.28160, Walls and Fencing requires that a decorative masonry wall a minimtun of 6 feet in height be provided along all side and rear property lines. A five foot tubular steel fence will be provided along the front property line. The applicant has complied with this requirement as shown on the Site Plan. The individual private open space areas will be separated with the uty standard 6 foot wood fence. ......, The existing landscaped area is approximately 6,540 square feet and the proposed landscaped area is approximately 8,970 square feet for a total area of 37,900 square feet or 41 % of the project site. Parking Section 17.66.030.D.1.b (Number of Parking Spaces Required), LEMC, states that two or more bedroom units required one covered space, plus one and one-third open space per dwelling unit. This would require that the applicant provide 13 covered parking spaces and 17 uncovered parking spaces for a total of 30 parking spaces. Staff also requested that a minimum of 4 additional spaces be provided for overflow needs such as visitors. The applicant has complied with this request and has provided 13 cover spaces and 21 open spaces for a total of 34 parking spaces. OPENSPACE Section 17.28.120, Open Space of the LEMC requires that both private open space and common open space be provided for all projects developed in the R-3 District. The following details how the project has met these requirements. ......, AGENDA ITEM .NO. cJ l. $" PAGE.1l OF ,. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OCTOBER 5, 2004 /'" Page 5 of 5 PROJECT TITLE: DESIGN REVIEW FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECT NO. R 2004-06 LOCATED AT 16420 JOY STREET - APN 379-131-008 2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. 3. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.82.070, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incotporated into the approval of the subject project to insure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of this Section and the planning district in which the site is located. Prepared by. . Miller, AICP, Associate Planner Reviewed by. dla, Code Enforcement and Planning Manager Approved by. r Reductions Exhibit 'A' Vicinity Map Exhibit 'B' Floor Plans, Elevations, Preliminary Landscape Plan Full Sized Exhibits ExhibIt 'C Floor Plan, Elevations, Preliminary Landscape Plan Exhibits Presented at Hearing Exlubit 'D' Colored Elevations Exhibit 'E' Color and Materials r AOENDA ITEM NO.~ PAGEJ1. OFli VICINITY MAP 16420 JOY STREET (APN 379-131-008) AGeNDA ITEM NO. .3 2 - PAGE ~.O_ OF..3S_ ~ RESOLUTION NO. 2004- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF THE DESIGN REVIEW OF RESIDENTIAL PROJECT NO. R 2004-06 FOR THE ADDITION OF SEVEN AP ARTMENTS TO AN EXISTING APARTMENT COMPLEX LOCATED AT 16420 JOY STREET - APN 379-131-008 WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the Oty of Lake Elsinore by A1i Salman to request Design Review of Residential Project No. R 2004-06, approval of an additional seven units to an existing six unit apartment complex pursuant to Chapter 17.28; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the Oty of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of recommending approval of Design Review for Multi-Family Residential Projects to Oty Council; and /""' WHE~AS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on October 5,2004; NOW TI-IEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the Gty of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows: SECfION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed design for the seven additional units to an existing six unit apartment complex and has found it acceptable. The project has been found to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15332, Oass 32, In-Fill Development Projects; SECfION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code the following findings for the approval of have been made as follows: 1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the Zoning District in which the project is located. 2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. /""' 3. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.82.070, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to insure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of this Section and the planning district in which the site is located. AGENDA ITEtv' NO. /,3". PAGEAl OF · 3$ RESOLUTION NO. 2004 - October 5, 2004 Page 20f2 ""'" NOW, lHEREFORE, based on the above Findings and subject to the Conditions of Approval, the Planning Commission of the Gty of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND TO 1HE OTY COUNOL APPROVAL of Design Review for Residential Project No. R 2004-06. Ron LaPere, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a meeting thereof conducted on October 5,2004 by the following vote: ATfEST: Robert A Brady, Secretary to the Planning Commission ...., AGENDA ITEM. NO. " . '~ PAGE ~~, .. ,......., CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECf NO. R 2004-06 LOCATED AT 16420 JOY STREET- APN 379-131-008 . N a:e: F a3 listai in the Corrlitions if A ppruu1l are the lxst 6tirnttes awilable at the tim: if appruu;d. The exaa Ire arramts Wll k reT.ielmi at the tim! if penrit issuai'Ke am mty k misffi. GENERAL CONDITION 1. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the Gty), indemnify, and hold harmless the Gty, its Official, Officers, Employees, and Agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the Gty, its Official, Officers, Employees, or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the Gty, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning the Tentative Condominium Map, which action is bought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Sections 65009 and/or 66499.37, and Public Resources G>de Section 21167. The Gty will promptly notify the Applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the Gty and will cooperate fully with the defense. If the Gty fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any such claim, or proceeding, the Applicant shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indenmify, or hold harmless the Gty. PLANNING DIVISION /'"' 2. Design Review approval for Residential Design Review No. R 2004-06 will lapse and be void unless building permits are issued within one (1) year of Gty G>uncil approval. The G>mmunity Development Director may grant an extension of time of up to one (1) year per extension, prior to the expiration of the initial Design Review approval. Application for a time extension must be submitted to the GtyofLake Elsinore one (1) month prior to the expiration date. 3. Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced on page one of building plans submitted to the Building Division Plan Check. All Conditions of Approval shall be met prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. 4. All site improvements approved with this request shall be constructed as indicated on the approved site plan and elevations. Revisions to approved site plans or building elevations shall be subject to the review of the Community Development Director. All plans submitted for Building Division Plan Check shall conform to the submitted plans as modified by G>nditions of Approval, or the Planning Commission! Gty Council through subsequent action. 5. All roof mounted or ground support air conditioning units or other mechanical equipment incidental to development shall be architecturally screened or shielded by landscaping so that they are not visible from neighboring property or public streets. Any material covering the roof equipment shall match the primary wall color. Wall or window mounted air conditioners shall not be allowed. /'"' Page 1 of 8 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3~ -.-- 2~) ~ .3S' OONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECf NO. R 2004-06 LOCATED AT 16420 JOY STREET- APN 379- U 1-008 "'" 6. All exterior on-site lighting shall be shielded and directed on-site so as not to create glare onto neighboring property and streets or allow illumination above the horizontal plane of the fixture. All light fixtures shall match the architectural style of the building and shall be approved by the CDD or Designee. . 7. Applicant shall meet ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) requirements. 8. Trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standards as approved by the Community Development Director or Designee. 9. Applicant shall use roofing materials with Oass "A" fire rating. 10. The applicant shall meet all Building and Safety Division requirements. 11. A cash bond of $1,000.00 shall be required for any construction trailers placed on the site and used during construction. Bonds will be released after removal of trailers and restoration of the site to an acceptable state, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. 12. The applicant shall comply with the City's Noise Ordinance. Construction activity shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday, and no construction activity shall occur on Saturdays, Sundays or legal holidays. ......, 13. Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City's Grading Ordinance. Construction generated dust and erosion shall be mitigated in accordance with the provisions of Municipal Code, d1apter 15.72 and using accepted control techniques. Interim erosion control measures shall be provided thirty (30) days after the site's rough grading, as approved by the City Engineer. 14. Materials and colors depicted on the plans and materials board shall be used unless modified by the Community Development Director or designee. 15. A decorative masonry 6 foot block wall shall be installed along all side and rear property lines. 1bis wall shall include pilasters at comers and every 50 feet. A 5 foot tubular steel fence shall be installed along the front property line. The City standard 6 foot wood fence shall be installed between each unit's rear private open space areas. 16. The applicant shall install the City standard 6 foot wood fence between the existing unit's rear pnvate open space areas. 17. Decorative paving shall be included at the drive entryways and shall be shown on the construction drawings submitted to Building and Safety. 18. On-site surface drainage shall not cross sidewalks. Page 2 of 8 ...." AGENDA ITEM NO. 31 " PAGEAOFc 3$_ ~ CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECT NO. R 2004-06 LOCATED AT 16420 JOY STREET- APN 379- DI-00S 19. Any exterior downspouts shall be painted to match the exterior colors of the building. 20. No outdoor storage shall be allowed for any tenant. 21. Parking stalls shall be double-striped with four- inch (4") lines two feet (2') apart. 22. Any proposed mailboxes shall be located in decorative housings which incorporate similar materials, colors, and textures utilized on the proposed building. The area for mailboxes should be of sufficient size to enable residents to pick up or deposit mail without encroaching on landscaping or parking. 23. All exposed slopes in excess of three feet (3') in height shall have a permanent irrigation system and erosion control vegetation installed, approved by the Planning Division. 24. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of $64.00 made payable to the County of Riverside for a Certificate of Fee Exemption "de Minimis Impact Finding. The check shall be submitted to the Planning Division for processing within 48 hours of the projects approvaL PRIOR TOBUILDING/GRADINGPERMITS 25, Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building permits, the applicant shall sign and complete an ~ "Acknowledgement of Conditions" fonn and shall return the executed original to the Planning Division for inclusion in the case records. 26. The building addresses shall be a minimum of four inches (4") high and shall be easily visible from the public right-of-way. Developer shall obtain street addresses for each unit prior to issuance of building permits. The addresses shall be displayed near the entrance. 27. Three (3) sets of the Final Landscaping/Irrigation Detail Plan shall be submitted, reviewed and approved by the Oty's Landscape Architect Consultant and the Community Development Director or designee, prior to issuance of building permit. A Landscape Plan Check & Inspection Fee will be charged prior to final landscape approval based on the Consultant's fee plus forty percent (40%) Gty fee. The applicant shall include plans to include revising the existing unit's front landscaped areas. a) All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic sprinkler system with 100% plant and grass coverage using a combination of drip and conventional irrigation methods. b) Applicant shall plant street trees, selected from the Oty's Street Tree List, a maximum of forty feet (40) apart and at least twenty-four-inch (241t) box in size. c) All planting areas shall be separated from paved areas with a six inch (6 It) high and six inch (6 It) wide concrete curb. ~ Page 3 of 8 AGENDA ITEM NO. 31 f' PAQE~OF~ CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECf NO. R 2004-06 LOCATED AT 16420 JOY STREET- APN 379-U1-008 d) Planting within fifteen feet (15') of ingress/egress points shall be no higher than thirty- six inches (36"). .~ e) Landscape planters shall be planted with an appropriate parking lot shade tree to provide for 50% parking lot shading in fifteen (15) years. f) Any transformers and mechanical or electrical equipment shall be indicated on landscape plan and screened as part of the landscaping plan. g) The landscape plan shall provide for ground cover, shrubs, and trees and meet all requirements of the Oty's adopted Landscape Guidelines. Special attention to the use of Xeriscape or drought resistant plantings with combination drip irrigation system to be used to prevent excessive watering. h) All landscape improvements shall be bonded 100% for material and labor for two years from installation sign-off by the Oty. Release of the landscaping bond shall be requested by the applicant at the end of the required two years with approval/acceptance by the Landscape Consultant and Community Development Director or Designee. ~ All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed within affected portion of any phase at the time a Certificate of Occupancy is requested for any building. All planting areas shall include plantings in the Xeriscape concept, drought tolerant grasses and plants. ~ D Final landscape plan must be consistent with approved site plan. 19 Final landscape plans to include planting and irrigation details. 28. Applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. Proof shall be presented to the Chief Building Official prior to issuance of building permits and final approval. 29. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall provide assurance that all required fees to the Lake Elsinore Unified School District have been paid. 30. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall provide assurance that all requirements of the Riverside County Fire Department have been met. 31. Prior.t~ issuance of building permits, applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fee in effect at time of building penrut ISsuance. 32. The applicant shall pay the Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Local Development Mitigation Fee of $859.00 per dwelling unit (fee for density greater that 14.1 dwelling units per acre) prior to obtaining building permits. Page 4 of 8 ...." AGENDA ITEM NO. , ~ PAGE ~" OF ,)3$ ~ CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECf NO. R 2Q04..06 LOCATED AT 16420 JOY STREET- APN 379-U1-OO8 PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL 33. The applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval prior to final approval. 34. The landscaped areas noted on the Landscape and Irrigation Plan shall be installed and approved prior to final approval. Approval is based on the completion of all irrigation and planting as noted on the Landscape and Irrigation Plans. ENGINEERING DIVISION 24. Pay all development fees, including area drainage, TIF and TUMF. 25. Provide drainage plan including hydrology and hydraulic information. 26. Provide clean water mitigation for construction activities as well as post construction operations. 27. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMq prior to issuance of building permit. ~ 28. Underground water rights shall be dedicated to the Gty pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.52.030 (LEMq, and consistent with the Gty's agreement with the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. 29. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Cbeckfees (LEMC 16.34, Resolution 85-26). 30. Submit a "Will Serve" letter to the Gty Engineering Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project. Submit this letter prior to issuance of building permit. 31. Construct all public works improvements per approved street plans (LEMC 12.04). Plans must be approved and signed by the Gty Engineer prior to final map approval (LEMC 16.34). 32. Street improvement plans and specifications shall be prepared by a Calif. Registered Gvil Engineer. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Riverside County Road Department Standards, latest edition, and Gty Codes (LEMC 12.04 and 16.34). 33. Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the Gty for the construction of public works improvements and-shall post the appropriate bonds prior to issuance of Building Permit. 34. Interior streets shall be designed with 9% as the desired grade and intersecting streets shall meet at anmaximum grade of 6 % ~ Page 5 of 8 AGfM)A ITE~ Nj? 31 ----'1 ~ CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECf NO. R 2004-06 LOCATED AT 16420 JOY STREET- APN 379-131-008 ...., 35. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Division for construction of public works improvements (LEMC 12.08 and Resolution 83-78). 36. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 ~" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of public works improvements will be scheduled and approved. 37. The applicant shall install two (2) permanent bench marks to Riverside Qmnty Standards and at a location to be determined by Gty Engineer. 38. Applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site easements for off-site grading from the adjacent property owners prior to final map approval. 39. Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. 40. Provide street lighting and show lighting improvements as part of street improvement plans as required by the Gty Engineer. 41. Developer shall annex to the Gtis Street Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District. 42. Developer shall install blue reflective pavement markers in the street at all fire hydrant locations. ""'" 43. Applicant shall submit a traffic control plan showing all traffic control devices for the tract to be approved prior to final map approval. All traffic control devices shall be installed prior to final inspection of public improvements. This includes No Parking and Street Sweeping Signs for streets within the tract. 44. All utilities except electrical over 12 kv shall be placed underground, as approved by the serving utility. 45. Apply and obtain a grading permit with appropriate security prior to building permit issuance. A grading plan signed and stamped by a Calif. Registered Gvil Engineer shall be required if the grading exceeds 50 cubic yards or the existing flow pattern is substantially modified as determined by the Gty Engineer. If the grading is less than 50 cubic yards and a grading plan is not required, a grading permit shall still be obtained so that a cursory drainage and flow pattern inspection can be conducted before grading begins. 46. Provide soils, geology and seismic report including street design recommendations. Provide final soils report showing compliance with recommendations. Page 6 of 8 ""'" AGENDA ITEM NO. , ~ PACE ~~ OF ,.~ "" CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECT NO. R 2004-06 LOCATED AT 16420 JOY STREET- APN 379-U1-008 47. An AIquis-Priolo study shall be performed on the site to identify any hidden earthquake faults and! or liquefaction zones present on-site. 48. All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer and he shall certify all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and proper erosion controL All manufactured slopes greater than 30 ft. in height shall be contoured. 49. Prior to corrunencement of grading operations, applicant to provide to the Gty with a map of all proposed haul routes to be used for movement of export material. Such routes shall be subject to the review and approval of the Gty Engineer. 50. Applicant to provide to the Gty a photographic baseline record of the condition of all proposed public Gty haul roads. In the event of damage to such roads, applicant shall pay full cost of restoring public roads to the baseline condition. A bond may be required to ensure payment of damages to the public right-of-way, subject to the approval of the Gty Engineer. 51. On-site drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way should be contained within drainage easements shown on the final map. A note should be added to the final map stating: "Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions". ~ 52. All natural drainage traversing site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the Gty Engineer. 53. Meet all requirements of LEMC 15.64 regarding flood hazard regulations. 54. Meet all requirements of LEMC 15.68 regarding floodplain management. 55. The applicant to provide FEMA elevation certificates prior to certificate of occupancies 56. Submit Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports for review and approval by Gty Engineer and the Riverside County Flood Control District prior to approval of final map. Developer shall mitigate any flooding and! or erosion caused by development of site and diversion of drainage. 57. Storm drain inlet facilities shall be appropriately stenciled to prevent illegally dtuIlping in the drain system, the wording and stencil shall be approved by the Gty Engineer. 58. Roof and yard drains shall not be allowed to connect directly through cuts in the street curb. Roof drains should drain to a landscaped area when ever feasible. , 59. 10 year storm runoff should be contained within the curb and the 100 year storm runoff should be contained within the street right-of-way. When either of these criteria is exceeded, drainage facilities should be installed. ~ Page 7 of 8 AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ ~ PAGE~OFS$ CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECT NO. R 2004-06 LOCATED AT 16420 JOY STREET- APN 379-U1-008 ....." 60. Applicant will be required to install BMP's using the best available technology to mitigate any urban pollutants from entering the waterShed. 61. Applicant shall provide the city with proof of his having filed a Notice of Intent with the Regional Water Quality Control Board for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program with a storm water pollution prevention plan prior to issuance of grading permits. The applicant shall provide a SWPPP for post construction which describes BMP's that will be implemented for the development including maintenance responsibilities. 62. Applicant shall obtain approval from Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board for their storm water pollution prevention plan including approval of erosion control for the grading plan prior to issuance of grading permits. The applicant shall provide a SWPPP for post construction which describes BMP's that will be implemented for the development and including maintenance responsibilities. 63. Education guidelines and Best Management Practices (BMP) shall be provided to residents of the development in the use of herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers as well as other environmental awareness education materials on good housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of stormwater quality and met the goals of the BMP in Supplement" An in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. 64. Applicant shall provide first flush BMP's using the best available technology that will reduce storm ....." water pollutants from parking areas and driveway aisles. 65. Intersection site distance shall meet the design criteria of the CAL1RANS Design Manual (particular attention should be taken for intersections on the inside of curves). If site distance can be obstructed, a special limited use easement must be recorded to limit the slope, type of landscaping and wall placement. End of Conditions Page 8 of 8 '-"'" AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 2 PAGEft OF ~ S' 'J IL9r.1-Z:I'-bOb z:;z:gg<::t> ""'IN~O:::lnV? 'w'N~ ~r~a aOOM3'9NV.l "~I :HOUYJOl N't'l,.n"(s nv .~:JIWN ear ! ~i II ! . ~ U )( L! E E II i~U H n ~ ~ III III I 'i 011 LH ,n n . . 0 :: = . . tt~ ~ ~ lilia ~ ~ i__~5: 6S: _: ..... i :~~ ~ag :1 ftiiit:. 'Ii..... ..~ ~~~~=~, -~... !!9!! I ~~ji!~a~~i~~~ l~1 nil~~i~5 In ! lji~~m~1 ~I 2 ~9~!~~~~ 21 Ki tS~~ii ~ ttt ttt glili .2lilili m .~ii;\l~ .;': I :{i: !~I~~~ b~~~;~ IUtltilS nUd I i.ij ii~ .i~ i82 00e.!> "'-Ze.!> R Z...-Z ...-<<><<> ::>cnozw~o "'-X....J<(W<(O ZW::>~~U~ W m....J _('I') ~o <(000::"';" ...-"'-1-(/))-00> O::...JZ-OZf"- <(<(W....J....,_('I') <( 00 o. Cl..Z~. o....J"Z <(O~a::NWa.: z...-<(~...:tw . ~oa.. ~~<( WO<( <( 00<( ....J Ii!, ;L 'I~t. it .L~ ! I ~,,~ ."" I i~-' ~i H. ~~~ ~~~ i~~~ .~ !I d ! ;;~E ~i. ~H~ D i ...: 2 ~~~t~ ;\1 mli~ :;~ ~~.~~~ . ~ =!?::~= ~ ',. II, " ~2 ~! f~ ~ ~ ~, ~:; I n ;ii~! ~~ ~b~; t~ !Ut~~ 2!! 1l~29~ ! _~ .i :1, ~~ ~:;.g: 1-~l" I iU21 i;~il .!~~~ niU .. ~ !l .. ~ ~ I; .. II " ~ i t lH ! i!~Hlh!;:iJidhJ 5~h~ ~ i~a' . YCl......~ t li I ~gf. - li~ ! i;.' i I~: i ~I f 0: NV1d ;llIS ;NOUdlH3S]Q ~\ F~;~~~~€~i:t~~~ ':; ~-:7'" t I ii ~~ ~.. J.:) J I. I H :tal v 0 ::z "," IVVNtaB 391/039 ~ ~ .... I 1"- ( I 5 E : g ~ <( .... ! ~ . ! d! I i!_ ~ ~II i I~ ~ ~ I i!~ ~ ~!' ! ~ :: tiit _ ~~ ~: 1_5., J; _~ oi 1 a , : ~ 3 , Iii 5 X ;I .,i . II !! , .::: ; .~ f! ~:i ~ ~ 2: ~ ~t!z i" Hiiillllii i! !l I :: II :I ~ I t! , {J I il H!}J'f:1 ~JJ.IJ.i~ . HI ~ . I - ~j j ~ 11 I !1!~ .!t~ p il~~d>Il l~t ulllfu: ul ~~~~~~!i~~~t~~t~~;; .~~i~~:; 1 . t J~ r II! I I · ;j,,"IH 1} '!hlj . r! !H.~. .til r~uhit~mlnl loti.! tfhHhmhihfH A ..cc.,......cc..c..cc ...Ii.!.. ,S....................aaol.........Ai'lii'lo;r;... . .' ( g &;t~~~ft~~ ~~ ; ,.;~i~~~~!~~~:~( ...~~~I :;f~gi~~i~!~1gs:fitg~~~! I} . { ! J n,Ji!i - ~h mmmm I ..f ii I 11 I ,all i 10 .S: ,a6 f Hi. UUdU.fJ1 .J.jl~ Hil.r- n i 33:'~ w_w __i hHh U~~Hd ~~dMi': ~fi ,~ i !5~S,;~ h~M~hd .~M~ ;,5~~ ~b , J f I I J 'i 1 i"r f -f .fJ-- -. i l<llhU i!lU! hUdtf !!UUlblnumiJ ~lh~~~~ImmiH j i b! . Ii IhaHl!! ili:!:i!t~! ..da~!gl!~~gaa5!~~~ ::'~:idl~~~~~~~bd <i~~Mdt pI .- i ,J..! .~ rl if I t if. -0 · . ,. .l.. .1' : J ~ Ji-, -"I l~ 0- ! :3ato.OI. . ....... .. Jl . \ tl- ~o E}S 7.hlit~1.i.iHI1.lri dHhl~riuhUhlilnIH~ ~nh!ll .tu61-t.l:;r..i~tf;;z...t.( .2.. :':.uuuull1uouuOu-.>uuu..1uuuvuuu c....~Q.!e;aiJ yY..~;~ I~~~hh lii~~$i~: S~!l~~jj~a~~U~bl~;;gt ii~~::;W~ j I@ . ~ ! It III III Z () Z III -' <( \.l it ~ \.l III -' III '.- .~~. ~ ~cY tt III III Z () Z III -' -( \.l Z -( I \.l ~ .. ~ ~ -' ijl z () \) ~ ~ 1Il Z 1Il It III III Z () Z IU ~ \l 1Il ~ I ~ <( 1Il L -( ~ C\ z -( -' t. It ~ \.l ~ <II ~ ~ H oj ~ li~~ !11 N: ~ ~~ w I~ <<... : ~~ ~ z::: l ~ \) ~ I ~ -( ~! !i ~t ~ {i~i ~ N~ i w!31 wS _ c= t It II IJ Z () Z II -' > \) 1L.l19-z:!e-bOi> Z;qqo, VI~I"1V? ~ aN~a aoGlMifl5lNv J. b~1 :SS~Ot NV~VS rw ~ ;]Pft'N ~MO "~f i I OL.QZ::.. V?'~ ir.:IfV1 ~S .4Of' Ol:.....l SS3HOlJ't SOl" NVld aus ~Ol1d~:)S30 AOENDA ITEM N .3= --------PAGE...i .. <( ~ L 1.1 t- iil ~ ~' Ii Ii J 1L JiHe;1l\ ! a :l ~ '-'" ; I 1- , """" '-' .J~ OF 3-$- . ~, \ ~~ i ; I ! n! i un i I ! ~ h r .1 t ii ~ ..~ ~ it; - I Ii!~ itq .III j.. I I~~~I fl J ti~ I : 3 ~~~! Iii t~ ~ I .1 t I_ I ! ~ ~i~i EllUl i ,0 6 ~ ~1!lili~' iii lnll fi I 11 ;~~ I iil! t II' I ill~ . ~ ~I t ~i UI .11. t .11 h.~l *1"1 ~! tl b;f iidi~li! i!hd'lhn !f i~ um ~ ft... ~i il~t; ei!~~~iJi!i !,! TIL ,....... ,....... IL\?\?-~IE-bOt> C:99Cb ""1~CYI"'? 'VN~O? 3^t~a aOOM~J. b%1 :SSJHOOW' NVW'1"'~ n~ :]fWN H3NMO 01.<1Z:""'?'lltIONt,"'1i1~ .L3;:nu., ;.or Ol:"rql SSltlOOV oar ~ 9Nlaltne =NOlldlH:)SJO :'t.~ ~~a'=":::__~:'..i:..'"'7":-~Z= y; "....__.._......._...._-~ . t -..-. .-...... t t I ~; -. ~ ~~~ .' ~ ; g ! 9<( WVNH3B 39t1039 ~ Ii ~ ~ ~ li , --------tn I r1 ;z 1'1<( J n_t__n_____ ~ " IL :::> o 0': \!) <( --' IL 0': o o iC9 I- ~ III . .0':0 _________________) n= s i..______________ ______lm_m f : ;'1 : , . . . z <( , --' !IL :~ :~ :~ :0': :0 :0 . --' :IL 1~ :0 :~ :11I ',___n__n_______) , . , . , , . . . t_ __ _ ____________,i -.------------,....-- --- --.---- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : 0: :.0 U : u : u : ;z <( --' IL IL o o 0': ~ ti 161, S; !fSi ~ ~i~ ~ ~ ~ 1 AGENDA ITEM NO. --.----- PAOC , '-4.;. r- ~ i> t ~ ... ~ 0 l't l't ~ 1:1 < .. III 1lI~ ; . < w r~ ~~ ~ l::P zc; on ~ Z . .('; .(< ....< ....::1 Lli/ L < ll!:< ~ ~ O!t o ;: ~n ~d Le L' O' t-~ %9 <ll . 0'- ~. u' i - .. =t~ L~ J l u.QQ-rIE-bOb- rQQr~ V'~O"'''''? 'VNO><<>? aA~ ~9NV.L bgel :SS]tfOO'( NYH""S nv .~ 'lm'N ll3NMO ,rl' P' I I 51 H .. r- t ... ~ "' l't l't ~ ~ OJ .( ~ ~ ' < AI ." t LT l::~ .. z . .( < ....1:1 L < II>: '" z () ;: O::i ....~ L b .... ~ 111 . II>: . - .. L ~ ~ =, t OLQ'O, Ii;? ~ ZlfV"l ~~ J.,CI("" or~9f SS3~~ SOl' ~ l'JOO':i :N(MidIHO'SJO ~ j ~ - Ii ~ ;~-'j :;'~;f~..E ; I : · ..! .L:J'I.1IM:)afV I I: ,-' MfNH311 3!)HO;ro & ~ ~ C't~ I . t;.{ X 81' P' I I i '-" (D I i II L l::o ~f ~~ 111'< 8~ i~ 2j 0- u' :H~ ~ I ~ R ~ ; $ ; .( ~ .. I . a ~ I . ......" AOENDA ITEM NO. " PAGE ,~ ...., 1 M IU1Q-Z:I~-IoO~ z:ggZ:~ 'o"N>IO"""'? '"",O>lO? ;v.~Q QOOM,n9N'o'.1 b%1 .SSJlWlJV WWlVS 1"1Y~ :3M'N ~]NMO '"" ~ ~ OLqz::.. V':J ~ONI$'"'g ~ ~5 ,).Of' <<..<;Pi SS3~oav oor NOl.l?3S" t;NOU....A3~ ;HOt.!.d>>f,)S]Q ~S~~2;'C-;-.:e _.~.n ~ :J3.l1 H :n, If WVNH31l 39M039 z () t- <( > U J .. .. .. " () .. 9 * :15 nl ~I 5J ro h 1;;.( G " i ~ 3, ).. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL """ TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Richard J. Watenpaugh, City Manager DATE: October 26,2004 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP 32336, Forecast Homes located north of Grand Ave at the end of McVicker Canyon Park Road. BACKGROUND At their regular meeting on July 20, 2004, City Council approved Tentative Tract Map 32336. The parcel map under consideration consists of approximately 298.81 acres and is a subdivision of 8 lots for financing purposes. The project site is located north of Grand Avenue at the end of Mc Vicker Canyon Park Road. FINDINGS Staff has reviewed the final map and it conforms substantially to the tentative tract map and all Conditions of Approval required at the final map stage have been completed. "'" FISCAL IMPACT None. RECOMMENDATION 1. Approve the final map, subject to the City Engineer's acceptance as being true and correct and accept all dedications at time of recordation. 2. Authorize the City Clerk to sign the map and arrange for the recordation. PREPARED BY: Ken Seumalo, Engineering Manager t4J6 APPROVED FOR AGENDA LISTING: CITY APPROVED BY: Exhibit A: Final map ....., AQENOA ITEM NO. 3 ~ "'-, PAGEloF-L CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL """"" TO: MA YOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: RICHARD W A TENPAUGH, CITY MANAGER DA TE: OCTOBER 26, 2004 SUBJECT: THELMA BALL MEMORIAL HALL BACKGROUND On September 29,2004, Thelma Ball, a longtime advocate for the Senior Center, died after a long battle with cancer. Thelma's volunteer career with the City of Lake Elsinore began with the Golden Spectrum Club. This club provided activities and services, originally out of the old theater building, and then moved to and operated the current Senior Center on Lakeshore Dr. In 1991, the city took over operation of the Senior Center, however, Golden Spectrum continued to be involved with programs and services. Thelma and other members of the club were active fundraisers with hot dog stands at parades and Chili Cook-Offs. Bingo, free Dial-A-Ride ticket books, weekly bread and monthly Survive Food distributions are among the current service programs instituted by Thelma as President of Golden Spectrum. The Center's furnishings, new carpet and flooring, office furniture, new awnings, computers, window coverings and tinting, acoustical ceiling, Christmas trees and other decorations and much more were all provided by funds from Golden Spectrum and the Volunteer's Club under Thelma's leadership. """"" Thelma continued to operate Bingo, volunteer at Survive Food and even went to Riverside to pick-up Dial-A-Ride tickets the day before she entered the hospital for the last time. DISCUSSION In appreciation for all of Thelma's work on behalf of the Senior Center, a recommendation was made by staff, volunteers and patrons of the Center to provide some type of memorial. It is suggested that the "Annex" building, built as a CDBG Public Works Project and dedicated on June 14, 1994, be re-named the "Thelma Ball Memorial Hall". Thelma was instrumental in getting that project off the ground and assisted in the development of the building and the inclusion of the pantry for storage and distribution of food to seniors in need. A memorial/dedication service would be held and a bronze plaque would be placed on the front wall of the building. Currently, there is no policy for dedicating or naming a building after a specific person. The only policy pertains to the dedication of a tree in a specific person's name (Council Policy 400- 10). """"" ,~A ITEM NO._ 3 " ,-:, PAGE_ , OF 2- - ;"""- FISCAL IMPACT The cost of the bronze plaque is estimated at $2,000. In accordance with Council Policy 300-9, item 5, the balance of the unallocated revenue is currently $1,659,731. There have been 9 items this fiscal year that have drawn from unallocated revenue totaling $192,021. RECOMMENDA TION Staff recommends that City Council consider staff's request to name the "annex" building at the Senior Center the "Thelma Ball Memorial Hall" and allocate funding for a bronze plaque as a memorial to someone who dedicated much of her later life to the Lake Elsinore Senior Center. PREPARED BY: rj4- APPROVED BY: APPROVED FOR AGENDA LISTING: ~4~/4!; 7?Jt.2 Richard J. Watenpaugh, Executive Director ,- ;"""- AQENOA ITEM NO.~ " '" PAGE~OF 2- CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL ~ TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: RICHARDJ. WATENPAUGH DATE: OCTOBER 26, 2004 SUBJECT: HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN BACKGROUND For the past year the City of Lake Elsinore has participated in a county wide project to develop a disaster-mitigation strategy for Riverside County. The "Riverside County Operational Area Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan" (the plan) is spearheaded by County Emergency Management Staff, and is a requirement of the United States Congress Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000). This law requires that to be eligible for future hazard mitigation grant awards every local, county, and state government entity must complete a hazard mitigation plan that includes the following: 1) Conduct an assessment of the natural hazards that pose a threat to the jurisdiction 2) Determine the potential financial impact of these hazards 3) Create a plan to mitigate these hazards 4) Implement the plan to reduce the impacts of natural disasters ....., On Thursday, October 8, 2004 the completed plan was made available for the first time to city staff via the County Emergency Services website. Staff immediately downloaded the plan onto compact discs and distributed them to City Council for review. Final approval of the plan from FEMA requires a formal resolution from the County Board of Supervisors, who adopted the plan this month, and a formal resolution from each participating agency be submitted with the plan when it goes to FEMA. The County has asked that our resolution be submitted to them by October 27, so that they may meet their submittal deadline of November 1,2004. DISCUSSION Riverside County's efforts to develop a disaster-mitigation plan started approximately one year ago. The goal was to bring all members of the Riverside County Operational Area (county, cities, special district, and tribes), together to create a multi-jurisdictional plan that identified and assessed the various hazards in the entire County of Riverside. The desire was to have the county, along with the cities, special districts, and tribes, develop an all inclusive plan; rather than each city, special district, and tribe write their own plan. The planning process included determining the potential impact of each identified hazard on the county, cities, special districts, and tribes. All participating jurisdictions helped establish a ~ A~ENDA '"''-',C\''''' '3 C \iii . it,,,. ,,,u. ", PAGE-LOF~ ~ list of potential mitigation efforts and prioritized those efforts based on the needs of their jurisdiction.. Participants in the development of the plan include The County of Riverside, 24 Cities, 1 Tribe, 10 Hospitals, 9 School Districts, and 14 Special Districts. The plan is in two parts. Part I, is an overview of all of the identified hazards in the county. Part II covers the participating agencies. In Part II, each agency provided documentation of their specific hazards, prioritized mitigation strategies, and a specific mitigation effort. FISCAL IMPACT Future hazard mitigation projects will be funded with hazard mitigation grant funds as they are made available. RECOMMENDATION ~ APPROVED BY: ayor and City Council adopt resolution number 2004 accepting na Area Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. \ Staff recommends that the the Riverside County Opera PREPARED BY: APPROVED FOR '~7 A JJ A ~ AGENDA LISTING: ~. ,f:J. . ~ ~' RIC ARDJ. WATENPAUGH, YMA GER ~ AQENOA ITEM NO. , , "'. PAGE~OF~ RESOLUTION NO. 2oo~-~4 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE FOR ACCEPTANCE OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY OPERATIONAL AREA MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN '-" WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elsinore has determined that mitigating natural disasters is more cost-effective than responding to them; and WHEREAS, per the new federal law known as DMA200, Local governments now have to plan for ways to reduce the impacts of natural disasters in order to be eligible for certain types of federal disaster assistance; and WHEREAS, this Riverside County Operational Area Multi-Jurisditional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan meets the goal of mitigating natural disasters in the Riverside County Operational Area; and '-" WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elsinore is a member of Riverside County Operaional Area and has participated in the development of this plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore hereby accepts this Riverside County Operational area Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan as it relates to them in lessening the impact of future natural disasters. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED on this 26th day of October, 2004 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS '-" AcaENOA ITEM NO. 3 ~ -" "'-. PAGE..i OF ~ ,-.., ~ ~ ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: ATTEST: COUNCILMEMBERS COUNCILMEMBERS THOMAS BUCKLEY, MAYOR VICKI KASAD, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: BARBARA LEIBOLD, CITY ATTORNEY AQENOA ITEM NO. ] S . "'. PAGE~OFJil- J "-;.-...4. ,_ 0.1 ~ . < , I ~ ; i .j ! ; i --~. I i. ~~t, ,t, .... I .; i f" i . ': ~'~~';;;J. ....." ....." ......" AGENDA ITEM NO. , $ PAGE~ OF...!L EXECUTIVE SUMMARY /""'" Changes to the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act have placed a new emphasis on hazard mitigation planning, primarily moving from post-disaster mitigation to pre-disaster planning, mitigation, and projects. As part of the DMA 2000, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is responsible for coordinating the implementation of the Act requiring local government, state, and special jurisdictions to develop hazard mitigation plans. In order to qualify for any future hazard mitigation grant awards, each jurisdiction must prepare, and have approved by the state, a local multi-hazard mitigation plan by November 1, 2004. Under the terms of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000, which seeks to reduce federal expenditures for catastrophic events, a county, city, tribe, or special district affected by a declared disaster (Le. earthquake, flood or wildfire) will still be able to receive emergency aid without having an approved plan in place. However, it would beineligibJe for FEMA funds to support hazard-mitigation projects, such as elevating flood-prone homes or seismic retrofitting vulnerable structures. Additionally, local county, city, tribe, or special district officials are being asked to formally recognize the plan as a demonstration of commitment to the process and formally adopt the plan when it is complete. A plan must include a discussion of the planning process, a risk assessment, a description of mitigation measures, a plan-review process outline and documentation that the plan has been adopted formally by the county, city, or special district. The State of California has required all Counties, cities, special districts, and participating tribes to prepare mitigation strategies. These strategies were developed as a group by the participating agencies, which subsequently established an individual prioritization for each strategy. Riverside County's efforts to develop a disaster-mitigation strategy started about a year ago. The goal was to bring all the members of the Riverside County Operational Area (county, cities, special district, and tribes), along with local businesses and interested members of the public together to create a multi- jurisdictional plan that identified and assessed the various hazards In the entire County of Riverside. The desire was to have the county, along with the cities, special districts, and tribes develop an all inclusive plan, rather than each city, special district, and tribe write their own plan. r-- The planning process including determining the potential impact of each identified hazard on the county, cities, special districts, and tribes. All participating jurisdiction helped estaj)lish a list of potential mitigation efforts and prioritized those efforts based on the needs of their jurisdiction. In addition, each participating jurisdiction developed a specific hazard mitigation strategy. Participants in the development of the Riverside County Operational Area Multi-jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan include: The County of Riverside, 24 Cities, 1 Tribe, 10 Hospitals, 9 School Districts, and 14 Special Districts. The Riverside County Operational Area Multi-jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan is in two parts. Part I . is an overview of all of the identified hazards in the county. Part I also includes specific mitigation strategies for the county. Part II covers the participating agencies. In Part II, each agency provided documentation of their specific hazards, prioritized mitigation strategies, and a specific mitigation effort The Riverside County Operational Area Multi-jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan has been reviewed by the California Office of Emergency Services and additional information has been added to the plan, based on the State's review. Final approval from FEMA requires a formal resolution from the County adopting the Plan as a part of the County's hazard planning process. For this reason, it is being recommended that the Plan be reviewed and approved for final adoption by the Board of Supervisors. The adoption of the plan meets the intent of the law by having an adopted plan prior to November 1, 2004. It is expected that FEMA's approval process will take approximately 45 days. In addition to Board adoption, each participating agency must submit either a formal Adoption Resolution or a Letter of Adoption to be submitted with the Plan. The plan may be reviewed by going to the Riverside County Website, requesting an electronic copy (provided on a CD), or reviewing a hardcopy of the plan located in the County OES Riverside Office. /""'" AGENDA ITEM NO.--..1L. '" PAGE.J.... ~ FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS What is a Hazard Mitigation Plan? A Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP) is created to protect the health, safety and economic ~ interests of residents by reducing the impacts of natural hazards through mitigqtion planning, awareness and.implementation of mitigation alternatives. Hazard mitigation is any action taken to permanently eliminate or reduce the long-term risk to human life and property from natural hazards. It is an essential element of emergency management along with p~eparedness, response and recovery. This plans will serve as a foundation for hazard mitigation activities within the County of Riverside and the participating, cities, special districts, and tribes. What is the difference between a natural hazard and a technological hazard? Technologicaf hazards result from actions or facilities created by people, while natural hazards exist because of the natural environment in which a community is located. Technological hazards typically include civil disturbances, dam failure, hazardous materials, pipelines, radiological, terrorism, and transportation. Natural hazards typically include floods, landslides, wildfires, severe winter storms, windstorms, earthquakes and volcanic eruptions. Why is it important to develop a Hazard Mitigation Plan? The federal Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 requires the development of a Hazard Mitigation Plan as a condition of receiving mitigation funds should a disaster occur. If a Gommunity identifies projects that can be implemented prior to a disaster and that can mitigate the potential impacts of a hazard, the community may apply for funding to implement the proposed mitigation alternative. To be eligible for implementation funding, Washington state communities must have Hazard Mitigation Plans approved by both the state and FEMA. """. ~ 1~ AGENDA ITE~.~ "-, PAGE , OF--=u.. ,-..., PART II SUBMITTING JURISDICTIONS ,-..., ,-..., AGENDA ITElvl NO. J ~. PAGE ~ OF~ Part II - Local Submitting Jurisdictions ;ities 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 City of Banninq City of Beaumont City of Blythe City of Calimesa City of Canyon Lake City of Cathedral City City of Coachella City of Corona City of Desert Hot Sprinqs City of Hemet City of Indian Wells City of India City of Lake Elsinore City of La Quinta City of Moreno Valley City. of Murrieta City of Norco City of Palm Desert City of Palm Sprinqs City of Perris City of Rancho Miraqe Citvof Riverside City of San Jacinto City of T emecula '-' "" Ither Jurisdictions 25 Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 Hospitals Desert Reqional Medical Center Hemet Valley Medical Center Inland Valley Medical Center JFK Memorial Hospital Kaiser Hospital Menifee Valley Medical Center Moreno Valley Community Hospital Parkview Community Hospital Rancho Sprinqs Medical Center Riverside Community Hospital '-"" ~$ AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE~OF~ ......... 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 Schools Alvord Unified School. District Beaumont Unified School District Lake Elsinore Unified School District Moreno Valley Unified School District Menifee Unified School District Riverside Unified School District San Jacinto Unified School District Riverside Co. Office of Education, Children & Family Services Special Districts Idyl/wild Fire Protection District Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District Home Gardens County Water District Lee Lake Water District Mission Sprinqs Water District Murrieta County Water District Rancho California Water District San Gorqonio Pass Water District Val/ey Sanitary District Western Municipal Water District 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 r-. ,-... AGENDA ITEM NO. ]$ " PAGE~OF~ rn c o ; o 0- "0 rn Os::: ::::J ..., C) c 0- - - 0- E ..0 ::::J en - CO o o ..J l... o u.. 0> ..0 CO .... 0> o C 0> l... 0> 'to- 0> ~ rn rn o l... U rn - c 0> E 0> l... ::::J 0- 0> 0:: c o - CO ::::J CO > W t CO a.. Sc: .- 0 '0;:; .- res "00 .!!! 0 I-...J ;:'C: -~ 0 res;:; o 0 o Q) ...Jen 0lQ) c: ~ .- c: ~O E In .oQ) ;:'0:: en <?U)' :Ew:!: wol- u._0 _ -.c: >.In- o Cll ;:, c:.~ <( Cll ~ Ol Cll 0 L- <(en-.2 ..... ...... ;:, r:: .....- >. Cll 0 ..s "'0 Ea;eno Cll Ol~ CO Ol Clll- _ 0> ns '. e r:: E r:: .c ~wEQ; ":;~Q)> >.0"'0 o Cll .:; C> r:: 0 Cll.- Cll ro Ol:t: rv 0 ....o~ 0 Cllnsc:..J E.- 0 >'e wE;:;.oo -onse~ ns~;:'oo ~=iU~:O "0 ns > g-.~ Cll () w "'0 L- u.- <(~ e ro 0... ro e o ~ o "'0 In 'C ::J J , ~ ::J :2 ..... r:: Cll E Cll ... :J e o ~ ::J o l/) a> 0:: ro o o ..J t:: ro 0... L- o "- a> :::: .~ ::J a> L- a> L- 0... ro E E ::J CI) "'0 e ro e o ~ ro o t;:: ~ e a> "'0 "'0 L- ro N ro I t:: ro 0... ro E E ::J CI) "'0 e ro e o ~ ro o t;:: ~ e a> "'0 "'0 L- ro N ro I C:- ro E ~Q) CI)~ "'Ol/) Q) c:~ a> roo ~ 5$ -c ~:::: o 0= $ t;::.o ~~ e a> .0 ~.s -::J ~ "E > a> ro"'O e N e ::J ro ro > I - _ e =0 t::U roa> o...CI) t:: ro 0... l/) :!::: ::J l/) a> 0:: CI) :::> ~ I "'0 a> N 'C ro E E ::J CI) t:: ro 0... t:: ro 0... l/) a> l/) l/) o ..J ro ~ e a> .... o 0... 0> e ~ ro E ~ l/) W >- ~ ~ ~ a> L- .~ U a> ::J > L- a U5 >- ~ ~ .0 ~ a> e ::J > e e l/) l/) a> l/) l/) <( t;:: o L- a.. C a> E l/) l/) a> If) If) <( ..::.:: If) iY a> L- ro e e o ~ l/) a> ::J a l/) "'0 e a> L- I- Q) 1i> a> a> .c .c l/) l/) ..::.:: ..::.:: L- L- o 0 $ $ .!!l .!!l ro ro o 0 C> <.9 e e o 0 :p ~ ro ro .... e a> E o ~ a> o E ;e :2 :2 t:: ro 0... t:: t:: ro ro 0... 0... l/) e o ~ o <( e o ~ ro 0> ;E l/):2 ro o C> e o ~ ro ;E :2 "'0 L- ro N ro I ro o o ..J >. 0> a> .... ro L- U5 "'0 e ro e o ~ o <( e o +i ro 0> ~ ~ "'0 a> l/) o a. o L- o...ro - l/) -0 t::o ro L- 0... a.. l/) e o ~ o <( e o ~ ro 0> E :2 >. 0> a> m L- U5 e o ~ ro ~ :2 1O I'- ..- I ..". I'- 0 :; Q) a> > .0> a> ro 0 0... t:: t:: ro ro 0... a.. e ro 0... a> .c .... 0> e ~ ro "'0 a. :::> "'0 e ro 0> e ~ ro ::J ro >::::- W;::::::: -..". 0>- .f: 0' L- ........ oeo .... 0 .c C; ON :2(1)? a> L- o(ij e e o ~ l/). a> ::J a l/) u e a> '- I- .~ ~ ro o(ij e e e e o 0 :;:; ; l/) l/) a> a> ::J ::J a a l/) l/) "'0 U e e ~ ~ I- I- 1.O ......., I.C)"- I'- e I'- e ..- a>..- a> I E I E ..". ~ 0 ~ 0 l/) a>..- a> a> > a> > 0> a> 0> a> ro 0 roO a.. I 0... ' .... e a> E t:: t:: t:: t:: ro ro ro ro 0... 0... 0... 0... l/) E o~ e ro .c o a> :2 0> e e e ro 0... 0> e ~ l/) Ox W o .... . f: ::::- e~ 0"""" 0- ..". .... ........ ro ........ L- 0 0- a."! L-..- 00 ON eel)? l/) l/) a> o o L- 0... a> o e ro e a> .... e o(ij :2 e ro 0... O~ ro e e o ~ l/) a> ::J a l/) u e a> L- I- ......" .... e a> E 100 1'-- ..-a> a> > 0> a> roO 0...' t::t:: ro ro 0... a.. ........ ~ ...-... ..". ........ ........ o - eo ..- o N eI)? .... e a> E a> > o > e o .0 ::J a.. "'0 a> ::J e ~ e o o '--' ......" AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 $ PAGE 'I OF..!!L Hazard Identification and Summary ~- Specific Hazards Summary What is HAZUS? Summarized HAZUS Results ~ Local Jurisdiction Vulnerability Worksheet ,....... EXPLANATION OF PART II FORMS Part I of this form identifies: 1. The jurisdiction and the contact person 2. The jurisdiction's size and population 3. Specific disaster and safety planning information for the jurisdiction. Part II of this form identifies: 1. Specific known hazards within the boundaries of the jurisdiction. 2. Specific known hazards near or adjacent to the boundaries of the jurisdiction. 3. Specific facilities owned and operated by the jurisdiction. 4. Locations damaged from prior disasters or hazard causing events. 5. Information about the iurisdiction's EOC This table identifies the specific location and hazard information identified by each iurisdiction as a potential threat. HAZUS (Hazards U.S.) is a GIS-based software used for estimating earthquake losses based on current scientific and engineering knowledge. It was developed under a cooperative agreement by the National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS) with funding from the Federal Emergency ManagementAgency (FEMA). This earthquake loss estimation tool is currently in use by communities throughout the United States and provides a planning guide for jurisdictions of the potential physical and economical impact of an earthquake that has occurred in their are Earthquake risks for each city were developed in terms of the vulnerability of the population and infrastructure and costs associated with physical and economic damages or destruction. Earthquake scenarios were used based on the major earthquake faults in the County of Riverside. . Risk assessments were developed only for the cities because of the broad overlay of the special district's boundaries and the specific data available from the cities. Several of the HAZUS and GIS maps contained in Part I of the plan depict potential impact of various hazards throuqhout the County on the cities and special districts. This table is a listing of the primary hazards identified by the working groups. Each jurisdiction was asked to evaluate the potential for an event to occur in the specific area of their jurisdiction. They were also asked to evaluate the potential impact of that event on their jurisdiction. The jurisdictions were asked to use a rating of between 0 and 4 (4 being the most severe). The jurisdictions were then asked to rank the hazards as they relate to their jurisdiction from 1 to 19. County OES conducted an extensive evaluation of the severity and probability potential for the county as a whole and those numbers were provided to the jurisdictions as a guide. A separate table was created to address the hazards relating to agriculture and this table can be found in the Agriculture Annex section of Part I of the Plan. 7$ AQENDA ITEM NO. U ,- "'-. PAGE I ~OF-=U- Local Jurisdiction Mitigation This table is a listing of the various mitigation strategy goals developed Goals by the working groups. Once this list was compiled. each jurisdiction was asked to prioritize that mitigation strategy. based upon the needs of each jurisdiction. These were rated as High, Medium, Low. or N/A. A separate set of strategy goals were created to address the hazards relating to agriculture and this table can befound in the Agriculture . Annex section of Part I of the Plan. Local Jurisdiction Proposed FEMA required each jurisdiction to go through the process of Mitigation Action And Strategy developing a Mitigation Strategy Proposal. The purpose of this Proposal activity\y was so that each jurisdiction became familiar with the process of determining and identifying a Mitigation Strategy Proposal. This process is used when requesting FEMA Pre-Hazard Mitigation Funds. Development Trends This questionnaire identifies specific land use and other information Questionnaire required by State OES and FEMA for each jurisdiction. The land use information asks for current and future data. County OES will use this data for future HAZUS assessments Crosswalk Review This is a State OES and FEMA document used to evaluate the contents of the entire. plan and each jurisdiction's submittal of information A\JiiC.''<.Ui'' j, .....h. ....v. .,~ .. ", PAGE..Jl. OF ~ ......, ......, ......, c: g 0.- .-- -:J 0.- o 0 "0 III <(0) ~ 0::: cu ~ ~~ 0 ... U - 0) (J> c: ... 0) cu C E III c: 0 0. "0 c: .- o :;.2 (J> -...- ~..- ~ (J> 0) :J .- o a E en .0 ::> ~ ~ en J: (J> "Oc:"O - C O)oC:>'cu 0 1Il'- cu 0> III - 0) 0 ocuc:_a. +J g..~.2 E 0 0 .- ...~t)(j)... "C c..~<( c.. (J> .- c: L.. .2 III ~ -- ., cu cu 0>0 - ;EC> CU ~ 0 ,-0 >. . -- J .- 0) =0) '- .o.c cu III 0 ...~ 0) ... LL c: 0 Q) :;~ > - .0 c: cu 0 I- :g ~ III .~ cu Q) Q) ~EO) 0 c:E.c C Cl) :J III ::2en-i: Q) "0"00 L.. ...c:~ Q) ~ cu 'f- cu Q) J: a; - - t Q) III .... cu c: ro e z a. :;:; w 0 W "0 ~ f/) CJ2 'C c:~ :J ., .- a. f/) E 0) Q) c: 0 ~ 0 0 c:: (ll E 0) ~ ..0 <( :J :f:I: en :f:t: :f:t: >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< x >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< - >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< x >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< x >< >< >< >< x >< >< . x >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< x >< >< >< >< >< >< >< x x x >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< x >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< x x >< x x >< >< >< >< >< >< >< x >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< x >< >< >< >< >< x >< >< >< >< <( z >< >< >< >< x C/) 0) c:: .C 0.. (j) f/) Q) :!::..-N0J'<::tLO<or--rom U O..--NC')'<::tLO<or--COffi -r- -r- '"" ~ o c (J) .~ ::l -1 '>- o -0 C co m :;:;coC/) o .D C o co "0 .D .- f/) 0-0 'c (j) C :J ., 10. Q) o ~ 01 C") '7 .s:: N N N N N 01~ AGENDA ITEM NO'--m- PAGE.ttOF~ lJ) (J) 5 (J) >. I- (J) ~ o ro CD ~ ~ > C/) w c 0 ~ ~ ::l C (J) 0 Q) a ~ 'C 0 E ~ co 0 ::; 0 ro .-J-122ZCL (J) lJ) 0) 0) ro 0 I- C 2 .... 'C (J) C co 0.. 0 -0 '0 ::l (j) .L lJ) co 0 E lJ) 0 L ., (J) .C C (J) c E f/) I- > co (J) ro co Q) c: CL 0.. 0::: 0::: (j) l- e +-' C 0)0 c E C :J C co ro (J) mm (J)2:- ~0 co +-' -1 co co 0 c-o(J)coI oQ).cct >-.coo(J) C......COl.-lJ) co co 0 0 (J) 00000 .... (J) C E .~ ,Q (J) 'D 'D I c c co lJ) (J) ~ E >.= _ co mo '+-4-4-4-4-~4-4-4-4-'-i-"+-'+-'+-"+-'+-\.f-4-'+-4-4-4--'+-'+- 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 000 2:-2:-2:-2:-2:-~2:-~~2:-2:-2:-2:-2:-2:-2:-2:-2:-2:-~~~2:-2:- 000000000000000000000000 cg 0.- .- - -:J 0.- o 0 "I/) <(Q) IX: IV 3: ~.lIl:: o ... () - Q) c .: Q) IV E I/) C o."c o ; .2 -...- ~t-:g Q) :J o 0 en ::> ~ :I: "c" - Q)OC>'IV I/) ~ IV ~ I/) OIVC_~ g-.~.2 E 0" "':::ow'" n.:E<( n. C .2 I/) -- IV IV 0>0 EC> :E -"- .- Q) =Q) .o..c IV I/) ....lIl:: Q) ... C 0 S~ > C o :g ~ I/) .~ IV Q)' ::EQ) cE..c Q) :J I/) :2en~ ",,0 ...c~ :3 IV IV :I: tI) c o - o "0 tI) 'i: ::s .., C> C ~ E .0 ::s en Q) .... cu Z W W C:::Q) (!)... c~ .- 0- tI) E Q) 0 o 0 c Q) C> <( ;1: ;1: ;1: x X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z >< X X X X X X X X X >< >< X X X X X X X X >< X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X >< X X >< X >< >< X X X IV :: 0- tI) o :J: tI) (IJ o v ()) :2: (IJ C o rn <l) a::: -+- L +-> L '- <l) <l) <l) Bl-c E-C Q) <l) Q) Q) OOIO (0 N (IJ () v Q) 2 >. Q) (IJ > '- Q) ...... c Q) o l'9 ~ Q. v C/) Q) 0 2I >. (IJ Q) .~ (IJ E > (1) v 2 c ~ (IJ u.. C J m u v E ()) C "(U:2 :J .~ en E 5}~ E o .;:: 0 I 0.. 0 3(/) ~- Q) 0 '- ._ m ':> ..c (1) C/):t= .:x:: u...... QjQ. ,-cc>C/) m m Q) ._ 0 o...a::OD::I >. .~ c m :J U E v E Q) 0 :2: 0 m>' >. ~~ Q) en ro (IJ 0> > IQ) om Qj~Qjc.~ .~ 'c -C ~ 5} (IJ <l)Q) 00 ~:2:02I /'- co (J) 0 NNNC") tI) o o L() .c C") 0 en N C") C") C") '<t C") C") X X X X >< X X X X X X X X X ~ ~ ~ <( ~ ~ ~ -.... Z Z Z Z Z Z Z X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X >< X X X X X X X X >< X X ....." "'-'" o ~ 0 o () 0 ~ ~ (/) 0 0 U o () as ~ B -5 (/) -2 (/) ~ l.:= 0 (/) -g o ~ c 3 (/) v ~ (/) ,,-.-_::J v (1) :e >....... (1) ~ ~ .E; ~ (j) .~ ~ c ::J ~ -' 0 -+:;c ::J 0 c C c ~ .S!! ::J (1) C ::J 0.!!1 0 (1) v T5 v t5 E -0 w t5 g 0 (1) t5 "iij t5 m t5 '-';:: :J';:: (1)";:: (j) 0 ~";:: '-';:: J.;:: 0...... m......~...... '-..c c_ (1)...... c...... 2"~ (1).S!! m.S!! 0 () (1).~ .~.S!! m.~ <(OOJO-.J02(/)20D::O(/)O ~ co C") r--... C") ~ ~ ~ '<t&N.,- AQENDA ITEM NO. ~ ""-. PAGE.1i. OF ,.. t:: t:: 0.2 "- ... -:3 0.- o 0 "0 III ct~ lIS ~ ~~ o .... (.) ... a> t:: .... a> ";0 E III t:: a. "0 t:: o ;.~ -....... ~.- ~ a> :3 o 0 en ::J ~ ::I: "Ot::"O - a>Ot::>-lIS III .- lIS 0) III ... a>0 OllSt::...;:;. g. .2>.~ E 0- .... ~ '0 U) .... a.:Ect a. t:: .~ III ... - lIS lIS 0)0 EC> :E ~... .- a> = a> .o..c: lIS III ....~ a> .... t:: 0 3~ > t:: o :;:: lIS ~1Il .~ lIS Q; :SEa> t::E..c: a> :3 III :Een~ "0"00 ....t::3: :s lIS lIS ::I: VI I:: o .. o "0 VI .i: ::J .., 0) I:: E ~ ., ) Ql .... ctl Z W w a: Ql ~..... t:~ .- a. (J) E .!!: 0 o 0 I:: (J) rn <( "It: "It: "It: I <( --. Z 4- 00(5 (]) C .~ (]) tt= L... o;g~ ...c (.) OU.- U .2: (]) c (]) "0 .Q if) . (j) ro 2::- L... (.) ._ ~::JE .- -0 ro a::WLL x x X X X X X X X >< >< X >< X X X X X X >< X <( <( <( ~ ~ ~ ~ <( <( <( -.... -.... -.... -.... -- -- Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z X X X X X >< X X X X X >< >< >< X X X >< X >< X >< X X X X >< X >< X X >< X X X >< >< X X X >< >< >< X >< >< >< X X X >< X X X >< X ro co..>. o '0 C 13 c ::J (]) ::J 0 --- 2 U e >. U) ~ ~0a30 L roE-eE LL >.~ ro.~ 2:Q___~0c)0 o .- (.) 0 L... (]) L... .i:~5 c2 E2 Iii >-..~ :0 ro 0 m OUOW5I5 L... L... 2 0'- I.... .$ m .;:: 2 (]) m 5 cnm ro 5 U) 05 5 ro i{i ill(/) .;:;- E a.. ro~ S ~ 0 s'i5.. 0 m 6 (]) if) U U (J) ..x: ro L... roc........-+-'-+--'O......,O+-' ....J .Q .g .~ .g -5 .g C) .g Q) i2............................. r-+-> C-+--" (]) .-.~ ::J.~ ro.~ m.~ ....J2020a::Oif)O '- Q) 13m 55 U) o~ >. '0 I.... m C :!::: ::J C2 m (f) C L... ___ >.Q)O W(j)E ill U) ~50 iU o 0') Ql 0') -q a. -q U) LD -q (0 l'- -q '<T 0'.) '<T Q) -q o l() or- N I.[) l() 0') l() AGENDA ITEM NO. 3S ", PAGEAo~ RIVERSIDE COUNTY MUL TI- JURISDICTIONAL LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION AGENCY INVENTORY '-' City of Lake Elsinore '-' '-' AGENDA ITEM NO. -1- ! PAGE.Ll OF!I.L ;t""" HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND SUMMARY WORKSHEET PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOllOWING INFORMATION I LAKE ELSINORE Agency/Jurisdiction: Type Agency/Jurisdiction: Contact Person: Title: I City I ESC First Name: I Bill I last Name: I Payne Agency Address: 130 So. Main St. lake Elsinore CA 92530 Contact Phone E-mail FAX Population Served I 33,050 I Sql!are Miles Served ;t""" Does your organization have a general plan? Does your organization have a safety component to the general plan? What year was your plan last updated? 138 YES YES 1/1/1990 Does your organization have a disaster/emergency operations plan? What year was your plan last updated? Do you have a recovery annex or section in your plan? Do you have a terrorismlWMD annex or section in your plan? ;t""" YES 1/1/1990 NO NO AGENDA ITEM NO. ) S _ PAGE.1f.. OF.!L ~ DOES YOUR ORGANIZATION HAVE: AIRPORT IN JURISDICTION AIRPORT NEXT TO JURISDICTION DAIRY INDUSTRY POULTRY INDUSTRY CROPS/ORCHARDS DAMS IN JURISDICTION DAMS NEXT TO JURISDICTION LAKE/RESERVOIR IN JURISDICTION LAKE/RESERVOIR NEAR JURISDICTION JURISDICTION IN FLOOD PLAIN CONTROLLED FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL UNCONTROLLED FLOOD CONTROL/CHANNEL EARTHQUAKE FAULTS IN JURISDICTION EARTHQUAKE FAULTS NEXT TO JURISDICTION MOBILE HOME PARKS NON-REINFORCED FREEWAY BRIDGES NON-REINFORCED BRIDGES BRIDGES IN FLOOD PLAIN BRIDGES OVER OR ACROSS RIVER/STREAM ROADWAY CROSSING RIVER/STREAM NON REINFORCED BUILDINGS FREEWAY/MAJOR HIGHWAY IN JURISDICTION FREEWAY/MAJOR HIGHWAY NEXT TO JURISDICTION FOREST AREA IN JURISDICTION FOREST AREA NEXT TO JURISDICTION WITHIN THE 50 MILES SAN ONOFRE EVACUATION ZONE MAJOR GAS/OIL PIPELINES IN JURISDICTION MAJOR GAS/OIL PIPELINES NEXT TO JURISDICTION RAILROAD TRACKS IN JURISDICTION RAILROAD TRACKS NEXT TO JURISDICTION HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITIES IN JURISDICTION HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITIES NEXT TO JURISDICTION HAZARDOUS STORAGE FACILITIES IN JURISDICTION HAZARDOUS STORAGE FACILITIES NEXT TO JURISDICTION YES NO YES YES NO NO YES YES NO YES YES NO YES NO YES NO NO YES YES YES YES YES NO NO YES YES YES NO NO NO NO NO YES NO ....., 0-vv ~ ~ AQENDA ITEM NO. 15 PAGE.l!l OF.lli ~ DOES YOUR ORGANIZATION OWN OR OPERATE A FACILITY IN A FLOOD PLAIN NEAR FLOOD PLAIN NEAR RAILROAD TRACKS NEAR A DAM UPSTREAM FROM A DAM DOWNSTREAM FROM A DAM DOWNSTREAM OF A LAKE DOWNSTREAM FROM A RESERVOIR NEAR A CONTROLLED FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL NEAR UNCONTROLLED FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL ON AN EARTHQUAKE FAULT NEAR AN EARTHQUAKE FAULT WITHIN THE 50 MILE SAN ONOFRE EVACUATION ZONE IN A FOREST AREA NEAR A FOREST AREA NEAR A MAJOR HIGHWAY A HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY NEAR A HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY A HAZARDOUS STORAGE FACILITY' NEAR A HAZARDOUS STORAGE FACILITY NON REINFORCED BUILDINGS A MAJOR GAS/OIL PIPELINE NEAR A MAJOR GAS/OIL PIPELINE ~ DOES YOUR ORGANIZATION HAVE ANY LOCATIONS THAT: HAVE BEEN DAMAGED BY EARTHQUAKE AND NOT REPAIRED HAVE BEEN DAMAGED BY FLOOD HAVE BEEN DAMAGED BY FLOOD MORE THAN ONCE HAVE BEEN DAMAGED BY FOREST FIRE HAVE BEEN DAMAGED BY FOREST FIRE MORE THAN ONCE HAVE BEEN IMPACTED BY A TRANSPORTATION ACCIDENT HAVE BEEN IMPACTED BY A PIPELINE EVENT ~ NO YES NO YES NO YES YES YES YES NO YES YES YES NO YES YES NO NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES YES YES NO YES NO 1~ AQENOA ITEM NO. La . , ~ PAGE 4).' OF~ .~ ~ .~, EMERGENCY OPERATIONS INFORMATION DOES YOUR ORGANIZATION HAVE AN EOC IS YOUR EOC LOCATED: IN A FLOOD PLAIN NEAR FLOOD PLAIN NEAR RAILROAD TRACKS NEAR A DAM UPSTREAM FROM A DAM DOWNSTREAM FROM A DAM DOWNSTREAM OF A LAKE DOWNSTREAM FROM A RESERVOIR NEAR A CONTROLLED FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL NEAR UNCONTROLLED FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL ON AN EARTHQUAKE FAULT NEAR AN EARTHQUAKE FAULT WiTHIN THE 50-MILE SAN ONOFRE EVACUATION ZONE IN A FOREST AREA NEAR A FOREST AREA NEAR A MAJOR HIGHWAY A HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY NEAR A HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY A HAZARDOUS STORAGE FACILITY NEAR A HAZARDOUS STORAGE FACILITY NON REINFORCED BUILDINGS A MAJOR GAS/OIL PIPELINE NEAR A MAJOR GAS/OIL PIPELINE OTHER FACILITY INFORMATION ARE THERE LOCATIONS WITHIN YOUR JURISDICTION THAT: COULD BE CONSIDERED A TERRORIST TARGET COULD BE CONSIDERED A BIO-HAZARD RISK YES NO YES NO NO NO YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES NO YES YES NO NO NO NO NO NO NO ....., ...." ~ llitj ...." AQENDA ITEM NO. 1 f PAGE 2. 'OF~ ~ Specific Hazards Summary Jurisdiction Hazard Hazard Name In Adjacent to Tvpe Jurisdiction? Jurisdiction? LAKE ELSINORE Dam Canyon Lake Dam No &~5 LAKE ELSINORE Dam Diamond Valley Lake Dam No No LAKE ELSINORE Dam Lake Hemet Dam No No LAKE ELSINORE Dam Lake Perris Dam No No LAKE ELSINORE Fault Elsinore Fault Yes No LAKE ELSINORE Flood Channel Lake Elsinore Outflow Channel Yes No LAKE ELSINORE Lake Canyon Lake No Yes LAKE ELSINORE Lake Lake Elsinore Yes No LAKE ELSINORE River San Jacinto River Yes No ~ Dams Summary Dam Name QUAIL VALLEY RAILROAD CANYON River SAN JACINTO SAN JACINTO RV RIVER Nearest City LAKE ELSINORE LAKE ELSINORE Height (feet) 37 94 Storage (acre-feet) 178 Year Built 1959 1928 Drainage Area (Sq mil 1.6 664 Hazard Type Significant High ..--.- AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ ' PAGE..2}OF Jurisdiction's Critical Facility Evaluation In December of 2001, the County of Riverside, in cooperation with local jurisdictions and agencies, developed an Emergency Response Database. This database was created so emergency planners could use the database as a planning tool as well as quickly determine the potential impact an event may have on a community, district, or specific site. During the creation of the Emergency Response Database, contributors were asked to identify critical facilities within their jurisdictions under the following sections: 'wIfI/I. . Airports . Fire Stations . Community Colleges . Government Buildings . Dams . Highways . Schools . Hospitals - Preschools . Red Cross Shelters - Elementary Schools . Law Enforcement Facilities - Middle Schools . Waste Management Sites - High Schools . Reservoirs / Water tanks For each site, the user can identify at a minimum, the address of the site, the type of structure, and the type of occupancy and site contact information. During the creation of this Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, it was determined that the Emergency Response Database could provide vital information for this project and it would be utilized as the source for the identification of crit[cal facilities within hazard areas. To ensure the most up'"to-date data was used, all participants involved updated the critical facilities data at the beginning of the Hazard Mitigation Plan project. The critical facility list for this jurisdiction will be reviewed and updated regularly to ensure that the vulnerability of each location is evaluated on a regular basis. '-' Because of the sensitive nature of the data obtained through this process, address information will not be included in the identification of critical facilities for the protection of all participants. / - .' _~{} J> ~) ty ......, 1f AQENOA ITEM NO. ~ f " PAGEll OF SUMMARIZED HAZUS RESULTS " Jurisdiction: City of lake Elsinore Scenario: M6.9 on Elsinore Fault Epicenter Near lake Elsinore ,...... ~=--_._~ -~~~..- ~._~.~~'~~~""""~~~~~.~-~~--'._~~-_.~~J ~_.~J3:fiT.~[~~;cit!1iir@Jl@:-~~~_ Structural Damage $44,661.19 Non-Structural Damage $186,271.73 Building Damage $230,932.92 Contents Damage $59,213.14 Inventory Loss $1,657.72 Relocation Cost $1,009.34 Income Loss $7,945.15 Rental Income Loss $11,679.34 Wage Loss $8,542.80 Total Loss $320,980.37 ~._~~~_._~----_._-~-~--~..~-~~~~~~~~ .__.._..~ ~________~ tc;~E~1~(a~~__~ Medical Aid 12 Hospital Treatment 6 Life-Threatening Severity 1 Death 3 ~~-~-'"'~~-'--~~:7~.~'-'~ ~~~ . Medical Aid 0 Hospital Treatment 0 Life-Threatening Severity 0 Death 0 ~ AGENDA ITEM NO.~. PAGE~OF~ SUMMARIZED HAZUS RESULTS Jurisdiction: City of lake Elsinore """"" Scenario: M6.9 on Elsinore Fault Epicenter Near lake Elsinore =-~-~--~---~-------;;--'~-'-:~~~=:--~:,-.::~- '-~~;-~~--~-n~-=-;^---- --~:-::~--' -- ---~ _~____~1;b(~$Ui.2;~~J (~Sl.~~.~Ut~" t{~: ~~~ t;:i\~{~:~~__~_ Medical Aid 20 Hospital Treatment 5 Life-Threatening Severity . 1 Death \ 2 ~. ---~~-=~~==~-IJ Medical Aid 0 Hospital Treatment 0 Life-Threatening Severity 0 Death 0 ~------ --- - -'---' -.-------- -----q-~~-- -. .--- ------~---~~-~- --~'---~--------- -'--~=z:J lj)rg,i:uIDrrf:1 (~;cw'€iHl*; f~l: [~ylimr:; ~@ru ~~-~-~~~~~~W~~=~~~_~_~ Medical Aid 19 Hospital Treatment 5 Life-Threatening Severity 1 Death 2 """"" r---'~----'- ____c,_c_ ~,QJii(ft'llt=k)j~l~an~~i@ii~~-----'----~~~ L-~..............._~ _______'---"- Medical Aid 22 Hospital Treatment 5 Life-Threatening Severity 0 Death 1 """"" 1$ A\it;n:'~-it.OF~ SUMMARIZED HAZUS RESULTS ~ Jurisdiction: City of lake. Elsinore Scenario: M6.9 on Elsinore Fault Epicenter Near lake Elsinore - >_..~-----~.. '~0-{jl~ f~~~~1~. @i~~ii~~l~-V@~~ ~,nIDf _.~.~. ...-. -~~----- -] ~ ~ -.> ---/ -' - "- ~:..? - > / .. f., - -' - v ~ - -< __~_~~~~~~~"""'_~~_~u_~_ Medical Aid 12 Hospital Treatment 2 Life-Threatening Severity 0 Death 0 /"'"'- ~ ~ --~~~~-- Medical Aid 86 Hospital Treatment 23 Life-Threatening Severity 4 Death 7 ~ AQENOA ITEM NO....J , PAGE.1Ja..OF~ '-' C) ~e>> ~~ ..- co ('I') l"- e>> 0 "<t 00 LO LO CO I"- Z' ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ~~ a::: z 0 ~>- ..... 01- -- Q..J W (J)m"<t W ~~. I w :Jmo I- .0 C/) ~ ..Ja::: ~ 0 ~a.. 0 rr: 0 0 ..J>- l- S ~"<t W' ('I') N N N ('I')M "<t "<tNT""" >- >0 w ..... (J) - ....J - >- CO I- <( :J rr: m"<t W ~. ('I') ('I') ('I') ('I') "<t "<t ('I') N NNN mo Z 0 ....J a::: >-0.. ::> I- .....", > Z :J Z 0 0>- 0 I- ....... ;>.: ~"<t W . ('I') N ('I') N ('I') N N N ('I') CO? "<t "<t N ..- 0 0 >0 Z w - w (J) 0 <.9 C/) ~ 0::: I- (f) Z ~ I- Z ~ W I- Z if) if) I- ~ l- I- ::> I W 0 W Z 0 if) z 0 0 l- I- Z (f) if) z ;: -, C) 0 i= I W I- ~ -' ::J I- ::J Z W a: W W 0 ::J -' ~ I- > <( 0 W 0 <( 0 W 0 0 ~ > -oJ ....J 0 if) <( W Z 0- W I- ::x:: 0 0 z W w <( ~ 0 (f) W 0 0:= ::J ~ 0 0 0 0:= ::J Z ~ ~ 0:= 0- <( 0:= m 0 z w z a 0 0 <( -' 0 0 U) <( LL <( W <( a.. -' <( w ~ if) w 0 -' z ~ ~ l- I- if) m ~ ?- m 0 w Z I- <( 0 ~ r:r:: l- I- w 0 z <( w a.. (2 ....J <( 0 z ~ () ~ ~ -' :::Ju 0 ~ w ~ w -- ~ 0 -U) a::: if) > w I- ::J ~w ~ ::r: z ~ W (f) I Z ~ w (f) <( w 0 -oJ ~ W 0 W :I: W <( ~ -oJ ~ <( U) w r:r:: r:r:: ::J <( 0 :?: <( ~u: => (f) r:r:: . w <(0 ~ => Z -oJ W .... <( a.. =>z z ~ ...J :?: 0<( w => ::r:...J 0 r:r:: ~ u r:r:: r:r:: w ....0 0 W I- (2 W w 2 r:r::....J 0 ::r: x ::r: ::I: ~ <( ;: ....J .... W " .... .... z W LL 0 <( 0 0 ....." AQENDA ITEM NO. 3r .'" PAGE...1J OF JiL LOCAL JURISDICTION MITIGATION GOALS Please evaluate the priority level for each listed mitigation activity identified below as it relates to your , ~risdiction or facility. If you have any additional mitigation activities or recommendations, please list them at . Ie end of this document. Place an H (High), M (Medium), L (Low), or N/A (Not Applicable) for your priority level for each activity in the box next to the activity. EARTHQUAKE H A~mressive public education campaion in Iioht of predictions M Generate new literature for dissemination to: 0 Government employees 0 Businesses 0 Hotel/motel literature 0 Local radio stations for education 0 Public education via utilities 0 Identify/create television documentary content M Improve the Emergency Alert System (EAS) 0 Consider integration with radio notification systems 0 Upgrade alerting and warning systems for hearing impaired . 0 Training and maintenance ~-, M Procure earthquake-warning devices for critical facilities M Reinforce emerqency response facilities N/A Provide training to hospital staffs H Require earthquake gas shutoffs on remodels/new construction H Evaluate re-enforcing reservoir concrete bases M Evaluate EOCs for seismic stability H Install earthquake cutoffs at reservoirs M Install earthquake-warning devices at critical facilities H Develop a dam inundation plan for new Diamond Valley Reservoir H Earthquake retrofitting 0 Bridges/dams/pipelines 0 Government buildings/schools 0 Mobile home parks L Develoo educational materials on structural reinforcement and home inspections M Ensure Uniform Building Code compliance 0 Update to current compliance when retrofitting L Insurance coverage on public facilities L Funding for non-structural abatement (Earthquake kits, etc.) L Pre - identify empty commercial space for seismic re-Iocation N/A Electrical co-generation facilities need retrofittina/reinforcement (Palm Springs, others?) I.o--.H Maooina of liquefaction zones I M Incoroorate County geologist data into olannina N/A Backup water supplies for hospitals 1S AGENDA ITEM NO. ~I' 1 PAGE~OF~ N/A L L L L L "-'" o o o M L COMMUNICATIONS IN DISASTER ISSUES M Communications Interoperability L Harden repeater sites M Continue existinq interoperabilitv project Strengthen/harden Relocate Redundancy Mobile repeaters FLOODS H H H M H H H M M H M L L M L L H '-' .""'" otential street re-desi n M M o is AGENDA ITEM NO.. It' -\ PAGEftOF..:LL- 0 Install warninq/water level siqnaqe 0 Enhanced public information 0 Road closure compliance "- 0 Shelter locations 0 Pre-event communications M Look at County requirements for neiqhborhood access 0 Secondary means of ingress/egress L Veqetation restoration proqrams M Ensure. critical facilities are hardened/backed up L Hardeninq water towers L Terrorism Surveillance - cameras at reservoirs/dams L Riverbed maintenance L Evaluate existinq lift stations for adequacy L Acquisition of property for on-site retention L Evaluate requlations on roof drainaqe mechanisms L Erosion-resistant plants L Traffic Iiqht protection M Upkeep of diversionary devices L Install more turn-off valves on pipelines M Backup qeneration facilities L Identify swift water rescue capabilities across County ~ WILDFIRES M L L L L L M L L M ies M L L M M N/A M .1$ " PAGE..lf20F~ l Research new technoloqies for identifyinq/trackinq fires l Procure/deploy backup communications eQuipments l "Red T aq" homes in advance of event l Provide fire-resistant qel to homeowners l Involve insurance aqencies in mitiqation proqrams l Clear out abandoned vehicles from oases M Code enforcement M Codes prohibitinq fireworks M Fuel modification/removal M Evaluate buildinq codes M Maintaininq catch basins . OTHER HAZARDS L L M' M L N/A L L L L N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A L M L M L L N/A M L N/A L M L ....." ....." wind seasons ....." ~r AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE!.L OF~ N/A .L ;--. /"" N/A M L ueduct AGENDA ITEM NO. '1 S PAGEnOF~ LOCAL JURISDICTION PROPOSED MITIGATION ACTION AND STRATEGY PROPOSAL Jurisdiction: City of lake Elsinore . Contact: Bill Payne Phone: (951) 674-5170 Proposal Name: I Crossing barriers on roadways MITIGATION STRATEGY INFORMATION "-' Proposal location: I Various locations throughout the city Proposal Type Place an "X" by the type of mitigation strategy (one or more may apply) X Flood and mud flow mitigation Fire mitigation Elevation or acquisition of repetitively damaged structures or structures in high hazard areas Mitigation Planning (Le. update building codes, planning develop guidelines,etc.) Development and implementation of mitigation education programs X Development or improvement of warning systems Additional Hazard identification and analysis in support of the local hazard mitigation plan Drinking and/or irrigation water mitigation. . Earthquake mitigation Agriculture - crop related mitigation Agriculture - animal related mitigation Flood inundation/Dam failure WeatherlTemperature event mitigation '-'" Proposal/Event History DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED MITIGATION STRATEGY List an revious disaster related events dates, costs, etc There are numerous locations throughout the city where floodwater from continuous raining flows across roadways and sidewalks. There have been instances where citizens have tried to cross such situations and have become stuck. This is a substantial safet concern. '-'" AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 s PAGEnOF-!il.i ,-.... Give a detailed description of the need for the Proposal, any history related to the Proposal. List the activities necessa for its com letion in the narrative section below. The known roadways that continually flood will have protective barriers/gates placed across them prior to floodwaters reaching the area. These devices will keep motorists awayfrom the hazardous situations and divert them to more suitable roadwa s in time of f100din . uoes your jurisdiction have primary responsibility for the Proposal? If not, what agency does? Narrative: Responsible Agency: Additional partners could include Riverside County Flood Control. FUNDING INFORMATION Place an "X" by the proposed source of funding for this Proposal Unfunded Proposal - funds are not available for the Proposal at this time Local jurisdiction General Fund X Local jurisdiction Special Fund (road tax, assessment fees, etc.) Non-FE~A Hazard Mitigation Funds X Local Hazard Mitigation Grant Funds - Future Request Hazard Mitigation Funds [Y] Has your jurisdiction evaluated this mitigation strategy to determine it's cost benefits? (i.e. has the cost of the mitigation proposal been determined to be beneficial in relationship to the potential damage or loss using the attached ~ostlBenefit Analysis Sheet or another internal method) ~ ,-.... AfiIENoA 'TEM NO. 3 s :.: "" PAGEA OF 'at , W, 0:: <( Z Z o I- C/) W ::::> a C/) o z W 0:: I-- I-- Z W ~ ll.. o .....J W > ill o Z o I-- o o C/) 0:: ::::> ...., ..J <( o o ..J I- Z W ~ ~ I ~o o::Z ~~ wCI) Cl)w :J>- o z('-o <{CI) ...1!!! 0::0:: o<{ LLO >-Z I-:J ~g ~...1 CI)<{ zz 00 a...- Cl)1- wQ 0::0 w~ >0:: <{:J I-' >-0:: O:J zO w>- ~~ o::~ :J- O~ >-CI) :>CI)W >w:J OOCl) ...1O~ W 10 Z o ~ :: 0:: o u. z W :I: I- w I- W ...1 a. :: o () o o o M "<t o ...- o C\I .S "0 a> ~ a> CI) L- o c 02 ~ "0 en 0;:: :J -, oS L- o c 02 ~ '0 en .;:: :J -, C oS o en ~ ~ ~ ~ o Ci a... CI) "0 '0 a> a> t) U a> a> ~C> '0' L- L- a... a... co l() C'? l() C'? "0 a> ~ a> CI) L- o L- C 0 o c 1? 0 '0 1? ,~ '0 :J ,~ -, :J 00 ~ C -, W 0 c oS =>.. c 0 en OOZ .!!2 ~ ~ 000 W :J ~ wf= a> 0. 00 0 iij ~ c5r =>0 .J e cCI)'O a> ~~ ,q ~ ...1-, 0 0 N "<t o ...- o N oS ...: a> .0 E :J C c .2 :ffi :J 0> a> L- L- o a> u c ro oS "0 L- o ~ o N 0> a> u ffie .S a> '0 E ofr G) > a> o 0> c 'w ro a> L- u c '0 a> > L- a> CI) a> en ro a> Ci. en ~ ::= co C'? CI) w >- o o o o o o o ci o l() o CO III 0> N U7 o ...- o N oS . <5 a5 -- en Q) a. :J ~ ro en > a> E o I '0 ,!l1 L- e a> a> .0 :!2 E en :J a> Z 0:: '0 '0 a> a> U U a> a> '0' "0' L- L- a... a... o o o C!- o N o CD o 0 0> C'? 0> 0 '<t N U70,...... L- "* '3 L- ro >- o o~ u en "0 ~ ~c 0> c.Q ro <5 co .... L- ...., .S ~ ~ ~ '0:;::; >- en a> o oE ('-. a> a. ij >-L-a>~ ~ > c a> en en en ro - c 0- a> a>~~"O E > en en c 0 ro'6~~~I ..c..cL-a>ro"- c-a>ca>O .Q 03 (;j 0 :> (p ~o>~(p~.o "0 ,S '6 .0 I;:::: E .~ro L- Ex ~ :Ja>o:Ja> -,"O.cca> L- en c a> m :J c oQ :S ~ E o 02 m en - 0- >- m L- 0- C X en ro _ 0- 0 a> :J 9- ro a> 0. oo>a>..cuo. O~o.~~<{ "0 a> ~ a> CI) C a> L- L- :J o o ...- o C\I oS ro o I- ro :;::; c a> :!2 en a> 0:: ro o f- a> m E 'x o L- 0. 0. <{ o N CO o ...- o N oS en a> en en a> oS en :J CO ro '0 L- a> E E o o "- o L- a> .0 E ::J Z '0 a> t) a> "0' L- a... en a> en en a> c en ::J CO ro '0 L- a> E E o o "- o L- a> .0 E :J Z a> m E 'x o L- 0. 0. <{ '-'" "*- CO ...- "*- o o ...- o CI) w >- - 0> c :;::; a> 0> "0 :J .0 "0 C ro 0> .S c c ro Ci. a> L- :J - :J "- C a> en ::J ';:;$? o o o ...- eft. o ...- eft. 0> eft. ...- N ...- ro '0 L- ro N ro ..c '0 o o ;;:::: c c .S u a5 -- en a. ~ en a> E o I "- o a> 0> ro e a> L- .2 c .Q ~ "0 en 0;:: ::J .~ L- ::J o >- c :E '3 en 0. :J o L- 0> 0> c c c ~ ~ ~ ~ m m m ~a> ~ ~ ~ ~ :E :E :E <1)> :J .S ,S ~ ~ ~ c c c :E a> .g 'w 'w Ow 0 02 0 c E ro u u :J ::J :J ~ ~ ~ -ro~> ~ ~ CO CO CO '6 "0 '6 ~~ffia> ~ R ro ro ro ~ ~ ~ :;::;e~~ ..... oo'~ 00 ::J :J :J ~ 0. a> 0 ~ ~ (p a> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~:E~ a> a> E E E ~ ~ ~ .1ijffi'O:c g g g g, 0 >- >-en >-~ o.c-~ I I 0 0 0 c ca>ccca>tro en 0- c 0- 0 0 C ro > - "- "- ,,-en_a>en enoenN -a...ro o oeno oa>oca> a>Na> cro a>~a>a>a> a>~a>OE~EEEE~EE2 ~c~~o> ~N~N~c~ro~~o.c'Oc -o-cN2en~'O_'Orooro~roroc~2ro cN ca>CL-C~LLNLL..cLL..c~o.~Ci. a>'O <1)E<1)c a>roa>N_'O __ ~ ~ ~ ro ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ro ro ~ co a> co ~ g ~ ~ o~ a>Na>Na>Na>..c<1)..cgNg~gl;::::'O_a>..c a...roa...~a...Ea...a>a...~~ro~~~'O~&"O= a>..ca> a>roa>~a>-O..cO~052c'eno ....ID~ID....,N~ro~~ ~ L ~~ ? ro ro ~ ro.!::: ro ro ro ~ ro '0 "- ~ "- +-' -:;::; L- 0 >-('-0 _.J E~E"-E E~EcOOOL-O~:J cno.en - 0- ~ 0- "0 0- ..c '_ 1: '_ ro L- 0 L- ro L- 03 o.en ro 0 a> x~xcx'Ox x-2;;::::2<1)2 >-ca>Uen e..c e ~ e g e 1ij e;g E's E's E oS en c >- ro 8. t ( o.t 0.'0 0.;;:::: 0. a> 0.3; <1) a> a> a>::J 0 = L- 0. 0.- 0. 0. 0. ::J :J ::J 0 0 1:.:::- <{ ~ <{ '3 <{ .c <{ .c <{ .c Z ~ Z ~ Z ~ n ,'; 3; 1<:".;2 _ n'-;Sv.~~L '" PA(;i;- - ....., "*- l() ...- ';:;$? o o o ro "*- o o "*- o ';:;$? o l() o CI) w >- ~ o o N '0 o o ;;:::: .S U Q) -- en a. <{ -- en a> E o I "- o a> 0> ro C a> U L- <1) a... a> ~ mC E 2 'x '0 o L- L- ro o.N ~~ . ",..... ..--" (ij ... o .... +# C A CI) c CIS a.. c o :;; CIS Cl E :!: '0 L- CIS N CIS :I:: U) 0 .... '" 15 0 '.0 -0 u 0 .... - ~ 0 .~~ ......, ~ ~~ ~..s g S -B J:l J:l 0 Q) 0 >.D ~ 0 ~ t:l-...o ~.E ~t:l-. ~] o .g .~ .~ -B~ U).~ ~....., "a ,;j E:~ ~~ J:l 0 .8 -B 0'-H .... 0 ~ '" '- Ci ~ S "-rj 0 ;:; .~ ~5o o o r-. -B.s - ~ o.~ o 0 -0 u ~- B.E ~ ~ <2 i:'J ~ 0 - - '" '" s s "Z ao A::~ -u ~.... . 00 J:l ,,..... en cd .~ ~ P. 'U _ Y' g ]::r:.g .~ u.~ 3~~ ~ ~.~ - J:l..,.., w ~ I ~ -'.0 .::1 0.;:; M--;;; 8 "3 g 0 ~"p -B 'O'~ ~ .- 'U 0 ~'c --;;; ~ ;::l > 0...,.., 0 8'~ ~ 'p "3 g. .~ E .... ~ ~ 0 .~.s "8 .~ - ro o -M ~ ~.5 0 ~ ~ '> 0..0..0 <t) .- M tIJ.~ ~ ..ot::~ U ~_ ~o.o ~"= 'U iU (.) o -' iU c o :;; (.) :0 CI) .i: ::s 7 :;; ::s :!: c ; CIS a. .0 :e CIS a. CI) c o :;; (.) :0 CI) .i: ::s ..., +# C (1) E c ... (1) > o C) "' (.) o -' <( () .J.. a. ::s C/) >- ~ J:l ~ P. ..0_ g g o 0 g .~ 0:0 g.", 'a's ::t ::r ~"3 S ~ .~Ls 5obJ) Q).S .... - 'Ua ~ '0 15 .~ '.0 ~ ~ '5 ~i -Bo.,; '-H > 15 o 0.... o bJ) 0 ..... (; ..... ~u~ ~ ..8 's o ..0 ....... .DgbJ) -Oil :gs Ci'~ <'::'.9< .8 J:l ~.~ .g s ~ .~ ~ 0.. ~>= .- 'U ~ ~ ~ >. ......, 0 .D ..o~'U g ~ o . ~ J:l" z ~ .9~~ ~ E .... - 0 ..--. S-uE O 0 u.D ^ J:l .8 C1 o J:l !j g. ~ l:: r=~s~ sg.g ;::l .... J:l" g.~ .9 -0-0 =~ .g ~ ..9 :~ ~ ~.=:: .s "8 S 0 So~ ='" -B S ~ .....g ~<2'U - ~ ~ "''U S Ci g i~'~ ~~t8 lO: 6.5 .9 l-t ~ tl 0.. '" :O~8 .g -..... '" ~ " S -B. :B......~ ;::l ~ lO: S-:S~ ..0....;'8 u lO: M ~ ~ lO: 00..0 o '0 s ::2.€ ~. ~ ~.~ I '.0 ] Q) -B >. .D -0 Q) -0 Q) Q) J:l lO: ., ] Q) .... Q) ~ 'U ~ ~ o ..0 ~ S s o 'U = .S; - u :a '" .C ;::lod .~ co eJI-o = ;::l .- - - u [.s -g 5 - 0 ;~ Q.,~ ..0..0 ~ Ii Q) 0 ~'.a ..c .8 "O~ ~ 'g _....... Q.,bJ) E .il o ~ ~ .& .D '€ :s! ~ ;::l Q., ,g-5 '" ~ ~ Q) (;.8 ~ u ~ta 8'0 U 8. ~ : .~ .E ~ ~" J:l18 ~'t t:l-. bJ) - J:l "2.- .8 ~ = "'a M_ lO: ~ .~ g o '.0 :::: u t8;c; ~ 'g f--<....... (ij c o :;::; o .0 III .;: ::s 7 :;::; "5 ":1.: l: o :;::; o :0 III .C ::s -, C) l: :;::; "' a. U :e "' Ia. - 1- .. c o :;::; Q) a. E o o ..... o Q) +# "' o ..... o l: o :g :0 III .;: ::s -, "tl "' Q) ....I .. G>l: ;:;~ i=a. - - o M It) N .....0) ..... .so:{ III 0 C> ~ l: Q) "' ... ....10 l: ....r: .iij 1Ilt::_ III ow ~ Z Q) "tl.....lI: "tlNIll o:{lt)....I '- 1 I en w o >. - l: ::s o o Q) "tl .iij ... Q) > ii: - III .lI: (1) ... .... 0 0.. ... ~ c: - 0 0 "en.M t).o w g ~ ~ i.: o 0 Q)Q)o (1)..... III ....0" ~ 0 .lI: 0 E....... ~- ~ l:::SLl) ...J .= ~ :>.. .iij Z oJ- - 0::- ;> >'jjj Q) " oa.iU 00 l:W - a. .. = l: Q) 0 en ~"' Q).oQ).lI: o - - :J C> "'IF 0 '5 .3 ~11= D.lo:{ ....I,D. ~ 1 C> ... C! Q) ... o c .iij Qi . Q) .lI: III @ .. Q) 'jV ~ :1.:"' .0. W.o -- I I-I a; +# III o - a; ;:; i= ~ I a; - "' o Q) ;:; i= III III "' o (J) 0:: o oj< '" ::s .... t'$ - CI.l t:l-. ~ Z '" -s:;: .S; 0:{ -- .~ Z "0 '" 'C ::s "":l i.: Q) ~ Q) .> Q) 0:: 0:{ ~ W U. Z ~ .,; ~ S Q) .... 'g. o .... t:l-. ~ ~ g> .~ o - Jj "tl Q) Q) -B a. '-H a. 0 "' ..0 :1.: g "0 0 Z .8 'U ~ "~ '" '" ~ C> 0 l: .D :g ~ a. '13 :e "' D. . <? - z ..... '" Q) .... o u '" M - ~ o .~ z ..8 Z':2 ..... Q) -:S C> "-' l: 0 :g ~ a. 0 .13 :e ~ IQ Iil D. Eo-< I CI.l >- ~~ ;,; z 2 za o 0 z UJ UJ ~ Z w :: ~ <( ~ w ~ > 0:: ~ Z Z z 0 0 z Z 0:: I- Z a. ~ :! LL. 0 UJ C w ~ W <II ?- E ~ U) ~ U) ...J <II ...J U) :I: <( C U) ~ <( I- W ro ~ ii: U) ~ 0:: 0- <II <( <I> :;:; Z ;:; <<'i' :0 w UJ :: I- 01 ~ ~ ~ z .~ 0 .. w W N II) ro !f 1ii C(n E () <I> :: " ... ~ ::> w a. C <II ~ a 0:: E .<::; :J <II UJ w 5 CI) E <II 0 C 0:: U) " ... ...J . ::> a Gl c <II ':; uj Cll S ~ 0 ro > 0" E w 0 oi "0 U) ~ 0:: ... > <I> <II :I: a. c E 0:: 0 '5 UJ I- - Gl e 0" l- I- Z (I) ro .2 - a. <II z Z w 0 c :0 III a:: w w :: u; 01 :: III :> c <I> :: w c a. iij 'c 1ii w W ...J Gl " C U5 ...J ...J a. E c a. <II g ro a. a. 'iij :> a: t: a. a. ::> :: .S '0 <II Cll ::> ::> UJ C U) UJ c "0 <II C UJ 0 <( (f) III () a: I- W :: I- W :: I- o Z !!?. 0- -(Cf C )( T""" .Q o 0 1ii In N a. <I> C(n '0 :0 C :e III ,Q ro .~ 0.. a. 2: .go g> <( <( ~ 'c ~ ffi ~ ~ a: a. U ro ~ c V> .Q ~'O .S! U iii U) 0:; .~ ~1 Q; :; D:: ~ z z z X ~ ~ 0- 0- <<'i' <<'i' E ~ 0 ~ Gl N 0 E C(n N 3 tC? U) (j) <II U) (j) .~ (I) :0 :0 <I> U) .~ > ~ ro 0.. .2 0 -" a. 0.. ~ U) ro a. ii: ..... ro ..... :0 ~ Q) c ::; > 01 C "Ui U) <I> U) U) <( UJ UJ UJ >. CI 2 ~ u; c ,2 1ii ~ ~ en c .2 '0 <( c .2 1ii g ~ C l\l a: <J) :E - .c '6 o E '0 C l\l c .Q '0 0) <J) .~ == 0) C l\l 0) ro 0) .... t). .... o 0) (,) c:: ~ 'S <.!> Ol c:: 'c: .C:: ~ Q.. c:: ,!;? Cii ~ ~ -e ~ ~ :6 -S ~ 0) -5 .... o <J) c o ti 0) <J) 0) ro 'c c. e c. c. l\l 0) en -51: C Q) .- E EQ) 0>.: .e::> -0- "O~ "OQ) lIlm C 0 ~-5 .!!JCi c_ Q) Q) E .... ~ 8 .- m 5-J? 0)- .... - "0 ~ (5 o (,) :p ~ ~.8 lIl.;.:: O)(ij ~ ~ .ern roe .eo ;== , ~.~ 3~ ~ I}. AQENlJA ITEM NO. .JfL "'-. PAGE..n OF ......,. ......,. ....., """"" 5 ~ ~ ,-... 0 U) f-< '-' U) ~ U f-< f-< <! ffi ...... ~ U) (/) ,.... ~ ~ g < ~ (/) 0 , u , ~ ~ ~ p.. ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ...... ~ f-< > '-' ffi ~ E-< ~ ;:;E ~ ;:;E ~ f-< > ~ ;:;EI 0 0 ~ Z ~ --- ~ p.. ~ f-< ~ ;:;E f-< U) ;:.-. ...... ~ ~ (/) I U) @ (/) 0 f-< --- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;:;E Z ~ , '--' 0 0 , u u ~~ (/) U) ~ ~ ~ ~..~~ . f-< Z~~,-... ",.........~2S......ou~'l:t: f-<~......o~ Zsugzo .2 8 ..,. ~ So ~ :Jf-<,.::;...... ......p... -l<'-"'U)Zf-<o oue:P2jfclz 036~p..U)~ s o --' -l wz~ ~~~ w 2S I ~ I- f-< ;:;E o~~ I-f-<~"'" ZZf-<o z~2S~ O;:;E~~ -~::r:~ I-~f-<p.. <{S;:;E~ ~ ClO o-l ~~ft~ u.. Z~ W~ If;il I-f-< cr~ WC) I-~ Zf"'l )!;!~ ~ ;~ O~ ~p., .s~~ '" >,- <l> ~ <l> . .~ t: 5 is .~ vi ~ > &(:..0 0 d)~~ti ~~E~ e-8~< c:.., t; ~ '~:6 "e ~ "'", - '5 'C "5 g g" .?'..c: t;: ~ ~ e ~ e- E ~ '8 ..c'-..oe ""'0-0", Ui*~~ r- 0.0 ~ o <l> ;; oj z.s~p.. .--. U) '-' f"'l f-< ...... (/) ..... o 01 ~ ~ p., ,-... V) '-' ,-... u '-' ~ ..... o N ceo 1:1 S Q) .... 'g. <1) ~ ~...... >.. .8 ;g ~.D .~ S.g15 ~ ~ ; .9 p".g 'g P.. ~ .g .8 "a .~ 4) S cO ~ ..... ...c= -d ::I >"'C ;:l u +J u..... ;:l S C'j '0 0 OJ ....., ....Q) "dROI) o ,,,OJ 01)1:: Q ~ ~ > !3 <8 '.;:J '. C'j o't: C'j v P.. ~ 0 ~.& ~ OJ fir g;~ '€ ~SOI)~",C'j ..... ..... ~ C'j p. ;:: .~ .t1 .s :: ::r: 'll "d Q).......... u :::"'::1>......:.,.0 'll 'C cr" 0 (OJ ...., ~ .;:; ~ ~ -s ~ ::: C'S ~ OJ ::: .SZ ...... ... :a '" '"i: c: ::l 0 ~..... I ...... :ac.. ;;.g ~~ r-- I l") en (\) 0.0 ro p... ~ ~ ~ . "d :8..8 Q)Q) ;:lV) -S-s ;:;E ~ .S .S .. 0;1 ...c="d Q) C'. ;:;)~V)u.sl:> ] '-' o;IC'jC'j...c="'O"'...... ,-... ~ - Q) P. > -~;....; ~ ,:::. b!l15 ",.{);> o;:;E S ~ ~ p.. C'j'n . l~ Q) ;:l ~ '" Q) gp 1;; ~ ..... -s u o~uop......"d 0 M 0;1 u...... ;:: .'" d "d CO>...... C'j '" 'll c.;:1 p.Q)~C'j:::;:l -.,J' = OJ.D _...c= ~ .;; S ~ ~ Sm >.. ~ .~ ~ :S'~ ~ ~ "- ...... ~. 0.. '=" ~ t). ~.8 ~.~.{) ..9 -- :a ...-.. 0 '"d Q) ........ 4.) s..CJ ~ il.~ 8 ~ 1;1 ~ ~ .;:; P.. fir....., p.,,::; p."d 0.0 r::: 'c r::: C'S ~ OJ == .SZ ""' ... .- ::: :g .~ 3~ ~.e- ...!.. u .::::~ ;:l '"' ~~ 3S AQENDA ITEM ~.~ ".. PAGE' OF.-:lW CI.l E-< ~ ::E ::E o U t:t: ~ ~ ~ :> ~ ~ f.1.. --- ~ E-< ~ CI.l --- ~ o u CI.l 5' z o ~ CI.l '-' ::E ~ E-< CI.l >0 CI.l CJ ~ o u CI.l ~ E-< ..... CI.l S CY ~ ~ 0... t:t: t:t: 0 o ~ E-< ~ ffi ::E ::E E-< ~ o > z ~ ~ ~ ~ CI.l E-< ~ ~ ~ ~~ >< ~ ~~..~ E-< ~~~ ~E=:out:t::ij;' z~E=:gO~ o~u6ZCJ E=:::E5,-,o~ ~r--..CI.lzE=: ueq:2~uQ 36~S:~~ z~ ~~ E-<::E ~~ E-<~""" zE-<o >I.l~N ::E>I.lg ~:r::~ ~E-<o... ::>::E>I.l CYO~ ~t:t:::J ~f.1..~ < ~ ~ E-< i:a u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ...;l >l.; >0 t:t: o E-< U ~ f.1.. CI.l E=: ~ CI.l I I Vi' '-' ~ v::E ,D Ct) ~E g .S t3'E ,"0 <E ___ u Z .S 2-5 ... ro Q) 0 "E c. ro o c. .r; c ro _ (I) :-:~~(I) ~.~~ ~ 0- -ai '0 a. ~ 5.2 ~ E U.- OCo~~ ~uQ)ro ":'~(1)a. c o..c Q) Cll E -;',s E ro.!:.,,- ~ g- g to tV ::S"i)"Uu;"'O g>~~-TI 0:: ~ 2 '5 .~ CI.l CI.l ~ U O~ ~... t:J..'O~ \.5 i::: v Z.5:l ~ """""......s.,. Z..::t:J.. ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ 'S t:J.. u i::: o C'$ Q~ Q ~ ~ i::: S v ii3 :i Ct)..Q Ct) <t) CI.l,D ~Q) c"S~~f1)~ M ~ t:. Q) ,s .0 ~~:_~o~ _0- fI) 0 a.. vLL2 c.~ t: ~'.~ ~ ;; ~g ~2co~ ~ ~cn cE~ ~roE:8 ,g Q)"O g>-g E= otiC.......co"ffiD Q)._(\l~cu~ en g> c; t) .Q .Q co ~~Ng~o~ c:cu(l)~O(l)C Q.)Q;~ro(l)~ro Eijlc...~~ c"'- .~u.oc EIii.~ E s.l? ~ 2 ID U ~ ........ CUCQ)o &:'0:::::(/5 ~~ a. ... i::: v E '" '" v '" '" < '" ,~ = :c C'$ Co C'$ U "; u o ~ ,!CU'O .a ..- c: CI)~:S CllCll;t S~1;: ,s:t:lll lll"ti E 'iiClle E :ii's 0::'0' t>01ll ot>>;;' ~.8'~ e.....S '_ tII c: ~ :3:30c: 0' E lll'- e'tJ>;;'~ tIIc:ollJ '- llJ ~ Q. aC:t,E ~..!!!c:o llJ~ lllol:: ee:Ee: o~~.! ":;;llJoQ. .S tl) >;;. Cll ~ Q....c:: ,~.- E.... ;:c:::E-Cll '-'tJtII'O " >;;. '0 ~ ,s~3:t> ~~~ ~ ~ ~ o Z (I) "0 en Iii 8 CI) c-- 0 L..W roro,sc.Q50 Q) Iii .!:.Q ro :IJ Q) "0 .5:? ..c 10 c. L- ..c .>C~O>OQ)::: e-5~;eQj",o C.2~ E iU~~Qi- lijcroro"Ot:.C\I:E Ci.ro~.~.s~ g::J Q)E>Q)"OC:pl? ..c:JCOC)c~O....... ~.r;enroroc.Q):B "'Q)Q)Ol",cCl)E 8= ~ ~ :3S.S a. OO~Bg~-g~ <i. 5 e g a.E:g a> ....:p-.- OlE Uo ~ .g..~ ~.5"E ~ D- E u c;il ~ ro"O~ Q) '" ro._ ro N Q) lij ~ tE .~ Ci~ ro :J ... i::: il) S '" '" Q.i '" '" < '" ,~ ;:: :c C'$ Co C'$ U "; u o ~ SllJ'O .:! :i c: CI)::.;:=: III ;;: Cll~~ So1;: ,s:t:Cll ~"tiE ~~~ 0::'0' t>Olll o t> >;;. ~ Cll.~ lll:eS '~~e:~ g.E~'S e'tJ~tl .~~~a _ ae:t,E ~..!!!e:o llJ~Cll-E: ee:Ee: o~~..!!! ":;;llJoQ. .S tl) >;;. Cll 'A ~ Q..(: ~.-e'W ~::E-Cll 'tltll'tJ Qj:;"2~ -"CllQ) ~~~ a ~ ~ o Z ::fl-g> Q) 0._ ro~o5 ~ :IJ~ 5} _><C'(JL.. .~ 4!.r: Q) - u .r; c: (I) .- ..... roQ).cc Ci~!.~ lll::J ",.- .r;oQ)~ -wee (I) 0),+= 0 Q) c: ,--- ouoco o c: (J).52> n.2C~E~ cocQ) 0 ~g~~u Q) ro '" 0.- ECllllE;il ~;e~e'c Uj E ro c..~ ... i::: Q.i E '" '" Q.i '" '" -< '" .~ := :c C'$ Co C'$ U "; u o ~ -!"o .:! .: e: CI)~;:=: Q)Q)i .(:~- ....oe: S:t:Cll Cll"ti E Q.Q)e Et.;.- o~g. t>01ll ot>" ~~~ e-.... ,_ tII e: ~ :3:30e: O'ECll.... e'l)t.;.tl tIIe:ollJ -C'CI~Q. ae:t,E ~~e:e llJ_Cll-.;; ee:Ee: o~ ~~ ":;;llJoQ. -SOl>;;'Cll '- Q..c: .~~ E- ~:E-Cll 'tJtII'tJ '. >;;.'0 ~ S~3:t> ~..~~ ~ ~ ~ z <t) 3 .... i::: 0 .S S en ii3 Ct) ...... Ct) Ct) g;.!:i ."-" ~ ;:l o:l CI.l @ ~ Q 0 ..... o ".p ...... en 1::'B ~ <t) C'$ Ct) ;:l >Oo...CI.lCY Ol c :e o ~-5"'-~ .QE"'Q) ~e~-E c: ~ ~ .f: ro 0 ro ,s 0. '0 5}'~ ~~a.c ~ ro Q) tI).cC> Q) .2 .Q 8 o .r; ro 1Il o~g>~(\o- U~'E~5 1:cQic~ ~~~~~ iij 0 U ~ .2. ... = Q.i E '" '" Q.i '" '" -< '" ,~ == :c C'$ c. C'$ U "; u o ~ '-"" 1'1 elVl 1'10. ., r PAGEn.OF~ " E E .g .g c:: c:: CIlIll.... .!!! .!!! .... 0 Q. Q. III ..- c: ~Q) ~CIl t)~;;: Q):S Q):S ,..... CIl~~ Q) Q) ~~ 501: ~-g . ::> ~:J:CIl lIJO lIJO ~"ti~ r...:' e \.,.... ~ Q.e" ~~ ~~ E Q)'S ~g ~g o::.~ OOCll 0;::::: 0":: 00" :t .~ J:: .~ ....Q)tI) 'b~5 'ti.... 'ti.... e?~ e?~ .~~c:~ ~E ~ E ~E~'!: 8.e? 8.~ ~'b"~ S ::> c:01ll Q)~ Q)O- .~ III ~ Q. ~e? .Q!I) ....'" ac:t.E ~.!:2 ~.!:2 ~a:t:e E:S E:S III CIloo;; c::C:: c::C:: Ec:Ec: 00 00 o~~.!! :O:::e? ~~ ""'1lI0Q. <00 E8 'sb/"CIl Eo ~ Q...J: ..E ::VJ -2 a~ ~.~ E.... ~~-Q) .S 1:: .S t: btl)'b .!:2 ~ .!:2 ~ '. l;, 'b..::! .:: . ,c: . ~~g;o ~g> f,;:~o> ~~~ [ CD e';;; Qi e'~ '0 ~~ .... Q. '" ;@ElIJ <:_Q. -Q. Ci:i ~ ~ ~ ~ z ~ ~ z ~ . /"""' (1) .... o .S V) ~ (1) ~ t':I H ~ t::: .8 </)1::t> (1) t':I (1) ><P-.U) ~ o ..... ...... Q) t) ~ Q) ~r.:; 4-< l-< l=loo t ~.S Cij ...... U') t:l-.U@ ~ (1) (1) 11) ::8~~~~~~ ~.s ~ .8 ~ .8 ~ .8 ~(1)0t>0t>0t> ~tol1)o(1)o(1) ..........d ...... (/) ...... (/) ._ Cf.) ~U~U~U~ (1)--:::: g :::: g :::: 8 ~ ~.;::l 1::.;::l 1:: .- ca~ ~~ ~.2l ~P-.~P-.~P-.~ '0 ('-. c c Q) <0 0 5 VI :g Q) t5 '6 :e Q) .~ ~ 'e- ~ Q)o.~ '0 C C ~g~ C. ,~ g- CD ;0:: '- :5 E CLl (J) 0>-5 Q) .!:: c: 8 g,;s o a .~ - (I) 1: 0 E Q) (I) ro E ~ 0, G] ~ K Q) ... Q) ....... ~ C3 ..0 U') v .s~ """' -~ ~ ~ Q) ::::! >-. ~ .~ C Q) 'B 2, g ~.;3.;3 g'o1 E .~ ~ ~ ~ """'....... Q) ~ Ol) ~ ;=:: '" ~,o .~ 1ii ~ 0 o:l t:!.- p. U') Q) ~ U) .8 ~ "CJ ~ - u"@ ~ -s '0 ~ :E t;i 0 :l .,: a - ;U ~ ~ '-'~-?-~ ~g;U8()N,OQ)-Boj ~ .8 ~ U') U) ~] J:::;.~ oj':5 oj.o ~ ~ 11) .......0d.l4.l4I-<~(<iI-tI-<U)...c"'...coja 0...... J:::; U') U') oj :l "' ;::J 0...... oj ~ ...c N "CJ _ '1:: ...... >- ~....., "CJ ~ :=: _ bJ) ~.~ 5 '" ~ if Q) a...c ~ - .8 -.:::; U) ~ ~s U')urilo,O~?-Q)s 5 ..,.., S ~8 -B 's -:S C a5 .....:l ..8 ;.:::: jg ,O;-g .; ~ .~ ~:e oS ~ ~ g .8 ~p... ~:E ~ '0 E 0.. .~ ;::l i2:a <t:1 ...... '+:J ~ Q) oj e 5 ~ ~....... :lSoj", Q)"CJ~2. o...~~[)-Q)"@ 0' ..... ~'C ~'5 2 "'. ~ i-; ,.!::: l:E: "CJ ~ t ~ & . ~ .=. ~ 5 g -< @ e;:;s ~ ~ 8 ~ 5 -0 .... t':I N t':I </) ::r::s ~ S -0 0 l;l<l:: N-o t':I (1) ::r:-o (1) ..8 C'-. 50 g ~ .8...... .8 :3 Q'J '0 (1) ...... ~e~ (1) o'~ ~~'''-' .- ~ ~ s II) II) eo> II) II) < .:.: II) Eo< iil z "; ~ ~ ~ .:: .- U) <.I U) :a ~ II) .- U) 'C t:: U) ::l eo> < '"':> E ~ .'!' II) .- II) 0> U) :; II) ;:2 :g II) < II) .~ .';:: ~ ~ ..; u -; <.,) o H ~ (1) 'E (l) :> o k ~ ... ~c ~.~ > f'l, bJ) ,;::::. .S ~ "'\0 </) . (l) ...... </)0 "'N <:= OJ) ~ ~ ..... ~r--. 11)<: -0........ ~s b~ ;..::: '-' . _ r--. ..0 0 t':I........ ...\0 (1) . .Eo ~N >= OJ) v; ~ (1) 'V; B </) 0 ~ E <:(1) 11) ~ t':I ~ HO f,p..., ~-.......-4 Q) o t> .s .!:l o(l)~t':I .- U) (l) a U (l) E 0 t::: t> ~..o 1::'S 8:: ~ t':I~;:l ;:l p-'~U)O' OJ) r--. ~P:l .~o .sx .....N '" ........ ~<:> ........ b\C! .- ..... :;:0 ..oN to;! c.()? .... (l) '" ~ (l) ;3 ~ > 0 bJ)H ~- .v; .~ ~~ <~ ~r ... t:M I~V. ". PAGE~OF~ E .g c: .!!! Q. ~~ <I> ~~ . ::> 1Il0 l...... 2? ~~ ~g 0::::: :t .~ ti- ~~ ~ E 8.~ ::> <1>0- .Q~ ~.~ E<S c:C: 00 :o:::~ 1Il0 Eo .s! 'It VJ .S 1: .~ ~ ,c: . ....~g> <n e';,; ~ Q. '" ~E<O <... - Q. ~ ~ o ...14 ro 0 .....:! 0 ...... './3- 0 o <.> !3 .~ OOoro .- (/) g S Uo..o ~ :5..!a 'a ~.s 8: ~ ro.$ ;:l ;:l ~~(/)O' 01) !:l .~ '"@ ~ i> :5 Vi ,.o]~ ~oU o .... '--' !:l E-< Q ~ ...... ;::3 i:! '--' >ON O1)SX .S P..~ ",0\0 ~~,.-; "'>0 -<8~ ~ ~ o ...14 !:l_ j !:l.g ~ .......g ~ 8- o u.~ 0 a o.~ ~ .- (/) ~ ~ U ~ "0 >-. ......0....01) ...... !:l ro 2 ~.- N ro ro.$ro.1:l ~~::r:(/) ~u~~8 t ~S~~ 0 ~ 0 u r.r:d::>~ ..<:l ;..:., ~ 8.~ . a'5 g ~ .~..<:l '" 0.0 ; - 0 "'" ,-,,~~d~~....~ ;:;) "," l::'3 0. ro 0 ~ X!:l2~o.g<.H~ U ~.- ;:l -B ;:l S o.o~ '\5' 0.. !:l 0'...... '0 2 .S 1:'. . - 0 ~ 0 S .- ..... ; o f~ g:B'o.~ g P- Si '- 'J.""1 <I) cd ....... r.:r 0 .....,,, ~ 0 -- J-4.......... () 4)....d ....... .~ :o.~ () p.. cd J-t ~ !:l"O ~"O.... 0 o~...... e .~ s .~ ~ .fj ::0 .9 ..:: oS.....t:lro"'~.....ro ~ ..,.... !:l '-, > 0 t;:::.8 > . ~ .~.g 0 8 0 .-::: ~ 8 0'"5'- -B o..Q 5.- P- o d 0 0 0.",""0 t:le- 0::: ~..o ~ ro '...... ,_ 'PJ ro ;>< C) ~ E-< ~ 1-< 1J) Z o ...... 1-< < C) l-I E-< ..... ::E -; ::: ~ .~ .~ .......... to> to> ~< 'i: g ;::3 ._ '7~ -,e b.D - .- ::s .;: ::E::E ~ U ~ Z ~ 1-< ~(/) ::E~ ~g .....:!~ ~~ ......, ~ ~ - 0 0 ...14 ...... ro ::: I .....:l 00 O. M ~..a....... 0 '" o u !3 .~ ......, 0 OO:::ro 01) ... (/) s S ro U ~ 0 0. ~ 0 ~ '.p ...... ~ ~.S 8: ~ ro ro.$ ;:l ;:l ~ ~~(/)O' ..<:l u ~ :.a::: ~ ~^ E-<~'o~...<:l ..... "-' >-. -B 0.. ~ 0 u .~ " ..0 2 0 l:: ~ -B ~ _ ; ~ roO"''''' ro :~ ~ .... '.p 'i=f 4), B: tf.)~ u ........... XOOro@"d-ro::: 0<8~ ~ g e-.g> -fi ~ 8 t ~ 3 5 .....:l.... -; 'U' .... 0';::3 0 :::.8 e- 0..... .;: I 5 u '--' 0.. g ::: S .- 0 0 .... 0..;> '" S 0 ~ ~... 0 M ::: -B g.9 8 uf ~ '" .....:l o 0 ;J -B .a .g ..<:l .;:l 0 sag ~ o'd N"""O~~aOO:::::_ .......... ....tIJ c.cn ~ Q.) 0 a ;e.:E '~.::= ll) p.. P-t tIJ B .... u ~ '" 0;1 "':;" '" .~ ~ 01) ~ .a .,J ::: ,s ..... -;:: 'C: p .... .... '" .... 1:'. 0 '" 1J) ::: o . ::: ... ;:i >-.::: ::: ::: 0 .8 ';:l 0 0 S ~ ~ s ~ '''-'..0 ~o S ~ E.o;I i:l:-8 -; S .~ ..<:l ~ 0 -B .~ ~ 0 ~ > ~ ~:;:: g.~ ;::3 '" _.~ 0 '+:l 0 o'~ 0.. 8 0 ~ ~ './3 ;::3 ar a ~ g..9 ~ g > g. 8 0.. e. 0 g.;.ag I~ n 0 P.5 ta ;:;. f1 0 R .8 ~I~ cJ ~ ~ b.CI .5 ... '" ~ 5 -s 'S .5 :a ::: to> o 0 ~::E '"' b.CI o ::: e-'a o ::: (,) e<l ..sa: ~ E-< <1J) 1-<1-< 1J)Z ~~ z::E S~ cS QO' ~~ ......, .-.. !... A ITEM NO. 'S s .'" PAGE~OF~ CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE '""'" REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: RICHARD J. WATENPAUGH, CITY MANAGER DATE: OCTOBER 26, 2004 SUBJECT: LAKE ELSINORE RENTAL HOUSING SAFETY PROGRAM BACKGROUND The City of Lake Elsinore's multifamily rental housing units comprise approximately 18 percent of the total housing or approximately 2,200 units. To ensure that residents have access to quality rental housing, the City must take a proactive role to protect the existing housing stock. Staff has researched other cities' rental housing inspection programs in order to develop a successful inspection program for the City of Lake Elsinore. DISCUSSION '""'" The City Council directed the Community Development Department to proceed with the development of a Rental Housing Safety Program. Since that time, staff has gathered information from numerous jurisdictions to assist in formulating an effective and comprehensive program for the City of Lake Elsinore. Staff is proposing to systematically phase in an annual inspection of approximately 2,700 rental units over a period of three years (for the purpose of this report it is estimated that 500 single family detached rental units will be included in the inspection program). During the first year multifamily units of five units or more would be notified and inspected. During the second year, properties with two or more units would be included in the annual inspection. Single family rental units would be subject to inspection commencing with the third year of the program. Inspections will be pre-scheduled to allow property owners to give tenants appropriate notice. Deficiency notices will be prepared by the clerical support staff and a 30 day period will be provided to allow for the correction of code violations. As proposed, the Rental Housing Safety Program will be a fee-based program, the costs of which will be borne by an annual per-unit fee assessed for each rental unit. The inspection fee will offset part of the City's cost to implement the program. """ AQENOA ITEM NO. 3<<'_ "PAGE-1-0F 1'-' ~ Rental Housing Safety Program October 26, 2004 Page 2 of 4 To implement this program, it will be necessary for City Council to adopt an ordinance that will add a new chapter to the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Title 8, Health and Safety. This chapter will establish the City's authority to conduct inspections of rental housing units. The City Council will also need to adopt a resolution establishing the fees associated with the inspection of each rental unit. Existing Programs Lake Elsinore currently has a Code Enforcement Division in the Community Development Department that inspects rental housing in response to complaints filed by residents. Although all neighborhoods and properties are subject to windshield surveys by Code Enforcement Officers based on the appearance or the condition of the properties, they do not conduct interior inspections except when responding to a complaint. .'" The City of Lake Elsinore and the Lake Elsinore Police Department have developed a Crime Free Housing Program in an effort to assist property owners and managers in preventing illegal activity from disrupting the living conditions of the renters. This program is based on a partnership between property owners/managers, tenants/residents and the Police Department. The Crime Free Housing Program is significant in providing outreach and an educational component, targeted towards property owners and managers. This program provides the City and the Police Department with the opportunity to assist property owners and managers of multi-family housing complexes in keeping illegal activity off the premises. Attending an annual seminar is required to begin the program. The first seminar has a nominal fee to cover supplies, while returning participants are free. Rental properties involved and certified in this program have noticeably safer and healthier environments. Certification in the Crime Free Housing program could allow the City to grant the property owner a discount for the Rental Housing Safety program inspection fees. The combination of the Code Enforcement, the Crime Free Housing program and the Rental Housing Safety program will provide improved safety and maintenance of rental housing units and may increase property values. Additionally, the City already requires the owners of residential rental properties to obtain a business license with the City. The Rental Housing Safety program will help to identify those properties which are not in compliance with the City's business license requirements. Program Design The Rental Housing Safety Program is designed so that all rental housing units are inspected every year to ensure compliance with minimum habitability standards. Educating the new and inexperienced rental property owners about the problems resulting from deferring routine maintenance is an important part of the program. Rental housing property owners and/or property managers will receive written notice from the City at least 60 days prior to the initial annual inspection that includes the date of the inspection and a checklist with the inspection guidelines. The inspection guidelines will enable the ....-. property owner/property manager to prepare for the inspection. AQENDA ITEM NO. ~.. '"', PAGE "- OF , 'i Rental Housing Safety Program October 26, 2004 Page 3 of 4 On the scheduled inspection day, the Inspector will visit scheduled rental units. The housing inspection guidelines prepared by the Building and Safety Division will be used to check for compliance with health, fire, safety and zoning codes If the rental property passes inspection, a Certificate of Compliance will be issued to the property owner and the property will automatically be scheduled for an inspection between one and two years from that date. ...." If violations of one or more provisions of applicable City codes and ordinances are noted during the initial inspection, the City shall provide written notice of such violations or non-compliance within fifteen (15) working days following the inspection and shall set a re-inspection date before which such violation shall be corrected. Generally, all necessary repairs are required to be completed within 30 days of notice of violation. If such violation has been corrected within that period, the City shall issue a Certificate for the premises. If such violations have not been corrected within that period, the City shall not issue the Certificate and the City may tak~ any action necessary to enforce compliance with applicable City codes and ordinances. Staffing Staffing for the Rental Housing Safety Inspection Program will include the following positions: 2 1 Building Inspectors Housing Clerk ....." The Building Inspector position is a mid-range position between Code Enforcement Officer and Senior Building Inspector. These positions will be filled using a standard recruitment process to screen for the most qualified candidates. The Housing Clerk position has already been filled. FISCAL IMP ACT The proposed annual cost for the program in Fiscal Year 2004/2005 is $235,600. These costs are illustrated in the attached budget detail. Staff is proposing the establishment of an inspection fee to offset costs associated with the program, including staff, capital equipment, and maintenance and operations, so that the impact on the General Fund is reduced. The program may yield indirect benefits that will be difficult to quantify such as a reduced need for law enforcement and code enforcement and increased property values and taxes. A per-unit fee is proposed to offset the cost of the inspection program. In order to completely cover the cost of the program, the inspection fee would have to be an average of approximately $91 per unit per year or $7.58 per month. The proposed inspection fee schedule includes an initial fee of $90 for the first unit and $50 for each additional unit. For example, a 150 unit apartment building would pay an annual fee of$7,540 ($90+149(50)). This would result in an average monthly cost of ...." AQENOA ITEM NO. , C. "PAGE ~ OFA- Rental Housing Safety Program October 26, 2004 ~ Page40f4 $4.19 per unit for a 150 unit complex. A discount of $5.00 per unit would be provided if the property is part ofthe Crime Free Family Housing program. A 150 unit complex would realize an annual savings of$750. If2,200 multi-family rental units participated in the Crime Free Housing Program, the City would annually generate $154,250 in inspection fees. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the following to the City Council: 1. Adopt and have first reading of the proposed Rental Housing Safety Program Ordinance. 2. Direct staff to prepare the resolution to adopt the inspection fee schedule. PREPARED BY: Robert Brady, Director of Community Development APPROVED FOR /t;'~ &r AGENDA LISTING:. t City Manager's Office ,.-- ~ ACiENDA ITEM NO. 3 c. ." PAGE~OF..1!i- co o o - N. 1&1 .- ~.!~ 0..0 Z-fN -0"0 ~:l:g IJ_", 1&1.0 ll: -8' ~ c(:J~ .JlOo I&. ",0 DeN - .. >- .. ftt ...". :; &~ 0'" U to ii: I ;;. it I c~ >I!. ;;.;;. -:R.fI! tflff!. it 0 i!"# ;;. 10 #-;I!. it ;;. ;;. 0 N~ ~:: <0 .... .... ~ 00 0 .... I .,.0 CO) 0 0 ""-, .... . U>O:J - g.t:co 6 ~ ~~ 0 88 00 00 ; 0 0 0 1 "'c. 0 00 00 , , , , . , 0 , , . , , , , , , 0 , . 0 , , 0 , , . , , g",u: .... , , , C')O I/)N IX) .... , , , , . , , 0 0 N N . , N.J:", cO ..; .0 !2 I 00 " ~ I 0 ;;. ';J!.?ft #.cf!. it >I!. it ;;.;;. ;;. ;;. c~ ';ft.'#. 0 ;;. ff!.cfl. >I!. .. . ;;.;;. ~ ; .... co 0 0> "'0> C').... 0 0 t;- o -J,; o~ m .... I/)N .,. 0 00 0 00 0 "l 0 '9C') ";"C') .... ... II) "'O:J 0> , - gJ:m ~!= IX) ........ ....... ~:s ~ 0 ~ 0 4 !1 ~;~ ;:: , , 0> C') <OC') , , , , , , , 0 . . , , . , , , , , . . , , , , . , , , , , . , . . 0 <OOC') IX).'<t 0 0' O.J:~ .0 COCO N ~ NO N I::: ::: ;:; ... 0 I ... 0 88 00 88 ; 0 00 ~ ; ~I~ ~1 8 l it coZ(/) 0 00 I . . . , , . . 0 0 0 , , , , . , , . . . . ow'" (10 , , . <0 <0 '<to N <0 . . , . , , 0 ' o. q , o::E(/) I/) <<iN cON ~~ 0 ... .... .... ""N ..; ",...W C') ... C') .... N in~::I ... I o 0 OD..W NWU: I 0 ... 8 0 00 88 0 ; 0 8 0 0 0 08 l 8 l ; ",Z(/) 0 ga: 0 0 0 0 0 ow'" . , . C') (IO'<t III , . I , , . . . , I "l '0 'q q . , I III . , ", , . 8.... . . . 0 . , o::E(/) ,.: cO cO": ~N ... .0 ... ... .... .0 .oN .,. ~~~ N ...N ... N N ... I I 00(0 OD..W NWU: 0 (/) N ........ ~:z~~ ~I 00> I &1.1, 0 :i OW IX) 0><0 , . , I , , . , , . . . . ON . . , . . . , , 0 , . , , . .,.WO: "!. , . 0>"" tn......NO , . . ..."!. q , 0...::1 ... NO "': "Ii" I ... ... I .... ~M!:: C')IN ;:;..,0 OOZ ~o:~ 0..)( I..., W .,. N(/) .... N C') C') .... .... '<to> ;1 ...0> 0 .... ", ~1 ~, <0 ,~ .... .... t- 0> <0 ...N .,. .... ", 0 ~..J ... ... ... N...... , I , , . , , , , I I , . . I I "!. . , I , . , "!. , , ... . . .... . , , , , . 0 ....0( cO ..; M"": N ... .... ;:; ~::I ... 0 ....... , 0 ~~ I N .,. lillii N ........ 0> :Z~~ 1 0 0 00 0 ; ,8g ~1 88 ; ~ IX) 0> <0 C') 0 0 00 ~ 0 "!. . , , 0> .... .... ....NO , . , , , . , 0 , . . , , , 0 'C!.q , , . . , , , , , ., :f 0 liio NO ,.: ~~~ N .0 (N ..;~ N ... ... ... .... I ;:; ::10 C')N ... N ." 0 "'::1 ! .... 0 ~ID N I CO) a(/) u; I/) I/)~ 10 IX) :g~ l 0 0 .....,. ... ~ ~1 ~1 co C') .... 10 co .... .t; 0 Z..J 10' . ~.... C') , . , , . , I , , , , . , I I , , C') , . . . , CO) . , .... , , , ...... 0 wo( .0 I N ... 0 N 0:::1 .,. ::E 0 ~t; I 0 ~ N ><( C) I I 0 N Den I ' 'I' a: 0 Z..J , , . , . . tl,l. . . . . , , , . I , . , , . , , , . I . , , . . . . , . , , I , , 0 W<( a.. ~ 0:::1 III I I II z 0 ~t; 0 0 N >0( j::: 1 0 I I II iii I I' w a.. , 0 0: U) Z 2!: 00 0:: 00 m W w 0 0.. ~ ~ Cl ~ C) ;.; I ui 00 ui 011 X ui w ooli= ll: ~o: Z Z ~ Z 0 ui 00 0 00 !i z 0 0 w > 0:: Z ;t~~ m05... c;) ...J 0 Z 0.. Cl 0:: > w w:::!Oz 0.. !i !i 00 ~ 0 Cl w w 00 0.. W i:i:0:: W I 0 )( W 0:: m Z 00 m ~;:)ww w ::> 00 ~ 0 g u.: w w m :;( ..J Z ~ ~ Cl )( 0 <C w oowo,!z m ...moll~ ~ 0 w w m mm > ;:) m ::; ... w w 0 I w Zoo Z Zw 0 0 g ...J <( 0.. "- ~ W Z Z ~ 0 :I: m~ !!:!~dw W ot:w~ 0.. :J: w ~ffi (S m 0:: ~ ;:) W ~ Cl 0 ::; 5 > w wo w ~ 0 ::::E w 011 ~ m~~z~ ;:)ou:;:) 0 ~ W 0..- 0 0.. 011 m 0:: ::::E Z 0:: Go 0 ..J m ;:: 0 ;:)Q. u:: Q. ::::E~ 0 ::::E ...J <C 0:: 011 X ;:) ~ ;:) ;:) !zw !!! Q. 0::1~ ~ 0.. O::oo~O oe( W ...J ::::E ~ 0:: !z 011 :ll: Q. W ti...._w ::~ t- O Q. ... Z m, . 0 Ow Q. 0 12 (5 0 ...: :;( ..J 00 5 0 0 0 00 Q. Wfl) ..J;:):;(..J ::I I ~ ::::E ~ ~.... .... Cl w 0 , Q. ;:) Z W 0 W W W 0:: ~~ GomQ.Q.Q. .f/) oIlzZW Z 0:: 0 Of/) W Z ~ ;:) J Z 0 0 t; ::::E 0 W wu:> I w <C wZ Z 6i m w w m 0 011 W D..-'wQ.wo 011 >.... W Q. W WW WW 00 0-, f/) in m <( w 0 :;( 0:: !i w ui <C 0 ~ Z ~ !i ::I<co::;:)o"'f/) ~f/)~;:);:: 0::::1 a: w 0:: ::::E ::::E~ 0:: Ww -' Z <( w ;:) Z ~ "- oil Cl 0 ClWLLO ~o f/) :s 011 ...J >::::E O::z ~ -' "- oil Cl 00 011 ..J Z ~ f/)i:i:oIlm-,w...J ~ ~- - <( ;:) 0 ~ 0 W :I: :l: "'~~W::::E ~ ...J OW ~2 U:z <( ... 0: ~ 0 W ...J W Z u: oIIO...:w~c6<( ...J 0: <( ~ ~ in 6 ... 00 Q. -...J II) .,. W ;:) -,0:: 0::-: Wo w 0 Z Z ::; ... "- <C ~ w w w ~!::z205i:i: ::100:00 G~ . N Cl w 0:: ~~ ~5} ~ ~ .... ;:) :5 m 0 ~ ~ ~.... CO) N Z ~ 00 :::> LLfI) ~ W .... m :;( m Z Cl w fI) -' :ll: z:;(lt~ W o:::!Q.U::'" ~ g .., .,. Z W ~ ~ <C :l:ui Wu: 0 Q. ;:) ;:) Z 0 0 ;:) W 0:: W ...J <( ~ W :s Wz ~~::::Eom12!;( ~al~~~ <(- ~ 0 0:: 0 wo:: 0::::::E ui Ow < 0 00 Cl 0 <( w ::::E 0.. Q. 0:: 0.. ...J ... W Cl ... U:o ~~ - ;.: .i:i I~I f/) 0 0 0 0> 0 01/) <0 00 O? go.. ... t? N C') ~ 0 ... C') ." <0 ~ IX) 0> 0... NC') .,.1/) 10 .... co 0>0 ~000C')0:::E !::....ool~ ~ ~ i3 :J 0:: ... N C') C') 'f ~~ ~ ...."l z ~ q ~ ~ ... ... ~ ... ~ NN NN NN N N ~ ~ 'c(~~~~;! A.~NC"') W 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 , I 00 00 'I' 0 0 <(00 f/) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 o.,..,.~.,. 0.. ... ... ... ... .... ... ... ... ... . 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N NN NN NN N N N N . ~~C')C')C')C'), "-- # 1:1'41)11I III: VI I'\IV. - <i. ~ "' PAGE S OFJ'4 "...... ... d u a ~ t: r:x: ~ o ~ Z Q ~\o... ~<:::::Id ~~u I a ~~~ ~ <:::::I 0 (<:::::1- ~~~ ~ u t> ~~, >. ~ .:: ~ d -u a a o u .. "...... ~ U tIS !;i...:l .s '0 oC f-<(j , U e-s o ,S "8 ~ tIS ~ rJ) U U ~-o tIS 0 ...:lU ....C o U C~ '.. tf.l U-o ..9 ; .S :E ~ tIS o U .g::r:: rJ) U bOt;; .S in rJ) 6..9 ~'oS ~ .~ U U ... 0 U ; -s ... ....- o S' rJ) 0 S 0 '11 .S U tIS p..bO .s ~ o ... '+1 0 S 5 u-o .... I:: rJ) U ~.g -0'-0 ; ; ~:i '.;::l'a o ::3 ~bO U I:: gl .g-o .~ ~ o ~ii '> .... o 0 ... :l p..1:: o U f-<:s! rJ) .. U '" ... ~ U ~-su ='+-04.-0 ,Q 0 0 1;; >. U = ....- o~ a WJ =.0 ~"8'~ -otlS;:E :;:E U '" tIS ... U U 0 :;:.d ,S ::3 u'" ~ -S ill. u. -S .S ,B !J tIS 'a p.. 3 '0 bO'-e .S [ u> ::3 ~ ~.d tf.l .....- ~ o c ~ o :( ~ \0 o o N 1 II) o o N r=: u> .fI t = bO U tIS ~ ~ .f'~ ~ ~ ~~a .f' e ~ c;g.g g.gp.. U p.. bO oS '0 .~ ~ t 6 g~..c;: S'3E ... = g o U I'i ....-SU U U U au><t: '.;::l tIS lU = e a Uo g'~ ....... 0 . . tf.l f-< Z r.ol ~ = tf.l 1-4 ~ l:4 ~ o u u < ~ o :( ~ II) o o N I' 'l:I' o o N r=: '" = o '+1 ';;; = ~ 8. .g ~ 01:: ~ lib :g .g S p ;g 'E P:;F; ::r:: p.. a '.. = ~ u> ~ tIS -0 .g lib g '.. lib; 0 0 ;:J"'OO= Ul5.. ~J~ l5..0 p.. O::3u'+1 ~g g if -S ~ '; '11 p. ... ...::3 = u -0 u ,8 is 'U; ~ ; ~ 'a c g.s G~'a'a ::r::.... ;.:::t;.as r-4O ootlSa .fig p. - 0 a = ..... .~ ] S 8 ~ ~ ~=ui:l _Od .t::",0 ti, u M '" ... >> 0 I:: u 'a u '" I'i ~ ]. ';::1 p.. t .!:l ~ M =-o::3~ 8':.::: ~~~.s oJ! ;:::6-0 ii'" fJ~8; -o~ -oO'cu-o -08 u-O-oUu>,8::3 8'Eu8'bOU'" - ..... -0 = e. = ~ 5 '> i'~ I:i ~ u U g U ~ 0 v O~P.O l'iU.,::Q . . .. .. \C Q I 0 0 :g 0 0 ~ r=: V) N III Q ..;. 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ V) 'l:I' cr r<l Q r=: '" 'S ::3 - tIS i:l ~ u ::3 ... en ~ ] ~ .: ~ ~ .~ u l5:E~~ a e 8 ;.:3 z .... 0 ~ .... 0 .13 u t3 ~ .~ ~ .g i ::3 ~ 0 ::3 ,::Q ,_, u 0 :> Vip.....~ ~ .s .D = f;ol u .~ '0 ~ ~ ~ ... ~ i i i ~ 8 ~ z '- ~ ;,; ..... = u e .d '" = e o CJ CJ < c; = o :c :a -0 < AQENDA ITEM NO. J C. "', PAGE.JL OF '" ... c:l u a ~ t: ~ C4 o t::l.. Z U 1'-4 ~ U)~... ~(:;:)c:l rT1 (:;:) u l""'I~a ~ ':I- t::l.. ~(:;:)o <(:;:),... ~~~ P-c~~ o >- ~ .~ f-4 c:l 1'-4 =' U a a o u + CLl u~ ~....l .5 '0 0.0 E-< ... U . CLl ~o5 ~] ~ '" u 0 j8 '0.0 .o~ ... 00 U-o .s fa .s ;g ~ '" o 0 g::I: ", 0 OIlS .s 00 ", ~ u ]05 -05 ~ o~ u 0 "'-0 U !:: -5 .~ .....- ~ a- !:: 0 o 0 li .s u '" 0.00 ", "0 !::~ .~ ~ .;::: ~ e ~ u-o ~ !:: ", CLl ~B ]] ~ J9 .;::: .a o ::s ~oo u d l!1 <2-0 .~ ~, u 0 -0-5 0> ..... o 0 ... ", o.~ b u E-<~ '" ... e CLl 0 ' ~.sv :c.....-g .- 0 U a .0_ Q~", rn ttS.& CLl '" 0 ~ ].~ "O"';:?1 ;;g 0 ... '" ... CLl 0 0 :c...t:l .s ~ vO", ~o5li3 rIl ~ o c ~ o ~ ", 00 .~ ~ .~ 8 ~ 0;;; g &t ~ 8. .;::: d .8 g @ .g ]"t~ ogEl ::I: 8.~:S ~a ",!!1 Iib-O..... 0 u.~ 0 fa .0 l:i. ~-o!:::_~!:: '0 u...... ",0 8.!:l u.g 00.;::: o g.o5 '" oog ~ e ~.a'S ~ -0 u t; ..., <I) d fa-5]U5<: >>l:::' ..oa::I: 0 o '" - d .... ~ '" ::! S 0 '0 El d.;::: ,:l..ggEl~S ~]El8""'~ .;:::!::.8~OM "'o~d~..2 t;~"'eCLlP. :8 8.!i ..2 [.s S"g ~ 9<,.g;a -0 '+=l Ir o~ u '" <:':=o-o~~ !:: '" 0 l;'" 0 '" g. '" CLl 0 go.~ -8 go ~ ~ -u 2.... -U ~ oS >0>:>1'000 CLl CLl 8 CLl 0 u OP::,:l..OU~ It) Cl Cl ~ ~ Cl Cl M ~ ~ . . . . . . rIl E-4 Z ~ rIl ::s ,:l.. )1 o u ~ ~ o ~ ~ :"I' Cl Cl M I fO'I Cl Cl M .f: ~ u CLl 0 .;;: IE e 0 c1d '" li:: 01:: - .8 8 '" 00 u.s .s ~ .S g 05 lib ~ 0. .~ J: ] .~ a.a ~ ~ ~ ~ g .g l:i.~ ~ .~ .~~ ~ * 0~;:?1 a 0 tlu;a.c -oe ....Q ... Po. 0 .2CLl -0 El 5.: a.1:: g ....lU ..t:l .s.s ~ .s.S t> "g ~ cp ~ U <<I :f~ ~ a fr ~ ,:l.. 0 0 5.: o u ~ u e o CPl::: -os u '" got: -0 ~ 0. U g- o", . .. III Cj' "'t' 0 0 0 Q~~V) ~ "'t' Cj' (Ol Q ~ (Ol Q , M e f:: o~ i 'd e ~ ~ i .~...u ~: f-o ~ CLl ~i:l~ s a 8 ;:i ~ ..... 0 ::g f;Iil 0 013 u u a ~ o~ ~ .g -Eb ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 8.] ~ Q .8 .f9 ..... f;Iil ~ 'a 0 f-o CLl !3 ~ ~i]~ ~ 0 ~ !3 (/}u....z ......." \:) \J' "-' ;,; .... !:: CLl e .c :! e Q U U -< -; I: Q :c :0 "0 -< ......" AQENDAITEM NO. 't't ... & ,..,- I ns: __ ~ ~ ~ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 8.68 TO TITLE 8 OF THE LAKE ELSINORE MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING A RENTAL HOUSING SAFETY PROGRAM THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That a new Chapter 8.68 is hereby added to Title 8 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 8.68 8.68.005 8.68.010 8.68.020 8.68.030 8.68.040 8.68.050 8.68.060 8.68.070 8.68.080 8.68.090 8.68.100 8.68.110 8.68.120 8.68.130 Purpose and Intent Definitions Registration Required Transfer of Property Maintenance of Records Manner of Registering Inspection Guidelines Preparation of Inspection Schedule Inspection Procedures Certificate of Compliance Required Right of Entry for Inspection Timing of Repairs Schedule for Implementation Enforcement 8.68.005 Purpose and Intent. The City recognizes a need for an organized inspection program of residential rental units within the City in order to ensure that rental units meet basic City and State safety, health, fire and zoning codes; to provide a more efficient system for compelling both absentee and local landlords to correct violations of these codes which pose a threat to the health and safety of tenants; and to ensure the maintenance, in proper condition, of residential rental properties within the City. The City recognizes that the most efficient system to provide for rental inspections is the creation of a regulatory program requiring the registration of certain residential rental units within the City so that orderly inspection schedules can be made by City officials. - I - AQENDA ITEM~O.~ '-, PAGE " OF---Ci.. 8.68.010 Definitions. The following definitions shall apply to this chapter: ~ "Boarding Unit" means a dwelling unit where lodging is provided with or without means for compensation, for seven or more persons, such that it is required to be licensed as a social care facility. "Certificate" means Certificate of Compliance. "City" means the City of Lake Elsinore. "Director" means the Director of Community Development or his/her designee. "Granny Flat" means a residential occupancy of an accessory dwelling unit located on the same parcel as the principal dwelling unit which is occupied by one or two adults, who have reached the age of sixty (60), and are dependents of the residents of the primary unit, or are court-appointed conservatees of a resident of a principal unit, or are members of a very low income household as specified in Section 50105 of the Health and Safety Code and are related to the residents of principal unit by birth, marriage, or adoption. "Inspector" means the Building Official, Code Enforcement Officer, City Planner or designees for the City of Lake Elsinore responsible for implementing the Rental Housing Safety Program. ~ "Occupant" means any person who occupies a Rental Housing Unit whether as a tenant or permittee of the Owner, but not an Owner Occupied Unit. "Owner" means a Person that has an ownership interest, whether as an individual, partner, joint venture, stock owner, or some other capacity, in a Rental Housing Unit. "Owner Occupied Unit" means a dwelling unit which is occupied by the Owner. "Person" means an individual, partnership, corporation or association or rental agent. "Rental Housing Safety Program" shall mean the procedures and requirements set forth in this Chapter 8.68. "Rental Housing Unit" means any dwelling unit, a single structure, or in a group of attached or detached structures containing one or more such dwelling units on the same parcel of land, and is occupied or intended to be occupied on a rental basis, excepting such units which are exempt as provided herein. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Rental Housing Unit shall not include Boarding Units, Granny Flats, hospitals, convalescent care facilities, nursing homes, mobilehomes within mobile home parks, and Owner Occupied Units. ....., - 2 - AQENOA ITEM NO 3 c. PAGE~'OF.J!L ~ "Resident" means any individual, family, or group of persons residing in a Rental Housing Unit. 8.68.020 Registration Required. No Person shall hereafter occupy, allow to be occupied or let to another Person for occupancy any Rental Housing Unit within the City for which a Rental Housing Safety Inspection Application form has not been properly filed with the Building and Safety Division and accompanied by a fee to cover the cost of inspection, in accordance with the City's fee schedule. The Rental Housing Safety Inspection Application form shall be furnished by the Building and Safety Division and shall specifically require the following minimum information: 1. Name, address and phone number of the Owner; 2. Name, address and phone numbers of a designated local property manager if the Owner lives outside of the City; 3. The street address of the Rental Housing Unit; 4. The number and types of Rental Housing Units within the rental property; ~ 5. The maximum number of Occupants permitted for each Rental Housing Unit; 6. The name, ad,dress and phone number of the Person authorized to make or otherwise provide for repairs or services for the Rental Housing Unit, if the Person is different from the Owner or designated local manager. 8.68.030 Transfer of Property. Every new Owner of a Rental Housing Unit shall submit to the Building and Safety Division a completed Rental Housing Safety Inspection Application form within thirty (30) days of transfer or change in ownership or control, indicating if any change in the type of occupancy as originally registered is contemplated. No fee shall be required of the new Owner at the time of submittal so long as all applicable fees are current. 8.68.040 Maintenance of Records. All records, files and documents pertaining to the Rental Housing Safety Program, except business licenses, shall be maintained by the Building and Safety Division and made available to the public as required by State law. ",-.. - 3 - AGENDA ITEM NO. J C. .. PAGE~ OF -' '-\ 8.68.050 Manner of Registering. .~ All Rental Housing Units shall be registered with the City as required by Section 8.68.020 by no later than May 1,2005 and shall be renewed annually, on or before May 1, of each year thereafter, by the Owner or designated local property manager in the office of the Building and Safety Division. 8.68.060 Inspection Guidelines. The Building and Safety Division shall prepare inspection guidelines to assist Owners in complying with the Rental Housing Safety Program. The inspection guidelines shall be made available free of charge. 8.68.070 Preparation of Inspection Schedule. The Director shall prepare an inspection schedule, consistent with the implementation phasing schedule set forth in Section 8.68.120, which provides at least sixty (60) days notice to the Owner prior to the initial inspection along with a copy of the inspection guidelines. 8.68.080 Inspection Procedures. A. The Director shall cause each Rental Housing Unit to be inspected annually for compliance with applicable City and State codes relating to zoning building, ~ health, safety and property maintenance. B. If the Rental Housing Unit is in compliance with applicable City and State codes relating to zoning building, health, safety and property maintenance, the Director shall issue a Certificate of Compliance. C. If, upon inspection, violations of one or more applicable City and State codes relating to zoning building, health, safety and property maintenance are noted, the City shall provide written notice of such violations or non-compliance within twenty (20) days following the inspection or within a reasonable time thereafter and shall set a re- inspection date before which such violation shall be corrected, but in no event shall such re-inspection take place less than thirty (30) days following service of the notice of violation. If such violation has been corrected within that period, the Director shall issue a Certificate of Compliance. If such violations have not been corrected within that period, the Director shall not issue the Certificate of Compliance and the City may take any action necessary to enforce compliance with applicable City and State codes relating to zoning building, health, safety and property maintenance. '-' -4- AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 C. PAGE , , OF I '-I ~ ~ 8.68.090 Certificate of Compliance Required. A. No Owner shall rent, let for occupancy or permit occupancy of any Rental Housing Unit without having a valid, current Certificate of Compliance for such Rental Housing Unit, subject to the Schedule ofImplementation set forth in Section 8.68.030. B. The Certificate of Compliance shall expire one (1) year from the date of issuance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Director may determine to extend the Certificate of Compliance for up to two (2) years. C. The Certificate shall provide the following information: 1. Date of Issuance; 2. Address of the Rental Housing Unit; 3. Date of expiration of Certificate; 4. That the Rental Housing Unit has been inspected and found in compliance with applicable City and State codes relating to zoning building, health, safety and property maintenance. /'"' D. A Certificate of Compliance issued pursuant to this Chapter shall be transferable to succeeding Owners; provided that, within thirty (30) days of the transfer, the transferor shall provide written notice of such transfer as set forth in Section 8.68.030 herein. 8.68.100 Right of Entry for Inspection. This Chapter contemplates exterior and interior inspections of residential rental properties. The Inspector shall have the right to make both exterior and interior inspections of properties which are subject to the Rental Housing Safety Program. If any person refuses to permit the Inspector to enter any premises to make an inspection authorized by this Chapter, the Inspector shall seek an inspection warrant or other appropriate court order. 8.68.110 Timing of Repairs. All necessary repairs shall be completed within thirty (30) days of service of the notice of violation, or for such longer period as may be approved by the Director. 8.68.120 Schedule for Implementation. Inspection under the Rental Housing Safety Program shall be phased in over a three year ~ period. In the first year beginning January 1, 2005, all properties consisting of five or more Rental Housing Units shall be subject to inspections as provided herein. In the - 5 - AcaENDA ITEM hiO. ,,, " PAGE I J.;X second year, properties consisting of two or more Rental Housing Units shall be subject to inspections as provided herein. In the third year, all single family Rental Housing ~ Units shall be subject to inspection as provided herein. 8.68.130 Enforcement. This Chapter shall be enforced in accordance with Chapter 1.20 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code provided, however, that nothing herein shall prevent the enforcement of this ordinance by criminal, civil, or administrative actions either undertaken individually or in conjunction with other remedies as provide herein. SECTION 2: SEVERABILITY The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each Section, subsection, clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that anyone or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional, in which case all other provisions hereof shall remain valid and enforceable. SECTION 3: EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days following its adoption and shall, prior to expiration fifteen (15) days after its adoption, be published and/or posted in at least three (3) public places as designated by resolution ofthe City Council. '-' PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this _ day of the following roll call vote: , 2004, by AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor ATTEST: Vicki Kasad, City Clerk '-' - 6- AGENDA ITEM NO. J , PAGE.l..l.OF~ ,....., APPROVED AS TO FORM: Barbara Zeid Leibold, City Attorney ,....., "..... - 7 - AGENDA ITEM NO. , C. PAGE--C!OF~ CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL ~ TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL FROM: BENEFIT AUDIT SUB-COMMITTEE DATE: October 26, 2004 SUBJECT: Benefit Audit BACKGROUND . Due to the withdrawal of the William Healey III firm, the Benefit Audit Sub- Committee has asked a second bidder, Conrad and Associates, to submit a proposal to carry out the audit as approved by the City Council. Conrad has submitted a letter generaly outlining their probable work product, cost (not-to-exceed $18,000), and completion timeframe (please see attached letter). ......, It has also come to the attention of the Sub-Committee that certain legal assistance may be necessary to complete the audit. FISCAL IMPACT Not to exceed $18,000. RECOMMENDATION The Benefit Audit Sub-Committee therefore requests that the Council authorize the Sub-Committee to interview and, pending interview, select Conrad and Associates to perform the audit at a cost of no more than $18,000. The Sub-Committee also asks the Council to allow the expenditure of up to $7,000 for legal assistance from our recently retained personnel attorney,Steven Filarsky. "" AQENDA 'TEM NO. 3 L "'-. PAGE-L OF) - - - - -.- r-- CC 1. 20. 2 I) I) 4 1 0 : 08 AM CB [Z NO. 6741 P. 2 ,--. CONRAD AND ASSOCIATES, L.L.P. CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 230'1 DUPONT DRIVE, SUITE 200 IRVINE. CALIFORNIA 92li12 ('4') 474.2020 F:I>r (949) 263.5520 October 20, 2004 Thomas Buckley, Mayor Robert E. Mage~ Councilman City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, California 92530 Dear Mayor Buckley and Councilman Magee: Conrad and Associates, L.L.P. is pleased to respond to your request for proposal to provide agreed-upon auditing services as set forth in your Jetter to us dated August 20, 2004 ond further clarified in your Summary of City Employee Benefits and Reimbursements dated September 29, 2004 with respecl to the fonowing: ,-- . Health and Wellness Benefit Program . City travel practices . Petty cash . City credit card usage (VISA, etc.) . City gas credit cards . Educational reimbursement . Other employee benetitslreimbursements We understand that records will be made available to our professional staff at the City offices. Based upon the selection and notification of award on November I, 2004, we would commence: all audit work for the year ended JtUle 30, 2004 on November 29, 2004 and submit our draft report to 'the subcommittee by January 7, 2005. We have allocated time for our management team to discuss our fmdings and recommendations with the Cotmcil subcommittee. We estimate the tasks as outlined in your August 20, 2004 scope of work and Summary of City Employee Benefits and Reimbursements dated September 29, 2004 to be approximately 190-200 professional hours including meeting and management review time for the fiscal year ended June 3D, 2004. Our not-to-exceed maximum fee, including our out-of-pocket expenses would be SI8,OOO. ,,-.. MEMBlR5 Of AIG'A AND OIlIfORNIA 50ClETY Qf CERTIFIED PU8l1C ^CCOUI'JT^NT5 MEMBER OF iIMERIC'-N INHITUTf Of Cf~iIFI[D PuBLIC ACCOUNTANTS J>~IV"'lE COMPANIES rRJICl'Cf SEatON !,1tMi!HJA ITEM NO.~~' 1~::~ PAGEA OF-1...! OCT 21 '04 13:40 9094714050 PRGE.03 Oct 21 04 01:3Sp 0C7.20.2004 iO:OBAM FWFP CBll ~U~"(.L"UOU p.'" NO. 6741 P.3 Thomas Buckley, MayoT Robert E. Magee, Councilman O<;tober 20, 2004 Page Two "-'" We have previously provided you with the qualifications of our fmn and the audit engagement team who will serve you. We look forward to yOUI decision and to corrunenc.ing this project on behalf of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore. If the fOIegoing proposal nleets with your approval. you may sign and return a copy of this engagement letter. Very truly yours, CONRAD AND ASSOCIATES, L.L.P. tf?1,'cA~ .4 ~ Michael A. Harrison, C.P.A. Partner MAH:dac. Enclosure '-" Accepted: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE By: Title: Date: AaeNoA 'TEM NO. ,., .':"" ",", ... ~ -6 ".PAGE-L..OF-l:!! n1T?1 '~a 1~:a~ 9094714050 PAGE. 04