Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/09/2004 CC ReportsPage Three — City Council Agenda — March 9,2004 } RECOMMENDATION: Approve Bid Award for one year, renewable to three yes. S. 2003 /2004 Equipment Replacement Program — Tractors — Cook Equipment - $3,251.50/mo.lease.. ', RECOMMENDATION: Authorize Lease of Two Tractors. 9. Bid Award — Contract of Asphalt Maintenance - Hardy & Harper - $72,100. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize Maintenance Contract. 10. Bid Award — Contract for Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk Maintenance - NPG Corporatibn - $6,750. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize Maintenance Contract. 11. Bid Award — Contract for Unpaved Road Maintenance — Hardy & Harper - $5,920. RECOMMENDATION:, Authorize Maintenance Contract. . PUBLICM GS s, 21 Tentative Tract Map 32008 Lakeshore Village Specific Plan -- Corman Leigh Communities. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Tentative Tract Map 32008 -, based tux.,the Findings and Subject to the Conditions of Approval. 22. Tentative Parcel Map No. 31963, "Pasadena Business Park II"- Triple J Development, RECOMMENDATION: Approve Tentative Parcel Map 31963, based on Findings'& x. Exhibit A, and Subject to Conditions of Approval. 23, General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -03, Zone Change No. 1003 -02, Tentative Condominium Map No. 31532, Residential Design Review No. R 2003.15 and Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2004.01 for the "Lake Elsinore City Center Townhomes" Phase I1- Resolution No. 2004 -16 & Ordinance No. 1117. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 2004 -16 approving General Plan >. Amendment 2003 -03 Adopt Ordinance No; 1, 1117 upon First Reading by Title Only approving Zane Change No. 2003 -02, approve Tentative Condominium Map 31532, approve Residential Design Review 2003 -15 and adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration 2004 -01 based on the Findings and Exhibits a thru R, and subject to Conditions t of Approval. z a MINUTES CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA THURSDAY, JANUARY 29, 2004 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Buckley called the City Council Study Session to order at 4:00 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: � ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: HICKMAN, KELLEY, MAGEE, SCHIFFNER BUCKLEY COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE Also present were: City Manager Watenpaugh, Assistant City Manager Best, Deputy City Attorney Steve Miles, Administrative Services Director Pressey, Community Development Director Brady, Community Services Director Sapp, Lake & Aquatic Resources Director Kilroy, Public Works Manager Payne, Parks & Open Space Manager Fazzio, Police Lieutenant Featherolf, and Deputy City Clerk Ray. DISCUSSION ITEMS Mayor Buckley gave an overview of the history of the Public Safety Commission. He noted the Commission was started in the mid 80's and slowly diminished. The idea of reestablishing the Commission was entertained one year ago by Council. During that time Council expressed there feeling and gave their views on the Public Safety Commission. 4AGGENDA ITU l ,`its. PAGE __. _.. OF PAGE TWO -STUDY SESSION - JANUARY 29, 2004 Public Comments Tim Fleming, stated that he along with Councilman Hickman attended a meeting at Martha's Village & Kitchen (homeless shelter) in Indio; Wendy Kolk from Supervisor Buster's Office also attended the meeting. He commented that there was no disaster relief in Lake Elsinore. He indicated there were some discrepancies on the City of Lake Elsinore/Riverside County Emergency Personnel List. Mr. Fleming suggested forming a citizen group based on future districts. Councilman Hickman commented that Temecula formed a citizens group overseen by the School District, Fire Department and Police Department. He stated that Temecula had two 40 ft. trailers that were mobile. He further commented that Lake Elsinore had no disaster plan. Mayor Buckley gave an overview of the packet presented to Council. He commended Councilman Magee on his proposed draft of Chapter 2.46 of the 1..0e Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. Ron Hewison, 35 Villa Valtelena, Tuscany Hills, commented that there were potential fire hazards in the Tuscany Hills area. He further commented that he had submitted recommendations for public safety issues. Councilman Magee commended Mr. Hewison on his detailed research and recommendations. Councilman Magee submitted a proposed draft of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Chapter 2.46 regarding the Public Safety Commission. He commented that the Commission would be helpful to police, fire and code enforcement. He noted that he would like to see the City complaint form available on the City website. Councilman Hickman stated his concern was that there was no disaster relief in Lake Elsinore. He suggested following Temecula's design. He stated his idea of public safety was not to watch over the Police Department. Mayor Buckley commented that the Disaster Preparedness Plan was updated every few years. He indicated that he would like to include public health in AGENDA ITEM. NO, PAGE OF� A0__ PAGE THREE -STUDY SESSION - JANUARY 299 2004 public safety. He noted grant funds might be available. Mayor Buckley commended Councilman Magee on the draft he submitted regarding the Public Safety Commission. He also suggested a citizen patrol /action patrol. Councilman Schiffner indicated that he was not in support of any commission or committee to oversee the Police Department; however he was in support of disaster relief and felt it was an excellent idea. He stated in his opinion the City Council was not ready to approve a commission at this time. He suggested forming an Ad Hoc Committee and presenting a package to Council. He reiterated that he would not approve any oversight of the Police Department. Councilman Magee asked the City Manager to give an overview of the disaster plan the City had in place at this time. City Manager Watenpaugh explained that the Emergency Operation Center (EOC) was located in Conference Room A at City Hall. He noted there were satellite phones to communicate with the County. He noted that Red Cross set up shelters depending on the disaster and the location. Mayor Pro Tem Kelley commented that there were some good ideas put on the table for the Council to consider. She stated that she could support the duties in the draft as proposed. She noted the citizen patrol /action patrol suggested by Mayor Buckley would need to be considered later. She understood there was a Countywide plan, but suggested there was a need for a Citywide plan that would include disaster preparedness. She complimented Mr. Hewison on the suggestions he had submitted. Police Lieutenant Featherolf, suggested that if Council was to elect a committee that it be an Advisory Council. He stated that from past experience an Advisory Council had been more effective with the community and law enforcement. He continued to say it would be an advisory body not an investigative body. He noted that the present ordinance would not work well if the Council elected to have an Advisory r- Council, as the ordinance would need to be revised. He noted that there AGENDA ITEM NO. —\ . a.• s. PAGE �,�i PAGE FOUR -STUDY SESSION - JANUARY 29, 2004 Lwn would always be a cost with an Advisory Council or Public Safety Commission. Councilman Hickman requested a copy of Temecula's Disaster Relief Plan. Public Works Manager Bill Payne commented that he would contact Phillip Bardos, Riverside Office of Emergency Services to obtain that information. Mayor Buckley commented there was no intent to micromanage public safety mechanics. He commented Councilmembers would only be responsible for appointing individuals of their choice. He asked Police Lieutenant Featherolf if there should be any type of background review of the individuals. Police Lieutenant Featherolf recommended screenings and background investigations. City Manager Watenpaugh recommended everyone chosen be over the age of 21. Councilman Magee agreed with Councilman Schiffner to appoint an Ad Hoc Committee. City Manager Watenpaugh indicated that with the direction of the Council, staff could start working on Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Chapter 2.46. He recommended having representatives from the Police, Fire, Code Enforcement and Public Works Manager Bill Payne who was the Disaster Preparedness Coordinator to give input to the Council. Councilman Magee stated that the LEMC needed to be rewritten. He suggested another draft of the LEMC Chapter 2.46. Mayor Buckley noted that he would like to see public health added to the draft. He indicated the information that would be brought back to Council would need to include duties and responsibilities. He commented that the title was very important; whereas the word commission implied a definite i•.. "�. PAGE QF� � PAGE FIVE -STUDY SESSION - JANUARY 299 2004 sense of permanence; whereas the word advisory council or committee did not; and to ensure it did not fade away again, appointed individuals that give their time and serve, needed to know that they were making a difference as opposed to just advising. He commented the Public Safety Commission was just as important as the Planning Commission. He asked fellow councilmembers if they would like to appoint an Ad Hoc Committee or elect two Councilmembers to work with staff. Councilman Schiffner suggested that two Councilmembers along with staff rewrite Chapter 2.46 and bring it back to Council. Council agreed an Ad Hoc Committee would not be appointed and staff would work with Councilman Magee and Mayor Buckley. Daniel Uhlry commented he agreed with the screening process and suggested following the City of Perris guidelines regarding section 2.48.010. He noted the Public Safety Commission should assist the police and sheriff patrols, not be a detriment. Chris Hyland suggested that there should be input from the public. She noted that the Council and Staff were going to rewrite the draft and there was not any public input; and she felt a member of the public should also be involved with the rewrite of Chapter 2.46. Mayor Buckley stated that the public could e -mail Councilmembers and staff or mail their ideas to the City regarding the issue. Edith Stafford complimented Councilmember Magee on the draft he submitted and asked to have a disaster plan implemented. She noted the community needed more eyes and ears and felt this was a good idea. City Manager Watenpaugh noted that the City had received phone calls from Tim Fleming and George Alongi, requesting to be considered for the Commission. Mayor Buckley thanked everyone for attending to the Study Session. AQEWA ITEM NO PAGE PAGE SIX -STUDY SESSION - JANUARY 29, 2004 ADJOURNMENT THE CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION WAS ADJOURNED AT 5:00 P.M. THOMAS BUCKLEY, MAYOR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE Respectfully submitted, Frederick Ray, Deputy City Clerk ATTEST: VICKI KASAD, CMC, CITY CLERK/ HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE = OF_1P__ •..01 ...r MINUTES CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 199 2004 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Buckley called the City Council Study Session to order at 6:10 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: HICKMAN, MAGEE, SCHIFFNER, BUCKLEY ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: KELLEY Also present were: City Manager Watenpaugh, Assistant City Manager Best, Deputy City Attorney Steve Miles, Administrative Services Director Pressey, Community Development Director Brady, Community Services Director Sapp, Information/ Communications Manager Dennis, Planning Manger Villa, Engineering Manager Seumalo, and Deputy City Clerk Ray. DISCUSSION ITEMS Mayor Buckley indicated that the City Council had authorized City Staff to hire consultants to perform a study of the Country Club Heights area. He stated the consultants would be giving a presentation of their findings; and noted the presentation would reflect options and concepts. City Manager Watenpaugh deferred to Community Development Director Brady to give a brief overview Community Development Director Brady commented there had been a lot of 100�- interest in the Country Club Heights area. The City Council had directed staff to move forward with a study of the area, which originally started out AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF—J-5— PAGE TWO -STUDY SESSION - FEBRUARY 19, 2004 with the area of Country Club Heights between Chaney Street and Riverside Drive; but later Council directed Staff to expand the study to include the area northeast of Riverside Drive. The area now included an estimated 800 acres and over 5,300 lots in that particular area. Staff mailed over 3,000 notices, of this meeting it was advertised in the Press Enterprise and on the City website. He noted the City had retained the services of The Planning Center to conduct the study. He noted the purpose of the study was to know the opportunities and constraints for development in the Country Club Heights area. He indicated that the area was unique in terms of the topography, road structure, and layout of roads. He further indicated there were a number of issues that had been identified by The Planning Center in regards to development (land use, zoning, utilities, infrastructure, etc.). He stated that Staff needed direction from the City Council as to the types of development, and input from the community as to what they would like to see the area developed into. He indicated road widths would need to be reviewed, and from a public safety standpoint how the fire department could service the area. He introduced Brian James and Collin Rukus from The Planning Center. Brian James stated they were asked to provide a basic understanding of the site, they were not proposing any concrete plans, but giving a basic understanding of the opportunity, the constraints and give a conceptual plan. He stated when the property was originally subdivided in the 1920's it was done without regard to the construction ability of the lots, without regard to access, and without regard to infrastructure; and the area was subdivided without consideration of the ability of the land to support the level of development. He indicated the City was fortunate that the property did not develop the way it was subdivided; as there was no way the existing circulation system could handle the level 'of traffic, there was no way the land could support the septic system and there was not adequate water for fires in that area. He reiterated there were 5,300 individual lots, some less than 1,000 sqft., which equated to about seven dwelling unit an acre; if that was to build out there would be 13,000 residents and about 53,000 daily trips. He indicated that was an urban level of development in that area and it demanded an urban level of services. He commented that the Planning Center did not think an urban level of development was appropriate on that AGENDA ITEM NO.. PAGE OE _ 1.5-- PAGE THREE -STUDY SESSION - FEBRUARY 199 2004 site and would provide background data to support their decision and a different land use pattern for the site. He noted their main goal was to provide the City Council with information to have an informed discussion on the area. Collin Rukus provided a PowerPoint presentation. He indicated the location of the area, centrally located between the downtown area and the Outlet area. He noted that it was located near some compatible residential in support of commercial development. The only constraints were the Temescal Wash and the light industrial development that needed to be buffered. He commented on the external road access to Lakeshore Drive and Highway 74. He noted there were over 3,000 owners, which put a substantial constraint on the ability to form cohesive development. He continued with the presentation with a brief discussion of each of the following issues: 1. ZONING The current General Plan and Zoning Code treated the site with a vision of a resort oriented development. The high density development was focused along the corridor and adjacent to the lake. In the southern portion it was high density R -2 and R -3. He continued to say at maximum build out the site could support over 6,000 units, but that did not mean it was appropriate or the units could actually be built, it only meant that it was permitted. Taking minimum lot size requirements the red portion of the slide indicated they did not conform to the minimum lot size requirements for their zone; the green lots did conform to the minimum lot size requirements. He noted that the properties were subdivided in the 1920's and were considered lots of record and therefore were not obligated to conform to the minimum lot size requirements, however the other lot standards such as; the lot frontages and set backs still did apply. AGENDA ITEM NO. 1' PAGE 3 OF PAGE FOUR -STUDY SESSION - FEBRUARY 19, 2004 2. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS They also studied the physical constraints on the site. Being that the property was next to the lake, they reviewed the flood hazard. He indicated that most of the topography worked in the site's favor, raising most of the land out of the reach of the 1,263 ft. floodplain. The Temescal Wash did not impact the site in a significant manner. The MSHCP would mostly likely be defined and follow the natural shape of the Temescal Wash. He indicated the next constraint was Wildland fires. He indicated the site was completely contained within a high fire hazard severity zone. He reminded everyone of the Old Waterman Canyon Fire. He also commented on the Oakland - Berkeley Hills Fire in 1991, which resulted in a loss of over 3,400 units and a total of twenty five deaths. The narrow roads and deep terrain played a significant role in the accessibility of emergency vehicles. The next environmental issue was the infrastructure of the water supply. He noted according to the Fire Department pipe lines had to be a minimum of 6 inches in width in order to provide a sufficient flow and capacity. He noted the majority of the site was inadequately served. In the central portion of the site where most of the development would occur there were no water lines. He indicated that to put development in that portion of the site could be a fire risk; he added with the slope of that area it would be very expensive to build. He indicated the limit of feasible development slope was 20% to 25 %; any higher would call for a need of extremely technological advance building methods. He further indicated on the 15% to 25% degree slope it was risky and would be hard to build. He noted slopes were in favor of the fires and allowed the fire to travel up the slope and expand on the crest, which makes it difficult for fire trucks to reach. ..me AGUCA ITEM! NO. PAGE OF t .? _• PAGE FIVE -STUDY SESSION - FEBRUARY 199 2004 3. ACCESSIBILITY He indicated that many of the roads suffer from steep slopes primarily unpaved; and the majority of the roads could only be accessed with 4x4 in good weather. He also indicated that most of the roads that were paved were far to narrow, and in order to expand to the full right -of -way there would be an extreme amount of grading, which would be expensive. 4. SERVICE He noted the location of the existing sewer lines, and the 200 ft. proximity to sewer was identified in the slide presentation. The Planning Center did a review of the size of the lots. The reason for the review of the size of the lots in relationship to the sewer was to get rid of waste water if the site was to be built upon. The only two ways to do it was (1) connecting to the existing sewer system or creating a subsurface septic system. He noted the Regional Water Quality Control Board informed the Planning Center they had a standard for new development that would require a lot to be '/2 acre in size to be allowed to use a septic system, due to the varying degrees of percolation rates, which differ depending on the amount of slope and the type of soil. He noted the areas that had a 200 ft. proximity to sewer, and presumed those areas could feasibly connect into the existing sewer system without too much cost. He indicated that 90% of the site was not large enough to develop individually and use a septic system. 5. CONSOLIDATION OPPORTUNITIES He indicated the red parcels in the slide presentation represented owners that owned 1 to 3 parcels, yellow indicated 4 to 10 parcels, and green indicated 11 or more parcels. He noted that a majority of the small lots were owned by individuals that owned maybe 1 or 2 parcels, so they would not be able to consolidate their parcels. The AGENDA ITEM! ISO. PAGE OF PAGE SIX -STUDY SESSION - FEBRUARY 19, 2004 EWA- individuals that owned 11 or more were more likely to be able to buy up the other property of those single lot owners or merge their own properties. 6. POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO He indicated at build out it would be 763 gross acres of residential, keeping the 14 acres of commercial development as commercial. He commented that 2,000 units developed at the moderate density level. Area 1. He indicated for the scenario they drew in' /2 acre lots for the area that suffered from high slopes and limited sewer access. Area 2. He indicated this area had existing development the northern section was primarily developed and suffered from minor slope constraints, but had major road access. This area was treated as a transition zone. Area 3. He indicated the area had some reasonable sewer expansion, moderate slope constraints and could serve as a transition zone. Area 4. He indicated the area consisted of minor slope constraints, which allowed for greater density. The area had major road access and was in close proximity to sewer lines. AGENDA ITEM NO.— PAGE OFv_I.!�_ �' PAGE SEVEN -STUDY SESSION - FEBRUARY 19, 2004 r-- Area 5. He indicated this area had the greatest development potential. The area had immediate sewer access, minor slope constraints and major road access. Area 6. He indicated that this area was commercial. Mayor Buckley indicated the idea for a Country Club Heights Overlay District was that the integrity of the existing neighborhood, as the preservation of the neighborhood was a primary concern, but it was difficult for individuals to build custom houses. He stated this was not a Trojan horse to bring in standard tract houses. Audrey Dunn, 26481 El Toro Road, indicated that he was concerned with the price that he was quoted $30,000.00 for permits and for improvements fees to put a manufactured home on the lot. He indicated he would like to put his home on the lot. George Bloomfield, 24532 Quintana Drive, indicated that he and his wife had purchased lots recently; and over the years he was told that he owned the lot with a surrounding private road. He was concerned that as development took place where the line would be drawn for the private road. The road was located off Champion. He indicated it was a very steep drop off from Champion to go across to their property. He commented that they had concerns regarding drainage and for getting construction equipment to the property; and if there was any support from the City for that particular intersection (Champion and Leinberg). He asked if the Powerpoint presentation would be accessible on the City website. Mayor Buckley indicated it would be accessible on the City website. a—� J.J. Swanson O'Neal, 1403 W. Heald, noted she was a member of Lake Elsinore Historical Society; she inquired if and noted the street lamps in that AGENDA ITEM PLO. PAGE —a OF PAGE EIGHT -STUDY SESSION - FEBRUARY 19, 2004 `woe area located on Lakeshore Drive in regard to the Overlay there was a chance to have those lights activated. She stated the lamp could be activated by solar panels made for each lamp. She indicated the price was $700.00 for the purchase and would probably be minimal to install the panels. She noted the street lamps had been in the area since 1926; and commented it would add some civic pride to the area. Terry Thiehen, 17937 Lakeshore Drive, indicated the septic tanks were 3 blocks west of Chaney. He indicated there were 10 houses along there that had septic tanks. He further indicated the Planning Center presentation showed that the sewer did not connect. He indicated that and had been in contact with the Regional Water Quality Control Board he complained to the Board that the sewers could contaminate the Lake. He noticed in the presentation it was zone as a R2 which was good to see. He noted it was 2,000 ft and asked who could put in the sewer line. He indicated he had spoken to EVMWD and they said they could put in the sewer line. Ron LaPere, 16867 Wells Street, indicated his concern was the amount of pounds per square inch of water. He noted they had a low water pressure and presumed it was from EVMWD. He noted the need for adequate fire protection in order to protection current homeowners in that area. Marjorie Kinney, P.O. Box 2219, Laguna Hills, CA, indicated she owned 14 lots in the Country Club Heights area. She indicated the area was a sleeping giant, and each owner of those lots had their own story to tell. She stated she realized it would take deep pockets to have the beauty and an appreciation in the price of the property. She noted some of her ideas to consolidate the lots were (1) to request eminent domain of any of the property that was currently delinquent in their state taxes. (2) A 90 day melt down, which was a current value of the property that was currently there and figure out based on the access to roads, whether it be flag lots or lots without access to roads, the location, the view, which would be a value to the owner and during a 90 day period the City would buy back those lots. (3) Find out which landowners would like to donate their land to the City. (4) A consortium of builders. (5) Consider a forum of the existing owners. AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE PAGE NINE -STUDY SESSION - FEBRUARY 199 2004 Dick Knapp, 16450 Monterey Street, noted that the Old Coastal Oil was left out of the presentation which was north of Gunnerson Street. He indicated he was on the Country Club Heights Advisory Committee in 1987 and the General Plan Advisory Committee 1987 -1990. He indicated that he lived in the Country Club Heights area in 1981 and was responsible for getting the roads in the area. He noted they were able to get 4 miles of pavement in for less than $25,000.00, but the roads before that were made of oil and full of pot holes. He indicated the City would need to remove the landscape easement. Willeta Graves, 16748 Gunnerson Street, decided not to make a comment. Denise Fleming, 17970 Lakeshore Drive, commented that she was passionate about the Country Club Heights area. She felt it might be a Pandora's Box. She noted that her family had lived in the area for 10 years. She indicated that many of the roads had been inaccessible to the residents in that area. She noted that Country Club Heights was the reason for people coming to Lake Elsinore back in the 1920's and 30's. She indicated that the developers that had come into the town lately had built pretty pictures on the outside, but shallow structures on the inside; and she was looking forward to a developer coming into the town preserving the history and the integrity in making Lake Elsinore what it originally wanted to be and should be in the future. Rick Weir, 621 W. 7th, Upland, CA, decided not to make a comment. Tim Fleming, 17970 Lakeshore Drive, stated the consultants presented a lot of negatives. He noted in California there was Studio City in Los Angeles, Hollywood Hills, Bel Air, Laguna Niguel, and other coastal city communities that had the same topography as Country Club Heights, and these communities have worked through their topography road blocks. He indicated that development in the area was possible and the owners should have the opportunity to make the area a matching gem to the focal point of the valley, the Lake itself Lake Elsinore. Michael O'Neal, 1403 Heald Avenue, decided not to make a comment. AGEWA ITEM O. FACE -OF O PAGE TEN -STUDY SESSION - FEBRUARY 19, 2004 Weldon Page, 2301 E. Santa Fe, Fullerton, CA, indicated he had been buying property since the early 80's. He stated he did not hear any positive points for the area from the presentation. He suggested one way roads, sidewalks adjacent to the one way roads, and bike lanes. He commented the area could be developed and understood there were a number of lots in that area. He suggested having minimum size lots and it was the decision of the property owner to buy or sale. He indicated he was against eminent domain; and noted he owned 8 properties in the City and realized he might need to fight eminent domain. He suggested a meeting that reflected positive ideas for the area. Phil Williams, EVMWD, he indicated the sewer lines did not go completely down Lakeshore Drive. He further indicated in order to install a sewer line the street would be closed for a minimum of 3 weeks. He stated if the area was going to be developed the Fire Department required a fire hydrant roughly every 250 to 300 ft. He indicated EVMWD had been meeting with EWD about bringing in the water lines. He noted the cost of a water line was roughly $50.00 per ft. $1,500 to $2,000 per hydrant, back flow valves and other issues, including pressure zones and sewer lines would be expensive. He suggested the only way EVMWD could help would be if the residents in that area or at least 2/3's (Prop 218) requested that services be put in, bonds could be sold, but it would be added to the property owner's tax bill. He commended the City for reviewing this area. Ron Hewison decided not to make a comment. Mayor Buckley asked Community Development Director Brady to comment on the fees. Community Development Director Brady explained that there were a number of fees associated with developing property and that was similar throughout the entire City. Mayor Buckley asked about the lots and the road division in that area. AGEMA ITEM NO..�,2� PAGE, C) of �'' PAGE ELEVEN -STUDY SESSION - FEBRUARY 199 2004 Community Development Director Brady explained that there was a subdivision on the property in that area. He noted there were roads identified, many of which might be paper streets that did not actually exist. He indicated some of the roads did not exist in the location where the actual right of way was located. For private roads in the area if they existed, the property owner was responsible for maintaining the road. Mayor Buckley asked if an Overlay District allowed for the levying of fees to support items of public historic interest, such as street lamps. Community Development Director Brady indicated that he would have to say no, an Overlay District was a land use tool, so in terms of levying fees or placing fees as part of an Overlay District, would likely be something the Council would need to adopt in another way. Mayor Buckley asked Staff to investigate the cost for solar panels and hooking up the existing lamps. Councilman Schiffner indicated that most likely all the street lamps had parts broken and might be on private property. City Manager Watenpaugh indicated staff could bring the cost back to Council. He noted that the Lighting Landscape Maintenance District that was in place was not paying a street lighting fee in that area. The only way to assess the property owner's was if they voted for it. Councilman Magee indicated Mrs. Swanson from the Historical Society had information on the street lamps and perhaps they could provide a data base for City Staff. He also indicated that Pete Dawson was involved in some reclamation of some of the light standards and suggested staff contact Mr. Dawson. City Manager Watenpaugh indicated that Staff would contact Mr. Dawson. Mayor Buckley asked Community Development Director Brady for his views on the water and sewer issue for the site. AGENDA ITEM tNO. 16. PAGE _, L OF � 5 PAGE TWELVE -STUDY SESSION - FEBRUARY 19, 2004 "Nse Community Development Director Brady indicated that the comments Mr. Williams from EVMWD made earlier touched bases on some of the financial issues as to some of the cost. He indicated taking a look at the land use issues in that area, felt the water issue was the greatest constraint. Mayor Buckley asked if individual above ground waste water treatment plants were legal in California. Community Development Director Brady commented he was not familiar with that type of system. Councilman Schiffner indicated the idea for the Overlay District was to find a way to revise the planning and zoning requirement, so it would make it possible to build in that area. He further indicated he never thought the City was going to develop the area, and it was probably a lot of landowners would like to develop their property if the requirements were reasonable. He stated the purpose of the study he believed was to find out how they could ..e adjust in an overlay or a specific plan of that area. He noted neither City nor County built improvements; improvements were made by a land owner or a developer when the land is developed and the price was added to the price of the house. He stated there were two ways to accumulate money to make improvements; (1) an assessment district, he indicated 2/3 of the owners needed to vote for the district and (2) Possible RDA project. He noted it was possible to build in that area. Mayor Buckley noted that it was his understanding that CalTrans looked negatively at building anything right on Highway 74. Community Development Director Brady indicated that the Mayor was correct in that CalTrans did not like to have direct access onto their highways. The idea would be to have the high density development, but not the direct access to the highway. Mayor Buckley asked Deputy City Attorney Miles to explain eminent domain. He further indicated that the City did not have the power of eminent domain. ",, A - ENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF PAGE THIRTEEN -STUDY SESSION - FEBRUARY 19, 2004 Deputy City Attorney Miles explained that eminent domain was a power by which government could for public purposes obtain property. He indicated with this particular issue it was residential property that would require the use of eminent domain for a plan to reestablish a new residential use would be pushing the use of eminent domain. He further indicated there was a U.S. Supreme Court decision in Hawaii that actually upheld the right to actually take private residential property and resale. The facts of that case were to break up large property ownership due to a shortage of property for individuals and housing, but that was not the fact pattern in the Country Club Heights area. He commented the utilization of eminent domain would have some difficulties. City Manager Watenpaugh indicated the Mayor was correct that the RDA did not have eminent domain power and the Agency had established a sub committee that was researching a variety of issues. He also indicated the City did have eminent domain powers for street right of way. Michael Lewis, indicated that he bought a house in the Country Club Heights area. He noted he purchased 13 lots to prevent looking down on manufactured homes. He also noted before the rain he planted 2.25 acres of wildflowers. He indicated he had to pay to water this land from his property, although there was no water service to those lots, but he was paying $1,000 annually to the Water District for lots that had no water and if he wanted water he would need to pay $50,000 to bring water to the lots. He stated they he was informed that he paid taxes on the infrastructure. He noted there was no infrastructure unless he used a water hose from his home to the lots. He suggested appointing a committee or a group of property owners that was willing to make what ever changes that needed to be made. Phil Molitor, suggested creating a list of all property owners that were present that was willing to become an assessment district. Maria Keffor noted she had property at Gunnerson Street and Riverside Drive, she asked if there was anything scheduled for that area. She noted that the property was in the flood plain and was lower than Riverside Drive. AGENDA ITEM NO. -ib PAGE _LL OF PAGE FOURTEEN -STUDY SESSION - FEBRUARY 19, 2004 -.MOW Mayor Buckley stated she could choose to donate the property to the habitat plan or sell it to the habitat plan. Councilman Magee thanked the property owners for being at the Study Session and thanked the Consultants for the presentation. He indicated that there were comments about the outline he explained that the consultants listed the constraints to development, which was the first step before identifying the opportunities. He noted it was not often that the public asked to be taxed. He agreed with Mr. Molitor in circulating a note pad around the Study Session and everyone that was willing to participate an assessment district write their name, address, and telephone number. Councilman Hickman commented the RDA Committee was scheduled to meet in April and would be giving this to the Committee to research. He indicated he would support development in the area. Councilman Schiffner commented that an assessment district did not need to be formed for the entire area it could be one block or a street. Mayor Buckley commented the presentation would be on the City website. He requested that everyone listing their name indicated whether they owned a home or lots, if lots list the number of lots owned. He noted that a City email box cchglake- elsinore.org to email suggestions and comments. He noted at the first Council meeting in March, a Country Club Heights Citizens Committee would be formed and each Councilmember would elect someone to the committee that lived in Country Club Heights. ADJOURNMENT THE CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION WAS ADJOURNED AT 8:00 P.M. AGENDA ITEM NO.-I-6--- PAGE .._.L ®E -.-L.L �'` PAGE FIFTEEN -STUDY SESSION - FEBRUARY 199 2004 THOMAS BUCKLEY, MAYOR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE Respectfully submitted, Frederick Ray, Deputy City Clerk ATTEST: VICKI KASAD, CMC, CITY CLERK/ HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AGENDA ITEM NO. ` E '' --� `` PAG OF MINUTES CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 24, 2004 CALL TO ORDER The City Council Study Session was called to order by Mayor Pro Tern Kelley at 4:01 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: HICKMAN, MAGEE, SCHIFFNER, KELLEY BUCKLEY Also present were: City Manager Watenpaugh, Assistant City Manager Best, City Attorney Leibold, Administrative Services Director Pressey, Community Development Director Brady, Lake /Aquatic Resources Director Kilroy, Parks & Open Space Manager Fazzio, Recreation & Tourism Manager Fazzio, and City Clerk/Human Resources Director Kasad. DISCUSSION ITEM City Manager Watenpaugh noted that Mr. Costa who was celebrating his 100th Birthday was an active participant at the Senior Center. Mayor Pro Tem Kelley inquired if members of the Rotary Club would be present to accept their proclamation. Staff confirmed. Mayor Pro Tern Kelley inquired if there were any questions on the Consent Calendar. OF PAGE—L— Page Two — Study Session Minutes — February 24, 2004 Councilman Magee questioned specific warrants and obtained clarification from staff regarding their purposes. Councilman Hickman questioned specific warrants and obtained clarification from staff regarding their purposes and vendor contracts. Mayor Pro Tem. Kelley questioned the public hearings. City Manager Watenpaugh clarified that Item 21 was a set of annexations into the public safety CFD. Councilman Hickman inquired about the location of Villa Martinique. City Manager Watenpaugh clarified the location. Councilman Hickman noted that Item 22 was regarding Weed Abatement, and inquired if staff would have the tractors in time. City Manager Watenpaugh indicated that if they were not in house in time, staff would rent them. He noted that staff had basically abated about half of the City's properties to date and were moving forward on the balance. He indicated that property owners would have until May I" to abate their parcels, and then staff would go to the most visible and areas of public safety concern first. Councilman Magee questioned the costs for abatement. City Manager Watenpaugh indicated that there were set fees, based on staff's abatement of properties, on a square footage basis. He explained that there was a $250 administrative charge for each parcel as well as the square footage charge for weed removal and tree trimming. Councilman Magee inquired with regard to the tree trimming on Lakeshore Drive between the inflow channel and the Senior Center. Parks & Open Space Manager Fazzio indicated that the trees were trimmed by the weed abatement crew. Councilman Magee commended them on a nice job and questioned the square footage costs. Parks & Open Space Manager Fazzio indicated that the cost was $.025 per square foot. ...rw 4�(IENDA ITEM NO. I.C.p r PAGE OF A#—,- Page Three — Study Session Minutes — February 24, 2004 City Manager Watenpaugh addressed Item No. 31, the Swick - Matich Concession building and noted that the high bids appeared to be due to the fact that everyone was busy and didn't do the work. He noted that the bid cost was almost $300 per square foot for the restroom facility. Councilman Hickman noted that the League parents had built the concession stand at Tuscany Hills park; and suggested letting the Little League do this work. Mayor Pro Tem Kelley clarified that this facility would need to meet ADA requirements. City Manager Watenpaugh commented that none of the Leagues had built a facility from the ground up, and he was not sure they would be willing to take that on. Mayor Pro Tem Kelley reiterated the difficulty of meeting the ADA requirements. Councilman Magee commented that the groups might have someone qualified who would be willing to try, and suggested discussing it at the next user's meeting to see if AO-1- anyone was interested. Councilman Magee questioned who calculated the estimate. City Manager Watenpaugh indicated that it was provided by the contractor. Councilman Magee inquired what could be deleted from the project. City Manager Watenpaugh indicated that staff was evaluating that question. Councilman Hickman clarified that the League did the Concession stand, but not the restrooms; but stressed that they did an excellent job. City Manager Watenpaugh indicated that he would be happy to look at it, but noted that there might be other issues, since the funding was from CDBG. City Manager Watenpaugh addressed Item No. 32 regarding the Downtown Merchant events. He noted that originally they were planned to come before the Council in April, but the Association wanted to bring forward the potential for a City wide garage sale, prior to April. Councilman Hickman inquired if garage sales would be free to everyone for two months. Recreation & Tourism Manager Fazzio indicated that free garage sales were only in April. r- Councilman Magee indicated that it was his understanding that people would be charged $25 to participate in this event, and the sales would occur AGENDA ITEM ISO. �''-• PAGE OF Page Four — Study Session Minutes — February 24, 2004 • No, on Main Street. He inquired how they would feel about moving down one block, to Sulphur Street, instead of Graham, and incorporate the parking lot area in their event. Donna Lucas indicated that they intended to keep it to one or two blocks with additional spaces depending on the need; but noted that they had not considered the parking lot. She suggested the possibility of the City providing a dumpster at that location. Councilman Magee indicated that his main concern was keeping the parking in front of the restaurants open and available. Ms. Lucas indicated that the parking would not be available anyway, due to the street closure. Councilman Magee indicated that he would like to revisit this event and move it down one block: and stressed that the restaurants have difficulty during those events. Mayor Pro Tern Kelley addressed the regular street fair and noted that this would allow them to include a swap meet two times in conjunction with the events; and there would be no additional street closures. She indicated that this street closure had been discussed several times and the majority of the business on Main Street preferred this setup. Ms. Lucas clarified that the event was shut down by 5 p.m. to allow for the restaurants' evening business. Councilman Schiffner clarified that the event was only on Sunday; and noted that at one time the restaurants and barber shop complained. He commented that Guadalajara was always full either way. Ms. Lucas noted that the Vietnamese Restaurant was only open for dinner on Sundays. Councilman Schiffner commented that there seemed to be no great harm being done. Ms. Lucas indicated that the restaurants were concerned for their regular customers. City Manager Watenpaugh clarified that there were a number of restaurants originally opposed to the program, and staff met with La Tre and offered to meet with Rusticana. He noted that the Council last dealt with the Street Fair on January 14th, 2003. Councilman Schiffner indicated that the Council had met with the business people and this had been discussed heavily with the final decision to leave it as it was. Mayor 10'` Page Five — Study Session Minutes — February 24, 2004 Pro Tem Kelley concurred that the majority of the businesses wanted the event to stay as it was. Councilman Hickman indicated that he would like to expand the event to a City -wide garage sale for the entire City. Ms. Lucas questioned the fee for garage sales. Mayor Pro Tem Kelley indicated that residents were allowed two garage sales per year, with permits costing $5 each. Ms. Lucas suggested this was a nice way to help clean up the community, and would allow for networking with the City and Downtown Merchants. Mayor Pro Tem Kelley indicated that her only question and concern would be after the event was over, that there would be adequate people and places to dispose of residuals, so they were not left behind. Ms. Lucas commented that there were options for partnering to ensure disposal. Councilman Hickman inquired if the Salvation Army would pick up the remaining items. Ms. Lucas indicated that the Salvation Army was pretty fussy about what they would take and it was unlikely they would be there on Sunday after the event to pick up. She commented that the swap meet on the other side of the Lake was packed every weekend, but stressed that they were only going to be doing it two times this year. Councilman Schiffner commented that this request would not cause any additional impact on the restaurants. Councilman Magee requested clarification that this item would be coming back for consideration. City Manager Watenpaugh confirmed. Councilman Magee inquired when it would be back. City Manager Watenpaugh indicated that it was due to come back in April. Councilman Magee stressed his concern with parking for the restaurants and suggested that he would offer the same courtesy to any other business. He noted a recent Council meeting, when he arrived and parked in front of Enchanted Treasures and was asked to park elsewhere, so he would not impact their business. He suggested the impact of this event was similar on the restaurants, and stressed equal courtesy to the businesses. Ms. Lucas indicated that she also had a business on Main Street, and any day of the , GEMAITEMNO._�'C_. PAGE D OF Page Six — Study Session Minutes — February 24, 2004 week, parking is difficult. She indicated that her customers use the parking lots and suggested that the restaurant customers could do the same. She commented that she would like the whole three blocks to be a walking district. Councilman Schiffner concurred that the parking was never good, but this issue had been discussed extensively. Mayor Pro Tem Kelley commented that if the event was moved for the convenience of the restaurants, it might be hurting other businesses that rely on the walk -in business of the events. Ms. Lucas noted the parking areas used for the restaurants. Councilman Hickman noted the irony of the parking situation was that those who parked during the day were the business owners. Ms. Lucas confirmed this was an issue. Councilman Magee indicated that when this matter was discussed in April, he would like to see something in writing from the businesses or see people at the hearing. He commented that he had been to the fairs and had seen what they did to the restaurants; and indicated that he was very torn over this issue. Ms. Lucas indicated that the fair had been declining, but as the new President of the Downtown Merchants group, she was working to rebuild it with advertising, etc. Councilman Schiffner indicated that all of the Councilmembers were torn over this issue. Mayor Pro Tem Kelley concurred that this was a difficult issue. Redevelopment Agency Chairman Hickman noted that the Redevelopment Agency Agenda contained only the Warrant List. Boardmember Magee questioned what the Union Bank payment was for. Administrative Services Director Pressey indicated that it was debt service on three series of bonds, including principle and interest. Chairman Hickman addressed the warrant list, and questioned the distribution of funds. Administrative Services Director Pressey clarified the receipts through the City and the payments to the Redevelopment Agency. He explained that there were other sources of funds, but the timing of the property tax did not always match. He indicated that the bottom line was that there were sufficient funds to cover the payments. ,AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE ... O_ OF Page Seven — Study Session Minutes — February 24, 2004 Legal Counsel Leibold noted that the Redevelopment Agency Board had one item for Closed Session discussion. Public Finance Authority Chairman Magee inquired if there were any questions on the Public Finance Authority Agenda. Authority Member Hickman noted that he was still not sure of the Authority's functions. Chairman Magee indicated that Administrative Services Director Pressey's comments had been very helpful in explaining the function of the Authority. He noted that this Agenda's action was limited to receiving one payment and writing one check. Administrative Services Director Pressey clarified that the check was only for debt service. Executive Director Watenpaugh noted that the payment was for the annual report by Rod Gunn. Administrative Services Director Pressey clarified further, and explained that the annual report was required to be prepared and submitted to the repository for the update on the status of investments. Authority Member Hickman inquired if the PFA was for the Assessment District. Administrative Services Director Pressey indicated that certain bonds were done through the Public Finance Authority, and noted that it would be covered in more detail at the meeting next week. ADJOURNMENT THE STUDY SESSION WAS ADJOURNED AT 4:36 P.M. ATTEST: THOMAS BUCKLEY, MAYOR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE VICKI KASAD, CMC, CITY CLERK/ � HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AQEMA ITEM NO. PAGE OF MINUTES REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 24, 2004 - 5:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER The Regular City Council Meeting was called to order by Mayor Pro Tem Kelley at 5:00 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: HICKMAN, MAGEE, SCHIFFNER, KELLEY ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCKLEY Also present were: City Manager Watenpaugh, Assistant City Manager Best, City Attorney Leibold, Administrative Services Director Pressey, Community Development Director Brady, Community Services Director Sapp, Lake /Aquatic Resources Director Kilroy, and City Clerk/Human Resources Director Kasad. CLOSED SESSION A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL -- ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (b)(3)(C) of Gov't Code Section 54956.9. (2 cases) B. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION - City Manager. C. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code §54956.8) AGENDA ITEM NO. _.J._.�.. PAGE OF �. Page Two — City Council Minutes — February 24, 2004 Property: Assessor Parcel Numbers 347 - 330 -045, 347 - 330 -046, 347 -330- 051, 347 - 330 -50, 347 - 330 -052, 347 - 330 -053, 347 - 330 -019, 347 -360- 004, 347 - 360 -005, 347-360-031347-250-006) 347 - 250 -007; 347 - 250 -008, 347- 350 -003; 347 - 350 -014; 347 - 350 -015; 347 - 360 -006 and 347 - 360 -007 Negotiating parties: Wasson Canyon Investments, L.P., A California Limited Partnership, South Shore Properties, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, the Treasurer of the County of Riverside and the City of Lake Elsinore Under negotiation: terms of payment City Attorney Leibold announced the Closed Session discussion items as listed above. THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS RECESSED TO CLOSED SESSION AT 5:01 P.M. The Closed Session discussion was completed at 6:50 p.m. RECONVENE IN PUBLIC SESSION (7:00 P.M.) Mayor Pro Tern Kelley reconvened the Regular City Council Meeting in public session at 7:10 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: HICKMAN, MAGEE, SCHIFFNER, KELLEY ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCKLEY Also present were: City Manager Watenpaugh, Assistant City Manager Best, City Attorney Leibold, Administrative Services Director Pressey, Community Development Director Brady, Community Services Director Sapp, Fire Chief Gallegos, Lake /Aquatic Resources Director Kilroy, Police ,AGEMA ITEM NO. PACE OF_1, -.d+` Page Three — City Council Minutes — February 24, 2004 Chief Walsh, Engineering Manager Seumalo, and City Clerk/Human Resources Director Kasad. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Dolores Mayhall. INVOCATION - MOMENT OF SILENCE Mayor Pro Tern Kelley led the meeting in a moment of silent reflection for Bill "Whiskers" Tucker and his family. PRESENTATIONS /CEREMONIALS a. Proclamation - John Costa - Celebration of 100th Birthday. Mayor Pro Tem Kelley called Mr. Costa and family forward for presentation; and read and presented the Proclamation honoring Mr. Costa on his 100th Birthday. Mr. Costa and his family thanked the Council for this recognition. b. Proclamation - Rotary Club - 50th Anniversary. Mayor Pro Tern Kelley invited all Rotary Club members in attendance forward for presentation, and noted that Community Development Director Brady was the current President of the Lake Elsinore Chapter. She noted the contributions of the Rotary Club including the FIT Committee, bus benches, monument signs, participation in the Student of the Month program, international projects in Mexico and speech contests. She read and presented the Proclamation to the group and commended the on their contributions to the community. Community Development Director Brady noted the organization's 100th year as a service organization and indicated that the local group currently had 51 members. He detailed their r A ITEM NO. } PAGE OF I Page Four — City Council Minutes — February 24, 2004 1"Wa„► sponsorship of the Youth Leadership Program, and indicated that he was honored to be the President of the local chapter this year. CLOSED SESSION REPORT City Attorney Leibold reported that all items were discussed, with no reportable action; however it was anticipated that the next meeting would include a public item on goals and objectives for the City Manager. PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON - AGENDIZED ITEMS -1 MINUTE George Alongi commented on the contributions of Bill "Whiskers" Tucker to the community; noting that he was the best ambassador the City had ever had for the Lake. He indicated that Mr. Tucker gave a part of his life to the Lake, and suggested that the City do something for the family to commemorate his service to the community. Mayor Pro Tem Kelley requested that staff prepare a \"''e Proclamation recognizing his efforts. Dolores Mayhall expressed concern with the parking lot across the street from the Cultural Center, where someone got stuck for 2-1/2 hours, because people would not move their cars. She suggested that the lot should be monitored during special events, noting that there had been several times when she had to drive over the sidewalk to get out of the lot. Donna Lucas, representing the Downtown Merchants, addressed a permit being proposed for bail bonds on North Main Street. She indicated that she had a petition by 80% of the Merchants, noting that they had a different vision for the District. She suggested consideration of what the Council would like to see on Main Street. CONSENT CALENDAR MOVED BY MAGEE, SECONDED BY SCHIFFNER AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE ,,� JWWMA ITEM NO PAGE OF_� Page Five — City Council Minutes — February 24, 2004 CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. 1. The following Minutes were received and ordered filed: a. Planning Commission Meeting - February 3, 2004. 2. Ratified Warrant List for February 12, 2004. PUBLIC HEARINGS 21. Resolution Nos. 2004 -11 to 2004 -13 & Ordinance No. 1115, Determining the Validity of prior proceedings relating to Annexation of Property into City of Lake Elsinore Community Facilities District No. 2003 -1 (Law r Enforcement, Fire and Paramedic Services); Calling a Special Election; Canvassing Election Results; Authorizing Levy of Special Taxes for CFD 2003 -1 - Annexation Area No. 5 (La Laguna Phase II) and Annexation Area No. 6 (Villa Martinique). Administrative Services Director Pressey explained that this item was for annexation of two additional projects into the existing public safety assessment district. He advised that they would add 216 units and 84 units respectively with about $34,800 and $12,600 per year going into the District. He noted the provision of copies of the Harris & Associates annexation reports; and indicated that the only difference from prior annexations was the boundary map and delineation of the property. Mayor Pro Tern Kelley opened the public hearing at 7:29 p.m., asking those persons interested in this item to speak. There were no requests to speak. Councilman Magee indicated that his first question had been answered by Administrative Services Director Pressey, and expressed appreciation for the explanation. He expressed support for this action. Councilman Schiffner indicated that he was in full support of this action. 'AAA ITEM NO. PAGE -:� OF I Page Six — City Council Minutes — February 24, 2004 Councilman Hickman indicated that this item was for police, fire and paramedic costs and he concurred with the action. Mayor Pro Tem Kelley supported this action. MOVED BY SCHIFFNER, SECONDED BY MAGEE AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2004-11: RESOLUTION NO. 2004 -11 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DETERMINING THE VALIDITY OF PRIOR PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY INTO CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-1 (LAW ENFORCEMENT, FIRE AND •.N► PARAMEDIC SERVICES). MOVED BY MAGEE, SECONDED BY HICKMAN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2004-12: RESOLUTION NO. 2004-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ACTING ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-1 (LAW ENFORCEMENT, FIRE AND PARAMEDIC SERVICES) CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION. City Attorney Leibold requested a pause in the meeting for tabulation of the ballots. AGENDA ITEM NO.._„�,;,� PAGE OF.� I'-- Page Seven — City Council Minutes — February 24, 2004 City Clerk/Human Resources Director Kasad reported majority support for the proposed annexations. MOVED BY HICKMAN, SECONDED BY SCHIFFNER AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2004-13: RESOLUTION NO. 2004-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ACTING ON BEHALF OF CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-1 (LAW ENFORCEMENT, FIRE AND PARAMEDIC SERVICES) CANVASSING AREA NO. 5 (LA LAGUNA PHASE II) AND ANNEXATION AREA NO.6 (VILLA MARTINIQUE) ANNEXED TO THE DISTRICT. MOVED BY SCHIFFNER, SECONDED BY MAGEE TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 1115, UPON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY: ORDINANCE NO. 1115 AN ORDINANCE FO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-1 (LAW ENFORCEMENT, FIRE AND PARAMEDIC SERVICES) AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN ANNEXATION AREA NO. 5 (LA LAGUNA PHASE II) AND ANNEXATION AREA NO.6 (VILLA MARTINIQUE) ANNEXED TO SAID DISTRICT. UPON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AGENDA ITEM - NO. N PAGE / OF +�� Page Eight — City Council Minutes — February 24, 2004 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: HICKMAN, MAGEE, SCHIFFNER, KELLEY NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCKLEY ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE 22. Declaration of Weeds, Rubbish, Refuse and Dirt as a Nuisance. Property Owners to be Notified - Resolution No. 2004 -14. Parks & Open Space Manager Fazzio explained this item, which would authorize the transmittal of notices to abate properties. He further explained that the property owners would have until May ls'to abate their properties. City Manager Watenpaugh requested clarification of the costs to be assessed. Parks & Open Space Manager Fazzio indicated that staff had calculated the cost per square foot at $.025 per square foot, plus a $250 administrative fee per lot abated. Mayor Pro Tern Kelley opened the public hearing at 7:34 p.m., asking those persons interested in this item to speak. There were no public requests to speak. Councilman Schiffner indicated that it was a shame that cities had to resort to this method to get people to clean their properties, but he was in favor of the proceedings. Councilman Hickman suggested if the rain continued, abatement might need to be done a second time. He commented that the Pepper Trees along Lakeshore were well trimmed and expressed support for the item. Councilman Magee concurred that he was the comments of the other Councilmembers, and expressed support of the program. He stressed that AGEMA ITEM NO. -L-L- PAGE OF-1� 4's 10'` Page Nine — City Council Minutes — February 24, 2004 this program did not happen by accident, and staff worked diligently on weed abatement. He noted that there had been nearly 125% increase in the department, but they were making significant progress on weed abatement; and concurred that the Pepper Trees were the latest, most visible item the citizens would see. He stressed that more would be occurring, but commented that this item was about those who were not complying. He commended staff on making a difference. MOVED BY SCHIFFNER, SECONDED BY HICKMAN AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2004-14: RESOLUTION NO. 2004-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING WEED ABATEMENT ASSESSMENT LIENS AND DECLARING THAT CERTAIN WEEDS, RUBBISH, REFUSE AND DIRT AS DEFINED IN SECTION 14875 OF THE HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND CHAPTER 8.32 OF THE LAKE ELSINORE MUNICIPAL CODE CONSTITUTE A NUISANCE AND REQUIRE A NOTICE TO BE GIVEN TO THE PROPERTY OWNER IN ACCORDANCE WITH DIVISION 12, PART 5, CHAPTER 2 OF THE HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND CHAPTER 8.32 OF THE LAKE ELSINORE MUNICIPAL CODE AND PROVIDING FOR A HEARING ON OBJECTIONS, TOGETHER WITH FILING OF COST REPORTS AND ASSESSMENTS AGAINST ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS. BUSINESS ITEMS 141 31. Swick - Matich Restroom /Concession Building - Rejections of Bids. 41GMA ITEM NO. Page Ten — City Council Minutes — February 24, 2004 City Manager Watenpaugh indicated that this item was included in the budget, however staff was recommending rejection of all of the bids, as they were 61 % higher than anticipated. He indicated that staff would like to reject the bids and take the opportunity to review the project. Community Services Director Sapp indicated that the project was estimated at $175 per square foot, but the bids were close to $300 per square foot. He stressed that staff would like the opportunity to review the project and determine if there were ways to reduce costs or restructure the bid documents. He commented that this was federal CDBG funds, and stressed that there were a lot of strings attached. Mayor Pro Tem Kelley clarified that this item was for the restroom building at Swick - Matich park to make it ADA compliant. Councilman Magee expressed support for staff's recommendation. Councilman Schiffner expressed disappointment with the bids, but concurred with the recommendation. Councilman Hickman inquired if the bid could be restructured to include just the restroom; and reiterated that the League in Tuscany Hills, built its own concession stand. Community Services Director Sapp indicated that he would talk with the County, since there was CDBG money involved, noting that it might limit the ability to use volunteers. MOVED BY SCHIFFNER, SECONDED BY MAGEE AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO REJECT THE BIDS AND DIRECT THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT TO REVISE THE SCOPE OF WORK TO FIT WITHIN THE AVAILABLE BUDGET CONSTRAINTS, AND RE- ADVERTISE THE PROJECT. 32. Historical Downtown Merchants Association Open Air Market. AQEMA ITEM NO. (. A^ Page Eleven — City Council Minutes — February 24, 2004 Recreation & Tourism Manager Fazzio, explained that this event had been occurring the first Sunday of every month since 2001; with the goods limited to new, collectible or antique merchandise. She further explained that they had requested an amendment to allow the sale of used merchandise twice a year, specifically in April and October. Councilman Schiffner commented that he realized that in the past there was a limitation on used merchandise, but suggested it was probably worth trying twice a year. He indicated that it would not effect the parking issues significantly, since it was in the same area as the monthly event. He expressed support for this request. Councilman Hickman expressed hopes that this could be presented as a giant garage sale; and suggested that other groups might want to participate. He indicated that he would like to give it a try. Councilman Magee expressed concern with the street fair, in general. He indicated that the fact that Main Street was shut down and that it impacted the restaurants in the area was of concern to him. He indicated he would like to move the event further south and have parking available for the restaurants. He stressed that he would like to allow the same courtesy other businesses have asked of him. He advised that he would vote in opposition to this item, but noted that it was not a reflection on Ms. Lucas or the organization. He stressed that final approval of the event should be conditioned to assure that the streets would be open by 5 p.m. and the trash would be picked up. Recreation & Tourism Manager Fazzio indicated that staff would review the permit in April, and could provide an overall review of the first event. Councilman Magee concurred with this approach. Mayor Pro Tem Kelley indicated that her only concern with the garage sale items, was that they would be disposed of or cleared from Main Street. She AWWA ITEM NO. 1� PAGE OF Page Twelve — City Council Minutes — February 24, 2004 further indicated that she would also like to see the street opened by 5 p.m. for the restaurants. MOVED BY SCHIFFNER, SECONDED BY HICKMAN AND CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 3 TO 1, WITH MAGEE CASTING THE DISSENTING VOTE AND BUCKLEY ABSENT TO APPROVE THE REQUEST BY THE LAKE ELSINORE HISTORICAL MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION TO ALLOW FOR TWO "SWAP MEET" DAYS AS PART OF THE OPEN AIR MARKET. THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS RECESSED AT 7:45 P.M. THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING RECONVENED AT 7:49 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON - AGENDIZED ITEMS - 3 MINUTES Gil Rasmussen, Wildomar, commented on the passing of Bill Tucker, and expressed his personal regret for the use of his name in the Californian article which was incomplete. He indicated that he was privileged to know Bill Tucker and very much enjoyed discussing politics and fishing. He commented that Bill added a lighter touch to public meetings and held an important place in the City's rich tapestry of characters. Paula Graver, 218 Ellis Street, indicated that it was the one year anniversary of the Support our Troops Rallies, and requested that the City Council pass another Resolution of Support for the Troops. She commented that the rally on March 13th would be very big. She requested a commitment from each Councilmember to be there at noon on March 13th for the reading of the Resolution. She further requested a Proclamation for Burger King for their support of the rallies, in spite of a threatening call. She read a poem in memory of Bill Tucker. ."0 AGENDA ITEM No. —..�. L. Nk ' ' P &GE � OF.J. r' Page Thirteen — City Council Minutes — February 24, 2004 CITY MANAGER COMMENTS City Manager Watenpaugh commented on the following: 1) Indicated that Bill Tucker would be missed, noting that he was quite a character and a friend. 2) Noted that Mayor Buckley's absence was excused. 3) Suggested the inclusion of a statement in the Agenda, as well as a couple of reminder announcements to suggest that anyone attending City Council Meetings park in the lot across the street. r—, CITY ATTORNEY COMMENTS City Attorney Leibold noted that she too would miss Bill Tucker. COMMITTEE REPORTS No Reports. CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilman Magee commented on the following: 1) Noted his offer to the volunteer fire fighters for equipment needs; and indicated that they had requested a thermal imaging camera to aid in rescue operations. He requested consideration of funding for this request on the next City Council agenda in two weeks. 2) Indicated that Animal Friends of the Valley had contacted him regarding modification of fee schedules; and requested that it be on r— the agenda in either two or four weeks. AOtNbA ITEM N6. ' C �:.... PAGE -L3 OF-[-L_ Page Fourteen — City Council Minutes — February 24, 2004 3) Noted that the City Manager, Mayor and himself were revising the Municipal Code regarding the Public Safety Commission. He indicated that work was completed and ready to come back to the full Council; and requested that it be at the earliest meeting possible for comments and appointments. 4) Indicated that he would like to bring forward the vacancy on the Nuisance Abatement Committee for appointment. 5) Indicated that the Mayor had set up a Committee for Country Club Heights, but he was not sure when staff would bring it forward. He suggested that it be on the agenda in four weeks, but left that decision to staff and the Mayor. 6) Requested an informational item on the next agenda regarding the status of the MSHCP. 7) Advised Ms. Graver that he would make every effort to be at the rally early in the day, but he already had a family obligation. 8) Commented that Bill Tucker, "Whiskers" was a unique and valued character in the community, who made a difference as the unofficial ambassador for the Lake, and by promoting fishing derbies for the youth. He indicated that he gave unselfishly of himself so others could discover the Lake, the community and fishing. Councilman Schiffner commented on the following: 1) Concurred with the future agenda items requested by Councilman Magee. 2) Noted that he was first acquainted with Whiskers, when he ran for Council eight years ago, and noted his comments at a political forum for that election. He indicated that everyone liked Whiskers and he ,..we AW-W ► 1 TEM Nb. PAGE ®�. �` Page Fifteen — City Council Minutes — February 24, 2004 was a lot of fun. He stressed the interest he had in the community and indicated that he would be sorely missed. Councilman Hickman commented on the following: 1) Indicated that he worked with John Meyers from the Temecula RDA; and advised that they had developed seventeen homes, and supplemented the cost. He advised that the people who had qualified for the homes were teachers, firemen and policemen. 2) Commented that Whiskers loved Lake Elsinore, the Lake, kids and fishing derbies. He suggested dedication of a fishing derby to him, as well as the July 4th Boat Parade, to show respect for Mr. Tucker. 3) Noted the recent rains and suggested Mr. Tucker was filling the Lake. Mayor Pro Tem Kelley commented on the following: 1) Congratulated Jeannine Martineau on moving up to the State School Board, and indicated that it was a feather in the hat of the community. 2) Announced that Mr. Tucker's family had indicated that services would be this Sunday at the Elsinore West Marina at 3 p.m. She indicated that the dress would be casual. She commented that Mr. Tucker was an incredible individual who thought highly of the Lake, fishing, the City and the children. She noted that the first time she met Bill he had handed her recall papers, but later took her fishing and apologized. She commented that he was quite an individual, who would be sorely missed. Councilman Hickman indicated that he would be late for the Rally on the 131h Mayor Pro Tern Kelley noted that in -lieu of flowers for Mr. Tucker, donations could be made to Linda Tucker, P. O. Box 33, Lake Elsinore, CA, 92531. AGENDA ITEM NO PAGE I OF Page Sixteen — City Council Minutes — February 24, 2004 ADJOURNMENT THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 8:01 P.M. GENIE KELLEY, MAYOR PRO TEM CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ATTEST: VICKI KASAD, CMC, CITY CLERK/ HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE A09MA ITEM NO. PAGE o 11% P MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 17, 2004 Chairman LaPere called the Regular Planning Commission Meeting to order at 6:00 PM. Director of Community Development Brady led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: LAPERE, UHLRY, BARNES, AND O'NEAL ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MATTHIES Also present were: Director of Community Development Brady, Planning and Code Enforcement Manager Villa, Engineering Manager Seumalo, Senior Planner Morita, Associate Planner Preisendanz, Associate Planner Coury, Office Specialist Porche' and Deputy City Attorney Steve Miles. PUBLIC COMMENTS None CONSENT CALENDAR Director of Community Development Brady indicated that an error was made on the February 03, 2004 Planning Commission Minutes. He indicated that on page 1 of 6, the Minutes should have been moved by `O'Neal, not Barnes. MOVED BY UHLRY, SECONDED BY O'NEAL AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS AMENDED. Minutes ,*—,� 1. February 17, 2004. A ITEM NO. � e' rr -2L PAGE 2 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES — FEBRUARY 17, 2004 PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Tentative Tract Map No 32008 — Lakeshore Village Specific Plan Chairman LaPere opened the Public Hearing at 6:06 PM, and requested the reading of the Staff Report. Director of Community Development Brady indicated the proposed Tentative Tract Map 32008 within the larger Lakeshore Village Specific Plan area was approved by the City Council in late 2003. He requested Senior Planner Morita to review the Staff Report with the Commission. Senior Planner Morita stated that the TTM subdivides a portion of the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan. He stated that the Planning Commission and the City Council approved the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan last November. He indicated that the plan proposed a Residential Planning Area and a Commercial Mixed Development along Lakeshore Drive. Senior Planner Morita stated that the applicant is proposing a private community with two entry gates. He stated that one gate would be off Lakeshore Drive and the other would be off Walnut Drive. He stated that the Tract Map would subdivide the 24 acres into 186 lots to allow 170 detached smaller lots, which would range in size from 3,800 to 7,000 square feet. He stated that in addition the Tract Map would also provide 2 commercial lots and 14 lettered lots for internal streets, a community swimming pool, a community center /club house and two parks. Senior Planner Morita stated that Staff supports this project, and recommends the Planning Commission approve and adopt a Resolution based on the Findings, Exhibits and is subject to the Conditions of Approval. He noted that there is a typo in the Conditions of Approval. He stated that No. 50 and 51 are duplicates and Condition No. 51 should be removed. He indicated that the applicant is present to answer any questions that the Commission may have. Chairman LaPere requested comments from the public. There being no comments from the public, Chairman LaPere requested the applicant to approach the podium. He asked the applicant if he has read and agrees to the Conditions of Approval. Chuck Treath — Temecula stated that he has read and agrees with the Conditions of Approval. He requested clarification on the Internal Private Collector Road. Senior Planner Morita stated that on page 3 of 29 in the Staff Report, it indicates that the right -of -way is noted to be 67 to 110 feet. He indicated that the maximum should be 67 feet. AGENDA ITEM NiO.�e' .. PACE OE__J__- PAGE 3 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES — FEBRUARY 17, 2004 Commissioner Barnes requested clarification on the Internal Private Local Streets right -of- way. He asked if that meant curb to curb. Senior Planner Morita indicated that it is 24 feet right -of -way. There being no further comments from the public, discussion was brought back to the Commission for comments. Commissioner Barnes stated that all of his questions have been already answered. He noted that the applicant has done a great job with this project and had no further comments. Commissioner O'Neal indicated that this project addressed all of the concerns with the City Council and Planning Commission, and indicated that it is a good project. He had no further comments. Vice Chairman Uhlry stated that he met with Rita Wilsey who is an adjacent property owner. He indicated that the builder has met and exceeded all of her concerns. He stated that he had no further comments. Chairman LaPere indicated that on page 16 of 29 of the Conditions of Approval, Condition No. 54 should read "Stater Bros" not State Bros. He requested clarification on what type of gate would be used. Mr. Treatch stated that the main entrance would have a call box with a key entry. He indicated that on Walnut it would be by remote control. Chairman LaPere asked Staff how many cars could be stacked at the Lakeshore entrance. Engineering Manager Seumalo indicated that the City's Traffic Engineer reviewed the Traffic Study and between 4 to 6 cars seems appropriate. Mr. Treatch stated that during the busy times on Lakeshore, the gate could remain open to alleviate any cars backing up onto Lakeshore Drive. Chairman LaPere asked for clarification on the traffic signals near the Stater Bros driveway. Mr. Treatch stated that a traffic study was completed for this project, and it was recommended to have a traffic signal placed near the driveway to Stater Bros shopping center. He indicated that another signal was recommended to be placed at Gunnerson and Lakeshore. Chairman LaPere had no further comments. Vice Chairman Uh}ry stated that Chairman LaPere brought up a very good point on the stacking of cars onto Lakeshore Drive. He noted that having two traffic signals near each :AAENDA ITEM NO. PACEOF �. PAGE 4 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES — FEBRUARY 17, 2004 other could cause major back up at those locations. He suggested having a left turn lane at Gunnerson, rather than a traffic signal. Engineering Manager Seumalo stated that he would have the city's Traffic Engineer look at the two signals, and address the issues. There being no further comments, Chairman LaPere closed the Public Hearing at 6:20 PM, and requested the reading of the Resolution. MOVED BY BARNES, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2004 -181 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32008 WHICH SUBDIVIDES 26 ACRES OF THE LAKESHORE VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA INTO 186 TOTAL LOTS. BUSINESS ITEMS 3. Minor Design Review for a Single Family Residence located at 29372 Turnbull Avenue. Chairman LaPere indicated that this is a Business Item, and requested the reading of the Staff Report. Director of Community Development Brady stated that this item before the Commission is a request of a Minor Design Review for a Single Family Residence which had been continued from the January 20, 2004 Planning Commission. He requested Associate Planner Preisendanz to review it with the Commission. Associate Planner Preisendanz indicated that the reason that this item was continued was due to the fencing issues and the lack of landscaping. He stated that the applicant agreed to have a 6 -foot high wood fence around the rear area, and additional landscaping in the front yard to include a lawn area along Turnbull with planters and ground cover. He also noted that the applicant has also agreed to augment the original architectural design with the architectural features and colors, enhancing the visual interest and street appeal. Associate Planner Preisendanz noted that Condition No. 5 was added to address the reciprocal access easement between the two lots in order to provide access to Turnbull Avenue. AGENDA ITEM NO..�:�_ P OF q PAGE 5 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES — FEBRUARY 17, 2004 Associate Planner Preisendanz stated that Staff has review the revisions and recommends to the Planning Commission to approve and adopt a Resolution based on the Findings, Exhibits, and subject to the Conditions of Approval. He indicated that the applicant is present to answer any questions that the Commission may have. Chairman LaPere requested the applicant to approach the podium. He asked the applicant if he has read and agrees to the Conditions of Approval. Juan Aguilar — 324 Date Street, Lake Elsinore CA stated that he agrees to the Conditions of Approval. He had no further comments. There being no further comments from the public, discussion was brought back to the table. Vice Chairman Uhlry noted that the applicant home address is difficult to see from the street. He requested Staff to address this issue. Associate Planner Preisendanz stated that the applicant's address could be placed on the mailbox for better visibility. Mr. Aguilar suggested to have the street address highlighted by a light, in order to see it from the street. Vice Chairman Uhlry stated that the plans still show a 5 -foot fence. Associate Planner Preisendanz stated that the plans show a 5 -foot fence, however the applicant would provide a 6 -foot fence around the rear yard. Vice Chairman Uhlry indicated that he has no objection on a wooden fence, however if the applicant is going to eventually have a block wall along the rear and sides, he would also like to see the consistency by having a block wall return. He asked the applicant as to when this project would begin. Mr. Aguilar replied that this project would begin as soon as it is approved. Vice Chairman Uhlry has no further comments. Commissioner O'Neal stated that this looks like a good project, and had no further comments. Commissioner Barnes concurred with Commission O'Neal and had no further comments. Chairman LaPere asked the applicant what types of Palm trees would be provided for the landscaping. Mr. Aguilar stated that the Palm trees already exist. He stated that he would be adding more trees to the property. AGOVA ITEM NO. —Lca PAGE OF PAGE 6 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES — FEBRUARY 17, 2004 Chairman LaPere stated that the applicant did a good job on improving the plans of the project, and had no further comments. There being no further comments, Chairman LaPere requested the reading of the Resolution. MOVED BY UHLRY, SECONDED BY BARNES AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2004 -19, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 29372 TURNBULL AVENUE, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBERS 378 - 114 -012 AND 089. 4. Minor Design Review for a Single Family Residence located at 4090 Crestview Drive, Assessor Parcel Number 379- 300 -006. Chairman LaPere indicated that this is a Business Item, and requested the reading of the Staff Report. Director of Community Development Brady indicated that the City's new planner Kirt Coury would be discussing this project. He indicated that the project is a Minor Design Review for a Single Family Residence, and requested Associate Planner Coury to review it with the Commission. Associate Planner Coury stated that the applicant is proposing to develop a 2,645 square foot home on an estate size lot. He indicated that the total building footprint would be 4,025 square feet, which would occupy 16% of the lot area. He indicated that the home would consist of 3 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms and a third bathroom located in the detached garage. He indicated that the detached garage is located in the rear of the property. He stated that there would be a drive approach going under the porte corche on the west side of the home. He indicated that the applicant would provide front yard landscaping as well as side and rear yard fencing. He stated that the fencing would consist of a six -foot high wood fence, wrought iron and a masonry block wall. Associate Planner Coury indicated that Staff supports this project, and recommends the Planning Commission to approve and adopt a Resolution based on the Findings, Exhibits, and subject to the Conditions of Approval. Associate Planner Coury indicated that the applicant is available to answer any questions that the Commission may have. Chairman LaPere requested the applicant to approach the podium. He asked the applicant if he has read and agrees to the Conditions of Approval. GW -MA ITEM NO. �� P PAGE, OF__3 PAGE 7 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES — FEBRUARY 17, 2004 Raymond Esquerra — PO Box 1075, Lake Elsinore indicated that he has read and agrees to the Conditions of Approval, and has no questions at this time. There being no further comments from the public, Chairman LaPere brought the discussion back to the table for comments. Commissioner Barnes had no comments. Commissioner O'Neal requested clarification on the garage. Mr. Esquerra indicated that the design of the garage would be consistent with the design of the house. He indicated that the garage is 45 feet in width and 35 in depth. He stated that the garage is a 3 -car garage to include a workshop and a 3/4 bathroom. Vice Chairman Uhlry indicated that the plans show the bathroom to be a '/z bath. He asked the applicant if he ever intends on making the garage into a mother -in -law or maids quarters in the future. Mr. Esquerra indicated that it could be used as a mother -in -law unit in the future, however not at this time. Vice Chairman Uhlry requested clarification on the fencing. Specifically he wanted to know if block wall and wrought iron would be used. Mr. Esquerra indicated "yes ". He stated that the wrought iron is six -foot in height and boarders the west boundary. He stated that the wooden fence goes along the rear portion of the property, and along the eastern side of the property is the block wall. Chairman LaPere stated that he likes the look of this project. He stated that the home would enhance the area. There being no further comments, Chairman LaPere requested the reading of the Resolution. MOVED BY BARNES, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2004 -20, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 4090 CRESTVIEW DRIVE, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 279- 300 -006. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS None AGENDA ITEM NO. _LL. .. PAGE_ OP 9 PAGE 8 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES — FEBRUARY 17, 2004 STAFF COMMENTS Director of Community Development Brady commented on the following: • He indicated that a Study Session would be held on February 19 at the Cultural Center to discuss the County Club Heights at 6:00 P.M. Vice Chairman Uhlry asked if a packet would be available for review. Director of Community Development Brady stated that a packet of information would be available, and Staff would be delivering the packets on Wednesday, February 18. PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS Chairman LaPere commented on the following-. • He welcomed Associate Planner Kirt Coury. • He indicated that at the last City Council meeting they approved to move forward with the General PIan. N"rr' • He thanked Staff for all of their hard work. Vice Chairman Uhky commented on the following: • He had no comments. Commissioner O'Neal commented on the followin • He had no comments. Commissioner Barnes commented on the followin • He had no comments. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY BARNES, AND SECONDED BY UHLRY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AT 6:45 PM. AGEMA ITEM NO. b , FACE OF�_ PAGE 9 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES — FEBRUARY 17, 2004 Respectfully Submitted, Dana C. Porche' Office Specialist III ATTEST: Robert A. Brady, Secretary to the Planning Commission RON LAPERE, CHAIRMAN AA ITEM NO. PAGE FEBRUARY 26, 2®®4 CITY OF LAKE ]ELSINOR E WARRANT SUMMARY FUND# FUND DESCRIPTION TOTAL 100 GENERAL FUND 717,190.08 102 L.L.E.B.G. PROGRAM FUND 13,557.14 110 STATE GAS TAX FUND 1,522.92 130 LIGHTING / LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE FUND 21,022.44 150 C.D.B.G. FUND 507.64 205 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE FUND 105.00 221 PARK C.I.P. FUND 74,957.95 254 89 -1 RAILROAD CANYON RD. IMPROVEMENT FUND 145.04 257 C.F.D. 2003 -2 CANYON HILLS 7,710.00 608 TRUST DEPOSITS AND PRE -PAID EXP. 2,400.00 620 COST RECOVERY SYSTEM 20,936.80 650 C.F.D. 2003 -1 LAW & FIRE SERVICE FUND 3,500.00 GRAND TOTAL 863,555.01 3/1/2004 PAWARRANT LIST MASTERMARRANT 022604 AGENDA i k )l .__.. PAGE 0F.,�....; FEBRUARY 26, 2004 CITY OF LAKIE ELSINORE WARRANT LIST CHECK# VENDOR NAME AMOUNT 76637 STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE 24,058.98 �✓ 76779 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. 222,592.79 76780 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 10,842.20 76782 VOID 0.00 76783 -76786 A & A JANITORIAL SERVICE 6,382.50 76787 A A EQUIPMENT RENTAL CO., INC. 129.02 76788 ALI, JESSIE & ZAHRA 350.00 76789 ALL PHASE REFRIGERATION & AIR CONDITIONING, INC. 1,279.26 76790 ALLIED TRAFFIC EQUIPMENT 167.01 76791 ALPINE PREMIUM WATER- NATHAN GARNER 290.10 76792 AMBER AIR CONDITIONING, INC. 59.50 76793 ANAHEIM HILTON & TOWERS 443.55 76794 ANIMAL FRIENDS OF THE VALLEY 7,100.00 76795 ANTIMITE TERMITE AND PEST CONTROL 247.00 76796 APPLE ONE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 448.00 76797 ARAMARK 285.71 76798 ARTISAN GOLDSMITHS & AWARDS 11.58 76799 BARNARD, NORMAN 350.00 76800 BARR, IRWIN 1,050.00 76801 BOATS PLUS 1,463.77 76802 BROWN, RICHARD P. 30.00 76803 BUCKLEY, THOMAS W. 276.00 76804 BUNDY CANYON TURF SUPPLY 524.61 76805 CALIFORNIA P.E.R.S. 22,540.57 76806 THE CALIFORNIA 61.00 76807 CANYON TIRE SALES, INC. 159.97 76808 CASTANEDA, FRANCISCO 500.00 76809 CENTEX HOMES, SO. CA. DIVISION 27,200.00 76810 CHACON, TOM 40.00 76811 CLEAR IMAGE WINDOW CLEANING 675.00 76812 CLEMONS, RUDY 350.00 76813 COLLIMORE, THOMAS & BEVERLY 1,440.00 76814 CORONA CLAY COMPANY, INC. 1,996.61 76815 COST RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC. 5,000.00 76816 COURY, KIRT A. 3,900.00 76817 CULLUM, SALLIE 50.00 76818 D & S ELECTRIC 2,926.50 76819 DONAHOE AICP, CAROLE K. 775.00 76820 DOWNS OIL CO., INC. 794.16 76821 DUN & BRADSTREET 2,659.88 76822 -76828 E. V. M. W. D. 12,644.34 76829 E -Z -GO DIVISION OF TEXTRON 168.68 76830 ELITE ELEVATOR, INC. 312.00 76831 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUPPLY, INC. 1,630.46 76832 ELSINORE VALLEY YOUTH COURT 102.49 76833 EMPLOYMENT SYSTEMS 3,408.44 76834 ERNST, PHILLIP 1,120.00 76835 -76837 EXCEL LANDSCAPE, INC. 27,551.23 76838 EXXON MOBIL 391.44 76839 FAZZIO, TERI 200.00 3/1/2004 P: \WARRANT LIST MASTER \WARRANT 022604 1 OF 3 A GENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF FEBRUARY 26, 2004 CITE' OF LAKIE ELSINORE WARRANT LISA' , - CHECK# VENDOR NAME AMOUNT 6840 -76841 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 219.57 76842 FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTATE SOLUTION 127.30 76843 FRED HALL & ASSOCIATES 750.00 76844 GOMEZ, LUPE 50.00 76845 GREGORY, SAM 1,050.00 76846 HANCOCK, LORENA 3,275.25 76847 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 29,766.00 76848 HDR, INC. 12,446.45 76849 I.C.M.A. RETIREMENT TRUST 4,675.43 76850 IMPACT PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS 274.00 76851 IVERSON, LAURA 54.00 76852 JEFF HAUSER MOBILE WELDING 450.00 76853 JONES, MARCIA 24.00 76854 JONES, ROBERT L. 150.00 76855 KARVELOT, STEVE 172.50 76856 KASER, FRANK D. 450.00 76857 KING, KIRSTEN 420.00 76858 KONOPACKI, EDWARD 8,065.00 76859 LAKE ELSINORE VALLEY LITTLE LEAGUE 750.00 76860 LARA, SALVADOR & ANABEL 700.00 76861 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES - RIVERSIDE DIVISION 100.00 76862 LEAR AUTO BODY & TOWING 90.00 76863 LINKLINE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 47.28 6864 LAKE ELSINORE VALLEY SOCCER & LITTLE LEAGUE 500.00 '865 LORY, SUSAN 438.00 ,6866 M.R. BRACEY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. 46,828.75 76867 MACKEY JR., CHARLES 3,325.00 76868 MILLER, LINDA M. 2,632.50 76869 MORITA, DUANE A. 4,669.00 76870 MORROW PLUMBING, INC. 170.00 76871 MSA INLAND EMPIRE /DESERT CHAPTER 120.00 76872 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 3,676.99 76873 NOBLE CONSULTANTS, INC. 1,575.40 76874 NOE, JONATHAN 500.00 76875 PACHECO, TRACY 36.00 76876 -76877 PETTY CASH 603.66 76878 PHD PENSKE LEASING 1,797.16 76879 PITLIK, GENE 30.00 76880 THE PRESS ENTERPRISE 1,805.00 76881 PRO COAT POWDER COATING 260.00 76882 PRODUCTION VIDEO 1,800.00 76883 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 152.85 76884 PUBLIC RELATIONS TACTICS 40.00 76885 -76886 QUILL CORPORATION 1,703.87 76887 RIGHTWAY 331.38 76888 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF 8,000.00 76889 RIVERSIDE COUNTY'S CREDIT UNION 2,825.00 76890 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE - LAKE ELSINORE SHERIFF STATION 13,797.22 ,,Z6891 RODRIGUEZ, AZUCENA 832.00 892 ROQUE, JESUS 120.00 3/1/2004 PAWARRANT LIST MASTERMARRANT 022604 2 OF 3 ,4" A ITEIM NO. `3 PAGE OF FEBRUARY 26, 2004 CITY OF LAKIE ]ELSE",40R E WARRANT LIST CHECK# VENDOR NAME AMOUNT 76893 SAPP, DAVID W. 300.00 76894 SERVICE ONE SERVICE, INC. 1,819.00 76895 SHERWIN - WILLIAMS CO. 367.64 76896 SIERRA INSTALLATIONS, INC. 1,480.00 76897 SIGNS PLUS 65.00 76898 SMITH TRACTOR SERVICES 225.00 76899 -76903 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO 12,540.17 76904 STAPLES CREDIT PLAN 958.29 76905 STAUFFER'S LAWN EQUIPMENT 216.69 76906 STORAASLI, PEGGY J. 990.00 76907 BOB STOVER, INC. 4,641.00 76908 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 1,416.37 76909 TEAM AUTOAID, INC. 50.85 76910 THOMAS, MYRTLE A. 16.24 76911 TOSCO /FLEET FUELING SERVICES 2,636.47 76912 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE, INC. 453.09 76913 TURF STAR, INC. 346.92 76914 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 19.45 76915 VALLEY CENTER AUTO PARTS NAPA 40.43 76916 THE VALLEY GROUP 450.00 76917 VERIZON EQUIPMENT SALES & SERVICES 576.14 76918 WALMART COMMUNITY 16.85 76919 WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC. 16,113.20 76920 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS, INC. 2,812.17 76921 WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS 66,500.00 76922 WILLIAMS, ROBERT G. 45,000.00 �../ 76923 Z -BEST PAINT 2,015.00 TOTAL 721,721.88 P/E DATE: 02/20/04 PAYROLL TAXES 43,824.21 02/20/04 PAYROLL CASH 98,008.92 GRAND TOTAL 863,555.01 jl'!!rDA ITEI-.,.,. 3/1/2004 PAWARRANT LIST MASTER \WARRANT 022604 3 OF 3 PAGE OF CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE MONTHLY REPORT OF INVESTMENTS JANUARY 2004 INTEREST RATE LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND 1.528% INVESTMENT TOTAL DATE MATURITY PURCHASED RATE DAILY 24 -HOUR AVERAGAE ANNUAL RATE .............1.695 % $15,104.763.91 AMOUNT $15,104,763.91 1 certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and it is in conformity with the investment policy as approved by the City Council on June 10, 2003. A copy of this policy is available in the office of the City Clerk. The pooled investments shown above provide sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. Investment Officer ,-;2 A/ /y Date **Will meet anticipated expenditures ' MA ITEM Nib, �. PAGE OF REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL FROM: DICK WATENPAUGH, CITY MANAGER DATE: March 9, 2004 SUBJECT: Resolution of Support BACKGROUND At the Regular City Council Meeting on March 25, 2003, the Lake Elsinore City Council adopted a Resolution supporting President Bush and the United States Troops in their efforts against Saddam Hussein and Iraq. At the Regular City Council Meeting on February 24, 2004, Lake Elsinore resident �^ Paula Graver requested a new resolution renewing the City's support, and recognizing the one year anniversary of military action in Iraq. RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. 2004- 15 , of support. PREPARED BY: �. VICKI KASAD, CMC, CITY CLERK/ HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR APPROVED FOR ��� `f AGENDA LISTING: 4 DICK WATENPAOGH," CITY MANAGER AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF RESOLUTION NO. 2004- 15 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE PRESIDENT AND COMMANDER -IN -CHIEF AND OUR TROOPS IN THEIR MATTER OF DISARMING SADDAM HUSSEIN. WHEREAS, Americans have always risen to the need to protect our freedom and security, as well as the freedom and security of nations around the world, when a clear danger is demonstrated; and WHEREAS, the City Council supports the President and Commander -in -Chief in his efforts to achieve disarmament in Iraq, and celebrates the capture of Saddam Hussein; and WHEREAS, this City Council supports the men and women serving in the armed forces and honors their commitment to our nation's safety and security; and WHEREAS, the City Council acknowledges the one year anniversary of military action in Iraq and the effectiveness of that action; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, that the City Council hereby supports the President and Commander -in -Chief and the men and women of the armed forces of the United States in their ongoing efforts to assist Iraq in establishing a democratic government and restoring peace to the Country. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 91h day of March, 2004, upon the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: AGENDA ITEM NO. _. A PAGE. OF�„� `.01 ^ Page Two — Resolution No. 2004- ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: THOMAS BUCKLEY, MAYOR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE VICKI KASAD, CMC, CITY CLERK/ HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: BARBARA LEIBOLD, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE AGENDA tTEM NO. PAGE-1- OF CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: DICK WATENPAUGH, CITY MANAGER DATE: MARCH 9, 2004 SUBJECT: DEPOSIT AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND LAING -CP LAKE ELSINORE LLC BACKGROUND In December of 2002, the Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency Board approved and executed a disposition and development agreement with Laing -CP Lake Elsinore LLC, (Developer) and Civic Partners (Master Developer). Among other terms, section 608 of the agreement calls for financing public improvements in the project through the formation of a community facilities district (CFD) and the issuance of bonds. DISCUSSION According to the City's policy on forming CFD's and according to the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, the City Council may approve an agreement to receive a deposit for the cost incurred by the City in creating the CFD and issuing special tax bonds. The initial costs will include an appraisal, a market absorption study, a rate and method of apportionment, and a CFD report. The development consists of 1,850 single family homes and 318 multi- family low and moderate income apartment homes. There are 4 phases. Phase 1, 3 and 4 will have pocket parks. Phase 2 will have a recreation center and golf clubhouse. An elementary school will be constructed in the middle of four residential villages. To the west of the project will be an 18 hole golf course in the flood basin surrounded by a multi - purpose linear trail, a golf club house, a wetlands area and a riparian habitat. The development will also include restoration of the San Jacinto River. FISCAL IMPACT The administrative cost to the City will be reimbursed with bond proceeds. John Laing Homes has deposited $50,000 for payment of the formation costs. AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF�_ Report to the City Council Deposit and Reimbursement Agreement March 9, 2004 Page 2 of 2 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the deposit and reimbursement agreement with Laing -CP Lake Elsinore LLC, (Developer) I.. 1, / 1 APPROVED FOR AGENDA LISTING: Matt N. Pressey, Director of AOinistrative Services AGENDA ITEM NO. ® PAGE OF�� ,'ode Feb 18 04 12:13p JLH -Lake Elsinore 9092452270 p.7 DEPOSIT AND RELM BURSEMENT AGREEMENT THIS DEPOSIT AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (this "Deposit Agreement "), dated as of January 27, 2004 for identification purposes only, is by and between the City of Lake Elsinore, California (the "City ") and Laing -CP Lake Elsinore LLC, a California limited liability company (the "Owner "). RECITALS WHEREAS, the City has determined to initiate proceedings to create a community facilities district designated "City of Lake Elsinore Community Facilities District Igo. 2004 -_ (Southerly) (the "Community Facilities District ") under the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the "Act "); WHEREAS, Owner has entered into contracts to acquire the real property within the proposed Community Facilities District proposed to be subject to special taxes; WHEREAS, in accordance with City's policy regarding use of the Act, the Owner is required to compensate the City for all costs incurred in the formation of the Community Facilities District and issuance of bonds for the Community Facilities District; WHEREAS, Section 533114.9 of the Act provides that, at any time either before or after the formation of a community facilities district, the legislative body may accept advances of funds from any source, including, but not limited to, private persons or private entities and may provide, by resolution, for the use of those funds for any authorized purpose, including, but not limited to, paying any cost incurred by the local agency in creating a community facilities district (including the issuance of bonds thereby); WHEREAS, Section 53314.9 of the Act further provides that the legislative body may enter into an agreement, by resolution, with the person or entity advancing the funds, to repay all or a portion of the funds advanced, as determined by the legislative body, with or without interest under all of the following conditions: (a) the proposal to repay the funds is included in both the resolution of intention to establish a community facilities district adopted pursuant to Section 53521 of the Act and in the resolution of formation to establish the community facilities district pursuant to Section 53325.1 of the Act (including the issuance of bonds thereby), (b) any proposed special tax is approved by the qualified electors of the community facilities district pursuant to the Act, and (c) any agreement shall specify that if the qualified electors of the community facilities district do not approve the proposed special tax, the local agency shall return any funds which have not been committed for any authorized purpose by the time of the election to the person or entity advancing the funds; and WHEREAS, the City and the Owner desire to enter into this Deposit Agreement in accordance with Section 53314.9 of the Act in order to provide for the advancement of funds by the Owner to be used to pay costs incurred in connection with the formation of the Community Facilities District and issuance of special tax bonds for the Community Facilities 112204 9083.1 H&O: ft13105 v245353081.2 AGEMA ITEM PAGE OF 3L- Feb 19 04 12:13p JLH -Lake Elsinore 9092452270 p.8 District (the "Bonds "), and to provide for the reimbursement to the Owner of such funds advanced, without interest, from the proceeds of any Bonds; `"00 NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1. The Deposits and Application Thereof. (a) The Owner has previously deposited with the City the amount of $50,000 (the "Initial Deposit "). The City, by its execution hereof, acknowledges receipt of, and accepts, the Initial Deposit_ (b) The Initial Deposit, together with any subsequent deposit required to be made by the Owner pursuant to the terms hereof (collectively, the "Deposits "), are to be used to pay for any costs incurred for any authorized purpose in connection with the formation of the Community Facilities District and the issuance of the Bonds (other than costs, fees and expenses to be paid out of the proceeds of the Bonds), including, without limitation, (1) the fees and expenses of any consultants to the City employed in connection with the formation of the Community Facilities District and the issuance of the Bonds, including an engineer, special tax consultant, financial advisor, bond counsel and any other consultant deemed necessary or advisable by the City, (ii) the costs of appraisals, market absorption and feasibility studies and other reports deemed necessary or advisable by the City in connection with the formation of the Community Facilities District and issuance of the Bonds, (iii) the costs of publication of notices, preparation and mailing of ballots and other costs related to any hearing, election or other action or proceeding undertaken in connection with the formation of the Community Facilities District and issuance of the Bonds, (iv) reasonable charges for City staff time incurred in connection with the formation of the Community Facilities District and the issuance of the Bonds by the Community Facilities District, and (v) any and all other actual costs and expenses incurred by the City in connection with the formation of the Community Facilities District and the issuance of the Bonds (collectively, the "Initial Costs "). The City may draw upon the Deposits from time to time to pay the Initial Costs. (c) If, at any time, the unexpended and unencumbered balance of the Deposits is less than $10,000, the City may request, in writing, that the Owner make an additional deposit in an amount estimated to be sufficient, together with any such unexpended and unencumbered balance, to pay for all Initial Costs. The Owner shall make such additional deposit with the City within two weeks of the receipt by the Owner of the City's written request therefor. If the Owner fails to make any such additional deposit within such two week period, the City may cease all work related to the issuance of the Bonds. (d) The Deposits may be commingled with other funds of the City for purposes of investment and safekeeping, but the City shall at all times maintain records as to the expenditure of the Deposits. (e) The City shall provide the Owner with a written monthly summary of expenditures made from the Deposits, and the unexpended balance thereof, within ten business 122104 90831 H&O: #13105 212 AGEMA it I E' 0. �5 �- PAGE _._L O - --�- -- Feb 19 04 12:14p JLH -Lake Elsinore 9092452270 p.9 days of receipt of the City of a written request therefor submitted by the Owner. The cost of providing any such summary shall be charged to the Deposits. Section 2. Return of Deposits; Reimbursement. (a) As provided in Section 53314.9 of the Act, the approval by the qualified electors of the Community Facilities District of the proposed special tax to be levied therein is a condition to the repayment to the Owner of the funds advanced by the Owner pursuant hereto. Therefore, if the qualified electors of the Community Facilities District do not approve the proposed special tax to be levied thereon, the City shall have no obligation to repay the Owner any portion of the Deposits expended or encumbered to pay Initial Costs. In accordance with Section 53314.9 of the Act, if the qualified electors of the Community Facilities District do not approve the proposed special tax to be levied therein, the City shall return to the Owner any portion of the Deposits which have not been expended or encumbered to pay Initial Costs by the time of the election on said proposed special tax. (b) If proceedings for the issuance of the Bonds are terminated, the City shall, within ten business days after official action by the City or the Community Facilities District to terminate said proceedings, return the then unexpended and unencumbered portion of the Deposits to the Owner, without interest. (c) If the Bonds are issued by the Community Facilities District, the City shall reimburse the Owner, without interest, for the portion of the Deposits that has been expended or encumbered, said reimbursement to be made within ten business days after the issuance of such �-�- Bonds, solely from the proceeds of such Bonds and only to the extent otherwise permitted under the Act. The City shall, within ten business days after the issuance of such Bonds, return the then unexpended and unencumbered portion of the Deposits to the Owner, without interest. Section 3. Abandonment of Proceedings. The Owner acknowledges and agrees that the issuance of the Bonds shall be in the sole discretion of the Community Facilities District. No provision of this Deposit Agreement shall be construed as an agreement, promise or warranty of the City to issue the Bonds. Section 4. Deposit Agreement Not Debt or Liability of City. As provided in Section 53314.9(b) of the Act, this Deposit Agreement does not constitute a debt or liability of the City, but shall constitute a debt and liability of the Community Facilities District upon its formation. The City shall not be obligated to advance any of its own funds to pay Initial Costs or any other costs incurred in connection with the issuance of the Bonds. No member of the City Council of the City and no officer, employee or agent of the City shall to any extent be personally liable hereunder. Section 5. Notices. Notices, Demands and Communications Between the Parties. Any notices, requests, demands, documents, approvals or disapprovals given or sent under this Deposit Agreement from one Party to another (collectively, "Notices ") may be personally delivered, transmitted by facsimile (FAX) transmission, or deposit with the United States Postal Service for mailing, postage prepaid, to the address of the other Parry as stated in this Section, and shall be deemed to have been given or sent at the time of personal delivery or FAX 1122/04 9083.1 H &O: "13105 d2 AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE J1- O Feb 18 04 12:14p JLH -Lake EIsinore 9092452270 p.10 transmission or, if mailed, on the third day following the date of deposit in the course of transmission with the United States Postal Service. Notices shall be sent as follows: If to City: City of Lake Elsinore Attn: City Manager 130 S. Main Street Lake Eliinore, CA 92530 FAX No. (909) 674 -239 With copies to: Van Blarcom, Leibold, McClendon & Mann, P.C. Attn: Barbara Zeid Leibold, City Attorney 23422 Mill Creek Drive, Suite 105 Laguna Hills, CA 92653 FAX No. (949) 457 -6305 If to Owner: Laing -CP Lake Elsinore LLC Attn: Jeff Herman 3121 Michelson Drive, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92612 FAX No. (949) 476 -9898 With copies to: John Laing Homes Attn: Southerly Project Manager 31900 Mission Trail, Suite 225 Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 FAX No. (909) 245 -2270 and: Hewitt & O'Neil LLP Attn: John P. Yeager, Esq. 19900 MacArthur Blvd, Suite 1050 Irvine, CA 92612 FAX No. (949) 798-0511 Each such notice, statement, demand, consent, approval, authorization, offer, designation, request or other communication hereunder shall be deemed delivered to the party to whom it is addressed (a) if personally served or delivered, upon delivery, (b) if given by electronic V22104 9083.1 H&O. # 13105 v2 PAGE OF Feb 18 04 12:15p JLH -Lake Elsinore 9092452270 p.11 communication, whether by telex, telegram or telecopier upon the sender's receipt of an appropriate answerback or other written acknowledgement, (c) if given by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, deposited with the United States mail postage prepaid, 72 hours after such notice is deposited with the United States mail, (d) if given by overnight courier, with courier charges prepaid, 24 hours after delivery to said overnight courier, or (e) if given by any other means, upon delivery at the address specified in this Section. Section 6. California Law. This Deposit Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. The Parties shall be entitled to seek any remedy available at law and in equity. All legal actions must be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, in an appropriate municipal court in Riverside County, or in the United States District Court for District of California in which Riverside County is located. Section 7 Successors and Assitins. This Deposit Agreement shall be binding upon and insure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the parties hereto. Section 8 Counterparts. This Deposit Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which shall constitute but one and the same instrument. Section 9. Other Agreements. The obligations of the Owner hereunder shall be that of a party hereto. Nothing herein shall be construed as affecting the City's or Owner's rights, or duties to perform their respective obligations, under other agreements, use regulations or subdivision requirements relating to the development. This Deposit Agreement shall not confer any additional rights, or waive any rights given, by either party hereto under any development or other agreement to which they are a party. Section 10. Titles and Captions. Titles and captions are for convenience of reference only and do not define, describe or limit the scope or the intent of this Deposit Agreement or of any of its terms. Reference to section numbers are to sections in this Deposit Agreement, unless expressly stated otherwise. Section 11. Interpretation. As used in this Deposit Agreement, masculine, feminine or neuter gender and the singular or plural number shall each be deemed to include the others where and when the context so dictates. The word "including" shall be construed as if followed by the words "without limitation." This Deposit Agreement shall be interpreted as though prepared jointly by both Parties. Section 12. No Waiver. A waiver by either Party of a breach of any of the covenants, conditions or agreements under this Deposit Agreement to be performed by the other Party shall not be construed as a waiver of any succeeding breach of the same or other covenants, agreements, restrictions or conditions of this Deposit Agreement. Section 13. Modifications. Any alteration, change or modification of or to this Deposit Agreement, in order to become effective, shall be made in writing and in each instance signed on behalf of each Party. V22104 9083.1 14 &O: #13105 J2 PAGE —7-- OF __.!. Feb 18 04 12:15p JLH -Lake Elsinore 9092452270 p.12 Section 14. Severability. If any term, provision, condition or covenant of this Deposit Agreement or its application to any party or circumstances shall be held, to any extent, invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Deposit Agreement, or the application of the term, provision, condition or covenant to persons or circumstances other than those as to whom or which it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected, and shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. Section 15. Computation of Time. The time in which any act is to be done under this Deposit Agreement is computed by excluding the first day (such as the day escrow opens), and including the last day, unless the last day is a holiday or Saturday or Sunday, and then that day is also excluded. The term "holiday" shall mean all holidays as specified in Section 6700 and 6701 of the California Government Code. If any act is to be done by a particular time during a day, that time shall be Pacific Time Zone time. Section 16. Legal Advice. Each Party represents and warrants to the other the following: they have carefully read this Deposit Agreement, and in signing this Deposit Agreement, they do so with full knowledge of any right which they may have; they have received independent legal advice from their respective legal counsel as to the matter set forth in this Deposit Agreement, or have knowingly chosen not to consult Iegal counsel as to the matters set forth in this Deposit Agreement; and, they have freely signed this Deposit Agreement without any reliance upon any agreement, promise, statement or representation by or on behalf of the other Party, or their respective agents, employees, or attorneys, except as specifically set forth in this Deposit Agreement, and without duress or coercion, whether economic or otherwise. Section 17 Cooperation. Each Party agrees to cooperate with the other in this transaction and, in that regard, to sign any and all documents which may be reasonably necessary, helpful, or appropriate to carry out the purposes and intent of this Deposit Agreement including, but not limited to, releases or additional agreements. Section 18. Conflicts of Interest. No member, official or employee of City shall have any personal interest, direct or indirect, in this Deposit Agreement, nor shall any such member, official or employee participate in any decision relating to the Deposit Agreement which affects his personal interests or the interests of any corporation, partnership or association in which he is directly or indirectly interested. [Signatures on following page] 1/22!04 4083.1 H &O: # 13105 d2 PAGE M _ OF Feb 18 04 12:15p JLH -Lake Elsinore 9092452270 p.13 r 10�1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Deposit Agreement as of the respective dates set forth below. "CITY» CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, a municipal corporation Dated: , 200_ By: Mayor ATTEST: VICKI KASAD, CITY CLERK By: VICKI KASAD APPROVED AS TO FORM: VAN BLARCOM, LEIBOLD, McCLENDON & MANN, P.C. City Attorney By: BARBARA ZEID LEIBOLD "OWNER" LAING -CP LAKE ELSINORE LLC, a California limited liability company By: WL Homes LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, its Managing Member Dated: 1200 _ By: Its: By: Its: 1122/04 9083.1 H &O: #13105 Q PAGE —j--- OF CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: RICHARD WATENPAUGH, CITY MANAGER DATE: MARCH 9, 2004 SUBJECT: BID AWARD FOR MOTOR CONTROL CENTER(s) BACKGROUND Per the agreement between the City of Lake Elsinore and LESJWA, the City is the lead agency responsible for the design, construction and installation of the axial flow pump destratification system. Five Motor Control Centers (MCCs) are required to operate the twenty axial flow pumps, time controllers and beacon lights. One MCC will be installed on each of the five docking stations. DISCUSSION Staff prepared bid documents and the City Clerk published a notice inviting bids. One bid was received by the City for this purchase from Brewster Electric in the amount of $65,292.00. FISCAL IMPACT The City is to be reimbursed by LESJWA for all capital costs related to this project up to $1,289,250. This item is within the budgeted amount. Therefore, there is no long -term fiscal impact to the City's budget. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council approve the bid award for the Motor Control Centers to Brewster Electric in the amount of $65,292.00. PREPARED BY: Pat Kilroy, Director of Lake & Aquatic Resources Department C APPROVED FOR , AGENDA LISTING: Richard J. Wateipaugh, CityNan&ger AGENDA ITEM NO. --�R PAGE OF NOTICE INVITING BIDS City of Lake Elsinore, California 1.000 PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that sealed bids will be received by the City of Lake Elsinore for the construction of certain improvements in the City of Lake Elsinore, California referred to as: PROJECT NO. 4228-MCC MOTOR CONTROL CENTERS The work to be performed consists of furnishing all materials, hardware, fasteners, equipment, tools, labor and incidentals, as required by the Plans, Specifications and Contract Documents to fabricate five (5) motor control centers for the above stated project. Bids will be publicly opened, examined and declared in the City Hall Conference Room, 130 South Main Street, Lake Elsinore, California at 2:00 p.m. on March 2, 2004. Each bid shall be made on the Proposal Form furnished in the Specifications and enclosed in an envelope supplied by the bidder. The bidder's envelope shall bear the bidder's name, address, title of the work ( "PROPOSAL FOR MOTOR CONTROL CENTERS ") and marked: "SEALED BID, DO NOT OPEN UNTIL 2:00 P.M., MARCH 2,2004". It is the sole responsibility of the bidder to ensure that his bid is received in proper time in the City Clerk's Office at the address and time hereinabove set forth. Any bid received after the scheduled closing time for receipt of bids shall be returned to the bidder unopened. The work is to be done in accordance with the Plans and Specifications on file in the Office of the Clerk of the City, and said Plans and Specifications are by reference made part of this Notice. Plans and Specifications may be examined at the front desk of the Building Division of the City of Lake Elsinore, 130 South Main Street, Lake Elsinore, California. Plans, Specifications and all Contract Documents may be obtained at the front desk of the Finance Department of the City of Lake Elsinore for a non - refundable charge of fifteen dollars ($15) plus an additional fee of ten dollars ($10) for postage and handling if mailing is requested. Payments to the Contractor will be made in cash by said City in accordance with the provisions of the Specifications, upon receipt of invoices submitted in accordance therewith. All bids shall be made in accordance with and as directed in the Specifications. All bidders shall comply with State, Federal and local laws applicable thereto. The time of completion for this Contract shall be eight weeks beginning from the date specified in the "Notice to Proceed ". 4AGMA ITEM NO, �- � ---- -- PAGE ,... OF _.51.....� 100"1 The City of Lake Elsinore reserves the right to reject any or all bids, to waive any irregularities in a bid and to award the Contract as may best serve the interests of the City. All proposals are binding for a period of thirty (30) days after they are opened and may be retained by the City for examination and comparison. Inquiries regarding this project should be directed to: Pat Kilroy, Project Manager Lake and Aquatic Resources Department 909 - 674 -7730 pkilroy@lake-elsinore.org By Order of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California. Date: 2004 Publish: , 2004 Vicki Kasad City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore 2 AXNMA ITEM NO. PAGE OF MOTOR CONTROL CENTERs Potential Bidder's List Elsinore Electrical Supply Inc. Shanks Electric Corporation 32391 Riverside Drive P.O. Box 542 Suite -17 Helendale, CA 92342 Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Phone: 760 - 952 -2085 909 - 674 -6961 Fax: 760 - 952 -2645 American Electric Supply Inc. 1872 Pomona Road Corona, CA 92880 909 - 734 -7910 Electrical Power & Controls Inc. 2405 Mira Mar Avenue Long Beach, CA 90815 562- 498 -6699 Wastech Controls & Engineering 9305 Eton Avenue, Chatsworth, CA 91311 (818) 998 -3500 Royal Wholesale Electric Contact: Tony Medeiros 1405 Spruce St Unit B Riverside, CA 92507 -2422 Phone: 909-683-6625 Fax: 909-787-9883 medeirost@royalriv.com Brewster Electric 31730 Dunlap Blvd. Yucaipa, CA 92399 Phone: 909 - 794 -8207 Fax: 909 - 794 -8209 Dalke & Sons Construction 4585 Allstate Drive Riverside, CA 92501 Phone: 909 - 274 -9880 Fax: 909-274-0319 NWMA ITEM NO. —L. N PAGE OF 1140 N4400 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: RICHARD J. WATENPAUGH, CITY MANAGER DATE: MARCH 9, 2004 SUBJECT: SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR PEST CONTROL OF CITY FACILITIES BACKGROUND As part of the City's facility maintenance program, all City buildings are treated with a State approved solution to control crawling insects and pests. Our current contract agreement for pest control services expires this month. Therefore, staff solicited for bids and held a bid opening on February 25, 2004. DISCUSSION Three companies submitted bid proposals. The bid results were as follows: Company Monthly Cost Annual Cost Robbins Pest Management, Lake Elsinore $220.00 $2,640.00 Morton Pest Control, Wildomar $480.00 $5,760.00 Team Too, Corona $505.00 $6,060.00 Following the bid opening, staff was contacted by Morton Pest Control, who indicated he interpreted the specifications to "power spray" the facilities as a "truck mounted gas powered sprayer." Staff reviewed the bid specification and confirmed that there was no requirement that power sprayer needed to be a truck mounted gas powered sprayer. Additionally, it appears that two of the three bidders did not read such a requirement into the bid specifications. Naturally, the bid specifications allowed prospective bidders to contact City staff concerning any questions and no such question was ever posed by Morton Pest Control. However, Morton Pest Control has stated they will go before City Council to dispute this bid. FISCAL IMPACT Funding for this program will be provided from the General Fund Facility Maintenance Budget in the amount of $2,640.00 per year. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Mayor and City Council accept the bid of $220.00 per month ($2640.00 per year) as submitted by Robbins Pest Management and authorize the City Manager to execute a contract in a form approved by the City Attorney consistent with the bid for a term of one year, renewable annually up to three years with approval by the City Manager. PREPARED BY: William Pam! Phlic�W APPROVED BY: J/ G%/. ,,davi v, Director of Services APPROVED FOR AGENDA LISTING: L&MO::�,0aZIUA IWA Richard J. Wate paugh, City nage IDA ITEM pro. PAM a CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE SPECIFICATIONS FOR PEST CONTROL FOR CITY FACILITIES 2004 CONTACT: Bill Payne City of Lake Elsinore 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 FAX 909 - 471 -1251 Office 909 - 674 -5170 E -MAIL bpayne @lake - elsinore.org NOTICE INVITING BIDS PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that sealed bids will be received by the City of Lake Elsinore for a licensed pest control operator to control crawling insects and pests within buildings owned and operated by the City of Lake Elsinore. This project is referred to as: PEST CONTROL FOR CITY FACILITIES Bids will be publicly opened, examined and declared in the City Hall Conference Room, 130 South Main Street, Lake Elsinore, California at the hour 11:00 AM of FEBRUARY 25, 2004. Each bid shall be made on the proposal form furnished in the Specifications and enclosed in an envelope supplied by the bidder, bearing the title of the work and the name and address of the bidder. It is the sole responsibility of the bidder to ensure that the bid is received in proper time in the City Clerk's office at the address and time hereinabove set forth. Any bid received after the scheduled closing time for receipt of bids may be returned to the bidder unopened. The work is to be bid in accordance with the Specifications on file in the office of the City Clerk and said Specifications may be examined at the City of Lake Elsinore City Hall, 130 S. Main Street, Lake Elsinore, California. Specifications document may be obtained at the Lake Elsinore City Hall Cashier's Window located at 130 South Main Street in Lake Elsinore. All bids must be made in accordance with and as directed in the Specifications, and all bidders shall comply with State, Federal and local laws applicable thereto. The City Council reserves the right to reject any or all bids, to waive any irregularities in a bid and to award the Contract as may best serve the interests of the City. All proposals are binding for a period of (30) days after they are opened and may be retained by the City for examination and comparison. For technical information relating to the details of the Specifications and /or bidding requirements, please contact Bill Payne in the Public Works Department of the City of Lake Elsinore. By Order of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California. Date: Pest Control Bid 2004.doc Vicki Lynne Kasad City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore 1 No INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS BIDDERS KNOWLEDGE Bidders must satisfy themselves by personal examination of the Specifications. No bidder shall, at any time after submission of.a proposal, make any claim or assertion that there was any misunderstanding or lack of information regarding the specifications. Any errors, omissions, or discrepancies found in the Specifications, or other Contract documents shall be called to the attention of the City Public Works Manager and clarified prior to the submission of proposals. If any person contemplating submitting a bid is in doubt as to the true meaning of any part of the Specifications, or other Contract documents, he may submit to the Public Works Manager a written request for the interpretation thereof, and the person submitting the request will be responsible for its prompt delivery. Any interpretation of the Contract documents will be made only by addendum duly issued and a copy of such addendum will be mailed or delivered to each person receiving a set of such documents. PROPOSAL FORMS Bids shall be submitted in writing on the proposal forms provided by the City of Lake Elsinore. All information requested therein must be clearly and legibly set forth in the manner and form indicated. SUBMISSION OF BIDS The envelope enclosing the proposal shall be sealed and addressed to the City Clerk, City of Lake Elsinore, 130 South Main Street, Lake Elsinore, California 92530. The envelope shall be plainly marked in the upper left -hand corner with the name and address of the bidder and bear the words, "PROPOSAL FOR ", followed by the name of the project being bid and the date and hour of bid opening. Proposals may be mailed or delivered by messenger; however, it is the bidder's responsibility alone to ensure delivery of the proposal to the City's designated official prior to the time stipulated for bid opening in the Notice Inviting Bids. Late proposals will not be considered. IRREGULAR PROPOSALS Unauthorized conditions, limitations or provisions attached to a proposal will render it irregular and may be cause for its rejection. Alternate proposals may not be considered unless specifically requested. Proposals may be rejected by the City for the following reasons: (a) If the proposal form furnished is not used or is altered. (b) If there are unauthorized additions, conditional or alternate bids or irregularities of any kind. (c) If the proposal is not properly signed by the bidder. Pest Control Bid 2004.doc 2 ITEM N0. --�- -_ WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSALS A proposal may be withdrawn by a written request signed by the bidder. Such requests shall be delivered to the City's designated official prior to the bid opening hour stipulated in the Notice Inviting Bids. The withdrawal of a proposal will not prejudice the right of the bidder to submit a new proposal, providing there is time to do so prior to bid opening. RELIEF OF BIDDER If the bidder claims a mistake was made in his proposal, the bidder shall give the City written notice within five (5) days after the date for submittal of proposals of the alleged mistake, specifying in the notice in detail how the mistake occurred. Relief will be granted only for clerical errors and at City's discretion. AWARD OF CONTRACT The Award of Contract, if made, will be to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder whose proposal complies with the requirements of the specifications and is the best value for the City based on cost, bid specification conformity, and service availability. Within thirty (30) days after the bid submittal date, the City will act either to accept a bid proposal or to reject all proposals. The acceptance of a bid proposal will be evidenced by a Notice of Award of Contract in writing, delivered to the bidder whose proposal is accepted. No other act of the City shall necessarily constitute acceptance of a bid proposal. City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive any irregularity, and to take the bids under advisement for a period of 30 days, all as may be required to provide for the best interests of the City. No contract shall be binding upon the City until the same has been "Uto approved by the Board. Pest Control Bid 2004.doc 3 ITEM NO. ,4.... OF SCOPE OF WORK 1. Power spray all City buildings monthly with State approved solution to control crawling insects. Insects and pests to include: ants, roaches, crickets, ground beetles, fleas, earwigs, spiders, silver fish, wasps. Also, provide pest control of mice and rodents with a State approved method on a monthly basis. 2. Provide same day emergency service for covered pests at no extra charge. 3. Provide Saturday a.m. Service 4. Provide City with copy of M.S.D.A. sheets of products being used. 5. Buildings to be serviced are listed on the bid schedule. 6. Service frequency is listed on the bid schedule. Pest Control Bid 2004.doc 4 TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL COST The Undersigned has checked carefully all of the above figures and understands that the City will not be responsible for any error or omissions on the part of the Undersigned in making up this bid. The Undersigned bidder declares, under penalty of perjury, that they are licensed to do business or act in the capacity of a Tractor vendor within the State of California and that they are validly licensed. Name of Vendor Signature of Bidder Print Bidder Name Here Title Pest Control Bid 2004.doc 5 ACOM i"A N ` Bid Schedule PEST CONTROL FOR CITY FACILITIES PROPOSAL SERVICE FACILITY SCOPE OF WORK FREQUENCY City Hall Complete inside Monthly _ 130 S. Main St. Outside building perimeter Monthly Cultural Center Complete inside Monthly _ 183 N. Main St. Outside building perimeter Monthly Community Center Complete inside Monthly _ 310 W. Graham Ave. Outside building perimeter Monthly Senior Center Complete inside Monthly _ 420 E. Lakeshore Dr. Outside building perimeter Monthly Outside patio area Monthly Public Works Complete inside Monthly _ 521 N. Langstaff Outside building perimeter Monthly Centennial Station Complete inside Monthly _ 132 W. Graham Ave. Outside building perimeter Monthly Stadium Complete inside Monthly _ 500 Diamond Dr. Outside building perimeter Monthly TOTAL MONTHLY COST $ COST The Undersigned has checked carefully all of the above figures and understands that the City will not be responsible for any error or omissions on the part of the Undersigned in making up this bid. The Undersigned bidder declares, under penalty of perjury, that they are licensed to do business or act in the capacity of a Tractor vendor within the State of California and that they are validly licensed. Name of Vendor Signature of Bidder Print Bidder Name Here Title Pest Control Bid 2004.doc 5 ACOM i"A N ` Name of Bidder Address of Bidder To: Citv of Lake Elsinore, California The undersigned bidder, in accordance with the City's Notice Inviting Bids, hereby proposes to furnish service, and incidentals required for the above - stated project as set forth in the Specifications, in the manner and time prescribed therein. The undersigned bidder certifies that this proposal is made in good faith, without collusion or connection with any other person or persons bidding on the work. The undersigned bidder understands that the City Council reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals or to waive formality or technicality in any proposal in the interest of the City. Name of Vendor Signature of Bidder Pest Control Bid 2004.doc Print Name Title 6 ITEM PLO.., -]� �-..,., Name of Bidder i<'o,. A 1_5 Pe-i-j— /`�s�N✓��z�/'9t' ; �.os Address of Bidder // 7 To: City of Lake Elsinore, California The undersigned bidder, in accordance with the City's Notice Inviting Bids, hereby proposes to furnish service, and incidentals required for the above- stated project as set forth in the Specifications, in the manner and time prescribed therein. The undersigned bidder certifies that this proposal is made in good faith, without collusion or connection with any other person or persons bidding on the work. The undersigned bidder understands that the City Council reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals or to waive formality or technicality in a�iy� proposal in the interest of the City. Name of Vendor Signature of Bidder Print Name Title N"10 2004 pest control contract.doc AOVM ITEM NO* s TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL Bid Schedule PEST CONTROL FOR CITY FACILITIES PROPOSAL SERVICE FACILITY SCOPE OF WORK FREQUENCY COST City Hall Complete inside Monthly 30,0// 130 S. Main St. Outside building perimeter Monthly Cultural Center Complete inside Monthly 183 N. Main St. Outside building perimeter Monthly Community Center Complete inside Monthly Yo,o O 310 W. Graham Ave. Outside building perimeter Monthly Senior Center Complete inside Monthly 30,06) 420 E. Lakeshore Dr. Outside building perimeter Monthly Outside patio area Monthly Public Works Complete inside Monthly 30,00 521 N. Langstaff Outside building perimeter Monthly Centennial Station Complete inside Monthly 3a.y y 132 W. Graham Ave. Outside building perimeter Monthly Stadium Complete inside Monthly 500 Diamond Dr. Outside building perimeter Monthly TOTAL MONTHLY COST $ The Undersigned has checked carefully all of the above figures and understands that the City will not be responsible for any error or omissions on the part of the Undersigned in making up this bid. The Undersigned bidder declares, under_ penalty of perjury, that they are licensed to do business or act in the capacity of a Tractor vendor within the State of California and that they are validly licensed. k�'1�1�f�'��57" Name of Vendor Signature of Bidder Print Bidder Name Here ? dd --,7' Title 2004 pest control contract.doc 5 AGtW ITEM Name of Bidder( Address of Bidder �54SgS �ic'PnP I LAmF_: , To: City of Lake Elsinore, California The undersigned bidder, in accordance with the City's Notice Inviting Bids, hereby proposes to furnish service, and incidentals required for the above - stated project as set forth in the Specifications, in the manner and time prescribed therein. The undersigned bidder certifies that this proposal is made in good faith, without collusion or connection with any other person or persons bidding on the work. The undersigned bidder understands that the City Council reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals or to waive formality or technicality in any proposal in the interest of the City. M nP,-m"3 Ps T Ccy')IMA j� 1 Name of Vendor Signature of Bidder arr. lY1OR1atJ Print Name Title '"WOO 2004 pest control contract.doc 6 AcswA rum no. 1 PAM_J ��_OF� TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL Bid Schedule PEST CONTROL FOR CITY FACILITIES PROPOSAL SERVICE FACILITY SCOPE OF WORK FREQUENCY COST City Hall Complete inside Monthly 7J� 130 S. Main St. Outside building perimeter Monthly Cultural Center Complete inside Monthly 183 N. Main St. Outside building perimeter Monthly Community Center Complete inside Monthly 310 W. Graham Ave. Outside building perimeter Monthly Senior Center Complete inside Monthly -�S 420 E. Lakeshore Dr. Outside building perimeter Monthly Outside patio area Monthly Public Works Complete inside Monthly 521 N. Langstaff Outside building perimeter Monthly Centennial Station Complete inside Monthly 132 W. Graham Ave. Outside building perimeter Monthly Stadium Complete inside Monthly 500 Diamond Dr. Outside building perimeter Monthly TOTAL MONTHLY COST $ r �1 The Undersigned has checked carefully all of the above figures and understands that the City will not be responsible for any error or omissions on the part of the Undersigned in making up this bid. The Undersigned bidder declares, under penalty of perjury, that they are licensed to do business or act in the capacity of a Tractor vendor within the State of California and that they are validly licensed. Name of Vendor Signature of B dder _ \ i� i Aft, M b PiiTO O Print Bidder Name Here Title 2004 pest control contract.doc ram NO, 5 A,, 1J 10F_1 Name of Bidder Address of Bidder I (955 L� 104h To: City of Lake Elsinore, California The undersigned bidder, in accordance with the City's Notice Inviting Bids, hereby proposes to furnish service, and incidentals required for the above - stated project as set forth in the Specifications, in the manner and time prescribed therein. The undersigned bidder certifies that this proposal is made in good faith, without collusion or connection with any other person or persons bidding on the work. The undersigned bidder understands that the City Council reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals or to waive formality or technicality in any proposal in the interest of the City. TOLMA 7?pa 48rAJ1P_J pes( CbAA(0) Name of Vendor Signature of Bidder Print Name �A,DVCV iSh.f V Title 2004 pest control contract.doc 6 �, A,--, TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL Bid Schedule PEST CONTROL FOR CITY FACILITIES PROPOSAL SERVICE FACILITY SCOPE OF WORK FREQUENCY COST City Hall Complete inside Monthly 130 S. Main St. Outside building perimeter Monthly tt � "IV Cultural Center Complete inside Monthly 183 N. Main St. Outside building perimeter Monthly Community Center Complete inside Monthly PC 310 W. Graham Ave. Outside building perimeter Monthly oa s " Senior Center Complete inside Monthly 420 E. Lakeshore Dr. Outside building perimeter Monthly Outside patio area Monthly yS OC Public Works Complete inside Monthly 521 N. Langstaff Outside building perimeter Monthly 3s Centennial Station Complete inside Monthly 132 W. Graham Ave. Outside building perimeter Monthly Stadium Complete inside Monthly 500 Diamond Dr. Outside building perimeter Monthly TOTAL MONTHLY COST $ 4; DS • �C The Undersigned has checked carefully all of the above figures and understands that the City will not be responsible for any error or omissions on the part, of the Undersigned in making up this bid. The Undersigned bidder declares, under penalty of perjury, that they are licensed to do business or act in the capacity of a Tractor vendor within the State of Cali o nia a th they are validly licensed. tt Name of Vendoij- Signature of Bidder _ —7pcxY.; A Print Bidder Name Here Title 2004 pest control contract.doc 5 �' r� CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: RICHARD J. WATENPAUGH, CITY MANAGER DATE: MARCH 9, 2004 SUBJECT: 2003/2004 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PROGRAM (Tractors) BACKGROUND The Public Works Division of the Community Services Department manages and maintains a fleet that includes thirty -seven vehicles, ten vessels, four personal watercrafts, and twenty -eight miscellaneous pieces of equipment. Each year, staff evaluates the condition of our fleet and replaces vehicles and equipment based on needs and life cycle cost analysis. This year staff identified the need to purchase the following equipment: (1) 1 — Sign Truck for the Public Works Department �-. (2) 2 — 4X4 Sport Utility Vehicles for City Manager's Office (3) 2 — Tractors with mowing attachments for the Weed Abatement Program (4) 1 — Vacuum Unit (trailer mounted) for Public Works Storm Drain Maintenance (5) 1 — 4X4 Pickup Truck for Lake Operations (6) 1 — 4X4 Pickup Truck for Park and Open Space (7) 2 — 4X2 Pickup Trucks for Code Enforcement Housing Inspection Program City Council has awarded bids for items 4, 5, 6, and 7 listed above. At this time, staff has received bids for item 3, which are two (2) tractors with attachments for the Weed Abatement Program. DISCUSSION At the December 9, 2003 City Council meeting, staff was directed to re -bid the weed abatement tractor equipment. Staff then issued a notice requesting bids for two (2) tractors and attachments. The bids were opened on February 17, 2004. Three vendors submitted bids. Bid results for the tractors and attachments are shown below. Bidder Purchase Price Lease Price Annual lease Cost Johnson Equipment Tractors $ 125,313 $ 2,365 Flail Mowers $ 24,117 $ 455 Disk Harrows $ 18,188 $ 343 total $ 167,618.08 $ 3,163.12 $ 37,957.44 Cook Equipment Tractors Flail Mowers Disk Harrows total $ 174,439.79 $ 3,251.50 $ 39,018.00 Powerland Equipment Tractors $ 129,812 $ 2,382 Flail Mowers $ 22,046 $ 414 Disk Harrows $ 27,970 $ 526 total $ 179,827.80 $ 3,321.91 $ 39,862.92 As discussed in greater detail below, even though Johnson Equipment submitted the low bid, the bid did not conform to the City's specifications. To assist with the evaluation and conformity to bid specifications, staff used a specification check list that each bidder submitted with their bid. The bidder checked whether or not their equipment complied or was an exception to the specification (a copy of this check list filled out by each bidder is enclosed). The specifications check list was important to staff in evaluating the equipment because it listed key components necessary for evaluating performance and efficiency of the equipment. Staff's evaluations of the bids are set forth below. Each bid was evaluated based on price and conformity to specifications. 1.) Johnson Machinery, Temecula, California A. Equipment Bid 1. Tractor — Make 2004 Challenger Model MT 545 2. Flail Mower — Make 2004 Little Model 000096 -AGFC 3. Disk Attachment — Make 2004 Struthmore Model H B. Cost — Johnson Machinery is the lowest bid, with a monthly lease cost of $3,163.12. C. Conformity to Specifications — Johnson machinery requested exceptions on item K, tractor 3 -point hitch, and item M -2 the disk attachment. D. Staff's Evaluation — Item K, 3 -point hitch, is specified as having a lift capacity of 9,250 lbs. Johnson Machinery has requested an exception for a lifting capacity of 8,700 lbs. It is staff's opinion that the variance of 550 lbs. is not significant enough to affect performance relating to the City's intended use of the equipment. Item M -2, disk attachment, is specified as having a weight distribution per disk �+ (WDPD) of 190 lbs. Johnson Machinery has requested an exception for a WDPD of 139 lbs. per disk. Staff believes that this is a significant deviation from the specifications and will reduce the performance and efficiency of the equipment. hV+1t/ UA 11 W WJ. pmj � a oF The request for a WDPD of a minimum of 190 lbs. was requested based on staff's experience with disk attachments. A WDPD of 190 lbs. and above increases productivity by ensuring efficient disking of weeds with one pass of the disk attachment over a designated area. Based on staff's experience, it is our opinion that using a WDPD rating of less than 190 lbs. will adversely affect productivity by requiring a second pass of the disk attachment to remove weeds on some soil types, thereby increasing labor costs and wear and tear on the other equipment. 2.) Cook Equipment, Corona, California A. Equipment Bid 1. Tractor — Make 2004 New Holland Model TM155 2. Flail Mower— Make 2004 Gearmore Model GHF 100 3. Disk Attachment — Make 2004 Domries Model BTO -10 -2441 B. Cost — Cook Equipment is next to lowest bid, monthly lease cost is $3,251.50. C. Conformity to Specifications — Cook Equipment did not request any exceptions to the specifications. However, Powerland Equipment who also submitted a bid has requested that the City disqualify Cook Equipment bid due to the fact that it does not meet the minimum bid specifications. D. Staff's Evaluation — Staff has reviewed the specifications of the equipment relating to the protest submitted by Powerland Equipment and submits the following evaluation and opinion: Tractor — Specifications request 32 forward and 32 reverse gears that range from 1.3 to 23.9 mph. The tractor specified by Cook Equipment has 18 forward and 6 reverse gears with a creeper gear. It is staff's opinion that the creeper gear will allow the operator to choose the optimal gear for weed abatement work. It is staff's opinion that this variance is not significant enough to affect performance. Specifications call for the hydraulic system to have a maximum pressure of 2,900 p.s.i. The tractor specified by Cook Equipment has a maximum hydraulic pressure of 2,750. It is staff's opinion that this variance is not significant enough to affect performance. The tractor hydraulics meets the minimum specifications for the intended use of the tractor. Mower — Specifications call for 36 cutting knives. The mower specified has 26 cutting knifes. It is staff's opinion that this variance is not significant enough to affect performance. More knifes would give a more manicured cut when the mower is used to mow a turf grass. For our intended use, weed abatement, 26 cutting knives is adequate. Specifications identify a mower that weighs 2,450 lbs. The mower bid weighs �-.. 2,200 lbs. It is staff's opinion that the weight of the mower will not affect performance. All tractor mounted mower units are designed with a roller that rides on the top of the surface being mowed. The weight of the mower does not add nor hinder mowing performance. AGENDA ITEM NO. �., p__._ 3.) Powerland Equipment, Valley Center, California A. Equipment Bid 1. Tractor - Make 2004 Massey Ferguson Model 6485 2. Flail Mower – Make 2004 Little Model 000096 -AGFC 3. Disk Attachment – Make 2004 Glenco /OD 65202 HD B. Cost – Powerland Equipment is the highest of the three bids submitted with a monthly lease cost of $3,321.91. C. Conformity to Specifications – Powerland Equipment did not request any exceptions to the specifications. D. Staff's Evaluation – Staff has reviewed the specifications of the equipment bid and has the opinion that the equipment complies with the minimum specifications. FISCAL IMPACT The annual equipment budget in the Weed Abatement Program is $60,000. Each of the three vendor's lease payment proposals are within the budget with a range of lease payments from $37,957.44 to $39,862.92 per year. RECOMMENDATION After careful evaluation of all three bids, it is staff's opinion that the bid submitted by Cook Equipment meets the minimum bid specifications needed for the intended use of the equipment and is the best value for the City. While Johnson Machinery has provided the lowest bid, it appears to have achieved the cost savings by reducing the disk weight by 27 %, which will materially affect the efficiency of the machinery leading to higher labor costs and increase maintenance on the tractors. The concerns expressed by Powerland Equipment in regards to the equipment bid by Cook Equipment are not significant enough to affect the efficiency of the machine's production when used for weed abatement purposes. It is staff's recommendation that the Mayor and City Council authorize the lease of two tractors and attachments as described in this report from Cook Equipment and authorize the City Manager to execute a lease agreement consistent with the above referenced terms and approved by the City Attorney. PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY: William PavuKPublic Works Director of C�nity Services i APPROVED FOR AGENDA LISTING: Richard J. Watenpau , City Manag AGENDA ITEM NO. PAM— OF 1-4wo ...10 apa W, WN, �- -a a V, 0, m On , (760) 749 -1271 A-4 H N DEERE FAX (760) 749-7413 27943 Valley Center Road, Valley Center, California 92082 1- 800 -33- MOWER 14F State Contractor's Lic. # 303356 www.poweriandequipment.com uAMYFERGUSOu March 02, 2004 Bill Payne City of Lake Elsinore 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Dear Mr. Payne, This letter is to illustrate to the City of Lake Elsinore why Cook Equipment should not be awarded the order for the tractors, mowers and discs. Your specifications call out specific requirements and in several cases the New Holland Tractor and the Gearmore Mower bid by Cook simply does not meet or exceed these required features. Tractor Item D: Your specifications for the tractors requires a transmission with 32 forward x 32 reverse gears with 4 power shift ranges from 1.3 mph to 23.9 mph. The New Holland TM155 has 18 forward x 6 reverse gears which clearly does not meet your specification. The New Holland is available with a creeper which may increase the number of gears but would all fall below the 1.3 mph to 23.9 mph requirement. After horsepower the most important feature of a tractor is being able to choose the optimal gear for the application. Item V: The specification of the hydraulic system calls for a maximum pressure of 2,900 p.s.i. with a standard output of 28 gallons per minute. The New Holland TM155 can only give 2,750 psi. N4nwor The referenced brand is a Little Industries model 000096 -AGFC and your specifications require that all others be equal to or exceed them. The units offered by Cook Tractor is the Gearmore GHF 100 which is made in Italy by Sepi Manufacturing. Although both mowers use '/2" sidewalls and 1/4" decks the Little Industries mower uses T -1 steel which is more expensive, stronger and considerably more wear resistant than normal mild steel. Your specifications call for 36 knives which is standard on the Little. The Gearmore has only 26 knives. The Gearmore weighs 2200 lbs, the Little weighs 2450 lbs. This clearly illustrates that Cook's bid fails to meet the specifications of the bid. This fact alone is sufficient grounds to reject Cook's bid. As you can see from the enclosed brochure of the Gearmore unit it is primarily designed for shredding brush or pruning in an agricultural application rather than a weed abatement use AMWOA G -.� PA ©F 53 L when hitting rocks and other hazards is the norm. I telephoned the Gearmore sales department on 03/01/04 and spoke to Eric who informed me that the minimum tractor horsepower required is 59 at the P.T. O. and must not exceed 90 hp because of the gearbox rating. Little Industries have vproved the use of their mower on 125 horsepower tractors. We also feel that the way Cook it c-luded the flails and discs in Item one (2 Tractors) was forcing the City to accept all items in6ad of the ability to select any item based on cost. Additionally, when a vendor knows that he is biddin, on a package he may well give a better discount compared to individual units to which he would aid bid preparation costs to each item. ,Finally, if the City is able to,c&se a vendor based 'on the "best overall cost to the City" the extended delivery time quoted by Cook forces the City to rent equipment at a cost of approximately $30,000 in order to meet fire department regulations. We urge you to consider that our bid is the only one that unequivocally meets your specifications and as such should be the recipient of the contract. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Kind Regards, Malcolm Sil5iffi, CEO- Powerland Equipment, Inc. PACE, .:.._OFD. U\V�v't-i SPECIFICATIONS FOR LAKE ELSINORE TRACTOR PURCHASE 2004 CONTACT: Bill Payne City of Lake Elsinore 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 FAX 909 - 471 -1251 Office 909 -674 -5170 E -MAIL bpayne @lake - elsinore.org AtiE MA ITEM ht0. PACE `7 c NOTICE INVITING BIDS PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that sealed bids will be received by the City of Lake Elsinore for the purchase of a tractor. This project is referred to as: LAKE ELSINORE TRACTOR PURCHASE Bids will be publicly opened, examined and declared in the City Hall Conference Room, 130 South Main Street, Lake Elsinore, California at the hour 11:00 AM of February 17, 2004. Each bid shall be made on the proposal form furnished in the Specifications and enclosed in an envelope supplied by the bidder, bearing the title of the work and the name and address of the bidder. It is the sole responsibility of the bidder to ensure that the bid is received in proper time in the City Clerk's office at the address and time hereinabove'set forth. Any bid received after the scheduled closing time for receipt of bids may be returned to the bidder unopened. The tractor is to be bid in accordance with the Specifications on file in the office of the City Clerk and said Specifications may be examined at the City of Lake Elsinore City Hall, 130 S. Main Street, Lake Elsinore, California.` Specifications document may be obtained at the Lake Elsinore City Hall Cashier's Window located at 130 South Main Street in Lake Elsinore. All bids must be made in accordance with and as directed in the Specifications, and all bidders shall comply with State, Federal and local laws applicable thereto. The City Council reserves the right to reject any or all bids, to waive any irregularities in a bid and to award the Contract as may best serve the interests of the City. All proposals are binding for a period of (30) days after they are opened and may be retained by the City for examination and comparison. For technical information relating to the details of the Specifications and /or bidding requirements, please contact Bill Payne in the Public Works Department of the City of Lake Elsinore. By Order of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California. Date: �� 5 /03 -- - Vicki ne Kasad City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore RATractor Bid Package Weed Abatement.doc AMN¢a MM NO. 1 PACE of S3 WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSALS A proposal may be withdrawn by a written request signed by the bidder. Such requests shall be delivered to the City's designated official prior to the bid opening hour stipulated'in the Notice Inviting Bids. The withdrawal of a proposal will not prejudice the right of the bidder to submit a new proposal, providing there is time to do so prior to bid opening. RELIEF OF BIDDER If the bidder claims a mistake was made in his proposal, the bidder shall give the City written notice within five (5) days after the date for submittal of proposals of the alleged mistake, specifying in the notice in detail how the mistake occurred. Relief will be granted only for clerical errors and at City's discretion. AWARD OF CONTRACT The Award of Contract, if made, will be to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder whose proposal complies with the requirements of the specifications and is the ,best value for the City based on cost, bid specification conformity, and service availability. Within thirty (30) days after the bid submittal date, the City will act either to accept a bid proposal or to reject all proposals. The acceptance of a bid proposal will be evidenced by a Notice of Award of Contract in writing, delivered to the bidder whose proposal is accepted. No other act of the City shall necessarily constitute acceptance of a bid proposal. City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, 'to waive any irregularity, and to take the bids under advisement for a period of 30 days, all as may be required to provide for the best interests of the City. No contract shall be binding upon the City until the same has been approved by the Board. AENDA MM No. 2 RATractor Bid Package Weed Abatement.doc 3 R� q of 53 TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL LAKE ELSINORE TRACTOR PURCHASE PROPOSAL Name of Bidder J CjH M t6 A . HIWERY CO. _, - -- Address of Bidder y I i 05 RALKF1 t- E Cain MURRT i/�, To: Citv of Lake Elsinore, Californi The undersigned bidder, in accordance with the City's Notice Inviting Bids, hereby proposes to furnish vehicles, and incidentals required for the above - stated project as set forth in the Specifications, in the manner and time prescribed therein. The undersigned bidder certifies that this proposal is made in. good faith, without collusion or connection with any other person or persons bidding on the work. The undersigned bidder understands that the City Council reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals or to waive formality or technicality in any proposal in the interest of the City. Name of Vendor Signature of Bidder Print Name MA�I�, rR___ -- Title RATractor Bid Package Weed Abatement.doc AGENDA ITEM NO 4 PAM-1 0 OF s3 Nvr1 TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL LAKE ELSINORE TRACTOR PURCHASE BID SCHEDULE ITEM DESCRIPTION 1. Provide 2 Tractors for Purchase as described in the specifications 2. Provide 2 Tractors for 60 month lease as described in the specifications 3. Provide 2 Flail Mower Attachments for Purchase as described in the specifications 4. Provide 2 Flail Mower Attachments for 60 month lease as described in the specifications 5. Provide 2 Disk attachments for purchase as described in the specifications 6. Provide 2 Disk attachments for 60 month lease as described in the specifications $ I ZA .�51L- ?JD - $�({.�per month $ $_ - -per :month $4 per :month Note: Purchase price shall be the "out the door" price with all tax, license and other fees and costs. With respect to leases, bidder shall provide the proposed lease contract and all applicable financial terms and conditions. Lease shall be a lease option to_ - buy with ownership for $1.00 after last lease payment. The Undersigned has checked carefully all of the above figures and understands that the City will not be responsible for any error or omissions on the part of the Undersigned in making up this bid. The Undersigned bidder declares, under penalty of perjury, that they are licensed to do business or act in the capacity of a Tractor vendor within the State of California and that. they are validly licensed. (D! E Ml , 0AAER CO. 4,z- Name of Vendor Signature of Bidder *f t t �AU Q 0151 _ Print Bidder Name Here '!E�,RMAN HAHAGEPR _ _ Title RATractor Bid Package Weed Abatement.doc 5 ffEM PAm w .s .. . TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL All bidders are to check "Comply" or "Exception" on the line provided for each line item of the specifications. Specifications LAKE ELSINORE TRACTOR PURCHASE 2004 4 wheel drive tractor, with air conditioned enclosed cab, minimum 120 horse power Power Take Off, with category two 3- -point hitch. I. MANUFACTURERS WARRANTY: Warranty period to begin when tractor is placed into service by the City. The minimum warranty requirements are as follows: A. BASIC: Minimum 0 -36 months, 100% parts and labor ors --he entire tractor, no deductions, including battery, with exceptions for tires, service adjustments, and consumer items. Comply X Exception______. II. SERVICE FACILITIES: The vendor shall operate a service facility capable of performing most repairs associates with the equipment they represent. This facility shall be located within 30 miles of the City, and be stocked with common replacement and high wear parts, as may be designated by equipment manufacturer, and approved by the City. Comply__ Exception III. TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS: The following are mi.n1,mcum specifications for the unit described. All features below shall be incorporated in the equipment and all items furnished and installed into a complete unit ready for operation. A. TYPE: New and unused tractor, with enclosed air conditioned cab, minimum factory rated advertised power take off of 125 horsepower. Acceptable makes and models are listed below, all others shall be equal to, or exceed them: -2004 Challenger MT545 2004 Massey Ferguson 6200 Series 2004 New Holland TM Series Comply Exception_____._ B. WHEELBASE: minimum 106 inches Comply_ Exception______ \d0 C. ENGINE: Diesel, liquid cooled, minimum displacement of :365 cu. in., 6 cylinders Comply X Exception ___ RATractor Bid Package Weed Abatement.doc 6 PaM__12 _cF . 53 , D. TRANSMISSION: Standard 32F x 32R with 4 power shift ranges �• from 1.3 mph to 23.9 mph comply 'X Exception E. WHEELS AND TIRES: Rear = 18.4 X 38 Front = 14.9 x 28 Comply--X— Exception___. F.ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT: To comply with SAE standards Comply Exception G. CAB-CHASSIS EQUIPMENT: 1. WINDSHEILD WIPERS Comply_ Exception_.___ 2. MIRRORS: Extendable outside mirro left and right side Comply Exception_.___. 3. RADIO: AM /FM type, with clock. Comply —x— Exception____. 4. BUMPERS: Standard front Comply- Exception______ 5. FUEL TANK: Capacity of 59 gallons, containing full amount of fuel at time of delivery to the CiLy. 10� ,/ Fuel tank Capacity Comply l� Exception__.,_____ H. BRAKES: Hydraulic wet disc Compl.yy_ Exception________ I. POWER TAKE OFF: RPM speeds of 540/1000 /economy Compl.y—>�— Exception!______ J. HYDRAULIC SYSTEM: Closed Center, PFC, with 2 remotes in cab, maximum pressure 2,900 psi, standard output of 28 gallons per minute Comply X Exception_!_______. K. 3 -POINT HITCH: Electronic 3 -point hitch control, cat:: °gory II, telescopic stabilizers, lift capacity of 9,250 @ 24 lbs, telescopic lower draft arm link ends, external hitch control buttons on both fenders. Comply Exception_x- F,T0L LES 15 L. WEIGHT BRACKETS: Front brackets w/12 -641b suitcase weights. ,O Comply—x— Exception___.___ RATractor Bid Package Weed Abatementdoc DA 9EN� ' ---- M. OTHER EQUIPMENT: Bidders shall provide the following: 1) Flail Mower Attachment: Center mounted, 96 inch wide, category 2 three point hitch mounted mower, (36 knives) for shrub, small trees, grass, and brush. Accept -able %woe makes and models are listed below, all others shall be equal to, or exceed them: Make: Little Model: 000096 -AGFC Year: 2004 Comply — Exception_..,____ Describe make and model bid: 2) Disk Attachment: Heavy duty, draw bar mounted, offset disc harrow with 24 inch by 1/4 inch round disc spaced 9 to 10 1/z inches apart with disc scrapers, wei<�ht distribution per disc is to be approximately 901bs per disc, positive depth gauge adjustment, 4 inch o inch tubular steel frame, 1 1/2 inch square axles, tongue jack, 5 inch by 8 inch hydraulic transport cylinder with dual transport tires size 11L by 15 inch on 15 inch by 10 inch rims. Acceptable makes and models are listed below, all others shall be equal to, or exceed them: Make: Glenco Model: OD 65202 Heavy Duty Year: 2004 Comply Exception y—_ DS R 1- d and model d �n 1 ►� F �1=7--c- -- 1 -6q LB5 -PER 'BLAUE - q. 5'' F LC TMT`_t. Q TZRES j)PARTS LISTS AND SHOP 'MANUALS: The vendor shall provide a total of one complete parts list, and o:rie complete shop manual', each containing complete information on the engine, transmission, and electric wiring schematic diagram. Comp ly_)�_Exc ept i on___ Note: Purchase price shall be the "out the door" price with all tax, license and other fees and costs. With respect to leaser, bidder shall provide the proposed lease contract and all applicable financial terms and conditions. Lease shall be a lease option to huv for 51.00 with ownership after last lease payment. RATractor Bid Package Weed Abatement.doc 140A ►ice O 8 pd9_,, y OF-5 -"10* Fri LEASE AGREEMENT THIS LEASE made and entered into this day of , 19 between JOHNSON MACHINERY CO. P. 0. BOX 351, 800 East La Cadena Drive, Riverside, California 92502, hereinafter called the Lessor, and hereinafter called the Lessee. Lessor, in consideration of the rental payments hereinafter reserved, hereby leases to Lessee the follow- ing personal property together with all accessories attached thereto: for a period of The rental rate shall be at the Lessor address above. commencing on the 4 c, J 3 °i ti CA- payable on the TERMS AND CONDITIONS day of 1. Rental Rate charge is for a maximum of one shift of 8 hours per day, 40 hours per week, or 176 hours per month of a 30 consecutive day period. The hours are to be recorded on the electric hour meter. Lessee further agrees to notify Lessor if the equipment is used for a greater number of hours and pay additional proportional rent for such use. Rental rate per hour over Iffi(1-hours shall be ; q 2. Property will be used in the County of State of California. Lessee will not remove the property from this county without written permission from Lessor. 3. In the event the equipment is returned to Lessor, Lessee agrees to pay for the tire wear or return the machine with tires as originally supplied, as directed by Lessor. 4. Lessee acknowledges receipt of said personal property in good order and condition. Upon expiration of the terms of this lease, including any extensions hereof or upon the sooner termination of this lease, Lessor, without necessity of any further notice, shall be entitled to the immediate possession of this equipment and Lessee agrees to deliver said property to Lessor at Riverside, California in good order and con- dition, ordinary wear and tear thereon excepted. Lessee agrees to pay all freight or other charges in connection with the use and operation of said personal property by Lessee or return to Lessor, or while in Lessee's possession. 5. Insurance. Lessee shall, at its expense, at all times from the time of delivery of equipment to Lessee, maintain insurance against all risks of loss or damage from any cause for not less than the full replacement value thereof and shall carry public liability and property damage insurance covering the equipment. Such insurance shall be in the amounts and with insurance companies satisfactory to lessor, protecting Lessor as an additional insured, and providing for ten (10) days written notice to Lessor before any policy may be modified or cancelled. Lessee shall deliver to Lessor evidence of the insurance. 6. Taxes. Lessee shall pay when due all taxes, including applicable sales or use tax, assessments, license and registration fees, and other governmental charges, that may now or hereafter be imposed on the lease payments, ownership, possession, leasing, operation, control, use and maintenance of the equipment excluding Lessor's franchise and income tax. Lessee shall supply to the Lessor in form satisfactory to Lessor, proof of payment of the above charges at least ten (10) days prior to the date on which they may become delinquent. Lessee shall be liable for any expenses, obligations, or legal fees which shall arise from the nonpayment of any such taxes or fees including legal fees incurred upon defense of the leased equipment or Lessor's interest therein. IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT NO WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, WHETHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING ANY WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ARE OR HAVE BEEN MADE OR AUTHORIZ- ED BY JOHNSON MACHINERY CO. WITH RESPECT TO ANY PRODUCTS DESCRIBED HEREIN EXCEPT AS SET FORTH ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS LEASE. THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS HEREIN SET FORTH, INCLUDING ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS SET FORTH ON THE BACK HEREOF, ARE AGREED TO BY LESSEE AND LESSOR, AND LESSEE ACKNOWLEDGES THAT HE HAS FULLY READ THIS AGREEMENT, BOTH FRONT AND BACK PAGES, AND ASSENTS TO ALL OF ITS TERMS AND CONDITIONS. JOHNSON MACHINERY CO. — LESSOR — LESSEE A CfEAA M0. U . PM 157 of: IF - - - - - --- - - o. o o. m z r m co no cr-'r6 o-; m m 77 n V3 0 IF - - - - - --- - - o. o o. NMO* ."Nol rfEM MD.—g-- m z r m co no cr-'r6 o-; m m n —r4 00 C; NMO* ."Nol rfEM MD.—g-- # - -1 ,,AtWDA ULM D"C", C D C, 0 c; -C, C OC # - -1 ,,AtWDA ULM �C 4h c- G. :Sr `-r G t� Nn c �- J VO �. k rd a c) cdo F4 o f -+wi a -�i cd 6 h r I;'i5'+.P ifCU •r HtU{ ��J ?M �',jr :,-t (,* + .hGSri (tiHij OCdCJli T U Jt'f(`1 ..C"71)Lr` .., U-j .�� -,4": i'.'(''?C 4C::i4 N .*•.^l�v� -t r1 H .-1 —1 r+ H �°:� ;rti. -f .-f .-f i-1 +�f H.-5 . rt on �,: : L , Kam., u- J..: i •.i, t1Ji i.T'. i -a In ci'U?U7 �u,� Ntfo Lr; d-cr � G ti'il PTO: +.tom ii.i -1w u.4't cif C .;r, i { i 74 -1 —f" 4 t - CIO f 'd fi JU "�H I0,0IF;( C.' "a r� IN 1 1 "7 wi --o � C ro 00 4 1 ..y w i-R co h H C? � rte- w:1 F. e,'-. � C `r , y, f} G i S, tl. IJ rJ U v? jam. a24' r ori H rj �7s; t ` 3.x Yr7tr 't Cc ri .0 t" 0,r r ac -r; AQMDA ITEM NO. tc'cit ^ -*[; -.- Gh�',� '- r„ f•.4' iit'L!7•,- - .i4Cq.:�i�.:cic ..3,"S.Y�? . J C';tL t;*t�.u�i'.'.' Ci! "'. it3L ^:1174'7 1. i v '.s f c r .41 t ,, n -: J ^ L C' rity'j. "' #�� -tvai + .•s f}..T L r t''T t• -JT� L. �t.1 ff� r +i,i -^FSy ._il �' -1.t ti - +.tom ii.i -1w u.4't cif C .;r, i { i 74 N4wo# N N C J -1 —f" 4 t - CIO f 'd r n; I� ct z• i ] r S ai +d r x, .. t.- ` 3.x � •43 AQMDA ITEM NO. fir z a t a `` PAS 1 $' OF .3 1. N4wo# N N C J -1 —f" 4 t - CIO f 'd r n; .•1 0 r x, - :j�t .•1 x, AQMDA ITEM NO. fir z a t a `` PAS 1 $' OF .3 1. 4 CO tt y Y *g0k " - L- — - 4 p f , it E �.: �Ir CO tt , Si = - L- — p f , it E �.: �Ir aAOEW RSA N0.__i____._ tt , Si = - L- — - aAOEW RSA N0.__i____._ ,"ItO AGENDA M NO PAML-a SPECIFICATIONS FOR LAKE ELSINORE TRACTOR PURCHASE 2004 CONTACT: Bill Payne City of Lake Elsinore 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 FAX 909 - 471 -1251 Office 909 - 674 -5170 E -MAIL bpayne@lake- elsinore.org (C- �,,,► No. g NOTICE INVITING BIDS PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that sealed bids will be received by the City of Lake Elsinore for the purchase of a tractor. This project is referred to as: LAKE ELSINORE TRACTOR PURCHASE Bids will be publicly opened, examined and declared in the City Hall Conference Room, 130 South Main Street, Lake Elsinore, California at the hour 11:00 AM of February 17, 2004. Each bid shall be made on the proposal form furnished in the Specifications and enclosed in an envelope supplied by the bidder, bearing the title of the work and the name and address of the bidder. It is the sole responsibility of the bidder to ensure that the bid is received in proper time in the City Clerk's office at the address and time hereinabove set fprth. Any bid received after the scheduled closing time for receipt of bids may be returned to the bidder unopened. The tractor is to be bid in accordance with the Specifications on file in the office of the City Clerk and said Specifications may be examined at the City of Lake Elsinore City Hall, 130 S. Main Street, Lake Elsinore, California. Specifications document may be obtained at the Lake Elsinore City Hall Cashier's Window located at 130 South Main Street in Lake Elsinore. All bids must be made in accordance with and as directed in the `Wor Specifications, and all bidders shall comply with State, Federal and local laws applicable thereto. The City Council reserves the right to reject any or all bids, to waive any irregularities in a bid and to award the Contract as may best serve the interests of the City. All proposals are binding for a period of (30) days after they are opened and may be retained by the City for examination and comparison. For technical information relating to the details of the Specifications and /or bidding requirements, please contact Bill Payne in the Public Works Department of the City of Lake Elsinore. By Order of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California. Date:_ \ /5 /D Vicki e Kasad City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore ,*.me RA Tractor Bid Package Weed Abatement.doc 1 APMA ITEM NO. PAM 4�az 53 INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS BIDDERS KNOWLEDGE Bidders must satisfy themselves by personal examination of the Specifications. No bidder shall, at any time after submission of a proposal, make any claim or assertion that there was any misunderstanding or lack of information regarding_ the specifications. Any errors, omissions, or discrepancies found in the Specifications, or other Contract documents shall be called to the attention of the City Public Works Manager and clarified prior to the submission of proposals. If any person contemplating submitting a bid is in doubt as to the true meaning of any part of the Specifications, or other Contract documents, he may submit to the Public Works Manager a written request for the interpretation thereof, and the person submitting the request will be responsible for its prompt delivery. Any interpretation of the Contract documents will be made only by addendum duly issued and a copy of such addendum will be mailed or delivered to each person receiving a set of such documents. PROPOSAL FORMS . Bids shall be submitted in writing on the proposal forms provided by the City of Lake Elsinore. All information requested therein must be clearly and legibly set forth in the manner and form indicated. SUBMISSION OF BIDS The envelope enclosing the proposal shall be sealed and addressed ^ to the City Clerk, City of Lake Elsinore, 130 South Main Street, Lake Elsinore, California 92530. The envelope shall be plainly marked in the upper left -hand corner with the name and address of the bidder and bear the words, "PROPOSAL FOR ", followed by the name of the project being bid and the date and hour of bid opening. Proposals may be mailed or delivered by messenger; however, it is the bidder's responsibility alone to ensure delivery of the proposal to the City's designated official prior to the time stipulated for bid opening in the Notice Inviting Bids. Late proposals will not be considered. IRREGULAR PROPOSALS Unauthorized conditions, limitations or provisions attached to a proposal will render it irregular and may be cause for its rejection. Alternate proposals may not be considered unless specifically requested. Proposals may be rejected by the City for the following reasons: (a) If the proposal form furnished is not used or is altered. (b) If there are unauthorized additions, conditional or alternate bids or irregularities of any kind. (c) If the proposal is not properly signed by the bidder. RATractor Bid Package Weed Abatement.doc �^jk 2 (X� AGO" ffm No. '`� pm a 3 of s3 'WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSALS A proposal may be withdrawn by a written request signed by the bidder. Such requests shall be delivered to the City's designated official prior to the bid opening hour stipulated in the Notice Inviting Bids. The withdrawal of a proposal will not prejudice the right of the bidder to submit a new proposal, providing there is time to do so prior to bid opening. RELIEF OF BIDDER If the bidder claims a mistake was made in his proposal, the bidder shall give the City written notice within five (5) days after the date for submittal of proposals of the alleged mistake, specifying in the notice in detail how the mistake occurred. Relief will be granted only for clerical errors and at City's discretion. AWARD OF CONTRACT The Award of Contract, if made, will be to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder whose proposal complies with the requirements of the specifications and is the best value for the City based on cost, bid specification conformity, and service availability. Within thirty (30) days after the bid submittal date, the City will act either to accept a bid proposal or to reject all proposals. The acceptance of a bid proposal will be evidenced by a Notice of Award of Contract in writing, delivered to the bidder whose proposal is accepted. No other act of the City shall necessarily constitute acceptance of a bid proposal. City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive any irregularity, and to take the bids under advisement for a period of 30 days, all as may be required to provide for the best interests of the City. No contract shall be binding upon the City until the same has been `"go approved by the Board. -..I' RATractor Bid Package Weed Abatement.doc Q� " --2A-10F S 2L TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL LAKE ELSINORE TRACTOR PURCHASE PROPOSAL Name of Bidder co, , ip 0&., hrieS Address of Bidder 1701 W Wit- C6k&n A- '} Ta�7� To: City of Lake Elsinore, California The undersigned bidder, in accordance with the City's Notice Inviting Bids, hereby proposes to furnish vehicles, and incidentals required for the above - stated project as set forth in the Specifications, in the manner and time prescribed therein. The undersigned bidder certifies that this proposal is made in good faith, without collusion or connection with any other person or persons bidding on the work. The undersigned bidder understands that the City Council reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals or to waive formality or technicality in any proposal in the interest of the City. Print Name Title RATractor Bid Package Weed Abatement.doc 4 IT L7V pM "TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL LAKE ELSINORE TRACTOR PURCHASE BID SCHEDULE ITEM DESCRIPTION 1. Provide 2 Tractors for Purchase as described in the specifications 2. Provide 2 Tractors for 60 month lease as described in the specifications 3. Provide 2 Flail Mower Attachments for Purchase as described in the specifications 4. Provide 2 Flail Mower Attachments for 60 month lease as described in the specifications 5. Provide 2 Disk attachments for purchase as described in the specifications 6. Provide 2 Disk attachments for 60 month lease as described in the specifications $ er month a -P,,,r+. (Jp Pk&rvt- $_ per month s $ per month Note: Purchase price shall be the "out the door" price with all tax, license and other fees and costs. With respect to leases, bidder shall provide the proposed lease contract and all applicable financial terms and conditions. Lease shall be a lease option to buy with ownership for $1.00 after last lease payment. The Undersigned has checked carefully all of the above figures and understands that the City will not be responsible for any error or omissions on the part of the Undersigned in making up this bid. The Undersigned bidder declares, under penalty of perjury, that they are licensed to do business or act in the capacity of a Tractor vendor within the State of California and that they are validly licensed. OWL -> Name of Vendor JSignat f Bidder Q U - 30 40 (Ci - LLpx t✓l 1/�6✓1 — Print Bidder Name Here Title R: \Tractor Bid Package Weed Abatement.doc 5 �� PAM OF S 3 TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL All bidders are to check "Comply" or "Exception" on the line provided for each line item of the specifications. Specifications LAKE ELSINORE TRACTOR.PURCHASE 2004 4 wheel drive tractor, with air conditioned enclosed cab, minimum 120 horse power Power Take Off, with category two 3 -point hitch. I. MANUFACTURERS WARRANTY: Warranty period to begin when tractor is placed into service by the City. The minimum warranty requirements are as follows: A. BASIC: Minimum 0 -36 months, 100% parts and labor on the entire tractor, no deductions, including battery, with exceptions for tires, service adjustments and consumer items. Comply Exception II. SERVICE FACILITIES: The vendor shall operate a service facility capable of performing most repairs associates with the equipment they represent. This facility shall be located within 30 miles of the City, and be stocked with common replacement and high wear parts, as may be designated by equipment manufacturer, and proved by the City. Comply Exception III. TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS: The following are minimum specifications for the unit described. All features below shall be incorporated in the equipment and all items furnished and installed into a complete unit ready for operation. A. TYPE: New and unused tractor, with enclosed air conditioned cab, - minimum factory rated advertised power take off of 125 horse power. Acceptable makes and models are listed below, all others shall be equal to, or exceed them: 2004 Challenger MT545 2004 Massey Ferguson 6200 Series 2004 New Holland TM Series_ Comply Exception B. WHEELBASE: minimum 106 inches / Comply V Exception C. ENGINE: Diesel, liquid cooled, minimum di placement of 365 cu. in., 6 cylinders 100-- Comply Exception R: \Tractor Bid Package Weed Abatement.doc 6 A ITm N0.___r_, PAm D. TRANSMISSION: Standard 32F x 32R withwer shift ranges from 1.3 mph to 23.9 mph Comply Exception E. WHEELS AND TIRES: Rear = 18.4 X 38 Front = 14.9 x 28 "we Comply Exception F. ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT: To comply with SAE standards Exception G.CAB- CHASSIS EQUIPMENT: Comply '- 1. WINDSHEILD WIPERS / . Comply ✓ Exception 2. MIRRORS: Extendable outside mirrors and right side Comply Exception 3. RADIO: AM /FM type, with clock. Comply Exception 4. BUMPERS: Standard front �� . Comply y Exception 5. FUEL TANK: Capacity of 59 gallons, containing full amount of fuel at time of delivery to the City. Fuel tank Capacity ! �Comply Exception H. BRAKES: Hydraulic wet disc Comply � Exception I. POWER TAKE OFF: RPM speeds of 540 /1000 /economy Comply t�Exception J. HYDRAULIC SYSTEM: Closed Center, PFC, with 2 remotes in cab, maximum pressure 2,900 psi, standard output of 28 gallons per minute Comply Exception K. 3 -POINT HITCH: Electronic 3 -point hitch control, category II, telescopic stabilizers, lift capacity of 9,250 @ 24 lbs, telescopic lower draft arm link ends, external hitch control buttons on both fenders. Comply Exception L. WEIGHT BRACKETS: Front brackets w/12 -641b suitcase weights. Comply Exception RATractor Bid Package Weed Abatement.doc '`r. P ° 3 M. OTHER EQUIPMENT: Bidders shall provide the following: 1) Flail Mower Attachment: Center mounted, 96 inch wide, category 2 three point hitch mounted mower, (36 knives) ^ for shrub, small trees, grass, and brush. Acceptable makes and models are listed below, all others shall be equal to, or exceed them: Make: Little Model: 000096 -AGFC Year: 2004 Comply Exception Describe make and model beQ- & 14 P /ate 2) Disk Attachment: Heavy duty, draw bar mounted, offset disc harrow with 24 inch by 1/ inch round disc spaced 9 to 10 1/2 inches apart with disc scrapers, weight distribution per disc is to be approximately 190lbs per disc, positive depth gauge adjustment, 4 inch by 6 inch tubular steel frame, 1 1/2 inch square axles, tongue jack, 5 inch by 8 inch hydraulic transport cylinder with dual transport tires size 11L by 15 inch on 15 inch by 10 inch rims. Acceptable makes and models are listed below, all others shall be equal to, or exceed them: ^ Make: Glenco Model: OD 65202 Heavy Duty Year: 2004 Comply Exception Describe make and model bid: s Syr t� 3)PARTS LISTS AND SHOP MANUALS: The vendor shall provide a total of one complete parts list, and one complete shop manual, each containing complete information on the engine, transmission, and electric wiring schematic diagram. Comply—�Exception Note: Purchase price shall be the "out the door" price with all tax, license and other fees and costs. With respect to leases, bidder shall provide the proposed lease contract and all applicable financial terms and conditions. Lease shall be a lease option to buy for $1.00 with ownership after last lease payment. RATractor Bid Package Weed Abatement.doc FEATURES: • Cat. II 3 -pt. hitch, center mount • Front or rear tractor mount • Shreds brush or prunings up to 3 ", intermittent 4" Gearbox HP at 540 R.F M. -90 HP, 1000 R.P.M. -110 HP • Specially designed drop forged hammer knives give optimum performance in brush shredding, mulching prunings, grass cutting and maintenance of cover crops • .Equipped with patented rear deflector which in open position discharges grass and allows tracior speeds up to 6 MPH, and in closed position contains and furtl; 2r sheds brush t,) -a finer mulch SPECIFICATIONS: This shredder is specially designed for severe conditions. Tall grass and weeds, cover crops, orchard prunings and even citrus brush are no match for, this heavy duty machine. The 3 Ib. drop forged ham- mer knives shred branches up to 4" in diameter. The 2000 R.P.M. large diameter rotor, makes a fine mulch. Easy to switch hitch allows the shredder to be mounted on the rear or front of tractors. ❑ Double row of drop forged cutter bars to increase the shredding of material ❑ 10" Diameter, computer balanced, vibration free rotor turns at 2000 R.P.M. ❑ Rotor bearings are double self- align�ig to insure long life ❑ 5 Belt drive protects gearbox, driveshaft and rotorshaft Cl 8" Diameter, full width gauge roller Hood plate I/4" thick, double plated front and back side plates r /z" thick ❑ Double row of front safety chains ❑ Rubber rear guard ❑ Driveshaft with overrunning clutch c � � INr, `.or O OF485 r Mowing Overall No. of Min. H.P. ;•I!odeI # Width width Knives Reaired Weight GHF90 90" 100" 24 50 2000# GHF100 100" 112" 26 58. 2.200 GHF140 140" 152" 36 78 3080 c � � INr, `.or O OF485 r New Holland TM Tractors Cooling system, qt (L) 27:5 6) raulic system, qt (L) 1 (100) Steering 125 (93) Type Hydrostatic Pump capa 'ty, gpm (lpm) 16.4 (61.9) Turning angle, 2WD/FWD /S rSteer F 52 0/55 0/650 Dimens ns 40% Height, top of cab, in(cX 113.4 (288) Wheelbase, 2WD, i (cm) 108.1 (275) Wheelbase, F4?, in(cm) 1072 (272) Wheelbase, S erSteer, in(cm) 118.4 (301) Wheelbase erraglide, in(cm) 109.7 (278) Overall ngth (Std. FWD), in(cm) 188.1 (478) Wid cross fenders, in(cm) (201) clearance at drawbar, in(cm) 20.0(51) Weight, FWD, lb(kg) 11,574 (5250) Weight, 2WD, lb(kg) 10,472 (4750) ModeLTM15 Engine TM155 Cylinders /Aspiration 6, turbocharged PTO horsepower (kW) 125 (93) Displacement, cu.in(L) 456 (7.5) Rated Speed (rpm) 2200 Maximum torque (rpm) 1400 Torque rise 40% Transmission TM155 Power Command powershift (2WD/FWD) 17 x 6/18 x 6 Range Command semi - powershift (2WD/FWD) 17 x 6/18 x 6 Creeper Yes Electrical Batteries (2) 12V Cold cranking amps 1300 Alternator (amps) 120 Worklights 12 PTO Type Wet, multi -plate Engagement Electro- hydraulic Speed (RPM) 540/1000 Hydraulics Page 2 of 3 http : / /www.abcgroff.com /ag/nhtm4.htm 7104 g OF .New riollanci lM "Tractors System type Closed center load sensing Hydraulic pump Variable displacement piston Pump capacity, gpm (Um) 28 (106) Max. pressure, psi (kPa) 2750 (190) Max. no. of rear remotes 4 Joystick control and optional mid -mount valves 2 -4 3 -Point Hitch Type Cat. II/IIIN Aux. lift RAM 1 Lift capacity w/hitch at 24 ", lb (kg) 11,420 (5180) Draft control/sensing EDC/tower link Flexible link ends Standard Telescoping stabilizers Standard Capacities Fuel tank, U.S. gal (L) 75.3 (285) Crankcase with filter, qt (L) 20 (18.9) Cooling system, gal (L) 6-7(25.5) Steering Type Hydrostatic Pump capacity, gpm (lpm) 16.4 (62) Turning angle, 2WD/FWD /SuperSteer FWD 52 0/55 0/650 Dimensions Height, top of cab, in(mm) 111.4 (2830) Wheelbase, 2WD, in(mm) 108.1 (2747) Wheelbase, FWD, in(mm) 107.2 (2723) Wheelbase, SuperSteer, in(mm) 113.4 (2880) Wheelbase, Terraglide, in(mm) 109.7 (2788) Overall length (Std. FWD), in(mm) 185.7 (4718) Min. clearance at drawbar, in(mm) 16 (405) Weight, 2WD, lb(kg) 10,471 (4750) Weight, FWD, lb(kg) 12,015 (5450) *Note: A.B.C. Groff is an equipment dealer. We are NOT the Manufacturer. Contact A.B.C. Groff for more product information 110 South Railroad Ave., New Holland, PA 17557 Telephone: (717)354 -4191 Fax: (717) 355 -2272 Call Toll free: 1 (800) 346 -8319 Email:abegroff@abcgroff.com Ag Main Page ABC Groff Main Page Page 3 of 3 http: / /www.abcgroff.com /ag/nhtm4.htm ffMNd/7/04 14NOW ../ New Holland TM Tractors ABC GBOFF New Holland TM Tractors s... ~r 'ne TM150 Cylinders /Aspiration - 6, turbo PTO horsepower (kW) 120 (90) Displacement, cu.in(L) 457.7 (7.5) Rated Speed (rpm) 2200 Maximum torque (rpm) 1100 Torque rise 48 Constant power ange (RPM) 1500/2200 FA 1. Transmission TM150 P wer Command powershift 18 x 6 Ran Command semi - powershift 18 x 6 Creep Yes Electrical Batteries (2 12V Cold cranking ps 1800 Alternator (amp 120 Worklights 12 PTO Type Wet, multi -plate Engagement Electro- hydraulic Speed (RPM) 540/1000 H drauli System type CCLS Hydraulic pump Variable displacement piston Pump capacity, (1 /m) 28 (106) Max. pressure, i (kPa) 2750 (190) Max. no. of re remotes 4 Joystick con of and optional mid -mo t valves 3 or 4 -Point Hitch Type C . II Lift c acity w/hitch at 24 ", lb (kg) 12,190 528) Draf control /sensing Electroli TM Fl e ble link ends Standard/remov ble T escoping stabilizers Standard Capacities Vuel tank, U.S. gal (L) 85 (325) Crankcase with filter, qt (L) 20 (18.9) http: / /www.abcgroff Com/ag/nhtm4.htm Page 1 of 3 MOMUMkO4 g `` p=_13 3�p� s New Hollond f i TM Tpectop Specifications b iMiti nwim txuo rMiu Tx175 mim TRANSMISSION Power Command'"' powershift (2WD/FWD) 17x6/18 x6 17x6/18x6 17x6/18x6 17x6118x6 17x6/18x6 MODEL TM120 TM130 TM140 TM155 TM175 TM190 ENGINE semi-powershift (2WD /FWD) 17 x 6/18 x 6 (: 17 x 6/18 x 6 17 x 6/18 x 6 NA Cylinders 6 6 6 6 6 6 Aspiration Turbocharged Turbocharged Turbocharged Turbocharged Turbocharged Turbocharged yes Air -to -air intercooled Air -to -air intercooled Air -to-air intercooled Air- to-air intercooled Air -to -air intercooled Air -to-air intercooled PTO horsepower (kW) 95 (70) 105 (78) 115 (85) 11 145 (108) 160 (119) Displacement, cu in (L) 456 (7.5) 456 (7.5) 456 (7.5) 456 (7.5) 456 (7.5) 456 (7.5) Rated speed (RPM) 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 Maximum torque (RPM) 1400 1400 1400 1400 1400 1400 Engine torque rise 30% 34% 40% 40% 40% 40% TRANSMISSION Power Command'"' powershift (2WD/FWD) 17x6/18 x6 17x6/18x6 17x6/18x6 17x6118x6 17x6/18x6 17x6/18 x6 Range CommandTm semi-powershift (2WD /FWD) 17 x 6/18 x 6 17 x 6/18 x 6 17 x 6/18 x 6 17 x 6/18 x 6 NA NA Dual CommandTm 24 x 12 24 x 12 NA NA NA NA Creeper yes yes yes yes yes yes ELECTRICAL Battery (2) 12V 12V 12V 12V 12V 12V Cold cranking amps 1300 1300 1300 1300 1300 1300 Alternator (amps) 120 120 120 120 120 120 Worklights 12 12 12 12 12 12 PTO Type Wet multi -plate Wet mufti -plate Wet multi -plate Wet multi -plate Wet multi -plate Wet mufti -plate Engagement Electro-hydraulic Electro- hydraulic Electro- hydraulic Electro- hydraulic Electro- hydraulic Electro- hydraulic Speed (RPM) 540/1000 540/1000 540/1000 540/1000 540/1000 540/1000 HYDRAULICS Systemtype .................................................. ............................... .........................Closed center load sensing ........................................................................... ............................... Implement hydraulic pump .......................... ............................... .......................Variable displacement piston ............ ...................................... ....................... ............................... Implement pump capacity, gpm (Vm) 28 (106) 28 (106) 28 (106) 28 (106) 31.7 (120) 31.7 (120) Max. pressure, psi (bar) 2,750 (190) 2,750 (190) 2,750 (1 90) 2,750 (190) 2,750 (190) 2,750 (190) Max. number of rear remotes 4 4 4 4 4 4 Joystick control and optional mid-mount valves 2 -4 2 -4 2 -4 2 -4 2-4 2 -4 .............................. ............................... ...........................(2nd & 3rd mid mounts factory installed, 4th is dealer installed) ............................................. ............................... 3-POINT HITCH Type Cat 11 Cat 11 Cat IIAIIN Cat 11/IIIN Cat IVIIIN Cat IIA11N Aux. Lift RAM 0 0 1 1 2 2 Lift capacity (24 inches "5# behind ball ends) 7,441 (3375) 7,441(3375) 11,420 (5180) ffV 17,085 (7750) est. 17,085 (7750) est. Lift capacity (ASAE S3492) 8,725 (3955) 8,725 (3955) 11,690 (5302) 11,690 (5302) WA N/A Draft control/sensing EDC / lower link EDC / lower link EDC / lower link EDC /lower link EDC / lower link EDC / lower link Flexible link ends Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Sway blocks Standard Standard. Standard Standard Standard Standard Page 1 of 2 NO' — na uL/ :p/ LUCJ4 i:D. Do 7D7b /.jqi ID DDMRIES ENTERPRISES PAGE 05105 BTO DISC FEATURES SINGLE TONGUE HITCH IS STANDARD DOUBLE LIP IS OPTIONAL DEPTH CONTROL SETBAR WITH TRANSPORT SAFETY PIN IN PLACE HEAVY DUTY WEAR PLATE AND ADD - A -BLADE EXTENSION WASHER IS STD. EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS RTO SERIES I MODEL ORDER NUMBER A.S.A.E.WIDTH OF CUT NO. OF BLADES SIZE BLADES BLADE EDGE NO. OF BLADES BTO -10 -1840 710" 18 24" FRONT SM REAR SM FRONT REAR BTO -10 -1860 7'1" 18 26" SM 9 9 SM g g BTO -10 -2040 20 24" SM SM 10 10 BTO -10 -2060 7110" 20 26" SM SM 10 10 BTO -10- 2240 8'5'' 22 24'' SM SM 11' 11' BTO -10- 2260 8'6" 22 26" SM SM 11 11 BTO -10 -2440 9320' 24 24" SM SM 12 12 BTO -10 -2460 9'3" 24 26" SM SM 12 12 BTO-10 -2640 i_ 9'11" 26 24" SM SM 13 BTO -10 -2660 - L10'01 ° 26 26" SM I SM _13 13 13 "See price sheet for Notched and Smooth Blade Combinations. Design Material and/or Specifications are Subject to Change without Notice and without Liability therefor, ti� a c r ` g V't SOLD BY -H.- DOMRIES ENTERPRISES, INC. 12281 Road 29 Madera, California 93638 Phone (209) 673 -9143 FAX (209) 673 -4110 -\ VYT: LBS. /\ 3419 3510 3522 3623 "x625 373�I 3850 3831 3963 _ - - A B R 1 (; " _,,MMMMFM-7 • r BTO BTO - 10 2241 815" soibd DDVd 53SIHdN31N3 SdINHOQ MODEL BTO SERIES I Thy Disc that has it all E IE CUTTING WIDTHS Ty, OYY TO l0' OYY BZIb L96` 5 R :qT bAR7 /gT 17a ,.„// SPECIFICATIONS FOR LAKE ELSINORE TRACTOR PURCHASE 2004 CONTACT: Bill Payne City of Lake Elsinore 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 FAX 909- 471 -1251 Office 909- 674 -5170 E -MAIL bpayne @lake- elsinore.org �','�Wj Oro cvp --� PAM-3. - NOTICE INVITING BIDS PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that sealed bids will be received by the City of Lake Elsinore for the purchase of a tractor. This Project is referred to as: LAKE ELSINORE TRACTOR PURCHASE Bids will be publicly opened, examined and declared in the City Hall Conference Room, 130 South Main Street, Lake Elsinore, California at the hour 11:00 AM of February 17, 2004. Each bid shall be made on the proposal form furnished in the Specifications and enclosed in an envelope supplied by the bidder, bearing the title of the work and the name and address of the bidder. It is the sole responsibility of the bidder to ensure that the bid is received in proper time in the City Clerk's office at the address and time hereinabove set forth. Any bid received after the scheduled closing time for receipt of bids may be returned to the bidder unopened. The tractor is to be bid in accordance with the Specifications on file in the office of the City Clerk and said Specifications may be examined_ at the City of Lake Elsinore City Hall, 130 S. Main Street, Lake Elsinore, California. Specifications document may be obtained at the Lake Elsinore City Hall Cashier's Window located at 130 South Main Street in Lake Elsinore. All bids must be made in accordance with and as directed in the ../' Specifications, and all bidders shall comply with State, Federal and local laws applicable thereto. The City Council reserves the right to reject any or all bids, to waive any irregularities in a bid and to award the Contract as may best serve the interests of the City. All proposals are binding for a period of (30) days after they are opened and may be retained by the City for examination and comparison. For technical information relating to the details of the Specifications and /or bidding requirements, please contact Bill Payne in the Public Works Department of the City of Lake Elsinore. By Order of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California. \/3/03 Date:_ Vicki nne Kasad City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore --wo, RATractor Bid Package Weed Abatement.doc 1 ?AffM MU NO. INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS BIDDERS KNOWLEDGE Bidders must satisfy themselves- by personal examination of the Specifications. No bidder shall, at any time after submission of a proposal, make any claim or assertion that there was any misunderstanding or lack of information regarding. the specifications. Any errors, omissions, or discrepancies found in the Specifications, or other Contract documents shall be called to the attention of the City Public Works Manager and clarified prior to the submission of proposals. If any person contemplating submitting a bid is in doubt as to the true meaning of any part of the Specifications, or other Contract documents, he may submit to the Public Works Manager a written request for the interpretation thereof, and the person submitting the request will be responsible for its prompt delivery. Any interpretation of the Contract documents will be made only by addendum duly issued and a copy of such addendum will be mailed or delivered to each person receiving a set of such documents. PROPOSAL FORMS Bids shall be submitted in writing on the proposal forms provided by the City of Lake Elsinore. All information requested therein must be clearly and legibly set forth in the manner and form indicated. SUBMISSION OF BIDS The envelope enclosing the proposal shall be sealed and addressed to the City Clerk, City of Lake Elsinore, 130 South Main Street, Lake Elsinore, California 92530. The envelope shall be plainly marked in the upper left -hand corner with the name and address of the bidder and bear the words, "PROPOSAL FOR ", followed by the name of the project being bid and the date and hour of bid opening. Proposals may be mailed or delivered by messenger; however, it is the bidder's responsibility alone to ensure delivery of the proposal to the City's designated official prior to the time stipulated for bid opening in the Notice Inviting Bids. Late proposals will not be considered. IRREGULAR PROPOSALS Unauthorized conditions, limitations or provisions attached to a proposal will render it irregular and may be cause for its rejection. Alternate proposals may not. be considered unless specifically requested. Proposals may be rejected by the City for the following reasons: (a) If the proposal form furnished is not used or is altered. (b) If there are unauthorized additions, conditional or alternate bids or irregularities of any kind. (c) If the proposal is not properly signed by the bidder. RATractor Bid Package Weed Abatement.doc 2 AG BM ITEM X10. . t WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSALS A proposal may be withdrawn by a written request signed by the bidder. Such requests shall be delivered to the City's designated official prior to the bid opening hour stipulated in the Notice Inviting Bids. The withdrawal of a proposal will not prejudice the right of the bidder to submit a new proposal, providing there is time to do so prior to bid opening. RELIEF OF BIDDER If the bidder claims a mistake was made in his proposal, the bidder shall give the City written notice within five (5) days after the date for submittal of proposals of the alleged mistake, specifying in the notice in detail how the mistake occurred. Relief will be granted only for clerical errors and at City's discretion. AWARD OF CONTRACT The Award of Contract, if made, will be to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder whose proposal complies with the requirements of the specifications and is the best value for the City based on cost, bid specification conformity, and service availability. Within thirty (30) days after the bid submittal date, the City will act either to accept a bid proposal or to reject all proposals. The acceptance of a bid proposal will be evidenced by a Notice of Award of Contract in writing, delivered to the bidder whose proposal is accepted. No other act of the City shall necessarily constitute acceptance of a bid proposal. City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive any irregularity, and to take the bids under advisement for a period of 30 days, all as may be required to provide for the best interests of the City. No contract shall be binding upon the City until the same has been , approved by the Board. � R: \Tractor Bid Package Weed Abatement.doc 3 IAPEMAMNOv v PAM Z 9 OF - 4 TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL LAKE ELSINORE TRACTOR PURCHASE PROPOSAL Name of Bidder POWERLAND EQUIPMENT, INC. Address of Bidder 27943 VALLEY CENTER ROAD, VALLEY CENTER CA 92082 To: City of Lake Elsinore, California The undersigned bidder, in accordance with the City's Notice Inviting Bids, hereby proposes to furnish vehicles, and incidentals required for the above - stated project as set forth in the Specifications, in the manner and time prescribed therein. The undersigned bidder certifies that this proposal is made in good faith, without collusion or connection with any other person or persons bidding on the work. The undersigned bidder understands that the City Council reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals or to waive formality or technicality in any proposal in interest of the City. r / POWERLAND EQUIPMENT, INC. Name of Vendor ure of Bidder MALCOLM SMITH RATractor Bid Package Weed Abatement.doc Print Name C.E.O. Title 111Cr N ffEM NO. TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL ITEM 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. LAKE ELSINORE TRACTOR PURCHASE BID SCHEDULE DESCRIPTION Provide 2 Tractors for Purchase as described in the specifications Provide 2 Tractors for 60 month lease as described in the specifications Provide 2 Flail Mower Attachments for Purchase as described in the specifications Provide 2 Flail Mower Attachments for 60 month lease as described in the specifications Provide 2 Disk attachments for purchase as described in the specifications 6. Provide 2 Disk attachments for 60 month lease as described $ 129,812.40 $ 2, 382.1 9 per month $22,045.66 $ 414.21 per month $ 27,969.74 In the specifications AJ $ 525.51 per month Note: Pur e price shall be the "out the door" price with all tax,,license and other fees and costs. With respect to leases, bidder shall provide the proposed lease contract and all applicable financial terms and conditions. Lease shall be a lease option to buy with ownership for $1.00 after last lease payment. The Undersigned has checked carefully all of the above figures and understands that the City will not be responsible for any error or omissions on the part of the Undersigned in making up this bid. The Undersigned bidder declares, under penalty of perjury, that they are licensed to do business or act in the capacity of a Tractor vendor within the Sta4Signature,' fornia and th they are validly licensed. POWERLAND EQUIPMENT, INC. Name of Vendor i El MALCOLM SMITH Print Bidder Name Here C.E.O. Title R: \Tractor Bid Package Weed Abatement.doc ^/ *AMA REM NO. r -- `� X11-2 TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL All bidders are to check "Comply" or "Exception" on the line provided for each line item of the specifications. Specifications LAKE ELSINORE TRACTOR PURCHASE 2004 4 wheel drive tractor, with air conditioned enclosed cab, minimum 120 horse power Power Take Off, with category two 3 -point hitch. I. MANUFACTURERS WARRANTY: Warranty period to begin when tractor is placed into service by the City. The minimum warranty requirements are as follows: A. BASIC: Minimum 0 -36 months, 100% parts and labor on the entire tractor, no deductions, including battery, with exceptions for tires, service adjustments, and consumer items. Comply XX Exception II. SERVICE FACILITIES: The vendor shall operate a service facility capable of performing most repairs associates with the equipment they represent. This facility shall be located within 30 miles of the City, and be stocked with common replacement and high wear parts, as may be designated by equipment manufacturer, and approved by the �. City. Comply XX Exception III. TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS: The following are minimum specifications for the unit described. All features below shall be incorporated in the equipment and all items furnished and installed into a complete unit ready for operation. A. TYPE: New and unused tractor, with enclosed air conditioned cab, minimum factory rated advertised power take off of 125 horse power. Acceptable makes and models are listed below, all others shall be equal to, or exceed them: 2004 Challenger MT545 2004 Massey Ferguson 6200 Series 2004 New Holland TM Series Comply XX Exception B.WHEELBASE: minimum 106 inches Comply XX Exception C. ENGINE: Diesel, liquid cooled, minimum displacement of 365 cu. in., 6 cylinders Comply XX Exception RATractor Bid Package Weed Abatement.doc PAM 6 �OJ` D. TRANSMISSION: Standard 32F x 32R with 4 power shift ranges from 1.3 mph to 23.9 mph Comply XX Exception E. WHEELS AND TIRES: Rear = 18.4 X 38 Front = 14.9 x 28 Comply XX Exception F.ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT: To comply with SAE standards G. CAB-CHASSIS EQUIPMENT: 1.WINDSHEILD WIPERS Comply XX Exception Comply XX Exception 2. MIRRORS: Extendable outside mirrors left and right side Comply XX Exception 3. RADIO: AM /FM type, with clock. Comply XX Exception 4. BUMPERS: Standard front Comply XX Exception 5.FUEL TANK: Capacity of 59 gallons, containing full amount of fuel at time of delivery to the City. Fuel tank Capacity 100 Comply XX H. BRAKES: Hydraulic wet disc Comply XX Exception Exception I. POWER TAKE OFF: RPM speeds of 540/1000 /economy Comply XX Exception J. HYDRAULIC SYSTEM: Closed Center, PFC, with 2 remotes in cab, maximum pressure 2,900 psi, standard output of 28 gallons per minute Comply XX Exception K. 3 -POINT HITCH: Electronic 3 -point hitch control, category II, telescopic stabilizers, lift capacity of 9,250 @ 24 lbs, telescopic lower draft arm link ends, external hitch control buttons on both fenders. Comply XX Exception L. WEIGHT BRACKETS: Front brackets w/12 -641b suitcase weights. RATractor Bid Package Weed Abatement.doc 7 Comply XX Exception A tfEM NO N../ M. OTHER EQUIPMENT: Bidders shall provide the following: 1) Flail Mower Attachment: Center mounted, 96 inch wide, category 2 three point hitch mounted mower, (36 knives) for shrub, small trees, grass, and brush. Acceptable makes and models are listed below, all others shall be equal to, or exceed them: Make: Little Model: 000096 -AGFC Year: 2004 Describe make and model bid: Comply XX Exception LITTLE INDUSTRIES /VMS 8FT. FLAIL 2) Disk Attachment: Heavy duty, draw bar mounted, offset disc harrow with 24 inch by 1/ inch round disc spaced 9 to 10 1/2 inches apart with disc scrapers, weight distribution per disc is to be approximately 190lbs per disc, positive depth gauge adjustment, 4 inch by 6 inch tubular steel frame, 1 1/2 inch square axles, tongue jack, 5 inch by 8 inch hydraulic transport cylinder with dual transport tires size 11L by 15 inch on 15 inch by 10 inch rims. Acceptable makes and models are listed below, all others shall be equal to, or exceed them: �-. Make: Glenco Q Model: OD 65202 Heavy Duty Year: 2004 Describe make and model bid: Comply XX Exception GLENCO /OD 65202 HD 3)PARTS LISTS AND SHOP MANUALS: The vendor shall provide a total of one complete parts list, and one complete shop manual, each containing complete information on the engine, transmission, and electric wiring schematic diagram. Comply XX Exception Note: Purchase price shall be the "out the door" price with all tax, license and other fees and costs. With respect to leases, bidder shall provide the proposed lease contract and all applicable financial terms and conditions. Lease shall be a lease option to buy for $1.00 with ownership after last lease payment. RATractor Bid Package Weed Abatement.doc 1- OEM 8 At ffm 1�0 ,(J(.._..-------- , Baystone Financial Group Proposal ---� B AYSTONE FINANCIAL GROUP Page 1 of 1 February 16, 2004 FORMAL P ROPOSAL LESSEE: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CA u This is a finance /ownership lease. No residual value. u Fixed interest rate for the five (5) year term. EQUIPMENT: 2 NEW TRACTORS AND /OR ATTACHMENTS OPTION 1 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CA Signature: Linda J. Tiers Typed Name do Title Acquisition Cost: $ 129,812.40 Term: Five (5) Years First Payment Due: At Closing Down: $ 0.00 Payment Mode: Monthly in Advance Payment Amount: $ 2,382.19 Trade In: $ 0.00 Interest Rate: 3.990% Principal Balance: $ 129,812.40 Rate Factor: 0.018351 OPTION 2 Acquisition Cost: $ 22,045.66 Term: Five (5) Years First Payment Due: . At Closing Down: $ 0.00 Payment Mode: Monthly in Advance Payment Amount: $ 414.21 Trade In: $ 0.00 Interest Rate: 4.990% Principal Balance: $ 22,045.66 Rate Factor: 0.018789 OPTION 3 Acquisition Cost: $ 27,969.74 Term: Five (5) Years First Payment Due: At Closing Down: $ 0.00 Payment Mode: Monthly in Advance Payment Amount: $ 525.51 "Trade In: $ 0.00 Interest Rate: 4.990% Principal Balance: $ 27,969.74 Rate Factor: 0.018789 OPTION 4 Acquisition Cost: $ 179,827.80 Term: Five (5) Years First Payment Due: At Closing Down: $ 0.00 Payment Mode: Monthly in Advance Payment Amount: $ 3,300.02 Trade In: $ 0.00 Interest Rate: 3.990% Principal Balance: $ 179,827.80 Rate Factor: 0.018351 This is a proposal only and is not a commitment to_f nance.._This_proposal . is. subject to credit review_an _approval and proper execution of mutually acceptable documentation_, Failure to consummate this transaction once credit approval is granted and the lease documents are dratted and delivered to Lessee will result in a documentation fee being assessed to the Lessee. This transaction must be credit approved, lease documents properly executed and returned to Baystone Financial Group and the transaction funded by Baystone Financial Group within 30 days from the date stated above, or Lessor reserves the right to adjust and determine a new interest rate, rate factor and payment amount. This transaction must be designated as tax - exempt under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as amended. LESSEE'S TOTAL AMOUNT OF TAX - EXEMPT DEBT TO BE ISSUED IN THIS CALENDAR YEAR WILL NOT EXCEED THE $10,000,000 LIMIT. There are no additional documentation fees or closing costs due Baystone Financial Group. BAYSTONE i` T INANCIAL GROUP CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CA Signature: Linda J. Tiers Typed Name do Title Vice President Date: Manhattan Chicago * Phoenix 2312 Anderson Avenue, Manhattan. KS 66502: Tel: 800 -752 -3562: Fax: ?85 -537 -4806 E- Mail:ltiers @baystone.net Webs ite:www.baystone.net "",o` MM too. 2 17/2004 SAMPLE AMORTIZATION SCHEDULE Lessee: Date of first payment: Original Balance: Total Number of Payments: Number of Payments per year: City of Lake Elsinore, CA RENTAL PAYMENT SCHEDULE 03/01/04 $129,812.40 60 12 PMT DUE RENTAL APPLIED TO APPLIED TO *PURCHASE NO. DATE PAYMENT INTEREST PRINCIPAL OPTION PRICE 1 01- Mar -04 $2,382.19 $0.00 $2,382.19 Not Available 2 01- Apr -04 $2,382.19 $423.71 $1,958.48 $127,854.56 3 01- May -04 $2,382.19 $417.19 $1,964.99 $125,813.32 4 01- Jun -04 $2,382.19 $410.66 $1,971.53 $123,766.63 5 01- Jul -04 $2,382.19 $404.10 $1,978.08 $121,714.49 6 01- Aug -04 $2,382.19 $397.53 $1,984.66 $119,656.88 7 01- Sep -04 $2,382.19 $390.93 $1,991.26 $117,593.78 8 01- Oct -04 $2,382.19 $384.31 $1,997.88 $115,525.17 9 01- Nov -04 $2,382.19 $377.66 $2,004.52 $113,451.05 10 01- Dec -04 $2,382.19 $371.00 $2,011.19 $111,371.40 11 01- Jan -05 $2,382.19 $364.31 $2,017.87 $109,286.21 12 01- Feb -05 $2,382.19 $357.60 $2,024.58 $107,195.45 13 01- Mar -05 $2,382.19 $350.87 $2,031.32 $105,099.12 14 01- Apr -05 $2,382.19 $344.12 $2,038.07 $102,997.20 15 01- May -05 $2,382.19 $337.34 $2,044.85 $100,889.67 16 01- Jun -05 $2,382.19 $330.54 $2,051.65 $98,776.52 17 01- Jul -05 $2,382.19 $323.72 $2,058.47 $96,657.74 18 01- Aug -05 $2,382.19 $316.88 $2,065.31 $94,533.31 19 01- Sep -05 $2,382.19 $310.01 $2,072.18 $92,403.21 20 01- Oct -05 $2,382.19 $303.12 $2,079.07 $90,267.43 21 01- Nov -05 $2,382.19 $296.21 $2,085.98 $88,125.96 22 01- Dec -05 $2,382.19 $289.27 $2,092.92 $85,978.78 23 01- Jan -06 $2,382.19 $282.31 $2,099.88 $83,825.87 24 01- Feb -06 $2,382.19 $275.33 $2,106.86 $81,667.22 25 01- Mar -06 $2,382.19 $268.32 $2,113.86 $79,502.81 26 01- Apr -06 $2,382.19 $261.29 $2,120.89 $77,332.63 27 01- May -06 $2,382.19 $254.24 $2,127.94 $75,156.66 28 01- Jun -06 $2,382.19 $247.17 $2,135.02 $72,974.89 29 01- Jul -06 $2,382.19 $240.07 $2,142.12 $70,787.31 30 01- Aug -06 $2,382.19 $232.95 $2,149.24 $68,593.89 31 01- Sep -06 $2,382.19 $225.80 $2,156.39 $66,394.62 32 01- Oct -06 $2,382.19 $218.63 $2,163.56 $64,189.48 33 01- Nov -06 $2,382.19 $211.44 $2,170.75 $61,978.47 34 01- Dec -06 $2,382.19 $204.22 $2,177.97 $59,761.56 35 01- Jan -07 $2,382.19 $196.98 $2,185.21 $57,538.74 36 01- Feb -07 $2,382.19 $189.71 $2,192.48 $55,309.99 37 01- Mar -07 $2,382.19 $182.42 $2,199.77 $53,075.29 38 01- Apr -07 $2,382.19 $175.11 $2,207.08 $50,834.64 39 01- May -07 $2,382.19 $167.77 $2,214.42 $48,588.01 40 01- Jun -07 $2,382.19 $160.40 $2,221.78 $46,335.40 41 01- Jul -07 $2,382.19 $153.02 $2,229.17 $44,076.77 PMT DUE RENTAL APPLIED TO APPLIED TO *PURCHASE NO. DATE PAYMENT INTEREST PRINCIPAL OPTION PRICE 42 01- Aug -07 $2,382.19 $145.61 $2,236.58 $41,812.12 43 01- Sep -07 $2,382.19 $138.17 $2,244.02 $39,541.44 44 01- Oct -07 $2,382.19 $130.71 $2,251.48 $37,264.69 45 01- Nov -07 $2,382.19 $123.22 $2,258.97 $34,981.88 46 01- Dec -07 $2,382.19 $115.71 $2,266.48 $32,692.98 47 01- Jan -08 $2,382.19 $108.17 $2,274.01 $30,397.97 48 01- Feb -08 $2,382.19 $100.61 $2,281.57 $28,096.85 49 01- Mar -08 $2,382.19 $93.03 $2,289.16 $25,789.59 50 01- Apr -08 $2,382.19 $85.42 $2,296.77 $23,476.17 51 01- May -08 $2,382.19 $77.78 $2,304.41 $21,156.59 52 01- Jun -08 $2,382.19 $70.12 $2,312.07 $18,830.82 53 01- Jul -08 $2,382.19 $62.43 $2,319.76 $16,498.85 54 01- Aug -08 $2,382.19 $54.72 $2,327.47 $14,160.66 55 01- Sep -08 $2,382.19 $46.98 $2,335.21 $11,816.23 56 01- Oct -08 $2,382.19 $39.21 $2,342.97 $9,465.56 57 01- Nov -08 $2,382.19 $31.42 $2,350.76 $7,108.61 58 01- Dec -08 $2,382.19 $23.61 $2,358.58 $4,745.38 59 01- Jan -09 $2,382.19 $15.76 $2,366.42 $2,375.85 60 01- Feb -09 $2,382.19 $7.89 $2,374.29 $0.00 -../i rte_ ,i'�1 ,'-- 110� SAMPLE AMORTIZATION SCHEDULE Lessee: Date of first payment: Original Balance: Total Number of Payments: Number of Payments per year: City of Lake Elsinore, CA RENTAL PAYMENT SCHEDULE 03/01/04 $22,045.66 60 12 PMT DUE RENTAL APPLIED TO APPLIED TO *PURCHASE NO. DATE PAYMENT INTEREST PRINCIPAL OPTION PRICE 1 01- Mar -04 $414.21 $0.00 $414.21 Not Available 2 01- Apr -04 $414.21 $89.95 $324.25 $21,915.21 3 01- May -04 $414.21 $88.60 $325.60 $21,570.40 4 01- Jun -04 $414.21 $87.25 $326.96 $21,224.50 5 01- Jul -04 $414.21 $85.89 $328.32 $20,877.51 6 01- Aug -04 $414.21 $84.52 $329.68 $20,529.42 7 01- Sep -04 $414.21 $83.15 $331.05 $20,180.22 8 01- Oct -04 $414.21 $81.78 $332.43 $19,829.92 9 01- Nov -04 $414.21 $80.39 $333.81 $19,478.51 10 01- Dec -04 $414.21 $79.01 $335.20 $19,125.99 11 01- Jan -05 $414.21 $77.61 $336.59 $18,772.35 12 01- Feb -05 $414.21 $76.21 $337.99 $18,417.59 13 01- Mar -05 $414.21 $74.81 $339.40 $18,061.70 14 01- Apr -05 $414.21 $73.40 $340.81 $17,704.69 15 01- May -05 $414.21 $71.98 $342.23 $17,346.55 16 01- Jun -05 $414.21 $70.55 $343.65 $16,987.28 17 01- Jul -05 $414.21 $69.13 $345.08 $16,626.87 18 01- Aug -05 $414.21 $67.69 $346.51 $16,265.31 19 01- Sep -05 $414.21 $66.25 $347.96 $15,902.61 20 01- Oct -05 $414.21 $64.80 $349.40 $15,538.77 21 01- Nov -05 $414.21 $63.35 $350.86 $15,173.77 22 01- Dec -05 $414.21 $61.89 $352.31 $14,807.61 23 01- Jan -06 $414.21 $60.43 $353.78 $14,440.30 24 01- Feb -06 $414.21 $58.96 $355.25 $14,071.82 25 01- Mar -06 $414.21 $57.48 $356.73 $13,702.18 26 01- Apr -06 $414.21 $55.99 $358.21 $13,331.36 27 01- May -06 $414.21 $54.50 $359.70 $12,959.37 28 01- Jun -06 $414.21 $53.01 $361.20 $12,586.20 29 01- Jul -06 $414.21 $51.51 $362.70 $12,211.85 30 01- Aug -06 $414.21 $50.00 $364.21 $11,836.32 31 01- Sep -06 $414.21 $48.48 $365.72 $11,459.60 32 01- Oct -06 $414.21 $46.96 $367.24 $11,081.68 33 01- Nov -06 $414.21 $45.44 $368.77 $10,702.57 34 01- Dec -06 $414.21 $43.90 $370.30 $10,322.25 35 01- Jan -07 $414.21 $42.36 $371.84 $9,940.73 36 01- Feb -07 $414.21 $40.82 $373.39 $9,558.01 37 01- Mar -07 $414.21 $39.26 $374.94 $9,174.07 38 01- Apr -07 $414.21 $37.71 $376.50 $8,788.91 39 01- May -07 $414.21 $36.14 $378.07 $8,402.54 40 01- Jun -07 $414.21 $34.57 $379.64 $8,014.94 41 01- Jul -07 $414.21 $32.99 $381.22 $7,626.12 A0WA MA PMT DUE RENTAL APPLIED TO APPLIED TO *PURCHASE NO. DATE PAYMENT INTEREST PRINCIPAL OPTION PRICE 42 01- Aug -07 $414.21 $31.40 $382.80 $7,236.06 43 01- Sep -07 $414.21 $29.81 $384.39 $6,844.77 44 01- Oct -07 $414.21 $28.21 $385.99 $6,452.24 45 01- Nov -07 $414.21 $26.61 $387.60 $6,058.47 46 01- Dec -07 $414.21 $25.00 $389.21 $5,663.45 47 01- Jan -08 $414.21 $23.38 $390.83 $5,267.18 48 01- Feb -08 $414.21 $21.75 $392.45 $4,869.65 49 01- Mar -08 $414.21 $20.12 $394.08 $4,470.87 50 01- Apr -08 $414.21 $18.48 $395.72 $4,070.82 51 01- May -08 $414.21 $16.84 $397.37 $3,669.50 52 01- Jun -08 $414.21 $15.18 $399.02 $3,266.92 53 01- Jul -08 $414.21 $13.52 $400.68 $2,863.06 54 01- Aug -08 $414.21 $11.86 $402.35 $2,457.92 55 01- Sep -08 $414.21 $10.19 $404.02 $2,051.50 56 01- Oct -08 $414.21 $8.51 $405.70 $1,643.79 57 01- Nov -08 $414.21 $6.82 $407.39 $1,234.79 58 01- Dec -08 $414.21 $5.12 $409.08 $824.49 59 01- Jan -09 $414.21 $3.42 $410.78 $412.90 60 01- Feb -09 $414.21 $1.72 $412.49 $0.00 SAMPLE AMORTIZATION SCHEDULE Lessee: Date of first payment: Original Balance: Total Number of Payments: Number of Payments per year: City of Lake Elsinore, CA RENTAL PAYMENT SCHEDULE 03/01/04 $27,969.74 60 12 PMT DUE RENTAL APPLIED TO APPLIED TO *PURCHASE NO. DATE PAYMENT INTEREST PRINCIPAL OPTION PRICE 1 01- Mar -04 $525.51 $0.00 $525.51 Not Available 2 01- Apr -04 $525.51 $114.12 $411.39 $27,804.24 3 01- May -04 $525.51 $112.41 $413.10 $27,366.77 4 01- Jun -04 $525.51 $110.69 $414.82 $26,927.93 5 01- Jul -04 $525.51 $108.97 $416.54 $26,487.69 6 01- Aug -04 $525.51 $107.24 $418.27 $26,046.05 7 01- Sep -04 $525.51 $105.50 $420.01 $25,603.02 8 01- Oct -04 $525.51 $103.75 $421.76 $25,158.59 9 01- Nov -04 $525.51 $102.00 $423.51 $24,712.75 10 01- Dec -04 $525.51 $100.24 $425.27 $24,265.50 11 01- Jan -05 $525.51 $98.47 $427.04 $23,816.83 12 01- Feb -05 $525.51 $96.69 $428.82 $23,366.74 13 01- Mar -05 $525.51 $94.91 $430.60 $22,915.22 14 01- Apr -05 $525.51 $93.12 $432.39 $22,462.27 15 01- May -05 $525.51 $91.32 $434.19 $22,007.90 16 01- Jun -05 $525.51 $89.51 $436.00 $21,552.08 17 01- Jul -05 $525.51 $87.70 $437.81 $21,094.81 18 01- Aug -05 $525.51 $85.88 $439.63 $20,636.11 19 01- Sep -05 $525.51 $84.05 $441.46 $20,175.94 20 01- Oct -05 $525.51 $82.22 $443.29 $19,714.32 21 01- Nov -05 $525.51 $80.37 $445.14 $19,251.24 22 01- Dec -05 $525.51 $78.52 $446.99 $18,786.69 23 01- Jan -06 $525.51 $76.66 $448.85 $18,320.67 24 01- Feb -06 $525.51 $74.80 $450.71 $17,853.18 25 01- Mar -06 $525.51 $72.92 $452.59 $17,384.21 26 01- Apr -06 $525.51 $71.04 $454.47 $16,913.74 27 01- May -06 $525.51 $69.15 $456.36 $16,441.80 28 01- Jun -06 $525.51 $67.25 $458.26 $15,968.35 29 01- Jul -06 $525.51 $65.35 $460.16 $15,493.41 30 01- Aug -06 $525.51 $63.43 $462.08 $15,016.96 31 01- Sep -06 $525.51 $61.51 $464.00 $14,539.00 32 01- Oct -06 $525.51 $59.58 $465.93 $14,059.53 33 01- Nov -06 $525.51 $57.65 $467.86 $13,578.54 34 01- Dec -06 $525.51 $55.70 $469.81 $13,096.03 35 01- Jan -07 $525.51 $53.75 $471.76 $12,611.99 36 01- Feb -07 $525.51 $51.79 $473.72 $12,126.42 37 01- Mar -07 $525.51 $49.82 $475.69 $11,639.31 38 01- Apr -07 $525.51 $47.84 $477.67 $11,150.66 39 01- May -07 $525.51 $45.85 $479.66 $10,660.46 40 01- Jun -07 $525.51 $43.86 $481.65 $10,168.71 41 01- Jul -07 $525.51 $41.85 $483.66 $9,675.40 . ,Affw N0. v ,.,D. -1- PMT DUE RENTAL APPLIED TO APPLIED TO *PURCHASE NO. DATE PAYMENT INTEREST PRINCIPAL \ OPTION PRICE 42 01- Aug -07 $525.51 $39.84 $485.67 $9,180.53 43 01- Sep -07 $525.51 $37.82 $487.69 $8,684.09 44 01- Oct -07 $525.51 $35.79 $489.72 $8,186.08 45 01- Nov -07 $525.51 $33.76 $491.75 $7,686.49 46 01- Dec -07 $525.51 $31.71 $493.80 $7,185.32 47 01- Jan -08 $525.51 $29.66 $495.85 $6,682.56 48 01- Feb -08 $525.51 $27.60 $497.91 $6,178.22 49 01- Mar -08 $525.51 $25.53 $499.98 $5,672.27 50 01- Apr -08 $525.51 $23.45 $502.06 $5,164.72 51 01- May -08 $525.51 $21.36 $504.15 $4,655.57 52 01- Jun -08 $525.51 $19.26 $506.25 $4,144.80 53 01- Jul -08 $525.51 $17.16 $508.35 $3,632.41 54 01- Aug -08 $525.51 $15.05 $510.46 $3,118.41 55 01- Sep -08 $525.51 $12.92 $512.59 $2,602.77 56 01- Oct -08 $525.51 $10.79 $514.72 $2,085.50 57 01- Nov -08 $525.51 $8.65 $516.86 $1,566.60 58 01- Dec -08 $525.51 $6.50 $519.01 $1,046.05 59 01- Jan -09 $525.51 $4.34 $521.17 $523.85 60 01- Feb -09 $525.51 $2.18 $523.33 $0.00 -OF a SAMPLE AMORTIZATION SCHEDULE Lessee: Date of first payment: Original Balance: Total Number of Payments: Number of Payments per year: City of Lake Elsinore, CA RENTAL PAYMENT SCHEDULE 03/01/04 $179,827.80 60 12 PMT DUE RENTAL APPLIED TO APPLIED TO *PURCHASE NO. DATE PAYMENT INTEREST PRINCIPAL OPTION PRICE 1 01- Mar -04 $3,300.02 $0.00 $3,300.02 Not Available 2 01- Apr -04 $3,300.02 $586.95 $2,713.06 $177,115.62 3 01- May -04 $3,300.02 $577.93 $2,722.08 $174,287.91 4 01- Jun -04 $3,300.02 $568.88 $2,731.14 $171,452.66 5 01- Jul -04 $3,300.02 $559.80 $2,740.22 $168,609.85 6 01- Aug -04 $3,300.02 $550.69 $2,749.33 $165,759.46 7 01- Sep -04 $3,300.02 $541.55 $2,758.47 $162,901.46 8 01- Oct -04 $3,300.02 $532.38 $2,767.64 $160,035.85 9 01- Nov -04 $3,300.02 $523.17 $2,776.84 $157,162.59 10 01- Dec -04 $3,300.02 $513.94 $2,786.08 $154,281.67 11 01- Jan -05 $3,300.02 $504.68 $2,795.34 $151,393.07 12 01- Feb -05 $3,300.02 $495.38 $2,804.63 $148,496.77 13 01- Mar -05 $3,300.02 $486.06 $2,813.96 $145,592.74 14 01- Apr -05 $3,300.02 $476.70 $2,823.32 $142,680.97 15 01- May -05 $3,300.02 $467.31 $2,832.70 $139,761.44 16 01- Jun -05 $3,300.02 $457.90 $2,842.12 $136,834.11 17 01- Jul -05 $3,300.02 $448.45 $2,851.57 $133,898.99 18 01- Aug -05 $3,300.02 $438.96 $2,861.05 $130,956.03 19 01- Sep -05 $3,300.02 $429.45 $2,870.57 $128,005.23 20 01- Oct -05 $3,300.02 $419.91 $2,880.11 $125,046.56 21 01- Nov -05 $3,300.02 $410.33 $2,889.69 $122,080.00 22 01- Dec -05 $3,300.02 $400.72 $2,899.30 $119,105.52 23 01- Jan -06 $3,300.02 $391.08 $2,908.94 $116,123.12 24 01- Feb -06 $3,300.02 $381.41 $2,918.61 $113,132.76 25 01- Mar -06 $3,300.02 $371.71 $2,928.31 $110,134.43 26 01- Apr -06 $3,300.02 $361.97 $2,938.05 $107,128.11 27 01- May -06 $3,300.02 $352.20 $2,947.82 $104,113.76 28 01- Jun -06 $3,300.02 $342.40 $2,957.62 $101,091.38 29 01- Jul -06 $3,300.02 $332.56 $2,967.45 $98,060.94 30 01- Aug -06 $3,300.02 $322.70 $2,977.32 $95,022.42 31 01- Sep -06 $3,300.02 $312.80 $2,987.22 $91,975.79 32 01- Oct -06 $3,300.02 $302.86 $2,997.15 $88,921.04 33 01- Nov -06 $3,300.02 $292.90 $3,007.12 $85,858.14 34 01- Dec -06 $3,300.02 $282.90 $3,017.12 $82,787.08 35 01- Jan -07 $3,300.02 $272.87 $3,027.15 $79,707.83 36 01- Feb -07 $3,300.02 $262.80 $3,037.22 $76,620.36 37 01- Mar -07 $3,300.02 $252.70 $3,047.31 $73,524.67 38 01- Apr -07 $3,300.02 $242.57 $3,057.45 $70,420.71 39 01- May -07 $3,300.02 $232.41 $3,067.61 $67,308.48 40 01- Jun -07 $3,300.02 $222.21 $3,077.81 $64,187.95 41 01- Jul -07 $3,300.02 $211.97 $3,088.05 $61,059.10 PMT DUE RENTAL APPLIED TO APPLIED TO *PURCHASE NO. DATE PAYMENT INTEREST PRINCIPAL OPTION PRICE 42 01- Aug -07 $3,300.02 $201.71 $3,098.31 $57,921.91 43 01- Sep -07 $3,300.02 $191.40 $3,108.62 $54,776.35 44 01- Oct -07 $3,300.02 $181.07 $3,118.95 $51,622.40 45 01- Nov -07 $3,300.02 $170.70 $3,129.32 $48,460.04 46 01- Dec -07 $3,300.02 $160.29 $3,139.73 $45,289.25 47 01- Jan -08 $3,300.02 $149.85 $3,150.17 $42,110.00 48 01- Feb -08 $3,300.02 $139.38 $3,160.64 $38,922.28 49 01- Mar -08 $3,300.02 $128.87 $3,171.15 $35,726.05 50 01- Apr -08 $3,300.02 $118.32 $3,181.69 $32,521.30 51 01- May -08 $3,300.02 $107.75 $3,192.27 $29,308.01 52 01- Jun -08 $3,300.02 $97.13 $3,202.89 $26,086.14 53 01- Jul -08 $3,300.02 $86.48 $3,213.54 $22,855.69 54 01- Aug -08 $3,300.02 $75.80 $3,224.22 $19,616.62 55 01- Sep -08 $3,300.02 $65.08 $3,234.94 $16,368.91 56 01- Oct -08 $3,300.02 $54.32 $3,245.70 $13,112.54 57 01- Nov -08 $3,300.02 $43.53 $3,256.49 $9,847.49 58 01- Dec -08 $3,300.02 $32.70 $3,267.32 $6,573.73 59 01- Jan -09 $3,300.02 $21.84 $3,278.18 $3,291.24 60 01- Feb -09 $3,300.02 $10.94 $3,289.08 $0.00 iii' -.00, CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: RICHARD J. WATENPAUGH, CITY MANAGER DATE: MARCH 9, 2004 SUBJECT: CONTRACT FOR ASPHALT MAINTENANCE BACKGROUND On January 12, 2004 the City issued a notice inviting sealed bids for asphalt maintenance services. The bid opening was held at City Hall on Wednesday, February 25, 2004, at 2:00 p.m. The scope of work consists of furnishing all materials, equipment, tools, and labor required to provide asphalt maintenance services to the City Public Works Maintenance Division on an as needed, on -call basis. The term of the agreement will be for one (1) year and may be renewable in one year increments up to three years by the City Manager. SUMMARY The bid package consisted of two parts. Part I, a sample work order, was used to determine the lowest bidder. Part 11 of the bid schedule allowed for unit bid prices on several items. The unit prices were used to calculate the sample work order in Part I of the bid schedule. The unit prices in Part H of the bid schedule will be the unit prices used throughout the term of the contract for all work to be completed. Five contractors submitted a bid for the work. The bids are as follows: Contractor Location Hardy and Harper Santa Ana International Pavement Solutions San Bernardino NPG Perris Pacific Asphalt Ontario Copp Buena Park Bid Amount $ 72,100 $ 75,350 $ 94,260 $ 122,200 $ 127,000 PAM_ OF FISCAL IMPACT The budget for the project is dependant upon the City Council approved budget. The City does not guarantee any work or a specific dollar amount to the contractor. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Mayor and City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a maintenance contract agreement with Hardy and Harper for asphalt maintenance services consistent with the above referenced terms and approved by the City Attorney. PREPARED BY: William L. Payne, Public rks Manager APPROVED BY: l..� . ve Sapp, Director ommunity Services APPROVED FOR , AGENDA LISTING: Richard J. Watenpa gh, City Ma ger M ITEM No. PAYE ck Edam SPECIFICATIONS FOR 2004 ASPHALT MAINTENANCE City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 (909) 674 -5170 1 !1G&mm ITEM NO. t PACk OF u i TABLE OF CONTENTS NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS .. .... .... .... .... .... .... 3 SCOPE OF WORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS . .... .... .... .... .... .... .... 6 PROPOSAL . .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ... ". 11 BID SCHEDULE .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... 12 SIGNATURE PAGE ... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... 16 NON - COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT .... .... .... .... .... .... .... 18 DESIGNATION OF SUB - CONTRACTORS .. .... .... .... .... .... 19 DECLARATION REGARDING LICENSE STATUS ... .... .... .... .... 20 LIST OF REFERENCES . .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... 21 CONTRACT AGREEMENT . .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... 22 CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATE - Workman's Compensation .... .... 24 SPECIFICATIONS - Wage Rates and Labor Code Requirements.... 25 Standard Specifications .... .... .... .... 26 Special Provisions .... .... .... .... .... 27 2 I../' ACOM ITEM W._____9___ _. PACiE.ROf NOTICE INVITING BIDS PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that sealed bids will be received by the City of Lake Elsinore for the maintenance, repair, and construction of certain improvements in the City of Lake Elsinore, California referred to as: ASPHALT MAINTENANCE The work to be done consists of furnishing all materials, equipment, tools, labor and incidentals as required by the Specifications and Contract Documents for the above stated project. The general items of work to be done hereunder consist of maintenance, repair, and construction of asphalt pavement within the city limits of the City of Lake Elsinore. Bids will be publicly opened, examined and declared in the City Hall Conference Room, 130 South Main Street, Lake Elsinore, California at the hour of 2:00 p.m. on February 25, 2004. Each bid shall be made on the proposal form furnished in the Specifications and enclosed in an envelope supplied by the bidder, bearing the title of the work and the name and address of the bidder. It is the sole responsibility of the bidder to ensure that his bid is received in proper time in the City Clerk's office at the address and time hereinabove set forth. Any bid received after the scheduled closing time for receipt of bids shall be returned to the bidder unopened. The work is to be done in accordance with the Plans and Specifications on file in the office of the Clerk of the City and said Plans and Specifications may be examined at the City of Lake Elsinore City Hall, 130 S. Main Street, Lake Elsinore, California. Each bidder must be licensed in the State of California and qualified to perform the work described in the Plans, Specifications and Contract documents. The bidder shall have a Class A Contractors license or a C -12 or C -32 Contractors license. Bidders are hereby notified that, pursuant to the provisions of the California Labor Code, Section 1773, the City Council has determined the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general prevailing rate for legal holiday and overtime work in the locality in which this work is to be performed for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute the Contract. Said determination is on file with the City Clerk, and is available to any interested party upon request, and by this reference is hereby made as part of this Notice Inviting Bids. 3 m REM NO..__m ° p,ACE__S _0f:-a_ Plans, Specifications, and all Contract documents may be obtained at the Lake Elsinore City Hall located at 130 S. Main Street. The selected bidder must furnish a Certificate of Insurance evidencing all insurance coverage as required by the Specifications. Payments to the Contractor will be made by said City in accordance with the provisions of the Specifications, submitted in accordance therewith. All bids must be made in accordance with and as directed in the Specifications, and all bidders shall comply with State, Federal and local laws applicable thereto. The City Council reserves the right to reject any or all bids, to waive any irregularities in a bid and to award the Contract as may best serve the interests of the City. All proposals are binding for a period of (30) days after they are opened and may be retained by the City for examination and comparison. For technical information relating to the details of the proposed project and /or bidding requirements, please contact Bill Payne in the Public Works Department of the City of Lake Elsinore. By Order of the City California. Date: Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, 9'�L 1"4� X"4j Vicki Ly e Kasad City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore WAWM MM NO. PACE. __ - --0F' Scope of Work The general item of work to be done consist of the maintenance, repair, and construction of asphalt pavement located within the city limits of Lake Elsinore. The amount of work to be done will be determined by the annual budget approved by the Lake Elsinore City Council for asphalt maintenance work. Funding for this work is allocated to the Street Maintenance Operations Budget and the Street Capital Improvement Budget. Work will be assigned on a job order basis as needed. The term of the agreement will be for a one year period and may be renewable in one year increments by mutual agreement. 5 HDA ITEM NO. AM -71or INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS BIDDERS KNOWLEDGE Bidders must satisfy themselves by personal examination of the work site, Plans, Specifications, and other Contract documents and by any other means as they may believe necessary, as to the actual physical conditions, requirements and difficulties under which the work must be performed. No bidder shall, at any time after submission of a proposal, make any claim or assertion that there was any misunderstanding or lack of information regarding the nature or amount of work necessary for the satisfactory completion of the job. Any errors, omissions, or discrepancies found in the Plans, Specifications, or other Contract documents shall be called to the attention of the Engineer and clarified prior to the submission of proposals. If any person contemplating submitting a bid for the proposed Contract is in doubt as to the true meaning of any part of the Plans, Specifications, or other Contract documents, he or she may submit to the Engineer a written request for the interpretation thereof, and the person submitting the request will be responsible for its prompt delivery. Any interpretation of the Contract documents will be made only by addendum duly issued and a copy of such addendum will be mailed or delivered to each person receiving a set of such documents. BIDDERS QUALIFICATIONS Bidders must be capable of performing the work bid upon. They may be required to supply a detailed statement covering experience on similar work, list of machinery, plants and other equipment which will be used on the proposed work, and such statements of their financial resources as may be deemed necessary. No proposal will be accepted from a bidder who has not been licensed in accordance with the provisions of the State Business and Professions Code. PROPOSAL FORMS Bids shall be submitted in writing on the proposal forms provided by the Agency. All information requested therein must be clearly and legibly set forth in the manner and form indicated. The Agency will not consider any proposal not meeting these requirements. For all work bid on a unit price basis, the Engineer's estimate of quantities shown on the proposal form are understood to be approximate and will be used only for the purpose of comparing bids. For work bid on a lump sum price basis, any estimate of quantities provided is furnished for the convenience of bidders is not guaranteed. When unit prices are indicated on the proposal form, the bidder shall indicate the unit price at which he or she Ac 4*M MA NO.-9-- PACE OF LU proposes to perform each item of work, written legibly to ensure consideration. The unit price shall be stated in figures. For items where unit prices are required, the extended amount of each item shall be computed from the unity price bid on the proposal and quantity given in the estimate. In case of errors in computing the extended amount, the unit price will be assumed correct. Failure by the bidder to list unit prices shall be justification for rejection of the bid. Where lump sum is indicated on the proposal, the bidder shall indicate, under the column of extended amount, the lump sum price at which he or she proposes to perform the work described for that item. SUBMISSION OF BIDS The envelope enclosing the proposal shall be sealed and addressed to the City Clerk, City of Lake Elsinore, 130 South Main Street, Lake Elsinore, California 92530. The envelope shall be plainly marked in the upper left -hand corner with the name and address of the bidder and bear the words, "PROPOSAL FOR ", followed by the name of the project being bid and the date and hour of bid opening. The certified check, cashier's check or bid bond shall be enclosed in the same envelope with the proposal. Proposals may be mailed or delivered by messenger; however, it is the bidder's responsibility alone to ensure delivery of the proposal to the Agency's designated official prior to the time stipulated for bid opening in the Notice Inviting Bids. Late proposals will not be considered. IRREGULAR BIDS Unauthorized conditions, limitations or provisions attached to a bid will render it irregular and may be cause for its rejection. The completed proposal form shall be without interlineations, alterations, or erasures. Alternate bids will not be considered unless specifically requested. No oral, telegraphic, or telephonic proposal, modifications, or withdrawals will be considered. Proposals may be rejected by the Agency for the following reasons: (a) If the proposal form furnished is not used or is altered. (b) If there are unauthorized additions, conditional or alternate bids or irregularities of any kind. (c) If the bidder adds any provisions reserving the right to accept or reject an award, or reserving the right to execute or not execute a contract pursuant to an award. (d) If the proposal is not properly signed by the bidder, whose address, telephone number, and California Contractors License number is shown. TAXES No mention shall be made in the proposal of sales tax, use tax, or any other tax as all amounts bid will be deemed and held to include any such taxes which may be applicable. 7 ►fa No. 9 PACE OF LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES All proposals must be submitted, filed, made and executed in accordance with State and Federal laws relating to bids for contracts of this nature whether the same are expressly referred to herein or not. Any bidder submitting a proposal shall by such action thereby agree to each and all of the terms, conditions, provisions and requirements set forth, contemplated, and referred to in the Plans, Specifications, and other Contract documents, and shall agree to full compliance therewith. CITY BUSINESS LICENSE The successful bidder and all maintain, throughout the term of Lake Elsinore business license. subcontractors shall obtain and the Contract, a current City of WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSALS A proposal may be withdrawn by a written request signed by the bidder. Such requests shall be delivered to the City's designated official prior to the bid opening hour stipulated in the Notice Inviting Bids. The withdrawal of a proposal will not prejudice the right of the bidder to submit a new proposal, providing there is time to do so prior to bid opening. Proposals may not be withdrawn after bid opening without forfeiture of the proposal guarantee. DISQUALIFICATION OF BIDDERS A bidder shall be considered disqualified for any of the following reasons: (a) Submitting more than one proposal from the same partnership, firm, or corporation under the same or different name. (b) Evidence of collusion among bidders. Bidders participating in such collusion shall be disqualified as bidders for any future work of the Agency until any such participating bidder has been reinstalled by the Agency as a qualified bidder. (c) Proposals in which any of the unit prices and /or lump sum prices obviously are unbalanced. A person, firm, or corporation may submit a sub - proposal to more than one bidder, or may submit sub - proposals in addition to submitting a proposal as bidder, without being disqualified. RELIEF OF BIDDER If the bidder claims a mistake was made in his proposal, the bidder shall give the Agency written notice within five (5) days after the date for submittal of proposals of the alleged mistake, specifying in the notice in detail how the mistake occurred. Relief will be granted only for clerical errors and at Agency's discretion. n. pA ffEM 9 � 10 loi- J AWARD OF CONTRACT The Award of Contract, if made, will be to the lowest responsive, s� responsible bidder whose proposal complies with the requirements of the Contract documents. Within thirty (30) days after the bid submittal date, the Agency will act either to accept a bid proposal or to reject all proposals. The acceptance of a bid proposal will be evidenced by a Notice of Award of Contract in writing, delivered to the bidder whose proposal is accepted. No other act of the Agency shall necessarily constitute acceptance of a bid proposal. Agency reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive any irregularity, and to take the bids under advisement for a period of 30 days, all as may be required to provide for the best interests of the Agency. The bidder may be required to submit, prior to award of the Contract, a financial statement and list of previous work of a similar nature. In no event will an award be made until all necessary investigations are made as to the responsibility and qualifications of the bidder to whom the award is contemplated. EXECUTION OF CONTRACT The bidder to whom award is made shall execute a written Contract with the Agency and furnish good Certificates of Insurance specified by the Agency within ten (10) calendar days after notification of award, unless an extension of time is granted to the bidder in writing. The Contract shall be made in the form adopted by the Agency, which includes the provision that no claim or suit whatsoever shall be made or brought by the Contractor against any officer, agent, or employee of the Agency for or on account of anything done or omitted to be done in connection with this Contract, nor shall any officer, agent or employee be liable hereunder. A corporation to which an award is made shall furnish a certified copy of the by -laws or resolution of the Board of Directors of the corporation showing the names of those individuals duly authorized to sign the Contract and bonds for the Corporation. Failure of the bidder to whom the award is made to execute a Contract and file insurance certificates, within the time specified may be just cause for annulment of the award and the forfeiture of the proposal guarantee. No Contract shall be binding upon the Agency until the same has been approved by the Board, been satisfactorily executed by the Contractor, and executed by the Agency. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Before commencing any work under the Contract, the successful bidder must file with the Public Works Manager certificates indicating proof that insurance policies, as required in the Agreement, have been obtained. Such policies include Worker's 0 AGWOA ITEM NO 1 Compensation, Automobile Public Liability, and Public Liability. In the event that such policies should become inoperative at any time before the completion of the work, all work shall cease immediately until new policies are obtained, and any time so lost shall not entitle Contractor to any extension of time. �..d` WORKER'S COMPENSATION CERTIFICATE A "Contractor's Certificate Regarding Worker's Compensation Insurance" in accordance with the provisions of Section 1860, 1861, and 3700 of the Labor Code, is included as a part of the Contract documents. The Contractor shall complete this certificate before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY The bidder agrees to abide by the requirements under Executive Order No. 11246, as amended, including specifically the provisions of the Equal Opportunity Clause. 10 .ANNA STEM NQ. TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL ASPHALT MAINTENANCE PROPOSAL Name of Bidder Address of Bidder To: City of Lake Elsinore, California The undersigned bidder, in accordance with the City's Notice Inviting Bids, hereby proposes to furnish all materials, equipment, tools, labor, and incidentals required for the above - stated project as set forth in the Plans, Specifications, and Contract documents therefore to perform all work in the manner and time prescribed therein. The attached Bid Schedule is hereby made a part of this proposal. The undersigned bidder declares that this proposal is based upon careful examination of the work site, Plans, Specifications, Instructions to Bidders, and all other Contract documents. If this proposal is accepted for award, bidder agrees to enter into a Contract with the City at the unit and /or lump sum prices set forth in the following bid schedule. Bidder understands that failure to enter into a Contract and furnish bonds in the manner and time prescribed will result in forfeiture to the City of the guarantee accompanying this proposal. The undersigned bidder certifies that this proposal is made in good faith, without collusion or connection with any other person or persons bidding on the work. The undersigned bidder understands that the City Council reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals or to waive formality or technicality in any proposal in the interest of the Agency. 11 "` PACE OF EXPLANATION OF BID SCHEDULE The following Bid Schedule is in two parts. Part I is a sample work order. Part I will be the document used to determine the lowest bidder. Part II of the Bid Schedule, are unit prices to be bid by each bidder. These unit prices will be the unit prices used throughout the term of the contract for all work to be completed. These unit prices are to be used when calculating the sample work order in Part I of the Bid Schedule. Ida �y A ffEM NCI. i PAO I OF TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL BID SCHEDULE PART I Total sum of items one through five in words: Total sum of items one through five in numbers: $ c NOTE: All work to be done in accordance with City of Lake Elsinore Ordinances, Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, and City Engineer direction. All work is subject to inspection by City Inspector. Any Contractor doing work in the City must have a City business license. Bid prices for sample work orders are to be calculated using unit prices bid in Part II of the bid schedule. 13 FDA ITEM 1O. P� OF Sample Work Order Item Description 1. Remove and replace 10,000 sq.ft. of asphalt 4" thick 2. Remove and replace 10,000 sq.ft. of asphalt 8" thick 3. Crack seal 20,000 ln.ft. 4. Install 10,000 ln. ft. of asphalt Berm 5. Setup Mobilization Charge for One Job Total sum of items one through five in words: Total sum of items one through five in numbers: $ c NOTE: All work to be done in accordance with City of Lake Elsinore Ordinances, Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, and City Engineer direction. All work is subject to inspection by City Inspector. Any Contractor doing work in the City must have a City business license. Bid prices for sample work orders are to be calculated using unit prices bid in Part II of the bid schedule. 13 FDA ITEM 1O. P� OF TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL BID SCHEDULE PART II ITEMS TO BE BID FOR ASPHALT MAINTENANCE Setup Mobilization Charge for each job $ lump sum Remove and Replace A.C. up to 4" includes all related costs (note: asphalt only does not include base material) 1 - 1,000 sq.ft. $ per sq.ft. 1,001 - 5,000 sq.ft. $ per sq.ft. 5,001 - 10,000 sq.ft. $ per sq.ft. 10,001 + sq.ft. $ per sq.ft. Remove and Replace A.C. 4 " -8" includes all related costs (note: asphalt only does not include base material) 1 - 1,000 sq.ft. $ per sq.ft. 1,001 - 5,000 sq.ft. $ per sq.ft. 5,001 - 10,000 sq.ft. $ per sq.ft. 10,001 + sq.ft. $ per sq.ft. Crack Sealing 1 - 11000 ln.ft. $ per ln.ft. 1,001 - 5,000 ln.ft. $ per ln.ft. 5,001 - 10,000 ln.ft. $ per ln.ft. 10,001 - 20,000 ln.ft. $ per ln.ft. Install Asphalt Berm 1 - 1,000 ln.ft. $ per ln.ft. 1,001 - 5,000 ln.ft. $ per ln.ft. 5,001 - 10,000 ln.ft. $ per ln.ft. 10,001 - 20,000 In.ft. $ per ln.ft. 14 ffEm NO. 1 pogj 01-7 i TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL 100-- The Undersigned has checked carefully all of the above, figures and understands that the City will not be responsible for any error or omissions on the part of the Undersigned in making up this bid. The Undersigned bidder declares, under penalty of perjury, that they are licensed to do business or act in the capacity of a contractor within the State of California and that they are validly licensed as follows: License Number: Classification: Expiration Date: This statement is true and correct and has the legal effect of an affidavit. 15 TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL SIGNATURE PAGE IF A SOLE OWNER OR SOLE CONTRACTOR, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted 2. Signature (Given and surname) of proprietor 3. Place of Business (Street and Number) City and State Zip Code 4. Telephone Number IF A PARTNERSHIP, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted 2. Name of each member of Partnership (indicate character of each partner, either general or special [limited]) 3. Signature (Given and surname and character of partner. Note: Signature must be made by a general partner) 4. Place of Business (Street and Number) City and State Zip Code 5. Telephone Number 16 �`' PAaE GF !L TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL ,.- IF A CORPORATION, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted 2. Name of each officer of corporation (indicate office) 3. Signature (Given and surname and title of officer authorized to sign for the Corporation) (Impress Corporate Seal here) 4. Incorporated under the laws of the State of 5. Place of Business (Street and Number)" City and State Zip Code 6. Telephone Number 17 • TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CA NON- COLLUSION DECLARATION (Public Contract Code Section 7106) I, do hereby declare that'I am (Name) the of (Title) (Contractor) the party making the foregoing bid for the construction referred to as: ASPHALT MAINTENANCE and that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, and undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any bidder or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the bidder has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the bidder or any other bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other bidder, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the Contract of anyone interested in the proposed Contract; that all statements contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the bidder has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid. I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. DATE PLACE SIGNATURE NAME S • +9 1 1 1, 1 il 0 TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGNATION OF SUBCONTRACTORS The undersigned certifies that he or she has used the sub -bids of the following listed subcontractors in making up his bid for the construction referred to as: ASPHALT MAINTENANCE and that the subcontractors listed will be used for work for which they bid, subject to the approval of the Engineer, and in accordance with the applicable provision of the Specifications. Bid Item Number Subcontractor Address /Telephone Name of Contractor Signature of Bidder Name Title 19 TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DECLARATION REGARDING LICENSE STATUS I do hereby declare that our /my Contractor's license is and expires on I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this at Signature Printed Name Title day of California. Signing on behalf of (if applicable) 20 20 Nwmoe u TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL LIST OF REFERENCES ASPHALT MAINTENANCE The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers for three (3) public agencies for which BIDDER has performed similar work within the past two (2) years: 1. 2. 3. ame and Address of Owner Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed Name and Address of Owner Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed Name and Address of Owner Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 21 • CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONTRACT AGREEMENT This Contract Agreement is made and entered into this day of 2004 by and between the City of Lake Elsinore and as Contractor for the construction referred to as: ASPHALT MAINTENANCE WITNESSETH that the City of Lake Elsinore and the Contractor have mutually agreed as follows: The Contract documents the Notice Inviting General Specification referenced specificat appendices, together wi bonds, insurance certi and also including any clarifying, amending o required to ensure its completion the provisions of said Contract as though fully set forth herein. ARTICLE I for the aforesaid Bids, Instructions S, Plans, Special ions, details, s th this Contract Ag ficates, permits, n and all addenda or r extending the work project shall consist of to Bidders, Proposal, Provisions and all tandard drawings, and reement and all required otices, and affidavits, supplemental agreements contemplated as may be in an acceptable manner. All of documents are made a part hereof ARTICLE II For and in consideration of the payments and agreements to be made and performed by the City of Lake Elsinore, Contractor agrees to *ASO furnish all materials and perform all work required for the above stated project, and to fulfill all other obligations as set forth in the aforesaid Contract documents. ARTICLE III Contractor agrees to receive and accept the prices set forth in the proposal as full compensation for furnishing all materials, performing all work, and fulfilling all obligations hereunder. Said compensation shall cover all expenses, losses, damages, and consequences arising out of the nature of the work during its progress or prior to its acceptance including those for well and faithfully completing the work and the whole thereof in the manner and time specified in the aforesaid Contract documents and also including those arising from actions of the elements, unforeseen difficulties or obstructions encountered in the prosecution of the work, suspension or discontinuance of the work, and all other unknowns or risks of any description connected with the work. ARTICLE IV The City of Lake Elsinore hereby promises and agrees to employ, and does hereby employ, Contractor to provide the materials, do 22 MWA MU tag. ACE "me the work, and fulfill the obligations according to the terms and conditions herein contained and referred to, for the prices aforesaid, and hereby contracts to pay the same at the time, in the manner, and upon the conditions set forth in the Contract documents. ARTICLE V Contractor acknowledges the provisions of the State Labor Code requiring every employer to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self - insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code and certifies compliance with such provisions. ARTICLE VI Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Lake Elsinore or its officers and agents from any claims, demands, or causes of action including related expenses attorney's fees, and costs based on, arising out of, or in any way related to the work undertaken by Contractor hereunder. ARTICLE VII Contractor affirms that the signatures, titles, and seals set forth herein after the execution of this Contract Agreement represent all individuals, firm members, partners, joint ventures, and /or corporate officers having a principal interest herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto for themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns do hereby agree to the full performance of the covenants herein contained and have caused this Contract Agreement to be executed 10' in triplicate by setting hereunto their names, titles, hands, and seals this day of , 2002. Contractor: By: CA Lic.# Title Subscribed and sworn to this day of , 2004. NOTARY PUBLIC City of Lake Elsinore, By: Mayor Attested City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, Date 23 *Arm ffem NO. PAM I OF-1 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATE REGARDING WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE Section 3700 of the Labor Code provides in part as follows: 100 "Every employer except the State shall secure the payment of compensation in one or more of the following ways: A) By being insured against liability to pay compensation B) By securing from the Director of Industrial Relations a certificate of consent to self- insure, which may be given upon furnishing proof satisfactory to the Director of Industrial Relations of ability to self - insure and to pay any compensation that may become due to his employees..." The undersigned is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self - insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract. SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME TITLE COMPANY ADDRESS DATE (In accordance with Article 5, commencing at Section 1860, Chapter 1, Part 7, Division 2 of the Labor Code, the above Certificate must be signed by the Contractor and filed with the awarding body prior to the Contractor performing any work under this Contract.) 24 REM NO OF N,W SPECIFICATIONS - Wage Rates and Labor Code Requirements WAGE RATES - By Resolution No. 82 -194 the City Council adopted the general prevailing rate of per diem wages as determined and published by the State Director of the Department of Industrial Relations, pursuant to Sections 1770, 1773 and 1773.2 of the California Labor Code. Copies of these rates and the latest revisions thereto are on file in the office of the City Clerk and are available for review upon request. Attention is directed to the provisions of Sections 1774, 1775, 1776, 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the State Labor Code. Sections 1774 and 1775 regarding prevailing wage rates, the execution of the Contract and specify penalties for failure to do so. COMPLIANCE - The above Labor Code Sections will be a part of the Contract documents. It shall be the responsibility of the prime Contractor to comply with all such sections. CLAYTON ACT AND CARTWRIGHT ACT - To the extent applicable her, Section 4551 of the State Government Code specified that in executing a public works Contract with the City to supply goods, services or materials, the Contractor or Subcontractor offers and agrees to assign to the Agency all rights, title and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C., Sec. 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2 commencing with Sec. 16700) of Part 2 Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code, arising from purchase of goods, services or materials pursuant to the Contract or Subcontract. This assignment shall become effective when the city tenders final payment to the Contractor without further acknowledgment by the parties. COPELAND "ANTI -KICK BACK" ACT - All contracts for construction or repair shall include a provision for compliance with the Copeland "Anti -Kick Back" Act (18 U.S.C. 874) as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR, Part 3) . This Act provides that each Contractor shall be prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person employed in the construction, completion, or repair of public work, to give up any.part of the compensation to which he or she is otherwise entitled. The participant shall report all suspected or reported violation to the State. CLEAN AIR ACT OF 1970 & FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION - Control Act Contracts of amounts in excess of $100,000 shall contain a provision which requires the recipient to agree to comply with all applicable standards, order, or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act of 1970 and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended. Violations shall be reported to the Service and Regional Office of the Environmental Protection Agency. 25 Gam am No. PACE_ a71 OF SPECIFICATIONS - Standard Specifications The Standard Specifications of the City of Lake Elsinore are contained in the 1997 Edition of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements, as written and promulgated by the joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the Associated General Contractors of California. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher at the following address: BUILDING NEWS, INCORPORATED, 3055 3055 Overland Avenue Los Angeles, California 90034 Phone: (213) 202 -7775 or may be ordered by mail from: BNI PUBLICATIONS P.O. Box 3031 Terminal Annex Los Angeles, CA 90051 The Standard Specifications set forth above will control the General Provisions, Construction Materials and Construction Methods for this Contract except as amended by the plans, special provisions, technical specifications or other Contract documents. 26 14MOO SPECIFICATIONS - Special Provisions The following special provisions are supplementary and in addition to the provisions of the Standard Specifications. Prior to issuing the Notice to Proceed, the Public Services Manager will schedule a pre- construction meeting with the Contractor to review the proposed work schedule and delivery dates, arrange utility coordination, discuss construction methods, and clarify inspection procedures. The Contractor shall notify the Public Works Manager forty -eight (48) hours in advance of the time and date that each phase of work will begin on this project. The Contractor shall also give forth -eight (48) hours advance notice when he or she will require the services of or assistance from the City to lay out any portion of the work. The Contractor shall begin work within five (5) working days after the date a Notice to Proceed or work order is issued to the Contractor for a particular job. The Contractor shall complete each job assigned within five (5) working days. Special note is to be taken that at no time shall the period of time that local or through traffic is prevented from using any street exceed twenty -four (24) hours. Contractor's failure to comply with the specified time limits may be cause for termination of the Contract by the City. The Contractor's activities shall be confined to the hours between 6:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. Deviation from these hours will not be permitted without prior consent of the Public Works Manager, except in the case of an emergency. The liability insurance coverage values are hereby amended to be: Insurance Coverage Requirements Limit Requirements Comprehensive General Liability $ 1,000,000 Comprehensive Automobile Liability $ 1,000,000 Contractual Liability $ 1,000,000 The Contractor and all subcontractors shall obtain and pay the cost of a City business license. The Contractor shall notify the occupants of all affected properties at least seventy -two (72) hours prior to any temporary obstruction of access. The method of notification shall be approved by the Public Works Manager prior to use by the Contractor. 27 AGODAN. . Vehicular access to property line shall be maintained except when construction operations preclude such access for a reasonable period of time. No over -night closure of any driveway will be allowed except as permitted by the Public Works Manager. ../" Contractor shall contact trash service provider to ensure that no street is scheduled for work on a day tract is scheduled for trash service. Contractor shall contact the Lake Elsinore School District to insure that access is provided for bus and auto traffic for all schools impacted by the project. Contractor must coordinate work with the postal service to insure that mail can be delivered in the project area. The City wishes to retain the contractor to provide maintenance, repair, and construction of curb, gutter, and sidewalk for a one year period, renewable annually up to a total of three years, commencing the date of the signed contract, to provide said work on an as needed basis and as the budget allows. It is understood that work will be performed at the unit prices set forth in this contract. MR mom nom. q TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL A,„,- ASPHALT MAINTENANCE PROPOSAL Name of Bidder Hardy & Harper, Inc Address of Bidder 1312 E. Warner Ave Santa Ana, CA 92705 To: City of Lake Elsinore, California The undersigned bidder, in accordance with the City's Notice Inviting Bids, hereby proposes to furnish all materials, equipment, tools, labor, and incidentals required for the above - stated project as set forth in the Plans, Specifications, and Contract documents therefore to perform all work in the manner and time prescribed therein. The attached Bid Schedule is hereby made a part of this proposal. The undersigned bidder declares that this proposal is based upon careful examination of the work site, Plans, Specifications, Instructions to Bidders, and all other Contract documents. If this proposal is accepted for award, bidder agrees to enter into a Contract with the City at the unit and /or lump sum prices set forth in the following bid schedule. Bidder understands that failure to enter into a Contract and furnish bonds in the manner and time prescribed will result in forfeiture to the City of the guarantee accompanying this proposal. The undersigned bidder certifies that this proposal is made in good faith, without collusion or connection with any other person or persons bidding on the work. The undersigned bidder understands that the City Council reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals or to waive formality or technicality in any proposal in the interest of the Agency. 11 AGENM ffEM PACE--a- EXPLANATION OF BID SCHEDULE The following Bid Schedule is in two parts. Part I is a sample work order. Part I will be the document used to determine the lowest bidder. Part II of the Bid Schedule, are unit prices to be bid by each bidder. These unit prices will be the unit prices used throughout the term of the contract for all work to be completed. These unit prices are to be used when calculating the sample work order in Part I of the Bid Schedule. 12 F �dDA ITEM21$0. TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL BID SCHEDULE PART I Total sum of items one through five in words: Amount $ 20,000.00 �TiINF TiTiIEIW $ 6,000.00 C' 1 1� nnn nn c 1. ion -on SEVENTY TWn THMIRANTI CINF PTT71,Tr1VVn nnTT TDa 'AMTN nTn rl T,+mmn Total sum of items one through five in numbers: $72,100.00 NOTE: All work to be done in accordance with City of Lake Elsinore Ordinances, Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, and City Engineer direction. All work is subject to inspection by City Inspector. Any Contractor doing work in the City must have a City business license. Bid prices for sample work orders are to be calculated using unit prices bid in Part II of the bid schedule. 13 • Sample Work Order Item Description 1. Remove and replace 10,000 sq.ft. of asphalt 4" thick 2. Remove and replace 10,000 sq.ft. of asphalt 8" thick 3. Crack seal 20,000 ln.ft. 4. Install 10,000 In. ft. of asphalt Berm 5. Setup Mobilization Charge for One Job Total sum of items one through five in words: Amount $ 20,000.00 �TiINF TiTiIEIW $ 6,000.00 C' 1 1� nnn nn c 1. ion -on SEVENTY TWn THMIRANTI CINF PTT71,Tr1VVn nnTT TDa 'AMTN nTn rl T,+mmn Total sum of items one through five in numbers: $72,100.00 NOTE: All work to be done in accordance with City of Lake Elsinore Ordinances, Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, and City Engineer direction. All work is subject to inspection by City Inspector. Any Contractor doing work in the City must have a City business license. Bid prices for sample work orders are to be calculated using unit prices bid in Part II of the bid schedule. 13 • TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL BID SCHEDULE PART II ITEMS TO BE BID FOR ASPHALT MAINTENANCE Setup Mobilization Charge for each job $ 1,100.00 lump sum Remove and Replace A.C. up to 4" includes all related costs (note: asphalt only does not include base material) 1 - 1,000 sq.ft. $4.20 per sq.ft. 1,001 - 5,000 sq.ft. $3.20 per sq.ft. 5,001 - 10,000 sq.ft. $2.00 per sq.ft. 10,001 + sq.ft. $2.00 per sq.ft. Remove and Replace A.C. 4 " -8" includes all related costs (note: asphalt only does not include base material) 1 - 1,000 sq.ft. $5.20 per sq.ft. 1,001 - 5,000 sq.ft. $4.20 per sq.ft. 5,001 - 10,000 sq.ft. $3.00 per sq.ft. 10,001 + sq.ft. $3.00 per sq.ft. Crack Sealing 1 - 1,000 ln.ft. $6.00 per ln.ft. 1,001 - 5,000 ln.ft. $1.30 per In.ft. 5,001 - 10,000 ln.ft. $ .40 per ln.ft. 10,001 - 20,000 ln.ft. $ .30 per ln.ft. Install Asphalt Berm 1 - 1,000 ln.ft. $ 4.00 per ln.ft. 1,001 - 5,000 ln.ft. $ 3.50 per ln.ft. 5,001 - 10,000 ln.ft. $ 1.50 per ln.ft. 10,001 - 20,000 ln.ft. $1.50 per ln.ft. ,'woe 14 i►�onO. 4`' OF. TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL � The Undersigned has checked carefully all of the above figures and understands that the City will not be responsible for any error or omissions on the part of the Undersigned in making up this bid. The Undersigned bidder declares, under penalty of perjury, that they are licensed to do business or act in the capacity of a contractor within the State of California and that they are validly licensed as follows: License Number: 215952 Classification: Class A Expiration Date: December 31,2005 This statement is true and correct and has the legal effect of an affidavit. 15 AGE# M ITEM NO. PAOI CAF TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL SIGNATURE PAGE IF A SOLE OWNER OR SOLE CONTRACTOR, SIGN HERE: ,"me 1. Name under which business is conducted N/A 2. Signature (Given and surname) of proprietor 3. Place of Business (Street and Number) City and State Zip Code 4. Telephone Number IF A PARTNERSHIP, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted N/A 2. Name of each member of Partnership (indicate character of each partner, either general or special [limited]) `rrr" 3. Signature (Given and surname and character of partner. Note: Signature must be made by a general partner) 4. Place of Business (Street and Number) City and State Zip Code 5. Telephone Number 16 1"./ • TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL IF A CORPORATION, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted Hardy & Harper, Inc 2. Name of each officer of corporation (indicate office) Fred T. Maas - President, Treasurer and General Manager Steve Kirschenr - Vice President Kristen S. Paulino - Corporate Secretary 3. Signature (Given and surname and title of officer authorized to sign for the Corporation) 1---) 1--- Steve Kirschner - Vice President Kristen S. Paulino - Corporare Secretary (Impress Corpora e Seal here 4. Incorporated under the laws of the State of California 5. Place of Business 1312 E. Warner Ave (Street and Number)' City and State Santa Ana, CA Zip Code 92705 6. Telephone Number (714) 444 -1851 17 14Cr tL?A {TAN NO •_L PACE 30 .�1►_a TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CA NON- COLLUSION DECLARATION (Public Contract Code Section 7106) I, Steve Kirschner do hereby declare that I am (Name) the Vice President of Hardy & Harper, Inc (Title) (Contractor) the party making the foregoing bid for the construction referred to as: ASPHALT MAINTENANCE and that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, and undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any bidder or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the bidder has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the bidder or any other bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other bidder, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the Contract of anyone interested in the proposed Contract; that all statements contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the bidder has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid. I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. February 24,2004 Santa Ana, CA DATE PLACE SIGIqATURE Steve Kirschner - Vice President NAME 18 '-wo, VW A NO. 3 $ OF TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE n DESIGNATION OF SUBCONTRACTORS The undersigned certifies that he or she has used the sub -bids of the following listed subcontractors in making up his bid for the construction referred to as: ASPHALT MAINTENANCE and that the subcontractors listed will be used for work for which they bid, subject to the approval of the Engineer, and in accordance with the applicable provision of the Specifications. Bid Item Number Subcontractor Address /Telephone 3 RUBBERIZED CRACKFFILER SEALANT 800 E. WALNUT AVE. FULLERTON, CA 92831 Phone #(714)843 -5192 Hardy & Hammer, Inc ��A° Name of Contractor Vgnature of Bidder Steve Kirschner Name Vice President Title W, AGWA ffEfA ` PAW � _ � CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California a ss. Oran County of 9 On February 24, 2004 before me, Kristen S. Paulino, Notary Public Date Name and Title of Officer (e.g., "Jane Doe, Notary Public ") personally appeared Steve Kirschner Name(s) of Signer(s) KRISTEN S. PAULINO IL 0 COMM. #1413262 a • � NOIARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNIA O ORANGE COUNTY n� 3. My Comm. Exp. May 20, 2007 lk personally known to me ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(?o whose name) l9'*-�. subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he sl t* executed the same in his / t authorized capacity(�s), and that by (jDhl�<th,@�D signature( on the instrument the person'., or the entity upon behalf of which the person(,s,,b acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official a. Place Notary Seal Above Signature of Notary lic OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Non- Collusion Affidavit Document Date: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: February 24, 2004 Capacity(ies) Claimed bysfeVe Virschner Signer's Name: ❑ Individual Vice President >� Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: Hardy & Harper, Inc. Number of Pages: 1 RIGHT THUMBPRINT', OF SIGNER ® 1999 National Notary Association • 9350 De Soto Ave., P.O. Box 2402 • Chatsworth, CA 91313 -2402 • www.nationalnotary.org Prod. No. 5907 Reorder: Call Toll -Free 1 -800- 876 -6827 `40# WAIAVA ITEM TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DECLARATION REGARDING LICENSE STATUS I do hereby declare that our /my Contractor's license is 215952 Class A and expires on December 31, 2005 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 24Tu day of February , 2004 at Santa Ana, California. Signature Printed Name Steve Kirschner Title Vice President Signing on behalf of Hardy & Harper, Inc (if applicable) 20 ArAMDA ITEM NO - P- � TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL LIST OF REFERENCES ASPHALT MAINTENANCE REFERENCES The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers for three (3) public agencies for which BIDDER has performed similar work within the past two (2) years: 1. City of Mission Viejo 200 Civic Center Mission Viejo, CA 92691 Name and Address of Owner Kim Lezrelin (949) 470 -3000 Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project Avg per year 200,000.00 Annual Asphalt Maint on going renewal 12 yrs Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed PIN City of Yorba Linda 4845 Casa Lama Ave Yorba Linda, CA 92885 Name and Address of Owner Jack Baecker (714) 322 -0338 Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project 200,000.00 avg per year Annual asphalt maintenance on going renewal 10 years Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 3. Capistrano Unified School Dist. 32972 Calle Perfecto San Jaun Capistrano, CA Name and Address of Owner Mark Bauer (949) 489 -7295 Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project Avg per year 400,000.00 Annual asphalt maintenanoe on going renewal 15 years Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 21 1./ 3DA rMM R40 • ..- ... -�-- PACE__.�.-�Au-- T"Mmul St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company Surety St. Paul Guardian insurance Company St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Ine. Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company Principal Office: 385 Washington Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 Seaboard Surety Company BID BOND Principal Office: 5801 Smith Avenue Baltimore, Maryland 21209 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that Hardy & Harper, Inc. 1312 E. Warner, Ave. of Santa Ana, CA 92705 as Principal, and St. Paul Guardian Insurance Companya Minnesota corporation, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto Citv of Lake Elsinore as Obligee, in the full and dust sum of (10 %) Ten Percent of amount bid Dollars, lawful money of the united States, for the payment of which sum, well and truly to be trade, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators. successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, the said Principal is herewith submitting its proposal Annual maintenance contract - asphalt maintenance THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such tha: if the aforesaid Principal shall be awarded the contract the said Principal will, within the time required, enter into a formal contract and give a good and sufficient bond to secure the performance of the terms and conditions of the contract, then this obligation to be void; otherwise the Principal and Surety will pay unto the Obligee the difference in money between the amount of the bid of the said Principal and the amount for which the Obligee legally contracts with another party to perform the work if the latter amount be in excess of the former, but in no event shall liability hereunder exceed the penal sum hereof. Signed, sealed and delivered 5th , day of February 2004 s„m • . - /r %�i 85274 Rev. 9.2000 Printed In U.S.A. (Scat) (Sea)) Surety Company: St. Pa Guardian Insurance Company Anomey -in -Fact Kathl en E. Maas AC 41M i7'1rilA no. OF CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of Orange ss. On February 5, 2004 , before me, Susan Pugh, Notary Public Date Name and Title of Ottker (e.g., *Jane Doe, Notary Puble) personally appeared Kathleen Maas Name(s) of Signer(a) =Ex GH 798 LIFORlM NTY 28, 2007 ❑ personally known to me ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same in his /her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his /her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and o ' ' I seal. Piste Notary Seal AWvs Susan Pugh sgneare of Notary Public OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Bid Bond Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: None-------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- Capaclty(les) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: Kathleen Maas Individual e Top of thumb here ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited O General C� Attorney In Fact • Trustee • Guardian or Conservator O Other. Signer Is Representing: St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company c 1997 Now" Notary Anodation • 9350 De Soto Ave., P.O. Box 2402 - Chatsworth, CA 91313 -2402 Prod. No. 5907 Reorder. Call Top -Free 1- 906878.8827 i ALMA n'EM 00. I I� PA Ot~�� meS'lftl Power of Attorney No. POWER OF ATTORNEY Seaboard Surety Company St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company 20675 United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. Certificate No. 1971579 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Seaboard Surety Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of New York, and that St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company and St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company are corporations duly organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and that United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Maryland, and that Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Iowa, and that Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Wisconsin (herein collectively called the "Companies "), and that the Companies do hereby make, constitute and appoint H. J. Dueck, Dwight Reilly, Christopher S. Hopper, Claudette N. Martin and Kathleen E. Maas of the City of Upland , State California , their true and lawful Attomey(s) -in -Fact, each in their separate capacity if more than one is named above, to sign its name as surety to, and to execute, seal and acknowledge any and all bonds, undertakings, contracts and other written instruments in the nature thereof on behalf of the Companies in their business of guaranteeing the fidelity of persons, guaranteeing the t performance of contracts and executing or guaranteeing bonds and undertakings-0 cjtlired or.peFrtitted in any actions or proceedings allowed by law. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Companies have caused this instrument tobe sigued,and sealed this 19� day of February 2003 1 Seaboard Surety Company ` United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company St. Paul Fire and Marine Insur#n' ee`Company' Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company St. Paul Guardian Insurance `Company Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company $unrp, JF1PE 6y o��N..�NS Q,��NSUq u��Y� gi..PQ q� 7 tW JGORYQggTq�C� ,W4 PV .Y' y -`�. 1927 "{ a mil, y- te96 ° ' j9%"J�ia� PETER W. CARMAN, Vice President :SE1LL..." State of Maryland City of Baltimore THOMAS E. HUIBREGTSE, Assistant Secretary On this 19 t6 day of February 2003 before me, the undersigned officer, personally appeared Peter W. Carman and Thomas E. Huibregtse, who acknowledged themselves to be the Vice President and Assistant Secretary, respectively, of Seaboard Surety Company, St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company, St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company, and Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.; and that the seals affixed to the foregoing instrument are the corporate seals of said Companies; and that they, as such, being authorized so to do, executed the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein contained by signing the names of the corporations by themselves as duly authorized officers. In Witness Whereof, I hereunto set my hand and official seal. %866), 9 bgVC (/ My Commission expires the 1 st day of July, 2006. 09E Cal �o REBECCA EASLEY- ONOKALA, Notary Public 86203 Rev. 7 -2002 Printed in U.S.A. CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California I ss. County of Orange On February 24, 2004 before me, Kristen S. Paulino, Notary Public Date Name and Title of Officer (e.g., "Jane Doe, Notary Public ") personally appeared Steve Kirschner Name(s) of Signer(s) I KRISTEN S. P"U' 0 o • ^, Comm. # 1413262 NOTARY PUBLIC CALIFORNIA G 3 /I ORANGE COUNTY ro My Comm. Exp. May 20, 2007 �[ 1,personally known to me ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose namegj Is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me tha ht e's E y executed the same in 0is /*ir authorized capacity(Ps), and that by �Kr /tKiir signatureX on the instrument the persoriP0, or the entity upon behalf of which the person§ acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand A offi I I seal. ,6%�L "6- ' Place Notary Seal Above Signature of Notary Public OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Bid Bond Document Date: February 5, 2004 Number of Pages Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Kathleen Maas Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: Steve Kirschner ❑ Individual Corporate Officer — Title(s): Vice President Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: Hardy & Harper, Inc. 1 RIGHT THUMBPRINT OF SIGNER .p of © 1999 National Notary Association - 9350 De Soto Ave., P.O. Box 2402 - Chatsworth, CA 91313 -2402 • www.nationalnotary.org Prod. No. 5907 Reorder: Call Toll -Free 1- 800 -876 -6827 r �i�i , Alm M NO.- ,,-. Contractors Reference Check Contractor Hardy & Harper Project Asphalt Maintenance Reference City of Mission Viejo Name of Reference Contact Interviewed Kim Lemelin Phone Number of Reference Interviewed 949 - 470 -3000 Date of Interview 2/27/04 Reference Interview Question and Answers: What was the scope of work performed by the contractor? Asphalt maintenance — including potholes and resurfacing What was the total project cost? $200,000 per year /ongoing renewal 2 years Was contractor able to perform the contracted services in a timely fashion? Yes Were there any change orders? Did you have any issues relating to these change orders? No How well did the contractor interface and communicate with your staff? Very Well On a scale of I to 10 how would you rate the contactors overall performance with 10 being excellent? 8 / CUDA ITEM NO. 1 PAM L Contractors Reference Check Contractor Hardy & Harper Project Asphalt Maintenance Reference Capistrano Unified School District Name of Reference Contact Interviewed Mark Bauer Phone Number of Reference Interviewed 949 - 489 -7295 Date of Interview 3/1/04 Reference Interview Question and Answers: What was the scope of work performed by the contractor? Asphalt maintenance District Wide — Replace or repave parking lots, play areas. What was the total project cost? $400,000 per year /ongoing renewal 5 years Was contractor able to perform the contracted services in a timely fashion? Yes Were there any change orders? Did you have any issues relating to these change orders? No. How well did the contractor interface and communicate with your staff? Excellent On a scale of I to 10 how would you rate the contactors overall performance with 10 being excellent? 10 • TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL ASPHALT MAINTENANCE PROPOSAL Name of Bidder .2JUT6AA6q-7-, Drt R t )ogt/6M EN T so4a rlORIS zAlz. Address of Bidder P 0 -(30X 10458, SAN 73C-R.AQ4RD /A-1Q0 !#- 90.9,3 --Pysa To: Citv of Lake Elsinore, California The undersigned bidder, in accordance with the City's Notice Inviting Bids, hereby proposes to furnish all materials, equipment, tools, labor, and incidentals required for the above - stated project as set forth in the Plans, Specifications, and Contract documents therefore to perform all work in the manner and time prescribed therein. The attached Bid Schedule is hereby made a part of this proposal. The undersigned bidder declares that this proposal is based upon careful examination of the work site, Plans, Specifications, Instructions to Bidders, and all other Contract documents. If this proposal is accepted for award, bidder agrees to enter into a Contract with the City at the unit and /or lump sum prices set forth in the following bid schedule. Bidder understands that failure to enter into a Contract and furnish bonds in the manner and time prescribed will result in forfeiture to the City of the guarantee accompanying this proposal. The undersigned bidder certifies that this proposal is made in good faith, without collusion or connection with any other person or persons bidding on the work. The undersigned bidder understands that the City Council reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals or to waive formality or technicality in any proposal in the interest of the Agency. 11 I EXPLANATION OF BID SCHEDULE The following Bid Schedule is in two parts. Part I is a sample work order. Part I will be the document used to determine the lowest bidder. Part II of the Bid Schedule, are unit prices to be bid by each bidder. These unit prices will be the unit prices used throughout the term of the contract for all work to be completed. These unit prices are to be used when calculating the sample work order in Part I of the Bid Schedule. 12 -../` AC MA ITEM 140. I PACE5-- _OFiL, - TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL BID SCHEDULE PART I Sample Work Order Item Description Amount 1. Remove and replace 10,000 sq.ft. of asphalt 4" thick 2. Remove and replace 10,000 sq.ft. of asphalt 8" thick $ a�i,,SO0 • p0 3. Crack seal 20,000 ln.ft. $ 500 OD 4. Install 10,000 In . ft. of asphalt Berm $ 5. Setup Mobilization Charge for One Job $ ,�5O•d D Total sum of items one through five in words: �"� Z�� �� �ll.'Ie4ll� V V Total sum of items one through five in numbers: $ 7,5' 350 NOTE: All work to be done in accordance with City of Lake Elsinore Ordinances, Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, and City Engineer direction. All work is subject to inspection by City Inspector. Any Contractor doing work in the City must have a City business license. Bid prices for sample work orders are to be calculated using unit prices bid in Part II of the bid schedule. 13 px,'.L -ICW TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL 14 ALMA tTEM NO. BID SCHEDULE PART II ITEMS TO BE BID FOR ASPHALT MAINTENANCE Setup Mobilization Charge for each job $ 550-0D lump sum Remove and Replace A.C. up to 4" includes all related costs (note: asphalt only does not include base material) 1 - 1,000 sq.ft. $ 3.50 per sq.ft. 1,001 - 5,000 sq.ft. $ a- -75- per sq.ft. 5,001 - 10,000 sq.ft. $ a.a 0 per sq.ft. 10,001 + sq.ft. $ f. g.S� per sq.ft. Remove and Replace A.C. 4 " -8" includes all related costs (note: asphalt only does not include base material) 1 - 1,000 sq.ft. $ y/75" per sq.ft. 1,001 - 5,000 sq.ft. $ 3 --20 per sq.ft. 5,001 - 10,000 sq.ft. $ oV• %s per sq.ft. 10,001 + sq.ft. $ 4•q5 per sq.ft. Crack Sealing 1 - 1,000 ln.ft. $ .90 per ln.ft. 1,001 - 5,000 ln.ft. $ q/ per ln.ft. 5,001 - 10,000 ln.ft. $ .35 per ln.ft. 10,001 - 20,000 ln.ft. $ per ln.ft. Install Asphalt Berm 1 - 1,000 ln.ft. $ J�•o a per ln.ft. 1,001 - 5,000 ln.ft. $ .300 per ln.ft. 5,001 - 10,000 In.ft. $ 0?. -7-D per ln.ft. 10,001 - 20,000 ln.ft. $ q.00 per ln.ft. 14 ALMA tTEM NO. TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL The Undersigned has checked carefully all of the above figures and understands that the City will not be responsible for any error or omissions on the part of the Undersigned in making up this bid. The Undersigned bidder declares, under penalty of perjury, that they are licensed to do business or act in the capacity of a contractor within the State of California and that they are validly licensed as follows: License Number: :2 Classification: U Expiration Date: 11-30— This statement is true and correct and has the legal effect of an affidavit. 15 MMA ffEW1 W---- 9 TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL SIGNATURE PAGE IF A SOLE OWNER OR SOLE CONTRACTOR, SIGN HERE: City and State Zip Code 1. Name under which business is conducted IF A PARTNERSHIP, SIGN HERE: 2. Signature (Given and surname) of proprietor 3. Place of Business 16 AGENDA ITEM NO PA • S �.i B?- -oF IA-�— (Street and Number) City and State Zip Code 4. Telephone Number IF A PARTNERSHIP, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted 2. Name of each member of Partnership (indicate character of each partner, either general or special [limited]) 3. Signature (Given and surname and character of partner. Note: Signature must be made by a general partner) 4. Place of Business (Street and Number) City and State Zip Code 5. Telephone Number 16 AGENDA ITEM NO PA • S �.i B?- -oF IA-�— TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL 10-� IF A CORPORATION, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted ,Z7UIL�RAlR7 /D�VI�L ? 4j/t-M&atT :5 04U71 DIU S 2. Name of each officer of corporation (indicate office) C. V1F6ER_ If -Ves. 3. Signature (Given and surname and title of officer authorized to sign for the Corporation) FA '' (Irp�5ress Corporate Seal here 4. Incorporated under the laws of the State of 5. Place of Business P.D. WM )Qq; $ Street and Number)' City and State S'A�J �f AR,I�jftjO - Zip Code a,3Va3. D L/5o0 6. Telephone Number Q ()q- 3g4- Q-10 17 AC4WA ITEM NO-- TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CA NON- COLLUSION DECLARATION (Public Contract Code Section 7106) I, DgAJOVt5 C . R/E6E2 do hereby declare that I am (Name) t h e PR.= S I D EN T %7Y,99514 RIM R_ Of MV rEe&Ari augL Mr-m7 Soto r1 ,Pius SWc . (Tile) (Contractor) the party making the foregoing bid for the construction referred to as: ASPHALT MAINTENANCE and that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, and undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any bidder or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the bidder has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the bidder or any other bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other bidder, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the Contract of anyone interested in the proposed Contract; that all statements contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the bidder has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid. I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. ATE PLACE SIGNATURE mym_5 0- .9) iF -6te , ows NAME 01.01 =nLpC�4tDA YTE4A RtO. TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGNATION OF SUBCONTRACTORS The undersigned certifies that he or she has used the sub -bids of the following listed subcontractors in making up his bid for the construction referred to as: ASPHALT MAINTENANCE and that the subcontractors listed will be used for work for which they bid, subject to the approval of the Engineer, and in accordance with the applicable provision of the Specifications. Bid Item Number Subcontractor iUDAIE Address /Telephone AMTu2m n o&t.A.L-PAUr -_x Nf -r � `qNS C Name of Contractor _?UG• Signatur of Bidder 19 D-Pou ucs L'_ R to AAR- Name t D6Vr- / 7??eM itle AGIMA ITEM no 1 _(0; �F! I �E_ TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DECLARATION REGARDING LICENSE STATUS I do hereby declare that our /my Contractor's license is and expires on �/� - I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this o< day of , 20_Y_. at I California. Signature Printed Name DEAW!S 0 - Title Signing on behalf of Yq%,k 7ANT 501&2 PA45 UG (if applicable) 20 AM DA ITEM NO. L- PAC#OFTU---- TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL LIST OF REFERENCES ASPHALT MAINTENANCE REFERENCES The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers for three (3) public agencies for which BIDDER has performed similar work within the past two (2) years: Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 2. Name and Address of Owner 3. Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed Name and Address of Owner Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 21 ,A ?A 90- ,wa.._OF _ ! 1_ a< �, s �` r 7yy P.O. Box 10458, San Bernardino, CA 92423 -0458 — (909) 794 -2101 — 1 (800) 826 -4163 Reference List — Public Works San Bernardino County 385 N. Arrowhead San Bernardino, CA 92415 -0184 909- 387 -8907 Contact Shakil Patel, ALA Numerous Projects Asphalt, Concrete, Seal Coat, Striping And Bldg. Construction Contract Range $8745.00 - $117,950.00 GSG Parking Lot ADA $50,804.00 Start 08 -15 -02 Complete 08 -28 -02 Old Hall of Records Parking Lot $117,950.00 Start 12 -01 -02 Complete 1 -10 -03 Big Bear Justice Parking Lot $33,950.00 Start 11 -01 -01 Complete 11 -30 -01 Crestline Sanitation Parking Lot $8,750.00 Start 10 -15 -01 Complete 10 -31 -01 - Fax: (909) 794 -7098 Morongo Basin Parking Lot $35,786.00 Start 10 -01 -01 Complete 10 -31 -01 Port of San Diego P.O. Box 120488 San Diego, CA 92112 -0488 619- 725 -6086 Contact Jay Waelder or Cyrus Toosky Gallagher Deficiencies — ADA Compliance Asphalt, Concrete, Construction, Striping Base Bid $90,064.00 c/o $24,770.95 Total Contract $114,834.85 ,"Ale "Your Complete Outdoor Maintenance Solution" C CA License #Al8729226 • NV License #A0041881 • http: / /www .pavement— solutions.com Xffm no. OF —W- Santa Rosa Community Services District 41785 Enterprise Circle South Temecula, CA 92589 909 - 296 -3176 Contact John Rogers, P. E. Numerous Projects Asphalt, Seal Coating, Striping Contract Range $5258.25 — $170,192.80 Los Gatos Sunset Terrace Base Bid $99,990.00 c/o $11,973.04 Total Contract $111,963.04 Start 01 -05 -02 Complete 01-31-02 Various District Roads $5258.25 Start 04 -15 -02 Complete 04 -28 -02 Various District Roads $50,975.00 Start 09 -30 -02 Complete 11 -30 -02 Slurry Seal Various Roads Base Bid $170,192.80 c/o $4788.88 Total Contract $174,981.68 Start 10 -01 -02 Complete 10 -31 -02 Sandia Creek Drive $162,970.00 Start 12 -15 -02 Complete 1 -15 -03 City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 909 - 694 -6444 Contact Susan Jones City Wide Concrete Repairs Base Bid $61,433.00 c/o $4,378.50 Total Contract $65,811.50 ''-- Start 02 -15 -02 Complete 02 -28 -02 Crafton Hills Community College 44100 8`h Street San Bernardino, CA 92408 909 - 389 -3381 Contact Darrell Covino Parking Lot Repairs Asphalt, Concrete, Seal, Striping Base Bid $340,526.00 c/o $24,679.90 Total Contract $365,205.90 Mate of California — Patton State Hospital 3012 E. Highland Ave. Highland, CA 92346 916- 376 -1663 Contact Don Hansen Parking Lot Repairs Asphalt, Concrete, Seal, Striping, Construction Base Bid $383,850.00 c/o $339,831.00 Total Contract $723,681.00 City of Chino — Aguiar Plaza Sixth & D St. Chino, CA 909 -591 -9831 Contact Mike Kolling Plaza Renovation Asphalt, Concrete Landscape, Striping Base Bid $285,190.00 c/o $34,660.00 Total Contract $319,850.00 A OEM No -- -----* N"Of CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONTRACT AGREEMENT This Contract Agreement is made and entered into this day of 2004 by and between the City of Lake Elsinore and as Contractor for the construction referred to as: ASPHALT MAINTENANCE WITNESSETH that the City of Lake Elsinore and the Contractor have mutually agreed as follows: The Contract documents the Notice Inviting General Specification referenced specificat appendices, together w' bonds, insurance certificates, p and also including any and all a clarifying, amending or extending required to ensure its completion the provisions of said Contract as though fully set forth herein. ARTICLE I for the aforesaid Bids, Instructions s, Plans, Special ions, details, s lth this Contract Ag project shall consist of to Bidders, Proposal, Provisions and all tandard drawings, and reement and all required ermits, notices, and affidavits, ddenda or supplemental agreements the work contemplated as may be in an acceptable manner. All of documents are made a part hereof ARTICLE II For and in consideration of the payments and agreements to be made and performed by the City of Lake Elsinore, Contractor agrees to furnish all materials and perform all work required for the above stated project, and to fulfill all other obligations as set forth in the aforesaid Contract documents. ARTICLE III Contractor agrees to receive and accept the prices set forth in the proposal as full compensation for furnishing all materials, performing all work, and fulfilling all obligations hereunder. Said compensation shall cover all expenses, losses, damages, and consequences arising out of the nature of the work during its progress or prior to its acceptance including those for well and faithfully completing the work and the whole thereof in the manner and time specified in the aforesaid Contract documents and also including those arising from actions of the elements, unforeseen difficulties or obstructions encountered in the prosecution of the work, suspension or discontinuance of the work, and all other unknowns or risks of any description connected with the work. ARTICLE IV The City of Lake Elsinore hereby promises and agrees to employ, and does hereby employ, Contractor to provide the materials, do 22 AGOWAftNO. 9-- - the work, and fulfill the obligations according to the terms and conditions herein contained and referred to, for the prices aforesaid, and hereby contracts to pay the same at the time, in the manner, and upon the conditions set forth in the Contract documents. ARTICLE V Contractor acknowledges the provisions of the State Labor Code requiring every employer to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self- insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code and certifies compliance with such provisions. ARTICLE VI Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Lake Elsinore or its officers and agents from any claims, demands, or causes of action including related expenses attorney's fees, and costs based on, arising out of, or in any way related to the work undertaken by Contractor hereunder. ARTICLE VII Contractor affirms that the signatures, titles, and seals set forth herein after the execution of this Contract Agreement represent all individuals, firm members, partners, joint ventures, and /or corporate officers having a principal interest herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto for themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns do hereby agree to the full performance of the covenants herein contained and have caused this Contract Agreement to be executed in triplicate by setting hereunto their names, titles, hands, and seals this day of , 2002. Contractor: By: CA Lic.# Title Subscribed and sworn to this day of NOTARY PUBLIC City of Lake Elsinore, By: Mayor Attested City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, Date 23 2004. . , 4r �, CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATE REGARDING WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE Section 3700 of the Labor Code provides in part as follows: "Every employer except the State shall secure the payment of compensation in one or more of the following ways: A) By being insured against liability to pay compensation B) By securing from the Director of Industrial Relations a certificate of consent to self- insure, which may be given upon furnishing proof satisfactory to the Director of Industrial Relations of ability to self - insure and to pay any compensation that may become due to his employees..." The undersigned is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self - insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract. SIGNATURE DATE.aZy,o200�( PRINTED NAME T),g"14tS c. TITLE We T -R-9-g -5 . COMPANY -�AV IZ NL� ti7 Svc. �T�OIU$ .i7UG. ADDRESS 13D11 �DtRSQ(Zi4lND, eA �l�Ya3 -D�l$� (In accordance with Article 5, commencing at Section 1860, Chapter 1, Part 7, Division 2 of the Labor Code, the above Certificate must be signed by the Contractor and filed with the awarding body prior to the Contractor performing any work under this Contract.) 24 Contractors Reference Check Contractor International Pavement Solutions, Inc. Project Asphalt Maintenance /Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk Maintenance/Unpaved Roads Reference State of California Patton State Hospital Name of Reference Contact Interviewed Don Hansen Phone Number of Reference Interviewed 916- 376 -1663 Date of Interview 3/2/04 Reference Interview Question and Answers: What was the scope of work performed by the contractor? Asphalt maintenance Parking lot repairs, asphalt, concrete, seal, striping What was the total project cost? $723,681 Was contractor able to perform the contracted services in a timely fashion? Yes Were there any change orders? Did you have any issues relating to these change orders? Initiated by the owner. There were no issues related to the changes. How well did the contractor interface and communicate with your staff? Very Well On a scale of I to 10 how would you rate the contactors overall performance with 10 being excellent? 8 AGMAMMM0. q PAN . �_O TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL ASPHALT MAINTENANCE ORIGINAL PROPOSAL Name of Bidder NPG Corporation Address of Bidder 1354 Jet Way * Perris, California 92571 To: Citv of Lake Elsinore, California The undersigned bidder, in accordance with the City's Notice Inviting Bids, hereby proposes to furnish all" materials, equipment, tools, labor, and incidentals required for the above - stated project as set forth in the Plans, Specifications, and Contract documents therefore to perform all work in the manner and time prescribed therein. The attached Bid Schedule is hereby made a part of this proposal. The undersigned bidder declares that this proposal is based upon careful examination of the work site, Plans, Specifications, Instructions to Bidders, and all other Contract documents. If this proposal is accepted for award, bidder agrees to enter into a Contract with the City at the unit and /or lump sum prices set forth in the following bid schedule. Bidder understands that failure to enter into a Contract and furnish bonds in the manner and time prescribed will result in forfeiture to the City of the guarantee accompanying this proposal. The undersigned bidder certifies that this proposal is made in good faith, without collusion or connection with any other person or persons bidding on the work. The undersigned bidder understands that the City Council reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals or to waive formality or technicality in any proposal in the interest of the Agency. 11 1 EXPLANATION OF BID SCHEDULE The following Bid Schedule is in two parts. Part I is a sample work order. Part I will be the document used to determine the lowest bidder. Part II of the Bid Schedule, are unit prices to be bid by each bidder. These unit prices will be the unit prices used throughout the term of the contract for all work to be completed. These unit prices are to be used when calculating the sample work order in Part I of the Bid Schedule. 12 • TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL BID SCHEDULE PART I Sample Work Order Item Description Amount 1. Remove and replace 10,000 sq.ft. of 20,825.00 asphalt 4" thick $ 2. Remove and replace 10,000 sq.ft. of 31 985.00 asphalt 8" thick $ ' 3. Crack seal 20,000 ln.ft. $ 6,000.00 4. Install 10,000 In. ft. of asphalt Berm $ 35,000.00 450.00 5. Setup Mobilization Charge for One Job $ Total sum of items one through five in words: Ninety Four Thousand Two Hundred Sixty Dollars And 00/100-- - - - - -- Total sum of items one through five in numbers: $ 94,260.00 NOTE: All work to be done in accordance with City of Lake Elsinore Ordinances, Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, and City Engineer direction. All work is subject to inspection by City Inspector. Any Contractor doing work in the City must have a City business license. Bid prices for sample work orders are to be calculated using unit prices bid in Part II of the bid schedule. 13 TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL BID SCHEDULE PART II ITEMS TO BE BID FOR ASPHALT MAINTENANCE Setup Mobilization Charge for each job $ 450.00 lump sum Remove and Replace A.C. up to 4" includes all related costs (note: asphalt only does not include base material) 1 - 1,000 sq.ft. $ 3.75 per sq.ft. 1,001 - 5,000 sq.ft. $ 3.25 per sq.ft. 5,001 - 10,000 sq.ft. $ 2.75 per sq.ft. 10,001 + sq.ft. $ 2.09 per sq.ft. Remove and Replace A.C. 4 " -8" includes all related costs (note: asphalt only does not include base material) 1 - 1,000 sq.ft. $ 3.85 per sq.ft. 1,001 - 5,000 sq.ft. $ 3.75 per sq.ft. 5,001 - 10,000 sq.ft. $ 3.50 per sq.ft. 10,001 + sq.ft. $ 3.20 per sq.ft. Crack Sealing 1 - 1,000 ln.ft. $ 0.75 per ln.ft. 1,001 - 5,000 ln.ft. $ 0.65 per ln.ft. 5,001 - 10,000 ln.ft. $ 0.55 per ln.ft. 10,001 - 20,000 ln.ft. $ 0.40 per ln.ft. Install Asphalt Berm 1 - 1,000 ln.ft. $ 6.00 per ln.ft. 1,001 - 5,000 ln.ft. $ 5.50 per ln.ft. 5,001 - 10,000 ln.ft. $ 5.00 per ln.ft. 10,001 - 20,000 ln.ft. $ 3.50 per ln.ft. 14 • TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL The Undersigned has checked carefully all of the above figures and understands that the City will not be responsible for any error or omissions on the part of the Undersigned in making up this bid. The Undersigned bidder declares, under penalty of perjury, that they are licensed to do business or act in the capacity of a contractor within the State of California and that they are validly licensed as follows: License Number: 664779 Classification: C12 / B / A Expiration Date: February 28, 2005 This statement is true and correct and has the legal effect of an affidavit. 15 AN I TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL SIGNATURE PAGE IF A SOLE OWNER OR SOLE CONTRACTOR, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted 2. Signature (Given and surname) of proprietor 3. Place of Business (Street and Number) City and State Zip Code 4. Telephone Number IF A PARTNERSHIP, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted 2. Name of each member of Partnership (indicate character of each partner, either general or special [limited]) 3. Signature (Given and surname and character of partner. Signature must be made by a general partner) 4. Place of Business City and State 5. Telephone Number 16 (Street and Number) Zip Code Note: AGMA M NO. TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL IF A CORPORATION, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted NPG Corporation 2. Name of each officer of corporation (indicate office) Jeff S. Nelson * President Sharon Nelson * CFO 3. Signature (Given and surname and title of officer authorized to sign for t}4 9CIrporation) Jeff . Ne son * President X • (Impress Corporate Seal here) 4. Incorporated under the laws of the State of California 5. Place of Business 1354 Jet Way (Street and Number)" City and State Perris, California Zip Code 92571 6. Telephone Number 909 - 940 -0200 17 IrF;: TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CA NON- COLLUSION DECLARATION (Public Contract Code Section 7106) I, Jeff S. Nelson , do hereby declare that'I am (Name) the President (Title) the party making the to as: of NPG Corporation (Contractor) foregoing bid for the construction referred ASPHALT MAINTENANCE and that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, and undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any bidder or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the bidder has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the bidder or any other bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other bidder, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the Contract of anyone interested in the proposed Contract; that all statements contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the bidder has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid. I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. February 25, 2004 DATE 1354 Jet Way * Perris, California PLACE TURE Jeff S. Nelson * President S ►a 1'1a AMDA tSFJA Ito• 1 PAN �( OF I I 1 TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGNATION OF SUBCONTRACTORS The undersigned certifies that he or she has used the sub -bids of the following listed subcontractors in making up his bid for the construction referred to as: ASPHALT MAINTENANCE and that the subcontractors listed will be used for work for which they bid, subject to the approval of the Engineer, and in accordance with the applicable provision of the Specifications. Bid Item Number Not Applicable Subcontractor NPG Corporation Name of Contractor 19 Address /Telephone z Signature of Bidder Jeff S. Nelson President Name Title AWNDA ITEM NO. J PAN � OF: I TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DECLARATION REGARDING LICENSE STATUS I do hereby declare that our /my Contractor's license is 664779 and expires on February 28, 2005. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 6 day of February 20 04 at Perris California. Signatu Printex Title Jeff S. Nelson President Signing on behalf of (if applicable) 20 NO.- '! -= OF. A*-" TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL LIST OF REFERENCES ASPHALT MAINTENANCE pvvvnvmr,VQ The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers for three (3) public agencies for which BIDDER has performed similar work within the past two (2) years: 1• Moreno Valley Unified School District Name and Address of Owner Stan Brown 909 - 571 -7800 Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project 64,000.00 Concrete & Asphalt August 2003 Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 2' Sun Lakes Country Club Name and Address of Owner Jim Morgan 909 - 845 -2191 Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project 199,000.00 District Wide Asphalt September 2003 Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 3• F.H. Paschen / SN Nielsen Name and Address of Owner Bruce Bare 562- 864 -1950 Name and Telephone.Number of Person Familiar with Project 378,000.00 Asphalt Construction August 2003 Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 21 Ate► �T�► �o'�- � --_-- PACV-D_] Contractors Reference Check Contractor NPG Corporation Project Asphalt Maintenance /Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk Maintenance/Unpaved Roads Reference F.H. Paschen / SN Nielsen Name of Reference Contact Interviewed Bruce Bare Phone Number of Reference Interviewed 562- 864 -1950 Date of Interview 2/27/04 Reference Interview Question and Answers: What was the scope of work performed by the contractor? Asphalt maintenance Asphalt construction What was the total project cost? $378,000 Was contractor able to perform the contracted services in a timely fashion? Yes Were there any change orders? Did you have any issues relating to these change orders? Yes. There were no issues relating to the changes. How well did the contractor interface and communicate with your staff? Very Well On a scale of 1 to 10 how would you rate the contactors overall performance with 10 being excellent? 9 Chi PACE — I Tt1F J ) I - TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL ASPHALT MAINTENANCE PROPOSAL Name of Bidder Pf ,,'FIe- H S NH.LT` SeR U t C e 6 Address of Bidder Ro,,&X 1&47 oyr R%t7i c ,qZ.4 To: City of Lake Elsinore, California The undersigned bidder, in accordance with the City's Notice Inviting Bids, hereby proposes to furnish all materials, equipment, tools, labor, and incidentals required for the above - stated project as set forth in the Plans, Specifications, and Contract documents therefore to perform all work in the manner and time prescribed therein. The attached Bid Schedule is hereby made a part of this proposal. The undersigned bidder declares that this proposal is based upon careful examination of the work site, Plans, Specifications, Instructions to Bidders, and all other Contract documents. If this proposal is accepted for award, bidder agrees to enter into a Contract with the City at the unit and /or lump sum prices set forth in the following bid schedule. Bidder understands that failure to enter into a Contract and furnish bonds in the manner and time prescribed will result in forfeiture to the City of the guarantee accompanying this proposal. The undersigned bidder certifies that this proposal is made in good faith, without collusion or connection with any other person or persons bidding on the work. The undersigned bidder understands that the City Council reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals or to waive formality or technicality in any proposal in the interest of the Agency. 11 MUM ffW NO - RAM '7 9 OF EXPLANATION OF BID SCHEDULE The following Bid Schedule is in two parts. Part I is a sample work order. Part I will be the document used N"Mov' to determine the lowest bidder. Part II of the Bid Schedule, are unit prices to be bid by each bidder. These unit prices will be the unit prices used throughout the term of the contract for all work to be completed. These unit prices are to be used when calculating the sample work order in Part I of the Bid Schedule. 12 m A: • • '"We TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL 10�- BID SCHEDULE PART I Sample Work Order Item Description Amount 1. Remove and replace 10,000 sq.ft. of asphalt 4" thick $ c2l? —T 2. Remove and replace 10,000 sq.ft. of asphalt 8" thick $ /f('� d ©Q,a'Q 3. Crack seal 20,000 ln.ft. $ ?,pon.00 4. Install 10,000 In. ft. of asphalt Berm $3S, ono,Oo 5. Setup Mobilization Charge for One Job Total sum of items one through five in words: OnIE /ttAnlbR�J 7- Wepi -N -Two TNo�esfla� Two flUaArzez� .1�o�,c� s qua "�%� Total sum of items one through five in numbers: $ /aa, .2pfl,Q-J NOTE: All work to be done in accordance with City of Lake Elsinore Ordinances, Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, and City Engineer direction. All work is subject to inspection by City Inspector. Any Contractor doing work in the City must have a City business license. Bid prices for sample work orders are to be calculated using unit prices bid in Part II of the bid schedule. 13 • TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL BID SCHEDULE PART II ITEMS TO BE BID FOR ASPHALT MAINTENANCE *Mae Setup Mobilization Charge for each job $ Z,,nnn,00 lump sum Remove and Replace A.C. up to 4" includes all related costs (note: asphalt only does not include base material) 1 - 1,000 sq.ft. $ S-as, per sq.ft. 1,001 - 5,000 sq.ft. $ "1.150 per sq.ft. 5,001 - 10,000 sq.ft. $ 3,71 per sq.ft. 10,001 + sq.ft. $ a.9 per sq.ft. Remove and Replace A.C. 4 " -8" includes all related costs (note: asphalt only does not include base material) 1 - 1,000 sq.ft. $ (p, 1-6, per sq.ft. 1,001 - 5,000 sq.ft. $ 5.6 y per sq.ft. 5,001 - 10,000 sq.ft. $ 5. /oZ per sq.ft. 10,001 + sq.ft. $ x{•(00 per sq.ft. Crack Sealing 1 - 1,000 ln.ft. $ a.,So per ln.ft. 1,001 - 5,000 ln.ft. $ #6' per ln.ft. 5,001 - 10,000 ln.ft. $ -Yo per ln.ft. 10,001 - 20,000 ln.ft. $ ►35 per ln.ft. Install Asphalt Berm 1 - 1,000 ln.ft. $ 5..50 per ln.ft. 1,001 - 5,000 ln.ft. $ 14. IN per ln.ft. 5,001 - 10,000 ln.ft. $ 14.37 per ln.ft. 10,001 - 20,000 ln.ft. $ 3.80 per ln.ft. 14 1 TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL �- The Undersigned has checked carefully all of the above. figures and understands that the City will not be responsible for any error or omissions on the part of the Undersigned in making up this bid. The Undersigned bidder declares, under penalty of perjury, that they are licensed to do business or act in the capacity of a contractor within the State of California and that they are validly licensed as follows: License Number: G7O13% Classification: Expiration Date: S10S This statement is true and correct and has the legal effect of an affidavit. 15 1 TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL SIGNATURE PAGE IF A SOLE OWNER OR SOLE CONTRACTOR, SIGN HERE: • e 1. Name under which business is conducted FRcrFeG ASPN/a1.1 2. Signature (Given and surname) of proprietor ;;�v„�z,10 3. Place of Business / #3gS 5gn17A AOA AUC �oaTfla9 (Street and Number) City and State fp4-rANF1 C QkJ Zip Code 92335 4. Telephone Number ?Ocl-- IF A PARTNERSHIP, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted 2. Name of each member of Partnership (indicate character of each partner, either general or special [limited]) 3. Signature (Given and surname and character of partner. Note: Signature must be made by a general partner) 4. Place of Business (Street and Number) City and State 5. Telephone Number 16 Zip Code ,.so TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL � IF A CORPORATION, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted 2. Name of each officer of corporation (indicate office) 3. Signature (Given and surname and title of officer authorized to sign for the Corporation) (Impress Corporate Seal here) 4. Incorporated under the laws of the State of 5. Place of Business (Street and Number)" City and State Zip Code 6. Telephone Number 17 AGMDA 1T NO. P,Aaj �()F- TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CA NON- COLLUSION DECLARATION (Public Contract Code Section 7106) I, M im, DcLtG H -ry , do hereby declare that' I am (Name) the C) Lo Ne-& of PAoi f95tttA�i (Title) (Contractor) the party making the foregoing bid for the construction referred to as: ASPHALT MAINTENANCE and that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, and undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any bidder or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the bidder has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the bidder or any other bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other bidder, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the Contract of anyone interested in the proposed Contract; that all statements contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the bidder has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid. I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. 4A Fon)T- AnJA C 9K--4 DATE PLACE %.� SIGMA RE M t k.G d7O t!6 t-t T y NAME It S"Mor PACE.- 0,;r; 1U . TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL A0__ CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGNATION OF SUBCONTRACTORS The undersigned certifies that he or she has used the sub -bids of the following listed subcontractors in making up his bid for the construction referred to as: ASPHALT MAINTENANCE and that the subcontractors listed will be used for work for which they bid, subject to the approval of the Engineer, and in accordance with the applicable provision of the Specifications. Bid Item Number Subcontractor Address /Telephone oo ri E f Acifrc 052HAKT 5C- AJ,ce,S Name of Contractor Signature of Bidder M f?a_- D0,46-H? N O o0 n) ce JZ Title 19 TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DECLARATION REGARDING LICENSE STATUS I do hereby declare that our /my Contractor's license is !) G, 70-23 � and expires on VG6 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this o2�5rH day of FeSRuRFy 20 F3 q at Fc4-rRr1 A , California. Signature Printed Name P? J l�o�l6ti7`i Title o uJ Ae F- Signing on behalf of P)9c.1 Fr— R5R#Ak7* 5eRU )c-�S (if applicable) M "EWA ITEM W. PAM 10-1- TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL LIST OF REFERENCES ASPHALT MAINTENANCE REFERENCES The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers for three (3) public agencies for which BIDDER has performed similar work within the past two (2) years: 1. � tsrR )c De5eR.7 Stir+DS UN►Ft�,t� Sc�pqk. Name and Address of Owner ,Y7-9,5,o byj e- P,4zM s R b. 4Q. QLt,,,i � A, C,4 �3t? � e .� a ,J 749 - 7-71- FSSt Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project .7n .0 P 600.0-0 R5Pyfl4z 4: n: �eTe �//o-;� Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 2. L) e.pT o F fDRP, K5 RN 6 gec-R aRT,o^) " G uX9MP4fl STATe PAfzk Name and Address of Owner R6Q PnkM GHR►'S t :Zuj�, Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project 4/-�-Y) 0np.00 A5i>�Y,947' tr1OZ Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 3. Goua7'y af= R►pe�s,�� S/�eR,+ =�S AuiATia� flAl1%6AP Name and Address of Owner ca 57e7'. OA Ave HelheT o9 57eye 13 c�.tzde,- 909 - ? s- 9 Sg l Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project 6 ,r*�G.41i) rb R A.Ui Contract Amount 21 GaAa,Zp- r°s -- e of Work 8 /es to Completed INSCO INSURANCE SERVICES, INC. insc %1cq Underwriting Manager for: p Developers Surety and Indemnity Company Indemnity Company of California 17780 Fitch, Suite 200 • Irvine, California 92614 • (949) 263 -3300 BID BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That we, Indemnity Company of California BOND NO. (NONE) as Principal, and Pacific Asphalt Services a corporation authorized to transact a general surety business in the State of California as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto City of Elsinore (hereinafter called the Obligee) in the full and just sum of 10% of job Dollars, ($ (10 % of job) ) for the payment whereof in lawful money of the United States, we bind ourselves, our heirs, administrators, executors, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, the said PRINCIPAL has submitted the accompanying bid for Asphalt Maintenance 2004 NOW, THEREFORE, if the Obligee shall accept the bid of the Principal and the Principal shall enter into a Contract with the Obligee in accordance with the terms of such bid, or in the event of the failure of the Principal to enter such Contract, If the Principal shall pay to the Obligee the difference not to exceed the penalty hereof between the amount specified in said bid and such larger amount for which the Obligee may in good faith contract with another party to perform the Work covered by said bid, then this obligation shall be null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. Signed and Sealed this 24th Pf}c-ltr6 ft5?JA'LT / t I KG ot[� k� p vo NGQ Principal ID -1198 (Bid Bond) (REV. 1/01) day of February 2004 YEAR Indemnity Company of California 4Suret By: Attorney -in -Fact POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR DEVELOPERS SURETY AND INDEMNITY COMPANY INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA A*-,- PO BOX 19725. IRVINE. CA 92623 (949) 263 -3300 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that except as expressly limited, DEVELOPERS SURETY AND INDEMNITY COMPANY and INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, do each, hereby make, constitute and appoint: ** *Jean Winston, Alan Winston, jointly or severally * ** as their true and lawful Attorneys) -in -Fact, to make, execute, deliver and acknowledge, for and on behalf of said corporations, as sureties, bonds, undertakings and contracts of suretyship giving and granting Unto said Attorneys) -in -Fact full power and authority to do and to perform every act necessary, requisite or proper to be done in connection therewith as each of said corporations could do, but reserving to each of said corporations full power of substitution and revocation, and all ofthe acts of said Attorncy(s) -in -Fact, pursuant to these presents, are hereby ratified and confirmed. This Power of Attorney is granted and is signed by facsimile under and by authority of the billowing resolutions adopted by the respective Board of Directors of DEVELOPERS SURETY AND INDEMNITY COMPANY and INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, effective as of November 1. 2000: RESOLVED, that the Chairman of the Board, the President and any Vice President of the corporation be, and that cash of them hereby is• authorized to execute Powers of Attorney, qualifying the attorncy(s) named in the Powers ofAttoiney to execute, on bchalfof the corporations, bonds, undertakings and contracts of suretyship: and that the Secretary or any Assistant Secretory of the corporations be. and each of them hereby is, authorized to attest the execution of any such Power of Attorney: RESOLVED. FURTHER, that the signatures of such officers may be affixed to any such Power of Attorney or to any certificate relating thereto by facsimile. and any such Power ofAttoincy or certificate hearing such facsimile signatures Shall be valid and bindings upon the corporation when so affixed and in the future with respect to any bond, Undertaking or contract of suretyship to which it is attached. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, DEVELOPERS SURETY AND INDEMNITY COMPANY and INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA have severally caused these presents to be signed by their respective Executive Vice President and attested by their respective Secretary this I st day of October, 2003. �1 ciije BY ANDr /y MPANYO David H. Rhodes, Executive Vice - President F °Q.,.•......•' •. ,�sc' O� PO r ,Co �RPORgrF � ,' SOP R9Tt( : V e rr e OCT. : < = z OCT. 5 -T' a': 10 � = w 1967 0 1936 By Walter A. Crowell, Secretary '�'�° /OW P ••• Ada' i c',g4/FO\A d2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) )SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) On October I, 2003, before me, Diane ,I: Kawata, personally appeared David H. Rhodes and Walter A. Crowell, personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacities, and that by their signatures on the instrument the entity upon bchalfof which the persons acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Yo f.•„ DIANE J. KAWATA O COMM. # 1334746 ,^ '� pp "� Notary Public - California �r..` �� 7j ORANGE COUNTY Signature My Comm. Expires JAN. 8, 2006 CERTIFICATE The undersigned, as Senior Vice - President, Underwriting of DEVELOPERS SURETY AND INDEMNITY COMPANY and INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, does hereby certify that the foregoing Power of Attorney remains in full force and has not been revoked, and furthermore, that the provisions of the resolutions of the respective Boards of Directors of said corporations set forth in the Power of Attorney, are in force as of the date of this Certificate. This Certificate is executed in the City of Irvine. California. the �Ilay of U By Wesley W. Cowling, enior Vice - President, Underwri r g I D -1390 ( Rev. 10/03 ) t • . �;: to Contractors Reference Check Contractor Pacific Asphalt Services Project Asphalt Maintenance Reference Department of Parks and Recreation — Cuyamaca State Park Name of Reference Contact Interviewed Chris Ruiz Phone Number of Reference Interviewed 760 - 765 -3022 Date of Interview 3/2/04 Reference Interview Question and Answers: What was the scope of work performed by the contractor? Asphalt maintenance Short stretch of a main road in a park What was the total project cost? $124,000 r..I Was contractor able to perform the contracted services in a timely fashion? Yes Were there any change orders? Did you have any issues relating to these change orders? No. How well did the contractor interface and communicate with your staff? Very well On a scale of I to 10 how would you rate the contactors overall performance with 10 being excellent? 9 Contractor Project Reference Contractors Reference Check Pacific Asphalt Services Asphalt Maintenance Desert Sands Unified School District Name of Reference Contact Interviewed Mariano Pasamonte Phone Number of Reference Interviewed 760- 771 -9551 Date of Interview 3/2/04 Reference Interview Question and Answers: What was the scope of work performed by the contractor? Asphalt maintenance Asphalt concrete What was the total project cost? $900,000 Was contractor able to perform the contracted services in a timely fashion? Yes Were there any change orders? Did you have any issues relating to these change orders? No How well did the contractor interface and communicate with your staff? Very Well On a scale of 1 to 10 how would you rate the contactors overall performance with 10 being excellent? 10 •a R> Contractors Reference Check Contractor Pacific Asphalt Services Project Asphalt Maintenance Reference County of Riverside Sheriff's Aviation Hangar Name of Reference Contact Interviewed Steve Burlein Phone Number of Reference Interviewed 909 - 925 -9591 Date of Interview 3/2/04 Reference Interview Question and Answers: What was the scope of work performed by the contractor? Asphalt maintenance Asphalt ramp with four concrete pads What was the total project cost? $55,000 Was contractor able to perform the contracted services in a timely fashion? Yes Were there any change orders? Did you have any issues relating to these change orders? Yes. There were no issues relating to the changes How well did the contractor interface and communicate with your staff? Quite well. On a scale of I to 10 how would you rate the contactors overall performance with 10 being excellent? 9 TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL ASPHALT MAINTENANCE PPnPngAT. Name of Bidder COPP CONTRACTING. INC. Address of Bidder P.O. BOX 457, BUENA PARK, CA. 90621 -0457 To: City of Lake Elsinore, California The undersigned bidder, in accordance with the City's Notice Inviting Bids, hereby proposes to furnish all" materials, equipment, tools, labor, and incidentals required for the above - stated project as set forth in the Plans, Specifications, and Contract documents therefore to perform all work in the manner and time prescribed therein. The attached Bid Schedule is hereby made a part of this proposal. The undersigned bidder declares that this proposal is based upon careful examination of the work site, Plans, Specifications, Instructions to Bidders, and all other Contract documents. If this proposal is accepted for award, bidder agrees to enter into a Contract with the City at the unit and /or lump sum prices set forth in the following bid schedule. Bidder understands that failure to enter into a Contract and furnish bonds in the manner and time prescribed will result in forfeiture to the City of the guarantee accompanying this proposal. The undersigned bidder certifies that this proposal is made in good faith, without collusion or connection with any other person or persons bidding on the work. The undersigned bidder understands that the City Council reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals or to waive formality or technicality in any proposal in the interest of the Agency. 11 . q PAM G � OF M EXPLANATION OF BID SCHEDULE The following Bid Schedule is in two parts. Part I is a sample work order. Part I will be the document used *1450 to determine the lowest bidder. Part II of the Bid Schedule, are unit prices to be bid by each bidder. These unit prices will be the unit prices used throughout the term of the contract for all work to be completed. These unit prices are to be used when calculating the sample work order in Part I of the Bid Schedule. 12 .m' AGENDA 1T EMNL—� TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL BID SCHEDULE PART I Sample Work Order Item Description Amount 1. Remove and replace 10,000 sq.ft. of asphalt 4" thick $ 24,000.00 2. Remove and replace 10,000 sq.ft. of asphalt 8" thick $ 48,000.00 3. Crack seal 20,000 ln. ft. $ 6,000.00 4. Install 10,000 ln. ft. of asphalt Berm $ 45,000.00 5. Setup Mobilization Charge for One Job $ 4,000.00 Total sum of items one through five in words: ONE HUNDRED TWENTY - SEVEN THOUSAND DOLLARS AND NO CENTS---------------------------------------- Total sum of items one through five in numbers: $ 127,000.00 NOTE: All work to be done in accordance with City of Lake Elsinore Ordinances, Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, and City Engineer direction. All work is subject to inspection by City Inspector. Any Contractor doing work in the City must have a City business license. Bid prices for sample work orders are to be calculated using unit prices bid in Part II of the bid schedule. 1193 _ KDA ITEM W0. TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL BID SCHEDULE PART II ITEMS TO BE BID FOR ASPHALT MAINTENANCE Setup Mobilization Charge for each job $ 4.000.00 lump sum Remove and Replace A.C. up to 4" includes all related costs (note: asphalt only does not include base material) 1 - 1,000 sq.ft. $ 7.00 per sq.ft. 1,001 - 5,000 sq.ft. $ 3.40 per sq.ft. 5,001 - 10,000 sq.ft. $ 2.40 per sq.ft. 10,001 + sq.ft. $ 2.40 per sq.ft. Remove and Replace A.C. 4 " -B" includes all related costs (note: asphalt only does not include base material) 1 - 1,000 sq.ft. $ 10.00 per sq.ft. 1,001 - 5,000 sq.ft. $ 6.80 per sq.ft. 5,001 - 10,000 sq.ft. $ 4.80 per sq.ft. 10,001 + sq.ft. $ 4.80 per sq.ft. Crack Sealing 1 - 1,000 ln.ft. $ 1.50 per ln.ft. 1,001 - 5,000 ln.ft. $ 1.00 per ln.ft. 5,001 - 10,000 ln.ft. $ 0.50 per ln.ft. 10,001 - 20,000 ln.ft. $ 0.30 per ln.ft. Install Asphalt Berm 1 - 1,000 ln.ft. $ 8.00 per ln.ft. 1,001 - 5,000 ln.ft. $ 5.75 per ln.ft. 5,001 - 10,000 ln.ft. $ 4.50 per ln.ft. 10,001 - 20,000 ln.ft. $ 4.50 per ln.ft. 14 AGSWA {TEM HO• PAM a OF 11 � TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL The Undersigned has checked carefully all of the above figures and understands that the City will not be responsible for any error or omissions on the part of the Undersigned in making up this bid. The Undersigned bidder declares, under penalty of perjury, that they are licensed to do business or act in the capacity of a contractor within the State of California and that they are validly licensed as follows: License Number: 384209 Classification: "A" Expiration Date: NOV. 30, 2005 This statement is true and correct and has the legal effect of an affidavit. 15 • TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL SIGNATURE PAGE IF A SOLE OWNER OR SOLE CONTRACTOR, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted 2. Signature (Given and surname) of proprietor 3. Place of Business (Street and Number) City and State Zip Code 4. Telephone Number IF A PARTNERSHIP, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted 2. Name of each member of Partnership (indicate character of each partner, either general or special [limited]) 3. Signature (Given and surname and character of partner. Note: Signature must be made by a general partner) 4. Place of Business City and State 5. Telephone Number 16 (Street and Number) Zip Code lA"ll UA ITEM 11W. 1 PAN 1 o c _�1 ,"No TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL IF A CORPORATION, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted COPP CONTRACTING, INC. 2. Name of each officer of corporation (indicate office) DENNIS W. COPP - PRESIDENT ERLINDA COPP - SEC.- TREAS. JOHN W. COPP - VICE -PRES. EZEKIEL A. COPP - VICE -PRES. 3. Signature (Given and surname and title of officer authorized to sign for the Corporation BY: W DENNIS W. COPP - PRES. (Impress Corporate Seal here) 4. Incorporated under the laws of the State of CALIFORNIA S. Place of Business 6751 STANTON AVE. P.O. BOX 457 (Street and Number)' City and State BUENA PARK, CA. Zip Code 90621 6. Telephone Number (714) 522 -7754 IVA ACOM ITEM NO. 1 AA0e 10 1 OF TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CA NON- COLLUSION DECLARATION (Public Contract Code Section 7106) I, DENNIS W. COPP , do hereby declare that' I am (Name) the PRESIDENT of COPP CONTRACTING, INC. (Title) (Contractor) the party making the foregoing bid for the construction referred to as: ASPHALT MAINTENANCE and that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, and undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any bidder or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the bidder has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the bidder or any other bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other bidder, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the Contract of anyone interested in the proposed Contract; that all statements contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the bidder has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid. I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. FEB. 23, 2004 BUENA PARK, CA. DATE PLACE SIGNATU DENNIS W. COPP- PRESIDENT NAME 18 %go, AMM ITEM NO.� PAM XOF -� TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE �"` DESIGNATION OF SUBCONTRACTORS The undersigned certifies that he or she has used the sub -bids of the following listed subcontractors in making up his bid for the construction referred to as: ASPHALT MAINTENANCE and that the subcontractors listed will be used for work for which they bid, subject to the approval of the Engineer, and in accordance with the applicable provision of the Specifications. Bid Item Number NONE Subcontractor COPP CONTRACTING, INC. Name of Contractor 19 Address /Telephone Signature o DENNIS W. COPP Name PRESIDENT Title dder 0 AGENDA ITEM AAM__Lo (WA_" -- TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DECLARATION REGARDING LICENSE STATUS I do hereby declare that our /my Contractor's license is #384209 "A" and expires on NOV. 30, 2005 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 23RD day of FEBRUARY 2004 at BUENA PARK , alifornia . Siqnature Printed Name DENNIS W. COPP Title PRESIDENT Signing on behalf of N/A (if applicable) 20 C 14DA ITEM `,i�dt0l• ,./ N./ Lw-!2 TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL LIST OF REFERENCES ASPHALT MAINTENANCE REFERENCES The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers for three (3) public agencies for which BIDDER has performed similar work within the past two (2) years: 1. 2. CITY OF LA HABRA P.O. BOX 337, LA HABRA, CA. 90633 -0337 Name and Address of Owner SID AFHRAFNIA (562) 905 -9720 Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project 3,558,120.07 REMOVE /REPLACE A/C SEWER,CONCRETE,A /C PAVE 5/03 Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed CITY OF CHINO HILLS 2001 GRAND AVE., CHINO HILLS, CA. 91709 -4869 Name and Address of Owner ANNE R. DUTREY (909) 364 -2856 Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project 946 646.11 CHIPSEAL, A/C PAVE 9/02 Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 3. CITY OF WHITTIER 13230 EAST PENN ST., WHITTIER, CA. Name and Address of Owner JOE DYER (562) 698 -2551 Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project SCOTT AVE. RESURFACING, CONCRETE Contract Amount Type of Work 21 9/00 Date Completed ACOM ITEM PQ 0 PAM-1.14 0Fy -!�.._.Y CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of ORANGE ss. On FEB. 23, 2004 before me, YOLANDA LUJAN – NOTARY PUBLIC Date Name and Title of Officer (e.g., "Jane Doe, Notary Public ") personally appeared DENNIS W. COPP – PRESIDENT OF COPP CONTRACTING,, Name(s) of Signer(s) r • >•94-0 0044449499944 4• >4994499449449 ?494•>'i• >A ., YOLANDA LUJAN COMM # 1362229 m _c, <- NOTARY PIJ3LIC - CALIFORNIA W Q ORANGE COUNTY My Commission Expires June 25, 2006 ; 0444• >44•'• - >• %• " > ?44? r +00• >• > ?4:•OOriOd -0444499444949 X7 personally known to me ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same in his /her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his /her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS y nd an ffi ial se/. Signature of Not Publi OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: BIDDEVS BOND – CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE Document Date: FEB. 23, 2004 Number of Pages: 1 Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: DENNIS W. COPP ❑ Individual Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney -in -Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: PRESIDENT Signer Is Representing: COPP CONTRACTING, INC. RIGHT THUMBPRINT OF SIGNER ®1999 National Notary Association - 9350 De Soto Ave., P.O. Box 2402 - Chatsworth, CA 91313 -2402 - — .nationalnotary.org Prod. No. 5907 Reorder: Call Toll -Free 1-800- 876 -6827 ITEM No. 1.n/ ..001" A^ BID BOND Bond No. Bid Bond The American Institute of Architects, AIA Document No. A310 (February, 1970 Edition) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we Copp Contracting, Inc. as Principal hereinafter called the Principal, and Contractors Bonding and Insurance Company a corporation duly organized under the laws of the state of Washington as Surety, hereinafter called the Surety, are held and firmly bound unto City of Lake Elsinore as Obligee, hereinafter called the Obligee, in the sum of Ten percent of the total amount of the bid Dollars ($10% ), for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, the said Principal and the said Surety, bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, the Principal has submitted a bid for Asphalt Maintennce NOW, THEREFORE, if the Obligee shall accept the bid of the Principal and the Principal shall enter into a Contract with the Obligee in accordance with the terms of such bid, and give such bond or bonds as may be specified in the bidding or Contract Documents with good and sufficient surety for the faithful performance of such Contract and for the prompt payment of labor and material furnished in the prosecution thereof, or in the event of the failure of the Principal to enter such Contract and give such bond or bonds, if the Principal shall pay to the Obligee the difference not to exceed the penalty hereof between the amount specified in said bid and such larger amount for which the Obligee may in good faith contract with another party to perform the Work covered by said bid, then this obligation shall be null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. Signed and sealed this ORSC 21328 (5/97) Witness Witness 11th day of February 2004 Copp Contracting, Inc. P ipal (Seal) By. PRESIDENT DENNIS W. PP Name/Title Contractors Bonding and Insurance Company Sure (Seal) By. - Linda D. Coats Attorney -in -Fact Lo IOFJII- CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California ss. County of ORANGE On FEB 1 1 2004 before me, CHRISTINE M. RAPP, NOTARY PUBLIC Date Name and Title of Officer (e.g., "Jane Doe, Notary Public ") personally appeared LINDA D. COATS Name(s) of Signer(s) personally known to me ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are CHRISTINE M. RAPPI subscribed to the within instrument and COMM, #1267189 )" acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed �- NOTARY PttC'cstxu► the same in his /her /their authorized rOWM.:F-xp: MY 91.MIN capacity(ies), and that by his /her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WI S my h nd and official s. Place Notary Seal Above Signature of Notary blic OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: Number of Pages: t RIGHT THUMBPRINT OF SIGNER of thumb here 0 1999 National Notary Association - 9350 De Soto Ave., P.O. Box 2402 - Chatsworth, CA 91313 -2402 - www.nationalnotary.org Prod. No. 5907 Reorder: Call Toll -Free 1- 800 - 876 -6827 Contractors Reference Check Contractor Copp Contracting, Inc. Project Asphalt Maintenance Reference City of La Habra Name of Reference Contact Interviewed Sid Afhrafnia / Ed Phone Number of Reference Interviewed 562- 905 -9720 Date of Interview 3/2/04 Reference Interview Question and Answers: What was the scope of work performed by the contractor? Asphalt maintenance Remove /replace asphalt /concrete sewer, concrete, asphalt /concrete pave What was the total project cost? $3,558,120.07 Was contractor able to perform the contracted services in a timely fashion? Yes Were there any change orders? Did you have any issues relating to these change orders? No How well did the contractor interface and communicate with your staff? Pretty Good. Very responsive On a scale of I to 10 how would you rate the contactors overall performance with 10 being excellent? 8 U is � AOUM tTlWt `A1,0�. f t t y OF--W- 10�1 Contractors Reference Check '00�' Contractor Copp Contracting, Inc. Project Asphalt Maintenance Reference City of Chino Hills Name of Reference Contact Interviewed Anne Dutrey Phone Number of Reference Interviewed 909 - 364 -2856 Date of Interview 3/2/04 Reference Interview Question and Answers: What was the scope of work performed by the contractor? Asphalt maintenance Chipseal, asphalt /concrete pave What was the total project cost? $946,646.11 Was contractor able to perform the contracted services in a timely fashion? Yes Were there any change orders? Did you have any issues relating to these change orders? No How well did the contractor interface and communicate with your staff? Very effectively On a scale of 1 to 10 how would you rate the contactors overall performance with 10 being excellent? 9 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: RICHARD J. WATENPAUGH, CITY MANAGER DATE: MARCH 9, 2004 SUBJECT: CONTRACT FOR CURB, GUTTER, & SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE BACKGROUND On January 12, 2004 the City issued a notice inviting sealed bids for curb, gutter, and sidewalk maintenance services. The bid opening was held at City Hall on Wednesday, February 25, 2004, at 2:00 p.m. The scope of work consists of furnishing all materials, equipment, tools, and labor required to provide curb, gutter, and sidewalk maintenance services to the City Public Works Maintenance Division. Work will be assigned on a job order basis as needed. The term of the agreement will be for one (1) year and may be renewable in one year increments up to three years by the City Manager. CiTMMARV The bid package consisted of two parts. Part I, a sample work order, was used to determine the lowest bidder. Part H of the bid schedule allowed for unit bid prices on several items. The unit prices were used to calculate the sample work order in Part I of the bid schedule. The unit prices in Part H of the bid schedule will be the unit prices used throughout the term of the contract for all work to be completed. Three contractors submitted a bid for the work. The bids are as follows: Contractor Location Bid Amount NPG Perris $ 6,750 International Pavement Solutions San Bernardino $ 7,152 Hardy and Harper Santa Ana $ 9,256 Af 'NDA ITEM NO. PACIL:j Of:, FISCAL IMPACT The budget for the project is dependant upon the City Council approved budget. The City does not -.or guarantee any work or a specific dollar amount to the contractor. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Mayor and City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a maintenance contract agreement with NPG Corporation for curb, gutter, and sidewalk maintenance services consistent with the above referenced terms and approved by the City Attorney. U:1 017,9 n117:��� William L. Payne, Public Words Manager APPROVED BY: G,/. Dave Sapp, Director APPROVED FOR AGENDA LISTING: Services -', PAM of of SPECIFICATIONS FOR 2004 CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 (909) 674 -5170 1 M" 1TIM W0._ PAGE O TABLE OF CONTENTS NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS .. .... .... .... .... SCOPE OF WORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS . .... .... .... .... .... PROPOSAL . .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... BID SCHEDULE .... .... .... .... .... .... .... SIGNATURE PAGE ... .... .... .... .... .... .... NON - COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT .... .... .... .... .... DESIGNATION OF SUB - CONTRACTORS .. .... .... .... DECLARATION REGARDING LICENSE STATUS ... .... .... LIST OF REFERENCES . .... .... .... .... .... .... CONTRACT AGREEMENT . .... .... .... .... .... .... CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATE - Workman's Compensation SPECIFICATIONS - Wage Rates and Labor Code RequirE Standard Specifications .... .... Special Provisions .... .... .... STANDARD DRAWINGS .. .... .... .... .... .... .... 2 !meh t s 3 ..✓ 5 ... 6 ....11 .... 12 .... 17 .... 19 ....20 ....21 ....22 ....23 .... 25 .... 26 ....27 ....28 .... 30 A ffEIA N0. t NOTICE INVITING BIDS PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that sealed bids will be received by the City of Lake Elsinore for the maintenance, repair, and construction of certain improvements in the City of Lake Elsinore, California referred to as: CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE The work to be done consists of furnishing all materials, equipment, tools, labor and incidentals as required by the Specifications and Contract Documents for the above stated project. The general items of work to be done hereunder consist of maintenance, repair, and construction of curb, gutter, and sidewalk within the city limits of the City of Lake Elsinore. Bids will be publicly opened, examined and declared in the City Hall Conference Room, 130 South Main Street, Lake Elsinore, California at the hour of 2:00 p.m. on February 25, 2004. Each bid shall be made on the proposal form furnished in the Specifications and enclosed in an envelope supplied by the bidder, bearing the title of the work and the name and address of the bidder. It is the sole responsibility of the bidder to ensure that his bid is received in proper time in the City Clerk's office at the address and time hereinabove set forth. Any bid received after the scheduled closing time for receipt of bids shall be returned to the bidder unopened. The work is to be done in accordance with the Plans and Specifications on file in the office of the Clerk of the City and said Plans and Specifications may be examined at the City of Lake Elsinore City Hall, 130 S. Main Street, Lake Elsinore, California. Each bidder must be licensed in the State of California and qualified to perform the work described in the Plans, Specifications and Contract documents. The bidder shall have a Class A Contractors license or a C -8 license. Bidders are hereby notified that, pursuant to the provisions of the California Labor Code, Section 1773, the City Council has determined the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general prevailing rate for legal holiday and overtime work in the locality in which this work is to be performed for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute the Contract. Said determination is on file with the City Clerk, and is available to any interested party upon request, and by this reference is hereby made as part of this Notice Inviting Bids. 3 ACMA PACM of Plans, Specifications, and all Contract documents may be obtained at the Lake Elsinore City Hall located at 130 S. Main Street. N"./ The selected bidder must furnish a Certificate of Insurance evidencing all insurance coverage as required by the Specifications. Payments to the Contractor will be made by said City in accordance with the provisions of the Specifications, submitted in accordance therewith. All bids must be made in accordance with and as directed in the Specifications, and all bidders shall comply with State, Federal and local laws applicable thereto. The City Council reserves the right to reject any or all bids, to waive any irregularities in a bid and to award the Contract as may best serve the interests of the City. All proposals are binding for a period of (30) days after they are opened and may be retained by the City for examination and comparison. For technical information relating to the details of the proposed project and /or bidding requirements, please contact Bill Payne in the Public Works Department of the City of Lake Elsinore. By Order of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California. Date: F Vicki Lynne Kasad' City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore Scope of Work The general item of work to be done consist of the maintenance, repair, and construction of curb, gutter, and sidewalk located within the city limits of Lake Elsinore. The amount of work to be done will be determined by the annual budget approved by the Lake Elsinore City Council for curb, gutter, and sidewalk work. Work will be assigned on a job order basis as needed. The term of the agreement will be for a one year period and may be renewable in one year increments by mutual agreement. ITEM NO. [ " INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS BIDDERS KNOWLEDGE Bidders must satisfy themselves by personal examination of the work site, Plans, Specifications, and other Contract documents, and by any other means as they may believe necessary, as to the actual physical conditions, requirements and difficulties under which the work must be performed. No bidder shall, at any time after submission of a proposal, make any claim or assertion that there was any misunderstanding or lack of information regarding the nature or amount of work necessary for the ,satisfactory completion of the job. Any errors, omissions, or discrepancies found in the Plans, Specifications, or other Contract documents shall be called to the attention of the Engineer and clarified prior to the submission of proposals. If any person contemplating submitting a bid for the proposed Contract is in doubt as to the true meaning of any part of the Plans, Specifications, or other Contract documents, he or she may submit to the Engineer a written request for the interpretation thereof, and the person submitting the request will be responsible for its prompt delivery. Any interpretation of the Contract documents will be made only by addendum duly issued and a copy of such addendum will be mailed or delivered to each person receiving a set of such documents. BIDDERS QUALIFICATIONS Bidders must be capable of performing the work bid upon. They may N,001 be required to supply a detailed statement covering experience on similar work, list of machinery, plants and other equipment which will be used on the proposed work, and such statements of their financial resources as may be deemed necessary. No proposal will be accepted from a bidder who has not been licensed in accordance with the provisions of the State Business and Professions Code. PROPOSAL FORMS Bids shall be submitted in writing on the proposal forms provided by the Agency. All information requested therein must be clearly and legibly set forth in the manner and form indicated. The Agency will not consider any proposal not meeting these requirements. For all work bid on a unit price basis, the Engineer's estimate of quantities shown on the proposal form are understood to be approximate and will be used only for the purpose of comparing bids. For work bid on a lump sum price basis, any estimate of quantities provided is furnished for the convenience of bidders is 6 not guaranteed. When unit prices are indicated on the proposal form, the bidder shall indicate the unit price at which he or she proposes to perform each item of work, written legibly, to ensure consideration. The unit price shall be stated in figures. For items where unit prices are required, the extended amount of each item shall be computed from the unity price bid on the proposal and quantity given in the estimate. In case of errors in computing the extended amount, the unit price will be assumed correct. Failure by the bidder to list unit prices shall be justification for rejection of the bid. Where lump sum is indicated on the proposal, the bidder shall indicate, under the column of extended amount, the lump sum price at which he or she proposes to perform the work described for that item. SUBMISSION OF BIDS The envelope enclosing the proposal shall be sealed and addressed to the City Clerk, City of Lake Elsinore, 130 South Main Street, Lake Elsinore, California 92530. The envelope shall be plainly marked in the upper left -hand corner with the name and address of the bidder and bear the words, "PROPOSAL FOR ", followed by the name of the project being bid and the date and hour of bid opening. The certified check, cashier's check or bid bond shall be enclosed in the same envelope with the proposal. Proposals may be mailed or delivered by messenger; however, it is the bidder's responsibility alone to ensure delivery of the proposal to the Agency's designated official prior to the time stipulated for bid opening in the Notice Inviting Bids. Late proposals will not be considered. IRREGULAR BIDS Unauthorized conditions, limitations or provisions attached to a bid will render it irregular and may be cause for its rejection. The completed proposal form shall be without interlineations, alterations, or erasures. Alternate bids will not be considered unless specifically requested. No oral, telegraphic, or telephonic proposal, modifications, or withdrawals will be considered. Proposals may be rejected by the Agency for the following reasons: (a) If the proposal form furnished is not used or is altered. (b) If there are unauthorized additions, conditional or alternate bids or irregularities of any kind. (c) If the bidder adds any provisions reserving the right to accept or reject an award, or reserving the right to execute or not execute a contract pursuant to an award. (d) If the proposal is not properly signed by the bidder, whose 7 ►. , Ir • • address, telephone number, and California Contractors License number is shown. Sri►' TAXES No mention shall be made in the proposal of sales tax, use tax, or any other tax as all amounts bid will be deemed and held to include any such taxes which may be applicable. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES All proposals must be submitted, filed, made and executed in accordance with State and Federal laws relating to bids for contracts of this nature whether the same are expressly referred to herein or not. Any bidder submitting a proposal shall by such action thereby agree to each and all of the terms,, conditions, provisions and requirements set forth, contemplated, and referred to in the Plans, Specifications, and other Contract documents, and shall agree to full compliance therewith. CITY BUSINESS LICENSE The successful bidder and all subcontractors shall obtain and maintain, throughout the term of the Contract, a current City of Lake Elsinore business license. WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSALS A proposal may be withdrawn by a written request signed by the bidder. Such requests shall be delivered to the City's designated official prior to the bid opening hour stipulated in the Notice Inviting Bids. The withdrawal of a proposal will not prejudice the right of the bidder to submit a new proposal, providing there is time to do so prior to bid opening. Proposals may not be withdrawn after bid opening without forfeiture of the proposal guarantee. DISQUALIFICATION OF BIDDERS A bidder shall be considered disqualified for any of the following reasons: (a) Submitting more than one proposal from the same partnership, firm, or corporation under the same or different name. (b) Evidence of collusion among bidders. Bidders participating in such collusion shall be disqualified as bidders for any future work of the Agency until any such participating bidder has been reinstalled by the Agency as a qualified bidder. (c) Proposals in which any of the unit prices and /or lump sum prices obviously are unbalanced. A person, firm, or corporation may submit a sub - proposal to more than one bidder, or may submit sub - proposals in addition to submitting a proposal as bidder, without being disqualified. 8 r a '• i RELIEF OF BIDDER If the bidder claims a mistake was made in his proposal, the bidder shall give the Agency written notice within five (5) days after the date for submittal of proposals of the alleged mistake, specifying in the notice in detail how the mistake occurred. Relief will be granted only for clerical errors and at Agency's discretion. AWARD OF CONTRACT The Award of Contract, if made, will be to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder whose proposal complies with the requirements of the Contract documents. Within thirty (30) days after the bid submittal date, the Agency will act either to accept a bid proposal or to reject all proposals. The acceptance of a bid proposal will be evidenced by a Notice of Award of Contract in writing, delivered to the bidder whose proposal is accepted. No other act of the Agency shall necessarily constitute acceptance of a bid proposal. Agency reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive any irregularity, and to take the bids under advisement for a period of 30 days, all as may be required to provide for the best interests of the Agency. The bidder may be required to submit, prior to award of the Contract, a financial statement and list of previous work of a similar nature. In no event will an award be made until all necessary investigations are made as to the responsibility and qualifications of the bidder to whom the award is contemplated. EXECUTION OF CONTRACT The bidder to whom award is made shall execute a written Contract with the Agency and furnish good Certificates of Insurance specified by the Agency within ten (10) calendar days after notification of award, unless an extension of time is granted to the bidder in writing. The Contract shall be made in the form adopted by the Agency, which includes the provision that no claim or suit whatsoever shall be made or brought by the Contractor against any officer, agent, or employee of the Agency for or on account of anything done or omitted to be done in connection with this Contract, nor shall any officer, agent or employee be liable hereunder. A corporation to which an award is made shall furnish a certified copy of the by -laws or resolution of the Board of Directors of the corporation showing the names of those individuals duly authorized to sign the Contract and bonds for the Corporation. Failure of the bidder to whom the award is made to execute a Contract and file insurance certificates, within the time specified may be just cause for annulment of the award and the forfeiture of the proposal guarantee. 9 l�GEHDA ITEM NO. No Contract shall be binding upon the Agency until the same has been approved by the Board, been satisfactorily executed by the Contractor, and executed by the Agency. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Before commencing any work under the Contract, the successful bidder must file with the Public Works Manager certificates indicating proof that insurance policies, as required in the Agreement, have been obtained. Such policies include Worker's Compensation, Automobile Public Liability, and Public Liability. In the event that such policies should become inoperative at any time before the completion of the work, all work shall cease immediately until new policies are obtained, and any time so lost shall not entitle Contractor to any extension of time. WORKER'S COMPENSATION CERTIFICATE A "Contractor's Certificate Regarding Worker's Compensation Insurance" in accordance with the provisions of Section 1860, 1861, and 3700 of the Labor Code, is included as a part of the Contract documents. The Contractor shall complete this certificate before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY The bidder agrees to abide by the requirements under Executive Order No. 11246, as amended, including specifically the provisions of the Equal Opportunity Clause. � 10 PA(M-1 I OFF= TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE PROPOSAL Name of Bidder Address of Bidder To: City of Lake Elsinore, California The undersigned bidder, in accordance with the City's Notice Inviting Bids, hereby proposes to furnish all materials, equipment, tools, labor, and incidentals required for the above - stated project as set forth in the Plans, Specifications, and Contract documents therefore to perform all work in the manner and time prescribed therein. The attached Bid Schedule is hereby made a part of this proposal. The undersigned bidder declares that this proposal is based upon careful examination of the work site, Plans, Specifications, Instructions to Bidders, and all other Contract documents. If this proposal is accepted for award, bidder agrees to enter into a Contract with the City at the unit and /or lump sum prices set forth in the following bid schedule. Bidder understands that failure to enter into a Contract and furnish bonds in the manner and time prescribed will result in forfeiture to the City of the guarantee accompanying this proposal. The undersigned bidder certifies that this proposal is made in good faith, without collusion or connection with any other person or persons bidding on the work. The undersigned bidder understands that the City Council reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals or to waive formality or technicality in any proposal in the interest of the Agency. 11 EXPLANATION OF BID SCHEDULE The following Bid Schedule is in two parts. Part I is a sample work order. Part I will be the document used to determine the lowest bidder. Part II of the Bid Schedule, are unit prices to be bid by each bidder. These unit prices will be the unit prices used throughout the term of the contract for all work to be completed. These unit prices are to be used when calculating the sample work order in Part I of the Bid Schedule. 12 .,r. • a ,'N/ ,*.. TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL 13 6 ly-e . ' . . BID SCHEDULE PART I Sample Work Order Item Description Amount 1. Remove and dispense 720 sq.ft. of existing sidewalk $ 2. Remove and dispense of 144 ln.ft. of existing curb and gutter $ 3. Install Sidewalk 720 sq. ft. 4" thick $ 4. Install Curb and Gutter 144 ln. ft. $ 5. Setup Mobilization Charge for one job $ Total sum of items one through five in words: Total sum of items one through five in numbers: NOTE: All work to be done in accordance with City of Lake Elsinore Ordinances, Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, and City Engineer direction. All work is subject to inspection by City Inspector. Any Contractor doing work in the City must have a City business license. Bid prices for sample work orders are to be calculated using unit prices bid in Part II of the bid schedule. 13 6 ly-e . ' . . TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL BID SCHEDULE PART II ITEMS TO BE BID FOR CONCRETE SIDEWALK, CURB, AND GUTTER Setup Mobilization Charge for each job $ lump sum Install Sidewalk - 4" thick 1 - 80 sq.ft. $ per sq.ft. 81 - 160 sq.ft. $ per sq.ft. 161 - 240 sq.ft. $ per sq.ft. 241 - 320 sq.ft. $ per sq.ft. 321 - 400 sq.ft. $ per sq.ft. 401 - 480 sq.ft. $ per sq.ft. 481 - 560 sq.ft. $ per sq.ft. 561 - 640 sq.ft. $ per sq.ft. 641 - 720 sq.ft. $ per sq.ft. 721 + sq.ft. $ per sq.ft. Install Curb and Gutter 1 - 16 ln.ft. $ per ln.ft. 17 - 32 ln.ft. $ per ln.ft. 33 - 48 ln.ft. $ per ln.ft. 49 - 64 ln.ft. $ per ln.ft. 65 - 80 ln.ft. $ per ln.ft. 81 - 96 ln.ft. $ per ln.ft. 97 - 112 ln.ft. $ per ln.ft. 113 - 128 ln.ft. $ per ln.ft. 1011 �-� 129 145 Remove - 144 ln.ft. + ln.ft. and Disposal of $ $ existing 4" thick per ln.ft. per ln.ft. Sidewalk 1 - 80 sq.ft. $ per sq.ft. 81 - 160 sq.ft. $ per sq.ft. 161 - 240 sq.ft. $ per sq.ft. 241 - 320 sq.ft. $ per sq.ft. 321 - 400 sq.ft. $ per sq.ft. 401 - 480 sq.ft. $ per sq.ft. 481 - 560 sq.ft. $ per sq.ft. 561 - 640 sq.ft. $ per sq.ft. 641 - 720 sq.ft. $ per sq.ft. 721 + sq.ft. $ per sq.ft. Remove and Disposal of existing Curb and Gutter 1 - 16 ln.ft. $ per ln.ft. 17 - 32 ln.ft. $ per ln.ft. 33 - 48 ln.ft. $ per ln.ft. 49 - 64 ln.ft. $ per ln.ft. 65 - 80 ln.ft. $ per ln.ft. 81 - 96 ln.ft. $ per ln.ft. 97 - 112 ln.ft. $ per ln.ft. 113 - 128 ln.ft. $ per ln.ft. 129 - 144 ln.ft. $ per ln.ft. 145 + ln.ft. $ per ln.ft 15 r y. 1 • TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL The Undersigned has checked carefully all of the above figures and understands that the City will not be responsible for any error or omissions on the part of the Undersigned in making up this bid. The Undersigned bidder declares, under penalty of perjury, that they are licensed to do business or act in the capacity of a contractor within the State of California and that they are validly licensed as follows: License Number: Classification: Expiration Date: This statement is true and correct and has the legal effect of an affidavit. 16 r,i�tb �. � ► /'- TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL SIGNATURE PAGE IF A SOLE OWNER OR SOLE CONTRACTOR, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted 2. Signature (Given and surname) of proprietor 3. Place of Business (Street and Number) City and State Zip Code 4. Telephone Number IF A PARTNERSHIP, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted 2. Name of each member of Partnership (indicate character of each partner, either general or special [limited]) 3. Signature (Given and surname and character of partner. Note: Signature must be made by a general partner) V 5. Place of Business City and State Telephone Number 17 (Street and Number) Zip Code AGORA ITEM 140. 0 PACE � OF C1 rp TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL IF A CORPORATION, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted 2. Name of each officer of corporation (indicate office) 3. Signature (Given and surname and title of officer authorized to sign for the Corporation) (Impress Corporate Seal here) 4. Incorporated under the laws of the State of 5. Place of Business (Street and Number) City and State Zip Code 6. Telephone Number im AMMA ITEM NO. l o p A 0 OF v{ _ � TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CA NON - COLLUSION DECLARATION (Public Contract Code Section 7106) I, do hereby declare that I am (Name) the of , (Title) (Contractor) the party making the foregoing bid for the construction referred to as: CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE and that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, and undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any bidder or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the bidder has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the bidder or any other bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other bidder, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the Contract of anyone interested in the proposed Contract; that all statements contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the bidder has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid. I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. DATE PLACE SIGNATURE NAME 19 AANDA ITEM wv. C) PACE TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGNATION OF SUBCONTRACTORS The undersigned certifies that he or she has used the sub -bids of the following listed subcontractors in making up his bid for the construction referred to as: CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE and that the subcontractors listed will be used for work for which they bid, subject to the approval of the Engineer, and in accordance with the applicable provision of the Specifications. Bid Item Number Subcontractor Address /Telephone Name of Contractor Signature of Bidder Name Title 20 ,� TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DECLARATION REGARDING LICENSE STATUS I do hereby declare that our /my Contractor's license is and expires on I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this day of FIB 21 California. Signature Printed Name Title Signing on behalf of (if applicable) 20 A4�DA ITEf�A IiO.�� PACE— OF %0, TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL LIST OF REFERENCES r./ CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE REFERENCES The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers for three (3) public agencies for which BIDDER has performed similar work within the past two(2) years: 1. 2. 3. Name and Address of Owner Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed Name and Address of Owner 11.10, Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed Name and Address of Owner Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 22 AGENDA REM NO. O PACE OF CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONTRACT AGREEMENT This Contract Agreement is made and entered into this day of 2003 by and between Lake Elsinore and for the construction referred to as: CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE the City of as Contractor WITNESSETH that the City of Lake Elsinore and the Contractor have mutually agreed as follows: ARTICLE I The Contract documents for the aforesaid project shall consist of the Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, General Specifications, Plans, Special Provisions and all referenced specifications, details, standard drawings, and appendices, together with this Contract Agreement and all required bonds, insurance certificates, permits, notices, and affidavits, and also including any and all addenda or supplemental agreements clarifying, amending or extending the work contemplated as may be required to ensure its completion in an acceptable manner. All of the provisions of said Contract documents are made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein. ARTICLE II For and in consideration of the payments and agreements to be made and performed by the City of Lake Elsinore, Contractor agrees to furnish all materials and perform all work required for the above stated project, and to fulfill all other obligations as set forth in the aforesaid Contract documents. ARTICLE III Contractor agrees to receive and accept the prices set forth in the proposal as full compensation for furnishing all materials, performing all work, and fulfilling all obligations hereunder. Said compensation shall cover all expenses, losses, damages, and consequences arising out of the nature of the work during its progress or prior to its acceptance including those for well and faithfully completing the work and the whole thereof in the manner and time specified in the aforesaid Contract documents and also including those arising from actions of the elements, unforeseen difficulties or obstructions encountered in the prosecution of the work, suspension or discontinuance of the work, and all other unknowns or risks of any description connected with the work. 23 • ARTICLE IV The City of Lake Elsinore hereby promises and agrees to employ, and does hereby employ, Contractor to provide the materials, do `10e the work, and fulfill the obligations according to the terms and conditions herein contained and referred to, for the prices aforesaid, and hereby contracts to pay the same at the time, in the manner, and upon the conditions set forth in the Contract documents. ARTICLE V Contractor acknowledges the provisions of the State Labor Code requiring every employer to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self- insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code and certifies compliance with such provisions. ARTICLE VI Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City of Lake Elsinore or its officers and agents from any claims, demands, or causes of action including related expenses attorney's fees, and costs based on, arising out of, or in any way related to the work undertaken by Contractor hereunder. ARTICLE VII Contractor affirms that the signatures, titles, and seals set forth herein after the execution of this Contract Agreement represent all individuals, firm members, partners, joint ventures, and /or corporate officers having a principal interest herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto for themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns do hereby agree to the full performance of the covenants herein contained and have caused this Contract Agreement to be executed in triplicate by setting hereunto their names, titles, hands, and seals this day of , 2002. Contractor: By: Title Subscribed and sworn to this day of 2002. NOTARY PUBLIC City of Lake Elsinore, By: Mayor Attested City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, Date 24 CA Lic.# i • • i CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATE REGARDING WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE Section 3700 of the Labor Code provides in part as follows: "Every employer except the State shall secure the payment of compensation in one or more of the following ways: A) By being insured against liability to pay compensation B) By securing from the Director of Industrial Relations a certificate of consent to self - insure, which may be given upon furnishing proof satisfactory to the Director of Industrial Relations of ability to self - insure and to pay any compensation that may become due to his employees..." The undersigned is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self - insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract. SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME TITLE COMPANY ADDRESS DATE (In accordance with Article 5, commencing at Section 1860, Chapter 1, Part 7, Division 2 of the Labor Code, the above Certificate must be signed by the Contractor and filed with the awarding body prior to the Contractor performing any work under this Contract.) 25 SPECIFICATIONS - Wage Rates and Labor Code Requirements WAGE RATES - By Resolution No. 82 -194 the City Council 1./ adopted the general prevailing rate of per diem wages as determined and published by the State Director of the Department of Industrial Relations, pursuant to Sections 1770, 1773 and 1773.2 of the California Labor Code. Copies of these rates and the latest revisions thereto are on file in the office of the City Clerk and are available for review upon request. Attention is directed to the provisions of Sections 1774, 1775, 1776, 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the State Labor Code. Sections 1774 and 1775 regarding prevailing wage rates the execution of the Contract and specify COMPLIANCE - The above Labor Code Sections will be a part of the Contract documents. It shall be the responsibility of the prime Contractor to comply with all such sections. CLAYTON ACT AND CARTWRIGHT ACT - To the extent applicable here, Section 4551 of the State Government Code specified that in executing a public works Contract with the City to supply goods, services or materials, the Contractor or Subcontractor offers and agrees to assign to the Agency all rights, title and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C., Sec. 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2 commencing with Sec. 16700) of Part 2 Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code, arising from purchase of goods, services or materials pursuant to the Contract or Subcontract. S4.00 This assignment shall become effective when the City tenders final payment to the Contractor without further acknowledgment by the parties. COPELAND "ANTI -KICK BACK" ACT - All contracts for construction or repair shall include a provision for compliance with the Copeland "Anti -Kick Back" Act (18 U.S.C. 874) as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR, Part 3). This Act provides that each Contractor shall be prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person employed in the construction, completion, or repair of public work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he or she is otherwise entitled. The participant shall report all suspected or reported violation to the State. CLEAN AIR ACT OF 1970 & FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION - Control Act Contracts of amounts in excess of $100,000 shall contain a provision which requires the recipient to agree to comply with all applicable standards, order, or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act of 1970 and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended. Violations shall be reported to the Service and Regional Office of the Environmental Protection Agency. 26 AGO" ITEM No. ' V _ I#-- SPECIFICATIONS - Standard Specifications The Standard Specifications of the City of Lake Elsinore are contained in the 1997 Edition of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements, as written and promulgated by the joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the Associated General Contractors of California. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher at the following address: BUILDING NEWS, INCORPORATED, 3055 3055 Overland Avenue Los Angeles, California 90034 Phone: (213) 202 -7775 or may be ordered by mail from: BNI PUBLICATIONS P.O. Box 3031 Terminal Annex Los Angeles, CA 90051 The Standard Specifications set forth above will control the General Provisions, Construction Materials and Construction Methods for this Contract except as amended by the plans, special provisions, technical specifications or other Contract documents. 27 AMMDA �E � ITEM NO. PAM SPECIFICATIONS - Special Provisions The following special provisions are supplementary and in addition `'r to the provisions of the Standard Specifications. Prior to issuing the Notice to Proceed, the Public Services Manager will schedule a pre - construction meeting with the Contractor to review the proposed work schedule and delivery dates, arrange utility coordination, discuss construction methods, and clarify inspection procedures. The Contractor shall notify the Public Works Manager forty -eight (48) hours in advance of the time and date that each phase of work will begin on this project. The Contractor shall also give forth -eight (48) hours advance notice when he or she will require the services of or assistance from the City to lay out any portion of the work. The Contractor shall begin work within five (5) working days after the date a Notice to Proceed or work order is issued to the Contractor for a particular job. The Contractor shall complete each job assigned within five (5) working days. Special note is to be taken that at no time shall the period of time that local or through traffic is prevented from using any street exceed twenty -four (24) hours. Contractor's failure to comply with the specified time limits may be cause for termination of the Contract by the City. The Contractor's activities shall be confined to the hours between 6:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. Deviation from these hours will not be permitted without prior consent of the Public Works Manager, except in the case of an emergency. The liability insurance coverage values are hereby amended to be: Insurance Coverage Requirements Limit Requirements Comprehensive General Liability $ 1,000,000 Comprehensive Automobile Liability $ 1,000,000 Contractual Liability $ 1,000,000 The Contractor and all subcontractors shall obtain and pay the cost of a City business license. The Contractor shall notify the occupants of all affected properties at least seventy -two (72) hours prior to any temporary obstruction of access. The method of notification shall be NM -./ ,.-�. approved by the Public Works Manager prior to use by the Contractor. Vehicular access to property line shall be maintained except when construction operations preclude such access for a reasonable period of time. No over -night closure of any driveway will be allowed except as permitted by the Public Works Manager. Contractor shall contact trash service provider to ensure that no street is scheduled for work on a day tract is scheduled for trash service. Contractor shall contact the Lake Elsinore School District to insure that access is provided for bus and auto traffic for all schools impacted by the project. Contractor must coordinate work with the postal service to insure that mail can be delivered in the project area. The City wishes to retain the contractor to provide maintenance, repair, and construction of curb, gutter, and sidewalk for a one year period, renewable annually up to a total of three years, commencing the date of the signed contract, to provide said work on an as needed basis and as the budget allows. It is understood that work will be performed at the unit prices set forth in this contract. 29 AGUM Md NO-__L Q_ STANDARD DRAWINGS 30 AMIDD A rfOA No. _OF.. CF MIN. 3' -, { R =600' MIN, 1000' MAX. 14'TO 29 7 SIDEWALK EASEMENT R =600' VARIES 1 80' TO 220' R =1000' VARIES 240' TO 280' LANDSCAPING NOT COUN -Y MAINTAINED TO BE MAINTAINED BY OTHER:I (ONLY SIDEWALK MAINTAINED BY THE BOUNTY) 6 TO FL -CF RW 11' TO 12' -J PARKWAY TI, NOTES: 1. RADII FOR CURVED SIDEWALK SHALL BE BETWEEN 600' AND 1000'. 2. ALL RADII SHALL BE STAGGERED. 3. EASEMENT REQUIRED FOR SIDEWALK THAT EX--'ENDS BEYOND RIGHT OF WAY LINE. 4. SIDEWALK SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 6' IN WIDTH ADJAM T TO CURB 5. SIDEWALK SHALL BE T AWAY FROM CURB FACE EXCEPT AT CURB RETURNS AND BUS STOPS. 6. SIDEWALK LAYOUT ON PLANS IS CONCEPTUAL ONLY. APPROVAL OF THE FINAL SIDEWALK LAYOUT SHALL BE MADE IN THE FIELD AND ADJUSTED A' ' NECESSARY TO MEET FIELD CONDITIONS AS APPROVED BY THE INSPECTOR PRIOR T,) FINAL CONSTRUCTION. APPROVED BY: DATE: 12/15/97 DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION DAVID E. BARNHART, RCE 19776 REVISIONS REV. BY: APRI) RATE REV. BY; ,t-R'D DAME _ �. 4 - COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE MEANDERING SIDEWALK STANDARD NO. 404 12 -97 AM DA A rrE 14t � PACE 33 OI~ CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1. IF DISTANCE FROM CURB TO BACK OF SIDEWALK IS TOO � PF TESCErnE SLOPE O HE FLARED SIDE SHALL NOT EEXF b 8.33 %. ONLY 6" CURBS WITH 36 RADII MEET F_EQUIREh TENTS FOR 1(r SIDE SLOPES. ALL OTHER CURBS REQUIRE 8.3 % SIDE SLOPES. 2. IF SIDEWALK IS LESS THAN V WOE, THE FULL V /IDTH OF THE SIDEWALK SHALL BE DEPRESSED AS SHOWN IV CASE B. 3. THE RAMP SHALL HAVE A 12" WIDE BORDER WF fH GROOVES 114" WIDE AND 114" DEEP APPROXIMATELY 3/4" ON CENTER_ SEE GROOVING DETAIL. 4. TRANSITIONS FROM RAMPS TO WALK:, GUTTEI tS, OR STREETS SHALL BE FLUSH AND FREE OF ABRUFT CHANC ES. 5. BE GROOVEDI IN A HERRING O E PAT TERN WI i N GRON6VES 11//4' i WIDE AND 114" DEEP APPROXIMATELY 1 -1/2" ON CENTER. SEE GROOVING DETAIL. GROOVES SI-ALL BE A _IGNED PARALLEL TO CROSSWALK LINES TO DIRECT VISUALLY IM 'AIRED PEDESTRIANS INTO THE CROSSWALK I 6_ RAMP SIDE SLOPE VARIES UNIFORMLY FROM A MAXIMUM OF UP TO 10% AT CURB TO CONFORM WITH LONGITUC INAL SIDEWALK j SLOPE ADJACENT TO TOP OF THE RANIP (EXCE )T IN CASE B). 7. WHERE SPACE LIMITATIONS PROHIBIT THE USE OF A 8.33% RAMP SLOPE, THE SLOPE MAY BE INCREASE) UP TO, 00k FOR A MAXIMUM RISE OF 6 INCHES. (REDU WES RAM:) LENGTH Y DIMENSION BY 1.321. 8. CONSTRUCT WEAKENED PLANE JOINTS AT 1/4 DELTAS WHEN RADIUS EQUALS 36 AND AT INSIDE EDGE OF GROOVED BORDER WHEN RADIUS EQUALS 25. 9. IF EXPANSIVE SOIL IS ENCOUNTERED, THEN RAMP SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OVER CLASS 2 AGGREGATE MA TER [AL. 10. CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS B. 11_ CURB RAMPS THAT HAVE A RAMP SLO �E FLATT ER THAN 6.67% SHALL HAVE A DETECTABLE WARNING SURFAC = THAT EXTENDS THE FULL WIDTH OF THE RAMP AND 24" MINIMU ;A LENGTH, SIMILAR TO THAT SHOWN ON CASE B WITH DETAIL. DET =CTABLE WARNING SURFACES, AT THE OPTION OF THE CC iNTRACT' 5R, SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY CAST -IN -PLACE OR STAMPEI) METHOD. 12. WHEN A DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE IS NOT REQUIRED ON A CURB RAMP, OR WHEN RAMP IS NOT L :)CATED N CURB RETURN, THE CONCRETE FINISH OF THE RAMP AND ITS FLARED SIDES SHALL HAVE A TRANSVERSE BROOMED SURFA +:E TEXTURE ROUGHER THAN THE SURROUNDING SIDEWALM :. 13. MAXIMUM SLOPES OF ADJOINING GUTTERS, TH _ ROAD SURFACE IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE CURD RAMP A, uD CONTINUOUS PASSAGE TO THE CURB RAMP SHALL NOT EXCEED 5% WITHIN 4' OF THE TOP OR BOTTOM OF THE CURFI RAMP. APPROVED BY: c'o+ COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DATE: 17/15M7 '� ►w ce mr� p t� DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION \ "'-01 . // CURB RAMP DAVID E. BARNHART, RCE 19776 ro.c..•r ^�+ CONSTRUCTION NOTES REVISIONS REV. BY: APRV DATE I REV. I BY: jAPrDI DATE 5.77 &W 1 4 �+ _ 5 e) s as Z 5 STANDARD NO. 403 (4 OF 4) 10-81 -90 3 6 12 -97 AMDA rnEM N0. Io r% A/4 I OF CURB Al2 -CC GR. ODE TG-=TOP A/4 - -171 _ _- � ` eo�o = CURB FACE TC S aF C O 0O L =FLOC tNE CF FL X 4' X SHORT APRON LONG PROFIL (15' MAX.) = TART F'C CF f UN RADIUS SIDE SLOPE X TC GRADE (',LONG CURB RETURN) (FT) 4.6 4.2 3% 4% 5 °Jo 6% 6" 35' 10% XS :3.9 3.6 3.4 3.2 X L 5.6 6.3 ''.2 8.4 10.0 12.5 8" 35' 10% XS 6.1 5.6 5.2 4.8 4.5 4.2 XL 7.5 t3.4 -- !i.6 11.2 13.4 15.0 6" 25' 8.33% XS 5.4 '1.9 4.5 4.1 3.8 3.5 XL 6.9 -'_9 ! t.4 11.6 15.0 15.0 8" 25 OR 35` 8.33% XS 7.2 6.5 .9 5.5 5.0 4.7 XL 9.1 10.6 - 12.5 15.0 15.0 15.0 TO CALCULATE "X" DIMEN,310N: SHORT SIDE (DOWN SLOPE): LONG SIDE (UP SLOPE): _ CURB FACE (FT) _CURB FACE (FT) XS (� SIDE SLOPE + TC GRADE XL (FT)=c -IDE SLOPE - TC GRADE ENGINEER TO SHOW XS AND XL )N IMPROVEMENT PLANS 914" / IN 12" BORDER 1 -1 1 -1/2" IN 4' APRON 1/4" GROOVING DETAIL APPROVED BY: DATE: 12/15/97 (/ rim ce Ism DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION \` ewsW 1 DAVID E. BARNHART, RCE 19776 !!E �DATE i t REV I BY! I AP 2'D I DATE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CURB RAMP STANDARD NO. 403 (3 OF 4) AMWDA t7EM NO p 3 . APPROVED BY: " "" t ypEBARgy �t COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DATE: 12/15197 N. ce mn B DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION G "• ""fJPO1 UR RAMP DAVID E. BARNHART, RCE 19776 +` °•�.t,� °° +` CASE B REVISIONS REV. BY: APR'D DATE REV. BY: Af'IVD DATE B -77 8-82 i 1 4 10-8 2-90 2 s STANDARD NO. 403 (2 OF 4) 10-61 2 -90 3 6 � tl 97 *,(A'uDA 117M No. PAM 3(6 ng Q r_ 1400 `%wof �-- 1/2 DELTA 6' TO FL _ --------- ED `cl) Igo, �, r!a pEtr'4 E3CR� -- 1SrO j EXPANSION JOINT r — 1.67" p � OTHERWISE SPECIFIED (SEE STD. NO. 205) ® a FLUSH (SEE N ©TE 4) -- 2�0 2.35" 1.67" 2 35" I o i F --------------- ,: 7Z7 4PART �,® ® 0\\</APART ` (/— 2% AX M RAISED TRUNCATED WEAKENED PLANE JOINT I � .- p, •� `� —4" MIN. SEE NOTE 9 DOME PATTERN (SEE NOTE 8) 4 �— CROSSWALK 0.45" 0.20" w 4' MIN_ ��' SECTION A -A o.90 "--i v EXPANSION JOINT SEE TABLE X ON SHEET 3 RAISED TRUNCATED DOME (SEE STD. NO. 205) Y DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE A SEE NOTE 11 can RAMP CONSTRUCTION CO SHALL INCLUDE CURB CURB AND GUTTER PER v AND GUTTER AND STD. N0.200 OR 201 3' SIDEWALK FROM r' SEE NOTE 11 AND DETAIL BELOW BCR TO ECR APPROVED BY: " "" t ypEBARgy �t COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DATE: 12/15197 N. ce mn B DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION G "• ""fJPO1 UR RAMP DAVID E. BARNHART, RCE 19776 +` °•�.t,� °° +` CASE B REVISIONS REV. BY: APR'D DATE REV. BY: Af'IVD DATE B -77 8-82 i 1 4 10-8 2-90 2 s STANDARD NO. 403 (2 OF 4) 10-61 2 -90 3 6 � tl 97 *,(A'uDA 117M No. PAM 3(6 ng Q r_ 1400 `%wof �-- 4' —� SEE NOTE 13 CONSTRUCT RETAINING 2' 2' CURB UNLESS r — 1.67" MRX. OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ® a FLUSH (SEE N ©TE 4) -- 2�0 2.35" 1.67" 2 35" to PvMTj --------------- ,: 7Z7 4PART �,® ® 0\\</APART ` (/— 2% AX M RAISED TRUNCATED —4" MIN. SEE NOTE 9 DOME PATTERN COLD JOINT 0.45" 0.20" ��' SECTION A -A o.90 "--i v RAISED TRUNCATED DOME DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE SEE NOTE 11 APPROVED BY: " "" t ypEBARgy �t COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DATE: 12/15197 N. ce mn B DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION G "• ""fJPO1 UR RAMP DAVID E. BARNHART, RCE 19776 +` °•�.t,� °° +` CASE B REVISIONS REV. BY: APR'D DATE REV. BY: Af'IVD DATE B -77 8-82 i 1 4 10-8 2-90 2 s STANDARD NO. 403 (2 OF 4) 10-61 2 -90 3 6 � tl 97 *,(A'uDA 117M No. PAM 3(6 ng Q r_ 1400 `%wof r- 1/2 DELTA 114 t)e, - L ZA ol X 71. -_ - O I '4( 6c' 'A �\ -7 IA A A WEAKENED PLANE JOINT (SEE NOTE 8) 'a EXPANSION JOINT (SEE STD. NO. 205) CURB AND GUTTER PER STD. NO. 200 OR 201 — 4' SEE NOTE 13 'y 2' y FLUSH (SEE NOTE 4) PVM7 _.�-�' _ I -- {�� ---- 8.330 ! VTO FL BCR--- EXPANSION JOINT (SEE STD_ NO. 205) 6' EXPANSION N,SIl (SEE EE STI) CROSSWALK 4- MIN N r7 N. � r. SEE TABLE X ON SHEET 3 RAMP CONSTRUCTION SHALL INCLUDE CURB AND GUTTER AND SIDEWALK FROM SCR TO ECR TABLE Y BELOW} 4' MINIMUM TOP OF RAMP ROUNDE:) :(SEE NOTE I 2% 4"MIN: JOINT 'SEE NOTE 9 TABLE Y SECTION A-A CF y 6" 7,90- 8.. 10-53! Y= CURB FACE (FT-) 6.33% APPROYED BY: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DATE: 12112115!97 N. CE amc DIRE w CTOR OF TRANSPORTATION CURB RAMP DAVID E. BARNHART, RCE 19776 CA' CASE A REVISIONS REV. BY: APWD DATE plt) F_ REV. BY: A VDATE 8-77 6-82 1 4 7_. 5 so S� 2 _5 1 STANDARD NO. 403 (1 OF 4) 10-81 2-90 3 6 1 12-97 1 #MfiDA ITEM NO-- (o pAj _2:L01F_q_�_ r= RNV 1 I j� I VARIES 6' _ ROADBED WIDTH SIDEWALK ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CLA.;S "B" CO 4CRETE. TO THIS POINT 5'=4 1/2* IF 6"C .F. E~' 1 112 "IF 6" C.F. Z" IF 8" C.F. Z �I S NOTE: AGGREGATE BASE OR APPROVED SELECT MAl ERIAL WI IEN SOILS REPORT INDICATES PRESENCE OF EXPANSIVE SOIL CONDITIONS. 6f t tt,0 APPROVED BY: ` ,/w"��. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DATE: 12/15/97 N, ecurn DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION SIDEWALK AND CURB DAVID E. BARNHART, RCE 19776 o.ttta REVISIONS REV. BY: APR'D DATE REV. BY: AP YD DATE: 8 -24-71 9-88 t 4 5 STANDARD NO_ 401 8-82 3 6 I I t ACENDA MM too. I o PAME OF v 1•4 - RfW AKENED PLANE JOI VT AT AP ROXIMATELY 5' INTERVALS LE 6'041N. j 6' MIN. TO FL SIDEVI'ALK OtI INSIDE OF KNUCKLE -112" E. CPANSION MATERIAL SIDEWALK CURB FACE UTILITY POLE OTHER TI4AN LINE: TRANSMISSION POLE SHALL BE PLACED BEHIND SIDEWALK �-VARIABLE ' WEAKENED PLANE JOIPIT AT APf;OXIMATELY V INTERVALS - O FL IRE HYDRANT 1'-6" FROM SIDED' 1ALK & T FROM CURB RETURN LINE FACE OF TRANSMISSION 'OLiE- SHALL BE PLACED 1'-6" BEHIND FACE OF CURB. SIDEWALK SHALL BE WIDENEDTO MIN. 6' CLEAR ANCE FOR MIN. L ENGTH ( F 20'. MINIMUM TRANSITION LENGTH SHALL BE 10'. - 10' 7 _20' 10' MIN. �, \ MIN. _MIN. _ Z SIDEWALK g CURB FACE ACCESS RAMP REQUIRMENTS SIC EWALK SEE: STANDARD NO.403 ll. " EXPANSION MATERIAL NOTE: 1. VARIABLE DISTANCES TO BE SHOWN ON AP'UCABLI: TYPICAL ROAD SECTION STANDARD. 2. CONSTRUCTION TO BE OF CLASS "B" CONCRETE 4!'P, IINIMUM THICKNESS. APPROVED BY: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE f T w Y�atDE'4wN I DATE: 12/15/97 =t ilm SIDEWALK Pp. CE DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION , FIRE HYDRANT, & DAVID E. BARNHART, RCE 19776 ° r /111 REVISIONS REV. BY: APR'D DATE REV, 8Y: AP 2'P DATE UTILITY POLE LOCATION !4-71 968 4 +-77 2-90 2 5 s-sz STANDARD NO. 400 i AGENDA REM NO. 6 P M-0F TYPICAL PLAN VIEW TOP Of FILLER 1/4" BELOW SURFAl,E - v 'R 1'4*t- R 114"' v V v v PREMOLDED EXPANSfoN JOINT FILLER ./2" �� c ECLION 'A — _-A' EK'ANSIQN JOINT EXP OiNSION . OINTS TO BE INSTALLED AT ALL B-C.S, E. .'S, CURB RETURNS, AND STIR JCTURE�;. 1 1/2 1 f4 V V SGTIQN"B-Bu WEAKENED PLANE JOINT 101 INTERVAL 3ETWEEN TRANSVERSE JOINTS MAY BE VARIE D TO ALLOW MATCHING OF JOINTS IN AD. ACENT EXISTING INMPROVEMENTS. APPRqVED BY. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DATE: 12/16197 "dL CE Ism DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION Ew S."41 CURB AND DAVID E. BARNHART, RCE 19776 oll, %f GUTTER JOINTS REVISIONS REV. BY: RD DATE 70T -DATE _--ili4-71 STANDARD NO. 205 3 r I mitim rrEm No.— 10 PMEA . 4-u— A� 6" 2" R 3/4" R 3/4" 2% -►► 8" CURB FACE (UNLESS OTHERWISE • SPECIFIED) 4 v D • • • ' � v ROADBED'VIIDTH TO THIS POINT { r i i 1 i { i i I i i i j 1 i j i SURFACING ( 1 j CLASS "B" CONCRETE 0,888 CU FT. / L.F. 1 CU. YD. = 30.41 L.F. MINIMUM PERMISSIBLE GRADE IS 0.50 % UNLESS SPECIFIC APPROVAL IS GIVEN 13Y THE D RECTOR OF TRANSPORATATION PRIOR rO DESIC N. APPR40VED BY: DATE: 92/15197 DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION DAVID E. BARNHART, RCE 19778 REVISIONS REV. BY; APR'D DATE REV. T BY ` B-24-7 1 q 2-90 1 11 2 1 1 1 K COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE mq. �X "m 41 ll4 /+ TYPE "D" CURB D DATE: STANDARD NO. 204 AMDA rfEM NO. PAM-4--L _� r= 6.' 2" R 3/4" R 3/4" 8 "FACE (UNLESS rl I OTHERWISE SPECIFIED) ROADBED ti VIDTH TO THIS POINT --� J- 1 1 1 i i 1 1 1 i 1 ; i i i SURFACING i i i i - EPDXY ADHESIVE SUEFACE 8., CLASS "B" CONCRETE 0.391 CU FT. / L,F. 1 CU. YD. = 69.05 L.F. MINIMUM PERMISSIBLE GRADE S 0.50 % JNLESS SPECIFIC APPROVAL IS GIVEN EY THE DI 2ECTOR OF TRANSPORATATION PRIOR TO DESIG J_ APPROVED BY. • .. c �' crt i A r' DATE: 12115/97 DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION DAVID E. BARNHART. RCE 19778 �orc�ti�e�• +* REVISIONS REV. BY: APR'D DATE 7REV. 8Y: 1 APF; V DATE 8-177 1 4 2 -90 1 11 2 1 1 c COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TYPE "D -1" CURS STANDARD NO. 203 AGENDA ITEM NO. PACE -OF -"001 Iftl/ ry V-7 3/16 � ROADBED 'I'VIDTH TO THIS POINT —�- i J i (!i j D j 2' -2" to z i w j m Lu i tY > i :3 Z j V i i i 6" TOP OF CURB �- ------ - - - - -- -- R 1,. 4„ 3„ O D O 10" �- (MIN.) ° • n ° ° ° v D ° •. •° ° • 7" (MIN.) C D V t, V D V D 4 C D ' F Z-4' — "�►i CLASS "B" CONCRETE 1.418 CU FT. JLF. 1 CU. YD. = 19.05 L.F. MINIMUM PERMISSIBLE GRADE S 0.50 % UNLESS SPECIFIC APPROVAL IS GIVEN EY THE DI SECTOR OF TRANSPORATATION PRIOR 10 DESIG V. APPROVED BY: �•n.as :eon :i DATE: i2/IW7 " a ti r - >,.- _. - z'- '.'9+- ,..- .•s.._•. _. - ' r.. cE Hors DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION DAVID E_ BARNiART, RCE 18776 �,.�.�. °' °• REVISIONS REV. BY: APR D WE- REV. BY: Ap ,—D GATE 2 -2471 1 4 382 2 5 2 -90 SURFACING i i i i COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TYPE "C" CURB STANDARD NO. 202 AGANDA ITEM NO. V p At � O R 3/8" 6_" 12 1/2" r% ROADBED WI )TH TO THIS POINT i SURFACING —� — 24" — — U 6" CURB FACE 318" j a D p D R 314" o A p o p p a o p p p D O p • l� - �_, � LEVEL LINE 2" 311/2" - - CLASS "B" CONCRETE 1.601 CU. FT. / LF. 1 CU. YD. = 16.86 L.F. MINIMUM PERMISSIBLE GRADE IS 0.50% UNLESS SPECIFIC APPROVAL IS GIVEN BY THE DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION PRIOR TO DESIGN. APPROVED BY: DATE: 12!15!97 cc lwm DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION e,aysaaa+ DAVID E. BARNHART, RCE 19776 `0 <<•"' REVISION$ REV. I BY: 1 APR'D I DATE REV.1 or I AP 2'D DATE B -71 1 46* ID-88: 2 2_90 3 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE: TYPE A -6 CURB STANDARD NO. 200 `�,; PAM R 3/8" ROil)RED W 13TH TO THIS POINT -- ---� i 6» 2" SURFACING i R 1" i 2% --► — 24" i i t © 8" CURB FACE O { p p R 3!4" ° 141/2» © I ° a a » O ; © p p p i p LEVEL LINE 2" 32" - - CLASS "B" CONCRETE 1.73 CU. FT. / L.F. 1 CU. YD. = 15.60 L.F. MINIMUM PERMISSIBLE GRADE IS 0.50% UNLESS SPECIFIC APPROVAL IS GIVEN BY THE DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION PRIOR TO DESIGN. APPR0yED BY: 1 ,• `.. - '; —' !� .�<.;_ •...' DATE. 12/15/97 DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION DAVID E. BARNHART, RCE 19776 REVISIONS REV. BY: APR'D DATE REV_ Be B -71 4 88 2 5 290 5-m -M v�r 4a { r H0. CE,Y►n { �r ♦� ej C ►y5� o ARM DATE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TYPE A -8 CURB STANDARD NO. 201 AGENDA {TEEN NO.�b PAM- of q �� TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE PROPOSAL Name of Bidder NPG Corporation Address of Bidder 1354 Jet Way * Perris, California 92571 To: City of Lake Elsinore, California The undersigned bidder, in accordance with the City's Notice Inviting Bids, hereby proposes to furnish all materials, equipment, tools, labor, and incidentals required for the above - stated project as set forth in the Plans, Specifications, and Contract documents therefore to perform all work in the manner and time prescribed therein. The attached Bid Schedule is hereby made a part of this proposal. The undersigned bidder declares that this proposal is based upon careful examination of the work site, Plans, Specifications, Instructions to Bidders, and all other Contract documents. If this proposal is accepted for award, bidder agrees to enter into a Contract with the City at the unit and /or lump sum prices set forth in the following bid schedule. Bidder understands that failure to enter into a Contract and furnish bonds in the manner and time prescribed will result in forfeiture to the City of the guarantee accompanying this proposal. The undersigned bidder certifies that this proposal is made in good faith, without collusion or connection with any other person or persons bidding on the work. The undersigned bidder understands that the City Council reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals. or to waive formality or technicality in any proposal in the interest of the Agency. 11 AMHDA IffM 110. l 0 PA OF_ EXPLANATION OF BID SCHEDULE The following Bid Schedule is in two parts. Part I is a sample work order. Part I will be the document used to determine the lowest bidder. Part II of the Bid Schedule, are unit prices to be bid by each bidder. These unit prices will be the unit prices used throughout the term of the contract for all work to be completed'. These unit prices are to be used when calculating the sample work order in Part I of the Bid Schedule. 12 NL'aDA aw N0.____1__O _ PACE_j2_OF— j-(A- TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL BID SCHEDULE PART I Sample Work Order Item Description Amount 1. Remove and dispense 720 sq.ft. of existing sidewalk $ 900.00 2. Remove and dispense of 144 ln.ft. of existing curb and gutter $ 1,260.00 3. Install Sidewalk 720 sq. ft. 4" thick $1,980.00 4. Install Curb and Gutter 144 ln. ft. $ 2,160.00 5. Setup Mobilization Charge for one job $ 450.00 Total sum of items one through five in words: Six Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Dollars And 00 /100----- - - - - -- Total sum of items one through five in numbers: $ 6,750.00 NOTE: All work to be done in accordance with City of Lake Elsinore Ordinances, Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, and City Engineer direction. All work is subject to inspection by City Inspector. Any Contractor doing work in the City must have a City business license. Bid prices for sample work orders are to be calculated using unit prices bid in Part II of the bid schedule. 13 ACINDA ITEM NO atu 0 TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL BID SCHEDULE PART II ITEMS TO BE BID FOR CONCRETE SIDEWALK, CURB, AND GUTTER Setup Mobilization Charge for each job $ 500.00 lump sum Install Sidewalk - 4" thick 1 - 80 sq.ft. $ 3.45 per sq.ft. 81 - 160 sq.ft. $ 3.40 per sq.ft. 161 - 240 sq.ft. $ 3.20 per sq.ft. 241 - 320 sq.ft. $ 3.00 per sq_ft. 321 - 400 sq.ft. $ 2.90 per sq.ft. 401 - 480 sq.ft. $ 2.80 per sq.ft. 481 - 560 sq.ft. $ 2.70 per sq.ft. 561 - 640 sq.ft. $ 2.60 per sq.ft. 641 - 720 sq.ft. $ 2.50 per sq.ft. 721 + sq.ft. $ 2.40 per sq.ft. Install Curb and Gutter 1 - 16 ln.ft. $ 30.00 per ln.ft. 17 - 32 ln.ft. $ 28.00 per in.ft. 33 - 48 ln.ft. $ 26.00 per ln.ft. 49 - 64 ln.ft. $ 24.00 per ln.ft. 65 - 80 ln.ft. $ 22.00 per ln.ft. 81 - 96 ln.ft. $ 20.00 per ln.ft. 97 - 112 ln.ft. $ 18.00 per in.ft. 113 - 128 ln.ft. $ 16.00 per ln.ft. 14 AGORA iEM RIO. 0 PAM _ - 129 - 144 ln.ft. 145 + per ln.ft. Remove and Disposal of existi $ 2.45 per sq.ft. 1 - 80 sq.ft. 81 - 160 sq.ft. 161 - 240 sq.ft. 241 - 320 sq.ft. 321 - 400 sq.ft. 401 - 480 sq.ft. 481 - 560 sq.ft. 561 - 640 sq.ft. 641 - 720 sq.ft. 721 + $ 9.75 sq.ft. Remove and Disposal of existi ln.ft. $ 9.25 per 1 - 16 ln.ft. 17 - 32 ln.ft. 33 - 48 ln.ft. 49 - 64 ln.ft. 65 - 80 ln.ft. 81 - 96 ln.ft. 97 - 112 ln.ft. 113 - 128 ln.ft. 129 - 144 ln.ft. 145 + ln.ft. 15 $ 14.00 $ 13.50 3 4" thick per ln.ft. per ln.ft. Sidewalk 2.75 $ per sq.ft. $ 2.70 per sq.ft. $ 2.65 per sq.ft. $ 2.45 per sq.ft. $ 2.25 per sq.ft. $ 2.10 per sq.ft. $ 2.00 per sq.ft. $ 1.85 per sq.ft. $ 1.65 per sq.ft. $ 1.45 per sq.ft. j Curb and Gutter $ 12.00 per ln.ft. $ 11.50 per ln.ft. $ 11.00 per ln.ft. 10.50 $ per ln.ft. $ 10.00 per ln.ft. $ 9.75 per ln.ft. $ 9.50 per ln.ft. $ 9.25 per ln.ft. $ 9.15 per ln.ft. 9.00 $ per ln.ft AGEMDA ITEM RIO. O 'PACE 50 OF TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL The Undersigned has checked carefully all of the above figures and understands that the City will not be responsible for any error or omissions on the part of the Undersigned in making up this bid. The Undersigned bidder declares, under penalty of perjury, that they are licensed to do business or act in the capacity of a contractor within the State of California and that they are validly licensed as follows: License Number: 664779 Classification: C12 / B / A Expiration Date: February 28, 2005 This statement is true and correct and has the legal effect of an affidavit. 16 10 TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL SIGNATURE PAGE IF A SOLE OWNER OR SOLE CONTRACTOR, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted 2. Signature (Given and surname) of proprietor 3. Place of Business (Street and Number) City and State Zip Code 4. Telephone Number IF A PARTNERSHIP, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted 2. Name of each member of Partnership (indicate character of each partner, either general or special [limited]) 3. Signature (Given and surname and character of partner. Note: Signature must be made by a general partner) M 0 Place of Business City and State _ Telephone Number 17 (Street and Number) Zip Code NO. � D OF PM �- TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL IF A CORPORATION, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted NPG Corporation 2. Name of each officer of corporation (indicate office) Jeff S. Nelson * President Sharon Nelson * CFO 3. Signatur (Given and surname and title of officer authorized to sign or/Jthe Corporation) Jeff /S�¢lson * President X f/ (Impress Corporate Seal here) 4. Incorporated under the laws of the State of California S. Place of Business 1354 Jet Way Perris California and Number) 92571 City and State Zip Code 6. Telephone Number 909 - 940 -0200 TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CA NON - COLLUSION DECLARATION (Public Contract Code Section 7106) I, Jeff S. Nelson do hereby declare that I am (Name) the President of NPG Corporation (Title) (Contractor) the party making the foregoing bid for the construction referred to as: CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE and that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, and undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any bidder or anyone else-to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the bidder has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the bidder or any other bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other bidder, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the Contract of anyone interested in the proposed Contract; that all statements contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the bidder has not, directly or. indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid. I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT TVIE FIRE, Febraury 25, 2004 / /// 1354 DATE eff &,- Velson 19 PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE )ING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. Jet Way * Perris, California PLACE NAME AGE DA ffW mo. ' 1D PAm 5- OF -..01 TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGNATION OF SUBCONTRACTORS The undersigned certifies that he or she has used the sub -bids of the following listed subcontractors in making up his bid for the construction referred to as: CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE and that the subcontractors listed will be used for work for which they bid, subject to the approval of the Engineer, and in accordance with the applicable provision of the Specifications. Bid Item Number Not Applicable Subcontractor NPG Corporation Name of Contractor 20 Address /Telephone %­_ Signature of Bidder Jeff S. Nelson Name President Title VA MM Xo. 1 C PAM a-_.� TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DECLARATION REGARDING LICENSE STATUS I do hereby declare that our /my Contractor's license is 664779 and expires on February 28, 2005. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 16th day of February , 20 04 at Perris , Californiw- Signatur Printe ame J ff Title President Signing on behalf o (if applicable) 21 DA MM NO ` D ..y N"./ TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL LIST OF REFERENCES CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE REFERENCES The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers for three (3) public agencies for which BIDDER has performed similar work within the past two(2) years: 1' Sun Lakes Country Club Name and Address of Owner Jim Morgan 909 - 845 -2191 Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project 199,000.00 District Wide Asphalt September 2003 Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 2. F.H. Pascen / SN Nielsen Name and Address of Owner Bruce Bare 562- 864 -1950 Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project 378,000.00 Asphalt Construction August 2003 Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 3. Moreno Valley Unified School District Name and Address of Owner Stan Brown 909 - 571 -7800 Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project 64,000.00 Concrete & Asphalt Contract Amount Type of Work 22 August 2003 Date Completed WANDA ITEM NO. I V PACE Contractors Reference Check Contractor NPG Corporation Project Asphalt Maintenance /Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk Maintenance/Unpaved Roads Reference Moreno Valley Unified School District Name of Reference Contact Interviewed Stan Brown Phone Number of Reference Interviewed 909 -571 -7800 Date of Interview 3/2/04 Reference Interview Question and Answers: What was the scope of work performed by the contractor? Asphalt maintenance Concrete & Asphalt What was the total project cost? $64,000 Was contractor able to perform the contracted services in a timely fashion? Yes Were there any change orders? Did you have any issues relating to these change orders? No How well did the contractor interface and communicate with your staff? Good On a scale of 1 to 10 how would you rate the contactors overall performance with 10 being excellent? 8 MENDA ITEM W,- „_ TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE PROPOSAL Name of Bidder .MTERMWr 1 D& ML PAUMEA1 T SOLU. rt O w S Z-M Address of Bidder 'P.D. Box 10458 , SIIN A c@Lq Z-3 8�f 58 To: City of Lake Elsinore, California The undersigned bidder, in accordance with the City's Notice Inviting Bids, hereby proposes to furnish all materials, equipment, tools, labor, and incidentals required for the above - stated project as set forth in the Plans, Specifications, and Contract documents therefore to perform all work in the manner and time prescribed therein. The attached Bid Schedule is hereby made a part of this proposal. The undersigned bidder declares that this proposal is based upon careful examination of the work site, Plans, Specifications, Instructions to Bidders, and all other Contract documents. If this proposal is accepted for award, bidder agrees to enter into a Contract with the City at the unit and /or lump sum prices set forth in the following bid schedule. Bidder understands that failure to enter into a Contract and furnish bonds in the manner �. and time prescribed will result in forfeiture to the City of the guarantee accompanying this proposal. The undersigned bidder certifies that this proposal is made in good faith, without collusion or connection with any other person or persons bidding on the work. The undersigned bidder understands that the City Council reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals. or to waive formality or technicality in any proposal in the interest of the Agency. 11 AGODA 1iEAw NO. PAM Y 9 OF Q' �p EXPLANATION OF BID SCHEDULE The following Bid Schedule is in two parts. Part I is a sample work order. Part I will be the document used to determine the lowest bidder. Part II of the Bid Schedule, are unit prices to be bid by each bidder. These unit prices will be the unit prices used throughout the term of the contract for all work to be completed. These unit prices are to be used when calculating the sample work order in Part I of the Bid Schedule. 12 TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL BID SCHEDULE PART I Sample Work Order Item Description Amount 1. Remove and dispense 720 sq.ft. of existing sidewalk $ 5,40.0p 2. Remove and dispense of 144 ln.ft. of existing curb and gutter $ P - 00 3. Install Sidewalk 720 sq. ft. 4" thick $,1-77.1-00 4. Install Curb and Gutter 144 ln. ft. $ 300.2.40 5. Setup Mobilization Charge for one job $ '550. Do Total sum of it one thro gh five in words: Total sum of items one through five in numbers: $ 7/5a • Iq o NOTE: All work to be done in accordance with City of Lake Elsinore Ordinances, Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, and City Engineer direction. All work is subject to inspection by City Inspector. Any Contractor doing work in the City must have a City business license. Bid prices for sample work orders are to be calculated using unit prices bid in Part II of the bid schedule. 13 AGENDA ITEM 100. PACE— OF�Q_ , TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL BID SCHEDULE PART II ITEMS TO BE BID FOR CONCRETE SIDEWALK, CURB, AND GUTTER Setup Mobilization Charge for each job $ 550.0 O lump sum Install Sidewalk - 4" thick 1 - 80 sq.ft. $ a -a5 per sq.ft. 81 - 160 sq.ft. $ 'I.85 per sq.ft. 161 - 240 sq.ft. $ 6.85 per sq.ft. 241 - 320 sq.ft. $ 5.85 per sq.ft. 321 - 400 sq.ft. $ per sq.ft. 401 - 480 sq.ft. $ 3.85 per sq.ft. 481 - 560 sq.ft. $ 3,86 per sq.ft. 561 - 640 sq.ft. $ 3.8.5 per sq.ft. 641 - 720 sq.ft. $ 3.85 per sq.ft. 721 + sq.ft. $ 3.85 per sq.ft. Install Curb and Gutter 1 - 16 ln.ft. $ 195.0b per ln.ft. 17 - 32 ln.ft. $ 5d -85 per ln.ft. 33 - 48 ln.ft. $ `10 -d*5 per ln.ft. 49 - 64 ln.ft. $ 38.85 per ln.ft. 65 - 80 ln.ft. $ 3445 per ln.ft. 81 - 96 ln.ft. $ 30.85 per ln.ft. 97 - 112 ln.ft. $.?8.85 per ln.ft. 113 - 128 ln.ft. $ a11-85 per ln.ft. 14 IDA rfE/M NO. 0_ RACI lam_ OF rJ 129 145 Remove - 144 ln.ft. + ln. ft. and Disposal of $ d0.85 per ln.ft. $ o?D•85 per ln. ft. existing 4" thick Sidewalk 1 - 80 sq.ft. $ A 501 per sq.ft. 81 - 160 sq.ft. $ A -OD per sq.ft. 161 - 240 sq.ft. $ 1.501 per sq.ft. 241 - 320 sq.ft. $ /-001 per sq.ft. 321 - 400 sq.ft. $ .75 per sq.ft. 401 - 480 sq.ft. $ •75' per sq.ft. 481 - 560 sq.ft. $ •75' per sq.ft. 561 - 640 sq.ft. $ .75' per sq.ft. 641 - 720 sq.ft. $ .75' per sq.ft. 721 + sq.ft. $ -7S per sq.ft. Remove and Disposal of existing Curb and Gutter 1 - 16 ln.ft. $ 5.25 per ln.ft. 17 - 32 ln.ft. $ Soa per ln.ft. 33 - 48 ln.ft. $ 4.5Z per ln.ft. 49 - 64 ln.ft. $ 4-40 per ln.ft. 65 - 80 ln.ft. $ 3.50 per ln.ft. 81 - 96 ln.ft. $ 3�00 per ln.ft. 97 - 112 ln.ft. $ 01.50 per ln.ft. 113 - 128 ln.ft. $ a -015 per ln.ft. 129 - 144 ln.ft. $ 01.00 per ln.ft. 145 + ln.ft. $ i•76 per ln.ft 15 AGENDA n EM %0.•_.� PACE �.� ()F -^ TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL The Undersigned has checked carefully all of the above figures and -Mao understands that the City will not be responsible for any error or omissions on the part of the Undersigned in making up this bid. The Undersigned bidder declares, under penalty of perjury, that they are licensed to do business or act in the capacity of a contractor within the State of California and that they are validly licensed as follows: License Number: %a 9 a a (o £ Classification: A Expiration Date: //- D� This statement is true and correct and has the legal effect of an affidavit. 16 '010f AGORA rMM NO •� — PAG1EJL-'�-_0,� TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL SIGNATURE PAGE IF A SOLE OWNER OR SOLE CONTRACTOR, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted 2. Signature (Given and surname) of proprietor 3. Place of Business (Street and Number) City and State Zip Code 4. Telephone Number IF A PARTNERSHIP, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted 2. Name of each member of Partnership (indicate character of each partner, either general or special [limited]) 3. Signature (Given and surname and character of partner. Note: Signature must be made by a general partner) M 5. Place of Business City and State _ Telephone Number 17 (Street and Number) Zip Code ACAN DA ITEM NO. PANE 0i TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL IF A CORPORATION, SIGN HERE: `.00, 1. Name under which business is conducted IMRU14VDNA.L PNEMEA11 SOLUTIOMS 7-;11C. 2. Name of each officer of corporation (indicate office) sec . 3. Signature (Given and surname and title of officer authorized to sign for the Corporation) e.1� '(Impress Corporate Seal here)A� n 4. Incorporated under the laws of the State of NEEVOk 5. Place of Business P.0.80)ob�58 (Stre t and Number) City and State S M 3ER.t AR.N40 0 zip Code 42242 3 -D q5(p 6. Telephone Number 9b9. 794- -a-to I 1: WANDA ITEM NO. PA e, _ �P TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CA NON - COLLUSION DECLARATION (Public Contract Code Section 7106) I, DENNIS C. {"211 =GE8- do hereby declare that I am (Name) the 1P- RSc- . % 7"X>_.45 - of 1XMP_NAn0N4L PAVEMStiIT SDLUTIO US,tNC. (Title) (Contractor) the party making the foregoing bid for the construction referred to as: CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE and that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, and undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any bidder or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the bidder has'not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the bidder or any other bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other bidder, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the Contract of anyone interested in the proposed Contract; that all statements contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the bidder has not, directly or. indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid. I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. ��Dt2Ll�R�QLV 3 aOO4 _�EI�TwE M DATE PLACE SIGNATURE D�htNtS C. �tEG�" IS AS NAME W, DA ITS NO- Q_ ____._. PAt�� � 7 OF��, TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGNATION OF SUBCONTRACTORS The undersigned certifies that he or she has used the sub -bids of the following listed subcontractors in making up his bid for the construction referred to as: CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE and that the subcontractors listed will be used for work for which they bid, subject to the approval of the Engineer, and in accordance with the applicable provision of the Specifications. Bid Item Number Subcontractor Address /Telephone �I1t�QAlAT1�ta.Al- �A�lWE1yT SOCIJR�D1.1,$ C C Name of Contractor =MC• Signatu e of Bidder DENklls C . - R\E6ER- Name PR.ES - i TR.6A'S Title 20 TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DECLARATION REGARDING LICENSE STATUS I do hereby declare that our /my Contractor's license is If 1_ and expires on ll O w I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this a2 IV -16 day of a&u.4kU 2O&, / at ��J�/ %�/� California. 21 Signature Printed Name QE✓U/t!!S C. /E6ER_ Title s �7-NEWS Signing on behalf of�All�,P1UAT /DU.4LU�I176Xtr (if applicable) SOLUTIONS -ZK)C . ACHM MIA No. D PAGE _�� TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL LIST OF REFERENCES CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE REFERENCES The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers for three (3) public agencies for which BIDDER has performed similar work within the past two(2) years: 1. �L �S S EE A 1 T'AcJ46b BAST Name and Address of Owner 2. 3. Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed. Name and Address of Owner Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed Name and Address of Owner Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 22 A"%oA ITEM NO v PAM---)OF 9 1"0/ 1-./ P.O. Box 10458, San Bernardino, CA 92423 -0458 — (909) 794 -2101 — 1 (800) 826 -4163 — Fax: (909) 794 -7098 Reference List — Public Works San Bernardino County 385 N. Arrowhead San Bernardino, CA 92415 -0184 909 - 387 -8907 Contact Shakil Patel, ALA Numerous Projects Asphalt, Concrete Seal Coat Striping And Bldg. Construction Contract Range $8745.00 - $117,950.00 GSG Parking Lot ADA $50,804.00 Start 08 -15 -02 Complete 08 -28 -02 �-. Old Hall of Records Parking Lot $117,950.00 Start 12 -01 -02 Complete 1 -10 -03 Big Bear Justice Parking Lot $33,950.00 Start 11 -01 -01 Complete 11 -30 -01 Crestline Sanitation Parking Lot $8,750.00 Start 10 -15 -01 Complete 10 -31 -01 Morongo Basin Parking Lot $35,786.00 Start 10 -01 -01 Complete 10 -31 -01 Port of San Diego P.O. Box 120488 San Diego, CA 92112-0488 619 - 725 -6086 Contact Jay Waelder or Cyrus Toosky Gallagher Deficiencies — ADA Compliance Asphalt Concrete Construction, String Base Bid $90,064.00 c/o $24,770.95 Total Contract $114,834.85 "Your Coinplete Outdoor Maintenance Solution" CA License #A/8729226 - NV License 00041881 - http: / /www .pavement— solutions.com #ENCA ITEM NO. rJ PACE„ bF Santa Rosa Community Services District ,,,r 41785 Enterprise Circle South Temecula, CA 92589 909 - 296 -3176 Contact John Rogers, P. E. Numerous Projects Asphalt, Seal Coating Striping Contract Range $5258.25 — $170,192.80 Los Gatos Sunset Terrace Base Bid $99,990.00 c/o $11,973.04 Total Contract $111,963.04 Start 01 -05 -02 Complete 01- 31 -02' Various District Roads $5258.25 Start 04 -15 -02 Complete 04 -28 -02 Various District Roads $50,975.00 Start 09 -30 -02 Complete 11 -30 -02 Slurry Seal Various Roads Base Bid $170,192.80 c/o $4788.88 Total Contract $174,981.68 Start 10 -01 -02 Complete 10 -31 -02 Sandia Creek Drive $162,970.00 Start 12 -15 -02 Complete 1 -15 -03 City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 909 - 694 -6444 Contact Susan Jones City Wide Concrete Repairs Base Bid $61,433.00 c/o $4,378.50 Total Contract $65,811.50 Start 02 -15 -02 Complete 02 -28 -02 AMNDA ITEM NO. l d PAM- �-- Crafton Hills Community College 44100 8h Street San Bernardino, CA 92408 909 - 389 -3381 Contact Darrell Covino " Parking Lot Repairs Asphalt, Concrete, Seal, Striping Base Bid $340,526.00 c/o $24,679.90 Total Contract $365,205.90 State of California — Patton State Hospital 3012 E. Highland Ave. Highland, CA 92346 916- 376 -1663 Contact Don Hansen Parking Lot Repairs Asphalt, Concrete, Seal, Striping, Construction Base Bid $383,850.00 c/o $339,831.00 Total Contract $723,681.00 City of Chino — Aguiar Plaza Sixth & D St. Chino, CA 909 -591 -9831 Contact Mike Kolling Plaza Renovation Asphalt, Concrete Landscape, Striping Base Bid $285,190.00 c/o $34,660.00 Total Contract $319,850.00 *AA-MA ffEWI NO . � D � al~_ CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONTRACT AGREEMENT This Contract Agreement is made and entered into this day of 2003 by and between the City of Lake Elsinore and as Contractor for the construction referred to as: CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE WITNESSETH that the City of Lake Elsinore and the Contractor have mutually agreed as follows: ARTICLE I The Contract documents for the aforesaid project shall consist of the Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, General Specifications, Plans, Special Provisions and all referenced specifications, details, standard drawings, and appendices, together with this Contract Agreement and all required bonds, insurance certificates, permits, notices, and affidavits, and also including any and all addenda or supplemental agreements clarifying, amending or extending the work contemplated as may be required to ensure its completion in an acceptable manner. All of the provisions of said Contract documents are made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein. ARTICLE II For and in consideration of the payments and agreements to be made and performed by the City of Lake Elsinore, Contractor agrees to furnish all materials and perform all work required for the above stated project, and to fulfill all other obligations as set forth in the aforesaid Contract documents. ARTICLE III Contractor agrees to receive and accept the prices set forth in the proposal as full compensation for furnishing all materials, performing all work, and fulfilling all obligations hereunder. Said compensation shall cover all expenses, losses, damages, and consequences arising out of the nature of the work during its progress or prior to its acceptance including those for well and faithfully completing the work and the whole thereof in the manner and time specified in the aforesaid Contract documents and also including those arising from actions of the elements, unforeseen difficulties or obstructions encountered in the prosecution of the work, suspension or discontinuance of the work, and all other unknowns or risks of any description connected with the work. 23 `i 0 � 14riA i t Lhv b pArs ARTICLE IV r The City of Lake Elsinore hereby promises and agrees to employ, and does hereby employ, Contractor to provide the materials, do the work, and fulfill the obligations according to the terms and conditions herein contained and referred to, for the. prices aforesaid, and hereby contracts to pay the same at the time, in the manner, and upon the conditions set forth in the Contract documents. ARTICLE V Contractor acknowledges the provisions of the State Labor Code requiring every employer to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self- insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code and certifies compliance with such provisions. ARTICLE VI Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City of Lake Elsinore or its officers and agents from any claims, demands, or causes of action including related expenses attorney's fees, and costs based on, arising out of, or in any way related to the work undertaken by Contractor hereunder. ARTICLE VII Contractor affirms that the signatures, titles, and seals set forth herein after the execution of this Contract Agreement represent all individuals, firm members, partners, joint ventures, and /or corporate officers having a principal interest herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto for themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns do hereby agree to the full performance of the covenants herein contained and have caused this Contract Agreement to be executed in triplicate by setting hereunto their names, titles, hands, and seals this day of , 2002. Contractor: By: Title CA Lic.# Subscribed and sworn to this day of 2002. NOTARY PUBLIC City of Lake Elsinore, By: Mayor Attested City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, Date 24 AGOWA ITEM NO. ( l! PA,dEof- CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATE REGARDING WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE Section 3700 of the Labor Code provides in part as follows: "Every employer except the State shall secure the payment of compensation in one or more of the following ways: A) By being insured against liability to pay compensation B) By securing from the Director of Industrial Relations a certificate of consent to self- insure, which may be given upon furnishing proof satisfactory to the Director of Industrial Relations of ability to self- insure and to pay any compensation that may become due to his employees..." The undersigned is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self- insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract. r SIGNATURE v DATE TEb- 24,2,004 PRINTED NAME DENN15 C. IZIE6ER TITLE �>RsS . / -XF_q g . COMPANY PAyEtAr_MT S1DLLk-rt011S =1 . ADDRESS P.D. dOX 1645% 0AM -bE1zMtARbtguo , C.tA 9x 423, 0458 (In accordance with Article 5, commencing a 1, Part 7, Division 2 of the Labor Code, must be signed by the Contractor and filed prior to the Contractor performing any work 25 t Section 1860, Chapter the above Certificate with the awarding body under this Contract.) .,too TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE PROPOSAL Name of Bidder Hardy & Harper, Inc Address of Bidder 1312 E. warner Ave Santa Ana. CA 92705 To: City of Lake Elsinore, California The undersigned bidder, in accordance with the City's Notice Inviting Bids, hereby proposes to furnish all materials, equipment, tools, labor, and incidentals required for the above - stated project as set forth in the Plans, Specifications, and Contract documents therefore to perform all work in the manner and time prescribed therein. The attached Bid Schedule is hereby made a part of this proposal. The undersigned bidder declares that this proposal is based upon careful examination of the work site, Plans, Specifications, Instructions to Bidders, and all other Contract documents. If this proposal is accepted for award, bidder agrees to enter into a Contract with the City at the unit and /or lump sum prices set forth in the following bid schedule. Bidder understands that failure to enter into a Contract and furnish bonds in the manner �- and time prescribed will result in forfeiture to the City of the guarantee accompanying this proposal. The undersigned bidder certifies that this proposal is made in good faith, without collusion or connection with any other person or persons bidding on the work. The undersigned bidder understands that the City Council reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals or to waive formality or technicality in any proposal in the interest of the Agency. 11 mil EO EXPLANATION OF BID SCHEDULE The following Bid Schedule is in two parts. Part I is a sample work order. Part I will be the document used to determine the lowest bidder. Part II of the Bid Schedule, are unit prices to be bid by each bidder. These unit prices will be the unit prices used throughout the term of the contract for all work to be completed". These unit prices are to be used when calculating the sample work order in Part I of the Bid Schedule. 12 MIA NO. "-, MM '1 sl S./ �-. TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL BID SCHEDULE PART I Sample Work Order Item Description 1. Remove and dispense 720 sq.ft. of existing sidewalk 2. Remove and dispense of 144 ln.ft. of existing curb and gutter 3. Install Sidewalk 720 sq. ft. 4" thick 4. Install Curb and Gutter 144 ln. ft. 5. Setup Mobilization Charge for one job Total sum of items one through words: FOUR HUNDRED THIRTY FOUR DOLLARS AND SEVENTY CENTS Total sum of items one through five in numbers: $ 434,70 $2.10 $11.00 $4.60 $17.00 $ 400.00 five in NOTE: All work to be done in accordance with City of Lake Elsinore Ordinances, Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, and City Engineer direction. All work is subject to inspection by City Inspector. Any Contractor doing work in the City must have a City business license. Bid prices for sample work orders are to be calculated using unit prices bid in Part II of the bid schedule. 13 AMDA ITEM 140. O W� . PAM �] `1 _cam � TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL BID SCHEDULE PART I Sample Work Order Item Description 1. Remove and dispense 720 sq.ft. of existing sidewalk 2. Remove and dispense of 144 ln.ft. of existing curb and gutter 3. Install Sidewalk 720 sq. ft. 4" thick 4. Install Curb and Gutter 144 ln. ft. 5. Setup Mobilization Charge for one job Total sum of items one through words: Amount $2.10 $11.00 $4.60 $17.00 2 EM, 11 11 five in FOUR HUNDRED THIRTY FOUR DOLLARS AND SEVENTY CENTS Total sum of items one through five in numbers: G� $ 434.70 ! 2� �►° NOTE: All work to be done in accordance with City of Lake Elsinore Ordinances, Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, and City Engineer direction. All work is subject to inspection by City Inspector. Any Contractor doing work in the City must have a City business license. Bid prices for sample work orders are to be calculated using unit prices bid in Part II of the bid schedule. 13 OAM VO -c ".r/ N.Nr' TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL BID SCHEDULE PART II ITEMS TO BE BID FOR CONCRETE SIDEWALK, CURB, AND GUTTER Setup Mobilization Charge for each job $400.00 lump sum Install Sidewalk - 4" thick 1 - 80 sq.ft. $10.00 per sq.ft. 81 - 160 sq.ft. $7.00 per sq.ft. 161 - 240 sq.ft. $6.00 per sq.ft. 241 - 320 sq.ft. $5 £in per sq.ft. 321 - 400 sq.ft. $5.60 per sq.ft. 401 - 480 sq.ft. $5.40 per sq.ft. 481 - 560 sq.ft. $5.20 per sq.ft. 561 - 640 sq.ft. $5.00 per sq.ft. 641 - 720 sq.ft. $4.60 per sq.ft. 721 + sq.ft. $4.50 per sq.ft. Install Curb and Gutter 34.00 1 - 16 ln.ft. $ per ln.ft. 17 - 32 ln.ft. $30.00 per ln.ft. 33 - 48 ln.ft. $29.00 per ln.ft. 49 - 64 ln.ft. $28.00 per ln.ft. 65 - 80 ln.ft. $27.00 per ln.ft. 81 - 96 ln.ft. $22.00 per ln.ft. 97 - 112 ln.ft. $20.00 per ln.ft. 113 - 128 ln.ft. $19.00 per ln.ft. 14 no 10 129 - 144 ln.ft. $17.00 per ln.ft. 145 + ln.ft. $ 16.00 per ln.ft. `SO Remove and Disposal of existing 4" thick Sidewalk 1 - 80 sq.ft. $ 7.00 per sq.ft. 81 - 160 sq.ft. $ 4.00 per sq.ft. 161 - 240 sq.ft. $ 3.50 per sq.ft. 241 - 320 sq.ft. $ 3.20 per sq.ft. 321 - 400 sq.ft. $ 3.00 per sq.ft. 401 - 480 sq.ft. $ 2.80 per sq.ft. 481 - 560 sq.ft. $ 2.60 per sq.ft. 561 - 640 sq.ft. $ 2.40 per sq.ft. 641 - 720 sq.ft. $ 2.10 per sq.ft. 721 + sq.ft. $ 2.00 per sq.ft. Remove and Disposal of existing Curb and Gutter 1 - 16 ln.ft. $ 22.00 per ln.ft. 17 - 32 ln.ft. $ 20-00 per ln.ft. 33 - 48 ln.ft. $ 18 00 per ln.ft. 49 - 64 ln.ft. $ 17-00 per ln.ft. 65 - 80 ln.ft. $ 16.00 per ln.ft. 81 - 96 ln.ft. $ 14.00 per ln.ft. 97 - 112 ln.ft. $ 13.00 per ln.ft. 113 - 128 ln.ft. $ 12.00 per ln.ft. 129 - 144 ln.ft. $ 11.00 per ln.ft. 145 + ln.ft. $ 10.00 per ln.ft 15 AMDA {TEAS NO.� — A.& Sr 7 r,� N TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL The Undersigned has checked carefully all of the above figures and understands that the City will not be responsible for any error or omissions on the part of the Undersigned in making up this bid. The Undersigned bidder declares, under penalty of perjury, that they are licensed to do business or act in the capacity of a contractor within the State of California and that they are validly licensed as follows: License Number: 215952 Classification: Class A Expiration Date: December 31,2005 This statement is true and correct and has the legal effect of an affidavit. W7 r.- ,y, • .,,o t! TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL SIGNATURE PAGE IF A SOLE OWNER OR SOLE CONTRACTOR, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted N/A 2. Signature (Given and surname) of proprietor 3. Place of Business (Street and Number) City and State Zip Code 4. Telephone Number IF A PARTNERSHIP, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted N/A 2. Name of each member of Partnership (indicate character of each partner, either general or specia ted]) 3. Signature (Given and surname and character of partner. Note: Signature must be made by a general partner) 4. 5. Place of Business City and State Telephone Number 17 (Street and Number) Zip Code 1"001 ..d® I*--. TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL IF A CORPORATION, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted Hardy & Harper, Inc 2. Name of each officer of corporation (indicate office) Fred T. Maas - President, Treasurer and , General -. Manager Steve Kirschner - Vice President Kristen S. Paulino - Corporate Secretary 3. Signature (Given and surname and title of officer authorized to sign for the Corporation) /, Steve Kirschner - Vice President = Kristen S. Paulino - Corporate Secretary- - (Impress Corporate Seal here) 4. Incorporated under the laws of the State of California 5. Place of Business 1312 E. Warner Ave (Street and Number) City and State Santa Ana. CA Zip Code 92705 6. Telephone Number (714) 444 -1851 TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL I, the CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CA NON - COLLUSION DECLARATION (Public Contract Code Section 7106) Steve Kirschner (Name) Vice President (Title) the party making the to as: do hereby declare that I am of Hardy & Harper, Inc (Contractor) foregoing bid for the construction CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE G referred and that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, and undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any bidder or anyone else -to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the bidder has'not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the bidder or any other bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other bidder, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the Contract of anyone interested in the proposed Contract; that all statements contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the bidder has not, directly or. indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid. I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. February 24,2004 Santa Ana, CA DATE PLACE GNATURE Steve Kirschner - Vice President NAME 19 � r � N"/` CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of Orange February 24, 2004 On , before me, Date personally appeared ss. Kristen S. Paulino, Notary Public Name and Title of Officer (e.g., "Jane Doe, Notary Public ") Steve Kirschner Names) of Signer(s) P, personally known to me ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(p whose name(o i V-4 subscribed to the wit W instrument and acknowledged to me a W /t §y executed the sa a in Iii / r / *ir authorized capacity), and that by his � /ir signature on the instrument the persor�, or the entit upon behalf of which the personK acted, executed the instrument. WIT ;my hand and ic' seal. Place Notary Seal Above Signature of otary Public OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Non - Collusion Affidavit Document Date: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: February 24, 2004 Capacity(ies) Claimed b )§kVffrschner Signer's Name: ❑ Individual Vice President Corporate Officer— Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: Hardy & Harper, Inc. Number of Pages: 1 RIGHT THUMBPRINT OF SIGNER .p of ® 1999 National Notary Association • 9350 De Soto Ave., P.O. Box 2402 • Chatsworth, CA 91313 -2402 • www.nationalnotary.org Prod. No. 5907 Reorder: Call Toll -Free 1- 800 -876 -6827 I ITEM 14 PAM _$" ' _OF KRISTEN S. PALILINO COMM. #p 1413262 a NOIAxy PUBLIC• CALIFORNIA r ORANGE COUNTY My Comm. Exp. May 20, 2007 ir ss. Kristen S. Paulino, Notary Public Name and Title of Officer (e.g., "Jane Doe, Notary Public ") Steve Kirschner Names) of Signer(s) P, personally known to me ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(p whose name(o i V-4 subscribed to the wit W instrument and acknowledged to me a W /t §y executed the sa a in Iii / r / *ir authorized capacity), and that by his � /ir signature on the instrument the persor�, or the entit upon behalf of which the personK acted, executed the instrument. WIT ;my hand and ic' seal. Place Notary Seal Above Signature of otary Public OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Non - Collusion Affidavit Document Date: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: February 24, 2004 Capacity(ies) Claimed b )§kVffrschner Signer's Name: ❑ Individual Vice President Corporate Officer— Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: Hardy & Harper, Inc. Number of Pages: 1 RIGHT THUMBPRINT OF SIGNER .p of ® 1999 National Notary Association • 9350 De Soto Ave., P.O. Box 2402 • Chatsworth, CA 91313 -2402 • www.nationalnotary.org Prod. No. 5907 Reorder: Call Toll -Free 1- 800 -876 -6827 I ITEM 14 PAM _$" ' _OF TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGNATION OF SUBCONTRACTORS The undersigned certifies that he or she has used the sub -bids of the following listed subcontractors in making up his bid for the construction referred to as: CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE and that the subcontractors listed will be used for work for which they bid, subject to the approval of the Engineer, and in accordance with the applicable provision of the Specifications. Bid Item Number Subcontractor NONE Address /Telephone Hardy & Harper, Inc Name of Contractor Signa e o id Steve Kirschner ame Vice President M Title AGVWA ITEM 1�0. P % TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DECLARATION REGARDING LICENSE STATUS I do hereby declare that our /my Contractor's license is # 215952 Class A and expires on December 31,2005 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 24TH day of February , 20 04 at Santa Ana California. 21 Signature �zo Printed Name Steve Crschner Title Vice President Signing on behalf of Hardy & Harper, Inc (if applicable) TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL LIST OF REFERENCES N.r" CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE REFERENCES The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers for three (3) public agencies for which BIDDER has performed similar work within the past two(2) years: 1. City of Mission Viejo 200 Civic Center Mission Viejo, CA Name and Address of Owner Kim Lemelin (949) 470 3000 Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project asphalt & concrete Average per yr 200,000.00 Annual Mint. contract on going renewal for 12 years Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 2. Placentia Yorba Linda Unified School District 1301 E. OrangeThorpe Placentia, CA Name and Address of Owner Jim Evans (714) 996 -9600 Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project Avergae per yr 150,000.00 Annual maint contract Concrete on going renewal 6 yrs Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 3. City of. -Norco 3954 Old Hamner Road Norco, CA Name and Address of Owner Buddy Snipes (909) 270 -5602 Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project maintenance & repair on going renewal Average per yr 150,000.00 annual asphalt and concrete for 7 years Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 22 py, a 1 ,"me 1*$1iaul St Paul Fire and Marine insurance Company Surety St Paul Guardian Insurance Company St Paul Mercury Insurance Company United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company Principal Office: 385 Washington Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 Seaboard Surety Company Principal Office: 5801 Smith Avenue BID BOND Baltimore, Maryland 21209 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that Hardy & Harper, Inc. 1312 E. Warner Ave. of Santa Ana, CA 92705 as Principal, and St. Paul Guardian Insurance Companya Minnesota corporation, as surety, are held and firmly bound unto City of Lake Elsinore as Obligee, in the full and just sum of (10 %) Ten Percent of amount bid Dollars, lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, the said Principal is herewith submitting its proposal Annual maintenance contract - curb, gutter, sidewalk maintenance THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such the. if the aforesaid Principal shalt be awarded the contract the sa:d Principal will, within the time required, enter into a format contract and give a good and sufficient bond to secure the performance of the terms and conditions of the contract, then this obligation to be void; otherwise the Principal and Surety will pay unto the Obligee the difference in money between the amount of Oe bid of the said Principal and the amount for which the Obligee legally contracts with another party to perform the work if the latter amount be in excess of the former, but in no event shall liability hereunder exceed the penal sum hereof. Signed, sealed and delivered 5th L' s : Harper., �� iner Vice tai President 85274 Rev. 9 -2000 Printed In U.S.A. , day of February , 2004 (Scat) (Seal) Surety Company: St. Pau Guardian Insurance Company kathl en E. Maaguorney -in -Fact + ` till i CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California ss. County of Orange On February 5, 2004 , before me, Susan Pugh, Notary Public , Date Name and We of Of er (a.g..'Jarw Doe, Notary POW) personally appeared Kathleen Maas Names) of Slgner(s) =wmn.R H 95 fUFC TY #VC 28, 2007 Place Notary Seal Above ❑ personally known to me 0 prov ed to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same in his /her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his /her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and oTtciaj se4� Susan Pugh signature of Notary Pub! OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, It may prove valuable to persons retying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Bid Bond Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: None---------------------------- -- --- --- -------- ---- ------ ------- Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: Kathleen Maas O Individual Top of thumb here O Corporate Officer — Title(s): D Partner -0 Limited O General ff Attorney in Fact 0 Trustee 0 Guardian or Conservator 0 Other: Signer Is Representing: St Paul Guardian Insurance Company O 1987 Nalional Notsry Association • 9350 rb SOW AM. P.O. Box 2402 • Chatsworth. CA 91313 -z402 MOO. — vw, . — `10 t • .A CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of Orange ss. On February 24, 2004 before me, Kristen S. Paulino, Notary Public Date Name and Title of Officer (e.g., "Jane Doe, Notary Public ") personally appeared KRISTEN S. PAULIN0 ` I COMM. #1413262 `z otn NOTARY PUBLIC CALIFORNIA o ORANGE COUNTY IV My Comm. ExP. May 20, 2007 �[ Steve Kirschner Name(s) of Signer(s) fP "personally known to me ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the personog) whose name( /a,* subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me at(D/sVtfe executed the same in i) /It/tja�ir authorized capacity(i_ , and that by hi /i A Ir signature�on the instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person] acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS. my h nd and offici seal Signature of Nota Public OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: B,irl RnnA Document Date: FPhrttary 5 2004 Number of Pages: 1 Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: Steve Kirschner ❑ Individual Top of thumb here °Corporate Officer— Title(s): Vice President Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney -in -Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: Hardy & Harper, Inc. 0 1999 National Notary Association - 9350 De Soto Ave., P.O. Box 2402 - Chatsworth, CA 91313 -2402 - www.nationalnotary.org Prod. No. 5907 Reorder: Call Toll -Free 1- 800 - 876 -6821 1heSlPdUl POWER OF ATTORNEY Seaboard Surety Company United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company Power of Attorney No. 20675 Certificate No. 1971581 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Seaboard Surety Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of New York, and that St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company and St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company are corporations duly organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and that United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Maryland, and that Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Iowa, and that Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Wisconsin (herein collectively called the "Companies "), and that the Companies do hereby make, constitute and appoint H. J. Dueck, Dwight Reilly, Christopher S. Hopper, Claudette N. Martin and Kathleen E. Maas of the City of Upland , State California , their true and lawful Attomey(s) -in -Fact, each in their separate capacity if more than one is named above, to sign its name as surety to, and to execute, seal and acknowledge any and all bonds, undertakings, contracts and other written instruments in the nature thereof on behalf of the ComPames in their business of guaranteeing the fidelity of persons, guaranteeing the performance of contracts and executing or guaranteeing bonds and undertakings Iectitred or permitted in any actions or proceedings allowed by law. y 19th February 2003 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Companies have caused this instrumen nbe sighed and sealed this day of Seaboard Surety Company i7nited States Fidelity and Guaranty Company St. Paul Fire and Marine Insu� &'Corrrpan - Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company St. Paul Guardian Insurance' ompa Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. St. Paul Mercury Insuranceany $tNETY EIRE 6 Ry INSG �P�� q �• . , i ",O ` * Z i!O VORR)f h 'W e�ONVOGRI e WWWAIM � MCOR70R4TED 1&96 1977 PETER W. CARMAN, Vice President 1927 ` 'SEALioF ��e`'.SSAL;aO °+ 1951 l �r AINs State of Maryland City of Baltimore THOMAS E. HUIBREGTSE, Assistant Secretary On this 19 th day of February 2 ,before me, the undersigned officer, personally appeared Peter W. Carman and Thomas E. Huibregtse, who acknowledged themselves to be the Vice President and Assistant Secretary, respectively, of Seaboard Surety Company, St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company, St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company, and Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.; and that the seals affixed to the foregoing instrument are the corporate seals of said Companies; and that they, as such, being authorized so to do, executed the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein contained by signing the names of the corporations by themselves as duly authorized officers. 0�4�P EAS(Fr� 171' - _ _ "_ �,�,Q,�(�,I • V/�'1� In Witness Whereof, I hereunto set my hand and official seal. NOTARY m PUBI/c My Commission expires the Ist day of July, 2006. �o CilV REBECCA EASLEY- ONOKALA, Notary Public 9E 86203 Rev. 7 -2002 Printed in U.S.A. PARE ' f .-t4_ . ©f-° -_. Contractors Reference Check Contractor Hardy & Harper Project Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk Maintenance Reference City of Mission Viejo Name of Reference Contact Interviewed Kim Lemelin Phone Number of Reference Interviewed 949 - 470 -3000 Date of Interview 2/27/04 Reference Interview Question and Answers: What was the scope of work performed by the contractor? Asphalt & Concrete maintenance What was the total project cost? $200,000 per year /ongoing renewal 2 years Was contractor able to perform the contracted services in a timely fashion? Yes Were there any change orders? Did you have any issues relating to these change orders? No How well did the contractor interface and communicate with your staff? Very Well On a scale of 1 to 10 how would you rate the contactors overall performance with 10 being excellent? 8 ACOVAOEMNO- OF -J. 44 Contractors Reference Check Contractor Hardy & Harper Project Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk Maintenance Reference Placentia Yorba Linda Unified School District Name of Reference Contact Interviewed Jim Evans Phone Number of Reference Interviewed 714- 996 -9600 — wrong number Date of Interview 3/2/04 Reference Interview Question and Answers: What was the scope of work performed by the contractor? Asphalt & Concrete maintenance What was the total project cost? $150,000 per year /ongoing renewal 6 years Was contractor able to perform the contracted services in a timely fashion? Were there any change orders? Did you have any issues relating to these change orders? How well did the contractor interface and communicate with your staff? On a scale of 1 to 10 how would you rate the contactors overall performance with 10 being excellent? ..O► CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: RICHARD J. WATENPAUGH, CITY MANAGER DATE: MARCH 9, 2004 SUBJECT: CONTRACT FOR UNPAVED ROAD MAINTENANCE BACKGROUND On January 12, 2004 the City issued a notice inviting bids for maintenance services to be provided for the City's unpaved roads. The bid opening was held at City Hall on Wednesday, February 25, 2004, at 2:00 p.m. The scope of work consists of furnishing all materials, equipment, tools, and labor required to provide maintenance to the City's twenty -one (21) miles of unpaved road surface. Work will be assigned on a job order basis as needed. The term of the agreement will be for one (1) year and may be renewable in one year increments up to three years by the City Manager. SUMMARY The bid package consisted of two parts. Part I, a sample work order, was used to determine the lowest bidder. Part II of the bid schedule allowed for unit bid prices on several items. The unit prices were used to calculate the sample work order in Part I of the bid schedule. The unit prices in Part II of the bid schedule will be the unit prices used throughout the term of the contract for all work to be completed. Four contractors submitted a bid for the work. The bids are as follows: Contractor Location Bid Amount Hardy and Harper Santa Ana $ 5,920 NPG Perris $ 5,941 International Pavement Solutions San Bernardino $ 8,600 Copp Buena Park $ 10,080 -Pp tTZP�I N0- t PA0;_J OF FISCAL IMPACT The budget for the project is dependant upon the City Council approved budget. The City does not guarantee any work or a specific dollar amount to the contractor. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Mayor and City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a maintenance contract agreement with Hardy and Harper for maintenance services for unpaved road surfaces consistent with the above referenced terms and approved by the City Attorney. PREPARED BY: William L. Payne, Public Works Manager APPROVED BY: .� s.-/� 6✓ APPROVED FOR AGENDA LISTING: /15av'e-Sapp, Director ofpmmunity Services }M1; , —OF v..r► ,"we SPECIFICATIONS FOR ►K@@@] ! MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR UNPAVED ROAD SURFACES City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 (909) 674 -5170 1 AGENCA ITE1N1 NO. PAC- C1 L TABLE OF CONTENTS NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS .. .... .... .... .... .... .... 3 SCOPE OF WORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS . .... .... .... .... .... .... .... 6 PROPOSAL . .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ....11 BID SCHEDULE ........... . .... .... .... .... ..... .. .... 12 SIGNATURE PAGE ... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ....16 NON - COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT .... .... .... .... .... .... ....18 DESIGNATION OF SUB - CONTRACTORS .. .... .... .... .... ....19 DECLARATION REGARDING LICENSE STATUS ... .... .... .... ....20 LIST OF REFERENCES . .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ....21 CONTRACT AGREEMENT . .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ....22 CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATE - Workman's Compensation .... ....24 SPECIFICATIONS - Wage Rates and Labor Code Requirements ....25 Standard Specifications .... .... .... ....26 Special Provisions .... .... .... .... ....27 2 AGENDA ITEM NO._ � 1 PAC c�_.OF ,'.,/ :, NOTICE INVITING BIDS PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that sealed bids will be received by the City of Lake Elsinore for the maintenance, repair, and construction of certain improvements in the City of Lake Elsinore, California referred to as: MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR UNPAVED ROAD SURFACES The work to be done consists of furnishing all equipment as required by the Specifications and Contract Documents for the above stated project. The general items of work to be done hereunder consist of maintenance and repair of unpaved streets and alleyways within the city limits of the City of Lake Elsinore. Bids will be publicly opened, examined and declared in the City Hall Conference Room, 130 South Main Street, Lake Elsinore, California at the hour of 2:00 p.m. on February 25, 2004. Each bid shall be made on the proposal form furnished in the Specifications and enclosed in an envelope supplied by the bidder, bearing the title of the work and the name and address of the bidder. It is the sole responsibility of the bidder to ensure that his bid is received in proper time in the City Clerk's office at the address and time hereinabove set forth. Any bid received after the scheduled closing time for receipt of bids shall be returned to the bidder unopened. The work is to be done in accordance with the Plans and Specifications on file in the office of the Clerk of the City and said Plans and Specifications may be examined at the City of Lake Elsinore City Hall, 130 S. Main Street, Lake Elsinore, California. Each bidder must be licensed in the State of California and qualified to perform the work described in the Plans, Specifications and Contract documents. The bidder shall have a Class A Contractors license or a C -12 license. Bidders are hereby notified that, pursuant to the provisions of the California Labor Code, Section 1773, the City Council has determined the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general prevailing rate for legal holiday and overtime work in the locality in which this work is to be performed for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute the Contract. Said determination is on file with the City Clerk, and is available to any interested party upon request, and by this reference is hereby made as part of this Notice Inviting Bids. Plans, Specifications, and all Contract documents may be obtained at the Lake Elsinore City Hall located at 130 S. Main Street. 3 ,A_ GENOA ITEM 140- — — PACE, J �F� The selected bidder must furnish a Certificate of Insurance evidencing all insurance coverage as required by the Specifications. Payments to the Contractor will be made by said City in accordance with the provisions of the Specifications, submitted in accordance therewith. All bids must be made in accordance with and as directed in the Specifications, and all bidders shall comply with State, Federal and local laws applicable thereto. The City Council reserves the right to reject any or'all bids, to waive any irregularities in a bid and to award the Contract as may best serve the interests of the City. All proposals are binding for a period of (30) days after they are opened and may be retained by the City for examination and comparison. For technical information relating to the details of the proposed project and /or bidding requirements, please contact Bill Payne in the Public Works Department of the City of Lake Elsinore. By Order of the City California. Date: 1/12/04 4 Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, Vicki Oynne Kasad City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore Scope of Work The intent of the notice inviting bids is to establish a list of qualified contractors to perform maintenance on unpaved road surfaces. Contractors that are qualified will be placed on a list and ranked according to the prices quoted on the bid schedule. The Lowest bidder will be ranked number one with all other bidders listed in ascending order based on bid schedule quote. Work will be assigned to contractors based on price and responsiveness of the contractor. The general item of work to be done consist of the maintenance and repair of unpaved streets and alleyways located within the city limits of Lake Elsinore. Work involves smoothing and reshaping of unpavened road and alleyway surfaces to provide adequate drainage and to keep a compact, reasonable smooth surface at an adequate gradeline elevation. Such maintenance includes smoothing, crown reshaping, dry weather blading, adjusting the aggregate /fines mix, reshaping, and dust prevention. Specific jobs may include the use of one or all of the following pieces of equipment: motorized grader, three point hitch grading drag, water truck, rubber tire roller, steel wheel roller, tractor broom, dump truck, traffic control devices. When a job requires materials to be applied such as decomposed granite, aggregate, or dust control product, the contractor is to be reimbursed the cost of these materials after submitting a purchase receipt for these materials. The amount of work to be done will be determined by the annual budget approved by the Lake Elsinore City Council for'asphalt maintenance work. Funding for this work is allocated to the Street Maintenance Operations Budget and the Street Capital Improvement Budget. Work will be assigned on a job order basis as needed. The term of the agreement will be for a one year period and may be renewable in one year increments by mutual agreement. AGENDA ITEM NO. I PACE] _G� INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS BIDDERS KNOWLEDGE Bidders must satisfy themselves by personal examination of the work site, Plans, Specifications, and other Contract documents and by any other means as they may believe necessary, as to the actual physical conditions, requirements and difficulties under which the work must be performed. No bidder shall, at any time after submission of a proposal, make any claim or assertion that there was any misunderstanding or lack of information regarding the nature or amount of work necessary for the satisfactory completion of the job. Any errors, omissions, or discrepancies found in the Plans, Specifications, or other Contract documents shall be called to the attention of the Engineer and clarified prior to the submission of proposals. If any person contemplating submitting a bid for the proposed Contract is in doubt as to the true meaning of any part of the Plans, Specifications, or other Contract documents, he or she may submit to the Engineer a written request for the interpretation thereof, and the person submitting the request will be responsible for its prompt delivery. Any interpretation of the Contract documents will be made only by addendum duly issued and a copy of such addendum will be mailed or delivered to each person receiving a set of such documents. BIDDERS QUALIFICATIONS Bidders must be capable of performing the work bid upon. They may be required to supply a detailed statement covering experience on similar work, list of machinery, plants and other equipment which will be used on the proposed work, and such statements of their financial resources as may be deemed necessary. No proposal will be accepted from a bidder who has not been licensed in accordance with the provisions of the State Business and Professions Code. PROPOSAL FORMS Bids shall be submitted in writing on the proposal forms provided by the Agency. All information requested therein must be clearly and legibly set forth in the manner and form indicated. The Agency will not consider any proposal not meeting these requirements. For all work bid on a unit price basis, the Engineer's estimate of quantities shown on the proposal form are understood to be approximate and will be used only for the purpose of comparing bids. For work bid on a lump sum price basis, any estimate of quantities provided is furnished for the convenience of bidders is not guaranteed. When unit prices are indicated on the proposal form, the bidder shall indicate the unit price at which he or she AGENDA MM NO. ` I PACE OF��� proposes to perform each item of work, written legibly to ensure consideration. The unit price shall be stated in figures. For items where unit prices are required, the extended amount of each item shall be computed from the unity price bid on the proposal and quantity given in the estimate. In case of errors in computing the extended amount, the unit price will be assumed correct. Failure by the bidder to list unit prices shall be justification for rejection of the bid. Where lump sum is indicated on the proposal, the bidder shall indicate, under the column of extended amount, the lump sum price at which he or she proposes to perform the work described for that item. SUBMISSION OF BIDS The envelope enclosing the proposal shall be sealed and addressed to the City Clerk, City of Lake Elsinore, 130 South Main Street, Lake Elsinore, California 92530. The envelope shall be plainly marked in the upper left -hand corner with the name and address of the bidder and bear the words, "PROPOSAL FOR ", followed by the name of the project being bid and the date and hour of bid opening. The certified check, cashier's check or bid bond shall be enclosed in the same envelope with the proposal. Proposals may be mailed or delivered by messenger; however, it is the bidder's responsibility alone to ensure delivery of the proposal to the Agency's designated official prior, to the time stipulated for bid opening in the Notice Inviting Bids. Late proposals will not be considered. IRREGULAR BIDS Unauthorized conditions, limitations or provisions attached to a bid will render it irregular and may be cause for its rejection. The completed proposal form shall be without interlineations, alterations, or erasures. Alternate bids will not be considered unless specifically requested. No oral, telegraphic, or telephonic proposal, modifications, or withdrawals will be considered. Proposals may be rejected by the Agency for the following reasons: (a) If the proposal form furnished is not used or is altered. (b) If there are unauthorized additions, conditional or alternate bids or irregularities of any kind. (c) If the bidder adds any provisions reserving the right to accept or reject an award, or reserving the right to execute or not execute a contract pursuant to an award. (d) If the proposal is not properly signed by the bidder, whose address, telephone number, and California Contractor License number is shown. TAXES No mention shall be made in the proposal of sales tax, use tax, or 7 AGENDA ITEM any other tax as all amounts bid will be deemed and held to include any such taxes which may be applicable. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES All proposals must be submitted, filed, made and executed in accordance with State and Federal laws relating to bids for contracts of this nature whether the same are expressly referred to herein or not. Any bidder submitting a proposal shall by such action thereby agree to each and all of the terms, conditions, provisions and requirements set forth, contemplated, and referred to in the Plans, Specifications, and other Contract documents, and shall agree to full compliance therewith. CITY BUSINESS LICENSE The successful bidder and all subcontractors shall obtain and maintain, throughout the term of the Contract, a current City of Lake Elsinore business license. WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSALS A proposal may be withdrawn by a written request signed by the bidder. Such requests shall be delivered to the City's designated official prior to the bid opening hour stipulated in the Notice Inviting Bids. The withdrawal of a proposal will not prejudice the right of the bidder to submit a new proposal, providing there is time to do so prior to bid opening. Proposals may not be withdrawn after bid opening without forfeiture of the proposal guarantee. DISQUALIFICATION OF BIDDERS A bidder shall be considered disqualified for any of the following reasons: (a) Submitting more than firm, or corporation (b) Evidence of collusi o in such collusion shal future work of the Ag has been reinstal l (c) Proposals in which prices obviously ar one proposal from under the same or n among bidders. 1 be disqualified Age until any such ed by the Agency a any of the unit p e unbalanced. the same partnership, different name. Bidders participating as bidders for any participating bidder s a qualified bidder. rices and /or lump sum A person, firm, or corporation may submit a sub- proposal to more than one bidder, or may submit sub - proposals in addition to submitting a proposal as bidder, without being disqualified. RELIEF OF BIDDER If the bidder claims a mistake was made in his proposal, the bidder shall give the Agency written notice within five (5) days after the date for submittal of proposals of the alleged mistake, specifying in the notice in detail how the mistake occurred. Relief will be granted only for clerical errors and at Agency's discretion. -AGENDA ITEM NO. PACT_ IO QF 6 AWARD OF CONTRACT The intent of the contract is to establish a list of qualified contractors to perform maintenance on unpaved road surfaces. Contractors that are qualified will be placed on a list and ranked according to the prices quoted on the bid schedule, quality, experience, previous performance, financial ability to provide the requested work, and conformity to the bid specifications. The acceptance of a bid proposal will be evidenced by a Notice of Award of Contract in writing, delivered to the bidders whose proposal is accepted. No other act of the Agency shall necessarily constitute acceptance of a bid proposal. Agency reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive any irregularity, and to take the bids under advisement for a period of 30 days, all as may be required to provide for the best interests of the Agency. Bidders may be required to submit, prior to award of the Contract, a financial statement and list of previous work of a similar nature. In no event will an award be made until all necessary investigations are made as to the responsibility and qualifications of the bidder to whom the award is contemplated. EXECUTION OF CONTRACT The bidders to whom award is made shall execute a written Contract with the Agency and furnish good Certificates of Insurance �--. specified by the Agency within ten (10) calendar days after notification of award, unless an extension of time is granted to the bidder in writing. The Contract shall be made in the form adopted by the Agency, which includes the provision that no claim or suit whatsoever shall be made or brought by the Contractor against any officer, agent, or employee of the Agency for or on account of anything done or omitted to be done in connection with this Contract, nor shall any officer, agent or employee be liable hereunder. A corporation to which an award is made shall furnish a certified copy of the by -laws or resolution of the Board of Directors of the corporation showing the names of those individuals duly authorized to sign the Contract and bonds for the Corporation. Failure of a bidder to execute a Contract and file insurance certificates, within the time specified may be just cause for annulment of the award and the forfeiture of the proposal guarantee. No Contract shall be binding upon the Agency until the same has been approved by the Board, been satisfactorily executed by the Contractor, and executed by the Agency. 9 ,AGENDA ITEM NO. PACE OF INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Before commencing any work under the Contract, the successful bidders must file with the Public Works Manager certificates indicating proof that insurance policies, as required in the Agreement, have been obtained. Such policies include Worker's Compensation, Automobile Public Liability, and Public Liability. In the event that such policies should become inoperative at any time before the completion of the work, all work shall cease immediately until new policies are obtained, and any time so lost shall not entitle Contractor to any extension of time. WORKER'S COMPENSATION CERTIFICATE A "Contractor's Certificate Regarding Worker's Compensation Insurance" in accordance with the provisions of Section 1860, 1861, and 3700 of the Labor Code, is included as a part of the Contract documents. The Contractor shall complete this certificate before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY The bidder agrees to abide by the requirements under Executive Order No. 11246, as amended, including specifically the provisions of the Equal Opportunity Clause. 10 AGENDA IT NO. PACE�_; TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR UNPAVED ROAD SURFACES PROPOSAL Name of Bidder Address of Bidder To: Citv of Lake Elsinore, California The undersigned bidder, in accordance with the City's Notice Inviting Bids, hereby proposes to furnish all materials, equipment, tools, labor, and incidentals required for the above - stated project as set forth in the Plans, Specifications, and Contract documents therefore to perform all work in the manner and time prescribed therein. The attached Bid Schedule is hereby made a part of this proposal. The undersigned bidder declares that this proposal is based upon careful examination of the work site, Plans, Specifications, Instructions to Bidders, and all other Contract documents. If this proposal is accepted for award, bidder agrees to enter into a Contract with the City at the unit and /or lump sum prices set forth in the following bid schedule. Bidder understands that failure to enter into a Contract and furnish bonds in the manner and time prescribed will result in forfeiture to the City of the guarantee accompanying this proposal. The undersigned bidder certifies that this proposal is made in good faith, without collusion or connection with any,other person or persons bidding on the work. The undersigned bidder understands that the City Council reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals or to waive formality or technicality in any proposal in the interest of the Agency. 11 t .R►ANDA ITEM NO. PACE 13 of Y EXPLANATION OF BID SCHEDULE The following Bid Schedule is in two parts. Part I is a sample work order. Part I will be the document used to determine the lowest bidder. Part II of the Bid Schedule is unit prices to be bid by each bidder. These unit prices will be the unit prices used throughout the term of the contract for all work to be completed. These unit prices are to be used when calculating the sample work order in Part I of the Bid Schedule. 12 AAGFNDA ITEM NO. 1! P _- H- OFA�-- TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL BID SCHEDULE PART I Sample Work Order Item Description 1. Set up Mobilization for one Job 2. Motorized grader with operator 8 hours 3. Three point hitch grading drag with operator 8 hours 4. Water truck with operator 8 hours 5. Rubber tire roller with operator 8 hours 6. Steel wheel roller with operator 8 hours 7. Tractor broom with operator 8 hours 8. Dump truck with operator 8 hours 9. Traffic control devices with two man crew 8 hours Total sum of items one through nine in words: Total sum of items one through nine in numbers: $ N N NOTE: All work to be done in accordance with City of Lake Elsinore Ordinances, Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, and City Engineer direction. All work is subject to inspection by City Inspector. Any Contractor doing work in the City must have a City business license. Bid prices for sample work orders are to be calculated using unit prices bid in Part II of the bid schedule. 13 AGENDA REM NO. TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL BID SCHEDULE PART II ITEMS TO BE BID FOR MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR UNPAVED ROAD SURFACES Setup Mobilization Charge for each job $ Motorized grader with operator lump sum $ per hour Three point hitch grading drag with operator $ per hour Water truck with operator Rubber tire roller with operator Steel wheel roller with operator Tractor broom with operator Dump truck with operator Traffic control devices with two man crew Notes: $ per hour $ per hour $ per hour $ per hour $ per hour $ per hour The line item "traffic control devices" is to include the price for all signage, cones, barricades and other devices needed to properly warn traffic of road construction activity in the public right -of- way when a traffic lane is closed. Price is to include all equipment necessary to close one traffic lane and include a two man flagging team. Electronic message board is not to be included and will be an additional cost to the City if required. Traffic warning devices to protect the equipment operator's work zone including cones and signage such as "Shoulder Work Ahead" or "Men Working" are to be in place for all jobs and are to be included in the cost of each piece of equipment. The City will not be charged extra for these items. 14 -../" A_ GUNDA {TEA PAM _�OF_U_ TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL The Undersigned has checked carefully all of the above figures and understands that the City will not be responsible for any error or omissions on the part of the Undersigned in making up this bid. The Undersigned bidder declares, under penalty of perjury, that they are licensed to do business or act in the capacity of a contractor within the State of California and that they are validly licensed as follows: License Number: Classification: Expiration Date: This statement is true and correct and has the legal effect of an affidavit. 15 AGENDA ITEM PAGE OF TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL SIGNATURE PAGE IF A SOLE OWNER OR SOLE CONTRACTOR, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted 2. Signature (Given and surname) of proprietor 3. Place of Business (Street and Number) City and State Zip Code 4. Telephone Number IF A PARTNERSHIP, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted 2. Name of each member of Partnership (indicate character of each partner, either general or special [limited]) 3. Signature (Given and surname and character of partner. Note: Signature must be made by a general partner) 4. Place of Business City and State _ 5. Telephone Number 16 (Street and Number) Zip Code '../ AG w Nu -ENDAru; .-A) 0 RACE I g 'OF- .0�1 TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL IF A CORPORATION, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted 2. Name of each officer of corporation (indicate office) 3. Signature (Given and surname and title of officer authorized to sign for the Corporation) (Impress Corporate Seal here) 4. Incorporated under the laws of the State of 5. Place of Business (Street and Number) City and State Zip Code 6. Telephone Number 17 AGFXDA tiEM NO. P 1 � aF °I TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CA NON - COLLUSION DECLARATION (Public Contract Code Section 7106) I, , do hereby declare that I am (Name) the of (Title) .(Contractor) the party making the foregoing bid for the construction referred to as: MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR UNPAVED ROAD SURFACES and that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, and undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any bidder or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the bidder has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the bidder or any other bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other bidder, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the Contract of anyone interested in the proposed Contract; that all statements contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the bidder has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid. I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. DATE PLACE SIGNATURE NAME W-1 AGIFMDA ITEM NO- 1� Pm 4F �_ �e . �, TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGNATION OF SUBCONTRACTORS The undersigned certifies that he or she has used the sub -bids of the following listed subcontractors in making up his bid for the construction referred to as: MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR UNPAVED ROAD SURFACES and that the subcontractors listed will be used for work for which they bid, subject to the approval of the Engineer, and in accordance with the applicable provision of the Specifications. Bid Item Number Subcontractor Address /Telephone Name of Contractor Signature of Bidder Name Title IN #!►MDA ITEM NO •_____�_1- - ---- TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DECLARATION REGARDING LICENSE STATUS I do hereby declare that our /my Contractor's license is and expires on I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this day of , 20 at Signature. Printed N Title , California. Signing on behalf of (if applicable) 20 AtDA {T'ENI N0. t ` e 2 OF_—j- � TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL LIST OF REFERENCES MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR UNPAVED ROAD SURFACES REFERENCES The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers for three (3) public agencies for which BIDDER has performed similar work within the past two(2) years: 1. Name and Address of Owner Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 2. Name and Address of Owner Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 3. Name and Address of Owner Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 21 NDA ITEM CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONTRACT AGREEMENT This Contract Agreement is made and entered into this day I-../ of Lake Elsinore and for the construction referred to as: 2003 by and between "the City of as Contractor MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR UNPAVED ROAD SURFACES WITNESSETH that the City of Lake Elsinore and the Contractor have mutually agreed as follows: ARTICLE I The Contract documents for the aforesaid project shall consist of the Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, General Specifications, Plans, Special Provisions and all referenced specifications, details, standard drawings, and appendices, together with this Contract Agreement and all required bonds, insurance certificates, permits, notices, and affidavits, and also including any and all addenda or supplemental agreements clarifying, amending or extending the work contemplated as may be required to ensure its completion in an acceptable manner. All of the provisions of said Contract documents are made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein. ARTICLE II For and in consideration of the payments and agreements to be made and performed by the City of Lake Elsinore, Contractor agrees to ,.00 furnish all materials and perform all work required for the above stated project, and to fulfill all other obligations as set forth in the aforesaid Contract documents. ARTICLE III Contractor agrees to receive and accept the prices set forth in the proposal as full compensation for furnishing all materials, performing all work, and fulfilling all obligations hereunder. Said compensation shall cover all expenses, losses, damages, and consequences arising out of the nature of the work during its progress or prior to its acceptance including those for well and faithfully completing the work and the whole thereof in the manner and time specified in the aforesaid Contract documents and also including those arising from actions of the elements, unforeseen difficulties or obstructions encountered in the prosecution of the work, suspension or discontinuance of the work, and all other unknowns or risks of any description connected with the work. 22 =aj0Fk ARTICLE IV The City of Lake Elsinore hereby promises and agrees to employ, A0__ and does hereby employ, Contractor to provide the materials, do the work, and fulfill the obligations according to the terms and conditions herein contained and referred to, for the prices aforesaid, and hereby contracts to pay the same at the time, in the manner, and upon the conditions set forth in the Contract documents. ARTICLE V Contractor acknowledges the provisions of the State Labor Code requiring every employer to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self - insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code and certifies compliance with such provisions. ARTICLE VI Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Lake Elsinore or its officers and agents from any claims, demands, or causes of action including related expenses attorney's fees, and costs based on, arising out of, or in any way related to the work undertaken by Contractor hereunder. ARTICLE VII Contractor affirms that the signatures, titles, and seals set forth herein after the execution of this Contract Agreement represent all individuals, firm members, partners, joint ventures, and /or corporate officers having a principal interest herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto for themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns do hereby agree to the full performance of the covenants herein contained and have caused this Contract Agreement to be executed in triplicate by setting hereunto their names, titles, hands, and seals this day of 2002. Contractor: By: Title CA Lic.# Subscribed and sworn to this day of 2002. NOTARY PUBLIC City of Lake Elsinore, By: Mayor Atteste City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, Date 23 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATE REGARDING WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE Section 3700 of the Labor Code provides in part as follows: "Every employer except the State shall secure the payment of compensation in one or more of the following ways: A) By being insured against liability to pay compensation B) By securing from the Director of Industrial Relations a certificate of consent to self - insure, which may be given upon furnishing proof satisfactory to the Director of Industrial Relations of ability to self - insure and to pay any compensation that may become due to his employees..." The undersigned is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self - insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract. SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME TITLE COMPANY ADDRESS DATE (In accordance with Article 5, commencing at Section 1860, Chapter 1, Part 7, Division 2 of the Labor Code, the above Certificate must be signed by the Contractor and filed with the awarding body prior to the Contractor performing any work under this Contract.) 24 tiarr N..r` SPECIFICATIONS - Wage Rates and Labor Code Requirements WAGE RATES - By Resolution No. 82 -194 the City Council adopted the general prevailing rate of per diem wages as determined and published by the State Director of the Department of Industrial Relations, pursuant to Sections 1770, 1773 and 1773.2 of the California Labor Code. Copies of these rates and the latest revisions thereto are on file in the office of the City Clerk and are available for review upon request. Attention is directed to the provisions of Sections 1774, 1775, 1776, 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the State Labor Code. Sections 1774 and 1775 regarding prevailing wage rates. COMPLIANCE - The above Labor Code Sections will be a part of the Contract documents. It shall be the responsibility of the prime Contractor to comply with all such sections. CLAYTON ACT AND CARTWRIGHT ACT - To the extent applicable here, Section 4551 of the State Government Code specified that in executing a public works Contract with the City to supply goods, services or materials, the Contractor or Subcontractor offers and agrees to assign to the Agency all rights, title and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C., Sec. 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2 commencing with Sec. 16700) of Part 2 Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code, arising from purchase of goods, i- services or materials pursuant to the Contract or Subcontract. This assignment shall become effective when the tenders final payment to the Contractor without further acknowledgment by the parties. COPELAND "ANTI -KICK BACK" ACT - All contracts for construction or repair shall include a provision for compliance with the Copeland "Anti -Kick Back" Act (18 U.S.C. 874) as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR, Part 3). This Act provides that each Contractor shall be prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person employed in the construction, completion, or repair of public work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he or she is otherwise entitled. The participant shall report all suspected or reported violation to the State. CLEAN AIR ACT OF 1970 & FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION - Control Act Contracts of amounts in excess of $100,000 shall contain a provision which requires the recipient to agree to comply with all applicable standards, order, or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act of 1970 and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended. Violations shall be reported to the Service and Regional Office of the Environmental Protection Agency. 25 AGEMDA MM N0.____L- ~ PAt 11DF__°l -k SPECIFICATIONS - Standard Specifications The Standard Specifications of the City of Lake Elsinore are contained in the 1997 Edition of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements, as written and promulgated by the joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the Associated General Contractors of California. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher at the following address: BUILDING NEWS, INCORPORATED, 3055 3055 Overland Avenue Los Angeles, California 90034 Phone: (213) 202 -7775 or may be ordered by mail from: BNI PUBLICATIONS P.O. Box 3031 Terminal Annex Los Angeles, CA 90051 The Standard Specifications set forth above will control the General Provisions, Construction Materials and Construction Methods for this Contract except as amended by the plans, special provisions, technical specifications or other Contract documents. 26 AGENDA REAR NO. PAS *M01 SPECIFICATIONS - Special Provisions The following special provisions are supplementary and in addition to the provisions of the Standard Specifications. Prior to issuing the Notice to Proceed, the Public Services Manager will schedule a pre - construction meeting with the Contractor to review the proposed work schedule and delivery dates, arrange utility coordination, discuss construction methods, and clarify inspection procedures. The Contractor shall notify the Public Works Manager forty -eight (48) hours in advance of the time and date that each phase of work will begin on this project. The Contractor shall also give forth -eight (48) hours advance notice when he or she will require the services of or assistance from the City to lay out any portion of the work. The Contractor shall begin work within five (5) working days after the date a Notice to Proceed or work order is issued to the Contractor for a particular job. The Contractor shall complete each job assigned within five (5) working days. Special note is to be taken that at no time shall the period of time that local or through traffic is prevented from using any �.. street exceed twenty -four (24) hours. Contractor's failure to comply with the specified time limits may be cause for termination of the Contract by the City. The Contractor's activities shall be confined to the hours between 6:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. Deviation from these hours will not be permitted without prior consent of the Public Works Manager, except in the case of an emergency. The liability insurance coverage values are hereby amended to be: Insurance Coverage Requirements Limit Requirements Comprehensive General Liability $ 1,000,000 Comprehensive Automobile Liability $ 1,000,000 Contractual Liability $ 1,000,000 The Contractor and all subcontractors shall obtain and pay the cost of a City business license. The Contractor shall notify the occupants of all affected properties at least seventy -two (72) hours prior to any temporary obstruction of access. The method of notification shall be approved by the Public Works Manager prior to use by the 27 AGENDA ITEM NO.� PAGV _4F Contractor. Vehicular access to property line shall be maintained except when construction operations preclude such access for a reasonable period of time. No over -night closure of any driveway will be N4001 allowed except as permitted by the Public Works Manager. Contractor shall contact trash service provider to ensure that no street is scheduled for work on a day tract is scheduled for trash service. Contractor shall contact the Lake Elsinore School District to insure that access is provided for bus and auto traffic for all schools impacted by the project. Contractor must coordinate work with the postal service to insure that mail can be delivered in the project area. The City wishes to retain the contractor to provide maintenance, repair, and construction of curb, gutter, and sidewalk for a one year period, renewable annually up to a total of three years, commencing the date of the signed contract, to provide said work on an as needed basis and as the budget allows. It is understood that work will be performed at the unit prices set forth in this contract. S"We AGODA ITEM NO. I PACE—") TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR UNPAVED ROAD SURFACES Name of Bidder Address of Bidder PPnPn.gAT. Hardy & Harper, Inc 1312 E. Warner Ave Santa Ana, CA 92705 To: Citv of Lake Elsinore, California The undersigned bidder, in accordance with the City's Notice Inviting Bids, hereby proposes to furnish all materials, equipment, tools, labor, and incidentals required for the above - stated project as set forth in the Plans, Specifications, and Contract documents therefore to perform all work in the manner and time prescribed therein. The attached Bid Schedule is hereby made a part of this proposal. The undersigned bidder declares that this proposal is based upon careful examination of the work site, Plans, Specifications, Instructions to Bidders, and all other Contract documents. If this proposal is accepted for award, bidder agrees to enter into a Contract with the City at the unit and /or lump sum prices set forth in the following bid schedule. Bidder understands that failure to enter into a Contract and furnish bonds in the manner and time prescribed will result in forfeiture to the City of the guarantee accompanying this proposal. The undersigned bidder certifies that this proposal is made in 1%00 good faith, without collusion or connection with any,other person or persons bidding on the work. The undersigned bidder understands that the City Council reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals or to waive formality or technicality in any proposal in the interest of the Agency. 11 �-nor AGENDA ifEM N0. F.,.. EXPLANATION OF BID SCHEDULE The following Bid Schedule is in two parts. Part I is a sample work order. Part I will be the document used to determine the lowest bidder. Part II of the Bid Schedule is unit prices to be bid by each bidder. These unit prices will be the unit prices used throughout the term of the contract for all work to be completed. These unit prices are to be used when calculating the sample work order in Part I of the Bid Schedule. 12 AMA nEM NO. PACE vl r TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL BID SCHEDULE PART I Sample Work Order Item Description 1. Set up Mobilization for one Job 2. Motorized grader with operator 8 hours 3. Three point hitch grading drag with operator 8 hours 4. Water truck with operator 8 hours 5. Rubber tire roller with operator 8 hours 6. Steel wheel roller with operator 8 hours 7. Tractor broom with operator 8 hours 8. Dump truck with operator 8 hours 9. Traffic control devices Amount $ 400.00 960.00 $ 576.00 $ 576.00 $640.00 $576.00 $576.00 $576.00 with two man crew 8 hours $1040.00 Total sum of items one through nine in words: FIVE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED AND TWENTY DOLLARS Total sum of items one through nine in numbers: $ 5,920.00 NOTE: All work to be done in accordance with City of Lake Elsinore Ordinances, Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, and City Engineer direction. All work is subject to inspection by City Inspector. Any Contractor doing work in the City must have a City business license. Bid prices for sample work orders are to be calculated using unit prices bid in Part II of the bid schedule. 13 14.00 AMDA MM NO PAM OF TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL BID SCHEDULE PART II ITEMS TO BE BID FOR MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR UNPAVED ROAD SURFACES Setup Mobilization Charge for each job $ 400.00 lump sum Motorized grader with operator $120.00 per hour Three point hitch grading drag with operator $72.00 per hour Water truck with operator Rubber tire roller with operator Steel wheel roller with operator Tractor broom with operator Dump truck with operator Traffic control devices with two man crew Notes: $72.00 per hour $80.00 per hour $72.00 per hour $72.00 - per hour $72.00 per hour $130.00 per hour The line item "traffic control devices" is to include the price for all signage, cones, barricades and other devices needed to properly warn traffic of road construction activity in the public right -of- way when a traffic lane is closed. Price is to include all equipment necessary to close one traffic lane and include a two man flagging team. Electronic message board is not to be included and will be an additional cost to the City if required. Traffic warning devices to protect the equipment operator's work zone including cones and signage such as "Shoulder Work Ahead" or "Men Working" are to be in place for all jobs and are to be included in the cost of each piece of equipment. The City will not be charged extra for these items. 14 OA NO. OF TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL The Undersigned has checked carefully all of the above figures and understands that the City will not be responsible for any error or omissions on the part of the Undersigned in making up this bid. The Undersigned bidder declares, under penalty of perjury, that they are licensed to do business or act in the capacity of a contractor within the State of California and that they are validly licensed as follows: License Number: 215952 Classification: Class " A " Expiration Date: December 31,2005 This statement is true and correct and has the legal effect of an affidavit. 15 MDA MM NO. I PACE c OF -..me TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL ,^ SIGNATURE PAGE IF A SOLE OWNER OR SOLE CONTRACTOR, SIGN HERE: M 1. Name under which business is conducted N 2. Signature (Given and surname) of proprietor 3. Place of Business (Street and Number) City and State Zip Code 4. Telephone Number IF A PARTNERSHIP, SIGN HERE: Ar/ 1. Name under which business is conducted ,y ! 4 2. Name of each member of Partnership (indicate character of each partner, either general or special (limited)) 3. Signature (Given and surname and character of partner. Note: Signature must be made by a general partner) 4. Place of Business City and State 5. Telephone Number 16 (Street and Number) Zip Code *RDA HW NO. _ , OF- TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL IF A CORPORATION, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted Hardy & Hamer, Inc 2. Name of each officer of corporation (indicate office) Fred T. Maas - President, Treasurer and General Manager Steve Kirschner - Vice President Kristen S. Paulin - Corporate Secretary 3. Signature (Given and surname and title of officer authorized to sign for the Corporation) /, Steve Kirschner - Vice President = Kristen S. Paulin - Corporate Secretary = dfi. 4 5 (Impress Corporate Seal here) 4. Incorporated under the laws of the State of 5. Place of Business 1312 E. Warner Ave (Street and Number) City and State Santa Ana, CP, Zip Code 92705 6. Telephone Number (714) 444 -1851 17 # t"r NDA i3fM t 0• I PMT of b ti.i✓ CM TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CA NON- COLLUSION DECLARATION (Public Contract Code Section 7106) I, Steve Kirschner (Name) the Vice President (Title) the party making the to as: do hereby declare that I am of Hardy & Harper, Inc ,(Contractor) foregoing bid for the construction referred MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR UNPAVED ROAD SURFACES and that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, and undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any bidder or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the bidder has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the bidder or any other bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that'of any other bidder, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the Contract of anyone interested in the proposed Contract; that all statements contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the bidder has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid. I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. February 24, 2004 Santa Ana, CA DATE PLACE SIGN TURE Steve Kirschner - Vice President NAME ,NDA {TEM N0. pAM CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of Orange I ss. On February 24, 2004 before me, Kristen S. Paulino, Notary Public Date Name and Title of Officer (e.g., "Jane Doe, Notary Public ") personally appeared Steve Kirschner Name(s) of Signer(s) personally known to me ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence J KRISTEN S. PAULINO ` COMM. # 1413262 e ^. N07ARr PUBLIC-CAUFORNIA o ORANGE COUNTY N My Comm. Exp. May 20, 2007 (� to be the personN whose named ,4i� subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that�hQtW executed the sa a in hl r authorized capacity (ii and that by (9hiRflt* signature�on the instrument the person*, or the entity upon behalf of which the personM acted, executed the instrument. WITN SS my hand and o icial eal. Signature of Notary Public OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Non - Collusion Affidavit February 24, 2004 Number of Pages: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: Steve Kirschner ❑ Individual Corporate Officer — Title(s): Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney -in -Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Vice President Signer Is Representing: Hardy & Harper, Inc. ® 1999 National Notary Association - 9350 De Soto Ave., P.O. Box 2402 • Chatsworth, CA 91313 -2402 • www.nationalnotary.org RIGHT THUMBPRINT OF SIGNER Prod. No. 5907 Reorder. Call Toll -Free 1- 800-876 -6827 M PAS t DD-- dF-- -i-�'t LJ TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGNATION OF SUBCONTRACTORS The undersigned certifies that he or she has used the sub -bids of the following listed subcontractors in making up his bid for the construction referred to as: MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR UNPAVED ROAD SURFACES and that the subcontractors listed will be used for work for which they bid, subject to the approval of the Engineer, and in accordance with the applicable provision of the Specifications. Bid Item Number Subcontractor Address /Telephone NONE Hardy & Harper, Inc Name of Contractor Sian"'atZre of 19 Steve Kirschner Vice President Name Title HDA ITEM NO FM OF q TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DECLARATION REGARDING LICENSE STATUS I do hereby declare that our /my Contractor's license is NO 215952 Class " A " and expires on December 31,2005 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 24TH day of February 04 20 at Santa Ana California. Signature Printed Name Steve irschner Title Vice President Signing on behalf of Hardy & Harper, Inc (if applicable) 20 AGENDA MIA.M0. �IJ, PAC E. OF,; 1; 4. r../ TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL LIST OF REFERENCES MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR UNPAVED ROAD SURFACES REFERENCES The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers for three (3) public agencies for which BIDDER has performed similar work within the past two(2) years: 1. County of Orange 10852 Douglass Road Anaheim, CA 92806 Name and Address of Owner Holly Felipe (714) 567- 6253 Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project Annual contract Avrg per yr. 700,000.00 asphalt and concrete maint. on going renewal 6 yrs Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed Capistrano Unified School Dist 32972 Calle Perfecto San Juan Capistrano, CA Name and Address of Owner Mark Bauer (949) 489 - 7295 Name and TelephWrc�son Familiar with Project an concrete Avg. per yr 400,000.00 Annual mint contract on going renewal 12 yrs Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 3. Rancho City of Rancho Palos Verdes 30940 Hawthorne Blvd Palos Verdes, CA 90275 Name and Address of Owner Dean Allison (310) 541 - 6500 Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project asphlat and concrete Avrg per yr. 300,000.00 Annual mint. contract on going renewal for 5 years Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 21 AGENDA ffEM PACE_43L_0 ft.%FaV' St Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company Surety St Paul Guardian Insurance Company St Paul Mercury Insurance Company United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company N../' Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. Fidelity and Guaranty Insurame Company Principal Office: 385 Washington Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 Seaboard Surety Company BID BOND Principal Office: 5801 Smith Avenue Baltimore, Maryland 21209 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that _Hardy & Harper, Inc. 1312 E. Warner Ave of Santa Ana, CA 92705 and St. Paul Guardian Insurance Co. a bound unto City of Lake Elsinore Minnesota as Principal, corporation, as Surety, are held and firmly as Obligee, in the full and dust sum of (10 %) Ten Percent of amount bid Dollars, lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum, well and truly to be trade, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators. successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, the said Principal is herewith submitting its proposal Annual Maintenance unpaved roads surfaces THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such tha. if the aforesaid Principal shall be awarded the contract the said Principal will, within the time required, enter into a format contract and give a good and sufficient bond to secure the performance of the terms and conditions of the contract, then this obligation to be void; otherwise the Principal and Surety will pay unto the Obligee the difference in money between the amount of the bid of the said Principal and the amount for which the Obligee legally contracts with another party to perform the work if the latter amount be in excess of the former, but in no event shall liability hereunder exceed the penal sum hereof. Signed, sealed and delivered 5th 7010 . � � VA 105 Va. 2 .- 85274 Rev. 9 -2000 Printed in U.S.A. , day of February , 2004 (Seal) (Sea)) Surety Company; St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company 't Kat en E. Maas Atterney- in -Fa A MDA ITEM PACE�T(3F�� CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of Orange ss. On February 5, 2004 , before me, Susan Pugh, Notary Public , Date Name and Title of OOker (e.g., *Jane Doe, Notary Public') personally appeared Kathleen Maas Name(s) of Signer(s) ,:.:: SUSAN PUGH COW. # 1407795 NOTARY PUNX t/ CALIFORNIA ORANGE COUNTY Comm. MARCH 26.2007 ❑ personalty known to me ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same in his/her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his /her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and offici seal. Place Notary Seal Above Susan Pugh Signature of Notary Public OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons retying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Bid Bond Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: None-------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: Kathleen Maas ❑ Individual Top of thumb here. ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited O General LX Attomey in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other. Signer Is Representing: St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company 10 O 1097 National Notary Association • 9350 De Soto Ave., P.O. Box 2402 • Chatsworth, CA 91313 -2402 Prod. No. 5907 Reorder. Call TaFree 1-800-875-M? AGENDA ITEM NO.�� PACT S osr, DeSfftl Power of Attorney No. POWER OF ATTORNEY Seaboard Surety Company St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company 20675 United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. Certificate No. 1971580 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Seaboard Surety Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of New York, and that St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company and St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company are corporations duly organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and that United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Maryland, and that Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Iowa, and that Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Wisconsin (herein collectively called the "Companies "), and that the Companies do hereby make, constitute and appoint H. J. Dueck, Dwight Reilly, Christopher S. Hopper, Claudette N. Martin and Kathleen E. Maas of the City of Upland , State California , their true and lawful Attorney(s) -in -Fact, each in their separate capacity if more than one is named above, to sign its name as surety to, and to execute, seal and acknowledge any and all bonds, undertakings, contracts and other written instruments in the nature thereof on behalf of the Companies in their business of guaranteeing the fidelity of persons, guaranteeing the performance of contracts and executing or guaranteeing bonds and undertakin4sp, d or pefmitted irr any actions or proceedings allowed by law. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Companies have caused this' 19`� February 2003 p �e stand sea}ed this day of u `, Seaboard Surety Company -United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company e St. Paul Fire and Marine Insu ce tom 1, n3t Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company St. Paul Guardian Insurance +Comp s, Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. St. Paul Mercury Insurance y t E�Fn SIMirIy Y ppee s y * Z lCORROR,,�F i Q. i011Y0RAT� ^ ` Wnenn...� i F i •^`'^`^NNYM1 N 192 �: n • t .SEAL i u t696 ' 1977 g PETER W. CARMAN, Vice President SEAL.:or bF �9Jt't OFhEW s,Rn uCE 1O d1. AyN yl AIN� 1 M ^ • f ' State of Maryland City of Baltimore THOMAS E. HUIBREGTSE, Assistant Secretary On this 19,b day of February 2003 , before me, the undersigned officer, personally appeared Peter W. Carman and Thomas E. Huibregtse, who acknowledged themselves to be the Vice President and Assistant Secretary, respectively, of Seaboard Surety Company, St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company, St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company, and Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.; and that the seals affixed to the foregoing instrument are the corporate seals of said Companies; and that they, as such, being authorized so to do, executed the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein contained by signing the names of the corporations by themselves as duly authorized officers. O�VGPEAS�r� ¢` Nor ZD In Witness Whereof, I hereunto set my hand and official seal. aoe My Commission expires the Ist day of July, 2006. ao CiT� REBECCA EASLEY- ONOKALA, Notary Public 9E 86203 Rev. 7 -2002 Printed in U.S.A. AMDA iTEM N0. CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of Orange ss. On February 24, 2004 before me, Kristen S. Paulino, Notary Public Date Name and Title of Officer (e.g., "Jane Doe, Notary Public ") personally appeared KRISTEN S. PAULINO Q COMM. #p1413262 • NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA 3 ORANGE COUNTY nai My Comm. Exp. May 20, 2007 Steve Kirschner Name(s) of Signer(s) impersonally known to me ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person)Q whose name is� subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me tha fi s*t� executed the sa e in � /tp�fJt C authorized capacity(), and that by (9Wt1 it signature'{ on the instrument the persor"), or the entity upon behalf of which the personoilj acted, executed the instrument. WIT E S my hand and off ici s I. 6 Signature of Notary ublic OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Rod Rond Document Date: Fehrijary 5 9004 Number of Pages: 1 Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: Steve Kirschner ❑ Individual Top of thumb here Corporate Officer— Title(s): Vice President ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney -in -Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: Hardy & Harper, Inc. ® 1999 National Notary Association - 9350 De Soto Ave., P.O. Box 2402 • Chatsworth, CA 91313 -2402 • www.nationalnotary.org Prod. No. 5907 Reorder: Call Toll -Free 1 -800- 876 -6827 PM _.��- Contractors Reference Check Contractor Hardy & Harper Project Unpaved Road Surfaces Reference County of Orange Name of Reference Contact Interviewed Holly Felipe Phone Number of Reference Interviewed 714 -567 -6253 Date of Interview 3/2/04 Reference Interview Question and Answers: What was the scope of work performed by the contractor? Asphalt & concrete maintenance Pothole, adjust the manholes, lead the crack sealing, asphalt ramps on raised concrete What was the total project cost? $500,000 per year/ ongoing renewal 3 years Was contractor able to perform the contracted services in a timely fashion? Yes Were there any change orders? Did you have any issues relating to these change orders? No How well did the contractor interface and communicate with your staff? Very Well On a scale of I to 10 how would you rate the contactors overall performance with 10 being excellent? 7 .�i 1100,, Contractors Reference Check Contractor Hardy & Harper Project Unpaved Road Surfaces Reference City of Rancho Palos Verdes Name of Reference Contact Interviewed Dean Allison Phone Number of Reference Interviewed 310 -541 -6500 — Fax number Date of Interview 3/2/04 Reference Interview Question and Answers: What was the scope of work performed by the contractor? Asphalt & concrete maintenance What was the total project cost? $300,000 per year/ ongoing renewal 5 years Was contractor able to perform the contracted services in a timely fashion? Were there any change orders? Did you have any issues relating to these change orders? How well did the contractor interface and communicate with your staff? On a scale of I to 10 how would you rate the contactors overall performance with 10 being excellent? AMDA MM NO. Contractors Reference Check Contractor Hardy & Harper Project Unpaved Road Surfaces Reference Capistrano Unified School District Name of Reference Contact Interviewed Mark Bauer Phone Number of Reference Interviewed 949- 489 -7295 Date of Interview 3/1/04 Reference Interview Question and Answers: What was the scope of work performed by the contractor? Asphalt & concrete maintenance Rough and fine grading, lay base, concrete pours, asphalt sections, concrete curb work. What was the total project cost? $400,000 per year/ ongoing renewal 5 years Was contractor able to perform the contracted services in a timely fashion? Yes Were there any change orders? Did you have any issues relating to these change orders? No How well did the contractor interface and communicate with your staff? Excellent On a scale of I to 10 how would you rate the contactors overall performance with 10 being excellent? 10 ,"age N%./ ,AMDA ti'E14 NO. PAM 6b 4F _.�. TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR UNPAVED ROAD SURFACES PROPOSAL ORIGINAL Name of Bidder NPG Corporation Address of Bidder 1354 Jet Way * Perris, California 92571 To: City of Lake Elsinore, California The undersigned bidder, in accordance with the City's Notice Inviting Bids, hereby proposes to furnish all materials, equipment, tools, labor, and incidentals required for the above - stated project as set forth in the Plans, Specifications, and Contract documents therefore to perform all work in the manner and time prescribed therein. The attached Bid Schedule is hereby made a part of this proposal. The undersigned bidder declares that this proposal is based upon careful examination of the work site, Plans, Specifications, Instructions to Bidders, and all other Contract documents. If this proposal is accepted for award, bidder agrees to enter into a Contract with the City at the unit and/or lump sum prices set forth in the following bid schedule. Bidder understands that failure to enter into a Contract and furnish bonds in the manner and time prescribed will result in forfeiture to the City of the guarantee accompanying this proposal. The undersigned bidder certifies that this proposal is made in good faith, without collusion or connection with any,other person or persons bidding on the work. The undersigned bidder understands that the City Council reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals or to waive formality or technicality in any proposal in the interest of the Agency. 11 AGENDA Ci'EM�NO. OF PAM EXPLANATION OF BID SCHEDULE The following Bid Schedule is in two parts. Part I is a sample work order. Part I will be the document used to determine the lowest bidder. `-WO Part II of the Bid Schedule is unit prices to be bid by each bidder. These unit prices will be the unit prices used throughout the term of the contract for all work to be completed. These unit prices are to be used when calculating the sample work order in Part I of the Bid Schedule. 12 NDA REIN HO. TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL BID SCHEDULE PART I Sample Work Order Item Description 1. Set up Mobilization for one Job 2. Motorized grader with operator 8 hours 3. Three point hitch grading drag with operator 8 hours 4. Water truck with operator 8 hours 5. Rubber tire roller with operator 8 hours 6. Steel wheel roller with operator 8 hours 7. Tractor broom with operator 8 hours 8. Dump truck with operator 8 hours 9. Traffic control devices with two man crew 8 hours Amount $ 325.00 1,000.00 $ 560.00 $ 600.00 $ 416.00 $ 720.00 $ 400.00 $ 600.00 $ 1,320.00 Total sum of items one through nine in words: Five Thousand Nine Hundred Forty One Dollars And 00/100--- - - - - -- Total sum of items one through nine in numbers: $ 5,941.00 NOTE: All work to be done in accordance with City of Lake Elsinore Ordinances, Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, and City Engineer direction. All work is subject to inspection by City Inspector. Any Contractor doing work in the City must have a City business license. Bid prices for sample work orders are to be calculated using unit prices bid in Part II of the bid schedule. 13 AGNDA MIA N0. OF q� TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL BID SCHEDULE PART II ITEMS TO BE BID FOR MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR UNPAVED ROAD SURFACES Setup Mobilization Charge for each job $ 325.00 lump sum Motorized grader with operator $ 125.00 per hour Three point hitch grading drag with operator $ 70.00 Der hour Water truck with operator $ 75.00 per hour Rubber tire roller with operator Steel wheel roller with operator Tractor broom with operator Dump truck with operator Traffic control devices with two man crew Notes: 52.00 $ per hour 90.00 $ per hour $ 50.00 per hour $ 75.00 per hour $ 165.00 Der hour The line item "traffic control devices" is to include the price for all signage, cones, barricades and other devices needed to properly warn traffic of road construction activity in the public right -of- way when a traffic lane is closed. Price is to include all equipment necessary to close one traffic lane and include a two man flagging team. Electronic message board is not to be included and will be an additional cost to the City if required. Traffic warning devices to protect the equipment operator's work zone including cones and signage such as "Shoulder Work Ahead" or "Men Working" are to be in place for all jobs and are to be included in the cost of each piece of equipment. The City will not be charged extra for these items. 14 4600A MM N0. U--- TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL The Undersigned has checked carefully all of the above figures and understands that the City will not be responsible for any error or omissions on the part of the Undersigned in making up this bid. The Undersigned bidder declares,, under penalty of perjury, that they are licensed to do business or act in the capacity of a contractor within the State of California and that they are validly licensed as follows: License Number: 664779 Classification: C12 / B / A Expiration Date: February 28, 2005 This statement is true and correct and has the legal effect of an affidavit. 15 AQWDA MM NO. PACE 55 OF TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL SIGNATURE PAGE IF A SOLE OWNER OR SOLE CONTRACTOR, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted 2. Signature (Given and surname) of proprietor 3. Place of Business (Street and Number) City and State Zip Code 4. Telephone Number IF A PARTNERSHIP, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted 2. Name of each member of Partnership (indicate character of each partner, either general or special [limited]) 3. Signature (Given and surname and character of partner. Note: Signature must be made by a general partner) 4. Place of Business City and State _ 5. Telephone Number 16 (Street and Number) Zip Code t' DA ffEM No. PA06 OF TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL IF A CORPORATION, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted NPG Corporation 2. Name of each officer of corporation (indicate office) Jeff S. Nelson * President Sharon Nelson *CFO 3. Signature (Given and surname and title of officer authorized to sign for Ae Corporation) Jeff ,T/ N V,.goy * President ,0--. X: Impress Corporate Seal here) 4. I corporated under aws of the State of California 5. Place of Business 1354 Jet Way (Street and Number) City and State Perris, California Zip Code 92571 6. Telephone Number 909 - 940 -0200 17 DA t7£M ISO. PA X- ,S � TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CA NON - COLLUSION DECLARATION (Public Contract Code Section 7106) I, Jeff S. Nelson do hereby declare that I am (Name) the President of - NPG Corporation , (Title) (Contractor) the party making the foregoing bid for the construction referred to as: MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR UNPAVED ROAD SURFACES and that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, and undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any bidder or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the bidder has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the bidder or any other bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that'of any other bidder, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the Contract of anyone interested in the proposed Contract; that all statements contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the bidder has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid. I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. February 16, 2004 DATE 1354 Jet Way * Perris, California SI Jeff S. Nelson * President NAME PLACE TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGNATION OF SUBCONTRACTORS The undersigned certifies that he or she has used the sub -bids of the following listed subcontractors in making up his bid for the construction referred to as: MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR UNPAVED ROAD SURFACES and that the subcontractors listed will be used for work for which they bid, subject to the approval of the Engineer, and in accordance with the applicable provision of the Specifications. Bid Item Number Not Applicable Subcontractor Address /Telephone NPG Corporation w Name of Contractor Signature of Bidder Jeff S. Nelson 19 President Name Title AGENDA MM NO• q TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DECLARATION REGARDING LICENSE STATUS I do hereby declare that our /my Contractor's license is 664779 and expires on February 28, 2005 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 6th day of February 2004 at Perris , California. Signatur Print4 Name Jeff S. Nelson Title President Signing on behalf of (if applicable) 20 ��A MM 140. OF PAct TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL LIST OF REFERENCES MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR UNPAVED ROAD SURFACES D 1+ T, V'D VATO V O The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers for three (3) public agencies for which BIDDER has performed similar work within the past two(2) years: 1. Moreno Valley Unified School District Name and Address of Owner Stan Brown 909 - 571 -7800 Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project 64,000.00 Concrete & Asphalt August 2003 Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 2. Sun Lakes Country Club Name and Address of Owner Jim Morgan 909- 845 -2191 Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project 199,000.00 District Wide Asphalt September 2003 Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 3. F.H. Paschen / SN Nielsen Name and Address of Owner Bruce Bare 562- 864 -1950 Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project 378,000.00 Asphalt COnstruction August 2003 Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 21 sAMDA REM NO..,.,.._. � ! Q- PAti[_ —_L�p. 02/29/2004 21:40 9099409192 NPG GOLDSTAR PAGE 01 NPG CO]RUPLORATION (909) 944 -0200 Phone P.O. Box 1515 * Perris, Ca. 92572 (909) 940 -9192 Fax 1354 Jet Way * Perris, Ca. 92571 RECEIVED MAR 0 12004 March 1, 2004 ?U1 3LIC WORKS City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, California 92530 Via Fax / Certified Mail 7003 1680 0002 4659 4007 Attention: Bill Payne Reference: Maintenance Program for Unpaved Road Surfaces Bid pate: February 25, 2004 Q 2:00p.m. Mr. Bill Payne: Good Morning, I am writing this letter to you this morning regarding the above referenced project. Upon my arrival this morning to my office I opened my email and found an interesting piece of mail sent from my insurance company. I am not sure if this would be considered good or bad news. The insurance company reviewed the bid results and stated that Set Up Mobilization for one Job was bid from us at $325,00 and by Hardy & Harper at $400.00. Ultimately once the setup charges was applied to each project we would be considered low bid and definitely low on the street maintenance where we were $21.00 higher. Please call my office so that we can discuss this matter further. Thank you for your attention to this matter and i look forward to speaking with you. JSN,jdlr cc: rile DA ITEM No-. t I - -- TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR UNPAVED ROAD SURFACES PROPOSAL Name of Bidder =MTGP -M ATt o u aL 'AU MEAtT SQUXTt D&A S --=VC Address of Bidder T —D. (bOK (0458 , SAN 'bEJ.Q,i p -atK.o eA U423- 0458 To: City of Lake Elsinore, California The undersigned bidder, in accordance with the City's Notice Inviting Bids, hereby proposes to furnish all materials, equipment, tools, labor, and incidentals required for the above - stated project as set forth in the Plans, Specifications, and Contract documents therefore to perform all work in the manner and time prescribed therein. The attached Bid Schedule is hereby made a part of this proposal. The undersigned bidder declares that this proposal is based upon careful examination of the work site, Plans, Specifications, Instructions to Bidders, and all other Contract documents. If this proposal is accepted for award, bidder agrees to enter into a Contract with the City at the unit and /or lump sum prices set forth in the following bid schedule. Bidder understands that failure to enter into a Contract and furnish bonds in the manner and time prescribed will result in forfeiture to the City of the guarantee accompanying this proposal. The undersigned bidder certifies that this proposal is made in good faith, without collusion or connection with any.other person or persons bidding on the work. The undersigned bidder understands that the City Council reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals or to waive formality or technicality in any proposal in the interest of the Agency. 11 aA iT�M NO. =Tiof EXPLANATION OF BID SCHEDULE The following Bid Schedule is in two parts. Part I is a sample work order. Part I will be the document used �„rr to determine the lowest bidder. Part II of the Bid Schedule is unit prices to be bid by each bidder. These unit prices will be the unit prices used throughout the term of the contract for all work to be completed. These unit prices are to be used when calculating the sample work order in Part I of the Bid Schedule. 12 jpl►17 V, p0. ' r b t4 fit �n _ r TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL BID SCHEDULE PART I Sample Work Order Item Description Amount 1. Set up Mobilization for one Job $ 4000.01) 2. Motorized grader with operator 8 hours 880.oa 3. Three point hitch grading drag with operator 8 hours $ %60 -OD 4. Water truck with operator 8 hours $ 52 O.0 U 5. Rubber tire roller with operator 8 hours $ 00000.0 a 6. Steel wheel roller with operator 8 hours $ j''?0•da 7. Tractor broom with operator 8 hours $ 880.011 8. Dump truck with operator 8 hours $ ("00-00 9. Traffic control devices with two man crew 8 hours $ /'?'00. '0 a Total ,sum of items one tq(h_rpo�ugh nine in words: 101-� 4:�� Total sum of items one through nine in numbers: $ NOTE: All work to be done in accordance with City of Lake Elsinore Ordinances, Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, and City Engineer direction. All work is subject to inspection by City Inspector. Any Contractor doing work in the City must have a City business license. Bid prices for sample work orders are to be calculated using unit prices bid in Part II of the bid schedule. 13 NMA R'EAA too. .�s - PAM TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL BID SCHEDULE PART II ITEMS TO BE BID FOR MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR UNPAVED ROAD SURFACES Setup Mobilization Charge for each job $ 07000-00 lump sum Motorized grader with operator $ &0.00 per hour Three point hitch grading drag with operator $ 95 D D per hour Water truck with operator Rubber tire roller with operator Steel wheel roller with operator Tractor broom with operator Dump truck with operator Traffic control devices with two man crew Notes: $ %s.00 per hour $ D0 per hour $ / /D• 0 per hour $ //0-00, per hour $_ 7.5o d per hour $ a5D • e 4---per hour The line item "traffic control devices" is to include the price for all signage, cones, barricades and other devices needed to properly warn traffic of road construction activity in the public right -of- way when a traffic lane is closed. Price is to include all equipment necessary to close one traffic lane and include a two man flagging team. Electronic message board is not to be included and will be an additional cost to the City if required. Traffic warning devices to protect the equipment operator's work zone including cones and signage such as "Shoulder Work Ahead" or "Men Working" are to be in place for all jobs and are to be included in the cost of each piece of equipment. The City will not be charged extra for these items. 14 ..i TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL The Undersigned has checked carefully all of the above figures and �., understands that the City will not be responsible for any error or omissions on the part of the Undersigned in making up this bid. The Undersigned bidder declares, under penalty of perjury, that they are licensed to do business or act in the capacity of a contractor within the State of California and that they are validly licensed as follows: ,^ License Number: Classification: A B Expiration Date: IL— X30 This statement is true and correct and has the legal effect of an affidavit. 15 TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL SIGNATURE PAGE IF A SOLE OWNER OR SOLE CONTRACTOR, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted 2. Signature (Given and surname) of proprietor 3. Place of Business (Street and Number) City and State Zip Code 4. Telephone Number IF A PARTNERSHIP, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted 2. Name of each member of Partnership (indicate character of each partner, either general or special [limited]) 3. Signature (Given and surname and character of partner. Signature must be made by a general partner) 4. Place of Business City and State _ 5. Telephone Number 16 (Street and Number) Zip Code Note: -../ `.0e TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL IF A CORPORATION, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted -DVM WflP VVaL M8A17- Sojwrlays 2. Name of each officer of corporation (indicate office) 2NC . 3. Signature (Given and surname and title of officer authorized to sign for the Corporation) (P£npress Corporate Seal here) 4. Incorporated under the laws of the State of hiVA-D A 5. Place of Business P.) -BOX WS8 , (Street a d Number) City and State SAM T,V--T,' b1M p 0 Zip Code g11a3 -D458 6. Telephone Number °1 DQ- -194- a l p 1 17 TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CA NON - COLLUSION DECLARATION (Public Contract Code Section 7106) I, D�AtNtS C!. RIF -G &R , do hereby declare that I am (Name) the 1 REStDr-m-T- f 7REAS of _TJ4 6RNPT1DM 4L P14MM EMT SOLLlT1DMS .21U4 . (Title) (Contractor) the party making the foregoing bid for the construction referred to as: MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR UNPAVED ROAD SURFACES and that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, and undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any bidder or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the bidder has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the bidder or any other bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other bidder, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the Contract of anyone interested in the proposed Contract; that all statements contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the bidder has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the `Not contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid. I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. DATE PLACE SIGNATURE �S. NAME 18 `.&0 MDA ITEM NO - TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGNATION OF SUBCONTRACTORS The undersigned certifies that he or she has used the sub -bids of the following listed subcontractors in making up his bid for the construction referred to as: MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR UNPAVED ROAD SURFACES and that the subcontractors listed will be used for work for which they bid, subject to the approval of the Engineer, and in accordance with the applicable provision of the Specifications. Bid Item Number Subcontractor Address /Telephone Noble AT1Q MA,L %AMk, t SOLuC DMS G Name of Contractor :tW- Signatur of Bidder l ASSUA11 S C . Name Title 101 PAM �..� _1- F TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL '"Nov, CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DECLARATION REGARDING LICENSE STATUS I do hereby declare that our /my Contractor's license is %02 9 a and expires on I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this oily day of LAG A&L-1 20041. at %d%l!E- , California. Signature- Printed Name D &AIA11 S C' • J�1 !EFs Title FRE-5 79,645 Signing on behalf of - Z;tli"ERA1A7'7dJll4L 00i4UM "7 �Z. &T /P,4/S --ZWG , (if applicable) 20 f TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL LIST OF REFERENCES REFERENCES MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR UNPAVED ROAD SURFACES The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers for three (3) public agencies for which BIDDER has performed similar work within the past two(2) years: 1. • grave • v �-A Em agingmej • - Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 2. Name and Address of Owner Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 3. Name and Address of Owner Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 21 BRANCH OFFICES: P.O. Box 10458, San Bernardino, CA 92423 -0458 — (909) 794 -2101 — 1 (800) 826 -4163 — Reference List — Public Works San Bernardino County 385 N. Arrowhead San Bernardino, CA 92415 -0184 909 - 387 -8907 Contact Shakil Patel, ALA Numerous Projects Asphalt, Concrete Seal Coat Striping And Bldg. Construction Contract Range $8745.00 - $117,950.00 GSG Parking Lot ADA $50,804.00 Start 08 -15 -02 Complete 08 -28 -02 Old Hall of Records Parking Lot $117,950.00 Start 12 -01 -02 Complete 1 -10 -03 Big Bear Justice Parking Lot $33,950.00 Start 11 -01 -01 Complete 11 -30 -01 Crestline Sanitation Parking Lot $8,750.00 Start 10 -15 -01 Complete 10 -31 -01 Morongo Basin Parking Lot $35,786.00 Start 10 -01 -01 Complete 10 -31 -01 Port of San Diego P.O. Box 120488 San Diego, CA 92112 -0488 619- 725 -6086 Contact Jay Waelder or Cyrus Toosky Gallagher Deficiencies — ADA Compliance Asphalt, Concrete Construction Striping Base Bid $90,064.00 c/o $24,770.95 Total Contract $114,834.85 Fax: (909) 794 -7098 "Your Complete Outdoor Maintenance Solutio 9AffEMH0� CA License #A/8729226 • NV License #A0041881 • http : /lwww.pavement— solutions.com ��� TM Santa Rosa Community Services District 41785 Enterprise Circle South Temecula, CA 92589 909 - 296 -3176 Contact John Rogers, P. E. Numerous Projects Asphalt, Seal Coating Striping Contract Range $5258.25 — $170,192.80 Los Gatos Sunset Terrace Base Bid $99,990.00 c% $11,973.04 Total Contract $111,963.04 Start 01 -05 -02 Complete 01 -31 -02 Various District Roads $5258.25 Start 04 -15 -02 Complete 04 -28 -02 Various District Roads $50,975.00 Start 09 -30 -02 Complete 11 -30 -02 Slurry Seal Various Roads Base Bid $170,192.80 c/o $4788.88 Total Contract $174,981.68 Start 10 -01 -02 Complete 10 -31 -02 Sandia Creek Drive $162,970.00 Start 12 -15 -02 Complete 1 -15 -03 City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 909 - 694 -6444 Contact Susan Jones City Wide Concrete Repairs Base Bid $61,433.00 c/o $4,378.50 Total Contract $65,811.50 ,.-. Start 02 -15 -02 Complete 02 -28 -02 Crafton Bills Community College 44100 8h Street San. Bernardino, CA 92408 909 - 389 -3381 Contact Darrell Covino Parking Lot Repairs Asphalt, Concrete, Seal, Striping Base Bid $340,526.00 c/o $24,679.90 Total Contract $365,205.90 State of California — Patton State Hospital 3012 E. Highland Ave. Highland, CA 92346 916 -376 -1663 Contact Don Hansen Parking Lot Repairs Asphalt, Concrete, Seal, Striping, Construction Base Bid $383,850.00 c/o $339,831.00 Total Contract $723,681.00 City of Chino — Aguiar Plaza Sixth & D St. Chino, CA 909 -591 -9831 Contact Mike Kolling Plaza Renovation Asphalt, Concrete Landscape, Striping Base Bid $285,190.00 c/o $34,660.00 Total Contract $319,850.00 / A MM N0. "` OF •"0' CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONTRACT AGREEMENT 10,11, This Contract Agreement is made and entered into this day of Lake Elsinore and for the construction referred to as: 2003 by and between the City of as Contractor MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR UNPAVED ROAD SURFACES WITNESSETH that the City of Lake Elsinore and the Contractor have mutually agreed as follows: ARTICLE I The Contract documents for the aforesaid project shall consist of the Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, General Specifications, Plans, Special Provisions and all referenced specifications, details, standard drawings, and appendices, together with this Contract Agreement and all required bonds, insurance certificates, permits, notices, and affidavits, and also including any and all addenda or supplemental agreements clarifying, amending or extending the work contemplated as may be required to ensure its completion in an acceptable manner. All of the provisions of said Contract documents are made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein. ARTICLE II For and in consideration of the payments and agreements to be made and performed by the City of Lake Elsinore, Contractor agrees to furnish all materials and perform all work required for the above stated project, and to fulfill all other obligations as set forth in the aforesaid Contract documents. ARTICLE III Contractor agrees to receive and accept the prices set forth in the proposal as full compensation for furnishing all materials, performing all work, and fulfilling all obligations hereunder. Said compensation shall cover all expenses, losses, damages, and consequences arising out of the nature of the work during its progress or prior to its acceptance including those for well and faithfully completing the work and the whole thereof in the manner and time specified in the aforesaid Contract documents and also including those arising from actions of the elements, unforeseen difficulties or obstructions encountered in the prosecution of the work, suspension or discontinuance of the work, and all other unknowns or risks of any description connected with the work. 22 MM no' w GFL c� ARTICLE IV The City of Lake Elsinore hereby promises and agrees to employ, and does hereby employ, Contractor to provide the materials, do the work, and fulfill the obligations according to the terms and conditions herein contained and referred to, for the prices aforesaid, and hereby contracts to pay the same at the time, in the manner, and upon the conditions set forth in the Contract documents. ARTICLE V Contractor acknowledges the provisions of the State Labor Code requiring every employer to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self - insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code and certifies compliance with such provisions. ARTICLE VI Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Lake Elsinore or its officers and agents from any claims, demands, or causes of action including related expenses attorney's fees, and costs based on, arising out of, or in any way related to the work undertaken by Contractor hereunder. ARTICLE VII Contractor affirms that the signatures, titles, and seals set forth herein after the execution of this Contract Agreement represent all individuals, firm members, partners, joint ventures, and /or corporate officers having a principal interest herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto for themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns do hereby agree to the full performance of the covenants herein contained and have caused this Contract Agreement to be executed '"no` in triplicate by setting hereunto their names, titles, hands, and seals this day of , 2002. Contractor: By: CA Lic A Title Subscribed and sworn to this day of , 2002. NOTARY PUBLIC City of Lake Elsinore, By: Mayor Attest City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, Date 23 AGMA t" NO. I I j`, CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE /^ CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATE REGARDING WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE Section 3700 of the Labor Code provides in part as follows: "Every employer except the State shall secure the payment of compensation in one or more of the following ways: A) By being insured against liability to pay compensation B) By securing from the Director of Industrial Relations a certificate of consent to self - insure, which may be given upon furnishing proof satisfactory to the Director of Industrial Relations of ability to self- insure and to pay any compensation that may become due to his employees..." The undersigned is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self - insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract. SIGNATURE c_— DATE E17 a y oZoO PRINTED NAME bLAJIJI S TITLE AW5 • / . COMPANY �lD %LCR/�l� T /D/� e �4 L A406M �v7" 611L d TIOMS -21UC ADDRESS _'�W LL96kAt,4R bt1UO 10,4 (In accordance with Article 5, commencing at Section 1860, Chapter 1, Part 7, Division 2 of the Labor Code, the above Certificate must be signed by the Contractor and filed with the awarding body prior to the Contractor performing any work under this Contract.) 24 � N0. TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR UNPAVED ROAD SURFACES PROPOSAL Name of Bidder COPP. CONTRACTING, INC. Address of Bidder P.O. BOX 457, BUENA PARK, CA. 90621 -0457 To: City of Lake Elsinore, California The undersigned bidder, in accordance with the City's Notice Inviting Bids, hereby proposes to furnish all materials, equipment, tools, labor, and incidentals required for the above - stated project as set forth in the Plans, Specifications, and Contract documents therefore to perform all work in the manner and time prescribed therein. The attached Bid Schedule is hereby made a part of this proposal. The undersigned bidder declares that this proposal is based upon careful examination of the work site, Plans, Specifications, Instructions to Bidders, and all other Contract documents. If this proposal is accepted for award, bidder agrees to enter into a Contract with the City at the unit and /or lump sum prices set forth in the following bid schedule. Bidder understands that failure to enter into a Contract and furnish bonds in the manner and time prescribed will result in forfeiture to the City of the guarantee accompanying this proposal. The undersigned bidder certifies that this proposal is made in good faith, without collusion or connection with any,other person or persons bidding on the work. The undersigned bidder understands that the City Council reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals or to waive formality or technicality in any proposal in the interest of the Agency. 11 * NO. PAN %70 o� N"we EXPLANATION OF BID SCHEDULE The following Bid Schedule is in two parts. Part I is a sample work order. Part I will be the document used to determine the lowest bidder. Part II of the Bid Schedule is unit prices to be bid by each bidder. These unit prices will be the unit prices used throughout the term of the contract for all work to be completed. These unit prices are to be used when calculating the sample work order in Part I of the Bid Schedule. 12 i _ I PM TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL BID SCHEDULE PART I Sample Work Order Item Description Amount 1. Set up Mobilization for one Job $ 3,200.00 2. Motorized grader with operator 8 hours $ 880.00 3. Three point hitch grading drag with operator 8 hours $ 760.00 4. Water truck with operator 8 hours $ 760.00 5. Rubber tire roller with operator 8 hours $ 760.00 6. Steel wheel roller with operator 8 hours $ 760.00 7. Tractor broom with operator 8 hours $ 800.00 8. Dump truck with operator 8 hours $ 760.00 9. Traffic control devices with two man crew 8 hours $ 1.400.00 Total sum of items one through nine in words: TEN THOUSAND EIGHTY DOLLARS AND NO CENTS------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- Total sum of items one through nine in numbers: $ 10,080.00 NOTE: All work to be done in accordance with City of Lake Elsinore Ordinances, Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, and City Engineer direction. All work is subject to inspection by City Inspector. Any Contractor doing work in the City must have a City business license. Bid prices for sample work orders are to be calculated using unit prices bid in Part II of the bid schedule. 13 A,� M'-M N0. pAM ; JL,OF TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL BID SCHEDULE PART II ITEMS TO BE BID FOR MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR UNPAVED ROAD SURFACES Setup Mobilization Charge for each job $ 3,200.00 lump sum Motorized grader with operator $ hour per hour $ 95.00 Three point hitch grading drag with operator $ 95.00 per hour Water truck with operator Rubber tire roller with operator Steel wheel roller with operator Tractor broom with operator Dump truck with operator Traffic control devices with two man crew Notes: $ 95.00 per hour $ 95.00 per hour $ 95.00 per hour $ 100.04 per hour $ 95.00 per hour $ 175.00 per hour The line item "traffic control devices" is to include the price for all signage, cones, barricades and other devices needed to properly warn traffic of road construction activity in the public right -of- way when a traffic lane is closed. Price is to include all equipment necessary to close one traffic lane and include a two man flagging team. Electronic message board is not to be included and will be an additional cost to the City if required. Traffic warning devices to protect the equipment operator's work zone including cones and signage such as "Shoulder Work Ahead" or "Men Working" are to be in place for all, jobs and are to be included in the cost of each piece of equipment. The City will not be charged extra for these items. IV TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL The Undersigned has checked carefully all of the above figures and understands that the City will not be responsible for any error or omissions on the part of the Undersigned in making up this bid. The Undersigned bidder declares, under penalty of perjury, that they are licensed to do business or act in the capacity of a contractor within the State of California and that they are validly licensed as follows: License Number: 384209 Classification: "All Expiration Date: NOV. 30, 2005 This statement is true and correct and has the legal effect of an affidavit. 15 No TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL SIGNATURE PAGE IF A SOLE OWNER OR SOLE CONTRACTOR, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted 2. Signature (Given and surname) of proprietor 3. Place of Business (Street and Number) City and State Zip Code 4. Telephone Number IF A PARTNERSHIP, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted 2. Name of each member of Partnership (indicate character of each partner, either general or special [limited)) 3. Signature (Given and surname and character of partner. Note: Signature must be made by a general partner) 4. Place of Business (Street and Number) City and State Zip Code 5. Telephone Number 16 TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL IF A CORPORATION, SIGN HERE: 1. Name under which business is conducted COPP CONTRACTING, INC. 2. Name of each officer of corporation (indicate office) DENNIS W.COPP - PRES. ERLINDA COPP - SEC.- TREAS. JOHN W. COPP - VICE -PRES. EZEKIEL A. COPP - VICE -PRES. 3. Signature (Given and surname and title of officer authorized to sign for the Corporatiqn) �_je,� , � � DENNIS W. COPP -PRES. (Impress Corporate Seal here) -N/ 4. Incorporated under the laws of the State of CALIFORNIA 5. Place of Business 6751 STANTON AVE., P.O. BOX 457 (Street and Number) City and State BUENA PARK, CA. Zip Code 90621 6. Telephone Number (714) 522 -7754 17 -"a$o M NO. p - . TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL I, CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CA NON - COLLUSION DECLARATION (Public Contract Code Section 7106) DENNIS W. COPP (Name) the PRESIDENT (Title) the party making the to as: do hereby declare that I am of COPP CONTRACTING, INC. ,(Contractor) foregoing bid for the construction 0 referred MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR UNPAVED ROAD SURFACES and that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, and undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any bidder or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the bidder has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the bidder or any other bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that'of any other bidder, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the Contract of anyone interested in the proposed Contract; -that all statements contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the bidder has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid. I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. FEB. 23, 2004 DATE PLACE SIGNATURE DENNIS W. COPP - PRESIDENT NAME BUENA PARK, CA. IN Mm tffm NO. . PM OFD . TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DESIGNATION OF SUBCONTRACTORS The undersigned certifies that he or she has used the sub -bids of the following listed subcontractors in making up his bid for the construction referred to as: MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR UNPAVED ROAD SURFACES and that the subcontractors listed will be used for work for which they bid, subject to the approval of the Engineer, and in accordance with the applicable provision of the Specifications. Bid Item Number Subcontractor Address /Telephone NONE COPP CONTRACTING, INC. BY: �� i� _ / Name of Contractor Signature of DENNIS W. COPP Name PRESIDENT 19 Title "I-- TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DECLARATION REGARDING LICENSE STATUS I do hereby declare that our /my Contractor's license is 4384209 "A" and expires on NOV. 30, 2005 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 23RD day of FEBRUARY 20 04 at BUENA PARK , Q-alifornia. Signature ,� � til -LZ Printed Name DENNIS W. COPP Title PRESIDENT Signing on behalf o A (if applicable) 20 Orr TO ACCOMPANY BID SUBMITTAL LIST OF REFERENCES MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR UNPAVED ROAD SURFACES '%, REFERENCES The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers for three (3) public agencies for which BIDDER has performed similar work within the past two(2) years: 1. ox CITY OF CYPRESS 5275 ORANGE AVE., CYPRESS, CA. 90630 Name and Address of Owner KAMRAN DADBEH (714) 229 -6740 Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project 351,095.23 A/C PAVING 10/03 Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed CITY OF BIG BEAR LAKE P.O. BOX 1000, BIG BEAR LAKE, CA. 92315 -8900 Name and Address of Owner JERRY VANTINE (909) 866 -5831 Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project 282,838.37 A/C PAVE, PULVERIZE A /C, PCC 7/03 Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 3. CITY OF ARTESIA18747 CLARKDALE AVE., ARTESIA, CA. 90701 Name and Address of Owner ISMAEL MORENO (562) 865 -6262 Name and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project 164,302.08 RESURFACING, CRACKSEAL, PCC 4/01 Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 21 `"We r i 4 CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of ORANGE ss. On FEBRUARY 23, 2004 before me, YOLANDA LUJAN – NOTARY PUBLIC Date Name and Title of Officer (e.g., "Jane Doe, Notary Public ") personally appeared DENNIS W. COPP – PRESIDENT OF COPP CONTRACTING, INC. Name(s) of Signer(s) 50 personally known to me ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence 9904994090999 4094040490099009994090949940 YOL:ANDA LU.fAN COIAM # 1362229 D W _ NOTARY PUBLIC CALIFORNIA rtl :17 = :'.' ORANGE COUNTY My Commission Expires June 25, 2006 e 9494994994099449044409490944009 •}040990944 to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same in his /her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his /her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS han d an fficial al. If Signature of otary P lic OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: BIDDER'S BOND – CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE Document Date: FEB. 23, 2004 Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: DENNIS W. COPP ❑ Individual fA Corporate Officer — Title(s): • Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General • Attorney -in -Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: PRESIDENT Signer Is Representing: COPP CONTRACTING, INC. Number of Pages: 1 RIGHT THUMBPRINT OF SIGNER 0 1999 National Notary Association - 9350 De Soto Ave., P.O. Box 2402 - Chatsworth, CA 91313 -2402 - www.nationalmtary.org Prod. No. 5907 Reorder: Call Toll -Free 1- 800 - 876-8827 : • • NZ • BID BOND The American Institute of Architects, AIA Document No. A310 (February, 1970 Edition) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we COPP Contracting, Inc- Bid Bond as Principal hereinafter called the Principal, and Contractors Bonding and Insurance Company a corporation duly organized under the laws of the state of Washington as Surety, hereinafter called the Surety, are held and firmly bound unto City of Lake Elsinore as Obligee, hereinafter called the Obligee, in the sum of Ten percent of the total amount of the bid Dollars ($10% ), for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, the said Principal and the said Surety, bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, the Principal has submitted a bid for Maintenance Program for Unpaved Road Surfaces NOW, THEREFORE, if the Obligee shall accept the bid of the Principal and the Principal shall enter into a Contract with the Obligee in accordance with the terms of such bid, and give such bond or bonds as may be specified in the bidding or Contract Documents with good and sufficient surety for the faithful performance of such Contract and for the prompt payment of labor and material furnished in the prosecution thereof, or in the event of the failure of the Principal to enter such Contract and give such bond or bonds, if the Principal shall pay to the Obligee the difference not to exceed the penalty hereof between the amount specified in said bid and such larger amount for which the Obligee may in good faith contract with another party to perform the Work covered by said bid, then this obligation shall be null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. Signed and sealed this Witness Witness ORSC 21328 (5/97) 11th day of February 2004 Copp Contracting, Inc. Print (Seal) By: \ PRESIDENT DENNIS W. COK Name/Title Contractors Bonding and Insurance Company Surety (Seal) Linda D. Coats Attorney -in -Fact 1.00, CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of ORANGE ss. On FEB 1 1 2004 before me, CHRISTINE M. RAPP, NOTARY PUBLIC Date Name and Title of Officer (e.g., "Jane Doe, Notary Public ") personally appeared LINDA D. COATS CHRISTINE. M. R APP COMM. #12167189 NOTARY PUBLIC • CALIFORNIA M m' ORANrE COUNTY L II 1 4' My Comm. Exp Jufv B, 2004 Place Notary Seal Above Name(s) of Signer(s) IX personally known to me ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same in his /her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his /her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WI SS my hand and official se Signature of Notary bli t OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: ❑ Individual Corporate Officer — Title(s): Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General Attorney in Fact Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: Number of Pages: RIGHT THUMBPRINT OF SIGNER of thumb here ®1999 National Notary Association - 9350 De Soto Ave., P.O. Box 2402 - Chatsworth, CA 91313 -2402 - www.nationalnotary.org Prod. No. 5907 Reorder: Call Toll -Free 1 -800- 876 -6827 �t At13A {T NO- _-_ .*—I Contractors Reference Check Contractor Copp Contracting, Inc. Project Unpaved Road Surfaces Reference City of Big Bear Lake Name of Reference Contact Interviewed Jerry Vantine Phone Number of Reference Interviewed 909 - 866 -5831 Date of Interview 3/2/04 Reference Interview Question and Answers: What was the scope of work performed by the contractor? Asphalt /concrete paving Pulverize asphalt/concrete, PCC What was the total project cost? $282,838.37 Was contractor able to perform the contracted services in a timely fashion? Yes Were there any change orders? Did you have any issues relating to these change orders? No How well did the contractor interface and communicate with your staff? Very good to work with. Very responsive. On a scale of I to 10 how would you rate the contactors overall performance with 10 being excellent? 10 AMWA IT �``� __ Contractors Reference Check Contractor Copp Contracting, Inc. '".I Project Unpaved Road Surfaces Reference City of Cypress Name of Reference Contact Interviewed Kamran Dadbeh Phone Number of Reference Interviewed 714- 229 -6740 Date of Interview 3/2/04 Reference Interview Question and Answers: What was the scope of work performed by the contractor? Asphalt/concrete paving What was the total project cost? $351,095.23 Was contractor able to perform the contracted services in a timely fashion? Yes Were there any change orders? Did you have any issues relating to these change orders? No. How well did the contractor interface and communicate with your staff? Very Well On a scale of I to 10 how would you rate the contactors overall performance with 10 being excellent? 8 -"no ..r/ CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL /REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL, AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FROM: RICHARD J. WATENPAUGH, CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR DATE: CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING OF MARCH 9, 2004 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32008 - LAKESHORE VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN APPLICANT Corman Leigh Communities 42346 Rio Nedo, Suite L Temecula, CA 92590 Attention: Mr. Chuck Treatch REQUEST Request that the City Council approve Tentative Tract Map No. 32008, pursuant to Section 16 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) and the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan. BACKGROUND Staff presented the proposed Tentative Tract Map at the February 17, 2004 Planning Commission meeting. �-. The Planning Commission heard staff's report, accepted public testimony, considered the application, and adopted Resolution No. 2004 -18, which recommended that the City Council approve Tentative Tract Map No. 32008. Please refer to Attachment A for the staff report and minutes from the February 17, 2004 Planning Commission meeting. The Planning Commission staff report further describes the proposed project. PROJECT LOCATION The project site is located near the west - central portion of Lake Elsinore. Lakeshore Drive forms the northern boundary; Walnut Drive the southern boundary. Existing commercial uses are located along the northern Lakeshore Drive frontage. The balance of the project site is undeveloped and vacant. The site is characterized by relatively flat topography and common urban non - native vegetation. The site is bounded on the south by existing multi - family residential; on the west by a mobile home park and commercial along the Lakeshore Drive frontage; on the east by existing commercial and undeveloped commercial property; and on the north by Lakeshore Drive, a commercial shopping center, and some undeveloped commercial property. The project site is located within the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan and Redevelopment Project Area No. 2, Area A. Attachment B presents a location map of the project site. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The City Council is being requested to review and approve proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 32008. Attachment C presents the proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 32008 and its location. The Tentative Tract Map encompasses the entire Detached Single - Family Residential Planning Area and portions of the Commercial/Residential Flex Planning Area as defined by the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan. Attachment D presents the Land Use Plan from the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan. The following describes the proposed 101-1- Tentative Tract Map: AGENDA ITEM 1VQ. y Lq .4 PAGE—L- REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL /REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MARCH 9, 2004 PAGE 2 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32008 -„& it 1. Proposed Lots: The Tentative Tract Map proposes 186 total lots in the following: 170 single- family detached residential small lots within the Detached Single - Family Residential Planning Area. • Two lots for future commercial uses within the Commercial/Residential Flex Planning Area. • 14 lettered lots for HOA- maintained open space, community center, park areas, clubhouse, swimming pool, detention basins, and other improvements. 2. Proposed Lot Size: The 170 single - family detached lots range in size from 3,825 to 7,020 sf., with an average lot size of 4,089 sf. The two commercial lots measure 24,910 sf. and 60,179 sf. 3. Proposed Roadway and Circulation Improvements: Primary access to the site will be from Lakeshore Drive along the northern boundary. Secondary access is off of Walnut Drive along the southern boundary. The proposed subdivision will be gated at both its Lakeshore Drive and Walnut Drive entries and will be a private community. The privately- maintained roadway network within the subdivision includes a collector road and several neighborhood local streets. 4. Recreational Amenities: In addition to the pedestrian parkway through the proposed community, the project will provide a community center, clubhouse, swimming pool, and pocket parks. 5. Private Community: As discussed, the detached single- family lots will be constructed as a private community. A Homeowner's Association will be established to maintain the internal roadways, open space, community center, park areas, clubhouse, swimming pool, detention basins, and other improvements. Attachment E presents the full size copy of proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 32008. DISCUSSION Staff supports the requested Tentative Tract Map and recommends approval for the following reasons: Proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 32008 Implements Intended Land Uses Designated in the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan: As discussed, the proposed Tentative Tract Map is located within and regulated by the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan, which was approved by the City Council in November 2003. The Specific Plan intends for those uses proposed with the Tentative Tract Map, including detached small lot residential units, future neighborhood commercial uses, parks and recreational facilities, and common open spaces. The proposed Tentative Tract Map represents the first step in implementing the intended land uses for the project site. The proposed Tentative Tract Map does not conflict with the intended land uses and their respective locations, and standards, objectives, and guidelines contained in the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan. -.a#* AGENDA ITEM 1`40. e_ PAGE OF REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL /REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MARCH 9, 2004 PAGE 3 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32008 2. Proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 32008 Complies With Design Standards Contained in the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan: City Planning and Engineering staff have reviewed the proposed Tentative Tract Map and have no concerns, if required conditions of approval are satisfied. The proposed Tentative Tract Map is consistent with development standards contained in the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan document in terms of minimum lot sizes, lot widths and depths, street widths, and other Planning and Engineering standards and requirements. The Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the City's Subdivision Ordinance and the Subdivision Map Act. 3. Proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 32008 Complies With Conditions of Approval Established With Lakeshore Village Specific Plan: The proposed Tentative Tract Map complies with those applicable Conditions of Approval that were previously established with the approved Lakeshore Village Specific Plan. The Planning Commission was supportive of the project and did not express any major concerns. Their comments related only to clarification of the project's design. No one from the public spoke on the project. Staff read into the public record corrections of typographic errors made in the conditions of approval and staff report. The Conditions of Approval have been corrected and revised, as attached to this staff report. The applicant accepted the Conditions of Approval during the Planning Commission meeting. ENVIRONMENTAL Environmental clearance and analysis for proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 32008 are provided by Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003 -03, which was prepared for the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan. Said environmental document was prepared in accordance with Article 6 of the CEQA Guidelines and was approved by the City Council in 2003. The proposed Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan and therefore, does not conflict with the findings and discussions contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Further environmental clearance is unnecessary. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve Tentative Tract Map No. 32008, for the subdivision of 26 acres into 186 lots (including 170 single - family detached lots, two commercial lots, and 14 lettered lots), based on the Findings and subject to the attached conditions of approval. The project site is located within Project Area No. 2, Area A. It is also recommended that the Redevelopment Agency concur with the City Council action. FINDINGS 1. TTM No. 32008, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan and the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan (Government Code Section 66473.5). The project is consistent with the designated land use planning areas, development and design standards, and all other appropriate requirements contained in the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan, General Plan, and City Municipal Code. AGENDA ITEM I40-22--• - ®E PAGE _—.1. REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MARCH 9, 2004 PAGE 4 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32008 2. The effects that TTM No. 32008 are likely to have upon the housing needs of the region, the public service requirements of its residents and the available fiscal and environmental resources have been considered and balanced. The project is consistent with the City's General Plan and Lakeshore Village Specific Plan, will provide necessary public services and facilities, will pay all appropriate fees, and will not result in any adverse environmental impact. 3. The design of TTM No. 32008 provides to the greatest extent possible, for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision. (Governmental Code Section 66412.3) Theproject will comply with all appropriate conservation requirements of the City and Uniform Building Code. PREPARED BY: Duane Morita, Senior Planner REVIEWED BY: J�f 4�-- Arm do G. Villa Planning and Code Enforcement Manager APPROVED BY: ob Brady Community Develop e t Director APPROVED FOR AGENDA LISTING: "U City Manager's Offi e ../ ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: February 17, 2004 Planning Commission staff report and minutes Attachment B: Location Map Attachment C: Reduction of Tentative Tract Map No. 32008 Attachment D: Reduction of Land Use Plan from the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan Attachment E: Full size set of Tentative Tract Map No. 32008 AGENDA ITEM {`IO. )- 1 Llq 1 RAGE OF— ._l -J..•- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32008 Recommended revisions to the Conditions of Approval are indicated by strike out for deleted text. New text is indicated by italics. PLANNING DIVISION General Conditions 1. Tentative Tract Map No. 32008 will expire two years from date of approval unless within that period of time a Final Map has been filed with the County Recorder, or an extension of time is granted by the City of Lake Elsinore City Council in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act. Additional extensions of time (36 months maximum time per the Subdivision Map Act) may be granted per City Council approval. Future development shall comply with those standards and guidelines contained in the Specific Development Plan, Circulation Plan, Infrastructure and Public Facilities Plan, Development Regulations, Design Guidelines, and Implementation Plan, and conditions of approval established with the 2003 Lakeshore Village Specific Plan. 3. Tentative Tract Map No. 32008 shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and applicable requirements contained in the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan document and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), unless modified by approved Conditions of Approval. 4. The applicant shall participate in the City of Lake Elsinore Citywide Landscaping and Street Lighting .-� District, as appropriate. 5. The applicant shall provide all project - related onsite and offsite improvements as described in the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan document and Tentative Tract Map No. 32008. 6. The applicant shall implement those mitigation measures identified in the 2003 Lakeshore Village Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program. 7. All future proposals shall be reviewed by the City on a project -by- project basis. If determined necessary by the Community Development Director or designee, additional environmental analysis will be required. 8. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, Agents, and its Consultants from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning implementation and construction of the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan, which action is bought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Sections 65009 and/or 66499.37, and Public Resources Code Section 21167. The City will promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City and will cooperate fully with the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, or proceeding, the applicant shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. 9. Provisions of the City's Noise Ordinance shall be satisfied during all site preparation and construction activity. Site preparation activity and construction shall not commence before 7:00 AM and shall cease at 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday. Construction activity shall not take place on Saturday, Sunday, or any Legal Holidays. A 04DA ITEM! NO. LL�.,� PAGE --L OF._11.: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32008 (Continued) 10. The applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department. Prior to Final Tract Map Approval 11. All lots shall comply with applicable standards contained in the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan document, LEMC, or Zoning Code. 12. A precise survey with closures for boundaries and all lots shall be provided per the LEMC. 13. Street names within the subdivision shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Designee. 14. All of the improvements shall be designed by the applicant's Civil Engineer to the specifications of the City of Lake Elsinore. 15. Future construction shall meet all Riverside County Fire Department standards for fire protection and any additional requirements requested by the County Fire Department (refer to attached). 16. The applicant shall annex into the City -Wide Community Facilities District for Police, Fire, and Paramedics (CFD 2003 -01). 17. Prior to approval of the Final Map or if deemed appropriate by the Engineering Manager, prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall initiate and complete the formation of a Homeowner's Association, -.00 approved by the City, recorded, and in place. All Association documents shall be approved by City Planning and Engineering and the City Attorney and recorded, such as the Articles of Incorporation for the Association; and Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC &Rs). At a minimum, the CC &Rs shall include language to ensure the following conditions: The HOA shall maintain landscaping along parkways and project streets, recreational facilities, walkways, and drainage improvements. • The HOA shall maintain all streets, entry gates, walls, and monumentation. • The HOA or a separate independent security patrol shall be responsible for enforcing the on- street parking on only one side of those affected project streets that are identified in the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan. Prior to Design Review Approval 18. All future structural development associated with the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan and TTM No. 32008, including building designs, recreational facilities, landscaping improvements, site plans, etc. shall require separate Design Review approval, as appropriate. 19. The applicant shall provide all recreational facilities and amenities including play equipment found at the proposed play lots. AGENDA ITEM NO.. PAGE OF �� CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32008 (Continued) 20. Prior to Design Review approval, the applicant shall show how the following fire mitigation measures are met: • The applicant shall participate in the Development Impact Fee Program as adopted by the City of Lake Elsinore, as appropriate. • All water mains and fire hydrants shall be constructed in accordance with Riverside County Ordinance No. 460 and/or No. 787.1. • Prepare a Fire Protection/Vegetation Management Plan for Fire Department approval. • The Homeowner's Association shall be responsible for implementing the Fire Protection/Vegetation Management Plan. • The project shall provide an alternate or secondary access. Prior to Grading Permit Issuance 21. The applicant shall obtain all necessary State and Federal permits, approvals, or other entitlements, where applicable, prior to each phase of development of the project. 22. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit a final grading plan, subject to all requirements of the City Grading Ordinance to the Engineering Manager for approval. Said grading plan shall address those grading standards and guidelines contained in the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan document. 23. Grading shall not be permitted outside the area of the designated project boundary unless appropriate approvals have been obtained. 24. Grading easements shall be coordinated with affected property owners. 25. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, grading and construction plans shall incorporate erosion control measures. 26. Any alterations to the topography, ground surface, or any other site preparation activity will require appropriate grading permits. A Geologic Soils Report with associated recommendations will be required for grading permit approval, and all grading must meet the City's Grading Ordinance, subject to the approval of the Engineering Manager and the Planning Division. Analysis of impacts of fills and cuts greater than 60 feet shall be provided. Interim and permanent erosion control measures are required. The applicant shall bond 100 percent for material and labor for one year for erosion control landscaping at the time the site is rough graded. Prior to Building Permit Issuance 27. The applicant shall enter into an agreement with the Redevelopment Agency, acceptable to Agency Counsel, to either provide affordable units in accordance with Section 33413 (b) (2) of the California Community Redevelopment Law, appropriate in -lieu fees, or a combination of both. AGENDA iTL= �` PAGE 0 F CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32008 (Continued) 28. The applicant shall pay all appropriate traffic impact mitigation fees. 29. The applicant shall comply with the following City programs: the City Source Reduction and Recycling Element and Household Hazardous Waste Element, the County Solid Waste Management Plan and Integrated Waste Management Plan. 30. Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall submit a letter of verification (will -serve letter) to the Engineer Manager, for all required utility services. 31. The applicant shall meet all requirements of Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). 32. The applicant shall pay applicable fees and obtain proper clearance from the Lake Elsinore Unified School District (LEUSD) prior to issuance of building permits. 33. Pay all applicable fees including park fees. 34. The applicant shall provide connection to public sewer for each lot within any subdivision. No service laterals shall cross adjacent property lines and shall be delineated on engineering sewer plans and profiles for submittal to the EVMWD. 35. The applicant (master developer) shall prepare a Community -Wide Wall Plan for the entire TTM No. 32008 area. 36. Prior to is of building permit, the applicant shall prepare a Final Wall and Fence Plan for the Detached Single - Family Residential Planning Area addressing the following: • Show that a decorative masonry block wall shall be constructed along all boundaries of the Detached Single Family Residential Planning Area of the TTM 32008 site. • Show materials, colors, and heights of side yard fences for proposed lots. • Show that all front return walls shall be decorative masonry block walls. Front return wood fences shall not be permitted. • Show that side walls for corner lots shall be decorative masonry block walls. 37. The applicant shall submit plans to the electric utility company for a layout of the street lighting system. The cost of street lighting, installation as well as energy charges shall be the responsibility of the applicant and/or the HOA. Said plans shall be approved by the City and shall be installed in accordance with the City Standards. 38. The applicant shall meet all requirements of the providing electric utility company. 39. The applicant shall meet all requirements of the providing gas utility company. 40. The applicant shall meet all requirements of the providing telephone utility company. 41. A bond is required guaranteeing the removal of all trailers used during construction. AGENDA ITEM 110. PAS bF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32008 (Continued) 42. Future signage requires a permit and shall be subject to Planning Division review and approval prior to installation. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy Issuance 43. Throughout construction, as deemed appropriate by the City and the applicant, fugitive dust suppression along Lakeshore and Walnut Drives, and other connecting roads shall be applied to minimize fugitive dust generation. Fugitive dust suppression techniques may include soil watering, application of soil binders, and/or placement of gravel or other appropriate material to minimize vehicle generated dust. 44. The applicant shall install signs along those appropriate project streets as shown in the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan to ensure parking is permitted on only one side and to prohibit on- street parking. Location of said signs shall require approval by the Engineering Manager. 45. The applicant shall paint the curbs red for those sides of the streets that prohibit on- street parking. ENGINEERING DIVISION 46. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to final map approval. 47. All Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees shall be paid (LEMC 16.34, Resolution 85 -26). 48. A "Will Serve" letter shall be submitted to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project. Letter shall be submitted prior to Final Map Approval. 49. All public works improvements shall be constructed per approved street plans (LEMC 12.04 and 16.34). 50. Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City for the construction of public works improvements and shall post the appropriate bonds, prior to final map approval. 51. A'ppliennt shall enter- into an agreement with the City for- the t. et: of bli wor-k . . �ments and shall post the appropriate bonds, pFior- to final map approval. 51. Applicant shall pay all fees and meet requirement of encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Division for construction of public works improvements (LEMC 12.08 and Resolution 83 -78). 52. Applicant shall dedicate right -of -way along Lakeshore Drive consistent with the General Plan Circulation element requirement of 60 ft. half width right -of -way (as measured from the centerline to the project property line) for an urban arterial. 53. Street `T' (project entrance) shall be opposite the main entrance to State Stater Brother's Shopping Center. 10011, 54. Sidewalks on private streets must meet ADA standards. AM-NDA ITEM iNlo. PAGE OF _ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32008 (Continued) 55. Walnut Drive shall be constructed to a collector street cross section width. Walnut Drive shall be paved for two (2) travel lanes from tract boundary to Fraser Drive. Walnut Drive shall provide an entrance drive at the bulb end of the cul -de -sac to allow access to the existing easement extending north from the Walnut Drive cul -de -sac. 56. The circulation improvements shall be constructed as described in Exhibit 6 -A in the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan Traffic Impact Analysis (see attached). Traffic signal at Stater Brother's Central Driveway and Main Entrance shall be operational at 20% build out. 57. Applicant shall design and construct a raised landscaped median along the frontage of Lakeshore Drive, subject to the approval of the Engineering Manager. 58. The entrance driveway aisles shall be designed so that at least 40 ft. is available between the street curb and the first parking stall in order to provide adequate on -site storage for entering vehicles. 59. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 -1/2" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of public works improvements will be scheduled and approved. 60. Applicant shall obtain all necessary off -site easements for off -site grading from the adjacent property owners prior to final map approval. 61. Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. 62. Applicant shall provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by Riverside County Fire. 63. Applicant shall provide street lighting and show lighting improvements as part of street improvement plans as required by the Engineering Manager. 64. Applicant shall install blue reflective pavement markers in the street at all fire hydrant locations. 65. Applicant shall submit a traffic control plan showing all traffic control devices for the tract to be approved prior to final map approval. All traffic control devices shall be installed prior to final inspection of public improvements. This includes No Parking and Street Sweeping Signs for streets within the tract. 66. All improvement plans and tract maps shall be digitized. At Certificate of Occupancy, applicant shall submit tapes and/or discs which are compatible with City's ARC Info /GIS or applicant to pay $30 per sheet for City digitizing. 67. All utilities except electrical over 12 KV shall be placed underground, as approved by the serving utility. 68. Applicant shall obtain a grading permit with appropriate security prior to building permit issuance. A grading plan signed and stamped by a California Registered Civil Engineer shall be required if the grading exceeds 50 cubic yards or the existing flow pattern is substantially modified as determined by the Engineering Manager. If the grading is less than 50 cubic yards and a grading plan is not required, a grading permit shall still be obtained so that a cursory drainage and flow pattern inspection can be conducted before grading begins. AGENDA 1TE %; 'IC 0, PAGE 0 Of �' N CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32008 ,� (Continued) 69. Applicant shall provide soils, geology and seismic report including street design recommendations. Provide final soils report showing compliance with recommendations. 70. An Alquist -Priolo study shall be performed on the site to identify any hidden earthquake faults and/or liquefaction zones present on -site. In the event the project is unaffected by any fault zone, developer shall provide a document certified by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer or Licensed Geologist identifying the site as being outside the fault zone. 71. All grading shall be done under the supervision of a Geotechnical Engineer and he shall certify all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and proper erosion control. All manufactured slopes greater than 30 feet in height shall be contoured. 72. Individual lot drainage shall be conveyed to a storm drain facility and conveyed to the public storm drain system. Any non - historic storm flows shall be accepted by adjacent property owners with a notarized and recorded letter of drainage acceptance or conveyed to a drainage easement. 73. On -site drainage facilities located outside of road right -of -way should be contained within drainage easements shown on the final map. A note should be added to the final map stating: "Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions ". 74. All natural drainage traversing site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the Engineering Manager. 75. Submit Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports for review and approval by Engineering Manager and the Riverside County Flood Control District prior to approval of final map. Applicant shall mitigate any flooding and/or erosion caused by development of site and diversion of drainage. 76. All drainage facilities in this tract shall be constructed to Riverside County Flood Control District Standards. 77. Storm drain inlet facilities shall be appropriately stenciled to prevent illegal dumping in the drain system, the wording and stencil shall be approved by the Engineering Manager. 78. Roof and yard drains will not be allowed to outlet through cuts in the street curb. Roof drains should drain to a landscaped area whenever feasible. 79. Ten (10) year storm runoff should be contained within the curb and the 100 -year storm runoff should be contained within the street right -of -way. When either of these criteria is exceeded, drainage facilities should be installed. 80. A drainage acceptance letter will be necessary from the downstream property owners for outletting the proposed storm water run -off on private property. 81. Applicant shall be subject to all Master Planned Drainage fees and will receive credit for all Master Planned Drainage facilities constructed. i-. 82. Applicant will be required to install BMP's using the best available technology to mitigate any urban pollutants from entering the watershed. AGENDA 1TE10 r 40. a PAGE OF_EA-17 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32008 (Continued) 83. Applicant shall obtain approval from Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board for their storm water pollution prevention plan including approval of erosion control for the grading plan prior to issuance of grading permits. The applicant shall provide a SWPPP for post construction which describes BMP's that will be implemented for the development and including maintenance responsibilities. 84. Education guidelines and Best Management Practices (BMP) shall be provided to residents of the development in the use of herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers as well as other environmental awareness education materials on good housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of stormwater quality and meet the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside county NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. 85. Applicant shall provide for flush BMP's using the best available technology that will reduce stormwater pollutants from parking areas and driveway aisles. 86. Intersection site distance shall meet the design criteria of the CALTRANS Design Manual (particular attention should be taken for intersections on the inside of curves). If site distance can be obstructed, a special limited use easement must be recorded to limit the slope, type of landscaping and wall placement. 87. Applicant shall provide a traffic study prepared by a traffic engineer to determine the traffic volume and the impacts on intersections in the vicinity and freeway on and off ramps prior to final map approval, subject to the approval of the Engineering Manager. 88. Access shall be restricted on Lakeshore Drive and Walnut Avenue and so noted on the final map. No residential lot shall have frontage onto Lakeshore Drive or Walnut Avenue. 1400 89. All parcels shall have access to public right -of -way or be provided with a minimum 30 -foot ingress and egress easement to public right -of -way by separate instrument or through map recordation. Private streets shall be owned and maintained by an HOA. 90. Riverside County Fire Department shall approve width and radii of private streets and the length and configuration of hammerhead turnarounds prior to final map approval. 91. Applicant shall cause to be recorded CC &R's with recordation of final map which provides for irrevocable reciprocal parking, circulation, loading and landscape maintenance easement in favor of all lots subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development and the City Attorney. The CC &R's shall enforce standards of building maintenance, participation in landscape maintenance, prohibition of outside vehicle or material storage. 92. An HOA shall maintain the storm drain detention basin. 93. In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal and recycling, the applicant shall be required to contact with CR &R Inc., for removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of construction. AGENDA ITEh1 4,30. PAGE EXHIBIT 6 -A CIRCULATION RECOMMENDATIONS CONSTRUCT LAKESHORE DRIVE FROM THE NORTHERLY PROJECT BOUNDARY TO THE SOUTHERLY PROTECT BOUNDARY AT ITS ULTIMATE HALF - SECTION WIDTH AS AN URBAN ARTERIAL IN CONJUNCTION WITH DEVELOPMENT. 4.* L9,��SyORF �J�� R r: `yam A. ............. ............................... ... I..-:: ::::::.i �� ....... / y CONSTRUCT WALNUT AVENUE NORTH OF THE SOUTHERLY PROJECT BOUNDARY AT ITS ULTIMATE HALF - SECTION WIDTH AS A COLLECTOR STREET IN CONJUNCTION WITH DEVELOPMENT. LEGEND: ® - NEW TRAFFIC SIGNAL 4 -FULL ACCESS RIGHT TURN ONLY ACCESS LEFT TURN ONLY ACCESS LAKES' VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN, Lake Elsin - 01513:38 6 -3 7I "*-,- PACE 1 of --!-A.. Tom Tisdale Fire Chief Proudly serving the Ulu DCOrporated ArMq of Rk•cmde County and the Cities of. • Bafiruilw A Heaurnont 4 Calimesa A.- Cwchcll.i I IUL Spn np Indian W*cll• Indio [A*e Clsinurc to Quinta Moreno Valki. g. 0 Rancho k4irice "an Jacinto ronccula ik%ard of'Supervixom Wt- Lkisier. Disinu I 6d111'rawsli-w fZoy wilrin UuLn,% 4 %Wion %.,hL-. ?)"tnf - FIRE DEPAjkfR !IP 6 .0;2' -V. In 000peration wt the -3 V Xt A, I- P FL. 80)(1549, Riverside, Ca.92w2 -1549 111''ZI-1 Fire Protection Plani" and Engineer on 1, "jt .71 A ko ATP- "—/%tJ -b Arj PLANNER: '' A The Riverside County Fire Department requests an amended mad with the following changes prior to issuance of letter of co 6`14 : "K " ons Show -0 vicinity map with 2003 or later 117116 es List all utility companies Driveway width not shown/incorrect minimum width h Driveway grade not shown/incorrect m='i1n-uM­­ iradei -5 bla" Driveway surface not showarincorrect, show asphalt oc concrete' '- Driveway radius not shown/incoffect. Contact Fire Dept-.for guideline handout Fire Dept. turnaround not shown/incorrect. Contact Fire Dept. for handout gul Fire Dept. turnout not shown/incorrect. Contact Fire Dept. for guideline handout Occup• classification per 2001 CBC not shown/incorrect 1-io1bldg(s), "I" Type construction per 2001 CBC not shown/incorrect for (S) _ )t �ldg ------ j .... Show square footage per floor, mezzanines and total for building, for each building shown Label all buildings as proposed or existing. Label existing building either to remain or to be removed Floor plans and elevations needed for buildings -Show all bus zones, loading, unloading zones, etc Show location and size in gallons for all abovelunderground fuel tanks, waste oil, LPG and chemical tanks. (If no tanks state on plans) Medians must be setback 35 feet from face of curb and minimum 20 feet driving width each side of medium- AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF H 14 JAN 0? '04 16 51 9099554886 PAGE.03 . I 11� - .7 .04 if t"R W Gate width and/or type of gat6 - e Z r mcorrect. -Gat ,,. Q.. must be a minim ZY feet in width, automatic and/or manu'a'I nth pjd. Entry System(s). Gate must be setback 35 feet from face of ri t of wgh*'(If no gates plans) 4 4 b,7 ;5r 4:_ - M2 ". i'� - Project will require water service from a pibbe waier §wp Y,4 *­1 ".t l VhS Cu, -de -sac A -de-sac length too long for High Fire Hazud Maxunum length 660 f Lf rf;, Ar Z Cul-de-sac exceeds maximum length of 1320 f6t Cul-de-sac length too long for State Responsibility AreaW- fl feet. Primary and secondary access not shownrmcorrect Driveways must take their access from a public or pnyate street. NOT an easement :.2, Vehicular access required within 150 feet of any portion of any building as 1 .1- measured along approved vehicular tray_el'��iys. Access ' shall be a minimum 24 feet J' al in width, asphalt or concrete surface if State on plans if this is a "SHELL BUILDING NO TENANrl- A Fire Protection Engineers Report shall be submitted for review and approval, prior to conditioning of the project. Firc flow letter was faxed/mailed on date: to fl Letter must be returned to fire Dept. prior to —condition'ing of project. "*'N Other ±,N6 1DF 5 'a' 4 4(IAJ - j2y A95 ME 644) OF SW P AJ SM6J� -(10.4e eld Re All question regarding these corrections contact. the Fire D. -ep-'ar_tment Planning Section at 909-9554777. 3-6-03/emm AGENDA ITEM N0­21— �11 Q01 -4 PAGE15—OF JAN 07 '04 16:52 9099554886 PAGE.04 01/07/04 Riverside County LMS Page: 1 16:36 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Library Conditions 10. GENERAL CONDITIONS FIRE DEPARTMENT 10.FIRE.999 �� - T7232c )o3 CASE - CITY CASE STATEMENT With respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced project, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and /or recognized fire protection standards: 10.FIRE.999 MAP - #50 -BLUE DOT REFLECTORS Blue retroreflective pavement markers shall be mounted on private streets, public streets and driveways to indicate location of fire hydrants. Prior to installation, placement of markers must be approved by the Riverside County Fire Department. 10.FIRE.999 MAP * - #16- HYDRANT /SPACING Schedule A fire protection approved standard fire hydrants, (6 11x4 11x2 1/211) located one at each street intersection and spaced no more than' �O feet apart in any dire ion, with no portion of any lot frontage more than _ feet from a hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be 1( GPM for 2 hour duration at 20 PSI. Shall include perimeter streets at each intersection and spaced 660 feet apart. 50. PRIOR TO MAP RECORDATION FIRE DEPARTMENT 50.FIRE.999 MAP -#7- ECS -HAZ FIRE AREA Ecs map must be stamped by the Riverside County Surveyor with the following note: The land division is located in the "Hazardous Fire Area" of Riverside County as shown on a map on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. Any building constructed on lots created by this land division shall comply with the special construction provisions contained in Riverside County Ordinance 787. 50. FIRE .999 MAP * -##43- ECS - ROOFING MATERIAL DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT ,"we Ecs map muse be stamped by the Riverside County Surveyor with the following note: All buildings shall be constructed with class "_" material as per the California A(JENDA ITEM+ tviu- 21� PAGE IL OF J--L" JAN 07 104 16 :53 9099554886 PAGE.05 01/07/04 Riverside County LMS Page: 2 16:36 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL lbrary Conditions 50. PRIOR TO MAP RECORDATION 50.FIRE.999 MAP * -#43 -ECS- ROOFING MATERIAL (cont.) DRAFT Building Code. 50.FIRE.999 MAP -#67 -ECS -GATE ENTRANCES DRAFT Ecs map must be stamped by the Riverside County Surveyor with the following note: Gate entrances shall be at least two feet wider than the width of the traffic lanes) serving that gate. Any gate providing access from a road to a driveway shall be located at least 35 feet setback from the roadway and shall open to allow a vehicle to stop without obstructing traffic on the road. here a one -way road with a single traffic lane provides access to a gate entrance, a 40' turning radius shall be used. 50.FIRE.999 MAP * -#k88- ECS - AUTO /MAN GATES DRAFT Ecs map must be stamped by the Riverside County Surveyor with the following note: Gate(s) shall be automatic or manual minimum 2y feet in width. Gate access shall be equipped with a rapid entry system. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation. Automatic /manual gate pins shall be rated with shear pin force, not to exceed 30' pounds. Automatic gates shall be equipped with emergency backup power. Gates activated by the rapid entry system shall remain open until closed by the rapid entry system. 50.FIRE.999 MAP - #46 -WATER PLANS DRAFT The applicant or developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, containing a Fire Department approval signature block, and shall conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow. Once plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Department for signature. 50.FIRE.999 MAP - #53- ECS -wTR PRIOR /COMBUS DRAFT Ecs map must be stamped by the Riverside County Surveyor with the following note: The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material placed on an individual lot. JAN 07 '04 16:53 '*1._1 PAGE 11 C)F 9099554886 PAGE.06 01/07/04 Riverside County LMS :16:36 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Library Conditions 80. PRIOR TO BLDG PRMT ISSUANCE FIRE DEPARTMENT 80.FIRE.999 MAP -##50C -TRACT WATER VERIFICA The required water system, including all fire hydrants ?, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency and the Riverside County Fire Department prior to any combustible building material placed on an individual lot. Contact the Riverside County Fire Department to inspect the required fire flow, street signs, all weather surface, and all access and /or secondary. Approved water plans must be a the job site. AAA ITEM NO. PAGE OF�� .L. Page: 3 JAN 07 '04 16:54 9099554886 PAGE.07 DRAFT �.i ATTACHMENT A February 17, 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AND MINUTES AGENDA ITEMS' qqNO...-..�_�- �` PAGE�L OF- j--.6- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT City of Lake Dsinme Pionning Di,i,i- 130 S. Main Stret Lake Elm—, CA 92530 (909) 674 -3124 (909) 471 -1419 fax DATE: February 17, 2004 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Robert A. Brady, Community Development Director PREPARED BY: Duane Morita, Senior Planner PROJECT TITLE: Tentative Tract Map No. 32008 — Lakeshore Village Specific Plan APPLICANT: Corman Leigh Communities; 42346 Rio Nedo; Suite L; Temecula, CA 92590; Attention: Mr. Chuck Treatch PROJECT REQUEST: Recommend approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 32008, pursuant to Section 16 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) and the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan. PROJECT BACKGROUND: The proposed Tentative Tract Map is located within the larger Lakeshore Village Specific Plan area, which was approved by the City Council in late 2003. The Specific Plan area is divided into four separate Planning Areas, each of which proposes either residential and /or commercial uses. The following describes land uses and features proposed within each Planning Area. Please refer to Exhibit A which provides a Location Map of the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan area. Exhibit B provides the Land Use Plan from the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan. Detached Single - Family Residential Planning Area: The Specific Plan allows for construction of a maximum of 176 small lot single - family detached residential units within this 24- acre Planning Area, which represent a density of under eight units per acre. Small lots are allowed measuring a minimum lot size of 3,500 s£; allowable average lot size is 3,825 sf. Minimum lot width and depth will be 42.5 feet and 83 feet, respectively. The 170 single - family residential small lots proposed with TTM No. 32008 are located within this particular planning area. • Attached Residential Planning Area: The Specific Plan allows for approximately 185 attached A004DA ITEM NO. PAGE a 0- OF - =0 4 REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION Ao"` FEBRUARY 17, 2004 PAGE 2 PROJECT: TTM NO. 32008 residential units (apartments) within this 8.5 -acre Planning Area, which represent a density of about 18.0 units per acre. No development is presently proposed within this particular planning area. • Neighborhood Commercial Planning Area: The Specific Plan allows for construction of approximately 12,000 sf. of gross building area at a floor area ratio of 0.25 within this one -acre Planning Area. It should be noted that the neighborhood commercial building(s), the underlying site plan, roadway improvements, and /or public utilities have not yet been designed. No redevelopment of this particular planning area is currently being proposed. • Commercial/ Residential Flex Planning Area: The Specific Plan allows for either attached residential or neighborhood commercial uses within this 4.5 -acre Planning Area. Given present market forces, the applicant is presently unsure of the specific land use. If commercial uses are provided, another 28,000 sf. can be constructed. If attached residential uses are provided, another 45 apartment units can be constructed. TTM No. 32008 proposes two large lots totaling 2.6 acres within this particular planning area. i—. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Planning Commission is being requested to review and recommend approval of the proposed Tentative Tract Map to the City Council. Exhibit C presents the proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 32008 and its location. The Tentative Tract Map encompasses the entire Detached Single- Family Residential Planning Area and portions of the Commercial /Residential Flex Planning Area as defined by the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan. The following describes the proposed Tentative Tract Map: 1. Proposed Lots: The Tentative Tract Map proposes 186 total lots in the following: • 170 single- family detached residential small lots within the Detached Single - Family Residential Planning Area. • Two lots for future commercial uses within the Commercial/ Residential Flex Planning Area. • 14 lettered lots for HOA- maintained open space, community center, park areas, clubhouse, swimming pool, detention basins, and other improvements. 2. Proposed Lot Size: The 170 single - family detached lots range in size from 3,825 to 7,020 sf, with an average lot size of 4,089 sf. The two commercial lots measure 24,910 sf. and 60,179 sf. 3. Proposed Roadway and Circulation Improvements: Primary access to the site will be from Lakeshore Drive along the northern boundary. Secondary access is off of Walnut Drive along the southern boundary. The proposed subdivision will be gated at both its Lakeshore Drive and Walnut Drive entries and will be a private community. The privately- maintained roadway AGENDA ITEM NO. t� PAGE OF 1--L-2 REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 17, 2004 PAGE 3 PROJECT: TTM NO. 32008 network within the subdivision includes a collector road and several neighborhood local streets. The following describes the proposed roadway improvements: • Along Lakeshore Drive: Ultimate improvements will widen Lakeshore Drive to a 110 -foot right -of -way width, with two travel lanes, left -turn pocket, 12 -foot median, eight -foot parking lane, six -foot sidewalks, and six -foot parkways. A 30 -foot dedication is required to achieve the full right -of -way width. Full access will be permitted (right -turn in and out, and left -turn in and out). Proposed Street "T" will extend from Lakeshore Drive and provide the gated entry to the project site. A traffic signal will be provided at the intersection of Lakeshore Drive and Street "T" that will control traffic to the project site and the existing commercial center (Stater Brothers) located on the north side of Lakeshore Drive. Street "T" will be designed to a 60 -foot right -of -way width, with two 20 -foot travel lanes, curb and gutter, and six -foot sidewalks. A gate will also be provided at this entry point. The entry gate will include a call box structure with wrought iron swing gate. • Along Walnut Drive: Ultimate improvements will widen and pave Walnut Drive to a 60- foot right -of -way width, with two travel lanes, six -foot sidewalk and six -foot parkway on one side. Walnut Drive will terminate at the project boundaries as a half cul -de -sac. Walnut Drive will continue to allow access to adjoining parcels to the west. Another entry gate will be provided off of Walnut Drive. The entry will be a remote control wrought iron swing gate. • Internal Private Collector Road. The primary collector road will have an expanded meandering pedestrian parkway /walkway within a 67- to 110 -foot right -of -way, with sidewalks on both sides, two travel lanes, and on -street parking on one side. • Internal Private Local Streets: Internal local streets will have either 42 -, 32 -, or 24 -foot rights -of -way. All internal streets will have two travel lanes and sidewalks. 4. Recreational Amenities: In addition to the pedestrian parkway through the proposed community, the project will provide a community center, clubhouse, swimming pool, and three tot lots. 5. Private Community: As discussed, the detached single - family lots will be constructed as a private community. Entry gates will be provided at Lakeshore Drive and Walnut Drive entrances. A Homeowner's Association will be established to maintain the internal roadways, open space, community center, park areas, clubhouse, swimming pool, detention basins; and other improvements. AGENDA ITEi�'': -N Lf 01 �`` PAGES OF_ L-L. a REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION ^ FEBRUARY 17, 2004 PAGE 4 PROJECT: TTM NO. 32008 PROJECT LOCATION: The project site is located near the west - central portion of Lake Elsinore. Lakeshore Drive forms the northern boundary; Walnut Drive the southern boundary. Existing commercial uses are located along the northern Lakeshore Drive frontage. The balance of the project site is undeveloped and vacant. The site is characterized by relatively flax topography and common urban non - native vegetation. The site is bounded on the south by existing multi - family residential; on the west by a mobile home park and commercial along the Lakeshore Drive frontage; on the east by existing commercial and undeveloped commercial property; and on the north by Lakeshore Drive, a commercial shopping center, and some undeveloped commercial property. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING: DISCUSSION: The applicant has worked diligently with staff in resolving issues relating to the requested Tentative Tract .O-1- Map. All issues have been addressed either through project design of the tract map, compliance with standards and guidelines contained in the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan, and A804DA ITEM NO. —1-1. "I-, ''�� --�� ` PAGE— OF EXISTING LAND USE ZONING GENERAL PLAN Project Site Vacant Lakeshore Village Specific Lakeshore Village Plan (Detached Single Specific Plan Family Residential Planning Area and Commercial /Residential Flex Planning Area North Shopping center C -1, Neighbor. Commercial Future Specific Plan "J" and General Commercial East Vacant and commercial C -2, General Commercial Future Specific Plan District and C -P, "Q" and General Commercial Park District Commercial South Multi- family residential R -2, Medium Density Medium High Residential and R -3, High Density Residential Density Residential 18 DU /AC West Mobile Home Park; vacant MC, Mobile Home Medium High Community and Lakeshore Density Residential Village Specific Plan (18 DU /AC) and (Attached Residential Lakeshore Village Planning Area) Specific Plan DISCUSSION: The applicant has worked diligently with staff in resolving issues relating to the requested Tentative Tract .O-1- Map. All issues have been addressed either through project design of the tract map, compliance with standards and guidelines contained in the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan, and A804DA ITEM NO. —1-1. "I-, ''�� --�� ` PAGE— OF REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 17, 2004 PAGE 5 PROJECT: TTM NO. 32008 Conditions of Approval established with the previously- approved Lakeshore Village Specific Plan and the proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 32008. ANALYSIS: Staff supports the requested Tentative Tract Map and recommends approval for the following reasons: 1. The Proposed Tract Map is Consistent with Land Uses Approved in the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan: As discussed, the proposed Tentative Tract Map is located within and regulated by the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan. The Specific Plan intends for small lot detached single - family residences and future commercial uses to be constructed within the project site as proposed by Tentative Tract Map No. 32008. Staff views the proposed tract map as the first step in implementing the intended land uses for the project site. The proposed tract map does not conflict with the underlying land use designations, standards, objectives, and guidelines contained in the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan. The application being considered by the Planning Commission is for Tentative Tract Map No. 32008 only. Future construction of the proposed detached residential product, commercial uses, and recreational facilities would require future Planning Commission and City Council .../ consideration and approval of Design Review application(s) relating to building designs, site planning, conceptual landscaping, etc. 2. The Proposed Tract Map Complies with Lotting and Development Standards Contained in the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan: City Planning and Engineering staff have reviewed the proposed Tentative Tract Map and have no concerns, if required conditions of approval are satisfied. The proposed Tentative Tract Map is consistent with development standards contained in the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan document in terms of minimum lot sizes, lot widths and depths, street widths, and other Planning and Engineering standards and requirements. The Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the City's Subdivision Ordinance and the Subdivision Map Act. 3. The Proposed Tract Map Implements Conditions of Approval that were Established with the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan: The proposed Tentative Tract Map complies with those applicable Conditions of Approval that were previously established with the approved Lakeshore Village Specific Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Environmental clearance and analysis for proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 32008 are provided by Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2003 -03, which was prepared for the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan. Said environmental document was prepared in accordance with Article 6 of the CEQA AQEMA ITEM _23. L4 01 4 PAGE l OF- —.60 REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 17, 2004 PAGE 6 PROJECT: TTM NO. 32008 Guidelines and was approved by the City Council in 2003. The proposed tract map is consistent with the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan and therefore, does not conflict with the findings and discussions contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Further environmental clearance is unnecessary. STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2004 -_, which recommends that the City Council approve Tentative Tract Map No. 32008, based upon the following Findings, and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. FINDINGS: 1. TTM No. 32008, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan and the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan (Government Code Section 66473.5). The project is consistent with the designated land use planning areas, development and design standards, and all other appropriate requirements contained in the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan, General Plan, and City Municipal Code. 2. The effects that TTM No. 32008 are likely to have upon the housing needs of the region, the public service requirements of its residents and the available fiscal and environmental resources have been considered and balanced. The project is consistent with the City's General Plan and Lakeshore Village Specific Plan, will provide necessary public services and facilities, will pay all appropriate fees, and will not result in any adverse environmental impact. 3. The design of TTM No. 32008 provides to the greatest extent possible, for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision. (Governmental Code Section 66412.3) The project will comply with all approptiate conservation requirements of the Ci y and Uniform Building Code. 10 17-1 AGENDA ITElk! PAGE OF_.!_J REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 17, 2004 PAGE 7 PROJECT: TTM NO. 32008 REVIEWED BY: G. Villa, Planning and Code Enforcement Manager APPROVED BY: obert A. Brady, Comm pity Development Director EXHIBITS Exhibit A: Location Map Exhibit B: Land Use Plan From Lakeshore Village Specific Plan Exhibit C: Reduction of Tentative Tract Map No. 32008 Full size set of Tentative Tract Map No. 32008 AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE on i CL =' Source:AAAC#vSe )- Aft NORTH SCALE: 0 .5 MILES = CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE E-IRIVERSIDE COUNTY = NATIONAL FOREST EXHIBIT A ( LOCATION MAP COMMUNITIES AGENDA ITEM NO. ` PAGE � OF,_� LU O rc z ~ o z W N w � G W Z Z W m < ° T o < u z 11 11 N 11 LL z U i� Y AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE a� OF--- s--� -- :.d. 1M�1 h+"1 F� Iy W F"4 I� I f" \ -/ Z <C C U ujuj Q OQ N LLJ11 �V y x Y U °o n O N f F C' WW cz o 0 r�a . 51 =1 /: .°�Cl i'. MYA � i i -Lb'.. t 1S�S :: 3as : I Ra< 1 � emq 7 w13.1 I MRl e � �A : I .1c� � 1 eWi•� I it 7 t•siJ(t rc z ~ o z W N w � G W Z Z W m < ° T o < u z 11 11 N 11 LL z U i� Y AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE a� OF--- s--� -- :.d. 1M�1 h+"1 F� Iy W F"4 I� I f" \ -/ Z <C C U ujuj Q OQ N LLJ11 �V y x Y U °o n O N f F C' WW cz o 0 r�a M 21, C� r L Tm� .-AN J a C7 6R Q lh� is tu Fs —41 00 0 04 cv) 0 z b ti 33 Zs O LU U) -ia:2 (3 BD DA ITEM N O)a PAGE I Ok OF ) ^a jg�picis^ C: O U) -ia:2 (3 BD DA ITEM N O)a PAGE I Ok OF ) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32008 S. O� PLANNING DIVISION General Conditions 1. Tentative Tract Map No. 32008 will expire two years from date of approval unless within that period of time a Final Map has been filed with the County Recorder, or an extension of time is granted by the City of Lake Elsinore City Council in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act. Additional extensions of time (36 months maximum time per the Subdivision Map Act) may be granted per City Council approval. 2. Future development shall comply with those standards and guidelines contained in the Specific Development Plan, Circulation Plan, Infrastructure and Public Facilities Plan, Development Regulations, Design Guidelines, and Implementation Plan, and conditions of approval established with the 2003 Lakeshore Village Specific Plan. 3. Tentative Tract Map No. 32008 shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and applicable requirements contained in the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan document and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), unless modified by approved Conditions of Approval. 4. The applicant shall participate in the City of Lake Elsinore Citywide Landscaping and Street Lighting District, as appropriate. 5. The applicant shall provide all project - related onsite and offsite improvements as described in the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan document and Tentative Tract Map No. 32008. 6. The applicant shall implement those mitigation measures identified in the 2003 Lakeshore Village Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program. 7. All future proposals shall be reviewed by the City on a project -by- project basis. If determined necessary by the Community Development Director or designee, additional environmental analysis will be required. 8. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, Agents, and its Consultants from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning implementation and construction of the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan, which action is bought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Sections 65009 and /or 66499.37, and Public Resources Code Section 21167. The City will promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City and will cooperate fully with the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, or proceeding, the applicant shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. AGMA ITEM NO. o� 1 PAGE 3 d OF_�_l.: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL � TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32008 (Continued) Provisions of the City's Noise Ordinance shall be satisfied during all site preparation and construction activity. Site preparation activity and construction shall not commence before 7:00 AM and shall cease at 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday. Construction activity shall not take place on Saturday, Sunday, or any Legal Holidays. 10. The applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department. Prior to Final Tract Map Approval 11. All lots shall comply with applicable standards contained in the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan document, LEMC, or Zoning Code. 12. A precise survey with closures for boundaries and all lots shall be provided per the LEMC. 13. Street names within the subdivision shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Designee. 14. All of the improvements shall be designed by the applicant's Civil Engineer to the specifications of the City of Lake Elsinore. 15. Future construction shall meet all Riverside County Fire Department standards for fire protection and any additional requirements requested by the County Fire Department (refer to attached). 16. The applicant shall annex into the City -Wide Community Facilities District for Police, Fire, and Paramedics (CFD 2003 -01). 17. Prior to approval of the Final Map or if deemed appropriate by the Engineering Manager, prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall initiate and complete the formation of a Homeowner's Association, approved by the City, recorded, and in place. All Association documents shall be approved by City Planning and Engineering and the City Attorney and recorded, such as the Articles of Incorporation for the Association; and Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC &Rs). At a minimum, the CC &Rs shall include language to ensure the following conditions: • The HOA shall maintain landscaping along parkways and project streets, recreational facilities, walkways, and drainage improvements. • The HOA shall maintain all streets, entry gates, walls, and monumentation. AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF_.1. —�.� CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32008 (Continued) • The HOA or a separate independent security patrol shall be responsible for enforcing the on -street parking on only one side of those affected project streets that are identified in the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan. Prior to Design Review Approval 18. All future structural development associated with the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan and TTM No. 32008, including building designs, recreational facilities, landscaping improvements, site plans, etc. shall require separate Design Review approval, as appropriate. 19. The applicant shall provide all recreational facilities and amenities including play equipment found at the proposed play lots. 20. Prior to Design Review approval, the applicant shall show how the following fire mitigation measures are met: • The applicant shall participate in the Development Impact Fee Program as adopted by the City of Lake Elsinore, as appropriate. • All water mains and fire hydrants shall be constructed in accordance with Riverside County Ordinance No. 460 and /or No. 787.1. • Prepare a Fire Protection /Vegetation Management Plan for Fire Department approval. • The Homeowner's Association shall be responsible for implementing the Fire Protection /Vegetation Management Plan. • The project shall provide an alternate or secondary access. Prior to Grading Permit Issuance 21. The applicant shall obtain all necessary State and Federal permits, approvals, or other entitlements, where applicable, prior to each phase of development of the project. 22. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit a final grading plan, subject to all requirements of the City Grading Ordinance to the Engineering Manager for approval. Said grading plan shall address those grading standards and guidelines contained in the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan document. 23. Grading shall not be permitted outside the area of the designated project boundary unless appropriate approvals have been obtained. 24. Grading easements shall be coordinated with affected property owners. AQEMA ITEM NO. _= _.�..•.• PACE 3 OF ....J. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32008 (Continued) 25. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, grading and construction plans shall incorporate erosion control measures. 26. Any alterations to the topography, ground surface, or any other site preparation activity will require appropriate grading permits. A Geologic Soils Report with associated recommendations will be required for grading permit approval, and all grading must meet the City's Grading Ordinance, subject to the approval of the Engineering Manager and the Planning Division. Analysis of impacts of fills and cuts greater than 60 feet shall be provided. Interim and Permanent erosion control measures are required. The applicant shall bond 100 percent for material and labor for one year for erosion control landscaping at the time the site is rough graded. Prior to Building Permit Issuance 27. The applicant shall enter into an agreement with the Redevelopment Agency, acceptable to Agency Counsel, to either provide affordable units in accordance with Section 33413 (b) (2) of the California Community Redevelopment Law, appropriate in -lieu fees, or a combination of both. 28. The applicant shall pay all appropriate traffic impact mitigation fees. 29. The applicant shall comply with the following City programs: the City Source Reduction and Recycling Element and Household Hazardous Waste Element, the County Solid Waste Management Plan and Integrated Waste Management Plan. 30. Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall submit a letter of verification (will-serve letter) to the Engineer Manager, for all required utility services. 31. The applicant shall meet all requirements of Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). 32. The applicant shall pay applicable fees and obtain proper clearance from the Lake Elsinore Unified School District (LEUSD) prior to issuance of building permits. 33. Pay all applicable fees including park fees. 34. The applicant shall provide connection to public sewer for each lot within any subdivision. No service laterals shall cross adjacent property lines and shall be delineated on engineering sewer plans and profiles for submittal to the EVMWD. 35. The applicant (master developer) shall prepare a Community-Wide Wall Plan for the entire TTM No. 32008 area. A004DA ITEM NO. PAGE OF OF --- =` CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32008 (Continued) 36. Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall prepare a Final Wall and Fence Plan for the Detached Single - Family Residential Planning Area addressing the following: • Show that a decorative masonry block wall shall be constructed along all boundaries of the Detached Single Family Residential Planning Area of the TTM 32008 site. • Show materials, colors, and heights of side yard fences for proposed lots. • Show that all front return walls shall be decorative masonry block walls. Front return wood fences shall not be permitted. • Show that side walls for corner lots shall be decorative masonry block walls. 37. The applicant shall submit plans to the electric utility company for a layout of the street lighting system. The cost of street lighting, installation as well as energy charges shall be the responsibility of the applicant and /or the HOA. Said plans shall be approved by the City and shall be installed in accordance with the City Standards. 38. The applicant shall meet all requirements of the providing electric utility company. 39. The applicant shall meet all requirements of the providing gas utility company. 40. The applicant shall meet all requirements of the providing telephone utility company. 41. A bond is required guaranteeing the removal of all trailers used during construction. 42. Future signage requires a permit and shall be subject to Planning Division review and approval prior to installation. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy Issuance 43. Throughout construction, as deemed appropriate by the City and the applicant, fugitive dust suppression along Lakeshore and Walnut Drives, and other connecting roads shall be applied to minimize fugitive dust generation. Fugitive dust suppression techniques may include soil watering, application of soil binders, and /or placement of gravel or other appropriate material to minimize vehicle generated dust. 44. The applicant shall install signs along those appropriate project streets as shown in the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan to ensure parking is permitted on only one side and to prohibit on -street parking. Location of said signs shall require approval by the Engineering Manager. 45. The applicant shall paint the curbs red for those sides of the streets that prohibit on -street parking. .00 AGENDA ITEM NO. 21 - PAGE 3 l OF_1_L� CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32008 (Continued) ENGINEERING DIVISION 46. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to final map approval. 47. All Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees shall be paid (LEMC 16.34, Resolution 85 -26). 48. A "Will Serve" letter shall be submitted to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project. Letter shall be submitted prior to Final Map Approval. 49. All public works improvements shall be constructed per approved street plans (LEMC 12.04 and 16.34). 50. Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City for the construction of public works improvements and shall post the appropriate bonds, prior to final map approval. 51. Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City for the construction of public works improvements and shall post the appropriate bonds, prior to final map approval. 52. Applicant shall pay all fees and meet requirement of encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Division for construction of public works improvements (LEMC 12.08 and Resolution 83 -78). 53. Applicant shall dedicate right -of -way along Lakeshore Drive consistent with the General Plan Circulation element requirement of 60 ft. half width right -of -way (as measured from the centerline to the project property line) for an urban arterial. 54. Street `T' (project entrance) shall be opposite the main entrance to State Brother's Shopping Center. 55. Sidewalks on private streets must meet ADA standards. 56. Walnut Drive shall be constructed to a collector street cross section width. Walnut Drive shall be paved for two (2) travel lanes from tract boundary to Fraser Drive. Walnut Drive shall provide an entrance drive at the bulb end of the cul -de -sac to allow access to the existing easement extending north from the Walnut Drive cul -de -sac. 57. The circulation improvements shall be constructed as described in Exhibit 6 -A in the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan Traffic Impact Analysis (see attached). Traffic signal at Stater Brother's Central Driveway and Main Entrance shall be operational at 20% build out. AGEMA ITEM NO. PAGE 3 5i OF I CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32008 (Continued) 58. Applicant shall design and construct a raised landscaped median along the frontage of Lakeshore Drive, subject to the approval of the Engineering Manager. 59. The entrance driveway aisles shall be designed so that at least 40 ft. is available between the street curb and the first parking stall in order to provide adequate on -site storage for entering vehicles. 60. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8-1/2" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of public works improvements will be scheduled and approved. 61. Applicant shall obtain all necessary off -site easements for off -site grading from the adjacent property owners prior to final map approval. 62. Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. 63. Applicant shall provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by Riverside County Fire. 64. Applicant shall provide street lighting and show lighting improvements as part of street improvement plans as required by the Engineering Manager. 65. Applicant shall install blue reflective pavement markers in the street at all fire hydrant locations. 66. Applicant shall submit a traffic control plan showing all traffic control devices for the tract to be approved prior to final map approval. All traffic control devices shall be installed prior to final inspection of public improvements. This includes No Parking and Street Sweeping Signs for streets within the tract. 67. All improvement plans and tract maps shall be digitized. At Certificate of Occupancy, applicant shall submit tapes and /or discs which are compatible with City's ARC Info /GIS or applicant to pay $30 per sheet for City digitizing. 68. All utilities except electrical over 12 KV shall be placed underground, as approved by the serving utility. 69. Applicant shall obtain a grading permit with appropriate security prior to building permit issuance. A grading plan signed and stamped by a California Registered Civil Engineer shall be required if the grading exceeds 50 cubic yards or the existing flow pattern is substantially modified as determined by the Engineering Manager. If the grading is less than 50 cubic yards and a grading plan is not required, a grading permit shall still be obtained so that a cursory drainage and flow pattern inspection can be conducted before grading begins. AGENDA ITEh! t,' - -0 . 1-1. PAGE OF.�1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32008 (Continued) 70. Applicant shall provide soils, geology and seismic report including street design recommendations. Provide final soils report showing compliance with recommendations. 71. An Alquist- Priolo study shall be performed on the site to identify any hidden earthquake faults and /or liquefaction zones present on -site. In the event the project is unaffected by any fault zone, developer shall provide a document certified by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer or Licensed Geologist identifying the site as being outside the fault zone. 72. All grading shall be done under the supervision of a Geotechnical Engineer and he shall certify all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and proper erosion control. All manufactured slopes greater than 30 feet in height shall be contoured. 73. Individual lot drainage shall be conveyed to a storm drain facility and conveyed to the public storm drain system. Any non - historic storm flows shall be accepted by adjacent property owners with a notarized and recorded letter of drainage acceptance or conveyed to a drainage easement. 74. On -site drainage facilities located outside of road right -of -way should be contained within drainage easements shown on the final map. A note should be added to the final map stating: �-. "Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions ". 75. All natural drainage traversing site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the Engineering Manager. 76. Submit Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports for review and approval by Engineering Manager and the Riverside County Flood Control District prior to approval of final map. Applicant shall mitigate any flooding and /or erosion caused by development of site and diversion of drainage. 77. All drainage facilities in this tract shall be constructed to Riverside County Flood ControlDistrict Standards. 78. Storm drain inlet facilities shall be appropriately stenciled to prevent illegal dumping in the drain system, the wording and stencil shall be approved by the Engineering Manager. 79. Roof and yard drains will not be allowed to outlet through cuts in the street curb. Roof drains should drain to a landscaped area whenever feasible. 80. Ten (10) year storm runoff should be contained within the curb and the 100 -year storm runoff should be contained within the street right -of -way. When either of these criteria is exceeded, drainage facilities should be installed. 81. A drainage acceptance letter will be necessary from the downstream property owners for outletting the proposed storm water run -off on private property. JAIMA ITEM! NO _ 2�. PAGE OF._1.1. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32008 (Continued) 82. Applicant shall be subject to all Master Planned Drainage fees and will receive credit for all Master Planned Drainage facilities constructed. 83. Applicant will be required to install BMP's using the best available technology to mitigate any urban pollutants from entering the watershed. 84. Applicant shall obtain approval from Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board for their storm water pollution prevention plan including approval of erosion control for the grading plan prior to issuance of grading permits. The applicant shall provide a SWPPP for post construction which describes BMP's that will be implemented for the development and including maintenance responsibilities. 85. Education guidelines and Best Management Practices (BMP) shall be provided to residents of the development in the use of herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers as well as other environmental awareness education materials on good housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of stormwater quality and meet the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside county NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. 86. Applicant shall provide for flush BMP's using the best available technology that will reduce stormwater pollutants from parking areas and driveway aisles. 87. Intersection site distance shall meet the design criteria of the CALTRANS Design Manual (particular attention should be taken for intersections on the inside of curves). If site distance can be obstructed, a special limited use easement must be recorded to limit the slope, type of landscaping and wall placement. 88. Applicant shall provide a traffic study prepared by a traffic engineer to determine the traffic volume and the impacts on intersections in the vicinity and freeway on and off ramps prior to final map approval, subject to the approval of the Engineering Manager. 89. Access shall be restricted on Lakeshore Drive and Walnut Avenue and so noted on the final map. No residential lot shall have frontage onto Lakeshore Drive or Walnut Avenue. 90. All parcels shall have access to public right -of -way or be provided with a minimum 30 -foot ingress and egress easement to public right -of -way by separate instrument or through map recordation. Private streets shall be owned and maintained by an HOA. 91. Riverside County Fire Department shall approve width and radii of private streets and the length and configuration of hammerhead turnarounds prior to final map approval. 0 AGEMA ITEM NO- PAGE CL OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL � TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32008 (Continued) 92 _ .hall cause to be recorded CC &R's with recordation of final map which provides for in ( bic reciprocal parking, circulation, loading and landscape maintenance easement in favor o ` sub)ect to the approval of the Director of Community Development and the City A }4 The CC &R's shall enforce standards of building maintenance, participation in lai . ,�.tp,.. maintenance, prohibition of outside vehicle or material storage. 93. A I shall maintain the storm drain detention basin. 94. Ir � o :dance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal and recycling, the al ; ;hall be required to contact with CR &R Inc., for removal and disposal of all waste m s . ;- Jcbris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and gr , :?r all other phases of construction. AGENDA ITEM NO.. _.. .�. PAGE j RESOLUTION NO. 2004- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF 11400, THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32008 WHICH SUBDIVIDES 26 ACRES OF THE LAKESHORE VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA INTO 186 TOTAL LOTS WHEREAS, Corman Leigh Communities has submitted an application for Tentative Tract Map No. 32008, which subdivides 26 acres of the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan area into 186 total lots, including 170 single - family detached residential small lots, two lots for future commercial uses, and 14 lettered lots for HOA- maintained open space, community center, park areas, clubhouse, swimming pool, detention basins, and other improvements. Tentative Tract Map No. 32008 is generally located near the west - central portion of Lake Elsinore. Lakeshore Drive forms the northern boundary; Walnut Drive the southern boundary. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council pertaining to subdivision of land; and WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on February 17, 2004. 1.90, NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed subdivision, Tentative Tract Map No. 32008, prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve the proposed subdivision. The Planning Commission finds and determines that the 2003 Lakeshore Village Mitigated Negative Declaration is adequate and prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which analyzes environmental effects of the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan and TTM No. 32008, and has recommended City Council certification. SECTION 2. That in accordance with State of California Subdivision Map Act and requirements of the City of Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 32008 have been made as follows: 1. TTM No. 32008, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan and the Lakeshore Village Specific Plan. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan (Government Code Section 66473.5). -.0e AGMA ITEM ISO. ,o - PAGE _ OF R1,, )1,04ION NO. 2004 - P . i Ilk- PlOie ct is consistent with the designated land use planning areas, development and design P tnd all other appropriate requirements contained in the Lakeshore Village Specific ;c iicral Plan, and City Municipal Code. 2. "1 '., --ffects that TTM No. 32008 are likely to have upon the housing needs of the region, the l r•,. ice requirements of its residents and the available fiscal and environmental resources 1F !,,considered and balanced. T c,ct is consistent with the City's General Plan and Lakeshore Village Specific Plan, will pi �4(, necessary public services and facilities, will pay all appropriate fees, and will not result in al + c environmental impact. 3. T` - acne of TTM No. 32008 provides to the greatest extent possible, for future passive or n<: .rating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision. (Governmental Code Section 6( Tl + oiect will comply with all appropriate conservation requirements of the City and Uniform Bi ' 'f,.: ("ode. THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City of Lak,. iJ,isiliore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the City Council of the City of Lake n Elsinor, .-tpptove Tentative Tract Map No. 32008. Ron LaPere, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission I hereb mly that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a meeting thereof i,cIucted on February 17, 2004 by the following vote: [ S: Commissioners: C, ES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: AGENDA ITEM NO. iL. PAGE_1J.. OF-L-136"' RESOLUTION NO. 2004 - PAGE 3 ATTEST: Robert A. Brady, Secretary to the Planning Commission AWMA FTEM NO. —L�— I� -� OF ,1 -.a-: PAGE -.n/` PAC F ? PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES —FEBRUARY 17, 2004 PUBLIC: ,' i F?ARINGS 2. f' �nan LaPere opened the Public Hearing at 6:06 PM, andF4equest'ed the reading of the report. 1 for of Community Development Brady indicated 17he proposed:,, Tentative Tract Map 3 s within the larger Lakeshore Village Spec �i Pl n area was approved by the City C cil in late 2003. He requested Senior Pla 'her Morita to review tip Staff Report with tl )tnmission. S� Planner Morita stated that the TTM subdbndes; - a' portion of the Lakeshore Village Sr, cific Plan. He stated that the Planning Commtsstoi and the City Council approved the Las , lliore Village Specific Plan Iasi November. He", __ated that the plan proposed a Re, ii cntial Planning Area and a Co n Mixed Development along Lakeshore Drive. Senior Planner Morita stated that the""" pplicanfi rs' proposing a private community with two entry- gates. He stated that one gate world h i� °off Lakeshore Drive and the other would be off :° 'alnut Drive Hr stated that the Tray, Map woulVsubdivide the 24 acres into 186 lots to allow 170 detached sm� lots, whtch� would range in size from 3,800 to 7,000 square feel 1-le stated�that,in addttr n the Tract Map would also provide 2 commercial lots and 14 lett •d lots for internal streets. a commum,iy' swimming pool, a community center /club hot, and two parks Ser:,, Planner M, a stated;.that Staff supports this project, and recommends the Planning Co. � .� Mission approverand ado ti a Resolution based on the Findings, Exhibits and is subject t t Conditions of o , proval e noted that there is a typo in the Conditions of Approval. He stated_ that No 50Fd 51 are duplicates and Condition No. 51 should be removed. He mdi ited`` at the ap pli giant is present to answer any questions that the Commission may hay Ch:,i9 Irnan LaPei- i&wested comments from the public. There being no comments from the puFii (_y Chairman LaPere requested the applicant to approach the podium. He asked the appl,,ant if he has read and agrees to the Conditions of Approval. Chuck Treath — Temecula stated that he has read and agrees with the Conditions of App.: >val. He requested clarification on the Internal Private Collector Road. Senior Planner Morita stated that on page 3 of 29 in the Staff Report, it indicates that the right -of -way is noted to be 67 to 110 feet. He indicated that the maximum should be 67 feet. AGENDA ITEM 6lO. _2A. PAGE OF.�.J_.: PAGE 3 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES – FEBRUARY 17, 2004 Commissioner Barnes requested clarification on the Internal Private Local Streets right -of- way. He asked if that meant curb to curb. Senior Planner Morita indicated that it is 24 feet right -of -way. There being no further comments from the public, discussion was brought back to the Commission for comments. Commissioner Barnes stated that all of his questions have been already answered. He noted that the applicant has done a great job with this project and lkgd"rio further comments. Commissioner O'Neal indicated that this project ad Council and Planning Commission, and indicated further comments. Vice Chairman Uhlry stated that he met withf"�=ta Wilse,. He indicated that the builder has met and all had no further comments. Chairman LaPere indicated that ori�page 16 of 29 of No. 54 should read "Stater Bros" Bros. He gate would be used. Mr. Treatch stated indicated that on Chairman Treatch stat, fate any cars Mr. Treatch"' recommended center. He ins Lakeshore. all of "the concerns with the City is a god_,,project. He had no ►o is an adlaceritrope`rty owner. Aer concerns. I Ie stated that he itions of Approval, Condition 3 clarification on what type of call box with a key entry. He be stacked at the Lakeshore entrance. City's Traffic Engineer reviewed the Traffic urirg i%busy times on Lakeshore, the gate could remain open to up oaf0Lakeshore Drive. clarification on the traffic signals near the Stater Bros driveway. ihat a traffic study was completed for this project, and it was ,e a traffic signal placed near the driveway to Stater Bros shopping that another signal was recommended to be placed at Gunnerson and Chairman LaPere had no further comments. Vice Chairman Uhlry stated that Chairman LaPere brought up a very good point on the stacking of cars onto Lakeshore Drive. He noted that having two traffic signals near each AGENDA ITEM NO. �` PAGE_ 1 _..I.OE—.6 -= �.rr+ ',t (' k'4 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES — FEBRUARY 17, 2004 could cause major back up at those locations. He suggested having a left turn lane at (_,',.cunerson, rather than a traffic signal. aigineering Manager Seumalo stated that he would have the city's Traffic Engineer look at 1,..: two signals, and address the issues. _° acre being no further comments, Chairman LaPere closed the Public Hearing at 6:20 PM, ­d requested the reading of the Resolution. 0.1tector rif Co nu Development Brady stated that this item before the Commission is r<_cluest of D "sign. Review for a Single Family Residence which had been ,a inued fro ma ary 20� X004 Planning Commission. He requested Associate Isr, r e Preisendan to 'ew itwith the Commission. riate`:.Planne re nda indicated that the reason that this item was continued was > the'r;c isstt's and lack of landscaping. He stated that the applicant agreed to lttr� e a 6 -foot .h tivood fence I ound the rear area, and additional landscaping in the front i co includ ' lawn area along urnbull with planters and ground cover. He also noted the app ant has also agree o augment the original architectural design with the ,rr.- },itectura eatures and colors, enh cing the visual interest and street appeal. .Associate lanner Preisendanz noted That Condition No. 5 was added to address the r< cil.racal ccess easement between the two lots in order to provide access to Turnbull �-, ,,r)ue. AGENDA ITEM NO. �` PAG'E OF I I I ( CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE RIVERSIDE COUNTY Q e CLEVELAND i PJ� �l ,,,_ PROJECT SITE, < ll f -I Vn Source:AAACitvSer CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE NORTH E—I RIVERSIDE COUNTY SCALE: ° s NATIONAL FOREST MILES 15 ATTACHMENT " LOCATION MAC COMMUNITIES { A ITI =fit! PAGE.' OF. L — I J I I I ( CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE RIVERSIDE COUNTY Q e CLEVELAND i PJ� �l ,,,_ PROJECT SITE, < ll f -I Vn Source:AAACitvSer CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE NORTH E—I RIVERSIDE COUNTY SCALE: ° s NATIONAL FOREST MILES 15 ATTACHMENT " LOCATION MAC COMMUNITIES { A ITI =fit! PAGE.' OF. Q, _0 CL Cc: 03 ism a t o Y-, co 0 C0 15-1 O M r 0 ID ♦_ C: 12 U) Z �EM NO. OF "Awn jA 1121T I ILLS-11-110 10, O M r 0 ID ♦_ C: 12 U) Z �EM NO. OF "Awn jA 1121T I •J •,.. . `.a' ;, ....lae.i .. Irt>evrlxe LU 0 Irrraria>Ar��.Ln,lrr+ �f- S w � W K W < pp t7 D < U 2 11 II 11 II LL Q U U W( Y AGEMA ITEM NO. PAGE OF 1 A�H W � r�r W U � E� H d N LWL_ r Z U' Cc C 0 U Ly Lu nrnn Q Z V Li =J C') w Wax R Qw U 0 n 0 N h F O cz o 0 ra c� ATTACHMENT E FULL SIZE SET OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32008 AGEMA ITEM NO..� L4 q �` PAGE OF __I i CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FROM: RICHARD J. WATENPAUGH, CITY MANAGER DATE: CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING OF MARCH 9, 2004 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 31963, "PASADENA BUSINESS PARK 11" APPLICANT Mr. Carl Johnson Triple J Development 512 Chaney Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 REQUEST The applicant is requesting consideration to subdivide approximately 8.52 (7.5 net) acres of vacant land into 15 industrial parcels for the development of an industrial business park that entails the construction of 15 separate freestanding buildings and total approximately 104,100 sf. of industrial space and related infrastructure improvements. Review is pursuant to Section 16 "Subdivisions" of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. BACKGROUND At their regular meeting held on February 3, 2004, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2003 -16, recommending to the City Council approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 31963. (Minutes, Staff Report and supporting documents attached) DISCUSSION Items of discussion at the Planning Commission were relatively minor. The Commission raised concerns with the establishment of CC &R's and a Property Owners Association for the ongoing maintenance of common areas. Conditions of Approval were included to address this issue. No further concerns were raised. ENVIRONMENTAL Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, (CEQA) This project does not require additional environmental clearance. Mitigated Negative Declaration (NIND) No. 2002 -03 previously approved and adopted by the City Council anticipates the development of this project. Mitigation contained in AGENDA ITEM NQ- PAGE --I, of: —L2L-1 REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 9, 2004 PAGE 2 SUBJECT: DESIGN REIVEW FOR 12003-01, "PASADENA BUSINESS PARK II" MND No. 2002 -03 addresses the development of this project. No further environmental clearance is required. FISCAL IMPACTS No direct fiscal impact to the city will be caused resulting from this development. It is anticipated that industrial job growth will be created. In addition, this project is within Redevelopment Areal. Ultimate construction of the proposed project will increase the Tax Increment allocation to the city. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve Tentative Parcel Map No. 31963 for the subdivision of 8.52 (7.51 net) of vacant land into 15 parcels (APN 377 -151 -057), based on the Findings, Exhibit "A" herein and attached Conditions of Approval. The proposed project is within the Redevelopment Project Area 1. It is also recommended that the Redevelopment Agency concur with the City Council Action. PREPARED BY: REVIEWED BY: APPROVED FOR AGENDA LISTING: G. Villa, Planning & Code Enforcement Manager AGENDA ITEM 114-3. �. PAGE OF -.oe CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 31963 �. PASADENA BUSINESS PARK II APN 377 - 151 -057 PLANNING DIVISION 1. Tentative Parcel Map No. 31963 will expire two (2) years from date of approval unless within that period of time a final map has been filed with the County Recorder, or an extension of time is granted by the City of Lake Elsinore City Council in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act. 2. Tentative Parcel Map No. 31963 shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Title 16 unless modified by approved Conditions of Approval. 3. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Official, Officers, Employees, and Agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Official, Officers, Employees, or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning TPM No. 31963, which action is bought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Sections 65009 and /or 66499.37, and Public Resources Code Section 21167. The City will promptly notify the Applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City and will cooperate fully with the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any such claim, or proceeding, the Applicant shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. 4. Prior to final map and recordation approval of TPM No. 31963, the applicant shall prepare and record CC &R's against the complex. The CC &R's shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director or Designee and the City Attorney. The CC &R's shall include methods of maintaining common areas, parking and drive aisle areas, landscaped areas including parkways, and methods for common maintenance of all underground, and above ground utility infrastructure improvements necessary to support the complex. In addition, CC &R's shall established methods to address design improvements. 5. No lot in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owner's group or similar entity has been formed with the right to financially assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and duty to maintain, all said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC &R's which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and /or dwelling units and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC &R's shall permit enforcement by the City for provisions required as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. 6. A precise survey with closures for boundaries and all lots shall be provided, per City Ordinance. Page 1 of 6 AGENDA ITEM NO. —1.4� �`` PAGE-3—OF-4 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 31963 PASADENA BUSINESS PARK II APN 377 -151 -057 7. The City's Noise Ordinance must be met during all site preparation activity. 8. Applicant shall bond for all public improvements and grading for subject development as required by the City Engineer. a) Bonding shall be done by phases and not by final maps(s) on grading. b)Bonding shall be done by final map(s) for all other improvements. 9. Pay all applicable fees including park fees as stated in the development agreement prior to issuance of building permits. 10. Prior to final map approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 31963, the improvements specified herein and approved by the Planning Commission and the City Council shall be installed, or the bonds and agreement for said improvements, shall be submitted to the City for approval by the City Engineer, and all other stated conditions shall be complied with. 11. All of the improvements shall be designed by developers Civil Engineer to the specifications of the City of Lake Elsinore. 12. Applicant must meet all requirements of Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). 13. The applicant shall provide connection to public sewer for each lot within the subdivision. No service laterals shall cross adjacent property lines and shall be delineated on engineering sewer plans and profiles for submittal to the EVMWD. 14. The developer shall submit plans to Southern California Edison for a layout of the street lighting system. The cost of street lighting, installation as well as energy charges shall be the responsibility of the developer and /or the association. Said plans shall be approved by the City and shall be installed in accordance with the City Standards. 15. Meet all requirements of the providing electric utility company. 16. Meet all requirements of the providing gas utility company. 17. Meet all requirements of the providing telephone utility company. 18. All trailers used during construction, mailboxes and signage shall be subject to Planning Division review and approval prior to installation. 19. Any alterations to the topography, ground surface, or any other site preparation activity will require appropriate Grading City permits. A Geologic Soils Report with associated recommendations will be required for grading permit approval, and all grading must meet the City's Grading Ordinance, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and the Planning Division. Analysis of impacts of fills and cuts greater than sixty-feet (60') shall be provided. Interim and permanent erosion control measures are required. The applicant shall bond 100% Page 2of6 AGENDA ITE10 NCB. PAGE OF�� CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 31963 �. PASADENA BUSINESS PARK II APN 377 - 151 -057 for material and labor for one (1) year for erosion control landscaping at the time the site is rough graded. 20. All development associated with this map requires separate Design Review approval. 21. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building permit, subdivider shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department. 22. The applicant shall pay applicable fees and obtain proper clearance from the Lake Elsinore Unified School District (LEUSD) prior to issuance of building permits. ENGINEERING DIVISION 23. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to building permit. 24. Dedicate a 20 ft. wide strip of additional street right -of -way along the frontage of Pasadena St. to the City prior to approval of final map. 25. Dedicate a 30 ft. wide strip of additional street right -of -way along the frontage of Crane St. to the City prior to approval of final map. 26. Dedicate additional right -of way for a standard corner cutback for the future curb return at the westerly corner of the lot. 27. All lots shall have direct access to public right -of -way or to be provided with minimum 30 foot ingress and egress easement to public right -of -way by separate instrument or with recordation of a final map with CC &R's. 28. The ingress and egress easements width and turning radii must be approved by the County Fire Dept. prior to approval of final map. 29. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (LEMC 16.34, Res. 85 -26). The traffic mitigation fee is $73,589, the K -rat fee is $4,260 and the drainage fee is $53,805. 30. Submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project. Submit this letter prior to approval of final map. 31. Construct all public works improvements per approved street plans (LEMC Title 12). Plans must be approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to approval of final map (LEMC 16.34) . Page 3 of 6 ALMA ITEM f�C,. . PAGE I' OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 31963 PASADENA BUSINESS PARK II APN 377 - 151 -057 32. Street improvement plans and specifications shall be prepared by a Calif. Registered Civil Engineer. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Riverside County Road Department Standards, latest edition, and City Codes (LEMC 12.04 and 16.34). 33. Developer shall construct half street improvements on Third Street as part of this development or pay an in -lieu fee for the construction of the half -street improvements. 34. Developer shall construct half street improvements on Crane St. plus one 10 ft. wide travel lane. 35. The applicant shall furnish a signing and striping plan for Pasadena Street and Crane Street, subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 36. Pay all fees and meet requirements of an encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Division for construction of off -site public works improvements (LEMC12.08, Res.83 -78). All fees and requirements for an encroachment permit shall be fulfilled before Certificate of Occupancy. 37. The driveway aisles should be designed so that at least 40 ft. is available between the street curb and the first parking stall in order to provide adequate on -site storage for entering vehicles. 38. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 1/2" x 11" mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of ' "Me off -site improvements will be scheduled and approved. 39. The applicant shall obtain all necessary off -site easements for off -site grading from the adjacent property owners prior to grading permit issuance. 40. Apply and obtain a grading permit with appropriate security prior to building permit issuance. A grading plan signed and stamped by a Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall be required if the grading exceeds 50 cubic yards or the existing flow pattern is substantially modified as determined by the City Engineer. 41. Applicant to provide erosion control measures as part of their grading plan. The applicant shall contribute to protection of stormwater quality and met the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. 42. Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. 43. Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by Riverside County Fire. 44. Provide street lighting, show lighting improvements on street improvement plans, as required by the City Engineer. Page 4 of 6 AGENDA ITEM ISO. ' _1 ! -� PAGE.�a._ OF � CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 31963 �.. PASADENA BUSINESS PARK II APN 377 - 151 -057 45. On -site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility or accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance or conveyed to a drainage easement. 46. All natural drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer. 47. Roof and yard drains will not be allowed to outlet through cuts in the street curb. Roofs should drain to a landscaped area whenever feasible. 48. Meet all requirements of LEMC 15.64 regarding flood hazard regulations. 49. Meet all requirements of LEMC 15.68 regarding floodplain management. Over half this site is in FEMA flood zone AE and the finish floor elevation must be at or above the Base Flood Elevation. Most building must have their floor elevations above an elevation of 1261 ft. and some building must be above 1261.5 feet. Some of the site is in flood zone AO and the floor elevation must at least one foot above the adjacent grade. 50. The applicant to provide FEMA elevation certificates prior to certificate of occupancies 51. Submit Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports for review and approval by City Engineer prior to approval of final maps. Developer shall mitigate any flooding and /or erosion downstream caused by'development of the site and /or diversion of drainage. 52. All drainage facilities in this tract shall be constructed to Riverside County Flood Control District Standards. 53. The applicant shall record a CC &R that provides for irrevocable reciprocal parking, circulation, ingress and egress, loading and landscaping maintenance easements in favor of all lots. It shall also enforce standards of building maintenance and participation in landscape maintenance. The CC &R shall be approved by the Community Development Director and shall be recorded prior to building permit. 54. Applicant shall obtain approval from Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board for their storm water pollution prevention plan including approval of erosion control for the grading plan prior to issuance of grading permits. The applicant shall provide a SWPPP for post construction which describes BMP's that will be implemented for the development and including maintenance responsibilities. 55. Education guidelines and Best Management Practices (BMP) shall be provided to building occupants of the development for outdoor storage, vehicle maintenance, building maintenance and landscaping as well as other environmental awareness education materials on good housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of stormwater quality and met the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. Page 5 of 6 AGENDA ITEM Nib. a PAGE OF�� CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 31963 PASADENA BUSINESS PARK II APN 377 - 151 -057 56. Applicant will be required to install BMP's using the best available technology to mitigate any urban pollutants from entering the watershed. Applicant can construct permeable concrete gutters, drain gutters to landscaped areas or use basins with filters. 57. Applicant shall provide first blush BMP's using the best available technology that will reduce storm water pollutants from parking areas and driveway aisles. 58. In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal & recycling, the applicant shall be required to contract with CR &R Inc. for removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of construction. Pagc 6 of 6 ADEIHUA ITBv, PAGE , OFOL ,../ i 1 Q / LU SU W L CC :a 11� 0 0 N Q7 c°°i W 0 6 b ; fit I i° i 1 it35� a ' q:6sa' xr° __ i .� $ o• �$y ite t t Me ; N ;r r ¢ k e5as, a3s t aY 8¢ hi gp I � ka• :a Ek °Q i ;y Q, BI ER 4? L A; INN 1 �� tja [ -- k !QeI Qi d<r. QQ y 8! 6 Ey -t, a Y n r p 3 Q da !Q;pre! g v� 1a .. _I CQe S q QAii¢g e,7Q.ieeli _3Q e3 e; aQa pp e k r a v _ ape o dt eyrie Q t4_ �¢ erid• ;E 14-1 a i�QQ�ggQ_, �3 `ai�gs t�� irr °° QS Qa r c e i i�t�r e Q�rd EE EA n' all ;g 5 rXK ti Qeil � i ty? t? I � III M M £t 10-1 VSO-I% -LL6 Kidd _ Zb 1 �, ...}�ib,!].� ems•• _• .Ol - f.M' __ -•• MM,TIj .Ti -�j � 1 1 •!i 1 NYC '� a° su]n.i 1-3 wn]� ti Ip:q: 1 $ 1 r .,2 J I 01OS' vu� � I S, 1 --- —L— - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- i E — -------- -- - - - - -- - - -- — -- — ---- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- R 4U�lSY -L1E iJdV 1 a 1 AdbrNDA ITEM" W ..�..o a r��xs IS a i aIN 'I" :BeQ Rif E $ iSe :tge bd!R d39t ta�R J1�i +K a+o 5 J Ca I W J " W Cm 0 LLJ C-) CcLL. Cm cl H4 CO C') N Ldl mb J < I xl it Ilh- n w=q lilac If ti 1 --: HK 19I S. L -------------- h; A it 9! rs H 1 -To 7 t Itl W7 RPM Oil J n h w, OIL a P m No my 0 1 "Y" z In Sup. id pal V— gly Q SO g 1 lum 1i m m"I i His QNS 0 10 URI . "M WIT 0:11 11 O Epp R A —Olin 01 103 2 NO R m1i 014 NO .ilk M T 11HO �z ig; ly T T n w=q lilac If ti 1 --: HK 19I S. o.o 1 EV wA Mize 'T 'Ammof L -------------- rs -To 7 n Imo, id pal V— _J I T I K lip _� o.o 1 EV wA Mize 'T 'Ammof MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 03, 2004 Chairman LaPere called the Regular Planning Commission Meeting to order at 6:00 PM. Commissioner O'Neal led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: LAPERE, UHLRY, AND O'NEAL ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES & MATTHIES Also present were: Community Development Director Brady, Planning and Code Enforcement Manager Villa, Engineering Manager Seumalo, Associate Planner Miller, Office Specialist Porche' and Deputy City Attorney Steve Miles. PUBLIC COMMENTS Chairman LaPere welcomed Councilman Magee to the Planning Commission. CONSENT CALENDAR Vice Chairman Uhlry indicated that on page 14 of 20 of the Planning Commission Minutes for January 20, 2004, the third sentence from the last should read; "The applicant shall grant an access easement to the adjacent property to the north. Commissioner O'Neal stated that a correction to the same minutes, page 14 of 20, the fourth sentence from the last should read; "Commissioner O'Neal stated that he concurs with Commissioner Matthies; however, he stated that he did not like the lack of fascia. He also indicated that on page 10 of 20, the second to the last paragraph should read; He reiterated that the storm drain installation must be completed prior to the first certificate of occupancy. MOVED BY BARNES, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS AMENDED. AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE __OF- PAGE 2 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES — FEBRUARY 03, 2004 Minutes 1. January 20, 2004. PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Tentative Parcel Map No. 31963, Pasadena Business Park II. Chairman LaPere opened the Public Hearing at 6:05 PM, and requested the reading of the Staff Report. Community Development Director Brady requested Planning & Code Enforcement Manager Villa to review the Staff Report with the Commission. Planning & Code Enforcement Manager Villa indicated that the project before the Planning Commission is a subdivision of approximately 8.52 acres of vacant land for the purpose of developing an industrial business park. He stated that the project is located off Pasadena and Crane Street. He noted that the parcels range in size from 13,500 square feet to 29,876 square feet. He stated that this project came before the Planning Commissioner in 2002 as an Industrial project, and was approved by the City Council last month. Planning & Code Enforcement Manager Villa stated that Staff developed CC &R's with entities to enforce the landscaping, parking lot maintenance and overall property maintenance standards. Planning & Code Enforcement Manager Villa indicated that no major issues have been raised, and Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution and recommends to the City Council approval of TPM No. 31963 based on the Exhibits, Findings and is subject to the Conditions of Approval. He indicated that the applicant is present to answer any questions that the Commission may have. Chairman LaPere requested comments from the public. There being no comments from the public, Chairman LaPere requested the applicant to approach the podium. He asked the applicant if he has read and agrees to the Conditions of Approval. Carl Johnson representing Neal -Cal Corporation /Triple "J" Development at 512 Chaney Street, Lake Elsinore stated that he has read and agrees to the Conditions of Approval. He had no further comments. Patrick Crask representing Madison Engineering at 109 N. Maple, Corona stated that he does not have any issues at this time, and would be able to answer any comments that the Commission may have. There being no further comments from the public, Chairman LaPere brought the discussion back to the Commission for comments. "we AGENDA ITEM _--- _--''- PAGEt�.r..--OF PAGE 3 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES — FEBRUARY 03, 2004 , <sioner Uhlry asked Staff to clarify the CC&R's. & Code Enforcement Manager Villa stated that he prefers an HOA; however he stated that an entity with similar powers could be used with the same intent. C� r missioner Uhlry indicated that it is essential that the entities are formed to enable the nr_. _ to be spent, in order to maintained the common areas. P � :! ig & Code Enforcement Manager Villa concurred. Cc. ,— Issioner O'Neal stated that as usual, Mr. Johnson's projects are excellent. He had no fiI comments. CL •stn LaPere asked the Engineering Manager to clarify Condition Number 27 of the C( )us of Approval. Pi: _ & Code Enforcement Manager Villa stated that the CC &R's are recorded with the Fine' � tap. CE n LaPere asked what it would specify. Planning & Code Enforcement Manager Villa stated that and example would be that each par( cc i ,,��ould offer reciprocal and parking assess. Chairman LaPere asked if it would cover maintenance as well. Plat & Code Enforcement Manager Villa indicated "yes ". Chainiian LaPere had no further comments. Thc° ng no further comments, Chairman LaPere closed the Public Hearing at 6:12 PM, and i .attested the reading of the Resolution. MON t :D BY UHLRY, SECONDED BY O'NEAL AND PASSED BY UNAi- 41MOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2004 'i , A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF , -KE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COf ^i CIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 31963. BUSINESS ITEMS 3. Minoi Design Review for a Sign Program for Flint and Chaney Business Center. AGENDA ITEM N0. 1-4 PAGE ,,. OF , PAGE 4 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES — FEBRUARY 03, 2004 Chairman LaPere indicated that this is a Business Item, and requested the reading of the Staff Report. Community Development Director Brady stated that this item before the Commission is a request of a Minor Design Review for a Sign Program, and requested Associate Planner Miller•to review it with the Commission. Associate Planner Miller stated that the applicant is requesting approval of a Sign Program for the Industrial project located on Flint Street and Chaney Street, within the City's industrial area. She stated that the project consisted of approval for three pre -cast (tilt -up) concrete buildings to be occupied by industrial uses. She stated that each building was to be built on an individual parcel created by Tentative Parcel Map 30187. She noted that the Sign Program includes signs for each unit of the three buildings. She stated that Staff recommends approval of the Sign Program and recommends that .the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution based on the Exhibits, Findings, and is subject to the Conditions of Approval. She stated that the applicant is present to answer any comments that the Commission may have. Chairman LaPere asked the applicant to approach the podium. Carl Johnson representing Near -Cal Corporation /Triple "J" Development at 512 Chaney Street, Lake Elsinore, CA. Chairman LaPere asked the applicant if he has read and agrees to the Conditions of Approval. Mr. Johnson stated "yes ". There being no further comments, discussion was brought back to the Commission for comments. Commissioner O'Neal stated that he felt that this project is excellent, and had no further comments. Vice Chairman Uhlry stated that he likes what he sees, and had no further comments. Chairman LaPere stated that he likes the design of the project. He noted that the signs would enhance the look of the buildings, and the entire area. He had no further comments. There being no further comments, Chairman LaPere requested the reading of the Resolution. AGENDA 1TFM NO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPOR T City of Lake Elsinore Plavviv6 Division 130 S. hfain Street 1ske Elsinore, G 92530 (909) 674 -3124 (909) 471 -1419 fax DATE: TO: FROM: PREPARED BY: PROJECT TITLE: APPLICANT: PROJECT REQUESTS e February 3, 2004 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Robert A. Brady, Community Development Director Armando G. Villa, Planning & Code Enforcement Manager Tentative Parcel Map No. 31963, Pasadena Business Park II Mr. Carl Johnson, Triple J Development, Inc., 512 Chaney Street, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 The subdivision of approximately 8.52 (7.51 net) acres of vacant land into 15 parcels pursuant to the requirements of Section 16 and Section 17.56 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING PROJECT LOCATION The subject site is located at the southeast corner of Pasadena Street and Crane Street. Primary access to the site will be off of two 30' wide driveways on Crane Street with similar secondary access driveways off of Pasadena. APN 377 - 151 -057. AGENDA II izib PAGE OE-4L EXISTING LAND USE ZONING GENERAL PLAN Project Site Vacant M -1 Limited Industrial North Mini-Storage M -1 Limited Industrial East Industrial Warehouse /Use M -1 Business Park South Industrial Park M -1 Business Park West Outdoor Storage /Vacant M -1 Limited Industrial PROJECT LOCATION The subject site is located at the southeast corner of Pasadena Street and Crane Street. Primary access to the site will be off of two 30' wide driveways on Crane Street with similar secondary access driveways off of Pasadena. APN 377 - 151 -057. AGENDA II izib PAGE OE-4L PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FEBRUARY 3, 2004 PAGE 2 PROJECT TITLE: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 31963 "PASADENA BUSINESS PARK II" BACKGROUND At their regular meeting held on December 16, 2003, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2003 -108, recommending to the City Council approval of Industrial Project No. 2003 -01 and adopted Resolution No. 2003 -109 approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2003 -18. In addition, at their regular meeting of January 13, 2004, the City Council gave final approval of 12003-01. The above actions were necessary for the development of an approximately 104,100 sf. industrial business park known as the Pasadena Business Park II. The proposed project further subdivides the already approved project. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project entails the subdivision of approximately 8.52 acres (7.51 net) of vacant land into 15 parcels for the purpose of developing an industrial business park. Proposed parcels range in size from 13,500 sf. to 29,876 sf. with an average parcel size of 21,810 sf. In addition, this project proposes right -of- way dedication and improvements to Crane Street and Pasadena Street. Crane Street is proposed to be widened to an ultimate width of 60' and Pasadena Street is proposed to be widened to an ultimate width of 90' consistent with the City Circulation Element of the General Plan. The project is being subdivided with the Planned Unit Development concept allowing for reciprocal access and parking for all parcels. Also mechanisms for common maintenance of landscaping, parking lot and accessory infrastructure will be required. DISCUSSION Pursuant to Section 17.56.050 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), the minimum lot area of newly created parcels in the M -1 District is 20,000 s£ In addition, this section states that smaller lot areas may be allowed provided these are master planned and share reciprocal facilities such as parking and access. The proposed project proposed smaller lots, however, these are being proposed as a master planned within an industrial (Planned Unit Development) business park complex. The project will be required to share infrastructure facilities such as parking and access. In addition, a property owner's /maintenance association or similar with entity with CC &R's will be required to address issues relating to landscaping installation and maintenance, parking lot maintenance, and overall property maintenance standards. ANALYSIS With the incorporation of mechanisms to insure maintenance of common facilities, parking and access agreements, this project meets the intent and development requirements of the Zoning Code. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, (CEQA) This project does not require additional environmental clearance. Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2002 -03 previously approved and adopted by the City Council anticipates the development of this project. Mitigation contained in MND No. 2002 -03 addresses the development of this project. No further environmental clearance is required. AGENDA iTEiVI W) PAGE —UQ— OFa]....:.. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FEBRUARY 3, 2004 PAGE 3 PROJECT TITLE: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 31963 "PASADENA BUSINESS PARK II" STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2004 -_, recommending to the City Council approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 31963 based on the project Exhibits A & B, the attached Findings and subject to the Conditions of Approval. FINDINGS The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan (Government Code Section 66473.5). The proposed Tentative Parcel Map located at APN 377 - 151 -057 complies with the goals and objectives of the General Plan, in that the approval of these industrial business park will assist in achieving the development of a well - balanced and functional mix of residential, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses as well as encouraging industrial land uses to divers Lake Elsinore's economic base. 2. The effects this project is likely to have upon the housing needs of the region, the public service requirements of its residents and the available fiscal and environmental resources have been considered and balanced. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map located at A13N 377 -151 -057 has been evaluated and determined to in approving the subdivision for the ultimate development of an industrial business park mill offer needed jobs and balance with existing and future housing needs and trend.. Environmental and municipal resources will have been evaluated and will be available to service this development. 3. Subject to the attached conditions of approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result in any significant environmental impact. Pursuant to the California EnvironmentalQuality Act (CEQA), the proposed Tentative Parcel Map located at A13N 377 -151 -057, has been reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City Divisions and Departments and Agencies, and will not have a significant effect on the environment pursuant to Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2002 -03 adopted by the City Council. PREPARED BY: Armando G. Villa, Planning & Code Enforcement Manager APPROVED BY: /iGENI A ITEM t�v. PAMF 1 - OF 1.� RESOLUTION NO. 2004- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 31963. WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Triple J Development, Inc. to subdivide certain property into 15 parcels for future industrial lots; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council pertaining subdivision of land; and WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on February 3, 2004; NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed subdivision (TPM No. 31963), prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve the proposed subdivision into 15 industrial lots. The Planning Commission finds and determines that this project does not require additional environmental clearance pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, (CEQA). Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2002 -03 previously approved and adopted by the City Council anticipates the development of this project. Mitigation contained in MND No. 2002 -03 addresses the development of this project. No further environmental clearance is required SECTION 2. That in accordance with State of California Subdivision Map Act, and the City of Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 31963 have been made as follows: 1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan (Government Code Section 66473.5). The proposed Tentative Parcel Map located at APN 377 - 151 -057 complies with the goals and objectives of the General Plan, in that the approval of these industrial business park will assist in achieving the development of a well- balanced and functional mix of residential, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses as well as encouraging industrial land uses to divers Lake Elsinore J, economic base. ,AGEMA ITEM NO I PACE, OF ®� t)N NO. 2004 - j'ue. effects this project is likely to have upon the housing needs of the region, the public requirements of its residents and the available fiscal and environmental resources La 2,been considered and balanced. - oposed Tentative Parcel Map located atAPN 377 -151 -057 has been evaluated and determined to in the subdivision for the ultimate development of an industrial business park will offer needed jobs ;! nce with existing and future housing needs and trends. Environmental and municipal resources will 'teen evaluated and will be available to service this development. r to the attached conditions of approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to in any significant environmental impact. i�,t to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed Tentative Parcel Map ! APN 377 -151 -057, has been reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City Divisions and t> gents and Agencies, and will not have a significant eect on the environment pursuant to Mitigated <,;e Declaration No. 2002 -03 adopted by the City Council. N(_ )-\X /, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City `+.i l riore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the City Council of the City of Lake ,,,e Tentative Parcel Map No. 31963. Ron LaPere, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a meeting ted on February 3, 2004 by the following vote: l" ',S: Commissioners: 0ES: Commissioners: NT: Commissioners: 1IN: Commissioners: '�..�Jv, Secretary to the +;uaission AQ04Dp ITEM NO---; PAGE — L-4— O CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL /REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FROM: RICHARD J. WATENPAUGH, CITY MANAGER DATE: CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING OF MARCH 09, 2004 SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003 -03, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2003 -02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP NO. 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003 -15 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR THE "LAKE ELSINORE CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II. APPLICANT Glen Daigle DAIGLE HOMES, LLC 28991 Old Town Front Street Suite #203 Temecula, CA 92590 REQUEST Approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -03, Zone Change No. 2003 -02, Tentative Condominium Map No. 31532, Residential Design Review No. 2003 -15 and Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2004 -01 for the design and construction often (10) residential condominium buildings, which include six (6) individual town homes per building and related improvements. Review is pursuant to the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan, Section 16 "Subdivisions" of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) and Section(s) 66424 and 66427 of the California Subdivision Map Act (CSMA); applicable Chapters of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) and the California Environmental Quality Act. PROJECT DESCRIPTION • General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -03. The applicant is requesting approval to amend the General Plan Land Use Map by changing the land use designation of a 5.33 acre site from Very Low Density (VLD) residential, which allows .5 dwelling units /acre maximum to Medium Density (MD) residential which allows 12 dwelling units/ acre maximum. The review and analysis of this General Plan Amendment is pursuant to Government Code Section(s) 65350- 65362, the Lake Elsinore General Plan, Chapter 17.84 (Amendments) and 1` Chapter 17.92 (Hearings) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). AGENDA ITEM N0...� c� PAGE -- REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MARCH 09, 2004 PAGE 2 SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003 -03, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2003 -02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP NO. 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003 -15 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR "THE LAKE ELSINORE CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II. • Zone Change No. 2003 -02. The applicant is requesting approval to change the Zoning of the subject property from (R -1) Single Family Residential to (R -2) Medium Density Residential. The review and analysis of the requested Change of Zone is pursuant to applicable chapters of the LEMC. • Tentative Condominium Map No. 31532. The applicant is requesting approval of Tentative Condominium Map No. 31532 pursuant to Section 16 "Subdivisions" of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), Chapter 17.30 (Condominium and Condo Conversions) of the LEMC, Chapter 17.24 (R -2, Medium Density Residential) of the LEMC and Section(s) 66424 and 66427 of the California Subdivision Map Act (CSMA). • Residential Design Review No. R 2003 -15. The applicant is requesting Design Review consideration for the construction of ten (10) residential condominium buildings, which include six (6) individual townhomes per building and related improvements. The floor plans, architectural elevations, color and materials are in substantial conformance to the fourteen (14) condominium buildings recently approved by the City Council on September 16, 2003. Review is pursuant to Chapter 17.24 (R -2, Medium Density Residential) of the LEMC, Chapter 17.30 (Condominium and Condo Conversions) of the LEMC, Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards) of the LEMC, Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requirements) of the LEMC, Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the LEMC and City of Lake Elsinore Landscape Guidelines. • Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2004 -01. The City of Lake Elsinore intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) pursuant to the Guidelines established by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). BACKGROUND At their regular meeting of September 16, 2003, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2003 -78, recommending City Council approval of a Tentative Condominium Map No. 31531 and Resolution No. 2003 -80 recommending City Council approval of Residential Design Review No. 2003- 08, which constituted the first phase of this condominium community. Subsequently, at their regular meeting of January 20, 2004 the Planning Commission considered the second phase of this condominium community which consisted of the items considered in the project description referenced herein. AGENDA ITEM NO. �®. PAGE � OL REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY �- MARCH 09, 2004 PAGE 3 SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003 -03, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2003 -02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP NO. 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003 -15 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR "THE LAKE ELSINORE CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II. DISCUSSION Items of discussion generally concentrated around questions related to the traffic impacts of the proposed project and the associated Traffic Impact Study (Elsinore City Center Condo Traffic Impact Study) prepared for this project. As indicated in the Minutes (see attached) the Commission specifically expressed concerns related to its validity. The Engineering Manager assured the Commission that the Traffic Engineer had completely reviewed the "Study" and found it to be legitimate. Moreover, the Commission had also voiced concerns that the results of the "Study" were merely based on an "opening day" or 2005 projection. Staff assured the Commission that they would analyze their concerns. Subsequently, the Engineering Division concluded that the projection analyzed in the Traffic Impact Study was entirely adequate, in that the Technical Memorandum No. 8 entitled "Traffic Impact Fee Calculation" prepared for the City of Lake Elsinore addressed future traffic impacts. Of additional interest to the Commission were concern(s) related to the safety of the children utilizing the tot lots located within the community and the timing of the actual development of the site. On the first issue, the Commission strongly suggested that the applicant provide appropriate signage that would promote a safe environment for the children. In response, Staff will verify that signage is shown on the site plan submitted to Building and Safety and verify compliance upon final site inspection of the project. On the second issue, related to the timing of the development, the applicant stated that they would prefer to proceed with the development of Phase I and H as a single grading project, pending approval of the second phase. ENVIRONMENTAL The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2004 -01 has been prepared pursuant to Article 6 (Negative Declaration Process) and Section 15070 (Decision to Prepare a Negative or Mitigated Negative Declaration) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on staff's evaluation, the proposed project would not result in any significant effect on the environment. Further, pursuant to Section 15073 (Public Review of a Proposed Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the intended Mitigated Negative Declaration was submitted to the State Clearinghouse (State Clearinghouse Number 2004011082) on January 15, 2004, ending on February 18, 2004. On February 19, 2004 the State Clearinghouse and Planning Unit acknowledged that the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration had complied with the review requirements and that no state agencies submitted comments by the closing date. AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE l OF`.�— REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MARCH 09, 2004 PAGE 4 ,"No SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003 -03, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2003 -02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP NO. 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003 -15 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR "THE LAKE ELSINORE CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. Jog -I b approving General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -03, adopt Ordinance No. - 11171 approving Zone Change No. 2003 -02, approve Tentative Condominium Map No. 31532, approve Residential Design Review No. 2003 -15 and adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2004 -01 for the design and construction of ten (10) residential condominium buildings, which include six (6) individual town homes per building and related improvements based on the recommended Findings, Exhibits A thru R and the attached Conditions of Approval. Also, since the subject site is located within Redevelopment Project Area #2 Area "C ", it is also recommended that the Redevelopment Agency concur with the Council's action. FINDINGS — GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT The proposed General Plan Amendment will not be; a) detrimental to the health, safety, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment or within the City, or b) injurious to the property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City. The proposed General Plan Amendment has been analyzed relative to its potentiality to be detrimental to the health, safety, comfort and welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment. The primary issue identified by staff relates to the traffic impacts of the proposed density. Staff, concluded, based on the Traffic Impact Report, that the Level of Service for the intersections in the Study Area will not be degraded as a result of this project. 2. The proposed General Plan Amendment will permit reasonable development of the area consistent with its constraints and will make the area more compatible with adjacent properties. The Proposed General Plan Amendment will allow the applicant to develop the site with the proposed density of 11.25 Dwelling Units /net acre and will in turn bring about a site more compatible with the first phase of the Condominium Project, designated `Multi family Residential ". 3. The proposed General Plan Amendment would establish a land use density and usage more in character with the subject property's location, access, and constraints. The proposed General Plan Amendment would establish a density more in conformance with the recently approved 84 -unit condominium project to the north of the subject site. Additionally, the proposed project site would be in close proximity of any necessary services needed by persons residing in the proposed condominium community. AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE .._ OF �L REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY � MARCH 09, 2004 PAGE 5 SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003 -03, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2003 -02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP NO. 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003 -15 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR "THE LAKE ELSINORE CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE IL 4. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not have a significant effect on the environment. The proposed General Plan was included within the description of the project's Initial Study. Based on the Initial Study, staff intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration, which concluded with mitigations that theproject will not have a significant effect on the environment. FINDINGS - ZONE CHANGE 1. The proposed zone change will not be; a) detrimental to the health, safety, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment or within the City, or b) injurious to the property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City. The proposed Zone Change has been analyzed relative to its potentiality to be detrimental to the health, safety, comfort and welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment. The primary issue identified by staff relates to the traffic impacts of the proposed density. Staff, concluded, based on the Traffic Impact Report, that the Level of Service. for the intersections in the Study Area will not be degraded as a result of this project. 2. The proposed action will be consistent with the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the General Plan and the development standards established with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). I Based on its analysis, staff has concluded that the requested amendment to the General Plan Land Use Map and the corresponding Zone Change, allowing the development of the subject condominium project is consistent with GOAL 1.0 of the General Plan Housing Element, obligating the City to provide "decent housing opportunities and a satisfying living environment for residents of Lake Elsinore". FINDINGS - CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan (Government Code Section 66473.5). The project as designed assists in achieving the development of a well - balanced and functional mix ofresidential, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses (GOAL 1. 0, Land Use Element) as well provide decent housing opportunities and a satisfying living environment for residents of Lake Elsinore (GOAL 1.0, Housing Element) AGENDA ITEM NO. t; .-�- -- PAGE � OF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MARCH 09, 2004 PAGE 6 `..I" SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003 -03, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2003 -02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP NO. 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003 -15 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR "THE LAKE ELSINORE CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II. 2. The effects this project is likely to have upon the housing needs of the region, the public service requirements of its residents and the available fiscal and environmental resources have been considered and balanced. Considering the effects this project is likely to have upon the needs of the region a condition of approval was implemented which would require the applicant to enter into an agreement with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore, providing 15% of the units in the project as affordable housing units in accordance with the requirements of Section 33413(b) of the California Community Redevelopment Law or an alternative equivalent action which may include (without limitation) dedication of vacant land, construction of affordable units on another site, orpayment of an in lieu fee calculated to provide sufficient funds to underwrite the long -term affordability of an equivalent number of affordable dwelling units constructed or substantially rehabilitated on other sites within the City's redevelopment project areas. 3. Subject to the attached conditions of approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result in any significant environmental impact. The project has been adequately conditioned by all applicable departments and agencies and will not therefore result in any significant environmental impacts. FINDINGS — DESIGN REVIEW 1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the Zoning District in which the project is located. The proposed Residential Design Review located within Assessor Parcel Number(s) 363 -240- 002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016 complies with the goals and objectives of the General Plan, in that the approval of this Condominium Community will assist in achieving the development of a well - balanced and functional mix of residential, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses as well as encouraging industrial land uses to diversify Lake Elsinore's economic base. 2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. The proposed Residential Design Review located at Assessor Parcel Number(s) 363- 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016 is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments in that the Condominium project has been designed in consideration of the size and shape of the property, ,"001 thereby creating interest and varying vistas as a person moves along the street. Further the AGENDA ITEM NO...� �` PAGE OFM�L REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MARCH 09, 2004 PAGE 7 SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003 -03, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2003 -02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP NO. 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003 -15 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR "THE LAKE ELSINORE CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II. project as proposed will complement the quality of existing development and will create a visually pleasing, non - detractive relationship between the proposed and existingprojects in that the architectural design, color and materials and site design proposed evidence a concern for quality and originality. 3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), theproposed Residential Design Review located at Assessor Parcel Number(s) 363- 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016, as reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City Divisions and Departments and Agencies, will not have a significant effect on the environment pursuant to attached Conditions of Approval. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter 17.82. Pursuant to Section 17.82.070 (Action of the Planning Commission) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), the proposed Industrial Design Review located at Assessor Parcel Number(s) 363- 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016 has been scheduled for consideration and approval of the Planning Commission. FINDINGS - MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 1. Revisions in the project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant before a proposed mitigated negative declaration and initial study are released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur; and The applicant has made revisions to the project or has agreed to specific conditions which would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects of the project to a point where no significant effects would occur. Additionally, the State Clearinghouse acknowledged that the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration complied with the review requirements and that no state agencies submitted comments by the closing date (February 18, 2004). 2. There is no substantial evidence, in the light of the whole record before the agency, that the project as revised may have significant effect on the environment. AGENDA ITEM NO. RAGE OF� REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MARCH 09, 2004 PAGE 8 SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003 -03, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2003 -02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP NO. 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003 -15 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR "THE LAKE ELSINORE CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II. Pursuant to the evidence received in the light of the whole record presented to staff the project will not have a significant effect on the environment considering the applicable Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Monitoring Program. PREPARED BY: Rolfe Pfreisendanz, Associate Planner REVIEWED BY: REVIEWED BY: APPROVED FOR AGENDA LISTING: Attachments: G. Villa, Planning and Code Enforcement Manager Abert A. Brady, Communij$ Development Department 1. Resolution No. approving General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -03 2. Ordinance No. approving Change of Zone No. 2003 -02 3. Minutes January 20, 2004 Planning Commission Meeting 4. Staff Report, Resolutions and Conditions January 20, 2004 Planning Commission Meeting 5. Notice of Intent, Notice of Completion and Initial Study. 6. State Clearinghouse and Planning Unit Memorandum. 7. State Clearinghouse and Planning Unit Acknowledgement. 8. Exhibits: Exhibit A Tentative Condominium Map No. 31532 Exhibit B Index Map Exhibit C Site Plan Exhibit D Landscape Plan Exhibit E Landscape Plan Exhibit F Fence Plan Exhibit G Drainage Plan Exhibit H Site Plan Exhibit I Section Plan GEJWA ITEM NO. : PAGE P F I'b` is' TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY t9, 2004 s� ' tt.w c,r— GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003 -03, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2003 -02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP NO. 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003 -15 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR "THE LAKE ELSINORE CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II. Exhibit J Building Type 1 Elevation Type A hibit K Building Type 1 Elevation Type B i �111bit L Building Type 2 Elevation Type A Exhibit M Building Type 2 Elevation Type B ','bit N Building Type 1 First Floor Plan ;.hibit O Building Type 1 Second Floor Plan U,I-hibit P Building Type 2 First Floor Plan iribit Q Building Type 2 Second Floor Plan hibit R Letter from Applicant Outlining Purpose for General Plan Amendment AGENDA ITEM NO. �e PAGE �� OF GENERAL CONDITION 1. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Official, Officers, Employees, and Agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Official, Officers, Employees, or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning the Tentative Condominium Map, which action is bought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Sections 65009 and/or 66499.37, and Public Resources Code Section 21167. The City will promptly notify the Applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City and will cooperate fully with the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any such claim, or proceeding, the Applicant shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. 2. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the applicant shall annex into Community Facilities District No. 2003 -1 to offset the annual negative impacts of the project on public safety operations and maintenance issues in the City. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-03 3. Conditions for the General Plan Amendment shall be the same conditions as set forth and required by Tentative Condominium Tract No(s) 31531 and 31532. 4. No park credit will be allowed under this project for recreation facilities. Park fees will remain at $1,450.00 per unit. ZONE CHANGE 2003 -02 5. The applicant shall enter into an acceptable impact mitigation agreement with the Lake Elsinore School District prior to issuance of building permits for the project. TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP NO. 31532 6. The Tentative Condominium Map will expire two (2) years from date of approval unless within that period of time the CC&R's and an appropriate instrument has been filed and recorded with the County Recorder, or an extension of time is granted by the City of Lake Elsinore City Council in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act. N"Wo 7. The Tentative Condominium Map shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Title 16 unless modified by approved Conditions of Approval. -.101 AeEMA ITEM NO. a.!� PAGE_ 0,F� CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-03, ZONE CHANGE 2003 -02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP NO. 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003 -15, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003-08 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR THE "LAKE ELSINORE CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II. 8. Prior to final certificate of occupancy of Tentative Condominium Map, the improvements specified herein and approved by the Planning Commission and the City Council shall be installed, or agreements for said improvements, shall be submitted to the City for approval by the City Engineer, and all other stated conditions shall be complied with. All uncompleted improvements must be bonded for as part of the agreements. 9. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall prepare and record CC&R's against the condominium complex. The CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director or Designee and the City Attorney. The CC&R's shall include methods of maintaining common areas, parking and drive aisle areas, landscaped areas including parkways, and methods for common maintenance of all underground, and above ground utility infrastructure improvements necessary to support the complex. In addition, CC&R's shall established methods to address design improvements. 10. No unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owner's group or similar entity has been formed with the right to financially assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and duty to maintain, all said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and /or dwelling units and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City for provisions required as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. 11. Provisions to restrict parking upon other than approved and developed parking spaces shall be written into the covenants, conditions and restrictions for each project. 12. Membership in the Home Owner's Association shall be mandatory for each buyer and any successive buyer. 13. Reciprocal covenants, conditions, and restrictions and reciprocal maintenance agreements shall be established which will cause a merging of all development phases as they are completed, and embody one (1) homeowner's association with common area for the total development of the subject project (Phase I) and the proposed project (Phase II). 14. In the event the association or other legally responsible person(s) fail to maintain said common area in such a manner as to cause same to constitute a public nuisance, said City may, upon proper notice and hearing, institute summary abatement procedures and impose alien for the costs of such abatement upon said common area, individual units or whole thereof as provided by law. AGENDA ITEM NO PAGE_ �_�__ OFI ' CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-03, ZONE CHANGE 2003 -02, TENTATIVE ..y CONDOMINIUM MAP NO. 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003 -15, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003-08 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR THE "LAKE ELSINORE CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II. 15. Each unit owner shall have full access to commonly owned areas, facilities and utilities. 16. The applicant shall comply with those mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program adopted with the Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2004 -01 prepared for the Lake Elsinore City Center Townhomes" Phase II reference as the "project" herein. PRIOR TO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 17. The applicant shall provide all project - related onsite and offsite improvements as described in the Elsinore City Center Specific Plan and Amendment No. 1 document. RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2003-15 18. Design Review approval for Residential Design Review No. 2003 -15 will lapse and be void unless building permits are issued within one (1) year of City Council approval. The Community Development Director may grant an extension of time of up to one (1) year per extension, prior to the expiration of the initial Design Review approval. Application for a time extension must be submitted to the City of Lake Elsinore one (1) month prior to the expiration date. ,ry 19. Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced on page one of building plans submitted to the Building Division Plan Check. All Conditions of Approval shall be met prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. 20. The dwelling units are multi -story, without elevators, and therefore are exempt from accessibility requirements. The site, Sales Office, parking and common use areas will be obligated to meet the requirements of Chapter 11 of the California Building Code. 21. All site improvements approved with this request shall be constructed as indicated on the approved site plan and elevations. Revisions to approved site plans or building elevations shall be subject to the review of the Community Development Director. All plans submitted for Building Division Plan Check shall conform to the submitted plans as modified by Conditions of Approval, or the Planning Commission /City Council through subsequent action. 22. All roof mounted or ground support air conditioning units or other mechanical equipment incidental to development shall be architecturally screened or shielded by landscaping so that they are not visible from neighboring property or public streets. Any material covering the roof equipment shall match the primary wall color. 23. All exterior on -site lighting shall be shielded and directed on -site so as not to create glare onto neighboring property and streets or allow illumination above the horizontal plane of the fixture. All light fixtures shall match the architectural style of the building. 1%001 WM` i CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-03, ZONE CHANGE 2003 -02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP NO. 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003 -15, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003-08 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR THE "LAKE ELSINORE CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II. 24. All loading zones shall be clearly marked with yellow striping. 25. Applicant shall meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. 26. Trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standards as approved by the Community Development Director or Designee. 27. No exterior roof ladders shall be permitted. 28. Applicant shall use roofing materials with Class "A" fire rating. 29. All exterior downspouts shall be concealed or architecturally screened and painted to match the exterior color of the building. 30. The Planning Division shall approve the location of any construction trailers utilized during construction. All construction trailers shall require a cash bond processed through the Planning Division. 31. Materials and colors depicted on the plans and materials board shall be used unless modified by the Community Development Director or designee. 32. Decorative paving shall be included at the drive entryways and shall be shown on the construction drawings submitted to Building and Safety. 33. On -site surface drainage shall not cross sidewalks. 34. Parking stalls shall be double- striped with four -inch (4 ") lines two feet (2) apart. 35. The applicant shall be required to submit for Planning Commission consideration a sign program prior to issuance building permits. 36. All exposed slopes in excess of three feet (3) in height shall have a permanent irrigation system and erosion control vegetation installed, approved by the Planning Division. PRIOR TO BUILDING /GRADING PERMITS 37. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or building permits, the applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgement of Conditions" form and shall return the executed original to the Planning Division for inclusion in the case records. 38. The applicant shall submit a photometric study for those light standards located in the proposed condominium project. Said study shall ensure that parking lot lights will not disturb neighboring AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OI= CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-03, ZONE CHANGE 2003 -02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP NO. 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 1"0 R 2003 -15, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003-08 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR THE "LAKE ELSINORE CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II. land uses and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or designee. 39. Prior to the commencement of grading operations, the applicant shall provide a map of all proposed haul routes to be used for movement of dirt material. Such routes shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. A bond may be required to pay for damages to the public right -of - way, subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 40. Three (3) sets of the Final Landscaping /Irrigation Detail Plan shall be submitted, reviewed and approved by the City's Landscape Architect Consultant and the Community Development Director or designee, prior to issuance of building permit. A Landscape Plan Check & Inspection Fee will be charged prior to final landscape approval based on the Consultant's fee plus forty percent (40 %) City fee. a. All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic sprinkler system with 100% plant and grass coverage using a combination of drip and conventional irrigation methods. b. Applicant shall plant street trees, selected from the City's Street Tree List, a maximum of forty feet (40) apart and at least twenty- four -inch (24 ") box in size. V, c. All planting areas shall be separated from paved areas with a six inch (6 ") high and six inch (6 ") wide concrete curb. d. Planting within fifteen feet (15) of ingress /egress points shall be no higher than thirty-six inches (36 "). e. Landscape planters shall be planted with an appropriate parking lot shade tree to provide for 50% parking lot shading in fifteen (15) years. f. Any transformers and mechanical or electrical equipment shall be indicated on landscape plan and screened as part of the landscaping plan. g. The landscape plan shall provide for ground cover, shrubs, and trees and meet all requirements of the Citys adopted Landscape Guidelines. Special attention to the use of Xeriscape or drought resistant plantings with combination drip irrigation system to be used to prevent excessive watering. h. All landscape improvements shall be bonded 100% for material and labor for two years from installation sign -off by the City. Release of the landscaping bond shall be requested by the applicant at the end of the required two years with approval /acceptance by the Landscape Consultant and Community Development Director or Designee. AGENDA ITEM NO. ®3 '__ PAGE QF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-03, ZONE CHANGE 2003 -02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP NO. 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003 -15, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003-08 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR THE "LAKE ELSINORE CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II. i) All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed within affected portion of any phase at the time a Certificate of Occupancy is requested for any building. All planting areas shall include plantings in the Xeriscape concept, drought tolerant grasses and plants. j) Final landscape plan must be consistent with approved site plan. k) Final landscape plans to include planting and irrigation details. 41. Applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. Proof shall be presented to the Chief Building Official prior to issuance of building permits and final approval. 42. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall provide assurance that all required fees to the Lake Elsinore Unified School District have been paid. 43. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall provide assurance that all requirements of the Riverside County Fire Department have been met. 44. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall pay park -in -lieu fee in effect at time of building permit issuance. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT 45. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore to provide 15% of the units in the project as affordable housing units in accordance with the requirements of Section 33413(6) of the California Community Redevelopment Law or an alternative equivalent action which may include (without limitation) dedication of vacant land, construction of affordable units on another site, or payment of an in lieu fee calculated to provide sufficient funds to. underwrite the long -term affordability of an equivalent number of affordable dwelling units constructed or substantially rehabilitated on other sites within the City's redevelopment project areas. 46. The applicant shall submit for review and approval an updated acoustical study which shall evaluate and analyze the current sound levels. Further, the applicant shall implement appropriate methods of construction necessary (i.e. sound walls and landscaping) which would insure that the future residents of this proposed community experience noise levels consistent with the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan. 47. The Home Owner's Association shall be established prior to the oecupaney sale release of the first dwelling unit. Amended per the Planning Commission on January 20, 2004. AGENDA ITEM NO. PAOE.—L� OF� CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-03, ZONE CHANGE 2003 -02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP NO. 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003 -15, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003 -08 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR THE "LAKE ELSINORE CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II. ENGINEERING 48. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to final map approval. 49. The developer shall submit a condominium plan as part of the final map which will show individual lots and air space. And provides for common areas. The condominium plan shall be approved prior to final map approval. 50. Applicant shall dedicate sufficient land along the frontage of Grape St. to provide for a right -of -way width of 100 feet for a major street. 51. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (LEMC 16.34, Resolution 85 -26). The traffic mitigation fee is $50,280, Railroad Canyon Road assessment fee is $87, 906, the T.U.M.F. amount is $276, 420. There is no drainage fee. 52. Submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project. Submit this letter prior to final map approval. 53. Construct all public works improvements per approved street plans (LEMC 12.04). Plans must be approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to final map approval (LEMC 16.34). 54. Street improvement plans and specifications shall be prepared by a Calif. Registered Civil Engineer. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Riverside County Road Department Standards, latest edition, and City Codes (LEMC 12.04 and 16.34). 55. Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City for the construction of public works improvements and shall post the appropriate bonds prior to final map approval. 56. Applicant shall obtain any necessary Caltrans permits and meet all Caltrans requirements. 57. Pay all fees and meet requirements of encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Division for construction of public works improvements (LEMC 12.08 and Resolution 83 -78). 58. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 ' /a" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of public works improvements will be scheduled and approved. 59. Applicant shall obtain all necessary off -site easements for off -site grading from the adjacent property owners prior to final map approval. AGENDA ITEM [�O. J � PAGE OF...�----� CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-03, ZONE CHANGE 2003 -02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP NO. 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003 -15, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003-08 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR THE "LAKE ELSINORE CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II. 60. Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. 61. Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by Riverside County Fire. 62. Provide street lighting and show lighting improvements as part of street improvement plans as required by the City Engineer. 63. Developer shall install blue reflective pavement markers in the street at all fire hydrant locations. 64. Applicant shall submit a traffic control plan showing all traffic control devices for the tract to be approved prior to final map approval. All traffic control devices shall be installed prior to final inspection of public improvements. This includes No Parking and Street Sweeping Signs for streets within the tract. 65. All improvement plans and tract maps shall be digitized. At Certificate of Occupancy applicant shall submit tapes and /or discs which are compatible with City's ARC Info /GIS or developer to pay $300 per sheet for City digitizing. 66. All utilities except electrical over 12 kv shall be placed underground, as approved by the serving Utility. 67. Apply and obtain a grading permit with appropriate security prior to building permit issuance. A grading plan signed and stamped by a Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall be required if the grading exceeds 50 cubic yards or the existing flow pattern is substantially modified as determined by the City Engineer. 68. Provide soils, geology and seismic report including street design recommendations. Provide final soils report showing compliance with recommendations. 69. An Alquis -Priolo study shall be performed on the site to identify any hidden earthquake faults and /or liquefaction zones present on -site. 70. All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer and he shall certify all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and proper erosion control. All manufactured slopes greater than 30 ft. in height shall be contoured. 71. Individual lot drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility or accepted by adjacent property owners r by a letter of drainage acceptance or conveyed to a drainage easement. 72. On -site drainage facilities located outside of road right -of -way should be contained within drainage easements shown on the final map. A note should be added to the final map stating: "Drainage AGENDA ITEM -12 NO. 0 3 PAGE OED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-03, ZONE CHANGE 2003 -02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP NO. 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003 -15, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003-08 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR THE "LAKE ELSINORE CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II. easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions". 73. All natural drainage traversing site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer. 74. Submit Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports for review and approval by City Engineer and the Riverside County Flood Control District prior to approval of final map. Developer shall mitigate any flooding and /or erosion caused by development of site and diversion of drainage. 75. All drainage facilities in this tract shall be constructed to Riverside County Flood Control District Standards. 76. Storm drain inlet facilities shall be appropriately stenciled to prevent illegally dumping in the drain system, the wording and stencil shall be approved by the City Engineer. 77. Roof and yard drains will not be allowed to outlet through cuts in the street curb. Roof drains should drain to a landscaped area when ever feasible. 78. Applicant will be required to install BMP's using the best available technology to mitigate any urban pollutants from entering the watershed. 79. Applicant shall obtain approval from Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board for their storm water pollution prevention plan including approval of erosion control for the grading plan prior to issuance of grading permits. The applicant shall provide a SWPPP for post construction which describes BMP's that will be implemented for the development and including maintenance responsibilities. 80. Education guidelines and Best Management Practices (BMP) shall be provided to residents of the development in the use of herbicides, pesticides and vehicle maintenance as well as other environmental awareness education materials on good housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of storm water quality and met the goals of the BAD in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. 81. Applicant shall provide first blush BMP's using the best available technology that will reduce storm water pollutants from parking areas and driveway aisles. 82. Intersection site distance shall meet the design criteria of the CALTRANS Design Manual (particular attention should be taken for intersections on the inside of curves). If site distance can be obstructed, a special limited use easement must be recorded to limit the slope, type of landscaping and wall placement. The developer's civil engineer shall verify the site distance for Street "A" prior to grading permit. `../' AGENDA ITEM! NO. '� PAGE 1 0 OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-03, ZONE CHANGE 2003 -02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP NO. 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003 -15, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003-08 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR THE "LAKE ELSINORE CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II. 83. Developer shall provide a traffic study prepared by a traffic engineer to determine the traffic volume and the impacts on intersections in the vicinity and freeway on and off ramps prior to final map approval, subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 84. The entrance driveway aisle should be designed so that at least 40 ft. is available between the street curb and the first parking stall and the gate opener in order to provide adequate on -site storage for entering vehicles. 85. Street vacations offsite need to be accomplished with the development of this site. The street vacations must be approved by the adjacent property owners when their access is being affected by the street vacation. Offshe dedications for new streets must be acquired prior to approval of the street vacations. Street abandonment's cannot land lock parcels or provide a new access which is not practicable and is based on a reasonable accessibility determination to the satisfaction of the City. 86. Before the street vacations can be approved, offsite grading must be approved by the adjacent property owner for the grading the new streets. 87. The sight distance at the intersection of A St. and Grape St. must meet the Caltrans Design Manual criteria for a 55 mph design speed on Grape Street. 88. The street width of the new dedicated Sunrise Drive shall be 36 ft. from curb to AC berm with a 4 ft. parkway on the northeast side of the street. 89. There shall be a standard Riverside County Road Dept. knuckled constructed on Sunrise Drive. 90. Street A shall have a 60 ft. R/W and 40 ft. curb to curb from Grape St. to the condo driveway. Street A shall have standard curb returns at the intersection with Grape Street. 91. The cul -de -sac at the end of the existing Sunrise Drive shall be in conformance with Riverside County Road Dept. Standards and the temporary cul -de -sac on Sunrise Drive must meet Riverside County Fire Dept. approval. 92. Developer shall provide a 24 ft. minimum wide emergency access from the cul -de -sac of Sunrise Drive to the drive aisle in Tr. 31531, subject to the approval of the Riverside County Fire Department. 93. If right -of -way is abandoned as part of this development, then adjacent property affected by the abandonment's must still have access to public maintained right -of -way. .-• 94. The final map shall show the abandonment of dedications of public right -of -way or easements by appropriate certifications on the map. AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OFj CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-03, ZONE CHANGE 2003 -02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP NO. 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003 -15, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003-08 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR THE "LAKE ELSINORE CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II. 95. In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal & recycling, the applicant shall be required to contract with CR&R Inc. for removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of construction. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 96. The applicant shall pay park fees of $1,450 per unit. 97. The applicant shall participate in the City of Lake Elsinore Landscape L Maintenance District (LLMD). 98. The Home Owner's Association shall maintain all interior landscaping, slopes, drainage swales, retention areas, and roadways. 99. No park credits shall be allowed for the proposed tot lots and swimming pool. 100. The Home Owner's Association shall maintain all landscape improvements along Grape Street as it 1%000 relates to the frontage of the development. 101. All exterior walls to be masonry block with anti - graffiti coating. The Home Owner's Association shall remove all graffiti as it occurs. 102. The applicant shall meet all City requirements for the recycling and removal of construction debris and materials. 103. The applicant shall comply with all NPDES requirements for urban storm water runoff. RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 104. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Riverside County Fire Department. Fire protection measures shall be provided in accordance with Riverside County ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards. 105. Blue retro- reflective pavement markers shall be mounted on public streets and driveways to indicate Iocation of fire hydrants. Prior to installation, placement of markers shall be approved by the County Fire Department. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 2003 -08 106. The Conditional Use Permit approved herein shall lapse and shall become void one (1) year ,,rr following the date on which the use permit became effective, unless prior to the expiration of one AGENDA ITEM NO. _, 3 PAGE �� OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-03, ZONE CHANGE 2003 -02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP NO. 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003 -15, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003-08 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR THE "LAKE ELSINORE CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II. year, a building permit is issued and construction commenced and diligently pursued toward completion on the site. 107. The Conditional Use Permit shall comply with the all applicable requirements of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code; Title 17 unless modified by approved Conditions of Approval. 108. The Conditional Use Permit granted herein shall run with the land and shall continue to be valid upon a change of ownership of the site or structure which was the subject of this approval. 109. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Official, Officers, Employees, and Agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Official, Officers, Employees, or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or Iegislative body concerning the Conditional Use Permit /Design Review C 2003 -07, which action is brought forward within the time period provided for in California Government Code Sections 65009 and /or 66499.37, and Public Resources Code Section 21167. The City will promptly notify the Applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City and will cooperate fully with the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any such claim, or proceeding, the Applicant shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. 110. Prior to final certificate of occupancy of the Conditional Use Permit, the improvements specified herein and approved by the Planning Commission and the City Council shall be installed, or agreements for said improvements, shall be submitted to the City for approval by the City Engineer, and all other stated conditions shall be complied with. All uncompleted improvements must be bonded for as part of the agreements. 111. The applicant shall at all times comply with Section 17.78 (Noise Control) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code which requires noise or sound levels to be below 50 decibels between the hours of 7:00 am to 10:00 pm and below 40 decibels between the hours of 10:00 pm to 7:00 am in nearby residential areas. 112. Security lighting shall be required. All exterior on -site lighting shall be shielded and directed on -site so as not to create glare onto neighboring property and streets or allow illumination above the horizontal plane of the fixture. AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE 1.OF., ,"Nor ATTACHMENT NO.1 RESOLUTION NO.2004 -_I_�_ APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-03 AGENDA ITEM NO. ®� PAGE OF IL RESOLUTION NO.2004 -_t(a A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, MAKING AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT FOR THE FIRST CYCLE OF THE CALENDAR YEAR 2004 FOR THE APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003 -03 AMENDING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF THE PARCELS SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED AS APN(s) 363- 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 AND 016 FROM VERY LOW DENSITY (VLD) RESIDENTIAL TO MEDIUM DENSITY (MD) RESIDENTIAL. WHEREAS, Daigle Homes, LLC has initiated proceedings to amend the General Plan Land Use Map by requesting an General Plan Amendment changing the designation of the parcels known as Assessor Parcel Number(s) 363 - 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016 from Very Low Density (VLD) Residential to Medium Density (MD) Residential; and WHEREAS, Section 65361(a) of the Government Code provides that no mandatory element of a General Plan shall be amended more frequently than four times during any calendar year; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on January 20, 2004 made its report upon the desirability of the proposed project and made its recommendations in favor of said General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -03 by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 2004 -02 recommending to the City Council approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -03; and WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the City Council has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on March 9, 2004; NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council has considered the proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -03, prior to making a decision to approve the proposed amendment to the Land Use Designation. The City Council finds and determines that Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2004 -01 is adequate and prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which analyzes environmental effects of ends City Council certification, based upon the following findings and determinations: �-- 1 SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -03 have been made as follows: AAMA ITEM NO. 137 PACE -Ja— OF RESOLUTION NO. 2004- PAGE NO.2 The proposed General Plan Amendment will not be; a) detrimental to the health, safety, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment or within the City, or b) injurious to the property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City. The proposed General Plan Amendment has been analyzed relative to its potentiality to be detrimental to the health, safety, comfort and welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment. The primary issue identified by staff relates to the traffic impacts of the proposed density. Staff, concluded, based on the Traffic Impact Report, that the Level of Service for the intersections in the Study Area will not be degraded as a result of this project. 2. The proposed General Plan Amendment will permit reasonable development of the area consistent with its constraints and will make the area more compatible with adjacent properties. The Proposed General Plan Amendment will allow the applicant to develop the site with the proposed density of 11.25 Dwelling Units /net acre and will in turn bring about a site more compatible with the first phase of the Condominium Project, designated "Multi- family Residential ". 3. The proposed General Plan Amendment would establish a land use density and usage more in character with the subject property's location, access, and constraints. The proposed General Plan Amendment would establish a density more in conformance with the recently approved 84 -unit condominium project to the north of the subject site. Additionally, the proposed project site would be in close proximity of any necessary services needed by persons residing in the proposed condominium community. 4. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not have a significant effect on the environment. The proposed General Plan was included within the description of the project's Initial Study. Based on the Initial Study, staff intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration, which concluded with mitigations that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS, IT IS RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, that the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Land Use Map hereof be amended for the first time in calendar year 2004 to reflect General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -03. AGENDA ITEM NO. y= PAGE.,, OF. �-- l ON NO. 2004- �'; -',)S 1D, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of March 2004, by the following it YFS: COUNCILMEMBERS: FS: COUNCILMEMBERS: YNT: COUNCILMEMBERS: AIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: asad, City Clerk `,, } ✓IUD AS TO FORM: I d Leibold, City Attorney Elsinore Thomas Buckley, Mayor City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE �� OFr ATTACHMENT NO.2 1. 0, ORDINANCE NO. 1 I I - APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 2003-02 AGEMA ITEM NO. rr�� �,.,.. PAGE 6 OF ORDINANCE NO. I I AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA APPROVING ZONE CHANGE NO. 2003 -02 CHANGING THE ZONING DESINGNATION OF A PARCEL SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED AS APN (S) 363 - 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 AND 016 FROM R -1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO R -2 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT UNDER THE ZONING ORDINANCE WHEREAS, Daigle Homes LLC, has initiated proceedings to change the zoning designation of the subject parcels known as APN(s) 363 - 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016 from R -1 Single Family Residential District to R -2 Medium Density Residential District;. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore at a regular meeting held on January 20, 2004 made its report upon the desirability of the proposed project and made its recommendations in favor of said Zone Change No. 2003 -02 by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 2004 -03 recommending to the City Council approval of Zone Change No. 2003 -02; and WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the City Council has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on March 09, 2004; NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council has considered the proposed Zone Change No. 2003 -02, prior to making a decision to approve the proposed amendment to the Land Use Designation and establish a Zoning Designation. The City Council finds and determines that Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2004 -01 is adequate and prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which analyzes environmental effects of the proposed project and recommends City Council certification, based upon the following findings and determinations: SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Zone Change No. 2003 -02 have been made as follows: 1. The proposed zone change will not be; a) detrimental to the health, safety, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment or within the City, or b) injurious to the property or improvements �-. in the neighborhood or within the City. 2 AGENDA ITEM NO. , ..... PAGE ___.L OF....®_... City Council Ordinance No. Page 2 on The proposed Zone Change has been analyzed relative to its potentiality to be detrimental to the health, safety, comfort and welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment. The primary issue identified by staff relates to the traffic impacts of the proposed density. Staff, concluded, based on the Traffic Impact Report, that the Level of Service for the intersections in the Study Area will not be degraded as a result of this project. 2. The proposed action will be consistent with the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the General Plan and the development standards established with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). Based on its analysis, staff has concluded that the requested amendment to the General Plan Land Use Map and the corresponding Zone Change, allowing the development of the subject condominium project is consistent with GOAL 1.0 of the General Plan Housing Element, obligating the City to provide "decent housing opportunities and a satisfying living environment for residents of Lake Elsinore ". SECTION TWO: ZONING RECLASSIFICATION This Zoning Map of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, is hereby amended by changing, reclassifying and rezoning the following described property, to wit: Assessor's Parcel Numbers 363 - 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 AND 016: TO R -2 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT UNDER THE ZONING ORDINANCE UNDER THE ZONING ORDINANCE Approval is based on the following: 1. The proposed Zoning is consistent with the Goals, Policies, and Objectives in the General Plan. 2. The proposed Zoning is consistent with the General Plan and the various land uses authorized by the Ordinance are compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the Plan. (Government Code Section 65860). 3. Reasons why the City has considered the effect of Zoning Ordinances on the regional housing needs in which the City is located and how the City has balanced these needs against the public service needs of its residents and available fiscal and environmental resources. (Government Code Section 65863.6). SECTION 3: This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its final passage. The City Clerk shall certify as to adoption of this Ordinance and cause this Ordinance to be published and posted in the manner required by law. •.r/ AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE a i �,, A c i l Ordinance No. v,, RODUCED AND APPROVED UPON FIRST READING this 9th day of March, ahoi i the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: -,SED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED UPON SECOND READING this 9th day of 1, "�4, upon the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ,^ ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATT i ' 1' Vick . ~ _, City Clerk APP ; ,, I) AS TO FORM: Barb: id Leibold, City Attorney City o i i -ake Elsinore (SEA Thomas Buckley, Mayor City of Lake Elsinore AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OE ATTACHMENT NO.3 I•J MINUTES JANUARY 20, 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION ,'.r✓ AGENDA ITEM NO. ) 3 PAGE 5 () OF d2Z4 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 TUESDAY, JANUARY 20, 2004 L�egular Planning Commission Meeting was called to order at 6:01 PM. by Chairman h. ??ledge of Allegiance was led by Community Development Director Brady. Rt 1 PI: COMMISSIONERS: LAPERE, UHLRY, BARNES & MATTHIES AF "`. COMMISSIONERS: Als > _ { ,it were: Community Development Director Brady, Planning and Code Enforcement Mal ' • !al.t, Engineering Manager Seumalo, Associate Planner Miller, Associate Planner �-. Preis Linz, Planning Consultant Donahoe, Housing Clerk Gibbons, and Deputy City Attorney Stev, ON-i ' + OF OFFICE: 'lerk Kasad administered Oath of Office to Michael O'Neal as the new Planning ., -assioner. nan LaPere welcomed Michael O'Neal as the new Planning Commissioner. PUIa . a..,OMMENTS (-� ()NE CON bt;1' T CALENDAR � -I t WED BY BARNES, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND CARRIED BY 'NiANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR. Minu4 -t,: 2. December 16, 2003 )3 AGENDA ITEM W. LaPAGE. OF PAGE 2 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES —JANUARY 20, 2004 PUBLIC HEARINGS 3. General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -03, Zone Change No. 2003 -02, Tentative Condominium Map No. 31532, Residential Design Review No. 2003 -15, CUP No 2003 -08, and Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2004 -01 for the "Lake Elsinore City Center Townhomes" Phase II. Due to complications, the tape recorded did not record any material until 6:10 PM. Chairman LaPere opened the Public Hearing at 6:07 PM, and requested the reading of the Staff Report. Community Development Director Brady requested Associate Planner Preisendanz to review the Staff Report with the Commission. Associate Planner Preisendanz stated that on September 16, 2003, the City Council approved Tentative Condominium Map No. 31531 and Residential Design Review No. 2003 -08 for an 84 -unit condominium project known as the "Lake Elsinore City Center Townhomes" Phase I. He stated that consistent with this approval, the applicant has also submitted Phase II on July 24, 2003. He indicated that the floor plans, architectural elevations, color and materials are identical to Phase I with the exception that the subject 5.33 net acre site, which is contiguous to Phase I, is not a part of the Elsinore City Center; Specific Plan No. 90 -03, Amendment No. 1, which re- designated the area containing Phase I from "General N"No, Commercial' to "Multi - family Residential'. Associate Planner Preisendanz indicated that considering these mentioned entitlements, the applicant has requested a General Plan Amendment and ensuing Zone Change along with the standard Residential Design Review, Tentative Condominium Map and Conditional Use Permit requested by the LEMC for this second phase. Associate Planner Preisendanz indicated that the location of the project is along the Interstate 15 Corridor, east of Grape Street, and south of Grape Street and Railroad Canyon Road Intersection within Southwest Riverside County. Associate Planner Preisendanz stated that Staff has reviewed the Housing Element & Traffic Study, and recommends approval of the project and recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution based on the Findings, Exhibits and is subject to the Conditions of Approval. He indicated that the applicant is present to answer any questions that the Commission may have. Chairman LaPere requested comments from the public. Glen Daigle, 28991 Old Temecula Front Street, indicated to the Commission that he is available for any questions that the Commission may have. He also indicated that he has read and agrees to the Conditions of Approval. He had no further comments. AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE 320F i - P!,ANNING COMMISSION MINUTES —JANUARY 20, 2004 LaPere requested any further comments from the public. There being no further cr -Iwents, Chairman LaPere brought the discussion back to the Commission for comments. Commissioner Matthies had no comments. " hairman Uhlry suggested the removal of the word "last" on page 9 of the Staff Report. Chairman Uhlry requested a time line for the project. ssociate Planner Preisendanz stated that the time -line is indicated in Condition No. 44. , Chairman Uhlry had no further comments. nissioner Barnes asked Staff if the City Engineer had a chance to review the Traffic c Associate Planner Preisendanz indicated both the City Engineer and the Traffic i eer for the City has had a chance to review the Traffic Study. r;ii issioner Barnes indicated that he has some concerns with the traffic count at the ction of SutnmerhiIl and Grape. He express that traffic is a main issue at that rsection. He indicated that he hopes that Staff, the Engineering Manager, and t.arnunity Development Director are confident that the Traffic Study is legitimate. t­1 Manager Seumalo gave an overview of the Traffic Study with the Commission. J Iso indicated that the traffic in that area is a hot issue with the City. He stated that the ­`fic. Engineer had looked at the build out conditions with this traffic report. I : cnissioner Barnes asked what year is the build — out. > , . >;,ciate Planner Preisendanz stated that it is the year 2025. ',ii: oian LaPere asked the Engineering Manager the page number of the Traffic Study, r . it discusses this. r�,ineering Manager Seumalo indicated "page 139" of the Traffic Study. Chairman LaPere indicated that the actual year should be noted. r (),it icering Manager Seumalo noted that he would discuss this with the Traffic Engineer as well. Commissioner Barnes had no further comments. A "I) ussioner Matthies expressed an issue with a Tot Lot. She also expressed her concerns to have a some type of signage at the crossing. ;:irriissioner O'Neal indicated that Staff has done a good job on preparing the report. He the project looks good. He had no further comments. AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE '�) 3 OF s1 PAGE 4 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES —JANUARY 20, 2004 Chairman LaPere concurred with the other Commissioners. He indicated that the traffic is an issue in that area. He also concurred with Commissioner Matthies on getting proper signage out in that area for the safety of the children. Vice Chairman Uhlry stated that it has been some time since City Council has approved Phase I of this project. He indicated that so far, not much has been completed. He requested the applicant to address the time lines of this project. Glen Daigle indicated that their plan is to build the project simultaneously, as one grading project. Vice Chairman Uhlry had no further comments. There being no further comments from the Commission, Chairman LaPere closed the Public Hearing at 6:32 PM, and requested the reading of the Resolution. MOVED BY UHLRY, SECONDED BY MATTHIES AND PASSED BY A 4 -1 VOTE WITH BARNES ABSTAINING TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2004 -01, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004 -01 FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO 2003 -03; ZONE CHANGE 2003 -02; TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP NO. 31532; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003 -08 AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2003 -15, WITHIN APN'S 363 - 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009, AND 016. MOVED BY MATTHIES, SECONDED BY BARNES PASSED BY A 4 -1 VOTE WITH BARNES ABSTAINING TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2004 -02, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003 -03 AMENDING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF THE PARCELS SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED AS APN'S 363 - 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009, AND 016 FROM VERY LOW DENSITY (VLD) RESIDENTIAL TO MEDIUM. DENSITY (MD) RESIDENTIAL. AGENDA ITEM NO 2-3 �... PAGE OF PAGE 5 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -JANUARY 20, 2004 MOVED BY UHLRY, SECONDED BY O'NEAL AND PASSED BY 4 -1 VOTE WITH BARNES ABSTAINING TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2004 -03, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. 2003 -02 CHANGING THE ZONING DESIGNATION OF A PARCEL SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED AS APN'S 363- 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009, AND 016 FROM R -1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO R -2 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT UNDER THE ZONING ORDINANCE. MOVED BY MATTHIES, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY A 4 -1 VOTE WITH BARNES ABSTAINING TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2004 -04, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP NO. 31532 FOR THE "LAKE ELSINORE CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II TO BE LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF GRAPE STREET AND SOUTH OF THE RAILROAD CANYON ROAD /GRAPE STREET INTERSECTION, WITHIN THE ELSINORE CITY CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN AREA APN'S 363- 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009, AND 016. MOVED BY UHLRY, SECONDED BY MATTHIES AND PASSED BY A 4 -1 VOTE WITH BARNES ABSTAINING TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2004 -05, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2003 -15 FOR THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF THE "LAKE ELSINORE CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES', TO BE LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF GRAPE STREET AND SOUTH OF THE RAILROAD CANYON ROAD /GRAPE STREET INTERSECTION APN'S 363 - 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009, AND 016. MOVED BY UHLRY AND SECONDED BY O'NEAL AND PASSED BY A 4 -1 VOTE WITH BARNES ABSTAINING TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2004 -06, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003 -08 FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE "LAKE ELSINORE CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II, TO BE LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF GRAPE STREET AND SOUTH OF THE RAILROAD CANYON ROAD /GRAPE STREET INTERSECTION, APN'S 363- 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009, AND 016. AGENDA ITEM N . 2 3 PAGE OF ATTACHMENT NO. 4 STAFF REPORT, RESOLUTIONS AND CONDITIONS JANUARY 20, 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM rrNO. 9-3 PAGE 3 b Qdff 10-1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPOR T City of Lake Elsinore Planning Division 130 S. Man Street Lake Elmore, CA 92530 (909) 674 -3124 (909) 471 -1419 fax 4 DATE: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Robert A. Brady, Community Development Director PREPARED BY: Rolfe Preisendanz, Associate Planner PROJECT TITLE: General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -03; Zone Change No. 2003 -02; Tentative Condominium Map No. 31532; Residential Design Review No. 2003 -15; Conditional Use Permit No. 2003 -08; and Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2004 -01 for the "Lake Elsinore City Center Townhomes" Phase II. APPLICANT: Daigle Homes LLC, (Attn: Mr. Glen Daigle), 28991 Old Town Front Street, Suite #207, Temecula, CA 92590. PROJECT REQUESTS General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -03. The applicant requests approval to amend the General Plan Land Use Map by changing the land use designation of the proposed 5.33 net acre site from Very Low Density (VLD) residential (Permitting .5 dwelling units /net acre maximum) to Medium Density (MD) residential (Permitting 12 dwelling units /net acre maximum). The review and analysis of this General Plan Land Use Map Amendment is pursuant to Government Code Section(s) 65350 through 65362, the Lake Elsinore General Plan and Chapter 17.92 (Hearings) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). Zone Change No. 2003 -02. Conforming and consistent to the requested amendment to the General Plan Land Use Map, the applicant is also requesting approval to change the Zoning of the subject 5.33 net acre site from (R -1) Single Family Residential to (R -2) Medium Density Residential. The review and analysis of the requested Zone Change is pursuant to Government Code Section(s) 65350 through 65362 and Chapter 17.92 (Hearings) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). AGENDA ITEM �NO. �` PAGE > _L OFJK. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JANUARY 20, 2004 Page 2 of 19 PROJECT TITLE: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-03, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2003-02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003- 15, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. CUP 2003 -08 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR "CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II. • Tentative Condominium Map No. 31532. The applicant is requesting approval of Tentative Condominium Map 31532, pursuant to Section 16 "Subdivisions" of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), Chapter 17.30 (Condominium and Condo Conversions) of the LEMC, Chapter 17.24 (R -2, Medium Density Residential) of the LEMC and Section(s) 66424 and 66427 of the California Subdivision Map Act (CSMA). • Residential Design Review No. R 2003 -15. The applicant is requesting Design Review consideration for the construction of ten (10) residential condominium buildings, which include six (6) individual townhomes per building and related improvements. Review is pursuant to the Elsinore City Center Specific Plan and applicable Chapters in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 2003 -08. The applicant is requesting the approval of a conditional use permit to allow for the establishment of 60 individually owned attached condominium townhomes which will participate in an underlying common area pursuant to Chapter 17.30 (Condominium and Condo Conversions) of the Lake S"Nw Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) and Chapter 17.74 (Conditional Use Permits) of the LEMC. • Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2004 -01. The City of Lake Elsinore intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) pursuant to the Guidelines established by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). BACKGROUND On September 16, 2003, the City Council approved Tentative Condominium Map 31531 and Residential Design Review 2003 -08 for an 84 -unit condominium project known as "Lake Elsinore City Center Townhomes" Phase I. Consistent with this approval, the applicant hereto has also submitted Phase II of the "Lake Elsinore City Center Townhomes" on July 24, 2003. The floor plans, architectural elevations, color and materials are identical to Phase I with the exception that the subject 5.33 net acre site, which is contiguous to Phase I, is not a part of the Elsinore City Center; Specific Plan No. 90 -03, Amendment No. 1, which re- designated the area containing Phase I from "General Commercial" to "Multi -family Residential ". Considering these afore mentioned entitlements, the applicant has requested a General Plan Amendment and ensuing Zone Change along with the standard Residential Design Review, Tentative Condominium Map and Conditional Use Permit required by the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) for this second phase. Likewise, staff determined that the scope of the application, AGENDA ITEM NO...-2'?) — ` PAGE 9OF PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JANUARY 20, 2004 Page 3 of 19 PROJECT TITLE: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-03, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2003-02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003- 15, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. CUP 2003 -08 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR "CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II. attached hereto, was a "project" as defined by the California Em ira mmtal Quality Act (CEQA) and would therefore require an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration. PROJECT LOCATION The proposed 5.33 net acre project site is located along the Interstate 15 Corridor, adjacent to and east of Grape Street and south of the Grape Street /Railroad Canyon Intersection within Southwest Riverside County, City of Lake Elsinore and Assessor Parcel Number(s) 363- 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009, & 016. Further, the project is located in the area known as Redevelopment Area No. 2C. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS) GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-13 The applicant requests approval to amend the General Plan Land Use Map with the ultimate intention of establishing the second phase of the "Lake Elsinore City Center Townhomes ", which consists of 60 attached condominium units on 5.33 net acres. The proposed density of this second phase equates to an empirical value of 11.26 dwelling units /net acre. Since the current General Plan Land Use Designation of Very Low Density (VLD) residential only allows .5 dwelling units /net acre, prohibiting a development of this type, the applicant is requesting a General Plan Amendment to Medium Density (MD), which would allow up to 12 dwelling units /net acre. ZONE CHANGE 2003 -02 Correspondingly and consistent with the proposed General PIan Amendment (referenced above), AGENDA ITEM� NO. 13 PAGE 4 X11 ;T LA �`- ,.;,- Vacant R -1 Single Family . Very Low Density Project Site North "Lake Elsinore City fic Plan Specific Specific Plan Center Townhomes" Phase I Southeast Vacant R -1 Single - Family Very Low Density East Vacant R -1 Single - Family Very Low Density West Interstate 15 PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS) GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-13 The applicant requests approval to amend the General Plan Land Use Map with the ultimate intention of establishing the second phase of the "Lake Elsinore City Center Townhomes ", which consists of 60 attached condominium units on 5.33 net acres. The proposed density of this second phase equates to an empirical value of 11.26 dwelling units /net acre. Since the current General Plan Land Use Designation of Very Low Density (VLD) residential only allows .5 dwelling units /net acre, prohibiting a development of this type, the applicant is requesting a General Plan Amendment to Medium Density (MD), which would allow up to 12 dwelling units /net acre. ZONE CHANGE 2003 -02 Correspondingly and consistent with the proposed General PIan Amendment (referenced above), AGENDA ITEM� NO. 13 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JANUARY 20, 2004 Page 4 of 19 PROJECT TITLE: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-03, ZONE *"me CHANGE NO. 2003-02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003- 15, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. CUP 2003 -08 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR "CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II. the applicant is also requesting a change in the Zoning from (R -1) Single- Family Residential to (R -2) Medium Density Residential to allow for the development of a 60 -unit multi - family condominium project pursuant to the applicable chapters of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP 31532 The applicant requests approval to establish the second phase of a proposed residential condominium community, known as the "Lake Elsinore City Center Townhomes ". Generally, condominium projects are defined as "subdivisions" pursuant to Section 66424 of the California Subdivision Map Act (CSMA). Consequently, this project requires both, Planning Commission and City Council consideration pursuant to the requirements of Section 16 "Subdivisions" of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). The parameter of Parcel 1 of Tentative Condominium Map No. 31532 encompasses portions of Lot(s) 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 9 of the Elsinore Lakeview Estates Unit No. 1 and will incorporate a dedication of Grape Street, a dedication of Street "A ", a vacation of portions of Lakeview Drive, Sunrise Drive -"moo and Canyon Drive and an offsite dedication for Sunrise Drive over portions of lot(s) 6, 10, 11, 12 and 59. An emergency access easement connecting I'M 31531 and Sunrise Drive is also shown and will be dedicated under a separate document. The proposed condominium concept would allow the applicant to be able offer individual dwelling units for sale within the building structures as defined by the Tentative Condominium Map 31532, while sharing common interest, ownership and maintenance responsibilities within the common areas for both Tentative Condominium Map No(s). 31531 and 31532. These common areas located within both Phase I and Phase 11, entail a swimming pool area, a tot lot, barbecue /picnic areas, common walls and fences, aisle -ways, pavement, minor accessory structures such as monument signs, mail boxes, landscaped areas, and onsite underground and aboveground utility infrastructure improvements necessary to service and support the residential community. RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003 -15 Sidig The proposed siting consists of ten (10) buildings identified as Building No(s) 15 -24 and will be two - story wood framed buildings, totaling approximately 100,920 square feet. Further, the buildings will be recognized as Building Type 1 or Building Type 2 and will be distinguished as an Elevation Type "A" or "B" and finished in association with either Color Scheme "1" or "2 ". Each building type will be approximately 10,092 square feet and will comprise of six (6) individually owned attached single- AGENDA ITEM NO..s= _ UAL PAGE r OF PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JANUARY 20, 2004 Page 5 of 19 PROJECT TITLE: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-03, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2003-02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003- 15, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. CUP 2003 -08 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR "CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II. family condominium dwelling units with six (6) enclosed attached garage - parking spaces. Two (2) of the six- (6) garages will be two- (2) car garages, with the remaining garages a one- (1) car garage. Four (4) of the condominium units located within each building will have access to a private yard, with the remaining two (2) units having access to a covered balcony. The private yards of Building No(s) 18 -24 will generally have a westerly view to the lake, with the remaining (3) buildings having an internalized view. Four of the condominium units within each building type will have an option available for a wood deck balcony. The buildings will be located on the final terraced pad ascending southeasterly above the Grape Street elevation, with Building(s) 15 -17 located on the furthest most pad(s). The slopes created by way of the site development and averaging approximately 15 to 20 feet in vertical height will be encompass the final phase and will be graded to maximum slope of 2:1. Building Number 18 will be set back from the Grape Street right of way approximately 56.9' and 47' -0" from the future Street "A" right -of -way The Pool Area, located in Phase I, consisting of a Jacuzzi, a Pool Equipment /Restroom building, a barbecue and a shade trellis will be accessible to the proposed condominium community. Pedestrian access to the pool area will be provided between Phase I and II. A second Tot Lot /BBQ Picnic Area will be conveniently located between Building(s) 21 and 22. An additional Barbecue (BBQ) /Picnic Area will be provided to the north of Building 17, adjacent the private yard areas. Trash enclosures will be provided at convenient locations throughout the project. r rrr" r i -r MW rrr r r Through circulation to the site will be made available by way of two (2) driveways located off of Grape Street provided in Phase I and one (1) "main" gated entry off of Street "A ", proposed for the subject project. The driveway off of Street "A" will lead to a rapid entry privacy gate. The entry gate will be located a minimum of 60 feet from the Street "A" public right of way and will allow full turn movements onto Street "A ". The garage entrances for the buildings will face and take access off the proposed private drives. A reciprocal access driveway has been provided adjacent to the subject site for the proposed phase. The proposed project will require a total of 60 covered parking spaces and 75 open parking spaces. The applicant will provide 80 covered spaces (within enclosed attached garages) and 89 open parking spaces. No compact spaces will be provided. The parking spaces will be located within the common area proposed for the condominium project. For convenience, additional parking spaces will also be provided in front of the southerly entry gate along Street "A ". AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 PAGE OF PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JANUARY 20, 2004 Page 6 of 19 PROJECT TITLE: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-03, ZONE • oe CHANGE NO. 2003-02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003- 15, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. CUP 2003 -08 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR "CITY CENTER TOWN HOMES" PHASE II. The applicant is proposing to develop the site with 97,513 square feet of landscaping. The slope areas created by the development will generally encompass the perimeter of the site and will create a terraced affect. Landscaped 2:1 slopes will generally front Grape Street providing an opportunity for a generous amount of landscaped screening for the project, while enhancing the architectural design of the buildings. The plant material for the site will include; Lake Elsinore Modified #36 Hydrose d Mix, Acacia Redolens, Rock Cotoneaster, Horsetail, Daylily, Aarons Beard, Myoporum parvifolium, Eastern Redbud, Red Iron Bark Eucalyptus, Chinese Flame Tree, London Plane Tree, and California Fan Palms. Here again, as proposed in Phase I, the plant palate chosen has evolved from successes and failures experienced from maintaining the landscaping installed at the commercial center to the north. The result is that the plant palate chosen will be more conducive to the local climate than originally proposed for the Wal Mart site. The BBQ /Picnic areas will be provided with "Marathon Turf" and additional shade trees shown on the plant palate. The buildings will generally be situated on "'r landscaped islands consisting of assorted ground cover, shrubs and trees. The meandering sidewalks at the entrances to the condominium units will be arrayed with turf, ground cover and various shrubs and trees. The private yards will remain un- landscaped to allow each owner the opportunity to create his or her own private yard area. All trash enclosures will have landscape planters on three sides to accommodate climbing vines. Archimmm The architectural design of the condominiums can generally be identified as a Santa Barbara Mission and will be identical with the architectural style of the buildings proposed in Phase I to the north and the architectural style of the buildings in the area. The applicant will incorporate architectural details conducive to the Santa Barbara Mission style. These architectural enhancements will include arched opening at the front entries, recessed arched windows at strategic locations within the building wall Plane, arched foam pop out window trims, pitched tile roof elements, stucco wains coating accent band, circular attic vents, wood shutters and recessed arched garage door openings. The garage doors themselves will be segmented paneled roll up doors. The windows proposed will be vinyl coated divided lites. The applicant is also proposing wood deck balconies for specific dwelling units. AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 PAGE ..�L� PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT �-� JANUARY 20, 2004 Page 7 of 19 PROJECT TITLE: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-03, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2003-02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003- 15, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. CUP 2003 -08 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR "CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II. Color and Materials The applicant is proposing to promote the ten (10) residential condominium buildings, with the two types of elevations augmented by two different two (2) discrete color schemes proposed under Phase I. As identified in the first phase, the following is a compilation of the materials and colors for the two elevation types and two (2) color schemes proposed. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003-08 Pursuant to the Chapter 17.30 Section 17.30.020 (Permits Required) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), the applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit for the establishment of the subject condominium project. As allowed in the LEMC the Planning Commission is empowered to grant and to deny applications for Conditional Use Permits and to impose reasonable conditions upon the granting of Conditional Use Permits. ANALYSIS GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003 -03 and ZONE CHANGE 2003 -02 In reviewing the requested land use map amendment and zone change, staff analyzed potential implications of the proposed amendment as it related to both the Housing Element and the Circulation Element of the General Plan. Specifically, staff identified local housing problems and AGENDA ITEM NO. 2-3 PAGE yL OF Wood Trim IRA Frazee "Indian Painting" Wood Trim Frazee `Bark Mulch" and Wood and Wood Deck Deck Balconies Balconies Roof Tile Deleo "Carmel Stone" and "Dark Roof Tile Deleo "Sahara" and "Brick Adobe Blend" Red Blend" Stucco Color La Habra "Canyon" Stucco Color La Habra "Alamo' Accent La Habra "Pacific Sand" Accent La Habra "Adobe" Stucco Color Stucco Color Exterior Frazee "Cool Forest" and "Bering Exterior Frazee "Tuscan Clay" Doors, Green" Doors and Garage Garage Doors and Doors Shutters CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003-08 Pursuant to the Chapter 17.30 Section 17.30.020 (Permits Required) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), the applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit for the establishment of the subject condominium project. As allowed in the LEMC the Planning Commission is empowered to grant and to deny applications for Conditional Use Permits and to impose reasonable conditions upon the granting of Conditional Use Permits. ANALYSIS GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003 -03 and ZONE CHANGE 2003 -02 In reviewing the requested land use map amendment and zone change, staff analyzed potential implications of the proposed amendment as it related to both the Housing Element and the Circulation Element of the General Plan. Specifically, staff identified local housing problems and AGENDA ITEM NO. 2-3 PAGE yL OF PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JANUARY 20, 2004 Page 8 of 19 PROJECT TITLE: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-03, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2003-02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003- 15, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. CUP 2003 -08 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR "CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II. needs and the potential of resulting traffic issues related to an increase in the housing stock. In conjunction with the mandates of the General Plan, staff was concerned with any potential impacts that would be detrimental to the health, safety, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment or within the City. Based on this analysis, staff has concluded that the requested amendment to the General Plan Land Use Map and the corresponding Zone Change, allowing the development of the subject condominium project is consistent with GOAL 1.0 of the General Plan Housing Element, obligating the City to provide "decent housing opportunities and a satisfying living environment for residents of Lake Elsinore" and that the traffic impacts related to these requests were negligible. In deliberation of this request staff considered the proximity of the this project to the Elsinore City Center Specific Plan, approved by the Lake Elsinore City Council on September 8, 1992 and the subsequent City Council approvals of Amendment No. 1 to the Elsinore City Center Specific Plan (91 -1); Residential Design Review No. 2000 -02 for a 156 unit apartment complex; and the City Council approval of Residential Design Review 2003 -08, for an 84 unit condominium community, staff reasoned that this General Plan Amendment offers excellent opportunities to establish ,,,or additional needed housing in the area. Finally, pursuant to the Elsinore City Center Caido Traffic Impact Study, prepared by RK Engineering on June 19, 2003, the City Traffic Engineer confirmed that the proposed condominium project will generate 184 less trip ends per day than the approved apartment project and that the study area intersections (See Site Plan Exhibit 2 -A), are projected to operate at a Level of Service (LOS) "D" or better during peak hours and that the proposed condominium project use would generate fewer impacts than the previously approved apartments. In summary, the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change will not be detrimental to health, safety and welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment or within the City. Additionally, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore to provide 15% of the units in the project as affordable housing units in accordance with the requirements of Section 33413(b) of the California Community Redevelopment Law or an alternative equivalent action which may include (without limitation) dedication of vacant land, construction of affordable units on another site, or payment of an in lieu fee calculated to provide sufficient funds to underwrite the long -tern affordability of an equivalent number of affordable dwelling units constructed or substantially rehabilitated on other sites within the City's redevelopment project areas. AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE .a1 OF PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JANUARY 20, 2004 Page 9 of 19 PROJECT TITLE: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-03, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2003-02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003- 15, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. CUP 2003 -08 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR "CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II. TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP 31532 Primary concerns dealing with condominium projects are the establishment of appropriate mechanisms to ensure the successful and consistent aesthetic appearance of residential complexes. Moreover, the establishment of unmistakable rules and boundaries or covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&R's) for ownership, interest, and maintenance responsibilities of common areas as well as individual areas within the units sold will be required. The establishment of the CC&R's, corroborating each of these elements, will be recorded against the project as a condition of approval. Additionally, a homeowner's association (HOA) must be established prior to the sale of the first unit sold. The HOA will be empowered to administer and enforce the various elements of the CC&R's. To accomplish this, homeowner's associations in most cases will establish monthly fees that cover aspects such as landscape maintenance, parking lot maintenance (utility infrastructure improvements). Likewise architectural design committees are often established to guarantee consistent design improvement within complexes. The applicant has submitted a copy of the 10"1 proposed CC&R's to the Planning Department, which is being reviewed by the City Attorney and will be ultimately approved by the Community Development Director. Additionally, Staff has added a condition of approval to address this matter. Correspondingly, pursuant to Section 17.30.040 (Documents Required) of the LEMC, staff has added a condition of approval which will require that a homeowner's association be established prior to the sale of the first dwelling unit. Exhibit "A" illustrates the Condominium Plan for all common areas and individual units. The plan submitted has been found acceptable by staff. The CC&R's will contain language considered necessary to address more specific ownership, interest, and maintenance responsibilities. RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003 -15 Sating The proposed site plan meets or exceeds the requirements of Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), Chapter 17.24 (R -2, Medium Density Residential District) of the LEMC and Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requirements) of the LEMC. Pursuant to and in compliance with Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards) of the LEMC, which encourages that building orientation and setbacks be varied, the applicant has varied the orientation of the buildings in order to maximize the scenic vistas to the Lake, as well as considering the privacy of each condominium unit within the community. Additionally, the applicant has exceeded the requirement contained in Chapter 17.24 (R -2, Medium Density Residential District) of the LEMC, in that the applicant is proposing 26% building coverage instead of the allowed 50% coverage as defined in Chapter 17.02 (Definitions). Further, the applicant has also exceeded the parking requirements encountered in Chapter 17.66 AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JANUARY 20, 2004 Page 10 of 19 PROJECT TITLE: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-03, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2003-02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003- 15, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. CUP 2003 -08 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR "CITY CENTER TOWIVHOMES" PHASE 11. (Parking Requirements) of the LEMC, in that the applicant has provided 169 parking spaces as compared to the 135 spaces required by this Chapter. Noise Pursuant to the attached Mitigated Negative Declaration, the Mitigation Monitoring Program, the Conditions of Approval and Chapter 17.78 (Noise Control), the applicant has agreed to accept a condition of approval, which would require the preparation and approval of an acoustical study prior to the issuance of a building permit. This mitigation was implemented to alleviate possible detrimental noise impacts to the residents located within the condominium community generated by the development of the site and the existing traffic generated by Interstate 15 to the west. Further, the applicant has also agreed to implement appropriate methods of construction, identified and necessary (i.e. sound walls and landscaping), which will insure that the future residents of this proposed community experience noise levels consistent with the City of Lake Elsinore Specific Plan. Tr - The analysis of the traffic impacts related to the subject project was based on the updated traffic study entitled The Elsinore City Center Cando Traffic Irnpaa Study. The traffic impact report submitted was prepared by RK Engineering Group and evaluated both Phase I and the subject project (Phase II). In comparison to the previously approved 156 -unit apartment complex, both phases of the condominium project consist of 144 attached condominium dwelling units. Considering this comparison, the traffic study found that, the proposed condominium project will generate 184 less trip ends per day than the approved apartment project. Additionally, the Traffic Impact Study referenced herein, found that the study area intersections (See Site Plan Exhibit 2 -A), are projected to operate at a Level of Service (LOS) "D" or better during peak hours, with the exception of the I -15 Freeway northbound ramps at Railroad Canyon Road and Grape Street at Railroad Carryon Road. The study further indicates that these intersections are projected to operate at LOS "F" during peak hours with or without the proposed condominium project. Conclusively the traffic Impact Study established that the proposed condominium project use would generate fewer impacts than the previously approved apartments. The circulation and parking space layout meets the requirements set forth in Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requirements) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) which states: For Studio and one bmrwn units: one (1) cored space, plus nev- thirds (213) open space per dwelling unit AGENDA ITEM N//O. _ 9- 3 PAGE b OF 4241 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT i-� JANUARY 20, 2004 Page 11 of 19 PROJECT TITLE: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-03, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2003-02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003- 15, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. CUP 2003 -08 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR "CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II. For tree or more la buans one (1) cmv& space, plus one and one quarter (1 -1 14) open space per dzeOM unit: Subsequently, the applicant has provided 80 covered and 89 open standard parking spaces. No "compact spaces" are being proposed as a part of this application. All parking has been designed to provide complete and thorough circulation. The applicant has provided 24' -0" two -way drive isles throughout the site which exceeds the required 20' -0" requirement. Staff has determined that the circulation will present adequate turning radii and turnarounds for emergency and trash and delivery vehicles. OAS a_ce The applicant has exceeded the open space requirement set forth in Chapter 17.24 (R -2, Medium Density Residential District /Open Space) of the LEMC which states: Multiple family dzwllings: Each dwelling unit shall be provided with a usable open space area in the form of a patio or mart yard with a nmirrrum area of one hundred ( 100) square feet and a mmwz,#n dvw7sion of ten feet (10), or a bakony as follows: a. Units 600 square feet or less. A halmny of sixty (60) square feet with a mir2ri dinmion of six feet (6). b. Units larger than 600 square feet of f loor area. A la2kony of eighty (80) square feet and a minimum dir� of six feet (6). Considering that the condominium units proposed are larger than 600 square feet of floor area, the three hundred and fifty (350) square feet of private open space area provided, in the form of a private yard and /or a balcony, exceeds the required square footage. Ard5itm ov The architectural design of the proposed buildings meets the requirements set forth within Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards) of the LEMC in that the architecture of the buildings has been designed to enhance their immediate surroundings. Additionally the applicant has provided a variety of building design and form such as staggering planes along the exterior walls, which will create light and shadow. AGENDA ITEM NO. „�.L.�.. PAGE OF PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JANUARY 20, 2004 Page 12 of 19 PROJECT TITLE: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-03, ZONE 100, CHANGE NO. 2003-02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003- 15, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. CUP 2003 -08 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR "CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II. Color and Materials The color and materials proposed for this project meets the requirements set forth within Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards) of the LEMC in that the colors and materials proposed will create a sensitive alteration of colors and materials, producing diversity and enhancing the architectural effects. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003 -08 In compliance with Chapter 17.30 (Condominiums and Condominium Conversions) of the LEMC the applicant has filed a request for a Conditional Use Permit. This request for a conditional use permit is consistent with the findings and requirements set forth in Chapter 17.74 (Conditional Use Permits) of the LEMC which states that: The City mzhze5 that it uses haw II' irI i o�urmwmtza that, I•I' /r • upon kcamn a/ ckggn I dx use, may r // y rr to '•rr V7prt adjoining I II' r:► / or w /L Said uses dxm* '/ r moye mpd"zsix mmw and r// I i pvcaiw, r /a • the ab&ty to cmcbtzon the pro)ec4 pro) in m-kr to n=gate any /' r ;L r inpam In on' onkr to iI ar r 1' y r N I rI1 ":/ to • a 6M to /% applicamm for 1 /rr/ i Use Pmws and to r r/I ' 'r / r/' /' /r I' upon . i w • I Gx2d6wd Use Pemits. Considering the potential ramification to the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of the community, as admonished, staff has paid particular attention to specific technicalities related to the development of the proposed use. These details included traffic impacts, local street circulation, internal vehicular and pedestrian circulation, landscape buffering, private common area amenities (i.e. swimming pool, Jacuzzi, tot lots and picnic areas), architectural compatibility and related development standards. Further, pursuant to Section 17.30.040 of the LEMC, the applicant has been conditioned to convey the common open spaces to a homeowner's association (HOA). In compliance, the applicant has submitted a declaration of covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CMR's), to be reviewed by the City Attorney and approved by the Community Development Director, which will govern the association. Correspondingly, the applicant has been conditioned to establish said homeowner's association prior to the sale of the last dwelling unit. Finally, pursuant to Section 17.30.040 of the LEMC, membership into the HOA will be mandatory for each buyer or any successive buyer. Because this project is the second phase of a previously approved project, reciprocal covenants, conditions, and restrictions, and reciprocal maintenance agreements shall be established. Compliance with this requirement will cause a magmg of the deWtoPn" *"no? AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE 0 F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT �-- JANUARY 20, 2004 Page 13 of 19 PROJECT TITLE: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-03, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2003-02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003- 15, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. CUP 2003 -08 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR "CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II. phases as they are ccn� and an&xly one (1) hor wmer's association with cw mra areas for the total dew 1opm a (Section 17.30.040.F of the LEMC). ENVIRONMENTAL The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2004 -01 has been prepared pursuant to Article 6 (Negative Declaration Process) and Section 15070 (Decision to Prepare a Negative or Mitigated Negative Declaration) of the Cal fomia Envbvwx atal Quality Act (CEQA). Based on staff's evaluation, the proposed project will not result in any significant effect on the environment. Further, pursuant to Section 15073 (Public Review of a Proposed Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration) of the California Enviro�tal Quality Act (CEQA), the intended Mitigated Negative Declaration was submitted to the State Clearinghouse on January 15, 2004 for the required 30 day review period. �"` RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2004- recommending to the City Council approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -03; Resolution No. 2004 -_ recommending to the City Council approval of Zone Change 2003 -02; Resolution No. 2004 -_ recommending to the City Council approval of Tentative Condominium Map 31532; Resolution No. 2004 -_ recommending to the City Council approval of Residential Design Review R 2003 -15; Resolution No. 2004- _ approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2003 -08; and Resolution No. 2004 - recommending City Council adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration No 2004 -01 based the following Findings, Exhibits "A" thru "R" and the proposed Conditions of Approval. FINDINGS - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not be; a) detrimental to the health, safety, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment or within the City, or b) injurious to the property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City. The proposed Galeral Plan A mmdnoit has ban analyzed relatiw to its potentiality to he detrrin"d to the health, safety, a n#k and welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighlxrrhoacl of the p vposed xrimd nmL The prvnary issue identifier) by staff relates to the traffu me wu of the proposed density. Staff, concluded, based on the Traffic Impact Report, that the Lezd of Service for the intersertions in the Study Area will not be degraded as a result of this pno fft 2. The proposed General Plan Amendment will permit reasonable development of the area consistent with its constraints and will make the area more compatible with adjacent AGENDA ITEM NO. L4 C1 PAGE sL L OF PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JANUARY 20, 2004 Page 14 of 19 PROJECT TITLE: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-03, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2003-02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003- 15, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. CUP 2003 -08 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR "CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II. properties. The Proposal General Plan Amendmnt will allow the applicant to dew,elop the site with the proposed density of 11.25 Dudling Units /net acre and will in turn bring about a site more crawpatible with the first phase of the Gad x itnn Piro* designat& "Multi family Residential - 3. The proposed General Plan Amendment would establish a land use density and usage more in character with the subject property's location, access, and constraints. The proposed General Plan Amancdnea'rt wnu%d establish a daisity more in cmformance with the rea-n* ap oad 84 -unit rrium prr�jat to the north of the subject site Additionally, the pr"sad prgect site uvdd be in close proximity of arty neassary services needed by persons residmg in the proposed wndxrarainn oaYrnnncmity. 4. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not have a significant effect on the environment. The proposed General Plan uas indu"within the description of the prnpect's Initial Study. Based on the Initial Study, staff intends to adopt a Mitigated NegatireDeclaration, ubxh conclud d with mitigations that the project will not bar e a sign.9�6-mt effect on the aav ar nmt FINDINGS - ZONE CHANGE 1. The proposed zone change will not be; a) detrimental to the health, safety, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment or within the City, or b) injurious to the property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City. The proposed Zare Change has ben analyzed relatire to its potentiality to he detrirnmtal to the health, safety, t ort and ze4m of the persons n swhT or wracking within the naghborbwd of the proposal arrxncdraait. The p inwy issue identified by staff relates to the traffic w*uas of the proposed density. Staff, c a x& dad based on the Tra* Impact Report, that the Lezd of Senn for the intersa^tiovzs in the Study Area will not be degraded as a result of this project 2. The proposed action will be consistent with the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the General Plan and the development standards established with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). Based on its analysis, staff has con& dal that the requested anm drmt to the General Plan Land Use Map and the comVmdmg Zone Change, allowing the dh&prnant of the subject condwniraimn project is caYwtow with GOAL 1.0 of the Ganeral Plan Housing Elonov, obligating the City to provide "deana housing opporumities and a satisfying living ena'm mmt for residents of Lake Elsinore': AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE � 0 OF PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JANUARY 20, 2004 Page 15 of 19 PROJECT TITLE: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-03, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2003-02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003- 15, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. CUP 2003 -08 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR "CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II. FINDINGS - CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION 1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan (Government Code Section 66473.5). The prelim as desip -zed assists in achieving the dex pnent of a uvd- balancrd and functianal mix of residential, ca m vrol, industrial, open space, recce wzal and institutional LM uses (GOAL 1.0, Land Use Element) as uOpmade deant housing opportunities and a satisfying livingenvirar ent for residents of Lake Elsinore (GOAL 1.0, Housing Element) 2. The effects this project is likely to have upon the housing needs of the region, the public service requirements of its residents and the available fiscal and environmental resources have been considered and balanced. Cansmbmg the Okts this pro je(t is likely to haze upon the needs of the regions a cmakion of app and uas implernemtel whkh umR require the applicant to enter into an agreement with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore, providing 15% of the units in the pr*a as affordable housing amiss in acmrc xxr with the requirenents of Section 33413(b) of the Califomia Carmmu y Re kwbpment Lary or an altematim egacmient action ub;ich may indv& (without limitation) dedication of vacant land amstrautian of affordable units on another site, or payment of an in lieu fee calculated to prmide sufficient funds to amdb mte the long term affordability of an equimVmt numl-er of affmzlable duelling units co nstnaed or substantially rehabilitated on other sites within the City's r lopnent prq)W amas. 3. Subject to the attached conditions of approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result in any significant environmental impact. The prof ct has been adequately cofndtionad by all applicable deptzrT amts and agencies and will not dyrefore insult in any significant environmental impacts. FINDINGS - DESIGN REVIEW 1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the Zoning District in which the project is located. The proposal Residential Design Review located within Assessor Pawl NurnWs) 363- 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016 cnrrp6as with the goals and oblertim of the General Plan, in that the approzd of this Candanmm Ccrawnly will assist in achieving the dezelopment of a uell balanced and functiaand mix of residential, ca7nrmd, industrial, open space, mc eatiawl and institutional land uses as well as axouraging industrial land uses to dtwrsify Lake Elsinore's ecaimi c base. AGENDA ITEM NO. ? 3 �, PAGE, Oa� PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JANUARY 20, 2004 Page 16 of 19 PROJECT TITLE: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-03, ZONE `Ne CHANGE NO. 2003-02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003- 15, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. CUP 2003 -08 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR "CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II. 2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. The proposed Residential Design Review located at Assessor Parcel NwnhT(s) 363- 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016 is appropriate to the site and sunowuling derelopments in that the Cozda niiz t pro ct has bem designed in consideration of the size and shape of the property, dxn* creating interest and zWYM vistas as a persavz mores along the street. Furdaer the project as proposal will cwpbe wit the quality of existing &wbpmezzt and will create a visually pleasing, non- c&aaix relationship l wxm the proposal and existing prnjaz in that the arch =ffal design, color and materials and site design proposal evidma a concern for quality and ongazality. 3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Pursuant to the Califonzia Environr xntal Quality Act (CEQA), the proposal Residential Design Review "Moe located at Assessor Parcel Nw Ar(s) 363- 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016, as revkuai and mn&tiazad by all applicable City Divisions and Dep�s and Agencies, will not haw a sign*" effect on the envi mnmt pursuant to attadxd G)nc 6xzs of AppruwL 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter 17.82. Pursuant to Sertim 17.82.070 (Action of the Plannvzg Conaniuion) of the Lake Elsinore Muni* Cale (LEMC), the proposal Industrial Design Review located at Assessor Parcel NwnWs) 363 - 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016 has been schaluled for consideration and approrrrl of the Planning C.crzzrrlission. FINDINGS - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1. The proposed use, on its own merits and within the context of its setting, is in accord with the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the site is located. In on-kr to acbiew r udl /r rr IG/ rr / r !Inr r / /y /r 1 i. r I s r IIY 1 ✓N mcrea6wd w / wid institutia r a/ uses, stqj%6 &4!uN rr / 1 N r .L r r r I r LI 1 1 III LI I' Ir I r r I r 1 /1 a r i AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 PAGE OFc. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JANUARY 20, 2004 Page 17 of 19 PROJECT TITLE: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-03, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2003-02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003- 15, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. CUP 2003 -08 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR "CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II. Carrrnc# city located at Assessor Parcel NwnWs) 363 - 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016. Accordingly, the proposed land use is in conaanncv with the ob* -tizes of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in uhkh the site is located 2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or the City, or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or the City. In accord with the purposes of the Chapter 17.74 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Carle, the City realized that the proposed caubninivat use located at Assessor Panel NwnWs) 363 - 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016 may haze a potential to negatkdy impact the welfare of persons residing or working wtithin the neighbmhoo d or the City. Considering this, staff has substantiated that all applicable City Delxtrbnmts and Agencies haze been afforded the opportzmity for a thorough review of the use and haze incorporated all applicable ctv netts and /or conditions related to installation and rrraimmnance of landscapmb stmt dedications, rodations of points of iehiadar ingress and Tress and control of potential nuisances, so as to elnrrinate any negatico impacts to the general health, safety, cu#6r4 or general welfare of the surrounding nigh rhoad or the City. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, and for all the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, buffers and other features required by Title 17 of the LEMC. The proposed cmdaninuan use located at Assessor Parcel NwnWs) 363 -240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016 has been designed in consideration of the size and shape of the property, thereby strengthining and en "ictrg the wm diate in dusmal area. Further-, the project as proposed, will oamplanent the quality of existing dkApnent and will curate a visually pleasing non detractiw relationship letuem the proposed and existing projers, in that the storage area has been mevi ae d to ensure adequate provision of scrtrnvag f u n the public rights -ofu-ay or adjaa nt pnimes. 4. The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways with proper design both as to width and type of pavement to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated by the subject use. Theproposedcondani on ocated at Assessor r ' /' 363-240-002, 003, 11' 11: 11' and I 16 has brmnvieu& as / its relation I the wx&y and /' ofpawnmt nmW to cany type and / quantity I tyr &neratad, in that has r /'/ r' ' u r !/ the potential w*wts associcitedwith ' praposed cut&or / r r' / I to its appvzd /, / has contitwwd dxprqw to be smvd by I - adequate / I r wid&ngn swulards I pywide nasonci& access by r r, tnxk, transi4 it / / I ' AGENDA ITEM NO. ) 3 PAGE 5 3 OF t .4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JANUARY 20, 2004 Page 18 of 19 PROJECT TITLE: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-03, ZONE `""'"`' CHANGE NO. 2003-02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003- 15, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. CUP 2003 -08 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR "CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II. 5. In approving the subject use located at Assessor Parcel Number(s) 363- 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016, there will be no adverse affect on abutting property or the permitted and normal use thereof. The proposed use has hem thoroughly real ued and ax"tiond by all applicable City Deparane z and outside Agauies, eliminating the potential for any and all adwm effects on the ahutung proorty. 6. Adequate conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.74.50 of the LEMC have been incorporated into the approval of the Conditional Use Permit to insure that the use continues in a manner envisioned by these findings for the term of the use. Pursuant to Section 17.74.050 (Action of the Planning Corranission) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Cale (LEMC), the outdoor storage use located at Assessor Panel NiorzWs) 363 -240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016 has ban scl"uled for (msideration and approu -d of the Planning C rynission. FINDINGS - MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 1. Revisions in the project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant before a proposed mitigated negative declaration and initial study are released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur; and 715e applicant has made revisions to the project or has agreed to specific cmc itions ubwi umU acrid the effects or mitigate the effects of thepnyert to a point uehere no significant eff cts umR ocaff 2. There is no substantial evidence, in the light of the whole record before the agency, that the project as revised may have significant effect on the environment. Pursuant to the mdmw rreeizrd in the light of the u hole recmd presented to staff the pro)ixt will not haw a sigrciftcant effect on the enzmrnrr considering the applicable Covulitions of Approud and Mitigatien Monitoring Program PREPARED BY: ROLFE PREISENDANZ, ASSOCIATE PLANNER REVIEWED BY: APPROVED BY: ARMANDO G. VILLA, PLANNING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT MANAGER ROBERT A. BRADY, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR •00f AGENDA ITEM NO. o F� ,0E Z I OFCL4 1, "NTlh C COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Z0, 2004 i'ITLE: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-03, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2003-02, TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP 31532, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003- 15, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. CUP 2003 -08 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2004-01 FOR "CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II. E., Tentative Condominium Map No. 31532 Index Map E' Site Plan E -, Landscape Plan Ex" Landscape Plan Ex] Fence Plan Exf Drainage Plan Exi Site Plan Exl: Section Plan Exlh. Building Type 1 Elevation Type A Exh Building Type 1 Elevation Type B Exh Building Type 2 Elevation Type A Exh.; f Building Type 2 Elevation Type B Exhi Building Type 1 First Floor Plan 10� Exhibit 0 Building Type 1 Second Floor Plan Exhit " Building Type 2 First Floor Plan Exhi' Building Type 2 Second Floor Plan Exhii � :t X Letter from Applicant Outlining Purpose for General Plan Amendment AGENDA ITEM NO. _.mss–• — PAGE ____5 OF 2�a RESOLUTION NO. 2004-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003 -03 AMENDING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF THE PARCELS SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED AS APN(s) 363- 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 AND 016 FROM VERY LOW DENSITY (VLD) RESIDENTIAL TO MEDIUM DENSITY (MD) RESIDENTIAL. WHEREAS, Daigle Homes, LLC has initiated proceedings to amend the General Plan Land Use Map by requesting an General Plan Amendment changing the designation of the parcels known as Assessor Parcel Number(s) 363 - 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016 from Very Low Density (VLD) Residential to Medium Density (MD) Residential; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council for changes to the approved General Plan Land Use Map; and WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on January 20, 2004; NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -03, prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve the proposed amendment to the Land Use Designation. The Planning Commission finds and determines that Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2004 -01 is adequate and prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which analyzes environmental effects of ends City Council certification, based upon the following findings and determinations: SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -03 have been made as follows: 1. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not be; a) detrimental to the health, safety, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment or within the City, or b) injurious to the property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City. AGENDA ITEM NO. °2- PAGE 57 C OF i) `1 !�;cj COMMISION RESOLUTION FOR t i. PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-03 Page of s t troposed General Plan Amendment has been analyzed relative to its potentiality to be detrimental to the health, safety, comfort and welfare of the persons residing or I , g within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment. The primary issue i� 1- kitiFed by staff relates to the traffic impacts of the proposed density. Staff, concluded, i)"I's Cd on the Traffic Impact Report, that the Level of Service for the intersections in the iv Area will not be degraded as a result of this project. 4n-oposed General Plan Amendment will permit reasonable development of the area , misistent with its constraints and will make the area more compatible with adjacent :v :. rties. roposed General Plan Amendment will allow the applicant to develop the site with )I-oposed density of 11.25 Dwelling Units /net acre and will in turn bring about a site compatible with the first phase of the Condominium Project, designated "Multi - Residential". proposed General Plan Amendment would establish a land use density and usage in character with the subject property's location, access, and constraints. i ; •roposed General Plan Amendment would establish a density more in conformance ii° , ,he recently approved 84 -unit condominium project to the north of the subject site. Idditionally, the proposed project site would be in close proximity of any necessary r ices needed by persons residing in the proposed condominium community. 4 :iv, proposed General Plan Amendment will not have a significant effect on the � % -Onment. V oposed General Plan was included within the description of the project's Initial W, Based on the Initial Study, staff intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative claration, which concluded with mitigations that the project will not have a significant on the environment. THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City of I c: i�,lsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the City Council of the City of Lake E1sii Aporove General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -03. Ron LaPere, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission I hercoy certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a meet] h +-f -of conducted on January 20, 2004 by the following vote: AGENDA ITEM NO. i PAGE S 70F PLANNING COMMISION RESOLUTION FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-03 Page 3 of 3 AYES: Commissioners: LaPere, Uhlry, Matthies and O'Neal NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: Barnes ATTEST: Robert A. Brady, Secretary to the Planning Commission AGENDA ITEM NO, 2 rArCy PAGE -- D ORj2� I A� ' RESOLUTION NO. 2004-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. 2003 -02 CHANGING THE ZONING DESINGNATION OF A PARCEL SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED AS APN (S) 363 -240- 002, 003, 004, 008, 009 AND 016 FROM R -1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO R -2 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT UNDER THE ZONING ORDINANCE WHEREAS, Daigle Homes LLC., has initiated proceedings to change the zoning designation of the subject parcels known as APN(s) 363 - 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016 from R -1 Single Family Residential District to R -2 Medium Density Residential District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council for changes to the approved Zoning Map; and WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on January 20, 2004; NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Zone Change No. 2003 -02, prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve the proposed amendment to the Zoning Map. The Planning Commission finds and determines that Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2004 -01 is adequate and prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which analyzes environmental effects of ends City Council certification, based upon the following findings and determinations: SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of Lake Elsinore the following findings for the approval of Zone Change No. 2003 -02 have been made as follows: The proposed zone change will not be; a) detrimental to the health, safety, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment or within the City, or b) injurious to the property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City. The proposed Zone Change has been analyzed relative to its potentiality to be detrimental to the health, safety, comfort and welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment. The primary issue identified by staff relates to the traffic impacts of the proposed density. Staff, concluded, based on the Traffic Impact Report, that the Level of Service for the intersections in the Study Area will n AGENDA ITEM NO. L PAGE .5 q OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR ZONE CHANGE NO. 2003-02 Page 2 of 2 not be degraded as a result of this project. 2. The proposed action will be consistent with the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the General Plan and the development standards established with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). Based on its analysis, staff has concluded that the requested amendment to the General Plan Land Use Map and the corresponding Zone Change, allowing the development of the subject condominium project is consistent with GOAL 1.0 of the General Plan Housing Element, obligating the City to provide "decent housing opportunities and a satisfying living environment for residents of Lake Elsinore ". NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore approve Zone Change No.2003 -01. Ron LaPere, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a meeting thereof conducted on January 20, 2004 by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: LaPere, Matthies, Uhlry, and O'Neal NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: Barnes ATTEST: Robert A. Brady, Secretary to the Planning Commission AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF Z�al RESOLUTION NO. 2004-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP NO. 31532 FOR THE "LAKE ELSINORE CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES" PHASE II TO BE LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF GRAPE STREET AND SOUTH OF THE RAILROAD CANYON ROAD /GRAPE STREET INTERSECTION, WITHIN THE ELSINORE CITY CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN AREA, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER (S) 363 - 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 AND 016. JZEAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Daigle s to request the approval of Tentative Condominium Map No.31532 for the of a residential condominium community. I _ ;REAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated ponsibility of recommending approval of Tentative Condominium Maps for ects; and "'11 F?REAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning 1 "? has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department :;.,rested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on January 20, 2004; Av THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES i k ",SOLVE as follows: VCTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed request for >>>dofninium Map No. 31532 and has found it acceptable. The Planning Commission ,'; (ermines that this project is consistent with Section 16 "Subdivisions" of the Lake 1 't,';icipal Code (LEMC), Section(s) 66424 and 66427 of the California Subdivision Map and that Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2004 -01 is adequate and prepared in �.,. 1th the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which a r�. ironmental effects of the project, ends with the City Council certification, based 1, f0! I owing findings and determinations: °UION 2. That in accordance with the Section(s) 66424 and 66427 of the California S_�tf�,r,itrt� Map Act (CSMA) and Section 16 "Subdivisions" of the Lake Elsinore Municipal C 4 I;), the following findings for the approval of the condominium map has been made a; AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 3 PAGE OFJ-4 FINDINGS - CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION 1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is NNo consistent with the General Plan. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan (Government Code Section 66473.5). The project as designed assists in achieving the development of a well - balanced and functional mix of residential, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses (GOAL 1. 0, Land Use Element) as well provide decent housing opportunities and a satisfying living environment for residents of Lake Elsinore (GOAL 1. 0, Housing Element) 2. The effects this project is likely to have upon the housing needs of the region, the public service requirements of its residents and the available fiscal and environmental resources have been considered and balanced. Considering the effects this project is likely to have upon the needs of the region a condition of approval was implemented which would require the applicant to enter into an agreement with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore, providing 15% of the units in the project as affordable housing units in accordance with the requirements of Section 33413(6) of the California Community Redevelopment Law or an alternative equivalent action which may include (without limitation) dedication of vacant land, construction of affordable units on another site, or payment of an in lieu fee calculated to provide sufficient funds to underwrite the long -term affordability of an equivalent number of affordable dwelling units constructed or substantially rehabilitated -"00# on other sites within the City's redevelopment project areas. 3. Subject to the attached conditions of approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result in any significant environmental impact. The project has been adequately conditioned by all applicable departments and agencies and will not therefore result in any significant environmental impacts. NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL of a Tentative Condominium Map No. 31532. Ron LaPere, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission 1..I" AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 3 PAGE 2, d I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a meeting thereof conducted on January 20, 2004 by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: LaPere, Uhlry, Matthies, and O'Neal NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: Bames ATTEST: Robert A. Brady, Secretary to the Planning Commission AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 PAGE G3oF —_�J RESOLUTION NO. 2004-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2003 -15 FOR THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF THE "LAKE ELSINORE CITY CENTER TOWNHOMES ", TO BE LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF GRAPE STREET AND SOUTH OF THE RAILROAD CANYON ROAD /GRAPE STREET INTERSECTION, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S) 363 - 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 AND 016. WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Daigle Homes, LLC, to request the approval of Residential Design Review No. 2003 -15 for the design, construction and establishment of a residential condominium community. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of recommending approval of Design Reviews for residential projects; and WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Commission. has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on September 16, 2003; NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed request for Residential Design Review No. 2003 -08 and has found it acceptable. The Planning Commission finds and determines that this project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and determines that Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2004 -01 is adequate and prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which analyzes environmental effects of ends City Council certification, based upon the following findings and determinations: SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code the following findings for the project have been made as follows: FINDINGS — DESIGN REVIEW 1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the Zoning District in which the project is located. AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF �^ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2003-15 Page 2 of 3 The proposed Residential Design Review located within Assessor Parcel Number(s) 363 -240- 002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016 complies with the goals and objectives of the General Plan, in that the approval of this Condominium Community will assist in achieving the development of a well - balanced and functional mix of residential, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses as well as encouraging industrial land uses to diversify Lake Elsinore's economic base. 2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. The proposed Residential Design Review located at Assessor Parcel Numbers) 363 -240- 002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016 is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments in that the Condominium project has been designed in consideration of the size and shape of the property, thereby creating interest and varying vistas as a person moves along the street. Further the project as proposed will complement the quality of existing development and will create a visually pleasing, non - detractive relationship between the proposed and existing projects in that the architectural design, color and materials and site design proposed evidence a concern for quality and originality. �— 3. Subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed Residential Design Review located at Assessor Parcel Numbers) 363- 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016, as reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City Divisions and Departments and Agencies, will not have a significant effect on the environment pursuant to attached Conditions of Approval. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter 17.82. Pursuant to Section 17.82.070 (Action of the Planning Commission) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), the proposed Industrial Design Review located at Assessor Parcel Number(s) 363- 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016 has been scheduled for consideration and approval of the Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above Findings, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL of a Residential Design Review No. R 2003 -15. AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 3 PAGE OF 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION FOR DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2003-15 Page 3 of 3 Ron LaPere, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a meeting thereof conducted on January 20, 2004 by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: LaPere, Uhlry, Matthies, and O'Neal NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: Barnes ATTEST: Robert A. Brady, Secretary to the Planning Commission AGENDA ITEM NO... a 3 PAGES OF4 RESOLUTION NO. 2004-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 2004 -01 FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003 -03; ZONE CHANGE 2003 -02; TENTATIVE CONDOMIMIUM MAP NO. 31532; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 2003 -08 AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2003 -15, WITHIN APN(S) 363 -240- 002, 003, 004, 008, 009 AND 016. Wf1 i ': EAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Daigle Homes LL( . to request approval of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2004 -01 for the purpose of develop 11 i, a residential condominium community; WHEREAS, Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2004 -01 has been prepared to evaluate environmental impacts resulting with the project; and �-. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendation to the City Council adopting Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2004 -01; and WH I i \' EAS, public notice of said applications has been given, and the Planning Commission: has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on January 20, 2004; and WHI REAS, a Notice of Intent to Adopt (NOI) has been filed with the County or Riverside Clerk of said applications, and the Planning Division has requested a public review period commencing on January 15, 2004 and extending to February 20, 2004; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows: Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2004 -01 has been prepared, submitted and reviewed in accordance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City's CEQA requirements. The report is complete and adequate in it's evaluation of all environmental effects of the project known as Lake Elsinore City Center Townhomes" Phase II. and associated discretionary approvals and will not result in any significant environmental affects with mitigation measures Based on the following findings; AGENDA ITEM NO. .23 PAGE L2 OF12&1' 1. Revisions in the project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant before a proposed mitigated negative declaration and initial study are released for public review ,-Sto would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur; and The applicant has made revisions to the project or has agreed to specific conditions which would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects of the project to a point where no significant effects would occur. 2. There is no substantial evidence, in the light of the whole record before the agency, that the project as revised may have significant effect on the environment. Pursuant to the evidence received in the light of the whole record presented to staff the project will not have a significant effect on the environment considering the applicable Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Monitoring Program. 3. Mitigation measures are required to ensure all potentially significant impacts are reduced to levels of insignificance. Mitigation measures have been required which will reduce significant environmental impacts to the level of insignificance. cance. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommends to the City Council that it finds that Negative Declaration No. 2004 -01 is complete and adequate and provides appropriate environmental documentation for the project and fully complies with the requirements of CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's environmental clearance procedures. NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City "so' of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND that the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore certify Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2004 -01. Ron LaPere, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission I hereby certify that the preceding resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at a meeting thereof conducted on January 20, 2004 by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: LaPere, Uhlry, Matthies, and O'Neal NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: Barnes ,..01 AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF f A`l 1 Robert A Brady, Secretary to the Planning Commission AGENDA ITEM' INO. PACE ATTACHMENT NO.5 Iftome NOTICE OF INTENT, NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND INITIAL STUDY AGENDA ITEM NO. ;L3 PAGE OF .ty of Lake Elsinore Planning Division 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 (909) 674 -3124 (909) 471 -1419 fax Notice of Intent to Adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration (In compliance with Section 15072 of the Public Resources Code) Filed With: Nx Office of Planning and Research xN County Clerk of Riverside County 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 2724 Gateway Drive Sacramento, CA 95814 Riverside, CA 92507 Project Title: GPA No. 2003 -03, Zone Change No. 2003 -02, Tentative Condominium Map No. 31532, Conditional Use Permit No. 2003 -08 and Residential Design Review No. 2003 -15. Project Location (Specific): The proposed project is located along the Interstate 15 Corridor, adjacent to and east of Grape Street and south of the Grape Street /Railroad Canyon Road Intersection and will be located on a vacant 5.33 acre site. The site topography consists of lower -lying relatively flat areas on a gradual east to west trending slope with significant ridgeline and hilltop areas occurring to the east and north. The site contains a combined vertical variation of approximately 60 feet between the extreme points of elevation on the property. coject Location (City): City of Lake Elsinore Description of Project: Project Location (County): Riverside County General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -03. The applicant is requesting approval to amend the General Plan Land Use Map by changing the land use designation of a 5.33 acre site from Very Low Density (VLD) residential, which allows .5 dwelling units /acre maximum to Medium Density (MD) residential which allows 12 dwelling units/ acre maximum. The review and analysis of this General Plan Amendment is pursuant to Government Code Section(s) 65350 - 65362, the Lake Elsinore General Plan, Chapter 17.84 (Amendments) and Chapter 17.92 (Hearings) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). • Zone Change No. 2003 -02. The applicant is requesting approval to change the Zoning of the subject property from (R -1) Single Family Residential to (R -2) Medium Density Residential. The review and analysis of the requested Change of Zone is pursuant to applicable chapters of the LEMC. • Tentative Condominium Map No. 31532. The applicant is requesting approval of Tentative Condominium Map No. 31532 pursuant to Section 16 "Subdivisions" of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), Chapter 17.30 (Condominium and Condo Conversions) of the LEMC, Chapter 17.24 (R -2, Medium Density Residential)of the LEMC and Section(s) 66424 and 66427 of the California Subdivision Map Act (CSMA). Residential Design Review No. R 2003 -15. The applicant is requesting Design Review consideration for the construction of ten (10) residential condominium buildings, which include six (6) individual townhomes per building and related improvements. The floor plans, architectural elevations, color and materials are in substantial conformance to the fourteen (14) condominium buildings recently approved by the City Council on September 16, 2003. Review is pursuant to Chapter 17.24 (R -2, Medium Density Residential) of the LEMC, Chapter 17.30 (Condominium and Condo Conversions) of the LEMC, Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards) of the LEMC, Chapter 17.66 (Parldng Requirements) of the LEMC, Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the LEMC and City of Lake Elsinore Landscape Guidelines. P.3 AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF • Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 2003 -07. The applicant is requesting the approval of a conditional use permit to allow for the establishment of 60 individually owned attached condominium townhomes which will participate in an underlying common area pursuant to Chapter 17.30 (Condominium and Condo Conversions) of the LEMC and Chapter 17.74 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2004 -01. The City of Lake Elsinore intends to adopt a Mitigate Negative Declaration (NIND) pursuant to the Guidelines established by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Name of Lead Agency: City of Lake Elsinore, Community Development Department, Planning Division Lead Agency Contact Person: Rolfe Preisendanz, Associate Planner Telephone Number: (909) 674 -3124 x 223 Address where document may be obtained: City of Lake Elsinore, 130 South Main Street, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Public Review Period: Begins: January 15, 2004 Ends: February 20, 2004 Anyone interested in this matter is invited to comment on the document by written response or by personal appearance at the hearing. Persons wishing to appear at the hearing should call: Rolfe M. Preisendanz, Associate Planner (909) 674 -3124 x 223 Signed: �\p h4� � mando G. Villa Title: Planning and Code Enforement Manager `%Wool AGENDA ITEM NO. „� PAGE �pF� Form A Notice of Completion & Environmental Document Transmittal SCH # Mail to: State Clearinghouse, PO Box 3044, Sacramento, CA 95812 -3044 916/445 -0613 Project Title: "Lake Elsinore City Center Townhomes" Phase II Lead Agency: City of Lake Elsinore Contact Person: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Street Address: 130 S. Main Street Phone: (909) 674 -3124 ext. 223 City: Lake Elsinore Zip: 92530 County: Riverside -------------------- — -------------------- Project Location: County: Riverside City/Nearest Community: Murrieta Cross Streets: Railroad Cayon Road and Grape Street Zip Code: 92530 Total Acres: 5.33 Assessor's Parcel No. 363 - 240 -002 003. 004. 008 Section: Twp. Range: Base: Within 2 Miles: State Hwy #: Interstate 15 Waterways: Airports: Railways: Schools: — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Document Type: CEQA: ❑ NOP ❑ Supplement/Subsequent EIR NEPA: ❑ NOI Other: ❑ Joint Document ❑ Early Cons (Prior SCH No.) ❑ EA ❑ Final Document N Neg Dec ❑ Other ❑ Draft EIS ❑ Other ❑ Draft EIR — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ❑ FONSI — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Local Action Type: ❑ General Plan Update ❑ Specific Plan ❑ Rezone ❑ Annexation © General Plan Amendment ❑ Master Plan ❑ Prezone ❑ Redevelopment ❑ General Plan Element ❑ Planned Unit Development N Use Permit ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ Community Plan N Site Plan ❑X Land Division (Subdivision, etc.) ❑X Other Zone Change Development Type: X1 Residential: Units 60 Acres 5.33 ❑ Office: Sqft. Acres Employees ❑ Commercial: Sgft. Acres Employees ❑ Industrial: Sgft. Acres Employees ❑ Educational ❑ Recreational ❑ Water Facilities: ❑ Transportation: ❑ Mining: ❑ Power: ❑ Waste Treatment: ❑ Hazardous Waste ❑ Other: Type Type. Type Type. MGD Watts — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Funding (approx.): Federal $ State $ Total $ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Project Issues Discussed in Document: © Aesthetic/Visual © Agricultural Land ❑X Air Quality © Archeological/Historical ❑ Coastal Zone © Drainage /Absorption N Economic /Jobs l-1 Fiscal ❑ Flood Plain/Flooding ❑ Forest Land/Fire Hazard N Geologic /Seismic ❑ Minerals © Noise N Population/Housing Balance N Public Services/Facilities © Recreation/Parks N Schools/Universities ❑ Septic Systems N Sewer Capacity 0 Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grading ❑ Solid Waste N Toxic/Hazardous ❑X Traffic /Circulation ❑ Vegetation ❑ Water Quality ❑X Water Supply /Groundwater N Wetland/Riparian N Wildlife © Growth Inducing © Landuse © Cumulative Effects ❑ Other — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Present Land Use /Zoning/General Plan Designation: Vacant / (R -1) Single Family Residential / Very Low Density (VLD) — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Project Description: General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -03, Zone Change No. 2003 -02, Tentative Condominium Map 31532, Residential Design Review No. R 2003 -15 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2003 -08. Revised 3 -31 -99 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 23 ���11,, PAGE OF Reviewing Agencies Checklist Resources Agency Boating & Waterways Coastal Commission Coastal Conservancy Colorado River Board Conservation V Fish & Game Forestry & Fire Protection ✓ Office of Historic Preservation Parks & Recreation Reclamation Board S.F. Bay Conservation & Development Commission Water Resources (DWR) Business, Transportation & Housing Aeronautics California Highway Patrol V✓ CALTRANS District # L Department of Transportation Planning (headquarters) Housing & Community Development Food & Agriculture Health & Welfare Health Services Form A, continued KEY S = Document sent by lead agency X = Document sent by SCH ✓ = Suggested distribution Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board California Waste Management Board SWRCB: Clean Water Grants SWRCB: Delta Unit _SWRCB: Water Quality SWRCB: Water Rights Regional WQCB # ( Youth & Adult Corrections Corrections Independent Commissions & Offices Energy Commission ✓ Native American Heritage Commission Public Utilities Commission Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy State Lands Commission Tahoe Regional Planning Agency State & Consumer Services ✓ Other L A F C O General Services OLA (Schools) — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Public Review Period (to be filled in by lead agency) Starting Date January 15, 2004 Signature�'�' -------------------- Lead Agency (Complete if applicable): Consulting Firm: Address: City/State /Zip: Contact: Phone: (� Applicant: Daigle Homes, LLC. Address: 28991 Old Town Front Street Suite 207 City/State /Zip: Temecula, CA 92590 Phone: 9( O9 ) 699 -5860 Ending Date February 20, 2004 Date g i. ,. �� Z oo — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — For SCH Use Only: Date Received at SCH _ Date Review Starts Date to Agencies Date to SCH Clearance Date Notes: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-03 ZONE CHANGE NO. 2003-02 TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP NO. 31532 MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003-08 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2003-15 INITIAL STUDY FOR MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION No. 2004 -01 Prepared By: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Applicant: DAIGLE HOMES, LLC. 28991 Old Town Front Street Suite 203 Temecula, CA 92591 JANUARY 2004 AGENDA ITEfM NO. 3 PAGE ► OFD I. INTRODUCTION A. PURPOSE This document is an Initial Study for evaluation of environmental impacts resulting from implementation 1"00 of proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -03, Zone Change No. 2003 -02, Tentative Condominium Map No. 31532, Conditional Use Permit No. 2003 -08, Residential Design Review No. 2002 -15 and Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2004 -01 as requested by Daigle Homes, LLC. For purposes of this document, this application will be called the "proposed project ". B. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT REQUIREMENTS As defined by Section 15063 of the State California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, an Initial Study is prepared primarily to provide the Lead Agency with information to use as the basis for determining whether an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative Declaration, or Mitigated Negative Declaration would be appropriate for providing the necessary environmental documentation and clearance for any proposed project. According to Section 15065, an EIR is deemed appropriate for a particular proposal if the following conditions occur: • The proposal has the potential to substantially degrade quality of the environment • The proposal has the potential to achieve short -term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long -term environmental goals. • The proposal has possible environmental effects that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable. • The proposal could cause direct or indirect adverse effects on human beings. According to Section 15070(a), a Negative Declaration is deemed appropriate if the proposal would not result in any significant effect on the environment. According to Section 15070(b), a Mitigated Negative Declaration is deemed appropriate if it is determined that though a proposal could result in a significant effect, mitigation measures are available to reduce these significant effects to insignificant levels. This Initial Study has determined that the proposed project will result in potentially significant environmental impacts and therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration is deemed as the appropriate document to provide necessary environmental evaluations and clearance, and recommend mitigation measures required to reduce any potentially significant impact to a level of insignificance. This Initial Study and Mitigation Negative Declaration are prepared in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended (Public Resources Code, Section 21000 et. seq.); Section 15070 of the State Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15000, et. seq.); applicable requirements of the City of Lake Elsinore; and the regulations, requirements, and procedures of any other responsible public agency or an agency with jurisdiction by law. The City of Lake Elsinore City Council is designated the Lead Agency, in accordance with Section 15050 of the CEQA Guidelines. The Lead Agency is the public agency which has the principal responsibility for carrying out or approving a project which may have significant effects upon the environment. -./ AGENDA ITEM NO. '�_3 PAGE C. INTENDED USES OF INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION This Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration are informational documents which are intended to 100�_ inform City of Lake Elsinore decision - makers, other responsible or interested agencies, and the general public of potential environmental effects of the proposed application. The environmental review process has been established to enable public agencies to evaluate environmental consequences and to examine and implement methods of eliminating or reducing any potentially adverse impacts. While CEQA requires that consideration be given to avoiding environmental damage, the Lead Agency and other responsible public agencies must balance adverse environmental effects against other public objectives, including economic and social goals. The City of Lake Elsinore City Council, as the Lead Agency, has determined that environmental clearance for the proposed project can be provided with a Mitigated Negative Declaration. The Initial Study and Notice of Availability and Intent to Adopt prepared for the Mitigated Negative Declaration will be circulated for a period of 20 days for public and agency review. Comments received on the document will be considered by the Lead Agency before it acts on the proposed project. D. CONTENTS OF INITIAL STUDY This Initial Study is organized to facilitate a basic understanding of the existing setting and environmental implications of the proposed project. I. INTRODUCTION presents an introduction to the entire report. This section identifies City of Lake Elsinore contact persons involved in the process, scope of environmental review, environmental procedures, and incorporation by reference documents. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION describes the proposed project. A description of discretionary approvals and permits required for project implementation is also included. III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM contains the City's Environmental Checklist Form. The checklist form presents results of the environmental evaluation for the proposed project and those issue areas that would have either a significant impact, potentially significant impact, or no impact. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS evaluates each response provided in the environmental checklist form. Each response checked in the checklist form is discussed and supported with sufficient data and analysis. As appropriate, each response discussion describes and identifies specific impacts anticipated with project implementation. In this section, mitigation measures are also recommended, as appropriate, to reduce adverse impacts to levels of less than significance. V. MANDATORY FINDINGS presents Mandatory Findings of Significance in accordance with Section 15065 of the CEQA Guidelines. VI. PERSONS AND ORGANIZATIONS CONSULTED identifies those persons consulted and involved in preparation of this Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration. VII. REFERENCES lists bibliographical materials used in preparation of this document. E. SCOPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS For evaluation of environmental impacts, each question from the Environmental Checklist Form is stated and responses are provided according to the analysis undertaken as part of the Initial Study. All responses will take into account the whole action involved, including offsite as well as onsite, cumulative /"` as well as project - level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. Project impacts and effects will be evaluated and quantified, when appropriate. To each question, there are four possible responses, including: 1. No Impact: A "No Impact" response is adequately supported if the referenced information sources 3 AGENDA ITEM NO..P ,..� PAGE. OF,'/- 0 � i show that the impact simply does not apply to the proposed project. 2. Less Than Significant Impact: Development associated with project implementation will have the potential to impact the environment. These impacts, however, will be less than the levels of thresholds that are considered significant and no additional analysis is required. 3. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: This applies where incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact" The Lead Agency must describe the mitigation measures and explain how the measures reduce the effect to a less than significant level. 4. Potentially Significant Impact: Future implementation will have impacts that are considered significant and additional analysis and possibly an EIR are required to identify mitigation measures that could reduce these impacts to less than significant levels. Regarding mitigation measures, it is not the intent of this document to "overlap" or restate conditions of approval that are established for the project. Additionally, those other standard requirements and regulations that any development must comply with, that are outside the City's jurisdiction, are also not considered mitigation measures and therefore, will not be identified in this document. F. TIERED DOCUMENTS, INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE, AND TECHNICAL STUDIES Information, findings, and conclusions contained reference of tiered documentation, and a technical project, which are discussed in the following section. 1. Tiered Documents in this document are based on incorporation by study that have been prepared for the proposed As permitted in Section 15152(a) of the CEQA Guidelines, information and discussions from other documents can be included into this document. Tiering is defined as follows: "Tiering refers to using the analysis of general matters contained in a broader EIR (such as the one prepared for a general plan or policy statement) with later EIRs and negative declarations on narrower projects; incorporating by reference the general discussions from the broader EIR; and concentrating the later EIR or negative declaration solely on the issues specific to the later project." For this document, the "Lake Elsinore General Plan Final EIR" (prepared in 1990) serves as the broader document, since it analyzes the entire City area, which includes the proposed project site. However, as discussed, site - specific impacts, which the broader document (Lake Elsinore General Plan Final EIR) can not adequately address, may occur for certain issue areas. This Initial Study and Negative Declaration identify potentially significant impacts. This document therefore, evaluates each environmental issue alone and will rely upon analysis contained within the Lake Elsinore General Plan Final EIR with respect to remaining issue areas. Tiering also allows this document to comply with Section 15152(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, which discourages redundant analyses, as follows: "Agencies are encouraged to tier the environmental analyses which they prepare for separate but related projects including the general plans, zoning changes, and development projects. This approach can eliminate repetitive discussion of the same issues and focus the later EIR or negative declaration on the actual issues ripe for decision at each level of environmental review. Tiering is appropriate when the sequence of analysis is from an EIR prepared for a general plan, policy or program to an EIR or negative declaration for another plan, policy, or program of lesser scope, or to a site - specific EIR or negative declaration." Further, Section 15152(d) of the CEQA Guidelines states: AGENDA ITEM CIO. _L3 4 \ PAGE. OF L.� 1_-./ IT an EIR has been prepared and certified for a program, plan, policy, or ordinance consistent ,,koh the requirements of this section, any lead agency for a later project pursuant to or consistent "l, ii the program, plan, policy, or ordinance should limit the EIR or negative declaration on the later �..� ;; C! to effects which: „ cte not examined as significant effects on the environment in the prior EIR; or rr susceptible to substantial reduction or avoidance by the choice of specific revisions in the project, by the imposition of conditions, or other means." l eotporation By Reference '�-poration by reference is a procedure for reducing the size of EIRs and is most appropriate for Ming long, descriptive, or technical materials that provide general background information, but ,.;r contribute directly to the specific analysis of the project itself. This procedure is particularly iISHu1 when an EIR or Negative Declaration relies on a broadly- drafted EIR for its evaluation of ',alive impacts of related projects (Las Virgenes Homeowners Federation v. County of Los Angele 177 Ca.3d 300]). If an EIR or Negative Declaration relies on information from a supporting ;,.iti ghat is available to the public, the EIR or Negative Declaration cannot be deemed unsupported dente or analysis (San Francisco Ecolo,gy Center v. City and County of San Francisco [1975, 48 Ca.3d -)95]). This document incorporates by reference the document from which it is tiered, the Lake re General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report, prepared in 1990. This document will be ed to as the "General Plan EIR ". t: an EIR or Negative Declaration incorporates a document by reference, the incorporation must y with Section 15150 of the CEQA Guidelines as follows: the incorporated document must be available to the public or be a matter of public record r (CEQA Guidelines Section 15150[a]). The General Plan EIR shall be made available, along with this document, at the City of Lake Elsinore, Community Development Department, 130 South ivlain Street, Lake Elsinore CA 92330, ph. (909) 674 -3124. ilis document must be available for inspection by the public at an office of the lead agency .EQA Guidelines Section 15150[b]). This document is available at the City of Lake Elsinore, ;ommunity Development Department, 130 South Main Street, Lake Elsinore CA 92330, ph. (909) 674 -3124. !'his document must summarize the portion of the document being incorporated by reference or ,riefly describe information that cannot be summarized. Furthermore, this document must describe the relationship between the incorporated information and the analysis in the General Plan EIR (CEQA Guidelines Section 15150[c]). As discussed above, the General Plan EIR addresses the entire City of Lake Elsinore and provides background and inventory information and data which apply to the project site. Incorporated information and /or data will be cited in the appropriate sections. i_'his document must include the State identification number of the incorporated document (CEQA Guidelines Section 15150[d]). The State Clearinghouse Number for the General Plan F]R is 91122065. fo lbe material to be incorporated in this document will include general background information 'CEQA Guidelines Section 15150[f]). /`` 3. Technical Studies 1 � �;_-1 ;sed Surveys for the Quino Checkerspot Butterfly and the Coastal California Knatcatcher were p,vpared by L & L Environmental, Inc. in June and July 2003 respectfully, to determine the prese 3 5 AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF or absence of the federally endangered species and to evaluate the effect the proposed project would have on the these species. Additionally, a Traffic Impact Study, prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc. in June 2003 evaluated the Elsinore City Center Condominium Project development from a traffic circulation perspective. - sool AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 PAGE, 0 OF II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. PROJECT LOCATION AND SETTING The proposed project is located along the Interstate 15 Corridor, adjacent to and east of Grape Street and south of the Grape Street /Railroad Canyon Road Intersection and will be located on a vacant 5.33 acre site. The site topography consists of lower -lying relatively flat areas on a gradual east to west trending slope with significant ridgeline and hilltop areas occurring to the east and north. The site contains a combined vertical variation of approximately 60 feet between the extreme points of elevation on the property. B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003-03 The applicant is requesting to change the General Plan Designation of the proposed site from Very Low Density (VLD) residential, which allows .5 dwelling units /acre maximum to Medium Density (MD) residential which allows 12 dwelling units/ acre maximum. ZONE CHANGE NO 2003 -02 In order to maintain consistency with the proposed General Plan and to develop the site with the density proposed, the applicant is also requesting a Zone Change from (R -1) Single Family Residential to (R -2) Medium Density Residential. TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP 31532 14�1 The applicant requests approval to establish a proposed residential condominium community. Condominium projects are defined as "subdivisions" pursuant to Section 66424 of the California Subdivision Map Act (CSMA). Consequently, this project requires Planning Commission and City Council consideration pursuant to the requirements of Section 16 "Subdivisions" of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). The condominium concept would allow the applicant to be able offer individual dwelling units for sale within the building structures as defined by the Tentative Condominium Map No. 31532, while sharing common interest, ownership and maintenance responsibilities within the common areas. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003 -08 Pursuant to the Chapter 17.30 Section 17.30.020 (Permits Required) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), the applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit for the establishment of the subject condominium project. As allowed in the LEMC the Planning Commission is empowered to grant and to deny applications for Conditional Use Permits and to impose reasonable conditions upon the granting of Conditional Use Permits. RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. R 2003 -15 The applicant is proposing to develop the vacant 5.33 acre site with ten (10) two story wood framed buildings, totaling approximately 100,920 square feet. This proposal will be the second phase of a previously approved 84 unit Condominium Project to the north. Each building will be approximately 10,092 square feet and will comprise of six (6) individually owned attached single- family condominium dwelling units. The attached condominium units will range in size from a one (1) bedroom -864 square foot unit to a three bedroom 1,450 square foot unit. Each building will also include six (6) enclosed attached garage - parking spaces. The ten (10) buildings will be located on the final terraced pad ascending soptherly above the Grape Street elevation. Access to the site will be made available by way of a proposed driveway located off "A" Street and the existing two (2) driveways located off of Grape Street. 7 AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE 0 OF III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND • 1. Project Title: • General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -03 • Zone Change No. 2003 -02 • Tentative Condominium Map No. 31532 • Conditional Use Permit No. 2003 -08 • Residential Design Review No. 2003 -15 • Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2004 -01 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Lake Elsinore; 130 South Main Street; Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Rolfe M. Preisendanz, Associate Planner (909)674 -3124 ext 223. 4. Project Location: The proposed condominium project will be located on a vacant 5.33 acre site east of Grape Street and south of the Railroad Canyon Road /Grape Street intersection, Assessor Parcel Number (s) 363 - 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009, & 016. 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Daigle Homes, LLC., 28991 Old Town Front Street, Suite 203, Temecula CA 92591 6. General Plan Designation: (VLD) Very Low Density (.5 dwelling units /acre) 7. Zoning: (R -1) Single - Family Residential District 8. Description of Project: The applicant requests approval to establish a proposed residential condominium community on 5.33 vacant acre site. The project will be the second phase of the 84 unit condominium project previously approved. The scope of the proposed project will consist of ten (10) two story wood framed buildings, totaling approximately 100,920 square feet. The architectural design and floor plan will be in substantial conformance of the previously approved project. Correspondingly, each building will be approximately 10,092 square feet and will comprise of six (6) individually owned attached single - family condominium dwelling units. The attached condominium units will range in size from a one (1) bedroom -864 square foot unit to a three bedroom 1,450 square foot unit. Each building will also include six (6) enclosed attached garage - parking spaces. The ten (10) buildings will be located on the final terraced pad ascending southerly above the Grape Street elevation. Access to the site will be made available by way of a proposed driveway located off "A" Street and the existing two (2) driveways located off of Grape Street. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The proposed project is located along the Interstate 15 Corridor, adjacent to and east of Grape Street and south of the Grape Street /Railroad Canyon Road Intersection and will be located on a vacant 5.33 acre site. The site topography consists of lower -lying relatively flat areas on a gradual east to west trending slope with significant ridgeline and hilltop areas occurring to the east and north and is generally surrounded by single family residences and vacant land, with the exception of the Wal Mart Shopping Center to the north of the site and Interstate 15 along the west boundary of the property. 10. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required: NA. AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE - 0 OF41� Ao—� ;: L, RONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED :nmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least .:r that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. c:,thetics _7 Biological Resources r ...� /,ards & Hazardous I neral Resources 1 ablic Services ,!sties / Service Systems �'IRJINATION: ,a.is of this initial evaluation: ❑ Agricultural Resources ❑ Air Quality ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Geology/ Soils ❑ Hydrology / Water Quality ❑ Land Use/ Planning ❑ Noise ❑ Population / Housing ❑ Recreation ❑ Transportation / Traffic ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a IAT'IVE DECLARATION will be prepared. fiat although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there 1)ot be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or „r , (1 to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an Ni VIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. f� ! ghat the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially - icant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been i,itely analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been r sed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An IRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that in to be addressed. at although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because ;t"ritially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE ;I ,:RATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant ;t earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures A c imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. 1r Preisendanz, Associate Planner Date AGENDA ITEM NO. 9 RAGE 3 O i Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic X vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock X outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its X d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime X views in the area? wuum uir P ry cut.4. a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the X Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural X use or a Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or X nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? III'. AIR QUALITY. Where'avatlable, the_siobcauce criteria establtkhecl by:the applicable air quality management'Of aiz pollution. coix#i "tl strict,ivay,be relied'iipon,'to make the following determinations. Would the. " ro`ect a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of X the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air X quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality X standard (including releasing emissions, which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial X pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a X substantial number of people? AGENDA ITEM NO. 10 PAGE - 6- OFaL4 /"'1 a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of X loss. iniurv. or death involving: 11 AGENDA ITEM ,NO. 2 �... PAGE OF=—.L Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporation Impact Impact IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES;..W ' th, , ra ec't's .. a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, X policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, X policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited X to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or X migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree X reservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community X Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional or state habitat conservation plan? V 'CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would die ro`ect: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined X in 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource X pursuant to 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique X geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those X interred outside of formal cemeteries? a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of X loss. iniurv. or death involving: 11 AGENDA ITEM ,NO. 2 �... PAGE OF=—.L IN000' AGENDA ITEM NO. -. 12 PAGE g 0 OF Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporation Impact Impact i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning map, issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other X substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? X iii) Seismic - related ground failure, including liquefaction? X iv Landslides? X b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence liquefaction or collapse? X d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -1 -B of the Uniform Building Code X (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater X disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARD()I S 1 ERI�LS.,'Wou d:the 'fit ect " .. a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use X or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonable foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the X release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or X waste within one - quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government code Section 65962.5 and, as a X result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles or a public airport or X public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? IN000' AGENDA ITEM NO. -. 12 PAGE g 0 OF VIII. HYDROLOCYAND`W.A'I'gR QI_TALITY., Wquld.the ro'ect: . . Less Than a) Violate any water quality standards or waste X Significant discharge requirements? Potentially With Less Than b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporation Impact Impact f) For a project within the vicinity of a private in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local airstrip, would the project result in a safety X hazard for people residing or working in the X rate of pre - existing nearby wells would drop to project area? a level which would not support existing land g) Impair implementation of or physically uses or planned uses for which permits have interfere with an adopted emergency response X plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of the site or area, including through the of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a including where wildlands are adjacent to X X urbanized areas or where residences are erosion or siltation on- or off -site? intermixed with wildlands? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern VIII. HYDROLOCYAND`W.A'I'gR QI_TALITY., Wquld.the ro'ect: . . a) Violate any water quality standards or waste X discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge, such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production X rate of pre - existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a X manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or X substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off -site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide X substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood hazard X Boundary of Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within 100 -year flood hazard area structures, which would impede or redirect X flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, X including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X IX.LAND.uSE.tND.PI.ANNINGoii�l a) Physically divide an established community? X 13 AGENDA ITEM PAGE 12 OF AEaEMA ITEM NO. .... -_ --• 14OF -/_L PAGE �-'�S,Z_ Nftaol '../" Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporation Impact Impact b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local X coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community X conservation plan? X. MINERAL;RESOLTRGES. , qo Oth . ro'ecti vt a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be a value to the X region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site X delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? XL,. 1,NOIW Would the prole- `resutt a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the X local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundbome vibration or X roundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels X existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity X above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose X people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? 0 For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people X residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X1T. POPiTLAT10N ANDHOI3SING. Wouldthe °i,r'o`eet:: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for X example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of X replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement X housing elsewhere? AEaEMA ITEM NO. .... -_ --• 14OF -/_L PAGE �-'�S,Z_ Nftaol '../" Issues Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Mitigation Less Than Significant No --._ — r-----r — :,€ a time's or'otliet °" erlormance ob`ectives jot an ,;.of the ,ttblii seivilcs . .. !- „ ., ... a Fire protection? X b Police protection? X c Schools? X d Parks? X e Other public facilities? X XIV. RECREATION. a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities, such that substantial X physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities X or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? XV. TRANSPORTATION % I RAFFIC: Would€ the Project: a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of x vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for X designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial X safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm X equipment)? e Result in inadequate emergency access? X Result in inadequate parking capacity? X g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation X (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE,,SYSTEMS. Wouici the: ro'ect:; a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control X Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction X of which could cause significant environmental effects? 15 AGENDA ITEM NO. IV-TCLW � • h► _� 16. MANllATC?RY,FINDITN,GIF° SLGNFI`CANCE. .,.... §, Less Than a) Does the project have the potential to degrade Significant the quality of the environment, substantially Potentially With ESignificant Significant Mitigation No Issues Impact Incorporation Impact c) Require or result in the construction of new X eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce storm water drainage facilities or expansion of X the number or restrict the range of a rare or existing facilities, the construction of which endangered plant or animal or eliminate could cause significant environmental effects? important examples of the major periods of d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve California history or prehistory? the project from existing entitlements and X b) Does the project have impacts that are resources or are new or expanded entitlements individually limited, but cumulatively needed? considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable" e) Result in a determination by the wastewater means that the incremental effects of a project treatment provider, which serves or may serve X are considerable when viewed in connection the project that it has adequate capacity to X with the effects of past projects, the effects of serve the project's projected demand in other current projects, and the effects of addition to the provider's existing probable future projects.) commitments? c) Does the project have environmental effects, f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted which will cause substantial adverse effects on capacity to accommodate the project's solid X X human beings, either directly or indirectly? waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes X and regulations related to solid waste? 16. MANllATC?RY,FINDITN,GIF° SLGNFI`CANCE. .,.... §, . a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to X eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project X are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on X human beings, either directly or indirectly? rn A0 ENDA ITE(M�, NO. 16 "l OF PACE IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS This section provides an evaluation of the impact categories and questions contained in the Environmental Checklist. I. AESTHETICS a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Less Than Significant Impact The proposed condominium project will not result in any significant visual impact to scenic vistas. The condominium project will be designed along the hillside terrain. The project requires Design Review approval by the City, which ensures that the proposed condominium project will be designed as aesthetically attractive as possible and feasible. b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? No Impact There are no State Scenic Highways located near the project site. Sensitive scenic resources are not located onsite or within neighboring areas. There is no relevance to this issue. c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? Less Than Significant Impact The condominium project will be consistent with the existing architecture within the area and will incorporate full title roofs, with colored stucco walls. Individual glass screens will be provided as noise attenuation. A tot lot, BBQ and picnic area will also be provided. The project requires Design Review approval by the City, which ensures that the proposed condominium project will be designed as aesthetically attractive as possible and feasible. d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Less Than Significant Impact New lights from parking, vehicles, and the condominiums themselves will be generated, which will contribute to the amount of light and glare found in the project vicinity. Impacts, however, are not considered significant. Much of the general area is already urbanized and amounts of light and glare already exist in the vicinity and the I -15 Freeway. Night light is also generated at the City Center shopping center. Consequently, the perception of new and additional light disturbances is lessened. No significant impacts are anticipated. MITIGATION MEASURES None Required II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non - agricultural use? No Impact The project site is not classified as either, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance by the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency. There is no relevance to this issue. b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? No Impact AGENDA ITEM NO. 17 © 1 PAGE � OF a) The proposed project site is not under a Williamson Act contract. No conflicts are known to exist. c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non - agricultural use? No Impact The proposed project will not convert any Farmland to any non - agricultural use. "O MITIGATION MEASURES None required. III. AIR QUALITY a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? No Impact The proposed project will not develop any uses that will directly generate additional air pollutants. The project will not conflict with any air quality plan. b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? No Impact Likewise, air quality standards will not be violated; the project will not contribute to any air quality violation. The proposed project will not result in any significant adverse air quality impact. c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? No Impact All of Southern California is within a non - attainment region for certain pollutants. It is concluded, however, that because the proposed project will not create any incremental impact, it will not significantly contribute to the non - attainment status of the region. Additionally, conditions of approval placed on the project will reduce the quantity of particulate mater and other pollutants emitted during the grading and construction phase of the proposed project through watering graded surfaces and planted ground cover as dust palliatives, in accordance with SQANM Rule No. 403. d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Less Than Significant Impact with mitigations The project area is bounded by the I -15 Freeway to the west, vacant areas to the south and east, and commercial development to the north. There is currently a very low concentration of custom homes to the south and east of the proposed site which could be considered sensitive receptors. Considering these sensitive receptors the following mitigation will be required. e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? No Impact The proposed project will not result in activities that typically create objectionable odors. MITIGATION MEASURES The design of efficient and direct traffic flow patterns on the project site can help reduce the quantity of air pollutants generated by minimizing the places in the roadway system where automobiles would be idling unnecessarily. The project traffic study, entitled Elsinore City Center Condo Traffic Impact Study, prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc. on June 19, 2003 contains internal �r circulation design guidelines to be utilized in creating an efficient roadway system. 23 AGENDA ITEM NO. 18 PAGE OF Monitoring Milestone: Project Design Responsible Implementing Agency: City of Lake Elsinore Planning and Engineering 00-1- Divisions Timing: Prior to issuance of building permits. Verifications: 2. Minimize particulate emissions from construction activities through a). suspension of grading during first and second stage smog alerts; b). wash trucks leaving the site; c) maintain construction equipment by keeping them tuned; d) use clean, low sulfur fuel for equipment; e) require watering of active project areas with multiple daily applications if necessary; f) require trucks to maintain two feet of freeboard; g) require all trucks hauling dirt , sand, oil or other lose substances and building materials to be covered; h) pave construction access roads; j) develop program for rapid clean up of street debris after a major event; and k) prohibit outdoor storage if from particulate matter. Monitoring Milestone: On -site construction inspection. Responsible Implementing Agency City of Lake Elsinore Building and Safety Division. Timing: During project construction. IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Less Than Significant Impact Focused surveys entitled, Focused Survey for the Quino CheckersFot ButterflX and Focused Survey for the Coastal Gnatcatcher prepared in June and July 2003 respectfully, by L & L Environmental, Inc., was conducted on the Daigle Development site in the City of Lake Elsinore, County of Riverside, California. The purpose of the study was to determine the presence or absence of the federally endangered species, and to evaluate the effect the proposed project may have on this species. Based on the results of Focused Survey for the Quino CheckersFot Butterllvit was concluded that it is highly unlikely a Quino Checkerspot Butterfly adult would ever visit the site. Likewise, the Focused Survey for the Coastal Gnatcatcher concluded that the site is currently unoccupied by the California Gnatcatcher. b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Less Than Significant Impact Results of the focused survey referenced herein indicate that no riparian or other sensitive natural communities have been identified in the local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Wildlife Services. c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? No Impact 'W-1- Wetlands are not located onsite. There is no relevance to this issue. d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of 19 AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGES L OF-1-26. native wildlife nursery sites? No Impact The affected site is not known to be a wildlife corridor. The site is neighbored by existing development and the I -15 Freeway which further support the finding that the site is not a functional wildlife corridor. There is no relevance to this issue. e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? No Impact The City of Lake Elsinore does not have any local policies or ordinances to protect biological resources of local concern; therefore, the proposed project will not have any adverse impact on locally protected biological resources. f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? No Impact At this time, there are no known HCPs or NCCPs encompassing the affected site or areas adjacent to the site. There is no relevance to this issue. MITIGATION MEASURES None required. V. CULTURAL RESOURCES a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? Less Than Significant Impact with mitigations Pursuant to the Status Report Letter from LSA Associates, Inc, dated January 12, 2004 historical 'moll resources exist within the project area. Additionally, the Status Report concluded that there were also records of prehistoric resources to the north of the parcel. Considering that historical resources have been noted within the site area, the Status Report recommends that all construction - related grading activities be monitored in order to recover any resources discovered. Mitigation has been added in order to insure compliance with this recommendation. b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to S 15064.5? Less Than Significant Impact with mitigations Likewise, pursuant to the Status Report Letter from LSA Associates, Inc, historical resources and the potential for paleontological resources exist within the project area. Additionally, the Status Report concluded that there were also records of prehistoric resources to the north of the parcel. Considering the potential for historical and paleontological resources within the site area, the Status Report recommends that all construction - related grading activities be monitored in order to recover any resources discovered. A mitigation has been added in order to insure compliance with this recommendation. c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Less Than Significant Impact with mitigations Likewise, pursuant to the Status Report Letter from LSA Associates, Inc, the potential for paleontological resources exist within the project area. Additionally, the Status Report concluded that there were also records of prehistoric resources to the north of the parcel. Considering the potential for paleontological resources within the site area, the Status Report recommends that all construction - related grading activities be monitored in order to recover any resources discovered. A mitigation has been added in N%NOW order to insure compliance with this recommendation. AGENDA ITEM NO. 20 PAGE OF 1 If- d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Less Than Si ng ificant Impact with mitigations Likewise, pursuant to the Status Report Letter from LSA Associates, Inc, historical resources and the potential for paleontological resources exist within the project area. Additionally, the Status Report concluded that there were also records of prehistoric resources to the north of the parcel. Considering the potential for historical and paleontological resources within the site area, the Status Report recommends that all construction - related grading activities be monitored in order to recover any resources discovered. A mitigation has been added in order to insure compliance with this recommendation. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The applicant shall monitor all grading activities of the site. If any cultural resources are uncovered by such grading activities the applicant shall immediately cease all activities until such time that a qualified archaeologist is contacted and an inspection of the resources is completed. The applicant shall not continue grading until such time that the City has given approval and clearance to proceed. Monitoring Milestone: Project Grading and construction. Responsible Implementing Agency: City of Lake Elsinore Planning and Engineering Divisions Tim�inp: During any activities which will disturb the existing soil. Verifications: The applicant shall inform the City in writing who will be monitoring the site. VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning map, issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. No Impact The project site, according to the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan (Exhibit VI -2), is not located within an Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map. There is no relevance to this issue. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? Less Than Significant Impact The project site is located close to the Whittier - Elsinore Fault. Therefore, the project site has been and will continue to be directly affected by seismic activity to some degree. Given that the project site is not within any seismic study area, it can be concluded the site will not be affected by ground shaking anymore than any other area in seismically active Southern California. Compliance with standard measures contained in the UBC and City Municipal Code regarding structure and construction. iii) Seismic - related ground failure, including liquefaction? No Impact The project site, according to the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan is not located within any areas that are characterized by liquefaction. There is no relevance to this issue. iv) Landslides? Less Than Significant Impact AGENDA ITEM NO. 21 � PAGE I :� Historical landslides are not known to have occurred in the past. Therefore, the project vicinity is not characterized as a landslide hazard area. Significant impacts are not expected. b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Less Than Significant Impact As with any development, soil erosion can result during construction, as grading and construction can loosen surface soils and make soils susceptible to effects of wind and water movement across the surface. Impacts, however, are not considered significant since erosion will be controlled onsite in accordance with City standards. c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Less Than Significant Impact The project site, according to the City of the Lake Elsinore General; Plan, is not characterized by unstable soils and is capable of supporting future development with compliance of applicable construction techniques. d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -1 -B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? Less Than Significant Impact As discussed, soils are supportive of development and will not create substantial risks to life and /or property. e) Have soils capable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? No Impact The project will not be serviced by septic tanks or other alternative wastewater disposal systems. There is N%U*o no relevance to this issue. MITIGATION MEASURES None required VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials? No Impact The proposed project will not handle any hazardous material. There is no relevance to this issue. b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonable foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? No Impact Likewise, there is no significant potential for release of hazardous materials from accidental conditions. c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one - quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? No Impact There are no schools within a'A mile of the affected areas. There is no relevance to this issue. d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to -"go* Government code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? No Impact 22 AGENDA ITEM NO.� PAGE OFD The project site is not located on any hazardous materials site as designated by Government Code Section 65962.5. There is no opportunity to create a significant hazard to the public or environment. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles or a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? No Impact The project site is not located within any airport land use plan. There is no relevance to this issue. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? No Impact The project site is not located near any private airstrip. There is no relevance to this issue. g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? No Impact There are no known emergency response plans or emergency evacuation plans applicable to the project site. The proposed project will not conflict with any emergency response or evacuation plans. h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? No Impact The project site has not experienced past wildland fires. The project site is neighbored by existing development and the I -15 Freeway. There is no relevance to this issue. '� MITIGATION MEASURES None required. VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation The proposed project will create urban pollutants typical of any development, including oils and other substances. To ensure water quality standards and discharge requirements will not be violated a Notice of Intent from the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board, in accordance with the City's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES) permit is required. Compliance with NPDES and Best Management Practices (BMP) regulations is required since the 5.33 -acre project site exceeds five acres. Compliance with NPDES and BMP regulations ensures that significant water quality impacts will not result with the project and violation of standards and requirements will not occur. b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge, such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre - existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? Less Than Significant Impact The project site is not considered a significant groundwater recharge area given its close proximity to the I -15 Freeway and its hilly terrain. The proposed project will not include activities that will substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere with regional groundwater recharge. Significant impacts will not result. AGENDA ITEM NO. .s ;Z 3 —• 23 l PAGE _11 cwj c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? Less Than Significant Impact Pursuant to the findings analyzed within the drainage study prepared on January 14, 2004 by MLB Professional Civil Engineer and Land Surveyor entitled Drainage Study TTM 31532 City Center Condominiums, onsite and upslope drainage flows will be conveyed into the public system located along Grape Street. Significant impacts are not expected. d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off -site? Less Than Significant Impact Onsite and upslope drainage flows will be conveyed into the public system located along Grape Street. Stream or river courses will not be affected. Significant impacts are not expected. e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Less Than Significant Impact The proposed project is a condominium project and will not create excessive drainage flows that will significantly burden existing and /or planned drainage systems. 0 Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? Less Than Significant Impact As discussed, compliance with NPDES and Best Management Practices (BMP) regulations is required since the 5.33 acre project site exceeds five acres. Compliance with NPDES and BMP regulations ensures that significant water quality impacts will not result with the project and violation of standards and requirements will not occur. g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood hazard Boundary of Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? No Impact The project will not provide any housing development in a Flood Hazard boundary. There is no relevance to this issue. h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures, which would impede or redirect flood flows? No Impact No structure is being placed within a 100 year Flood Hazard area. There is no relevance to this issue. i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Less Than Significant Impact Based on the foregoing discussions, there is no significant risk of flooding or significant exposure of people or structures to hazards. j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? No Impact The affected site is not subject to mudflows, seiches or tsunamis. There is no relevance to this issue. MITIGATION MEASURES Future development shall comply with the following mitigation measures relating to Hydrology: Prior to issuance of grading permit, the applicant shall acquire a Notice of Intent from the Santa Ana 24 AGENDA ITEM NO.- PAGE � OF --Moe ,^ Regional Water Quality Board, in accordance with the City's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES) permit and comply with appropriate NPDES and Best Management Practices regulations. IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING a) Physically divide an established community? Less Than Significant Impact The proposed project will permit construction of a 60 unit condominium project. The proposed project is not of a land use or size that will not physically divide the community. b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Less Than Significant Impact The project requires a General Plan Amendment, a Zone Change, Tentative Condominium Map, Conditional Use Permit and Design Review approval by the City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission and City Council. If these applications are approved, the project will not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation. c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? No Impact No known habitat or natural community conservation plan applies to the project site at this time. There is no relevance to this issue. MITIGATION MEASURES None required: X. MINERAL RESOURCES a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be a value to the region and the residents of the state? No Impact The project site is not known to have any mineral resource that may be of value to the region or State. There is no opportunity to affect this type of mineral resource. b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No Impact The project site is not designated as a locally important mineral resource recovery site by any plan. There is no relevance to this issue. MITIGATION MEASURES None required. XI. NOISE a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation The proposed project will increase noise levels. However, increased noise levels generated by the proposed project will not be substantial enough to conflict with City noise standards. Any project - relate , 25 AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE, OF noise will be "mixed" with existing traffic and operations noises already generated along the I -15 Freeway and Grape Street, and by the City Center Shopping Center. The project vicinity presently experiences noise levels due to its close proximity to the aforementioned roadways, especially the I -15 Freeway, and as a result, any incremental increase in project - generated noise will probably be masked to a great extent. Impacts are expected to be insignificant. Compliance with those applicable mitigation measures relating to Noise, as contained in the Mitigation Monitoring Program further ensures that any potential noise impact will be reduced to an insignificant level. b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? Less than Significant Impact. The project site is bounded by the I -15 Freeway to the west, vacant areas to the south and east, and commercial development to the north. Sensitive receptors are not located nearby. There is no relevance to this issue. c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Less Than Significant Impact with mitigation The proposed project will not result in substantial increases in ambient noise levels. As discussed previously, the project site is located close to the I -15 Freeway and Grape Street and commercial retail uses which presently generate noise levels. Even under existing conditions, noise is generated in the vicinity. As a result, any incremental increase in project - generated noise will be masked to a great extent. d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Less Than Significant Impact There will be disturbances created by short -term construction activities. Noise generated by construction equipment can reach high levels. However, given the temporary nature of noise disturbances and because noise along neighboring roadways, especially the I -15 Freeway already exist, it is expected that future noise levels will be "masked ", thus, reducing the perception of incremental noise disturbances. ..we Furthermore, there are no sensitive receptors located nearby to be affected by any noise disturbance. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact The project site is not located within any airport land use plan. There is no relevance to this issue. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact The project site is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip. There is no relevance to this issue. MITIGATION MEASURES Future development shall comply the following applicable mitigation measures relating to Noise, as contained in the Mitigation Monitoring Program. 1. The applicant shall submit an acoustical analysis prepared by a qualified engineer, which shall identify and provide direction for any sound attenuation required to mitigate any noise levels above that allowed by the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan. Monitoring Milestone: Project Design Responsible Implementing Agenc. City of Lake Elsinore Planning and Engineering 1"00" Divisions 26 AGENDA lTRA NO. PAGE J-0- v OF Timing: Prior to issuance of building permits. Verifications: XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Less Than Significant Impact The proposed project is located within an area that is presently anticipated for Very Low Density Residential. The proposed project will not induce substantial population growth, but instead better respond to demands for private and affordable residential homes within the City of Lake Elsinore. Further, the applicant is proposing a General Plan Amendment to change the current designation to Medium Density Residential, which will allow a significantly higher level of density; however the previously approved project, known as Phase I, has been approved with an equivalent density. Additionally, the applicant has prepared a "Traffic Impact Study ", which has addressed both the previously approved Phase I project and the proposed 60 unit condominium project. b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact Residences are not located within the project site. There is no relevance to this issue relating to displacement. c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact Residences or populations are not located within the project site. There is no relevance to this issue relating to displacement. MITIGATION MEASURES None required. XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? Less Than Significant Impact with mitigation Pursuant to the Condition of Approval and the Mitigation Monitoring Program contained herein the applicant will annex into Community Facilities District No. 2003 -1 which will offset the annual negative impacts of the project on public safety operations. The Riverside County Fire Department provides fire protection and safety services to the City. The nearest fire station is No. 10, just off Main Street in downtown Lake Elsinore at 410 West Graham Avenue. The project as mitigated will not result in activities that create significant impacts. Ambulance and paramedic services are provided by Goodhew Ambulance Service. Design of the proposed project is required to comply with Fire Department requirements and standards to ensure adequate fire protection improvements and access are provided. b) Police protection? Less Than Significant Impact with mitigation Likewise, the applicant will annex into Community Facilities District No. 2003 -1 which will offset the 27 AGENDA ITEM NO— 1-3..... —3 PAGE OErX , annual negative impacts of the project on public safety operations. Law enforcement services are provided by the Riverside County Sheriffs Department. The nearest sheriff's station is located at 117 South Langstaff. Traffic enforcement is provided for Riverside County in this area by the California Highway Patrol with additional support from the local County Sheriffs Department. Additionally, design of the proposed project is required to comply with Sheriff's Department requirements, standards and recommendations identified in the comment letter dated November 21, 2003 prepared by Officer Beth mor DeCou, Crime Prevention Officer /City of Lake Elsinore Police Department to ensure adequate police protection services are provided. c) Schools? Less Than Significant Impact The proposed project will directly increase student enrollment at schools within the Lake Elsinore Unified School District, however the applicant, as conditioned on all projects, will be conditioned to pay all school fees in affect at the time of permit issuance. There is no relevance to this issue. d) Parks? Less Than Significant Impact Although, the proposed project(s) will increase population and associated burden on parks in the area, the project will also provide tot lots, a swimming pool and Jacuzzi Area, BBQ and Picnic Areas, which will relieve burden on City parks. e) Other public facilities? Less Than Significant Impact The proposed project will increase population and associated burden on other governmental services such as the library. The 60 unit condominium project, however, is not of a size that will significantly affect library services in the City. MITIGATION MEASURES Monitoring Milestone: Permit issuance Responsible Implementing_Agencv: City of Lake Elsinore Finance Department and the Planning and Engineering Divisions Timing: Prior to issuance of the first building permits. Verifications: The applicant shall have entered into Community Facilities District 2003 -1 prior to the first Building Permit. Coordination and verification will be monitored by applicable City Departments and Divisions. XIV. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities, such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Less Than Significant Impact The proposed project will increase population and associated burden on parks and other recreational facilities in the area. The project will provide a tot lot, swimming pool and tennis court, which will relieve burden on City parks and recreational facilities. As discussed, the applicant is also required to pay appropriate park fees. Significant impacts are not expected. b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? No Im act The proposed project will provide a tot lot, swimming pool and tennis court onsite, within the apartment complex. Significant environmental impacts will not directly result from these onsite recreational 28 AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF facilities MITIGATION MEASURES None required. XV. TRANSPORTATION /TRAFFIC a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? Less Than Significant Impact A traffic study entitled, "Elsinore City Center Condo Traffic Impact Study ", was prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc. on June 19, 2003 (Appendix B). According to the traffic study, the entire project (Phases I and II) will generate approximately 848 trip ends per day with 63 vehicles per hour during the AM peak hour and 78 vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour. Likewise, the originally approved was projected to generate approximately 1,028 trip -ends per day with 74 vehicles per hour during the AM peak hour during the AM peak hour and 90 vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour. Further, the originally approved commercial use was projected to generate approximately 2,963 trip -ends per day with 80 vehicles per hour during the AM peak hour and 304 vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour. Conversely, the proposed condo project generates 184 less trip -ends per day than the approved apartment project and 2,119 less trip -ends per day than the originally approved commercial project. The traffic study further concludes that the for the opening year with traffic conditions, the study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service "D" or better during the peak hours, with the exception of the I -15 Freeway northbound ramps at Railroad Canyon Road and Grape Street at Railroad r Canyon Road. Consequently, these intersections are projected to operate at a LOS "F" during peak hours with or without the project. Based on the analysis presented in the Traffic Study referenced herein, the proposed condo project use would generate fewer impacts than both the previously approved apartments and the originally approved commercial uses. b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? No Impact No affected roadways are designated as a Congestion Management Program roadway. There is no relevance to this issue. c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? No Impact The proposed project will not affect any air traffic patterns. There is no relevance to this issue. d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Less Than Significant Impact Both phases of the Condo project will provide three (3) full turn movement access driveway(s) and one (1) right in right out driveway, which will allow safe and efficient vehicular circulation throughout the project. The driveways will require construction of the existing medians along Grape Street to allow left - .o_� turns in and out of the condominium project. Additionally, the applicant will offer Street "A ", shown on the Site Plan, for dedication, allowing for additional access to the site. This is a design improvement of the project and not a mitigation measure. All improvements shall comply with design criteria contained in the Caltrans Design Manual and other City requirements and standards. No significant hazards are expected. 2 29 AGENDA ITEM NO.-J.., �/QLl�- � PAGE OFZ LA e) Result in inadequate emergency access? Less Than Significant Impact Riverside County Police and Fire Department(s) have reviewed the project and provided comments and /or conditions, which will insure that the site has adequate emergency access throughout the entire site. No significant hazards are expected. f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? No Impact The project proposes to provide parking spaces consistent with the requirements of the Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requirements) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Less Than Significant Impact The project does not provide activities that conflict with any policy relating to transportation. Moreover, in their letter dated November 11, 2003, Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) found that the project design is "generally acceptable" as submitted. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. None Required. XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? Less Than Significant Impact The project does not propose activities that will cause standard wastewater treatment requirements to be significantly exceeded. *MO* b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Less Than Significant Impact Water and sewer improvements have been installed as part of the City Center Shopping Center. Presently, water improvements are installed and operating except for the segment fronting the project site. The existing 16 -inch line along Grape Street will be extended to serve the project site. All water lines shall be placed underground and shall be designed in accordance with Elsinore Valley Water District requirements. Similarly, sewer improvements are already installed and operating except for the segment fronting the project site. The existing 8 -inch line along Grape Street will be extended to serve the project site. All sewer lines shall be placed underground and shall be designed in accordance with Elsinore Valley Water District requirements. c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Less Than Significant Impact Drainage plans will be designed and approved by the City as part of the Design Review. Improvements are proposed to accommodate project flows. The proposed project does not require any amendment to the already approved drainage plan. d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and N40 0` resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Less Than Significant Impact 30 AGENDA ITEM NO. RAGE OErL ct will be serviced by existing water supplies. New or expanded entitlements are not required. i "cr,,Fh in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the existing commitments? Less Than Significant Impact Tlxc Project will be serviced by the existing wastewater provider, which is the Elsinore Valley Water , ew or expanded entitlements are not required. 1 ;, < <>> c:c1 by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid �...ste disposal needs? Less Than Significant Impact r,cct does not propose activities that will significantly impact solid waste services or facilities. i ) v-aith federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? No Impact ec;t does not propose activities that will significantly impact solid waste services or facilities. The ill not conflict with any statutes or regulations. There is no relevance to this issue. < I)ON MEASURES 31 AGENDA ITEM No. 23 PAGE., pF V. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE The following are Mandatory Findings of Significance in accordance with Section 15065 of the CEQA Guidelines. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Less Than Significant Impact. Based on evaluations and discussions contained in the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration, the proposed project has limited potential to degrade the quality of the environment. The proposed project will not significantly affect the environment with mitigation measures. N"We b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) Less Than Significant Impact with mitigations. The proposed project will not have impacts that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable with mitigation measures. Given that project impacts are insignificant, cumulative impacts are not foreseen. c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Less Than Significant Impact with mitigations. The proposed project could have the potential to significantly adversely affect humans, either directly or indirectly, but with mitigation measures the effects will not cause substantial effects on human beings. 32 AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE O 6 OF 1/1. PERSONS AND ORGANIZATIONS CONSULTED dentifies those persons who prepared or contributed to preparation of this document. This p fired in accordance with Section 15129 of the CEQA Guidelines. `' V LAKE ELSINORE 1's _ I: Brady, Community Development Director rrr a,ido G. Villa, Planning and Code Enforcement Manager Rolfe Preis endanz, Associate Planner erz Seumalo, Engineering Manager r? nr V' 1ZONMENTAL CONSULTANTS ,she Irish, Principal, L & L Environmental, Inc. 1 >.ruyea, Senior Biologist, L & L Environmental, Inc. Bert E. Reynolds, Project Manager, LSA Associates Inc. Pngineering -A CITY DEPARTMENTS "sash, Chief of Police, Lake Elsinore de County Fire Department n Flexman, Engineering /GIS Analyst, EVMWD 33 AGENDA ITEM NO. ._ 3 .,�.. PAGE l OF I X VII. REFERENCES 1. Focused Survey for the Quino Checkerspot Butterfly, prepared in June 2003 by Guy Bruyea, Senior Field Biologist, L & L Environmental, Inc. for Mr. Glen Daigle, Daigle Development, LLC., 28991 Front Street, Suite 207, Temecula CA 92590. 2. Focused Survey for the Coastal California Gnatcatcher, prepared in July 2003 by Ms. Leslie Irish, Principal, L & L Environmental, Inc. for Mr. Glen Daigle, Daigle Development, LLC., 28991 Front Street, Suite 207, Temecula CA 92590. 3. Elsinore City Center Condo Traffic Impact Study, prepared on June 19, 2003 by RK Engineering Group, Inc. 200201 S.W. Birch Street, Suite 250, Newport Beach, CA 92660 for Villa Martinique, LLC 28991 Old Town Front Street, Suite 203, Temecula, CA 92590. 4. Status Report Letter for Cultural and Paleontological Assessments of Subdivision 31532 from Robert E. Reynolds, Project Manager, LSA Associates dated January 12, 2003 5. Drainage Study TTM 31532 City Center Condominiums prepared by MLB Professional Engineer and Land Surveyor on January 14, 2004. 6. Letter from Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) dated November 11, 2003. AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 34 PAGEgOE l MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION — City of Lake Elsinore The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California EnvironmenialQuality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Public Review Period: January 15, 2004 thru February 20, 2004 Project Name: "Lake Elsinore City Center Townhomes" (Phase II) Project Applicant: Daigle Homes, LLC., 28991 Old Town Front Street, Suite 203, Temecula CA 92591 Project Location: The proposed project is located along the Interstate 15 Corridor, adjacent to and east of Grape Street and south of the Grape Street /Railroad Canyon Road Intersection and will be located on a vacant 5.33 acre site. The site topography consists of lower -lying relatively flat areas on a gradual east to west trending slope with significant ridgeline and hilltop areas occurring to the east and north. The site contains a combined vertical variation of approximately 60 feet between the extreme points of elevation on the property. Project Description: The applicant is requesting to change the General Plan Designation of the proposed site from Very Low Density (VLD) residential, which allows .5 dwelling units /acre maximum to Medium Density (MD) residential which allows 12 dwelling units/ acre maximum. In order to maintain consistency with the proposed General Plan and to develop the site with the density proposed, the applicant is also requesting a Zone Change from (R -1) Single Family Residential to (R -2) Medium Density Residential. Additionally, the applicant requests approval to establish a proposed residential condominium community. Condominium projects are defined as "subdivisions" pursuant to Section 66424 of the California Subdivision Map Act (CSMA). Consequently, this project requires Planning Commission and City Council consideration pursuant to the requirements of Section 16 "Subdivisions" of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). The condominium concept would allow the applicant to be able offer individual dwelling units for sale within the building structures as defined by the Tentative Condominium Map No. 31532, while sharing common interest, ownership and maintenance responsibilities within the common areas. Pursuant to the Chapter 17.30 Section 17.30.020 (Permits Required) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), the applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit for the establishment of the subject condominium project. As allowed in the LEMC the Planning Commission is empowered to grant and to deny applications for Conditional Use Permits and to impose reasonable conditions upon the granting of Conditional Use Permits. The applicant is proposing to develop the vacant 5.33 acre site with ten (10) two story wood framed buildings, totaling approximately 100,920 square feet. This proposal will be the second phase of a previously approved 84 unit Condominium Project to the north. Each building will be approximately 10,092 square feet and will comprise of six (6) individually owned attached single - family condominium dwelling units. The attached condominium units will range in size from a one (1) bedroom -864 square foot unit to a three bedroom 1,450 square foot unit. Each building will also include six (6) enclosed attached garage - parking spaces. The ten (10) buildings will be located on the final terraced pad ascending southerly above the Grape Street elevation. Access to the site will be made available by way of a proposed driveway located off "A" Street and the existing two (2) driveways located off of Grape Street 3 35 PAGE I. l) FINDING This is to advise that the City of Lake Elsinore, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environmental and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following findings: ❑ The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X The Initial Study identifies potentially significant effects but: (1) Proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur. (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. (3) Mitigation measures are required to ensure all potentially significant impacts are reduced to levels of insignificance. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all, related documents are available for review at the City of Lake Elsinore, Planning Division, 130 South Main Street, Lake Elsinore (909) 674 -3124. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. / 1 0 o y n �,� �z.-� Date of etermination Rolfe M. Preianz, Associate Planner AGENDA ITEM NO. 36 PAGE OF421 APPENDIX A MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM 37 AGENDA ITEM NO. +K PAGE (� Off' MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM FOR MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION No. 2004 -01 Prepared By: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Applicant: DAIGLE HOMES, LLC. 28991 Old Town Front Street Suite 203 Temecula., CA 92591 JANUARY 2004 AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF C D /',- AIR QUALITY !'tip• design of efficient and direct traffic flow patterns on the project site can help reduce the quantity of air pollutants generated by minimizing the places in the roadway system where omobiles would be idling unnecessarily. The project traffic study, entitled Elsinore City Center Condo Traffic Impact Study, prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc. on June 19, 2003 contains internal circulation design guidelines to be utilized in creating an efficient roadway system. Monitoring Milestone: Project Design ;_responsible Implementing Agency City of Lake Elsinore Planning and Engineering Divisions I_im�n�: Prior to issuance of building permits. Verifications: 'iinimize particulate emissions from construction activities through a). suspension of li :sating during first and second stage smog alerts; b). wash trucks leaving the site; c) maintain construction equipment by keeping them tuned; d) use clean, low sulfur fuel for equipment; cl require watering of active project areas with multiple daily applications if necessary; f) i squire trucks to maintain two feet of freeboard; g) require all trucks hauling dirt , sand, oil c)r other lose substances and building materials to be covered; h) pave construction access ,cads; j) develop program for rapid clean up of street debris after a major event; and k) prohibit outdoor storage if from particulate matter. Monitoring Milestone: On -site construction inspection. Responsible Implementing Agency City of Lake Elsinore Building and Safety Division. Timing: During project construction. CULTURAL RESOURCES The applicant shall monitor all grading activities of the site. If any cultural resources are �'L•red by such grading activities the applicant shall immediately cease all activities until such that a qualified archaeologist is contacted and an inspection of the resources is completed. i'hL applicant shall not continue grading until such time that the City has given approval and i . ' a_nce to proceed. Monitoring Milestone: Project Grading and construction. atesponsible Implementing Agency City of Lake Elsinore Planning and Engineering Divisions Timing: During any activities which will disturb the existing soil. Verifications: The applicant shall inform the City in writing who will be monitoring (lie site. AGENDA ITEM NO...��— d PAGE. _! � HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Future development shall comply with the following mitigation measures relating to Hydrology: 1. Prior to issuance of grading permit, the applicant shall acquire a Notice of Intent from the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board, in accordance with the City's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES) permit and comply with appropriate NPDES and Best Management Practices regulations. NOISE Future development shall comply the following applicable mitigation measures relating to Noise, as contained in the Mitigation Monitoring Program. 1. The applicant shall submit an acoustical analysis prepared by a qualified engineer, which shall identify and provide direction for any sound attenuation required to mitigate any noise levels above that allowed by the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan. Monitoring Milestone: Project Design Responsible Implementing Agency: City of Lake Elsinore Planning and Engineering Divisions Timing: Prior to issuance of building permits. Verifications: PUBLIC SERVICES MITIGATION MEASURES S..0' Monitoring_ Milestone: Permit issuance Responsible Implementing Agency: City of Lake Elsinore Finance Department and the Planning and Engineering Divisions Timing: Prior to issuance of the first building permits. Verifications: The applicant shall have entered into Community Facilities District 2003 -1 prior to the first Building Permit. Coordination and verification will be monitored by applicable City Departments and Divisions. AGENDA ITEM NO. =..�. PAGE.. OE � APPENDIX B LETTERS FROM REVIEWING AGENCIES 38 AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE t 1 J OF 2 bl J 11/ lbb4 15:.34 'JU'3- b" -YLy 4 LSA January 12, 2003 LSA AseOCIATIS. INC- t63O SfsucR STRrsT.STR moor O1Vnfa1u6. RALIFORMtA 92sel 5IKA1tulu Ut51UN BLO OTUS* O►ISCIta y09.71t.9310 1*1- 1KVtNR V09.7914277 fAX FT. Rter34918e tlAbt UZ/ 171 M COLLIMS B9MXKLA1 %6csLtx Mr. Glen Daigle Daigle Homes, LLC 28991 Old Town Front Street. Suite 203 Temecula, California 92590 Subject: Status Report for 2,- -003 - 004,-U08e� -0�6) in the Ory o Lake Elsinore, Riverside (APNs 363 2 County, California Dear Mr. Daigle: LSA Associates, Inc. (LSA) is plesaSCA to inform Daigle domes that no surface expression of cultural resources were observed during the field assessment, and the planned project schcdule will not be affected by funhcr studies. The paleontological and cultural studies did locate former historic resources and the potential for paleontological resources within the project area - There are also W,%'& of prehistoric resources to the notch of the parcel. Consequently, monitoring of all construction- related grading activities to recover paleontological and cultural resources will be recommended in the assessment reports. We look forward to continuing working with you on this interesting project• if you have questions, please call me at (909) 781 -9310. 111 ?1b4(R_ CM"3%USk L. lekhnr= atam sep.wpd) AGENDA ITEM ' �I (NO. PAGE 1 — OFL -21F ,rte Riverside Transit Agency 1825 Third Street P.O_ Box 59968 Riverside, CA 92517 -1968 Phone: (909) 565 -5000 Fax: (909) 565 -5001 November 11, 2003 Rolfe Preisendanz City of Lake Elsinore Planning Division 130 S Main St Lake Elsinore CA 92530 SUBJECT: Tentative Tract 31532 — Comments from Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) Thank you for the opportunity to review Tentative Tract 30836 and related zoning cases located off Grape St and near the Interstate 15 /Railroad Canyon Rd interchange in Lake Elsinore. A copy of the RTA project review memo on this tentative tract is attached for your information. RTA Bus Routes 7, 8 and 40 operate out of a small transit center at the Wal *Mart, about %2 mile from this site and offering connections for bus patrons to all of Lake Elsinore, and from the Outlet Center, commuter bus service to Temecula or Corona. Additional bus service is possible in the future along this portion of Grape St as the area approaches build -out, but no bus amenities are anticipated except routine curbside bus stops. Riverside Transit Agency advises that we find the project design generally acceptable as submit- ted. Pedestrian access from interior of the project out to Grape St needs to be as convenient as possible, and appears OK on the submitted map in most respects. In general the project seems quite compatible with transit as a viable option here for mobility. If you need additional clarification or I can be of further assistance, please call me at (909) 565- 5164 or contact me online at mmccoyCaD-riversidetransit.com. Sincerely, Michael McCoy Senior Planner (This letter and the supporting memo were e- mailed to Mr Preisendanz on Nov 11.) AGENDA ITEM NO. 23 F:\data \Planning \MikeM \Word \Dev Review \Lake Elsinore \RTA Itr - tenttract31532.doc PAGE a� Riverside Transit Agency November 11, 2003 PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW To: Anne Palatino, Director of Planning From: Michael McCoy, Senior Planner 44 Subject: City of Lake Elsinore, Residential project, Tract 31532 60 Single- family homes, E of Grape St, SE of Railroad Canyon Rd RTA Comments Bus route(s) affected: 7, 8 and 40 Summary: Daigle Homes LLC proposes T -31532 and related zoning cases, for 60 town homes on 6 acres, about % mi SE of the Railroad Canyon - Grape St intersection and about '/. to % mi from an RTA transit center at the Wal *Mart RTA local routes 7, 8, 40 are available at the store, with connections to commuter route #208 (to Temecula or Corona) which stops at the Outlet Mall on Collier. RTA buses might use Grape St in the future but it will probably not be necessary to stop at T- 31532. Bus stop amenities and pedestrian access to the transit center from T -31532 appear to be adequate, as long as bus patrons from the project can use internal circulation paths to conveniently access Grape St. A letter will be sent to the City approving this project. INITIAL REVIEW INFORMATION - Review completed date: November 11, 2003. Documents received at RTA: October 30, 2003 Reply -by Date: November 12, 2003; City Council /Bd of Supervisors Agenda Date: Unknown at present Thomas Guide Map page grid: 866, J -6; Case Numbers: Tentative Tract 31532,Zoning ZC 2003 -02, CUP 2003 -08 Contact at Lake Elsinore Planning: Rolfe Preisendanz; Applicant: Daigle Homes LLC, of Temecula CA RTA PLANNING FOLLOW -UP: _Z Standard "Acceptable" letter to jurisdiction, applicant or consultant without comments Letter with comments advising project modifications re transit issues Verbal conversation with Case Planner and appropriate letter follow -up Letter sent: Date: I It 03 File name: FAdata0anni g\MikeM \Word \Dev Review \Lake Elsinore \RTA Itr - tenttract31532.doc SECOND REVIEW: Review materials placed in archive files: Date: 3 AGENDA ITEM NO. °� FAdata \Planning\MikeM \Word \Dev Review \Lake Elsinore \Tenttract31532.doc �p� PAGE . l % . 01= I C�A_ P:cparcd Fbr: . Oak Grave Equities 28091 Fcrmt Stleei Suite 207 . Temecu* CA 92590 .. Q pFESSlo, t $ � � �c1 i��� r` y G► < c`i 373 m h.I m Exp. Cste 3/42 :z i AQO S. LIVE OAK PARK ROAD FALLBROOK, CA 92024. PHOKE: 760 726 -6434 • FAX: ?60 891 -2165 • E -MAIL, MLBENSSHSPACBBLL.NPT AGENDA ITEM NO �3 - PAGE ..1 19 OCI I U1114 /L004 1L. JO 7E): 0_D -G7;JY ru.r..........v ..�...�..... ..�.. •••.•� _- P � • Wednesday, Januar} 14, 2004 8:38 AM Michael (180) 897.2195 . Pagc 2 Hydroloff Study - Ph 2 pmary 14, 2.004 Tablc of Co atenta .......................... ..... . .- ............... -.._.. ..... Existing Se lkscnn on .............._.- ...- ...... ......... ..... _._.._. . Proposed Project ........... .» ......... .......» .................... _.. ........... .... .......... - Method of Analyr3 »:..» :...- _. .. ... »..._.. »..........._ -- ............. ..... . ....:4 ». Hydraulic Calculation Method .._- ... -...» ..... »..._ .- ...._.... .. ....._..._ »........... %%NO 404 S. LIVV. OAK PARK ROAD - FALLBROOK, CA 92026 PHONE: 160 126 -6935 • PAR: 760 597 -2165 • E- MAIL: MLBENRSH ®PACBELL.NET f AGENDA ITEM NO., PAGE] �Llb OF22.� ' - - 7017- 077 —G7:/Y JiicMll...utl u�..il vim u�✓ i • a 4 4, 2004 9 :38 AM Michael (760) 897 -2165 p.0 Page 3 �,� Hydiobgy StudT - Ph 2 January 14, 2004 EXISTING SITE DESCRIPTION . c�ect site is located cNicriy mid adjacent to Grape Street in the City of Lure Flsiaone.appmriraeuly 3,300.Sect )I Iherly of Railroad Canyon. Road. The project is the secctad plwe of a camdoarimua► prola:ct appeoved is TIM 31531. The h assists of appnramately 6.5 acres. 'the silt b currsntip'scant- `tire eopogsnphp cMtists of a modcwnc. slope acing. u rarip to the East'l beet is also f natural dtaituap�e am conaistiog of some 22 trees. of tmtlt vrloped hiibidcs to the East 0 1: it which drains diMUO the project The majouty of the site >utTl be eegradcd for the Proposed pt*rL :moral drainage,patnem the sift is to the. mast and South, dtimatdp dairrittg into a.xoor drain inlets adjectat to . PRoposeD PROJECT ti 10 condominium bw1dinga with appurtenant parlang end :tcreaaotai facs7dties proposcd for the site. Y ro +osed project iacarporat s: ales drains and larger storns drains to cm y ran -off f ore the site to the existing stone -. in Grape Street MPTHOD OF ANALYSIS : onel Method for computing storm runoff as oudined.in the Covnty of Riverside Hydrologp M.RMW is used is this i _ <: ; � ❑a3 Method Formula: Q= CIA Q i� the peak flow in cubic feet pct second. is` the ruoofi coefficient as that pmesttage of ssin&U whit-, produces the peak discharge., Plates D-5.3 and D -5.4 are ed Tr, detetmaic the appropriate runoff coefficient based. on the 30i1 type. Pcx the CO=ty Soil Grove. Map Plate G1741, 6)a s site is conVprised of Soil Type B in the lower area closet tD Gctpe Sant and Type C in the biUs .de areas. j. !y the avenge trinfall intensity in inches Fcr hour for x srorm duration equa to the bare of concemrat+on (Tc) of the s:�utwg drainage ast:a. The SWdard Rainfall InbWAty curve for Elsinore — Wildemar is used. ,,4 is the dtainagc arc& in the acrzs Vi.botary to the design point- !r ust Time of Concenttatioau, Tc, for the initial drainage area is determined front Appendix .0.3. LL :taw bane through streets is detcrttuned using Plate D7.7 and the average peak runoff for the street: The peck now Q at the confluence of two drrinagc mew is dctarns red by the following ruyetAods: if the Q of the area with due shorter Tc is huger, then (Qs > 02 at Tcu > Tez): Q = Qr + Qa (Tcr /Tea) ,. i f the Q of the AMR with the longer Tc is larger, than (Qr > Qx & Tel, < Tcar Q= Qr +Q7W12) 404 S. LIVE OAK PARK ROAD - FALLBROOK. CA 92028 PHONE: 760 728 -6938 • FAX. 760 997 -2165 - .R -MAM: ML8IINESA@PACI3ELL.NET ■ AGENDA ITEM NO- PAGE J•..— J OF m/ 14! Ztltl4 1 Z: Ob 7tl7-b7�-L774 1 fcH t , i��luiv DLL r 7r. Ulf i c wedneSday. January 1d, 2004 9:36 AM Michael (160) 897 2185 Page 4 Hydtolcgy Study - Ph 2 }tlnuaty 4 , 2001 . HYDxAVLIC CALCULAfIbN nle mmwi tgs eq � is used m dexcmiae fiictioa lOSSet Eot � byd�C calculation-: sho•� +�: this study. Man+tiABf pq�,atipe: Q = (K Ds/3 why Q is the peck fion in cubic feet per second. . iK ie a c,cf£eicat bwed on the depth. Of flow. and anrtel ehaeattctistiei is the depth of flow in the cl+snnet A;$ the slope of the c1lonwl. , n is the Manaia6s eoug}wess coefficient NGuot Losses ace calculated gs faliiwr. Fnuaxc Losses: h= 1.2(V+ /2g) Succt CapecitY is detcr,t kioed form Platt D - 7.5. \ri 404 S. LIVE OAK PARK ROAD • FALLBROOX, CA 92020 PHONE! 760 729.6935 • FAX: 760 997 -2165 - H -MAILt MLHENESH @PACBlLL.NRT I AGENDA ITEM NO- 2-3. 2 9-o PAM.-.&--- F� 01/14/2004 12:56 909 -699 -2954 bIKAIthll: Ut51UN nLu rrK uo.ic Wednesday, January 14, 2 9.36 AM Michael (766) 897.2I95 P.02004 �Qya O 0 a r n PS' eOrf -- $ C T O C) C7 w p + M E 'n �. u v of aD v a f- o m OD m V p C p p .a in N N y Go h N lV M !� o Cm fin 0 r �. o 0 000 c U. q ,� ao T m, to v ago �[1 O •O ^' O� to "' Q 0% N OQD r OND .� OD t ham. CND 6 0 p a O p O O O ►1 C4 m n'> fh ` m m m mim a� v •o o 1i OD v� y m u O a s y N M C cn CD AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE 1. a 3 0176' bl f 14/ Lt9b4 1 L: 7b we 7b7- b77 -L7�4 J 1 RFi i Gl71ll 1lGJll]I'1 OLL u;, ".t nenl 897 -2185 p.vf . 9o&x motw potmwy A 90" GROW 0"Knalope RCFCaWCD 171YURVLOOY MANUAL HYDROLOGIC SOILS GROUP MAP FOR ELSWRE ,woe • \N/r` AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 PAGE t OF�-f- Ul! 1Y/ LUUY L4.:lu Jvj -- uJ, 1-1 Wednesday. January 14, 2004 9.36 AM MiCd2e1 V60) 697.2165 p•' , c !9 Poor t�Orrl'r o .2 16 o 18�. 17 E - 250 r 17 �.r• ,f�.. 'G� • t8 C 15 / - 19 n S 44 (Pa C 20 v 200 _ 13 ° ID =. .� 25 ° KEY ]s0 9 L-Hc -K Tc 0 ® 30 EXAMPLE: 7 (1) L =550, H =5.0; K = Single Family(1 /4 Ac) 35 Development, R =12.6 min. 6 (2) L =550, H =5.Or, K= Commercial K�O DivelOp►rleet , TC = 9.7 intn. 40 !Z 1.. 4 RCFC a W-CD HYMOLOGY MANUAL Referees: Bibscompby I"m Na 35. AGENDX ITEM IJO.....�• -�"� •� PAGE � O;aL Te LIMITATIONS: L 100 1. Maximum. W."th, =1000' TC ldQO . 40 2. Maximm.m . dyed it. )0 ADM' . 5 900.;......x. 700 60 }3`` 3AOpOp 7 -- E 600. E 50 � •d fl� 0 �O 9. a 500 0 .2 ° ° `I, na ' ;' I0 �. 39 t� E K A tt c _..400 g 3O tMeevNerN 0 -° •- Good Cava 0 25 Cover ::�35 T 14 E �,� c !9 Poor t�Orrl'r o .2 16 o 18�. 17 E - 250 r 17 �.r• ,f�.. 'G� • t8 C 15 / - 19 n S 44 (Pa C 20 v 200 _ 13 ° ID =. .� 25 ° KEY ]s0 9 L-Hc -K Tc 0 ® 30 EXAMPLE: 7 (1) L =550, H =5.0; K = Single Family(1 /4 Ac) 35 Development, R =12.6 min. 6 (2) L =550, H =5.Or, K= Commercial K�O DivelOp►rleet , TC = 9.7 intn. 40 !Z 1.. 4 RCFC a W-CD HYMOLOGY MANUAL Referees: Bibscompby I"m Na 35. AGENDX ITEM IJO.....�• -�"� •� PAGE � O;aL LH now- lp MEN fuq a r- IV r. A Wc❑ �•l �� 01/14/2004 12:bb y0y- b" -ZJn4 Wednesday, January 14, 20048;36 AM W W W vI W V 2 VI W z Z d a JIKMIMUIU UGJI UIV DL_L Michael (760) 897 -2185 � ro Sw�i r + ilAwwww IO�wa .%� «� w± «g oi�i..:'e ►3rr1 wN O E� •' bN.:.1 •' rr.•.r ..•ww q s r� *A •►•'•MAN ' NNMNN NNNNN r O � � � wrI•` MO •00•.ew FANNM �w�s� i���A - �>> �' r ANN N'N�. .NN NNr www..w .i...rr+ ry s - •e pYi�M .'eNZ� :�rre 'oewie « �~ aurae'. r:.��I ���.... NN.MIi•N .An n.: ii • I�•.ee N'A'M eN a MNN �Af1Y r1 leNiN =. � "� :iaY milaiw . �yy eY �s�•! an•erw pr�HN Ow ;OI NANw • ♦ww rw.r r 2 rY irr/M�I�..III nA ••••AAA ANNNN, NNMNN. N••wrr e n � tOy1 a•✓r!N A 'Yii.w AM Nx�IA 1•�rlNl IDOA.O:0..ttIoji1`I ole% -rs1 _ - i[•ON AI+Aw X•.IMJ /q de '! •P ♦A. r1 �pflA Aw woa leAr � �T ��j•I�AI•� NN N'NN NNMNN rr.•rr•, •'�wr"•"• .Mrr Mr� N H W J e rM lnowe• e-•N�I ^p1.r0� ON +ie e•�•ee ei•1a «e ao�llsn r NNNNM A AAA ••rwI erAe! O R �• N=ge- : + :-•a . o.+ eA1..+0- ~ ~w ~� 2•~.r�e �iiwe o �e w•ww• • '�y e 'H A ! e i ♦ N O � � . . . _ ra •II'I O1A AAAAN NNMNN NNMNN Mrwr.• rrrwr. .p•...+.+w O O AI NN•Oh ALNiA ♦M�Oi wf�0► •eAe♦ 0:ll� w._e5 .°.'; 31w « •e �e �h �e� NN• • : i ANNN•• :s :P1 . . . . . � p �> A�YNNN N u =O M i? we• -owI owNr►I «i 0Z orlei �Nf � OMeas NO«oM M �, �, r,r r..,Nrr NNMNN AA If « «r. ♦•. •.ee O f RCFC & WCa HyDROLO�Y MANUAL r Ht]G L V/ 1 L .� r�j �J AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF i !Fi•4' Mr1•MN •1 N.+ OO er• ear► -� ♦rINNA pIAN �. re�Y1 O_ �l M Y1n6 .SrM... •s •eO ^.r O•[ rh •OnN MIIIA ►.1p AAn�IA ANNNN aNMNN .1 - - -- - A •..rr O 1 w � O M'4AN• eOr IM IN i01+ ' O•.•Pr O.+ ► «4 I: A11.N E: IPAOA ar Meh ree•�h P t et rAeei lima fAN..e 104r = �'OM i i :OOeI� • . i t ^Y AMNNN Mrr•+N .•wwww. r...44- .. ..w W -e0 n0•- +! NM/ti•�N w�'iw w�MA i1M�i wwhre « ��•11.01 .eriww.I�. r...•r� �r O N O �/• =r,,• Nx1.iN OIN NN «oA�w AMNOr erF rl PO Ne! A•:N �� N re0 b� ►�4i� I� ••+M" /•f IAA T et T� re « eeh ANNNN p•N NMN Nrw.ir ^`- �r""'� = w} riMe.t I/IAA 1iwwA�1 e Y � � Y r IAralai MVO rr lwft.. gwh1N e ww riMa S I AA N of•Ar N r e 0 e �e 0A0 r w . y. s e e .•h t r F O I A N. r A 0! e r F • 1 •� • • • . I r1 Or•1•r/N .,NNMNN NNN�•w ...w.r r�..r rrr r r•+ww py � r J i N 111 dIF�f+ Nww�w ~���♦• NNrdN ANAAM ♦Ir1 M10 .p •. w.ee r u RCFC & WCa HyDROLO�Y MANUAL r Ht]G L V/ 1 L .� r�j �J AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF ! # ■ ■ttra.w.�-- -- - -- - trsw- �-- �-- irw��..tr ■m ■ ■ltttt ■ ■ ■ / ■ ■sms ■ ■s /! ■susrll♦i rtr.rr -w -w. # ■! ■ ■i ■ ■r ■ ■ / * ■sswtr1B ■ ■ ■f ■� ■ ■!■ wt r�i.M ■ ■ ■ ■ ■#Mwrw w _.w- -- ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■! ■ /qA a, - �r�- wawtt ■ /Ksf�l:�f�_s_iM ■■! ■/■ ■ ■ ■ ■s ■ ■t� 7��:..,•' raMll \ ■o■l� =sis ■/ M- ��rwr ■ ■! ■i ■ ■l�s��� / ■uflssGr�- wwlssAr�ius� /s.�.r /f!i w• -^--- If ■i ■ ►�w /iii! /R_ a� Mw�"�� / / ■/r.r- �:r #�sifiwo!! ■* - •..■11119 /f -+ � .ur ►:' ! ` 1.. ^;,• ■mli�lsr # ■�eans,wassM!pIT•■ irwiir /■ lm ■ri / ■ ■ ■ ■ /qJ!iOf�'r , '"`r! ■1st /s■ r +, rman ■ /smomwq!_SG�.. loin ■!ss.'!J v�rms■■! ■s!!:.!■ /! ■ /! / ■! *w-- .r ■i ■ ■ ■ ■ ■i .■■■■ssi:`JIM,Iti ENDED A'"- iM ■ ■m ■m■ 1 ■ ■ ■!R ■ ■RrA'.., • „ /w ■P��!�s ■ ■m!'[ 1 ■r!:r ■ ■■�S ■r"�.rwflM! / ■fom/a■I I# ■ ■ ■tIR IVi■ ■r±c� y�e / ■ ■ /w. A�l.i / ■s ■ ■! esasr■gIBi ■ ■1 Iuii�1 ■■ : /mfR•� �: +awm ■ ■■# . f�rl/7/ �■r- .�w■n7A■P/ *rMr / ■IM ■!!r!' 1 ■mrff1•I ■ ■!:� ! ■ ■MS/�1;7v�r ■1Myr_wmm ■■■■■Mans ■ ^S / #mil ■ ■►.m ■I / ■s►If \ %fMi�r;iws(� y�i ■! ■ ■ ■ / ■ ■ ■/��i SM ■iili��e�if ■ ■ ■ ■s ■1 if sup I ■/ /� ■ ■r�■■■■ ■R� .!!r'■i :A ■s /! ■ ■ / ■ /o_iwmlf ■!i * /�i■ ■/fin ■sf ■ / �r��� \ %�i \���►:•a! ■' %�:ir ■ %t�� ■�� rl<w/I�i %��iws411��t���A� \����1 ■I, ■ / /i/ ■ ■!• �� /iR':7i muss■ /7 / /zmm! ■mm■P- nasamm■ ■f■ ■■iii!■■■ it •/ /ms' / / /s■► 1 /u�f"� iiiiiri none siiiii�siiiiiiiilse' �,i/■r.i■ ■ /lr.r /■ a . •sf/Ar ■MR:�► /f`�!'� ■ilwrS.�! /ii ■ /uo:wm* / ■w ■f■■ /■■moot /tofu■ m■i' / ■ ■s ■.rwsR�► iJu ■ ■ ■/' ,,w■irss�. � / ■uf! /s■ / ■ ■r ■ ■m ■ ■!■ /iii ■ ■s! ■■ ram■■ mr�/ r�.. MM■■ srv�m■ s!■ fr,�s■mm■sf ■■■ ■MMi/ ■ ■n■ ■e ■sf■■i !fI ■ ■ ■f! / ■F� � ■fs ■A7►= m ■ / ■s ■ /'s ■!ms■ /s ■i/ ■ties ■s ■silt ■if ■r / ■f■ ���i�is; ■ / ■ ■cK /■■■ i�!!//■■ friiwwsiinouail ■iiil■ii Blame sii��� wassurm1 I& iangu r .",Afw Jim ■■ moron■ isii ■mlm�du1u��tf�l■iiiluiliii 1■ssI / ■ ■r� ■ /mr *�.uM ■ ■■ /.JIM maimuseum s ■s ■ / ■Mm ago ■sss ■soon ■ ■ / ■sfll l ■ ■u'Jii�■ /sun Noon am n VMS so No asommusesso Mass o"Isinnum %��ill �ist11i ■ /� *af ■ ■1!s \! �1�■ ■ ■�S ■�\ \fief ■■���s�1 -- ww t.a. �. ■ ■r . mi■/ N�_:::=eiii�t�ISlar�i�r�10R��1 sl ■r� ■m■1►m■ ■' um�■ ■■■■■ ■■ ■m ■■ ra■r ri/■�J■ ■..Jn■ ■■.■■n■!■iu ■ ■■ Do men 'Asp we 'Y '1■r /lfifif ■I �afrVER:*% / ■■r■ on ! /' / ■ ■ ■I,ri /rJlmsll ■i ■ ■ ■s ■ ■f ■ !!■■ ■' / ■r�i'I ■f ■s ■ii• ■ ■iitf ■ ■ ■■ ■� summa■\: M ■ ■ ■fs ■■m■fi ■f ■mss■ so Emmaus ii. !i1 all ii ii Iii vn.Nrn ■ ■Nonsense s ■ # ■ ■sms ■ ■flrisfs rtrR ^♦ �- rims /f■isfffffli/ 1 • Lr. ;..tilrwa�/sl ■ ■r■■ifll■■■ms■s■ ■1 ! ■ ■/■ ■psi / ■ /rRR�� ■�.:::::::wool swWOO s =[_© 1 M Ellis - -- ■■a ■i!■ s■at ■ ■ ■a! ■■■■a! ■!■ ■ar ■si ■fa■ � ■ ■i ■ ■t /! ■ ■rrrlrw't�f ��iiwltwtr�I/ t ■tslr■ ■_ ■t ■ /drwd��rs��frrw.ri� iii � ■ai ■r ■ ■ ■r��1 -�tM .•r.__ r•�;' ^�r,�rrrrrrrP +wwrr It!!a■■op -N +v^;rd■■■■ ■f■p ■f ■wa __ -MUM la ■ ■��1.- �� /f ■! ■! ■i //w P r•� ■ ■i1..�i��....irr1.■r!M ■w r- rr��r��■■% i +P'".wr / ■ai■M ■.. +P-- rrw�tl /r/rr / .s• /P:.r/fM�R ■i }rte- �rwt1 ■fA��rr_- rrr• / ■r I ■r■�.�.rt■■rR�i■ � ---- r. ■■tliliG■n /.... If ■►ter ■ ■i1"+..r`•'!•`�- ..ri•�1f •S:r■ ■Iril +••- Ir� / ■ ■ ■1'�.,J�,, �':..l� ■�tf!'!�.li %r�r ■+r+ P ■ ±i".:�r /'i��r■ 1'. ■M ■ ■!���.'In• •■■■■/!. f■ ai�■ ■s_:iri %pir�lllsiwrria ■iaiwMw_ rrw■ s ■a■rG,'- ! ■■� �` ' /tr'M ■a soup _i01aMw 1 1i■ i■ tit■� i►i�rlr i>.ri. jiil *,r■i�:is!': ih tt /i�i� ■r ■ i /rv• ■ ■i ■f ■ /!ir! ■■ a�•■ s�■ d■ was■ rss/ f ss +■ i°� ■i� aiit . i■/ i■rif■i■� asii■ssr! s!■il■■O■r, "W '.l■F- f 1 ► A!■ ir■ s; ni* ano i /fi�ii MSN i'iEEPl.41 1 i iir smissssii iis mossoo! mov!s awa sii iiiiPWii1■01r- ! :" doamin�iisi�iiisslrtsssissi�ssiassiissl ■asis�i�fl t/.f ■ra ■■ i�,1►�'I ■■t/ ■■t;f ■! ■! / ■■ alit ■fafrf ■ ■!a■■M■f ■ ■ ■a ■i ■fi ■ ■ ■1 M mundan�siis�sssisssssssl ■isiaswisswi% �■ iii>•!■ ■i ■ ■ ■■a ■■t ■ ■ ■f ■t ■ ■ ■ ■! ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■■al 1O/Nor, r✓ laawbisrs•% us% MessMilsssssll llilsssilisi \ssssr��iissMa ■I a■+ /ia'i'Af'A al.. ■ra art f,7:M ■!I »•l fib■ t■ i■■■ ff ■ ■ ■ ■ ■i ■t ■i ■fti ■ii ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■a ■! ■ ■rr■ ■r1 ■ ■� `/■ i/✓ wtr■!■■■■■■ i�iiir ila ■i /■i ■! ■ ■a ■ /■■■■ ■a ■s■aiifa■ !'A ■ ■ /E'.1, ■ ■aa' / ■ ■fI. ■r■ ■r■■■ = ■ff ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■f■ ■ ■ ■iiMt■a ■ ■■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ r`slstsfi i1sE�����e �s■ s�sl A�ssl s� ■t���rsliASSMMangisifssi ■ssiNSf ■ ■� :+ a■ rZi. i■■■■■■ i■ f■■■ w■■■ f ■tl ■ ■!! ■a ■f ■sa ■ ■■f ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■a ■a ■ ■a■ 4a ■li % / ■[ 1m■!I Ii ■ ■atli / ■ ■ ■s ■ ■ ■f■ ■magma ■ ■a ■ti ■ ■ ■■■■ ■a■■■ ■■r ■ ■ ■■ QsiAFa1■ rsr■ is MANOR sssissssssaississsssiisssssissssiisssssssi� goldA!_L'. JOB JtR�srssssswssAAS�s %�ss�s���rsssssss�ssssssss�iO Ir1i itMM sii, sss�sssi■ iiilsisii ■oaAllya! ■'1 ■r! ■ ifs■■ alma ■ ■ ■ii ■! ■A ■i ■■a ■aaliii ■ ■ ■s■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■� f�IrieavaRJa ■f ■ ■ ■f ■■ alma■ mama ■ ■iiiti ■ ■ ■ff ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ati ■ia ■f ■a ■ ■■ ■��lf *.',r'� Irt■ f�■■ i!■ ifr ■ ■t ■f ■ ■ ■ ■■ *i ■i / ■fti ■ ■ ■aafa ■ ■t ■1 ■t / ■a1 in war. ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■l ■f ■ ■i ■■�sOai:ft*■r� �R t sol 1 ■ ■ ■t,rw�,..: ".. ■l ■ ■ ■!!t r � ; � [' Y I,y , J ■t ■■iaa■■wl it1■■an a ■ ■■ ■a ■ ■ri ■ ■a■ =all ■ ■■■■■ ■ammo■ ■a■ ■t ■aa■■aa■ ■ ■i ■ ■i ismIisr" �iisissrsri fi■ ■ ■�rigosarti t t ig{ia■ i■ ■s■■ia■ii■sr s■■iir M■ i■r s■ r♦■si w■iM■�iM ■■ l■!i s■■ M �■■r! ■ ■ ■ owl of low SOL,.■■■■ is iis?is issi■ so :a of ■ t ■t ■a ■ ■a ■fa ons�amMS I f a"r I!■■■■ mono . �r 3man fr. 1_z: « iiir■ilr ■i ■!a ■i ■l i ?1 /u� Ittii■a■ ■it r i■ tl■ �isisissilsssiWinss�iswslsIN ass :600 iiwssiss .. ... ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ am ago ■t !:l:i rrrAMIUw■ ■. ■ tl l t �1 flu 1■ 1■: nr a!1 ME a15 ON t■ tr to 1.■ (ii i�/ 1 r . ■s■rw■ri■ ■ ■■ ■ /i■■i r 1. a- ads ■■ia■■a■■■!■ ■■ ■■■■■■f■l■■■l■■■■ ■a ■■■irlst ■■■■s■■ siiiisisl■issssisso i ■■ ■■fs■■■Ina■■ra ■ ■ ■■■ ) 9.0 ME ■ ELSINORE CITY CENTER: CONDO TRAFFIC IMPACTSTUDY re, a I rnia,.w / /'*_ d^ �iiylneering v onp, inc. transportation planning ■ traffic engineering acoustical /air duality studies June 19, 2003 ,Mr. �_J( ) Daigle VILt, MARTINIQUE, LLC 289 ;cF Town Front Street, Suite 203 CA 92590 Sub Elsinore City Center Condo Project Traffic Impact Analysis Dear L'jaigle: The fl,-ni of RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. (RK) is pleased to submit this updated traffic ,pact analysis for the Elsinore City Center Condo Project development. This report orovides a summary of the findings, analysis procedures and evaluation of the proposed project with respect to on -site and off -site traffic impacts pursuant to City of Lake. Elsinore requirements. This report evaluates the proposed 144 -condo dwelling unit project in comparison to the previow— �. approved apartment project and commercial project. It will generate fewer trips th _i t )c)th of the previously approved uses. If you have any questions regarding this study, pie hesitate to call us at (949) 4' '•f. 0809. S/py9 ART Sincerci;v CM No. 0555 m. RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. `t EXP. 12/31ro 7p cfjq� AFF�G F OF CA1.��0 rik TaInk 7 on Goedecke, MBA Robert Kahn, P.E. Engineering Technician Transportation Planner Principal Attachments ET:AG:RK:wg /1715 JN:1595 -03 -01 AGENDA ITEM NO.. PAGE 20201 s.w. hirch street, suite 250 newport beach, California 92660 tel 949.474A809 faX 949.474.0902 http: / /www.rkengineer_com ELSINORE CITY CENTER CONDO PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: VILLA MARTINIQUE, LLC 28991 Old Town Front Street, Suite 203 Temecula, CA 92590 Prepared by: RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. 200201 S.W. Birch Street, Suite 250 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Erik Tanaka Allison Goedecke, MBA Robert Kahn, P.E. June 19, 2003 JN:1595 -03-01 ET:AG:RK:wg /1715 AGENDA ITEM PAGE _1270 T ,tI...E OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.� INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY .................................. ............................... 1 -1 A. Purpose of Report and Study Objectives r >_ Executive Summary 1. Site Location and Study Area 2. Development Description 3. Principal Findings F-koPOSED DEVELOPMENT ......................................... ...... ......................... 2 -1 Summary of Development 1. Location 2. Land Use and Intensity 3. Site Plan ?'v-� I- CONDITIONS ....................... .... 3 -1 Study Area 1. Area of Significant Traffic Impact Site Accessibility 1. Area Roadway System 2. Existing Traffic Volumes and Conditions in Study Area ­'r: _ jECTED TRAFFIC ........................................ ............................... ............ 4 -1 Site Traffic 1- Trip Generation 2. Trip Distribution 3. Trip Assignment Other Development Traffic 1. Method of Projection 2. Non -Site Traffic for Study Area 3. Through Traffic Total Traffic FICANALYSIS ....................................................... ............................... 5 -1 < Level of Service Analysis 1. Level of Service at Opening Year Without Project 2. Level of Service at Opening Year With Project �IDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS -I'raffic Contribution AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE.L =3 OF =�E APPENDICES TRAFFIC COUNT WORKS-HEETS`........ _.:r .:.. :.....: :...:....:......... ..............:................ A CALCULATION OF INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE •.ii AGENDA ITEM NO._� PAGE OFG04 B EXI STING....................................................................................... ............................... CALCULATION OF INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE OPENING YEAR WITHOUT PROJECT ........................................ ............................... C CALCULATION OF INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE OPENINGYEAR WITH . PROJECT ................................................ ............................... D •.ii AGENDA ITEM NO._� PAGE OFG04 Li;`if0F EXHIBITS PAGE I-A LOCATION MAP .................................................................................. 1-2 2-A SITE PLAN ........................................................................................... 2-2 EXISTING NUMBER OF THROUGH LANES AND INTERSECTION CONTROLS .............................................................. 3-2 3-t CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT ......................................... ......... . .. .. . . . . ........ 3-3 3-( CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN ROADWAY CROSS SECTIONS ......................................................... 3-5 34 FXISTING AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) ................................ 3-6 3-1- EXISTING AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES ............... 3-11 3-F EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES ............... 3-12 4-A. PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION ......................................................... 4-6 4-E PROJECT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) .................................... 4-7 4-C PROJECT AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES ................. 4-8 4-D PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES ................. 4-9 4-E OTHER DEVELOPMENT LOCATION MAP ...................................... 4-11 4-F CANYON HILLS TRIP DISTRIBUTION ............................................. 4-14 4-G LUSK PROPERTY TRIP DISTRIBUTION ......................................... 4-15 4-H LAMBS FELLOWSHIP CHURCH TRIP DISTRIBUTION ................... 4-16 4-1 RETAIL TRIP DISTRIBUTION ........................................................... 4-17 4-J OTHER DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) .......... 4-18 4-K OTHER DEVELOPMENT AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES .............................................................. 4-19 AGENDA ITEM No. .� PAGE � OF 22.a' 4 -L OTHER DEVELOPMENT PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTIONVOLUMES ............................... ............................... 4 -20 4 -M -- OPENING YEAR WITHOUT PROJECT;: '"Ne AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC ( ADT) ..................... ............................... 4 -22 4 -N OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC ( ADT) ..................... ............................... 4 -23 5 -A OPENING YEAR WITHOUT PROJECT AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES ................................. ............................... 5-3 5 =13 OPENING YEAR WITHOUT PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES ................................. ............................... 5-4 5-C OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES ................................. ............................... 5-6 5 -D OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES ................................. ............................... 5 -7 e AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE' OF2 IST OF TABLES PAGE -j-,i INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR EXISTING CONDITIONS .............. 3-9 4-1 TRIP GENERATION RATES ............................................................... 42 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION ........................................................... 4-3 TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON ................................................... 4-4 OTHER DEVELOPMENT LAND USE ............................................... 4-12 OTHER DEVELOPMENT TRIP GENERATION ................................ 4-13 iNTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR OPENING YEAR WITHOUT PROJECT .......................................................................... 5-2 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR OPENING YEAR WITHPROJECT ................................................................................... 5-5 PROJECT TRAFFIC CONTRIBUTION ................................................ 6-2 AGENDA ITEM NO. c c 3-- PAGE .) 3 -70F,--q-94 ELSINORE CITY CENTER CONDO PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS =__TAKE ELSIN.ORE,�ALIFORNIA 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY A. Purpose of Report and Study Obiectives The purpose of this traffic impact analysis is to evaluate the Elsinore City Center Condo Project development from a traffic circulation standpoint. The proposed development is located within the City of Lake Elsinore in the County of Riverside. Study objectives include (1) documentation of existing. traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site; (2) evaluation of traffic conditions for Opening Year without the proposed project; (3) analysis of Opening Year with project traffic conditions; and (4) determination of the project traffic contribution to the intersections. B. Executive Summary 1. Site Location and Study Area The project site is located east of Grape Street and south of Railroad Canyon Road within the City of Lake Elsinore in the County of Riverside. Exhibit 1 -A illustrates the project location and traffic analysis study area. The study area includes the following intersections: Grape Street (NS) at: Railroad Canyon Road (EW) 1 -1 3 AQENDA ITEM! NO. PAGE OF ..,r ,'woe Exhibit 1 -A LOCATION MAP y �r m co llL -to --Rn'er i cam sue, e SITE f i_ LEGEND: • = INTERSECTION ANALYSIS LOCATION ? p9NDA t7EM NO. PACE OFJ,� N 15%-0"1 (at -A) engineering ELSINORE CITY CENTER CONDO PROJECT - TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY, Lake Elsinore. California group, inc. 1 -2 1 -15 Freeway NB Ramps (NS) at: • Railroad Canyon Road (EW) lame 1 -15 Freeway SB Ramps (NS) at: • Railroad Canyon Road (EW) Casino Drive (NS) at: • Railroad Canyon Road (EW) 2. Development Description The project is-proposed to be developed. with 1.44 condominium townhome dwelling units.. 3. Principal Findings a. Required Level of Service: b. For existing traffic conditions, the study area intersections operate at Level of Service "D" or better during the peak hours, except for the intersection of the 1 -15 Freeway northbound ramps /Railroad Canyon Road which operates at Level of Service "F" during peak hours, and Grape Street/Railroad Canyon Road which operates at Level of Service "E" during the PM peak hour. C. The proposed condo project is projected to generate 844 trip -ends per day with 63 vehicles. per hour during the AM peak hour and 78 vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour. The approved apartment project was projected to generate approximately 1,028 trip -ends per day with 74 vehicles per hour during the AM peak hour and 90 vehicles per hour during the PM ..,r 1-3 AOENDA ITEM NO. 2,3 PACE � (] OF C :I peak hour. The'orig'rnally approved commercial use -was projected to generate approximately `2,96 tnp =ends per day with 80 vehicles per hour during the AM peak ho- ur and 304 vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour. The prop6sed�co &d ;p' roject generates 184 less � trip-ends per'day'thafi #h-e`apgro,*d apartment project and. 2,11 less trip-ends per day than the originally approved commercial project. �. For opening Year with protect traffic con ditions the study area intersections are projected to operate at -Level of Service "D" or better during the peak hours, with the exception of the 1 -15 Freeway northbound ramps at Railroad Canyon Road and Grape Street at Railroad Canyon Road. These intersections are projected to operate at LOS "F" during the peak hours with or without the project. The proposed condo protest arse` wctd `- generate less impacts than both the previously approved apartments and the originally approved=coimtnercial uses. 3 z_ rt- �j 23� A UEM NO. 1-4 PAGE OF1��L.: T 2.0 PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT :m J 2 -1 AGENDA ITEM NO. 2-3 .. PAGE I y OFCQ -Y , Study Area 1. Area of Significant Traffic Impact The study area includes the following intersections: Grape Street (NS) at: • Railroad•Canyon Road (EW) 1-15 Freeway NB Ramps (NS) at: Railroad Canyon Road (EW) 1-15 Freeway SB Ramps (NS) at • Railroad Canyon Road (EW) Casino Drive (NS) at: • Railroad Canyon Road (EW) B. Site Accessibility 1. Area Roadway System Exhibit 3-A identifies the existing roadway conditions for study area roadways- The number of through travel lanes for existing roadways and the existing intersection geometries are identified. Exhibit 3-B shows the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Circulation Element. Future roadways are included in the Circulation Element of the 3-1 1 AGENDA ITEM N O. PAGE 1 L4 � OF6;14L-- Exhibit 3 -A EXISTING NUMBER OF THROUGH LANES -AND INTERSECTION CdAtROLS = m a i ' •ewer Rairr�d . q0 Caq sp 4 s c �G SITE f LEGEND: t: TRAFFIC SIGNAL 4 = NUMBER OF LANES D = DIVIDED U = UNDIVIDED ?3 AOA ITEM NOS. )—{L PAGE.._._ N 1595-03— _ engineering ELSINO[ � s _ CONDO PROJECT- TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY, Lake Elsinore, CalAomla group, Inc. 3 -2 Pf e: 9 N ' � C ?SO, i. F .. •s ., 3T.9 \ t +rFStiogF�YF% ����' �Ft 9 4 LAKE ELSINORE 1h i _wAlattt 1 ci ~ q o ` < i o� •�� o r m BAXTER RO. i U i ,�yyti• y 'CO'4� TON KEiTN RD. LEGEND: FREEWAY Q INTERCHANGE LOCATION ---- --- URBAN ARTERIAL (6 -LANES / 120' R.O.W.). MAJOR (4- LANES /100'11.O.W.) - - - - -- SECONDARY (4 -LANES 190' R.O.W.) -»-- COLLECTOR (2- LANES /68'R.O.W.) ONE-WAY SECONDARY (2- LANES /601 .Ft 0;W.) SPHERE OF INFLUENCE BOUNDARY SOURCE: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE N 1595-03-01,E>(3-B) engineering ELSINORE CITY CENTER CONDO PROJECT- TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY, Lake Elsinore, Catifomia group, inef�_ 2 3-3 AWWA ITEM NO ` . )]- / PACE' OE _aL Exhibit 3 -B CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELNT i TELFOR_O.. q�6 ►-1. f `' <•- -1R13. -I P � ATiON t Qp OItVE RD v. t�CANYON iAtcE � % �` 4yI l_� �i J ell tmLS AD- RO. O�Ca G jt d SrTE 1 0. Z 9� OLIVE ST. .... _wAlattt 1 ci ~ q o ` < i o� •�� o r m BAXTER RO. i U i ,�yyti• y 'CO'4� TON KEiTN RD. LEGEND: FREEWAY Q INTERCHANGE LOCATION ---- --- URBAN ARTERIAL (6 -LANES / 120' R.O.W.). MAJOR (4- LANES /100'11.O.W.) - - - - -- SECONDARY (4 -LANES 190' R.O.W.) -»-- COLLECTOR (2- LANES /68'R.O.W.) ONE-WAY SECONDARY (2- LANES /601 .Ft 0;W.) SPHERE OF INFLUENCE BOUNDARY SOURCE: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE N 1595-03-01,E>(3-B) engineering ELSINORE CITY CENTER CONDO PROJECT- TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY, Lake Elsinore, Catifomia group, inef�_ 2 3-3 AWWA ITEM NO ` . )]- / PACE' OE _aL General Plan and are graphically depicted on Exhibit 3 -B. Exhibit 3 -C fWustrates the City of Lake Elsinore arterial street cross- sections. 2. existing Traffic Volumes and Conditions in Study Area existing average daily traffic (ADT) volumes throughout the study area are -mown on Exhibit 3 -13. Existing ADT volumes are based upon traffic data -ollected by RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. (RK) on April 29, 2003 gee Appendix "A "), and factored up from PM peak hour counts made for RK, using the following formula for each intersection leg: PM Peak Hour (Approach Volume + Exit Volume).* 12`= Leg Volume The current technical guide to the. evaluation of traffic operations is the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) (Transportation Research Board Special Report 209). The HCM defines level of service as a qualitative _ measure which describes operational conditions within a traffic stream, generally in terms of such factors as speed and travel time, freedom to Maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort and convenience, and safety. The Criteria used to evaluate LOS (Level of Service) conditions vary based on the type of roadway and whether the traffic flow is considered interrupted ,- W. uninterrupted. 'Fhe definitions of level of service . for uninterrupted flow (flow unrestrained by the existence of traffic control devices) are: LOS "A" represents free flow. Individual users are virtually unaffected by the presence of:o#hers in the traffic stream. { " " ' the 'ran a of stable flow, but the presence of other users LOS B is in g P in the traffic stream begins to be noticeable. Freedom to select desired -4 3 AGENDA ITEM No s..- .--- -- J .; PAGE JOF,-212�' Exhibit 3-C, CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL PLAN ROADWAY CROSS SECTIONS 12a PLOW- IV 17—+14 �t7�ir�tt'�1 T URBAN ARTERIAL HIGHWAY 12a RO -W- 86' 17 4WIEtz�trar�t��)_ ^' trtr�tr� 1r URBAN ARTERIAL HIGHWAY (64-q E) 1w ROW 80` 1a 148JKE� Eis 61 �ix i� tr 1s to 1cE iilAlOft lCfbY' t� W RO.W. Ta to :BWEt— r �P �tr ir�8 to SECONDARY HIGHWAY W FLAW. 4V 1111 1C 12' 17 17— to COLLECTOR HIGHWAY SOURCE: CITY OF LAKE U.Sf � FJ �59�«► -0� «,. engineering ELSINORE CITY CENTER CONDO PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Lake Elsinore, California gC�lip, Inc. 3-5 AGENDA ITEM NO- 13 PAGE OPCl Exhibit 3-D EXISTING AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) LEGEND: 10.0-'VEHICLES PER DAY ONUS) AGEMA ITEM NO, PAGE OF,2L44 ne. 1595 -03-01 (EX3-D) �engi .1 fing ELSINORE CITY CENTER CONDO P! OJECT- TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY, Lake Elsinore, California group, Inc. 3-6 speeds is relatively unaffected, but there is a slight decline in the freedom to maneuver. • LOS "C" is in the range of stable flow, but marks the beginning of the range of flow in which the operation of individual users becomes significantly affected by interactions with others in the traffic stream. • LOS "D" represents high - density but stable flow. Speed and freedom to maneuver are severely restricted, and the driver experiences a generally poor level of comfort and convenience. • LOS "E" represents operating conditions at or near the capacity level: All speeds are reduced to a low, but -relatively uniform value. Small increases in flow will cause breakdowns in traffic movement. • LOS "F" is used to define forced or breakdown flow. This condition exists wherever the amount of traffic approaching a point exceeds the amount which can traverse the point. Queues form behind such locations. The definitions of level of service for interrupted traffic flow (flow restrained by the existence of traffic signals and other traffic control devices) differ slightly: depending on the type of traffic control. ; The level of service is 'typically dependent on the: quality of traffic flow at the intersections, along a roadway. The HCM methodology expresses the level of service at an intersection in terms of delay time for the various intersection approaches. The HCM uses different procedures depending on the type of intersection control. The levels of service determined in this study are determined using the HCM methodology. AWMA ITEM NO. 3 -7 PAGE i? OOF =nr signalized intersections, average stopped delay per vehicle is used to 0 termine level of service. Levels of service at the signalized study area intersection has been evaluated using the HCM intersection analysis program. he study area intersections which are currently stop sign controlled with --op control on the minor street only have been analyzed using the ,,osignalized intersection methodology of the HCM. For these `!)tersections, the calculation of level of service is dependent on the ou-Currence of gaps occUming in the traffic flow of the main street. Using eta collected describing the intersection configuration and traffic volumes the study area locations, the level of service have been calculated. The level of service criteria for this type of intersection analysis is based on average total delay per vehicle. The level of services are defined for the various analysis methodologies r)" follows: SIM b4 J-1: W 11 U-1 d H I u F 80,0'1 :and; up, 50,01 and up Fxisting peak. hour traffic operations have been evaluated for the study area intersections. The results of this analysis are summarized in Table 3-1, along with the existing intersection, geometries and traffic control devices at the analysis locations. Existing intersection level of se�rvice calculations are based upon manual AM and PM peak hour AUENDA ITEM NO. 3-8 PAGE -L1 I 1;r.'�± AVERAGE CONTROL, DELAY PER VEHICLE (SECONDS) LEVEL OF SERVICE SIGNALIZED UNSIGNALIZED A 0 to. 10.00 -00 0010. B 10.01 to 20.00 10.01 to 15.00 C 20.01 to 35.00 15.01 to 25.00 D 35.01 to 55.00 25.01 to 35.00 66�b.i to 86.00 35A:1' t6-5.0.0o SIM b4 J-1: W 11 U-1 d H I u F 80,0'1 :and; up, 50,01 and up Fxisting peak. hour traffic operations have been evaluated for the study area intersections. The results of this analysis are summarized in Table 3-1, along with the existing intersection, geometries and traffic control devices at the analysis locations. Existing intersection level of se�rvice calculations are based upon manual AM and PM peak hour AUENDA ITEM NO. 3-8 PAGE -L1 I 1;r.'�± TABLE 3-1 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS. FOR EXISTING CONDITIONS \1 l41 6 When a right hum Is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L =1eft; T = Through; R = Right 2 Analysis Software: Traffix. Version 7.5.0615 (2001). Per the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual, overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with traffic signal or all-my stop control. For intersections with cross-street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement delay and level of service for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown. TS = Traffic Signal 4 _ Delay High, Intersection Unstable, Level of Service "F". j:rktabIesVk1700Vk1715tb AGENDA ITEM NO. A JN: 1595-03-01 3-9 PAGC '"11111100, ,"me INTERSECTION APPROACH LANES' NORTH- SOUTH- EAST­ WEST= DELAY2 LEVEL OF TRAFFIC O= BOUND JR BOUND BOUND BOUND (S SERVICE INTERSECTION 3 CONTROL 1 �I_ T R :�T . L T L T R AM PM AM PM pe SL (NS) at: Railroad Rd. (EW) TS 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1.5 0.5 1 2.5 0.5 'D 52.3 77.9 D. -151". No RarWs� (!4S • Railroad ailroad Canyon Rd. EM/) TS 0-5 0 0.5 0' 6 0 2 0* 0 2 1 120.7 F F 15 -IS Fwy-So., • Railroad Can y'an Rd. (EW) TS 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 1 2 0 24.1 27.2 C C s sino Dr- (NS) at • f - �asload Canyon Rd. (EW) 0.5 1 1.5 5 1 25 0.5 B B \1 l41 6 When a right hum Is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L =1eft; T = Through; R = Right 2 Analysis Software: Traffix. Version 7.5.0615 (2001). Per the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual, overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with traffic signal or all-my stop control. For intersections with cross-street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement delay and level of service for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown. TS = Traffic Signal 4 _ Delay High, Intersection Unstable, Level of Service "F". j:rktabIesVk1700Vk1715tb AGENDA ITEM NO. A JN: 1595-03-01 3-9 PAGC '"11111100, ,"me a F IF] W toming movement counts collected for RK on April 29, 2003 (see Exhibits ee n TV and 3-F) Traffic count worksh ts are included i Appendix "A". F - or existing traffic conditions the study area' intersections operate at Level of Service "D" or better during the peak hours,I e? xempt fo r the, eterse pris. of Grape S-, tr at Railroad _C.-apyon Road and the 1-15 F i I)rthbQuno . ramps/Rajlroad Can y n Roan, which 00.1b an ''IqV- acceptable jevel of service during the eAs#ing peck are provided in A worksheets ppe,)dix, B". 3. 3-10 AGEMA tTF-M NO. 4-2 PAGE Exhibit 3-E EXISTING. AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES 1595-03-01 (E-X:3 E) ELSINORE CITY CENTER GONDCi PROJECT- TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY, Lake Elsinore, California 3-11 AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF engineqrin.g-: -group, Ind. I Exhibit 3 -F EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES m F s pin S SITE O 1'. a: • ,ScY`6'p � - t AQEMA ITEM NO. PAGE L5 OFt2a N 1595 -t engineering .. - - ELS1N �. CONQ0,, PRQIECT- TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY, Lake Elsinore. caii>«raa group, ltlC. 3 -12 0 4.0 PROJECTED TRAFFIC A. Site Traffic 1. Trip Generation Trip generation represents the amount of traffic which is attracted and produced by a development. The traffic generation for this project' is based upon the specific land use planned for the Elsinore City Center Condo Project development. The project is proposed to be developed with 144 condominiumltownhome dwelling units. The approved apartment use is for 156 apartment dwelling units. The originally approved use is 61,200 square feet of theater and office. Trip generation rates for this project are shown in Table 4 -1. The trip, generation rates are based upon data collected by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Both daily and peak hour trip generation for the proposed project are shown in Table 4 -2. The proposed condo project is projected to generate approximately 844 trip -ends per day with 63 vehicles per hour during the AM peak hour. and 78 vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour. This traffic impact analysis report has analyzed the proposed condo project site compared with the approved apartment use and the originally approved office /theater use. A trip generation comparison is depicted in Table 4 -3. The originally approved commercial use is projected to generate approximately 2,963 trip -ends per day with 80 vehicles per hoar during the AM peak hour and 304 vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour. The approved apartment use is projected to generate approximately 1,028 trip -ends per day with 73 vehicles per hour during the AM peak hour and 90 vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour. 4 -1 AGEMA ITEM NO. PAGES OF TABLE 4 -1 TRIP GENERATION RATES' PEAK HOUR AM PM LAND USE UNITS !N OUT IN OUT DAILY _. 170.37 Townhouse pU 0.0T 0.36 0.18 5.86 v 2 � � BtittS AGENDA ITEM NO. j rktat , _, s 715th 4-2 PAGE c TABLE 4-2 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION . _ PEAK-HOUR AM PM LAND USE : QUANTITY UNITS:' . . IN OUT IN OUT qDAILY ondominium / Townhouse 144 DU 10 53 52 26 rn DU =Dwelling Units AGENDA ITEM NO. )—,3 . i:rktablesWc1700\rki715tb 4 -3 PAGE j-5–YOF JN:1595-03 -01 TABLE 4 -3 �-'1 TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON Xm i z is i s._. ' DU =Dwelling Units TSF = Thousand Square Feet x j:rktab1es1rk17GOVk1715tb ALMA ITEM NO., JN:1595-03 -01 PAGE 4 -4 $� OF- .. - UNITS' . PEAK HOUR _ : DAILY. LANQ- USE. QUANTITY AM PM iN . OUT IN 0-UT, - Proposed Use, Elsinore City Center Condos 144 DU 10 53 52 26 844 Approved Use Apartments 156 DU 141 59 59 31 1028 Originally Approved Use . 312 31.0 TSF TSF 65 3 9 3 19 179 95 11 543 242 Oj - Theater Total 68 12 1981 106 2963 Difference Approved Use (Appartments) Originally roved Use Commercial -4 -58 -6 41 -7 -146 -5 -80 -184 -2119 Xm i z is i s._. ' DU =Dwelling Units TSF = Thousand Square Feet x j:rktab1es1rk17GOVk1715tb ALMA ITEM NO., JN:1595-03 -01 PAGE 4 -4 $� OF- As shown on Table 4 -3, the proposed project will generate approximately 2,119 less trip -ends per day than the originally approved commercial use and 18&4 leilr io -ends per 'djy thawWdapptoved apartmoht use. 2. Trip Distribution Trip distribution represents the directional orientation of traffic to and from the project site. Trip distribution is heavily influenced by the geographical location of the site, _ the location of commercial, employment and recreational opportunities and the proximity to the regional freeway system. The directional orientation of traffic was obtained from a previous study prepared for the center. Trip distribution for this study has been based upon near -term conditions, based upon those highway facilities which are either in place or will be contemplated over the next two years, which represents the opening occupancy time -frame for the project. The trip distribution pattern for the project is graphically depicted on Exhibit 4 -A.. 3. Trip Assignment The assignment of traffic from the site to the adjoining roadway system has been based upon the site's trip generation, trip distribution, and existing. street system. Based on the identified project traffic generation and .distribution, .project related ADT volumes are shown on Exhibit 4 -B. - Project AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Exhibits 4 -C and 4 -D, respectively. 4 -5 AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE. OF4 .. ao m Exhibit - 4 A i - PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION _ O�` 5 m� 2s R h Nk- Raiy�d �1 cap ort, Rd •- soh ?s 1 £. �s t i i SITE s LEGEND: _ 23 aSEC T ION ANALYSIS LOCATION ABDA ITEM NO. OF N PAGE, r, 1595-03-01 (EX„ ____ - -- engineering ELSINORE CIT ';1.'4 f LR CONDO PROJECT - TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY, Lake EISI la. Card is group, inc. m Exhibit 4-B PROJECT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) LEGEND; 10.0 = VEHICLES PER DAY (IOWS) 23 NOM = NOM . INAL. LESS THAN 50 VEHICLES AGENDA ITEM NO. At (P(4 lECITYCENTtll CONDO PROJECT - -1 PAGEi"()F-;i� engineering, IMPACT STUDY, Lake Elsinore, Gahlomia, grou pli - rn '"mor Exhibit 4 -C PROJECT AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES / r � �. a` a� m F a �•_ ---.. San an o V SITE � cds t' b N 1595-0sa FEK4-C _ engineering ELSINORE CITY CE"i ER COIJD�O PRC)dECT- TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Lake Elsinore, California MIR rou Inri. ITM Na...r... 4-8 PAGE OF Exhibit 4 D PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES N 1595 -03-01 (EX4-D) engineering. ELSINORE CITY CENTER CONDO PROJECT - TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY, Lake Elsinore. Cafdamia r 4 -9 PAGE OF14 B. (. p i x. Uo velopment Traffic 1 Method of Proiection t u assess Opening Year traffic conditions, project traffic is combined with existing traffic, other development and areawide growth. Other is =welopment which is being processed concurrently in the study area �cludes the projects illustrated on Exhibit 4 =E. The study year for analysis ,urposes in this report is 2005. 2. « Son -Site Traffic for Study Area Table 4-4 lists the proposed land uses for the nearby development for )pening Year traffic conditions known by RK at the time this study was prepared. Table 4 -5 shows the daily .and peak hour vehicle trips generated by the surrounding development being processed concurrently in the study area. =.:,,hibits 4 -F to 4 -1 contain the directional distribution and assignment of he, other development traffic. Based on the identified trip distributions for the other development on arterial highways throughout the study area, ether development ADT's are shown on Exhibit 4 -J. Other development AM and PM peak hour intersection turning .movement volumes are shown can Exhibits 4 -K and 4 -L, respectively. 3. g:hroucih Traffic o account for areawide growth on roadways, future traffic volumes have been calculated based on a "conservative" 3 percent annual growth rate of t xisting traffic volumes over a two -year period for a total growth rate of tM1 0 7 I I W] { 4 =10 pA ITEM�N © ©...... -: `, PAGE 0 � Exhibit 4 -E OTHER DEVELOPMENT LOCATION MAP MIS )WSHIP JRCH go- AGMA ITEM NO. PAGE O N 1595 -63-01 (EX4 -E) engineering ELSINORE CITY CENTER CONDO PROJECT- TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY, Lake Elsh"e. Casfomia group, I nc. 4 -11 `%ww TABLE 44 r QUANTITY UNITS' OTHER DEVELOPMENT LAND USE Single-Family Single-Farrily Detached Residential 608 3 m OJECT . LAND USE QUANTITY UNITS' Single-Family Single-Farrily Detached Residential 608 DU Single-Fan-if Single-Fan-ify Detached Residential 132 DU .h p Church Church 16 TSF Commercial Retail 9.41 1 TSF TABLE 4-5 OTHER DEVELOPMENT TRIP GENERATION PROJECT PEAK HOUR DAILY AM PM IN OUT IN OUT an yon Hills 116 340 395 219 5,819 k Property 25 74 86 48 1,263 mbs Fellowship Church:, 6 5 6 5 146 6 4 21 22 460 TAL 153 423 508 _ 294 7,688 ' Trip generation was based on the commercial retail trip generation rates of the entire shopping center. 23 4 -13 A4ENDA ITEM ((NO. . .e.� i:rk1ab1es1rk1700Wk1715tb PAGE. OF JN:1595 -03 -01 Exhibit 4 -F CANYON HILLS TRIP DISTRIBUTION y��s is LEGEND: J1. FO(FROMPROJECT N 3` 1595-03 -01 ; _ engineering ELSINORE ? GONDO PROJECT - TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Lake Elsinore, California roup inc. A iT ill NO. 4-14 PAGE OF Exhibit 4-G. LUSK PROPERTY TRIP DISTRIBUTION LUSK PROPERTY LEGEND: 10 = PERCENT TO/FROM PROJECT D1 WP ): 0EC"O�N"P"Dp �"Ec,T-1 AWWA ITEM NO. PAGE engineering inegring IMPACT STUDY, Lake :Elsinore Cardbrrd - a__ group, in. 4-15 .- )-1, LEGEND: 10 = PERCENT TO/FROM PROJECT Exhibit 4 -H LAMBS FELLOWSHIP CHURCH TRIP DISTRIBUTION F h �J o 65 • = � • �. IAMBS FEIIOWSHIP CHURCH d. i S SITE o s� s 2 3 AWWA ITEM-�NO{ . PAGE. ►.OFAI en&eertng :> e dsiixme, Caiifomia geOu 4 -16 Exhibit 4 -1 RETAIL TRIP DISTRIBUTION LEGEND: 10 = PERCENT TO /FROM PROJECT N ELSINORE CtT1(CrkltR C0N0W PROJF-CT- l STUDY, Lake.Elsina 4 -17 nia. AGENbA ITEM NO. Z _-s PAGEE?-C3F� engineering I*-- Exhibit 44 OTHER DEVELOPMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) L EGEND: IC ,l) . VE HICLES PER DAY (1000 3 .,,C-Mnk ITEM NO------'O" t,�om = NOMINAL. LESS THAN 50 VEHICLES PAGE 12,3 OF 8 en veering ..g I . . 09 - ELSINOME CITY CENTER CQ46�-TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY, Lake ElsinOre, Calftnia group, inc. malu-0 Exhibit 4 -K OTHER DEVELOPMENT AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES t= CITY CE TEk CO"' M EST- TW AUMA ITEM NO. 2.3 PAGE J._.L.i OF engineering T STUDY. Lake Elsinore. Calfornia 9rouP� 4 -I9 Exhibit 4 -L OTHER DEVELOPMENT PM PEAK HOUR fMTERSECTION VOLUMES q, o, F Rd r ; _ sf s� SITE ii 1 2 AsEMA tTEM NO. ---- -- 4 PAGESOF ._LJ -- 1595-03 -0j (EXaL) engineerb) TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY, Lake Etsinme. Cardomia inc. EISWORE-C" dENTER CONDO PROJECT group, 4 -20 Areawide growth has been added to daily and peak hour traffic volumes on surrounding roadways, in addition to traffic generated by the project and other development.- C. Total Traffic Exhibit 4 -M shows the ADT's which can be expected for Opening Year without project traffic conditions. Exhibit 4 -N shows the ADT's which can be expected for Opening Year with project traffic conditions. r 4 -21 '..0+ �W AlA ITEM NO. 2.® PAGE OF 4 -22 Exhibit 4 -M' OPENING YEAR WITHOUT PROJECT .— AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) F com` F J o Rallr'ad . is C Ag . 2 ah �Rd ••� � w r• i 9� h N s� `9, SITE LEGEND: n.t "tW VFHICLES PER DAY (10005) AGENDA ITEM NO °...r N PACE ` OF 1 t, engineering 1595 -03-01 (Ex4M) ELSINORE CITY CENTER CONDO PROJECT - TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY, Lake Elsinore, CaliEomia group, Inc. t 4 -22 Exhibit 4-N OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) LEGEND; 10.0 =VEHICLES PER DAY (1000-S) MEMA ITEM NO. I""N PAGE t OF N 1595-03-01 (EX+N�, engineering ELSINORE CITY CENTER CONDO PROJECT- TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY, Li*e Elsitwe. Cafifomia group, Inc. 4-23 5.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS = A.` Level of Service Arra*sis 1. Level of Service at Opening Year Without Project Opening ear intersection levels of service for the g proposed network., without the proposed project are shown in Table 5 -1. Table 5: -1 shows HCM calculations based on the geometries at the intersections_ Clpenirtg Year without project AM and PM. peak hour intersection turning movement I volumes are shown on Exhibits 5 -A and 5 -13, respectively. `l I For Opening Year conditions, all study area intersections are projected to E operate at an acceptable level of service during peak hours, with the exception of the intersections of Grape Street at Railroad Canyon Road and the 1 -15 Freeway northbound ramp at Railroad Canyon Road, which are projected to operate at Level of Service "F" during Opening Year peak hour conditions. 1 2. Level of Service at Opening Year With Project i a Opening Year intersection levels of service for the proposed network with the proposed project are shown in Table 5-2. Table 5 -2 shows the HCM 1 ` calculations based on the geometries at the intersections. Opening Year with project AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Exhibits 5-C and 5-D, respectively. Opening Year without project HCM calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix "C ". For Opening Year with project conditions, all study area intersections are projected to operate at an acceptable lever of service during peak,hours, with the exception of the intersections of Grape Street at Railroad Canyon Road and the 1 -15 Freeway northbound ramp, at Railroad Canyon Road, 5 -1 AQMA ITEM NO. PAGE l0 OF TABLE 54 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR OPENING YEAR WITHOUT PROJECT When a right turn is designated. the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width . for right taming vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L = Left; T = Through; R = Right Analysis Software: Traffix.Version 7-5..0615 (2001). Per. the 1997 , Highway Capacity Manual, overall average intersection delay and levef4sei-A—ce -are shown for 1n,tersectionswM traflic sibriji or jo-way stop control. For Intersections wlth6bss-street stop the delay and level of service for the worst Individual movement delay and level of service for the worst individual movement ,or movemiehiss ring 9 single lane) are shown. 3 TS = Traffic Signal =Delay High, Intersection Unstable, Level of Service 'F". A ITEM NO. 5-2 PACE OF CA& j:rktab1es\rk1700\rk1715th JN:1595-03-01 L INTERSECTION APPROACH LANES' DELAY' LEVEL OF NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST-, TRAFFIC BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND (SECS.) SERVICE L T R L T R L T R L T R AM PM AM PM INTERSECTION CONTROL' Grape SL (NS) at - - Railroad Canyon R& (EW) T9 Z 2 1 1 '1 1 7 1.5 O�5 2 1 .5 OS. 83.8 1132 F F 1-15 Fwy. NB Ramps (NS) at • Railroad da Rd. (My., TS 0.5 0 05 0 0 6 1 ­ 2 0 0 2''- 1;' 159.7 158.7 F F 1-15 Fwy.S8 Ramps (NS) at • Railroad Ad. {EW) TS 1 0 0 0 , 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 1 1 2 .0, 32.5 150.2 C I D. asino Dr. (NS) at • Railroad Canyon 0d. (Ew) TS 1 1.5 0.5 1., .1.5 0.5 .5 When a right turn is designated. the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width . for right taming vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L = Left; T = Through; R = Right Analysis Software: Traffix.Version 7-5..0615 (2001). Per. the 1997 , Highway Capacity Manual, overall average intersection delay and levef4sei-A—ce -are shown for 1n,tersectionswM traflic sibriji or jo-way stop control. For Intersections wlth6bss-street stop the delay and level of service for the worst Individual movement delay and level of service for the worst individual movement ,or movemiehiss ring 9 single lane) are shown. 3 TS = Traffic Signal =Delay High, Intersection Unstable, Level of Service 'F". A ITEM NO. 5-2 PACE OF CA& j:rktab1es\rk1700\rk1715th JN:1595-03-01 L Exhibit 5-A OPENING YEAR WITHOUT PROJECT CT Alf PEAK HOUR VOL UM ES 123 AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE 017c22� N 159""1 (EX&►) engineering ELSINORE CITY CENTER CONDO PROJECT- TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY, Lake Elsinore, Qgifomia group, im'. 5-3 PAGE OF N engirt ets9s of c } e�i ng ELSINORE CITY CENTER CONDO PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY, Lake bsi�m. CaMomia groups Inc. i 5 -4 Exhibit 5 -B OP NINE YEAR WITHOUT PROJECT PM PEAK HOC1'MNTERSECTION VOLUMES 3 1.33 v r F . gnto. • --�' t2atr Ca � \ �. r ', sf s� SITE AGENDA ITEAA NO PAGE OF N engirt ets9s of c } e�i ng ELSINORE CITY CENTER CONDO PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY, Lake bsi�m. CaMomia groups Inc. i 5 -4 TABLE .5,2 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT ../' ti.% { i ' When a right turn is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn tane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L = Left; T = Through; R = Right i Analysis Software: Traffiz, Version 7.5.0615 2001. Per the 1997 Highway Capacity rage intersection delay y ( ) g y p city Manual, overall average and level of service are shown for intersections with traffic signal or all -way stop control. For intersections with cross- street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement delay and level of service for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown. 3 TS = Traffic Signal I — = Delay High, Intersection Unstable, Level of Service "F "_ r� A�Ti - NDA.ITEM NO i:rktableskk1700kkI715tb PAGE OFI =- 5 — S -f- JN:1595 -03 -01 INTERSECTION APPROACH LANES' NORTH- SOUTH - EAST- WEST- DELAY2 LEVEL OF TRAFFIC BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND (SECS:) SERVICE L T R L T R L T R L T R AM PM AM PM INTERSECTION CONTROLS Grape St. (NS) at • Railroad Canyon Rd. (EW) TS 2 2 1 1 1 1 , 2 1.5 0.5 1 2.5 0.5 88.8 118.6 F F 1 -15 Fwy. NB Ramps (NS) at: • Railroad Canyon Rd. (EW) TS 0.5 0 0.5 0 0 0 .1 2 0 0 2 1 161.5 160.5 F F -15 Fwy.Sf3 Ramps (NS) at.. Canyon Rd. (ENV) TS 0 0 0, 1 0 1 0 2 1 1 2 0. .34-5 529 C D Lilroad o Or. (NS) at ilroad Canyon Rd. (ENV) I TS 1 1.5 0:5 1 1.5 0.5 1 25 0-51 2 1 -5 0.5 17.3 18.9 B B ti.% { i ' When a right turn is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn tane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L = Left; T = Through; R = Right i Analysis Software: Traffiz, Version 7.5.0615 2001. Per the 1997 Highway Capacity rage intersection delay y ( ) g y p city Manual, overall average and level of service are shown for intersections with traffic signal or all -way stop control. For intersections with cross- street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement delay and level of service for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown. 3 TS = Traffic Signal I — = Delay High, Intersection Unstable, Level of Service "F "_ r� A�Ti - NDA.ITEM NO i:rktableskk1700kkI715tb PAGE OFI =- 5 — S -f- JN:1595 -03 -01 VIC 4 c h. c. Exhibit 5 -C OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE O 1 S � „_.� N 1595 -03 -01 (E)CS.C, engineering ELSINORE CITY CENTER CONDO PROJECT - TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY, Lake Elsinore, Calibmia group, Inc. 5-6 Exhibit 5 -0 OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES AQMA ITEM NO. �3 PAGE L OF N �✓ 1595-03 -01 (Exs.D) engineering ELSINORE CITY CENTER CONDO PROJECT- TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY, Lake Elsinore, California group, inc. 5 -7 v,lhich are projected to operate a an unacceptable level of service during : '- ,pening Year with project peak hour conditions. Opening Year with project HCM calculaf' ion worksheets are provided in Appendix "D". 5-8 AGENDA ITEM NO..,�.= PAGE U OR.4 6.0 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. - - - Traffic Contribution The proposed condo project is projected to generate approximately 844 trip -ends per weekday with 63 vehicles per fiour._during the AM peak ,hour and 78 vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour. The project traffic contributions have been calculated for the PM peak hour and are shown in Table 6-1 1✓ AW-WA ITEM NO. �- 6 -1 PAGE OF TABLE 6 -1 PROJECT TRAFFIC CONTRIBUTION' r I _ywN i ERSECTION /SI " !NS) at fc:ad Canyon Rd. Ramps (NS) at ` f oad Canyon tip` damps (NS) at: k <a lroad Canyon Rd. -' it (NS) at d Canyon Rd. ' 6 .:r,,I ?Jpon PM peak hour traffic volumes j:rktab1es1rk17001rk' ; :th 6-2 JN:1595 -03-01 AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE L u 1OF u� i� PROJECT TRAFFIC OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC PROJECT OF TOTAL TRAFFIC 75- 5872 1.28% 51 4877 1.05°/0 37 3803 ; 0.97% 20 3038 0.66% ' 6 .:r,,I ?Jpon PM peak hour traffic volumes j:rktab1es1rk17001rk' ; :th 6-2 JN:1595 -03-01 AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE L u 1OF u� i� APPENDIX A TRAFFIC COUNT WORKSHEETS AGEMA ITEM NO. PAGE 12 0 OR-22, Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by` Southlar d'Car Counters` N -S STREET: Summerhill/ Grape St. DATE: 4/2912003 LOCATION: City of Lake Elsinore E -W STREET: Railroad Canyon Rd. DAY: TUESDAY PROJECT# 03- 0717 -003 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER' WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 2 1.5 .5 1 1 1 2 1.5 .5 1 3 0 6:00 AM 6:15 AM 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 33 13 41 21 14 67 35 108 47 28 335 19 761 7:15 AM 42 9 45 29 12 82 37 131 52 32 397 23 891 7:30 AM 54 11 67 33 9 96 46 167 56 37 459 27 1062 7:45 AM 63 15 59 38 16 128 42 .196 68 49 491 35 1200 8:00 AM 51 10 51 30 13 106 39 172 63 46 438 31 1050 8:15 AM 49 12 48 27 11 91 32 153 54 41 379 29 926 8:30 AM 58 17 60 22 8 85 26 129 72 35 364 33 909 8:45 AM 45 14 55 25 10 79 29 144 61 44 356 38 900 .9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10 :00 AM 10 :15 AM 10:30 AM. 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11 :45 AM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = -395 101 426 .225 13 734 286 1200 473. 312 3219 235 7699- AM Peak Hr Begins at: 730 AM PEAK VOLUMES = 217 48 225 128 49 421 159 688 241 173 1767 PEAK HR. FACTOR: 0.894 CONTROL: Signalized 0.821 0.889 0.897 122 4238 0.883 AGENDA ITEM NO. )- 3 PAGE 19 1 OFE Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: Southland Car Counters a N -S STREET: Summerhill/ Grape St. DATE: 4/29/2003 LOCATION: City of Lake Elsinore E -W STREET: Railroad Canyon Rd. DAY-TUESDAY PROJECT# 03 -0717 -003 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 1 1. 2 1.5 .5 1 3 0, 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 2 :00 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PM 3 :00 PM 3 :15 PM 3:30 PM 3 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 67 36 61 33 31 65 87 261 104 78 279 40. 1142 4:15 PM 58 28 68 36 34 54 78 244 98 62 256 31. 1047 4:30 PM 71 ` 25 74 40 28 58 85 236 91 59 231 36 1034 4:45 PM 64 32 79 42 26 71 91 217 116 65 240 42 1085 r 5:00 PM 76 39 83 35 33 79 97 228 122 74 263 44- 11X3 5:15 PM 81 41 87 44 37 86 109 209 135 68 304 39, - -- .1240 i. 5 :30 PM 97 44 93 47 46 95 126 280 143 83 327 48. 1429 5:45 PM 59 35 80 38 41 83 113 193 129 76 286 37 1170 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM . 6;45 PM.: �. TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 573 280 625 315 276 591 786 1868 938 565 2186 317 9320 x PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM PEAK i VOLUMES = 313 159 343 164 157 343 445 910 529 301 1180 168 5012 PEAK HR. FACTOR: 0.871 0.883 0.858 0.900 0.877 3: CONTROL: Signalized AGMA ITEM NO. PAOE,w OF� Intersection. Turning Movement Prepared by Southland Car Counters N -S STREET: I -15 NB Ramps DATE: 4/29/2003 LOCATION: City of Lake Elsinore E -W STREET: Railroad Canyon Rd. DAY: TUESDAY PROJECT# 03- 0717 -004 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES, .3 .3 .3 1 2 2 1 6:00 AM 6:15 AM 6:30 AM >: 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 36 1 53 49 157 174 259' 729 7:15 AM 32 2 68 42 142 216 307- 809 7:30 AM 45 0 79 60 174 237 346:- 941 7:45 AM 57 1 94 72 206 318 374 ` ' . 1122 E 8:00 AM .48 3 85 65 169 273 324 9G7 8:15 AM 43 2 76 57 161 220 287._. 846 8:30 AM 37 0 63 51 178 229 253 811 f 8:45 AM 41 2 71 48 183 264 261.: 870 9:00 AM 9:15 AM f 9:30'.AM 9:45 AM - 10:00 AM` 1 10:15 AM f 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM 1. TOTAL TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR ' VOLUMES .= _t. 339 11 .589. .. , :.0 0 .0 _ 444 1370- 0 . 0 1931 2411 7095 AM Peak Hr Begins at: 730 AM PEAK VOLUMES = 193 6 334 0 0 0 254 710 0 0 1048 1331 3876 PEAK HR . FAC15011: 0.877 0.000 0.867 0.000 0.864 i CONTROL: Signalized; AQMA ITEM NO. IN PAGE 0= T^ Interse0fon Tur.-n ng Movement Prepared by: Southland Car Counters PM Peak Hr Begins at: PEAK VOLUMES = 333 PEAK HP, FACTOR: 500 PM 15 668 0 0 0.910 0.000 CONTROL: Signalized; 0 271 1172 0 0 876 840 4175 ;.3 0.889 0:000 0.894 AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE 1 ► OFL� N -S STREET. I -15 NB Ramps DATE: 4/29/2003 LOCATION: City of Lake Elsinore E -W STREET: Railroad Canyon Rd. DAY: TUESDAY PROJECT# 03 -0717 -004 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 2 1 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1.45 PM , 2 :00 PM 2:15 PM 2 :30 PM 2 :45 PM 3.00 PM 3 :15 PM ` 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4 :00 PM 61 2 157 67 296 237 209 1029" 4:15 PM 49 4 136 61 305 208 186, 949 4:30 PM 53- 5 142 59 283 193 171 906 j PM 56 3 151 51 279 264 163 967, -.age 5:00 PM 72 6 163 53 297 186 195 972 5:15 PM 86 4 178 71 268 213 217 1037 5:30 PM 94 3 182 83 323 252 230. 1167 5:45 PM 81 2 145 64 284 225 198 999 6:00 PM 6:15 iPM 6:30 PM .. 6:45 PM,_, TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 552 29 1254 0 0 0 509 2335 0 0 1778 1569 8026 PM Peak Hr Begins at: PEAK VOLUMES = 333 PEAK HP, FACTOR: 500 PM 15 668 0 0 0.910 0.000 CONTROL: Signalized; 0 271 1172 0 0 876 840 4175 ;.3 0.889 0:000 0.894 AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE 1 ► OFL� Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: Southland Car Counters' N -S STREET: I -15 SB Ramps DATE: 4/29/2003 LOCATION: City of Lake Elsinore E -W STREET: Diamond Dr. DAY: TUESDAY PROJECT# 03- 0717 -005 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1.3 .3 .3 2 1 1 2 6:00 AM 6 15 AM 6:30 AM { 6:45 AM - 7:00 AM 86 1 38 132 46 105 97 505 7:15 AM 98 0 47 119 54 121 126 565 7:30 AM 90 0 65 113 69 137 145 619.` i 7:45 AM 122 1 89 157 85 153 194 801 8:00 AM 111 0 81 141 76 142 163 7:14: . 8:15 AM 89 2 74 107 63 116 151 602: 8:30 AM 95 0 87 129 67 134 168 8:45 AM 107 1 96 124 62 130 182 702 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9 :30 AM 9:45 AM 10 :00 AM 10:15 AM 10 :30 AM 16:45 AM 11:00 AM. 11:15 AM 11 :30 AM 11:45 AM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES =... , . 0 0. 0 .. Z98 S 577 0 1022 ... 522. 1038 :: 1226. : 0.., 51$8 AM Peak Hr Begins at: 745 AM PEAK VOLUMES = 0 0 0 417 3 331 0 534 291 545 676 0 2797. i PEAK HR. FACTOR: 0.000 0.886 0.000 0.880 0.873 r CONTROL: Signalized; E �3 AGENDA ITEM NO --------- pp—CC� PAGE f 5 OF; Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: Southland Car Counters PM Peak Hr Begins at: PEAK VOLUMES = 0 PEAK HR. FACTOR: 445 PM a 0 0 713 7 406 0 0.000 CONTROL: Signalized; 0.888 703 348 296 833 0.000 0.902 0 3306 0.952 AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE 017,;�-4�11.1— N-S STREET: 1-15 SB Ramps DATE: 4/2912003 LOCATION: City of Lake Elsinore E-W STREET. Diamond Dr. DAY: TUESDAY PROJECT4 03-0717-005 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1.3 .3 .3 2 1 1 2 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 2:0.0 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM .2:45 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 190 2 97 191 89 93 201 4:15 PM 178 1 85 169 86 86 184 789 4:30 PM 165 0 108 184 75 89 179 800 4:45 PM 157 2 94 178 92 98 215 836 5*00 PM 169 0 91 165 84 85 168 762 5:15 PM 181 2 113 157 78 102 207 5:30 PM 206 3 108 203 94 11 243 868 5:45 PM 187 1 88 174 81 84 192 807 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM TOTAL NL ta NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 0 0 0 1433 11 784 0 1421 679 648 1589 0 6565. PM Peak Hr Begins at: PEAK VOLUMES = 0 PEAK HR. FACTOR: 445 PM a 0 0 713 7 406 0 0.000 CONTROL: Signalized; 0.888 703 348 296 833 0.000 0.902 0 3306 0.952 AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE 017,;�-4�11.1— S. k s� I k s r- 'I 1 I i 1 E E Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: Southland Car Counters N -S STREET: Casino Dr. DATE: 4/29/2003 LOCATION: City of Lake Elsinore E -W STREET: Diamond Dr. DAY: TUESDAY PROJECT# 03 -0717 -006 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND:. EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 3 0 2 2 0 :00 AM. 6:15 AM 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 2 4 11 35 2 9 5 109 2 27 84 19 309 7:15 AM 4 8 17 31 6 8 7 187 3 39 118 28 _ 456 7:30 AM 7 6 13 29 8 12 10 145 7 51 121 42' 451 7:45 AM 12 10 20 38 11 16 18 184 5 63 167 65 609 8:00 AM 10- 12 15 33 9 13 12 152 4 46 139 57- ` 502 , 8:15 AM 8 9 23 44 7 15 14 123 3 58 127 46 -` .477 8:30 AM 6 7 16 47 4 8 15 131 6 60 135 54' 489 8:45 AM 9 8 19 52 3 11 10 118 4 53 153 49 489 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 58 64 134 309 50 92- 91 1149 34 397 1044 360 3782 AM Peak Hr Begins at: 745 AM PEAK VOLUMES = 36 38 74 162. PEAK HR. FACTOR: 0.881 CONTROL: Signalized; 31 52 59 590 0.928 0.806 18 227 568 222 2077 0.862 0.853 AAA ITEM NO. PAGE OF PM Peak Hr Begins at: PEAK VOLUMES = 59 PEAK HR. FACTOR: 445 PM 80 160 196 70 95 0.849 CONTROL: Signalized; 0.820• 1 74 696 73 267 769 213 2752 0.833 0.892 0.859 z.. r AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE � LQQ L:I?dd . OF IntersectionTti'ming Hrovement Prepared by: Southland Car Counters N -S STREET: Casino Dr. DATE: 4/29/2003 LOCATION: City of Lake Elsinore E -W STREET. Diamond Dr. DAY: TUESDAY PROJECT# 03 -0717 -006 <: .Y NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 3 0 2 2 0 ` K, 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1 :45 PM 2:00 PM -2 :15 PM: 2 :30 PM: Tv 2:45 PM 3:00 PM- 3:15 PM 3:30 PM° 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 13 22 37 51 19 23 24 193 9 59 192 39" 681 4:15 PM 15 18 30 42 14 17 19 182 12 53 174 44- 620 4:30 PM 12. 27 42 46 21 25 17 165 10 64 180 42 651 4:45 PM 10 16 36 43 16 20 13 189 16 68 187 51- 665 5:00 PM 16 21 40 45 13 28 20 154 19 60 158 47. 621 5:15 PM 14 19 39 48 17 21 15 147 17 66 203 59.:. :665 - 5:30 PM 19 24 45 60 24 26 26 206 21 73 221 .56 801 5:45 PM 6:00 PM 11 13 33 54 18 21 22 172 13 56 169 45 .'. 627 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6 :45 PM TOTAL NL NT NR SL- ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 110 160 302 389 142 181 156 1408 117 499 1484 383 5331.. PM Peak Hr Begins at: PEAK VOLUMES = 59 PEAK HR. FACTOR: 445 PM 80 160 196 70 95 0.849 CONTROL: Signalized; 0.820• 1 74 696 73 267 769 213 2752 0.833 0.892 0.859 z.. r AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE � LQQ L:I?dd . OF Average Daily Traffic Volumes Prepared by: Southland Car Counters � Yollurnes for: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 City: Lake Elsinore Project #: 03 -0965 001 Location: Grape St. & s/o Lake Elsinore City Center Dwy- Client Ref #: 1595 -03 -01 AM Period NO SB EB WB PM Period NB SB EB WB 12:00-12-15­g 7 — T200 -12:15 46 Y 45 12:15 -12-30 5 6 12:15 -12:30 26 33 12:30 -12:45 3 7 12:30- 12:45 44 31 12:45 -1:00 0 16 1 21 37 12:45 -1:00 52 168 46 155 323 1:00 -1:15 2 2 1:00 - 1:15 49 43 1:15 -1:30 1 3 1:15 - 1:30 58 29 1:30 -1:45 j 1:45 -2:00 1 1 5 2 1 8 13 1:30 - 1:45 1:45- 2:00 62 60 229 37 38 147 376 2:00 -2:15 0 0 2:00-2:15 57 41 2:15 -2:30 1 1 2:15 -2:30 45 45 2:30- 2:45 - 0 0 230 -2:45 43 43 2:45 -3.00 1 2 3 4 6 2:4S- 3:00 55 200 33 162 362 3:00 -3:IS 1 0 3:00- 3:15 50 52 3:15 -3:30 1 0 3:15 -3:30 61 47 1 3:30 -3:45 3 0 3:30 -3:45 104 52 3:4S -4:00 3 8 1 1 9 3 :45 -4:00 75 290 47 198 488 4 :00.4:15 4 1 4:00 -4:15 78 51 4:15 -4:30 6 2 4:15 -4:30 87 Sl 4:30.4:45 5 1 4:30.4:45 51 49 4:45 -5:00 5 20 0 4 24 4:45.5 :00 71 287 52 203 490 5:00 -5:15 6 4 5:00 -5:15 59 58 5:15 -5:30 9 1 5:15 -5:30 81 50 5:30 -5:45 8 2 5:30 -5 :45 82 41 x:45 6:00 7 30 2 9 39 5:45- 6:00 70 292 41 190 482 0 -6:15 7 4 6:00- 6:15 80 50 6:15 -6 :30 14 3 6:15 -6:30 84 29 6:30 - 6:45 22 5 6:30 -6:45 86 20 } 6 :45 -7:00 28 71 11 23 94 6:45 -7:00 83 333 54 153 486 7:00- 7:15 38 12 7:00 -7:15 84 37 7:15 -7:30 32 15 7:15 -7:30 69 34 7:30-7:45 36 25 7:30 - 7:45 46 34 7:45-8:00 24 130 24 76 206 7:45 -8:00 32 231 41 146 377 8:00 - 8:15 34 33 8:00 -8:15 43 35 8:15 -8:30 43 14 8:15 -8:30 22 36 8:30 - 8:45 34 21 8:30 -8:45 29 44 8AS -9:00 41 152 37 105 257 8:45 -9:00 24 118 26 141 259 9.•00 -9:15 53 26 9:00 -9:15 15 30 9:15 -9:30 41 18 9:15-9:30 23 21 9:30 -9:45 25 23 9:30 -9:45 35 27 9:45 -10:00 42 161 26 93 254 9:45 -10:00 29 102 26 104 206 I0:00 -10:15 30 25 10:00 -10:15 19 11 10 :15 -10:30 35 19 10:15 -10:30 16 15 10:30 - 10:45 38 33 10:30 -10:45 20 17 10:45 -11:00 1 104 1 78 182 10:45 -11:00 12 67 18 61 128 IVOG -11:15 44 27 11:00 -11:15 6 9 11:15 -11:30 3S 27 11:15 -11:30 4 11 11:30 -11:45 35 34 11:30 -11:45 3 6 11:45 -12:00 43 157 28 116 273 11:45 -12 :00 5 18 1 27 45 Total Vol. 8% 538 0 0 1394 2335 1687 0 0 4022 Totals 3191 2225 0 0 5416 AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE ial OF'; APPENDIX B CALCULATION OF INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE EXISTING AQEIDA ITEM NO. 2 PAGE o OF A0011- Traffix 7.5.0715 (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP L./ AAA ITEM N(())O��. PACE.. = o O MITIG8 - exam Mon Jun 16, 2003 15:29:16 Page 1 -1 /., ----- ----- - - -- -- ------------------------------------------------- Elsinore City Center Existing _ AM zP k H(apr Interjection v44umes_ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base volume Alternative) Intersection #5 Grape St. (NS) /Railroad Canyon Rd. (EW) - Cycle (sec): 116 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X): 0.821 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y +R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 52.3 Optimal Cycle:OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 20 20 .20' 20 20 20 10 20 20 10 20 20 Lanes: 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 --------------- ( --------------- 1 0 1 ---------- 0 2 1 0 - - - - -� ------ - - - - -- --------------- Volume Module: Base Vol: 217 48 225 12.8 49 421 159 688 241 173 1767 122 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 217 48 225 128 49 421 159 688 241 173 1767 122 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. PHF Volume: 217 48 225 128 49 421 159 688 241 173 1767 122 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 217 48 225 128, 49 421 159 688 241 173 1767 122 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 217 48' 225 128 49 421 159 688 ---------- --------------- 241 173 ---------- 1767 122 - - - - -} - -- -------}---------------}---------------}----- ------------ I --------------- Saturation Flow Module: --------------- Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.92 0.91 0.91 0.95 0.90 0.90 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.48 0:52 1.00 2.81 0.19 t Final Sat.: 3502 3610 1615 1805 1900 1615 3502 2569 ------ ----- 900 -- ��-------=-- 1805 4803 332 - - - - -} ------------ ---=----=------ Capacity Analysis ��---------------}-- Module: Vol /Sat: 0.06 0.01 0.14 0.07 0.03 0.26 0.05 0.27 0.27 0.10 0:37 0.37 Crit Moves: Green /Cycle: 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.09 0.34 0.34 0.12 0.37 0.37 Volume /Cap: 0.36 0.08 0.81 0.27 0.10 0.99 0.53 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.99 0.99 j Delay /Veh: 42.7 40.3 62.1 34.1 32.3 82.0 52:5 38.4 38.4 67.1 53.1 53.1 ( User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel /Veh: 42.7 40 -.3 62.1 34.1 32.3 82.0 - 52.5 38.4 38.4 61-11 53.1 53:1 Designoueue: 12 3 12 6 2 21 9 31 it 10 78 5 A0011- Traffix 7.5.0715 (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP L./ AAA ITEM N(())O��. PACE.. = o O expm Mon Jun 16, 2003 10.49:58 Page 6 -1 Z Elsinore City Center Existing i -- eak Hour InCerct ion 'crYilumes - " - j Level Of Service Computation Report . 2000 HCM Operations Method. (Base Volume Alternative) a: Intersection #5 Grape St. (NS) /Railroad Canyon Rd: (EW) Cycle (sec): 108 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X): 1.140 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y +R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 77.9 i� Optimal Cycle: 120 Level Of Service: E , Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound. West Bound Movement: ------------ L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: ----------------- Split Phase ----------- Split Phase ----------------- Protected Protected - --- - - - - -( - Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 20 26 20 20 20 20 10 20- 20 10 20 20 Lanes: 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 1 O --- --- -- - - -- --------------- Volume Module: --------------- --------------- ------- --- - - - - -) - Base Vol: 313 159 343 164 157 343 445 910 529 301 1180 168.. Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 . Initial Bse: 313 1S9 343. 157 343 445 910 529. 301.1180 168 User Adj:. 1.00 1.00 1.00 .164 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Vv PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. PHF Volume: 313 159 343 164 1S7 343 445 910 529 301 1180 168 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 "0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 Reduced Vol: 313 159 343 164 157 343 445 910 529 301 1180 168 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.40 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1..00 1.00 L MLF Adj:- 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 313 159 343 164 157 343 445 910 529 301 1180 168 Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane:.. 1,900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900. 1900 . 1900 1900 1900 _ Adjustment: 0.92.6.95 0.85 0.95 1..00 0.85 0.92 0.90 0.90 0..95 0.89. 0.89 Lanes: 2.00 2..00 1_00 1100 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.26 0.74 1.00.2.63; 0.37: r Final Sat.: - - 3502 3610 1615 1805 1900 1615 3502 2157 1254 1805 4454 634 ------ - - -- --------------- Capacity Analysis Module: --------------- --------------- ��-------- ------- � Vol /Sat: 0.09 0.04 0.21 0.09 0,.08 0.21 0.13 0.42 0.42 0.17 0.26 0.26 t. Crit Moves: ; * * *. * *•* * * *; ; # ** Green /Cycle: 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.17 0.37 0.37 0.15.0.35, 03.5 Volume /Cap: 0.48 0.24. 1.14 0.49 0..44 1.14 0.76 1.14 1.14 1.14 0.76 0.76- Delay /Veh: 39.8`37_6.139.2 40.4 39.9 139.2 48.6 107 107,0 144.6:- 3.3.1. 33,1­1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.,.00. 1.00_• j. 333 AdjDel /Veh: 39.8 37.6 139.2 40,4 39.9 139.2 48.6 107 101.0 144.6 33.1 33.1 DesignQueue: 16 S. 1.0 :. 8 8 18 23 38 22. 16 49 7. z Traffix 7.S.671S (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP AGEMA ITEM NO. -. PAaaZ2;:-OF1 MITIG8 - exam Mon Jun 16, 2003 15:19:49 Page 1 -1 ` ---------------------- --- ---- ------- -------- - - - - - -- --------------- - - -- Elsinore City Center Existing A[L-Peak Hour-. I:nterWctionvyoliumes Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) .� + * *t•�•..�r *. :.•• * * :f *.e *t: tat**:** t*** t.***• x* tt*# * * * * *t * * :,ra *r' * : : * * * * *�• * * *,r# Intersection #4 I -15 Fwy. NB Ramps (NS) /Railroad Canyon Rd._ (EW) •,r : *w�,rrr * : * *,r :,r *. *,r,rt gar**, r, t*, rt*•, t+ r**:*****, t** r* ir** t*, c ,t * *r *� * * + * *,rf,r *,r *r * # :� * * #�* _ A Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X): 1.377 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y +R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 122.1 Optimal Cycle:OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: F **• tx:+ t**, tx*: t*, t�t, t+ rs�*, t*:**:*, r:*, r* t*, rxtrt** r; r * *,ttrt,r�r : * «r *+t : :• * +xw : * * *,r +r +r *xr * :: Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T R L - T - R- ------------ - - -- ---------)--------------- ----------=---- ---------- - - - - -� Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 15 0 0 15 15 Lanes: 0 0` 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 1 0 2 0 0 '0 0 2 0 1 ------------ i--------------- i i---------- - - - - -i f--------------- i ------=--- - - - - -i Volume Module: Base Vol: 193 0 334 0 0 0 254 710 0 0 1048 1331 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 193 0 334 0 0 0 254 710 0 0 1048 1331 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 193 0 334 0 0 0 254 710 0 0 1048 1331 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 193 0 334 0 0 0 254 710 0 0 1048 133.1- PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol. 193 0 334 0 0 0 254 710 0 0 1048 1331 -----------=- - =------------ --------------- --------------- ---------- - - - - -� j Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.85 1 Lanes: 0.37 0.00 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 625 0 1081 0 0 0 1805 3610 0 0 3610 1615 ----------=-'--------------- =----------- ---------- ----- ----- ---- - - - - - -� Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.31 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.29 0:82 Crit Moves: • : +• * *•* *,r *# Green /Cycle: 0.22 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.60 Volume /Cap:' 1.38 0.00 1.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.38 0.28 0.00 0._0t) 0.49 1.38 Delay /Veh: 232.0" 0.0 232.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 253.1 6.8 0.0 0.0 13.8 200.4 user De1Adj: 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00. AdjDel /Veh: 232.0 0.0 232.0 0.0 0.:0_ 0.0 253:7 6.8 6.0 0:0 13.8 200.4 DesignQueue: 11 0 19 0 0 0 16 15 0 O 30 44 j Traffix 7.5.0715 (c).2002 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING. GROUP AAA ITEM NO. 2® PAaE� OF ', . (c) 102'D6wiing Ass A GENDA ITEM NO. � . ''` rAcmc ^* Mon i*, zoos 15,25,44 Page z-z Mzrzmm - eopm `Jun _--------_---_--__---__------___----_--_-----_-_----_-------------- ozoinmr= city Center Existing_ ,--� _� zocaroec�ioo volime-a __------'-_________-_-,----_------'_---_----___-_---'-------- Level of Service ' ioo Report aVV»�oC�°op�x���moo^°°^*^^^^�°�^�°^*°°°�°^^°°°^^°°°°°°�°^°^^°°°~°�° method (s*aae Volume Alternative) Intersection 0* z-zs swy' ma Ramps (Ns)/Railroad Caryon.Rd' (ow) -- Cycle (sec): zzs ' Critical Vol./Cap- (m)-. z'ses Loss Time (sec): 9 (r+a ~ x sec) Avezageoelay (sao/veh); 120`7 nptimal cycle:OezzMzZum Level Of Service: F. ' -,yppzzsaob: North Bound South Bound East woot Bound Movement: ,v=m�o�, L - 7 - a L - T - a L _ T - a if fl-------- L - T - e � ------------ |-----_---------[��--------------- Control: _ Split swsaoe --------------- opllt.ehaee ezotected ------- ...Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include ' Green:. o n o m m o 10 is o , n 15 15 Lanes: u o il o o o o 6 o m z .m a a 0 o o o. m 1 --------|--^--------1 Volume Module- -------------- --------------- !|--------------- � ' Base Vol: 333 o e68 u o o 271 1172 m o 87e Growth 1'00 1'00 1'00 z'ou 11.00 1'00 1'00 z'on 1'0u z_mo 1,00 1'oo,_ , zoitial'B- : 333 p eao n u n 271 1172 n n 876 840 User adj; z'oo z'mu z'no 1'06 1'00 1.00 z'uo z'uo z'uo z'up 1'00 1'0o eaFadj; 1.00 1.60 z'oo z'uo 1'00 1'00 z'wo z'uo i'oo z'uo z_mo z'uq, eHr Volume: ��s n 668 n o o 271 1172 n o eva 840 ' aednot Vol. o u o .m o w u o o o u 0 ` Reduced Vol: ass m 668 o o w 271 1172 u m 87* 840 �� eco xudj; 1�04 1'00 z'uu z'mo z'nu 1. 00, l'oo 1,90 z-oo 1-00 z'ou 1.00 nm �rx���; z'uu �'0n z�#u 1.0,0 i u �^nu z'mo 'uu z'uo �'oo z'�o i�uu z'm� Final Vol.: s»a 4 6e8 o o 0 u?z 1172 V 0. 876 8*0 -------- I'------'-- ---------'--1|----------- -------` ---r-|' L� Saturation Flow =, ' ` Sat/Lane: z*no 1*no z*oo zguu z*uo 1e00 zaoo zyum zyuu 1900 19.00 zeoo Adjustment: n'An i'ou o'yo z,uo 1-00 z�ow n'uso'§� z'no z'ou 0'95 0'85 '. Lanes: u-as8'mn o's� o'oo V,Vo o'oV z'ou u'oo n'no o'Vo a.uu z'o�. ' Final Sat.: 566 o zzss o n 0 �eus sszu n |� o —_--_---- ss�n �i��n � ------------ - Analysis Module: --- |--------- � Vol/Sat: '0, 0'06 o'sy o'ou o'oo o'oo n'zs u'so o'oo o'uo 0,24 u'so , .` ` 3� Crit Moves- ~- Green/Cycle: 0.00 o'«a n'no o'ou u'oo 0'11 0'4e o'oo 0.00 0'38 0.38. '.. — ---' n^on 1'sr 4.00 0.00 m^mm 1.36 u'as 0.00 n_au 0. 64 1'37 ,. Delay/V ="� 20='9 0.0 z-os y o ^ u 0,0 0.0 244.2 o44'2 ma-m �u 0'0 30.1 21 m 4 User --- , 1'06 1'00 140 � 1'00 i'nn. 1.06 �' mo ,' no i - ou 1,00.. '- 20d,9 o'o ohs.m 0'0 o'o o,m 24 4.2 ��'m ' o ' 4 �i.ma u�u�o ' 1 21n�,[ ._ ^D' oee1gu{uepm, z$ u nq .' - .m _ » ' o 16 41 o ' u zn ao = ', . (c) 102'D6wiing Ass A GENDA ITEM NO. � . ''` rAcmc ^* MITIG8 - exam Mon Jun 16, 2003 15:23:23 Page 1 -1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Elsinore City Center Existing _ AM-Peak Hour Int -eroection= yoluines= Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 I -15 Fwy_ SB Ramps (NS) /Railroad Canyon Rd. (EW) Cycle (sec): 65 Critical Vol./Cap- (X): 0.790 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y +R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 24.1 Optimal Cycle :OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East.Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L T - R L T - R L - T - R- ------------ -- -------- - - - - -( --- P------ - - - - -( --------- - ----- ��-------------- -r Control: lit Phase Split Phase Permitted Protected Rights: Include Include include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 15 10 15 0 Lanes: 6 0 0 0 .0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 6 - ---- - - - - -- ---------------( --------------- --------------- --------- - - - -(. Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 417 0 331 0 534 291 S45 676 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1..00 1.00. Initial Bse: 0 0 0 417 0 331 0 534 291 545 676 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.0.0 1700 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00, PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.0.0 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 A 0 417 0 331 0 534 291 545 676 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i� Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 417 0 331 0 534 291 545 676 0 ` PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 417 ' 0 331 0 S34 291 545 676 0 j------------ --------------- --------------- IL------ - - - - -- --------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0:00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 1805 0 1615 0 3610 1615 1805 3610 0 - - - -- - -- I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------- - - - - -� Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.15 0.18 0.30 0.19 0.00 { 'Crit Moves: • +w+ r + ** + + ++ Green /Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.00 0..27 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.36 0.59 0.00„ Volume /Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.85.0.00 0.75 0.00 0..64 0.78 0.95 0.32 0.00. Delay /Veh: 0.6 0.0 0.0 35.0 0.0 28.6 0.0 24.3 33.6 29.2 6.9 0.0. User DelAdj: 1.00.1.00 1.00 1.60 1_.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 14,00 .1.00 1.Q0 AdjDel /Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.0 0.0 28.6 0.0 24.3 33.6 29.2 6.9 0.0 DesignQueue: 0 0 0 12 O 9 0 15 8 14 11 0 Traffix 7.5.:0715 (.c) 2002.._Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP Aa'totDA MM NO. PAGE= MITIG8 - expm Mon Jun z«, 2003 15:35:45 , . Page z-z __-_----__-'_-__-_---_----_-_---____-__--__--------_---'- Elsinore City Center Existing '-___________________________-_�_ z­nt.46F secEiofi`4i(5 ved- _______ e� -------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report operations -���^������°���°°+°°°^°°^°°°^°�°�°°^°°°^°.°°^°°^°°°^^ ^ ^^°~..~°.~^ �� Intersection #3 1-15 pwy' aa Ramps (mo)/RailzoauCaoyoo Rd , _(e»v ) ' Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap. ) 0.887 Loss Time (sec): 9 (r+R ~` 4 gec) Average Delay (meoyveh): 27-2 Optimal cyp1a:mPrzMIoaD Level of servzoa; .c -Approach- North Bound South Bound ma=t Bound Webt Bound Movement: u - T - a L -� � � -� a u - � - � _ - � a ---------f--�-----'---[|�------------[�------------�i---�-----------`' omotzzol, ' ` �t s�`awe .�. mgz1t Phase ` Permitted / Protected . �^ e1gbtm; . Include zooloda include include Mlo' Green: w o o m m u o is is 10 is o Lanes: o o o u o z' o o V z o u z m 1 1 m z o o / ------------ | --------------- Volume "uodule, >i---------------- ------------ ----------------- Base Vol: o a n 713 n 406 n 703 a*e 296 833 Growth xudj` i'uV z'wV z-ou 1'00 1'00 1�00 z'oo z-oo z'mn a�mo z'oU z.�m Initial ase: n o o 713 u 406 o 703 3418 296 o33 » User xudj, z'on z'ou z'oo 1'00 z'oo 1'00 z_oo 1,00 z'no z'oo 1'00 z'on ` �0 Por xudj ; 1.'00 z'oo z'mn z'uo z'om 1.'00 z'on 1.00 z'oo z'mu z'uo z'mu` eenVoluma; u o o 713 u *nu n 703 348 o96 ass V eeduot Vol: o n o a o e o n o o o V Reduced Vol: n o V 713 o «na n 703. 34e 29e 833 « �V ecoAdj: 1;�n 1'00 z'uo 1'00 z'oo 1'00 .z'on 1.00 z'oo 1.'00 1.00 z'mo � »��a��, z'uo ��ou �'oo �'on �'nn z'eo z'on 1.00 z'oo 1 ' oo 1'00 z'oo^ 4�w� Final Vol..- n o u 713 o xo« o nma 348 �----------| |---------| |---------'--_| � 96 833 n ____--_ Saturation nz __-_-_ ---- Module: ~_ Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 zaou zyuo 1900 1*00 1900 1900 1e00 19^ . 0 u1nnn zaon Adjustment:, z'on z'no z ' ou 0' 95 1' 00 0' 85 1­00 0-95 0-8.5 u ' �s o ' es z' �oo Lanes- o un 0.00 o' ` ' z -V0 � on o ou oo u�h0 2.00 1 0 1'00.2'00 o'oo �U Final mnt , ' n `n o zns o 15 o sezo zazs |----------- 1805 —_____----_� 3610 u --------'—i Capacity Analysis --------------- ���le, Module: ] l---------| ' Vol/Sat; 'ou w'on o'ou o'*o u_wV 0'25 o'mo 0.19 o'uz n'zo o'zo m'mo,� czic xmzvea, -----' � o'um o'oo o'oo. 0.42 0'00 V'«z 0'00 0'25 m_us o'zn 0'43 m'oV o'nu 0. o u'mo o'ea o'on 0'5* o'oo 0.78 o'ma o.»o 0,54 0.00 . ` - oelay/Vab, o'o o 'u o ' o 34' 5 0 14`7 o - m 25' 3 38 '5 sx ' s sa z 0.0 User oelAuj, 1'00 z*uV 1-00 ,6' 1' 00 z ' oo z ' mo z ' po z ' mo z ' ou 1, 00 z' VV 1.06 '' e^�JDel/neh; ¢'0 'ocm m'o 34.5 0.0 14,7 .0 25.3 so.s sr^s 13-2 m'n o=�lg���e�e,°oo°^^°^°^+°^^^�^^��^°^^°°°°^° o is 0 m n 18 a o zv o Traccix 7.5.0.715 (c) 2002 mcwl` - As~���-Liceuseuto no ENGINEERING GROUP ���*� �� AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE OF 10�- Traffix 7.5.0715 (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc_ Licensed to -RK ENGINEERING GROUP AGENDA ITEM NOS.._ 2...r PAGE 2D-7 OF Mon.Jun 16, 2003 10:49:18 Page exam -3-1 -- ------------------------- - - - - -- - - -- Elsinore City Center Existing AM_Feakc Hour Intersection - valaimes - -------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Casino Dr_ (NS) /Railroad Canyon Rd. (EW) a Cycle (sec): 65 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X): 0.449 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y +R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 16.8 optimal Cycle: 60 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound I Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R -- L - ----- T - R ----- - - - - -� Control: Permitted -------- - - - - -- Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 20 20 20 20 20 20 10 20 20 10 20 20_ ' Lanes: 1. 0 1 1 0 " - --------- 1 0 1 1 0 --------------- 1 0 2 1 0 -- --- ---------- 2 0 ---- ------ 1 1 0 - - - - -� j ------ - -- - -- - - -- Volume Module: Base Vol: 36 38 74 162 31 52 59 590 18 227 568 222 1 Growth Adj: 1.0.0 1.00 1 -00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 -00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 36 38 74 162 31 52 59 590 18 227 $68 222 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1_.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: "36 38 74 162 31 52 59 590 18 227 S68 222 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' Reduced Vol: 36 38 74 162 31 52 59 590 18 227 568 222 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00 ' MLF Adj: 1'.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 Final Vol.: - 36 38 74 - 162 31 52 - -- 59 590 18 ----- ��----- 227 568 222 -- - - -- - =( ------ - - - -- Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.70 0.86 0.86 0.68 0 -86 0.86 0.95 0.91 0.91 0.92 0.91 0.91 Lanes: 1.00 1.0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.91 0.09 2.00 1.44 0.56 Final Sat.,: 1328 1626 1626 .1286 1635, 1635 --------------- 1605 5013 153. --------- =--- -- 3502 ------ 2487 972 ---- - -- - =� ------ - - - - -- --------- Capacity Analysis Module: } Vol /Sat: 0.03 0.02 0.05 0.13 0.02 0.03 0.03.0..12 0.12 0.06 0.23 0.23 Crit Moves: tttt tttt + +,rt Green /Cycle: 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.15 0.37, 0.37 0.18 0.40 0.40" Volume /Cap: 0'.08 0.15 0.41 0.06 0.10 0.21 0.32` 0.32 0.35 0:57 0.57 ,0.0.9 Delay /Veh: 16.1 16.0 16.4 18.5 15.9 16.1 24.4 14.8 14.8 23.4 -15:7 15.7 1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.,00 1.00 1.00. AdjDel /Veh: 16.1 16.0 16.4. 18.5 15.9 16.1 24.4 14.8 14.8 23.4 .15.7 15.1 DesignOueue: 1 1 2 4 1 1 2 i4 0 7 13 S 10�- Traffix 7.5.0715 (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc_ Licensed to -RK ENGINEERING GROUP AGENDA ITEM NOS.._ 2...r PAGE 2D-7 OF expm Mon Jun 16, 2003 10:49:58 Page 3 -1 Elsinore City Center Existing _- PM Eak -Hour Intersection V40 umes ---------------------- ------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Casino Dr. (NS) /Railroad Canyon. Rd. (EW) Cycle (sec): 65 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X) 0.579 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y +R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 18.0 Optimal Cycle. 60 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement. L - T - R L - T - R L T - R L - T - R ------------ ,---------------- +--------------- ---------- -- ----- - - - - -� Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 20 20 20 20 20 20 10 20 20 10 20 20 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 ------------ I--------------- --------------- �t------ ----- ---- - --- ---- -- -- - - - -�. Volume Module: Base Vol: 59. 80 160 196 70 95 74 696 73 267 769 213 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 59 80 160 196 70 95 74 696 73 267 769 213 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 59 80 160 196 70 95 74 696 73 261 769 213 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 59 80 160 196 70 95 74 696 73 267 769 213 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00_ 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 59 80 160 196 70 95 74 696 73 267 769 213 ------ - - - - -- I --------------- -----------=--- 11--------------- ------------ . - - -�. Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1960 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.64 0.86 0.86 0.58 0,8.7 0.87 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.92 0.92 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.0.0 1.00. 1 -00 1.00 1.00 2.32 0.28 2.00 1.57 0.43 Final Sat.: 1218 1625 1625 1110 1650 .1650 1805 4629 496 3502 2734 757 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.18 0.04 0.06 0.04 0.15 0.15' 0.08 0.28 0.28 Crit Moves: Green /Cycle: 0.31 0.31 Volume /Cap: 0.16 0.16 Delay /Veh: 16.6.16.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1:00 AdjDel /Veh: 16.6 16.4 Des igno ueue : 1 2 0.31 0.32 17.5 1.00 17.5 4 # # #* 0.31 0.31 0.57 0.14 21.3 16.3 1.00 1.00 21.3 16.3 5 2 k *t #tt * #tt* * * ## 0.31 0.15 0.37 0.19 0.27 0.41 16.6 24.8 1S.4 1.00 1.00 1.00 16.6 24.8 15.4 2 2 16 0.37 0.41 15.4 1.00 15.4 2 t * ## 0.18 0.40 0.40 0.41'.0.70 0.70 23._8'17.9 17.9 1.00 1.00 1.00 23.6 17.9 17.9 8 18 5 Traf fix 7.5.071S (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP 3 F L a. s. i- T:' AGENDA ITEM NO.-2-3 PAGE OP2�-4 s j i f I 1 APPENDIX C CALCULATION OF INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE OPENING YEAR WITHOUT PROJECT AGENDA ITEM NO. �. 23 �' PAGE OF.� -1- am opening year Thu Jun 19, 2003 10.44.19 Page 6 -1 -------------------------------------- Elsinore City Center Opening year without project :- AM_.QEak Hc»Ur Inter ect2on_volumes_ _ --------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 Grape St. (NS) /Railroad Canyon Rd. (EW) Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X): 0.952 Loss Time (sec), 12 (Y +R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 83.8 Optimal Cycle:OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: F Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R -------- ----- ------ =----- -- ��---- ----- - - - - -- ! Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Inolude Min. Green: 20 20 20 20 20 20 10 20 20 .10 20 20 Lanes: 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 1 0` ------------ i--------------- i i---------- - - - - -i i-=-------- - - - - -i ---------- - - - - -i Volume Module: Base Vol: 217 48 225 128 49 421 159 688 241 173 1767 122 " Growth Adj: 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 Initial Bse: 230 51 238 136 52 446 169 729 255' 183 1873 129 Added Vol: 2 3 1 19 8 63 21 56 3 2 156 7 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 232 54 240 155 60 509 190 785 258 185 2029 13.6 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 PHF Volume: 232 54 240 155 60 509 190 785 258 185 2029 136 Reduct Vol: = 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 1.01. Reduced.Vol: 232 54 240 155 60 509 190 785 258 185 2029 136 PCB Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:_00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj- 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 232 54 240 155 60 509 190 785 258 185 2029 136 ------ - - - - -- --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- � Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.92 0.91 0.91 0.95 0.90 0.90 Lanes: 2.00 200 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.56 0.50 1.00 2.81 0.19 Final Sat.:' 3502 3610 1615 1805 1900 1615 3502 2616 861 1805 4817 324 ---- -- - - -- --------------- ------------- ---- -------- --- ---- -- ---- - -- - -� Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.07 0.01 0.15 0.09 0.03 0.32 0,05 0.30 0.30 0.1`0 0.42 0.42 Crit Moves: * * #* # # ## # * ## * # ## Green /Cycle: 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.28. 0.28 0.28 0.08 0.34 0.34 0.12 0.37 0.37 Volume /Cap: 0.400.0.9 0.89 0.31 0.11 1.13 0.65 0.89 o.89 0.89 1.13 1.13 Delay /Veh: 45.1'42.4. 77.2 34.5 32.4 127.5 58.4 45.8 45.8 85.3 10S 104.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdiDel /Veh: 45.1 42.4 77.2 34.5 32.4 127.5 58.4 45.8 45.8 85.3 105 104.8' DesignQueue: 13 3 14 8 3. 26 12 37 12 11 94 6 Traffix 7.5.0715 (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP AGENDA ITEM NO., 1-3 ' ' bona 10:47,27 Page *-z pm opening r Thu Jun 1e' ____________________________________________ Elsinore City Center m�-eea��cv�r s�roriou vo�""=° 9f9_6 ____________-_______--_--_______-__--'--~_-____ Level Computation Report. 2000 Hcm 1on a ���hzd (Future Volume Alternative) ' Intersection #s mra&y, St' (ma)/Railroad Canyon Rd. (mW) . -- Cycle (men), zzs Critical Vol ./Cap. ' (X) ^ Delay (moc/veh) : 1.295 z 113'2 Loss Time (aec)` zz (r+a Optimal Cycle;OpTImzomo ' Level ,of o�z��oe= � ' : -~~--��, North Bound South Bound East Bound a � - � - a ,a� Bound � West - � - a ' �N Movement: � - r - a u - r - �� |� � -------- cootznI; -------------i1-7—`---------- Split Phase �------------' Split Phase Protected --�---�-----' Protected ' alg��o, Rights: zoolu�� �ooIo�e zooIuue zuoznde �1u Green: --- ' uu uo 20 uo 20 zu 10 uo zo 10 oo ao ----- , z z o z z o z .m � o u i z n >� z w � x V | -----'----- { ------------ \i Volume Module: ----------- ^-----------'`-----------^ � i , VA Base Vol: 313 zs* 343 164 157 sxs 445 110 301 1180 168 Growth Adj: z.o* 1~06 1'06 z�os z'ae z'oe 1.06 1.06 z'o* 1'06 1.06 1'06 ' Initial ~`, Added Vol- 332 zoy 164 zz zz u 174 166 oex 472 965 561 zz m 41 ry 181 zz 319 « zusz 178 .zmz nz ramneraym,l: �o o o u o m o 0 » ' « « » Initial F�t: 343 180 sro 18e 174 48s 545 1146 572 sos 13 uoo ooez adj, z'oo 1'00 1'04 1.00. 1'00 z'ou 1'40 1'00 1'00 x'mo z_ao z'wn PsF Adj i'oo z'oo z'no z'uV z`uo 1'00 1'00 1'00 z'»« 1'00 z'n» 1`00 Par Volume, sos ieo srn 186 174 40s sxs xzxs 572 325 zasu zoq _ ^� aedoct Vol: ' o o n o u o o o o o u o Reduced noz, s«y zuo 370 186 174 «Vs sxs 114e 572 325 z�sz 2uo . ` eco adj: z'uo 1'00 1'00 1.00 z'oo z'oV z'oo 1'00 1.00 1.00 1.06 1'00 ��� Ad j: --' --'� z'Uo �'Vo z-wo 1.00 1.00 z`uu 1.00 1.00 1'00 z'nu z'UV 1'00 Final ': s�a zao �rn �---------..-------�—'^_—_--_--�'''.` zu* ir� �us s«s 1146 `yrz |i |i sos 1352 206 | -------|--------| Saturation Flow xm,uuze' , Sat/Lane- zaoo 1*00 znoo 1900 1900 ` 1�n0 3.900 1900 1900 19.00 i9,001 1900 Adjustment: o'n z 0.95 0 ' 85 u ' os z ' nv o`' ms o ' Ao 0' 90 o ' *o o ' ns 0.8§ 0' 89 Lanes: 2'00 u'uo 1'00 z'oo 1'00 1.00 2'00 1'33 0'67 z'uO 2'61 o'uy, Final oo,.: 3502 aein 16zs zans 1*00 zsig 3902 aoaa 1142 ------------ ------------- --11 zoos ------------ 4432 esw �-�,,' '---------l------------ Capacity »mazyaio mmouuze, Vol /Sat: 0'10 n'oS 0.23 w'zo o.n* w'us o'z« o'so u'so 0'1e n'au o'su.~ .. orit vuovao, Green/Cycle: o'za o'zo u^xo 0.19 n"z* b-zn 0.18 0-39 0'39 0'14 0.13.5 0. ~` Volume/Cap'. V'g5 0~2 p 1'30 0,53 0-*7 .1.30 0'88 1'30 1'30 1'30 0^88, 0.08 oezay/`*eh: 44'3 41.3 203'8 43'3 «u'z 201'0 59 174 zvo'y 208'7 *o'� 40'4.� . ---- --- ; z'oo z'nV 1'no z'mo z'ou �'ou �.au �.oV z'ou �'ou ���V �'oo� udjzm� � ` 44'3 41.3 203-8 43'3 42'2 zoz'o 59:.3 174 173'9 208'7 «V'« 40-4 � �u oemiguQuene: za 10 20 10 * ' uz so sz 25. 19 az 9. ` ^* Traffix 7.5.0715 (c) 2062 Dowling Assoc. 'Licensed to RK BUG I INEERINO GROUP � ��-3 AGENDA I-TEM PAGE f am opening year Thu Jun 19, 2003 10:44:19 Page.S -1 --------------- - - -- Elsinore City Center Opening year without project AN__Peak HoApt Interr%ectign.,,,yO%umes -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ -- - - - - - Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) .++++•++++++++++ + + + + + + + + * + + + :.,t. + +,rr +,t + + + +it it +t * +t +titt,t +# t +frt frtr +* it # +t + + + *,t ,t + + + + ++ Intersection #4 I -15 Fiwy...NB Ramps (NS) /Railroad Canyon Rd. (EW) a Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X): 1.545 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y +R = 4 sec) Average. Delay (sec /veh)_ 159.7 Optimal Cycle:OPTIMIZED Level. Of Service: F Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T - R L - T - R L - T - R L T - R - ---- - -- - - -- --------------- 11--------------- 11-- ----- -------- 11-- -------- -r - - -' Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Permitted Rights: Include Include Include In Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 iq 15 0 0 IS .15 Lanes : 0 0 it 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 193 0 334 0 0 0 254 710 0 0 1048 1331 Growth Adj: 1.06. 1,06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1..06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.Q6 Initial Bse: 205 0 354 0 0 0 269 753 0, 0 1111 14.11 Added Vol: 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 57 0 0 115 105... PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. Initial Fut: 205 0 377 0 0 0 269 810 0 0 1226 1516 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 205 0 377 0 0 0 269 810_ 0 0 1226. 1516 Reduct Vol: = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 205 . 0 377 0 0 0 269 810 0 0 1226 1516: PCE Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.0o 1.Q0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. MLF Adj:, 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 205 0 377 0 O 0 269 810 0 0 1226 1516: ------------ 1 ---------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------- .` Saturation Flow Module: j Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 . 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1960 1900 Adjustment: 0.90.1.0.0 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.9S 1.00 1.00 0,95 0.85 Lanes: 0.35 0._00 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.60 Final Sat. 600 0 1105 0 .0 0 1865 3610 0. 0 3610 1615: ---=--- - - - --1 -------- ---- 11------ - - - - -- 11--------------- 11---- ------ - - - - -1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.34 0..00. 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.22 0.00 0..6 0.34 0.94 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.22.0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.09 0..10 0.70 0 -.00 0.00 0.61 0 61 Volume /Cap: 1.54 0.60 1.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.54 0.32 0.00 0.00 0,56 1,,54 Delay /Veh: .304:8 ..0.0 304.8 6.0 0.0 0.0 325.5 6.8 6.0 0.0 14.3 273.8. User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1_00 1.00 1.06 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 AdjDel /Veh: 364.8 ..0.0 304.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 325.5 6.8 6.0 0.0 14.3 273.8: DesignQueue: 12 ' 0 21 0 1. 0 0 17 17 0 0 3S 50 Traffix 7 .5.0715.(c).200.2. Dowling. Assoc. Licensed_to.RK..ENGINEERING GROUP AWMA ITEM NO. ,,,,,,. PAGE -2, a�L AGENDA ITEM NO. � `� ' ~~ Thu Jun zn unuo 10,47,27 Page s-z pm_op�oiog_�ear__-_�___________^------------------------------------------- au=ioorr City C=uter opening year without project -- ______ ----------------------------------------------------- Level Of service ioo meport zvov HCM ^^~~~°r^t--`°°°^°°'°°°°°°°^^°°^°° �8 �u zo��z�e��iou°#«°z°zs°rwy'�mm pa (mS)/Ju��lrcsud Canyon ma (sW) _ °,��m°'^°°°°°°°°°°°°°^^°°°,° ^ Cycle (sec)- 120 �^^�^"=l ^~^'^ I's40 u»aa Time (sec)- e <r+n ~`� « sec) Delay (oco/v=h)` 158_7 � 8 Optimal Cycla,meTzMz000 Level Of p=^~^^~' - ' -Approach: North Bound s,pod Bound Wm- ot Bound ` ~~'`^e--' L T _ n u T - n L r o )�East --------'---- L ------------ T a - | . --- --------------- ' Control: Split !South Phase ------------ Split Phase ero�eo�c� �=z�l���d ' aigb��` Include Include include zoczuur '--' ----- ` » V o m u zo. is o u is is Lanes: u u z! V o o o o u 1 o u n o o u o -o ___--_--_I_-_------- volume xw^dolc; F'w ----�------1--------------- |--------- 1172 o a — -�z ' 87e o«o, Base Vol: ass n 668 o o u 271 mzzmvth--� Ad~: 1'06 1'06 z'me i'oa z. 06 1.06 1'06 z' o« 1'06 1'0* 1'06 z'me Initial a . sss u 70e n o o 2e7 zu«o w n 929 a 9 Added Vol: o n 76 o o n o zun o o uz 71 pao=ezayvol, V o n o o u « » n V « u Initial put` 153 o 784 o o n 287 1430 V o 1011 !�rz. User Adj-. 1 oV 1' 00 z ' un z ' uu 1' 00 z ' oo z ' mo 1' 00 z' un z ` mn 1'00 1'00 ^'. eoF adj, 1' 00 1'00 z 'nn z ' on i ' on 1' 00 1' 00 z ' Vw 1' 00 z ' oo 1' 00 x'mo ^ sUF Volume- 53 n 78* o o o oev 1430 o u �o�z ��z `. . ! ---- meuuot Vol: '0 n n 0 o o o o n o o o Reduced Vol: ass u 784 o o u 287 1430 o o 101z 9*1 pcs xuxj, 1.00 ' z' nu 1'00 1'00 1'00 z'no 1'00 z'no 1'00 z'no z'oo z'nn »o,mdj� z'Vo z' nn z ' wn z ' uo z ' ou 1' 00 1' 00 1' 00 1' 00 z-oo 1' 00 1' 00 Final Vol'` 353 n 784 n n o 287 1430 o --------------- 11 --------------- [|—__----------- o 1011 961 | � ----'----- | ---------- Saturation p -'' ` '1' ' ---'-aoe 1906 1900 z*uo zeuo 1900 znuo zyoo zono 1:900 190� 0 yoV 1900 _ , Ad~u-tmen*: 0.'89 10 o`o* z'uo z'Vo z'nu 0'95 0`95 z'un 1'00 0.95 o'ms ~^~~~ , � 'sz 0' 00 n-sa 0.00 0.00 u'oo 1.00 u'on 0'00 o'oo z,no_ 1.99: '-'-- oat.i - zr o zzxz || w o a zuos sezo o (\ Y|----------� _--_-''_'_-. ----___---_., 0 aain 1615 c� ------------ --------------- caQsnoity � lm Module; - - ' ^' Vol/Sat- 0' e7 u ' no n�67 0' no o ^ on o ' ou 0' 16 o' �0 0.00 - 0.00 n ' oo n ' zu o `60 - ' . crit Mmveo� °+^° ^°** Green/Cycle: 0.44 0'00 0'44 u' `no a zo o o'Vn 4' n`oo ' ��� r n on ' � �9� »' �� ' ` � Volume/Cap: z'��4 0`00 z� �� O^Oq 0^00 u'Vu 1'54 n '8_ z m ' on _ � �! n ' 7z z ' 54 ' ----^''-' z83« 0-.0 283 '6 0.0' u'V V'o 321'4 om-7 o'o o'o 33'3 287'7 ~~^^ ~^^~-^ ; 1' 00 z'no �'ou i�uu z'oo 1'00 z-ou1'on z�'0u 1,00 1'e0 z'mn '-'---^-' ags'« 0.0 283.6 o'm o'n o ' u 321' 4 28' 7 0' 0 o _ n as _ s 287_ 1r �** ' oea :`1ans�uoo zo s« o o 4s - (c) zooz Dowling Assoc­ Licensed to ao ENGINEERING GROUP AGENDA ITEM NO. � `� ' ~~ am opening year Thu umo 19^ zoos zo'««,z* �-z __---_-_ -----__--_--_-'-_-_-_---___----�---------_- -~-` '.��=. ������������-� Elsinore City Center Opening year without project - an��:m� u�^� �u -' -` ipn--ymammeo- -'------------------------'------'-----------------------------------''--------- Level of Service Computation Report zoon eo« Operations Me* thxd (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #a z-zs mwy^ oo Ramps (NS)/Railroad Canyon ou' (ow) ' Cycle (sec): ro Critical noz'/cag' (X), n-aeo ' Loom Time (sec): 9 (Y°R ~ a sec) Average /veh): 32'5 Optimal cyczo,oprzmz000 Level of Service: C` ' Approach: North Bound, Spn~b ao6�d East Bounm' West `000�u^ ^ ^` Movement: u - T - e L - T - a L ' r - R z' - T� - o ------------ !--------------- !I-----------�|------------i/-----�---_--/ ^ Control: apllt.ebame 1t Phase '' Permitted ' ' Rights: ocIn�e ��oznae z�olo�o , z��Ia�o ' -mio' Green: o m o u ' o o n is zs iV is n caoeo, o o n o o z g n o z ` o u 2 o z z n z o 6 ------------�--------+---�i--'-----'------------��-----��------------� volume Module- Base vol' n o u 417 o 331 o 534 291 545 a76 Growth edj: 1 _ 06 1_ 06 1 _ 0e 1.06 i _ 06 z _ ua 1_ 06 1_ 06, 1' 06 i ' na z`na z'o� ~~ Initial aoe, 'n 'o n u*s o 351 n 566 308 .578 '117 n' Added Vol. o V n 37 u o o ie o 63 su o- PasserByVol: o n o o o n o u n o o a`' Initial Fut, n n n 479 o 351 V sas �3no e41 rai m »�u User ` z'noz'oo z'n ' o z'oa z'nu z'np �-uu z'oo �-oo z'oo z'bo z', eep xudj, 1-00 1.00 '1'00 z'VV!z,wa z'on 1'00 1'00 1'00 z'oo 1'00 z'wo ' eeF Volume: . n o V 47* 0 351 o sms 309 641 769 p: � aeduot Vol: ' (1 o o u n o u o « » u o Reduced Vol` o o n 479 u ssz o ses anu 641 76e o pcoAuj, 1.00 z'0o 1-00 1-00 z'vo z'no 1.00 z'oo 1'60 1.00 z.nn 1.00 ' ` MLF Ad j- z`pn z'oo z'oA z'no 1.00 1'00 1'00 z'ou z'oo 1'00 1'00 i-uo Final Vol., n u ' .n 479 o 351 o s#s sOn exz roy o --------/-------- -------------- -1i--------------- ---_------| ' Saturation Flow amduz*` Sat/Lane; 1900 z*oo 1e00 1e00 1900 z»uV 1900 1900 zyoo 1*00 196-0 1900 Adjustment: 1.00. 1,06 1'06 w_ns z-nd V'85 1.00 0.95 o'Hs o'es 0`95 z'Vu . .� uauae: o'nV n'no m'mo 1.00 0.00 z'ou n'un z'am 1'00 z'oo 2-00 o'on Final amt', 01 . u o zmns n 1615 o 3610 zazs zems 3616 n -'_--------|-_-------- ------------- ----------'- ----_----�-| cwIxxoity Analysis Module: VoI/Sat , o'uo o`uu o'oV 0'27 w.uo 0'22 o'yo 0-16 m'ze 6'35 0'21 h'oo cr1t eo°eo, Green/ Cycle: V'Vu u'ow n'nn n'zo o'oo o'zo u'op 0.21 m'az 0'3e0'5* 0 , o'uu 0,00 o'mb 0'94 o-uo 0`77 0.00 0.-76 '' re m'oA 0'94 o'a� �' oo � w - U 'o.h 0_0 sx�b m'o 31'1 0.0 30.1 50'4 «s-u 7 �� — User , z`oo 1.00- z'wu 1. 00 »'uo z'oo z'nu z'on z'no i,no 1'00 1'00�/ u'o o'o n.0 51_2 �-o sz'z 0,8 30'1 50A «�'o ' �'a �o�n` oealguQueoe, 0 o '�- - -iwr- n in o 19 zu 17 13 n! ' rrafcio 7'5.0715 (c).00uz. Assoc- Licensed toRKENGINEERING GROUP- AGENDA ITEM N'0. Page 4 -1 Thu Jun 19, 2003 10:47:27 pm opening year --------------------------- Elsinore City Center Opening year . without project �PM beak our Intersection volumes -------- Level Of -- - - -- Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative), Intersection #3 I -15 Fwy. SB Ramps (NS) /Railroad Canyon Rd. (Elk) Critical Vol. /Cap. (X): 1.056 Cycle (sec): Loss Time (sec): 65 9 (Y +R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 50.2 Optimal Cycle:OPTIMIZED Level Of Service:. D North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound _Approach: Movement; L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R s----- ---- - - - --- L - T - R -- Control: i- Split Phase Split Phase Permitted Protected Rights: include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 6 0 0 O 0 0 15 15. 10 15 0 Lanes d 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 .0 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 - - - ------------ - ------=------- H Volume Module: --------------- --- ------ -- --- - ---------- - -) _, WE 0 713 0 406 0 703 348 296 833 0 Base Vol: Growth Adj: 0 0 1..06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 756 0 430 0 74S 369 314 883 0. Added Vol: 0 0 0 125 0 0 0 63 0 44 38 0 ,. PasserByVol: 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Put: 0 0 0 881 . 0 430 0 808 369 358 .921 O E User Adj: i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 g; PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 881 0 430 0 808 369 358 921 6 Reduct Vol: .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 O Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 881. 0 430 0 808 369 358 921 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. MLF Adjc 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 01 0 881 0 430 0 868 369 -- ---- - -- - -- 358 921 0 - - - - - - -- r Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1:00 1.00 1..00 0.95 1.00 0.8.5 1.00 0.95 0.85 0.95 0..95 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.0,0 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 3, Final Sat.: 0 0 0 ��--------------- 1605 0 1615 0 3610 1615 ��--------------- ��-- 1805 -3610. 0 -- .-------- -- i. ---------- ----------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.00 0 :.-oo 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.22 0.23 0.20 6.26 0.00 (' Crit Moves: * + ** + * *« * * ** Green /Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.18 0.41 0.00 Volume /Cap. 6.00 0.;00:,0.06 1.09 0.00 0.59 0.00 0.97 .0.99 1.09 0.62 0.00 Delay /Vo: 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.1 0.0 14.8 0.0 48.7 68.6 101.8 15..8 0.0 User De1Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel /Veh: 0.0 .0.0 0.0 76.1 0.0 14.8 0.0 48.7 68.6 101.8 15.8 0.0. DesignQueue:.. 0 0 0 20 0 9 0.: 24 11 11 21 0 . Traffix 7.5.0715 (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE?�G� am opening year Thu Jun 19, 2003 10:44:19 Page 3 -1 Elsinore City Center ----------------- Opening year without project = ABC_Xpa)c Hour Lntgr4,ectionyoulumes ------------------------------------------ _ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Casino Dr. (NS) /Railroad Canyon Rd. (EW) Cycle (sec): 65 Critical Vol_ /Cap. (X): 0.493 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y +R 4 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 17.3 Optimal Cycle:OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected t Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 20 20 20 20 20 26 10 20 20 10 20 20 Lanes: 1 ------------ 1--------------- 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 If--------------- L1---------- 2 0 1 1 0 Volume Module: --------------- - - - - -� Base Vol: 36 38 74 162 31 52 59 590 18 227 568 222 Growth Adj: 1.06 1:06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06_ Initial'Bse: 38 40 78 172 33 55 63 625 19 241 602 235 j Added Vol: 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 17 0 4 48 0 c PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J Initial Put: 38 40 80 172 33 55 63 642, 19 245 650 235. User Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00`1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 PHF Volume: 38 40 80 172 33 55 63 642 19 245 650 . 235 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 36 40 80 "172 33 55 63 642 19 245 650 235 i PCE Adj: 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00' Final Vol:: 38 ------------ 40 80 172 33 55 63 642 19 245 650 235 I --------------- Saturation Flow Module: ------=--------))--------------- ---------- - - - - -� Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 . Adjustment: 0.70 0.86 0.86 0.67 0.86 0.86 .0.95 0.91 0.91 0.92 0.91 0.91 Lanes: 1._00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.06 1.00 2..91 0.09 2.00 1.47 0.53 Final Sat.: 1321 ------------ 1625 1625 1275 1635 1635 1805 5017 149 3502 2545 921. Capacity Analysis --------- 11 Module: --- ------------ 11 --------------- ��---------- - - - --� Vol /Sat:- 0.03 0.02 0.05 0.13 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.13 0.13 6.07 0.26 '0.26 1 Crit Moves: Green /Cycle: 0.31.0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.15 0.37 0.37 0.18 0.4.0 0.40 Volume /Cap: 0. 09 0.08 0.16 0.44 0.07 0.11 0.23 0. 'j5 0.35 0.38 0764 0:64. Delay /Veh:' 16.1 16.0 16.5 18.8 15.9 16.2 24.S 14.9 14.9 23.6 16.7 16.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.Q0 1.00 1.00. AdjDel /Veh: 16.1 16.0 16.5 18.8 25.9 16.2 24.5 14.9 14.9 23.6 16.7 16.7 DesignQudue: I 1 2 '4 1 1 2 15 0 7 15 5 Traffix 7.5.0715.(c) 2002.Dowling Assoc.. Licensed to. RK.ENGINEERING GROUP AGENDA ITEM No. 23 PAGE OF LWOM pm opening year Thu Jun 19, 2003 10:47:26 Page 3 -1 Elsinore City Center Opening year without project _ -Pea% Hour Intesection volumes ------- - -- - -- - - -- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) *** t* tt*#* t*** tttt*! r*****##******# t# t* t**##*#* tt* * # #ttt * * * # # * * * # * * * * *tt * * * * *t *t* Intersection #2 Casino Dr. (NS) /Railroad Canyon Rd. (EW) Cycle (sec): 65 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X): 0.634 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R = 4 sec). Average Delay (sec /veh): 18.9 Optimal Cycle:OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B ,Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ----- -- - - -- --- ---------- It --------- -- --- - ---------- - - - - -� Control: Permitted .Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 20 20 20 20 20 20 10 20 20 10 20 20 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 O 2 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 ------ - - - - -- --------------- --------------- --------------- it---------- - ----1 volume Module: Base Vol: 59 80 160 196 70 95 74 696 73 267 769 213 Growth Adj: 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 Initial Bse: 63 85 170 208 74 101 78 738 77 283 .815 226 Added Vol: 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 58 0 3 34 1. PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Put: 63 85 175 209 74 101 78 796 77 286 849 227 User Adj- 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.U0 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: -63 85 175 209 74 101 78 796 77 286 849 227 Reduct Vol: _0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 63 85 175 209 74 101 78 796 77 286 849 227 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00, Final Vol.: 63 85 175 209 74 101 78 796 77 286 849. 227 ------ - - - - -- --------------- --------------- -------------- - ---- - - -- -� Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 19.00 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0:64 0.8S 0.85 0.57 0.81 0.87 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.92 0.92 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.73 0.27 2.00 1.58 0.42 Final Sat.: 1206 1623 1623 1073 1650 1650 1805 4666 454 3502 2158 737 ------ - - - - -- ---------------(--------------- 11--------------- 11------ - - - - -- - -� Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: - 0.05 0.05 0.11 0.19 0.04 0.06 0.04 0.17 0.17 0.08 0.31 0.31 Crit Moves: * * ** * # *# *x ** Green /Cycle: 6.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.15 0.37 0.37 0.18 0.40 0.40. Volume /Cap'`: 0.17 0.17 0.35 0.63 0.15 0.26 0.28 0.46 6.46 0.44 11.77 0.77 Delay /Veh:_ 16:6 16.5 17:7 23.3 16.4 16.7 24.9 15.8 1S.8 24.6 19.6 19..6 User DelAd): 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00.1.00 1.00 AdjDel /Veh: 16.6 16.5 17.7 23.3 16.4 16.7 24.9 15.8 15.8 24.0 19.6 19.6 Designoueue: 2 2 4 5 2 3 .2 2 9. 20 5. Traffix 7.5.0715 (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP 3 z: x Ll AGENDA ITEM NO.- 3 r 'N' 2(-1 PACE ® __ APPENDIX D CALCULATION OF INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT --wo, -.WWI AGENDA ITEM NO. -�La- PAGE 2 O-R:� Traffix 7.5.0715 (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP AAA ITEM NO. C 3 PAGE. 10FC.2LL am opening year w /project Thu Jun 19, 2003 10:29:42 Page 6 -1 --- ------------ - - - - -- ------------------------------------------ Elsinore City Center opening year with project AM pak Hour. Intergecti.on -yolumes ----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) xttt, tttttt+ x�xxt +t +txxx * * *x;t +ttt +,r *x *t : *xx +it it it« ittx#* ;t,txtxxttxxt +xtxxt «xtx +t,k + *t+ Intersection #5 Grape St. (NS) /Railroad Canyon Rd. (EW) x+ x+ xtttttxtxxtxxt+ txtxx+* ttxtttxx+ xxtxxxttt* t; t+ rxx« t : : «tx «txtx +tx +xxx +xx *x +tx,rt;r Cycle (sec): 115 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X): 0.968 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y +R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 88.8 Optimal Cycle: 120 Level Of Service: F tttt, tttttttttttttttttxtxxx: ttttttxtxx««, rt, rtxxtt* t, �ttxx +xxx +ttxxx +xtxxtxx +xxt,t,tt* Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L ----------- - T - R ------ - - - - -- Control: --------------- Split Phase --------------- Split Phase --------------- Protected Protected - - - -j` Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 20 20 20 20 20 20 10 20 20 10 20 20. Lanes: 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 ---------------(---------------- 2 0 1 1 0 1 ---------- 0 2 1 0 - - - - -- ------ - - -= -- Volume Module: --------------- ( Base Vol: 217 48 225 128 49 421 159 688 241 173 1767 122 Growth Adj: 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 Initial Bse: 230 51 238 136 52 446 169 729 255 183 1873 129_ Added Vol: 36 6 15 19 9 63 21 56 10 4 156 7 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 266 57 254 155 61 509 190 785 265 187 2029 136' User Adj:' 1.00.1.60 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00_ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. PHF Adj: 1.00 1.09 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 II PHF Volume: 266 57 254 155 61 -509 190 785 265 187 2029 136 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0_ Reduced Vol: 266 57 254 155 61 509 .190 785 265 187 2029 136 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00- MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 Final Vol.: 266 57 254 155 61 509 --------------- 11--------------- 190 785 265 187 ---------- 2029 136 - - - = -) ------------ Saturation Flow --------------- Module: Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 190.0 1900 3.900 Adjustment: 0.42 6.95 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.92 0.91. 0.91 0.95 0.90` 0.90 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2..00 1.49 0.51 1.00 2.81 0.19 Final Sat.: 3502 3610 1615 - - - -- 1805:1900 1615 - - - - -- 35Q2 2595 --------------- 877 1805 ----------- 4817 324 - - - -'� -- Capacity Analysis I --------- - Module: )--------- Vol /Sat: 0.08 0.02 0.16 0.09 0.03 0.32 0.05 0.30 0.30 0.10 0.42 0.42 Crit Moves: tttx ttt* xxtt tt ; *t Green /Cycle: 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.09 0.34 0.34 0.11 0,36 0.3.6'.. Volume /Cap: 0.44 0.09. 0.90 0.32 0.12 1.16 0.62 0..96 0.90 0.90 116 1.16" Delay /Veh: 43.0 3.4.9 76.4 33.7 31.6 136.6 54.6 46.4 46.4 87.2 115 115.2 User DelAdT: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00_ AdjDel /Veh:_ 43.0 39.9 76.4 33.7 31.6 136.6 54:6 46.4 46.4 87.2 115 115.2 DesignQueue: .14 3 14' 7 3 25 11 36 12 11 92 6 xtttxt: txtttx. tttxtttirtx« txtxtttxxttxxxt«« x+ xt+ xxxrttxxtxrxxxt «tttt #xxxxtxxx «xx► Traffix 7.5.0715 (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP AAA ITEM NO. C 3 PAGE. 10FC.2LL ' -- pm opening year w/nroject Thu auu. 19, ____--____-_-________--_---______-___--_____-_ 2003 zu: IS: 1u rage 6-1- � Elsinore city Center opening year with � ^~ ^^-- -_-- ------_--_-- ,--_-_- - --- �m - r� *r __------_-_'--_--_-_---_--_------------_-----__----_---_-__------ Level uouu ocmcpezatioua Method, (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 Grape St. (NS)/Railroad Canyon Rd, (ow) �� Cycle (smo), 115 ' ori 1`320 Loss Time (sec): zz (Y+o o sec) , . 118'6 |� Optimal «yczn, 120 _ . p �x ' _Approach, ' North Bound ' South Bound East Bound ^ Bonud` ` � movement:: - T - a u - � - R L - T - R » - T - o �D ------------ Control: [___-.-------|/--------------|�_--_--'------|f------------� lit Phase Split Phase ' Protected Protected Rights: include Include Include _ Include. _ Min. Green: vn 20 on zm zm 20 10 20 20 zo 20 20 zauem; z o z o z z 0 1 o 1 z o z 1 m a o 2 z 0 _ --------- -----------|i-------'------ Volume Module: --------------{Y---------��-�}� Base Vol:' sza zs* a«s 1e4 343 445 ezu 52e 3o� 1180. 168, Growth z'ns 1.06 z'ua 1'06 1.o6 1. 06' z'ua 1'06 1. 66 1.,06 z'� 1'06 ' 1.06 Initial-B. . 332 169 sa« 174 16e 364 472 965 5e1 31e 1251 i Added Vol: uo zs zs zz zo 41 ry 181 44 19 1o1 22 eaooerayVoz, o u o u o o o o n o o .6 Initial Put, 380 182 377 zma 176 405 s«s 11*e ums 3.38, 1352 ono .` na=r Auj: 1.00 z'ou z'oo z'00. 1. 0u 1'00 1'00 1_00 1'00 I-oo 1'90 1'ou� � '. eHnAdj, 1'oV z'nu z'uo z'on z'mo 1'00 1'00 1'00 z'uo 1'00 z-mn 1'00 Wr Volume: PHF sno `1e2 377 zos 176 *os s«s 114e 60s sso 1352 oon`` aadnot vol, ' o u u o » 0 » « 0 » n o' Reduced Vol- sao 1e2 377 186 176 «os s45 1146 ams 338 135 omo , poo Adj, 1'06 z'ou 1'00 1.00 1.06 1'00 z'uo z'ou z'ou 1.00 1..00- z'ou aur xydj: ` 1'06 1'V0 1. 00 1'00 z'oo z'ou 1.00 1'00 1.00 ' z_ou �.uo z'm0' Final Vol.: 360 znz 377 zno 176 «ns s*s zz«« uns a�V zas� zoo --------|--------|�-------->�---------------_-�'-=�/ Satoration z Sat/Lane: zyou 1900. 1-9.00 1900 zyuo igu0 igou 1900 ' zyuV 19bo 1900. Adjustment: 0,.-52 0'95 0,05 o'as 1.00 o`os 0-92 0,90 .o'90 0'95 0,89 0'e9 Lanes: ' 2.00 2.00 4^00 1.00 z_Vn 1-00 2.00* 1-31 u'a* 1.00 z'az 0-39 Final Sat': ssoj' 3610 1615 1805 1900 1.615 3502 2240 zzoo 1805 4432 656 ------------- |--�------|l----------/| --------------- |(-------- ---_7.�-� i��ud�z�� Capacity Analysis, 0.10 n'os n'os o'zn o'mv 0'25 0.16 0.51 o'sl 0'10 0'3�0: V'sn Cri Green/Cycle: 0.18 0.10 0.18 0.19 01.19 w.z-0 0'18 o'sy o-og 0'1* p.35 0'3-5.. z. 32 0'54 �'me 1_32_ -9.7 1'12 1'12 1'32g-m7 0. 81 - uo.e�z�� 213.'9 *�'9 *o'? o11'* �ms�a*-� aza'218.2. s�'� 39.:A � --~^ ~^ z ' qo 1' 00 1' 00 �. un z ' mn 1,00 1.00. 1.06 z'oo 1.00 1'00 z|o,i *4.9 41,3 213.j A�-� «z'� o��,m sm's z8� �a*'� o�m'� ��_� a�'w. oaoigoOuene` ' zo� 10 az 10 9 oo _ 30 sz 27 19 60 .9' ' �8 rzaccix r's'orzs (o) 2oo2' Dowling Aoscc'`Liobno=d to RK ENGINEERING GROUP AGENDA ITEM NO. ^� �-�� ' �m ~�=-_ OF~���l.�~ ������� am opening year w /project Thu Jun 19, 2003 10:29 :42 Page 5 -1 ------------------------ Elsinore City Center Opening year with project AN Peak Hour , Int _erW_cti0n_yQluMeS Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 I -15 Fwy. NB Ramps (NS) /Railroad Canyon Rd. .(EW) Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X): 1.554 Loss Time (sec); 9 (Y +R = 4 sec) Average belay (sec /veh): 161.5 Optimal Cycle: 120 Level Of Service: F Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West.Bound Movement:, L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R -- L - T - R ----- - - - - - -- ----- -Control: Split --- - - - --- Phase -------- Split - - - - -- Phase Protected Permitted Rights: Include Include -Include Include _ Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 15 0 0 15 15 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 {{------- 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 - - - - -` 11---------- 0 0 2 0 1 - - - -1 -------==--- {--------------- f Volume Module: -{{--------------- - Base Vol: 193 0 334 0 0 0 254 710 0 0 1048 1331 Growth Add: 1.06 1.06, 1.06. 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 Initial Bse: 205 0 354 0 0 '0 269 753 0 0 1111 1411 Added Vol: 0 0 24 0 0 0 O 62 0 0 137 118. PasserByVol: 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 205 0 378 0 0 0 269 815 0 0 1248 1529 User Adj: 1;.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.0-0 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1- 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 n PHF Volume: 205 0 378 0 0 0 269 815 0 O 1248 1529 Reduct Vol: O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 205 0 378 0 0 0 269 815 0 0 1248 1529 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol_: 205 0 378 {{--------------- 0 0 0 269 815 0 {{-----=--------- {---------------- 0 1248 1529 { ------------ --------------- Saturation Flow Module: t Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1,900 1900 . 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00_1_.00 1.00 0:95 0.95 1.00 1_.00 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 0.35 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 -00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat., 598 0 1105 ---------- 0 {--------------- 0 0 1805 3610 0 {{------------ 0 --------------- 3610 1615. { -'-----------=--- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.34 0.00 0.34 0.00.0.00 0.00 0.15 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.95. Crit Moves: Green /Cycle: 0.22 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0,71 0.00 0.00 0..61 0.61. Volume /Cap: 1.55 0.00 1.55 0.00 0.00 0._00 1.55 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.57 1.55 Delay /Veh:` 309.2 0.0 3092 0`.0 6.0 0.0 329.8 6.8 0.0 0.0 14.4 278.0 i User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00" 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1..00 140 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel /Veh: 309.2 0.0 309.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 329.8 .6.8 0.0 0.0 14.4 278.0 Designoueue: 12' 0 21 0 0 0 17 17 0 0 36 51 /--, Traffix 7.5.0715 (c).2002.Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK.ENGINEERING GROUP AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE 22 0' � rracfix 7-s.6715 <c> 2002 Dowling ASSOC. Licensed to PK eomGz»mzEnzmo GROUP = UA AQENDA ITEM NO. f J!` PAGE F ' . p* opening ye=r=ymcn1ect Thu. Jun ouns 10,15,10 ease 5-1 -_-_--_ ---- ---------- ----- -zs, ---- --- ---- -------- ---------_------_--_--_- Elsinore City Center ~- Opening ' -�����sfu:��' -_' .~~.^ 1�ce�Zmbc ��A-^x6 um=d- '-----------------------------_-------'------_--_--------_---------~---'________ -Level Of Seri:rloe Computation Report �w zouo acM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)., . � U Intersection #« 1-15 p*y`_ma.Ramps (NS) /Railroad Canyon Rd., iEw) �� ' Cycle (sec)-- xzo Critical Vol-/Cap. (X); I'sso Loss Time (sec): a (Y+R = * men) oeIay (sen/veb); -m 160'5 �K �� x�1nel���z�� zaV ` � mez�lo�� �r -Approach: North Bound. amutbmonnu East Bound ' West 000uu Movement. ,vem�a . u ------------ - - - - - T - a - - - - - - - - - - -i|- L - T - R L - r - a - - - - - ||-----------| L - T - o Control: Split Phase - _ - - --- -----(�------------ Split Phase ' Protected '' ---- Permitted ' Rights: R1gbtm, zoczode Include Include ' Include Mia' Green: o u o o n o zo is u � m is is ` zaoea; n ------------ p 11 o o m m' n. u m z o 2 o e --------------- !| m m z a 1 , a� /--------------- Volume Module: /l 11 --------------- ---------------- � Base Vol: 333 o jnse w o o 271 1172 _ o 97e m«u Growth Ad]; 1�06 1'06 1'06 z.oe z'wa 1'0e 1'06 1'06 z'ue� .o z'o6 z. 06 1_00- ` -- Initial Bse. 353 o 708 u o o 287 1242 n o gig oeo - Added Vol: o o o« o o o o 214 o o nu 78 � eaooe ,_ o o n o o u o o u o u o Initial axt, 353 V 792 _ u o o uev 1456 m g 1021 968 User adj� z-on z'no z'oo z'oo 1-06 i'mn z'mo 1'00 1'00 1'90 1.00 1'00 `^ ^' ean adj, z'un z'mo z'no 1'00 1.00 z'mn 1'00 1'00 1'00 z'oo 1..QQ z'mo eoF xmxIpne; sss u 792 o a o 287 1456 o m 1021 *aa aadvct 'n w o o n o u o u m o o Reduced Vol: 35_3 V ne� o m o �a7 �*oo o m �daz ya� � xu nCm ��� 1'n0 �'uO �_on z'oo z'ou z'uV z,ou z'mu z.no z'u4 �_oo �'mn MLp edj: 1_00 1'00 1'00 1'00 z'oo z'uo z'mw 1'00 1'00 z'po z'om z'mo. Final Vol.: 353 __________ o zyz u o o 287 1456 o m 1021 968 _______-||--------- -------. Flow mouuze, -------- _-----_---'-_/ 000 1900 z*`^ 1e00 1*06 1900 1900 ` 190o zyou zenu'�`u `*oo Adjustment: o-un 140 o'on 1.00 1,00 1.00 0'95 0'95 1'00 1'00 0,95 o'gs ' ^ ' Lanes: n`si o'no 0'69 u'mo 0_00, 1'00 2'00 o'oo u-oo 20o 1'00 Final Sat.` szs -- -— o 1174 10.00 u m u zoos 3610 -- -(------ --li Capacity anal»sio Module: -------- ------- }--------------- ��---mse�z�+o �—zs�z-s [j Vol/Sat:- ' 0.67 0.00 0.67 o'mu U'ou o'mn 0'16 0'40 o'wO o'oo m_um 8.60. Cr1t movem � **�^ 0'4* 0'00 0'*4 o'oo 0'00 o.Ou) 0.10 0,49 0.00. V'oo 0..39 o.sn z1.55- SS 0'00 z'� OAP u'no_ o.uo 1.5t 0_81 �0^ow m,m8�'`' i'55` ' 7 3 287.9 o'u 287'e O'Q n'o m'4 326'0 29'5 o'o m.x 31.4 291.9. ` ooar �z'uu ~ �'no z'on i'm� z'�D i'uo �'mn �-oV 1'oO ' �-�u � ou 1_00, ' Adjzwel/neh: 287'9 4'0 287.9 m'm o'o p-m aze-o 29,5 0_6 .0'0 33'*2*1`9� [� Des .-. 16 o 3S A n` u zg ss _'m ' m /uq 4e . '8 x� rracfix 7-s.6715 <c> 2002 Dowling ASSOC. Licensed to PK eomGz»mzEnzmo GROUP = UA AQENDA ITEM NO. f J!` PAGE F /"� Traffix 7.5.0715 (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP AAA ITEM NO. '2-3 PAGE �� 3 077T am opening year w /project Thu Jun 19, 200310:29:42 Page 4 -1 Elsinore City Center Opening year with project i AN-Peak - -_.- Hour- Intersection-xolumes- _ .... - Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 I -15 Fwy. SB Ramps (NS) /Railroad Canyon Rd. (EW) Cycle (sec): 65 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X): 0.916 f Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y +R 4 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 34.5 Optimal Cycle- 86 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East -Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L. - T - R Control: Split Phase Split Phase Permitted Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min_ Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 15 10 15 0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0. 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 --------------- 1 0 2 0 0 ------------ --------------- Volume Module- 117-7 ------------- 11 11 --------------- Base Vol: 0 0 0 417 0 331 0 534 291 545 676 O Growth Adj: 1.06 1.06 1.06 .1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 442 0. 351 0 566 308 578 717 .0.- Added Vol: 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 22 0 71 65 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 Initial Put: 0 0 0 48.2 0. 351 0 588 308 649 782 0. User Adj: 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 i.00 1. -00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.'Oo PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00 PHF Volume: 0 - 0 0 482 0 351 0 588' 368 649 782 0 Reduct Vol: . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 482 0 351 0 588 308 649 782 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ,1.00 j MLF Adj: 1. -00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00. 1..00 - ..1.00 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 482 0 351 0 588 308 649 782 O ------------ {---------------- Saturation Flow Module: ({--------------- {{--------------- {(--------------- � 2 Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900, 1900 1900 '1900, 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900. Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85, 1.00 0- 95 0.85 0.95 0.95 1.00.1 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 -0.00 1.00 0.00 2.00. 1.00 1.00 -2.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 1805 0 1615. 0 3610 1615 1805 3610 0. ------------{-------==------{{--=------------{{--------------- Capacity Analysis Module: { {---------- - - - - -{ Vol /Sat:. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.27 0..00 0.22 0.00.0.16 0..19 0.36 0.22 0.00 Crit Moves: Green /Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.00 0:27 0.06 0.23 0.23. 0.36 0.59 0.00. Volume /Cap:.. 0.00 6.66 0.99.6.10 0.81 0.00 0..71 0.83 0.99 0_37 0.00 Delay /Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 62.7. 0.0 32.9 0.0 25.8 38.0 54.0 7.0 0.0 User DelAdj- '1.00.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00_ AdjDel /Veh: .0.0 '0.6 0.0 62.7 0.0 32.9 0.0 25.8 38.0 54.0 7.0 0.0 DesignQueue: 0 0 0 14 O 10 0 17 9 16 12 O /"� Traffix 7.5.0715 (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP AAA ITEM NO. '2-3 PAGE �� 3 077T pm opening year w /project Thu Jun -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 19, 2003 10:15:10 Page 4 -1 Elsinore City Center opening year with Project. `Peak *Hour Intasectitin "volumes - _ `` ---------------------------------------------.----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) z Intersection #3 I -15 Fwy- SB'Ramps (NS) /Railroad Canyon. Rd. (EW) Cycle (sec): 65 Critical.Vo1. /Cap. (X): 1.071 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y +R = 4 sec) Average Delay (spec /veh): 52.9 Optimal Cycle:_ 120 Level Of 'Service: D -Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement:, L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ Control: i--------------- Split 11--------------- Phase II___ Sprit Phase ___-- _------ Permitted 11--------------- i Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 .15 10 15 0 t Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 V 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 ------------ {--------------- Volume Module: 11-------------- - 11---------------- I{---------------- {.:_ _. Base Vol: 0 0 0 713 0 406 0 .703 348. 296 833 0 Growth Adj: 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 756 0 430 0 74S 369 314 683 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 138 0 0 0 16 0 48 44 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. Initial Fut: 0. 0 0 894 0 .430 0 821 369 362. 927 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0.0.1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 894 0 430 0 821 369 362 927 0 Reduct Vol- .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 8.94 0 430 0 821. 369. 362 927 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 894 0 430 0 821 369 362 927 0 ------------{---------------{{------------=-- Saturation Flow Module: 11--------------- { {----- - - - - -- - - -i Sat /Lane : 1900 1900 1900 1,900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900. 1900. Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00. 0100 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 1805 0 1615 0 3610 1615 1805 3610 0 ------------ I --------------- Capacity Analysis_ ({--------------- Module: { i--------------- {{---------------- :{ :. Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.20 0.26 0.00 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** Green /Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0..00 0.45 0.00 0.45 0.00.0..23 0.23" 0.18 0.41 0.00 Volume /Cap: 0.00 0.00. 0.00 1.10 0.00 O.S-9 0.00 0.99. 0.99 1..10-0.62 O.OQ Delay /Veh: 0.0 0:0 O.0 81:5 0.0 14.8 0.0 52.4 68..6 106.9 15.9. 0.0 ; User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.:.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - AdjDel /Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 81.5 0.0 14.8 0.0 52.4 68.6 106.9 15.9 0.0 DesignQueue: 0 0 0 20 0 9 0 24 11 11 21 0 1 Traffix 7.5.0715 (c)'2002 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP AQENDA ITEM NO. � 3 PAGE, OF I-*-- Traffix 7.5.0715 (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP AAA ITEM NO. PAQE22L OFC2�H. am opening year w /project Thu Jun 19, 2003 10:29:42 Page 3 -1 Elsinore City Center Opening year with project AM, Peak Hour Inter §pcti-qn_yroluMes =:- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Casino Dr. (NS) /Railroad Canyon Rd. (EW) Cycle (sec): 65 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X): 0.498 Loss Time (see): 9 (Y +R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 17.3 Optimal Cycle: 60 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement. L - T - R L - T - R L - T ----- - R --- -- L - T - R -- ---- - -- - -- Control: -------=------- Permitted ---------------'}--- -- Permitted Protected ------ Protected ---- - -- - -� -� Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 20 20 20 20 20 20 10 20 20 10 20 20 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 - - - -} ----- ---------- 2 ---------- 0 1 1 0 - { ------------ --------------- Volume Module: H ---------- - - - - -' Base Vol: 36 38 74 162 31 52 59 590 18 227 568 222 Growth Adj: 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 Initial Bse: 38 40 78 172 33 55 63 625 19 241 602 235 Added Vol: 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 19 0 7 56 3 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 j Initial Fut: 38 40 80 173 33 55 63 '644 19 248 658 238 User Adj: 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00'1.'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 PHF Volume: 38 40 80 173 33 55 63 644 19 248 658 238 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 38 40 80 173 33 55 63 644 19 248 658 238 - PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 Final Vol.: 38 40 80 173 33 55 63 644 - - i--------- - - 19 - - -- i 248 i--------- 656 - 238 - - - -- r i - ----- - - - - -- Saturation Flow i---------- - - - - -} Module: i--------- - - -- Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 19.00 1900 Adjustment: 0.70 0.86 0.86 0.67 0.86 0.86 0.95 0.91 0.91 0.92 0.91 0.91 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 2091 0.09 2.00 1.47 0.53` i Final Sat.: 1321 1625 1.625 1275 1635 1635. 1805 5018 11---=------ ----- 149 ��--------------- 3502 2544 921 � ------------ Capacity Analysis }--------- - - - - -- Module: F--------------- Vol /Sat: 0.03 0.02 0.05 0.14 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.07 0.26 0.26 Crit Moves: Green /Cycle: 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.15 0.37 0.37 0.18 0.40 0.40' Volume /Cap: 0.09 6.08 0.16 0.44 0..07 0.11 0.23 0.35 0.35 0.38 0.65 0.65 Delay /Veh: 16.1 16.0 16.5 18.8 15.9 16.2 24.5 14.9 14.9. 23.6 16.9 16.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1:00 1.06 1.00 7.00 1.00 AdjDel /Veh: 16:1 16.0 16.5 18.8 15.9 16 -.2 24.5 14.9 14.9 23.6 16.9 16.Y DesignQueue: 1 1 2 4 1 1 2 15 0 7 15 6 I-*-- Traffix 7.5.0715 (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP AAA ITEM NO. PAQE22L OFC2�H. pm opening year w /project Thu Jun 19, 2003 10:15:10 Page 3 -1 Elsinore City Center _ - _ Opening year wt�i _Froj eft `PM Pea Hour tersection volumes k in Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Casino Dr. (NS) /Railroad Canyon Rd. (EW) Cycle (sec): 65 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X): 0.638 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y +R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 18.9 ! Optimal Cycle: 60 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ---- -- --- L ----- - T ----- - R - --- -� -- --- -- -- --- ---=----------- Control: Permitted --------------- ------ Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 20 20 20 20 20 20 10 20 20 10 20 20 Lanes: .1 0 1 1 0 1 O 1 1 0 1 0 2' 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 ------ - - - - -- ---------- Volume Module: - - - - - --------------- --------------- ru Base Vol: 59 80 160 196 70 .95 74 696 73 267 .769 213. Growth Adj: 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06, Initial Bse: 63 85 170 208 74 101 78 738 77 283 815 226. Added Vol: 0 0 7 3 0 0 0 66 0 4 38 2 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 63 85 177 211 74 101 .78 8.04 77 287 853 228 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 ;. PHF Adj: 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: -63 85 177 211 74 101 78 804 77 287 853 228 sv� Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 Reduced Vol: 63 85 177 211 74 101 78 804 77 287 853 228 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1400 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj.: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 63 85 177 211 74 101 78 804 77 11--------- ------ 287 853 ----- 228 - - - - - -� - ------------ I--------------- Saturation Flow Module: 11--------------- Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900. 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.64 0.85 0.85 O.S6 0.87 0.87 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.92 0.92 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00' 1.00 2.74 0.26 2.00 1.58 0.42° Final Sat.: 1206 1623 1623 1070 1650 1650 1805 4670 450 --------------- 3502 ---------------- 2758 736 -- ---- - - -- -- --------------- Capacity Analysis Module: --------------- Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.05 0.11 0.20 0.04 0.06 0.04 0.17 0.17 0.08 0.31 0.31 Crit Moves: ` Green /Cycle: 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.15 0.37 0.37 0.18 0;40 0.40 Volume /Cap: 0.17 0.17 0.35 0.64 0.15 0.20 0.28 0.47 0.47 0.44 0.77 0.77 Delay/Veh. 16.6 16.5 17.8 23.616.4 16:7 24.9 15:8 15.8 24.0 19.7 19.7: User DelAdj: 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 -00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel /Veh: 16.6 16.5 17.8 23.6 16.4 16.7 24.9 15.8 15.8 24.0 19.7 19.7 Designoueue.: 2 2 5 5 2 3 2 19 2 9 20 5 Traffix 7.5.0715 (c) 2002 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP i AGENDA ITEM No. 23 PAGE ?4 OF -2 L r If I' I M t. B I O L O G I C A L & C U L T U R A L I N V E S T I G A T I O N S & M O N I T O R I N G FOCUSED SURVEY FOR THE QUINO CHECKERSPOT BUTTERFLY ON APN #363- 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009, and 016 DAIGLE DEVELOPMENT SITE, LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Mr. Glen Daigle Daigle Development, LLC. 28991 Front Street, Suite 207 Temecula, CA 92590 Prepared by: Guy Bruyea, Senior Field Biologist Leslie Irish, Principal Julia Fox, Technical Editor Meredith Rosebure, Technical Editor L & L Environmental, Inc. 1269 Pomona Road, Suite 102 Corona, California 91720 909 - 279 -9608 June 2003 AAA ITEM NO- 23 PAGE 22!OF� p MC MIME SEP 2 3 2003 BY: -------------- - - - - -- 1269 Pomona Rd-Suite 102 - Corona, Cat 92882 - Phone: 909.279.9608 - Fax: 909.279.9609 (Daigle Development Site, A1n.N #363- 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016 'Focused Quin Checkerspot Butterfly Survey Tune 2003 - TABLE-OF CONTENTS- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0) INTRODUCTION ........................................................ ............................... 1.1) Project Location 1 .............................................. ............................... 1 2.0) REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT ......................................... ............................... 2.1) Federal Endangered Species Act ...................................... ............................... 5 3.0) SPECIES INFORMATION ................................:............................ ............................... 6 3.1) Quino Checkerspot Butterfly (Euphydryas editha quino) .... ............................... 3.2) Background Information ..................................................... 6 6 ............................... 3.3) Year 2003 QCB Flight Season .......................................... ............................... 8 4.0) SURVEY METHODS ..................................................................... ............................... 11 TABLE 1: Focused Survey Information ............................. 11 ............................... 5.0) SITE DESCRIPTION ..................................................................... ............................... 13 5.1) Habitat Characteristics ....................................................... ............................... 13 5.2) QCB Larval Host Plant Resources ..................................... 16 ............................... 5.3) QCB Nectar Resources ..................................................... ............................... 16 TABLE 2: QCB Vegetation Resources .............................. ............................... 16 6.0) RESULTS ..................................................................................... ............................... 17 6.1) . Local QCB Records ........................................................... ............................... 17 6.2) Lepidoptera Observations .................................................. ............................... 17 TABLE 3: Lepidoptera Observations ................................ ............................... 18 7.0) CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................. .............................19 8.0) REFERENCES AND CITATIONS ................................................. ............................... 20 QCBSIGNATURE PAGE ......................................................................... ............................... 22 APPENDICES APPENDIX A: TABLE 4: Wildlife Species Observed or Detected on the Project Site TABLE 5: Plant Species Observed or Detected on the Project Site APPENDIX B: Site Photographs LIST OF FIGURES Figure1. Project Vicinity Map .................................................................. ............................... 2 Figure2. Project Location Map ................................................................ ............................... 3 Figure 3. USGS Aerial Photograph .......................................................... ............................... 4 Figure4: Habitat Map Overlay ................. ----- - ----- r..:. ................ --- ,.................................... 14 AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE 2.z i� OF SW 03 -121 i LAG I�aA l v)t'- i'elvpment Site, APX #363- 240 - 002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and016 Tocused Quino Checkerspot Butterfry Survey June 2003 '. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A focused survey for the quino checkerspot butterfly (Euphydryas editha quino) was conducted on the Daigle Development site within the City of Lake Elsinore, County of Riverside, California. The pirpose of the study was to determine the presence or absence of the federally endsi;;C; <<rtpd species, and to evaluate the effect the proposed project may have on this species. The study area, totaling 6± acres, is located just east of the Escondido freeway (1 -15) south of - ,anyon Road. The subject property is situated Section 10, Township 6 South, Range 3 Wesi kmihin the U.S.G.S. Lake Elsinore 7.5' Topographic quadrangle map. The is � i ct area is currently undeveloped. Most of the site is relatively disturbed and dominated by njc '; L,P a,'id non - native vegetation. Remnant Riversidean sage scrub occurs within this area, but coy isists of sporadic, low density RSS species dominated by an understory of non - native weedy >L;ecies. Portions of the site appeared to have burned in recent years, probably within 2- 3 years. Habitat marginally suitable to support larval host and nectaring plant species is present on the projec rite within the areas that support remnant RSS. No larval host plant species were obsenled on site. A total of sixteen (16) relatively common butterfly species were observed on the pr{ ': v ,during the present survey (Table 3). In general the Daigle property represents a relative,', ;average site for QCB flight season diversity of lepidoptera fauna in the area. Althouc_!i', topographic resources occur off -site, no potential topographic resources occur on site and no Q(".B adults, ova, larvae or pupae were detected during the present study. Based on the absence of primary QCB larval host plants and no adult observations during the present survey and other information presented in the above report, L &L concludes that it is highly unlikely that a QCB breeding population currently occupies the subject property. In addition, based on the lack of historical data indicating QCB's presence in the area, and human related disturbances within thy:: project site, it can be reasonably concluded that it is highly unlikely a QCB adult would ever visit the subject property. AGENDA ITEM NO. I PAGE - OF- SW-03-121 ii Lc�G i 'Dai yfe Devefi p wnt Site, A(PN #363- 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016 Focused Quino C(reckerspot Butterfly Survey ,dune 2003 1.0) INTRODUCTION-- __ . - _ � - _ `✓ The following report was written for Daigle Development, LLC. It describes the results of a focused survey for the quino checkerspot butterfly (QCB) on the Daigle Development property, APN #363- 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009, and 016. The purpose of the assessment was to determine the presence or absence of the quino checkerspot butterfly, and to evaluate the effect the project may have on the species and its habitat. This information is needed since the project could result in adverse effects upon the species. Our assessment consisted of: (1) a records search and literature review, conducted to review previous studies and species information, and (2) eight protocol surveys, conducted to determine the presence or absence of the QCB on -site. 1.1) Project Location The study area is located east of Interstate Highway 15 (1 -15) and south of Railroad Canyon Road in the Sedco Hills area and the City of Lake Elsinore (Figure 1). The project is located in the City of Lake Elsinore and 2 miles west of the City of Canyon Lake, California. The project a site can be accessed by taking the Railroad Canyon Road exit east from Interstate 15, turning+ south on Grape Street, east on Malaga Road and north on unimproved Lakeview Drive. The Daigle Development project area is situated in southwest % of the southwest '/4 of Section 10, y Township 6 South, Range 3 West within the U.S.G.S. Lake Elsinore 7.5' Topographic quadrangle 4 maps 9 P (Figure 2). The site is bounded as follows (Figure 3): to the west by Grape Street and mainly highly disturbed open areas, 1 -15, and commercial development beyond. Some moderately disturbed sage scrub occurs between Grape and the 1 -15. To the east the site is bound by a mixture of disturbed and relatively undisturbed lands with scattered rural residential homes; to the north by a mixture of disturbed and relatively undisturbed lands, the Lake Elsinore Town Center (commercial), and residential areas beyond; and to the south by a mixture of disturbed and relatively undisturbed open space with scattered rural residential areas beyond. AGENDA ITEM NO. � PAGE OF_� SW-03-121 1 LdZL Daigle DeveCopm t Site, ANN #363- 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016 Focused Quinn Checkerspot Butterfly survey dune 2003 2.0) REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT 2.1) Federal Endangered Species Act The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), under the Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act), protects species listed as endangered or threatened. Endangered species are defined as a species "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range" while a threatened species is "likely to become endangered in the foreseeable future." Take of listed species is prohibited under Section 9 of the Act. Take includes the direct killing, harming, or harassing of a species, and destruction of habitat that may be important for the species survival and recovery. Harm is further defined as significant habitat alteration that results in death or injury to listed species by significantly impairing behavior patterns such as breeding, feeding, or sheltering. A permit for take of listed species incidental to otherwise lawful activities can be authorized by the USFWS. Procedures for obtaining a permit for incidental take are identified under Section 7 of the Act for projects which involve more than one Federal actions, such as ACOE permitting, and Section 10 for private projects, non - federal actions. AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE L3-2-OF � SW-03-121 5 L87,L r^ DaiYfe (Development Site, A(PN #363- 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016 Focused Qicino Checkerspot Butterfly survey June 2003 3.0) SPECIES INFORMATION 3.1) Quino Checkerspot Butterfly (Euphydryas editha quino) The USFWS added this rare butterfly to the federal list of endangered wildlife in early 1997. The Quino Checkerspot Butterfly (QCB) is a geographic race (subspecies) of . Euphydryas editha, whose combined ranges extend from northern Baja California to Canada along the Pacific coast, and east to Colorado (Bauer, 1975). The QCB is presently known to exist only as several, probably isolated, colonies in southwestern Riverside County, southern San Diego County and northern Baja California, Mexico. This butterfly is associated with sparsely vegetated or bare areas usually characterized by clay or cryptobiotic soil deposits that develop a hard crust within southern California sage scrub vegetation communities. Low - growing herbaceous annuals including the QCB's primary larval host plant, dot -seed plantain, Plantago erecta (Plantaginaceae), typically inhabit these areas. Other potential QCB host plants (usually secondary) may occupy these areas and include owl's clover (Castilleja exserta) and white snapdragon (Antirrhinum coulterianum), both in the plant family Schrophulariaceae. University of California, Riverside (UCR) museum records for QCB exist from southwestern Riverside County dating back to 1951. Most southwestern Riverside County QCB observations, both historic and recent, exist from Temecula and Murrieta, east to areas within 10 to 15 miles of these locations (Mattoni et al., 1995(1997)). Localities in this region include Oak Mountain (1990), Anza - Aguanga (1997), Sage (1998), Wilson Valley (1999), and Bautista Canyon near Hemet (1998). Recent surveys by various researchers have indicated additional QCB populations near Skinner Reservoir, Bachelor Mountain, Skunk Hollow and several other locations in the Temecula - Murrieta area. In addition to UCR museum records, some of the above - referenced QCB locality information is based on a combination of personal observations by Guy Bruyea and conversations with other professionals familiar with QCB distribution in Riverside County, California. 3.2) Background Information The USFWS established its base survey guidelines for the QCB on January 31, 2000 (herein 3 Protocol). In this document the USFWS indude's a Year Quino 'Survey Areas map -of rt southern California with polygons delineating six specific survey areas of potential QCB habitat where QCB adult focused surveys are recommended. Potential habitat for QCB is determined SW-03-121 6 AGMA ITEM NO.LE s p�CjF`s OF-C 1 (DaigfeDevekpwntSite,A(P.N #363- 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009and016 TocusedQuino Cfreckerspot butterfly survey June 2003 consecutive days at an average rate of 10 -15 acres per hour (by one permitted biologist). L &L 11.044 conducted this survey accordingly. On April 15, 2002 the USFWS released its final rule for designation of QCB critical habitat. Critical habitat identifies specific areas, both occupied and unoccupied, that are essential to the conservation of a listed species and that may require special management considerations or protection (USFWS 2002). Two critical habitat units collectively totaling approximately 100,000 acres lie within southwestern Riverside County and are defined as follows: (1) the Lake Mathews Unit (Unit 1), which contains approximately 14,000 acres, and includes the Harford Springs and Lake Mathews Estelle Mountain Reserve subunits, generally located in the Lake Mathews area west of Interstate Highway 215; and (2) the Southwestern Riverside Unit (Unit 2), which contains approximately 86,000 acres, and includes the Temecula Murrieta Oak Grove and Brown Canyon subunits, generally located east of Interstate Highway 215 and north of Highway 79. Based on preliminary maps provided by the USFWS in its final rule designation, the Daigle project site does not lie within the Lake Mathews or Southwestern Riverside critical habitat units. 3.3) Year2002 QCB Flight Season QCB seasonal flight patterns, including numbers of individuals present in a given year and emergence dates, can vary annually based on late winter and early spring rainfall amounts, host plant and nectar resource availability, weather patterns during the flight season, and other factors. Due to several early winter storms and average seasonal temperatures in November and December 2002, QCB's primary larval host plant (Planfago erecta) and many other spring annuals germinated in late December or early January in most areas of southwestern Riverside County. Weather and host plant conditions were initially favorable for QCB larval development in southwestern Riverside County based on preliminary observations by L &L biologists and other researchers, and post- diapausing larvae were observed feeding on recently germinated plants as early as January 8 at one San Diego County USFWS monitored location (USFWS, 2003). Biologist Guy Bruyea observed germinated P. erecta plants in mid - January 2003 at Harford Springs County Park in the Gavilan Hills area of northwestern Riverside County, and in other areas of southwestern Riverside. County.- 1.r✓ SW-03 -121 8 BEMA ITEM iZiZ2 3 PAGEL2Y OF _i l Daiyle Omelopment Site, A1'N #363- 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016 'Focused Quino Checkerspot futuegTy Survey ,dune 2003 From early January to about mid - February 2003, a critical period in the development of QCB post- diapausing larvae and subsequent adult emergence patterns, atypically dry conditions prevailed throughout southern California. In southwestern Riverside County, this unusual weather pattern included a combination of high winds, unseasonably high temperatures, and below average precipitation. During this approximately forty -five day period, most areas of southwestern Riverside County received less than 1 inch of rain that fell on only two days with measurable precipitation amounts (GB, pers. obs.). Due to these conditions P. erecta and other spring annuals (including potential QCB nectar resources) were in the initial stages of drought stress by early February, and no QCB larvae had been observed at any of the southwestern Riverside County monitoring sites (USFWS, 2003). Around mid - February, seasonably cool conditions (including periods of substantial precipitation) returned to southern California and remained throughout the months of March and April, enabling post- diapausing QCB larvae to continue and complete their development on newly germinated and /or drought - relieved larval host plants. In 2003, QCB adults were first reported from the Lake Skinner reference site (nearest USFWS monitored site to Daigle) on March 6 (1 male), with additional sightings on March 7 (2 males), March 31 (3 males, 1 female), and April 9 (2 males, 1 female). Additional QCB adult sightings (as reported by the USFWS) were made in the Warm Springs Creek area (approximately 6 miles south of the subject property) on March 19 (1 male), April 7 (1 male) and April 17 (1 male). At low elevation sites within the southern portion of its range, QCB adults were observed as early as January 28 depending on local weather patterns and other factors. In portions of southern San Diego County, the season was essentially split in two as a small segment of adults emerged in late January and early February, and another segment of the population emerged in March. Due to above average precipitation amounts in February and March, conditions were favorable for an extended flight of QCB adults in Marron Valley, Jamul, and other USFWS monitored reference sites. At higher elevations of western Riverside County, QCB adults were common on Oak Mountain near Vail Lake on March 17 (60+ reported), with additional sightings reported from localities in the Anza- Aguanga area as late as April 24, indicating that relatively cool conditions resulted in an extended flight period of QCB throughout much of its range, regardless of elevation. Based on discussions with other QCB researchers and L &L biologist's personal observations in _ _ - F the field, it is likely that previous 2000 -2002 drought conditions had an adverse effect on the Temecula - Murrieta QCB metapopulation unit and other low elevation colonies in 2003, despite SW-03 -121 9 AQEIDA ITEM NO. p11.3SOF L Oaggee Development Site, APN #363- 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016 EocusedQuino Chcckerspot Butterfly Survey Tune 2003 favorable weather conditions and the associated abundance of QCB larval host plants and + nectar resources. Although QCB was detectable throughout its range in 2003, it is probable that QCB population densities were somewhat reduced, especially at lower elevations. It may take several seasons of at or above normal winter reci itation levels low- elevation p Is for some tow elevation populations to recover to pre- drought population densities. Throughout its range, QCB has a history (documented as far back as the 1930's) of significant population fluctuation from year to year, which in part is likely due to annual late winter drought precipitation cycles, although habitat fragmentation likely plays a key role in such fluctuations as well. QCB observations reported by the USFWS's website and information obtained from other QCB researchers suggests that conditions during the present survey were suitable for determining QCB presence at most locations in western Riverside County, including the Daigle property. In 3 western Riverside County, observations during he g survey period suggest that overall butterfly activity (i.e. numbers of individuals observed) was about average or better depending on the species; however, butterfly diversity (i.e. number of species observed) was probably below average g for most Locations. Due to an extended period of relatively cool conditions throughout March and April in southwestern Riverside County, the QCB adult flight period (and in fact, the flight period for .✓ many spring -flying butterfly species) became extended, lasting an estimated 7 to 8 weeks at elevations of approximately 1500 above mean sea level (AMSI_). SW-03 -121 10 i PAGE® OF Daigfe Devekpment Site, A1�.N #363- 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016 Focused Quino Checkerspot ButterfCy survey June 2003 t- 4.0) SURVEY METHODS Guy P. Bruyea performed adult focused surveys in March and April 2003. A valid section 10(a)(1)(A) recovery permit issued under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, is currently held by Mr. Bruyea (Permit Number TE- 837439 -5, as amended). As outlined in the conditions of the permit a copy of this report will be sent to the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS). L &L conducted adult focused surveys for the QCB based on a strict interpretation of the year 2000 survey Protocol and 2002 Protocol update. Adult focused surveys were conducted on the site for a total of eight man -days on eight dates (March 7, 14, 22, 29, April 4, 12, 20, and 27, 2003) during the approximately eight -week focused survey period (Table 1). This level of survey effort meets or exceeds the standards recommended in the USFWS's most recently published Protocol. The entire 6 -acre site (Figure 3) was covered on foot at a slow pace, stopping periodically, during the eight -week adult focused survey season. During each adult focused survey, the `^ survey effort included areas containing both native and non- native vegetation and a variety of known and potential QCB nectar resources throughout the site. This survey was conducted simultaneously with a survey on 26 acres immediately adjacent to the east. Survey times and data sheets incorporate both sites. Table 1. Focused Survey Information Date Time PST Weather Wind Biologist Survey Results 03 -07 -03 1035 -1400 Sunny, 65-70° F 0 -1 F GB FS No QCB 03 -14 -03 0900 -1200 Sunny, 61 -70° F 0 -2 F GB FS No QCB 03 -22 -03 0930 -1300 Sunny, 67 -77° F 0 -1 F GB FS No QCB 03 -29 -03 1100 -1500 Sunny, 70 -75° F 0 -3 F GB FS No QCB 04 -04 -03 0945 -1330 Sunn , 59 -68° F 0 -2 F GB FS No QCB 04 -12 -03 0930 -1300 Partly Cloudy, 64 -70 °F 0 -2 F GB FS No QCB 04 -20 -03 0930 -12630 Overcast, 68 -77° F 0 -2 F GB FS No QCB 04 -27 -03 0915 -1230 Sunny, 63 -73° F 0 -2 F GB FS No QCB • GB (Guy Bruyea) • FS (Focused Survey) • Wind measurement on Beaufort (F) scale Eight adult focused surveys man -days were conducted on eight days - suitable for adult butterfly activity as evidenced by appropriate weather conditions (temperatures, cloud cover, and wind Y SW-03-121 11 AGENDA ITEM NO '� w PAGE 2 2 'i L of = i DaWfe Deve(opment Site, ATX #363 -240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016 Tocusecf Quinn CFieckerspot Butter Survey ,dune 2003 conditions). The presence of several butterfly species on focused survey days indicates that weather conditions are suitable for potential QCB activity (Table 3). Daily weather data were noted on field forms and /or a digital audio recorder roughly once per hour during focused survey visits. Weather data were recorded using a digital anemometer (Beaufort scale of wind speed measurement), thermometer, and by visual observation and estimation of cloud cover and other pertinent daily weather characteristics (rain, drizzle, marine layer, etc.). Digital recordings were later transcribed to field forms. National Weather Service data was retrieved on daily weather conditions for Riverside County and other areas of southern California. The most recent QCB Protocol states that adult focused surveys will not be considered valid if during a focused survey visit one or more of the following weather conditions occur: fog, drizzle, rain, sustained winds greater than 15 miles per hour measured 4 -6 feet above ground level, temperature in the shade at ground level less than 60 °F on a clear, sunny day, or temperature in the shade at ground level less than 70 °F on an overcast or cloudy day (USFWS 2000). Focused surveys were not conducted on inclement weather days characterized by these specific weather conditions. All focused surveys on the Daigle site were conducted during suitable weather conditions for potential QCB activity. All observed butterfly species and their relative abundance were recorded daily during each of eight focused survey site visits. These data and additional daily weather and biological information (plants, wildlife, additional comments, etc.) were recorded during each site visit on one -page daily field forms (Quinn Checkerspot Focused Survey Field Notes ). Daily field forms (Appendix C), a summary of wildlife observations (Appendix B), daily survey, weather data, and survey results (Table 1), QCB vegetative resources (Table 2), and daily butterfly observations, including relative abundance of each species observed (Table 3) are included in this report. Focused surveys for the QCB primarily consisted of surveying areas containing patches of undisturbed vegetation that may support known QCB larval host plants. Searches for adult QCB were conducted throughout the entire property, especially in areas inhabited by potential nectar resources. Due to this site's proximity to historically known and recently discovered QCB populations in the Temecula area, and the presence of potential QCB resources, adult focused surveys were conducted to determine presence or absence of this endangered butterfly. Based on the USFWS's 'hotline' information, L &L's knowledge of the species, and information from other researchers, year 2002 adult focused survels for QCB were- vTeek'of March 1, 2003 and terminated the week of April 21, 2003 for the Daigle property. S`fN -03 -121 12 AG EMA ITEM NO. PAGE 2 3� DaWfe 0eve4wnt Site, 4eX #363- 240-002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016 Focused Quino Checkerspat Butterfly Survey June 2003 5.0) SITE DESCRIPTION Land use varies within and adjacent to the survey area, and includes anthropogenic disturbances such as residential areas, strip malls, paved and unimproved roads, off -road vehicle activity, target shooting, and dumping. Several unpaved roads of varying widths, mostly used and created in association with off -road vehicle activity, are present throughout the subject property. unpaved These roads continue off site to the north south and east. P p Topographically, the site consists of lower -lying relatively flat areas on a gradual east to west trending slope. Two significant ridgeline and hilltop areas occur off -site to the east and north. The site contains a combined maximum vertical relief of approximately 60 feet between the highest and lowest elevation points on the property, with elevations ranging from approximately 1425 to 1485 feet AMSL. Surrounding topographic features in the immediate vicinity of the subject property include gently LF to steeply sloping hills and ridgelines interspersed with lower -lying relatively flat areas. Additional ridgelines and hilltops at elevations of approximately 2000 to 2200 feet AMSL are present southeast of the site (Appendix A). The site contains evidence of anthropogenic disturbances associated with residential areas, strip malls, paved and unimproved roads, off -road vehicle activity, target shooting, and dumping. Additionally, portions of the site appeared to have burned in recent years, probably within 2 -3 years based on present shrub sizes. 5.1) Habitat Characteristics Most of the project site is heavily disturbed and are dominated by ruderal weedy vegetation and non - native grassland, especially in areas subjected to relatively recent off -road vehicle activity (Figure 4). Remnants of the original Riversidean sage scrub (RSS) vegetation community do occur scattered within.approximately half of the site, but are more disturbed and less dense than appears in Figure 4. Adult focused surveys were conducted throughout the entire site; but focused on remnant Riversidean sage scrub (RSS) and potential QCB nectar resources. Areas containing cryptobiotic crusts were observed, but not common, among the matrix of open patches. A mix of native low- growing and tall weedy annuals were found in these areas, and included pygmy stonecrop (Crassula connata), California filago (Filago califomica), and other L: associated plants. Although these crusts are present, mostly decomposed granitic soils without a c ry ptobiotic layer were more frequently observed within the survey area. �s l S`--03 -121 13 ': PAGE 2.�. OFy?14 no t lip 9 ( Daigfe (Development Site, ATW #363- 240 - 002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016 Focused Quinn Checkerspot Butterfly survey %une 2003 r� A general discussion of the vegetation communities and plants observed on the Daigle Development property is presented as part of this report, with emphasis on potential QCB adult nectar resources within those communities. A comprehensive botanical evaluation of this site was not conducted in conjunction with the current QCB focused survey. Pertinent plant identifications were made in the field; additional plant identifications and vegetation community determinations were made utilizing Schoenherr (1992), Hickman (1993), Sawyer and Keeler -Wolf (1995), Parker (1999) and Psomas (1999). Common names are from Hickman where possible. 5.1.1) Disturbed/ Ruderal Habitat Disturbed habitat includes areas that contain mostly non- native plant species including LJ ornamentals and ruderal exotics. The majority of the site is now mostly disturbed and contains many ruderal plant species. Mostly non - native, weedy species have invaded these areas, including short-pod mustard, foxtail chess, red - stemmed filaree (Erodium cicutarium), long- beaked Storksbill (Erodium botrys), cheeseweed ( Malva parviflora), London rocket (Sysimbrium irio), and various non - native grasses. Other plant species observed in abundance included fiddleneck, . horehound (Marrubium vulgare), chia (Salvia columbariae) and red maids (Calandrinia ciliata). ,F i In addition, remnant Riversidean sage scrub (RSS) species are present. RSS is a xeric form of coastal sage scrub containing mostly drought- deciduous shrubs with small leaves. Individual and sporadic native RSS shrubs located within the site include flat top buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum), brittlebush (Encelia farinosa), white sage (Salvia apiana), California sagebrush (Artemesia califomica). Due to at or above normal precipitation levels in early 2003 and the site being recently burned, annuals were both diverse and abundant on the property. Conspicuous annuals including blue dicks (Dichelostemma capitatum), California poppy (Eschscholzia califomica), fiddleneck (Amsinckia menziesii var. intemmedia), red maids (Calandrinia ciliata), were present. Open patches can be found throughout portions of the site, containing a mixture of native and non- native low- growing annuals including popcorn flower (Plagiobothrys sp.), forget -me -not (Cryptantha intermedia), goldfields (Lasthenia califomica), sun cups (Cammisonia bistorta) and slender pectocarya ( Pectocarya lineads). SW-03-121 15 PAGE Daigfe 23evefopment Site, ,/`l(PN #363- 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016 FocusedOufn) ('fterkrrmnt (R,,tt.,ff- �..,.,.�.. ,dune 2003 5.2) QCB Larval Host Plant Resources During the present survey, although P. erecta and C. exserta are known from the region, no P. erecta or C. exserta were observed on the subject property after careful searching during the present focused survey. Crust- forming soils (clay and /or cryptobiotic) generally found to be suitable for the growth of P. erecta were very uncommon on the Daigle property, due to previous site disturbances. C. exserta is frequently observed in association with decomposed granitic soils, which are abundant on the subject property. However, no C. exserta were observed during this study. 5.3) QCB Nectar Resources Due to higher than normal precipitation amounts in the late spring and early winter months of 2003, many annual plant species were common, including potential nectar resources such as (but not limited to) fiddleneck, various mustards, chic and many other species. Some of the known and potential QCB nectar resources identified on the property during 2003 focused surveys are summarized in this report (Table 2). Table 2. QCB Vegetation Resources on Daigle Development Property QCB Known and Potential Larval Host Plant Resources Scientific N Plant Famil None Obs QCB Known and Potential Nectar Resources Common Name Scientific Name Plant Family Fiddleneck Amsinckia menziesii Bora inaceae Short-pod mustard Hirschfeldia incana Brassicaceae Deerweed Lotus sco anus Fabaceae Goldfields Lasthenia califomica Asteraceae Forget-me-not Cryptantha intermedia Bora inaceae Po corn.tlower Plagiobothrys s . Bora inaceae Blue dicks Dichelostemma ca itatum Liliaceae SW-03 -121 16 AGENDA ITEM NO. `_ PAGE a"-O-OF Daigfe Devefopment Site, AW #363- 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016 EocusedQ,uino Checkerspot ButterffySurmy June 2003 6. 0) RESULTS No QCB adults were observed on the Daigle Development site during eight focused survey man -days on eight separate dates. Additionally, no QCB eggs, larvae or pupae were observed on the property during year 2003 focused surveys. 6.1) Local QCB Records There are relatively few locality records of QCB from the extreme western portion of Riverside County, although historic (up to the mid- 1980's) records exist for the Gavilan Hills and Lake Mathews areas located approximately seven to ten miles northeast of the site. Interestingly, there is a single 1987 record from the north side of Lake Elsinore near Terra Cotta Hill, which is approximately two miles north of the subject property. L &L knows of no other relatively recent QCB records in the Lake Elsinore area. 6.2) Lepidoptera Observations A total of sixteen (16) relatively common butterfly species were observed on the property during the present survey (Table 3). In general the Daigle property represents a relatively average site for QCB flight season diversity of lepidoptera fauna in the area. Common butterfly species observed during the present study include chalcedon checkerspot (Euphydryas chalcedona), y Behr's metaimark A odemia morrno virgult►) and painted lady ( Vanessa cardul). Common ( P hilltopping species such as Felder's orange -tip (Anthocaris cethura), checkered white (Pontia > protodice), and west coast lady (Vanessa annabella) were observed in association with the off- site ridgelines and hilltops to the south and north of the subject property. These off -site E� topographic features may be a significant resource for hilltopping butterfly species on the Daigle site and in the general area. /_ L Interestingly, several common butterfly species that are usually observed during the QCB flight season were conspicuously uncommon or even absent during the 2003 survey period in southwestem Riverside County. .These include southern blue (Glaucopsyche lygdamus australis), bramble hairstreak (Callophrys perplexa), alfalfa sulfur (Colias eurytheme), funereal duskywing (Erynnis funera/is), and western checkered skipper (Pyrgus communis albescens). S'W-03 -121 17 WLMA ITEM ND/�_ PAGE OI=-2? ll -_ Daigle Development Site, A N #363- 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016 'FocusedQuino Checkerspot Butterfly Survey Yune 2003 Table 3. Le ido tera Observations March Aril Common Name I Scientific Name 7 14 122 129 4 12 20 27 Anise Swallowtail Pa ilio zelicaon S Checkered White Pontia rotodice X X C C C C A Cabbage White Piens ra ae S Sara Orange-tip Anthocaris Sara sara X X X F F F F Felder's Orange-Up Anthocaris cethura X X A C S Alfalfa Sulfur Colias eu heme Painted Lad Vanessa caidut A X X A A A A A West Coast Lad Vanessa annabella X F S F Red Admiral Vanessa atalanta S S Chalcedon Checkers of (Euphydiyas chacedona X X X A A A C C Monarch Butterfly (Danaus lexi pus S Funereal Dusk in g (Erynnis funeralis X X S Behr's Metalmark A odemia mormo vi uffi X X X C A A A A Southern Blue Glauco s the lygdamus australis S Bramble Hairstreak (Callophrys perp lexa S S S Common Hairstreak (Strymon melinus S S 16 Species Total Total Daily Observations 6 7 1 6 T 8 8 10 8 5 • S (rare) 1 observation • F (few) 2 -5 observations • C (common) 6 to 30 observations (approx) SW-03 -121 • A (abundant) 31 +observations (approx) • X abundance not recorded 18 A004pA ITEM NO. L' - P -AC,I- OF v./ m C E' �.z �f F �T f� U (Daigle Oevekpwnt Site, qrx #363- 240 - 002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and016 'Focused Quino Checkerspot Butterfly Survey June 2003 7.0) CONCLUS16NS During the eight -week year 2003 QCB focused survey period, the entire approximately six (6) acre Daigle Development site was surveyed according to USFWS Protocol, in conjunction with a twenty -four (24) acre adjacent site. Although topographic resources occur off -site, no potential topographic resources occur on site and no QCB adults, ova, larvae or pupae were detected during the present study. Based on the absence of primary QCB larval host plants and no adult observations during the present survey and other information presented in the above report, L &L concludes that it is highly unlikely that a QCB breeding population currently occupies the subject property. In addition, based on the lack of historical data indicating QCB's presence in the area, and human related disturbances within the project site, it can be reasonably concluded that it is highly unlikely a QCB adult would ever visit the subject property. SW-03-121 19 AWMA ITEM NM 23 PAGE'S OP . Daigfe Devefopwnt Site, 4(P.N #363- 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016 TocusedQuino Checkenspot Butterfly Survey 8.0) REFERENCES AU0 CITATIONS - tune 2003 Arnett, Ross H. Jr. 2000. American Insects: A Handbook of the Insects of America North of Mexico. CRC Press, New York, New York. 1003pp. Ballmer, G. R., D. Hawks, K. Osborne, G. Pratt. 1998. The Quino Checkerspot (Euphydryas editha quino). Unpublished manuscript for UCR Quino Workshop. Bauer, D. 1975. Tribe Melitaeini, pp. 139 -195, in Howe, W. (ed.), The Butterflies of North America. Doubleday and Company, Inc., Garden City, New York. 633 pp. Brown, David E. 1994. Biotic Communities: Southwestern United States and Mexico. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, Utah. 342pp. Bruyea, Guy P. 2003. Field notes from focused QCB surveys conducted on the 6 -acre project site. March -April Emmel, T. C. and J. F. Emmel. 1973. The Butterflies of Southern California. The Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Science Series 26. Erhlich, P. R. et al. 1975. Checkerspot Butterflies: A Historical Perspective. Science 188:221- 228. Jameson, Jr., E. W. and Hans J. Peters. 1988. California Mammals. University of California Press, Berkeley, California. 403pp. Hickman, James C. (editor). 1993. The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles. Kaufman, Kenn. 1996. The Lives of North American Birds. Houghton Mifflin Company, New York. 675pp. Mattoni, R., G. Pratt, T. Longcore, J. Emmel and J. George. 1995 (1997). The Endangered Quino Checkerspot Butterfly (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). J. Res. Lepid. 34: 99 -118: McAuley, Milt. 1985. Wildflowers of the Santa Monica Mountains. Canyon Publishing Company, Canoga Park, California. 543pp. Munz, Philip A. 1974. A Flora of Southern California. University of California Press, Berkeley, California. Murphy, D. D. and R. R. White. 1984. Rainfall, resources, and dispersal in southern populations of Euphydryas editha (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Pan - Pacific Entomologist 60:350 -354. Orsak, L. J. 1977. The Butterflies of Orange County, California. University of California, Irvine, California. SI V-03 -121 Z0 PAG214 oFQ E Daigre Deveropment Site, APN #363- 240 - 002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016 Tocused Quino Checkerspot Butterfry Survey ,dune 2003 Parker, Robert et al. 4999: Weeds of the West: The Western Society of Weed Science. Newark, California. 630pp. Sawyer, John O. and Todd Keeler -Wolf. A Manual of California Vegetation. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, California. 471 pp. Scott, J. A. 1986. The Butterflies of North America, a Natural History and Field Guide. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. 583pp. Schoenherr, Allan A. 1992. A Natural. History of California. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, California. 772pp. Sibley, David Allen. 2000. National Audubon Society The Sibley Guide to Birds. Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., New York, New York. 545pp. Small, Arnold. 1994. California Birds: Their Status and Distribution. ibis Publishing Company, Vista, California. 342pp. Stebbins, Robert C. 1985. A Field Guide to the Western Reptiles and Amphibians. Houghton Mifflin Company, New York, New York. 336pp. Thelander, Carl G. and Margo Crabtree. 1994. Life on the Edge: A Guide to California's Endangered Natural Resources: Wildlife. Bay Checkerspot Butterfly (Euphydryas editha bayensis) p 338 -341. BioSystems Books, Santa Cruz, California. 550 pp. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Federal Register, Vol. 62, No. 11. January 16, 1997. Determination of Endangered Status for the Laguna Mountains Skipper and Quino Checkerspot Butterfly. Final Rule. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. 2000. Quino Checkerspot Butterfly (Euphydryas editha quino) Year 2000 Survey Protocol. January 31. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2000. Draft Recovery Plan for the Quino Checkerspot Butterfly (Euphydryas editha quino). Portland, Oregon. x + 123 pp. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002. Quino Checkerspot Butterfly (Euphydryas editha quino) Survey Protocol Information. Carlsbad, California. February 12. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Federal Register. Vol. 67, No. 72. April 15, 2002. Designation of Critical Habitat for the Quino Checkerspot Butterfly (Euphydryas editha quino). Final Rule. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2003. Quino Checkerspot Butterfly (Euphydryas editha quino) Monitored Reference Site Information website. Carlsbad, California. February - May. (URL: http: / /carisbad.fws.gov /Rules /OuinoDocuments/ Quino _htms /Fiight_info_2003.htm) SW-03-121 21 --�� PAGE '4 70F,; r. t: rs (Dal�fe (Development Site, 4TN#363-240-002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016 TOcusedQuino Checkerspot Butterfly Suivey ,dune 2003 4CB Signature Page 6-acre Daigle Site Project. Lake Elsinore, California. I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this biological evaluation, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of our knowledge and belief. Date Leslie Irish, Principal SW-03-121 22 AGENDA tTEM NO ....'w* PArIF 2, L/ _l Ort:;; 16.01 -i C C I: F r, c e G G G 'Daigle Develop =t Site, A1r.N #363- 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016 EocusedQuino Checkerspot Butterfly Survey June 2003 TABLE 4: Wildlife Species Observed or Detected on the Daigle Project Site Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, California March — April 2003 SCIENTIFIC NAME Birds Acciptiridae Buteo jamaicensis Aegithalidae Psaltriparus minimus Alaudidae Eremophilia alpestris Cathartidae Cathartes aura Columbidae Columba livia Zenaida macroura Corvidae Corvus brachyrhynchos Corvus corax clarionensis Emberizidae Pipilo crissalis Zonotrichia leucophrys Falconidae Falco sparverius Fringillidae Carduelis psaltria Hirundinidae Petrochelidon pyrrhonota tachina Icteridae Stumella neglecta Euphagus cyanocephalus Mimidae Mimus polyglottus S`W-03 -121 COMMON NAME Hawk Family Red -tail Hawk Long- tailed Tit Family Bushtit Lark Family Homed Lark Vulture Family Turkey Vulture Pigeon Family Rock Dove (Feral Pigeon) Mourning Dove Jay and Crow Family American Crow Common Raven Emberizine Sparrow Family California Towhee White- crowned Sparrow Falcon Family American Kestrel Finch Family Lesser Goldfinch Swallow Family Cliff Swallow Icterid Family Western Meadowlark Brewer's Blackbird _ Mockingbird Family__ Northern Mockingbird A -1 PAGE .= ! ! OF .i f f C C f r i r E CDaigfe q)e•vefopment Site, ,g N #363 -240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016 FocusedQuino Checkerspot Butterfly Survey -7une 2003 Table 4 (Continued) SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Passeridae Passer domesticus Sturnidae Stamus vulgads vulgaris Timaliidae Chamaea fasciata Trochilideae Calypte anna Troglodytidae Thryomanes bewickii Tyrannidae Tyrannus verticalis Mammals Leporidae Sylvilagus audubonii Sciuridae Spermophilus beecheyi Reptiles & Amphibians Iguanidae Uta stansburiana Teiidae Cnemidophorus tigris Old World Sparrow Family House Sparrow Starling Family European Starling Babbler Family W rentit Hummingbird Family Anna's Hummingbird Wren Family Bewick's Wren Tyrant Flycatcher Family Western Kingbird Rabbit Family Audubon's Cottontail Squirrel Family California Ground Squirrel Iguanid Family Side- blotched Lizard Teiid Lizard Family Western Whiptail 23 SW-03-121 4-2 ""'Z'° PAGE.= OFG,2L M S yr_reloment Site, AW #363- 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016 r Tbcused uino Cfreckerspot Butterfly Survey June 2003 TABLE 5: Plant Species Observed or Detected on the Daigle Project Site Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, California March — April 2002 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Anacardiaceae Sumac Family S,J inus molle Peruvian Pepper Apiaceae D w,,A;s pusillus Boraginaceae Amsinckia menziesii intermedia Ctyptantha intermedia Pectocaya linearis Brassicaceae Hirschfeldia incana Sisymbrium ido Crassulaceae Crasssula connata Cuscutaceae Cuscuta species Euphorbiaceae Eremocarpus setigerus Fabaceae Lotus scoparius Lupinus bicolor Lupinus sp. Carrot Family Rattlesnake weed Sunflower Family California Sagebrush Common Pineapple -weed Brittlebush Unidentified California Filago Annual Sunflower Prickly Lettuce Goldfields Cudweed Aster Silver Puffs California Chicory Common Sow Thistle Borage Family Fiddleneck Forget -me -not Slender Pectocarya Mustard Family Short -pod Mustard London Rocket Stonecrop Family Pygmy Stonecrop Dodder Family Dodder Spurge Family Doveweed Pea Family Deerweed Dove Lupine Unidentified Lupine SW-03-121 A -3 4N PAGE OF, Asteraceae ` Arterr asia califomica Ch tt- numila suaveolens Em (.Via farinosa Ericplyllum sp. Filago califomica Helianthus annuus Lactuca serriola Lasthenia califomica Lessingia f/laginifolia '^ Microceris lindleyi Rafrnesquia califomica Sonchus oleraceus Boraginaceae Amsinckia menziesii intermedia Ctyptantha intermedia Pectocaya linearis Brassicaceae Hirschfeldia incana Sisymbrium ido Crassulaceae Crasssula connata Cuscutaceae Cuscuta species Euphorbiaceae Eremocarpus setigerus Fabaceae Lotus scoparius Lupinus bicolor Lupinus sp. Carrot Family Rattlesnake weed Sunflower Family California Sagebrush Common Pineapple -weed Brittlebush Unidentified California Filago Annual Sunflower Prickly Lettuce Goldfields Cudweed Aster Silver Puffs California Chicory Common Sow Thistle Borage Family Fiddleneck Forget -me -not Slender Pectocarya Mustard Family Short -pod Mustard London Rocket Stonecrop Family Pygmy Stonecrop Dodder Family Dodder Spurge Family Doveweed Pea Family Deerweed Dove Lupine Unidentified Lupine SW-03-121 A -3 4N PAGE OF, ftigfe Devekpwnt Site, ApN #363- 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 and 016 Focused Quino Checkerspot ButterjTy Survey ,dune 2003 _Table 5 (Continued) SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Geraniaceae Geranium Family Erodium botrys Long- beaked stork's bill Erodium cicutarium Red- stemmed filaree. Hydrophyllaceae Waterleaf Family Phacelia distans Distant Phacelia Lamiaceae Mint Family Marrubium vulgare Horehound Salvia apiana White Sage Salvia columbariae Chia .Liliaceae Lily Family Dichelostemma capitatum Blue Dicks Malvaceae Mallow Family Malva parviflora Cheeseweed Onagraceae Evening Primrose Family Cammisonia bistorta Sun Cups Papaveraceae Poppy Family Eschscholzia califomica California Poppy Poaceae Grass Family . Avena barbata Slender Wild oat Bromus madritensis rubens Foxtail Chess Bromus species Brome Grass Hordeum vulgare Barley Schismus barbatus Mediterranean Grass Polygonaceae Buckwheat, Family Eriogonum fasciculatum Flat -top Buckwheat Portulacaceae Purslane Family Calandrinia ci/iata Red Maids Rubiaceae Madder Family Galium aparine Annual Bedstraw S'W-03 -121 A -4 AGENDA ITEM NO.... PAGE i -..� '� —..� 5...4L''wr- .�,y�.M�r ;'gcsuLV .- �anriiS�q��° .• ' ~ l..a � , _.tom°""'' �r� _ `K" ,• „� ,� .. im h DaWfe Deveiopwnt Site, _AT5V#363-240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009 andOl 6 TocusedQuino Checkerspot Butterfly survey June 2003 Photo 3: Taken from the southeast corner to the northwest. A991-4QAITEM NQ-- SW-03-121 B-2 '*N pAGE.2S740FLIlL—F// 14.01 I...00i B I O L O G I C A L & C U L T U R A L I N V E S T I G A T I O N S & M O N I T O R I N G FOCUSED SURVEY FOR THE COASTAL CALIFORNIA GNATCATCHER ON APN #363- 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009, and 016 TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 31532, LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Mr. Glen Daigle Daigle Homes, LLC. 28991 Front Street, Suite 207 Temecula, CA 92590 Prepared by: Ms. Leslie Irish, Principal Mr. John Konecny, Biological Investigator Ms. Julia Fox, Technical Editor Ms. Meredith Rosebure, Technical Editor L & L Environmental, Inc. 1269 Pomona Road, Suite 102 Corona, California 91720 909- 279 -9608 SEP 2 3 2003 July 2003 BY: -------------------- AGENDA ITEM NO. _, -� PAGE 1-5.5 OF 1269 Pomona Rd-Suite 102 - Corona, '- 92882 • Phone: 909.279.9608 - Fax: 909.27.9.9609 y -APW #363 - 240 -002, 003, 004, oo8, oog, and o16 Focused Coasta(Caffomia Gnatcatcher Survey Ju(y 2003 - -- - TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVESUMMARY .......................................................................... ............................... ii 1.0) INTRODUCTION ............................................................................ ..............................1 1.1) Project Location ................................................................. ............................... 1 1.2) Site Description .................................................................. ..............................1 FIGURE 1: Project Vicinity Map ........................................ ...... ......................... 2 FIGURE 2: Project Location Map ...................................... ............................... 3 FIGURE 3: USGS Aerial Photograph ................................ ............................... 4 2.0) REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT .................................................. ............................... 6 2.1) Federal Endangered Species Act ...................................... ............................... 6 3.0) SPECIES INFORMATION ............................................................. ............................... 7 4.0) METHODS AND PERSONNEL ..................................................... ............................... 8 4.1) Survey Methods ................................................................. ............................... 8 TABLE 1: Project Site Survey Information ........................ ................I............... 8 5.0) RESULTS ..................................................................................... ............................... 9 5.1) Vegetation ......................................................................... ............................... 9 FIGURE 4: Habitat Map Overlay ....................................... ............................... 10 5.2) Literature Review ............................................................... ............................... 11 5.3) Field Survey ......................................................................... .............................11 1%✓ 6.0) CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................. ...... .......................12 7.0) REFERENCES AND CITATIONS ................................................. ............................... 13 APPENDICES APPENDIX A: TABLE 2: Bird Species Observed on the Project Site APPENDIX B: Site Photographs AGENDA ITEM NQ- sly-03-121 APN #363 - 240 -002, 003, 004, oo8, oog, and ol6 Focused Coasta(Cal fornia Gnatcatcher Survey JuCy 2003 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A focused survey for the coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila califomica calfomica) was conducted on Tentative Tract Map 31532, APN #363 - 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009, and 01.6 within the City of Lake Elsinore, County of Riverside, California. The purpose of the studies was to determine the presence or absence of the federally threatened species, and to evaluate the effect the proposed project may have on this species. The study area, totaling 6± acres, is located just east of Interstate 15 south of Railroad Canyon Road. The subject property is situated Section 10, Township 6 South, Range 3 West within the U.S.G.S. Lake Elsinore 7.5' Topographic quadrangle map. The project area is currently undeveloped. Most of the site is relatively disturbed and dominated by ruderal and non - native vegetation. Remnant Riversidean sage scrub occurs within this area, but consists of sporadic, low density RSS species dominated by an understory of non - native weedy species. Portions of the site appeared to have burned in recent years, probably within 2- 3 years. Habitat found within the project site was identified as remnant Riversidean sage scrub and disturbed grassland. A focused survey for the coastal California gnatcatcher was conducted during the 2003 nesting season, according to U.S. Fish and Wildlife protocol. Surveys concentrated on the remnant sage scrub portions of the site identified as potentially suitable habitat. A total of six site visits were made during the nesting season. During this focused survey, no coastal California gnatcatchers were observed on -site. L &L concludes the project site is currently unoccupied by the coastal California gnatcatcher. slw-03-121 ii AGEMA ITEM NO. PAGE 1 S -7 OF / .DPW #363- 24o -oo2, oo3, oo4, 008, oog, and o16 gocusedCoastaCCaCfornia Gnatcatcher Survey JuCy 2003 1.0) INTRODUCTION The following report was written for Daigle Homes, LLC. It describes the results of a .focused survey for the coastal California gnatcatcher (CAGN) on APN #363- 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009, and 016. The purpose of the assessment was to determine the presence or absence of the coastal California gnatcatcher, and to evaluate the effect the project may have on the species and its habitat. This information is needed since the project could result in adverse effects upon the species. Our assessment consisted of: (1) a records search and literature review, conducted to review previous studies and species information, and (2) six protocol surveys, conducted to determine the presence or absence of the CAGN on -site. 1.1) Project Location The study area is located east of Interstate 15 (1 -15) and south of Railroad Canyon Road in the Sedco Hills area and the City of Lake Elsinore (Figure 1). The project is located in the City of Lake Elsinore and two miles west of the City of Canyon Lake, California. The project site can be accessed by taking the Railroad Canyon Road exit east from Interstate 15, turning south on Grape Street, east on Malaga Road and north on unimproved Lakeview Drive. Legally, Tentative Tract 31532 is situated in southwest % of the southwest '4 of Section 10, Township 6 South, Range 3 West within the U.S.G.S. Lake Elsinore 7.5' Topographic quadrangle maps (Figure 2). 1.2) Site Description Land use varies within and adjacent to the survey area, and includes anthropogenic disturbances such as residential areas, strip malls, paved and unimproved roads, off -road vehicle activity, target shooting, and dumping. The site is bounded as follows: to the west by Grape Street and mainly highly disturbed open areas, 1 -15, and commercial development beyond. Some moderately disturbed sage scrub occurs between Grape and the 1 -15. To the east the site is bound by a mixture of disturbed and relatively undisturbed lands with scattered rural residential homes; to the north by a mixture of disturbed and relatively undisturbed lands, the Lake Elsinore Town Center (commercial), and residential areas beyond; and to the south by a mixture of disturbed and relatively undisturbed open space with scattered rural residential areas beyond (Figure 3). Q kT.EAff,NO !� StiY -o3 -121 I &L.t��1L1� pp( 2 YOF i l L &L Environmental, Inc. BIOLOGICAL AND CULTURAL INVESTIGATIONS AND MONITORING SW -03 -121 July 2003 Figure I Project Vicinity Riverside County, California PAGE. i i' ';,':` _:.•t,'y 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009, andol6 i"ocwwd CoastatCalifornia Gnatcatcker Survey Juty 2003 l pographically, the site-isa-west facing scope of the Sedco Hills. The site contains a combined vertical relief of approximately 1000 feet between the highest and lowest elevation points on the property, with elevations ranging from approximately 1400 to 1500 feet AMSL. c snciirlg topographic features in the immediate vicinity of the subject property include gently s`.t,. nn ly sloping hills and ridgelines interspersed with lower -lying relatively flat areas. ridgelines and hilltops at elevations of approximately 2000 to 2200 feet AMSL are _ ,Air it southeast of the site (Appendix B). operty contains evidence of anthropogenic disturbances such as off -road vehicle activity, :'_ noting, and dumping. Additionally, portions of the site appeared to have burned in ;.-� irs, probably within 2 -3 years based on present shrub sizes. ,}121 5 AGENDA ITEM NOL ® , PAGE APN #363- 24o -oo2, oo3, 004, 008, oog, ando16 FocusedCoasta[Cat forma Gnatcatcher Survey ,Iuty 2003 2.0) REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT 2.1) Federal Endangered Species Act The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), under the Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act), protects species listed as endangered or threatened. Endangered species are defined as a species "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range" while a threatened species is "likely to become endangered in the foreseeable future." Take of listed species is prohibited under Section 9 of the Act. Take includes the direct killing, harming, or harassing of a species, and destruction of habitat that may be important for the species survival and recovery. Harm is further defined as significant habitat alteration that results in death or injury to listed species by significantly impairing behavior patterns such as breeding, feeding, or sheltering. A permit for take of listed species incidental to otherwise lawful activities can be authorized by the USFWS. Procedures for obtaining a permit for incidental take are identified under Section 7 of the Act for projects which involve more than one Federal action, such as ACOE permitting, and Section 10 for private projects, non- federal actions. s-w -03 -121 6 AGENDA l •_ PAGE. OF !� --�-� Q�i..L. ' � j-240 -002, 003, 004, oo8, oog, and oj6 T(YcvsedCoasta(CaCfornia Gnatcatcher Survey IuCy 2003 3.0) SPECIES INFORMATION The coastal California gnatcatcher (CAGN) is a federally listed threatened species and state listed species of concern. This small, gray songbird is an obligate year -round resident of sage scrub communities from southern Ventura County southward to LA, .Orange, Riverside, San Berri ixeo, and San Diego counties into Baja California, Mexico, near El Rosario. This species is strongly associated with sage scrub communities in its various successional star - " However, the CAGN will also utilize chaparral, grassland, and riparian plant coma ;nities where they occur adjacent to or intermixed with sage scrub. Typical CAGN habitat consi:.: cf low- growing, drought- deciduous, and succulent plant species. Dominant plants includ,_ i;,lifornia sagebrush (Artemisia califomica), sages (Salvia spp.), California buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum), California bush sunflower (Encelia californica), various cacti (Opuntia spp.), -ind several species of Haplopappus. The CAGN generally avoids dense chaparral, and is rarely found in habitats that do not support California sagebrush. The CAGN is almost strictly insectivorous, actively foraging through shrub cover and have a kitten -like mewing call. They are most vocal in the early morning and evening. Detection can be difficult without vocalization ( http:/ /ventura.fws.gov /speciesaccount /birds /cagn_account.htm). The br�:eding season of the CAGN extends from about 15 February to 31 August, with peak nesting activity occurring from mid -March through mid -May. CAGN typically build nests less than one meter above the ground in the shrub component of coastal sage scrub (Mock, 1993). CAGN maintain territories during the breeding season that may vary from 2 - 20ha; during the winter home ranges may expand by 70 %. Home ranges tend to be smaller near the coast and larger in the drier, sparser inland areas. Territories are frequently defined by landscape features such as !idge lines, trails, and breaks in plant communities (Mock 1993). Successful fledging may extend into August for birds that have produced more than one clutch in a year, and juvenile associate with their parents for weeks or months following fledging (http: / /veritura.fws.gov/ speciesaccount /birds /cagn_account.htm). A Pi #If1 ITEM Niil4�ss� S1'V-03 -I21 % �b 3 O �� PAGE �._ APN #363- 24o -oo2, 003, 004, 008, oog, and-o16 -Tocused CoastaCCal California Gnatcatcher Survey JU(Y 2003 4.0) METHODS AND PERSONNEL Pertinent literature was reviewed to identify local occurrences and habitat requirements of the CAGN. Literature reviewed included compendia provided by resource agencies (California Dept. of Fish and Game 2003a; USFWS 1999, 2000), and California Natural Diversity Data Base (2003b) reports for the Lake Elsinore and the three closest surrounding quadrangles (Romoland, Murrieta, and Wildomar). In addition, review of sensitive species information from standard reference works, field guides, existing literature, and unpublished reports contributed to background information. 4.1) Survey Methods L &L conducted a focused survey during the nesting season in 2003. Surveys for the coastal California gnatcatcher were conducted on April 4, 12, and 29, May 7 and 30, and June 6, 2003, in accordance with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service protocol. A total of six surveys were conducted by John Konecny, L &L Environmental, Inc. (L &L), consulting biologist ( USFWS Permit # TE837308 -3). Survey temperatures varied between 48 and 62 degrees Fahrenheit. No surveys were conducted during inclement weather. Survey data is outlined in Table 1, below. Table 1. Project Site Focused Survey Information Date Time PST Weather Wind Biologist Survey Results 04 -04 -03 6:00 -7:30 Partly Overcast, 48° F 1 -3 MPH JK FS No CAGN 04 -12 -03 6:40 -7:50 Overcast 56° F 3 -5 MPH JK FS No CAGN 04 -29 -03 6:20 -7:40 Mostly Clear, 62° F 1 -3 MPH JK FS No CAGN 05 -07 -03 6:10 -7:30 Mostly Clear, 58° F 1 -3 MPH JK FS No CAGN 05 -30 -03 6:30 -8:30 Clear, 62° F 1 -3 MPH JK FS No CAGN 06 -06 -03 6:20 -7:40 Overcast 62° F 1 -3 MPH JK FS No CAGN The surveys were conducted on the entire 6± acres, but concentrated on the acres with the remnant Riversidean sage scrub, which constituted the best habitat for the CAGN on the project site. Surveys were made by walking slowly through the vegetation and stopping regularly to listen and look for coastal California gnatcatchers. Binoculars (8.5 x 44) were used to aid in the identification of observed animals. SW -03 -121 I PAGE2kf OF -1P.N #363 -440 -002, 003, 004, oo8, oog, and o16 Focused Coastaf Carfornia GnatcatcFier Survey July 2003 5.0) RESULTS 5.1) Habitat Characteristics Most of the project site is heavily disturbed and are dominated by ruderal weedy vegetation and non - native grassland, especially in areas subjected to relatively recent off -road vehicle activity (Figure 4). Remnants of the original Riversidean sage scrub (RSS) vegetation community do occur scattered within approximately half of the site, but are more disturbed and less dense than appears in Figure 4. Adult focused surveys were conducted throughout the entire site; but focused on remnant Riversidean sage scrub (RSS) and potential QCB nectar resources. Areas containing cryptobiotic crusts were observed, but not common, among the matrix of open patches. A mix of native low- growing and tall weedy annuals were found in these areas, and included pygmy stonecrop (Crassula connata), California filago ( Filago californica), and other associated plants. Although these crusts are present, mostly decomposed granitic soils without a cryptobiotic layer were more frequently observed within the survey area. A general discussion of the vegetation communities and plants observed on the property is presented as part of this report, with emphasis on potential QCB adult nectar resources within those communities. A comprehensive botanical evaluation of this site was not conducted in conjunction with the current QCB focused survey. Pertinent plant identifications were made in the field; additional plant identifications and vegetation community determinations were made utilizing Schoenherr (1992), Hickman (1993), Sawyer and Keeler -Wolf (1995), Parker (1999) and Psomas (1999). Common names are from Hickman where possible. 5.1.1) Disturbed/ Ruderal Habitat Disturbed habitat includes areas that contain mostly non - native plant species including ornamentals and ruderal exotics. The majority of the site is now mostly disturbed and contains many ruderal plant species. Mostly non - native, weedy species have invaded these areas, including short-pod mustard, foxtail chess, red - stemmed filaree (Erodium cicutarium), long - beaked Storksbill (Erodium bohys), cheeseweed ( Malva parviflora), London rocket (Sysimbrium irio), and various non - native grasses. Other plant species observed in abundance included fiddleneck, horehound (Marrubium vulgare), chia (Salvia columbariae) and red maids (Calandrinia ciliata). AQEiDA ITEM NO. _..G- SW -03 -121 9 PACE i i. i' is i 4 i. t . L &L Environmental, Inc. BIOLOGICAL AND CULTURAL INVESTIGATIONS AND MONITORING SW -03 -121 July 2003 Figure 4 Habitat Map Overlay (provided by Riverside County Flood Control, 2000) Daigle Homes LLC County of Riverside, California AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE 2 OF _ _ 9 .LPN #363 - 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, 009, and ol6 FocusedCoastaCCalifornia Gnatcatcher Survey Juty 2003 In addition, remnant Riversidean sage scrub (RSS) species are present. RSS is a xeric form of coastal sage scrub containing mostly drought - deciduous shrubs with small leaves. Individual and sporadic native RSS shrubs located within the site include flat top buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum), brittlebush (Encelia farinosa), white sage (Salvia apiana), California sagebrush (Arfemesia californica). 5.2) Literature Review Coastal California gnatcatchers are known to occur in RSS east of Interstate 15 in the Railroad Canyon area of Riverside County (Atwood 1992). Review of the California Natural Diversity Data Base (2003) reports listed the closest recorded sighting of a coastal California gnatcatcher approximately one mile northwest of the project site. A previous biological report conducted on the 148 acres, which included the project area reported a CAGN observation, but could not give a location (Helix, 2002). The project site is located just inside of the boundaries of Unit 10 of the area designated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as critical habitat for this species (USFWS, 2000). 5.3) Field Survey Surveys concentrated on the remnant sage scrub portions of the site identified as potentially suitable habitat. A total of six site visits were made during the nesting season. During this focused survey, no coastal California gnatcatchers were observed on -site. A total of sixteen (16) relatively common bird species were observed on the property during the present survey. L &L has determined the project site is currently not occupied by the coastal California gnatcatcher. A A-%I �� 3 StiV-03 -121 11 PAGES OFL &. —�?•'� APN #363 - 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, oog, and o16 Focused CoastaCCaCfornia Gnatcatcher Survey JU(Y 2003 6.0) CONCLUSIONS- The coastal California gnatcatcher is federally listed as threatened and the project site is located within Unit 10 designated critical habitat for the species. The nesting season surveys were conducted on all of 6t acres of the project site, half of which was remnant sage scrub.habitat, considered potentially suitable for the coastal California gnatcatcher. No coastal California gnatcatchers were detected on the project site during focused surveys. Therefore, it is determined that during the 2003 breeding season, the coastal California gnatcatcher did not occupy nor utilize site. Based on the current survey results, the proposed project will not result in the take of this species. No further surveys or mitigation is recommended for this species. .SrW- 03-121 12 �.r 14.I _XI 1314, a3 L &L PAGE 2-6 / A ;6_y- 240 -002, 003, 004, oo8, oo-9, ando16 ", � ed Coasta(CaCfomia Gnatcatc`cer Survey IuC y 2003 0) IZE- FERENCES AND CITATIONS f .,vond, J. L. 1992. A Maximum Estimate of the California Gnatcatcher's Population Size in the Wited States. Western Birds 23:1 -9. c i Dept. of Fish and Game Natural Diversity Data Base. 2003a. Special Animals. CDFG, ' sramento, California. http: / /www.dfg.ca.gov /whdab /html /lists.html C 'department of Fish and Game. 2003b. Rarefind. Records check of electronic data. R. F. 1986. Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of Jifomia. California Resources Agency, Department of Fish and Game, 156 pp. & :)hn O., and Keeler -Wolf, Todd. 1995. A Manual of California Vegetation. California ,taive Plant Society, Sacramento, California. U: P artrnent of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 1997. Coastal California Gnatcatcher ,i'ohoptila calffidmica califomica) Presence /Absence Survey Protocol. US i -o apartment of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 1999. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; review of plant and animal taxa that are candidates or proposed for !fisting as endangered or threatened species. Federal Register 64:57534 -57547 (Oct 25) US , .� "i1rnent of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 2000. California gnatcatcher +'.:- .iclnated final critical habitat. Federal Register 65:63680 (Oct 24). 7703 -121 13 - PAGE 9 Y -ATX #363 - 240 -002, 003, 0o4, o08, oog, andoi6 Focused Coasta[Caffornia Gnatcatcher Survey JuCy 2003 TABLE 2: Bird Species Observed on the Project Site (N =16) Accipitridae Hawks, Kites, Eagles Buteo jamaicensis Red- tailed Hawk Columbidae Pigeons, Doves Zenaida macroura Mourning Dove Trochilidae Calypte anna Tyrannidae Sayornis nigricans Tyrannus verticalis Hirundinidae Petrochelidon pyrrhonota Stelgidopteryx serripennis Corvidae Aphelocoma coerulescens Corvus corax Aegithalidae Psaltriparus minimus Mimidae Mimus polyglottus Emberizidae Pipilo crissalis Aimophila ruficeps Fringillidae Carduelis psaltria Carpodactus mexicanus Hummingbirds Anna's Hummingbird Tyrant Flycatchers Black Phoebe Western Kingbird Swallows Cliff Swallow Northern Rough- winged Swallow Crows, Jays Western Scrub Jay Common Raven Bushtits Bushtit Mockingbirds Northern Mockingbird Emberizids California Towhee Rufous- crowned Sparrow Finches Lesser Goldfinch House Finch AGEM A ITEM NO. 3 S-W -03 -121 2-7 0 PAGE OF__�, _ - •.- _ Rio f. f .LPN #363 - 240 -002, 003, 004, 008, oog, and o16 Focused Coasta(Caffornia Gnatcatctier Survey Juty 2003 Photo 3: Taken from the southeast corner to the northwest. y./ AGENDA �ITEM SrW -03 -121 B -2 PAGE- OF Z40-002, 003, 004, 008, oog, ando16 /Vt Used Coastal Cafifornia Gnatcatcher Survey Judy 2003 Rive R',13'01H COUNTY CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits the data and information required for this biological evaluation, and that the facts, and information presentdd are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3 SIGNED: Leslie Irish, Principal L&L Environmental, Inc. PAGE' 6 B I O L O G I C A L & C U L T U R A L l N V E S T/ G A TI O NS & M O N/ TO R/ N G BIOLOGICAL REPORT SUMMARY SHEET Applicant`Name: As ssoes`ParietNuaiber(s). _ Section, Tow m*n p and Rainge;_ Building and Safety: Long Number. Case NturibFrt; .d/l�oel `EA Number CHECK I h."_ ' SURVEYER_FOR IFE CI ES _ SD + of.CQFCERi lb Yesy No or)WA reWa►dJ>tg **des Yes NO gala Arroyo Soutxestern Toad Yes No n/a Blueiine Stream(s) Yes No n1a f Coachella Valley Fringed -Toed Lizard Yes No n/a / Coastal California Gnatcatcher Yes n/a j Coastal Sage Scrub Yes No n/a i Delhi Sands Flower- Loving Fly Yes No n'a 1 Desert Pupfish Yes No n/a Desert Slender Salamander Yes No n/a Desert Tortoise Yes No n/a Fiat- Tailed Horned Lizard Yes No n/a Least Bell's Vireo Yes No nia Oak Woodlands Yes No n/a Quino C:heckerspot Butterfly Yes No n/a Riverside Fair} Shrimp Yes No n/a Santa Ana River Wooiystar Yes No n/a San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat Yes No n/a Slender- Horned Spineflower Yes No n/a Stephens' Kangaroo Rat Yes No n/a _ Vernal Pools Yes No n/a Wetlands Yes No nia i26) Pomona Xri - Suite 102 - Corona, (A 92882 - Phone: 909?79.9608 - )kQ9NMJXM&iO. PAGE OF CSECK ITEM s) SURVEYED' FOR ` SPECIES or ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUE of CONCERN f ndb Yes, w or N/A rrdsite) speeiec �`� Other Yes No nia Other Yes No n/a I Other Yes No n/a I Other Yes No nia I Other Yes No n/a Other Yes No n/a Species of concern shall be am, unique, rare. endangered. or threatened species. It shall include species used to delineate wetlands and riparian corridors. It shall also include any hosts, perching, or food plants used by any animals listed as rare, endangered. threatened or candidate species by either State, or Federal regulations, or for Riverside County as listed by the California Department of Fish and Crame Natural Diversity Data Base (NDDB)- I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided on this.summary sheet is in accordance with the information provided in the bipilogical report or habitat assessment. a3 — - /.� gna a and CornpanyName Date 10(a) Permit Number (if applicable) Permit Expiration Date County Use Only Received By Date: PD-B# AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE S OF B I O L O G I C A L & C U L T U R A L I N V E S T I G A T I O N S & MONITOR 1 N G LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE CHECKLIST 'For Biological Resources (Submit two copies to the County) Case Number: Lot/Parcel No. EA Number Assessor's Parcel Number(s): Iv �-24a_ (i�? t L�C�3, (iC dL�L) Date: r7/6-/03 Wildlife & Vegetation: Potentially Significant Impact Biological Resources Would the Project ?: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Attachment E -4 Less than No Significant Impact Impact a) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state conservation plan? X b) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any endangered, or threatened species. as listed in Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations ( Sections 670.2 or 670.5) or in Title 50, Code of Federal Regulations (Sections 17.11 or 17.12)? — so e) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive. or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game, or U. S. Wildlife Service? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species, or with established native resident migratory wildlife corridors_ or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? — X E-4.1 1_'69 Pomona 'Pd-Suite 102 • Corona, C-14 92812 - Phone. 909.279.96OS K9iX 14U PAGE 2--7 la t 1.r/ LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE CHECKLIST For Biological Resources (Submit two copies to the County) is I e) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat, or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game, or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Q Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands, as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including. but not limited to, marsh, vernal pools, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption) g) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or f"f ordinance? 1. i l Findings of Fact: C) C —) �. Proposed N itization: Monitorine Recommended: on!"e- Source: CGP Fig. V1.36 -V1.40 Revised October 1999 i E -4.2 AWMA ITEM NO. PAGE OF�2. ATTACHMENT NO. 6 STATE CLEARINGHOUSE AND PLANNING UNIT MEMORANDUM ABENDA ITEM NO, a3 PAGE OF -� d sE o��DF Plan.. F� STATE OF CALIFORNIA Governor's Office of Planning and Research � �,,, State Clearinghouse and Planning Unit OF krnok' Jan Boel ,.,warzer,..,, ,. Govemot Acting Deputy Director ;;ITY OF LAKE ELSINORE Memorandum RECEIVED FEB 0 2 2004 January 28, 2004. pLpNNINO DEPT All Reviewing Agencies I ►�� Scott Morgan, Senior Planner R, SCH # 2004011082 GPA No. 2003 -03, Zone Change No. 2003 -02, Tentative Condominium Map No. 31532, Conditional Use Permit No. 2003 -08 and Residential Design Review No. 2003 -15 Pi , i i) the attached letter, the Lead Agency has corrected their information regarding the . ? project. All other information remains the same. qp s- s x,. t cc: Rolfe Preisendanz f i iy of Lake Elsinore V) S. Main Street I.,ake Elsinore, CA 92530 1400 TENTH STREET P.O. BOX 3044 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95812 -3044 (916)445 -0613 FAX(916)323 -3018 www.opr.ca.gov AGENDA ITEM NO..��„ PAGES? O I T .L VV /-v t l V O L. Applicant: Craig Schleuniger, Daigle Homes, LLC 28991 Old Town Front St. #203 Temecula, CA 92590 (owner: Robert Stenson, Elsinore Lakeview Estates 6500 Wilshinre Blvd- Los Angeles, CA 90048) r Project Location: The proposed project is located at Grape Street south of Lake Elsinore City Center Shopping Center. APN: 363 - 240 - 002, 003, 004, 008, 009, 016 Attached you should find the following studies prepared on January 19, 2004 by LSA Associates: • Paleontological Resources Assessment; and • Cultural Resource Assessment. These studies will augment the information contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration sent to your office on January 15, 2004. Additionally, it was brought to my attention that we mistakenly sent thirty (30) copies of the Mitigated Negative Declaration to the SCR, instead of the fifteen (15) copies required Please discard any extra copies not needed Thank you. AGENDA ITEM NO, PAGE �.gt '01Z. Request for Review and Comments - Form No. PD 2000 -27- Revised August, 2000 Page 1 of I Form A J Notice of Completion & Environmental Document Transmittal SCH # t Mail to: State Clearinghouse, PO Buz 3044, Sacramento, CA 95812 -3044 9I6:435 -0613 Project Title.. 'Lake Elsinore City Center Townhomes- Phase II Lead Agency: City of Lake Elsinore Contact Person: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Street Address: 130 S. Main Street Phone. (909) 674 -3124 ext. 223 _ AV-- City: Lake Elsinore Zip: 92530 County. Riverside Project Location: County. Riverside City/Nearest Cona rumity: Murrieta Cross Streets: Railroad Cayon Road and Grape Street _ Zip Code: 92530 Total Acres: Assessor's Parcel No. 383- 240 -002. 003. 004, 008 Section: Twit. Range: Batt: Within 2 Miles: State Hwy 9: Interstate 15 Waterways: Airports: Railways: Schools: - ------ -.-V.� w -- 4--- Document Type ty . CE1: m [] NOP Suppicent.'Subsequent Ent NEPA: �QNoll Other: ❑ loin, Document Q Early Cons (Prior SCH No.) i EA ❑ Final Document El Neg Eke ❑Other .IAN � t) ?Ql;g- DmlJE,S ❑Other - -_ ❑Draft EIR �t ❑FONSi _______— ____ ___ __ _ _ ___ Local Action Type STts i E CLf:AHltiG HOiISE ❑ Genera! Plan Update ❑ Specific Plan �— ❑ Rezone ❑ Annexation © General Plan Amendment ❑ Master Plan ❑ Pteaone ❑ Redevelopment ❑ General Plan Element 0 Planned Unit Development ® Use Permit ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ Community Plan ® Site Plan © Land Division (Subdivision, etc.) I@ Other Zone Chance __________ _____ ____ __ __ _____ __ _____ ______ Development Type: El Residential: Units 60 Acres 5.33 ❑ Water Facilities: Tye AIGD_ ❑Office: Sgfr. Acres Employes ❑Transportation: Tjyr ❑Commercial: Sgfc Acres Emp4mes E] Mining: Mineral p Industrial: Sg fr Acr , Emplq � ❑ Power Typa IPaus ❑ Educational ❑ Waste Treatment. Tjpc Q Recreational ❑ Hazardous Waste: Type _ Q Other: ----------------------------------------- Funding (approx.): Federal S State S Total S ___________ _______ _________________ _ __ _ __ Project Issues Discussed in Document: ® AestheticlVisual ❑ Flood Plain/Flooding © schools/Univev ides ❑ Water Quality El Agricultural Land Q Forest Land/Fire Ilazard ❑ Septic Systems © Water Supply /Groundwater © Air Quality © Geologic/scismic © Sewer Capacity M Wed-d/Riparian &I Archeologicat'Histmical ❑ Minerals_ ® Soil E—ioo1Compaction/Grad6g © Wildlife Q Coastal Zane ® Noise ❑ Solid Waste © Grouvh Inducing ® Drainage/Absorption ® Population(Housing Balance Q ToxidtlaTardous © Landuse © Economidlobs © Public Scrviees/Facilities W Traffic/Circulation [g) Cumulative Effects ®Fiscal © Rccreatioo/Parks ❑Vegetation ❑Other ___________ _________ ___ ___ ______ _____ ____ Present Land Use/Zoning/General Plan Designation. Vacant / (R -1) Single Family Residential I Very Low Density (VLD) ----------------------------------------- Project Description: General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -03, Zone Change No. 2003 -02, Tentative Condominium Map 31532, Residential Design Review No. R 2003 -15 atW Conditional Use Permit No. 2003 -08. State Clearinghouse Contact. Project Sent to the following State Agencies (916) 445-0613 X Resources State Review Becan: -' ('� - 2004 _ Boating & Waterways Coastal C 7ni .. .. Colorado Rvr 1 ' i _ Conservation �? SCH COMPLIANCE - 2004 X Fish & Game # Delta Protection Comm _ _ Forestry & Fire Prot _ Historic Preservation X Parks & Rec _ Reclamation Board Please note State Clearinghouse Number _Bay Cons &DevComm (SCH #) on all Comments DWR 2 0 0 2 0 1 1 i 0 8 2 OES (Emergency Svcs) SCH #: Bus Transp Hous Please forward late comments directly to the Aeronautics Lead Agency = clip r' _ X Caltrans # �J 2l _ Trans Planning AQMD /APCD , Housing & Com Dev _ Food & Agriculture (Resources: / f� l _ Health Services State/Consumer Svcs _ General Services Cat EPA _ ARB —Airport Projects _ ARB — Transportation Projects _ ARB — Major Industrial Projects _ Integrated Waste Mgnt Bd _ SWRCB: Clean Wtr Ping _ SWRCB: Wtr Quality SWRCB: WtrRi X Reg. WQCB # _ Toxic Sub Ctrl -CTC Yth/Adlt Corrections —Corrections Independent Comm Boargy Commission X NAHC _ Public Utilities Comm _ Santa Monica Mors State Lands Comm Tahoe Rgl Plan Agency Other: AGENDA ITEM NO. *;L 3 IV OF (2/A . ATTACHMENT NO. 7 STATE CLEARINGHOUSE AND PLANNING UNIT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ALMA ITEM NO. _® 'N' p PAGE F o�D '4: iNni�• STATE OF CALIFORNIA`' O~ *`Ci\ Governor's Office of Planning and Research V State Clearinghouse and Planning Unit Arnold Jan Boel .hwarzenegger Actin Deputy P tY Governor Director r February 19, 2004 ClTYOFLAKE ELSINORE RECEIVED Rolfe Preisendanz FEB 2 3 2004 City of Lake Elsinore 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 PLANNING DEPT. Subject: Lake Elsinore City Center Townhomes Phase II SCH #: 2004011082 Dear Rolfe Preisendanz: The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named Negative Declaration to selected state agencies for review. The review period closed on February 18, 2004, and no state agencies submitted comments by that date. This letter acknowledges that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft environmental documents, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Please call the State Clearinghouse at (916) 445 -0613 if you have any questions regarding the environmental review process. If you have a question about the above -named project, please refer to the ten -digit State Clearinghouse number when contacting this office. Sincerely, Terry Roberts Director, State Clearinghouse 1400 TENTH STREET P.O. BOX 3044 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95812 -3044 (916)445 -0613 FAX (916)323 -3018 www.opr.ca.gov AAA ITEM NO. PAGE =A_,- OF Document uetails tcepori State Clearinghouse Data Base SCH# 2004011082 Project Title Lake Elsinore City Center Townhomes Phase 11 Lead Agency Lake Elsinore, City of Type Neg Negative Declaration Description General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -03, Zone Change No. 2003 -02, Tentative Condominium Map 31532, Residential Design Review No. R 2003 -15 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2003 -08. Lead Agency Contact Name Rolfe Preisendanz Agency City of Lake Elsinore Phone 909/674 -3124 ext. 223 email Address 130 South Main Street City Lake Elsinore Project Location County Riverside City Murrieta Region Cross Streets Railroad Canyon Road and Grape Street Parcel No. 363 - 240 -002, 003, 004, 008 Township Range Fax State CA Zip 92530 Section Proximity to: Highways 1 -15 Airports Railways Waterways Schools Land Use Vacant/ (R -1) Single Family Residential / Very Low Density (VLD) Base Project Issues Aesthetic/Visual; Agricultural Land; Air Quality; Archaeologic- Historic; Cumulative Effects; Drainage /Absorption; Economics /Jobs; Fiscal Impacts; Geologic /Seismic; Growth Inducing; Landuse; Noise; Population /Housing Balance; Public Services; Recreation /Parks; Schools /Universities; Sewer Capacity; Soil Erosion /Compaction /Grading; Toxic /Hazardous; Traffic /Circulation; Water Supply; Wetland /Riparian; Wildlife Reviewing Resources Agency; Department of Fish and Game, Region 6; Office of Historic Preservation; Agencies Department of Parks and Recreation; Office of Emergency Services; California Highway Patrol; Caltrans, District 8; Department of Housing and Community Development; Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region 9; Native American Heritage Commission Date Received 01/20/2004 Start of Review 01/20/2004 End of Review 02/18/2004 AGENDA ITEM N'. e PAGE Note: Blanks in data fields result from insufficient information provided by lead agency. N"✓" -*401 i'` ORDINANCE NO. 1115 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003 -1 (LAW ENFORCEMENT, FIRE AND PARAMEDIC SERVICES) AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN ANNEXATION AREA NO. 5 (LA LAGUNA PHASE II) AND ANNEXATION AREA NO. 6 (VILLA MARTINIQUE) ANNEXED TO SAID DISTRICT WHEREAS, on January 13, 2004, the City Council (the "Council ") of the City of Lake Elsinore, California (the "City ") adopted Resolution No. 48 stating its intention to annex certain property ( "Annexation Area No. 5 (La Laguna Phase II) ") into City of Lake Elsinore Community Facilities District No. 2003 -1 (Law Enforcement, Fire and Paramedic Services) (the "District ") pursuant to the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, (the "Act "); and WHEREAS, on January 13, 2004, the Council adopted Resolution No. 49 stating its intention to annex certain property ( "Annexation Area No. 6 (Villa Martinique) ") into the District pursuant to the Act; and WHEREAS, notice was published as required by law relative to the intention of the Council to annex Annexation Area No. 5 (La Laguna Phase II) and Annexation Area No. 6 (Villa Martinique) into the District; and WHEREAS, on February 24, 2004 this Council held a noticed public hearing as required by law relative to the determination to proceed with the annexation of Annexation Area No. 5 (La Laguna Phase II) and Annexation Area No. 6 (Villa Martinique) into the District and the rate and method of apportionment and manner of collection of the special tax to be levied within Annexation Area No. 5 (La Laguna Phase II) and Annexation Area No. 6 (Villa Martinique) to finance certain public services; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all persons desiring to be heard on all matters pertaining to the annexation of Annexation Area No. 5 (La Laguna Phase II) and Annexation Area No. 6 (Villa Martinique) were heard and a full and fair hearing was held; and WHEREAS, the Council subsequent to said hearing adopted Resolution No_ 2004 - � ( determining the validity of prior proceedings relative to the annexation of Annexation Area No. 5 (La Laguna Phase II) and Annexation Area No. 6 (Villa Martinique), annexed Annexation Area No. 5 (La Laguna Phase 1I) and Annexation Area No. 6 (Villa Martinique) into the District and authorized the levy of a special tax within Annexation Area No_ 5 (La Laguna Phase II) and Annexation Area No. 6 (Villa Martinique); and WHEREAS, the Council subsequent to said hearing adopted Resolution No. 2004- 1 which called an election within Annexation Area No. 5 (La Laguna Phase II) and Annexation j-. Area No. 6 (Villa Martinique) for February 24, 2004 on the proposition of levying a special tax; and 45367598.1 AGENDA ITEM NQ. PAGE —I— OF WHEREAS, on February 24, 2004 an election was held within each Annexation Area No. 5 (La Laguna Phase fl) and Annexation Area No. 6 (Villa Martinique) in which the eligible electors approved by more than two- thirds vote the proposition of levying a special tax; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003 -1 (LAW ENFORCEMENT, FIRE AND PARAMEDIC SERVICES), DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. A special tax is levied within the boundaries of Annexation Area No. 5 (La Laguna Phase 11) and Annexation Area No. 6 (Villa Martinique) pursuant to the formula set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference in an amount necessary to finance a portion of the cost of providing law enforcement, fire and paramedic services that are in addition to those provided in the territory within Annexation Area No. 5 (La Laguna Phase II) and Annexation Area No. 6 (Villa Martinique) prior to the annexation of Annexation Area No. 5 (La Laguna Phase II) and Annexation Area No. 6 (Villa Martinique) into the District, periodic costs, and costs of the tax levy and collection. Section 2. This legislative body is hereby further authorized each year, by resolution adopted as provided in section 53340 of the Act, to determine the specific special tax rate and amount to be levied for the next fiscal year, except that the special tax rate to be levied shall not exceed the maximum rate set forth in Exhibit "A." Section 3. All of the collections of the special tax shall be used as provided for in the Act and Resolution No. 2004 - 11 of the Council. Section 4. The above authorized special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem taxes are collected and shall be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure and sale in cases of delinquency and provided for ad valorem taxes. Section 5. The Mayor shall sign this ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to such signature. The City Clerk is directed to cause the title and summary or text of the this ordinance, together with the vote thereon, to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated within the territorial jurisdiction of the City, and to post at the main office of the City a certified copy of the full text of the adopted ordinance along with the names of the Council Members voting for and against the ordinance. Section 6. This ordinance relating to the levy of the special tax takes effect and shall be in force from and after 30 days from the date of final passage. A copy of this ordinance shall be transmitted to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Riverside County, the Assessor and the Treasurer -Tax Collector of Riverside County_ 45367598.1 M `*moo AGENDA ITEM NO.. , 2 �` PAGE OF ^ ' v IRODUCED AND APPROVED UPON FIRST READING this 24th day of Febro. 2004, upon the following roll call vote: AYL: -. COUNCILMEMBERS: HICKMAN, MAGEE, SCHIFFNER, KELLEY NOLs. COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSI ` COUNCILMEMBERS: BUCKLEY ABST,1IN: COUNCILMEMBERS; NONE "ASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED UPON SECOND READING this 9th day of M..— 1) , 2004, upon the following roll call vote: AYI COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSEN I'. COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: VICKI KASAD, CMC, CITY CLERK/ HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: BARJ� ^,.t '.^ LEIBOLD, CITY ATTORNEY THOMAS BUCKLEY, MAYOR AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE m OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) )ss. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) I, Vicki Kasad, City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of said City at a regular or adjourned regular meeting thereof held on the day of , 2004, and that it was so adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 45367598.1 By: Vicki Kasad, City Clerk AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 PAGE OF � NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2004— NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on , 2004, at the Council Chambers of the City of Lake Elsinore, 183 North Main Street, Lake Elsinore, California 92530, the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, in its capacity as the legislative body of the City of Lake Elsinore Community Facilities District No. 2003 -1 (Law Enforcement, Fire and Paramedic Services), held a public hearing and adopted Ordinance No. 2004— A summary of Ordinance No. 2004— follows and is marked as Exhibit "A ". At said time and place the testimony of all interested persons or taxpayers for or against said ordinance was heard. Ordinance No. 2004— was adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: i— CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003 -1 (LAW ENFORCEMENT, FIRE AND PARAMEDIC SERVICES) Dated: 12004 By Vicki Kasad, City Clerk AWMA ITEM N ®. 31,E 45367598.1 5 "I , PAGE OF..,,i EXHIBIT "A" BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003 -1 (LAW ENFORCEMENT, FIRE AND PARAMEDIC SERVICES) IN THE MATTER OF Authorizing the Levy of a Special Tax Within Annexation Area No. 5 (La Laguna Phase II) and Annexation Area No. 6 (Villa Martinique) Annexed to City of Lake Elsinore Community Facilities District No. 2003 -1 (Law Enforcement, Fire and Paramedic Services) ORDINANCE NO. 2004 — SUMMARY The ordinance authorizes levy of an annual special tax within Annexation Area No. 5 (La Laguna Phase II) and Annexation Area No. 6 (Villa Martinique) annexed to City of Lake Elsinore Community Facilities District No. 2003 -1 (Law Enforcement, Fire and Paramedic Services) (the "District "), collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem taxes, in an amount necessary to finance a portion of the cost of providing law enforcement, fire and paramedic services that are in addition to those provided in the territory within Annexation Area No. 5 (La Laguna Phase II) and Annexation Area No. 6 (Villa Martinique) prior to the annexation of Annexation Area No. 5 (La Laguna Phase II) and Annexation Area No. 6 (Villa Martinique) to the District, which is necessary to meet increased demands placed upon the City as a result of development or rehabilitation occurring within Annexation Area No. 5 (La Laguna Phase II) and Annexation Area No. 6 (Villa Martinique). DATED: 52004 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE By: Vicki Kasad, City Clerk 45367598.1 ALMA ITEM NO. PAGE � ` OF e� CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: DICK WATENPAUGH, CITY MANAGER DATE: MARCH 9, 2004 SUBJECT: REQUEST FROM VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT BACKGROUND In an effort to show support to the City's Volunteer Fire Department, Councilman Magee requested Chief Gallegos secure a list of items that the Volunteers needed that could possibly be funded by the City. DISCUSSION In response to Councilman Magee's request of the Volunteer Fire Department, Chief Gallegos presented the Councilman with a request to consider funding a Thermal Imaging Camera, not to exceed $10,000. A Thermal Imaging Camera is a hand -held devise that sees infrared energy, :interprets that information, converts it to a visible image and presents that image to the operator. Infrared energy can pass through smoke and darkness, allowing firefighters to see through smoke and darkness. This allows firefighters to save lives in the area of victim rescues and fire suppression. FISCAL IMPACT The cost of the Thermal Imaging Camera will not exceed $10,000. These funds could be allocated from the City's unallocated revenues. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended the Mayor and City Council consider the request, and if approved, direct staff to allocate the necessary funds from the City's unallocated revenues. PREPARED BY: DICK WATENPAUGH, CITY MANAGER APPROVED FOR AGENDA BY: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE MEMORANDUM TO: COUNCILMAN ROBERT MAGEE . r. FROM: DICK WATENPAUGH, CITY MANAGER, DATE: FEBRUARY 11, 2004 SUBJECT: VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT REQUEST Attached is a memo from Steve Gallegos, Fire Chief, explaining the Thermal Imaging Camera the Volunteer Fire Department would like to acquire. This is in response to your request for a list of items the City may be willing to fund. The department is waiting for a formal quote, however, it would appear to be under $10,000 ($9,100). Please let me know if you wish any further information. %./ /sr Attachment C. Mayor and City Council Assistant City Manager City Clerk/Director of Human Resources Fire Chief H . Z Lake Elsinore Volunteer Fae CO Phcrie 909 674 21 E I 1:1,. rWe VO[Unteer 410 W. Gramm Ave, Fax Wc) 674 8461 Lake i Lake Elsinore. CA 32530 Fire COMP-MY *10 AValuable Tool for the Modem Fire Service 10-1- A*-,- 0 r eo ii u-t i e: -tup ranKnara insurance a -ra -oo i -noc_ r rte. c Thermal imagileg O►eMew What is a thermal imager? How can it benefit public safety in Lake Elsinore? A thermal imaging camera (TIC) is a handheld device that sees infrared energy, interprets that in�Vrnatio^, converts it to a visible image, and presents that image to the operator. Infrared energy can pass through smoke and darkness, allowing firefighters to "see' thru smoke and darkness. This allows for dramatic time savings in the areas of victim rescue, downed firefighter rescue, and fire suppression. In Rescue Currently, when presented with a smoke filled structure, firefighters must crawl into the structure working mainly on fee! when looking for victims. The thermal imaging camera saves valuable time by allowing them to "see" the victims trapped. In Fire Suppression A TIC allows firefighters to see heat trapped in walls, or by other factors. Being able to see where the heat is originating will save suppression time and reduce property damage caused 'Dy the fire and by suppression efforts. Other areas benefted by the use of a TIC are; 1. Scene Size Up 2. Search & Rescue 3. Ventilation 4. Overhaul 5. Hazardous Material Incidents 6. Wildland Firefighting ,.Moe N.001 `"101 F t: 41p Pankhard Insurance J4J- JbI -bbeI p.J the cost? The TIC that we our recommending is the MSA Evolution 5000, attached is the specifications for the device. The price chtained from their area representative is S 9100.00. We are currently waiting for the formal quote to arrive. z Feb 11 04 12 :41p PASJ64_1' Pankhard Insurance 949- 367 -6627 p.4 PRODUCT SPECIFICATION FOR THE EVOLUTION® 5000 TIC Prepared by: John Raimondi, Product Line Manager 1. Purpose: To establish minimum standards for MSAs Evolution 5000 Thermal Imaging Camera (TIC) and Truck Mounted Charging System.The Evolution 5000TIC is designed to be a tool for firefighters and first response emergency personnel and used for search and rescue, fire scene size -up, overhaul, location of victims, and advanced firefighting and first response applications. 11. Type: The thermal imaging camera covered by this specification shall be of the type incorporating a 160x120 vanadium oxide microbolometer foca! plane array sensor. The Evolution 5000 TIC displays black and white representations of the scene on a 3.5 diagonal LCD display. Its design is optimized for firefighters in its ergonomic design and ease of incorporation with firefighting gear, It features a dual handle design for easy handoff and handling and a high impact, heat resistant housing that ensures that the 71C wiil withstand the rigors of the firefighting environment. tt is further protected by a rubber bumper system that provides additional protection from extremely harsh environments.The TIC shall be tested and comply with the following standards: Water /Dust Ingress international Standard CEI, IEC 529, IP 67 Classification Direct Flame /Heat Exposure Simulated NFPA 1981 -1997 Ed., NFPA 1982 -1998 Ed. Vibration MIL- STD -810E Category 1 Loose Cargo Transport Radio Frequency 'interference CE /EN 50081 - 2:1992, EN 50082 -2: 1992, FCC Part 15 Rollover (Truck Charger) Simulated NFPA 1901 - 12,1.7 111. Component Parts: The product shall consist of the following component parts. TICS and accessories can be purchased in standard config,irations er custom corfigurations via the Assemble -To -Crider system. 1. Evolution 5000Thermal imaging Camera 2. Lithium Ion Battery Packs 3. Stand alone battery charger with wall plug and cigarette lighter adapter. 4. Vehicle mounted charging systern. 5. Attachments- caribiner, wrist strap, shoulder strap, and retractable lanyard. 6. Video out connector 7. Tripod attachment 8. Carry!ng Case 9. Manual 10. Optional Direct Temperature Measurement 11, Optional Heat - Seeker Indicator �gti±3 2_ `od1 Feb 11 04 12:41p Pankhard Insurance 949 - 367 -6927 p.5 IV. Specific Requirements 1. Evolution 5000 TIC SENSOR Type: Vncoo'ed Vanadium oxide Mierobolometer Focal Plane Array Detector Array Size: 160x120 Spectral Response: 8 -14 microns NETD: <50MK nominal (<_389MK in Low Sensitivity) Dynamic Range: Normal mode -40° to 275'F ( -40' to 135 °C) in Low Sensitivity -40 °F to 932`F ( -40°C to 500 °C) Nominal Video standard: 16 bit real time analog Frame rate 30 Hz Video output: NTSC MECHA'VICAL Dimensions: 10.8" x 8.1" x 4.4" (275rnm x 205mm x 112mm) Base Weight: Materials- 45 oz. (2.8 Lbs) Outer Case and bumper materials pass simulated NFPA 198:1997 edition Ambient Tern p.: direct flame and heat exposure tests. Outer housing: Bayer PCPET Makroblend Rubber Bumpers: FR Neoprene Display cover: Heat and scratch resistant po;ycaroonate CLEC7RICAL Power Supply: Suppled by an integral battery pack Power Consumption: <6 W nominal Video Output: RS -170 a standard SMA connector is included under the display for direct connection to a remote video source. An SMA to ENC adapter is included. Display: 3.5" LCD backlit display ENVI RONM EN,TAL Thermal Tolerance: The Evolution 5000 TIC is designed to have the following temperature tolerances. Ambient Tern p.: Operating Time 80 °C, 176° F: > 30 minutes 120 °C, 248` F: > 10 minutes 260`C, 500" F: > 5 minutes -30`C: > 40 minutes -40`C: > 25 minutes Water /Dust ingr >;s: The TIC shall resist the ingress of dust and .water and must conform to International Standard CEI IEC 529; Degrees of Protection Provided by Enclosures (IF Code); IP -67 classification. Impact; Drop: Dropaed 3 consecutive times onto concrete from 6' at any angle with no operational defaults or physical compromise of the outer housing. Vibration: TheT!C and components housed in the carrying case shall be resistant to vibration and must conform to MIL- STD -810E, Category 3, loose cargo transport. RFI /EMC: The TiC should not interfere with standard firefighter frequency bands at power levels found in hand -held (3 -5W) and vehicle mounted systems (- 100tH. Communication /electronic devices cannot affect the TIC to the point where navigation ,A,;th the TIC is compromised when the TIC is subjected to RF interference of 80 MHz to 1 CHz at 30V /m. The TiC must rneet RFI emissions and susceptibility ofCUEN. Feb I1 04 12:42p Pankhard Insurance 949 -367 -6627 p.6 OPTICAL Lens: Field of View: Focus: W_ AR_NINGS11NDICATORS TIC Status Green: Flashing Green: 8.5mn., F1.2 55° horizontal, 4i° vertical Optimal 3' to � (lm to �) There will be one green LED to indicate the TIC status. It will function as follows: TIC in normal mode and functioning correctly TIC in standby mode and functioning correctly BATTERY STATUS Total battery capacity will be indicated in the viewing area with a row of 3 LEDs. They will function as follows: Green: Fui) Battery Capacity Yellow: Marginal Battery Capacity Red: Battery Warn - Lit for 15 min. before shutdown Flashing Red: Battery Shutdown - Flashes 60 sec. before shutdown block in the upper left corner of the display Shutter Indicator: On screen indicator which appears as a small when the camera shutters, indicating that are -scan of the area is necessary. Lew Sensitivity Indicator: On- screen indicator which appears as the letter "L" in the lower left portion of the screen. This indicates activities when the TIC is in Low Sensitivity (Firefighting) mode. CL'ERTEMPERATURE WARNING There will be ene red LED to indicate the TIC's over - temperature status. It will function as follows: Not Lit: TIC is within operational thermal limits Flashing Red: TIC has exceeded recommended operational thermal limits z. Rechargeable Lithium Ion Battery Pack Battery Type: Rechargeable Lithium Ion battery pack Battery Location: Inside the handle Battery Weight: 3.2 oz. Operating Time: 2 hours 3. Stand -Alone Battery Charger Battery ChargeTirne: 2 hours nominal Power Supply: 110 VAC (220VAC optional) 12 VDC Cigarette adapter included 4. Evolution 5000 Truck Mounted Charger truck mounted charger will charge the TIC and one spare battery while Functionality: The optional properly installed in the vehicle. Each truck charger will come with a mounting kit for installation on the vehicle. The charger will draw less than 1.5 amps of power. Battery Charge Time: 3 hours nominal, trickle maintenance charge. Power Supply: vibration: 12 -24 VDC The truck mounted charger must safe y charge the71C white in a moving vehicle reference MIL- STD -810E —vibration resistance. Rollover: The truck mounted charger must meet the rollover requirements identified in LED indicators: NFPA 1901- 12 -1.7 The truck mounted charger user interface will consist of 3 LEDs: 1 LED for each battery (inside the TIC and one spare) and 1 LEDforthe system status. They',nilI operate as follows: Battery Status: Not Lit - Battery not present Flashing Green -Slow: Charge pending Flashing Green -Fast: Charge in process Green: Battery fully charged Red: Fault, Lost signal to battery System Status: Not Lit - System Fault Green Power On, System Operational Dimensions: 10 3!8" L, 5 3/4" W, 6" H '"ll t- ev _ s u °+ ,f sp ranfanaro i nsurcrru,o r Attar .1,1,, }t-, and Carrying options 5 Each r!C shall come equipped with a caribiner attachment for securng the TIC to a tx�l belt or other gear. Wrist Strap!' ip; An optional Wrist strap /Hunker clip attachment is available. This wall be made of fire and heat resistant materials. Sn -a p: An optional flame and heat resistant shoulder strap is available. It vrih include an emergency release clip. Retractable : anyard: Retrractiion line is to be m larYar ade e of aoKevlar care tmaterial. Housingto be'beat resiistant. 6. Video t,;;sjector All TFCs 0i C, -,)me standard with an, SMA video out connector. an SMA to Bt1C cable is also included. 7, Tripc, _rating A tripod I," : r'.,;ng attachment shall be available as an option. Tripods are available as optional equipment - 8. Carry u, t: se gents: Case will hold, as a mini mum, the TIC, two lithium ion buttery packs, manual, carry!ng attach me: ts, staid - alone battery charger assembly, tripod mount, and SMA to BNC adapter cable. Vv''ater; Du gress: The Case shall resist the ingress of dust and water and must conform to nternaticral Standard CH IEC 529; Degrees of Protection Provided by Enclosures (IP Code); IP -54 classification. lm m pa:: '. ;rop: Dropped 3 consecutive ties onto concrete from 3' (lm} at any angle with no opera:!ona{ defaults or physical compromise of the case or contents Operation and Instruction Manual 9. to, optional Direct Temperature Measurement p y can be included at the TIC without any add -on devices. Ca abilit installation: Integrated inside of time of purchase or added at to the base camera by MSA Repair and Service Center. - Device: Measurement Taken from FPA °F °) 32 °F to 1000' (0° to 500`C) in lour sensitivity Range: 32 °F to 300 (0° to 150 in normal mode, °C) 250 °F, 500 °F.750 °F in low sensitivity Tick Marks: 100 °F to 20C °F (50'C to 100 in normal mode, ± 27'F (15 °C) or ±10% which ever is greater. For temperatures greater than Arc .,racy: 435 °F (225 °C) ± 209'o Thermometer style bar indicator in Fahrenheit or Celsius available. Readout: iy. Optional Heat - Seeker Indicator the TIC without any add -on devices. Capability can be included at installation: Integrated inside of time of purchase or added at to the base camera by MSA Repair and Service Center. Device: Measurement Taken from FPA Red of portions of a scheme that are above 275 °F (135 °C } - yellow, Readout: Yellow to colorization °F °C) or 842 °F (450 °C)- yettaw, 887'P (475 °C) -red, in !ow 288 (142 -red, in normal mode, sensitivity mode vote: -f nls Eu !N. r :.n - � / ge ry ra• Corpo. a He�dy,.arterz O7fiCP.s and represeniatives worldwide .U.ri ;.iian of ltc U, �'d�.!55.,cw., .. hik N'0 - 41. Vi,r5t It FA,.30 Uit ham, fu,thcr lnr:a 'Ttr•- U4eSdnr.'. (:f911'an3l c: r.;;:7 iliri JrC Cr. ;[iF.cd,Unr:e; rU CirC. jst.r „e55h Bt! cnr S,x 9L73.�00 nw.r.MSAnm.com - } c -e prxl•.+Re. be u J ty , ",tr.,ineJ of U.S. co mm, sa,k, Center �nquallcel u,9iaidua s and Wt l ,.r s r d ct n:b K -a•' cc,,rr���_ V­rr. Fax ,.3co- 90 0398 ccg _r p' MSA CnaOJ .'' /• ur C „” pr Jetl hale reel �r:One •.3U0 �,15A•xxxI tt,m_j. Ily ,cjj end Fxx 9x- :99 -4,;., •_ndcr•.tu:Y..0 ^rr rhey<u,• jr, the MSA Mcxicv cum il2C•and detaed ir.'o• ^'.okDO ;' +ac -SSc mccrm rg pr�pe ux j. ! rrr, of Fax 52'° 359433� a1u rniv- :laur ID 3400-34-MC / ian X004 r!, -­ 4 2-95;-3354 I.,w 4,7 96-,.345, rry,:..i .G G. V­,U., ., I:.iA CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 10'1 REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: DICK WATENPAUGH, CITY MANAGER DATE: MARCH 9, 2004 SUBJECT: PUBLIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMISSION BACKGROUND The City Council at their regular meeting of January 13, 2004, discussed re- establishing the City's Public Safety Advisory Commission. DISCUSSION The City Council, following considerable discussion, set a public study session on January 29, 2004 to receive public input. Following the public input, the City Council discussed the options and appointed a Council sub - committee of Mayor Buckley, Councilman Magee and the City Manager to incorporate the input into a new Chapter 2.46 of the Municipal Code, establishing the Public Safety Advisory Commission. Attached is the sub - committee's redraft of the Code and their recommendations for the City �— Council's consideration. As an additional thought, the City Council may wish to have the Public Safety Commission and possibly even the City Council participate in the City's Multi Hazard Functional Plan (MHFP) training that explains the standard operating procedures for all emergencies. In addition, should the City Council adopt the revised Municipal Code and decide to form the Commission, the attached ordinance will need a second reading and not take affect for 30 days following the second reading. The City Council could, however, appoint the members to the Commission tonight, subject to the effective date. FISCAL IMPACT Aside from staff time, the Commission will not impact the City's general fund without Council's authorization. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended the Mayor and City Council consider the revised Municipal Code in reference to the Public Safety Advisory Commission; and if adopted, have first reading of the ordinance, schedule second reading for March 23, 2004, and consider Council appointments to the Commission, subject to effective date. PREPARED BY: DICK WATENPAUGH, CITY VANAGER APPROVED FOR AGENDA BY: CITY MANAGER'S �_; S3 Chapter 2.46 Public Safety Advisory Commission 2.46.010 .J Definition. "Public Safety" is that which is related to Police, Fire, Code Enforcement Services and civil disaster within the City of Lake Elsinore. 2.46.020 Creation of a Public Safety Advisory Commission. A Public Safety Advisory Commission is established. 2.46.030 Membership. The Public Safety Advisory Commission shall consist of five members. Members of the Public Safety Advisory Commission shall: (1) reside within and be a registered voter in the City of Lake Elsinore; or (2) be an owner of a business (or the owners' designee) that is established and currently licensed inside the City of Lake Elsinore. . 2.46.040 Appointment - Removal. The members of the Public Safety Advisory Commission shall be appointed by each member of the City Council and may be removed at his/her pleasure, but subject to the approval by the majority vote of the City Council. Upon its creation the Mayor shall select the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Commission. Said terms shall run for the period of one year (or until July 1, 2005) at which time the Chairman and Vice - Chairman shall be selected by a majority vote of the membership of the Commission. 2.46.050 Term of Office. The members of the Public Safety Advisory Commission shall be appointed for a term of two years, said two year term shall commence on July 1 of the respective year in which appointed. Those members of the Public Safety Advisory Commission serving as of the date of this amendment shall serve until July 1, 2006, except for the Chairman and Vice - Chairman, whose initial terms are set in section 2.46.040. All members are subject to potential re- appointment pursuant to Section 2.46.040. m Z 2.46.060 Duties and Responsibilities A. The Commission shall serve as a conduit of information from the residents and business people of Lake Elsinore to their Public Safety, Code Enforcement and B. Emergency Services Professionals. B. The Commission shall serve as an additional set of eyes and ears that shall complement staff's efforts in their attempt to be proactive. C. The Commission shall create and maintain a link on the City's web site D. encouraging citizen input and providing a complaint or contact form, which may be submitted, on -line. D. The Commission shall seek out additional input and maintain a dialogue with various City organizations including but not limited to Lake Elsinore Marine E. Search and Rescue, Neighborhood Watch Groups, Homeowner's Associations, the Chamber of Commerce and the Downtown Merchants Association, etc. E. The Commission shall report to the City Council on a regular basis. F. The Commission shall consider assisting the City Council, City Manager or other Public Safety Professionals with disaster preparedness and crisis management. G. The Commission shall consider and evaluate the cost and benefits of creating a Citizens' Action Patrol. H. The Commission shall actively and aggressively seek out funding programs such as grants to fund Public Safety related programs, projects and equipment needs for the City of Lake Elsinore. I. The Commission shall limit its activities to those enumerated above. However, the Commission may request of the City Council additional duties and responsibilities (i.e. changes to section 2.46 of the LEMC). Such requests may be granted by a majority vote of the City Council. 2.46.070 Meetings. A. The Commission shall be subject to the laws governing public agencies and a quorum must be present in order to hold a meeting or take any action. B. Printed agendas and backup material shall be prepared for each meeting. C. Minutes of each meeting shall be prepared and distributed to all City Council Members and available upon request for public review at City Hall or on the City's website. D. If a Commissioner cannot attend a meeting or is going to be late, he /she shall contact the City Manager's office. Failure to be present at four regularly scheduled meetings in any one calendar year may be cause for removal from the Commission by the Mayor and City Council. E. The Commission shall be authorized to meet as often as twice a month, but not less than once a quarter. F. The Chief of Police and the Fire Chief or a member of their respective staffs may attend the regularly scheduled meetings, but are not voting members of the Commission. All Commission actions will be forwarded in writing to the Chief �'' of Police, Fire Chief and Code Enforcement Manager. 2.46.080 Obligations and Expenses. En The Public Safety Advisory Commission shall incur no obligations or expenses of any kind, without obtaining prior written authorization and approval by the City Council. 2.46.090 Termination The Commission may be terminated at any time by a simple majority vote of the City Council. R . ,o-- ORDINANCE NO. 1116 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, REPEALING SECTION 2.46 OF THE LAKE ELSINORE MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING A NEW SECTION 2.46 RELATING TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMISSION. WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elsinore first established a Public Safety Commission in 1984; and WHEREAS, the Public Safety Commission has been inactive since about 1988; and WHEREAS, the Lake Elsinore City Council now desires to revise and reactivate the Commission, as the Public Safety Advisory Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, the Lake Elsinore City Council does hereby repeal in its entirety, Section 2.46 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code; and replaced Section 2.46 as follows: SECTION 2.46.010 — DEFINITION. "Public Safety" is that which is related to Police, Fire, Code Enforcement Services and civil disaster within the City of Lake Elsinore. SECTION 2.46.020 — CREATION OF A PUBLIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMISSION. A Public Safety Advisory Commission is established. SECTION 2.46.030 — MEMBERSHIP. The Public Safety Advisory Commission shall consist of five members. Members of the Public Safety Advisory Commission shall: (1) reside within and be a registered voter in the City of Lake Elsinore; or (2) be an owner of a business (or the owner's designee) that is established and currently licensed inside the City of Lake Elsinore. SECTION 2.46.040 — APPOINTMENT — REMOVAL. The Members of the Public Safety Advisory Commission shall be appointed by each member of the City Council and may be removed at his/her pleasure, but subject to the approval by the majority vote of the City Council. Upon its creation the Mayor shall select the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Commission. Said terms shall run for the period of one year (or until July 1, 2005) at which time the Chairman and Vice- Chairman shall be selected A�l by a majority vote of the membership of the Commission. �:. 33 S Page Two — Ordinance No. 1116 SECTION 2.46.050 — TERM OF OFFICE. The Members of the Public Safety Advisory Commission shall be appointed for a term of two years, said two year term shall commence on July 1 of the respective year in which appointed. Those members of the Public Safety Advisory Commission serving as of the date of this amendment shall serve until July 1, 2006, except for the Chairman and Vice - Chairman, whose initial terms are set in section 2.46.040. All members are subject to potential re- appointment pursuant to Section 2.46.040. SECTION 2.46.060 — DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES. A. The Commission shall serve as a conduit of information from the residents and business people of Lake Elsinore to their Public Safety, Code Enforcement and Emergency Services Professionals. B. The Commission shall serve as an additional set of eyes and ears that shall complement staff s efforts in their attempt to be proactive. C. The Commission shall create and maintain a link on the City's web `.OF site encouraging citizens input and providing a complaint or contact form, which may be submitted, on -line. D. The Commission shall seek out additional input and maintain a dialogue with various City organizations including but not limited to Lake Elsinore Marine Search and Rescue, Neighborhood Watch Groups, Homeowners' Associations, the Chamber of Commerce and the Downtown Merchants Association, etc. E. The Commission shall report to the City Council on a regular basis. F. The Commission shall consider assisting the City Council, City Manager or other Public Safety Professionals with disaster preparedness and crisis management. G. The Commission shall consider and evaluate the cost and benefits of creating a Citizens' Action Patrol. �:5 33 000�1 P.at i, Tliree —Ordinance No. 1116 H. The Commission shall actively and aggressively seek out funding programs such as grants to fund Public Safety related programs, projects and equipment needs for the City of Lake Elsinore. I. The Commission shall limit its activities to those enumerated above. However, the Commission may request of the City Council additional duties and responsibilities (i.e. changes to Section 2.46 of the LEMC). Such requests may be granted by a majority vote of the City Council. SECTION 2.46.070 — MEETINGS. A. The Commission shall be subject to the laws governing public agencies and a quorum must be present in order to hold a meeting or take any action. B. Printed agendas and backup material shall be prepared for each meeting. C. Minutes of each meeting shall be prepared and distributed to all City Council Members and available upon request for public review at City Hall or on the City's website. D. If a Commissioner cannot attend a meeting or is going to be late, he /she shall contact the City Manager's Office. Failure to be present at four regularly scheduled meetings in any one calendar year may be cause for removal from the Commission by the Mayor and City Council. E. The Commission shall be authorized to meet as often as twice a month, but not less than once a quarter. F. The Chief of Police and the Fire Chief or a member of their respective staffs may attend the regularly scheduled meetings, but are not voting members of the Commission. All Commission actions will be forwarded in writing to the Chief of Police, Fire Chief and Code Enforcement Manager. SECTION 2.46.080 — OBLIGATIONS AND EXPENSES. The Public Safety Advisory Commission shall incur no obligations or expenses of any Page Four —Ordinance No. 1116 kind, without obtaining prior written authorization and approval by the City Council. SECTION 2.46.090 — TERMINATION. The Commission may be terminated at any time by a simple majority vote of the City Council. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its passage. The City Clerk shall certify as to adoption of this Ordinance and cause this Ordinance to be published and posted in the manner required by law. INTRODUCED AND APPROVED UPON FIRST READING this 9h day of March, 2004, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED UPON SECOND READING this day of , 2004, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: THOMAS BUCKLEY, MAYOR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE v ' ass» 1-..I" 10�1 Page Five — Ordinance No. 1116 VICKI KASAD, CMC, CITY CLERK/ HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: BARBARA LEIBOLD, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE le--- 1 -�- y CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: DICK WATENPAUGH, CITY MANAGER DATE: MARCH 9, 2004 SUBJECT: MAYOR'S COMMITTEE /COUNTRY CLUB HEIGHTS BACKGROUND The City Council in fiscal year 2002 -03 expressed concern with regard to the development constraints of the Country Club Heights area and directed staff to hire a consultant to evaluate the constraints and opportunities. DISCUSSION At a study session in the Cultural Center on February 19, 2004, the City Council were presented the results of the Planning Center's analysis of the constraints and opportunities. Following the presentation, the City Council received considerable input from residents, over 200 participants, and then brought the topic to the dais for Council discussion and comment. It was the consensus of the Council to gather further input from the community by appointing a committee or task force to work with staff on a vision for the area and outline unique development standards that would allow for development of the area and retention of its unique character. Attached is a copy of the consultant presentation along with the Mayor's suggestion on the formation of a Mayor's Committee and the Committee's tasks. Staff would provide an option to the formation of a Mayor's committee, in that only five residents would be appointed. Rather than a 5- member committee, the City Council could provide several Saturday morning or evening workshops where all of the residents could provide their input for staff to review and assist in formulating a draft for the residents to review before it is returned to the City Council for consideration. FISCAL IMPACT The cost of City staff will be the direct expense related to the formation of a Mayor's Committee or workshops. Cost to implement the new standards as an overlay district are unknown at this time. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended the Mayor and City Council consider the formation of a Mayor's Committee or workshops; appoint Committee members if desired; or provide direction to staff on how the Council wishes to proceed. PREPARED BY: DICK WATENPAUGH, CITY MANAGER APPROVED FOR AGENDA BY: MANAGER'S(OFVICE I 3 Country Club Heights - Committee Formation and Expected Study Areas As was presented to the City Council at a February 19, 2004 study session, the Country Club Heights area has a significant number of barriers to development. However, the area also has great potential to become one of the City's premier neighborhoods. To that end, a citizen's Mayor's committee will be formed to investigate the problems and their potential solutions to aid the City in formulating a plan for the future of Country Club Heights. The Committee shall consist of five residents and/or landowners in Country Club Heights. Each Councilmember will appoint one committee member, with the Mayor appointing the chairperson. The Committee shall work closely with the City Manager, City Attorney, and Director of Community Development and shall have a reporting time frame of three to four months. The Committee shall make every effort in its findings to enhance and preserve the integrity of the neighborhood, emphasizing the development of custom and semi - custom homes rather than large tract housing projects. The Committee is tasked with investigating and making recommendations to the City Council on the areas of interest itemized in no particular order below.. • Viewshed ordinance • Sewer and septic issues • Water availability and fire safety • Zoning, including lot sizes, setback requirements, etc. • Design standards • Eminent domain and/or internal lot consolidation • Roadway standards and alignments • Street lighting and other historical public elements • Grading, engineering, and slope issues • Expansion of study area • Habitat preservation • City acceptance of tax sales property • Building permits and City fee structures • Redevelopment Agency involvement • Assessment districts and other improvement financing methods N..r` The City Council, at its discretion, shall then either act on the proposals immediately (separate from but eventually to be incorporated into the General Plan) or shall incorporate the proposals into the upcoming General Plan process. The City Council may modify, accept, or reject any or all of the Committee's recommendations. 3y 1 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL "SPECIAL STUDY SESSION" TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: RICHARD J. WATENPUAGH, CITY MANAGER DATE: SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 19, 2004 SUBJECT: COUNTRY CLUB HEIGHTS STUDY AREA "DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES & CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS" BACKGROUND Staff has been working with the Planning Center Consulting Firm to analyze and develop alternative development scenarios and standards for the subject Study Area within the Country Club Heights. At the direction of the Council, staff requested the Planning Center to analyze additional areas for inclusion to the original project Study Area boundaries. Cost estimates for the overall evaluation will total approximately $49,813. which has already been allocated. The Planning Center has concluded the majority of the research and scope and will be presenting its Findings. These Findings will be presented in a Power Point Presentation format (attached). STUDY SUMMARY This study seeks better understanding of the development potential of the Country Club Heights. It is an Opportunities and Constraints Analysis that will assist staff and the City Council formulate feasible land use development scenarios and ultimately development standards to accommodate the uniqueness of the area. Issues discussed will include ownership patterns, existing zoning, environmental constraints, topography, roadway accessibility, water & sewer availability for service and emergency purposes, and lastly drainage patterns. All these will be presented and evaluated collectively to ultimately formulate alternate development scenarios for the City Council to consider. It is staffs desire to receive input from the public and direction from the City Council to proceed with a preferred development scenario based on the presented opportunities and constraints. This study, its findings, and additional City Council recommendations will represent the foundation for subsequent land use actions by the Planning Commission and City Council. PREPARED BY: Annando G. Villa, Planning & Code Enforcement Manager REVIEWED BY: APPROVED FOR AGENDA LISTING: Attachments: Exhibit "A" Boundary Map Notice of Public Meeting "Study Session" (rnailed to all affected property owners) �� Power Point Presentation "Country Club Heights Development Opportunity Analysis" 2/19/200044 n u Ciry of Lakc Elsinore P1 ... i't Disirier 130 S. Afro S1.0 Lakc Elsnocc, U 9530 (909) 674 -3124 (909) 471 -1419 fu Notice of Public Meeting "Study Session" NOTICE IS HER E GIVN that the City Councilf the Cary of Lake Elsinore will hold a Publie;� Meeting "Study Session" m the: LAKE ELSINORE CULTURAL 'CENTER - `.183 NORTH MAIN'' Lake Cafo ry -1 - .2004 a6 0 PM, .to oSTREET; , o s;' and comments on -ihe .subject:prolect Date: Thursday, February 05, 2004 From: Armando G. Villa, Planning & Code Enforcement h'lanager (909) 674 3124, ext. 275 avilla @lake- elsinore.org Project Title: "Country Club Heights Development Study" Applicant. City of Lake Elsinore Project Description: The Country Club Heights Study represents an effort to analyze development constraints and opportunities for the area and develop acceptable and optimal development scenarios. This study session will cover the First Phase of the study which include areas such as developing adequate development standards & scenarios, analyzing existing and needed infrastructure for the adequate provision of public &. safety services, circulation, and drainage. This study session will seeks direction from the City Council to continue later phases of the study. Project Location: The study area includes all properties bounded by the following points of reference, north of Lakeshore Drive, west of Chaney Street, south of G unnerson /Strickland /Treleven, and cast of Dryden as shown in Exhibit "A ". ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend this Study Session and express opinions upon the item listed above, or to submit written comments to the Plamung Division prior to this date. FURTHER INFORMATION on this item may be obtained bj, contacting the Planning Division, at CitS- Hall (909) 674 -3124, where all agenda materials are available for review- AS 9 Sj Y .. - , - . \ ♦ � 111 \ / / /JJJ���'���) /AfJ e , � r \. = 5 ' it f y. R4 it I •�r � '� y'V T a ': .( ♦) \ ' �)/�} l \ C z "St { A y[� sp t Y Sz- .F 0 ' -cc z, a: r.d., 4 R t 0 ' -cc 51K r- 0 o' ./ I !ti �lr - ,may. �'.'_�h'l'�i� '�L. � \� � <`�� � -�', S�`� ✓. _ � .it '. .a.f .,1 �.... ,y O, �^`- ♦ � y . II fill - - � T �--- i 7/ o , ;• f �� -:,, +� -e° � a.�r I.��r�Cs Y �.i f •sc ac J, '. -.off .�� �\�' ��/ • ;' �' � ' Ks ,5 r �� :�Q� � ..� � � 4�.r<�.- �-'_ ���y �a 4a. n�. ^ ♦f S t 'n y� <c`.�, QP �. 7 �( l L e •S y J 1 t / '6 tr1 c d "e .- ;Nl� * o Arl r. e it Z 4p r' Ln cn �1 D z 0 r[` i tj� /JI B� • E..'' a� mmm Vw j� s AUAAM PIK- Nll '�, €- ° •.,, . r �''�: - 'tom r. { .� ,, { If mn .�� vi ,� Rk L1 CI L J orm V FD �Tr%� ` V ) Q C G M .O 3 CD n r � e `'^ ~ tea" -i.'s :. ��.f{isa'�y+/a!•I�. +,� � ��, a sr. , —t� s t. ,.: 7 .i. ^'� v�1'°'$ S ��FtYy, ��% �G 4 •��f ,(�,f � %t' ► ���'� � �. 1 �' r t F t �r `�i� �: '\t.��. I'ts `� ,. 14f;`J. % m. !y/,� ,� �''' l!•� � ".. tom! �� �` t +t � `'�- ".- °- 'i`�"t .� r, r>u �' `F '7rtl t •` cr� fC.':�,r5 � y�' t` �+� a� y f4.Y rL x 7 (r ) / IA 1 .L�`'r�i h Y„ +ter ,, `! � •! .� >" [`'t � .._,� S� �i �• � } - r d f� � f �rr� ✓i � �:�: f car '�� ''�1�1i� � i� /f � ,- �rjy�y �.1 . #� � `� `•-` n. k `. � o s rJ� � v }F �,�` � /^ � ✓�, a / �� 1. / �� ti (_+.0 � + �� �', \ jiiC," j a j 4 ►bbl\. � � /`r �- ..�- '� <.l �, , A' . �� /�` • , '� U ,>'``` i 1, r� ,;gip � ,, � ,�' �• •�. F t? / � y� j f '4 /4Y ,� .� �•�. ham'' i d~ 'F� •y / -- y\G C` t' _ '� i �, c� •r .����' jam'" Jr t,> ♦:'.1 , t r lJf J ~�y,,66ti ` ^a >�' !'- ! C ^tee• -� /� J i i �J. Fes\ a r! -'� > J. 3 j j...•.D 'y �ffrt'' —1 Ni bll ''LLB ` d ( /�~ .`may~ IY F ✓ 'J' 1� y �, �,�y:✓�rS, P tXr � 7 i 1 �,` �, � Jim}/' �'ri! t2/ fcn.�. ? �., �°�, ,�.� - �/ f� .,. :w r '1 Jl 94 � !� P • ( X mot' I J �`d �¢ t y ?� � ���' 's.�C � ti 6 `nf` / llld -'e e.� /. e, � � r� •\ ,�7C 9 � 7 ,►wa'r`?tX =�1� � "�.. }.� �T� 'Jf��JJ�� -,�,. �®•t{',� 1a1 f l/ ACI Ov �::.mS�. Y 0 r 0 H 0 a 0 a 1 � a o • , E • v'laney -1 s ' ya sf r 0 QJ ` i r c w I ya 4 f "0 A ls 44- ISO ro '411 0 I I �i t � S t• 6 � , t / ' c - t � t ar x�r ' _� i lip 6 � , t / ' c - t � t ar x�r ' _� i ar x�r ' _� i A,-- o � (D a• -t CD 0 CL =N 0 CD 0 (D a) CD o m `< 0 0 O cn ?cn �o Q c c" cn cD cn c(n x < CL t 9 • �i t. .. JL 6•k,4�6 .� � .1 i R �xX eor, P ir� S�p`Y' 00-11 0 N 0 1% • CD CD 90 ::E Do aj CD CD 0 -n cY) 0 (D (n 0 CD u) CD (D OD I Ul r.* (D 0 U) U) c 0 --% (n Q- --% ON M 0 CD 90 3 CD :3 CD cn -:z 03 M U) (0 0 M 0 X (n (D — C) * 0 C:) C/) (D CD r- 0 � a C) o :3 (D C/) < (n 0 (D '(D 3 U) ID C, U) °o oh 0 -0 N CD E 0 ro CD CD !=t o m 0 0 D 0 3 c: 0 Z 0 --I CD L CO CD 0 C) 3 0 cn D 0 0 o 3 (D CD cn *410 X (n (D — C) * 0 C:) C/) (D CD CD X—. I., 3 0 0. CD C/) < (n 0 (D '(D 3 cn *410 00-11 ..+% oo-- CD CD �� 0 (0) 0 0 U) 0 0 a Q. (D (D 0 m :3 0 (n �o 0-0 C). 0 r.+ on D CD U) f"Wn ®�a®0 00 0 CD �� 0 (0) 0 CD (n < 0 U) 0 0 a Q. (D 0 CD m CD 0- (D N . O o � O.r -� o :y m O c C) CD o -. :3 o U) CD 0-0 . O Q. 00 'a O O.r -� (D -A j ``^^ O N -V O m O c O -1 C) W D CL O -. LL N CD 2 � (n �� -u 00 'a O O.r -� (D -A j ``^^ O N -V O m O 0 3 O -1 C) W D CL 1.L c m `V LL N 2 � a B F L) CD CD O 6 � 3 O CD (p cn w n CD ^t u ,3 � V . �t�s• ® ®i air 49A Mr, IMP rD fir► .�1 @® '�i'P � ® o _ ® �o® .� •� Ito x �Z • r � �s 1 a 1 1 1 0 i y OWN fl eY rr. k O�yaco 1 �o i o��s t, y f � 1/� ♦�6��f f r 1s i t �tt Ages O � Sj `®Ai•• d Lri ON Emig W4 • ® Ln f. u CD C CD 0 I 0 A • �.Ij I I �# � �,,..��' l f T 1� st ii- 7�t �` � f � i � t � ♦ ,i � rk. f'+i i ICI 1 fo b � a�' '�1�+r.- e.�_.- +�......�.�..w •h�-l`. 111 k�� I S .s • r .7 r4- a � �x.t,Y ��t3. � T- . s ' x _sue ,_ _� '' �+' � n ice, r Ot ✓�� Sir ��N %fin ,ter �.:-� -t-'', "�"'"�at3�, -., rv, Yt :�iA y Awl. i_ Ate. .. -�• - =5 /u''���`C�;f3 �`$'f pa'`'w 4.'F ;.� '�',` .� 1{ .•.11 - � 4A Ttz f ;s i Z- U CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: DICK WATENPAUGH, CITY MANAGER DATE: MARCH 9, 2003 SUBJECT: DRAFT GOALS FOR CITY MANAGER BACKGROUND For the last several months, the City Council has been working to establish clear goals for the City Manager's position. DISCUSSION It has been the City Council's intent to identify specific, clear goals for the City Manager's position, more extensive goals than adopted in the fiscal year 2003 -04 budget. ,,., The attached draft goals represent the general consensus of the City Council. It is the City Manager's understanding that the City Council wishes to discuss and possibly refine these goals with the intent to evaluate the City Manager in six months (September 2004). FISCAL IMPACT Adoption of the attached goals for the City Manager's position, in themselves, has no impact on the City's General Fund. However, the implementation of some of the goals, with Council's authorization, will have an impact. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended the Mayor and City Council discuss and adopt the attached goals or revise the attached goals to be used to evaluate the City Manager in September. PREPARED BY: DICK WATENPAUGH, CITY MANAGER APPROVED FOR AGENDA BY: MANAGERWOFFICE __ 35 GOALS AND CITY MANAGER'S POSITION MARCH 9, 2004 Mission Statement (as approved in the Fiscal Year 2003 -04 budget) — "The City Manager and the City Manager's office strive to provide visionary, professional leadership and administration in implementing City Council goals and priorities. Critical coordination of policies and programs that encompass focused direction to City staff, proactive intergovernmental relations and positive interaction with community stakeholders will provide a fiscally sound and efficient service driven organization to meet the demands of this growing city". Goals (per adopted budget) — • Resolve RCIP issues with Riverside County • Encourage Lake development and operation to benefit the City • Manage City budget policies to balance and incorporate State impacts • Facilitate consideration of the sale or lease of the Diamond Stadium • Increase public awareness efforts regarding City policies and programs • Expand Economic Gardening programs and institute a tracking system database New Goals for Next Six Months — • Open City Hall on Fridays and maintain negotiated 9/80 work week • Implement MSHCP (if or when approved) • Prepare and implement multi -year budget • Develop five and ten year budget projection • Develop five year Capital Projects Program • Develop complete Developer Impact Fee Program for Council's consideration • Develop functional system for Council/Manager communication • Implement I.T. Strategy as adopted • Develop scope of work for revising the General Plan, prepare bid package for consultants, complete the interview /selection process and initiate the process to revise the General Plan • Prepare a detailed/defined role (separate from the City Manager's) for the Assistant City Manager (validating said) position • Prepare and implement a program to improve the Human Resources Department • Prepare and implement a plan to improve the public's perception of the Community Services Department • Expand the City's role in economic development and job creation • Implementation and support for existing and new committee /commissions • Assist the Council in creating and implementing a new /revised City logo • Work with the City Council and the City Treasurer to clearly identify the role and responsibility of the Treasurer's office • Work with the City Council, City Clerk and the City Attorney to prepare an updated and accurate City Council Policy Manual • Revise /implement Agenda Review Policy for Mayor and RDA Chair 3.5 Mayor and City Council March 9, 2004 Page 2 • Provide for additional and improved Public Relations Program to market the City • Develop and implement internal program for Policy and Procedures Review • Develop and implement a Public Infrastructure Management Plan • Develop a new Vendors Policy to assure multiple service vendors • Outline and present City Council with weekend transportation program for Youth and Senior Services Agenda Item No. 36 Status Report Western Riverside County Multi - Species Habitat Conservation Plan City Attorney Leibold will provide a verbal update report at the City Council Meeting on Tuesday.