Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-27-2010 City Council Item No. 10CITY OF „ A LADE JLSINOIZE DREAM EXTREME. REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: ROBERT A. BRADY, CITY MANAGER DATE: JULY 27, 2010 SUBJECT: SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2010 -01 AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE CANYON HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN Background On June 15, 2010, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Amendment No. 3 to the Canyon Hills Specific Plan to the City Council. Items of discussion at the Planning Commission meeting related to the project area locations, current developments within the Canyon Hills Specific Plan area, and roadway improvements. The SPA No. 3 document applies to the Phase VII and Phase VIII areas of the overall Canyon Hills Specific Plan. Discussion Presently, the land use designations for the Phase VII and VIII areas include residential (detached and attached), open space, and park uses. SPA No. 3 will primarily provide the same type of land uses and development, but will redistribute the residential units differently from SPA No. 2. Future development within Phase VIII could include multi - family attached condominiums, neighborhood commercial uses, a neighborhood park, and an open space /riparian area, or if market conditions dictate, lower density options including but not limited to single family detached homes or detached condominiums. The Phase VIII area is dominated by hillside and biological resources. As required by the California Department of Fish and Game, the San Jacinto River and other riparian areas will be preserved and unaffected. As currently proposed, multi - family attached condominiums would be constructed throughout the Phase VIII area. A neighborhood park would be provided in the center of the condominiums. In addition, neighborhood commercial uses would be provided along Railroad Canyon Road, to the west. SPA No. 2 allowed density transfers throughout the Canyon Hills Specific Plan area, including those areas that are defined by SPA No. 3, as long as 4,275 residential units were not exceeded for the entire Specific Plan area. 4,275 residences were the AGENDA ITEM NO. 10 Page 1 of 18 Canyon Hills Specific Plan Amendment No. 3 July 27, 2010 Page 2 of 2 total number of units that were approved with the original Canyon Hills Specific Plan, SPA No. 1, SPA No. 2, and now SPA No. 3. SPA No. 3 will transfer and redistribute densities only within the Phase VII and VIII areas. Architecture and design of future residential, commercial, and recreational uses will be consistent with other areas within Canyon Hills and will be consistent with those development and design standards and guidelines contained in SPA No. 2. These same development standards and design guidelines are contained in this SPA No. 3 document. City Planning and Engineering staffs have reviewed the Specific Plan Amendment No. 3 document and have no concerns regarding the proposed request. The realigned Specific Plan Phase and Planning Areas will not exceed the overall unit total (4,275 units) that has been entitled for the Canyon Hills Specific Plan area. The requested changes are expected to address and respond to current market demands. The Specific Plan Amendment will continue to allow provision of quality residential uses, commercial uses, open space, and recreational uses. Recommendation Adopt a Resolution making Findings that the Project is consistent with the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), Adopt a Resolution approving Addendum No. 3 to the Final EIR for the Canyon Hills Specific Plan, Introduce by title only and waive further reading of an ordinance approving Amendment No. 3 to the Canyon Hills Specific Plan Prepared by: Kirt A. Coury Project Planner Reviewed by: Matthew Harris, ,{✓15-1 Senior Planner Approved by : Robert A. Brady/ City Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. SPA #3 Location Map 3. Resolution No. 2010 -050 making findings that the Project is consistent with the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). 4. Resolution No. 2010 -051 approving Addendum No. 3 to the Final EIR for the Canyon Hills Specific Plan. 5. Ordinance No. 1282 approving Amendment No. 3 to the Canyon Hills Specific Plan. 6. Conditions of Approval 7. Exhibits: Canyon Hills Specific Plan Amendment No. 3 Addendum No. 3 to the Final EIR for the Canyon Hills Specific Plan Page 2 of 18 L _Z U_% f mo= W J O � =mo mzw J Q Q J W O O � 3 5 3 a n W • ,p i ► 4 P m � P O H � � A i a s a z J � O Z U � y�J NO Z Q Z Q � � O �� �•" w o Q ay as � o rc W J J Z 2 r 0 O Q t° U IU/I Z G °J° - J °OCDC 0 0 — 0 0- — °o °e '.t Canyon Hills Page 3 of 18 RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -050 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING FINDINGS THAT THE PROJECT KNOWN AS CANYON HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 3 IS CONSISTENT WITH THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Pardee Homes, for the Canyon Hills Specific Plan Amendment No. 3 ( "the Project "), located within the Canyon Hills Specific Plan Project Area (the "Site "); and WHEREAS, Section IV(D) of the City of Lake Elsinore's MSHCP Implementing Resolution expressly exempts from the MSHCP: Any project for which and to the extent that vested rights to proceed with the project notwithstanding the enactment of this Resolution exist under the common laws of the State of California, a vesting tentative map pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, a development agreement pursuant to Government Code section 65864 et seq., or other instrument, approved or executed by the City prior to adoption of this Resolution. Projects subject to this exemption must comply with all provisions of any applicable state and federal law. WHEREAS, public notice of the project has been given, and the City Council has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on July 27, 2010. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council has considered the Project and its consistency with the MSHCP "Plan Wide Requirements" prior to making a recommendation that the City Council adopt Findings of Consistency. SECTION 2. That in accordance with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and the MSHCP, the City Council makes the following findings: 1. The Project is a project under the City's MSHCP Resolution, and the City must make an MSHCP Consistency finding before approval. The Project is exempt from the City's MSHCP Resolution. On July 9, 1990, the City and Pardee - Grossman /Cottonwood Canyon entered into that that certain development agreement (the "Development Agreement'), which expressly exempted the Developer from responsibility for any new development impact fees. The Development Agreement will expire on July 9, 2010. Page 5 of 18 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -050 PAGE 2OF4 Even though the Project is exempt from the MSHCP, the Developer must comply with other state and federal laws. Consistent with federal law, the applicant had prepared a project- specific Habitat Conservation Plan and has a history of extensive coordination with the wildlife agencies. Where approved for development, the project site has already been graded, cleared, or developed in accordance with the Project HCP. Given the foregoing, no further action regarding the MSCHP is required. 2. The proposed project is subject to the City's LEAP and the County's Joint Project Review processes. See Response #1 above. 3. The proposed project is consistent with the Riparian /Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools Guidelines. See Response #1 above. 4. The proposed project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines. See Response #1 above. 5. The proposed project is consistent with the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines. See Response #1 above. 6. The proposed project is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements. See Response #1 above. 7. The proposed project is consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures. See Response #1 above. 8. The proposed project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines. See Response #1 above. 9. The proposed project will be conditioned to pay the City's MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee. Developer is exempt from payment of the City's MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee by virtue of the Development Agreement. 10. The proposed project is consistent with the MSHCP. See Response #1 above. SECTION 3. Based upon all of the evidence presented, the above findings, and the conditions of approval imposed upon the Entitlements, the City Council finds that the Entitlements are exempt from the MSHCP. Page 6 of 18 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -050 PAGE 3OF4 SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 27th day of July 2010, by the following vote: MELISSA A. MELENDEZ MAYOR ATTEST: CAROL COWLEY INTERIM CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: BARBARA LEIBOLD CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE Page 7 of 18 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -050 PAGE 4OF4 I, Carol Cowley, Interim City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. was adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, at a regular meeting held on the 27th day of July 2010, and that the same was adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CAROL COWLEY INTERIM CITY CLERK Page 8 of 18 RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -051 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING FINDINGS TO CERTIFY ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO THE FINAL SUPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 87111606) WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Pardee Homes, for the Canyon Hills Specific Plan Amendment No. 3 ( "the Project'), located within the Canyon Hills Specific Plan Project Area (the "Site "); and WHEREAS, the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code §§ 21000 et seq.: "CEQA ") and the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA (title 14, Cal. Code Regs. §§ 15000 et seq.: the "CEQA Guidelines ") are applicable to discretionary projects, which are defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15357 as "a project which requires the exercise of judgment or deliberation when the public agency or body decides to approve or disapprove a particular activity, as distinguished from situations where the public agency or body merely has to determine whether there has been conformity with applicable statutes, ordinances, or regulations "; and WHEREAS, in January 1989, the City of Lake Elsinore (the "City ") certified Final Environmental Impact Report, State Clearinghouse No. 87111606 (the "FEIR ") for the Cottonwood Hills Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, in March 2003, and March, 2007, the City approved the First and Second Amendments to the Specific Plan, which, among other things, changed the name of the Specific Plan to the Canyon Hills Estates Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, a modified Environmental Checklist was prepared to evaluate whether this Entitlement would result in any new significant impacts or new information necessitating preparation of a subsequent environmental document; and WHEREAS, Section 15164 (a) of the CEQA Guidelines provides that "The lead agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred "; and WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a) states that "When an EIR has been certified or negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: 1. Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; Page 9 of 18 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2010 -051 PAGE 2 OF 4 2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or 3. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: (A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; (B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more sever than shown in the previous EIR; (C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not the be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative'; and WHEREAS, public notice of the Entitlement has been given, and the City Council has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on July 27, 2010. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council has considered Addendum No. 3 prepared for the Entitlement. The City Council determines that, based upon the following findings, Addendum No. 3 was prepared in conformance with CEQA and is the appropriate environmental document for the Entitlements: 1. Addendum No. 3 to the FEIR is complete, contains all required information, and has been completed in compliance with CEQA, utilizing criteria set forth in Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines. 2. Addendum No. 3 is the appropriate document because changes and Page 10 of 18 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2010 -051 PAGE 3 OF 4 modifications proposed by the Entitlements are necessary but do not trigger any of the conditions set forth in CQEA Guidelines Section 15162 (see below). 3. The Entitlement does not introduce any new significant environmental effects, nor will they result in any new significant unavoidable project impacts beyond those previously identified in the FEIR. 4. The Entitlement does not propose substantial changes to the project as analyzed under the FEIR, which will require major revisions to the FEIR due to new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant environmental effects. 5. No new information of substantial importance exists, which was either unknown or could not have been known at the time that the FEIR was certified, to show that the Entitlement will have significant effects that were not described in the FEIR, that significant effects that were examined in the FEIR will be more severe as a result of the Entitlement, that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found infeasible would in fact be feasible, or that new mitigation measures are necessary for the Entitlements. SECTION 2. Based upon the foregoing, and based upon all oral and written testimony and other evidence presented, the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore adopts Addendum No. 3 to the FEIR. SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 27th day of July 2010, by the following vote: MELISSA A. MELENDEZ MAYOR ATTEST: CAROL COWLEY INTERIM CITY CLERK Page 11 of 18 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2010 -051 PAGE 4OF4 APPROVED AS TO FORM: BARBARA LEIBOLD CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE I, Carol Cowley, Interim City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. 2010 -051 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, at a regular meeting held on the 27th day of July 2010, and that the same was adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CAROL COWLEY INTERIM CITY CLERK Page 12 of 18 ORDINANCE NO. 1282 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE CANYON HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN WHEREAS, Pardee Homes, has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of Amendment No. 3 to the Canyon Hills Specific Plan (the "Project "); and WHEREAS, the 1,969 -acre Canyon Hills Specific Plan site is located between I- 15 and 1 -215, along Railroad Canyon Road, within the western portion of the City; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore considered the proposed Amendment at its regularly scheduled meeting on June 15, 2010 meeting and made a recommendation that the City Council approve the proposed Amendment; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore is responsible for making decisions relating to the approval or amendment of specific plans; and WHEREAS, public notice of the Project has been given, and the City Council has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on July 27, 2010. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Prior to making a decision, the City Council has reviewed and analyzed Amendment No. 3 to the Canyon Hills Specific Plan pursuant to the Planning and Zoning Laws (Cal. Gov. Code §§ 65000 et seq.) and Chapter 17.99 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code ( "LEMC "). SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning Laws and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the City Council makes the following findings for the approval of Amendment No. 3 to the Canyon Hills Specific Plan: 1. The location and design of the proposed development shall be consistent with the goals and policies of the City's General Plan and with any other applicable plan or policies adopted by the City. The Canyon Hills Specific Plan Amendment No. 3 meets the City's Specific Plan criteria for content and required implementation of the General Plan established by Section 65450 et sea. of the California Government Code and Section 17.99 of the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. Accordingly, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 3 complies with the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the site is located. 2. The proposed location shall allow the development to be well- integrated Page 13 of 18 ORDINANCE NO. 1282 PAGE 2OF4 with or adequately buffered from its surroundings, whichever may be the case. The Project is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments in that implementation of the Project will result in construction of single - family homes, multi- family attached condominiums, neighborhood commercial uses, a neighborhood park, and an open space in accordance with appropriate development and design standards contained in the Canyon Hills Specific Plan Amendment No. 3 document. The Project creates interest and varying vistas as a person moves along any Project street. The Project also complements the quality of existing neighboring development and will continue to provide visually - pleasing design and architecture within the immediate area. 3. All vehicular traffic generated by the development, either in phased increments or at full build -out, is to be accommodated safely and without causing undue congestion upon adjoining streets. The width and type of pavement needed to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated that will result from implementation of Canyon Hills Specific Plan Amendment No. 3 has been reviewed and accounted for. The City has conditioned the Project to be served by roads of adequate capacity and design standards to provide reasonable access by car, truck, transit, and bicycle. 4. The Specific Plan Amendment shall identify a methodology(s) to allow land uses to be adequately serviced by existing or proposed public facilities and services. In appropriate circumstances, and as provided elsewhere by City Code, the City may require that suitable areas be reserved for schools, parks and pedestrian ways; or public open spaces shall be dedicated or reserved by private covenant for the common use of residents, establishments or operations in the development. The Canyon Hills Specific Plan Amendment No. 3 properly identifies methodologies to allow land uses to be adequately serviced by existing or proposed public facilities and services. The Specific Plan Amendment No. 3 identifies necessary streets and circulation to support the proposed land use allocations, as well as all necessary wet and dry utilities for proper and adequate infrastructure services. In addition, the Final Specific Plan Amendment No. 3 identifies single family and multi - family land uses„ neighborhood commercial uses, a neighborhood park, and an open space for dedication and preservation. 5. The overall design of Specific Plan Amendment No. 3 will produce an attractive, efficient and stable development. The proposed Canyon Hills Specific Plan Amendment No. 3 has been designed in consideration of the size and shape of the property, thereby, strengthening and enhancing the immediate areas. The Project will complement the quality of neighboring existing and future uses by creating visually - pleasing development. Page 14 of 18 ORDINANCE NO. 1282 PAGE 3OF4 The Canyon Hills Specific Plan Amendment No. 3 will not be detrimental to the health, safety, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working near the Project or within the City, nor will it be injurious to property or improvements in the project area or within the City. In addition, staff has substantiated that all applicable City Departments and Agencies have been afforded the opportunity for a thorough review of the Specific Plan Amendment No. 3 and have incorporated all applicable comments and /or conditions related to installation and maintenance of landscaping, street dedications, regulations of points of vehicular ingress and egress and control of potential nuisances, so as to eliminate any negative impacts to the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of the surrounding neighborhood or the City. 6. In accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), impacts have been reduced to a level of non - significance, or in the case where impacts remain, a statement of overriding considerations must be adopted to justify the merits of project implementation. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(a), the City prepared an addendum to the previously certified Final Environmental Impact Report for the Canyon Hills Specific Plan (State Clearinghouse No. 87111606) (the "FEIR) to address the minor changes proposed under Specific Plan Amendment #3 (the "Addendum'). The reconfiguration of Phases VII and VII does not result in any new significant impacts or new information not previously analyzed in the FEIR. The Addendum to the FEIR is adequate and is prepared in accordance with the requirements of CEQA. SECTION 3. Based upon all of the evidence presented, the above findings, and the conditions of approval imposed upon the Project, the City Council hereby approves Canyon Hills Specific Plan Amendment No. 3. SECTION 4. If any provision, clause, sentence or paragraph of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions of this Ordinance and are hereby declared to be severable. SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its final passage. The City Clerk shall certify as to adoption of this Ordinance and cause this Ordinance to be published and posted in the manner required by law. INTRODUCED AND APPROVED UPON FIRST READING this 27th day of July 2010, by the following vote: MELISSA A. MELENDEZ MAYOR Page 15 of 18 ORDINANCE NO. 1282 PAGE 4 OF 4 ATTEST: CAROL COWLEY INTERIM CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: BARBARA LEIBOLD CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE I, Carol Cowley, Interim City Clerk of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, hereby certify that Ordinance No. 1282 was introduced by title only and waive further reading by the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore, California, at a regular meeting held on the 27th day of July 2010, and that the same was adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CAROL COWLEY INTERIM CITY CLERK Page 16 of 18 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2010 -01 FOR CANYON HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 3 GENERAL 1. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, and Agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees or Agents to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning Specific Plan No. 2010 -01 regarding Canyon Hills Specific Plan Amendment No. 3 2. The Draft Canyon Hills Specific Plan Amendment No. 3 shall be revised to incorporate any corrections and changes required by the Planning Commission and /or City Council. A Final Canyon Hills Specific Plan Amendment No. 3 document shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Director or designee within 30 days of approval by the City Council. No permit shall be issued until the Canyon Hills Specific Plan Amendment No. 3 document and any required revisions are administratively approved by the Community Development Director or designee. 3. Future development shall comply with those standards and guidelines contained in the Canyon Hills Specific Plan Amendment No. 3 document. 4. Those issues, standards, guidelines, etc. not addressed in the Canyon Hills Specific Plan Amendment No. 3 will revert to the City Municipal Code and /or Zoning Code in effect at the time future projects are proposed. ENGINEERING GENERAL 5. All drainage facilities in this project shall be constructed to Riverside County Flood Control District Standards and hydrology manual. 6. Developer shall mitigate any flooding and /or erosion downstream caused by development of the site and /or diversion of drainage. 7. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). 8. Roadway width for streets designated as "Local' shall be 40 -feet of pavement on 60- feet of right -of -way. Deviations to the "Local' street section standard shall be approved by the Engineering Division and Fire Department. 9. Development phasing plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Engineering Division. Phasing plans shall identify construction traffic control and circulation, temporary traffic control and circulation plans for phased occupants. Page 17 of 18 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2010 -01 FOR CANYON HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 3 PAGE 2 OF 2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 10.The applicant shall comply with all Riverside County Fire Departments requirements and standards. Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by the Riverside County Fire Department. Page 18 of 18