The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06/05/07 PC Reports CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MICHAEL O'NEAL, CHAIRMAN JOHN GONZALES, VICE CHAIRMAN JIMMY FLORES, COMMISSIONER AXEL ZANELLI, COMMISSIONER PHIL MENDOZA, COMMISSIONER ROLFE PREISENDANZ, DlR. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WWW.LAKE-ELSINORE.ORG (951) 674-3124 PHONE (951) 674-2392 FAX LAKE ELSINORE CULTURAL CENTER 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 ******************************************************************* TUESDAY, JUNE 5,2007 6:00 P.M. If you are attending this Planning Commission Meetingplease park in the Parking Lot across the street from the Cultural Center. This will assist us in limiting the impact of meetings on the Downtown Business District. Thank you for your cooperation! CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMENTS-NON AGENDIZED ITEMS-3 MINUTES (Please read & complete a Speaker's Form at the podium, prior to the start of the Planning Commission Meeting) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS (All matters on the Consent Calendar are approved in one motion, unless a Commissioner or any members of the public requests separate action on a specific item.). 1. Joint Planning Commission and Public Safety Advisory Commission Study Session Meeting Minutes for December 13, 2006. RECOMMENDATION: Approval PAGE 2 - PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA- JUNE 5,2007 2. Minor Design Review of a single-family dwelling unit located at 16562 Gunnerson Street (APN's: 378-231-014/015). · The applicant is requesting design review consideration of a three-story conventionally built single-family dwelling unit located at 16562 Gunnerson Street (APN's: 378-231-014/015). . CASE PLANNER: Justin Carlson, Associate Planner Ext. 295, jcarlson@lake-elsinore.org RECOMMENDATION: Approval 3. Minor Design Review of a Single-Family Residence located at 1503 West Heald Avenue (APN: 374-112-019). · The applicant is requesting approval to construct a Single-Family Residence on a vacant lot located at 1503 West Heald Avenue (APN: 374-112-019). CASE PLANNER: Linda Miller, Planning Consultant Ext. 209, Imiller@lak6-elsinore.org RECOMMENDATION: Approval 4. Minor Design Review of a Single-Family Residence located at 16813 Bell Avenue (APN: 378-261-051). CASE PLANNER: Tom Weiner, Planning Manager, Ext. 270, tweiner@lake-elsinore.org RECOMMENDATION: Continue PAGE 3 - PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA- JUNE 5,2007 PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS (Please read & complete a Speaker's Form at the podium prior to the start of the Planning Commission Meeting. The Chairman will call on you to speak when your item is called.) 5. Residential Design Review No. 2006-14 · The applicant is requesting approval of Residential Design Review No. 2006-14 for seventy- four (74) single family detached residential dwelling units located within a 707 unit development known as Summerly Lake Elsinore (Tract 31920), East Lake Specific Plan, Amendment No.Six. CASE PLANNER: Linda Miller, Planning Consultant Ext. 209, lmiller@lake-elsinore.org RECOMMENDATION: Approval 6. Residential Design Review No. 2006-15 · The applicant is requesting approval of Residential Design Review No. 2006-15 for seventy- four (74) single family detached residential dwelling units located within a 707 unit development known as Summerly Lake Elsinore (Tract 31920), East Lake Specific Plan, Amendment No. Six. CASE PLANNER: Linda Miller, Planning Consultant Ext. 209, lmiller@lake-elsinore.org RECOMMENDATION: Approval 7. Residential Design Review No. 2006-16 · The applicant is requesting approval of Residential Design Review No. 2006-16 for seventy-four (74) single family detached residential dwelling units located within a 707 unit development known as Summerly Lake Elsinore (Tract 31920), East Lake Specific Plan, Amendment No. Six. CASE PLANNER: Linda Miller, Planning Consultant Ext. 209, lmiller@lake-elsinore.org RECOMMENDATION: Approval PAGE 4 - PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA- JUNE 5,2007 BUSINESS ITEMS INFORMATIONAL STAFF COMMENTS PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT MINUTES CALL TO ORDER: JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION AND PUBLIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMISSION STUDY SESSION aTY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 13 Chairman O'Neal called the Joint Planning Commission Study Session to order at 4:03 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Director of Community Developmen ROLL CALL PRESENT: Als Comm Kilroy, Dire Manager Chip Attorney Santana. mmunity Development Preisendanz, Information k De ., Gty Oerk Ray, Lake and Aquatic Resources Director Recreation Sapp, Building and Code Enforcment Division ager Weiner, Engineering Manager Seumalo, Deputy Gty PUBLIC COMME S Non- enda Items Mr. Tl111 Fleming stated his address as: Lakeshore Drive, Lake Elsinore. He said, "As a member of the General Plan Advisory Committee I want to thank the Gty for their efforts in cleaning up the Lakeshore Drive lakefront properties as it is the first step in cleaning up the past. As a GP AC member it is my hope that before any decisions are made along the lake regarding lakefront property use, careful consideration be given to the long term effects on the Gty. Being that we are only discussing raw land here, not urban renewal, we must ensure that our number one asset remains the lake itself. As you know, the lake has lost more amenities over the years, Page { I /3 Agenda Item No. of PAGE 2 - JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION AND PUBLIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMISSION STUDY SESSION- December 13, 2006 than we actually have in use today. I understand that today's Joint Study Session is to address Codes and Ordinances, land use-both permitted and non-permitted, within the Lakeshore Overlay District. Our general plan update should contain two important issues: number one is the goals which should be the statements which should provide philosophical direction, and number two the objectives to provide points of measurement and attainment. There have always been hopes and dreams for the lake and I believe we are on the verge of working towards the goals of achieving the extreme dream." DISCUSSION ITEMS Director of Community Development isendanz stated the Lakeshore Overlay District. Th hore Overla controversial for the staff and the city be olves both interests and ownership. First he demo Ian 0 an overhead: "The Overlay District in the development code identifies a e lake, and as you can see, the area is defined on Exhib' oes from treet to Street-approximately 3.45 miles down to Iowa. This' as a city ave been involved in via Code Enforcement, Lake Management Division. Swift mentioned, they were interested in developing an area that 'verside and get many developers that wish to develop along there and ng the B is the current existing General Plan. This exhibit Are e dge Specific Plan. He said, "This is a future Specific doc or a plan approved by the Gty, except for an area in the Gen this area, as well as the rest of the lake edge should deve op. Plan d use that calls it a Lake Edge, we have a Lakeshore Overlay D r overlay, and then we have another layer that would be our zoning. This 'bit. The zoning describes or identifies the area in light purple as recreational, area around Lakeshore that is Cl - Neighborhood Commercial, around Main Street aneycomes in. There is an area along Riverside that's Commercial Park and a medium 0 density on Joy Street, so there are some spot zoning's in there as well, We have a multi-la of standards and requirements and design guidelines that we need to adhere to in developing in this area. The other item that you don't see on the maps currently is where the Army Cotp of Engineers is involved in environmental issues as you enter into certain jurisdictional lines, so we also are faced with that challenge. In the same light, I wanted to elude to our General Plan Update, and the General Plan Update through the General Plan Advisory Committee has prepared numerous meetings through a couple of years where we have talked about the lake edge." He brought up the next exhibit and continued, "Cmrently there are three Agenda Item No. ---L- page;;;' of I ~ Monica Swift of Bankhurst Realty from Lake Elsinore, represent' the meeting said, "The clients own ninety acres from Joy Riverside Drive frontage. They have spent millions of dolla develop commercial and luxury town homes, and they d ' it to be taken into consideration that millions of do invest millions into our city, and there is a need for PAGE 3 - JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION AND PUBLIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMISSION STUDY SESSION- December 13, 2006 alternatives of land use we have developed through public hearings, workshops, and so forth, and in the area around the lake, the city will be divided into general districts: the Ballpark District which is the stadium area - and these are all proposed of course, and the Lake Edge District. Within the future plan we are identifying design guidelines and how the city wants to develop the lake edge in the sense of urbanization, down to the smallest detail of fencing. There is a definite interest and a plan for the lake edge. It helps to know where we are coming from, what we are dealing with now, and what we are moving towards. This particular area is a portion of the Lake Edge District of the future general plan." Overlay District for instance requires Planning Commission approval of a design guid' or encing in that area, so through the General Plan update, we are going to establish . that district so we have specific standards or guidelines to follow in the lake edge, ompass more than this area. So, I wanted to paint a picture of the current situa . 'on. We are now in the process of the future, so we can now make crus. Currendy, though the issues of code enforcement are be e, but Code Enforcement has made a lot of changes down of debris, slabs, and fencing. So, we are addressing the rest in the La ore Overlay District, and those restrictions have to do with the us you see in one of your exhibits regarding the use of the District itself far as pennitted d those that are conditionally pennitted. That's where we are today an ' kind of whe re going tomorrow." Mr. Preisendanz turns the floor over to B Chipman to discuss enforcement issues. de Enforcement Manager ger Chipman stated, "Over the past several umerous complaints, specifically the area st towards the Four Comers area. Those encing, homeless camps, concrete slabs, and of n October of this year the Code Enforcement pproximatelyone hundred seventy (170) parcels located . ntify those properties with the existing conditions in e. er completing the survey, letters were sent out to ifferent property owners, infonning them of those violations. se efforts and have received quite positive results from most of are a few property owners that are still not in compliance and we and resolve the outstanding issues, but I think if any of you have ve seen the results, and they look pretty good. Also, at the same time Public Works took th initiative to clean up their properties- weed abatement, trim the trees on the city owned parcels along there. So, working in conjunction with them we were able to clean up quite a bit of the debris along the Lakeshore edge, existing slabs, fences, and those kinds of things. We are going to continue with that process, trying to work with the owners to get it taken care of" Agenda Item No. Page 3 of PAGE 4 - JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION AND PUBLIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMISSION STUDY SESSION- December 13, 2006 Pat Kilroy, Lake and Aquatic Resources Department, said "Today I am requesting direction on the process for establishing dock standards and not on the standards themselves. I've created a detailed draft of some dock standards which I will be handing out to you today. I wanted to read the pwpose and preface of why I see we need those dock standards. 'The Gty of Lake Elsinore is required by the State of California to maintain the lake for public park and recreation pwposes in perpetuity.' That's based on the transfer agreement of the lake itself from the state to the Gty of Lake Elsinore. We own the surface water rights of the on which docks float on. The standards are intended to provide minimum requireme rotect public safety, access, navigation and water quality. The Gty of Lake Elsin recognizes the utility and convenience of these residential docks for their owners; ho e city must balance the needs of the shoreline property owners with those of the g or the safe enjoyment of Lake Elsinore by all recreational users. So, this is a ra ere we're crossing over public and private properties. With the fluid na the surface water rights; it often inundates the property owner's p . d of a gray area, so we need to be sensitive on how we ap at kind of has a mix between land and water ties to it." Mr. d out Draft andards. He continued, "Again, I am not asking for your input on today, just on the process; and I would recommend fonning a Joint Su mmittee cons is two members from each of the commissions to work out a final draft 0 dock standa envision this Sub-Committee holding open public meetings to gathe ecially fro line property owners, because they're going to be the most affec . y hav 0 ask their opinion for any standards that are established. If you gene commendation today, then we would list this as an age or your re sched mmission Meetings for you to appoint two members . sions to Sub-Committee." ked the Commissioners to discuss both y would need direction as far as how the g mbers from each Commission on a Sub- that back to the Planning Commission as well, and Mark ry Commission on an agendaized item to appoint two co nts regarding the current situation of the lake edge in d comments relative to the general plan update and where we lake edge in this particular area because we are concentrating in e Commissioners would see the city evolving. PUBLIC COMME NONE CONSENT CALENDAR Agenda Item No. Page It I of [~ PAGE 5 - JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION AND PUBLIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMISSION STUDY SESSION- December 13, 2006 Commissioner Comments Planning Conunissioner Zanelli stated, "I think the improvements made along Lakeshore have been great. It looks much better. In regard to docks on private properties, I am not quite sure how that would fit in along any of those private properties along Lakeshore as the access to the properties themselves appears to be quite limited. I am not intimately aware of that, but I don't have an issue with having public docks for the residences. In any future development commercial properties along the water's edge such as condominiums or hotel, I would like to see us maintain public access either through walking paths, bike paths, 0 means for the public to transgress the areas anywhere we can along the lake as it is a re for us and would attract tourism here and make it a nice place for people to come. some other water front areas access is not available and I think that at this point in have an opportunity to guide that in the future, I would really like to see n space along the water's edge available to the public. If we decide to p. would volunteer to do that." Ms Sund said, "I like the dock idea about having groups-the four of us." Planning Conunissioner Flores directed Resources: "I haven't had an opportuni gotten this earlier so I could review it. scanning that you've included the release of nt responded, "Again, I wasn't really looking . ust a process for how we move forward. stion is I really need assistance from the Mr. Kilroy if the city has any existing dock construction . taken on a case by case basis, you need city approval and a n an individual basis with no guidelines provided." Planning Conuniss throughout the lake. ores asked Mr. Kilroy if this would affect the entIre shoreline Mr. Kilroy answered, "That's correct, not just the overlay district." Conunissioner Flores asked if any existing facilities have been considered, for instance the Princess Boat that is being done. Agenda Item No. Page '5 I Of-D- PAGE 6 - JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION AND PUBLIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMISSION STUDY SESSION- December 13, 2006 Mr. Kilroy said he was just looking for a process to move forward on the establishment of any kind of dock standards. Planning Commissioner Flores said, "It seems like we are going to need a lot of procedures and standards, I agree that a Sub-Committee run from Public Safety Advisory Commission, including yourself and Commission, would probably put this in its perspective and I look forward to being a part of that." e the existing code allows for 've run into over the years with o erty, what direction the city's intent is for add ed Robin Chipman, Building Division Manager. He eign orhood commercial. Planning Commissioner Flores said, t we have a few areas that were colored as neighborhood n anything along that shoreline." Mr. Chipman deferre ireetor of Community Development Preisendanz Director of Community Development Preisendanz said, "Neighborhood commercial has a list of uses that is permitted, there is also the Recreational District. Within neighborhood commercial, apparel stores, appliance stores, bicycle shops, florists, and general merchandise stores are permitted." Agenda Item No. Page 0 I of l3 PAGE 7 - JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION AND PUBLIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMISSION STUDY SESSION- December 13, 2006 Conunissioner Flores asked Mr. Preisendanz if there are any in existence today along the colored areas. Director of Community Development Preisendanz answered, "No, it is a good point you bring up. We've had some inquiries along the area where Cheney intersects Graham The problem has been restricted access to get in and out of the site, restricted developable area in the sense of foundations and building pads. And so, whenever we have spoken t people they have gone away and not come back because of the restrictions. At one point, Ie of years ago 1 had discussed pole design, having a pier going out with a resta it and it was two-story situation. It probably would have cost a great amount of m we had discussed it at a few meetings, but they never came back It's really restri there is a little narrow strip that's Cl, Neighborhood Commercial. Generally from G2, which is general commercial." ed and he answe , "Not that many, again it is very been there for a long time. 1 have not seen re frontage since 1 have started here, and 1 nty (20) years. The problem is, you have ricted access. You also have a recreational Co that the didn't see the properties e any issues on when we do incur flooding. 1 know tan rom the Lake shoreline allowed for the excess water. 1 that gave any type of distance for that, from the lake itseH to f flooding." evelopment Preisendanz stated that the recreational zoning line shown on the visual . ood way line. The original intent on the zoning was to create a buffer or establish a recreati nal area that was restricted in use. The recreational area is very restricted in terms of what you can do there. He said he thought that was the intent for those areas that are shown as purple, as recreational. Conunissioner Knight said, "I drive down Lakeshore and it is looking so good, but it still has room for improvement. We are addressing some of the issues right now that need future improvements. The fences you see that extend along the private property and out into the Agenda Item No. I Page ~ of l 3 PAGE 8 - JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION AND PUBLIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMISSION STUDY SESSION- December 13, 2006 water, as far as I'm concerned are a safety hazard and need to be dealt with. Docking, 1 guarantee you that as soon as we meet again, the Public Safety Advisory Commission will supply two members to study the dock situation and give you a safety guideline to work with." Commissioner Mendoza said, "I think the committee on the docks is warranted and 1 think we will move by leaps and bounds, especially with this path. They did a really good job but at the same time we have to make sure we are protecting the city also. As far as a few of these definitions, as far as the littering... 1 know we can't necessarily fine erty owner for any of the littering on there because you can't say that he did it specifi , but can we fine them for not cleaning it up in a timely manner?" Director of Community Development Preisendanz re property owner is responsible. We do give him or h cleanup, but after a period of time they are subject our best to coordinate with them. We realize th and in some cases Public Works will chip in and just becomes fairly large refrigerators and who knows eventually the property owner is respo . Ie." He asked, "Once the rty owner can't afford the subsidize it or defer the cost to be sensitive to the resident's ponded, "The area we are describing, the edge in this particular area, so when we are inclu e entire lake area. The area is in a redevelopment with the city and we would have to meet with city be more opportunities as we get down to that point ge any way possible to get fencing in compliance." Commissione On the non-conforming use, in number C on the foundations where foundatio er concrete structures not for use for retaining pwposes, not in conjunction or nec th existing or developed property shall be removed within six (6) months. Is there a y that we can have them pay a bond, whatever the cost of removal is plus ten percent (1000 before they put anything down so we don't have to come back and say it isn't authorized, they have to take it out and all of a sudden they can't afford to take it out?" Director of Community Development Preisendanz asked Commissioner Mendoza if he was talking about having them place a bond, each of the property owners to keep them from placing any concrete. Agenda Item No. ~ Page 8 of I 3 PAGE 9 - JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION AND PUBLIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMISSION STUDY SESSION- December 13, 2006 Commissioner Mendoza said he was talking about if there are any new structures that need to be removed after, say six (6) months; it says 'Shall be removed within six (6) months.' If someone put something in that has to be removed within six (6) months, it could if we were able to condition it. If it was a project that came before the Commission and the Gty Council could condition it to bond for a removal. Commissioner Mendoza responded, "Obviously, we can't do it to the older ones, I'm just saying if anyone does anything in the future. That's to protect our interest." situations where some d so those we are not smaller structures, e, restaurants are chniques and Director of Community Development Preisendanz said " permits are ministerial, for example over the counter small able to condition, so I don't know if we have the mec . but we could on larger structures. In the Lakeshore allowed in there if it would work, you have t everything, but in that case we could require a b Director of Community Development P Commission on that and discuss it with the exist with that. he Wi have to get back to the to see what legal ramifications d, "If I look at this whole recreation area rty now? In 1980 this area was all under ey?" zonmg co district that a is not a long list exhaustive list of environmental const t Preisendanz said, "Depending on what the zoning is, ey weren't conforming to the current standards. We g a al non-conforming use if it was non-conforming to the at are permitted in the recreational district, and also the overlay ht and some that are conditionally permitted and although there d find Tourist Commercial or General Commercial, but it is an reational type uses and there are some possibilities. I think the and the topography of the sites is very restrictive to development." Vice Chair Gonzales asked, "This area right in here, this big recreational area, what is allowed there right now?" Director of Community Development Preisendanz responded, "Currendy that area that you are pointing at is C1 or a neighborhood commercial along the west side of Lakeshore Drive and its very narrow as you can see. In the Recreational Area you would have such things that would be Agenda Item No. I Page q of I 3 PAGE 10 . JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION AND PUBLIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMISSION STUDY SESSION- December 13, 2006 approved with a conditional use permit... TIlls is agriculture, horticulture, airports or heliports, atWetic fields, boat docks, campgrounds, equestrian facilities, fishing piers, golf courses and driving ranges, parks." Vice Chair Gonzales confirmed that these would be things that would come under water without serious problem Director of Community Development Preisendanz agreed. there are tennis courts and it says 'Other uses which the P accord with the putpose of this chapter'. If a use came in have to bring it before the Commission and adopt a resoluti to keep major structures out of the recreational area restrictive, than you see on the Overlay District, whic point you brought up in the sense that the recreatio you look at the list, . sion finds to be in ot on this list we would the list. The intent is District is more lake. It's a good " oking at these projects in a co cting, so we have to ensure oint were it is recreational that d of a d area that we have to bring into someone to start development along the lake. . e runs along the lake and that would be of the developments. It has been very this area particularly? One of the things I is a view from this area when you are driving from . Street. If we want to maintain that then you need to Then again, back to what I had originally alluded to, terests that we need to address." ode is not going to affect these developments later. From the the recreation area. would support heartily a joint sub-committee to address the processing of dock standards. addition to that, this committee could address a number of issues that have been brought up. .As an example, what are tourist-oriented uses, public access? What are in fact the city's plans with respect to the development of this area? What about fencing, overnight camping, shoreline buffer zones? I think that what can happen here is that all of these can be addressed by a couple of members from each of these committees getting together with the appropriate manager and putting together some standards that can in fact be sent back to each of the respective committees for further comment. Deputy Gty Attorney Santana would Agenda Item No. J Page I 0 of I '3 PAGE 11- JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION AND PUBLIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMISSION STUDY SESSION- December 13, 2006 probably attest to that one could ask another question, and another question, and another question, and quite frankly it seems to me here that the specificity is not what we are necessarily looking for, but we are looking for some direction. So, it seems to me that the best thing would be for this Sub-Committee to address all of these concerns and 1 would be happy to either appoint or ask for two bodies from the Planning Commission to make time to do this." A person in the audience who didn't state their name asked that Lake Elsinore be addressed. that there is a certain Comers area and Robin Chipman, Building Division responded, "I think homeless population in Lake Elsinore, in particular, addressed the issue. Chairman incline wha little bit think abou vass Ybodyabout this particular issue. 1 would be so at. They would have ample opportunity to comment on e would take. Also, 1 think it speeds up the process a ction in a rapid manner. That would be how 1 would Commissioner the two commissio ave to agree with you. That would keep this Commission within available today, along with staff." Director of Comm Development Preisendanz thanked both Commissions for attending the meeting; the study session was to bring to light an issue that has been going on for quite a while. Agenda Item No. I Page ~ ( of I '3 PAGE 12 . JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION AND PUBLIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMISSION STUDY SESSION- December 13, 2006 STAFF COMMENTS NONE PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS BUSINESS ITEMS Michael O'Neal, Chairman, Planning Commission NONE NONE INFORMATIONAL NONE ADJOURNMENT Ron Hewison Chairman, Public Safety Advisory Commission Agenda Item No. Page I d- I of /3 PAGE 13 - JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION AND PUBLIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMISSION STUDY SESSION- December 13, 2006 Respectfully Submitted, Kristine Herrington Office Specialist III ATTEST: Rolfe Preisendanz, Director of Community Development Agenda Item No. Page { ~ I of (3 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DA TE: JUNE 5, 2007 PREPARED BY: JUSTIN CARLSON, ASSOCIATE PLANNER PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED AT 16562 GUNNERSON STREET (APN'S: 378-231-014/015) APPLICANT: XIN DING: 2837 ONYX WAY, WEST COVINA, CA 91792 OWNER: SAME PROJECT REQUEST The applicant is requesting design review consideration of a three-story conventionally built single-family dwelling unit located at 16562 Gunnerson Street (APN'S: 378-231- 014/015). Review is pursuant to Chapter 17.23 (R-l, Single-Family Residential), Chapter 17.82 (Design Review), Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards), and Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requirements) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). WATER AVAILABILITY/FIRE FLOW The applicant provided staff with a detailed 'Water Will Serve' letter from the Elsinore Water District (EWD). In addition to the agency stating that they will provide water to the subject lot, they also provided 'Fire Flow' Information indicating that there is a "Dry Barrel" hydrant approximately 400-feet from the subject lot. Furthermore, the "Water Will Serve" letter indicates that the "Dry Barrel" hydrant is able to produce approximately 850 gallons per minute at twenty (20) pounds per square inch for a minimum two (2) hour duration (please see attachment #5). ACfNDA ITEM NO. d- PAGE I OF 3 e REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 5, 2007 PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED AT 16562 GUNNERSON STREET (APN'S: 378-231-014/015) BACKGROUND The Design Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the plans for the proposed single- family dwelling unit and provided several substantive comments on the proposed architectural design, fencing, landscaping, structure heights, and retaining walls. Once revised, the applicant re-submitted plans along with building elevations for the proposed home, which incorporated the recommendations that were suggested by the DRC. PROJECT LOCATION The existing vacant lots are located approximately 450 linear-feet southwest of Ulmer Street and 20-linear feet northwest of Gunnerson Street at 16562 Gunnerson Street. Furthermore, the project site is located within the R-l (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District and has a General Plan designation of Future Specific Plan J (Country Club Heights #1) (APN: 378-231-014/015). ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING LOCATION EXISTING ZONING LAND USE Project Sites Vacant R-l (Single-Family Future Specific Plan J Residential North Vacant R-l (Single-Family Future Specific Plan J Residential) South Vacant R-l (Single-Family Future Specific Plan J Residential) East Vacant R-l (Single-Family Future Specific Plan J Residential West Vacant R-l (Single-Family Future Specific Plan J Residential) AGENDA ITEM if- PAGE.a. OF 3B REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 5, 2007 PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED AT 16562 GUNNERSON STREET (APN'S: 378-231-014/015) PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting design review consideration for the design and establishment of one (1) conventionally built three-story single-family dwelling unit located at 16562 Gunnerson Street (APN'S: 378-231-014/015). The proposed dwelling will have an attached 538 square-foot two (2) car garage, lobby, and storage closet on the lower floor. The first floor will have a living room, bonus room, dining room, kitchen, family room, bathroom, and laundry room. The second floor will have three (3) bedrooms, a second story deck, a bathroom, and a master bedroom with master bathroom and walk-in-closet. The net lot coverage for the proposed single-family dwelling unit located at 16562 Gunnerson Street, which includes the lower floor, first floor, and two (2) car garage will be approximately fifty percent (50%). It should be noted that the proposed dwelling unit complies with the maximum lot coverage requirement of fifty-percent (50%) as outlined in Chapter 17.23.090 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). Siting The proposed three-story single-family dwelling unit will be located on a relatively hilly location of Gunnerson Street. In order to develop the property, the applicant will have to conduct extensive grading and utilize rear and interior property line retaining walls in order to create a buildable pad. The applicant is proposing to cut approximately 1,815 cubic-yards of earth from the slope. The rear retaining wall will be approximately six-feet (6') high at the northwest corner and increases to approximately seventeen-feet (IT) high as it ceases at the northeast comer of the subject lot. The northwest interior property line retaining wall is approximately six-feet ( 6') at the northwest comer and decreases to approximately half-a- foot as it runs along the interior property line just past the proposed dwelling unit. The northeast interior property line retaining wall is approximately seventeen-feet (17') at the northeast comer and decreases to approximately two-feet (2') as it runs along the interior property line to the front of the proposed dwelling unit. Once the proposed northeast interior property line wall reaches the front of the dwelling unit, it wraps around the front of the house where it ceases at the front-entry stairwell. It should be noted that the AGENDA ITEM if.. PAGE3-0F~ REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 5, 2007 PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED AT 16562 GUNNERSON STREET (APN'S: 378-231-014/015) applicant is proposing to incorporate a planter between the front retaining wall and the proposed dwelling unit. This will assist in providing interest as well as softening the front elevation, which is visible from Gunnerson Street. The rear retaining wall will be set back fifteen feet (15') from the rear of the house, which complies with section 17.23.080 of the LEMC. This section mandates that finished slopes in excess of five percent (5%) shall not be permitted within fifteen feet (15') of the main dwelling unit. Architecture The applicant is proposing to include elements of "European" architecture for the proposed single-family dwelling unit. The east (front) elevation will include an cement-tile roof, decorative coach lights, an arched front-entry porch with windows on both sides and above the door, cultured stone veneer, decorative window surrounds with divided "lites", decorative garage door, a chimney cap, a turret like tower element, and bay windows. The west elevation (rear) will include a cement tile roof, a second story deck, and decorative window surrounds with divided "lites." The north (interior) elevation will include a decorative chimney cap, windows with surrounds and divided "lites", and a turret like bay window architectural element. It should be noted that the turret like bay window element will incorporate the same concrete tile roofing material that is present on the main dwelling unit roof. The south (interior) elevation will include decorative window surrounds with divided "lites" and concrete tile roofing. The applicant is proposing to incorporate six-foot (6') high wood fencing along the interior and rear property lines and decorative wall returns that connect from the interior property line fencing to the main dwelling unit. The return walls will be constructed of block with pilasters containing wrought-iron in between. Staff has added a condition of approval stating that all visible walls shall either be of "split- face" material or stuccoed. AGENDA ITEM ;)- PAGE..:l OF 3J3 REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 5, 2007 PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED AT 16562 GUNNERSON STREET (APN'S: 378-231-014/015) Landscaping The applicant is only proposing to landscape and irrigate the front-yard. Front-yard landscaping will include "Star Jasmine" groundcover and "Hybrid Fescue" grass, fifteen (15) five (5) gallon "Azalea" shrubs, nine (9) five (5) gallon "CoprosmaKirkii" shrubs, two (2) fifteen (15) gallon "Hibiscus Syriacus" trees, five (5) five (5) gallon "Pink Breath of Heaven" shrubs, eight (8) one (1) gallon "Asparagus Meyeri" shrubs, eight (8) one (1) gallon "Begonias Richmondensis" shrubs, three (3) five (5) gallon "White Shrub" roses, three (3) fifteen (15) gallon "Lantana Dwarf' shrubs, and one (1) fifteen (15) gallon "phoenix Roebelenii" palm. All landscaping will be automatically irrigated and will include a rain sensor, which will assist in the conservation of water. In an effort to comply with Section 5.78 (Significant Palm Trees) of the LEMC, the applicant is proposing to incorporate three (3) existing palm trees located along the Gunnerson Street right-of-way into the front-yard landscaping. Color and Materials tectural Features "El Morado Blend" "French Vanilla" "Driftin Dune" "Caramel D stack" Roof Wall Trim Stone Veneer 'S"-tile Stucco Wood Cultured Stone ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the proposed single-family dwelling unit and found that with the attached conditions of approval, the project meets all minimum requirements of Chapter 17.82 (Design Review), Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards), Chapter 17.23 (Single-family Residential), and Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requirements) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) including but not limited to; density, setbacks, landscaping, parking, and lot coverage. AGENDA ITEM :}- PAGE -2 OF D~ REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 5, 2007 PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED AT 16562 GUNNERSON STREET (APN'S: 378-231-014/015) Siting The net lot coverage for the proposed single-family dwelling unit located at 16562 Gunnerson Street, which includes the lower floor, first floor, and two (2) car garage will be approximately fifty percent (50%). It should be noted that the proposed dwelling unit complies with the maximum lot coverage requirement of fifty-percent (50%) as outlined in Chapter 17.23.090 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). In addition, the site plan will meet all applicable development standards and criteria outlined in the R-l (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District and the Residential Development Standards outlined in the LEMC. Architecture The proposed architecture of the single-family dwelling unit located at 16562 Gunnerson Street is consistent with the style and design of existing single-family dwelling units within Country Club Heights. Furthermore, the proposed colors and materials to be incorporated are consistent with the goals and intent ofthe architectural design guidelines of the General Plan's Community Design Element, in that the proposed residence provides an aesthetic quality that lends to the overall achievement of a well balanced R-l (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District. Landscaping The minimum landscape coverage requirements for in- fill single- family dwelling units states that the applicant landscape the front-yard with an automatic irrigation system as outlined in Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards). The applicant has met this requirement by proposing a fully landscaped, automatically irrigated front yard. Furthermore the applicant is proposing to incorporate a rain sensor, which will assist in the conservation of water. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Class 3, Section 15303(a) (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), staffhas determined AGENDA ITEM ~a PAGEkOF~ REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 5, 2007 PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED AT 16562 GUNNERSON STREET (APN'S: 378-231-014/015) that the proposed project will not have a significant affect on the environment and shall therefore be exempt from the provisions of CEQA. Therefore no additional environmental clearance is necessary. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2007-_ approving the proposed single-family dwelling unit located at 16930 Pierrott Avenue based on the Findings, Exhibits, and the proposed Conditions of Approval. PREPARED BY: JUSTIN CARLSON, ASSOCIATE PLANNER APPROVED BY: -~~ ~~<<- R LFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ATTACHMENTS: 1. VICINITY MAP 2. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 3. PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 4. CEQA-NOTICE OF EXEMPTION 5. ELSINORE WATER DISTRICT 'WATER WILL SERVE' LETTER 6. SIGNED ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 7. SITE PLAN 8. PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 9. LOWER & FIRST FLOOR PLAN 10. SECOND FLOOR PLAN 11. ROOF PLAN 12. ELEVATIONS 13. BUILDING SECTIONS/FINISH DETAILS AGENDA ITEM cr- PAGE -r OF 3'CJ REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 5, 2007 PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED AT 16562 GUNNERSON STREET (APN'S: 378-231-014/015) 14. LANDSCAPE PLAN 15. MATERIALS SHEET 16. FULL SIZE PLANS AGENDA ITEM ;>- PAGE ~ OF -3C(; VICINITY MAP MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-FAMilY DWElliNG UNIT lOCATED AT 16562 GUNNERSON STREET PLANNING COMMISSION ACENDAITEM NO. d- PAGE q OF ,:S~ RESOLUTION NO. 2007-_ RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A THREE-STORY CONVENTIONALLY BUILT SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT WHEREAS, Xin Ding filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of a Minor Design Review for a conventionally built three- story single-family dwelling unit with an attached two (2) car garage on property located at 16562 Gunnerson Street (APN: 378-231-014/015) (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of considering and approving, conditionally approving, or denying Minor Design Review requests for residential projects; and WHEREAS, public notice of the Project has been given and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public meeting held with respect to this item on June 5,2007. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed design for the Project and has found it acceptable. The Planning Commission finds and determines that the Project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. SECTION 2. The Planning Commission finds and determines that the Project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code SS 21000 et seq.: "CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R. SS 15000 et seq.) pursuant to a class 3(a) exemption for new construction or conversion of small structures because the Project involves construction of one single-family residence. (14 C.C.R. S 15303(a)). SECTION 3. That in accordance with Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Chapter 17.82, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the approval of the Project: ACifNDA ITEM NO. PACE (0 d- OF 38 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2007-_ PAGE20F4 1. The Project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the intended General Plan and the Zoning District in which the Project will be located. The Project complies with the goals and objectives of General Plan designation Specific Plan J (Country Club Heights No.1) as well as the R-1 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District. General Plan designation Specific Plan J is intended to provide a wide range of housing densities and some limited commercial and industrial uses. Furthermore, Table 111-5 (General Plan/Zoning Compatibility Matrix) within the General Plan identifies that the General Plan designation Future Specific Plan J (Country Club Heights No.1) is compatible with the R-1 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District. In addition, Future Specific Plan J General Plan designation mandates that the average residential density will be 6 dwelling units to the acre. The proposed single-family dwelling unit will cover approximately fifty-percent (50%) of the net lot area, which complies with the goals and objectives of the Future Specific Plan J designation of the General Plan, R-1 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District, and the General Plan/Zoning Compatibility Matrix. Approval of this Project will assist in achieving the development of a well balanced and functional mix of residential, limited commercial, limited industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses by providing additional affordable housing within the R-1 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District. The Project also encourages the development and maintenance of a broad range of housing types for all income groups and age categories. Finally, the Project, which incorporates elements of "European" style architecture, will provide a well rounded design while maintaining the desirable rural characteristics and base framework to achieve quality and compatibility in the physical design of the developing portions of the City. Overall, the Project will enhance the existing developed areas within General Plan designation Future Specific Plan J and Zoning Designation R-l (Single-Family Residential) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 2. The Project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. The Project is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments in that the proposed single-family dwelling unit will provide: a twenty-foot (20 ') ~ If,,\ ~,;, . <,,' ,'~,' ,.~ ~,,), r,: d- AC.H\lLrA ; i ,-,,; i~";._~ - PAGE I I OF?fBJ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2007-_ PAGE30F4 front-yard setback; sufficient front, side, and rear-yard landscaping; and, safe and sufficient on-site vehicular circulation. In addition, the Project complies with all setback, height, and lot coverage requirements as outlined in the R-1 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. The Project will complement the quality of existing projects in that the applicant is providing elements of "European" style architecture, which includes: 360-degree architecture articulation pursuant to the "General Plan, Community Design Element Design Guidelines"; decorative style window surrounds with divided window lites; decorative front-entry porch, coach lights, ledgerstone veneer; and an "S"- tile roof 3. Subject to the attached conditions of approval, the Project is not anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. A Class 3 CEQA exemption may be invoked when the development proposal involves construction of one single family residence. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines 15303(a), the Project is exempt from environmental review because it involves the construction of one single family residence. Moreover, the Project has been reviewed by all City divisions and departments, which have imposed certain conditions of approval on the Project to ensure that no adverse impacts occur. In light of those conditions of approval, as well as the design features of the Project itself, the Project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the Project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter 17.82. Pursuant to Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Section 17.82.070, the Project has been scheduled for consideration and action of the Planning Commission. The Project has also been conditioned to comply with all aspects of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. The Applicant shall meet all required setbacks and development standards pursuant to the R-1 (Single- Family Residential) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. AGENDA ITE,,':: t~O. d- PAGE I;;).. OF "38 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2007- PAGE40F4 SECTION 4. Based upon the evidence presented, the above findings, and the conditions of approval, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Minor Design Review application. SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of June 2007, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Rolfe Preisendanz Director of Community Development AGEND:\ iTEM IIiO. J- PAGE (3 OF 3 B CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PROJECT NAME: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED AT 16562 GUNNERSON STREET (APN'S: 378-231-014/015) PLANNING DIVISION GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, and Agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning the Minor Design Review project attached hereto. 2. The decision of the Planning Commission shall be final fifteen (15) days from the date of the decision, unless an appeal has been filed with the City Council pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 17.80 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 3. If the project proposes an outdoor storage tank, the applicant shall locate the unit within the side or rear yards. If location must be within the front yard, the applicant shall provide a method of screening subject to the review and approval of the Director of Community Development or his designee. 4. Minor Design Review approval of one (1) single-family dwelling unit located at 16562 Gunnerson Street (APN: 378-231-014/015) will lapse and become void one (1) year of the approval date unless a building permit is issued and construction commenced and the project is diligently being pursued toward completion. 5. All Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced upon page one of building plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division for Plan Check. 6. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the applicant shall sign and ~{GEit'~D;\ 'T'~r~1 r~o. PAce-L 4- ~ OF ~8 complete an "Acknowledgement of Conditions," and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records. 7. All materials and colors depicted on the plans and materials board shall be used unless modified by the Applicant and approved by the Community Development Director or designee. 8. All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved site plan and elevations, with revisions as noted herein. The applicant shall meet all required setbacks, and development standards pursuant to the R-1 (Single- Family Residential) development standards. Any revisions to the Minor Design Review attached hereto shall be processed in a similar manner as the original Minor Design Review. All plans submitted for Building Division plan check shall conform to the submitted plans as modified by the Conditions of Approval. 9. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Riverside County Fire Department. 10.All windows shall use foam surrounds and/or other architectural-type features approved by the Community Development Director or designee. 11.All necessary exterior/ancillary equipment shall be effectively screened from public view. All proposed screening methods shall be reviewed and approved the Community Developer Director or designee. 12.All roofing materials shall have a minimum Class "A" Fire rating, and so noted on the construction plans. 13. The Applicant is to meet all applicable City Codes and Ordinances. 14.A cash bond of $1,000.00 shall be required for any construction trailers placed on the site and used during construction. Bonds will be released after removal of trailers and restoration of the site to an acceptable state, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. , . 0'0 '"'\- i\ ,.~,..,,,., ,', 0- t:..:.~,.,;t;-f-~vt~'" ,~. PAGEJ5-0F 3 g 15.The Applicant shall comply with the City's Noise Ordinance. All construction activity shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday, and no construction activity shall occur on Saturdays, Sundays or legal holidays. 16. The Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City's Grading Ordinance. Construction generated dust and erosion shall be mitigated in accordance with the provisions of Municipal Code, Chapter 15.72 and using accepted control techniques. Interim erosion control measures shall be provided thirty (30) days after the site's rough grading, as approved by the City Engineer. 17.Any exterior air conditioning or other mechanical equipment shall be ground mounted and screened so that they are not visible from neighboring property or public streets. Air conditioning units and related equipment may not encroach more than two-feet (2') into the required minimum side yard setback. 18.Garages shall be constructed to provide a minimum interior clear space of twenty feet (20') x twenty feet (20') for two cars. 19.The Applicant shall provide shrubs and plant materials as shown on the landscape plan. Any changes to this plan shall be subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. The landscape plan improvements and plantings shall be fully installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 20.All planting within fifteen feet (15') of ingress/egress points shall be no higher than 36 inches. 21.All driveways shall be constructed of concrete per Building and Safety Division standards. 22.All walls or fences located in any front yard shall not exceed thirty-six inches (36") in height with the exception that wrought-iron fences may be five feet (5') in height. Chain link fences shall be prohibited. 23. The applicant shall be required to remove and replace any existing chain link fencing and any fencing that is in poor condition. It will be the responsibility of the applicant to contact the effected neighboring property owners. If the AGENDA ITEM NO. PACE I ~ d- OF 33 existing fencing is in good condition, this requirement may be waived per the approval of the Director of Community Development or Designee. 24.The applicant shall provide a flat concrete pad a minimum of 3'- 0" by 7'- 0" adjacent to each dwelling unit. The storage pad for trash barrels shall be concealed from public view. 25.The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of $64.00 made payable to the County of Riverside for a Notice of Exemption. The check shall be submitted to the Planning Division for processing within 48 hours of the projects approval. 26. The applicant shall place a weatherproof 3' x 3' sign at the entrance to the project site identifying the approved days and hours of construction activity and a statement that complaints regarding the operation can be lodged with the City of Lake Elsinore Code Enforcement Division (951) 674-3124. 27.All exposed walls visible from a public right-of-way shall be of "split-face" material or stuccoed to match the proposed dwelling unit located at 16562 Gunnerson Street. Plain precision block is not permitted. 28. The applicant is to meet all requirements of the Community servIces Department. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS 29.All walls and/or fencing need to be located off the property line and so indicated on the construction plans. If the Applicant proposes to place any walls and/or fencing on the property line he/she must submit a notarized agreement between the subject property owner and the adjacent property owner to the Planning Department prior to issuance of a building permit. 30.The applicant shall provide assurance that all required fees to the Lake Elsinore Unified School District have been paid prior to issuance of building permits. 31. The applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fees in effect at the time prior to issuance of building permits. 32.The applicant shall provide assurances to the Planning Division that all AGENDA ITEM NO. if PACiE-L-:LOF 38 requirements and fees of the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District have been met. 33.The applicant shall pay the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Fee (MSHCP) Local Development Mitigation Fee (fee for density less than 8 du/ac) prior to obtaining building permits. 34.Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the Project, the Developer shall enter into an agreement with the City and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore to provide (a) 15% of the units constructed in the Project as affordable housing units in accordance with the requirements of Section 33413(b)(2) of the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Safety Code Sections 33000 et seq.), or (b) an alternative equivalent action as determined by the City which may include (without limitation) dedication of vacant land, construction of affordable units on another site, or payment of an in-lieu fee at the rate of $2.00 per square-foot of assessable space for each dwelling unit in the Project. For purposes of this condition, "assessable space" means all of the square-footage within the perimeter of a structure, not including any carport, walkway, garage, overhang, patio, enclosed patio, detached accessory structure, or similar area. The amount of the square-footage within the perimeter of a residential structure shall be calculated by the building department of the City in accordance with the standard practice of the City in calculating structural perimeters. 35.Prior to the issuance of a building permit the Applicant shall obtained and submit a "will serve" letter from Elsinore Municipal Water District to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. The "will serve" letter shall specifically indicate the specific water flow volumes for both domestic and fire protection water supply. 36. The applicant shall pay all applicable Library Capital Improvement Fund fees, prior to the issuance of a building permit. 37.The applicant/developer shall submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Planning Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project and specify the technical data for the water service at the location. such as water pressure and volume etc. The AGENDA m:;M NO. PACE.. J /k; ')- OF 38 applicant shall submit this letter indicating that water and sewer arrangements have been made, prior to applying for a building permit. 38.Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide assurances to the Planning Division that all sewer arrangements have been met. 39.Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide assurances to the Planning Division that he he/she has met all parcel merger requirements for APN'S: 378-231-014/015. 40.Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit revised plans indicating that the vicinity map reflects the proper project location. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 41.The Applicant shall plant twenty-four inch (24") box street trees along all street frontages selected from the City Street Tree List, a maximum of thirty feet (30') apart. Planting is subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development or designee prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 42.The applicant shall provide an irrigation system for landscaped areas onsite as shown on the landscape plans. The irrigation system shall be fully installed and operational prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 43.The Applicant shall provide a rain sensor as shown on the landscape plan. The rain censor shall be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 44.All exposed slopes in excess of three feet (3') in height shall have permanent irrigation system and erosion control vegetation installed, as approved by the City's Landscape Architect. A Planting and Irrigation Plan shall be submitted, approved and planted prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Fees are required for review of plans and inspections. 45.The building address shall be a minimum of four inches (4") high and shall be easily visible from the public right-of-way. Care shall be taken to select colors and materials that contrast with building walls or trim. Installation of building address shall be done prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. l~Gi:fJr)A ~TE;d f~O~ ).. PAGE /9 OF 38 46.The applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. ENGINEERING DIVISION GENERAL 47.All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), prior to the issuance of a building permit. 48.The applicant shall process and meet all parcel merger requirements, prior to building permit. 49.The applicant submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project and specify the technical data for the water service at the location. such as water pressure and volume etc. The applicant shall submit this letter prior to applying for a building permit. 50.The applicant shall submit a "Non Interference Letter" from Southern California Edison prior to issuance of Grading Permit. Southern California Edison's contact person is Lisa Salinas at 14799 Chestnut Street, Westminster CA. 92683, and her telephone number is (714) 934-0838. 51.All arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. 52. The applicant shall provide fire protection access and facilities as required in writing by the Riverside County Fire Department. 53.In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal & recycling, the applicant shall be required to contract with CR&R Incorporated for removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of construction. k'~la.' " . .'"'\ d- :.C'_d' c'IliV. PACE ;)..0 OF ~ B 54. The applicant shall protect palm trees in place or contact the Department of Community Services of City of Lake Elsinore for Palm Tree Preservation Program, pursuant LEMC 5.78 Ordinance 1044. 55.All grading and street improvement plans submitted to engineering shall be drawn on 24" x 36" Mylar and be set into City's specific border and title block and include city specific general notes for grading or street improvements respectively. All Digital files for the border and the notes are available by request to "agutierrez@lake-elsinore.org". DEDICATION 56. The applicant shall dedicate a fifteen foot (15') wide strip of additional street right of way along the southeasterly property line, for future street align, to the City prior to issuance of building permit. 57.All public right-of-way dedications shall be prepared by the applicant or his agent. All deeds shall be submitted to the Engineering Division for review and approval and recordation, prior to issuance of building permit. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 58.All work done under an encroachment permit for off-site improvements of utility lines shall be delineated on the street improvement plans and approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits. 59. The applicant shall pay all fees and meet requirements of an encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Division for construction of off-site public works improvements (LEMCI2.08, Res.83-78). All fees and requirements for an encroachment permit shall be fulfilled before Certificate of Occupancy. GRADING 60.The developer shall obtain all necessary off-site easements for off-site grading from the adjacent property owners prior to issuance of grading permit approval. 61. The applicant shall apply and obtain a grading permit with appropriate security prior to any grading activity. AGENDA ITEM NO. d- PACE~OF 3~ 62.A grading plan stamped/signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer is required if the sum of the cut and fill in grading exceeds 50 cubic yards and the existing drainage flow pattern is substantially modified as determined by the City Engineer. The grading plan shall show volumes of cut and fill, adequate contours and/or spot elevations of the existing ground as surveyed by a licensed surveyor or civil engineer. All contours shall extend to minimum of fifteen-feet (15') feet beyond property lines to indicate existing drainage pattern. The applicant shall apply and obtain a grading permit with appropriate security prior to grading permit issuance. 63. The applicant shall provide soils; geology and seismic report, as part of this report address the requirement of the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act. The applicant shall provide final soils report showing compliance with recommendations. 64. The applicant is to provide erosion control measures as part of their grading plan. The applicant shall contribute to protection of storm water quality and meet the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. 65.All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer and he shall certify all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and proper erosion control. DRAINAGE 66.All on-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility, accepted by adjacent property owners by a notarized letter of drainage acceptance, or conveyed to a drainage easement. 67.All natural drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer. 68.Roof drains shall not be allowed to outlet directly through coring in the street curb. All roofs shall drain to a landscaped area and driveways shall be sloped to drain into landscaping prior to entering street facilities. AGENDA IrEM NO. )- PAGE ;)...;)- OF--3~ 69.The applicant shall submit, along with grading plans, Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports for review and approval by City Engineer. The developer shall mitigate any flooding and/or erosion downstream caused by development of the site and/or diversion of drainage. FEES 70.The applicant shall pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (LEMC 16.34). The current traffic mitigation fee is $1,369.00; the current drainage fee is $699.00 (Northwest Lake Management. Dist.) and the current TUMF amount is $9,693.00; the amount of fees shall be adiusted according to the fee schedule current at the time of payment. 71.The applicant shall provide in-lieu payment for future off-site public improvements prior to building permit. (Res. 86-35) In-lieu payments shall be calculated by developers' engineer or architect and submitted for City Engineer's approval. The estimate shall be based on current cost of street improvements from property line to centerline of the street within the property limits, plus a 15% added cost for engineering and construction administration. STORMW A TER/ CLEANW A TER PROTECTION PROGRAM 72. The City of Lake Elsinore has adopted ordinances for storm water management and discharge control. In accordance with state and federal law, these local storm water ordinances prohibit the discharge of waste into storm drain system or local surface waters. This includes non-storm water discharges containing oil, grease, detergents, trash, or other waste remains. Brochures of "Storm water Pollution, What You Should Know" describing preventing measures are available at City Hall. PLEASE NOTE: The discharge of pollutants into street, gutters, storm drain system, or waterways -without Regional Water Quality Control Board permit or waver - is strictly prohibited by local ordinances and state and federal law. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 73. The developer is to pay park fees of $1 ,600 per unit. AGENDA ITE[\'~ rm..2__ PAGE )-'3 Or- l~ ~ 74. The developer is to comply with all NPDES requirements. 75.The developer is to participate in the City-wide LLMD. 76.The developer is to comply with all City Ordinances regarding construction debris removal and recycling as per Section 8.32 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 77. The developer is to meet City curb, gutter, and sidewalk requirements. 78.The City's Landscape Architect is to review all landscape and/or irrigation plans. AGENDA ITEM UD. ;;}- PACE~CF ~~ CITY OF ~ LAKE \6,LSiNO~ ~ DREAM E,XTREMETW Notice of Exemption Filed With: 0 Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 [8] County Oerk of Riverside County 2724 Gateway Drive Riverside, CA 92507 Project Title: Minor Design Review of a single-family dwelling unit located at 16562 Gunnerson Street (APNS: 378-231-014/015) Project Location (Specific): The proposed vacant lots are generally located 450-feet southwest of Ulmer Street and 20-feet northwest of Gunnerson Street at 16562 Gunnerson Street. Project Location (Gt)7: Gtyof Lake Elsinore Project Location (Count)7: Riverside County Description of Nature, Purpose, and Beneficiaries of Project: A Minor Design Review for a three-story single-family dwelling unit with an attached two (2) car garage located at 16562 Gunnerson Street. The subject property has a Zoning designation of R-l (Single-Family Residential) and a General Plan designation of Future Specific Plan J (Country Club Heights #1). Furthermore, the proposed project will have a net lot coverage of approximately fifty percent (50%). Name of Public Agency Approving Project: Gty of Lake Elsinore Name of Person / Agency Administrating Project: Justin Carlson, Associate Planner, Gtyof Lake Elsinore Exempt Status: D Ministerial (Section 15073) D Declared Emergency (Section 15071 (a)) D Emergency Project (Section 15071 (b) and (c)) ~ Categorical Exemption (state type and section number): Article 19 Categorical Exemptions Section 15303(a), New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures Reasons why project is exempt: This project meets the requirements pursuant to Section 15303(a) (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) of the California Environmental Quality &t (CEQA). Contact Person: Justin Carlson, Associate Planner Telephone Number: (951) 674-3124 x 295 Signed: Title: Director of Community Development Rolfe M Preisendanz ACfNDA ITEM NO. PAGE )..5 ;).-- OF ?, 9 ELSINORE WATER DISTRICT WA7CR WfLL SERve LETTER. REQUEST CHECKUST Date of Request 12 ~ If .:.. )-0" b ~coount If. Owner'sName )(/,..v O/A/fJ Owners Phone # Ilot ell s--( b.t' MaIling Add~ ~:f ~ ? {lI..JY X J,u A Y CIty/State/Zlp hh:.?}1 l'~ VI'nt\ C It 1') 1 ).. . Contact NarM 1/ t I Contact's Phone # 6 J.-& /;u 6 s- 6 6 J TmckIlotlBlock. APN' 3 ) tf 2.1 i, C 15, 0/9 to-m,b j nett StreetAddress t)~" 1'\ e.yj , .., >7 Type of Request Resldentiaf (9 Commercial --.NewConstroction... Remade( J Other Type Received: Date Initials CorM1ents Grant Deed Pre1iminary TiUe Report Plans o~ Addition (Remodels Only) Payment ~O Ched<:#:t.-8- JLOate i) ~lg - ~6 t="tek:f Check: Remodels: ,If Size of Main Line \e location of Main Line Served by Hydro Tank No Within Easement Zone Backflow Device Needed Static water pressure less Olan 45 psi Static water pressure greater than 90 psi Meter Size location Customer Shut Off Fire Senrice Street lateral Size & MatMets Building latent1 S"1%e & Materials Cn.u."IA.U;50)l Sri:3!fl Tvoe /OO~ ~S( Engineering Prepared' By: Date Sent Dale Appf'oVed bv Engineering . J1J~""'i,(' ~~ Date i J-Icr-oc ~_',.-' J1:--- I~-A--Ob ~ '"" Date ..- . -.-'- Approved 8y: FINAl WIlt-SERVE lETTER ISSUANCE: Date PreDat'El4 Wilt Serve Issued --Dc./'r ~(, Conditions of Wdl-Serve. If appficable: Dateto~ I ~! I'J-<?_ C . ~-....~_...-...-_:t._ ACEND.>\ ITEM NO._?---- PP.CE~~ OF tJ .s- FORM B Page 1 Name '/...Jf/.' QIN&- APN 3 It.... ?.3/-el/l/t:)/L PUBLIC WATER SERVICE CERTIF1CA TION This certifies that the above referenced property is within the service area boundaries of this water service utility and that: S ~erviC~ Information: (Check one) There are currently existing adequate source, storage and distribution line capacities to provide potable water to the referenced site in sufficient quantities to satisfy the domestic water service and fire protection requirements of the proposed use. The water mains to serve each propos~d service connection are currently installed and operable. . Financial arrangements have been made to install water mains for each proposed service outlet and any other necessary fa~i1ities to insure that the proposed use will have adequate sOUJce, storage and distribution line capacities for each proposed service connection that will satisfy the domestic water service and fire protection requirements of the proposed use. It is financially and physically feasible to install water service facilities that will provide adequate source, storage and distribution line capacities for each proposed service connection that will satisfy the domestic water service and fire protection requirements of the proposed use. Easement Information: (Check one) This agency has no known water lines or easements on the subject property line. This agency has water lines and/or easements on the subject property but they do not conflict with the proposed use as currently designed. if" This agency has waterlines and/or easements on the subject property which conflict with the proposed project as currently designed. Applicant must revise plans and resubmit them to this agency for approval. Fire Flow Information: ~o Gallons per minute at 20 pounds per square inch for a minimum two-hour duration. A \)tH' \'J~t.e..2..L above referenced parcel. hydrant is located fl~ l!:(J (J feet from the ACHWA nEM NO. ;)- PACE~ I OF 38 Date i1' - /0; -c;(p Name XI N. D 1 Nb-- Address 'J.- ~.6 '1 c0 N he City Lu'iS\ COV/NJ<t- / Ct) , APN # 3/~ - 23) - o/kt,OJ!i WA-'( ZIP ~/7crL Street Name ~V1~JJ ESTIMA TED. COST ST cPO , Water Account DeposH o Fire Hydrant $ JOt) Meter Installation $ ~C> $ :J'100 $ ~~c; t:J6 ~ <:!PC) $ 3:::;, () Connection Fee/Capacity Charge Ji Permits 7i Hot Patch $ /too ~o o Total: $ ~<D $ !f),5"'-/t( Miscellaneous o Due to the length of line extension, it will be necessary for you to contact a Civil Engineering company of your choice for cost estimate and installation. "Exhibit An attached hereto lists requirements for first plan check. Cost of Plot Plan Check dependent on estimated cost of project. **Note: Estimate valid for 60 days. ** ELSINORE WATER DISTRICT &I~~ Michael Mosier ----. . Field Supervisor n '~""''''I'i ~""C"".' 11>0 ') ~ut'l\lt.lj<, I ~ o:::hi... er-- PAGE. -2--3 -OF ~ ~ CITY OF ~ LA~ ,5,LSiNORJ: ~ DREAM EXTREME ACKNOWLEDEGEMENT OF DRAFT CONDITIONS RE: Minor Design Review of a single-family dwelling unit located at 16562 Gunnerson Street (APN: 378-231-014/015) I hereby state that I/We acknowledge the draft Conditions of Approval for the above named project. I/We understand that these are draft conditions only and do hereby agree to accept and abide by all final conditions prescribed by the City of Lake Elsinore staff, as set forth in the attachments to the approval letter that will be sent after final project approval. All final conditions shall be met prior to issuance of permits or prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy, or otherwise indicated in the Conditions, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director of the City of Lake Elsinore. Phone Number: ,.,---' ::r.~ I; L, - vfs ~7 ~ 'jy. Wo..~ V~ Go~)\ Yl(h ~A ~ 179 ~ bv'b - b / b- rb6s- Date: Nl~ \ ) ~7 Applicant's Signature: Print Name: Address: 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530 WWWLAKE-ELSINORE.ORG ACENDA ITEM NO. PAGE ).'1 ')-- OF 3 <2J i i: i: i i ;I!i !;i Ii Ii III; ii Ii Ii ;m ~~l Ii ~i Ii li!i Ii !,!Iii !i;i :; i Iii ili Ii ii Ipi !i Ii Iii i fi ; I; ! ! II I.!I !! !~I~i . 'I , !~I d ~ ~ IU!II ~ ill ~ \-1 ~ ~~~ !~I II!I ! JIll ~ Ii n 01 !!i II1II ! i~; - .11 ~I .i I ,I, I ~ II - 1111 ..1 I 'i .-1 I 1~~lli 1'111 D r II III I~ I J I I ~ - =11 Ii ; ; ; I .I~II !I I lilli-II ~I;~ !!.i! ! I Pi! Ii; ;. 1!li!llllil ~I-II! ~ I. d I!I I !;! II II~ Iii II! 'I . III I.. II! 50. . II -. 1 . I '"e I-rllll. ". I ~ il I I Ii I II i I!! ., I ! hiU I ! IIi! I I; ~ I ~~~ji!ll!ijjj lii~ II Ii :I ~ II ; -III: 1II1 I III!I I t I I~i I I I I I;. I lel!_. ill II III I ' ! I -I II ; I I I!I a II I ~ I !l ! I I ... 1 , . - i · II I II_ I! 1._, I I ~ i I I Ii I I i\ U ,Ii Ii ..'1. 1 -- .,.......f : .~...18e~.~' i... ,I!U;~ ,I!U;i p 1111111 ' U ~ U!3 II I. i i ,. \ ~ 1 I ~ IT] I h 'UI ~ 'I!I ~ I ::.......~7Iir. i i --1111 f~'llm f~'II~ I 1'.... /' II I ~. R R i . :......::.. '. ~~:>~.- - i II; 11'1 11'1 ~*z ~; l I I fT1 .. .:.. . " ~ ~ q .~ <E) u~ I GOLDEN LAKE HOUSE K t NEW HOUSE PROJECT 16562 GUNNERSON ST. LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 ~fPIII H I f ~.. !i!i h 11!i11 ~ r I. ~;I~i ill nnu! Uf ~~il ~!; ~r ill.1 eeH~e ~ ~;.. ~R~'m ~II n n 51 I ~i n ~ ~ I~ I I i II ~ I - ;; ~~. ~~ ~~~~I~ ~ i I ~(j) zO ...r s;:a:;~ 0 ii'1 i'i~9' rn N fllNI\) Z ~ v; G">':' L ~ z~6 J> <f1 Oz- ~ ' '" rn .J>. ~ !" (]\w <f1 <>O'-J :I U1 ~~Z 0 f\) -< W C t:iA:~ '" o~o VJ . - rn U1 7" 'p. ~~ f1l H; H!i i. ,~i j' ,,10 ., f ;,', Hi! 11,1' 8j 0 ;;1 c ~i g il ~~! f~ j ;ri1 I ] i ~f ~~ , I d ~i J !~ ~i > ~! H ~ ~[ ~f g ~ ~ ! II "I~I~~;:I~ I i ~ I~&l~~ ~ : ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L.J ggl ilj i ~ I II ~p I ,~ II' :Jill.~ !~II ~ -~; II ~ ;0 f"I < Vi a z c.? ti ~ ~ 1'l \J "... j" i ~!i Ii il!i ~~ ~q:ii ill i~i'i t~ h'! I' I*~l H., i !u. g !HI! :i~! i lih f ~is. s ,h 'i~l~." WIFlll . " . 'iiWi[ -, l " 11 ~~. ,l.,,"~ .' ,.d ,;,~. r. i 1: s' i'li~li~ h i~ ~l U~" a :!.!"{ ; , h 11 I Uf,' [, .~ "I~t"i JiH. & i c~ a o!.!!.~~~~ r; iT "0 !'. - h""il' 1: a 11< a.. ~i la~~i ~ ~ ~~ i' C!i~ ~ It P ~i ",! (Hit li ~.:: .!a tt ~u ; ~ :llj ill~Jhf i . d hi ili! ~ i: it Ii !i~i~~~l · i fl :~ l 3~!"t . i .. S. n1,. iih! 1 ' i aq Ith :; I' Ii t3 iaJll~<i g: i il h!. i!"~ . i ~.~~ !in.~i ! j i ii. [': f, l~"i ..,.lll ' , ! "l "i" I; l.f il t!j"~l i ! I !i i ~i~' . ',' '1.'1'1 i ~ "I a~' u:l ': !~il lii;ll, i l. l JU ;lii f '[ i ~ 'in! 't ii s. ill ii lill! im ill IU i Ii Ii IlH ~!li Hi!i ~ ~ Ii Ii !i U !Il! I Iii h HUi Hll HI Win i UK SUIPjfitmu i Ii n Ii fm iftiiih.,i\HHjHiIU hiH H~f .~~p.tU $H~!li !~l ~h~:lM.p II1'HilP~ nm !jii 11~m'i liB~Pl HI .'s~' [!ti 1 I .i' ~,. 5 ' i h. ,. i' 'a ~~ If i" . ." 0< i "l lii:l U.if1lu[ !ri~ U.i f ! ! Uif H"i U Ii Iii d i it U. i nr i~ i ,,~~.i i:i I! 118 a I ~ Iii! 111 i h Ii !! "i I i'i Ii 2 Iii i~ i iiU li.~ 'i! . it! ~ !. h~ S~ I H '(IH itn't ~ ~'i h ! ;~I did~[ h I ~ ~ f~; rf I h If" [1 ~ . 'I pI'.. ..! f ! ~[' :i ; I ~ i r 1. ~.. ! ill M !Il !~; ii~ II g~ III , I I ~~~~-t~,,,,,- 1\ i i B /j"""" i \ \ ,,~> I~ I II I I r.J~_ \ y---~ tk-+,. ~k r- ~ \ i . ~ \ t' I II "GUNN_ II SIIEET " " ~I ~ !irl~ ~ 'a.f.; ~Ib~ *;~~~ IIP-~ Illjl ~Iil ~t~1 I;~ !lli~ i I~I ~IIPf 1& .~ 1~~~~f.lilS i Nil Illilldll!.~ ~ .1111 !lIrg[mi g ~ Jrr~ 1111 ~ g j:"IllUU/I II If I M 1I1111! I i I ; d(!HIIII t tfllllllf~ II 'it I ! " '" m " i (;; m i Gl '" Ii z Gl :'< 0 II I 0 il ~ 11 ~ 0 ~ " 0 ~ ~ 0 '" <;;;;; tl ... ~I ~ ~~ -< ~~ 1;1 r- Zz ~ ~I Om "'''' m", - 0 J:! Slz :s~ .. ~'" I "'m o~ ~ ~ ~ 'I" D.._____ " n /! o ~ (lJ E ~ o c: ;:! m --I o m ;;! F 9 '-I ~ ui ; E "~il "II "1 II !h ., l ~ J' l~' ; ~ii II - In q .!. u ~, H -, h I if '" "',. ;s: ~ ~ii i~ i.l H ~ ~ rn Imi U i,i i~l~ ~ !ii ,n :>i l~",il ~ .H[ Ii iW I HUh JiB :1 "} H,i l~ I t .r"ii -;~ <: ...iR Iil [i ~ ! r~ H ~lii!iii ~! ~ i li'! "" [ . ,I' n i ! ~i i (0 1 1 ~ 0 i ~ I -,i t: l:: ~li ~i ~!U H t !H!!~ '!" - .6.:> iii,jJl!: Ii l~ hH ~ ~ :! h j~ ~! I'j.! 1~ Ijl~ " H:U d -I 1;1 1m i · 'i l !h ~ ~II ~~~ ~i~~ ~;~~~~~;~~~~: I~~;!;i~i I m 1m nmmnm mmm 0"'''' ",,"e. ~ol ~!lY~m;;!iii~.fi i<1!tl,!:...G'l::tEh", ~~~ ~a~~ ~~~~~~~~~..~, ~iQffi~~~;~ ~~~ ~~.~ ~~~~g~~'~~'~~ ~.~~~hm~ ~~~ ~~~~ 8.Q~.~~~~~h~ ~~~~~~~2i !~ h~i ~~m~M~i.~~~ ~~'~2M; ~u ~~~~ ~a~;~~'~~~~'2 ~Q2~W~~ ~,,~ ~;~~ .a~'a~2!~~~~~ i~~h~~~~ ~~~ ~ig~ ~~ih~h~~~~~ $~2H~~~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~i~~~~:I~~~~~ ~i~li~~;~ .~ ~~~ ~5' ~~~i~~~Q hu~~h~ ~~ '~~ ;~~ '~~md i ~~ ~. &~~" 1J ;U m (') - (J) m G) ;U ~ o z G) ~ Z i~1 ! !i!! i!! !g : II Ih UII I. ;U '; II'IP ~ R . !l !.. _ · II I .1 Z Ii.. i' I Ii ~ -,! II m II! II 1J r ~ Z ..!II -i ~. .~~.. p~ p~ ~""".' ,., ! ~ II :.,,~ ~ I~f' -/;::! < I 'k. I . i1l821 ~.;--. 'I. . sill m ,U ~ ~~ ~ t-q~~HIH ~ J,"i ',I ~lill~f[U I } ~ J ,~ I II . I I f ______....LJ r o :E ~~ ~-n .r "'0 '0 ~:;o -0 r l> z "11 :;0 ~~ -"11 ~r '0 "'0 ~:;o -0 r l> Z '" ..5: . 5 Nlz G) " . "'G)' ~~~ ;I'm 8 '" N r n 0 J> ::E '" m G) '" ~ ~ G) m !'!1 :. '" - '" <> ~ 0 :.... 0. ~ 0 '" '" ~ ;-n ~ (ji;;;Q UI J"~? . ~. 0- ~ ti==o (J) cncncncn :n ~:n~~ n I ;----- n .. ",-" ~jj ~~ "-,, j!!b o~ 0.. ~ Qi~ ~I: N t ~ ~Di ~ @ ~~ I r <D m; I GOLDEN LAKE HOUSE K Ull. NEW HOUSE PROJECT iI AGENDA I PAG 16562 GUNNERSON S1. LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 ! f?1! .. ~ ~ ~ cI.. 2 ~ t'i 6 '" ~ iil'ii r II II Ildl' 1I11;i · ! nl~!~ I i II II! · i II;I J': i · I~I I. i!: ~ ! II I ! ~ II ~ ~ I . I i I ~ i' ;: -;. ;: r:;: p .. .. ~ ! I.U UI i.i PI i! i H. B jljili!III~;U ~..-IUll. lII~i '.llh..~I--.. 1:;111111 ill I II- -;1 1111111111;: 181 I I ~ I I Cl ~II Iql-II q · ;~J ~I~ I; i.! I i h Pi ill !i~j.1 ~ II i!1 !I I ~ I illi II ii I; i i liI!1 II~ I : 1 . ~II II dIll I I: I~i ! · I I III I ~ It .. III, ~~~ll ..~1I1 .~I-h ~J;.U . I ~ - ~ ii ~!I~i Hi II:i Ilii Ii 111111111 ~IIII I I~U II P ! !- I '~IIII · I I 1111 ;11;111- I PII~ II_Ill Iii' Illl~ II ; ~ Iii - 1.1 ~ . I . -I.- 'ill II I-I ! Ill'.; ~! I I. · 1;11 !j ! ii J IIII J I I I ,II I . III I ~ l> () ... .<P> (f) m () ~O nZ ~O ..." -.r ,0 qo ::0 ""tJ r ~~ Ii .lit f i: IliI 1!il1ill1il1ilI iii IllII11 511 IJ riI IZI 13I1l11D1 r::llill III le8 113 8 B 8 n ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ! ill e "f'a( i 1= "i j I ; i;' H j ~U ';~ f!i ~ ~1~lJ!i: ; JE :fI~!i!11 1m! i~ i~U!1 !lfr!~tl~ a ~ ~ J ~ il I ",= i It it t~!' . J.l i I f ~ 'B ~ 1, ~i I~ lif g B ~i4i !,! I ! ;p ij; iljii! l~ iH ~~!~ i 11 ~ ~~ J ~ I ill' h: ill ~ ~ J 5 ~ m t ~ ! ih~f i: It l! i i i ~ij 511 ili 5 II i I~ . ; ~ a1:9 JI fl 5 ~ ~ J ; : ~~ II: I~ ~ t i ,! J ~~. ~ 3 IH '! I ,! ri!' I I ; II ~I i t~ ~~ iii 1 ~.. ~~... I i l~ I' If i 9 q~. u- I .!t I (}!);-- ~J,;I GOLDEN LAKE HOUSE K . )l' NEW HOUSE PROJECT Ii i 16562 GUNNERSON STREET . LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 .. . . .. .. .. .. .. 2;1; ;'1- ii!i ;~I~ ili!ii!! ~!I ~! !ifi ~iill!~!; Iii Iii; 2;11 illi jl!; il:i, !i!i i:i; I I:;; I! !~ a! ;;;1 !;! ~!I ilil !!;~ j;!; ill,s: =11 wi! "IB 1.li ~ .i~~ I~ ~ ~Ig~ I~~ I~I I~ .,~ ~II wi! ;MI.~ ;M.JI ! II II~I I ~~.i; II I i!1 ;!il !!; 1:; ~!&I iMI.~ =-.QI I .,;.. m.. ~ II~I" " Jl~ ;;;;1 i u. hi Mil. ~Ii gll' . .,; J !m ;~il nil ! "I Ii ~ II: I :1>1" ! Jil ;I! IIi "A! igl.~. ;~il nU III~ ;~.. I a~ ,~i_ . ~I ~ i ! I I M~ III I,,~ I~ II~ 5~.. i.;~ III ~ IIi il~1 I ~I=~ i:j ~ I~! I Iii ~!I I.;;i i.!~ III :hl' hI Iii I 1111 m a! ~ Iii D I:; I ill =~:l' hI ;I!! III = ~ i!l~ ai i;a; "i! ~ ill ~I Ii! ;I!! =11 ~!I; Ii! I il !;;: I~; i n Iii i;! ~ I,,~ h 1;1 ;11; Ii! i=f !ii I.i IIi ~!i t;j I I!i; ~:! II III i!f !ii ~!i I!I I Ii $.i~ i E i ! 1:1 i II! I! I~i ~!i I!I ~ ~ z '" >- Q 0 ~ 0 0 ~ .." .." ~ s; e5 z !:) 0 -l c:: >- .." >- ~ :j -< g; tTl 0 n ::a z ~ >- I I II -< ~ -l '"I:l t;;;,.., tTl 0 g; ~ tTl ~~~ Z ~ '" -l 0 !:) ~ c:: () - ." c:: z . ~ I >- .., ~ .. :::l ~ c- I ~ () ~ 0 c:: "'C II c- 5= >- -l \S 0 Z z ,.. '" ~;oA 8E1 D~II'i'P'1 . ; ; I, ~ ~ I ~.tl m~ i ~I & is 51 @ -IIi la i & ;!21 l;I * ~ Ii ; ; ~ m . s ~ ~ .... ~ ;0 >< !; (Jj) .; " .; " .; " il1li h I ~I;i Iii! ;Ii~ II~I If'" I.I~ ,II: ~I~I !111 ! ! .i!IM !_I II! ;Mi ..II dM . ~i!iii:iI5 1.~i~1151 ;, i !~~!i III :11-: II ! I'in .1 i : ;II I- i i ! · II ; is I i III ~ " il I'l II ~ ~ ~ Ii! n I s- = I ~ ; ~ il I . i i a B ! M a S ! lil ; s. " .s " s.. " . a~"~ \!M"_ "I~~ ! -I! hil ~MJI ~I-~ ill iii: J~i Iii n~ h~ Iii a:J ua la! II! 1"1 :1 ~ ~ 111'1~1!!lm," iill !III! Ii! I;i"l !Ii!" ill t ;j Iii JBjl~c,111 a IIII I,I!" 1111.. dill 1= I III i II h II! · . l!iI !i! =i~!'d=lliI; }i!!! "I; I If if ! II; !Ii !!lil:! !'Ii ial Ijil!iiii Iii II!/! I! I; ; i! :! I I ill Iii !!llil I HI4 i~lilirl' Ill' 'Iii hi I~ , ~ i ! jilili~ I: !!I. IIII 111 II. 1 M ~ I i Ii !II e ~ II ,I . I I I.. · ~. I iii.. III ; -.1 = I; ~ ! ~ 1111 1"19: 1,,1 II . ..I I II I.~ ! i lil I JI 4 I '" ! ~ ~I ! i1li II i a!; ill ; 1M i ~ ! i II Ii i "Ii · · II i i! : I -I! !il Ii I m~1 iff~ .,J .~ GOLDEN LAKE HOUSE K NEW HOUSE PROJECT 16562 GUNNERSON ST. LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 N :E m en ~-I ;;.m -:::r "1m '< ""l> ~::! o z - :;0 m l> :;0 - .... III .... rr1 lye. i Ip,11 ~ II" ~ 11 f (Jl l!; ~ .. .. .. .. . ~ iHI III I I i I ~ ~ e en o ~~ ;;.:I: ";m ,'r -.m ,< "Il> -I o Z r I I I I I .... ,,,, ! ,'It:t. I I I I I I .~ w_p .-it .~ .~ ((91 ~ R "ID I'~ !~ i ."). I~~ m~ .~ '-4 '6 .-. '-4'''' .....,... .~ .. I I ... ..- M~~ mrS ~ i g ~1l ~ f'l l> 1'\ en (Jl ~ -I ~ ;;. m 111. v -:::r 1111" l:!"Im 1/ ~~~~ ...'i ~ ~ -I z' 0 I I ~ D~i :;0 "I o Z -I - 1 ~ ~. ~ \;~ ~ ~~\ ""I , fl" ~"4 ~ ~~ $ ;; Fm - ^ . w; I nrTT'MIl v ~~~ ~,,~ Em , . $ ~ r /' rJ Y I I I I I I I ~ I I i ~. ~5' II 1m ~ ~ ~ I...I! ~ ! ~ \ ~ ~* ~\~ I m 1 -, I ~ ^ v Vol ~ 'V' z o :;0 ~1 -!:: ~m ,r -. m ,< 0, l> -I o Z !l 2 5 II iii lil~ ~ ~ ~~, ~ ~ ~ ~~ I It ~ ltl:ttt1 : i ~ i V ~ I " 1"_,. /(11 ! !Em] r ~ ,/t "I!- I r1 ~ IIIIB 110 I __J ~ ~ -~ .k> 4 $ t " f[] ~ !Em] _ 111: K"l mo il. ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 83) I I I I --, I ~ , ~ illtJ , ~ ~lliIIt J~ II !Em] I I 1f-41'" j,~ .~ "-41'" \ I I <~ \1 v ~ L ~ <e> .( 1\ )' : \ I \ L...Y,' I 'I I ~R- I \ ~\ ~ I ill U). .~I 1 'J ,.., I ~ - : : .. --- ..... \ I I \ I ; . - I ~n~1 GOLDEN LAKE HOUSE K till!' _ .d ~ (J!) liff z;E m ~ l'l' NEW HOUSE PROJECT AGE mm~ ITE~ i ~ .. II~ ... -;<~ ij ~ 16562 GUNNERSON ST. j' 1\11 . '" iJ5 . LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 1 !~ Ii I~~ . ,.... ~~ ~~ @ ~~ (/) 1"'1 0 n -l ~D ~z "- ;;;ttI ," ttI -. '" II 00 'c (/) 1"'1 ^ V' z ~C ;-t ~ !" ~~ ----. ~~ ~ C -co ~5 ~ zo i " c ~~ ~ ~~ ~ oco ",::0 --------- 1') " ~ at ~ a II --~ : Pl ~ G) iilf~~ I !EJi H . . GOLDEN LAKE HOUSE K NEW HOUSE PROJE~t 16562 GUNNERSON ST. LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 PAGE ~ III!IP IIas~PII!I:; 'P;II~!.!P~~PI;!liI!PIIPI~i ~.. 111111 ill IIIIII~~I bl!lmml~lipli 1,1111.1. I I I ,ill !J "Ii ;1;;1 -IJd!I~lilll d1h !i:.l!II:: li~~ il il ~ '.~II III' nl II III1 1'1;- I, !i,l! 1,1. II I !i-! .;1 Iii! .1 'II :1~1111~ i! ~i 1 III! IIII lilll! II! ~ Illll! '_I! ~! Ii III ! I :!;;=I ~111 ~II.I!:!IJ ~li;!1 !I~! ;1 ~illll in I!I. II · '11=i1:111 !llln h I III I! !II .I!: II! I!J.II I III I I I I I!I I: I I ~ ... ... In ~ = 6' [;j" ... <II ~ e. I"l ~ I ~ II ~ ~ ~ ~M; Iii I!= ~~g I;~ . il :1 ~i R Ss g I: ~ ... In ~ e. t ~ lEJ ~M; \ ~Ii ~~s Jill ~i ~ ~ @ u: I GOLDEN LAKE HOUSE K ~li NEW HOUSE PROJECT ~ 16562 GUNNERSON STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 ![~ Q '" . 0 ~ ~ h r- '"'" z su C>> - ~ Co '" tun ~ c.n ~ ~ C'D C>> CD 8 m N ::::s w h!U - G') en r- pl!il -. C ~ ::::J ::::J m <l ~ 0 ::::J ~ -t c ~ ... C'D ... 0 C'D CD 3' ., '"Ill ... ID - ~ en a. -t -. 0 0 -a ! i' )> ::::J ~ CD )> 0 N < ..... c.n C'D CD w . n 0 ,... " )> "tJ Z =It W ...... co N W '"'" 0 '"'" c.n - !I >,< 0 II '" '"'" '" ~ 3l ". I m n z g c 2 l ;; n z n fl- ;:: 0 ,... )0 ~ I 1ii 0 ~ :,:!: ::a m (D ~ . . , ,.. " ACENDA ITEM NO. ).. PACE ?:/6 OF 3E; CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ROLFE M. PRESIDENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: JUNE 5,2007 PREPARED BY: LINDA MILLER, PLANNING CONSULTANT PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE APPLICANT: RICHARD RANKER, ARCHITECT, 272 VIA VILLENA, ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA 92024 OWNER: JORGE BARRAGAN, 605 A VENIDA LOS FLORES, SAN CLEMENTE, CALIFORNIA 92672 PROJECT REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to construct a single family residence on a vacant lot. Review is pursuant to Chapter 17.82 (Design Review), Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards), Chapter 17.23 (R-l, Single-Family Residential District) and all other applicable Chapters of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) and the Historic Elsinore Architectural Design Standards. PROJECT LOCATION The project site is located at 1503 West Heald Avenue within the Historic Overlay District (APN 374-112-019). :-1C L: r,~ Uj\ 1":0 3 - I" "=0; ~ PAGE_ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE JUNE 5, 2007 PAGE 2 of3 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Project Site Vacant Low Medium Low Medium Densit Densit North Single Family Low Medium Low Medium Residential Densi Densit South Single Family Low Medium Low Medium Residential Densit Densi East Single Family Low Medium Low Medium Residential Densi Densit West Single Family Low Medium Low Medium Residential Densit Densit PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is proposing to construct a 2,153 square foot conventionally built single family residence with an attached 204 square foot patio and 587 square foot garage on a vacant 8,122 square foot (net) lot. Buildings will occupy 24% of the lot area which is within the maximum allowance of fifty percent (50%) pursuant to the Historic Standards. There was a small building on the site that has been removed. Both water and sewer services will be provided by the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). The proposed single story structure consists of a kitchen, dining room, great room, four (4) bedrooms, two (2) bathrooms, laundry room and two (2) car garage. Architecture~ Materials and Colors The applicant intends to use a Monterey style of architecture. Features include a long covered porch with wide posts and rafter tails, shutters with wide bottom shelf trim, Talavera tile accents around the wood look garage doors and arched entry with iron gates. Roofing material will be flat concrete tile. Colors and Materials proposed are: Roof Stucco Weathered T erracotta Cream Puff AGENDA iTEM i~O. PACE ~ 3 m:d)o PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE JUNE 5, 2007 PAGE 3 of3 Wood Trim Talavera Tile Brown Semi-transparent stain Delores - Multi color blues ANAL YSIS The Monterey style of architecture meets the architectural requirements of the Historic Standards. The site layout meets all setback and lot area requirements as well. The applicant will provide front yard landscaping and automatic irrigation. The City Standard six foot (6') wood fence will be provided along the sides and rear property lines. Staff is requiring that the front returns be decorative block. Wood fencing will not be allowed along the front. Staff can recommend approval of the single family residence since the applicant has met all of the requirements listed in the Historic Standards and LEMC. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The project has been deemed exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act, (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303, Class 3. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2007- _ approving Minor Design Review of a Single Family Residence located at 1503 Heald Avenue (APN 374-112-019). The recommendation is based on the findings, exhibits, and conditions of approval attached. PREPARED BY: LINDA M. MILLER, PLANNING CONSULTANT ~ ~..a: < J FOe. ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPROVED BY: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Resolution No. 2007- _ approving Minor Design Review of a Single Family Residence 3. Conditions of Approval 4. Exhibits AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE 3 3 01: -d-~ VICINITY MAP MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 1503 HEALD AVENUE APN 374-112-019 ---- "'- ",,~-t-.i' <...'~ "<Yo.('o, .<r~ ""o~ " " / PLANNING COMMISSION AGtNDArrE~~O._.~~ PACE Or RESOLUTION NO. 2007- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WHEREAS, Richard Ranker filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of a Minor Design Review for a single family residence to be constructed on a vacant lot located at 1503 West Heald Avenue, also identifiable as APN 374-112-0 19 (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of approving, conditionally approving, or denying Minor Design Review requests for residential projects; and WHEREAS, notice of the Project has been given and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public meeting held with respect to this item on June 5, 2007. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed design for the single family residence and has found it acceptable. The Planning Commission finds and determines that the Project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. SECTION 2. The Planning Commission finds and determines that the Project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code ~~ 21000 et seq.: "CEQA") and the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA (14 C.C.R. ~~ 15000 et seq.: "CEQA Guidelines") pursuant to a class 3(a) exemption for new construction or conversion of small structures because the Project involves construction of one single family residence (14 C.C.R. ~ 15303(a)). SECTION 3. That in accordance with Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Chapter 17.82, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the approval of the Minor Design Review: 1. The Project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the Zoning District in which the Project is located. ACENDA m:M NO. 3 PACE....:> Of ;).f" PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2007- PAGE20F3 The Project complies with the goals and objectives of the General Plan in that the approval of this single family residence will assist in achieving the development of a well-balanced and functional mix of residential homes, as well as encouraging the development and maintenance of a broad range of housing types for all income groups and age categories in that the applicant is proposing a conventionally built home utilizing Monterey architectural design. 2. The Project complies with the design directives contained in Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Section 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. The Project is appropriate in size and design to the lot and meets all setback requirements, provides front yard landscaping, and proposes an acceptable Monterey style architecture. Architectural features include a long covered porch with wide posts and rafter tails, shutters with wide bottom shelf trim, Talavera tile accents around the wood look garage doors and arched entry with iron gates. Roofing material will be a flat concrete tile. The single family residence will complement the quality of existing development and will create a visually pleasing, non-detractive relationship between the proposed and existing projects in that the architectural design, color and materials proposed meet or exceed the size and design of the homes in the surrounding area. 3. Subject to the attached conditions of approval, the Project is not anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Notwithstanding the fact that the Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to a Class 3 exemption, the Project was reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City departments to ensure that the single family residence blends into existing development, creates the least amount of disturbance, and does not negatively impact the residents of Lake Elsinore. The Project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Chapter 17.82.100, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the Project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter 17.82. Pursuant to Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Section 17.82.070, the Project has been scheduled for consideration and approval of the Planning AGENDA ITEM fvO. PACE 0 3 OF d-e:. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2007-_ PAGE30F3 Commission. The Project complies with all applicable provisions of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. SECTION 4. Based upon all of the evidence presented, the above findings, and the conditions of approval imposed upon the Project, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Minor Design Review for a single family residence to be located on APN: 374-112-019. SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this fifth day of June 2007, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development AGfNDA Irri;~ NO. PACE --, 3 OF~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 1503 WEST HEALD AVENUE Note: Fees listed in the Conditions of Approval are the best estimates available at the time of approval. The exact fee amounts will be reviewed at the time of permit issuance and may be revised. GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, and Agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning the single family residential project attached hereto. 2. The decision of the Planning Commission shall be final fifteen (15) days from the date of the decision, unless an appeal has been filed with the City Council pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 17.80 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. PLANNING DIVISION 3. Minor Design Review approval of a single family residence located at 1503 West Heald Avenue - APN 374-112-019 will lapse and be void unless a building permit is issued within one (1) year of the approval date and construction commenced and diligently pursued toward completion. 4. Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced upon page one of building plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division for Plan Check. All Conditions of Approval shall be met prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. 5. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgement of Conditions," and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records. Page 1 of 10 AGENDA iTEM (.m. 3 PAGE e; ~ OF~. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 1503 WEST HEALD AVENUE 6. The applicant shall place a weatherproof 3' x 3' sign at the entrance to the project site identifying the approved days and hours of construction activity and a statement that complaints regarding the operation can be lodged with the City of Lake Elsinore Code Enforcement Division (951) 674 3124. 7. All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved site plan and elevations, with revisions as noted herein. The applicant shall meet all required setbacks pursuant to the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). Any other revisions to the approved site plan or building elevations shall be subject to the review of the Director of Community Development or his designee. All plans submitted for Building Division Plan Check shall conform to the submitted plans as modified by Conditions of Approval, or the Planning Commission through subsequent action. 8. Materials and colors depicted on the plans and materials board shall be used unless modified by the applicant and approved by the Community Development Director or designee. 9. All windows shall use surrounds and/or other architectural-type features as shown on the approved plans or modified with the approval of the Director of Community Development or designee. 10.At minimum the applicant shall use concrete tile or similar material approved by the Director of Community Development or Designee on the dwelling. Roofing materials shall have a minimum Class "A" Fire rating, and so noted on the construction plans. 11. The applicant shall meet all applicable City Codes and Ordinances. 12.A cash bond of $1,000.00 shall be required for any construction trailers placed on the site and used during construction. Bonds will be released after removal of trailers and restoration of the site to an acceptable state, subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development or designee. Page 2 of 10 AGHJDA lTri'vl NO. :3 PACE 1 OF~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 1503 WEST HEALD AVENUE 13.The applicant shall comply with the City's Noise Ordinance. Construction activity shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday, and no construction activity shall occur on Saturdays, Sundays or legal holidays. 14.The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City's Grading Ordinance. Construction generated dust and erosion shall be mitigated in accordance with the provisions of Municipal Code, Chapter 15.72 and using accepted control techniques. Interim erosion control measures shall be provided thirty (30) days after the site's rough grading, as approved by the City Engineer. 15. The applicant shall meet all applicable County Fire Department requirements for fire protection. 16. The applicant shall meet all applicable Building and Safety Division requirements. 17.Any exterior air conditioning or other mechanical equipment shall be ground mounted and screened so that they are not visible from neighboring property or public streets. Air conditioning units and related equipment may not encroach more than two-feet (2') into the required minimum side yard setback. 18.Garages shall be constructed to provide a minimum interior clear space of twenty feet (20') x twenty feet (20') for two cars. 19.The applicant shall plant and maintain twenty-four inch (24") box street trees selected from the City Street Tree List, a maximum of thirty feet (30') on center and along all street frontages. Planting is subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 20. The applicant shall provide and maintain shrubs and plant materials as shown on the landscape plan. Any changes to this plan shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development or designee. The landscape plan shall be implemented prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Page 3 of 10 AGI:NDA ITEM NO. PACE lo 3 OF d-<o CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 1503 WEST HEALD AVENUE 21.Planting within fifteen feet (15') of ingress/egress points shall be no higher than 36 inches. 22. The applicant shall provide front yard irrigation systems as shown on the landscape plans. The irrigation system shall be implemented prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 23. The applicant shall provide a rain sensor as shown on the landscape plan. The rain censor shall be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 24.All exposed slopes in excess of three feet (3') in height shall have permanent irrigation system and erosion control vegetation installed, as approved by the City's Landscape Architect. A Planting and Irrigation Plan shall be submitted, approved and planted prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Fees are required for review of plans and inspections. 25.Driveways shall be constructed of concrete per Building and Safety Division standards. 26. Walls or fences located within the front yard setback shall not exceed thirty-six inches (36") in height with the exception that wrought-iron fences may be five feet (5') in height. Chain link fences shall be prohibited. 27.The applicant shall construct the City's Standard six foot (6') wood fence along the side property lines. Decorative masonry pillars and historic type wood gates will be provided along the front fence returns. The applicant shall be required to remove and replace any existing chain link fencing and any fencing that is in poor condition. It will be the responsibility of the applicant to contact the effected neighboring property owners if it is found the fencing will need to be removed and replaced. 28.The building address shall be a minimum of four inches (4") high and shall be easily visible from the public right-of-way. Care shall be taken to select colors and materials that contrast with building walls or trim. Page 4 of 10 AGENDA rn:M No.~3 PAGE-1L-OF~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 1503 WEST HEALD AVENUE 29.The applicant shall provide a flat concrete pad a minimum of 3'- 0" by 7'- 0" adjacent to each dwelling. The storage pad for trash barrels shall be concealed from public view. 30. The applicant shall provide assurance that all required fees to the Lake Elsinore Unified School District have been paid prior to issuance of building permits. 31.The applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fees in effect at the time prior to issuance of building permits. 32. The applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. 33.The applicant shall submit water and sewer plans to Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District and shall incorporate all District conditions and standards, including payment of applicable connection fees. 34.The applicant shall pay the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Fee (MSHCP) Local Development Mitigation Fee prior to obtaining building permits. 35. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of $64.00 made payable to the County of Riverside for a Notice of Exemption. The check shall be submitted to the Planning Division for processing within 48 hours of the projects approval. 36.The Applicant shall pay all applicable Library Capital Improvement Fund fee. 37.Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the Project, the Developer shall enter into an agreement with the City and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore to provide (a) 15% of the units constructed in the Project as affordable housing units in accordance with the requirements of Section 33413(b)(2) of the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Safety Code Sections 33000 et seq.), or (b) an alternative equivalent action as determined by the City which may include (without limitation) dedication of vacant land, construction of affordable units on another site, or payment of an in-lieu fee at the rate of $2.00 per square-foot of assessable space for each dwelling unit in the Project. For purposes of this condition, "assessable space" Page 5 of 10 AGENDA ITeM NO. '3 . PACE J,;} Of ~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 1503 WEST HEALD AVENUE means all of the square-footage within the perimeter of a structure, not including any carport, walkway, garage, overhang, patio, enclosed patio, detached accessory structure, or similar area. The amount of the square-footage within the perimeter of a residential structure shall be calculated by the building department of the City in accordance with the standard practice of the City in calculating structural perimeters. ENGINEERING DIVISION 38.All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to building permit. 39.Submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project and specify the technical data for the water service at the location, such as water pressure and volume etc. Submit this letter prior to applying for a building permit. 40.Submit a "Non Interference Letter" from Southern California Edison prior to issuance of Grading Permit. Edison's contact person is Lisa Salinas at 14799 Chestnut Street, Westminster CA. 92683, and her telephone number is (714) 934-0838. 41.Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. 42.Provide fire protection access and facilities as required in writing by Riverside County Fire. 43.In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal & recycling, the applicant shall be required to contract with CR&R Inc. for removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of construction. Page 6 of 10 ACE:NDA ItEM NO. .3. ~.... PAGE .. L~ _OF ~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 1503 WEST HEALD AVENUE 44.Protect palm trees in place, or contact the Community Services of City of Lake Elsinore for Palm Tree Preservation Program, LEMC 5.78 Ordinance 1044. 45.All grading and street improvement plans submitted to engineering shall be drawn on 24" x 36" Mylar and be set into City's specific border and title block and include city specific general notes for grading or street improvements respectively. Digital files for the border and the notes are available by request to "agutierrez@lake-elsinore.org". DEDICATION: 46.Dedicate a 2.5' wide strip of additional right of way alone northerly property line to the City for widening of the alley prior to issuance of building permit. 47.Public right-of-way dedications shall be prepared by the applicant or his agent. Deeds shall be submitted to the Engineering Division for review and approval and recordation prior to issuance of building permit. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 48.Alley and pavement transitions shall be 2.5" AC over compacted native base. 49.Construct all public works improvements from property line to one foot beyond centerline of Heald A venue (the minimum pavement section shall be 3" Asphalt Concrete over 5" Aggregate Base) and from new property line to 2' beyond center line of the alley (minimum of 2" AC pavement over compacted native) and transitions as required (2.5" AC over compacted native base) per approved street plans (LEMC Title 12). Plans shall be approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit (LEMC 16.34). 50.A Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall prepare street and alley improvement plans and specifications. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Riverside County Road Department Standards, latest edition, and City Codes (LEMC 12.04 and 16.34). Street improvement plans shall show existing and future profiles at centerline of street, at top of curb and at centerline of the alley. The profiles and contours shall extend to 50' beyond the property limits on HealdcAvenue centerline. Page 7 of 10 AGENDA ITEM r~o. PAce-1lf 3 or-~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 1503 WEST HEALD AVENUE 51. Work done under an encroachment permit for off-site improvements of utility lines shall be delineated on the street improvement plans and approved and signed by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits. 52.Pay all fees and meet requirements of an encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Division for construction of off-site public works improvements (LEMC 12.08, Res.83-78). All fees and requirements for an encroachment permit shall be fulfilled before Certificate of Occupancy. GRADING 53.Developer shall obtain all necessary off-site easements for off-site grading from the adjacent property owners prior to issuance of grading permit approval. 54.Apply and obtain a grading permit with appropriate security prior to any grading activity. 55.A grading plan stamped/signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer is required if the sum of the cut and fill in grading exceeds 50 cubic yards and the existing drainage flow pattern is substantially modified as determined by the City Engineer. The grading plan shall show volumes of cut and fill, adequate contours and/or spot elevations of the existing ground as surveyed by a licensed surveyor or civil engineer. Contours shall extend to minimum of 15 feet beyond property lines to indicate existing drainage pattern. Apply and obtain a grading permit with appropriate security prior to grading permit Issuance. 56. Provide soils, geology and seismic report, as part of this report address the requirement of the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act. Provide final soils report showing compliance with recommendations. 57.Applicant to provide erosion control measures as part of their grading plan. The applicant shall contribute to protection of storm water quality and meet the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. Page 8 of 10 AGt:NDA ITEM ~JO. PAceJ ,C:; -=' OF~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 1503 WEST HEALD AVENUE 58.All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer and he shall certify all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and proper erosion control. DRAINAGE: 59.0n-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility, accepted by adjacent property owners by a notarized letter of drainage acceptance, or conveyed to a drainage easement. 60.All natural drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer. 61.Roof drains shall not be allowed to outlet directly through coring in the street curb. Roofs shall drain to a landscaped area. Driveways shall be sloped to drain into landscaping prior to entering street facilities FEES: 62.Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (LEMC 16.34). The current traffic mitigation fee is $1,369.00; the current drainage fee is $1,030.00 (Town No.4 Dist.) and the current TUMF amount is $9,693.00; the amount of fees shall be adlusted according to the fee schedule current at the time of payment. STORMW A TER/ CLEANW A TER PROTECTION PROGRAM 63.City of Lake Elsinore has adopted ordinances for storm water management and discharge control. In accordance with state and federal law, these local storm water ordinances prohibit the discharge of waste into storm drain system or local surface waters. This includes non-storm water discharges containing oil, grease, detergents, trash, or other waste remains. Brochures of "Storm water Pollution, What You Should Know" describing preventing measures are available at City Hall. Page 9 of 10 ACHJDf~ ITEM NO. '3 PAGE {(p OF ~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 1503 WEST HEALD AVENUE PLEASE NOTE: The discharge of pollutants into street, gutters, storm drain system, or waterways -without Regional Water Quality Control Board permit or waver - is strictly prohibited by local ordinances and state and federal law. End of Conditions Page 10 of 10 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 PACE I, OF~_ z 8 CC i ~ ~( I~ ~~ ~m i: ~ ~I ~ ~ >- u w ow "'>- lLin I ) :!l .l.33;,jiS ON3SNmo.l. EJ II! W dl J: ::> Z ...J ~'\ ~ II! <( .. z o i= .. iii' u '" w o .. <( J: '" ~ o '" '" w '" '" <( @ >- 1-" z5 u' >~ ...J <( " W ...J r--- ~i ~'. " <. 'w ::J Z W > <( o --I ~~ I . . " ~ <. ~I~ , W 3 >- I .. <( II! ~ " ~ 0 .. 0 I- " < ~ Z <( ...J .. w.. 1-< ;;;M AGtN~~~HJ; ~' "3 Cl~ EJ IJ) ] g~ ., ~ 8 lU 1 ,. z j i= Il' . j a: i= w ~u (!) Z III ~( I: J <{ :> a: ::J z t f~ 0 IS ~5: I~ -' ~;! ~I!:! I ~1 w z > , t- U O. . ; ~: I: II! Il' i= 8 iu <{ <( D- 0 D- ~ : . lU D- U~ <( "'. ~I 0 I: '" w! @ (!) lU i>< o. t- o . a: <{ >- '" -'~ ~ I-~ '" <(~ 0 1: u z~ w i= ~ 0" '" ". """"I ~ ow '" w. IJ) ~~ >~ <( -' g lU .~ I ! I / /1 . ~____t_ ~33,HS ON3SNmo~ :J> r--- ~~---~ ~~ '" <L <II ~ N I~ II I~" . " ~I tn . W 3 ~ ((~ ( ~ ~ ~ z <( -' D- " z is <( Il' " >- 1l'9 ~g ~~ :; uJii Il'~ D-~ ACHJDA ITEM NO. \9 PACE "3 OF~ B ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ig~!~~~~ ! z ] ~~ Z 8 .J Q . . i ,~ a: i u u II! (!) : : w G ~ ~I ! ! m III a: z I: j 0 . . " ~~ i= . . z t ~~ ~I!! <( . . .... e ~* i: I: ! ~ ~'\ w z 1 ~~ I~ II( u 0 0 II! F i ~~ i <( lI. IL ;;. ;;; lI. i' ... ii\ . ~ Q 0 ~ lI. U (!) ~I ' , <( oil l- I: oil w tW u ~ j i>< 0 a: ~ $ ~ 0 0 w >- >- oil ..., ~~~g 3~ u t-~ oil .... 0 . . w z:~ w <( .....,. ~ . . . . ~i~~g~e II( ~ ; . . ow u' oil \J u u ~ .., i'l CI .... !f . ~~ oil w ll.. il Ill' ~'" >~ <( .... I ~ --r--- ~33<;~S ON3SNmo~ :!> l\ ~, il' '" ~~~; " ~t 3 z ~~~~ i= .. u ~~:!it.. '" ~~~ u ~9 3~ X i~ ~~ ~~~i~ ill ~i~ ~i ., .. ~~ 00 N ,; .J' ~i~ ;0' ~i~ 0.. ~~~ ~3r 'w " z w > <( 0 I ;f. lJ) w 0 E,t- E~ 3 . ~; .0 o. o. ~~~ ~.~ ... i " l~ ~~ ." 5~ ,. '< oS"~ '" 'h " ~ ~ Ci ~ ? ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z <( .... lI. .5-,,. .0-.81 "I-,SY '~~-- ..,.-,S' "I-.Z;<;; ,,11-,51 .0- .1-.111 ,0-,0" .9-.11 oJ.. t-~ ;;;~ .'-.ll ,,0-,5' ACHJDA ITEM NO. ~ PACE )-OOr ~ I ) 1--- -- :!l ON3SNmo.l .l33~.lS ~, ~ '" u. "' () ;z ;:: "' x UJ . . ~:1$ ..leI- :~~ w ~!!j ~ ~~~~ . . wn ~~~ ~~~ ~a8 ." . '- " 0.. .'0 ~:::Il ~~7 .. 8;""" :~~~~ ~S~~~ , II ,I~ 'I: , I o~~ /" w' ~g w., I~~ ;~~ ~5~ ,....? it - I ljj.\"'....')~~.~ ~tii :; ~ 1; . ~ , ~ . ~~ ~g ~Q .~' E~I d ~;:; , li~i ~u~! ~ () ;z iO "' x UJ z <( .... .. UJ ~: u. "', o Zlii <(' ....~ 3 Of ;),l 0 ACfNDA ITEM NO. PACE ~ I 8 ~ j ~ ~[ I~ ~i ~ 15 ~~ UI ~ ~ 0' III III J: ::> z .... ~'\ ~ -( II. II. -( J: '" iI< o '" "'. 1110 ~! -(~ >- t-~ ~~ U >~ ~ :.J ow ~~ ~'" < L ~ ! I! ~ . . . ~ Q 0 -== < ~ ! ! ! i I ! ; ~\ o III l:: ~ ~ o o o w , o ". ~o ~!...- ::1 o F u w .. L. I . ~ ~ H . I 1 ~ ~ijl .. ! i ~ II 01 .. ~ ~ ~ :! i ~ ~ i ~ Ii! -' t! 0 .. -dI} II< o o o ~ -' 13 ii ~ ;g5~! :. I ~ : ~ ~ ~. I ~~li~i!2l ~ ~~ ~ ;;#.;.. 3 ~ i ~ ~ o o % '3 I il II I >, Ii n I --~---"""._; ~ '" >. " l ~ni~ -..I~ ~~~b f < !i -~ ~ i~" ~r- ;/ c'-.J ~..' = {~'. ~I !> ~" sB it ./' co "i, ilg ~~ I, VI ~m m !~~ "<c B ... '3 " :: ~ ~S i ,~ .... r & Q j " " 'I. . "0 ~ 1: ~ ~ e ~~ Z u ~ 1 .~~ ~a ::: i~.t. ~i ~~~! ..J ~ 10' -( ~ ". ~9 T '" " z o ;:: U III '" ~ ". Z. -> o -(. O'~ ,,~ ~ I ~ ~( I~ ~~ ~ \lJ i~ ~ ~I Q ~ ... u w ow ",... IL.. --- ....,0 .0-." .O-.L ........ -0-... ---.- .0-.01 .I-,tl .t~1 hOt .!:I?-.. U >- 017 ~ V HS ~" 0 i 0 . HlOV9 C!l3.l.~ 0 ? '" 0 w ,- 1[(:0 G) n ~ " : . 1~IQj Ir'\ ~ w " <( " 151313010 ~ ^ '" ~ U( <( - " " : : . 1111------------1 ""38O~mNiil '" 0 <( tv"?1 u : \ ~ , co ~ I III ~ "--- 11"tH ~ . IllI l 0 - . ~ :7fGt I, T = . ... \: 0 I ~~ II w ~ '" ^ f\ ~a , >- ~Ol < "t3<:!1V' )I(!10m/3'J"tC!:lOJ.5 ,. , , ~~~~~koeE J ~ i <( 0 0 V V I I' 11!!lnoO ).,1!!I1N3 '\ ,- ~ i ~ 1<( ( <(I , ,- f-- f\ ~ N':;>"'" 111 0 ____on ~ le:::::J1 '=O=! . ? ..g ..-.1 .tllt-.!. ::0:: .l.t' .,-.t .O'-.! .tll ~'.' .V"-,QI .0-,. .0-.' .0-." ..0-" .o~." .o-,tt .t'.LI .o".t .0-.. B ~ >- >- ~ ,,~ ~ R. ~ (,,,,, .. ! 1 ,Ii II ..'i I '~, j"' ~ ~;g f ~~ ... '\ ~ ,~~ iu ..J <( " W ..J 00, I it 1.11 I ~, z <( ..J II. III o o ..J IL ..J W > ~~ Ill' W 3 Iii 0< ..J~ ACENDA ITEM NO. ~ PACE ;) 3> OF ~ ~ a: ~ ~ ~( I~ ~~ a: ~ I: 16 ~ ~I Q ~ ill <l I ~~.:. b- II! W III x: ::J Z I- o w ~~ ~'" at -' W U II! <t IL lO ik' o lO lO. w. lO" fJ)~ <to " o o " I- <( W " '" '" z Z ~ ~ ~ ~ EJ ~ <:: 0 t ~, z o i=8 IL 0 ~: U~ lO. w~ 0< . ~ -' 3 <t. "" WI- -,S , . " '. , . ~i z <t ..J IL II! o o -' .. -' W > Wb -', , II!' W.. ~~ ACENDA ITEM NO. '3 __ PAG~CiJ:..d{,< _ 8 ~ i ~ ~( I~ ~~ ~ I~ i~ Vi Q ~ ! '!lu . . i ~ I i n '\ ~ w III I: ::J Z t ...J z ~1 w 0 " u i= 8 ".I.I lIIHOW ! ~ D... q ~ <( w: : ;: .. : -UIIAYO 0 ! ~ U~ .. "'. ~ , <( '" l!P I!' ~ I: ~ ! iko . 0 )- "' ...J t-~ :39 <( z~ "'. " u' "" w ~ >~ <(. ...J U W ~~ IL" u u z o ~ u w '" / . ! L . . i ~ ~ j .. .. ~ 0; ~ ~ o ~. ~. . ; I;~~;!~ .. 8 ~ ~. U g ~iSH~ '" z o ~ u :Jl oil '" z o ~ u :Jl ACENDA ITEM i'JO. PACE ~ EJ U III < c ,. " ..' t ~ J ~ " .. . , , '" t ~ "' z o i= U w "' ". z' g: 5~ IllM '3 Of d(.. z 8 a: i ~ ~( I~ ~~ f~ i~ ~ ~I Q ~ ~! ~ ~ !, . II E ~ ~~ ~~ ~, 0 ~ "' " .. 81 ~; 0 u ~~ z W " W i -' ~ w t II! ~ ~ u ~ 0 i <> l i u ~ l j 1 . . -' ! ~ d , '- <( ~ " -- ii1 ii .' ~ ~~ !I '. W ~: I- ~. S! S~ 'l <( ~ ~~ 5, J: II! 0 ii1 ~ W 0 0~~<9> ?- m X ~ W [I [I I l- ll' o z I l- e:> o <J) ~ u "l Ow ~t: ~'" II! W III J: ::J z ~'\ -' z W U 0 II! f:: <( .. .. j;: .. :;l <( J: '" W ix 0 >- 0 '" -' 1-- "'. z:~ Wo <( u. "'. " "" W >~ <(0 -' ! i . I ~ s < m u 0 I c DODD DODO I- <J) W 3 m [I mil mm ',. ,. , " DODO 0000 EJ '" "" z o ;= <{ > 1'J w I- <J) <{ w '" z o ;:: <( > W -' W ~~ 0' ~; W I-~ X. W~ AGfNDf':\ ITEM NO. '3 PAGE dfq OF d-f (? ~:& 'JII........ _ CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: JUNE 5, 2007 PREPARED BY: TOM WEINER, PLANNING MANAGER CORDIE MILLER, PLANNING TECHNICIAN PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 16813 BELL AVENUE (APN: 378-261-051) APPLICANT: KEVIN & DAWN BOWEN. 29523 LA SHELL AVENUE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 OWNER: KEVIN & DAWN BOWEN. 29523 LA SHELL AVENUE LAKE ELSINORE CA 92530 BACKGROUND This item was first presented at the May 15,2007 Planning Commission meeting. At this meeting, the item was continued to this date in order to allow the applicant to work with staff on design issues. PROJECT REQUEST Staff is requesting a continuance ofthe proposed project in order to allow the applicant time to resubmit plans for the proposed single family dwelling. The applicant has indicated that they are in the process of modifying the project request. Staff is requesting that the item be continued to an off calendar date. ACENDA ITEM NO.~ PAGE I OF;).. REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 5, 2007 PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-F AMIL Y RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 16813 BELL AVENUE; (APN: 378-261-051). PREPARED BY: TOM WEINER, PLANNING MANAGER CORDIE MILLER, PLANNING TECHNICIAN APPROVED BY: ~ L-- Z. ~ "~ ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENDA ITEM if PAGEd- OF ~ CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: JUNE 5, 2007 PREPARED BY: LINDA MILLER, PLANNING CONSULTANT PROJECT TITLE: RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-14 APPLICANT: BRIAN HARDY, WL HOMES, LLC, 255 EAST RINCON STREET, SUITE 100, CORONA, CALIFORNIA 92879 OWNER: WL HOMES, LLC. 255 EAST RINCON STREET, SUITE 100, CORONA, CALIFORNIA 92879 PROJECT REQUEST: Review and approval of Residential Design Review No. 2006-14 for seventy-four (74) single family detached residential dwelling units located within a 707 unit development known as Summerly Lake Elsinore (Tract 31920), East Lake Specific Plan, Amendment No. Six. Summerly Lake Elsinore is divided into several "neighborhoods." Residential Design Review No. 2006-14 is known as Neighborhood No. 4 (Home Run at Summerly). A Model Home Complex is proposed that will be used for two (2) neighborhoods, Neighborhood No.4 and Neighborhood No.6 (Grand Slam at Summerly). Review is pursuant to East Lake Specific Plan, Amendment No. Six, Chapters 17.82 (Design Review), and 17.66 (Parking Requirements) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) and Summerly's Phase 1 Neighborhood Design Guidelines. ACENDA ITEM NO. PAGE I 5 OF 3 d- REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 5, 2007 Page 2 of7 PROJECT TITLE: RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-14 PROJECT LOCATION The project site is located within the East Lake Specific Plan, Amendment No. Six in the southern section of the City of Lake Elsinore (APN 371-270-015). ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING EXISTING LAND USE Project Site Vacant ZONING Residential 1 North Residential 1 Vacant South Residential 1 Vacant East Residential & Commercial County of Riverside Residential 1 & Open Space West Vacant PROJECT BACKGROUND GENER.A.L East Lake Specific Plan East Lake Specific Plan East Lake Specific Plan County of Riverside East Lake Specific Plan The East Lake Specific Plan (ELSP) was adopted by Ordinance No. 955 by the City Council in June 1993. The Plan consists of 3,000 acres and was originally divided into three (3) individual districts that included a Marina District, Lakeside Resort, and Recreation Village. Several Amendments have been made to the East Lake Specific Plan. The first two (2) amendments (Amendment No.1 and No.2) changed the central area or Phase One of the Specific Plan. The changes primarily reduced the number of residential units and commercial uses and added a Golf Course to the open space area of the plan. Phase One is the development area where the current Laing Homes project is now located. Two other amendments, Amendment No. 3 and No.4, were related to industrial development along Corydon Avenue which are both outside of Phase One. Amendment No. 5 is for the proposed marina development located on Lakeshore Drive, known as WatersEdge. Laing Homes processed East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No. 6 which was adopted by the City Council on July 27, 2004. This amendment replaced multi- AGENDA rrEM NO. PACE_d- 5. OF .3 .d:___ REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 5, 2007 Page 3 of7 PROJECT TITLE: RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-14 family uses with single family uses, provided several parks and added an approximately 165 acre Golf Course, Club House, and Maintenance and Golf Cart Storage Facility. The Golf Course, Club House and Maintenance Facility have been previously reviewed by the Planning Commission and reviewed and approved by the City Council. The current project before the Planning Commission is one of several single family residential neighborhoods within the Laing Homes project known as Summerly Lake Elsinore. The neighborhood under consideration is a 9.6 net acre parcel known as Neighborhood No.4, (Home Run at Summerly). Lots in this Neighborhood range in size from 5,000 square feet to 9,037 square feet with an average lot size of 6,039 square feet. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed Design Review consists of the following: 1) Plotting Plan; 2) Elevations and Floor Plans; 3) Model Home Complex; and 4) Typical and Model Home Complex Landscape Plans. The applicant is proposing to provide three (3) different floor plans. Each floor plan includes three (3) different architectural styles. All of the plans offered are two stories. Optional balconies are offered for each plan. The following is a description of each Plan type: Plan One is a 2,389 square foot unit that includes a kitchen, dining room, living room, family room, laundry, three (3) bedrooms and two and one-half (2 Yz) bathrooms with options for up to five (5) bedrooms and one (1) additional bathroom. The three (3) car garage includes a tandem space that can be converted to one (1) of the additional bedrooms. Plan Two is a 2,501 square foot unit that includes a kitchen, dining room, living room, family room, laundry, four (4) bedrooms or three (3) bedrooms and a den, two and one-half (2 Yz) bathrooms, with options that include a fifth bedroom, third bathroom, and/or a retreat area. A two (2) car garage is planned for this unit. The garage is placed at the rear of the unit allowing for a motor court/parking area. Plan Three is a 2,582 square foot plan that includes a kitchen, nook, dining room, living room, family room, laundry, four (4) bedrooms or three (3) I'. '"'-'.'.~d', 1~'7'" ~'O S F-\~~i-!!.}.-..t ~jt;~-Ioa h,.'._ PAGE 3 OF 3). REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 5, 2007 Page 4 of7 PROJECT TITLE: RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-14 bedrooms and a den, two and one-half (2 Yz) bathrooms, with options that offer up to six (6) bedrooms, and a third bathroom. A three (3) car tandem garage is proposed for this unit. The tandem space can be used for one (1) of the options available. Architecture, Materials and Colors Each Plan includes three (3) different architectural styles. The three (3) styles are Spanish, Plantation and Bungalow: The Spanish architecture includes decorative window shutters, wrought iron grills, decorative railing, arched entries, stucco wainscot, pot shelves, pop outs with gable roof, extended overhang with knee braces and'S' type tile roof. The Plantation design includes balconies with stylized columns and railings, pop outs with gable roof and decorative trusses, horizontal siding, shutters, pot shelves and flat concrete tile roof. The Bungalow design includes stone veneer wainscot, battered wood columns, wood railings, horizontal siding, shutters, pot shelves, pop outs with gable roof, knee braces, and concrete tile roof. Elevations that can be seen from any public road are required to include the enhanced features shown on the enclosed plans. Nine (9) color schemes will be provided including nine (9) different roofing tile colors. Landscapin2 Summerly Lake Elsinore, Phase 1 Neighborhood Design Guidelines includes a detailed Landscape Design Criteria section that has been divided into the following categories: 1) Entries (Primary Neighborhoods - installed by the Master Developer Laing Homes); 2) Corner Lots & Neighborhood Enhancements (installed by each Neighborhood Guest Builder including Laing Homes), and 3) which lists landscaping specific to each architectural style proposed. For example, all units with Spanish architecture will use the Spanish Plant Palette. Neighborhood No.4 will use Spanish, Plantation and Bungalow Plant Palettes. ACHmj\ HE.1 rm. PAGE_~ S OF 3 )... REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 5, 2007 Page 5 of7 PROJECT TITLE: RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-14 Wall and Fencin2 The applicant proposes to provide split face block walls throughout the development. The return wall will include a tubular steel gate. The Master Developer is responsible to construct the perimeter split face block walls as well as installing perimeter landscaping. Model Complex As mentioned, Neighborhood No.4 will share a six (6) unit Model Home Complex with Neighborhood No.6 located at Village Parkway, between Batter's Box and Line Drive. Each of the plans proposed for Neighborhood No. 4 will be represented. The parking lot will include eight (8) parking spaces including one (1) handicap space. The Model Home Complex will be fully landscaped with hardscape, trees and scrubs. ANAL YSIS Staff recommends approval of the Residential Design Review application based on the following: The single family residential neighborhoods that are part of the Summerly Lake Elsinore project are associated to the City's first Golf Course development that is currently under construction. These neighborhoods were to be constructed simultaneously with the construction of the Golf Course facility. Therefore, development of the single family residential development has been strongly encouraged by the City. The products proposed meet and/or exceed the existing product types that are currently being constructed within the City. The current zoning of the property is Residential 1, allowing up to 6 dwelling units per acre. The applicant is proposing a density of 5.6 dwelling units per acre, which meets this requirement. The project proposes three (3) floor plans with three (3) different architectural styles providing several choices for the home buyer. All elevations that will be seen from a public roads will require architectural enhancements. AG~NDi\ ITEM NO.. PAGE :5 5 Of :=3;r- REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 5, 2007 Page 6 of7 PROJECT TITLE: RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-14 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code SS 21000 et seq.: "CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R. S~ 15000 et seq.), public agencies are expressly encouraged to reduce delay and paperwork associated with the implementation of CEQA by using previously prepared environmental documents when those previously prepared documents adequately address the potential impacts of the proposed project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15006). CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 establishes the standard to be used when determining whether subsequent environmental documentation is necessary. Section 15162 says that when an environmental document has already been adopted for a project, no subsequent environmental documentation is needed for subsequent entitlements which comprise the whole of the action unless substantial changes or new information are presented by the project. A Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was approved and adopted in 2004 for the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No.6 (SCH #2003071050) and evaluated environmental impacts that would result from maximum build-out of the specific plan, which contemplated development of a golf course and clubhouse. The request for design review of the club house is consistent with the scope of the project as analyzed under the SEIR. The Project does not present substantial changes or new information regarding the potential environmental impacts of development. Therefore, no additional CEQA documentation is necessary. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the following Resolutions: Resolution No. 2007-_, recommending to the City Council adoption of the Findings of Consistency with the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan; and Resolution No. 2007-_ recommending to City Council approval of Residential Design Review No. 2006-14 for seventy-four (74) single family detached residential dwelling units and associated improvements (APN 371-270-015). Approval is based on the attached Exhibits, and Conditions of Approval. AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE ~ ,~ OF .3 a: REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 5, 2007 Page 7 of7 PROJECT TITLE: RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-14 APPROVED BY: LINDA M. MILLER, AICP, PROJECT PLANNER :t~ U~fV~ ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PREPARED BY: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Resolutions: a. Resolution No. 2007-_ recommending City Council adoption of Findings Of Consistency with the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan b. Resolution No. 2007-_ recommending City Council approval of Residential Design Review No. 2006-14 for a seventy-four (74) single family detached residential dwelling units and associated improvements. 3. Conditions Of Approval 4. Exhibits 5. Color Exhibits (Presented At The Hearing) AGENDA ITEM NO. PP,CE "] l) Of 3...+- VICINITY MAP RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-14 APN 371-270-015 / I J PE/E LEH&O& a: o 0' 2' o ~ S a SYLVESTER ST. \ ~ ~ PROJECT SITE ~ {:)' ~"-- I 1m] \ PLANNING COMMISSION ACENDA \"El\~ NO. c:; PACE ~ OF 3d- RESOLUTION NO. 2007-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ADOPT FINDINGS THAT THE PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP) WHEREAS, WL Homes, LLC, has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of Residential Design Review No. 2006-14 for the construction of a seventy-four (74) single family detached residential development including a Model Home Complex and associated improvements (the "Project") on a parcel of land identifiable as APN: 371-270-015; and WHEREAS, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP requires that all discretionary projects within an MSHCP criteria cell undergo the Lake Elsinore Acquisition Process ("LEAP") and Joint Project Review ("JPR") to analyze the scope of the proposed development and establish a building envelope that is consistent with the MSHCP criteria; and WHEREAS, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP further requires that the City of Lake Elsinore adopt consistency findings demonstrating that the proposed discretionary entitlement complies with the MSCHP cell criteria, and the MSCHP goals and objectives; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Section 17.82, requests for commercial design review are discretionary actions to be considered, reviewed, and approved, conditionally approved or denied by the Lake Elsinore City Council; and WHEREAS, the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No. 6 is partially covered by two distinct MSHCP criteria cells: approximately three (3) acres of the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No.6 are within cell 4846 and approximately three tenths (0.3) of an acre are within cell 4937; and WHEREAS, the Project site within the boundaries of East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No.6 that are covered by the aforementioned cell sites; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to the Project on June 5, 2007. AC!:NDA nEM NO. S- P,Q,GE cr ..OF::S d- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2007-_ PAGE 2 OF 5 NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the Project and its consistency with the MSHCP prior to recommending that the City Council adopt Findings of Consistency with the MSHCP. SECTION 2. That in accordance with the MSHCP, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for MSHCP consistency: 1. The Project is a project under the City's MSHCP Resolution, and the City must make an MSHCP Consistency finding before approval. Pursuant to the City's MSHCP Resolution, the Project must be reviewed for MSHCP consistency, which review shall include an analysis of the Project's consistency with other "Plan Wide Requirements. " The Project is located within the East Lake Specific Plan (ELSP) area, specifically within the ELSP Amendment No. 6 area. Prior to the City's adoption of the MSHCP, there were a series of meetings between the County of Riverside, Us. Fish and Wildlife Service, and California Department of Fish and Game to discuss conservation measures within the ELSP and to decide how to ensure development within the ELSP could proceed consistently with the MSHCP and with the Us. Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 permit. It was determined that a target acreage of 770 acres was warranted for MSHCP conservation in the back basin area of the City. The Project site is within the ELSP and is covered by that conservation agreement. Part of the conservation agreement also included a requirement that projects in the back basin area be consistent with the other "Plan Wide Requirements" set forth in the following sections of the MSHCP: Protection of Species Associated with Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pool Guidelines (MSHCP, S 6.1.2), Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines (MSHCP, S 6.1.3), Additional Survey Needs and Procedures (MSHCP, S 6.3.2), Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines (MSHCP, S 6.1.4), Vegetation Mapping (MSHCP, S 6.3.1) requirements, Fuels Management Guidelines (MSHCP, S 6.4), and payment of the MSHCP Local ACr-l\!DA HE','; 1\10. PAGE 10 5 Of 3;:+ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2007-_ PAGE30F5 Development Mitigation Fee (MSHCP Ordinance, S 4). The Project has been reviewed in light of these sections and is consistent therewith. 2. The Project is subject to the City's LEAP and the County's Joint Project Review processes. The ELSP MSCHP consistency determination was submitted to the County of Riverside in October 2003, prior to the initiation of the City's LEAP and County's Joint Project Review process. Nevertheless, both the City and Dudek (acting on behalf of the County) agreed that the Project was consistent with the MSHCP due to the extensive acreage set aside for conservation. The Project has not been modified and was part of the overall ELSP which has been determined to be consistent with the MSHCP. 3. The Project is consistent with the Riparian!Riverine Areas and Vemal Pools Guidelines. The previously approved ELSP Amendment No.6 was determined to be consistent with the Riparian/Riverine and Vernal Pool Guidelines as set forth in MSHCP S 6.1.2. The scope and nature of the Project have not been modified from that which was previously approved and is therefore consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools Guidelines. 4. The Project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines. The previously approved ELSP Amendment No.6 was consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines as set forth in MSHCP S 6.1.3. The Project has not been modified from that which was previously approved under the ELSP Amendment No.6. Additionally, based upon prior approvals, the entire Project site has been graded and any plant species which may have existed on the site have been removed and replaced with development. It is for these reasons that the Project is consistent with the aforementioned guidelines. 5. The Project is consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures. The previously approved ELSP Amendment No.6 was consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures as set forth in MSHCP S 6.3.2. AGENDA \TEM NO. ,C) PACE / ( OF _,~d PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2007-_ PAGE40F5 The Project has not been modified from that which was previously approved under the ELSP Amendment No.6, and the entire project site has been graded pursuant to previously issued permits. The Project is consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures of the MSHCP. 6. The Project is consistent with the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines. The previously approved ELSP Amendment No.6 was consistent with the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines as set forth in MSHCP 9 6.1.4. Because the Project has not been modified from that which was previously approved under the ELSP Amendment No.6, no further MSHCP review is necessary and the Project is consistent with the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines. 7. The Project is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements. The previously approved ELSP Amendment No.6 was consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements as set forth in MSHCP 96.3.1. Mapping was conducted as part of the biological surveys for the original project. The Project has not been modified from that which was previously approved and therefore is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements. 8. The Project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines. The previously approved ELSP Amendment No.6 was consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines as set forth in MSHCP, 9 6.4. The Project site is not within or adjacent to conservation areas where the Fuels Management Guidelines would be required. The Project has not been modified from that which was previously approved and therefore is consistent with the Fuel Management Guidelines. 9. The Project will be conditioned to pay the City's MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee. As a condition of project approval, the Project will be required to pay the City's MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee at the time of issuance of building permits. AGH~Dr\ nEt\~/t~O: OFE;~ PAGE d:::::.. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2007-_ PAGE 5 OF 5 10. The Project overall is consistent with the MSHCP. As stated in No.1 above, the Project is within the ELSP area which has previously been determined to be consistent with the MSHCP. SECTION 3. Based upon all of the evidence presented, the above findings, and the conditions of approval imposed upon the Project, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council find that the Project is consistent with the MSHCP. SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of June, 2007, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission ATTEST: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE ( ..3 5 OF ~d- RESOLUTION NO. 2007-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-14 WHEREAS, WL HOMES, LLC, has initiated proceedings for Residential Design Review No. 2006-14 for the design and construction of a seventy-four (74) single family detached residential development including a Model Home Complex and associated improvements located within the East Lake Specific Plan, Amendment No. Six (APN 371-270-015) (the "Entitlement"); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council for residential design review applications; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code 99 21000 et seq.: "CEQA") and the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA (14 C.C.R. 99 15000 et seq.: "CEQA Guidelines"), public agencies are expressly encouraged to reduce delay and paperwork associated with the implementation of CEQA by using previously prepared environmental documents when those previously prepared documents adequately address the potential impacts of the proposed project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15006); and WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 establishes the standard to be used when determining whether subsequent environmental documentation is necessary and says that when an environmental document has already been adopted for a project, no subsequent environmental documentation is needed for subsequent entitlements which comprise the whole of the action unless substantial changes or new information are presented by the project; and WHEREAS, a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report was approved and adopted in 2004 for the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No.6 (SCH #2003071050) and evaluated environmental impacts that would result from maximum build-out of the specific plan, which contemplated development of single family residential development; and WHEREAS, the Entitlement does not present substantial changes or new information regarding the potential environmental impacts of development; and A0Ei\if'lt\ I"n::'",l NO s: <~~d~~'1 y' o~ ~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2007-_ PAGE20F4 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to the Entitlement on June 5, 2007. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the Entitlement prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve Residential Design Review No. 2006-14 for a single family detached residential development. SECTION 2. The Planning Commission finds and determines that no new CEQA documentation is necessary. The Entitlement comprises the whole of the action which was analyzed in the previously approved and certified Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SCH # 2003071050) for the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No.6. Approval of the Entitlement will not change density or intensity of use; it simply establishes standards for color palates, articulation, orientation, and design of single family residential development. Therefore, no further environmental review is necessary. SECTION 3. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning Law and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Planning Commission makes the following findings regarding Residential Design Review No. 2006-14: 1. The single family detached residential development, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan, Specific Plan and the Zoning District in which it is located. The single family detached residential development complies with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No.6. The facility will assist in achieving the development of a well-balanced and functional mix of residential, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses. 2. The single family detached residential development complies with the design directives contained in the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No.6 and all applicable provisions of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. The single family detached residential development is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments. The three (3) architectural styles proposed ~C'NO~ I~Ei~ ~. .~ p,..Cr: -li- Of 'J.)- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2007-_ PAGE30F4 will create a distinctive street scene within the project site. Sufficient setbacks and onsite landscaping have been provided thereby creating interest and varying vistas. In addition, safe and efficient circulation has been achieved onsite. 3. Subject to the attached conditions of approval, the single family detached residential development is not anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. The single family detached residential development, as reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City divisions, departments and agencies, will not have a significant effect on the environment. Approval of the design for the single family detached residential development will not result in a substantial change to the previously adopted Supplemental Environmental Impact Report. Therefore, no additional environmental review is necessary. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the Project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter 17.82. Pursuant to Section 17.82.070 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Entitlement been scheduled for consideration by the Planning Commission on June 5, 2007. SECTION 4. Based upon all of the evidence presented, the above findings, and the conditions of approval imposed upon the Entitlement, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve Residential Design Review 2006-14. SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. ACENDA ITEM NO. PACE (~ ,C) OF 3d- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2007-_ PAGE40F4 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of June 2007, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development p" ,-,"~,il \-,r;':'\~ "in 5- ,oi:'.~_t'l~Lh''', ,L,,;.~\;I Il"/,i.___ SAGE_ /7 Of ir CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-14 HOME RUN AT SUMMERLY LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL 1. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, and Agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning the Residential Design Review projects attached hereto. PLANNING DIVISION 2. Design Review approval for Residential Design Review No. 2006-14 will lapse and be void unless a building permit is issued within one (l) year of the Planning Commission approval date. The Community Development Director may grant an extension of time for up to one (1) year prior to the expiration of the initial Design Review. An application for a time extension and required fee shall be submitted a minimum of one (1) month prior to the expiration date. 3. The decision of the Planning Commission shall be final fifteen (15) days from the date of the decision, unless an appeal has been filed with the City Clerk's Office pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 17.80 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 4. All construction shall comply with these Conditions of Approval and those provisions and requirements contained in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy and release of utilities. 5. All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved building elevations and site plans for the Residential Design Review and the Model Home Complex. 6. Future site plotting and construction shall be consistent with these Conditions of Approval, those conditions approved with Tentative Tract Map No. 31920 and those provisions and requirements contained in the Municipal Code, subject to approval by the Community Development Director or designee. 7. The following architectural details shall be provided: Page 1 of 13 AGENDA \TEM NO. PACE 18 5 OF .3 d-:::: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-14 HOME RUN AT SUMMERLY LAKE ELSINORE . Any masonry provided at the front elevation will continue to wrap around the side elevations, to the front wall return. . All front fence returns will be decorative masonry walls. Wood fences will not be allowed along the front elevation. . Additional architectural enhancements shall be provided on elevations within public view. The applicant shall provide the Planning Division sequence sheets listing which units shall receive enhancements. The sequence sheets shall be provided prior to the issuance of building permits for each phase of development. . Nine (9) different color schemes will be provided. 8. All weep screeds shall be a maximum three inches above any hard surface and four inches above any earth surface. 9. The applicant shall provide a flat concrete pad or area a minimum of 3'- 0" by 7'- 0" adjacent to the dwelling for the storage of the City trash barrels. The storage pad or area shall conceal the trash barrels from public view, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. Precise grading plans shall identify the location of the aforementioned flat concrete pad and air conditioning units. 10. The building addresses (in numerals at least four inches high) shall be displayed near the entrance and easily visible from the front of the unit and public right-of-way. The applicant shall obtain street addresses for all production lots prior to issuance of building permit. 11. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City's Grading Ordinance. Construction generated dust and erosion shall be mitigated in accordance with the provisions of Municipal Code, Chapter 15.72 and using accepted techniques. Interim erosion control measures shall be provided 30 days after the site's rough grading, as approved by the City Engineer. 12. The applicant shall comply with all applicable City Codes and Ordinances. Page 2 of 13 ACfNDl'\ iTEM NO. PACE J 9. 5 OF 3 d-- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-14 HOME RUN AT SUMMERLY LAKE ELSINORE 13.Prior to issuance of building permit, building plans for the Model Home Complex shall comply with all American Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements, including provision of a handicapped-accessible bathroom. 14.A cash bond of $1,000.00 shall be required for the Model Home Complex. This bond is to guarantee removal of the temporary fencing material, parking lot, etc. that have been placed onsite for the Model Home Complex. The bond will be released after removal of the materials and the site is adequately restored, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. 15.A cash bond of$I,OOO.OO shall be required for any garage conversion of the model(s). Bonds will be released after removal of all temporary materials and the site is adequately restored, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. 16.A cash bond of $1,000.00 shall be required for any construction trailers used during construction. Bonds will be released after removal of trailers, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. 17. The applicant shall pay school fees to the Lake Elsinore Unified School District prior to issuance of building permit. 18. The project shall connect to sewer and meet all requirements of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). The applicant shall submit water and sewer plans to the EVMWD and shall incorporate all district conditions and standards. 19.The design and construction of the project shall meet all County Fire Department standards for fire protection. 20.All mechanical and electrical equipment for the building shall be ground mounted. All outdoor ground or wall mounted utility equipment shall be consolidated in a central location and architecturally screened behind fence returns, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director, prior to issuance of building permit. Page 3 of 13 PAGE. ~ 5' OF 3d- ,..(,...~ ,~;;':i:'~ ~"~....~f'~ r~O. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-14 HOME RUN AT SUMMERLY LAKE ELSINORE 21.All front yards and side yards on comer lots shall be properly landscaped with automatic (manual or electric) irrigation system to provide 100 percent plant and grass coverage using a combination of drip and conventional irrigation methods. The final landscaping/irrigation plan is to be reviewed and approved by the City's Landscape Architect Consultant and the Community Development Director or designee. A Landscape Plan check fee will be charged prior to final landscape approval based on the Consultant's fee plus 40 percent. . The applicant shall comply with the Plant Palette listed for each of the neighborhoods as indicated within the Phase 1 Neighborhood Design Guidelines. . Planting within 15 feet of ingress/egress points shall be no higher than 36 inches. . The landscape plan shall provide for ground cover, shrubs, and trees and meet all requirements of the City's adopted Landscape Guidelines. Special attention to the use of Xeriscape or drought resistant plantings with combination drip irrigation system to be used to prevent excessive watering. . All landscape improvements shall be bonded with a 100 percent Faithful Performance Bond for materials and labor for two years from Certificate of Occupancy. . All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed within an affected portion of any phase at the time a certificate of occupancy is requested for any building. . One of the proposed lots of the Model Home Complex shall be Xeriscaped and signage provided identifying Xeriscape landscaping. . The Final landscape plan shall be consistent with any approved site and/or plot plan. . The Final landscape plan shall include planting and irrigation details. Page 4 of 13 ACfNDA iTEM NO. PACE ~I OF 5 .~J- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-14 HOME RUN AT SUMMERLY LAKE ELSINORE 22.All exposed slopes in excess of three feet in height within the subject tract and within private lots shall have permanent irrigation system and erosion control vegetation installed, as approved by the Planning Division, prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. 23.The applicant shall prepare a Wall and Fencing Plan for the project area, in compliance with the fencing standards within the Zoning Code Section 17.14.130.D prior to issuance of any building permit, and subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. 24.Fences located in any front yard shall not exceed three feet in height with the exception that wrought-iron fences may be five feet in height. Chain link fences shall be prohibited. 25. Garages shall be constructed to provide a minimum of 10' x 20' of interior clear space for two cars for a total interior clear space of 20' x 20' . 26.Prior to issuance of any precise grading permit or building permit, the applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records. 27. These Conditions of Approval and those conditions approved with Tentative Tract Map No. 31920 shall be reproduced on subsequent building plans prior to issuance of building permit. 28.Provisions of the City's Noise Ordinance shall be satisfied during all site preparation and construction activity. Site preparation activity and construction shall not commence before 7:00 AM and shall cease at 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday. Construction activity shall not take place on Saturday, Sunday, or any Legal Holidays. 29. The applicant shall pay all appropriate City fees. 30.The applicant shall pay the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Fee (MSHCP) Local Development Mitigation Fee prior to obtaining building permits. Page 5 of 13 ACifNDA IlE\\~ r,~a.5___,__ PACE ~;r OF _~_ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-14 HOME RUN AT SUMMERLY LAKE ELSINORE 31. The applicant shall place a weatherproof 3' x 3' sign at the entrance to the project site identifying the approved days and hours of construction activity and a statement that complaints regarding the operation can be lodged with the City of Lake Elsinore Code Enforcement Division (951) 674-3124. 32.Pursuant to the following Section 12.10 of the First Amended and Restated Development Agreement between the City of Lake Elsinore and Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC which states, "Upon application for each residential dwelling unit building permit constructed in the Project, Developer shall, at the time of issuance of such building permit, pay an in-lieu Affordable Housing Fee in the amount of One Dollar and Thirty Cents ($1.30) per square foot of "assessable space" (as that term is defined in Government Code Section 65995(b )(1) ("Affordable Housing Fee"). Notwithstanding the foregoing, in lieu of paying the Affordable Housing Fee, Developer may elect to enter into a mutually acceptable agreement with the City and Agency to provide up to fifteen percent (15%) of the units in the Project on the Developer Property in accordance with requirements of Section 33413(b) of the CRL as Affordable Housing Units on a site within the Developer Property or a mutually acceptable alternative site outside of the Developer Property to be designated in the future for multi-family uses." ENGINEERING DIVISION General Requirements: 33.A grading plan signed and stamped by a Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall be required if the grading exceeds 50 cubic yards or the existing flow pattern is substantially modified as determined by the City Engineer. If the grading is less than 50 cubic yards and a grading plan is not required, a grading permit shall still be obtained so that a cursory drainage and flow pattern inspection can be conducted before grading begins. Page 6 of 13 ACiE.NDA ITEM NO._S_~_~~ PACE d.3 L OF 3,;}- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-14 HOME RUN AT SUMMERL Y LAKE ELSINORE 34.Prior to commencement of grading operations, applicant to provide to the City with a map of all proposed haul routes to be used for movement of export material. Such routes shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 34.All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer and he shall certify all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and proper erosion control. 35.This project shall comply with applicable Conditions of Approval of Tract 31920. 36.Phasing Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer. Bond public improvements for each Phase as approved by the City Engineer. 37.An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained prior to any work on City right-of-way. 38.Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. Overhead utilities shall be undergrounded. 39.Underground water rights shall be dedicated to the City pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.52.030 (LEMC), and consistent with the City's agreement with the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. 40. The applicant shall install permanent bench marks per Riverside County Standards and at locations to be determined by the City Engineer. 41.Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by Riverside County Fire Department. 42.Applicant shall pay all applicable development fees, including but not all inclusive: TUMF, MSHCP, TIF and area drainage fees. 43.10 year storm runoff shall be contained within the curb and the 100 year storm runoff shall be contained within the street right-of-way. When either of these criteria are exceeded, drainage facilities shall be provided. Page 7 of 13 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15 P.~GE t?: Y Of 3 d:-:- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-14 HOME RUN AT SUMMERLY LAKE ELSINORE 44.All drainage facilities in this project shall be constructed to Riverside County Flood Control District Standards. 45.All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 ~" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of public works improvements will be scheduled and approved. 46.Slope maintenance along public right-of-ways shall be maintained by a homeowner's association or other maintenance mechanism as approved by the City. 47.All open space and slopes (except for public parks and schools) and flood control facilities outside the public right-of-way shall be owned and maintained by homeowner's association. 48.Alllandscaping at intersections shall meet City Sight Distance Standards. 49.All waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or other phases of the construction shall be disposed of at appropriate recycling centers. The applicant should contract with CR&R Inc. for recycling and storage container services, but the applicant may use the services of another recycling vendor. Another recycling vendor, other than CR&R Inc., cannot charge the applicant for bin rental or solid waste disposal. If the applicant is not using CR&R Inc. for recycling services and the recycling material is either sold or donated to another vendor, the applicant shall supply proof of debris disposal at a recycling center, including verification of tonnage by certified weigh master tickets. 50.0n-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility, accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance, or conveyed to a drainage easement. 51.All natural drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer. 52.Roof drains shall not be allowed to outlet directly through coring in the street curb. Roofs should drain to a landscaped area. Page 8 of 13 ACEND}\ ITEM NO. <; PACE d-) Qf 3..:+-. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-14 HOME RUN AT SUMMERL Y LAKE ELSINORE 53.Applicant shall comply with all NPDES requirements in effect; including the submittal of an Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) as required per the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. The requirements of WQMP may affect the overall layout of the project. Therefore, WQMP submittal should be during the initial process of the project. 54.Education guidelines and Best Management Practices (BMP) shall be provided to residents of the development in the use of herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers as well as other environmental awareness education materials on good housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of storm water quality and met the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. (Required for lot of one acre or more) 55.Applicant shall provide BMP's that will reduce storm water pollutants from parking areas and driveway aisles. (Required for lot of one acre or more) 56.City of Lake Elsinore has adopted ordinances for storm water management and discharge control. In accordance with state and federal law, these local storm water ordinances prohibit the discharge of waste into storm drain system or local surface waters. This includes non-storm water discharges containing oil, grease, detergents, trash, or other waste remains. Brochures of "Storm water Pollution, What You Should Know" describing preventing measures are available at City Hall. PLEASE NOTE: The discharge of pollutants into street, gutters, storm drain system, or waterways -without Regional Water Quality Control Board permit or waver - is strictly prohibited by local ordinances and state and federal law. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 57. Streets with a slope greater than 9% shall be redesigned to 9% or less, unless approved by the City Engineer. 58. Maintenance access shall be provided to all open spaces and drainage facilities and easements. Page 9 of 13 ACENDJ\ ITE,: r',m. 5 PAGE ~ OF '3 ;;)- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-14 HOME RUN AT SUMMERLY LAKE ELSINORE 59.A Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall prepare street and traffic improvement plans and specifications for the street improvements as shown on the Site Plan. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Riverside County Standards, latest edition, and City Codes (LEMC 12.04 and 16.34). Street improvement plans shall include curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lighting, ac pavement and drainage improvements. 60.Note: The street section of Mission Trail shall comply with General Plan Street Section. 61.Make an offer of dedication for all public streets and easements required by these conditions or as shown on the Site Plan. All land so offered shall be granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost to the city. 62. Applicant shall submit signing and striping plans for the required street improvements. All signing and striping and traffic control devices shall be installed prior to final inspection of public improvements. The signing and striping shall include Street Name Signs, No Parking and Street Sweeping Signs for streets within the project. 63.Submit grading plans with appropriate security, Hydrology, and Hydraulic Reports prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer for approval by the City Engineer. The grading plans shall include mitigation/protection of any flooding and/or erosion downstream caused by development of the site and/or diversion of drainage. The grading plan shall also show that no structures, landscaping, or equipment are located near or at street intersections in order to meet sight distance standards. 64.Construction Project access and hauling route plan shall be submitted and approved by the City Engineer, 65.Provide soils, geology and seismic report including street design recommendations. Provide final soils report showing compliance with recommendations. 66.An Alquist-Priolo study shall be performed on the site to identify any hidden earthquake faults and/or liquefaction zones present on-site. Page 10 of 13 ~ 1"\11. '\.:~,,~ ~i'" 5 ACI::NVN Ii !::;Ni i<1)._"""~,==.,~"-,,,,-,-,, .d::. 7 C" 3 d-= PAGE... r =~., u - CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-14 HOME RUN AT SUMMERLY LAKE ELSINORE 67.The applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site easements and/or permits for off-site grading and/or drainage acceptance from the adjacent property owners prior to grading permit issuance. 68.Applicant to provide erosion control measures as part of their grading plan. The applicant shall contribute to protection of storm water quality and meet the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. 69.Applicant shall provide the city with proof of his having filed a Notice of Intent with the Regional Water Quality Control Board for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program with a storm water pollution prevention plan prior to issuance of grading permits. The applicant shall provide a SWPPP for post construction, which describes BMP's that will be implemented for the development including maintenance responsibilities. The applicant shall submit the SWPPP to the City for review and approval. 70. The applicant shall provide an approved WQMP plan. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit 71.Submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project and specify the technical data for the water service at the location. such as water pressure and volume etc. Submit this letter prior to applying for a building permit. 72.Provide proof that no structures, landscaping, or equipment are located at intersections and street curves that could compromise sight distance requirements. 73. WQMP and erosion control plans shall be in place to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 74.Pay all Capital Improvement TIF and Master Drainage Fees, and Plan Check fees (LEMC 16.34). Page 11 of 13 ACENDA ITEM fl0. S_ PAGE .2-8 OF 3~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-14 HOME RUN AT SUMMERL Y LAKE ELSINORE Prior to Occupancy 75.Pay all fees and meet requirements of an encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Division for construction of off-site public works improvements (LEMCI2.08, Res.83-78). All fees and requirements for an encroachment permit shall be fulfilled before Certificate of Occupancy. 76.All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 1/2" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of off-site improvements will be scheduled and approved. 77.All public improvements shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans or as conditions of this development and/or Tract 31920, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. All Public Works improvements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). The improvements shall include street and drainage improvements, street lighting, and associated traffic improvements related to the project. 78.All signing and striping and traffic control devices shall be installed. This includes Street Name Signs, No Parking and Street Sweeping Signs for streets within the tract. 79. Water and sewer improvements shall be completed in accordance with Water District requirements. 80.Proof of acceptance and maintenance responsibility shall be provided for all open spaces, slopes, and drainage facilities. 81. TUMF fees shall be paid. The TUMF fees shall be the effective rate at the time when the Certificate of Occupancy is obtained. 82.Post construction erosion controls and landscaping shall be installed and approved by the City Engineer. 83. The traffic signal at the intersection Mission Trail and Hidden Trail shall be completed an in operation as recommended in the Traffic Study for Tract No. 31920. Page 12 of 13 ACfNDA iTHii NO. S- PAGE ;)...9 OF.. 3 ~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-14 HOME RUN AT SUMMERLY LAKE ELSINORE 84. The applicant shall submit as-built plans and shall as-built the mylars. A digital copy of all completed public improvement plans shall be provided. A bond (amount to be determined by the City Engineer) is required to guarantee compliance of this requirement. SHERIFF RIVERSIDE COUNTY 85.Meet all the requirements per the attached letter dated March 20,2007. End of Conditions Page 13 of 13 ;,CENDt\ iTEM NO. S- , . - PAGE 30 OF. ..~...+-_ CITY OF A LA~ 5LSiNO~ , , V DREAM EXTREME March 20, 2007 Linda Miller, Associate Planner City of Lake Elsinore Planning Division 130 S. Main St. Lake Elsinore, California 92530 Projects: Residential Project No. 2006-14/ Neighborhood 4 Residential Project No. 2006-15 / Neighborhood 5 Residential Project No. 2006-16/ Neighborhood 6 Applicant: Brian hardy, WL Homes LLC Dear Ms. Miller, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the above described project(s) to be located within the John Laing Home project known as Home Run at Summerly, south of Malaga Road and west of Mission Trail. All residence design reviews should be consistent with the Lake Elsinore Crime Free Multi-Housing Program and Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) specifications. The following issues of concern related to public safety and law enforcement are presented: PRE-CONSTRUCTION AND CONSTRUCTION PHASES: (When Applicable) Construction site: Prior to construction on any structure, a material storage area should be established and enclosed by a six foot chain link fence to minimize theft of materials and/or equipment. It is recommended that a list of serial and/or license numbers of equipment stored at the location be maintained both, at the site and any off-site main office. Thefts and burglaries of building materials, fixtures, and appliances from construction storage areas and buildings under construction are on the rise. To reduce thefts and burglaries during the construction phases of this project, the developer and builders need to provide site security. The Lake Elsinore Police Department recommends the developer and builders use bonded security guards (when and if applicable) licensed by the State of California Bureau of Security & Investigative Services Department to handle project security. The public and non-essential employees should be restricted in access to the construction areas. Current emergency contact information for the project should be kept on file with the Lake Elsinore Police Department. The developer and/or builders name, address and phone number should be conspicuously posted at the construction site. Visibility into the construction site should not be intentionally hampered. Areas actually under construction should be lit during hours of darkness. All entrances and exits should be clearly marked. Designate and establish specific parking areas for construction site workers and tiGH'~D.:l, riE',1 i~O. 5 Pj~GE '3 I OF 3d- employees. The parking areas and commercial areas on the premises should be accessible to emergency vehicles at all times with paved pathways of sufficient width to accommodate such vehicles. LIGHTING: Have adequate security lighting throughout the project. All lighting fixtures should be resistant to vandalism tampering. The standards should be of a height to reduce any tampering or damage. GRAFFITI REDUCTION TIPS: Prior to occupancy, the surface walls, fences, buildings, logo monuments, etc. should be graffiti resistant either through surface composition, applied paint types and/or planned shielding by landscaping or plants. Wrought iron fencing has worked well in other projects to reduce graffiti. LANDSCAPING: Landscaping shall be of the type and situated in locations to maximize observation while providing the desired degree of aesthetics. Security planting materials are encouraged along fence and property lines and under vulnerable windows. At no time should shrubbery/plants/trees block line of sight from residence windows. All shrubbery should be trimmed below the lowest ledge of windowsill. Trees and tree limbs should never be in close proximity to a residence to allow access/entry into residence. LINE OF SIGHT/NATURAL SURVEILLANCE: Wide-angled peepholes should be incorporated into all dwelling front doors and to all solid doors where visual scrutiny to the door from public or private space is compromised. Other line of sight obstructions including recessed doorways, alcoves, etc., should be avoided on building exterior walls. PLAYGROUNDS / PLAY AREAS / RECREATION AREAS: All playgrounds and/or play areas for children should be surrounded by residences on all sides for viewing and/or have security fencing as to prevent non-residents from accessibility. Recreation areas, whether for adults or children, should also be securely maintained as to prevent non- residents from accessibility. All children areas are to be protected, secured and maintained accordingly. Should the community development department, developer or construction staff have any questions regarding the listed law enforcement and public safety concerns, please contact Officer Beth DeCou at (951) 245-3322. Sincerely, Officer Beth DeCou CPTED Specialist Lake Elsinore Police Department 333 W. Limited Ave. Lake Elsinore, CA. 92530 PAGE ~~~ I\Gc}JDA CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: JUNE 5,2007 PREPARED BY: LINDA MILLER, PLANNING CONSULTANT PROJECT TITLE: RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-15 APPLICANT: BRIAN HARDY, WL HOMES, LLC, 255 EAST RINCON STREET, SUITE 100, CORONA, CALIFORNIA 92879 OWNER: WL HOMES, LLC. 255 EAST RINCON STREET, SUITE 100, CORONA, CALIFORNIA 92879 PROJECT REQUEST: Review and approval of Residential Design Review No. 2006-15 for seventy-seven (77) single family detached residential dwelling units located within a 707 unit development known as Summerly Lake Elsinore (Tract 31920), East Lake Specific Plan, Amendment No. Six. Summerly Lake Elsinore is divided into several "neighborhoods." Residential Design Review No. 2006-15 is known as Neighborhood No. 5 (Diamond Drive at Summerly). A Model Home Complex is proposed that will include all three (3) of the plans proposed. Review is pursuant to East Lake Specific Plan, Amendment No. Six, Chapters 17.82 (Design Review), and 17.66 (Parking Requirements) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) and Summerly's Phase 1 Neighborhood Design Guidelines. PROJECT LOCATION The project site is located within the East Lake Specific Plan, Amendment No. Six in the southern section of the City of Lake Elsinore (APN's 371-270-002 & 016). AGENDA ITEM NO. en PACE { OF ~ ;;r REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 5, 2007 Page 2 of7 PROJECT TITLE: RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-15 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING EXISTING LAND USE ZONING Project Site Vacant Residential 1 East Lake Specific Plan North Vacant Residential 1 & East Lake Specific o en Space Plan South Vacant Residential 1 East Lake Specific Plan East Vacant Residential 1 East Lake Specific Plan West Vacant Residential 1 East Lake Specific Plan PROJECT BACKGROUND The East Lake Specific Plan (ELSP) was adopted by Ordinance No. 955 by the City Council in June 1993. The Plan consists of 3,000 acres and was originally divided into three (3) individual districts that included a Marina District, Lakeside Resort, and Recreation Village. Several Amendments have been made to the East Lake Specific Plan. The first two (2) amendments (Amendment No. 1 and No.2) changed the central area or Phase One of the Specific Plan. The changes primarily reduced the number of residential units and commercial uses and added a Golf Course to the open space area of the plan. Phase One is the development area where the current Laing Homes project is now located. Two other amendments, Amendment No. 3 and No.4, were related to industrial development along Corydon Avenue which are both outside of Phase One. Amendment No. 5 is for the proposed marina development located on Lakeshore Drive, known as WatersEdge. Laing Homes processed East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No.6 which was adopted by the City Council on July 27, 2004. This amendment replaced multi- family uses with single family uses, provided several parks and added an approximately 165 acre Golf Course, Club House, and Maintenance and Golf Cart Storage Facility. The Golf Course, Club House and Maintenance Facility have been previously reviewed by the Planning Commission and reviewed and approved by the City Council. The current project before the Planning Commission is one of ACENOA ITEM NO._~ ~ PAGE_.J. _ _OF~ '3 ~ REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 5, 2007 Page 3 of7 PROJECT TITLE: RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-15 several single family residential neighborhoods within the Laing Homes project known as Summerly Lake Elsinore. The neighborhood under consideration is a 14.3 net acre parcel known as Neighborhood No.5, (Diamond Drive at Summerly). Lots in this Neighborhood range in size from 7,200 square feet to 13,189 square feet with an average lot size of 8,334 square feet. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed Design Review consists of the following: I) Plotting Plan; 2) Elevations and Floor Plans; 3) Model Home Complex; and 4) Typical and Model Home Complex Landscape Plans. The applicant is proposing to use three (3) different floor plans. Each floor plan includes three (3) different architectural styles. Two (2) of the plans are two story, while Plan Three includes a third story loft. Optional balconies are offered for each plan. The following is a description of each Plan type: Plan One is a 3,142 square foot unit that includes a kitchen, nook, dining room, great room, laundry, three (3) bedrooms and two and one-half (2 ~) bathrooms with options for a fourth bedroom or den and giant bonus room. The three (3) car garage includes a tandem parking space. Plan Two is a 3,979 square foot unit that includes a kitchen, nook, dining room, living room, family room, laundry, five (5) bedrooms and three and one-half (3 ~) bathrooms with options that include up to eight (8) bedrooms and four (4) bathrooms. A three (3) car garage is included in this plan. Plan Three is a 4,641 square foot plan that includes a kitchen, nook, dining room, living room, super family room, laundry, five (5) bedrooms, three and one-half (3 1'2) bathrooms, with options that offer up to ten (10) bedrooms, and five (5) bathrooms. A three (3) car garage is proposed for this plan ACfNDA niEl.~ NO. PAGE \3 Co OF ~;;}- REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 5, 2007 Page 4 of7 PROJECT TITLE: RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-15 Architecture. Materials and Colors Each Plan includes three (3) different architectural styles. The three (3) styles are Monterey, Prairie, and Craftsman: The Monterey architecture, includes balconies, decorative window shutters, pot shelves, wrought iron grills, decorative railing, arched entries, and'S' type tile roof. The Prairie design includes brick veneer, wood railing, pot shelves, pop out with hip roof, wide roof overhang, and concrete flat roof tiles. The Craftsman design includes stone veneer wainscot, battered wood columns, wood railings, horizontal siding, knee braces, shutters, pot shelves, and concrete tile roof. All of the elevations that can be seen from a public road are required to include the enhanced features shown on the enclosed plans. Nine (9) color schemes will be provided including nine (9) different roofing tile colors. Landscapine: Summerly Lake Elsinore, Phase 1 Neighborhood Design Guidelines includes a detailed Landscape Design Criteria section that has been divided into the following categories: 1) Entries (Primary Neighborhoods - installed by the Master Developer Laing Homes); 2) Corner Lots & Neighborhood Enhancements (installed by each Neighborhood Guest Builder including Laing Homes), and 3) An Individual Neighborhood - which lists landscaping specific to each architectural style proposed. For example, all units with Spanish architecture will use the Spanish Plant Palette. Neighborhood No.4 will use a Monterey, Prairie, and Craftsman Plant Palette. Wall and Fencine: The applicant proposes to provide split face block walls throughout the development. The return wall will include a tubular steel gate. The Master Developer is responsible to construct the perimeter split face block walls as well as installing perimeter landscaping. ACENDA ;T"MI~.o. . _(.3 ~ PAGE ''1' _OF d- REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 5, 2007 Page 5 of7 PROJECT TITLE: RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-15 Model Complex The Model Home Complex will be located at Village Parkway and Baseball. A model of each of the three (3) Plans proposed will be included as well a parking lot for six vehicles including one (1) handicap space. The Complex will be fully landscaped with hardscape, trees and scrubs. ANAL YSIS Staff recommends approval of the Residential Design Review application based on the following: The single family residential neighborhoods that are part of the Summerly Lake Elsinore project are associated to the City's first Golf Course development that is currently under construction. These neighborhoods were to be constructed simultaneously with the construction of the Golf Course facility. Therefore, development of the single family residential development has been strongly encouraged by the City. The products proposed meet and/or exceed the existing product types that are currently being constructed within the City. The current zoning of the property is Residential 1, allowing for up to 6 dwelling units per acre. The applicant is proposing a density of 3.9 dwelling units per acre, which meets this requirement. The project proposes three (3) floor plans with three (3) different architectural styles providing several choices for the home buyer. All elevations that will be seen from a public roads will include architectural enhancements. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code SS 21000 et seq.: "CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R. SS 15000 et seq.), public agencies are expressly encouraged to reduce delay and paperwork associated with the implementation of CEQA by using previously prepared environmental documents when those previously prepared documents adequately address the potential impacts of the proposed project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15006). 4CENDAnEM)ID._- (" 3~ PAGE_S_. .Of _____ REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 5, 2007 Page 6 of7 PROJECT TITLE: RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-15 CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 establishes the standard to be used when determining whether subsequent environmental documentation is necessary. Section 15162 says that when an environmental document has already been adopted for a project, no subsequent environmental documentation is needed for subsequent entitlements which comprise the whole of the action unless substantial changes or new information are presented by the project. A Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was approved and adopted in 2004 for the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No.6 (SCH #2003071050) o and evaluated environmental impacts that would result from maximum build-out of the specific plan, which contemplated development of a golf course and clubhouse. The request for design review of the club house is consistent with the scope of the project as analyzed under the SEIR. The Project does not present substantial changes or new information regarding the potential environmental impacts of development. Therefore, no additional CEQA documentation is necessary. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the following Resolutions: Resolution No. 2007-_, recommending to the City Council adoption of the Findings of Consistency with the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan; and Resolution No. 2007-_ recommending to City Council approval of Residential Design Review No. 2006-15 for seventy-seven (77) single family detached residential dwelling units and associated improvements (APN's 371-270-002 & 016). Approval is based on the attached Exhibits, and Conditions of Approval. PREPARED BY: LINDA M. MILLER, AICP, PROJECT PLANNER ~ 1O~~(L ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPROVED BY: AC-N._.t\ i"""""...' ,,~ ( . ,; ~& . ~ ;,,~: ,~, J' ~ -,I '" t r ~~c~ ~'''C~''OF 3::>- REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 5, 2007 Page 7 of7 PROJECT TITLE: RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-15 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Resolutions: a. Resolution No. 2007-_ recommending City Council adoption of Findings Of Consistency with the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan b. Resolution No. 2007-_ recommending City Council approval of Residential Design Review No. 2006-15 for a seventy-seven (77) single family detached residential dwelling units and associated improvements. 3. Conditions Of Approval 4. Exhibits 5. Color Exhibits (Presented At The Hearing) AC~ND?\ 1\10. PACE f ~ OF 3.;r VICINITY MAP RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-15 ~ -; <fl, o~ -t.. ,..J. -}:J ----------- PLANNING COMMISSION A'~'-"~ 11.\0 ~ - ACfND 111.:1'1 1'0 .- '3 PAGE 8 ~OF __" r_ RESOLUTION NO. 2007- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ADOPT FINDINGS THAT THE PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP) WHEREAS, WL Homes, LLC, has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of Residential Design Review No. 2006-15 for the construction of a seventy-seven (77) single family detached residential development including a Model Home Complex and associated improvements (the "Project") (APN: 371-270-002 & 016); and WHEREAS, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP requires that all discretionary projects within an MSHCP criteria cell undergo the Lake Elsinore Acquisition Process ("LEAP") and Joint Project Review ("JPR") to analyze the scope of the proposed development and establish a building envelope that is consistent with the MSHCP criteria; and WHEREAS, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP further requires that the City of Lake Elsinore adopt consistency findings demonstrating that the proposed discretionary entitlement complies with the MSCHP cell criteria, and the MSCHP goals and objectives; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Section 17.82, requests for commercial design review are discretionary actions to be considered, reviewed, and approved, conditionally approved or denied by the Lake Elsinore City Council; and WHEREAS, the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No. 6 is partially covered by two distinct MSHCP criteria cells: approximately three (3) acres of the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No.6 are within cell 4846 and approximately three tenths (0.3) of an acre are within cell 4937; and WHEREAS, the Project site within the boundaries of East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No.6 that are covered by the aforementioned cell sites; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to the Project on June 5, 2007. AGENDA ITEM tWo PAGE.. '1. , OF Co ~r PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2007- PAGE20F5 NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the Project and its consistency with the MSHCP prior to recommending that the City Council adopt Findings of Consistency with the MSHCP. SECTION 2. That in accordance with the MSHCP, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for MSHCP consistency: 1. The Project is a project under the City's MSHCP Resolution, and the City must make an MSHCP Consistency finding before approval. Pursuant to the City's MSHCP Resolution, the Project must be reviewed for MSHCP consistency, which review shall include an analysis of the Project's consistency with other "Plan Wide Requirements." The Project is located within the East Lake Specific Plan (ELSP) area, specifically within the ELSP Amendment No. 6 area. Prior to the City's adoption of the MSHCP, there were a series of meetings between the County of Riverside, Us. Fish and Wildlife Service, and California Department of Fish and Game to discuss conservation measures within the ELSP and to decide how to ensure development within the ELSP could proceed consistently with the MSHCP and with the Us. Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 permit. It was determined that a target acreage of 770 acres was warranted for MSHCP conservation in the back basin area of the City. The Project site is within the ELSP and is covered by that conservation agreement. Part of the conservation agreement also included a requirement that projects in the back basin area be consistent with the other "Plan Wide Requirements" set forth in the following sections of the MSHCP: Protection of Species Associated with Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pool Guidelines (MSHCP, f 6.1.2), Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines (MSHCP, f 6.1.3), Additional Survey Needs and Procedures (MSHCP, f 6.3.2), Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines (MSHCP, f 6.1.4), Vegetation Mapping (MSHCP, f 6.3.1) requirements, Fuels Management Guidelines (MSHCP, f 6.4), and payment of the MSHCP Local ACENDA ITEM NO. ~ PAGE_ td OF __ J ).- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2007-_ PAGE 3 OF 5 Development Mitigation Fee (MSHCP Ordinance, S 4). The Project has been reviewed in light of these sections and is consistent therewith. 2. The Project is subject to the City's LEAP and the County's Joint Project Review processes. The ELSP MSCHP consistency determination was submitted to the County of Riverside in October 2003, prior to the initiation of the City's LEAP and County's Joint Project Review process. Nevertheless, both the City and Dudek (acting on behalf of the County) agreed that the Project was consistent with the MSHCP due to the extensive acreage set aside for conservation. The Project has not been modified and was part of the overall ELSP which has been determined to be consistent with the MSHCP. 3. The Project is consistent with the RiparianJRiverine Areas and Vemal Pools Guidelines. The previously approved ELSP Amendment No.6 was determined to be consistent with the Riparian/Riverine and Vernal Pool Guidelines as set forth in MSHCP S 6.1.2. The scope and nature of the Project have not been modified from that which was previously approved and is therefore consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools Guidelines. 4. The Project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines. The previously approved ELSP Amendment No.6 was consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines as set forth in MSHCP S 6.1.3. The Project has not been modified from that which was previously approved under the ELSP Amendment No.6. Additionally, based upon prior approvals, the entire Project site has been graded and any plant species which may have existed on the site have been removed and replaced with development. It is for these reasons that the Project is consistent with the aforementioned guidelines. 5. The Project is consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures. The previously approved ELSP Amendment No.6 was consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures as set forth in MSHCP S 6.3.2. .ACE.NDA ITEM NO. (0 PACE (l OF ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2007- PAGE 4 OF 5 The Project has not been modified from that which was previously approved under the ELSP Amendment No.6, and the entire project site has been graded pursuant to previously issued permits. The Project is consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures of the MSHCP. 6. The Project is consistent with the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines. The previously approved ELSP Amendment No.6 was consistent with the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines as set forth in MSHCP J 6.1.4. Because the Project has not been modified from that which was previously approved under the ELSP Amendment No.6, no further MSHCP review is necessary and the Project is consistent with the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines. 7. The Project is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements. The previously approved ELSP Amendment No.6 was consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements as set forth in MSHCP J 6.3.1. Mapping was conducted as part of the biological surveys for the original project. The Project has not been modifiedfrom that which was previously approved and therefore is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements. 8. The Project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines. The previously approved ELSP Amendment No.6 was consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines as set forth in MSHCP, J 6.4. The Project site is not within or adjacent to conservation areas where the Fuels Management Guidelines would be required. The Project has not been modified from that which was previously approved and therefore is consistent with the Fuel Management Guidelines. 9. The Project will be conditioned to pay the City's MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee. As a condition of project approval, the Project will be required to pay the City's MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee at the time of issuance of building permits. ACiENDA ITEM NO. ~ PACE, J J...-: OF 3?-- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2007- PAGE50F5 10. The Project overall is consistent with the MSHCP. As stated in No.1 above, the Project is within the ELSP area which has previously been determined to be consistent with the MSHCP. SECTION 3. Based upon all of the evidence presented, the above findings, and the conditions of approval imposed upon the Project, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council find that the Project is consistent with the MSHCP. SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of June, 2007, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission ATTEST: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development 1\('r.',~,""l,'\ "'7:'1\~ >,'0 ",(p ~ .a;;r-.ild""\ I ~ ~~.,.~ iv . ... . 'PAGE }3 OF 6)--- RESOLUTION NO. 2007-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-15 WHEREAS, WL HOMES, LLC, has initiated proceedings for Residential Design Review No. 2006-15 for the design and construction of a seventy-seven (77) single family detached residential development including a Model Home Complex and associated improvements located within the East Lake Specific Plan, Amendment No. Six (APN 371-270-002 & 016) (the "Entitlement"); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council for residential design review applications; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res, Code 99 21000 et seq,: "CEQA") and the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA (14 C.C.R. 99 15000 et seq.: "CEQA Guidelines"), public agencies are expressly encouraged to reduce delay and paperwork associated with the implementation of CEQA by using previously prepared environmental documents when those previously prepared documents adequately address the potential impacts of the proposed project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15006); and WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 establishes the standard to be used when determining whether subsequent environmental documentation is necessary and says that when an environmental document has already been adopted for a project, no subsequent environmental documentation is needed for subsequent entitlements which comprise the whole of the action unless substantial changes or new information are presented by the project; and WHEREAS, a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report was approved and adopted in 2004 for the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No, 6 (SCH #2003071050) and evaluated environmental impacts that would result from maximum build-out of the specific plan, which contemplated development of single family residential development; and WHEREAS, the Entitlement does not present substantial changes or new information regarding the potential environmental impacts of development; and r.:l\i'DA "~-"~ r\Q ro AC" !J Il':')~i ,'0 .~ PAoe--1.f-.oF 3 y PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2007- PAGE20F4 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to the Entitlement on June 5, 2007. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the Entitlement prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve Residential Design Review No. 2006-15 for a single family detached residential development. SECTION 2. The Planning Commission finds and determines that no new CEQA documentation is necessary. The Entitlement comprises the whole of the action which was analyzed in the previously approved and certified Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SCH # 2003071050) for the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No.6. Approval of the Entitlement will not change density or intensity of use; it simply establishes standards for color palates, articulation, orientation, and design of single family residential development. Therefore, no further environmental review is necessary. SECTION 3. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning Law and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Planning Commission makes the following findings regarding Residential Design Review No. 2006-15: 1. The single family detached residential development, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan, Specific Plan and the Zoning District in which it is located. The single family detached residential development complies with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No.6. The facility will assist in achieving the development of a well-balanced and functional mix of residential, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses. 2. The single family detached residential development complies with the design directives contained in the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No.6 and all applicable provisions of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. The single family detached residential development is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments. The three (3) architectural styles proposed ACE.NDA iTE!\i1 rm. ~ PACE I S'- OF 3:;;r- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2007-_ PAGE 3 OF 4 will create a distinctive street scene within the project site. Sufficient setbacks and onsite landscaping have been provided thereby creating interest and varying vistas. In addition, safe and efficient circulation has been achieved onsite. 3. Subject to the attached conditions of approval, the single family detached residential development is not anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. The single family detached residential development, as reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City divisions, departments and agencies, will not have a significant effect on the environment. Approval of the design for the single family detached residential development will not result in a substantial change to the previously adopted Supplemental Environmental Impact Report. Therefore, no additional environmental review is necessary. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the Project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter 17.82. Pursuant to Section 17.82.070 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Entitlement been scheduled for consideration by the Planning Commission on June 5, 2007. SECTION 4. Based upon all of the evidence presented, the above findings, and the conditions of approval imposed upon the Entitlement, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve Residential Design Review 2006-15. SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. [4GHlDA iTEM NO. ~ PAGE~OF ~ d-:-_ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2007- PAGE40F4 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of June 2007, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development ^C- \' '''''. ,u,,_ < 1\\0 ( ",~,'~lJ;\ ll::':i.l ~~' ........Jo~._- IpAGEt"7 OF 3;;>- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-15 DIAMOND DRIVE AT SUMMERLY LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL 1. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, and Agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning the Residential Design Review projects attached hereto. PLANNING DIVISION 2. Design Review approval for Residential Design Review No. 2006-15 will lapse and be void unless a building permit is issued within one (1) year of the Planning Commission approval date. The Community Development Director may grant an extension of time for up to one (1) year prior to the expiration of the initial Design Review. An application for a time extension and required fee shall be submitted a minimum of one (1) month prior to the expiration date. 3. The decision of the Planning Commission shall be final fifteen (15) days from the date of the decision, unless an appeal has been filed with the City Clerk's Office pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 17.80 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 4. All construction shall comply with these Conditions of Approval and those provisions and requirements contained in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy and release of utilities. 5. All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved building elevations and site plans for the Residential Design Review and the Model Home Complex. 6. Future site plotting and construction shall be consistent with these Conditions of Approval, those conditions approved with Tentative Tract Map No. 31920 and those provisions and requirements contained in the Municipal Code, subject to approval by the Community Development Director or designee. 7. The following architectural details shall be provided: Page 1 of 13 -..,n I<"~.'~ '.10 / ACH'H)h i~". bv.~_..~-- PAGE I ~ Of 3 d-: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-15 DIAMOND DRIVE AT SUMMERLY LAKE ELSINORE . Any masonry provided at the front elevation will continue to wrap around the side elevations, to the front wall return. . All front fence returns will be decorative masonry walls. Wood fences will not be allowed along the front elevation. . Additional architectural enhancements shall be provided on elevations within public view. The applicant shall provide the Planning Division sequence sheets listing which units shall receive enhancements. The sequence sheets shall be provided prior to the issuance of building permits for each phase of development. . Nine (9) different color schemes will be provided. 8. All weep screeds shall be a maximum three inches above any hard surface and four inches above any earth surface. 9. The applicant shall provide a flat concrete pad or area a minimum of 3'- 0" by 7'- 0" adjacent to the dwelling for the storage of the City trash barrels. The storage pad or area shall conceal the trash barrels from public view, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. Precise grading plans shall identify the location of the aforementioned flat concrete pad and air conditioning units. 10.The building addresses (in numerals at least four inches high) shall be displayed near the entrance and easily visible from the front of the unit and public right-of-way. The applicant shall obtain street addresses for all production lots prior to issuance of building permit. 11. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City's Grading Ordinance. Construction generated dust and erosion shall be mitigated in accordance with the provisions of Municipal Code, Chapter 15.72 and using accepted techniques. Interim erosion control measures shall be provided 30 days after the site's rough grading, as approved by the City Engineer. 12.The applicant shall comply with all applicable City Codes and Ordinances. Page 2 of 13 ACENDA ITEJ11'1 ~'JO. .~ PAGE /9 OF 3~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-15 DIAMOND DRIVE AT SUMMERLY LAKE ELSINORE 13.Prior to issuance of building permit, building plans for the Model Home Complex shall comply with all American Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements, including provision of a handicapped-accessible bathroom. 14.A cash bond of$I,OOO.OO shall be required for the Model Home Complex. This bond is to guarantee removal of the temporary fencing material, parking lot, etc. that have been placed onsite for the Model Home Complex. The bond will be released after removal of the materials and the site is adequately restored, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. 15.A cash bond of$I,OOO.OO shall be required for any garage conversion of the model(s). Bonds will be released after removal of all temporary materials and the site is adequately restored, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. 16.A cash bond of $1,000.00 shall be required for any construction trailers used during construction. Bonds will be released after removal of trailers, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. 17. The applicant shall pay school fees to the Lake Elsinore Unified School District prior to issuance of building permit. 18.The project shall connect to sewer and meet all requirements of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). The applicant shall submit water and sewer plans to the EVMWD and shall incorporate all district conditions and standards. 19. The design and construction of the project shall meet all County Fire Department standards for fire protection. 20.All mechanical and electrical equipment for the building shall be ground mounted. All outdoor ground or wall mounted utility equipment shall be consolidated in a central location and architecturally screened behind fence returns, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director, prior to issuance of building permit. Page 3 of 13 I"I>''I'\A l......r~ r.\("\\ ~ ACt'I\lv I' 1;,'" j~V._~ PACE ;J-.O 01= _ ~~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-15 DIAMOND DRIVE AT SUMMERL Y LAKE ELSINORE 21.All front yards and side yards on comer lots shall be properly landscaped with automatic (manual or electric) irrigation system to provide 100 percent plant and grass coverage using a combination of drip and conventional irrigation methods. The final landscaping/irrigation plan is to be reviewed and approved by the City's Landscape Architect Consultant and the Community Development Director or designee. A Landscape Plan check fee will be charged prior to final landscape approval based on the Consultant's fee plus 40 percent. . The applicant shall comply with the Plant Palette listed for each of the neighborhoods as indicated within the Phase 1 Neighborhood Design Guidelines. . Planting within 15 feet of ingress/egress points shall be no higher than 36 inches. . The landscape plan shall provide for ground cover, shrubs, and trees and meet all requirements of the City's adopted Landscape Guidelines. Special attention to the use of Xeriscape or drought resistant plantings with combination drip irrigation system to be used to prevent excessive watering. . All landscape improvements shall be bonded with a 100 percent Faithful Performance Bond for materials and labor for two years from Certificate of Occupancy. · All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed within an affected portion of any phase at the time a certificate of occupancy is requested for any building. · One of the proposed lots of the Model Home Complex shall be Xeriscaped and signage provided identifying Xeriscape landscaping. · The Final landscape plan shall be consistent with any approved site and/or plot plan. · The Final landscape plan shall include planting and irrigation details. Page 4 of 13 ACENDA ITEM NO. ~ . -""---~_.. PACE d-f Of~_ 3~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-15 DIAMOND DRIVE AT SUMMERLY LAKE ELSINORE 22.All exposed slopes in excess of three feet in height within the subject tract and within private lots shall have permanent irrigation system and erosion control vegetation installed, as approved by the Planning Division, prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. 23.The applicant shall prepare a Wall and Fencing Plan for the project area, in compliance with the fencing standards within the Zoning Code Section 17.14.130.D prior to issuance of any building permit, and subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. 24.Fences located in any front yard shall not exceed three feet in height with the exception that wrought-iron fences may be five feet in height. Chain link fences shall be prohibited. 25. Garages shall be constructed to provide a minimum of 10' x 20' of interior clear space for two cars for a total interior clear space of 20' x 20' . 26.Prior to issuance of any precise grading permit or building permit, the applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records. 27.These Conditions of Approval and those conditions approved with Tentative Tract Map No. 31920 shall be reproduced on subsequent building plans prior to issuance of building permit. 28.Provisions of the City's Noise Ordinance shall be satisfied during all site preparation and construction activity. Site preparation activity and construction shall not commence before 7:00 AM and shall cease at 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday. Construction activity shall not take place on Saturday, Sunday, or any Legal Holidays. 29.The applicant shall pay all appropriate City fees. 30.The applicant shall pay the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Fee (MSHCP) Local Development Mitigation Fee prior to obtaining building permits. Page 5 of 13 ACEND.L\ ITEM rJo. fa PACE 0-;)-- OF "3 ~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-15 DIAMOND DRIVE AT SUMMERL Y LAKE ELSINORE 31. The applicant shall place a weatherproof 3' x 3' sign at the entrance to the project site identifying the approved days and hours of construction activity and a statement that complaints regarding the operation can be lodged with the City of Lake Elsinore Code Enforcement Division (951) 674-3124. 32.Pursuant to the following Section 12.10 of the First Amended and Restated Development Agreement between the City of Lake Elsinore and Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC which states, "Upon application for each residential dwelling unit building permit constructed in the Project, Developer shall, at the time of issuance of such building permit, pay an in-lieu Affordable Housing Fee in the amount of One Dollar and Thirty Cents ($1.30) per square foot of "assessable space" (as that term is defined in Government Code Section 65995(b)(1) ("Affordable Housing Fee"). Notwithstanding the foregoing, in lieu of paying the Affordable Housing Fee, Developer may elect to enter into a mutually acceptable agreement with the City and Agency to provide up to fifteen percent (15%) of the units in the Project on the Developer Property in accordance with requirements of Section 33413(b) of the CRL as Affordable Housing Units on a site within the Developer Property or a mutually acceptable alternative site outside of the Developer Property to be designated in the future for multi-family uses." ENGINEERING DIVISION General Requirements: 33.A grading plan signed and stamped by a Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall be required if the grading exceeds 50 cubic yards or the existing flow pattern is substantially modified as determined by the City Engineer. If the grading is less than 50 cubic yards and a grading plan is not required, a grading permit shall still be obtained so that a cursory drainage and flow pattern inspection can be conducted before grading begins. 34.Prior to commencement of grading operations, applicant to provide to the City with a map of all proposed haul routes to be used for movement of export material. Such routes shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. Page 6 of 13 ACEI\IDA iTEM NO. (0 .. ..___. PACE ~~ OF 3 d-~. "----.. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-15 DIAMOND DRIVE AT SUMMERLY LAKE ELSINORE 33.All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer and he shall certify all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and proper erosion control. 34.This project shall comply with applicable Conditions of Approval of Tract 31920. 35.Phasing Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer. Bond public improvements for each Phase as approved by the City Engineer. 36.An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained prior to any work on City right-of-way. 37.Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. Overhead utilities shall be undergrounded. 38.Underground water rights shall be dedicated to the City pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.52.030 (LEMC), and consistent with the City's agreement with the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. 39.The applicant shall install permanent bench marks per Riverside County Standards and at locations to be determined by the City Engineer. 40.Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by Riverside County Fire Department. 41.Applicant shall pay all applicable development fees, including but not all inclusive: TUMF, MSHCP, TIF and area drainage fees. 42.10 year storm runoff shall be contained within the curb and the 100 year storm runoff shall be contained within the street right-of-way. When either of these criteria is exceeded, drainage facilities shall be provided. 43.All drainage facilities in this project shall be constructed to Riverside County Flood Control District Standards. Page 7 of 13 ACE,NDA ITEM NO.. Co PACE~':C.~F '3 ~. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-15 DIAMOND DRIVE AT SUMMERLY LAKE ELSINORE 44.All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 YZ" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of public works improvements will be scheduled and approved. 45.Slope maintenance along public right-of-ways shall be maintained by a homeowner's association or other maintenance mechanism as approved by the City. 46.All open space and slopes (except for public parks and schools) and flood control facilities outside the public right-of-way shall be owned and maintained by homeowner's association. 47 . All landscaping at intersections shall meet City Sight Distance Standards. 48.All waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or other phases of the construction shall be disposed of at appropriate recycling centers. The applicant should contract with CR&R Inc. for recycling and storage container services, but the applicant may use the services of another recycling vendor. Another recycling vendor, other than CR&R Inc., cannot charge the applicant for bin rental or solid waste disposal. If the applicant is not using CR&R Inc. for recycling services and the recycling material is either sold or donated to another vendor, the applicant shall supply proof of debris disposal at a recycling center, including verification of tonnage by certified weigh master tickets. 49.0n-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility, accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance, or conveyed to a drainage easement. 50.All natural drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer. 51.Roof drains shall not be allowed to outlet directly through coring in the street curb. Roofs should drain to a landscaped area. 52.Applicant shall comply with all NPDES requirements in effect; including the submittal of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) as required per the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. The requirements of WQMP may affect Page 8 of 13 ACH~DA ITEM NO. .. Co PAGE d-S": OF_3;;L-_ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-15 DIAMOND DRIVE AT SUMMERLY LAKE ELSINORE the overall layout of the project. Therefore, WQMP submittal should be during the initial process of the project. 53.Education guidelines and Best Management Practices (BMP) shall be provided to residents of the development in the use of herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers as well as other environmental awareness education materials on good housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of storm water quality and met the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. (Required for lot of one acre or more) 54.Applicant shall provide BMP's that will reduce storm water pollutants from parking areas and driveway aisles. (Required for lot of one acre or more) 55.City of Lake Elsinore has adopted ordinances for storm water management and discharge control. In accordance with state and federal law, these local storm water ordinances prohibit the discharge of waste into storm drain system or local surface waters. This includes non-storm water discharges containing oil, grease, detergents, trash, or other waste remains. Brochures of "Storm water Pollution, What You Should Know" describing preventing measures are available at City Hall. PLEASE NOTE: The discharge of pollutants into street, gutters, storm drain system, or waterways -without Regional Water Quality Control Board permit or waver - is strictly prohibited by local ordinances and state and federal law. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 56. Streets with a slope greater than 9% shall be redesigned to 9% or less, unless approved by the City Engineer. 57. Maintenance access shall be provided to all open spaces and drainage facilities and easements. 58.A Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall prepare street and traffic improvement plans and specifications for the street improvements as shown on the Site Plan. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Riverside County Standards, latest edition, and City Codes (LEMC 12.04 and 16.34). Street improvement plans shall Page 9 of 13 AQENDA \TEM NO.--~5~' PACE .;;lb Of __------ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-15 DIAMOND DRIVE AT SUMMERLY LAKE ELSINORE include curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lighting, ac pavement and drainage improvements. 59.Make an offer of dedication for all public streets and easements required by these conditions or as shown on the Site Plan. All land so offered shall be granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost to the city. 60.Applicant shall submit signing and striping plans for the required street improvements. All signing and striping and traffic control devices shall be installed prior to final inspection of public improvements. The signing and striping shall include Street Name Signs, No Parking and Street Sweeping Signs for streets within the project. 61.Submit grading plans with appropriate security, Hydrology, and Hydraulic Reports prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer for approval by the City Engineer. The grading plans shall include mitigation/protection of any flooding and/or erosion downstream caused by development of the site and/or diversion of drainage. The grading plan shall also show that no structures, landscaping, or equipment are located near or at street intersections in order to meet sight distance standards. 62.Construction Project access and hauling route plan shall be submitted and approved by the City Engineer, 63.Provide soils, geology and seismic report including street design recommendations. Provide final soils report showing compliance with recommendations. 64.An Alquist-Priolo study shall be performed on the site to identify any hidden earthquake faults and/or liquefaction zones present on-site. 65.The applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site easements and/or permits for off-site grading and/or drainage acceptance from the adjacent property owners prior to grading permit issuance. 66.Applicant to provide erosion control measures as part of their grading plan. The applicant shall contribute to protection of storm water quality and meet the goals of Page 10 of 13 ACENDA IT"r.""", (. t.~.i ha..l. . ~ PAGE d- ~ --0';: --~-"""-d-' - - r '1- -- -.... . ""'.-.~~" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-15 DIAMOND DRIVE AT SUMMERLY LAKE ELSINORE the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. 67.Applicant shall provide the city with proof of his having filed a Notice of Intent with the Regional Water Quality Control Board for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program with a storm water pollution prevention plan prior to issuance of grading permits. The applicant shall provide a SWPPP for post construction, which describes BMP's that will be implemented for the development including maintenance responsibilities. The applicant shall submit the SWPPP to the City for review and approval. 68. The applicant shall provide an approved WQMP plan. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit 69.Submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project and specify the technical data for the water service at the location. such as water pressure and volume etc. Submit this letter prior to applying for a building permit. 70.Provide proof that no structures, landscaping, or equipment are located at intersections and street curves that could compromise sight distance requirements. 71. WQMP and erosion control plans shall be in place to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 72.Pay all Capital Improvement TIF and Master Drainage Fees, and Plan Check fees (LEMC 16.34). Prior to Occupancy 73.Pay all fees and meet requirements of an encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Division for construction of off-site public works improvements (LEMC12.08, Res.83-78). All fees and requirements for an encroachment permit shall be fulfilled before Certificate of Occupancy. Page 11 of 13 ACtNDA l"tEM NO... .(,.~ PAGE..a-~ ,._OF 3d:-.- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-15 DIAMOND DRIVE AT SUMMERLY LAKE ELSINORE 74.All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 1/2" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of off-site improvements will be scheduled and approved. 75.All public improvements shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans or as conditions of this development and/or Tract 31920, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. All Public Works improvements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). The improvements shall include street and drainage improvements, street lighting, and associated traffic improvements related to the project. 76.All signing and striping and traffic control devices shall be installed. This includes Street Name Signs, No Parking and Street Sweeping Signs for streets within the tract. 77.Water and sewer improvements shall be completed in accordance with Water District requirements. 78.Proof of acceptance and maintenance responsibility shall be provided for all open spaces, slopes, and drainage facilities. 79. TUMF fees shall be paid. The TUMF fees shall be the effective rate at the time when the Certificate of Occupancy is obtained. 80.Post construction erosion controls and landscaping shall be installed and approved by the City Engineer. 81. The traffic signal at the intersection of Malaga and Diamond Drive shall be completed and in operation as recommended in the Traffic Study for Tract No. 31920. 82. The applicant shall submit as-built plans and shall as-built the mylars. A digital copy of all completed public improvement plans shall be provided. A bond (amount to be determined by the City Engineer) is required to guarantee compliance of this requirement. Page 12 of 13 AGENDA rrEM NO. Co PAGE ?-~. OF ~}-. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-15 DIAMOND DRIVE AT SUMMERLY LAKE ELSINORE SHERIFF RIVERSIDE COUNTY 83.Meet all the requirements per the attached letter dated March 20, 2007. End of Conditions Page 13 of 13 r,r(""....l\ Co ....1.i(;'I','!j, g"""'"'' , ''''r H.::M NO PAGE~OF _ ~ 2::. CITY OF A LAKE ,6/LSiNO~ ~ DREAM EXTREME March 20, 2007 Linda Miller, Associate Planner City of Lake Elsinore Planning Division 130 S. Main St. Lake Elsinore, California 92530 Projects: Residential Project No. 2006-14/ Neighborhood 4 Residential Project No. 2006-15/ Neighborhood 5 Residential Project No. 2006-16/ Neighborhood 6 Applicant: Brian hardy, WL Homes LLC Dear Ms. Miller, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the above described project(s) to be located within the John Laing Home project known as Home Run at Summerly, south of Malaga Road and west of Mission Trail. All residence design reviews should be consistent with the Lake Elsinore Crime Free Multi-Housing Program and Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) specifications. The following issues of concern related to public safety and law enforcement are presented: PRE-CONSTRUCTION AND CONSTRUCTION PHASES: (When Applicable) Construction site: Prior to construction on any structure, a material storage area should be established and enclosed by a six foot chain link fence to minimize theft of materials and/or equipment. It is recommended that a list of serial and/or license numbers of equipment stored at the location be maintained both, at the site and any off-site main office. Thefts and burglaries of building materials, fixtures, and appliances from construction storage areas and buildings under construction are on the rise. To reduce thefts and burglaries during the construction phases of this project, the developer and builders need to provide site security. The Lake Elsinore Police Department recommends the developer and builders use bonded security guards (when and if applicable) licensed by the State of California Bureau of Security & Investigative Services Department to handle project security. The public and non-essential employees should be restricted in access to the construction areas. Current emergency contact information for the project should be kept on file with the Lake Elsinore Police Department. The developer and/or builders name, address and phone number should be conspicuously posted at the construction site. Visibility into the construction site should not be intentionally hampered. Areas actually under construction should be lit during hours of darkness. All entrances and exits should be clearly marked. Designate and establish specific parking areas for construction site workers and ACHmJ\ HaJ~ NO. P;\CE j t b Of _30- employees. The parking areas and commercial areas on the premises should be accessible to emergency vehicles at all times with paved pathways of sufficient width to accommodate such vehicles. LIGHTING: Have adequate security lighting throughout the project. All lighting fixtures should be resistant to vandalism tampering. The standards should be of a height to reduce any tampering or damage. GRAFFITI REDUCTION TIPS: Prior to occupancy, the surface walls, fences, buildings, logo monuments, etc. should be graffiti resistant either through surface composition, applied paint types and/or planned shielding by landscaping or plants. Wrought iron fencing has worked well in other projects to reduce graffiti. LANDSCAPING: Landscaping shall be of the type and situated in locations to maximize observation while providing the desired degree of aesthetics. Security planting materials are encouraged along fence and property lines and under vulnerable windows. At no time should shrubbery/plants/trees block line of sight from residence windows. All shrubbery should be trimmed below the lowest ledge of windowsill. Trees and tree limbs should never be in close proximity to a residence to allow access/entry into residence. LINE OF SIGHT/NATURAL SURVEILLANCE: Wide-angled peepholes should be incorporated into all dwelling front doors and to all solid doors where visual scrutiny to the door from public or private space is compromised. Other line of sight obstructions including recessed doorways, alcoves, etc., should be avoided on building exterior walls. PLAYGROUNDS / PLAY AREAS I RECREATION AREAS: All playgrounds and/or play areas for children should be surrounded by residences on all sides for viewing and/or have security fencing as to prevent non-residents from accessibility. Recreation areas, whether for adults or children, should also be securely maintained as to prevent non- residents from accessibility. All children areas are to be protected, secured and maintained accordingly. Should the community development department, developer or construction staff have any questions regarding the listed law enforcement and public safety concerns, please contact Officer Beth DeCou at (951) 245-3322. Sincerely, Officer Beth DeCou CPTED Specialist Lake Elsinore Police Department 333 W. Limited Ave. Lake Elsinore, CA. 92530 l l\Gi.:I\m..\ ITEM NO. ~ PAGE 3;::}- OF ?> &- CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: JUNE 5,2007 PREPARED BY: LINDA MILLER, PLANNING CONSULTANT PROJECT TITLE: RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-16 APPLICANT: BRIAN HARDY, WL HOMES, LLC, 255 EAST RINCON STREET, SUITE 100, CORONA, CALIFORNIA 92879 OWNER: WL HOMES, LLC. 255 EAST RINCON STREET, SUITE 100, CORONA, CALIFORNIA 92879 PROJECT REQUEST: Review and approval of Residential Design Review No. 2006-16 for seventy-two (72) single family detached residential dwelling units located within a 707 unit development known as Summerly Lake Elsinore (Tract 31920), East Lake Specific Plan, Amendment No. Six. Summerly Lake Elsinore is divided into several "neighborhoods." Residential Design Review No. 2006-16 is known as Neighborhood No.6 (Grand Slam at Summerly). A Model Home Complex is proposed that will be used for two (2) neighborhoods, Neighborhood No. 6 (Grand Slam at Summerly) and Neighborhood No.4 (Home Run at Summerly). Review is pursuant to East Lake Specific Plan, Amendment No. Six, Chapters 17.82 (Design Review), and 17.66 (Parking Requirements) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) and Summerly's Phase 1 Neighborhood Design Guidelines. AGENDP I""":;,...., r",'.7 " ~....... ." Ii.. \.... . PACE , -"i:.i~.3d- REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 5, 2007 Page 2 of7 PROJECT TITLE: RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-16 PROJECT LOCATION The project site is located within the East Lake Specific Plan, Amendment No. Six in the southern section of the City of Lake Elsinore (APN 371-270-003). ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Project Site Vacant Residential 1 East Lake Specific Plan North Vacant Residential 1 East Lake Specific Plan South Vacant Residential 1 East Lake Specific Plan Southwest Vacant Open Space East Lake Specific Plan East Vacant Open Space East Lake Specific Plan West Vacant Residential 1 East Lake Specific Plan PROJECT BACKGROUND The East Lake Specific Plan (ELSP) was adopted by Ordinance No. 955 by the City Council in June 1993. The Plan consists of 3,000 acres and was originally divided into three (3) individual districts that included a Marina District, Lakeside Resort, and Recreation Village. Several Amendments have been made to the East Lake Specific Plan. The first two (2) amendments (Amendment No. 1 and No.2) changed the central area or Phase One of the Specific Plan. The changes primarily reduced the number of residential units and commercial uses and added a Golf Course to the open space area of the plan. Phase One is the development area where the current Laing Homes project is now located. Two other amendments, Amendment No. 3 and No.4, were related to industrial development along Corydon Avenue which are both outside of Phase One. Amendment No. 6 is for the proposed marina development located on Lakeshore Drive, known as WatersEdge. AOEI\lDA iTEii;~ NO. ( PAGE ~ (Jr 3d- REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 5, 2007 Page 3 of7 PROJECT TITLE: RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-16 Laing Homes processed East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No.6 which was adopted by the City Council on July 27, 2004. This amendment replaced multi- family uses with single family uses, provided several parks and added an approximately 165 acre Golf Course, Club House, and Maintenance and Golf Cart Storage Facility. The Golf Course, Club House and Maintenance Facility have been previously reviewed by the Planning Commission and reviewed and approved by the City Council. The current project before the Planning Commission is one of several single family residential neighborhoods within the Laing Homes project known as Summerly Lake Elsinore. The neighborhood under consideration is a 11.0 net acre parcel known as Neighborhood No.6, (Grand Slam at Summerly). Lots in this Neighborhood range in size from 6,000 square feet to 11,808 square feet with an average lot size of 6,933 square feet. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed Design Review consists of the following: 1) Plotting Plan; 2) Elevations and Floor Plans; 3) Model Home Complex; and 4) Typical and Model Home Complex Landscape Plans. The applicant is proposing to provide four (4) different floor plans. Each floor plan includes three (3) different architectural styles. Three (3) of the Plans are two story, while Plan One is a single story unit. Optional balconies are offered for each of the two (2) story plans. The following is a description of each Plan type: Plan One is a 2,800 square foot single story unit that includes a kitchen, nook, dining room, living room, laundry, four (4) bedrooms and two and one-half (2 'li) bathrooms with options for a fifth bedroom or den. A two (2) car garage is proposed with an optional work area and/or golf cart space. Plan Two is a 3,076 square foot two (2) story unit that includes a kitchen, nook, dining room, living room, family room, laundry, three (3) bedrooms, two and one-half (2 'li) bathrooms with an optional fourth bedroom, den or office and third bathroom. A Bonus room is also included. A three (3) car garage is included. Plan Three is a 3,347 square foot two (2) story plan that includes a kitchen, nook, dining room, living room, family room, laundry, five (5) bedrooms AGENDf\ !F>S t"of ~ACE ~"3'~'-u;'-~"~. REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 5, 2007 Page 4 of7 PROJECT TITLE: RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-16 and three and one-half (3 lh) bathrooms and Bonus Room or Game Room. A three (3) car garage is included in this plan. Plan Four is a 3,066 square foot two (2) story plan that includes a kitchen, nook, dining room, living room, family room, laundry, five (5) bedrooms three and one-half (3 1/2) bathrooms which is the same layout as Plan Three with a portion of the second floor eliminated. This plan also offers a three (3) car garage. Architecture, Materials and Colors Each of the four (4) Plans includes three (3) different architectural styles. The three (3) styles are Spanish, Ranch, and Craftsman: The Spanish architecture, includes arched entries, decorative window shutters, pot shelves, wrought iron grills, wrought iron railing, and'S' type tile roof. The Ranch design includes stone veneer wainscot, wood posts and wood railing, wood pot shelves, horizontal siding, outlookers and concrete flat roof tiles. The Craftsman design includes stone veneer wainscot, battered wood columns, wood railings, horizontal siding, knee braces, shutters, pot shelves, and concrete tile roof. All of the elevations that can be seen from a public road are required to include the enhanced features shown on the enclosed plans. Twelve (12) color schemes will be provided including twelve (12) different roofing tile colors. Landscapine: Summerly Lake Elsinore, Phase 1 Neighborhood Design Guidelines includes a detailed Landscape Design Criteria section that has been divided into the following categories: I) Entries (Primary Neighborhoods - installed by the Master Developer Laing Homes); 2) Comer Lots & Neighborhood Enhancements (installed by each Neighborhood Guest Builder including Laing Homes), and 3) which lists landscaping specific to each architectural style proposed. For example, all units with Spanish architecture will use the Spanish Plant Palette. Neighborhood No. 6 will use Spanish, Ranch and Craftsman Plant Palettes. AGEND.~ ITEi'4 ~m. l PAGE_ ."t _OF_ 2> ?-:::-- REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 5, 2007 Page 5 of7 PROJECT TITLE: RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-16 Wall and Fencin2 The applicant proposes to provide split face block walls throughout the development. The return wall will include a tubular steel gate. The Master Developer is responsible to construct the perimeter split face block walls as well as installing perimeter landscaping. Model Complex The Model Home Complex will be located at Village Parkway and Baseball. Three (3) of the four (4) plans proposed will be included as well a parking lot for six vehicles including one (1) handicap space. The Complex will be fully landscaped with hardscape, trees and scrubs. ANAL YSIS Staff recommends approval of the Residential Design Review application based on the following: The single family residential neighborhoods that are part of the Summerly Lake Elsinore project are associated to the City's first Golf Course development that is currently under construction. These neighborhoods were to be constructed simultaneously with the construction of the Golf Course facility. Therefore, development of the single family residential development has been strongly encouraged by the City. The products proposed meet and/or exceed the existing product types that are currently being constructed within the City. The current zoning of the property is Residential 1, allowing for up to 6 dwelling units per acre. The applicant is proposing a density of 4.7 dwelling units per acre, which meets this requirement. The project proposes four (4) floor plans with three (3) different architectural styles providing several choices for the home buyer. All elevations that will be seen from a public roads will include architectural enhancements. ACHWA rrC1J\ i~D. PAGE 5 { OF 3 d-/ REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 5, 2007 Page 6 of7 PROJECT TITLE: RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-16 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code 99 21000 et seq.: "CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R. 9S 15000 et seq.), public agencies are expressly encouraged to reduce delay and paperwork associated with the implementation of CEQA by using previously prepared environmental documents when those previously prepared documents adequately address the potential impacts of the proposed project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15006). CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 establishes the standard to be used when determining whether subsequent environmental documentation is necessary. Section 15162 says that when an environmental document has already been adopted for a project, no subsequent environmental documentation is needed for subsequent entitlements which comprise the whole of the action unless substantial changes or new information are presented by the project. A Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was approved and adopted in 2004 for the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No.6 (SCH #2003071050) and evaluated environmental impacts that would result from maximum build-out of the specific plan, which contemplated development of a golf course and clubhouse. The request for design review of the club house is consistent with the scope of the project as analyzed under the SEIR. The Project does not present substantial changes or new information regarding the potential environmental impacts of development. Therefore, no additional CEQA documentation is necessary. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the following Resolutions: Resolution No. 2007-_, recommending to the City Council adoption of the Findings of Consistency with the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan; and Resolution No. 2007-_ recommending to City Council approval of Residential Design Review No. 2006-16 for seventy-two (72) single family detached residential dwelling units and associated improvements (APN 371-270-003). Approval is based on the attached Exhibits, and Conditions of Approval. ACENDA ITEM NO. PAGE b I OF 3~ REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 5, 2007 Page 7 of7 PROJECT TITLE: RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-16 PREPARED BY: LINDA M. MILLER, AICP, PROJECT PLANNER ~ W, .-< .) FvG. < . ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPROVED BY: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Resolutions: a. Resolution No. 2007-_ recommending City Council adoption of Findings Of Consistency with the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan b. Resolution No. 2007-_ recommending City Council approval of Residential Design Review No. 2006-16 for a seventy-two (72) single family detached residential dwelling units and associated improvements. 3. Conditions Of Approval 4. Exhibits 5. Color Exhibits (Presented At The Hearing) AGEJ'JDA In::i',,1 i~O. I PAGE f._OF ~~. VICINITY MAP RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO, 2006-16 / HIDDEN=TR ~ PLANNING COMMISSION --- < r= g; G> rn iJ ~ / 1\ "=,.,~ ,',0 f AC\:N~~~~C'iB~ '-=OF _3).- - RESOLUTION NO. 2007-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ADOPT FINDINGS THAT THE PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP) WHEREAS, WL Homes, LLC, has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of Residential Design Review No. 2006-16 for the construction of a seventy-two (72) single family detached residential development including a Model Home Complex and associated improvements (the "Project") (APN: 371-270-003); and WHEREAS, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP requires that all discretionary projects within an MSHCP criteria cell undergo the Lake Elsinore Acquisition Process ("LEAP") and Joint Project Review ("JPR") to analyze the scope of the proposed development and establish a building envelope that is consistent with the MSHCP criteria; and WHEREAS, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP further requires that the City of Lake Elsinore adopt consistency findings demonstrating that the proposed discretionary entitlement complies with the MSCHP cell criteria, and the MSCHP goals and objectives; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Section 17.82, requests for commercial design review are discretionary actions to be considered, reviewed, and approved, conditionally approved or denied by the Lake Elsinore City Council; and WHEREAS, the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No.6 is partially covered by two distinct MSHCP criteria cells: approximately three (3) acres of the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No. 6 are within cell 4846 and approximately three tenths (0.3) of an acre are within cell 4937; and WHEREAS, the Project site within the boundaries of East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No.6 that are covered by the aforementioned cell sites; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to the Project on June 5, 2007. ACHlDA ITEM NO. l PAC;E~OF -t/-;J- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2007-_ PAGE20F5 NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the Project and its consistency with the MSHCP prior to recommending that the City Council adopt Findings of Consistency with the MSHCP. SECTION 2. That in accordance with the MSHCP, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for MSHCP consistency: 1. The Project is a project under the City's MSHCP Resolution, and the City must make an MSHCP Consistency finding before approval. Pursuant to the City's MSHCP Resolution, the Project must be reviewed for MSHCP consistency, which review shall include an analysis of the Project's consistency with other "Plan Wide Requirements." The Project is located within the East Lake Specific Plan (ELSP) area, specifically within the ELSP Amendment No. 6 area. Prior to the City's adoption of the MSHCP, there were a series of meetings between the County of Riverside, u.s. Fish and Wildlife Service, and California Department of Fish and Game to discuss conservation measures within the ELSP and to decide how to ensure development within the ELSP could proceed consistently with the MSHCP and with the u.s. Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 permit. It was determined that a target acreage of 770 acres was warranted for MSHCP conservation in the back basin area of the City. The Project site is within the ELSP and is covered by that conservation agreement. Part of the conservation agreement also included a requirement that projects in the back basin area be consistent with the other "Plan Wide Requirements" set forth in the following sections of the MSHCP: Protection of Species Associated with Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pool Guidelines (MSHCP, ~ 6.1.2), Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines (MSHCP, ~ 6.1.3), Additional Survey Needs and Procedures (MSHCP, ~ 6.3.2), Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines (MSHCP, ~ 6.1.4), Vegetation Mapping (MSHCP, ~ 6.3.1) requirements, Fuels Management Guidelines (MSHCP, ~ 6.4), and payment of the MSHCP Local AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE l d I m'": 2.:::-: _.~_.- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2007-_ PAGE30F5 Development Mitigation Fee (MSHCP Ordinance, J 4). The Project has been reviewed in light of these sections and is consistent therewith. 2. The Project is subject to the City's LEAP and the County's Joint Project Review processes. The ELSP MSCHP consistency determination was submitted to the County of Riverside in October 2003, prior to the initiation of the City's LEAP and County's Joint Project Review process. Nevertheless, both the City and Dudek (acting on behalf of the County) agreed that the Project was consistent with the MSHCP due to the extensive acreage set aside for conservation. The Project has not been modified and was part of the overall ELSP which has been determined to be consistent with the MSHCP. 3. The Project is consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vemal Pools Guidelines. The previously approved ELSP Amendment No.6 was determined to be consistent with the Riparian/Riverine and Vernal Pool Guidelines as set forth in MSHCP J 6.1.2. The scope and nature of the Project have not been modified from that which was previously approved and is therefore consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools Guidelines. 4. The Project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines. The previously approved ELSP Amendment No.6 was consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines as set forth in MSHCP J 6.1.3. The Project has not been modified from that which was previously approved under the ELSP Amendment No.6. Additionally, based upon prior approvals, the entire Project site has been graded and any plant species which may have existed on the site have been removed and replaced with development. It is for these reasons that the Project is consistent with the aforementioned guidelines. 5. The Project is consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures. The previously approved ELSP Amendment No.6 was consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures as set forth in MSHCP J 6.3.2. ACE1~DA llEM NO.__ I PACE t L OF__ ~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2007-_ PAGE 4 OF 5 The Project has not been modifiedfrom that which was previously approved under the ELSP Amendment No.6, and the entire project site has been graded pursuant to previously issued permits. The Project is consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures of the MSHCP. 6. The Project is consistent with the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines. The previously approved ELSP Amendment No.6 was consistent with the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines as set forth in MSHCP ~ 6.1.4. Because the Project has not been modified from that which was previously approved under the ELSP Amendment No.6, no further MSHCP review is necessary and the Project is consistent with the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines. 7. The Project is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements. The previously approved ELSP Amendment No.6 was consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements as set forth in MSHCP ~ 6.3.1. Mapping was conducted as part of the biological surveys for the original project. The Project has not been modified from that which was previously approved and therefore is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements. 8. The Project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines. The previously approved ELSP Amendment No.6 was consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines as set forth in MSHCP, ~ 6.4. The Project site is not within or adjacent to conservation areas where the Fuels Management Guidelines would be required. The Project has not been modified from that which was previously approved and therefore is consistent with the Fuel Management Guidelines. 9. The Project will be conditioned to pay the City's MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee. As a condition of project approval, the Project will be required to pay the City's MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee at the time of issuance of building permits. AGENDA ITEM WJ._.,.~ _ PAC~_-'d- m~ 3d- _ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2007-_ PAGE50F5 10. The Project overall is consistent with the MSHCP. As stated in No.1 above, the Project is within the ELSP area which has previously been determined to be consistent with the MSHCP. SECTION 3. Based upon all of the evidence presented, the above findings, and the conditions of approval imposed upon the Project, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council find that the Project is consistent with the MSHCP. SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of June, 2007, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission ATTEST: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development ACENDA ITEM NO. { PAGE I ~ 0;=_ 3d- __ RESOLUTION NO. 2007- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-16 WHEREAS, WL HOMES, LLC, has initiated proceedings for Residential Design Review No. 2006-16 for the design and construction of a seventy-two (72) single family detached residential development including a Model Home Complex and associated improvements located within the East Lake Specific Plan, Amendment No. Six (APN 371-270-003) (the "Entitlement"); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council for residential design review applications; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code 99 21000 et seq.: "CEQA") and the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA (14 C.C.R. 99 15000 et seq.: "CEQA Guidelines"), public agencies are expressly encouraged to reduce delay and paperwork associated with the implementation of CEQA by using previously prepared environmental documents when those previously prepared documents adequately address the potential impacts of the proposed project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15006); and WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 establishes the standard to be used when determining whether subsequent environmental documentation is necessary and says that when an environmental document has already been adopted for a project, no subsequent environmental documentation is needed for subsequent entitlements which comprise the whole of the action unless substantial changes or new information are presented by the project; and WHEREAS, a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report was approved and adopted in 2004 for the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No.6 (SCH #2003071050) and evaluated environmental impacts that would result from maximum build-out of the specific plan, which contemplated development of single family residential development; and WHEREAS, the Entitlement does not present substantial changes or new information regarding the potential environmental impacts of development; and ACENDA ITEM NO. l .. . PACE~OF 3d- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2007-_ PAGE20F4 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to the Entitlement on June 5, 2007. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the Entitlement prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve Residential Design Review No. 2006-16 for a single family detached residential development. SECTION 2. The Planning Commission finds and determines that no new CEQA documentation is necessary. The Entitlement comprises the whole of the action which was analyzed in the previously approved and certified Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SCH # 2003071050) for the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No.6. Approval of the Entitlement will not change density or intensity of use; it simply establishes standards for color palates, articulation, orientation, and design of single family residential development. Therefore, no further environmental review is necessary. SECTION 3. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning Law and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Planning Commission makes the following findings regarding Residential Design Review No. 2006-16: 1. The single family detached residential development, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan, Specific Plan and the Zoning District in which it is located. The single family detached residential development complies with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No.6. The facility will assist in achieving the development of a well-balanced and functional mix of residential, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses. 2. The single family detached residential development complies with the design directives contained in the East Lake Specific Plan Amendment No.6 and all applicable provisions of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. The single family detached residential development is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments. The four (4) architectural styles proposed ACENDA iTEM i~ { PAGE-' ,} OF ~;V PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2007- PAGE30F4 will create a distinctive street scene within the project site. Sufficient setbacks and onsite landscaping have been provided thereby creating interest and varying vistas. In addition, safe and efficient circulation has been achieved onsite. 3. Subject to the attached conditions of approval, the single family detached residential development is not anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. The single family detached residential development, as reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City divisions, departments and agencies, will not have a significant effect on the environment. Approval of the design for the single family detached residential development will not result in a substantial change to the previously adopted Supplemental Environmental Impact Report. Therefore, no additional environmental review is necessary. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the Project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter 17.82. Pursuant to Section 17.82.070 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Entitlement been scheduled for consideration by the Planning Commission on June 5, 2007. SECTION 4. Based upon all of the evidence presented, the above findings, and the conditions of approval imposed upon the Entitlement, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve Residential Design Review 2006-16. SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. I-~"N'O { ~ :0'"':\. "" --.. ~. ~~' 11- AGENL'}4.!t;" I '- ?-- pf.;GE_l Cp _OF _'3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2007-_ PAGE 4 OF 4 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of June 2007, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development il~"" I" -- J' 'W""'. . ---, ....\,.(i:r\";."'i\II~,"r~O I ';~CE ""'''r 7' OF 3~ . CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-16 GRAND SLAM AT SUMMERL Y LAKE ELSINORE GENERAL 1. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, and Agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning the Residential Design Review projects attached hereto. PLANNING DIVISION 2. Design Review approval for Residential Design Review No. 2006-16 will lapse and be void unless a building permit is issued within one (1) year of the Planning Commission approval date. The Community Development Director may grant an extension of time for up to one (1) year prior to the expiration of the initial Design Review. An application for a time extension and required fee shall be submitted a minimum of one (1) month prior to the expiration date. 3. The decision of the Planning Commission shall be final fifteen (15) days from the date of the decision, unless an appeal has been filed with the City Clerk's Office pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 17.80 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 4. All construction shall comply with these Conditions of Approval and those provisions and requirements contained in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy and release of utilities. 5. All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved building elevations and site plans for the Residential Design Review and the Model Home Complex. 6. Future site plotting and construction shall be consistent with these Conditions of Approval, those conditions approved with Tentative Tract Map No. 31920 and those provisions and requirements contained in the Municipal Code, subject to approval by the Community Development Director or designee. 7. The following architectural details shall be provided: Page 1 of 13 ACEN~~~EMlN%i OF~> CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-16 GRAND SLAM AT SUMMERLY LAKE ELSINORE . Any masonry provided at the front elevation will continue to wrap around the side elevations, to the front wall return. . All front fence returns will be decorative masonry walls. Wood fences will not be allowed along the front elevation. . Additional architectural enhancements shall be provided on elevations within public view. The applicant shall provide the Planning Division sequence sheets listing which units shall receive enhancements. The sequence sheets shall be provided prior to the issuance of building permits for each phase of development. . Nine (9) different color schemes will be provided. 8. All weep screeds shall be a maximum three inches above any hard surface and four inches above any earth surface. 9. The applicant shall provide a flat concrete pad or area a minimum of 3'- 0" by 7'- 0" adjacent to the dwelling for the storage of the City trash barrels. The storage pad or area shall conceal the trash barrels from public view, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. Precise grading plans shall identify the location of the aforementioned flat concrete pad and air conditioning units. 10. The building addresses (in numerals at least four inches high) shall be displayed near the entrance and easily visible from the front of the unit and public right-of-way. The applicant shall obtain street addresses for all production lots prior to issuance of building permit. 11. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City's Grading Ordinance. Construction generated dust and erosion shall be mitigated in accordance with the provisions of Municipal Code, Chapter 15.72 and using accepted techniques. Interim erosion control measures shall be provided 30 days after the site's rough grading, as approved by the City Engineer. 12. The applicant shall comply with all applicable City Codes and Ordinances. Page 2 of 13 A"C!\!f';/" \-1');:" 1'/" f__.,,, "," \,t~I"LI'OOl\ _hfi ..V.__"...--_ . PAGE_ i '1 _OF. ':3 2:: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-16 GRAND SLAM AT SUMMERL Y LAKE ELSINORE 13.Prior to issuance of building permit, building plans for the Model Home Complex shall comply with all American Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements, including provision of a handicapped-accessible bathroom. 14.A cash bond of$I,OOO.OO shall be required for the Model Home Complex. This bond is to guarantee removal of the temporary fencing material, parking lot, etc. that have been placed onsite for the Model Home Complex. The bond will be released after removal of the materials and the site is adequately restored, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. 15.A cash bond of$I,OOO.OO shall be required for any garage conversion of the model(s). Bonds will be released after removal of all temporary materials and the site is adequately restored, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. 16.A cash bond of $1,000.00 shall be required for any construction trailers used during construction. Bonds will be released after removal of trailers, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. 17. The applicant shall pay school fees to the Lake Elsinore Unified School District prior to issuance of building permit. 18. The project shall connect to sewer and meet all requirements of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD). The applicant shall submit water and sewer plans to the EVMWD and shall incorporate all district conditions and standards. 19.The design and construction of the project shall meet all County Fire Department standards for fire protection. 20.All mechanical and electrical equipment for the building shall be ground mounted. All outdoor ground or wall mounted utility equipment shall be consolidated in a central location and architecturally screened behind fence returns, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director, prior to issuance of building permit. Page 3 of 13 ACiENDl'\ IYEM NO. I PAGE d-O OF ~~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-16 GRAND SLAM AT SUMMERL Y LAKE ELSINORE 21.All front yards and side yards on comer lots shall be properly landscaped with automatic (manual or electric) irrigation system to provide 100 percent plant and grass coverage using a combination of drip and conventional irrigation methods. The final landscaping/irrigation plan is to be reviewed and approved by the City's Landscape Architect Consultant and the Community Development Director or designee. A Landscape Plan check fee will be charged prior to final landscape approval based on the Consultant's fee plus 40 percent. . The applicant shall comply with the Plant Palette listed for each of the neighborhoods as indicated within the Phase 1 Neighborhood Design Guidelines. . Planting within 15 feet of ingress/egress points shall be no higher than 36 inches. . The landscape plan shall provide for ground cover, shrubs, and trees and meet all requirements of the City's adopted Landscape Guidelines. Special attention to the use of Xeriscape or drought resistant plantings with combination drip irrigation system to be used to prevent excessive watering. . All landscape improvements shall be bonded with a 100 percent Faithful Performance Bond for materials and labor for two years from Certificate of Occupancy. . All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed within an affected portion of any phase at the time a certificate of occupancy is requested for any building. . One of the proposed lots of the Model Home Complex shall be Xeriscaped and signage provided identifying Xeriscape landscaping. . The Final landscape plan shall be consistent with any approved site and/or plot plan. . The Final landscape plan shall include planting and irrigation details. Page 4 of 13 AGENDA ITEM NO. I PAGE;>...t. OF '3::v CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-16 GRAND SLAM AT SUMMERL Y LAKE ELSINORE 22.All exposed slopes in excess of three feet in height within the subject tract and within private lots shall have permanent irrigation system and erosion control vegetation installed, as approved by the Planning Division, prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. 23.The applicant shall prepare a Wall and Fencing Plan for the project area, in compliance with the fencing standards within the Zoning Code Section 17.14.130.D prior to issuance of any building permit, and subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. 24.Fences located in any front yard shall not exceed three feet in height with the exception that wrought-iron fences may be five feet in height. Chain link fences shall be prohibited. 25.Garages shall be constructed to provide a minimum of 10' x 20' of interior clear space for two cars for a total interior clear space of 20' x 20'. 26.Prior to issuance of any precise grading permit or building permit, the applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgment of Conditions" and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records. 27.These Conditions of Approval and those conditions approved with Tentative Tract Map No. 31920 shall be reproduced on subsequent building plans prior to issuance of building permit. 28.Provisions of the City's Noise Ordinance shall be satisfied during all site preparation and construction activity. Site preparation activity and construction shall not commence before 7:00 AM and shall cease at 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday. Construction activity shall not take place on Saturday, Sunday, or any Legal Holidays. 29.The applicant shall pay all appropriate City fees. 30.The applicant shall pay the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Fee (MSHCP) Local Development Mitigation Fee prior to obtaining building permits. Page 5 of 13 ACtNDA ffEM NO. . ( . PAGE. d::::J-.. OF ?:>>:'-. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-16 GRAND SLAM AT SUMMERL Y LAKE ELSINORE 31. The applicant shall place a weatherproof 3' x 3' sign at the entrance to the project site identifying the approved days and hours of construction activity and a statement that complaints regarding the operation can be lodged with the City of Lake Elsinore Code Enforcement Division (951) 674-3124. 32.Pursuant to the following Section 12.10 of the First Amended and Restated Development Agreement between the City of Lake Elsinore and Laing-CP Lake Elsinore LLC which states, "Upon application for each residential dwelling unit building permit constructed in the Project, Developer shall, at the time of issuance of such building permit, pay an in-lieu Affordable Housing Fee in the amount of One Dollar and Thirty Cents ($1.30) per square foot of "assessable space" (as that term is defined in Government Code Section 65995(b)(I) ("Affordable Housing Fee"). Notwithstanding the foregoing, in lieu of paying the Affordable Housing Fee, Developer may elect to enter into a mutually acceptable agreement with the City and Agency to provide up to fifteen percent (15%) of the units in the Project on the Developer Property in accordance with requirements of Section 33413(b) of the CRL as Affordable Housing Units on a site within the Developer Property or a mutually acceptable alternative site outside of the Developer Property to be designated in the future for multi-family uses." ENGINEERING DIVISION General Requirements: 33.A grading plan signed and stamped by a Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall be required if the grading exceeds 50 cubic yards or the existing flow pattern is substantially modified as determined by the City Engineer. If the grading is less than 50 cubic yards and a grading plan is not required, a grading permit shall still be obtained so that a cursory drainage and flow pattern inspection can be conducted before grading begins. 34.Prior to commencement of grading operations, applicant to provide to the City with a map of all proposed haul routes to be used for movement of export material. Such routes shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. Page 6 of 13 .t\CHJDA ITEM NO. I Pf'\CE d- 3 vi= 3~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-16 GRAND SLAM AT SUMMERL Y LAKE ELSINORE 34.All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer and he shall certify all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and proper erosion control. 35.This project shall comply with applicable Conditions of Approval of Tract 31920. 36.Phasing Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer. Bond public improvements for each Phase as approved by the City Engineer. 37.An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained prior to any work on City right-of-way. 38.Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. Overhead utilities shall be undergrounded. 39.Underground water rights shall be dedicated to the City pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.52.030 (LEMC), and consistent with the City's agreement with the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. 40. The applicant shall install permanent bench marks per Riverside County Standards and at locations to be determined by the City Engineer. 41.Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by Riverside County Fire Department. 42.Applicant shall pay all applicable development fees, including but not all inclusive: TUMF, MSHCP, TIF and area drainage fees. 43.10 year storm runoff shall be contained within the curb and the 100 year storm runoff shall be contained within the street right-of-way. When either of these criteria are exceeded, drainage facilities shall be provided. 44.All drainage facilities in this project shall be constructed to Riverside County Flood Control District Standards. Page 7 of 13 AGi:NDA ITE:Vi NO. ( PACE~OF 3d- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-16 GRAND SLAM AT SUMMERL Y LAKE ELSINORE 45.All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 ~" x 11 II Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of public works improvements will be scheduled and approved. 46. Slope maintenance along public right-of-ways shall be maintained by a homeowner's association or other maintenance mechanism as approved by the City. 47.All open space and slopes (except for public parks and schools) and flood control facilities outside the public right-of-way shall be owned and maintained by homeowner's association. 48.Alllandscaping at intersections shall meet City Sight Distance Standards. 49.All waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or other phases of the construction shall be disposed of at appropriate recycling centers. The applicant should contract with CR&R Inc. for recycling and storage container services, but the applicant may use the services of another recycling vendor. Another recycling vendor, other than CR&R Inc., cannot charge the applicant for bin rental or solid waste disposal. If the applicant is not using CR&R Inc. for recycling services and the recycling material is either sold or donated to another vendor, the applicant shall supply proof of debris disposal at a recycling center, including verification of tonnage by certified weigh master tickets. 50.0n-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility, accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance, or conveyed to a drainage easement. 51.All natural drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer. 52.Roof drains shall not be allowed to outlet directly through coring in the street curb. Roofs should drain to a landscaped area. 53.Applicant shall comply with all NPDES requirements in effect; including the submittal of an Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) as required per the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. The requirements of WQMP may affect Page 8 of 13 ACEN~~~:~r:02 ~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-16 GRAND SLAM AT SUMMERL Y LAKE ELSINORE the overall layout of the project. Therefore, WQMP submittal should be during the initial process of the project. 54.Education guidelines and Best Management Practices (BMP) shall be provided to residents of the development in the use of herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers as well as other environmental awareness education materials on good housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of storm water quality and met the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. (Required for lot of one acre or more) 55.Applicant shall provide BMP's that will reduce storm water pollutants from parking areas and driveway aisles. (Required for lot of one acre or more) 56.City of Lake Elsinore has adopted ordinances for storm water management and discharge control. In accordance with state and federal law, these local storm water ordinances prohibit the discharge of waste into storm drain system or local surface waters. This includes non-storm water discharges containing oil, grease, detergents, trash, or other waste remains. Brochures of "Storm water Pollution, What You Should Know" describing preventing measures are available at City Hall. PLEASE NOTE: The discharge of pollutants into street, gutters, storm drain system, or waterways -without Regional Water Quality Control Board permit or waver - is strictly prohibited by local ordinances and state and federal law. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 57.Streets with a slope greater than 9% shall be redesigned to 9% or less, unless approved by the City Engineer. 58. Maintenance access shall be provided to all open spaces and drainage facilities and easements. 59.A Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall prepare street and traffic improvement plans and specifications for the street improvements as shown on the Site Plan. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Riverside County Standards, latest edition, and City Codes (LEMC 12.04 and 16.34). Street improvement plans shall Page 9 of 13 ACrrJDl\ ITEM NO. { PAGE ~'" OF "3?-- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-16 GRAND SLAM AT SUMMERL Y LAKE ELSINORE include curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lighting, ac pavement and drainage improvements. 60.Make an offer of dedication for all public streets and easements required by these conditions or as shown on the Site Plan. All land so offered shall be granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost to the city. 6l.Applicant shall submit signing and striping plans for the required street improvements. All signing and striping and traffic control devices shall be installed prior to final inspection of public improvements. The signing and striping shall include Street Name Signs, No Parking and Street Sweeping Signs for streets within the project. 62.Submit grading plans with appropriate security, Hydrology, and Hydraulic Reports prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer for approval by the City Engineer. The grading plans shall include mitigation/protection of any flooding and/or erosion downstream caused by development of the site and/or diversion of drainage. The grading plan shall also show that no structures, landscaping, or equipment are located near or at street intersections in order to meet sight distance standards. 63.Construction Project access and hauling route plan shall be submitted and approved by the City Engineer, 64.Provide soils, geology and seismic report including street design recommendations. Provide final soils report showing compliance with recommendations. 65.An Alquist-Priolo study shall be performed on the site to identify any hidden earthquake faults and/or liquefaction zones present on-site. 66.The applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site easements and/or permits for off-site grading and/or drainage acceptance from the adjacent property owners prior to grading permit issuance. 67.Applicant to provide erosion control measures as part of their grading plan. The applicant shall contribute to protection of storm water quality and meet the goals of Page 10 of 13 t\Ct:NDl\ iTEM NO. I PAGE :>-1. OF .3?- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-16 GRAND SLAM AT SUMMERL Y LAKE ELSINORE the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. 68.Applicant shall provide the city with proof of his having filed a Notice of Intent with the Regional Water Quality Control Board for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program with a storm water pollution prevention plan prior to issuance of grading permits. The applicant shall provide a SWPPP for post construction, which describes BMP's that will be implemented for the development including maintenance responsibilities. The applicant shall submit the SWPPP to the City for review and approval. 69.The applicant shall provide an approved WQMP plan. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit 70.Submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project and specify the technical data for the water service at the location. such as water pressure and volume etc. Submit this letter prior to applying for a building permit. 71.Provide proof that no structures, landscaping, or equipment are located at intersections and street curves that could compromise sight distance requirements. 72. WQMP and erosion control plans shall be in place to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 73.Pay all Capital Improvement TIF and Master Drainage Fees, and Plan Check fees (LEMC 16.34). Prior to Occupancy 74.Pay all fees and meet requirements of an encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Division for construction of off-site public works improvements (LEMC12.08, Res.83-78). All fees and requirements for an encroachment permit shall be fulfilled before Certificate of Occupancy. Page 11 of 13 ACHIlDJ\ iTEM NO. PAGE ~ ( Or 3:r-- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-16 GRAND SLAM AT SUMMERL Y LAKE ELSINORE 75.All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 1/2" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of off-site improvements will be scheduled and approved. 76.All public improvements shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans or as conditions of this development and/or Tract 31920, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. All Public Works improvements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). The improvements shall include street and drainage improvements, street lighting, and associated traffic improvements related to the project. 77.All signing and striping and traffic control devices shall be installed. This includes Street Name Signs, No Parking and Street Sweeping Signs for streets within the tract. 78.Water and sewer improvements shall be completed in accordance with Water District requirements. 79.Proof of acceptance and maintenance responsibility shall be provided for all open spaces, slopes, and drainage facilities. 80.TUMF fees shall be paid. The TUMF fees shall be the effective rate at the time when the Certificate of Occupancy is obtained. 81.Post construction erosion controls and landscaping shall be installed and approved by the City Engineer. 82. The traffic signal at the intersection Malaga and Diamond Drive shall be completed an in operation as recommended in the Traffic Study for Tract No. 31920. 83.The applicant shall submit as-built plans and shall as-built the mylars. A digital copy of all completed public improvement plans shall be provided. A bond (amount to be determined by the City Engineer) is required to guarantee compliance of this requirement. Page 12 of 13 ACENDA ITEM NO. l PACE .).q OF ?;, ;)- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-16 GRAND SLAM AT SUMMERL Y LAKE ELSINORE SHERIFF RIVERSIDE COUNTY 84.Meet all the requirements per the attached letter dated March 20, 2007. End of Conditions Page 13 of 13 ACfNDl\ ITEM NO. ( PACE 3d OF 3.;r CITY OF ~ LAKt 6LSiNO~ , , 'V DREAM EXTREME March 20, 2007 Linda Miller, Associate Planner City of Lake Elsinore Planning Division 130 S. Main St. Lake Elsinore, California 92530 Projects: Residential Project No. 2006-14 / Neighborhood 4 Residential Project No. 2006-15 / Neighborhood 5 Residential Project No. 2006-16/ Neighborhood 6 Applicant: Brian hardy, WL Homes LLC Dear Ms. Miller, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the above described project(s) to be located within the John Laing Home project known as Home Run at Summerly, south of Malaga Road and west of Mission Trail. All residence design reviews should be consistent with the Lake Elsinore Crime Free Multi-Housing Program and Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) specifications. The following issues of concern related to public safety and law enforcement are presented: PRE-CONSTRUCTION AND CONSTRUCTION PHASES: (When Applicable) Construction site: Prior to construction on any structure, a material storage area should be established and enclosed by a six foot chain link fence to minimize theft of materials and/or equipment. It is recommended that a list of serial and/or license numbers of equipment stored at the location be maintained both, at the site and any off-site main office. Thefts and burglaries of building materials, fixtures, and appliances from construction storage areas and buildings under construction are on the rise. To reduce thefts and burglaries during the construction phases of this project, the developer and builders need to provide site security. The Lake Elsinore Police Department recommends the developer and builders use bonded security guards (when and if applicable) licensed by the State of California Bureau of Security & Investigative Services Department to handle project security. The public and non-essential employees should be restricted in access to the construction areas. Current emergency contact information for the project should be kept on file with the Lake Elsinore Police Department. The developer and/or builders name, address and phone number should be conspicuously posted at the construction site. Visibility into the construction site should not be intentionally hampered. Areas actually under construction should be lit during hours of darkness. All entrances and exits should be clearly marked. Designate and establish specific parking areas for construction site workers and AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE 3 ( l OF ~ ;;.-- employees. The parking areas and commercial areas on the premises should be accessible to emergency vehicles at all times with paved pathways of sufficient width to accommodate such vehicles. LIGHTING: Have adequate security lighting throughout the project. All lighting fixtures should be resistant to vandalism tampering. The standards should be of a height to reduce any tampering or damage. GRAFFITI REDUCTION TIPS: Prior to occupancy, the surface walls, fences, buildings, logo monuments, etc. should be graffiti resistant either through surface composition, applied paint types and/or planned shielding by landscaping or plants. Wrought iron fencing has worked well in other projects to reduce graffiti. LANDSCAPING: Landscaping shall be of the type and situated in locations to maximize observation while providing the desired degree of aesthetics. Security planting materials are encouraged along fence and property lines and under vulnerable windows. At no time should shrubbery/plants/trees block line of sight from residence windows. All shrubbery should be trimmed below the lowest ledge of windowsill. Trees and tree limbs should never be in close proximity to a residence to allow access/entry into residence. LINE OF SIGHT/NATURAL SURVEILLANCE: Wide-angled peepholes should be incorporated into all dwelling front doors and to all solid doors where visual scrutiny to the door from public or private space is compromised. Other line of sight obstructions including recessed doorways, alcoves, etc., should be avoided on building exterior walls. PLAYGROUNDS' PLAY AREAS' RECREATION AREAS: All playgrounds and/or play areas for children should be surrounded by residences on all sides for viewing and/or have security fencing as to prevent non-residents from accessibility. Recreation areas, whether for adults or children, should also be securely maintained as to prevent non- residents from accessibility. All children areas are to be protected, secured and maintained accordingly. Should the community development department, developer or construction staff have any questions regarding the listed law enforcement and public safety concerns, please contact Officer Beth DeCou at (951) 245-3322. Sincerely, Officer Beth DeCou CPTED Specialist Lake Elsinore Police Department 333 W. Limited Ave. Lake Elsinore, CA. 92530 ACr:NO.^ ITEM NO. 1 PAGE "3 d- OF _ d-