The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About01/15/2008 PC Reports CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MICHAEL O'NEAL, CHAIRMAN JOHN GONZALES, VICE CHAIRMAN JIMMY FLORES, COMMISSIONER AXEL ZANELLI, COMMISSIONER PHIL MENDOZA, COMMISSIONER ROLFE PREISENDANZ, DIR. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WWW.LAKE-ELSINORE.ORG (951) 674-3124 PHONE (951) 674-2392 FAX LAKE ELSINORE CULTURAL CENTER 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 ******************************************************************* TUESDAY, JANUARY 15, 2008 6:00 P.M. The City of Lake Elsinore appreciates your attendance. Citizens' interest provides the Planning Commission with valuable information regarding issues of the community. Meetings are held on the 1st and 3rd Tuesday of every month. If you are attending this Planning Commission meeting, please park in the Parking Lot across the street from the Cultural Center. This will assist us in limiting the impact of meetings on the Downtown Business District. Thank you for your cooperation. . The agenda is posted 72 hours prior to each meeting outside of City Hall and is available at each meeting. The agenda and related reports are also available in the Community Development Department on the Friday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should contact the Community Development Department at (951) 674-3124, ext. 289, at least 48 hours before the meeting to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON AGENDIZED ITEMS - 3 MINUTES (Please read & complete a Speaker's Form at the podium, prior to the start of the Planning Commission Meeting) PAGE 2 - PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA- JANUARY 15, 2008 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS (All matters on the Consent Calendar are approved in one motion, unless a Commissioner or any members of the public requests separate action on a specific item.) 1. Reqular Planninq Commission Meetinq Minutes for December 18. 2007 Recommendation: Approval 2. Minor Desiqn Review of a Sinqle-Familv Residence located at 29376 Turnbull Avenue (APN: 378-115-027) Justin Carlson. Associate Planner Ext. 295, icarlson@lake-elsinore.orq Recommendation: Approval PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS (Please read & complete a Speaker's Form at the podium prior to the start of the Planning Commission Meeting. The Chairman will call on you to speak when your item is called). 3. Commercial Desiqn Review No. 2007-17 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-03 (Rio Car Wash) Tom Weiner, Planninq Manaqer Ext. 270. tweiner@lake-elsinore.orq Recommendation: Approval 4. Uniform Siqn Proqram No. 2007-08 (Diamond Professional Plaza) Justin Carlson, Associate Planner Ext. 295, icarlson@lake-elsinore.orq Recommendation: Approval 5. Spvqlass Ranch Specific Plan Justin Carlson, Associate Planner Ext. 295, icarlson@lake-elsinore.orq Recommendation: Approval / PAGE 3 - PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA- JANUARY 15, 2008 BUSINESS ITEMS INFORMATIONAL STAFF COMMENTS PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT The Lake Elsinore Planning Commission will adjourn to a regular meeting to be held on Tuesday, February 5,2008, at 6:00 p.m. to be held in the Cultural Center located at 183 N. Main Street, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, ROLFE PREISENDANZ, Secretary to the Planning Commission, do hereby affirm that a copy of the foregoing agenda was posted at City Hall, 72 hours in advance if this meeting. /JJJ11~ ~OLFE PREISENDANZ DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT / /IO/Of DAtE / MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 2007 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman O'Neal called the regular Planning Commission meeting to order at 6:06 pm. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Chairman O'Neal led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: p' N EAL,<.;Q.N;zALES, MEt-,lROZA, ZAt-,lELLI FLORES, ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Also present were: Director of Community Development Preisendanz, Planning Manager Weiner, Depy!y Cit~~ttorney Satl.tsma, Engineering Manager Seumalo, Associate Planner Res~ndiz;~I.~nningi Intern Bitterolf, Planning Consultant Coury, andOffi.ce Specialisll-ierrington. PUBLIC COMMENTS(Non-A~enda Items) Hector Zubieta, 38372 Innovation Court, Murrieta, stated that he thinks the Single Family in-fill should be handled administratively which would reduce the City's work load and also to shorten the time for developing. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS 1. Minutes Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes for August 7,2007. MOVED BY MENDOZA, SECONDED BY ZANELLI AND PASSED BY A VOTE OF 5-0, TO APPROVE MEETING MINUTES FOR AUGUST 7, 2007. " '"':: ", '\ ;.'\1'. I ;.....: ~ "';~ ~ _U ~.:~.__.L__._Gj: '5 PAGE 2 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - DECEMBER 18, 2007 2. Minor Desian Review of a Sinale-FamilY Residence located at 29905 Reid Street (APN: 375-023-028) MOVED BY MENDOZA, SECONDED BY ZANELLI AND PASSED BY A VOTE OF 5-0, TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 2007-213, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED AT 29905 REID STREET. 3. Minor Desian Review of a Sinale-FamUY Dwellina Unit located at 16300 Bailey Avenue (APN's: 378-223-006.& 007) MOVED BY MENDOZA, SE.QONDED BY ZANELL.I AND PASSED BY A VOTE OF 5-0, TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 2007 -214'\~iRE~OLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'OF.THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, .. '~~~ROVING A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A THRE;E-STORY CONVENTIONALLY BUILT SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT AT 16300 BAIL.EYAVENUE. 4. Minor Desiq~Revievvof a Sinale-FamilyResidence located at 30073 Illinois Street (APN: 375~032-016) MOVED B~.I\IIEN[)i~~, SFCONDED BY ZANELLI ~N[).PASSE[) BY AVClTE OF 5-0, TO APPROVE RESOIt"".!IONNO. 2007-215, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING.COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE;' CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 30073 ILLINOIS STB..I;ET (APN: 375-032-016). 5. Tentative Tract Map No. 35563 Chairman O'Neal opened the Public Hearing at 6:06 pm. Director of Community Development Preisendanz provided a brief overview of the proposed project and requested Planning Consultant Coury to review it with the Commission and answer questions. Planning Consultant Coury provided an overview of the project. AGHm,~ lir:~Jl NO. p;,,';;r: ~ I OF c;. PAGE 3 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - DECEMBER 18, 2007 The applicant, Jim Stringer, Pardee Homes, 1385 Old Temescal Road, Corona, read and agreed with the Conditions of Approval. Chairman O'Neal closed the Public Hearing at 6:10 pm. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Commissioner Mendoza had no comments. Vice Chair Gonzales had no comments. Commissioner Flores had no comments. Commissioner Zanelli had no comments. Chairman O'Neal had no comments. MOVED BY FLORES, SECONDED BY ZANELLI AND PASSED BY A VOTE OF?-O,;rO> APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 2007-216, AB.ESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF>i[HE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,<. < CALIFORNIA, .... ADQPTING FINDINGS THAT THE SUBDIVISION IS>EXEMPT FROM THE MULTIf?LESgECIES HABITAT CONSERV~;rION PLAN(M~HCP); MO'fJ.;R BY< GONZALES, SECONDED BY MENDOZA, AND PASSED BY<A VOTE OF 5-0, TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 2007 -217, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY'e>r LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING/CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 35563. STAFF COMMENTS Public Works DirectorSeumalo gave the Capitol Improvement Plan update and thanked the Commission for their support and input during this past year and indicated that it was a pleasure serving the Commission. Planning Manager Weiner had no comments and wished everyone a happy New Year. Director of Community Development Preisendanz had no comments and wished everyone a Merry Christmas. Deputy City Attorney Santana had no comments and wished everyone a happy holiday. ACENDA ITEM NO. J PAGE 3 OF '5 PAGE 4 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - DECEMBER 18, 2007 PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Cammissianer Zanelli thanked staff far all af the suppart during the past year and said it was a pleasure warking with everyane. Cammissianer Flores said that it was a pleasure warking with staff repart and indicated that he has learned a lat as a Cammissianer, and laaks farward to. learning mare. Cammissianer Mendaza cammented abaut an article that he read in the newspaper abaut the Tayata Dealership caming to. LakeE:I~inare and indicated that the article stated that lacal residents appased the Dealership. He indicated that he was amazed because there was anly ane (1) P~E~8~ that spake abaut the Dealership and was in favar af it. He thanked stafffor their suppart throughaut the year and stated that the City is maving forward andhe< is proud to. be a member af the Planning Cammissian far the C.iW: Vice Chair Ganzales thanked staff far their help and wished everyane a happy haliday. Chairman O'Neal asked staff hawlpng it takes taPr~pare a staff to. the Planning Cammissian. Directar af Cammunity Develapment.statedtoatstaff repart preparatian takes approximately two. (2) o.purs. Chairman O'Neal~!a~ed thaf.he was curip~s as to. why Mr. Zubieta stated that it takes eighteen (18) manths far the PlanningCammissian to. cansider the project and make an "Administrative~pproy~I".as appased to. "Planning Cammissian Approval" and indicated that. the Cammissian is nat respansible far the length af time it takes to. get.approved.< Chairman O'Neal also. indicated that it has been a wanderful year serving as the~i!y's Planning Cammissian Chairman, and said that staff has always been caurteaus and helpful and appreciates staff's cantinued .. suppart, p.~rticularly, Directar af Cammunity Develapment Presidendanz,vvha he has the mast interactian with and is always helpful. He also. thanked D~p~ty City Attarney Santana far assisting the Cammissian with any legal questiansthat arise. INFORMATIONAL ADJOURNMENT THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, CHAIRMAN O'NEAL ADJOURNED THE MEETING AT 6:20 pm. ACiE,NDA ITEM NO. I PAGEl.o~,. 5 PAGE 5 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - DECEMBER 18, 2007 Michael O'Neal, Chairman Respectfully Submitted, Kris Herrington Office Specialist III ATTEST: Rolfe Preisendanz, Director of Community Development ACENDA ITEM NO. PAGE C) J Or 5" CITY OF .~ LAKE ,6,LSiNO~ Y DREAM EITREME... CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: JANUARY 15, 2008 JUSTIN CARLSON, ASSOCIATE PLANNER PREPARED BY: PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED AT 29376 TURNBULL AVENUE (APN: 378-115-027) WAYNE GUNTER: 601 PARKVIEW DRIVE, LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 APPLICANT: OWNER: SAME PROJECT REQUEST The applicant is requesting design review consideration of a 1,870 square-foot conventionally built two-story single-family dwelling unit on an approximately .29 net acre lot located at 29376 Turnbull Avenue (APN: 378-115-0274). Project review is pursuant to Chapter 17.23 (R-1, Single-Family Residential), Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requirements), Chapter 17.82 (Design Review), and Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. WATER AVAILABILITY/FIRE FLOW The applicant provided staff with a "Water Will Serve" letter from the Elsinore Water District (EWD) dated March 5, 2007. In the letter, EWD indicates that there is currently existing adequate source, storage, and distribution line capacities to provide potable water to the subject parcel. Furthermore, the letter also indicates that there is a standard fire hydrant located approximate 685 feet from the project site. EWD indicates that the existing fire hydrant can deliver approximately 500 gallons-per-minute at 20 pounds per square inch for a minimum two-hour duration (see attachment 5). AGENDA ITEM NO. PACE / ..1.- Of 3 --, REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSISION JANUARY 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED AT 29376 TURNBULL AVENUE (APN: 378-115-027) It should be noted that staff has added a condition of approval stating that the applicant shall provide assurances to the Community Development Department that a standard fire hydrant shall be installed and operational within 500 feet of the proposed lot located at 29376 Turnbull Avenue (APN: 378-115-027); prior to the issuance of a building permit. SEPTIC SYSTEM Due to the fact that public sewer is not available for the area, the applicant is proposing to incorporate private septic system for the residence at 29376 Turnbull Avenue. The applicant is proposing a 1,200 gallon tank with seepage pits in the front-yard directly behind the required ten-foot (10') slope easement. It should be noted that staff has added three (3) conditions of approval regarding the proposed septic system. The added conditions are as follows: 1. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide a revised site plan which indicates the one-hundred percent (100%) septic-system expansion area. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a map from the applicable water district showing the nearest sewer connection to the subject lot located at 29376 Turnbull Avenue. If the submitted map indicates that the nearest sewer connection is within two-hundred (200) feet from the subject lot, the applicant shall connect to public sewer. 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide the Building and Safety Division with two (2) sets of Riverside County Health Department approved septic-system plans. PROJECT LOCATION Project review is pursuant to Chapter 17.23 (R-1, Single-Family Residential), Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requirements), Chapter 17.82 (Design Review), and Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. The subject property is located within the R-1 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning district and has a split General Plan land use designation of Future Specific Plan J (Country Club Heights #1) and Limited Industrial (L1). AGENDA ITEM J.- PAGE .J- OF ?;;:l REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSISION JANUARY 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED AT 29376 TURNBULL AVENUE (APN: 378-115-027) ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING LOCATION EXISTING LAND USE Project Site Vacant R-1 (Single-Family Residential) GENERAL.PLAN South Vacant East Residential Future Specific Plan J/Limited Industrial Future Specific Plan J/Limited Industrial Future S ecific Plan J Future Specific Plan J/Limited Industrial Future Specific Plan J North Vacant R-1 (Single-Family Residential) West Vacant R-1 (Single-Family Residential) PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting minor design review consideration for the design and establishment of a 1,870 square-foot conventionally built two-story single-family dwelling unit on a .29 net acre lot located at 29376 Turnbull Avenue (APN: 378-115-027). The proposed dwelling unit will include an attached two (2) car garage, a 440 square-foot covered front-porch, dining room, living room, foyer, kitchen, pantry, bathroom, and master bedroom with walk-in-closet and master bathroom on the first floor. The second floor will include three (3) bedrooms, two (2) bathrooms, and a laundry room. The net lot coverage for the proposed single-story single-family dwelling unit, which includes the first-floor of the dwelling unit, the attached two (2) car garage, and covered front-porch, will be approximately fourteen-percent (14%). It should be noted that the proposed dwelling unit complies with the maximum lot coverage requirement of fifty- percent (50%) for single-family dwelling units as outlined in Chapter 17.23.090 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). Sitinq The proposed .29 net acre vacant lot located at 29376 Turnbull Avenue will be located on a relatively hilly section of Turnbull Avenue within Country Club Heights #1. In orderto create a flat buildable pad for development, the applicant is proposing to cut and fill approximately 410 cubic-yards of earth. There is a twenty-foot (20') wide driveway access easement located on the easterly portion of the subject lot. The proposed easement is necessary for access to the subject lots located directly behind the subject property at 29376 Turnbull Avenue. There is an existing retaining wall located on the eastern adjacent property line. The adjacent wall runs along AGENDA ITEM ;)... PAGE3.-0F 3r REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSISION JANUARY 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED AT 29376 TURNBULL AVENUE (APN: 378-115-027) the subject property line from the rear of the lot and terminates at Turnbull Avenue. Architecture The applicant is proposing to include elements of "Folk Victorian" architecture for the proposed two-story single-family dwelling unit located at 29376 Turnbull Avenue. The front elevation will include a covered front-porch with decorative posts and handrails, lap-siding, ornate dormers, window surrounds with divided "lites", and a lightweight concrete tile roof. The rear elevation will include a chimney with cap, lap-siding, windows with surrounds and divided "lites", a sliding rear door, and a lightweight concrete tile roof. The left elevation will include a decorative garage door, coach lights, lap-siding, ornate dormers, and a lightweight concrete tile roofing. The right elevation will include lap-siding, ornate dormers, windows with surrounds and divided "lites", and a lightweight concrete tile roof. The applicant is proposing wood fencing along the rear and sides of the subject lot and the rear and western yard fencing will terminate at the twenty-foot (20') access easement. Return fencing will include a wood gate that accesses the rear yard along the twenty-foot (20') access easement and a decorative stuccoed block wall along the western side of the property. It should be noted that staff has added a condition of approval stating that the proposed stuccoed block wall return shall match the color of the main dwelling unit. Landscapina The applicant is proposing to landscape and irrigate the front-yard of the subject property. Front-yard landscaping will include two (2) twenty-four inch (24") "Holly Oak" trees, one (1) twenty-four inch (24") box "Hybrid Plum" tree, "Rose" bushes, "Spirea" shrubs, "Irish Moss" groundcover, and turf. To further enhance the front-yard landscaping, the applicant is also proposing to include landscaping along the westerly portion of the lot; between the property line and the access easement. Staff will continue to work with the applicant in the field in order to reduce the area of turf proposed; thereby assisting in the preservation of water. The applicant is also proposing to landscape and irrigate the manufactured 2-to-1 slope which lies between the rear retaining wall and the rear property line. Staff has added a condition of approval requiring that the manufactured slope be landscaped and irrigated; prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Gradina As mentioned above, the applicant is proposing to cut and fill approximate 41 0 cubic-yards of earth in order to create a flat buildable pad for development. Due to the subject lot being located at a hilly section of Turnbull Avenue, the applicant is proposing retaining walls in the rear yard and along the twenty-foot (20') access easement. The proposed retaining wall AGENDA ITEM ~ PAGE 'f OF 3..( REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSISION JANUARY 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED AT 29376 TURNBULL AVENUE (APN: 378-115-027) along the access easement will be approximately five-feet (5') at the front of the property directly behind the ten-foot (10') slope easement along Turnbull Avenue and terminates at the driveway to the subject house. There is another retaining wall on the opposite side of the proposed driveway which is approximately eight-feet (8') in height and decreases to five and a half feet (5'-6") at the rear of the lot. The applicant is also proposing a retaining wall that runs along the rear of the lot, which assists in creating a usable rear-yard. The proposed retaining wall will be five-feet (5') at the western portion of the lot and increases to approximately six-feet (6') as it runs across the rear of the lot to the eastern side of the lot. The wall then decreases to approximately three-feet (3') as it extends down the eastern property line. Color and Materials Roof La -Sidin Fascia Porch Railin s/Posts Front Door Gara e Door Lightweight Concrete Tile Wood Wood Wood Wood Metal "Grey Wolf" "Gre Vals ar" "Ultra White" "Ultra White" "Ultra White" "Ultra White" ANAL YSIS Staff has reviewed the proposed conventionally built two-story single-family dwelling unit located at 29376 Turnbull Avenue (APN: 378-115-027) and found that the project will meet all minimum requirements of Chapter 17.82 (Design Review), Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards), Chapter 17.23 (R-1, Single-Family Residential) Zoning District, and Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requirements) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) including but not limited to; density, setbacks, landscaping, parking, and lot coverage. Sitinq The net lot coverage for the proposed single-story single-family dwelling unit, which includes the first-floor of the dwelling unit, the attached two (2) car garage, and covered front-porch, will be approximately fourteen-percent (14%). It should be noted that the fourteen-percent (14%) net lot coverage is well-below the maximum lot coverage of fifty- percent (50%) as outlined in Chapter 17.23.090 of the LEMC. In addition, the site plan meets all applicable development standards and criteria outlined in the R-1 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District and the Residential Development Standards outlined in the LEMC. AGENDA ITEM ;)- PAGE50F3i REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSISION JANUARY 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED AT 29376 TURNBULL AVENUE (APN: 378-115-027) Architecture The proposed architecture of the conventionally built two-story single-family dwelling unit is consistent with the style and design of existing single-family dwelling units within the vicinity. Furthermore, the proposed colors and materials to be incorporated are consistent with the goals and intent of the architectural design guidelines of the General Plan's Community Design Element, in that the proposed dwelling unit, which incorporates elements of "Folk Victorian" architecture, provides an aesthetic quality that lends to the overall achievement of a well balanced R-1 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning district. Landscaoina The minimum landscape coverage requirements for in-fill single-family dwelling units states that the applicant landscape the front-yard with an automatic irrigation system as outlined in Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards). The applicant has met this requirement by proposing a fully landscaped, automatically irrigated front-yard. Furthermore, the applicant is proposing to incorporate a rain sensor, which will assist in the conservation of water. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Staff determined that the Project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code SS 21000 et seq.: "CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R. SS 15000 et seq.) pursuant to a class 3(a) exemption for new construction or conversion of small structures because the Project involves construction of one single- family dwelling unit. (14 C.C.R. S 15303(a)). RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2008-_ approving the proposed the single-story single-family dwelling unit based on the Findings, Exhibits, and the proposed Conditions of Approval. AGENDA ITEM d- PAGE k OF 3--, REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSISION JANUARY 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED AT 29376 TURNBULL AVENUE (APN: 378-115-027) PREPARED BY: JUSTIN CARLSON, ASSOCIATE PLANNERt APPROVED BY: ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNI~ DEVELOPMENT V II ' ATTACHMENTS: 1. VICINITY MAP 2. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 3. PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 4. CEQA-NOTICE OF EXEMPTION 5. ELSINORE WATER DISTRICT "WATER WILL SERVE" LETTER 6. SIGNED ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 7. COVER SHEET (8" X 11") 8. SITE/ROOF PLAN (8"X 11") 9. LANDSCAPE PLAN (8" X 11") 1 O. FLOOR PLAN (8" X 11") 11. ELEVATIONS (8" X 11') 12. BUILDING SECTIONS (8" X 11') 13. GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN (8" X 11") 14. MATERIALS SHEET (8"X 11") 15. FULL SIZE PLANS AGENDA ITEM d- PAGE f OF 3-, VICINITY MAP MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED AT 29376 TURNBULL AVENUE ~~_____ ~~c."C ""r>>'"'' PLANNING COMMISSION ACtNDA.ITEf\;l NO. d-- PACE ~ OF ~., RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_ RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A CONVENTIONALLY BUILT TWO-STORY SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED AT 29376 TURNBULL AVENUE WHEREAS, Wayne Gunter filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of a Minor Design Review for a conventionally built two-story single-family dwelling unit with an attached two (2) car garage (the "Project") on property located at 29376 Turnbull Avenue (APN: 378-115-027); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of considering and approving, conditionally approving, or denying Minor Design Review requests for residential projects; and WHEREAS, public notice of the Project has been given and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public meeting held with respect to this item on January 15, 2008. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed design for the Project and has found it acceptable. The Planning Commission finds and determines that the Project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. SECTION 2. The Planning Commission finds and determines that the Project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code SS 21000 et seq.: "CEQA") and the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA (14 C.C.R. SS 15000 et seq.: the "CEQA Guidelines") pursuant to a class 3(a) exemption for new construction or conversion of small structures because the Project involves construction of one single-family residence. (CEQA Guidelines S 15303(a)). SECTION 3. That in accordance with Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Chapter 17.82, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the approval of the Project: 1. The Project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the intended General Plan and the Zoning District in which the Project will be located. The Project complies with the goals and objectives of the General Plan in that the proposed lot has a split land use designation of Future Specific Plan J (Country Club Heights #1) and Limited Industrial and the intent of the area is to develop utilizing residential uses; as mandated by the Future Specific Plan J land use designation as well as existing residential uses within the area. General Plan AGfNOA ITEM r~o. d- Pi\O!: q OF '3., PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_ PAGE 2 OF 4 designation Specific Plan J is intended to provide a wide range of housing densities and some limited commercial and industrial uses. Furthermore, Table 11I-5 (General Plan/Zoning Compatibility Matrix) within the General Plan identifies that the General Plan designation Future Specific Plan J (Country Club Heights No.1) is compatible with the R-1 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District. In addition, Future Specific Plan J General Plan designation mandates that the average residential density will be 6 dwelling units to the acre. The proposed single-family dwelling unit will cover approximately fourteen percent (14%) of the net lot area, which complies with the goals and objectives of the Future Specific Plan J designation of the General Plan, R-1 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District, and the General Plan/Zoning Compatibility Matrix. Approval of this Project will assist in achieving the development of a well balanced and functional mix of residential, limited commercial, limited industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses by providing additional affordable housing within the R-1 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District. The Project also encourages the development and maintenance of a broad range of housing types for all income groups and age categories. Finally, the Project, which incorporates elements of "Folk Victorian" style architecture, will provide a well rounded design while maintaining the desirable rural characteristics and base framework to achieve quality and compatibility in the physical design of the developing portions of the City. Overall, the Project will enhance the existing developed areas within General Plan designation Future Specific Plan J/Limited Industrial and Zoning Designation R-1 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning district of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 2. The Project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. The Project is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments in that the proposed single-family dwelling unit will have: an approximate twenty-four foot (24) front-yard setback; sufficient front-yard landscaping; and, safe and sufficient on-site vehicular circulation. In addition, the Project will comply with all setback, height, and lot coverage requirements as outlined in the R-1 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. The Project will complement the quality of existing projects in that the applicant is providing elements of "Folk Victorian" style architecture, which includes: 360- degree architecture articulation pursuant to the "General Plan, Community Design Element Design Guidelines':- decorative window surrounds with divided "lites"; a decorative front-entry porch; coach lights, lap-siding; ornate dormers; and a lightweight concrete tile roof. AaEND.~ iTEM NO. PAGE (cJ d- OF 37 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_ PAGE 3 OF 4 3. Subject to the attached conditions of approval, the Project is not anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. A Class 3 CEQA exemption may be invoked when the development proposal involves construction of one single family residence. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines 15303(a), the Project is exempt from environmental review because it involves the construction of one single family residence. Section 7.3.2 of the MSHCP states that: '1djevelopment of individual single-family homes on existing parcels, in accordance with existing land use regulations is a "Covered Activity within the Criteria Area," subject to an expedited review process. Impacts of development of single-family residences on sensitive habitat and covered species were accounted for in the MSHCP and the MSHCP EIR. The Planning Commission hereby finds that the single-family residence at 29376 Turnbull A venue (APN: 378-115-027) was sited on the least sensitive portion of the lot. Consideration was given to access, topography/terrain, zoning standards including setbacks, soil types, presence of earthquake fault lines, leach fields, presence of oak trees and high fire hazard areas. The building foot print area is appropriate and complies with the MSHCP Criteria Area. Moreover, the Project has been reviewed by all City divisions and departments, which have imposed certain conditions of approval on the Project to ensure that no adverse impacts occur. In light of those conditions of approval, as well as the design features of the Project itself, the Project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the Project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter 17.82. Pursuant to Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Section 17.82.070, the Project has been scheduled for consideration and action of the Planning Commission. The Project has also been conditioned to comply with all aspects of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. The Applicant shall meet all required setbacks and development standards pursuant to the R-1 (Single-Family Residential) zoning designation. SECTION 4. Based upon the evidence presented, the above findings, and the conditions of approval, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Minor Design Review application. SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE I L J- OF 5( PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_ PAGE 4 OF 4 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of January 2008, by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Rolfe Preisendanz Director of Community Development AGENDA m:M NO. d-- PAGE_l d Of 31 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PROJECT NAME: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A CONVENTIONALLY BUILT TWO SINGLE-STORY SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT LOCATED AT 29376 TURNBULL AVENUE (APN: 378-115-027) PLANNING DIVISION GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, and Agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning the Minor Design Review of a conventionally built two-story single-family dwelling unit located at 29376 Turnbull Avenue (APN: 378-115-027) project attached hereto. 2. The decision of the Planning Commission shall be final fifteen (15) days from the date of the decision, unless an appeal has been filed with the City Council pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 17.80 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 3. If the project proposes an outdoor storage tank, the applicant shall locate the unit within the side or rear yards. If the location must be within the front yard, the applicant shall provide a method of screening subject to the review and approval of the Director of Community Development or his designee. 4. Minor Design Review approval of the conventionally built two-story single-family dwelling unit located 29376 Turnbull Avenue (APN: 378-115-027) will lapse and become void one (1) year of the approval date unless a building permit is issued and construction commenced and the project is diligently being pursued toward completion. 5. All Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced upon page one of building plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division for Plan Check. 6. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgement of Conditions," and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records. 7. All materials and colors depicted on the plans and materials board shall be used unless modified by the Applicant and approved by the Director of Community Development or designee. AGENDA iTEM NO. J PACE .J ~ OF '3"7 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 29376 TURNBULL AVENUE PAGE 2 OF 10 8. All site improvements shall be constructed as indicated on the approved site plan and elevations, with revisions as noted herein. The applicant shall meet all required setbacks, and development standards pursuant to the R-1 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning district development standards. Any revisions to the Minor Design Review attached hereto shall be processed in a similar manner as the original Minor Design Review. All plans submitted for Building Division plan check shall conform to the submitted plans as modified by the Conditions of Approval. 9. The applicant shall comply with any/all requirements of the Riverside County Fire Department. 10. All windows shall use foam surrounds and/or other architectural-type features approved by the Director of Community Development or designee. 11. All necessary exterior/ancillary equipment shall be effectively screened from public view. All proposed screening methods shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development or designee. 12. All roofing materials shall have a minimum Class "A" Fire rating, and so noted on the construction plans. 13. The Applicant is to meet all applicable City Codes and Ordinances. 14. A cash bond of $1,000.00 shall be required for any construction trailers placed on the site and used during construction. Bonds will be released after removal of trailers and restoration of the site to an acceptable state, subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development or designee. 15. The Applicant shall comply with the City's Noise Ordinance. All construction activity shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday, and no construction activity shall occur on Saturdays, Sundays or legal holidays. 16. The Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City's Grading Ordinance. Construction generated dust and erosion shall be mitigated in accordance with the provisions of Municipal Code, Chapter 15.72 and using accepted control techniques. Interim erosion control measures shall be provided thirty (30) days after the site's rough grading, as approved by the City Engineer. 17. Any exterior air conditioning or other mechanical equipment shall be ground mounted and screened so that they are not visible from neighboring property or public streets. Air conditioning units and related equipment may not encroach more AGENDA iTEM NO. PACE_ILf d- OF '3 I CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 29376 TURNBULL AVENUE PAGE 3 OF 10 than two-feet (2') into the required minimum side yard setback. 18. Garages shall be constructed to provide a minimum interior clear space of twenty feet (20') x twenty feet (20') for two cars. 19. The Applicant shall provide shrubs and plant materials as shown on the landscape plan. Any changes to this plan shall be subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or designee. The landscape plan improvements and plantings shall be fully installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 20. Planting within fifteen feet (15') of ingress/egress points shall be no higher than 36 inches. 21. All driveways shall be constructed of concrete per Building and Safety Division standards. 22. All walls or fences located in any front yard shall not exceed thirty-six inches (36") in height with the exception that wrought-iron fences may be five feet (5') in height. Chain link fences shall be prohibited. 23. The applicant shall be required to remove and replace any existing chain link fencing and any fencing that is in poor condition. It will be the responsibility of the applicant to contact the effected neighboring property owners. If the existing fencing is in good condition, this requirement may be waived per the approval of the Director of Community Development or Designee. 24. The applicant shall provide a flat concrete pad a minimum of 3'-0" by 7'-0" adjacent to each dwelling unit. The storage pad for trash barrels shall be concealed from public view. 25. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of $64.00 made payable to the County of Riverside for a Notice of Exemption. The check shall be submitted to the Planning Division for processing within 48 hours of the projects approval. 26. The applicant shall place a weatherproof 3' x 3' sign at the entrance to the project site identifying the approved days and hours of construction activity and a statement that complaints regarding the operation can be lodged with the City of Lake Elsinore Code Enforcement Division (951) 674-3124. The sign shall be placed on the property, prior to the issuance of a grading permit. AGENDA ITEM tJO. ~ PACE I 5 OF ~ I CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 29376 TURNBULL AVENUE PAGE 4 OF 10 27. All exposed retaining walls visible from any public right-of-way shall utilize "split- face" block or stuccoed to match the proposed dwelling unit. Plain precision block is not permitted. 28. The applicant is to meet any/all requirements of the Lake Elsinore Unified School district. 29. The applicant is to meet any/all requirements of the City of Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency. 30. The applicant is to meet any/all requirements of the Building and Safety division. 31. The applicant will be responsible for landscaping and maintaining all required dedications or easements until such time that all street improvements are constructed. 32. All walls and/or fencing need to be located off the property line and so indicated on the construction plans. If the Applicant proposes to place any walls and/or fencing on the property line he/she must submit a notarized agreement between the subject property owner and the adjacent property owner to the Planning Department prior to issuance of a building permit. 33. The project shall comply with any/all requirements of the City of Lake Elsinore Building and Safety division. 34. The project shall comply with any/all requirements of the City of Lake Elsinore Parks and Recreation Department. 35. The project shall comply with any/all requirements of the Lake Elsinore Police Department. 36. The project shall comply with any/all requirements of the City of Lake Elsinore Redevelopment Agency. 37. The applicant shall pay all required fees to the Lake Elsinore Unified School District. 38. The applicant shall pay park-in-Iieu fees in effect at the time of issuance of a building permit. 39. The applicant shall construct all interior and rear yard fencing as indicated on the ACENDA iTEM NO. ;) PACE l ~ OF ::s '7 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 29376 TURNBULL AVENUE PAGE 5 OF 10 Site Plan. The applicant shall be required to replace any chain link fencing. 40. The proposed stucco wall return shall match the main color of the proposed dwelling unit. If the applicant proposes a different color other than the color of the main dwelling unit, the proposed color shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development or designee; prior to the issuance of a building permit. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS 41. The applicant shall pay the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Fee (MSHCP) Local Development Mitigation Fee (fee for density less than 8 du/ac), prior to obtaining building permits. 42. The applicant shall pay all applicable Library Capital Improvement Fund fees, prior to the issuance of a building permit. 43. Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the Project, the Developer shall enter into an agreement with the City and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore to provide (a) 15% of the units constructed in the Project as affordable housing units in accordance with the requirements of Section 33413(b )(2) of the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Safety Code Sections 33000 et seq.), or (b) an alternative equivalent action as determined by the City which may include (without limitation) dedication of vacant land, construction of affordable units on another site, or payment of an in-lieu fee at the rate of $2.00 per square-foot of assessable space for each dwelling unit in the Project. For purposes of this condition, "assessable space" means all of the square-footage within the perimeter of a structure, not including any carport, walkway, garage, overhang, patio, enclosed patio, detached accessory structure, or similar area. The amount of the square-footage within the perimeter of a residential structure shall be calculated by the building department of the City in accordance with the standard practice of the City in calculating structural perimeters. 44. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide assurances to the Community Development Department that a standard fire hydrant shall be installed and operational within 500-feet of the proposed lot located at 29376 Turnbull Avenue (APN: 378-115-027). 45. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a revised grading and drainage plan indicating that the proposed retaining wall located within AOENDA ITEM fJO. ~ PAGE li OF 3, CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 29376 TURNBULL AVENUE PAGE 6 OF 10 the front-yard setback shall not exceed a maximum height of three-feet (3'). 46. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide a revised site plan which indicates the one-hundred percent (100%) septic-system expansion area. 47. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a map from the applicable water district showing the nearest sewer connection to the subject lot located at 29376 Turnbull Avenue. If the submitted map indicates that the nearest sewer connection is within two-hundred (200) feet from the subject lot, the applicant shall connect to public sewer. 48. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide the Building and Safety Division with two (2) sets of Riverside County Health Department approved septic-system plans. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICA TE OF OCCUPANCY 49. The applicant shall provide an irrigation system for landscaped areas onsite as shown on the landscape plans. The irrigation system shall be fully installed and operational prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 50. The Applicant shall provide a rain sensor as shown on the landscape plan. The rain censor shall be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 51. All exposed slopes in excess of three feet (3') in height shall have permanent irrigation system and erosion control vegetation installed, as approved by the City's Landscape Architect. A Planting and Irrigation Plan shall be submitted, approved and planted prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Fees are required for review of plans and inspections. 52. The building address shall be a minimum of four inches (4") high and shall be easily visible from the public right-of-way. Care shall be taken to select colors and materials that contrast with building walls or trim. Installation of building address shall be done prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 53. The applicant shall meet all Conditions of Approval prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. ACiENDA ITEM NO. d- PACE~O:: '3, CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 29376 TURNBULL AVENUE PAGE 7 OF 10 ENGINEERING DIVISION GENERAL 54. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), prior to the issuance of a building permit. 55. The applicant shall submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project and specify the technical data for the water service at the location. such as water pressure and volume etc. The applicant shall submit this letter, prior to applying for a building permit. 56. The applicant shall submit a "Non Interference Letter" from Southern California Edison, prior to issuance of Grading Permit. Edison's contact person is Lisa Salinas at 14799 Chestnut Street, Westminster CA. 92683, and her telephone number is (714) 934-0838. 57. All arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. 58. The applicant shall provide fire protection access and facilities as required in writing by the Riverside County Fire Department. 59. In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal & recycling, the applicant shall be required to contract with CR&R Incorporated for removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of construction. 60. All grading and street improvement plans submitted to engineering shall be drawn on 24" x 36" Mylar and be set into City's specific border and title block and shall include city specific general notes for grading or street improvements respectively. All digital files for the border and the notes are available by request to aQutierrez@lake-elsinore.orq. DEDICA TION 61. The applicant is to dedicate a ten-foot (10') slope easement of right of way along Turnbull Avenue and along the southeasterly property line for future street alignment, prior to the issuance of a building permit (Res. 87-64). AGENDA maJi NO. PACE I '1 ;)- OF ""3 f CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 29376 TURNBULL AVENUE PAGE 8 OF 10 62. All public right-of-way dedications shall be prepared by the applicant or his agent. All deeds shall be submitted to the Engineering Division for review and approval and recordation, prior to the issuance of a building permit. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 63. All work done under an encroachment permit for off-site improvements of utility lines shall be delineated on the street improvement plans and approved and signed by the City Engineer, prior to the issuance of a building permit. 64. The applicant shall pay all fees and meet requirements of an encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Division for construction of off-site public works improvements (LEMC12.08, Res.83-78). All fees and requirements for an encroachment permit shall be fulfilled before the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. GRADING 65. The developer shall obtain all necessary off-site easements for off-site grading, if any, from the adjacent property owners, prior to the issuance of a grading permit approval. 66. The applicant shall apply and obtain a grading permit with appropriate security, prior to any grading activity. 67. A grading plan stamped/signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer is required if the sum of the cut and fill for grading exceeds 50 cubic-yards and the existing drainage flow pattern is substantially modified as determined by the City Engineer. The grading plan shall show volumes of cut and fill, adequate contours and/or spot elevations of the existing ground as surveyed by a licensed surveyor or civil engineer. All contours shall extend to minimum of 15 feet beyond property lines to indicate existing drainage pattern. The applicant shall apply and obtain a grading permit with appropriate security, prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 68. The applicant shall provide soils; geology and seismic report, as part of this report address the requirement of the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act. The applicant shall provide a final soils report showing compliance with recommendations. 69. The applicant to provide erosion control measures as part of their grading plan. AGENDA iTEr-ii NO. PACE ~o .:l- OF 3 -, CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 29376 TURNBULL AVENUE PAGE 9 OF 10 The applicant shall contribute to protection of storm water quality and meet the goals of the BMP in Supplement "An in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. 70. All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer and he shall certify all slopes steeper than 2-to-1 for stability and proper erosion control. The geotechnical engineer shall make recommendation for the minimum distance of building foundation to the top and toe of slopes. DRAINAGE 71. All on-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility, accepted by adjacent property owners by a notarized letter of drainage acceptance, or conveyed to a drainage easement. 72. All natural drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer. 73. All roof drains shall not be allowed to outlet directly through coring in the street curb. Roofs shall drain to a landscaped area. All driveways shall be sloped to drain into landscaping, prior to entering street facilities. 74. The applicant shall submit, along with grading plans, Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports for review and approval by City Engineer. The developer shall mitigate any flooding and/or erosion downstream caused by development of the site and/or diversion of drainage. 75. If sump pumps are used to divert run off into street; the applicant shall provide a notarized letter stating that it will be maintained in good operating condition by the owner of the property. FEES 76. The applicant shall pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (LEMC 16.34). The current traffic mitigation fee is $1,369.00; the current drainage fee is $1993.00.00 (Arroyo Del Toro Dist.) and the current TUMF amount is $10,046.00; the amount of fees shall be adiusted accordinq to the fee schedule current at the time of payment. 77. The applicant shall provide payment for cash in-lieu of street construction for future off-site public improvements, prior to the issuance of a building permit. (Res. 86- A(,jENDA ITEM NO. PACE ;). I d- OF '3 I CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 29376 TURNBULL AVENUE PAGE 10 OF 10 35) In-lieu payment shall be calculated by developers' engineer or architect and submitted for City Engineer's approval. The estimate shall be based on current cost of street improvements from property line to centerline of the street within the property limits, plus a 15% added cost for engineering and construction administration. The street improvements shall include 6' wide concrete sidewalk, curb and gutter, and 3" AC over 5" AB pavement section to center line of the street. STORMWA TER! CLEANWA TER PROTECTION PROGRAM 78. The City of Lake Elsinore has adopted ordinances for storm water management and discharge control. In accordance with state and federal law, these local storm water ordinances prohibit the discharge of waste into storm drain system or local surface waters. This includes non-storm water discharges containing oil, grease, detergents, trash, or other waste remains. Brochures of "Storm water Pollution, What You Should Know" describing preventing measures are available at City Hall. PLEASE NOTE: The discharge of pollutants into street, gutters, storm drain system, or waterways -without Regional Water Quality Control Board permit or waver - is strictly prohibited by local ordinances and state and federal law. AGENDA ITEM tWo A- PACE ~_Q:-:.".f~'?-_ 3 '7 CITY OF ~ LAKE ,6,LSINORf ~ DREAM E,XTREMEnl Notice of Exemption Filed With: D Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 [8J County Clerk of Riverside County 2724 Gateway Drive Riverside, CA 92507 Project Title: Minor Design Review of a single-family dwelling unit located at 29376 Turnbull Avenue (APN: 378-115-027). Project Location (Specific): The proposed vacant lot is generally located 230 linear-feet southwest of Baker Street and 20- feet northwest of Turnbull Avenue at 29376 Turnbull Avenue (APN: 378-115-027). Project Location (City): City of Lake Elsinore Project Location (County): Riverside County Description of Nature, Purpose, and Beneficiaries of Project: Minor Design Review for a conventionally built two-story single-family dwelling unit with an attached two (2) car garage located at 29376 Turnbull Avenue (APN: 378-115-027). The subject property is located within the R-1 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning district and has a split General Plan land use designation of Future Specific Plan J (Country Club Heights #1) and Limited Industrial (L1). Furthermore, the proposed project will have a net lot coverage of approximately fourteen-percent (14%). Name of Public Agency Approving Project: City of Lake Elsinore Name of Person / Agency Administrating Project: Justin Carlson, Associate Planner, City of Lake Elsinore Exempt Status: o Ministerial (Section 15073) o Declared Emergency (Section 15071 (a)) o Emergency Project (Section 15071 (b) and (c)) ~ Categorical Exemption (state type and section number): Article 19 Categorical Exemptions Section 15303, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures Reasons why project is exempt: This project meets the requirements pursuant to Section 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Contact Person: Justin Carlson, Associate Planner Telephone Number: (951) 674-3124 x 295 Signed: Title: Director of Community Development Rolfe M. Preisendanz Ac;EI~DA IlEil1 !'W. d-- PAGE ,),,3 OF "3 -, ,......, ~ ~ ELSINORE WA TER DISTRICT WA TER WILL SERVE LETTER REQUEST CHECKLIST Date of Request 3-5-07 Owner's Name Wayne Gunter ~ccount# Owner's Phone # 951-203-2965 Mailing Address City/State/Zip Contact Name Track/Lot/Block Street Address Type of Request: Residential 601 Park View Dr. Lake Elsinore. Ca. 92530 Wayne Gunter Contact's Phone # APN# Turnbull Avenue 951-203-2965 378-115-027 x Commercial Other Type New Construction x Remodel Received: Date Initials Comments Grant Deed Preliminary Title Report Plans of Addition (Remodels Only) Payment Check # Date Field Check: Size of Main Line ~ Location of Main Line SH:__<-T I}J ~NT or- fk~EL Remodels: Served by Hydro Tank ~ Within Easement Zone Backflow Device Needed Tvpe Static water pressure less than 45 psi Static water pressure greater than 90 psi Meter Size Location 109pSi Customer Shut Off Street Lateral Size & Materials Building Lateral Size & Materials Fire Service Engineering Date Sent Date Approved by Engineering Prepared By: Michael Mosier ~~ Date 3 - /3-0'7 3-/3-07 Approved By: Date FINAL WILL-SERVE LETTER ISSUANCE: Will Serve Issued Date Prepared 3-/3-01 Date to Customer 3-1:!J-o) Conditions of Will-Serve, if applicable: ACl:.i'~DA iTEM NO. d- PAcr:-2:Lm= 31 . . FORM 8 Page 1 Name APN .'-'" Wayne Gunter 378-115-027 ,.... PUBLIC WATER SERVICE CERTIFICATION This certifies that the above referenced property is within the service area boundaries of this water service utility and that: Service Information: (Check one) X There are currently existing adequate source, storage and distribution line capacities to provide potable water to the referenced site in sufficient quantities to satisfy the domestic water service and fire protection requirements of the proposed use. The water mains to serve each proposed service connection are currently installed and operable. Financial arrangements have been made to install water mains for each proposed service outlet and any other necessary facilities to insure that the proposed use will have adequate source, storage and distribution line capacities for each proposed service connection that will satisfy the-domestic water service and fire protection requirements of the proposed use. It is financially and physically feasible to install water service facilities that will provide adequate source, storage and distribution line capacities for each proposed service connection that will satisfy the domestic water service and fire protection requirements of the proposed use. Easement Intonnation: (Check one) _x_ This agency has no known water lines or easements on the subject property line. This agency has water lines and/or easements on the subject property but they do not conflict with the proposed use as currently designed. This agency has waterlines and/or easements on the subject property which conflict with the proposed project as currently designed. Applicant must revise plans and resubmit them to this agency for approval. Fire Flow Intonnation: 500+ Gallons per minute at 20 pounds per square inch for a minimum two-hour duration. A Standard Type hydrant is located approx 685' feet from the above referenced parcel. On Bennett St. south of Turnbull Ave. AGE.NDA ITEM NO. ;).- PACE ;;.- 5 or- "3 r "....., ~ Date 3-13-07 Name Wayne Gunter Address 601 Park View Dr. City Lake Elsinore. Ca. ZIP 92530 APN # 378-115-027 Street Name Turnbull Avenue ESTIMATED COST ~Water Account Deposit $ 100.00 o Fire Hydrant (if required) $ 5000.00 ~ Meter Installation $ 2900.00 ~Connection Fee/Capacity Charge $ 5594.00 ~ Permits $ 500.00 o Hot Patch $ o Miscellaneous $ Total: Not including Fire Hydrant $ 9094.00 o Due to the length of line extension, it will be necessary for you to contact a Civil Engineering company of your choice for cost estimate and installation. "Exhibit A" attached hereto lists requirements for first plan check. Cost of Plot Plan Check dependent on estimated cost of project. **Note: Estimate valid for 60 days. ** ELSINORE WATER DISTRICT NJ!), ~ Michael Mosier ~-- Field Supervisor AOENOA m:M NO. d- PAGE ;) ~ _OF 3.,. m CITY OF ~~ . LAKE OLSINORJ \ I V DREAM EXTREME A CKNOWLEDEGEMENT OF DRAFT CONDITIONS RE: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A SINGLE-F AMIL Y DWELLING UNIT LOCATED AT 29376 TURNBULL AVENUE (APN: 378-115-027) I hereby state that I/We acknowledge the draft Conditions of Approval for the above named project. I/We understand that these are draft conditions only and do hereby agree to accept and abide by all final conditions prescribed by the City of Lake Elsinore staff, as set forth in the attachments to the approval letter that will be sent after final project approval. All final conditions shall be met prior to issuance of permits or prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy, or otherwise indicated in the Conditions, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director of the City of Lake Elsinore. Date: /~.ht?~7 . Applicant's Signat~-""'-J:!..~ Print Name: d/~/V'G" V 64'~ Address: d9/4-~ &u~~~6~;F- ~O /Yl5./l#/FG"G t!d- 9dS~~ Phone Number: 0s I) ;J.d 3 --,d 9 t;P s- 951.674.3124 130 s. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE. CA 92530 WWW.LAKE-ELSINORE.ORG ACENDA ITEM rm. ).- PAOE C), OF 3 I ~ig~g ~Ia,~i j~~ ji~~~ !~ii~ jfl iff~1 ~~~ ! II~ ifi i i;~Js ; a ~ !I I A ALFORD DESIGN & DRAFTING , I D 41&10 _ sr. !IlIIE 105 i'. 0 :.-:;:.: -i .. -" % CD 0 m ii -" ~ hili 'liar 'l'lf!& _151: gi II i U'i "1"'1 II ! 1 I iF !I s" ill ill. J!i ilIl!j! ~ '-: i!r1 u IR'IiII!! ~i u" r n~ HI II~ 11'~i f!!~j :', ..1i~1"IIJII r.:DiI5IpiillllH!;e--:; Hi ill ~! RIPI Ii ~ elm ~ II" I 'm ;;lil '!'If ~;iI!H . I" iill. I IfI:" 1'1f1 ~ 1 pi ~ pn,r 5 ~. ~!'iilim;l- i5Rig !=fil5ltiI5~:Bi fl JiD 'II om · G iP. D iI. fa.ft D""m" I~ I~ I, a I. : I HI i B ~ Ie ~ II ~ ItW ! Ii! iElli I r! a I K'I :; !: ! E m J Ii;'l ~ ... I I I I " r.. II 'I ~ Ill' I,ll. ~1111~IIIJHl~I'I~ !!if' II II d! I I ill! m !!!i'5ij"J B i J ,,; e I Iq PI I ~ ~ ! III I ili ji I ~ ~ ~ Id ~ :<J 1I.c III Ir, ~ ." r r ~ ~ ~q z umw!,1 ~ ~ia; ~ ~ ' & I ~ I \l ;;0 o c:... m ~ en c s::: s::: )> ~ o < t""' S C'5 ~ Z - 00\ m ~ \Otr1o~?;l Z ~ ~~;~ CD ~~Q~iil :E \l f'-!D _. G> :J: -(Joe 0 ggp'~a 3 \O;g?(!!l CD VI W o GUNTER RESIDENCE 29376 Turnbull Ave. Lake ElsinOl9, CA. i t ~~ ; I ~~ ~ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ PAGE_ aCb OF 3/ ~cn "-i m "'0 r )> Z - ,::0 40 o 11 "'0 r )> Z I , I , I , I , I , I r , I , I , Ii I , I , I ... - , ~...."'-------------- '/1 .... " : --,,- :~~~~t~:>(/ I! ! !! ! I I . , , , , , , , , , , , [~~l~>:i I! I !! ! ! I ! !! ! !! I , I.... I , , , r----~ ! ! i --:=>i r---r-- ",_ \ I -.. \, ! '1---------------- r 15 ! ~ - I i II ~ ! ~ . .. . . - , k I , I , I , I ... .... .. ::v ~!Ii! ~ I i!1 sa 1'1 ,., 8 Q I d > ::f ~ (J) \l )> .. il !I ~, ..... " .. 0 ~ t · " ..... ~ GUNTER I A ALFORD DESIGN & DRAFTING RESIDENCE o 41810 - !II'. UlE IOS 29376 TumbuU Ave. -....- II 0.... ...1 .,-- Lake Elsinore, CA. ~ ~ ~~ " " " ~z ~ !i1~ I'~ c ~ Ii. j r\ 1-- .- I . . ---~ elll ~ .1111 ~ I!IS If I In !~ ,~~ ..m:l !~ ~ PACE :;)-'1 OF '3-, - I , L~I I .. , .. .1.. I , I ; I ~ I z 0 r I en , . () I )> , "1J I , m I~ "1J ); If '-1 I fl- z , I. I I I I I I . I i :.. 0 011 . . OS ~~8:!a il .:t;. ~~~~~ .;.:- ~~ ~;t ~ m ~ b 9- ~ if ~ .~I ~r. z III q II II ~ ~ ~ II -I II ~ ~ F ~ ~ 11 J! I- ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ \l )> ~ I II ...... P! .. 0 x N ~ GUNTER I A ALFORD DESIGN & DRAFTING RESIDENCE o 41.,0 DIal: Sf. SUI'I!: 103 " 0 =-=:.: 29376 Turnbull Ave. Lake Elsinore, CA. o ~ AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE '3 CJ ~ U~ ~r ~ OF 3( H _ - ~ ~ :r: (Jl -l .. ." .. 5 ~ ~ ~ 1: z o l______j .f~ IL::J t p (Jl m (') o z C ." 5 o :Xl "tl . > . z II 1 ... H :r: 1: l :r: 1: 1 ~ . . II I p 1: l :r: t l - :r: t 1: - - Iii ,ii il" "llllr.llll':n ii.ii';ir "i.ltill .1 11111 .1 illllz 11,,1 i'~1 G · i II 'I?i U II! I I 3 .1 III ~ .. III I. lI!I I. d I- -I 'il i i!.! II;!I i Ii." J ; i ~ ~ .11, I II, I I I , II I · ~I - ,. "I'!' . ! =- I Ii r ' I .. ~ ~ I A ALFORD DESIGN & DRAFTING D 41.10 - sr. SUIlE 105 ,. D:'-=:'': GUNTER RESIDENCE 29376 Turnbull Ave. Lake Elsinore, CA. ~ ~ ~ w~ m ~::~ I! Ii ~ ~ c ~ t" . : .. .. J- . PACE '3 I OF. 3 I )> r= ~ \l II I I ~ r~ ' , , , , I , I II II I II , , , , , , , , , , , , - 2 III II , , , l: , , , , , 1! ' , l: II , , , , I II , , I , , , , , II I I l; ~ ~ 0 ~ x ...... ~ i I A ALFORD DESIGN & DRAFTING ! 0 418::=.:r.:F IOS .. 0 ...(111)....--- GUNTER RESIDENCE 29376 Turnbull Ave. Lake Elsinore. CA. I ~ ~ j ~: ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ Iii ~ , rl. ~O. J- AO D PACE 3~ OF 3, , , I , , I , , I , , I: ! II , , , , II , , l !III II ~ z m ~ . I A ALFORD DESIGN & DRAFTING . I'D 41.10_sr.SlI1'E103 41 ." D :':i:t: GUNTER RESIDENCE 29376 Turnbull Ave. Lake ElsinoAl. CA ~ i >j" .." ~ 2 :::" d ~ I A.rhv D. ~ ~ o PAGE 3'3> OF ?:>t - , , , , ~ . I :: I S I C . II I I II I I II II II I I II I I GUNTER ~ j'P ~ ,." ~ I A AlFORD DESIGN & DRAFTING RESIDENCE ~ 2 =" .. ~~ % D 41.10 M1'E sr. surE 1~ .. 0 ~ -...- 29376 Turnbull Ave. ~ % ...... .. 0.... ...) --,.., Lake ElsinOlll, CA m ~ l AGENDA ITEM NO. :J- PAGE~ 3lf- OF 3'1 ;tQ\ I ~ ~~~, U\ ,~ ~ I!i ?:: ~ liI f:;f=' ~ 8 ~r ~ ~ <-"" B~ ~~ggj~~ i~ is:!; ..~!i; ~~F=~QI~ 2 e <: i'tJl::O 'Uf=' 6.~ ~ i~~ v.> . ~--~ ~ ~ I;! i !Ui IIi; !II ; n I i ~ I ~; I~U ili; I~i ~ != ~ -~'.' ~~ ~ ~ I ~ ;"iii ~~; ~~ ~ ~~ i~~~U: ~ ~~: ~u ~~; d II ~~~~.~~ ~ ~ ~ hill Ih il~ ~~ ~~~~~~ e ! I i~~~~! ~i~;:i~ II i~ ~in~. ~ ~ 51 Ii ~~ ~~ a~ ~~~)iI~~ g I i i:l ~ ~ ~~ . ~ ~j~?I~; it i ;iii~ ~h fj~ ~ j~">:'" r;: !S~o "'ill; ~~ ~ !:l::.~~o~ .... "':-I ~ ~ ~ ~ ,. + _ n ';--c..~ F;; '" IE< i ~ ~ ~ m ~~ ~ ~.. \;!lii] ~i!i '" ~I~ ~I~ ~ !d I~~ ~ ~ ~!~ j;,el~ ~~: !: ~ ~ii'ii ~..~ ~151~iS;1Il (:l':l':l' j! ~~ Illlil~l~ ~ ii i; ~'!1 ~ i!i~ 32 ;8n i'ii m 0 OJ -.Q ~ f;Il~iffl ~ ~~~C> ~ ~~~I ~ ;6 ~-" (J) ~ 6 '" m Vl :r: ~ "., GJ "., N ...., m z ::l i ~I'~ ! ..... < f1J~ l !' 'it. Gl i ~ ;;i,' ~ ~ ; a>~ ;~ ~ ~l ~. ~ ~ ...\....,-,.:.." M~.iiI, "lli'iJ",' ~~~i ~~' ~."';' ,,:.h ~!1. . /,Y~-~ )5 ~12i I o ::0 ~ ~ -<: Ii ~~~ ~ ,.,,~ ~ ~i~ ,~, hI ''''',::'''T,,_lt''Ii~;:,C' ~"'l;T~~O!J.~'-,...., !il~ c- ~~ -0 ~rii -1;;0 C~ 20 m> :;;: -I (5 2 l!il ~IJ'~ll<llil:ifliil'li:I'f'f!jill;r!iiill!liil Ili~ i t i!1; :fl~' 'I' J. -I !IIJJr (rl ~ f= ~!,!~:"il ~ 111111~ I t!li~ ~11!1 It~1 il!iJ11.ti!! 1!lljll II 111'; J1:I'I'* J." · i I · tJI t 11- ~ ,1;-1 -I ~ .. ~ It., 11t }iBql :.t t"t ~r;;' I!o Il!I (1111 r"', I' I" II I rl' ..-!oll a I .. r ,i.. [II 1f.~ill il1t ~. ~~I I ! r I I~il J!J t1;1.. rr'. t, I"t t f. I LIar . r 11' ,," ~r" " ..I:r llf n!u~ ill- 11 . F f I I fIlii Ih !~1 ~~l a-J., If l~! i iiI..' lit 111"llt t I' ~J ~r=} t ~ [~JJJ. I I" t" , a r r r I ! ' I,' r[IJ~1 ~ I (f :; ~ ! r "'II ""I r.1 r a f " '} I I I I I ~J~ rlil! tf!r.. .. I< ~ilt ;:Q ~ iiii:l~! lijill~ I ~ il!:';~"j 2: al!i!;' I G) i!;ii; . ;E ~S~i~F J )> ii,.a! I J= U~:H ~ ~BU~! ~ 101 mm,; j 111111111:,; Hlp\lp!H:,. ~ ~I IIUUIl i I, "; H """", i ~ ~ ~ I" 11111111.1 i ~ I ljlf~nlj~;~. ft G iI11;;~H~!t'~ I~~"~~.,~ ~ mn~ ,.j,hi,; ~;~s~;! il!ill>; ~~: j: ~ !a,c!~ ~ ~~ IllS ~ !lSI!! ~I~h! 101 , ! I ij gj ( ~ ~ ~ i ! : ~ ;1 L. ~ I! :c ~ Ii H~ ' , 'ill 0: <' 's -.j il~ ~~ ull~~i In n U~ I!; !!;~ ~ ~~i ~~ ~ ~H H ~~! ~~I .1 ~ ~!~ ~~ ~ .;; ~~ "~~ ~~. III ~ 8>..,,, ~.. ~~ ! 'r~ 8 ~~I.g ~ ~il"~ .g ~~ i I I,".> ~ I. .> ~> 00. li~ ., "~ '~., ~8 .8 ~~ ~~~ iii 0 '=' ,.. "l I'Izg jtIIA '"'~ ::z:.~ ~~ ~ i~ ~ ~~> ~ " ~.~ ~ !~ ~ U~ ~ ~H~! ~ ! ~ In ~ ~n!~ i I I ~~ i ~~ ~u g " ~ ,"."> ~~ a ~ ~ ..~ ~ ~a. ~ ~ I c ~s ill ~Q ! ~ ; ; ~: i F~ . i 0 ~ ~~ ~ Q! a . ~ ~ !, ~ ~F ~ ~ ~ 6 ,..~ ~ ~~ i ~ j, ! ~~ i " ~ ~ ~ . ~~ ~ ~ ~ J; l llii g 0 ~ g ~ 13 ~ ! ~ I::I;;() iR~ ~ !l!",",S F~ till fi a~8~ ~~ E! . h!~ Ir ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ m~ 9~ ,~~~:'~a p ~ 8 ~, r J:~~8F~~ .1 il ~ 8F ::z: F'~I'O.~ ih:o ~~ ~~ ~ a~ 0 8~ i ~ ~~ n ilia ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~f 0 ~ n", ~~ : ~ $~ ~ ~~~~~~~ ~. ~ ~'. ~~ n z~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ sH ~ ~H . ~~ ; IH ~ ~ ji8~ ~~ !:~.~SB!1 I::;~~~'''I' JS~:~! "llI..31:o.<:\~ !~~~g~' ~a~~ ~{Il .! .. l~ 1~ I! I"... .. _~~.e~ j;l ~ to ~ ! :x: ~, ill N I ; ~ i ii\; ~ ' " s I ,~ i OJ ::0 o ::E o ~ ~ !!~. ~ I """, ~ii ~ m U~ ui ) ! i i ~ ~ ~ ~II iUt ltll:;f~~~ 11:1 t~ hllll I;f I r I" t r I l l ',," r .} H fF" .....1.. ., u ~1~~ll.f III Illr!J, jrJ J rll~ III "II It.li II. l~l"I"Il II! 11;1' !I! !l! "IJI~~h,.1 I~f Ji'hf.... ~Jt" ..~~t.ll:;l~ .. ..",,". l . I! :lltn I hi. I ~5m "tl ~~~~ {j;~~o ~~::l~c;; 2:~(gl'l m ~~~S G) 'l"i'ii - <!:! ",il!liP~6 f3~~~ Z -..J2~r- G) ~~~"tI -<2: '" C ~ii!;; z 1> :./;l /.1'-0' ; !~l ~&~ ill I!i :;l-l i;\ liI f,p. ~ ~ ";-lr- ~ l! f:iiil t.Hrp ~~28~E~ " "-I 88c:! ~~~)~;eg ~::e.:!:r- ONe;! ~~;~~~?Q ~1~~~~ ~ ~~ :, m'" ~~ i~ -~+'l!~~ ~ ~"'C_ ~~ $! ~!iS:~~~~ :l! ~~I:::;.i~ ~ ~~..~:;:~ ~ ~~"~~i ~ ~~~~~'" ~ ~~~~~~ ~ "~~~~~ 0 ~~~{Ili ~ ~~~~a~ ;.- {~-> 8 i!': [;J ~ ~~ o ~ ~ ,. ~ '" '-O'l~ p~~ <...l ~2g ~~2 Ci:l ~~~ ~~~ ~ i1~~ ~~~ Y' ~;~ ~~~ ~ ~;<;!il ~~~ ~ ~~~ lO~;;: ,..,~~ ';f~f! :T~ ~i' '&i <bl!! IO:!:~ ~~ tE~ / ~~ '" ;Bm 8 ~ <">2 ~~~~ :::;! ~~: ~ : ~~~ ~ ~ '" ""tl~_ I)l <::J g: m ~ N ~ 9) ~ I I;IIU!UI I ~ i I!! ~ mi~UIiIi ~ ~ :II /:; 1;:1;: ~ iiI ~ 11 :tl: I ~ + '1~ ~ ~t r: ~ ~ :, 1 18 I I I' i I · I,.. .I~I i~~~II:I! ~ u~~! ~~ ~~~~;;r:1 ~i!il!.><g ~ ;"liil 8 8 illil;lil'lll;ji;D . mUi f :X:~~51 ~ =:j:m rM ~~~" cL~~ ffi'~~ !~~ -l>~ tirrio 'un." ""0-< ~ijj~ ~rnSQ ~~~ ' m :@~ 'mm IC" '" ll>Z , <::> -I \;0 m j~~ \~~ 'm rn I ~ I : ~ ~ i!ii I \; I". Ml' -_O! cl~(i ~1155 " ,~ ~ Ei5 ',>e: : ~F "il ~ji 1"" ;i~'" -, 01 :ii " " ~ CD\ ~ ~\NA_ GRAlE \ I , ! l:> I I f 1 1.. J., I I I ",' ~: i!", r z, ~ ~ I III !!l II I -~ -r- In IT] Q -I o 2::: :J> ~ , ,I ,~ I :~ "l -ill !;:il!llll t ~.J "g S 'l'IIN!; Imi!i.p~l; m 1,,~~,1'l i '1!!1~!i'!i !I" ill'lii: , II dWW I, Hi!I~1 i I!hi! l!i'l~ 9;.q. ",'I, j': I !l:.. !"~S I ~l' I. .11"1' I I ~;" j' ~ .. iil" ;g,'Pll B H !!i!! i II ill ill !i In,! I ! ,'j H . .- [- --~--~ - f'; - " ~ ill 1 Vii: m z ...1 ;~ ' ':: - ------f'"@l ----~Z;' --~ ';1. ~ AQENDA iTEM N~ OF "3::z ~ P~\Ju. i\VtN~ ----- I III !!l II 8 .. ,- "j I! I, iI " ~ ~ z ~ o B' n 3 C ~ lIi!!llll ~ ~ ~ ~ I III !!l II ~, 1 - - ~ ---.-e- ~~ ~z =n" .3~ In IT] (') =:I o 2::: OJ . ill-- ; -- - - - ~IIII () ~ ()C/.l~ ()'"= ()I~ Q~lr ~rr 0 00"'1 o Q o ~ po :-+ Q 0- S' o ;:-: = -"'I -fI.> _ol:l. (JQ Q o n o n o 0 -. (Dg~ ..... l:l. ..... 0.. = 7 =- ..... -. 70..= I Q I ~ ~ I ~ ...... = C ~ Col:l. S~ S Or-' o () ~ -0= @.g o 0 I-j q 0.. ~ q::: ..... ::il::s ..... 0....:: po "'I P> po _. P> en ::s () ~ -. ~ ~ = ~ -<&. (JQ ..... g:8 (]l g: ::rfl.> ~Jg ~ (;) ..... ..... ..... ~. ~ ..... DJ~ (]l (]l (]l = (]l '0 ........ -< -< -<l:l. -< po ....., ~'< ~ ..... I po po e:...,"= po =l:!: ...... :\E(]l en en en ~-' en Q 0- 0 '0 '0 '0 fI.> '0 po po e; ~ e; 0'-' :::;; -. ..... l..Il I =l:!: =l:!: =l:!: =l:!: -' -.J -.J -.J -.J tJJ AGENDA iTEM NO. ;l. 0 0 0 0 l..Il l..Il l..Il l..Il '?" ~ ~ ~ ~ PAGE OF ""31 ~ ~ ~ ~ CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PREPARED BY: JANUARY 15, 2008 TOM WEINER, PLANNING MANAGER COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2007-17 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2007 -23, A REQUEST TO 1) ADD A VACUUM TOWER AND ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT RELATED TO AN EXISTING AUTOMATED CAR WASH BUILDING AND; 2) MODIFY THE USE AND OPERATION OF AN EXISTING AUTOMATED CARWASH FACILITY NASHAT DAMMAN (RIO CAR WASH) 31585 CANYON ESTATES DRIVE, LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532 DATE: PROJECT TITLE: APPLICANT: OWNER: SAME PROJECT REQUEST The applicant is requesting commercial design review and conditional use permit approval to allow the placement of a vacuum tower and ancillary equipment for an existing automated car wash building as well as modifying the use and operation of said existing automated carwash facility to a full service car wash. Review and analysis is pursuant to guidelines contained within the Canyon Creek "Summerhill" Specific Plan, Chapter 17.82 (Design Review), Chapter 17.38 (Non- Residential Development Standards), and Chapter 17.74 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. PROJECT LOCATION The project site is located on the southwest corner of Summerhill Drive and Canyon Estates Drive, east of Interstate 15 and the San Jacinto River. The site is within the Canyon Creek "Summerhill" Specific Plan Area, Assessor Parcel Number 363-670-003. { .!~ . "'2 ~"~'ZL!~ p /' ~/:.: :~_: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JANUARY 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2007-23 AND COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2007-17; RIO CAR WASH BACKGROUND In 2003, the Planning Commission and City Council approved both the construction and establishment of the existing automated car wash as well as the adjacent gas station and convenience store (Shell Station) located on the property. At the time of the approval, it was anticipated that the gas station and automated car wash would be operated by a single entity. However, the gas station and car wash operation, which were both completed in late 2007, are now separately owned and operated. This commercial design review and conditional use permit (CUP) request is for the automated car wash only. The original (2003) approval of the automated car wash facility was approved under several conditions of approval. One specific condition relates to adhering to criteria outlined in a Business Plan (Attachment 4) that was submitted by "Abbacy Holding Group," which was the owner and applicant at the time of the original approval. In the second paragraph of the Business Plan, there is a statement related to the entire project proposal that indicates "no more than four (employees) working at any time...." This statement within the Business Plan in essence restricts the gas station/mini-mart and automated car wash to a maximum of four (4) employees. In addition to the above Business Plan/condition of approval, an excerpt from the "Project Description" portion of the August 19, 2003 Planning Commission staff report (Attachment 5) states: The "automated hand car wash" use will consist of a self-serve car wash tunnel......... The self-serve automated hand car wash facility will be a high-end operation, offering complete car care washes and drying services. The car wash facility will also provide a small self-serve (post-wash) detail area for additional customer needs. Once occupancy approvals were granted in late 2007, the applicant began to operate the facility beyond the parameters allowed under the original CUP approval, which restricted the operation to a self-serve automated car wash with a limited number of employees. Dialogue between the applicant/operator and Community Development Department staff has been ongoing since that time, resulting in the applicant submitting this CUP and commercial design review application request. The applicant indicated that although he understood that a CUP was in place for the car wash use, he did not realize that restrictions regarding the number of employees were in place or the fact that the original CUP was approved under the notion that the car wash facility was "self-service" in nature. The following matrix reflects a chronology of recent events related to the automated car wash facility: AGENDA HEM NO. ~. PACE_;+ ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JANUARY 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2007-23 AND COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2007-17; RIO CAR WASH RIO CAR WASH CHRONOLGY I Date II I August 15,2007 Attached and detached car wash signs approved (over-the- counter). I October 12,2007 I Business License issued to applicant by City Finance Department. November 1, 2007 Building permit finalized. Occupancy approvals issued by City Building and Safety Division. November 15, 2007 Notice of violation issued by the City Code Enforcement Division regarding operation of full service car wash (as opposed to approved automated only) with multiple employees drying and vacuuming vehicles. November 28, 2007 Field inspection by City Staff revealed that car wash was closed. December 15, 2007 Field inspection by City Staff revealed that car wash was closed. PROJECT ANALYSIS PROPOSED USE The proposed vacuum tower and ancillary equipment (which has already been installed) as well as the request to operate a full serve car wash requires review by the Planning Commission. Staff has evaluated the proposed issues associated with the applicant's request for additional equipment on the site and the operation of a car wash facility. According to the applicant, the carwash facility will operate from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. seven (7) days a week. The applicant is requesting to operate a full serve car wash facility with ten (10) to thirteen (13) employees staffing the facility at any given time. These employees include a cashier as well as those that will conduct vacuuming, drying and detailing of vehicles. Although the proposed thirteen (13) parking spaces provided for the car wash site exceeds minimum code requirements, staff has included a condition of approval prohibiting any reduction to existing parking spaces, in order to maintain appropriate off-street parking for the proposed number of employees. The proposed vacuum tower and ancillary equipment, which has already been installed, is located at the southwest corner of the site, in the vehicle approach area at the car wash AG""",D!\I""F"lNO~ ., d\l' f.., i'::.. . . PACE 3 OF, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JANUARY 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2007-23 AND COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2007-17; RIO CAR WASH tunnel entrance. The tower is eight feet (8') high and will contain vacuum hoses for the vacuuming of vehicles prior to entering the car wash tunnel. Noise Noise impacts related to the existing car wash tunnel were analyzed under the original approval. There are however, potential sources of noise that may emanate from the proposed vacuum tower and the proposed intensification of the car wash from self-serve to full serve use. The Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) sets guidelines for ambient noise parameters and specifies acceptable decibel levels for specific zones. At staff's request, the applicant submitted a sound rating analysis from the manufacturer of the proposed vacuum system (Attachment 6). The decibel reading for a 10 HP vacuum system that the applicant is proposing for the car wash operation is at an acceptable level per LEMC standards. Vehicles Vehicles will proceed through the car wash tunnel into a proposed designated drying area that is located at the northeast corner of the car wash site. The drying area and the car wash facility in general, is located at a substantially higher grade from the street and will have minimal visual impact on Summerhill Drive. Vacuuming is proposed to be conducted at the southwest portion of the site to further minimize the visibility of vehicles. Conditions of approval have been incorporated to minimize impacts to vehicle circulation on the site. They include: . Shifting the location of the vacuum tower forward in order to allow for greater vehicle stacking away from parking and circulation areas. . Placement of a four foot (4') wide decorative (stamped concrete) strip emanating from the "northwest" column of the existing trellis auto detailing area running perpendicular to the existing planter area along the entry driveway (see Figure 1 below). This decorative strip will demarcate the limit line for the vehicle drying area, mitigating any interference with circulation, parking, and vehicle back up areas. Please see Figure 1 on next page. AGEN~:;:Et~(). OF~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JANUARY 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2007-23 AND COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2007-17; RIO CAR WASH Figure 1 I r ! r~~ I v' I ! / I ( I I Parking, landscaping, and other portions of the site plan will remain as approved. The applicant is not proposing any changes to parking, landscaping, or building elevations. Staff has included a conditional of approval requiring additional landscaping in the planter area along Summerhill Drive, in order to further minimize any potential visual impacts. With the proposed conditions of approval, Staff has determined that the proposed structural (vacuum tower) and operational changes to the car wash facility will not adversely impact surrounding properties with little or no impacts to adjoining uses, which include a gas station, mini-mart, and a commercial office building. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, Section 15162 (Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations), staff has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 00-01 previously approved by the City Council. Therefore no additional environmental clearance is necessary. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2008-_ recommending approval to the City Council of Commercial Design Review No. 2007-17 and Resolution No. 2008-_ approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-23 based on the ~~'-"~AI.'C1'"~~ r!o~ P\.n:tJU i CNI ~ . . Pl\GE_5 OF PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JANUARY 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2007-23 AND COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2007-17; RIO CAR WASH Findings, Exhibits, and proposed Conditions of Approval. PREPARED BY: TOM WEINER, PLANNING MANAGER APPROVED BY: ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ~ ATTACHMENTS: 1. VICINITY MAP 2. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIONS 3. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 4. APPLICANT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 5. "SUMMERHILL GAS STATION AND CAR SPA BUSINESS PLAN" 6. SEPTEMBER 19, 2003 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT AND AUGUST 19, 2003 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 7. SOUND RATING ANALYSIS FOR PROPOSED VACUUM SYSTEM 8. PHOTOGRAPHS 9. EXHIBITS (REDUCTIONS OF SITE PLAN AND FLOOR PLAN) 10. FULL SIZE PLAN SET AGEND/\ m::f,j NO.--.3 PAGE ~ OF -q:q- VICINITY MAP C 2007-17 & CUP 2007-23 (Rio Car Wash) <' ~~/( )/;// '''''''''-. ;1 9:' / " ,I::) '-., I I-..,'X ~"'-, -- j ~ " ", "'1'- f ~ I ""'--""~L."""__,,,_ ~ $' ~- ---"" .::5~1::) '" "0 ,/ Qj, C I' "''''' -1l\1h . ",01\1 /1 '~.s ~~ 12'.s () PROJECT SITE / ~~", I I I I ! I "",,,r'" , /' /,/" /" J/ ,/,. / /'" I ____L,------ 0::: (:) ~ ~ _______,--~----~ ---1 ffi- ::2: ::2: :::> Cf) ". " ''^'~'''~ ~..,",,,, '~ ------ -~-~------------------ -- ~76' " \ PLANNING COMMISSION AGEND/\ ITEr,;'l NO, '3 PACE '{ OF_~ RESOLUTION NO. 2008- RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2007-23 WHEREAS, Nashat Damaan (Rio Car Wash), has initiated proceedings to request the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-23 for modifying the use and operation of an existing automated carwash facility to a full service car wash. (the "Entitlement") located on the southwest corner of Summerhill Drive and Canyon Estates Drive, east of Interstate 15 and the San Jacinto River. The site is within the Canyon Creek "Summerhill" Specific Plan Area, Assessor Parcel Number 363-670-003; and WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elsinore recognizes that certain uses have operational characteristics that, depending upon the location and design of the use, may have the potential to negatively impact adjoining properties, businesses or residents and therefore are permitted subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit, which allows the City to comprehensively review and approve the use; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of considering and approving, conditionally approving, or denying conditional use permits; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code SS 21000 ef seq.: "CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R. SS 15000 ef seq.), public agencies are expressly encouraged to reduce delay and paperwork associated with the implementation of CEQA by using previously prepared environmental documents when those previously prepared documents adequately address the potential impacts of the proposed project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15006); and WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a) states that "When an EIR has been certified or negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: 1. Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; 2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or AGENDA m:~.!l NO. 3 PAGE ~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008- PAGE 2 OF 4 3. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: (A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; (B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; (C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative."; and WHEREAS, the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 00-01 was previously approved by the City Council and said MND evaluated environmental impacts that would result from development of commercial properties within the Canyon Creek "Summerhill" Specific Plan area which included the previously approved gas station, mini-mart, and car wash building; and WHEREAS, the Project does not present substantial changes or new information regarding the potential environmental impacts of development; and WHEREAS, public notice of the Entitlement has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on January 15, 2008. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-23 prior to rendering its decision and finds that the requirements of Chapter 17.74 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code have been satisfied. SECTION 2. The Planning Commission finds and determines that in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, the Entitlement does not present a substantial AGENDl4, m:r;~ ;~O. P,i},C::; q OF~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008- PAGE 3 OF 4 change or new information that would require further CEQA analysis. The environmental impacts associated with development of the Entitlement were contemplated by the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 00-01. No new CEQA documentation is necessary for the Entitlement. SECTION 3. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning Law, the Canyon Creek "Summerhill" Specific Plan, and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for approval of CUP 2007-23: 1. The proposed use, on its own merits and within the context of its setting, is in accord with the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the site is located. Issuance of this Conditional Use Permit will facilitate the creation of a well balanced and functional mix of residential, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses. The proposed land use conforms to the objectives of the General Plan and the Canyon Creek "Summerhill" Specific Plan. 2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or the City, or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or the City. All applicable City departments and agencies have been afforded the opportunity to review the use permit and their comments have been addressed in the conditions of approval attached to the staff report for this Project. Conditions have been applied relating to the proposed use, so as to eliminate any negative impacts to the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of the surrounding neighborhood or the City. 3. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, and for all the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, buffers and other features required by Title 17 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. The existing car wash was designed in consideration of the size and shape of the Project Site, thereby strengthening and enhancing the immediate commercial area. Further, the proposed use will complement the quality of existing development and will create a visually pleasing, non-detractive relationship between the proposed and existing projects, in that the facility design has been reviewed to ensure adequate provision of screening from the adjacent properties. 4. The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways with proper design both as to width and type of pavement to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated by the subject use. The proposed modification to the car wash use has been reviewed in relation to the width and type of pavement needed to carry the type and quantity of traffic AGENDA ITEM NO. "3 PACEjo ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008- PAGE 4 OF 4 generated. The City has adequately evaluated the potential impacts associated with the proposed facility prior to its approval and has conditioned the Project to be served by roads of adequate capacity and design standards to provide reasonable access by car, truck, and emergency services vehicles. 5. In approving the subject use, there will be no adverse affect on abutting property or the permitted and normal use thereof. The Project has been thoroughly reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City departments and outside agencies, eliminating the potential for any and all adverse effects on the abutting property. 6. Adequate conditions and safeguards pursuant to Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Section 17.74.50 have been incorporated into the approval of the Conditional Use Permit to insure that the use continues in a manner envisioned by these findings for the term of the use. Pursuant to Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Section 17.74.050, the proposed drive-thru facility use has been scheduled for consideration and approval of the Planning Commission at the regularly scheduled meeting on January 15, 2008. SECTION 4. Based upon the evidence presented, the above findings, and the attached conditions of approval, the Planning Commission hereby approves Conditional Use Permit 2007-23. SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of January 2008, by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Rolfe Preisendanz Director of Community Development IV"r:"l~ ~ IT"~";' r"0 3 MVd'.~:~~~_~~I_.S:(' _ c;~ RESOLUTION NO. 2008- RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2007-17 WHEREAS, Nashat Damaan (Rio Car Wash), has initiated proceedings to request the approval of Commercial Design Review No. 2007-17 for the construction of a vacuum tower and ancillary equipment at an existing carwash. (the "Entitlement") located on the southwest corner of Summerhill Drive and Canyon Estates Drive, east of Interstate 15 and the San Jacinto River. The site is within the Canyon Creek "Summerhill" Specific Plan Area, Assessor Parcel Number 363-670-003; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of considering and making recommendations to the City Council for commercial design review applications; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code SS 21000 et seq.: "CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R. SS 15000 et seq.), public agencies are expressly encouraged to reduce delay and paperwork associated with the implementation of CEQA by using previously prepared environmental documents when those previously prepared documents adequately address the potential impacts of the proposed project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15006); and WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a) states that "When an EIR has been certified or negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: 1. Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; 2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or 3. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: AGENDA ITW NO. ~ _ PAGE_._J2..~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008- PAGE 2 OF 4 (A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; (8) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; (C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative."; and WHEREAS, the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 00-01 was previously approved by the City Council and said MND evaluated environmental impacts that would result from development of commercial properties within the Canyon Creek "Summerhill" Specific Plan area which included the previously approved gas station, mini-mart, and car wash building; and WHEREAS, the Project does not present substantial changes or new information regarding the potential environmental impacts of development; and WHEREAS, public notice of the Entitlement has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on January 15, 2008. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Commercial Design Review No. 2007-17 prior to rendering its decision and finds that the requirements of Chapter 17 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code have been satisfied. SECTION 2. The Planning Commission finds and determines that in accordance with CEOA Guidelines Section 15162, the Entitlement does not present a substantial change or new information that would require further CEOA analysis. The environmental impacts associated with development of the Entitlement were contemplated by the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 00-01. No new CEOA documentation is necessary for the Entitlement. 0.'0 3 I~ . P,/{cE__._L3-m:: ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008- PAGE 3 OF 4 SECTION 3. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning Law, the Canyon Creek 'Summerhill" Specific Plan, and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for approval of CUP 2007-23: 1. The Project complies with the goals and objectives of the General Plan in that the approval of the vacuum tower and ancillary equipment will assist in achieving the development of a well balanced and functional mix of residential, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational, and institutional land uses and the Project will serve to diversify and expand Lake Elsinore's economic base. The project location has a zoning designation of Neighborhood Commercial/Specific Plan (C-1/SP) and a General Plan designation of Canyon Creek "Summerhill" Specific Plan. The existing land use conforms to the objectives of the General Plan and the Canyon Creek "Summerhill" Specific Plan. 2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or the City, or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or the City. All applicable City departments and agencies have been afforded the opportunity to review the design review application and their comments have been addressed in the conditions of approval attached to the staff report for this Project. Conditions have been applied relating to the proposed use, so as to eliminate any negative impacts to the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of the surrounding neighborhood or the City. 3. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, and for all the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, buffers and other features required by Title 17 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. The existing car wash was designed in consideration of the size and shape of the Project Site, thereby strengthening and enhancing the immediate commercial area. Further, the proposed use will complement the quality of existing development and will create a visually pleasing, non-detractive relationship between the proposed and existing projects, in that the facility design has been reviewed to ensure adequate provision of screening from the adjacent properties. 4. The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways with proper design both as to width and type of pavement to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated by the subject use. The car wash is an existing facility and has been reviewed in relation to the width and type of pavement needed to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated. The City has adequately evaluated the potential impacts associated with the proposed facility prior to its approval and has conditioned the Project to be AGHmil ITW NO. 3 ~ PAGE~Of - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008- PAGE40F4 served by roads of adequate capacity and design standards to provide reasonable access by car, truck, and emergency services vehicles. 5. In approving the subject use, there will be no adverse affect on abutting property or the permitted and normal use thereof. The Project has been thoroughly reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City departments and outside agencies, eliminating the potential for any and all adverse effects on the abutting property. SECTION 4. Based upon the evidence presented, the above findings, and the attached conditions of approval, the Planning Commission hereby recommends approval to the City Council of Commercial Design Review No. 2007-17. SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of January 2008, by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Rolfe Preisendanz Director of Community Development AGENDf'\ !T,.JJ~ NO.~. PAGE__~r~ CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2007-17 AND COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2007-17 FOR THE ADDITION OF A VACUUM TOWER AND ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT RELATED TO AN EXISTING AUTOMATED CAR WASH BUILDING AND MODIFICATION TO THE USE AND OPERATION OF AN EXISTING AUTOMATED CARWASH FACILITY PLANNING General Conditions 1. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, and Agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning the Conditional Use Permit (Drive Through Lane) project attached hereto. 2. If applicable, the applicant shall place a weatherproof 3' x 3' sign at the entrance to the project site identifying the approved days and hours of construction (7 AM - 7 PM, Monday through Friday with no construction activity to occur on Saturdays, Sundays or legal holidays) activity and a statement that complaints regarding the operation can be lodged with the City of Lake Elsinore Code Enforcement Division (951) 674-3124. The sign shall be installed prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 3. All Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced upon page one of building plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division for Plan Check. 4. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgement of Conditions," and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records. 5. The Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City's Grading Ordinance. Construction generated dust and erosion shall be mitigated in accordance with the provisions of Municipal Code, Chapter 15.72 and using accepted control techniques. Interim erosion control measures shall be provided thirty (30) days after the site's rough grading, as approved by the City Engineer. 6. The proposed location of onsite construction trailers shall be approved by the Director of Community Development or Designee. A cash bond of $1,000.00 shall be required for any construction trailers placed on the site and used during construction. Bonds will be released after removal of trailers and Planning Commission Approval Jamwy 15,2008 AGENDF\ nl':Jii I~V'~ .'..... . II _ P'c c_ l L P PiG E _J....l,e-- ,) , . .I--. restoration of the site to an acceptable state, subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development or designee. 7. The project shall provide a minimum of eight (8) vehicle stacking/queing area for the vehicle vacuum area. 8. The applicant shall comply with all applicable City codes and ordinances. 9. The Conditional Use Permit approved herein shall lapse and shall become void one (1) year following the date on which the use permit became effective, unless prior to the expiration of one (1) year a building permit is issued and construction commenced and diligently pursued toward completion on the site. 10. The Conditional Use Permit shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, Title 17 unless modified by approved Conditions of Approval. 11. The Conditional Use Permit granted herein shall run with the land, once said use is established, and shall continue to be valid upon a change of ownership of the site or structure which was the subject of this approval. 12. The applicant shall at all times comply with Section 17.78 (Noise Control) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 13. The car wash site shall maintain a minimum of thirteen (13) standard parking spaces at all times. 14. The vacuum tower and vacuum tubes shall be shifted forward towards the car wash tunnel entrance in order to allow proper vehicle queuing and alleviate obstruction to parking and circulation areas. 15. A four foot (4') wide decorative (stamped concrete) strip emanating from the "northwest" column of the existing trellis auto detailing area running perpendicular to the existing planter area along the entry driveway (see Figure 1 in staff report) shall be installed. This decorative strip will demarcate the limit line for the vehicle drying area. No vehicle drying, parking, or other type of servicing shall take place beyond this demarcation. 16. Litter shall be removed daily from the premises, including adjacent public sidewalks and all parking areas under the control of the operator. 17. The 3 foot retaining wall along the Summerhill Drive entrance shall be painted and stucco coated to match similar retaining walls throughout the gas station and car wash facility. 18. Exterior storage of any kind, including but not limited to, auto parts, AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ PAGE l,~ Planning Commission Approval January 15, 2008 dismantled vehicles, and tires is prohibited. 19. Temporary storage containers on the property, including but not limited to shipping containers, are prohibited. 20. Parking areas shall be used for customer and employee parking only and shall be kept clear of any vehicle for sale, vehicle awaiting repair, rental vehicles, rental equipment, and any other type of machinery or equipment. 21. There shall be no exterior speakers, music, bells, whistles, buzzers or other similar audible devices used in conjunction with the operation at anytime. 22. The applicant shall maintain the property (including all landscaping, walls, lighting, buildings, and the parking lot) in good condition at all times. 23.Any violation to these conditions of approval shall be grounds for the revocation or modification of the Conditional Use Permit. COMMUMTYSERWCESDEPARTMENT 24. Developer shall comply with all City Ordinances regarding construction debris removal and recycling as per Section 8.32 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 25. The Developer is to maintain all common landscaped areas. RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 26. The applicant shall comply with all Riverside County Fire Departments requirements and standards. ENGINEERING DIVISION 27.An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained prior to any work on City right-of- way. 28.lf applicable, the applicant shall pay development fees, including but not all inclusive: TUMF, MSHCP,TIF, Railroad Canyon Benefit District Fees, and area drainage fees. 29.AII drainage facilities in this project shall be constructed to Riverside County Flood Control District Standards. 30. In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal & recycling, the applicant shall be required to contract with CR&R Inc. for removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other Planning Commission Approval January 15, 2008 AGENDA ITEM NO. ? PAGE l 8 OF ~~___ rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of construction. 31. Roof drains shall not be allowed to outlet directly through coring in the street curb. Roofs should drain to a landscaped area. 32. Applicant shall comply with all NPDES requirements in effect; including any existing Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). 33. Education guidelines and Best Management Practices (BMP) shall be provided to residents of the development in the use of herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers as well as other environmental awareness education materials on good housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of storm water quality and met the goals of the BMP in Supplement "An in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. 34. Applicant shall provide BMP's that will reduce storm water pollutants from parking areas, driveway aisles, and carwash wastewater. 35. The City of Lake Elsinore has adopted ordinances for storm water management and discharge control. In accordance with state and federal law, these local storm water ordinances prohibit the discharge of waste into storm drain system or local surface waters. This includes non-storm water discharges containing oil, grease, detergents, trash, or other waste remains. Brochures of "Storm water Pollution, What You Should Know" describing preventing measures are available at City Hall. PLEASE NOTE: The discharge of pollutants into street, gutters, storm drain system, or waterways -without Regional Water Quality Control Board permit or waver - is strictly prohibited by local ordinances and state and federal law. 36. The applicant shall pay the fair share cost of the future driveway improvements on Canyon Estates Drive (across Boulder Vista Drive). The driveway improvements include a right in/out only access and related signing and striping. 37. On-site traffic signing and striping of this project shall be provided as approved by the City. A",.-"y',,, '",""'~~ ~t ~ , Ut:~\iLfj''I: ~. t~-ll I~'O. J Planning Commission Approv,ll January 15, 2008 PAGE~OF_~ CITY OF ~~ LAKE ,6,LSiNORt: V 0 REAM EITREME", ACKNOWLEDEGEMENT OF DRAFT CONDITIONS RE: COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2007-17 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2007-23 RIO CAR WASH I hereby state that I/We acknowledge the draft Conditions of Approval for the above named project. I/We understand that these are draft conditions only and do hereby agree to accept and abide by all final conditions prescribed by the City of Lake Elsinore staff, as set forth in the attachments to the approval letter that will be sent after final proj ect approval. All final conditions shall be met prior to issuance of permits or prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy, or otherwise indicated in the Conditions, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director of the City of Lake Elsinore. Date: 1- 10 -o?) Applicant's Signature: Phone Number: IU(O~6hd! d~/M.Wl<9iY) 31.5&"6 ((Y((ly'OVl e8l-~1~~ D,o \.r.>J k'~ e '6 \Y"0'<C cA ~ Z=;3"2- <3(51- 2L.fG" -95/7 Print Name: Address: AGENDA ITEM NO. ; PACE :lQ OF 'fLf 361-C Railroad Canyon Road Lake Elsinore. CA 92532 Phone: (909) 245-9936 Fax: (909) 245-8927 Abbacy Holding Corporation BUSINESS PLAN SUMMERHILL GAS STATION & CAR SPA Abbacy Holding Corporation or its management company will be operating both the gas station and the car spa. All employees, no more than four working at any time, will be required to attend a management course paid for by our station's brand. It includes how to operate the service portion, sales of gas, and operating the convenience store. It will also include the operation of the car spa. " ; The convenience store is being set up to fulfill the needs of the local residents. No alcohol will be sold - Kids carded for tobacco. We will offer variety goods including ice cream, se.ftyogart; and other normal snacks, including pizza. We want to be kid friendly so a bike rack will be installed. A "No Loitering" sign will be present at all times and posted. We will offer part-time work for teens and enterprise with other businesses in the City of Lake Elsinore. All major credit cards will be accepted and banking will be done at Washington Mutual four times a day. We will also have one of their ATM machines installed in the convenience store. The station will carry little cash at night. Regardless of who is working on any shift, a primary manager (adult) will always be present. Our plan is simple - Friendly and courteous people making each transaction, no matter how small, a joy - A smile builds business, a frown closes the doors. Planning CO~i:~.,~n Approved City Co~, Approved ~ ....................... '.a.mA tTEM NO.__ '3 .. .;~ ~GE..slL OF UlJJ \::;iI'iHtV ~ CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO CITY COUNCILIREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY' FROM: RICHARD J. WATENPAUGH,CITY MANAGER DATE: CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 9, 2003 SUBJECT: COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW C 2003-04 FOR ABBACY HOLDING GAS STATION, MINI-MART AND AUTOMATED CAR WASH-APN 363-550-015. APPLICANT Thomas R. Saltarelli Abbacy Holding Corporation 361-C Railroad Canyon Road Lake Elsinore CA 92532 REQUEST Approval of Design Review C 2003-04 to design, construct and establish a gasoline dispensing ) establishment associated with a convenience mini-mart and an Hautomated hand car wash". PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant requests the approval to establish a proposed gasoline dispensing establishment associated with a convenience mini-mart and an Hautomated hand car wash" use within the Canyon Creek "Summerhill" Specific Plan Neighborhood Commercial/Specific Plan (HC-lISP") Zoning District. The applicant is propqsing to develop one (1) 3,233 square foot mi~-mart building, 2,080 square foot automated car wash building anda 3,825 square foot canopy structure. The mini-mart building will be located at the most northerly portion of site and adjacent to and parallel with Canyon Estates Drive. The main entrance to the Mini-mart will be located in the center of building on the south elevation, with parking spaces provided directly in front of the mini-mart. The Canopy structure and car wash building will be located to the south of the mini-mart building with the Canopy structure located between the mini-mart building and the car wash building, which will be located at the southerly most portion ofthe site. The car wash tunnel will be approximately 360 feet (360') from the nearest residents. BACKGROUND On October 24, 2000 the City Council approved Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 to the Canyon Creek HSummerhill" Specific Plan No. 85-1 to remove approximately 32 acres from the Specific Plan and re- designate the 20 acres located south of Canyon Estates Drive and east of the I 15 Freeway to Neighborhood Commercial/Specific Plan "C-lISP". AGENDA lTEM NO. ?:> PAGE d-~ - ~ Of -~Cf REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SEPTEMBER 9, 2003 PAGE 3 SUBJECT: COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW C 2003-04 FOR A GASOLINE DISPENSING ESTABLISHMENT AND ASSOCIATED MINI-MART AND CAR WASH. . insure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of this Chapter and the planning district in which the site is located. PREPARED BY: isendanz, Associate Planner ~VIEWED BY: REVIEWED BY: APPROVED FOR AGENDA LISTING: City Manager's Office ) ",-, F'\\" 0-; !,'j (', q b-l<l,r",j ./.4 ~.;.'.~". -.; n~~"p;\~E__~3-0-~ TfL 9. The use of an outdoor public address system shall not be allowed 10. Security lighting shall be required All exterior on-site lighting shall be shielded and directed on-site - so as not to create glare onto neighboring property and streets ot allow illumination above the horizontal plane of the fixture. The light fIXture proposed is to match the architecture of the building. A photometric Plan illustrating this condition shall be required subject to the review and approval by the Community Development Director or designee. DESIGN REVIEW FOR COMMERCIAL PROJECT C 2003-04 11. The Design Review approval shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date on which - _. the Design Review became effective, unless prior to the expiration of one year, a building permit - related to the Design Review is issued and construction commenced and diligently pursued toward completion. The Design Review granted herein shall run with the land for this one (1) year period and shall continue to be valid upon a change of ow nets hip of the site 12. Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced on page one of building plans submitted to the Building Division Plan Check. All Conditions of Approval shall be met prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and release of utilities. 13. All site improvements approved with this request shall be constructed as indicated on the approved site plan and elevations. Revisions to approved site plans or building elevations shall be subject to the review of the Corrimunity Development Director. All plans submitted for Building Division c...-..).... . Plan Check shall conform to the submitted plans as modified by Conditions of Approval, or the '. Planning Commission/City Council through subsequent action. 14. Any alteration or expansion of this Design Review approval shall be reviewed according to the provisions of Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 15. This project shall be subject to all Mitigation Measures contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Specific Plan Amendment NO. 1 for the Canyon Creek "Summerhill" Specific Plan (MND 00-01). 16. All roof mounted or ground support air conditioning units or other mechanical equipment incidental to development shall be architecturally screened or shielded by landscaping so that they are not visible from neighboring property or public streets. Any material covering the roof equipment shall match the primary wall color. 17. All exterior on-site lighting shall be shielded and directed on-site so as not to create glare onto neighboring property and streets or allow illumination above the horizontal plane of the fixture. All light fIXtures shall match the architectural style of the building. 18. All building sign age shall comply with the Sign Program submitted to the Planning Division. 19. Applicant shall meet ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) requirements. 20. Trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standards as approved by the Community Development Director or Designee. f' ~'" url/\ f.!" '3 i,vi.:i\l~i'\ ,.,-J PA'.~(_.2-~~_OF~ f) Any transfoimers and mechanical or electrical equipment shall be indicated on landscape plan and screened as part of the landscaping plan. g) The landscape plan shall provide for ground cover, shrubs, and trees and meet all requirements of the City's adopted Landscape Guidelines. Special attention to the use 'of Xeriscape or drought resistant plantings with combination drip irrigation system to be used to prevent excessive watering. h) All landscape improvements shall be bonded 100% for material and labor . for two years from installation sign-off by the City. Release of the landscaping bond shall be requested by the applicant at the end of the required two years with approval/acceptance by the Landscape Consultant and Community Development Director or Designee. ~ All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed within affected portion of any phase at the time a Certificate of Occupancy is requested for any building. Allplanting areas shall include plantings in the Xeriscape concept, drought tolerant grasses and plants. j) Final landscape plan must be consistent with approved site plan. k) Final landscape plans to include planting and irrigation details. 31. Applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. Proof shall be presented to the Chief Building Official prior to issuance of building permits and fmal .) approvaL 32. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall provide assurance that all required fees to the Lake Elsinore Unified School District have been paid 33. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall provide assurance that all requirements of the Riverside County Fire Department have been met. 34. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fee in effect at time of building penrut Issuance. ENGINEERING 35. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to building permit. 36. All parcels shall have direct access to public right-of-way or to be provided with minimum 30 foot ingress and egress easement to public right-of-way by separate instrument or with recordation of a final map. 37. This development will be subject to all applicable conditions of approval for Parcel Map 30832 at the appropriate development approval 38. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (LEMC 16.34, Res. 85-26). The traffic mitigation fee is $3.35 per sq. foot of building area and there is no drainage fee. AGENDA ITEM rm'.__..c.3 _ n',-'- "")5 I"\~ ~ ri"'~:..."~ ~ t..," ~ , l ~-...--._--. .--~~--~ 53. Applicant to provide erosion control measures as part of their grading plan. The applicant shall contribute to protection of storm water quality and met the goals of the BMP in Supplement <<A>> in the Riverside County NPDESDrainage Area Management Plan. 54. Provide fIre protection facilities as required in writing by Riverside County Fire Department. 55. Provide street lighting, show lighting improvements on street improvement plans, as required by the Gty Engineer. 56. On-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility or accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance or conveyed to a drainage easement. 57. All natural drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer. 58. Roof and yard drains will not. be allowed to outlet through cuts in the street curb. Roofs should drain to a landscaped area whenever feasible. 59. Applicant shall obtain ~pproval from Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board for their storm water pollution prevention plan including approval of erosion control for the grading plan prior to issuance of grading permits. The applicant shall provide a SWPPP for post construction which describes Bump's that will be implemented for the development and including maintenance responsibilities. ')-~.'.'... .. 60. Education guidelines and Best Management Practices (BMP) shall be provided to residents of the development in the use of herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers as well as other environmental awareness education materials on good housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of storm water quality and met the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. 61. In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal & recycling, the applicant shall be required to contract with CR&R Ine. for removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of construction. RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 62. The applicant shall comply with all the conditions referenced in the attached Conditions of Approval from Riverside County Fire Department, dated June 10, 2003 (C 2003-04/LE-03-CUP- 04). COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 63. The applicant shall pay all park fees at $.10 per square foot. 64. The applicant shall comply with all City recycling construction and debris ordinances~ ~CENDA ITE. M t. m.~.. .' _. , PAC~_ ~~.~OF~~ MINUTES PlANNING COMMISSION MEETING CIlY OF lAKE ELSINORE 183 NORm MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 TUESDAY, AUGUST 19,2003 Chairman Barnes called the Regular. Planning Commission Meeting of August 25, 2003 to order at 6:00 PM. . The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chairman Barnes ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, MA Tn-HES, NASH, lAPERE & UHLRY ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Also present were: Community Development DireCtor. Brady, Planning & Code Enforcement Manager Villa, Associate Planner Miller, Associate Planner Preisendanz, City Engineer O'Donnell, Community Development Technician Hennings, Office Specialist Porche' and Deputy City Attorney Miles. ) PUBLIC COMMENTS None CONSENT CALENDAR MOVED BY lAPERE SECONDED BY NASH AND CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED. 1. Minutes a. Planning Commission Regular Meeting - July 15, 2003 b. Planning Commission Regular Meeting - August 05, 2003. PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. ConditionalUse Permit No. 2003-05, Design Review of Industrial Proiect No. I 2002- 04, and Mitigated negative Declaration No. 2003-02 -APN 377-120-007 & 008 Chairman Barnes opened the Public Hearing at 6:05 PM. ACENOA ITEM rl!).~3 4 PACE_~-=:L. uF~ If_-- PAGE 3 - PLANNING COMMlSSION MINUfES - AUGUST 19, 2003 City Engineer ODonnell stated that Condition No. 54 and 55 are designed to help the applicant lower the cost of insurance when applying for flood insurance. Vice Chairwoman Matthies asked for clarification on Condition No. 38, where it discusses paving the entire width of Central Avenue. She asked if it would be acceptable to have the applicant pave only to the centerline. 0 City Engineer ODonnell stated that if the applicant only paved to the center it would leave a lip. Commissioner Uhlry stated that the applicant would only need to cap the street, as it already has curbs and gutters. He stated that grading would hot be necessary. Vice Chairwoman Matthies wanted to make sure that all the needs of the applicant have been met. She requested that Mr. Washburn approach the podium. Mr. Washburn approached the podium. He introduced Conrad Rieger, Architect for the project. He also stated that he understood the Condition and understood that other projects have come and gone, however he just wanted to make sure that he is not stuck with other costs. He stated that he paid for their share, it is in a fund, and agreed to do that street. Mr. Conrad Rieger stated that the current curb and gutter would have to be removed because it is not is the correct location. Mr. Washburn indicated that he did not feel that Condition No. 55 is necessary, as the area is one foot above the base level of the FEMA maps. City Engineer ODonnell stated that the wording could be changed on Condition No. 55 to read "only ifrun:ssary". Vice Chairwoman Matthies had no further comments. Commissioner LaPere asked for clarification on Condition No. 21. Associate Planner Miller stated that the second to the last sentence would be modified to read, the ~ shdl/subnit evidena! of ~with this requirorxm to, and rmire apJJr<JWl of pnxf if disclosure prim- to making any such sale. Commissioner LaPere. asked if Condition No. 38 could be changed to read "feather to the center lo >> me. Vice Chairwoman Matthies concurred. Deputy City Attorney Miles suggested to have the Condition remain as is, and presented it to the City Council. ;~GEND,~ ire. 3 Pt'lGF. ~..~ PAGE 5 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUfES - AUGUST 19, 2003 OF lAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT NO. 2002-04 TO BE LOCATED ON CENTRAL AVENUE AND PASADENA STREET - APN 377-120-007 & 008 TO INCLUDE. TO NOTED MODIFICATIONS TO lHE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 3. Conditional Use Pennit No. 2003-04 and Design Review C 2003-04 for Abbacy Holding Gas Station, Mini-Mart and Automated Car Wash-APN 363-550-015. Chainnan Barnes opened the Public Hearing at 6:50 PM. ...... Community Development Director Brady indicated that this is a request for approval of a gas station, mini-mart, and automated carwash, and requested Associate Planner Preisendanz to review it with the Commission. ",.) ~,,: .. Associate Planner Preisendanz indicated that the gas station, mini-man, and automated carwash would be located on the southwest comer of Summerhill Drive and Canyon Estates Drive, east of Interstate 15 and the San Jacinto River. He indicated that the gas station would be exclusively a self-serve operation and would consist of a six fueling island located under a detached canopy. He stated the mini-mart would be located within a detached building would provide goods typically' found in a grocery- store. He stated that no alcohol beverages would be sold at this location. He stated the hours of operation would be from Monday thru Friday from 5:00 AM to 10:00 PM and Saturday and Sunday and Holidays from 5:00 AM to 11:00 PM. Associate Planner Preisendanz stated that the architectural design. of the proposed structures is consistent with the architecture approved for the Washington Mutual Bank to the west and would complement the architectural design of the existing buildings in the area. He stated that the applicant has met the intent of Section 030 of the "C-1/SP" Zoning District of the Canyon Creek "Summerhill" Specific Plan. He stated that the applicant has designed the site by placing the car wash building approximately three hundred sixty feet away from any residential properties in the area. He indicated that in order to reduce the impaCt of light glare generated by the project the applicant would provide recessed under canopy light fIXtures for the gasoline dispensing area and fully shielded lamps for the parking lot light standards. Associate Planner Preisendanz stated that Staff recommends approval of this project based on the Findings, Exhibits and subject to the Conditions of Approval. He indicated that the applicant is present this evening to answer any questions that the Commission may have. Chairman Barnes requested comments from the Public. Mr. Bill Kipp, 361-C Railroad Canyon Road, Lake Elsinore indicated that he is the President of Abbacy Corporation. He indicated that would be able to answer any questions that the Commission may have. He stated that their number one mission is to have everything blend in well. He stated that their would be an adult supervising the gas station at all times of operation. AGENDA m:t-':j NO. 3 j PACE~",;l-ct ~Of: ~,~ ~ PAGE 7 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUIES -AUGUST 19,2003 MOVED BY IAPERE, SECONDED BY UHLRY AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-69, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY . OF lAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003-04 TO BE LOCATED ON THE SOUTIlWEST CORNER OF CANYON ESTATES DRIVE AND SUMMERHILL DRIVE, PARCELS 2 AND 3 OF PM 30832, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 363-550-015 TO INCLUDE THE MODIFICATIONS ON THE NOTED CONDITIONS. MOVED BY LAPERE, SECONDED BY MATTHIES AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-68, A RESOLUTION OF TI-lE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003-04, TO BE LOCATED ON THE SOUTIlWEST CORNER OF CANYON ESTATES DRIVE 'AND SUMMERHILL DRIVE PARCELS 2 AND 3 OF PM 30823, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 363~550-015 TO INCLUDE THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE NOTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. 4. Variance No. 2003-05 and Minor Design Review for a Sign Program for a proposed Commercial Center located at Canyon Estates Drive and Summerhill Drive. ) Chairman Barnes opened the Public Hearing at 7:23 PM, and requested the reading of the Staff Report. Community Development Director Brady indicated that this is a request for a Sign Program for the commercial center and requested that Associate Planner Miller review it with the Commission. Associate Planner Miller stated that this request is for a project located on Canyon Estates Drive and Summerhill Drive. She indicated that this project is part of the Canyon Creek/Summerhill Specific Plan and was originally zoned neighborhood commercial and multi-family. She stated that the applicant is requesting a Variance to exceed the allowable signage area and height limitation for a freestanding Freeway Identification Sign. She stated that the applicant is proposing a sign that would be 72 feet 6 inches in height. She noted that the maximum height allowed for a Freeway Identification Sign is 45 feet. She stated that Staff feels that a request for a variance for a freeway sign that substantially exceeds the allowable sign area by 694% is unreasonable for this commercial center. She indicated that the applicant is requesting approval of a "roller blind" system for changing the pricing for the Shell portion of the Freeway Sign. She indicated that the applicant states that this system would only change numbers when gas prices change and would not be continually moving. Associate Planner Miller indicated that this program is considered incomplete. She stated that several items have been requested by Staff and have not been received. Therefore, she indicated Staff could not recommend approval of the Sign Program. Chairman Barnes requested comments from the Public. ~lQ ? """",. '. rr- o -\;F---cr I .3_.~,-._,-,...~.~, P.tl,Cr: PAGE 9 - PLANNING COMMISSION MlNUIES - AUGUST 19, 2003 Community Development Director Brady suggested approving the Washington Mutual Bank sign on the building. He stated that the applicant has agreed to re-design the sign, and would need to know how long it would take the applicant to complete this. Associate Planner Miller asked Community Development Director if the applicant could have the Washington Mutual Bank approved over the counter. It waS agreed by the Commission to have the Sign Program brought back to the Commission on September 16, 2003. There being no furthercommerits, Chairman Barnes closed the Public Hearing at 8:30 PM. MOVED BY IAPERE, SECONDED BY NASH AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TOHA VE VARIANCE NO. 2003-05 AND MINOR DESIGN REVIEW. OF SIGN PROGRAM FOR SUMMERHILL COMMERCIAL C:t;:NTER LOCATED AT CANYON ESTATES DRIVE BROUGHT BACK TO tHE PIANNING COMMISSION ON SEPTEMBER 16,2003. Chairman Barnes requested a five-minute recess of the Planning Commission at 8:25 PM. The Planning Commission reconvened the meeting at 8:30 PM. -) 5. Zone Code Amendment No. 2003-02, Chapter 17.18 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code regarding density bonuses. Chairman Barnes opened the Public Hearing at 8:31 PM. and requested the reading of the Staff Report. Community Development Director Brady indicated that this is a request to have the ordinance of the City of Lake Elsinore adding Chapter 17/18 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code regarding density bonuses tabled, and direct Staff to fe-notice and schedule the Public Hearing for a future date. MOVED BY UHLRY, SECONDED BY MATTHIES AND PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE PRESENT TO HAVE THE ZONE CODE AMENDMENT NO. 2003-02, CHAPTER 17.18 OF THE lAKE ELSINORE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING DENSITY BONUSES TABLED FOR A FUTURE DATE. BUSINESS ITEMS 6. Minor Design Review of a Duplex located at 409 N. Langstaff Street. Chairman Barnes indicated that this is a Business Item, and requested the readinl! of the Staff Report. A~fNDA ITEM NO. '3 PACE_3~L_OF If-lf. PAGE 11 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINlITES - AUGUST 19, 2003 ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW OF A DUPLEX LOCATE AT 409 N. LANGSTAFF STREET INFORMATIONAL NONE STAFF COMMENTS Community Development Director Brady commented on the following: · He indicated that the Planning Division has received a request for approval of a watercraft rental, located in the Overlay recreation Zone. He indicated that it should be treated as a temporary use permit application, and possibly bring back as a CUP. Commissioner Nash asked where the watercraft rental facility would be located. Community Development Technician Hennings indicated it would be located on Lakeshore Drive across from Bushman. .) PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS Chairman Barnes commented on the following: · No comments Vice Chairwoman Manhies commented on the following: · No comments. Commissioner Uhhy commented on the following: -No comments Commissioner Nash commented on the following: - No comments Commissioner LaPere commented on the following: · Thanked Staff again for all their hard work ;:"GtNDA ITEM NO. ...... PACE 3 r 3 OF. If Lf PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT City cl Ukc Elsinore Planning Division 13OS.Man St_ Uk< Elsnon; CA 92530 (909) 67+3124 (909) 471. \4 19 fax ~ ~~;:-~d~ DATE: Tuesday, August 19,2003 TO: Chairman and Members of the PlannihgCommission FROM: Robert A. Brady, Community Development Director PREPARED BY: Rolfe Preisendanz, Associate Planner PROJECT TITLE: Conditional Use Permit No. 2003-04 and Design Review C 2003-04 for Abbacy Holding Gas Station, Mini-Mart and Automated Car Wash-APN 363-550-015. ) .,~I" APPLICANT: Thomas R. Saltarelli, Abbacy Holding Corporation, 361-C Railroad Canyon Road, Lake Elsinore CA 92532 PROJECT REQUEST Approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2003-04 and Design Review C 2003-04 to design, construct and establish a gasoline dispensing establishment associated with a convenience mini-mart and an "automated hand car wash" . PROJECT LOCATION The 1.33~acre project site is located on the southwest comer of Summerhill Drive and Canyon Estates Drive, east of Interstate 15 and the San Jacinto River. The project site consists of Parcel No. 2 (.59 net acres) and Parcel No.3 (.67 net acres) of Parcel Map 30832, within the Canyon Creek "Summerhill" Specific Plan Area,Assessor Parcel Number 363-550-015. BACKGROUND On October 24, 2000 the City Council approved Specific Plan Amendment No.1 .to the Canyon Creek "Summerhill" Specific Plan No. 85-1 to remove approximately 32 acres from the Specific Plan and re-designate the 20 acres located south of Canyon Estates Drive and east of the I 15 Freeway to Neighborhood Commercial/Specific Plan <<C-1/SP"_ AGENDA iTEt\~ NO._.. _~ PACE 3 30:=~--q-cr PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AUGUST 19,2003 PAGE.3of 10 PROJECT TITLE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003-04 AND DESIGN REVIEW C 2003-04 FOR A GASOLINE DISPENSING ESTABLISHMENT, ASSOCIATED MINI-MART AND AN AUTOMATED CAR WASH. grocery stores. No off-site alcohol beverage sales are being proposed as a part of this Conditional Use Penrut. Purchases for gasoline may be tendered directly at the fueling island or via the mini- mart. The gasoline dispensing establish, associated mini-mart and automated hand car wash will be open for business Monday thru Friday 5:00 AM to 10:00 PM and Saturday and Sunday and Holidays from the hours of 5:00 AM to 11:00 PM. The proposed fueling islands and canopy structure have been located within the center of the site, between the mini-mart building. which fronts Canyon Estates Drive and the car wash building to the south. The mini-mart building and landscaping proposed along Canyon Estates Drive and Summerhill Drive' will assist in providing additional" screening of the gas fueling islands to the neighboring residents. The proposed canopy lighting will be recessed within and under the canopy structUre, precluding the direct glare of light shining onto the neighboring properties. Likewise, the parking lot light standards proposed within the site will be fully shielded to prevent lighting glare onto neighboring properties. AutanatedHandCar,Wash Use ) The "automated hand car wash" use will consist of a self-serve car wash tunnel located over 300 feet (300) from the residents to the north along Canyon Estates Drive and 300 feet (300') from the residents to the northeast along Summerhill Drive. The car wash tunnel building will be located adjacent to and east of the San Jacinto River, with the entrance of the tunnel generally facing to the west of the site, away from the residents to the north. The self-serve automated hand car wash facility will be a high-end operation, offering complete car care washes and drying services. The car wash facility will also provide a small self-serve (post-wash) detail area for' additional customer needs. The proposed washing and chying equipment within the car wash tunnel will be state of the art machinery fitted with adequate baffling equipment, reducing the number of decibels generated. DESIGN REVIEW NO.C 2003-04 Section 100 of the Canyon Creek "Summerhill" Specific Plan explains that, No buildingpmnits shaUb? issued far the anstmctim of any building or structure wi1hin the ccC-1/SP" Distria until the applicant has obtain<<! DesiWZReviewappruwlpursuant to thepravisions of Chapter 17.82 of the LEMC Siting The applicant is proposing to develop Parcel 2 with one (1) 3,233 square foot mini-mart building and Parcel 3 with a 2,080 square foot automated car wash building and a 3,825 square foot canopy structure. The mini-mart building will be located at the most northerly portion of Parcel' 2 and adjacent to and parallel with Canyon Estates Drive. The main entrance to the Mini-mart will be located in the center of building on the south elevation, with parking spaces provided directly in from of the mini-mart. The Canopy structure and car wash building will be located on Parcel 3 with t'C~:"'t'\' ~,"" ~ /,r'ic b..;'.;IIl.."f',. \ ''.i:''':. ./ ~., '..,...~_. . Z:,;CE_~a_ c~lf If.,,,,~ .i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AUGUST t9, 2003 PAGE 5ofto PROJECT TITLE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003-04 AND DESIGN REVIEW C 2003-04 FOR A GASOLINE DISPENSING ESTABLISHMENT, ASSOCIATED MINI-MART AND AN AUTOMATED CAR WASH. A rchita:tu1'e The architectural design of the proposed structures is consistent with the architecture' approved for the Washington Mutual Bank to the west and will complement the architectural design of the existing buildings in the area. The architectural style proposed can generally be' identified as "Santa .Barbara Mission". The buildings proposed for the'mini-mart and car wash tunnel will be wood frame buildings with a Highland # 155 smooth "hump and dump" stucco exterior fUlish, matching the fmish of the bank building. The stucco'.exterior fmish will be given defmition with a wainscOt at the base of the buildings and double "v" expansion joints placed at critical points. The north elevation of the mini-mart facing Canyon Estates Drive will incorporate"the' architectural elements proposed on the front ekvation, excluding the glass storefront, creating a "front entry" appearance to the public view. The canopy struCture will be metal framed with a stucco treated parapet element matching the proposed mini-mart and car wash building exterior. The canopy structure will also incorporate the use of six (6) square architectural columns at the fuel islands, which suppon the canopy roof. The architectural columns will be overlaid with a stucco exterior fmish and color to match the other buildings. The applicant has proposed pitched "EI Camino" US Tile roof elements on all the proposed structures. The mini-man and car wash tunnel willintorporate.the use of distinct tower.elements also. with a pitched "EI Camino" US Tile roof, as well as' additional pitched roof elements. The canopy structure will receive a pitched roof element, matching the other structures. The roof eaves throughout the project will consist of exposed 6" x 12" corbel decorative rafter tails, treated with Vista # 67 Mahogany fmish. 4" x 12" wood trellises have been provided at strategic locations throughout the project, enhancing the proposed architectural style. The buildings will also feature decorative wrought iron elements at critical locations. Finally, the applicant will also introduce pre- finished anodized (dark bronze) store fronts at the main entrance to the mini-man and the car wash building. 0J0r and Materials The applicant is proposing the following colors and materials: Buildin Exterior Roof Elements Wood Trellis Rafter Tails Store Front Exterior roll u and metal man doors Decorative Iron Hi land # 155 stucco US Tile "El Camino Blend" Vista # 67 Maho y Vista # 67 Maho Pre-finished Anodized (Dark Bronze Hi hland #155 stucco color Dunn Edwards Flat Black AGc....:>!), n.~..' ),1\") q '^"';:\'<c.'-'c;'5"'--:~'- ~. Lf .!'-"'i"~\ '--.,;. ~ \.~q _...~-"-_., -..---.-.'-- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AUGUST 19,2003 PAGE 7 of10 PROJECT TITLE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003-04 AND DESIGN REVIEW C 2003-04 FOR A GASOLINE DISPENSING ESTABLISHMENT, ASSOCIATED 'MINI-MART AND AN AUTOMATED CAR WASH. DESIGN REVIEW C 2003-04 Siting ) The proposed sltmg meets the mmnmun requirements of Chapter 17.38 (Non-Residential , Development Standatds)"of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) and the Development Standards set forth in the "C-l/SP" Neighborhood Commercial Specific Plan Zoning District. Section 120 (Floor Area Ratio) of the "C-1/SP" Zoning District requires that, 1hemaximumdmsiiy ofdeudoprmt under tk ccC-1/SP>> District shall k 17,424 squarefretJX?racrr?ora F.A.R. (Floar Area Ratio) of 40 percent (40%). The FA.R. proposed for Parcel 2, including the area covered by the canopy structure, is approximately .29 or 29%. The F A.R. proposed for Parcel 3 is approximately.09 or 9%. The total FAR proposed for both Parcels 2 and 3 is approximately .18 or 18%. In this case the proposed F A.R. is less than the required F A.R. Subsequently, Section 050 (Setbacks) of the "C-1/SP" Zoning District of the C~yon Creek "Summerhill" Specific Plan requires that any buildings or parking areas proposed be setback a minimum of ten feet (10' from property lines. The closest building or parking area proposed is the mini-mart building, which has metthe minimum setback allowed. Further, Section 17.38.090 A. (Gasoline Dispensing Establishments) states that, ail gasoline pumps and pump islands uJXn uhidJrlxy are pIaar1 shall k set bark a minimum of thirty feet (3D; Jran any pruJmy line~ The pump islands proposed have met or exceeded the minimum requirement. Finally, Section 17.38.090 (Gasoline Dispensing Establishments) states that, Canopies shall k setbcuk a minimum of tuxnty fret (20; firm any profX?f1y line. The setback for the proposed canopy has met the required minimum dimension. Gn::ulatial The proposed circulation meets the requirements of Chapter 17.38 (Non-Residential Development Standards). Section 17.38.090.F (Gasoline Dispensing Establishments - Circulation) of the LEMC states that, No more than tlW (2) points ofingress shall k a:lLauxri to any strret. The applicant has met the maximum allowed by providing two points of access, one point of access from Summerhill Drive and a second point of access from Canyon Estates Drive. Additionally, Chapter 17.66.080 (Circulation and Parking Space Layout) states that, No WXYlmy ciriu? aisles shall k less than tux:nty feet (20;. The minuTIlun dimension for a drive aisle proposed is twenty-two feet (22l Parking Spaa Layout The proposed parking space layout meets the requirements of Chapter 17.38 (Non-Residential Development Standards). Section 17.38.090.G (Gasoline Dispensing Establishments - Parking) of the LEMC requires that, W:xn a mini-mart or corm:nieruE sta1'f! is op;rated in anjwu:tion with a gasoline statim., a minimum of ftR (5) parking spaa5 shall Ix? providal and cam:miently kxated to ~ 5ta1'f! ",.'" '3 ~"""'-~~'. --~,. '" {'~ ':. '2.J _ f' -~,.,J't, ~~_M -- -. PlANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AUGUST 19,2003 PAGE 9 onO PROJECT TITLE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003-04 AND DESIGN REVIEW C 2003-04 FOR A GASOLINE DISPENSING ESTABLISHMENT, ASSOCIATED MINI-MART AND AN AUTOMATED CAR WASH. ENVIRONMENTAL Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, Section 15162 (Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations), staff has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 00-01 previously approved by the City Council. Therefore no additional environmental clearance is necessary. RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2003-_ recommending to the City Council approval of Design Review C2003-04 and Resolution No~ 2003-_ approving Conditional Use Pennit No. 2003-04 based the following Findings, Exhibits "An thm "N" and proposed Conditions of Approval. FINDINGS - CONDI'tIONAL USE PERMIT 1. The proposed use, on its own merits and within the context of its setting, is in accord with the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the site is located. 2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or the City, or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or the City. 3. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, and for all the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, buffers and other features required by Title 17 of the LEMC. 4. The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways with proper design both as to width and type of pavement to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated by the subject use. 5. In approving the subject use at the comer of Canyon Estates and Summerhill Drives, there will be no adverse affect on abutting property or the permitted and normal use thereof. 6. Adequate conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.74.50 of the LEMC have been incorporated into the approval of the Conditional Use Pennit to insure that the use continues in a manner envisioned by these findings for the term of the use. N.:A"" '2 -lOF~~~ f-- \j --____.:L-,-~ ....-.-~".....- RESOLUTION NO. 2003-68 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING . CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF DESIGN REVIEW FOR COMMERCIAL PROJECT NO. C 2003-04, TO BE LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CANYON ESTATES DRIVE AND SUMMERHILL DRIVE, PARCELS 2 AND 3 OF PM 30832, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 363-550-015. WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Thomas R. Saltarelli, Abbacy Holding Corporation, to request the approval of a Design Review of Commercial Project No. C 2003-04 for the construction of a gasoline dispensing establishment associated with a convenience mini-mart and an <<automated hand car wash". WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of approving Design Reviews for commercial projects; and WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on August 19,2003; ) NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed request for the Commercial Project No. 2003-04 and has found it acceptable. The Planning Commission finds and determines that this project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and the Canyon Creek "Summerhill" Specific Plan Neighborhood CommerciallSpecificPlan f'C-l/SP") Zoning District and that nor further environmental review is necessary pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15162, based on the findings of Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 00-01 previously approved by the City Council; SECfION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code the following findings for the project have been made as follows: DESIGN REVIEW FINDINGS 1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the intended General Plan and the Zoning District in which the project will be located. 2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 of the LEMC and all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. 3. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section ] 7.82.070 of the LEMC, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the -',,' ,j :1 ,-'.", , .~ ',-.,.--- --':f--- ,..... r-. {.'~l:.., PAvr3~__y\_lf ,-- RESOLUTION NO. 2003-69 I / A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NQ. 2003-04, TO BE LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CANYON ESTATES DRIVE AND SUMMERHILL DRIVE, PARCELS 2 AND 3 OF PM 30832, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 363-550-015. WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Lake Elsinore by Thomas R. Saltarelli, Abbacy Holding Corporation, to request the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2003-04 for the construction of a gasoline dispensing establishment associated with a convenience mini-mart and an "automated hand car wash". WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of approving Conditional Use Permits for commercial projects; and WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on August 19,2003; ) NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore DOES HEREBY RESOL YEas follows: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed request for the Conditional Use Permit No. 2003-04 and has found it acceptable. The Planning Commission finds and determines that this project is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and the Canyon Creek "Summerhill" Specific Plan Neighborhood Commercial/Specific Plan ("C- liSP") Zoning District and that nor further environmental review is necessary pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15162, based on the findings of Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 00-01 previously approved by the City Council; SECTION 2. That in accordance with Chapter 17.74 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code the following findings for the project have been made as follows: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS 1. The proposed use, on its own merits and within the context of its setting, is in accord with the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the site is located. 2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or the City, or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or the Citv. ;'i': :'i'\ ~ p,qc',~.~,3 ~.=oi-qTf ~~ DATE: October 17, 2ee7 ~ J t. , : I ' ! I 1.-"'1 ." < ' " H.."" ,,-1<\ " f "/~ 1 i '.... ' ~. I ! 111 '\~ - ~I,>-;~. \" I , " J,ll ,/ ' , \ I ' - i') \, 11 !'-__."" ! ; ...., '-:>" , I 'I I . "'-~-:::::~~l"-J I' I /: ,_./--:.. , I" ---Irfr= Ii' : o/-,,'~i ~,J,I I~ ~.. '"~...",,.~,,', I, ~"--','"",../...'/ 4:''' " '~.- . , " --,." "" . " - .....-. '.... .." 'C',:, e...... ,': ::",._,;<~?,':"'J- ,-, -- . "-If'-' . *!?\ at G2 Equipment we performance machine ('-- "'-....,f"', ". " . IJC .I 3: Nashet D.amman Rio Car Wash 31585 Canyon Estates Dr Lake Elsinore, CA 92532 DEAR Nashat, Thank you for promoting our vacuum systems. Here excel at manufacturing an extremely smooth, high that is also very quiet. , , l i' The decibel levels on our vacuum producers with the muffler are as follows: ..-----71e HP, 3-Stage ~ 15 HP, 4-Stage \:::.J 28 HP, 5-Stage 25 HP, 7-Stage 59 decibels 62 decibels 66 decibels 68 decibels These ratings are taken at 18 feet from the machine with no background noise or outside interference. We hope that these Ratings are satisfactory. If you have any further questions, please contact me at our toll free number 888-628-8682. Thank you, Kimberly Graves G2 Equipment / Sales Office: (619) 258-9881 Fax: (619) 258-9885 Cell: (619) 654-3933 AGENDA rn:!/. NO. "3 PACE '-1.0 Of~ if If ~ 9410 Bond Ave EI Cajon, CA 92021' ,~ Phone: (619)258.9801 Fax: (619)258-9805 -.-..lL ___._ EXHIBIT 1 CAR STOCKING AT THE ENTRANCE ( vacuum area) This area it holds at least 5-6 cars at one time without affecting anything on the property. I J',::',i":', I', ;'~>,' ";', 3 t....~\.}....,t''"'-,.'..." <: ; to....li t...~. PAGE_~OF=:=gy EXHIBIT 2 DRYING AREA This area it is a drying area that it hold now on this picture 5 cars and it is capable to hold at least 5 more. "/" ~",,""' '7""'"'"" "''-' 3 K\.J~~\t(.;:\ ~ ~ :':':.,,':i f'~v. PACE Lt;}- "--0I=3lf .. I . ~,-- ~ ~ I ~ ,,- . I I > ::0 I ~ i I -I ! rn (") -I i c I ::0 > I r Ul -I ~ rn -U ~ r > ,- -=- I I < (") z -I -< ;;: > 'U .ZC;:!1f..::;';;li%~;;:;;: ii'.... ~......~ HllIHtmu II;' nlHwi :q'l~imIH ~ IH;nU~ I~"s !;!~;i!; i: ~liUi..~, . i. a 2 i ; E · ~ i I! i Sp i' i "d .., i~. I ,.......1 !t ~!-P,I !.';.'d. ! 5 .;' ~ e; . = j' q. , . :& i:~ Iii .; d!;ni if Ii ~ ~ I ~ : i a i! : ~; I ~ B~!d H I:!~~: ~t~:~~I:s~;~~ : ~ : : ! ~ , , ~ GENDA iTt:~'.1 i'ip. \~- \ f ~$ :..~. """t,y" ~. I \ \ I I _NO.b~ _ _ 114.74' / / I I /- - - - - ----~ L:=:::::::J \ f' ;~ - ;;:!, ! ~ {- ~~ -\ ~1 2\ \ ~ \' i i i i i / i i i i ; i ; ; ,/ ; ; i ; ; / ! ; /f /1 ,I / i / ,':'''' .' ., /' ""., Tioo~iYiINiJirnl- )00.... ---'~ ------ ~,--~ SUfv1f'1ERHIL~ - -~-----_w \ \ \. --~ ------------ ....~...._--- .... ~-- ~._-...._----- -~)---- ~-----........::. .~.................... --J I ~u III HH ~;~I .u~ ""tqmlt ~.~ U~ ~ "f ~ i It ii " illll llin II 1":11 . E ~ I · ill ~~! ~HHH -0 ':0 a c- (Tl (') -I '=' l>o -I l>o "I ~~ !j ;! 'U ::0 o c- rT! (') -I '"' PI:UHHU : iL1;qUUH .1 j~ !I IiPi~! , . q~.SG '"/,'Ol. ~ T ~ I ;: ~ IJl!dlh~ al_!~~sl~E~~~i i PPI ii!", !! i j I L;1 n I . t) i'~UH il'iill' lIB!! ilihi .PB - -'II Z TI o :;JJ ;;: l>o -I o Z (") )> Z --! rn. '0 . i! q Ii i l:l :J: > W'~~<<;n !M@. 3 '" '" II 111/1 .., ~ '" 0 '" .., t;J {JJ ~~~ ~!\~IHI Ii 0 1\ 111\ ~ III -. 0 .., U ~ ~ aJfYOJI' D1'UD om" Z 31585 CANYON ESTATES DRIYE un nstIou,a ..- ~i 0 IAVC' C'I c:nlnor 1"'.101 TC'l'\OlIIA .... ..........--.. "'-- --... _.~ .! ~ . i./;/ ~/ ~. , / / /' / /f ; ; ; j ; i ; ; J j i ,. i ,. ,. i j i i i i i i i i i i i i ! i t i " i -,_ ! ,,", II ~ ~____~AOOL E I -.---._ 1 R lOCE ------- i DRIVE i ,. / ! ; i ! i ! -- -- f i /--- ,/ FH (./ z o -I rn Ul ~ #" t y. !j] Ii lIa it .; 4 jii; i j !!W f. V) W f- a z z -=: ..J a. cr: a a ..J .... I U a: -=: L i- t; ~;: n f!j! 2 I II .. ~d ;~~~ 5 ~ ;: i i' I ". ~ ~ q H t. !, r'i; -. ~~,. h dizl ." I :! ;, 'i~~l::hn ~i~r~f'iP~ ."j.Sr....;; fi;u!tU~~ :;;::;:;::::::;;~:~ _r.r~un a..ua IGnll JO.{n:;J Itflr Htv M IIY:>> OUI ':>ND NYIlIIIYCI 3A)~O S3JVJS3 NOANVJ ses~, ~~y M &jIW'~ ~ '@~ U~MW'@1 ~ ;Iili'iillll . i ! j -- ---~ ----~; ~ ~ f.:" ~ . i: ~ AGENDA ITEM NO. PACE Lf tt .. '" '" :!:: rn ~ o ~ , I , i I I ~ z ..: ....J Q a:: a a ..J .... :r V) ..: :;= a:: -=: u ~ .."'.... :!~.'c-.;., ...:.... ". i t ~ I ~~ T ;: .___ _. ._ I CITY OF ~ LAKE 6LSiNOIU: \ I Y 0 REAM fiT REME", CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: JANUARY 15, 2008 PREPARED BY: JUSTIN CARLSON, ASSOCIATE PLANNER PROJECT TITLE: UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM NO. 2007 -08 (DIAMOND PROFESSIONAL PLAZA) JERRY MURDOCKlUL TRASIGNS: 9025 BALBOA AVENUE, #150, SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 DIAMOND PROFESSIONAL PLAZA, LLC: 290 S. DIAMOND DRIVE, SUITE 101, LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 APPLICANT: OWNER: PROJECT REQUEST The applicant requests approval of a Uniform Sign Program for the proposed Diamond Professional Plaza located at 290 S. Diamond Drive (APN: 363-162-040). The uniform sign program will include building mounted signage and one (1) freestanding identification sign. The project site has a Zoning and General Plan designation of East Lake Specific Plan as well as a specific plan land use designation of General Commercial (GC). Project review is pursuant to Chapter 17.94 (Signs-Advertising Structures) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). PROJECT LOCATION The proposed project site is generally located 825 linear-feet south of Lakeshore Drive and 20 linear-feet east of Diamond Drive at 290 S. Diamond Drive (APN: 363-162-040) AGENDA ITEM NO. PACE l 4 OF c.2 <0 REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSISION JANUARY 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM NO. 2007-08 (DIAMOND PROFESSIONAL PLAZA) BACKGROUND On March 20, 2007, the City of Lake Elsinore Planning Commission reviewed and recommended City Council approval of Commercial Design Review No. 2006-16; for the design and construction of a 10,404 square-foot conventionally built professional medical office building and on-site improvements on a .92 net acre vacant site located at 290 S. Diamond Drive. On March 27, 2007 the City of Lake Elsinore City Council concurred with the Planning Commission recommendation and approved Commercial Design Review No. 2006-16 for the Diamond Professional Plaza located at 290 S. Diamond Drive (APN: 363-162-040). The application for Uniform Sign Program No. 2007-08 is necessary in order for the applicant to satisfy a condition of approval that requires the applicant to receive Planning Commission review and approval for a Uniform Sign Program for the Diamond Professional Plaza, prior to issuance of a building permit. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Pro'ect Site North South East West Vacant Vacant Vacant Commercial Vacant East Lake S East Lake S East Lake S ecific Plan East Lake Specific Plan East Lake Specific Plan East Lake S ecific Plan East Lake S ecific Plan East Lake S ecific Plan East Lake Specific Plan East Lake Specific Plan LOCATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION Uniform Sign Program No. 2007-08 The proposed Uniform Sign Program for the Diamond Professional Plaza located at 290 S. Diamond Drive (APN: 363-162-040) will include building mounted signs as well as one (1) freestanding sign. Buildina Mounted Sians The applicant is proposing to install seven (7) building mounted signs. Each in-line tenant will receive one (1) tenant location sign directly above the suite front-entry door. The corner suites, in addition to the front-entry signage, will also receive one (1) additional sign, which will be located on the side elevation of the proposed suite. This will ensure that there will be one (1) tenant sign along the west elevation (Diamond Drive) and one (1) tenant sign along AGENDA ITEM Y PAGE 2 OF .;L~ REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSISION JANUARY 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM NO. 2007-08 (DIAMOND PROFESSIONAL PLAZA) the east elevation (the rear of the lot). Staff has added a condition of approval requiring the east and west elevation sign be reserved for the corner suite to which it is attached. This will assist in providing a concise relation of tenant sign to suite location for the east and west elevations. All building mounted signs will constructed of reverse pan channel letters and will incorporate "halo" reverse lighting. This will assist in providing a soft elegant radius at the rear of the sign. The sign material will be constructed of an aluminum face with neon behind, aluminum sides, and neon halo on mounting surface behind. It should be noted that any proposed corporate logos or branding will be constructed of the same material and will include "halo" lighting. Each tenant sign will have a size of one (1) square-foot of sign area per linear foot of tenant lease frontage and will have a maximum height of one-foot six-inches (1 '-6"). The length of each sign will not exceed seventy-five percent (75%) of fascia area between building architectural elements. This will ensure that all building mounted signs will be centered and proportionate to the architectural feature to which it is attached. Freestanding Sign The sign program is proposing to include one (1) freestanding sign to be located within the front landscape area along Diamond Drive. The sign will be setback five-feet (5') from the back of the sidewalk and eleven-foot six-inches (11 '-6") from the front property line. It should be noted that the proposed sign location is within the required Diamond Drive dedication for future road widening. The City's Engineering Division has conditioned the project to secure an encroachment permit for the proposed sign for work done in the dedication area along Diamond Drive. The applicant will also be required to secure a "hold harmless and maintenance agreement" for the proposed freestanding sign; prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. This will ensure that the applicant has accepted liability and responsibility for maintenance for the proposed freestanding sign although it is located within City property. At such time that future road improvements are installed; the applicant will also be responsible for the relocation of the sign out of the dedication area and onto Diamond Professional Plaza property. The freestanding sign will be approximately six-feet (6') in height and have an overall width of nine-foot four-inches (9'-4"). The freestanding sign will include the same architectural features and colors that are present on the main building and will include a stone veneer base. Each of the five (5) tenants will have one (1) panel mounted sign with an approximate size of three-foot nine-inches (3'-9") and the overall tenant copy area will not exceed twenty (20) square-feet. The tenant panels will be constructed of ~" clear "glass green" plex tenant panels with a second surface applied vinyl graphics. The sign cabinet, directly behind the five (5) panel signs will be routed and backed with white plex for backlit illumination. AGENDA ITEM ~ PAGE3-0F ~ REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSISION JANUARY 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM NO. 2007-08 (DIAMOND PROFESSIONAL PLAZA) The freestanding sign will also include the medical center name, address, as well as a signature Lake Elsinore name and branding logo. Staff has added a condition of approval, requiring the Lake Elsinore name and logo be back lit and incorporate the "halo" illumination as present on the tenant panels. ANAL YSIS Staff has reviewed the proposed Uniform Sign Program for Diamond Professional Plaza located at 290 S. Diamond Drive (APN: 363-162-040) and found that the project will meet all minimum requirements of Chapter 17.94 (Signs-Advertising Structures) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) including but not limited to; maximum sign area, maximum sign height and length, and freestanding sign setbacks. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Staff determined that the Project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code SS 21000 et seq.: "CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R. SS 15000 et seq.) pursuant to a class 11 (a) exemption for accessory structures because the Project involves construction of on-premise signs. (14 C.C.R. S 15311 (a)). RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2008-_ approving Uniform Sign Program No. 2007-08 for the Diamond Professional Plaza; based on the Findings, Exhibits, and proposed Conditions of Approval. AGENDA ITEM 4 PAGE ~ OF ..L~ APPROVED BY: REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSISION JANUARY 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM NO. 2007-08 (DIAMOND PROFESSIONAL PLAZA) PREPARED BY: JUSTIN CARLSON, ASSOCIATE PLANNER 1 ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY ~ DEVELOPMENT ATTACHMENTS: 1. VICINITY MAP 2. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 3. PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 4. CEQA-NOTICE OF EXEMPTION 5. SIGNED ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 6. COVER SHEET (8" X 11") 7. TABLE OF CONTENTS (8"X 11") 8. INTRODUCITON PLAN (8" X 11") 9. SIGN CONSTRUCTION REQUIRMENTS PLAN (8" X 11") 10. PROHIBITED/TEMPORAY SIGNS PLAN (8" X 11') 11. SHOP TENANT SIGNAGE SPECIFICATIONS (8" X 11') 12. SIGN CONSTRUCTION PLAN (8" X 11") 13. SIGN EXAMPLES (8" X 11") 14. SITE PLAN (8" X 11") 15. TENANT SIGN LOCATION PLAN (8" X 11") 16. WINDOW/DOOR SIGNAGE PLAN (8" X 11") 17. SIGN ELEVATIONS PLAN (8" X 11") 18. FREESTANDING SIGN ELEVATIONS (8" X 11") 19. FULL SIZE PLANS (11" X 17") AGENDA ITEM <i PAGESOF~ -~ ((- VICINITY MAP Uniform Sign Program No. 2007-08 Diamond Professional Plaza ~ 1 L---- I BARTCHST CAMPBElLST~. PLANNING COMMISSION ACENDA ITEM NO. 4 PACE--Lz.-..OF d 8 RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_ RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM NO. 2007-08 WHEREAS, Jerry Murdock/Ultrasigns, has initiated proceedings for Uniform Sign Program No. 2007-08 for the Diamond Professional Plaza (the "Uniform Sign Program"), generally located 825 linear-feet south of Lakeshore Drive and 20 linear-feet east of Diamond Drive at 290 S. Diamond Drive (APN: 363-162-040) (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of approving Uniform Sign Programs; and WHEREAS, on January 15, 2008, at a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the Uniform Sign Program prior to taking action on the application. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that the Uniform Sign Program conforms to all requirements set forth in Chapter 17.94 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. SECTION 2. The California Legislature has determined that certain classes of projects do not have a significant effect on the environment and are therefore exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code SS 21000 et seq.: "CEQA") and the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA (14 C.C.R. SS 15000 et seq.: the "CEQA Guidelines"). A Class 11 exemption consists of: "Construction or replacement of minor structures accessory to (appurtenant to) existing commercial, industrial, or institutional facilities, including but not limited to: (a) On-premise signs; (b) Small parking lots; (c) Placement of seasonal or temporary use items . . . in generally the same locations from time to time in publicly owned parks, stadiums, or other facilities designed for public use. " The Uniform Sign Program qualifies for a Class 11 exemption because it involves the construction of on-premise signs that are appurtenant to an existing commercial facility, the Diamond Drive Professional Plaza. Therefore, the Planning Commission hereby AGENDA ITEM fJO.~ PAGE I Of ~ ~~.. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2008-_ PAGE 2 OF 3 finds and determines that the Uniform Sign Program is exempt from CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines. SECTION 3. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the approval of the Uniform Sign Program: 1. The project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the Zoning District in which the project is located. The Uniform Sign Program complies with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the East Lake Specific Plan Zoning District in which the Diamond Drive Professional Plaza is located. The Uniform Sign Program will assist in achieving the development of a well-balanced and functional mix of residential, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses, thereby diversifying Lake Elsinore's economic base. Moreover, the Uniform Sign Program will facilitate the efficient and orderly use of signs for the purpose of attracting new and returning customers to participating businesses. 2. The project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. The Uniform Sign Program for the proposed Diamond Professional Plaza is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments in that the Uniform Sign Program has been designed in consideration of the size and shape of the property, thereby creating interest and varying vistas as a person moves along the street. Further, the Uniform Sign Program will complement the quality of existing development and will create a visually pleasing, non-detractive relationship between the proposed and existing projects in that the architectural design, color and materials and site design evidence a concern for quality and originality. 3. Subject to the attached conditions of approval, the proposed project is not anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. The Uniform Sign Program was reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City departments to ensure that the Uniform Sign Program blends into existing development, creates the least amount of disturbance, and does not negatively impact the residents or businesses of Lake Elsinore. The Uniform Sign Program will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE B y OF ;).- '2> PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2008-_ PAGE 3 OF 3 incorporated into the approval of the subject project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter 17.82. Pursuant to Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Section 17.82.070, the Uniform Sign Program has been scheduled for consideration by the Planning Commission at its regularly scheduled meeting on January 15, 2008. SECTION 4. Based upon all of the evidence presented, the above findings, and the conditions of approval imposed upon the Uniform Sign Program, the Planning Commission hereby approves Uniform Sign Program No. 2007-08. SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of January 2008, by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development AGENDA ITEM NO. PACE ~ Lf OF d.-B CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PROJECT NAME: UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM NO. 2007-08 (DIAMOND PROFESSIONAL PLAZA) PLANNING DIVISION GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, and Agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning Uniform Sign Program No. 2007-08 for the Diamond Professional Plaza located at 290 S. Diamond Drive (APN: 363-162-040) project attached hereto. 2. The decision of the Planning Commission shall be final fifteen (15) days from the date of the decision, unless an appeal has been filed with the City Council pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 17.80 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 3. Prior to issuance of any building permits, the applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgement of Conditions," and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records. 4. All materials and colors depicted on the plans and materials board shall be used unless modified by the Applicant and approved by the Community Development Director or designee. 5. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Riverside County Fire Department. 6. The Applicant is to meet all applicable City Codes and Ordinances. 7. The Applicant shall comply with the City's Noise Ordinance. All construction activity shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday, and no construction activity shall occur on Saturdays, Sundays or legal holidays. 8. The applicant shall place a weatherproof 3' x 3' sign at the entrance to the project site identifying the approved days and hours of construction activity and a statement that complaints regarding the operation can be lodged with the City of Lake Elsinore Code Enforcement Division (951) 674-3124. The sign shall be placed on the property prior to the issuance of a grading permit. ACiENDA ITEM NO. lf PAGE ( 0 OF d-~ 9. The applicant is to meet all requirements of the Lake Elsinore Unified School district. 10. All signs shall use "Halo" lighting. 11. The applicant shall apply for a sign permit and pay appropriate fees for any sign installed at the project site 12. The location size, and color for all signs shall comply with the sign program (approved herein). Any additions or revisions to the sign program shall require Planning Division review and approval. 13. Any alteration or expansion of this Design Review shall be reviewed according to the provisions of Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 14. All exterior sign lighting shall be review and approved by the Director of Community Development or designee. 15. The "Lake Elsinore name and logo" on the proposed freestanding sign shall be reviewed by the Communications Manager or designee. 16. The "Lake Elsinore name and Logo" shall incorporate "halo" lighting. 17. The building mounted signs on the east and west elevation shall be reserved for the east and west corner suite respectively. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS 18. The applicant shall pay all applicable Library Capital Improvement Fund fees, prior to the issuance of a building permit. 19. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a revised sign program indicating that up lighting has been incorporated around the proposed freeway identification sign. 20. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide assurances from the Communications Manager or designee, that the Lake Elsinore name, logo style, and color has been reviewed and approved. 21. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a revised uniform sign program indicating that the Lake Elsinore name and logo on the proposed freestanding sign incorporates "halo" effect lighting as present on the freestanding sign and all building mounted signage. ACENDA ITEM NO. Lf PAGE..-LL- OF ...2 8 22. Any/all applicable fees shall be paid, prior to the issuance of a building permit. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICA TE OF OCCUPANCY 23. The applicant shall meet all conditions of approval prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. ENGINEERING DIVISIONS 24. The applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit for work performed in public right of way. 25. Capital Improvement fees and mitigation fees (LEMC 16.34, Res. 85-26) if applicable, shall be paid prior to issuance of building permit. 26.lf grading exceeds 50 cubic yards, grading plans shall be prepared by a Calif. Registered Civil Engineer and approved prior to grading permit issuance. Prior to any grading, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit and post appropriate secu rity. 27. A Hold Harmless and Maintenance Agreement for the sign shall be completed prior to occupancy. The agreement shall be prepared by the applicant and approved by the City. 28. Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall submit construction drawings of the sign for sight distance review. 29. The applicant shall implement NPDES Best Management Practices during and after construction to prevent discharge of pollutants into the city's storm drain system. 30.ln accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal & recycling, the applicant shall be required to contract with CR&R Inc. for removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of construction. ACiENDA ITEM ~JO. l{ PAGE J,:).. OF a <0 CITY OF A LAIZE ,6,LSiNORf: ~ DREAM EXTREMElY Notice of Exemption Filed With: D Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 [g] County Clerk of Riverside County 2724 Gateway Drive Riverside, CA 92507 Project Title: Uniform Sign Program No. 2007-08 (Diamond Professional Plaza). Project Location (Specific): The proposed project site is generally located 825 linear-feet south of Lakeshore Drive and 20 linear-feet east of Diamond Drive at 290 S. Diamond Drive (APN: 363-162-040). Project Location (City): City of Lake Elsinore Project Location (County): Riverside County Description of Nature, Purpose, and Beneficiaries of Project: Uniform Sign Program No. 2007-08: The applicant requests approval of a uniform sign program for the Diamond Professional Plaza located at 290 S. Diamond Drive (APN: 363-162-040). The proposed uniform sign program will include building mounted signs as well as one (1) freestanding sign. Project review is pursuant to Chapter 17.94 (Signs-Advertising Structures) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). Name of Public Agency Approving Project: City of Lake Elsinore Name of Person / Agency Administrating Project: Justin Carlson, Associate Planner, City of Lake Elsinore Exempt Status: D Ministerial (Section 15073) D Declared Emergency (Section 15071 (a)) D Emergency Project (Section 15071 (b) and (c)) [g] Categorical Exemption (state type and section number): Class 11 (a) (On-premise signs) Reasons why project is exempt: This project meets the requirements pursuant to Section 15311 (a) (Accessory Structures) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The proposed project consists of on-premise signs. Contact Person: Justin Carlson, Associate Planner Telephone Number: (951) 674-3124 x 295 Signed: Title: Director of Community Development Rolfe M. Preisendanz AQENDA ITEM NO. PAGE t 3 If OF 01'0 CITY OF A LAKE .6LSiNOR& V DREAM E,>(TREME... A CKNOWLEDEGEMENT OF DRAFT CONDITIONS RE: Uniform Sign Program No. 2007-08 for the Diamond Professional Plaza located at 290 S. Diamond Drive (APN: 363-162-040) I hereby state that I/We acknowledge the draft Conditions of Approval for the above named project. I/We understand that these are draft conditions only and do hereby agree to accept and abide by all final conditions prescribed by the City of Lake Elsinore staff, as set forth in the attachments to the approval letter that will be sent after final project approval. All final conditions shall be met prior to issuance of permits or prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy, or otherwise indicated in the Conditions, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director of the City of Lake Elsinore. Date: 1;11,/01 . Print Name: Address: /.. h J () ~ 5 &A.I..bo... N<- .s~~ J.$O 50ll D~IJD I cA- 't2/~ 3 853 - 5' 't . ''"lOa '/.. '1/0 ~ Phone Number: AOENDA ITEM NO. y.. PA(;E~OF d-8 CJ m n m 3;:: OJ m ~ ...... .:'l tv 0 0 '-l ~ So C ___ Joo-ol <> ~~ - :I:> 0 == z 0 0 loti (f) ~ ~ z: 0 C1 C Joorj t'!1 ~ trJ Z ." trJ ~.~. ~ :=a Joo-ol i 0 '~ 0 Z ~ > ..,., f:""'I ;:::. ~ rn " loti .~ '" ~ 0 ~ ~,\l '" > G) C1 - N 0 > ::-\ -'. N trJ .~ ~ z: ~ Joo-ol " > :I:> C) ~ " Z '. - ~ N ~ loti ." ~ :s 0 C) ~ > ::a::- ~ ~ CJ trJ AQENDA ITEM NO. 4- PAGE t5 OF eJ-B f-' CJ rrJ n rrJ 3:: o:l rrJ /j ..... n .:'l 0 > t"'" N Z > 0 ~ 0 CJ) n Z '.J C :I: 0 t"'" - t"'" ~ ~ 0 /j ~ tTj 50 n ~ ;:i ;:i 0 _____10-1 <> >:"Tl>-lCll\DC::; "Tl>-l~~>- >-lr<VJO 0'1:1 ~>-m~o ~~C::;~1f' m>-.......... ~~ ><r< b:~ r<;;>\;:::1>- ~~ z~~ c:iS;: ~~:>::IVJm -;:omN~ ~o .. 00 00 0 >- ~~Clo~ 0 ~CJ1CJ1~ Ulmno m~ 0-39-39tlr<~ ~C~~m cr<>-z nm Z ~$$P~~ g;g;.?>m~ o--~~o ...,n ~zz>-o "n>-CIl 66~;:Q~ -DOO:>::l 0"" 0 ::r:.......... >:m >-~~>-<r< ~~\DGin 21:>::100 ~ OVJO\Dmm "IUlN . UlJTl:>::l"Tl >: ><~zn Ulm>- n.....m ~ ~ 0-- -H :>::I >-<CIl :; ~~~g NCIln mCll ~ .....' n S::r: ~ 0 0 UlCll>- >-l..... Ul Z ~@r< m>-l ~ >- m '"rj .....>- Nn r< UlO O>-l >-0 rr.l 0< .....CIl r< >- ~ CJ'j m Z CJ'j Cl 0 .?> tn m r< 10-1 Z Z r< 0 CJ CJ (] ..... Z Z m > m :>::I CIl r-c ~ r-c [J > [J [J N > ~ ~ CIl CIl CIl ~ CIl CIl >-0 n CIl >-0 >-l o~ ::r: ::r: ::r: ..... ..... :>::I 0 c::; :>::I ..... 0 >-l CJ >-l Z F: 0 0 0 m Z 0 Z c:i 0 r< "Tjeo CJ'j >-0 >-0 >-0 ::r: ~ '-0 m c::; t"'" r< >-0 >- CIl m >-l >-l >-l r< 53 >-l ~ n nt:'"'" 10-1 ~ C/'J m m m C/'J ~ CJ :>::I m ::J >-l om G1 m - Z Z Z - c::; >- 0 z C') ~ >- ~ C') CIl m n >-0 0 r< ..... Z Z >-l Z Z Z m >-l CIl :>::I ..... CIl C/'J >-l >-l >-l C/'J n CIl 0 If' m ..., >-< Cl n CJ m ~ CIl ;; Z Z r< ..... Z >- >-l m '"'a m Z n :>::I >-0 0 Z < ~ CIl m >-0 :>::I ~ ~ 0 0 :>::I >-< ..., 0 0 ~ 0 ~ c::; r;jJ 0 z ...... >- :>::I G1 z CIl CIl m r< CIl >-< ~ CIl CJ ~ Z m CIl Z > >-3 CIl ~ ...... ..... ...... ...... ...... Ul Ul "'" VJ N ...... "'" VJ N ...... 0 -D AGENDA ITEM rm. PAOE ( (p OF If ,;tB ~ CJ t11 N Cl t'I'1 n t'I'1 ~ OJ t'I'1 ;;0 ,...... ,'I tv o o 'I ;;0 So ---- Jo-I <> ~~ o z o ~ :::a o JIIr.l t!1 fJ) fJ) Jo-I o Z > ~ ~ ~ > N > fJ) Jo-I C) Z ~ :::a o C) :::a > ~ O::T:'I ::to 0 [J) 'G. ro ::T ::l ;;n 0 e!...'"O S- ,., ~. 0.. g a PJ 0.. rJ) ~. ~S:::ClQ o' :+. ::l ::l PJ r:::r' . hl ro 8" nl S g PJ < .... ro g..p.. s:~ (tl S)' ro .... ~. it g. ~ ClQ ::l 8 ~ - ""':. o '" ,.... .... PJ ro ::l '" 0..15 .... ::l ro '" ~6'" ~ ~ ~~ ~ 8" ~1l ro ('j 8"::T PJ i= ~ CJ trJ UJ (6 Z ..0 0 s::: '" ~. oQ' ~::l n~ ~~. ~ "'Clr:::r' ro ro .... -. S ~ _. .... ~~ ro 0.. S. g:. o s::: .... .... ::T ro ~ ;:l. .... .... ro ::l L' PJ ::l 0.. 0" .... 0.. PJ "'Cl "'Cl .... o <: e!... Q) ::l 0.. .... ::T ro [; ~ (j)' PJ .... ::l ::T '" ro ....., Q (6 S:cJ ro 0 .... ::l a ~. n r:::r' Q) ~ g.~ ::l 0 '" ....., Q) .... ::l ::T o..ro ~ ~ :;! ::l (=i' ~ : ~ n '" ,., _. ~~ '" ~ 8 ~. .g 8" ~ .....,'<: Q) .... r:::r'0 ;:l. < Q ~ ct. ~ 0,<: ;; Q) i= ,., o ::l 0.. g. s::: >- '" ,., ro n 0..0 _. .... ::l &. g:.cfJ ro _ n~ ro .... ::l ::T ro ro !"1 L' Q) ::l 0.. 0" .... 0.. ~ .... ro .... Q) sr ~ .... dQ' ::T .... '" o ....., PJ "'Cl "'Cl .... o <: e!... ....., o .... Q) ::l '<: '" dQ' ::l 'Q g:. ~ o ro ,., ~ ~~ ~ ::l ;:to ;::> 0.. 0 Q) -::l "'Cl S; ~ ;1. 0.. 0 n" ~ !""1- Q) ::l ::T ;:t 0.. ~ o. ~ ro ~ ..... r.n r:::r'-.... '<: ::; ~ ....roo.. ::T..o Q) ro s::: .... n ~. it ;:;: ~ tI'l ':<: "'Cl ::T ~ ~ o ::l <: 0 e!....... g,g" Q)"'Cl S ~ o S &. ::;,.. ::nro Q 0.. ;:to S! o ;::2. ::l .... ....::T o 0 .... s::: ::T.... ro Q) gl. :g ClQ .... ::l ~ e!... ::r- o 3 Jg.sn ::l ,..., ,., it ;:l. ....~ ~ ::l ?i' Q) a '" ::T ~ r:::r' ro .... ro '" "'Cl o ::l '" cr: ro ....., o .... [ ....., ~ 3 ro ::l .... o ....., ~ .... ro "8. .... ro 3 ro a '" o ....., .... ;r. '" :I'- ,..., ::T ro ~ ::l PJ ::l .... '" ::T Q) i= o r:::r' .... PJ s. Q) i= ::l ro n ro '" '" Q) .... '<: "'Cl ro .... [ ~ ----~ g' ,..., -::T s.ro s. ~ ClQ ::l ::n~ ::l .... Q) '" :::=r ==' ~ '" - "'Cl"'Cl ro PJ Q.'<: O. 0' ::l .... n PJ o i= ~ '" '" _. ':-"~ ;;n .... ro Sl .... ro 0.. S PJ ro .... ~ '" PJ ::l 0.. s. '" .... e!... Sl .... O. ::l ....., ro ro '" ~ ::l ;;? .... 0 .... ::T~O' ro 0 .... ~. ::l 3 ro ....., Q) >< S; ::l 11 g. R ~ ::l 0 ro ClQ ....., C gl. g:. "'Cl ClQ Iii' o ::l '" ~ ~ crQ' 0.. Q) ::l ro ::::: (") 3 r:::r' 8.- PJ ro ro ::l .... .... 0.. ro Sj. r:::r'S '" '<: 0 ::T s-~~ roo..r:::r' L' r:::r' ro PJ '<: .... ::l _. 2: g:. ~ o ro .... .... ro 0 p.. ::l G; ~~ ....ro o ::l .... 0' 8:~ '" R ~. 0... ~ ~ ,., 0.. o PJ ::l ::l tI'<: ,., .... o .... "'Cl::TQ),..., a ei g.. ::T ;S. 3 _. ro '" 0 ~ s. O. ::l ro ro >-1 ::l o' Q)::l Z ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ =r~'~8: ~ p...~~t/) 0 :;::. g:. ,., gl. 1'"""1 o:ro OClQ V S:::Q)S;::l C Q)....O",., - & S'~: n ~ ::;,.. ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ Sj. >-1 ::T S:::' Iii' 0 n' (6 ~ 8" Z ~ 0 Sl"'Cl "'Cl ....., ::l .., (6g:.R~ t:JJ rD 0......... gl. "'Cl PJ 0.. g a ::l ~ . --. 0.. ::T o tT'J n tT'J ~ 0:1 tT'J ~ ....... .:'I tv o o '-l ~ So ---- """" <> ~~ o z o ""d ~ o '"rJ tTJ 00 00 """" o z > t""l ""d ~ > N > 00 """" C) Z ""d ~ o C) ~ > ~ ~ CJ t1i *'" ~~ Pl 2': ~ - S' ~ oac; Z g. oaq ro S ~ ~ o ~ '" ~~ 8 r:r ::l ::> p........ s. i?" ur ~ :So i'; - ...... ;T'" ro~ ~a o ..... ~ g ro ..... p..g o ,...., ...... ::> ro Pl '" '" ..., o <: ro p.. ~ o ~ aq ::1..g ~ ?' c; '" p.. 2': ,;-a~;- 8' ::So '" Qq' ~ s rp ::l (6' @- q pro ;~[~ ::l '< '" ;:;. '< '" ::> ~ ~ rp ~ 0' 0" '" -::l ~. ~ if ~ g. i R ~ ~ = ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ;~ if p..11l~0 ro Pl '" ,...., ro g ..., I1l S I1l 0 X ro '" p.. @ p..;;r~== 8'g:~0 O"!'l' . ...... ro >-:I L'..o O"::>~~ ~rort~ ~ L' ::1.'''T <; Pl ::l ';'; '" ::l aq >- ~e:1"'t"~ ~Qg'o -p.......aq ~ ~ 0 p.. ~ ~r ~ Pl ro aq '" ~ 5"- ro ~s:'l @2lL' ~ g.~ ..., ::l Pl ~O;~ p.. ro ..... p.. ::l ro I1l 0 ..., '" ..., ::> @ S ~. ::l Pl aq p;;:;";,r ..., Pl '" :n ].. ;. Pl Pl - - - - ~O" ..... I1l I1l Pl ..., '" o [fl ,....,,,, Pl I1l ..... n '-< ~ '" ..... ro ~ o Pl ::l ::l .....p.. ro [fl [g' ~ == ~. ~ ro p.. o I1l ,...., ..... '" I1l ~ S ~ 5' ::>ro ~ p.. , 0" '< Pl ...... ~ ~ ::l tT'J ;;;.~ ~ ~ ..., I1l s~ ~. ~ ro ~ p....... . 0' ::l 0" o X I1l !f' ~ S '" !f' ..... ~ 0" 5' aq o ..., ::l I1l o ::l n ..., o '" [fl o <: ro ..., '" o ,...., Pl ::l '< ~ '" ro ...... SJ1 rr:1 X '" o '" ro p.. ..., Pl n ro ~ Pl '< '" Pl ..., ro ::l o ..... '" ro ..., 8. ..... ..... ro p.. '" 0'\ 2.:.0 '< Pl E; S' ~ro ::>p.. ~ ~ ro ..., ",pj' ..., n o I1l p..'" ~ 8' ~ [fl ::> S ~ Pl ro '< Pl 0"", ro ~ ~ 5' ro ,...., p.. ..... . 2. '" ?" o ::l ~ '" Pl a' n o ::l g. ::l 5' aq Pl n ..., '< ~ n ::l ...... o ~ ..., ..... S ::l ~::l ;5, 0 I1l n ~ ~ 5' ~ aq ::> OJ ~ ::l <a~ ~'< S Pl ::l ~ pj' n 8' ..., I1l ..., '" ' ~ 0" ~ 0" ro ;5. '" 5' ro ,...., ..., o S 5"- ro '" ..... ..., ro ~ ~ o S i'; !J' 8 [ a~ g [ I1l - ~. c " S ::> ..... 5"-~ ro p-. o Z::l ~o O. 0" ::l I1l ~VJ 0:10 ~ ~ p.. ~. as 'TI'" ~. ::l I1l ro CO ::l .P p; 5' ..., '" ~ ;;r ..., == ;:1.: ro I1l p.. ;;1 Pl r..n::l ",p.. I1l - n Pl S~ n - Pl ro =-. 0.. o ..... ::l ::l "'= ::i' p.. ~ '" ...... ..., ';<:: ~g;~ ~~. ~ g'~ Z. ~::n~ ::l ro PJ tn' p.,. 5i?"~ ...... rJ) l-t O'",pj' ..., ::> n S ~ ~ ~ifa & ~ S n ro I1l ro I1l ;;r n......- o ..., '" ::l 0 ::> ,...., S Pl Qp..== 8. ~ if ::l""~ aq 0 (!) ...... ..., I1l o Pl ~ ...... ::l 0 ~~ S g~ 8. V~ ro - ::>.:-'n I1l p.. Pl ~::l ::l '" ",. Z. ;;r '" ::l ::l ' aq p.. Pl Pl Pl ::l ::l ...,p..p.. ~ 2 ~ o ::l Pl ,...., '" ..., 5"- Pl "'Sl. ::l ::l ro p.. qq Sf ~ 8 g; 0", ..., I1l ~ ~ p..q ~PJ ~ 0-. .....0 ~~ sa ~ [ rip: ::> ..... (!) ::l xaq ..... I1l ~ X Sf ro C1Q ::!. I1l 0 X ..., ..... [fl ~, ~ g ?f I1l '" 2':--> ;:::r..n ~~. ..., n ;>1"0 S S ~"2 ",- ::l n'< o ...... S 0 ",if ~ 2' '" - ~~ O' ::l ~. Pl ::l ::l '" p..11l aqp.. o :So ~ 5"- ~s: ~ro 8:0 ~~ '< !OJ 1-" ~ ~ p.. ~ r..n ..., ..... Pl Pl ~ ro ro Pl . ::l p.. '" ::> ~ i'; !'-' ~ g; p..(!) 5' ro aq ~ 0- ~. ,.....~ ;-.'" L' ..... . aq ::l '" '" ~ ~ o. ~ ,...., n' a-' ~~ O. Pl ::l 0" \Jl ::!. Pl Q ::l ...... p..ro O"p.. I1l 0" Pl '-<: ..., Pl ~c::: r-'i-< E;';" if:g - ..., . 0 <: I1l p.. ::> Pl <: I1l '" ...... ~...... ::l n ~ 0 o ..., n o Pl p-. ::l aq '" '" ::> ~ (!) x Pl n ...... ~ S Pl ..... n ::> ...... ::> (!) n o 0' ..., '" '" '" ro n 51 I1l p.. o ::l ..... ::> I1l Pl '" '" ..., o <: ro p.. '" Qq' ::l n o S '" !OJ ::l '::': ro ;' ro ~g; ..., (So ~. Plaq ;:;"~ o Pl p..::l ~ p.. 5"- ~. ..., s. '" PI. ~ O. ::l '" ::> Pl == n o S '" ~ :So 5"- ~ o n ~ 0" ~ =::.: p.. s. aq Pl ::l p.. CJ m Z m ~ >- L"" (f) 1-1 CJ Z n o Z (f) ..., ~ C n ..., 1-1 o Z ~ m /:) C 1-1 ~ m ~ m Z ..., (f) AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE ./ ~ OF If &.-5 Pl ...... '" p 11 ~ Oaq 11 ::l ..... '" ~ S ~ ~ ::l ..... p..if n S g ",p.. ~(t) S 0 ro ,...., ag. Pl ..., ~~ ore ..... 2 ~~ 0"1 S. S' -::> &.5' ::l ..... aq p-. . ::l aq S !OJ ro ..., [ '" 5"- ~ Pl ..., (!) Pl ..., I1l 8' 0" I1l '" I1l Pl ro p.. ~ Pl ro ..., '" ..., o o ...... if~5~ ::!l <: ::l __ ~ ~ 0 0 ~!f' 0: 5' " ~ @ 5' 2i ~ ~aq ro~r;a p..!f' <: S ~ ~ (j)' PJ o..o..g:~ e: s. ro Pi' ;::. ::> ~ Si' rn(tlro___ ::>..., - I1l I1l pj' ~cjq o..~cn": ~ (!) g' ~ Pl::l_Pl '" ~ - S r-t" en CT' CIl o,""",ro-...- O"::>n", I1l ~ g g' ~(!)p-.== S~::lO" o 0 J:: I1l R.p..g ::r> I1l ...... '" Z, Pl 0 Pl '" 0" <: ::l ::> ........ 1-" 0... ro ro~. 0.. g:~ 5' ~ g ~ ~ ::l Pl :4., p.. '< i'; S ~ ~ 0 8' ~;;;'O" ~?,",ro o tI1 n tI1 $: o:l tI1 /0 ..... -:'I tv o o '-l /0 So ---- ~ <> ~a:: o z o ""'d ~ o Jorj tf1 en en ~ o z > ~ ""'d t""4 > N > ~ CJ trJ CJl en ~ C1 Z ""'d ~ o C1 ~ > a:: ;.n 2=! g; o Pl ... 0.. (fl ciQ' ::J en ....O"nmoo ~~ g X ~ OJ ~~. ro QQ' nro~3::r ~'rcn~r-t" ~~~~g' 0.... 2: S {j 0" O"'-(fl < a 2:~ q :r' rtl cn _. n' < 0: ~ ~ ::r~ro s-~ ::;.' ::J 0.. ro ~ r-t" ==:: P-i ro ::r (1q .... iilro::r::r fie:~~ '~g.ro 5Jg"9 ,::, Pl '"g en ~ P-i Pl"O Pl ::J ...~ S' g. 0.. rt~~ ~ ::;: 0 ~~~ 11' <' ::1>-ro OT ::J ::r ~~~ ::r@g. ro"O~ ~ S' ~ [:!J.::J~ ~ S g. n~(1q g"0"< .... ro ::r ~ ~ n' ro Pl ::r .... ::J ~ro 0.. Pl ... ro ::J ~ "0 ro ~, ;+ ro p.. JJ. 8 c tn:'l .... iil ~ ciQ' ..... ... .... .....::J iii' ~~o~g~ U)' 0.. IV O::;:<:~(fl CJ) rtl PJ Qq' ~~:4.5S~ ~ ~: x .. g:~ ~ ~ 0: 8" ~'~ q _. 0- ~ q ~. ,rt ;>; 0 Pl ro ... >= 11 11 8" g. ~ S 6'0:8- ~. ~ ~ p.. 1:;' !:' ~~;:r 1"0 p-. ~, og(f ro en ~8'~ <: Pl .... ro en 0 ~ 11 s:- q Q. ~ >= i:t> <: ~~~ ~ ~ 0.: ~. 0 ro ::r .... en :;; Pl < lV Q. =: ~ <' n' ;:l::;:::r .... ~ Pl ::J ... o ro .... 0..'"' ro . ;:nz ::J 0 ~ ~. 5'~ .... en ::r::r ro Pl Pl == ;+"0 Pl ... n 0 ~ro' o..!:l. ~ ~ 2:~ O"ro ::;.' 0 0'''' ::~ ro 5" ~ < a:r- ~ ro en ciQ' ::J ::, 0" ro Pl .... ro p >-l ::r ro en ciQ' ::J ::, 0" ro Pl .... ro Pl ..... en ~ >-l ::r ro .... ro en ::r ~ 0" ro ::J o en ~. en s:- ~ Pl ... ro :;!) Pl en ::r S' ~ S o S. ::J (1q o .... Pl >= 0.. 6' fO ~ ~ [~ - S' ro ~ (fl ~. en "0 Pl S' ro 0.. ~ ... ro !:l. ~ o ::J Pl 0" S, 0: S' (1q en >= ... ..... Pl n ro ~ ;:l ~ 0" ro "0 ~ ro p.. en ciQ' ::J en S Pl ~ ::J ~ "0 ... o roo !:l. Pl 0" o <: ro s- ro 8' "0 o ..... Pl "0 Pl .., Pl "0 ~ s:- ro .., o o ..... g: ro ~ s:- ro < ~ ...... s:- q :g. 011 ? ~ ~ ?> , ~ >-l :::. >-l 0 ~ ~:Hl. >- ~ ~ _ n, '"g s: ;00 0 ::r:::::r So.... Pl = ~ ~':-' _ Pl::J == ro v ro 0 0 "'"0 .... "0 >-l 'T1en ~ro::J::soo..rosp-.::s~"Oro ro~::r~_ro~~Plro~(1qPl<~~~o~::J"'S .... 0 ro - Pl _ ... ~" .... .... >= .... t::. - <; X ::l - .... 0 - ::; -::;:: ::r g. <tl ~ ~ s' ;:> ::; ~ iil;;' ;:> ~ 0 5' 0 ~ !:' ;,'i 0 Plroro 0.... ~~o......en(1q~~;:>n::Jcr-.., a~~~::s*irn~~=~[t@~i~~~~~~ ~Pl:r~"Oo..n_>= ... ~ w. ::J.....en ::; 0"0 0 ~ 0:;;-:;; 0 v " Pl Pl ::tl ro ::s _. 0 ro ... ..... ... ... '" ~ S ro ;:> ::s 0.. @ Pl Pl S >= <:.., ro ~ .e:o ;$ = :::._ en n, Sf. ~ 0 .e: ;iJ n (1q P'o' _ --<" ~!:' "'0 en 'v I..J _ ~....... 0 "'1 f"+ rn v '\j;:J ........ t::;:!:) EU "'(1q ro::s :g.;:.~ ro....... p-. ~Q:~ Q ro i ro ll>::S:g. ::tl iil 5 0 ll> ro o..::s 2:::tl [:!J. (1q ro ., ll> ~.., [:!J, oa ::s ll> ll> 0.. ll> ;;;- == = ll> o...::t ll> ::s >=;:n ~ 0 (1q - S' == <tl_~;:txcr""""ro,<;<tl(1qiil::S en ..... ~;:l(1q"" ..-.- (j rtl "'""" to> P-i -.. 0.. P-i ro ...... ro 0 ro :g. ~ro~g::S';iJ~gro~o.. (1q S :g.99.-g ~ 5.. ~ ~. :+ ~o ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ = ~ "0 :::._ S $. 1:;' 0" "i:t> ro ~ ::J ,> 8 H ro ~ en 6' ~ 0" ro [:!J. ro ro ~ if o..::s ro Z ::s S' ~"O S ... ll> ro iiJ g ll> " ~ ro I""'l-o ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ .. ~ a '"'d ~ Q... S;.., ~ ro ll>::S ~- 9 n -.., en - n ~ <tl~~~s~~[ [~ ~ i i~ [ ~. !~ '5 ~ ~ ~ ~ l ~ ~ ~. ~ 1 ~ ~ o O':::-~P)::J'-<U".J (")P-i e:. ~ 0"""" ........ 0.. ro~::tl>=g.~~g gs ~ ~~ :g. g ~~~~'go~"O ~s:-] ro;8 ~ 0.. :::.~110..8~0g. _0 0 0.. ....:::. i a-: ;=r~~@';'Rrn e:~ ~ ~ :;:.;- tJJ g Q. ~ R ~ ~ 8 ~ g- ]. [ ~ ~ ~ ~ g. ~ ~ re ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ @ n' ~ ~ g O"~ ~. ~ ~ -- @ ~ ~. ~ i2 if ~ liT' ; ~ g. ~ 8' ~. 0.. ~ ~ ~~ 1 ~ ~ [. ~ ~ ~ i ~ en ~ ro s: g' ~ 8.. < n' 0""0 ro ro iti ::s S' ro == o' - [0 "[ ~ @::' <: -< p..~if~~'O'::S 0.... 0" s:- ~ .., 0.. ro < 5)n$Q~ < g (1q (fl {Jl ';:::) ::1 ,.... o9en(1q ..... >= < ~ :r 2. ~ ::s ro n n (flll>::r"'O ~s'::r8 ro ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~~" (JrorJ:-< e. ~ rJJ t""!" ..... ... ::r 0 0'0;<3. ~ C 9 ~ N' E ~. 0.. 0 ~. ll> ro ::s ~ ~~PT~ ro ~ ....... -. "Oqo~ 8 n' ~ ~ ::r:::.ro ;; ~ 0.. _. 0 n ro < :::. o..ro . .., n ro ::i' ;>; ro ll> en ::J S:-~ ~~ ll> 0 iti 9 "0 ll> .... >= [)i s:- n 0 g, ~. ro ro 0..0.. 0" ~ .... ::r ro S < ~ [:!J. z ~ en' 0 en Q'q 0 (f) - "'"I _. ~ l-tj _. ~ ~ (]q <" ro (1q 0..' ::s<;...::s 0"0 ~~~ ~ ..,;fo::r::JO 8 ~ ~ ~. ;. ~ ::s [)i < 3 ll> ;:;.' 2'- 2:>= ==>= ~ ~ & [ ~. g. q3S[)iiiJ(1q ~~~ o:=~ ::!:tii"f6'""1ctt3 ~... r..Jl '"1 lJ,) ~~[9S:; n ~ ill Sll n ::r 0 ro ::i' ::c ~ ~'~. ~ ~ n =r ~ .?' ~ if ~ ....Nen. 0 P.-- (f'J <::; '"1 o .[1) n S' a 8 ~ ~ (J):= 0 ~ ::J~-:o ll>O~O" 9"'O....ro ll> _: ~ ~. ::s :::J' u:; ;:I t"'"' (1q .... ro 0 0 ~ ... 0'" ro ~~o..o.. 8""': ~. Q ~. d (1q S ::s ~::s ll> (t ~-. .., ::s::S rt CJ '-:: iiJ I-i tI1 -. ro ,..,... q ::s <,"=ll>ro ::;: 0- s:; p.. ::r'" n ll> - ~ [:!J.~ ~~ '2 ~ ro'>B -8 ~. 9 ~ trl Orc"Oro tn U) 0 '"1 rn"'~~~ l!:: g"'-< ~ ~ 0" == [:!J . ro t:li ~. 0 (]q m !7 ag~~ ~ .... en, en::S '\:i o -' g ~ 0 ::r ll> ::r ro ro8.ll>8 ~ O's~ 0.. ::>> ==ororo ~ ~ ;,'i 5 ~ ~ S' 0" ll> n ......... (1q ro a S' ~ ~.::.n ~ (1q ~ 0"...... 2..en~~ ll> en ::s ~ =-.~rn~ o Cl l-t U1 ::s ==!:' 0 r! 0'" ~ '-" ro ll> ~~ S g ::;.. ~ ro 3 o..ro ~~ .... == ~ n' o S" 9 :;!) o ll> S' g. ::s m- :::. (f) """"' CJ Z (f) ...... tv (fl ro n o ::s 0.. ll> ... ~ en ciQ' ::s en ll> .., ro "0 .... o ::r ~ ro p.. '\:i ~ o ::c """"' 0:; """"' ~ t.'I1 CJ (f) """"' CJ Z (f) ...... ...... ...... P >-l ::r ro ~ en ro o ..... "0 ro S ll> ::s ro a en. ll> ro . >- ::s ~ en tij. ::l o .... n o ;:I 0' ~. (1q .... o en "0 ro n s; n ll> p-. o ::l en o ::s "0 ll> (1q ro ~ en dQ' ::s en ~ ro "0 .... o ::r g: ro p.. AGENDA ITEM NO. PAOE~OF .2'l> ...... .:'l N o o '.J ~ So ---- ~ <> ;~ o z o ~ CJ m 0'\ Cl t'I1 n t'I1 ~ r::Jj t'I1 ~ :s ['I1 ;r.3::: n 0 ::r <: ClQ ~ r" 8p>' O:l ...,. ~ gOp> ~g'lil t'O~S::r~EB 8 ~. "<: 0 r.Jj 0 (j ::lClQO::lPi'g'" Pi'~~"'~", - '0.. ::r 0.. ::r ::l(l)'OP>(I)P> 8 ::n-t:::x t::: S~~~~~ 80..0~8"'O (I) P> 0 (I) (I) .... ...."'::l~:s..g Q. ~ (J) ~. ~. rc ~::l::r~::l.... -. 0.. P> 02J 0.. ~ a.:S~08'" ~ is' if o..::l ~ 8::r"'08&Ei P> 0" (I) ::l ;:r, (I) g'83 0..0 0.. ~a~:~:~o :3 !fl Fb o' .... ~ P>80..(;l (I) '<:p>"'O~ GO 0"0..(1)" -.... roro~a_ 0 P>00" .: s""'&;:r. 5. :s~&.~ 0 (I) 0 ::l.?: .... 0.. 0.. ClQ III S.:O ~ ~ ;'SJro (') P>~.~ 8' ~..0 :J ~ ~ ~ ; 0 "'08"2 Cl ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ o ~ trj fJj fJj ~ o z > ~ '"tJ ~ > N > fJj ~ C1 Z '"tJ ~ o C1 ~ > ~ r~ ~~m ~ g 8 (I) ::lr::r5.~'7' (I) P> _.::l ;:::::., @ ~g'~ ~ ~ g ::l '"': ~ - '" '" z S! g ~ iil ~ ~ {j ..., (1)-0 tT:l ~;:r.(;l Z (I) 8 6' ::l ~ s-: ::> @ o~ Z ~;'on ~~9 tT:l n :s el. o tn' a ::: ro ~ ~ :, S' @. ~~ ~ ~ :' ~ p....... ~ .... GO 0.. (I) ~ '" '" 0" ~ t::. E:: <: ;;> rorn~ ~ ...,. 0 III ::r "'0 a (I) Cl '" ~. :s 5;:r~ S8"Zt ~ ::r& ...,. t:;. 0" (I) ~ (I);r.o.. '" ~ r' p..0?" ?'~ 0ig'>-1"'O ~;:r.8 @- Oi~ ~ := ?[ a ~. ~ ~ M- ~ S' o 0 __ 9 ,< c;; t::. ~ 0 ::!i 00;:00 "'O::l~op> ::l ::l _. 0', W ro .: '<: ~ Pi' ;.;.~g-9"" 8'oClQ 0" ~_PJl""l"PJnQO"'1l-iro =o~gro~~~::1 cr ~ ~.~ (J) :J Z: ~ ro g ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ '"1 ~ ;::. 8 Si' 0" 0" 8.. a .... ~ el. g- ro n ~ ~.... ~. ~ W I-i :J ...,. ro rn 0 IV Pl 0 ~ ~ ~ 0.. g g. ~ ';:; Ef ~ ;s' ~g~ ~~gg~~ "'--<::r Ill::r~ ro <: ::l 0 P> ::l 0 n 8 '0 ;S' s;.::l~ o.."a~~rn 8" 11 ~ ~ 8 ~. sr _~? ..... ..... ~ ~ ~ IV IV :J PJ S~(l) ~roo..!lln== 1l fO~ if~~ s1f8 0.. "'0 ro _. "'0';; :s ~. (;l (1)....0.. ::l(l)(I)ro::l~ "'O..g ~ g-::l,.... 0.. 0.. .. ~ ~ ~ 0.. 8.. g S. Iii' ~,<&, ~"'8~8 Ef.";iJ 1llg-;::JP>ft P.l r.Jl t:::: ro ro "'1 ::l U; ]O"g8'" ~ 3 ~~ro~~ 0.. P> oro"'Oo,-, cr ~tot ~ ~ P.l o P.l P.l ..... I-t C/:J <: "'0 lil 8.. '<: ::r ~ ~fO:"'1l6? ~ ~. ~ 2 9 nr 1f it '<: ~ ::;" 1f 0.. ..::;P> <: ro ::r is' .: Si' .... ...,. .... ::r(l) (1)..0 ~ E. ::l iil III a ",- ro x "'0 ro ::l '" r" [0 o .... 0.. ~ ::l P> a ",- ~'" ro 0 .... ~rn~ S ~ ~ ::l 1l (I) l""l" :J t:/l o~& ::r ro j;U 8"::;!. ;iJ S'~ ~ ~ 0:::: '<: n o..""';r. u)' s:- ~ " ro iil S' ~ ~ U) _. P> ...,. ::l g~o.. ro' Ei\~ fJ> ;:r. (I) P> 0 ::l ::l ::l 0.. ~ 0 ro o ;- a ~ == ~ o n;l ro ~ ~ q. ;:j. ~ ~r o fJ> - ~~. ~ o'~ 0.9. ~ fJ> ~ fJ> (I) 8 ~ ~ ;::J 0.. ~ aOSt (I) ro 0.. ~ I--! Z VJ 'I::l tT:l n ..., I--! o Z "., [J) ?" ?'8 ClQ>-1P>:sOi~ P1 ?[ 5.. ..... ~ S' 0.. ~O::!i r"1fggop> OQ' __ ...,. ~ sr ::r (I) P> 0" ...,.'1,1 fO?rn ~;:8~6 ~O"'Oro~ (I) 5: ~ ...... :3 g-~~~ro =U)~ e._ o _. ~. ~r o """ oq n ;=;' ~&~::r ~ro"'Oro~ ::r ::r (I) fJ> <: a ~ ~ ~ n' __ """. ;:J rc ::J o..~' rtl fJJ ~~ g ~ F (0 ~. 'T1 ~ ~ ~fJ>....0..0 (I) 0 P.: Iii' g ~~~8~ 0' ~ ,rJ.l rtl ~=:r'{J)~ '<:':~::J ~ ~ ~ ;J ~. ~ a~ ro '<: P> 0- -;j;: 0 ~ ro CJ1 1-1'" P.l ~3:::~s [ge;~ III 0...: 0.. O"~ ~ o ,. 0.. ;iJ ~ '" ""'>8 1f ~ ~ 11 fO ..g ~ ~ a ::> ~;!l. to ~~ ::> r' - Z P> (I) 5.; t) Q~ 0 p...... Z ~ '7' ~ ;:::::., W tT:l -9 Z ..., 0.. III '<: fJ> "'" .... o 9 <: P> " III ;:r. ::l ClQ "'0 .... ro S, fJ> ro 'J; fJ> ::r P> ~ 0" ro n o 9 ro o ~ VJ >-< CJ Z VJ :so.. c~ ::g~~~..g:~ rr~ :r:~~ 9 ~OClQ""''''O ~ o' [ =' 8" Q o' ::J PJ ~ ,.;. OJ .... 0'<: (I) 1f~ 8" ::-:s ~ :s g. ~ S' tlJ~:T g; ~j" (I)<,i3" 00.. ::r<;<,~:S0 o S' <; s;. s' :s 5: i3" ~ (I) ClQ ;!l, ~:S8~iil~ PJ~S~~Ul s..~g.o..[~ ? 0" ~ ~ ~. ~ o~;'~<n(l) N S' ~ ~ .. ~ ~~:;;:b 0 (I) ~ ro;iJ ~ ~8"1lN 0.. III .... <:J1 :s 8"' "0 ~. ~ _. E?~;:+~ g: :s o' ~ ~ a ...... 0..' (j ~ ::l >-1 ro o.:o1fa ::r;o..o ro >< ~ ::- ::r" .... ::r o ::g ~ ro t=: 0.. _. <' ~ S' g <; ~()Q ~=r ga. ~ ~ x ~:s ~ rn ~ (I) ~ ro p.. 0 Oi _. 0- P> ~ .: 5&;::; ro ~ ~ .... ~ t:.fI ::r' Q'q ::r 0 "'" ~ 8 ~ o-~r" ro (I) Z fti''''''o ~~"'O .. ro 0 s' a. 2-. ClQ ...,. 0 O::r~ 8..~~8"~ 8~~S:-~ 5.&~~3. _. =:l tu ~ ""'", ::r.Q'q~~~ g~~&,<: PJ()~~til r-t-tl,l cnO'G-9 ~gg-~cn ;:r.~ ~g.g 8 ...,. "'0 ~ ~ (I) 0 (3 0 (I) ~ :s ro' ~ It a:Q.~~ " 9 III ::r 0 lil :. ~ [ ~ ~ 0"'" ...,. III 6f ~ ~ (") ~. ro 1fx 0.. ~ ....5 0i0i", III ~] ~ ~ " ::l (I) (I) ~ "'1 .., '" 'J; CJl cTQ' g-::l :=~ O"ro (I) III P> fJ> ""'::r ~~ 1f::l o..~ [~13 ?" ?'<:~ 0"'0 g g';. ~ ..., 2..~n::.1U)~ ~ '<: 0' .: ~ S' p: l~J oo..;::J....ClQ(I) '7' ::l (J} ro r.n r"\,..,. ~ ro ::r ::l '" it' t::' 'I::l P>~::r<:~ ~ ~ "'0 ~;S' 0.. 0 0"0"(1) -ro ...,., III ro ::l. if ':-:' ~ f"J ::l"'o -::> ~~,p..~ ~ :::0 ;~8"'~ ~ -< ~roEi~ q. ;: ~ e III ~. ~ ro,<:...,.9 0 r-. "'0 ~ s' P> ;::;' I., J Cl (I)~8 o-Z ::l ro fJ> ' a" ~ ~ c SF- CfJ (I) .... 9 0 o..;r.go ~ n "'0 .~ rn;::::- Si' 0 ~,<;~;r. ~ ~ 0'" W 0... ~ n" '"\. S. S ~ '-< tJ' '-" e;8~~ cr & ~ ~ ';:; R. ~~rr1g 1;; ... ~ ~ 'J; (I) .e: ;:r, ::r (I) 0.. ~ ;iJ 0 8 ~ ""'0..8;:r. P> ~,~ Ei;iJ ~ ~ .?: iil 0.. ...,. ::l~ hl fJ> "'0 (I) .... P> ...,. .... !=l'Y'~""5.~~1f~ [J) [J) [J) [J) ::r ~ 0 "'" ::ii' dQ' dQ' dQ' dQ' III ClQ ::l S:s ~~~~<:~--<O"~ '" fJ> fJ> 9 ro P> 0 S. P> ::r::r::r....~iil~~..... P> P> P> ..... 0 P> ... ~~~~ 8 (l)ClQ 0.. ifififif~ g-3[~ fti' &. ~"'O (I) ~ 8 &11 "'O~O"Si'::r::lOOO ...,. v <' n ", Q. <: ;:r. <: _, Si' <; (I) ::; 'T P> ~ (I) ::l,<: (I) 0..... (I) 0"1ll 0.. ClQ(I)o..fJ>?~rn::;-O" 8 ~ 2.. ~ 0 ::g ;!l.0'8 '<: 0.. ~ ~ fJ> ~N o..ClQ .: ~ -.... ~ r-t- ~ EU rtl 8--<00';::;::;r.;.;:r.", ~0..~""'1ll""1ll0- &Ei"'O 8"~~~(;l ~ ;:r. t::. 8. _. .?: ~ 0" .. ~ o .... ....... ~ C;.J ro """,. ~ClQ~-5 ~"'O & III 0 ro (I) ~ ~ 0 ; 1l 11 ~ g S. <:' := ~ ~ ~ ~ r-t- 0)' g. 5" ~ ~ ~ (t o' ~ ~ S; ~ s. ~ ; '1;; ~' ~ ~ ~ S' ~ ...,. III (I) III ~ ~ ~ ~ 5. ~~ ~ ::r <: i;; --< 8 ro ,<"'0 0" "'1 ~ I Pl PJ ...rr: n ::t n CJl c: ~...~ Cij' ~ 0 U) :. ~ g. 1-1 N ,-, a. -3 Q. g.'::r ...,. ~ oq' 0 ::r III ...,. ro 8 "'0 o .... P> .... '<: fJ> aq' ~ "'0 ro ~ ACENDA ITEM NO. PAGE .20 OF y d.-B o tTi n tTi ~ o:l tTi ~ >-' .:'l tv o o '-l ~ So '-- Jo-I <> ~~ o z o ""C ~ o "Tl t'r.I C/':J C/':J Jo-I o Z > ~ ""C ~ > N > C/':J Jo-I C1 Z ""C ~ o C1 ~ > ~ ~ CJ t11 '-..1 Z m o z :::c J> r- o o z s: o e z -< Z G:> (f) e ::0 ...,.., J> " m o:J m :::c z o J> E s: z e s: ...,.., J> " m :;;;: :::j :::c z m o Z o:J m :::c z o J> E s: z e s: (f) c; m (f) m >< > s: "'a r- m o .." > r- c: s: z c: s: ;J;! C") m Cl C") :I: > Z Z m r- r- m ~ m :XI Z m o Z :::c :>> 5 o Z s: o e Z -< Z G:> (f) e ::0 ...,.., :>> " m o:J m :::c z o ::0 o e -< m :;;;:g :::j-< :::c :>> OZ -00 :>>-0 DC e en m:::c -0 -< :>>:::c z::O -;0 me o G:> ...,..,:::C :>>-0 Or- m~ :>> E s: z e s: ...,.., :>> " m :;;;: :::j :::c z m o Z o:J m :::c z o :>> E s: z e s: (f) c; m en m t: s: "'a r- m o .." > r- c: s: Z c: s: ~ C") m Cl C") :I: > Z Z m r- r- o C') o ,___ _n___________ ______] gl.::;-< ro 0 ""-~--1 ~ ~ ~ ro ~~ 'Oi: ft CS [~ 1 ?Ii '" Po> '" ~, eg' ~ [W ( ..fll I-t'\ Q) 0...-... _____^.;.._~ s;~ ~ o-j ::r 0.. S'- it f"l ..... ro"O ;ti 8 0 Po> Po>::S ~.... tf) tI:I ~ r-t- fl ~ ~ ~ <: """"'" 0 M- tn. ~ ~ it C 0 rtl Po> '" .... _ '" f"l .....::r ~ S 0 ro "OS ~ 0.. ""0" rtl f"l o ::s '" i5.: ro .... rtl 0.. S' 9~S'-~5" Po> rtl rtl Po> 0 S' Po> 0"0 .... :<roo.. ~. ::r' ro 00 ~ ~ e:. P1 ~. ~ -~~o gO"~cr'e:. 0.. rtl ro 0 ':<:QgPo>~ n ~ o~ C rtl "'" f"l ~610..<;;ti ro .... '" ro Po> 0.. ro..o o..;:t. ~~go~ ~[;ti~'< PJ ...... ....... .-t- ~ !"'l < 0 ro ::s ::>o.:o::so.. 0" C S" 0.. Po> ~Po>Q'q 0".... o=rtlrc~' S ';; tn. '6 g-. ::s ::s ::s 0.. 0..Q.~~ ~ ~ it eg' ft R rtl '" o..~~p, o~~i!i S'-' ~ ~ rtl, 5" ~ &. '0 ..... ::s cr'~9Q'q o ::r..... III ~ rtl ur ::s 0.. ...."0 0.. .~""o.. ~ ~ ~ rtl ro 0.. 1-'" ~ Po> .!" ft rtl 0'~0..::S ....it....~ g:.~ ~Jg AGENDA rltM NO. PACE~OF '1:1:: 0 ~b 0Q'q 00 ~ '" ::rC ..... '" ro rtl ::s e:. rtl C g ~. ::r::S Po> C 09 ~pr ~f"l 9 fl s' f"l Po> ~ g. ::s ;:J ~ ~ '" _O>-JCJJ ~r<::r>-3 9 ::Q. rtl 0 .....;;;o,~ ~~stil o' C ~ ~ p ~ S' 0 Po> Q'q Z ~~ >-3 ~.~ ~ ::s '" CJ C 0 Z 9;:;'> Po>gCJ R~tTi 0..2 f"l f"l ~ g. ::s ::s ~ ~ enS ~ 0" ~ro ::re:. '1:1::0 ~~ oro Op'- ~ 2": ro ::s rtl o ::s ::r Po> o ~. .... ::r .... o C .... rtl 0.. Po> ::s 0.. "0 C '" ::r Q'q .... Po> "0 ::r (=)' '" Po> ::s 0.. o ~ ro .... f"l ffi:'~ ro rtl .... Iii" ~.... ro .... ,'" o~ l ~ i I ~J ~l ~ ~lk~ j -.l.... i ~i lU\~mj '" C f"l ::r Po> '" ~ :0 Po> ::s 0.. ~ ~ 2": f"l ::r gS'-;J 0.. (3 rtl ..... C .... 8Q'qa i:l. g" ~ f"l C .... rtl .... 0 roS:~ 9 rtl ::r ~ 8 tn. ur a 8. o ~ rt 0.. ~ g. ~ 2": tn. rtl Iii" o rtl 0 "0 g S' S' 0 '" .... C ~ rtl .... ;ti III ~ ;!l. qs. '" i:\l ::s .... ::s Q'q g 0..S'-0.. '" rtl Po> qn6- ~....>=: ~ ro N Po> rtl ....0.. ~: C q 2. o ........ ........s; ~9 "0 '" o .... Q'q'< ~ ro "0 ::r (=)' e:. 8 r:.n ::r: o 'I::J >-l t:TJ Z >- Z >-l r:.n ....... CJ Z >- CJ t:TJ r:.n 'I::J t:TJ n ....... "Tj ....... n ~ ....... o Z r:.n if ~'O t1 t'11 n t'11 ~ OJ t'11 Id ...... .:'l tv o o '1 Id So "---~ <> ~~ o z o '"'0 ~ o I'rj trj r:J) r:J) ~ o z > t""'l '"'0 t""'l > N > r:J) ~ (;) Z ""d ~ o (;) ~ > ~ ~ CJ t"11 00 CJ> ::I:I~ m.... <0 mco ::I:Im cne m' '"t/'I; ):0"" CJ> Z ~ ~ n ~ :::! ::J: 0 0 ):0)> "" z~ Z'" m m r-5; 6:= c), o~ , I ;::: ;::: )> )> "" "" 'l< 'l< ~ ~ - :=: g; ~ e '" ;::: :0 co e :0 CJ> )> ffi '" 0 ;;:: )> -< ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;=; ,. '" C> ;; \L -T ~Q:I> 2C-m ~ "" n ccCt..C := C'D rn c .... (") u:::z ""'1'1 ~:r(i) c -. :c m_. ~=-:-- m _.... c:I :;II;:: ~ = r- :0 S ~ "'CI :z: ~.Ct 0 ;1-a cO j~ N~ ~ <= :E'" _" ~~ II "'~ ~'" ,. <= 00"> ~= ~'- ,.'" ~~ ~~ E5 ,. <= '" Z ~ C> I ,. Z Z w .. C> '" 5 <= ::; ~ I ~ <= ~ i: t '" -~~I ~~ ~~ ;;;0 C)-l .....>< m ~ _N >< r- (")''0' m:x: >::::E xm:z: - ""OX en -l >:x: _:J: Zm 0 ~ O~ Z , -CJ en'tl: ~cn :E -" >~ ~;' Zm 0 {N ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ '" I ~ ::;;~ ~'" ~C> ~~ ~~ ~ 0"> '" ~ t:ll:;:""3:: -<-0>- (jt""t:ll"" Ot""t'l'1t'l'1 :::ot:ll(j:::O "Q~O> OCZt"" :::O""C/lC/l ~Ccn- t'l'1:::o""t"" t:ll>;>B :::Ot:llZ3:: >0""_ Zt""""Z 1:10:I:>- -(j:::O"" ZOOO f:1ZCz I:1Cl;> t'l'1:I:Z ZO_ C/lCU t'l'1""(j 1:1;>0 OZt"" :::01:10 ;>",,~ ,.,,:I:O 0t'l'1,." Zt""t"" ""t'l'1t'l'1 1:1"""" t'l'1"""" ""t'l'1t'fj t'l'1:::O:::o :::oC/lC/l 3::~ -t"" Zt'fj t'fj o .. ~ ~ <= ~ Z '" .9 "'t""'.....""d""drc............... ""OO::::IllIll"O'-<.....- III :: (]Q :: ..... ..... :: ~ :> a- -9 tt 0 5l ::l ::l..... t"'" tj ... 0 rJl .....::: :: ~ ~ 0 S. ~::~~~~ro;.....::l ""....rctt::rc::lp...t""'~ e!. (]Q rJl "' rJl .... III t"'" rc ~.g e ~. ~ ~ ~ a. S ~ p...::r"rc ;.~::;=-.~::::t"'" ~er8 '*i:::;eo~ S zS :> III ::l 3i ..... :;;:l n ..... ~ ,;:., ""d~ ~o~c~ 6 .....z..... .....-::lO,;:.,CF.i- 0 '-< "1:l r; ::::E eo ::r: h' 5l Z C a~ =-......:;;:lrrl"1:l n. ~ "" 0 ....."'-.-10 0 il:l ::r" ::l ..... .... 1",/ - ::l "r.l CJ;'1ll ;jCJ:>a ~ ~ "' rJl :;;:l t"'" "'"' IJ r6oro~rrlcrc~ rrl '< Jg ::: 0 -< ~ ;. =-. Cj ~::T~::l ~.....; g n rc......rJl::Trrlzrc ::r: Er tq ~ ~ --l C ~ ~. :> :::: -....? :> 7' ::l ~ Z h' 0.;' t"'" ,';:" ti;,;:::r Z S'~;. C ?"~ rrl n "' rc n III t"'" rn"2.o' ;. CF.i . ~~ rc ~ ~ o' ~ ~ ..... ::l ;.~ ~ 151 <"" ;6 cng; me '"t/' ~ ~ CJ> C"') ~ ~ ;; ~ ~ z)> "" ~5 r-g; :;5; -Ie -I' ~~ cnp ,. '" C> ;; 0- "' z ~ ~ ~ ,. <= C> ~ ~ IJ-__~- ////. t- ("~~) --- 1:" __:::c-:] " "~ "'1'1 '''1 " ;:: :ri ~ ~ ~'*' z Z en> 0 c;):>..... -i en g t; ~ ~~;' ~ ;;! Z. "T'l C)'I Z -N X r- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ -t ~ m ::c '"Ox CJ'l-l ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ -l :E ZC en *' C'1 )>0 Glen =........ :J: -< ~E ~ ~ ~~~i ~~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~'" ~C> ;~ -~ .. C> '" Z '" <= ::; ~ I ~ <= ~ [J CF.i ..... CJ Z n o Z CF.i --l :;;:l C n --l ..... o Z N ~ ~ '" ~ :E ~ ~ <= :0 iii 4 ~6 AOENDA ITEM NO. PAGE d~ OF C1 [Tj n (I) [Tj 3: ~ c::: .... :Do co -t [Tj m C :;0 C [Tj ...... ~ >< .:'I -t :;:. 3: ~ tv m 0 m '"'0 .... 0 m r' '.J < [Tj ~ (fJ C5 :;0 z 0 So >-rJ :;0 ---- .....-c tIi -<> -< 2;~ tIi :;:0 (fJ 0 tIi Z ~ 0 Z n ""0 ~ ~ :;:. 0 z z ~ tIi t'r.I r' r..n r' tIi r..n >-:l .....-c >-:l 0 tIi :;:0 Z (fJ > ~ ""0 (I) 3: ~ c::: > > -t m N c z > C5 ::c .. -t r..n 3: .....-c m m C1 .... m < Z ~ C5 z ""0 ~ 0 C1 :::d > 3:: ~ CJ [Tj \0 AGENDA ITEM NO.~ PACE d- 3 OF c? ~ c:J (fJ tT:1 ::J n tT1 tT:1 'W 2;:: r' >- OJ Z tT:1 ~ ..... ,'-J N 0 0 '-J ~ So " ioo-l <> ,;~ 0 =; m Z -0 r;;: Z 0 " " ~ ~ 0 ton r'r.I C/'J C/'J ioo-l 0 Z > t""'4 ""0 t""'4 > N > C/'J ioo-l C1 Z ""a z e:> ~ '" M 0 ~ m C1 ~ > ~ ~e ~ CJ t'11 >-' o lil~ 111$ I!!il!i Ii ~ ~ ill ~ EJ ~~ ~ ~ i. , ~;~ . ~ e ~ 3;6 '-Cz =J3:-J .,,"'e:> ~~~ 3:e:>'" ~.,.,~ o2!= -00"" mmM "':lE"" :;!~':1 !:::::-::C? z - .!!! It DIAMOND DRIVE . . i ' "- = = " ~J , ~~ ~~~~~ .....p ....~'\Io' 1.>(:1' o..~ ar:w.1' !l : II n:;':'-'t-' l===" F " , F=' ~ , ~ ' ~~--'l: c= i:P~' ~ = :; c:==: F=--'lrt-Il'A; / IN ,1, ~,~, 1_ , !-r:-'.:"""~",~ _.' {!:~1. i>i_"'-'~ " ~.....-.. i~:~' ~I ~,." :r;;' .."'!:. .'t::::J ~ ',-' ;.' If' .-... 1, r ~~--,~g: ~ ~ rd,'~ ~ ~ , .> :;; m"".1il =" ,~" ='" .iLd ~ !! ""t .." , '. =,". ~, ~.. !i ,- ... ~ c F=' i': CD :;!~'I " ,= '" = : . "C:==: '<I -. - = ~ = s: ~ 1C . :-:.~ AQENDA IT&;;;M NO. If PACE .) Lf OF ;). 'b o tT'J n tT'J 3::: O::l tT'J ~ ...... '-'l N o o '-'l ~ So ____ io-I <> ~~ o z o ~ ~ o "'11 rr.l 'JJ 'JJ io-I o Z > ~ ~ ~ > N > 'JJ io-I G") Z ~ ~ o G") ~ > ~ ~ CJ trJ .... .... ::< "" c:; :>- r- '" :t: o "" .... m z: :>- :!:i p:! !:!! :>- ::! z: IJ ~ --0 ~ 0 I~ "'CIln>olg1aZ~/l'l:t:noE~~x~~ ~ /l'l 0 ~ o-l Z ~ ~ ~ /l'l --0 ~ - n ~ ~ ... o-l C'l "' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ Zoo ~ ~ ~ o-l :t: o-l _ _ z c:: ~ Q o Z ~ >- /l'l CIl :t: ~ /l'l ~ >- n ~ o-l is ~O~OZCiZ~""'~>ol~::aa~c:: ~>- ':'txl /l'l'-"'-"r-<~>->- ~ ::1 gJ ~ ~ ~ < ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ 1:; C'l /l'l /l'l r ~ /l'l CIl .. < CIl Z~--O/l'lOUZC'lZ></l'lt!'i!3r-<o ~C'lzf'i~Z:iJ:!~~mGl~c::~a CIl /l'l" C'l Z --0 r /l'l , /l'l CIl >- /l'l o-l /l'l ~ 00 /l'l >- a /l'l a >- ~ --0 _ ~ a /l'l Z 00 ~ o-l ~ C'l Z > > Z /l'l ~ ~ ;;' 0 n o-l Q a I:J ~ Z m ~ a g; C'l. ;:Saz:r:--an~Y'g:JzC'l /l'l ~ /l'l o-l ~ a a o-l o-l Z ~ nn><aC'l~z >olaf;>- o-l ~ ~ ~ ~ Z /l'l ~ c:: /l'l r-< ~ a >< ~"m s:t:l~~C'l ~ r-< >- r-<<;lgJ;:<a [;; ci1 ~;,\l 0 ~ ::j ~ /l'l a ~ e m ~ ~~~~ Gl ~ ~ ~ ~ f:: ~ CIl n i':: r-< ";;" a >-P.1 ~ ~ I:J >- . ~ I I ~ J I ~ I 1----: 1 , I , , I I , 1 , t~l 1 j ~~ ~] I' ....... , J f.. c~c~ \;, , '.. , , , I ,.................~ f ilJ1UJ . , ~:: .-..... ....., ~ J ~-~jl L............~ 1 , 1 , 1 , I , I , , I ~---- o ~~ -l~ m~ ~c i)~ zC! ,...;j~ f'i /l'l '" .., i!: r!' ~ ~ 9 AGENDA ITEM NO. PACE .J. 5" OF If ~~ CJ rri n rri ~ OJ rri /j ,.... .:'l N o o '-J /j So '-. 1-004 <> ;~ o z o "'tl ~ o JoTj rr1 r:J'j r:J'j 1-004 o Z > r-c "'tl r-c > N > r:J'j 1-004 C1 Z "'tl ~ o C1 ~ > ~ ~ CJ rr:l I-' N . ;Tl $~E;=<rri~w~z 6~~~S;:E~8! ~~rn)!;~~t5~S1 ~~~~~:Erri~ a:n"TI:d:::j~cn-< ocn~-<~rri~z ~~~~~s~~ ~~;;::~~~ ~~E;~~~55 ~m x::c~~ (/):0 -I.)>:r:m en C1 ,- 0 C5 0 ~gs ~~~~ 2m r"'cn 0 m;:D encn 0 om en- :0 ZO D G") !j;~:'j r; ~~ ~ ~ 0~ ~ ~ O-l?< -I m:o en :r: )>-< ffi )> ~g z :g 00)> c: o:o:D m :o~ S Cl .. . .:EI' ~=<13~s~~ ""Utn:r:Zo ~~~ffi~~~ ::r: )>. :r: C') )> .... ~~;!l~iZ;:ri~ !":!?:';'::=t~:I!z ~SS<~c=i~~ )>C::. mcn-l ~~ffi~~~ u;OJZ::on::O )>~)>cno~ FCl~55~~ ~ ~E;5;~ m 0-10 '=' :DzO ~ rnCi.l~ o sngG"> p::! r-q5~ <: I::Ocn ~ ~. i <n -i-i ~ ~ ~ '" Z-o ~ -i r- OJ Z m c:: )> a ;= s: a m Z '" >-l >-< ""0 n >- l' tTJ l' tTJ ;;; i-1 5 z -c ::z:J 0 -C 0 en m C ~ :z c d 0 ~) :e C?,'~ en - cC~ CO) :z > CO) m :z m >< ('") m en en 0 "T1 -4 ~ m ::z:J m C c: ::z:J m S m :z -4 en 0 "T1 -4 ~~I i 1- ~ -1 en .. en - CO) .... :z m -C Z ... ::z:J 0 :I> ~ CO) en ::z:J n Z > >- l' .... W S tTJ en ...... Z ...... ~ ~ t;:J :I> > > r- II ~ r- >-: ::z:J I m 0 m > ("') m <: m C ::z:J ('") > "'tJ "'tJ ::z:J 0 <: > r en n >- r-' tTJ ,.... ~ II >-: 6 > ~ ""0 n ~ tTJ r-' tTJ ;;; i-1 5 z '" ---~ q ... z .... l> l-.) Z ... W z ~ ,J:io (j) n >- r-' tTJ ,.... t;:J > II >-: 6 > AGENDA ITEM NO.~ PACE .ll.o OF d- ~ 0 {/l tTJ ::r: n 0 tTJ 'U ~ ..., tT'l OJ Z tTJ >- ~ z ..., ..... tT'l -:'l r' tT'l N <: 0 ~ 0 '-1 0 Z {/l ~ m "" So en .... I!l m ---- ~ < "" <> .... 6 :z: ~a:: 0 z 0 ~ :z: 0 ~ en "" .... 0 :t: c: m 0 .... :t: :;:; m < r =< '"r.I m en < 6 "" '"' tr.1 .... "" :z: r :z: :z: ~ trJ 0 ... ~ trJ ;E "l 0 ~ z ~ 0 '" en ~ S Z :z: "" ~ > ~ r 0 I:""'" == m 0 0 == ~ :z: m en en 0 .... I:""'" c: m .... r > :t: ::E m "" r .... m en N ;; 6 ... en :z: "" .... r > ~ 6 ~ z ~ ~ , trJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ": ~ 9 Z ~ ~ 0 en ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" > ~ a:: ": ~ CJ I:T'J I-' C;J AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE eJ..i Lf OF ~e 0 [Tj n [Tj ~ OJ [Tj :;0 ,..... ,'I tv 0 0 'I :;0 So ---- 1-1 <> ~~ 0 z 0 '\; ~ 0 1'!1 rr.l r:J'J r:J'J 1-1 0 Z > t""l '\; t""l > N > r:J'J 1-1 C') Z '\; ~ 0 C') ~ > ~ ~ CJ tIj ........ fl::>. B :z: m :e CI o c: CI> ,... m "T1 > C"> m CI 3: o :z: c: 3: m :z: ..... en i5 :z: en C"> ,.. ,... !":' Co> "'; '" ~ ~ ~ m -< '" ~ CD""Omll ~~R~ ~~~~ G1:!10"-i ~~E9 en 0 J> ~~~ :5:IZ ~ ~ I :;;:-<'" =i~g Ic::.... o"m ".-0 ~~~ c::en.... m",,, )lJJ>c:: ".,"en m,;;:!;;:C en"., , en '---~~~~~] <" ~ ~~~ ,mC) en. ~ G'"Jfnh; C; c; ~~~ :!;::r:c) ~~l; oen S~ enm c::m :02 )lJ , ~;:2 J>~ " .... " m .- 2 ~~ dn:l~ ~~r;:t C"j~' ",-. ~g "'." '" -< ..,>> Q:tl . ." =!I~ Q -. 'I ~~~dffi ~~:J:g::Z t9z:E:7J~ ':-)>IOCC g~~~ ~~~~ ::t:Xcof; ~tBf;S <::O^;D ex> m c> J>C>c:: "., 2 13 0 =i ex> c> c> m ~~ J> .... ~ s: o c:: 2 .... Z en ~~~~~~ 6~~~~~ ~^tDO~!:i :s~~~~~ ~c::S2u;c)> ~6~=~~ Z-l-;:D::r:- -i 0 ~~ ~ ~agjd s: ~~~ f"m -: W en.... -< I C'" Om enJ> l ~__ /;~i:.i~:::'~'.)\ ~. '~ ~ \ ~ \ -'T-r--'~u /_., '~"-j' / I', I " -1-- . CD)> 5;:0 G)-" ~ ~:= g~ ~tq ~ 6~ ~3S ~~ rri ~E z~ ;s!~ ~ c:::$:. G)<: m ~ X a gsm ~~ ~ Ci )>cn Iii en .- .., ~'" ~~ $;<::1 ....", 1"~ "';::: ~ '" '" l <0. ~ IIII C'> .- SO ~~ ;50 ~~ ~ '" ~ o z ~n~ i\'iz ",m ~o ;,,:; 2i~ ~ ~g cjz zz ~~ 0> z;~ ~ AGENDA ITEM NO. PACE d-IQ '0 ,"co ~~ >>m 2l~ .-> cnfg :Ii", ~ OF L( ifC() ~ CITY OF lAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: JANUARY 15, 2008 SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT TITLE: APPLICANT: SPYGLASS RANCH llC (ATTN: ERIK lUNDE) 240 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 220, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 OWNER: SAME PROJECT REQUEST · Draft Environmental Impact Report No. 2007-01 · General Plan Amendment No. 2005-06; to re-designate the land use designations of the Spyglass Ranch property from Future Specific Plan (3.0 du/ac maximum density), Freeway Business, and Neighborhood Commercial to Specific Plan (4.0 du/ac maximum density). · Zone Change No. 2005-07; to change the Zoning designation of the Spyglass Ranch property from Single-Family Residential (R-1) and General Commercial (C-2) to Specific Plan. · Specific Plan No. 2005-02 - Adoption of the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan. PROJECT lOCATION The 259.6 acre project site is located on the east side of Camino Del Norte at its intersection with Main Street (Assessor Parcel Numbers: 377-250-011,377-350-004,007, 008,010,014,015,016,017,377-260-004,005, & 006). BACKGROUND During the processing of this project, staff worked closely with the applicant to achieve enhanced architectural design guidelines addressing such issues as grading, landscaping, ACENDA ITEM NO.~ PAGE I ~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JANUARY 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN streetscapes, walls and fencing, and entry-monumentation for the proposed Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING EXISTING LAND USE ZONING GENERAL PLAN Project Vacant/Residence Residential Single Freeway Site Family Business/ (R-1 )/General Neighborhood Commercial (C-2) Commercial/ Future Specific Plan - G North Vacant Unincorporated/ Low Density Single Family Res.lFreeway Residential Business (R-1 )/Rural Residential (RR) South Vacant Single Family Freeway Residential (R-1) Business/Future Specific Plan - G East Vacant Single Family Future Specific Residential (R-1) Plan - G West Interstate 15 PROJECT DESCRIPTION GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2005-06 General Plan Amendment No. 2005-06 will change the City of Lake Elsinore's General Plan land use designation for the Project Site from Future Specific Plan - G, Freeway Business and Neighborhood Commercial to Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan. The proposed General Plan Amendment will also increase the maximum density from 3.0 du/ac to 4.0 du/acre. ZONE CHANGE NO. 2005-07 Zone Change No. 2005-07 will change the zoning designation on the Project Site from Single Family Residential (R-1) and General Commercial (C-2) to Specific Plan (SP). SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005-02 The purpose of the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan is to provide for the orderly and efficient ACENDA ITEM fJO. PACE J. 5: OF Y-s PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JANUARY 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN development of the Project Site. Spyglass Ranch will be a Rustic Californian themed master planned residential community containing a maximum of 1 ,035 dwelling units with park and open space areas integrated into the project design. The Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan proposes to divide the Project Site into approximately fourteen (14) separate planning areas consisting of four (4) basic residential land use categories along with park and open space categories. LAND USE CATEGORIES RESIDENTIAL USES Estate Residential (0-2 du/ac) Approximately 7.5 acres of the Project Site has been designated "Estate Residential". The land use category will contain a maximum yield of eight (8) dwelling units. Residential products will consist of detached units on a minimum of 12,000 square foot lots. Sinqle-Familv Residential (4-8 du/ac) Approximately 115.6 acres of the Project Site has been designated Single-Family Residential. The land use category will contain a maximum of 515 dwelling units. The residential home products will consist of detached units on a minimum of 5,000 square foot lots. Courtvard Homes (8-15 du/ac) Approximately 18.6 acres of the Project Site will have a Courtyard Homes designation. The land use category will contain a maximum of 171 dwelling units. The residential products will consist of detached units with common front yard areas on a minimum of 7,200 square foot lots Multi-Familv Residential (15-24 du/ac) Approximately 14.5 acres of the Project Site will be designated Multi-Family Residential. The land use category will contain a maximum of 341 dwelling units. Furthermore, if Multi- family residential units are not developed in these areas, a commercial land use designation shall apply for development consistent with the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan. All commercial uses shall be consistent with the Zoning requirements under the General Commercial (C-2) Zoning District of the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). AGENDA ITEM NO. & PAGE .:s OF PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JANUARY 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN OPEN SPACE AND RECREA TlON Parks Approximately 6.5 acres of the Project Site will be designated for parks. Two (2) park facilities will be provided within the specific plan boundary. A 3.0 acre park is to be located within Planning Area 7 and will consist of both active and passive areas, such as basketball courts, rolling turf areas, picnic facilities, tot lots, etc. Furthermore, an existing residence located in Planning Area 3 may be incorporated into the design of the park to form a large community center, which may serve as the central gathering location for residents of Spyglass Ranch. A second 3.5 acre park site will be located within Planning Area 13, which will also provide numerous active and passive recreational amenities and is conveniently located at the intersection of Street "0" and Elsinore Hills Drive. Open Space Approximately 85.8 acres of the Project Site will be designated for open space. The open space areas will be interspersed throughout the specific plan boundary and will assist in achieving the "Rustic Californian" theme for the community by preserving natural visual amenities such as rolling topography, rock outcroppings and natural indigenous vegetation. Moreover, the open space areas will serve to create buffer zones between various types of onsite land uses and density variations. Finally, a system of pedestrian trails will be incorporated within the open space belts which will provide connectivity between residential neighborhoods. Trails The Spyglass Ranch community also includes an extensive trail system, which includes concrete sidewalks and soft-surface trails. The system of concrete sidewalks and soft- surface trails are intended to encourage activities such as walking, jogging, and bicycling. There is an existing ten-foot (10') wide trail, which will be preserved within Planning Area 8A (Open Space). This existing trail provides access from the southwestern portion of the community adjacent to Planning Area 6 (Multi-family Residential) and Planning Area 2 (Single-Family Residential) in the northwest portion of the community. A second trail is planned to traverse the southern, eastern, and northern portions of the community, providing connections to the existing trail's northern and southern terminus points and other existing off-site trails located east of the community. This ten-foot (10') trail provides immediate pedestrian access to the majority of the residential planning areas, as well as the park in the Planning Area 13. ACENDA IT.EM NO.~u PACE. l.f __oFlfS PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JANUARY 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN Residential & Non-Residential Density Summary 7.5 115.6 18.6 14.5 156.2 1.1 4.5 9.2 23.5 6.6 8 515 171 341 1,035 Center 6.5 85.8 11.1 103.4 259.6 4.0 1,035 ROADWAY AND CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENTS Regional access to Spyglass Ranch is obtained from Interstate 15 (1-15) via the Camino Del Norte and Main Street exit. The primary objective of the Spyglass Ranch Circulation Plan is to meet the vehicular travel needs of the community by providing direct and convenient access to individual planning areas through a safe an efficient network of roadways. Camino Del Norte Primary access to the community will be provided via Camino Del Norte which abuts the community's southern property line and the Interstate 15 freeway. This roadway has been designated as a Secondary Highway with a ninety foot wide right-of-way including a fourteen-foot (14') painted median and a six-foot (6') curb-adjacent sidewalk within a ten- foot (10') parkway. The applicant has been conditioned to provide a temporary asphalt road between Camino Del Norte and Canyon Estates Drive to the east. Elsinore Hills Drive Elsinore Hills Drive generally bisects the community and provides an north-south access through the development. This roadway has also been designated as a Secondary Highway with a ninety-foot (90') wide right-of-way including a fourteen-foot (14') painted median and a six-foot (6') curb-adjacent sidewalk within a ten-foot (10') parkway. AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE C) OF ~S- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JANUARY 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN Streets A, B C & D & Other Local Streets Internal local streets serving the overall community will be designed to minimize through traffic within neighborhoods while creating internal linkages for residents and access to recreational amenities. Local streets will be designed with a sixty-foot (60') right-of-way. These roads do not contain a median and shall consist of six-foot (6') curb-adjacent sidewalks within a ten-foot (10) foot parkway. DESIGN GUIDELINES A large portion of the Specific Plan document is devoted to Single-Family, Multiple-Family and Commercial Architectural Design Guidelines as well as comprehensive Landscaping Design Guidelines. The Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan Design Guidelines are intended to establish standards for a superior master-planned residential community and will help to guide development of an aesthetically cohesive environment that incorporates the natural topography and landscape of the community. The Design Guidelines section consists of two (2) components: Architectural Design Guidelines and Landscape Design Guidelines. These components define the design concept, physical character, and theme of Spyglass Ranch. The Architectural Design Guidelines provide a high quality living environment by defining guidelines for site planning, architectural theme and details, building mass and scale, materials and color, and articulation. The Landscape Design Guidelines provide general landscaping requirements including, but not limited to, design standards for streetscapes, landscaping, walls and fences, edge conditions, plant palette establishment, and entrance monumentation. Architectural Desiqn Guidelines Sinqle-Familv Residential Based on the Project Site history and topography, the applicant is proposing a "Rustic Californian" theme for the community. Specific architectural styles permitted in association with the theme include Craftsman, Spanish and American Farmhouse for both single-family and multi-family residential homes. These styles are compatible with one another and provide adequate flexibility in design. To promote the goal of attaining appealing communities and personable neighborhoods, single-family residential design guidelines should include, but not be limited to: · Long, unbroken facades and box like forms should be avoided. Building facades should be broken up to give the appearance of a collection of smaller structures. · Use of simple roof forms to provide interest by jogging rooflines, varying plate lines, and roof heights. AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE (l] 5 OF qr PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JANUARY 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN · Combine one (1) and two (2) story architectural elements when appropriate for the architectural style, including patio walls and balconies to break up exterior walls. · Building mass should reflect interior uses within the repertoire of forms for the chosen architectural style while exterior mass and form can be manipulated to improve the streetscape. · Colors of structures should blend with natural colors of the hillsides, where possible. A harmonious combination of colors and materials should be used. Multi-Family Residential The development of Multi-Family Residential within the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan is proposing to incorporate the design standards and guidelines included for Single-Family homes where appropriate. In addition, special details are proposed, but not limited to: · The upper story of a two-story building should be stepped back to reduce the scale of facades facing streets, courtyards, or open space areas. · Flat roof on garages, carports, and ancillary structures are discouraged. · No more than eight (8) attached units should be permitted in a single-structure. · Upper floor entries should have a distinct design that complements the main building frontage. Commercial Architectural Guidelines The Spyglass Ranch provides a commercial land use alternative for Planning Areas 5 and 6. The goal is to promote visual compatibility and individuality within the Spyglass Ranch community, while maintaining maximum flexibility to accommodate a wide variety of uses. The concept for commercial architecture is to maintain consistency and compatibility with the residential proposed themes, proposed for the residential community of Spyglass Ranch. In addition, special details are proposed, but not limited to: · Exterior building materials should be of natural character that would reflect the rural character of the surrounding environment. · Principal roof forms should be gable or hip with pitches from 4: 12 to 6: 12. · Consideration should be taken to relate interior building design to pedestrian spaces through generous use of glazing in doors and windows. · Light standards should blend architecturally with buildings, pedestrian areas, other AGENDA ITEM NO. PAOE~_ -, 5 _ OF~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JANUARY 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN hardscape elements, and street furniture. Landscapinq Desiqn Guidelines The Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan Landscape Design Guidelines reinforces the project theme through application of the landscape elements and sets forth general criteria for landscaping within the community and compliments the Architectural Design Guidelines. In addition, the Landscape Design Guidelines establishes the proposed tree and shrub palette, streetscape planting, entry-monumentation, walls and fences, slope planting, and park layout. ANAL YSIS The Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan is consistent with the City's General Plan. By changing the current land use designations of Freeway Business, Neighborhood Commercial, and Future Specific Plan G to Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan, the City would have an opportunity to cluster development and create a significant open space area that other General Plan designations would not facilitate. By functioning as a regulatory document, the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan provides a means of implementing the City's General Plan through implementation of particularized land use provisions, development regulations, and designs. Furthermore, the proposed Zone Change from the current designation of R-1 (Single- Family Residential) and C-2 (General Commercial) to Specific Plan is consistent with the General Plan Land Use of Specific Plan Spyglass Ranch. Furthermore, the project as proposed, will compliment the existing and proposed development in the surrounding area. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION According to the State CEQA Guidelines, "the EIR process starts with the decision to prepare an EIR." (14 C.C.R. S 15081.) At the conclusion of the initial study of the proposed project, it was determined that there was substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. To that end, a draft environmental impact report (DEIR) was prepared. Even though the DEIR concluded that unavoidable adverse impacts related to Air Quality (emissions of ROG, NOx, PM1O, and PM2.5 during construction; emissions of ROG, NOx, and CO during operations; and, conflicts with the regional Air Quality Management Plan) and, Transportation and Traffic (queuing impacts at the 1-15/Main Street interchange during General Plan Build-out) would result from the proposed project, a Statement of Overriding Considerations has been prepared in accordance with Section 15093 of the CEQA Guidelines. The Statement of Overriding Considerations "balances" the proposed project against this unavoidable environmental effect. ACENDA ITEM NO. PACE_ e 5 OF If- r PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JANUARY 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN The CEQA Guidelines require that a DEIR, which is submitted to the State Clearinghouse for review by state agencies, be circulated for public review for a minimum of 45 days (14 C.C.R. S 15105.) Accordingly, the public review period for the proposed project began on May 21, 2007 and closed on July 5, 2007. Staff prepared responses to all comments received, which are identified as Attachment 6. One additional item to note is a Caltrans letter that the City received on July 17, 2007, after the close of the DEIR comment period. This letter expressed concerns about the additional traffic generated by both the Spyglass Ranch and Porto Romano projects in this area. Because of the complexity of the traffic issues in this area, Caltrans requested additional review time until August 28,2007 which Staff granted. Staff contacted Caltrans on August 29,2007 to obtain a status on their comments. Caltrans stated that they were still in process of preparing comments as they have significant concerns about additional traffic at the 1-15/Main Street exit. To date, no further written or verbal comments from Caltrans regarding this project have been received. A Condition of Approval has been included requiring full compliance with Caltrans requirements prior to recordation of the first tract/parcel map within the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the following Resolutions: 1. Resolution No. 2008-_ recommending to the City Council adoption of Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Consistency Findings. 2. Resolution No. 2008-_ recommending to the City Council certification of Environmental Impact Report No. 2007-01. 3. Resolution No. 2008-_ recommending to the City Council approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2005-06 4. Resolution No. 2007-_ recommending to the City Council approval of Zone Change No. 2005-07. 5. Resolution No. 2007-_ recommending to the City Council approval of Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan No. 2005-02. AGENDA ITEM NO. '5 PAGE 't _~OF ~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JAN UARY 15, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN PREPARED BY: JUSTIN CARLSON, ASSOCIATE PLANNER4 APPROVED BY: ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT fYYJ1.---- ATTACHMENTS: 1. LOCATION MAP 2. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIONS 3. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 4. INITIAL STUDY/ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 5. DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (Included within the Final EIR enclosed) 6. AFFECTED AGENCY RESPONSE TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND STAFF'S RESPONSE TO COMMENTS (Included within the Final EIR enclosed) 7. CEQA FINDINGS OF FACT 8. SPECIFIC PLAN AQENDA ITEM NO. ~ PACE... l 0 OF . VICINITY MAP "SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN" ------\ \ ;1- Jl PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ItEM NO. .5:tc PAGE", II _OF . RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_ RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ADOPTION OF FINDINGS THAT THE PROJECT KNOWN AS SPYGLASS RANCH IS CONSISTENT WITH THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP) WHEREAS, Spyglass Ranch LLC has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2005-06, Specific Plan No. 2005-02, and Zone Change No. 2005-07 for the project identified as the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the 259.6-acre project site is located on the north side of Camino Del Norte at its intersection with Main Street within the City of Lake Elsinore (the "Project Site"); and WHEREAS, Section 6.0 of the Western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (the "MSHCP") requires that the City of Lake Elsinore adopt consistency findings demonstrating that the proposed development is consistent with the MSHCP criteria and the MSHCP goals and objectives; and WHEREAS, action taken by the Planning Commission and City Council with regard to general plan amendment, specific plan, and zone change are discretionary actions subject to the MSHCP; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code SS 21000 et seq.: "CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R. SS 15000 et seq.), a draft environmental impact report was prepared for the project, circulated for public review for a period of 45 days and was accompanied by a Statement of Overriding Considerations; and WHEREAS, public notice of the Project has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on January 15, 2008. NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the Project's consistency with the MSHCP prior to recommending that the City Council adopt Findings of Consistency with the MSHCP. SECTION 2. That in accordance with the MSHCP, the Planning Commission makes the following MSHCP Consistency Findings: AGE.NDA \iEM NO.p ~ PAGE_ l~T~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_ PAGE 2 OF 4 1. The Project is a project under the City's MSHCP Implementing Resolution, and the City must make an MSHCP Consistency finding before approving the Project. Pursuant to the City's MSHCP Implementing Resolution, prior to approving any discretionary entitlement, the City is required to review the Project to ensure consistency with the MSHCP criteria and other "Plan Wide Requirements." The Project, as proposed, was found to be consistent with the MSHCP criteria. In addition, the Project was reviewed and found consistent with the following "Plan Wide Requirements": Protection of Species Associated with Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pool Guidelines (MSHCP S 6.1.2), Protection of Narrow Endemic Species (MSHCP S 6.1.3), Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines (MSHCP S 6.1.4), Vegetation Mapping (MSHCP S 6.3.1), Additional Survey Needs and Procedures (MSHCP S 6.3.2), Fuels Management (MSHCP S 6.4), and payment of the MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee (MSHCP Ordinance S 4.0). 2. The Project is subject to the City's lake Elsinore Acquisition Process (lEAP) and the County's Joint Project Review processes. The Project Site is within the Elsinore Area Plan, and according to MSHCP maps, was shown to be within a Criteria Cell. LEAP No. 2006-03 was processed, but it was ultimately agreed upon by City staff and the Regional Conservation Authority that a mapping error had occurred and that this Project is NOT within a Criteria Cell. As such, LEAP 2006-03 was withdrawn from the Joint Project Review process. 3. The Project is consistent with the RiparianlRiverine Areas and Vernal Pools Guidelines. Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP focuses on protection of riparian/riverine areas and vernal pool habitat types based upon their value in the conservation of a number of MSHCP covered species. All potential impacts to riparian/riverine areas will be mitigated as identified in the Determination of Biological Equivalent or Superior Preservation (DBESP). The Project Site does not have vernal pools. The Project is therefore consistent with Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP. 4. The Project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines. The Project is not located in a Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Area as mapped in Section 6.1.3 of the MSHCP. Therefore, the provisions of Section 6.1.3 are not applicable to the Project. ACifNDA ITEM NO. PAGE 13 OF~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_ PAGE 3 OF 4 5. The Project is consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures. The Project is located within the Burrowing Owl survey area as identified in Section 6.3.2 Additional Survey Needs and Procedures of the MSHCP. Surveys were conducted on the entire Project Site, and the results indicated that no Burrowing Owls occupied the Project Site. However, the Project will be required to conduct a pre- construction survey 30 days prior to the commencement of grading. As such, the Project is consistent with Section 6.3.2 of the MSHCP. 6. The Project is consistent with the UrbanlWildlands Interface Guidelines. The Project Site is not within an MSHCP Criteria Cell and does not abut any areas proposed for conservation. However, the Project has minimized potential indirect impacts using Best Management Practices and has precluded planting of highly invasive weedy species within project boundaries. As such, the Project is consistent with Section 6. 1.4 of the MSHCP. 7. The Project is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements. The Project Site is not within a MSHCP Criteria Cell and is not located within areas that require mapping of vegetation. As such, the Project is consistent with the MSHCP Section 6.3.1 Vegetation Mapping requirements. 8. The Project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines. The Fuels Management Guidelines presented in Section 6.4 of the MSHCP are intended to address brush management activities around new development within or adjacent to the MSHCP Conservation Area. The Project Site is not in a Criteria Cell and does not abut any areas proposed for conservation. As such, the Project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines. 9. The Project will be conditioned to pay the City's MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee. As a condition of approval, the Project will be required to pay the City's MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee at the time of issuance of building permits. 10. The Project is consistent with the MSHCP. For the foregoing reasons, the Project is consistent with the MSHCP. AGENDA ITEM NO. c:; PAGE~Or- lfr- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_ PAGE40F4 SECTION 3. Based upon all of the evidence presented, and the above findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore adopt findings that the Project is consistent with the MSHCP. SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of January 2008, by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission ATTEST: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development AGENDA fltM 1,0. . ~ PAGE---1-LOF 4r-- RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_ RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CERTIFY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 2007 -01 WHEREAS, Spyglass Ranch LLC has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2005-06, Specific Plan No. 2005-02, and Zone Change No. 2005-07 for the Project identified as the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elsinore (the "City") has caused an Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2006121069: the "EIR") to be prepared on the Project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Sections 21000, ef seq.: "CEQA"), the State Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (14 California Code of Regulations, Sections 15000, ef seq.: the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's procedures relating to environmental evaluation of public and private projects; and WHEREAS, the City transmitted for filing a Notice of Completion of the Draft EIR and thereafter, in accordance with the CEQA Guidelines, forwarded the Draft EIR to the State Clearinghouse for distribution to those agencies which have jurisdiction by law with respect to the Project and to other interested persons and agencies, and sought the comments of such persons and agencies; and WHEREAS, notice to all interested persons and agencies inviting comments on the Draft EIR was published in accordance with the provisions of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15082(c)(1), on January 11, 2007 the City held a duly noticed scoping meeting in order to expedite consultation regarding the scope and content of the environmental information in the Draft EIR; and WHEREAS, all actions required to be taken by applicable law related to the preparation, circulation, and review of the Draft EIR have been taken; and WHEREAS, the Draft EIR prepared for the Project was sent to the Planning Commission and the Planning Commission held a public hearing to receive public input on the adequacy of the Draft EIR on January 15, 2008. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Planning Commission has evaluated all comments, written and oral, received from persons who have reviewed the Draft EIR. AGHmA ITEM NO. S . _ PAOE~Of~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_ PAGE 2 OF 6 Section 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council that the EIR for the Project is adequate and has been completed in compliance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and local procedures adopted by the City pursuant thereto; the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Draft EIR and finds that the Draft EIR represents the independent judgment of the City. Section 3. The Planning Commission hereby makes, adopts, and incorporates herein as its "findings of fact" regarding the potential environmental impacts of the Project, the analysis and conclusions set forth in the Draft EIR (including, without limitation, the mitigation measures therein set forth); the following summarizes those conclusions: a. The Initial Study and the Draft EIR determined that impacts related to the implementation of the Project would be less than significant without mitigation for aesthetics, agricultural resources, geology/soils, hydrology/water quality, mineral resources, population/housing, public services, and recreation. b. The Draft EIR identified potentially significant adverse impacts related to the implementation of the Project, but which will be mitigated to an insignificant level by conditions imposed upon the Project. Biological resources, cultural resources, hazards and hazardous materials, land use, and noise are impacts that can be mitigated to less than a significant level. Most air quality and transportation and traffic impacts would also be mitigated to a level of less than significant through implementation of the identified mitigation measures. For those impacts that are not mitigable, see subsection (e) below. The type of impact for which mitigation was designed and the associated mitigation measures are identified in Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis of the Draft EIR, and are summarized in the Executive Summary of the Draft EIR. c. All feasible mitigation measures, which are within the jurisdiction of the City, as identified in the Draft EIR have been incorporated into the Project and represent the fullest extent to which the Project-related impacts can be reasonably avoided and/or substantially lessened. d. The Draft EIR did not identify alternatives to the Project which would reduce environmental impacts while still substantially achieving Project objectives, and as such, the proposed Project was determined to be the environmentally superior alternative. e. The Project and associated discretionary approvals will result in significant unavoidable impacts related to: emissions of ROG, NOx, PMlO, and PM2.5 during construction; emissions of ROG, NOx, and CO during operations; conflicts with the regional Air Quality Management Plan; and, queuing impacts at the 1-15/Main Street interchange during General Plan Build-out. Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, the City Council has determined that the unavoidable adverse impacts that will result from project implementation are acceptable and outweighed by specific social, economic and other benefits of the project. Therefore, a Statement of Overriding AOE.NDA ITEM NO. 5~ PAGE l" OF r-- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_ PAGE 3 OF 6 Considerations has been prepared and is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein. Section 4. A mitigation monitoring program for the Project has been prepared in accordance with Section 21081.6 of CEQA, and the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the mitigation monitoring program. Section 5. Based upon all of the evidence presented and the above findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore certify Environmental Impact Report No. 2007-01. SECTION 6. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of January 2008, by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development AGENOA ITEM 110._ ~ PAGE---1-LOF . "EXHIBIT A" STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a public agency to balance the benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve the project. The Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan has identified and discussed significant effects that may occur as a result of the Project. With the implementation of project design features, standard conditions, and/or mitigation identified for each environmental topic, most of the potentially significant impacts can be reduced to a level of less than significant, except for unavoidable significant impacts as discussed in Section III of the Findings. The City of Lake Elsinore has made a reasonable and good faith effort to eliminate or substantially mitigate the potential impacts resulting from the Specific Plan. Impacts, in these and all other cases, have been mitigated to the extent considered feasible. All significant adverse impacts are identified in the Final EIR and are addressed in the Findings, which accompany this Statement of Overriding Considerations. The Project will result in the following significant impacts that cannot be mitigated to less than significant levels: 1. Air Quality Construction Emissions: Implementation of the proposed Project would result in significant emissions of ROG, NOx, PM10, and PM2.5 during the Project's construction phase (Final EIR pp. 4.2-8 and 4.2-9). As a condition of project approval, the Project must adhere to SCAQMD Rules 403 (Fugitive Dust Control) and 1113 (VOCs) during construction-related activities. However, compliance with these rules would minimize but not eliminate construction-related impacts. Operational Emissions: Implementation of the proposed Project would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for ROG, NOx, and CO (Final EIR pp. 4.2-10 and 4.2-11). The daily operational and area source emissions cannot be reduced to less than significant levels for emissions of ROG, NOx, and CO even with implementation of the mitigation measures identified in Section III, Findings. AQMD Consistency: Implementation of the proposed Project would result in conflicts with the AQMP (Final EIR pp. 4.2-7 - 4.2-8). No feasible mitigation measures exist to minimize impacts to below a level of significance. ACENDA ITEM NO. S' C PAGE--1L.Or- L[ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_ PAGE 5 OF 6 2. Transportation and Traffic Main Street Interchange Queuing: Implementation of the proposed Project would result in heavy vehicle queuing on Main Street between Camino del Norte and the 1-15 southbound ramps during the peak hours due to the proximity of the intersections and other physical topographical constraints (Final EIR pp. 4.13-15). Even with implementation of Mitigation Measure 4.13-5, which requires that the Project contribute on a fair share basis to the funding of the Project Study Report (PSR), the impact to the 1-15/Main Street interchange would remain significant and unmitigated. Summary Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, the City Council must balance the benefits of the proposed Project against any unavoidable environmental impacts in determining whether to approve the Project. If the benefits of the proposed Project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental impacts, those impacts may be considered "acceptable." Staff has determined that the unavoidable adverse impacts that will result from proposed Project implementation are acceptable and outweighed by specific social, economic and other benefits of the Project. In making this determination, the factors and public benefits specified below were considered. Staff further finds that except for the proposed Project, all other alternatives set forth in the EIR are infeasible because they would prohibit the realization of Project objectives and/or of specific economic, social, and other benefits that staff finds outweigh any environmental benefits of the alternatives. Having reduced the adverse significant environmental effects of the proposed Project to the extent feasible by adopting the mitigation measures; having considered the entire administrative record on the Project; and having weighed the benefits of the Project against its unavoidable adverse impacts after mitigation, the staff has determined that the following social, economic, and environmental benefits of the Project outweigh the potential unavoidable adverse impacts and render those potential adverse environmental impacts acceptable based upon the following overriding considerations: Social Benefits of the Project . The Project will provide housing for the City of Lake Elsinore and Inland Empire's growing population. . The Project will provide a variety of housing opportunities, ranging in size and affordability to meet the housing needs of the region. . The Project will provide neighborhood park space and open space. ACENDA iTEM f'(O. S- PAGE JO OF~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_ PAGE60F6 Economic Benefits of the Project . Construction of the proposed Project will generate its fair share of property tax revenues to the City of Lake Elsinore annually. Construction of the Project will also generate utility user tax revenues to the City. . If the commercial alternative is adopted, the Project will generate sales tax revenue for the City of Lake Elsinore. . The Project will be built out over several phases, providing steady construction jobs over the construction period. . The Project will contribute fees toward traffic improvements, school facilities, park facilities, fire services, and police services. . The Project includes substantial upgrades to regional traffic circulation and public utilities (sewer, water, and reclaimed water) around the Project site. Specifically, the Project includes construction of three water tanks to serve its residents and adjacent project sites. Spyglass LLC's share of these infrastructure costs alone would exceed 15 million dollars and do not include the Project's on-site infrastructure costs. Staff has determined that the foregoing benefits provided to the public, through approval and implementation of the proposed Project, outweigh the identified significant adverse environmental impacts of the Project which cannot be mitigated. Staff finds that each of the proposed Project benefits outweighs the unavoidable adverse environmental effects identified in the EIR and, therefore, finds those impacts to be acceptable. AGENDA ITEM NO. '5 PACE d-' Of 4.\ RESOLUTION NO. 2008- RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2005- 06 WHEREAS, Spyglass Ranch LLC has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2005-06 for the project identified as the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the 259.6-acre project site is located on the north side of Camino Del Norte at its intersection with Main Street within the City of Lake Elsinore (the "Project Site"); and WHEREAS, on November 27, 1990, the City of Lake Elsinore City Council approved the current version of the Lake Elsinore General Plan; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65300 requires each city prepare and adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the City and any land outside the City's boundaries which in the City's judgment bear relation to the City's planning; and WHEREAS, the 1990 Lake Elsinore General Plan "Land Use Map" Figure designates the Project Site as Future Specific Plan (3.0 du/ac maximum density), Freeway Business and Neighborhood Commercial; and WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to change the General Plan land use designation to Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan and to increase the maximum density from 3.0 du/ac to 4.0 du/ac; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 17.80.010 of the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council for approval of General Plan Amendments; and WHEREAS, public notice of the Project has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on January 15, 2008. NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Prior to making a recommendation to the City Council, the Planning Commission has reviewed and analyzed the General Plan Amendment pursuant to the State Planning and Zoning Laws (Cal. Gov. Code SS 65000 et seq.) to determine the appropriateness of changing the general plan land use designation from Future Specific j:,CENDA I"lE',l No.5 PACE ;). J- OF ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_ PAGE 2 OF 3 Plan, Freeway Business and Neighborhood Commercial to Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan. SECTION 2. In accordance with the State Planning and Zoning Laws and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code ("LEMC"), the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2005-06: 1. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not be: a) detrimental to the health, safety, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment or within the City, or b) injurious to the property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City. The proposed General Plan Amendment will change the Project Site's General Plan land use designation to Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan and increase the maximum density to 4.0 dulac. Currently, the Project Site has a General Plan land use designation of Future Specific Plan (maximum density of 3.0 dulac) Freeway Business and Neighborhood Commercial. The proposed land uses are similar to existing and approved uses on all sides of the Project perimeter and roadway network. Impacts will be mitigated and therefore will not result in any significant impacts in surrounding neighborhood(s) except in the areas of construction-related air quality impacts. The significant air quality impacts are only construction related and will not have long term effects. Mitigation measures are proposed to lessen short-term construction related air quality impacts to less than significant levels. Overall, the Project will not be detrimental to the health, safety, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the Project. Furthermore, because the Project is a residential community, the Project will not be injurious to the property or improvements in the neighborhood surrounding the Project Site or within the City. 2. The proposed General Plan Amendment will permit reasonable development of the area consistent with its constraints and will make the area more compatible with adjacent properties. The proposed General Plan land use designation of Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan will allow for a variety of land uses on the project site including residential, open space and parks to enhance the appearance and livability of the community through encouragement of creative approaches to the use of land and the design of facilities; and, to promote and create public and private open space as an integral part of land development design. To this end, the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan will include residential, open space and park uses consistent with the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan General Plan designation and shall be compatible with the surrounding residential, open space and park land uses surrounding the Project Site. Moreover, the Project Site shall be adequate in shape, size and design to accommodate the proposed increase in maximum density to 4.0 dulac. FlC , ,,'II. "1\ 5 r'~~J. :> 3 O~ ltr- P;:\':5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_ PAGE 3 OF 3 3. The proposed General Plan Amendment would establish a land use designation and usage more in character with the subject property's location, access, and constraints. Changing the land use designation for the Project Site to Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan and, allowing for a higher maximum residential density will serve to enhance the existing character and natural topography of the site. Residential clustering will result in residential products that compliment the topography while maintaining natural open space. Finally, the Project will use existing connection points of access for the future residential community. 4. In accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), impacts have been reduced to a level of less than significant, or in the case where impacts remain significant; a statement of overriding considerations must be adopted to justify the merits of project implementation. Environmental Impact Report No. 2007-01 was adequately prepared and analyzed the environmental effects of the General Plan Amendment in accordance with the CEQA. SECTION 3. Based upon all of the evidence presented, and the above findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore approve General Plan Amendment No. 2005-06. SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of January 2008, by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission ATTEST: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development AGENDA ITEM NO. 5" PACE ~ '1 OF LfJ RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_ RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005- 02 WHEREAS, Spyglass Ranch LLC has filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of Specific Plan No. 2005-02 for the project identified as the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the 259.6 acre project site is located on the east side of Camino Del Norte at its intersection with Main Street within the City of Lake Elsinore (the "Project Site"); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council for Specific Plans; and WHEREAS, public notice of the Project has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on January 15, 2008. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Prior to making a recommendation to the City Council, the Planning Commission has reviewed and analyzed Specific Plan No. 2005-02 pursuant to the Planning and Zoning Laws (Cal. Gov. Code 65000 et. seq.) and Chapter 17.99 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code ("LEMC"). SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the approval of Specific Plan No. 2005-02: 1. The location and design of the proposed development shall be consistent with the goals and policies of the City's General Plan and with any other applicable plan or policies adopted by the City. The Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan meets the City's Specific Plan criteria for content and required implementation of the General Plan established by Section 65450 et. seq. of the California Government Code and Section 17.99 of the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. Accordingly, the proposed Specific Plan is in concurrence with the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the site is located. 2. The proposed location shall allow the development to be well integrated with or adequately buffered from its surroundings, whichever may be the case. The proposed project is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments in AOENOA ITEM ~lO. k PACE .,;>.-r- OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2008-_ PAGE 2 OF 3 that the project will construct both single-family detached and multiple-family residential units in accordance with appropriate development and design standards contained in the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan. The project creates interest and varying vistas as a person moves along any project street. The project also compliments the quality of existing neighborhood development and will continue to provide visually-pleasing design and architecture within the immediate area. 3. All vehicular traffic generated by the development, either in phased increments or at full build-out, is to be accommodated safely and without causing undue congestion upon adjoining streets. The proposed Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan has been reviewed as to its relation to the width and type of pavement needed to carry the type and quantify of traffic generated, in that the City has adequately evaluated the potential impacts associated with the proposed uses prior to its approval and has conditioned the project to be served by roads of adequate capacity and design standards to provide reasonable access by car, truck, transit and bicycle. 4. The Final Specific Plan shall identify a methodology(s) to allow land uses to be adequately serviced by existing or proposed public facilities and services. In appropriate circumstances, and as provided elsewhere by Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the City may require that suitable areas be reserved for schools, parks and pedestrian ways; or public open spaces shall be dedicated or reserved by private covenant for the common use of residents, establishments or operations in the development. The Final Specific Plan properly identifies methodologies to allow land uses to be adequately serviced by existing or proposed public facilities and services. The Final Specific Plan identifies necessary streets and circulation to support the proposed land use allocations, as well as all necessary wet and dry utilities for proper and adequate infrastructure services. In addition, the Specific Plan identifies two park sites for common use of the residents, and approximately 86 acres of open space for dedication and preservation. 5. The overall design of the Specific Plan will produce an attractive, efficient and stable development. The proposed Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan has been designed in consideration of the size and shape of the property, thereby strengthening and enhancing the immediate residential area. The project, as proposed, will compliment the quality of existing development and will create a visually pleasing, non-detractive relationship between the proposed and existing project, in that the proposed use has been reviewed to ensure adequate provision of screening from the public rights-or-way or adjacent properties. The Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan will not be detrimental to the health, safety, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working near the project area or within the City, or will it be injurious to property or improvements in the project area or within the City. In addition, staff has substantiated that all :If AGENDA ITEM rlO. PAGE )-b OF r PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2008-_ PAGE 3 OF 3 applicable City Departments and Agencies have been afforded the opportunity for a through review of the Specific Plan and have incorporated aI/ applicable comments and/or conditions related to instal/ation and maintenance of landscaping, street dedications, regulations of points of vehicular ingress and egress and control of potential nuisances, so as to eliminate any negative impacts to the general health, safety, comfort, or welfare of the surrounding neighborhood or the City. 6. In accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), impacts have been reduced to a level of less than significant, or in the case where impacts remain significant; a statement of overriding considerations must be adopted to justify the merits of project implementation. Environmental Impact Report No. 2007-01 was adequately prepared and analyzed the environmental effects of the Specific Plan in accordance with the CEQA. SECTION 3. Based upon all of the evidence presented, and the above findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore approve Specific Plan No. 2005-02. SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of January 2008, by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission ATTEST: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development AQENDA ITEM NO. 5" PACE D-, OF 3..C. RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_ RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. 2005-07 WHEREAS, Spyglass Ranch LLC has submitted an application with the City of Lake Elsinore to change the City's official zoning map (the "Zone Change") from Single- Family Residential and General Commercial to Specific Plan for Assessors Parcel Numbers 377-250-011,377-350-004,007,008,010,014,015,016, 017, 377-260-004 thru 006 (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the proposed Zone Change conforms to and is consistent with the proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2005-06 that covers the property; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council regarding changes to the official zoning map; and WHEREAS, public notice of said application has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on January 8, 2008. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Zone Change prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve Zone Change No. 2005-07. SECTION 2. That in accordance with the State Planning and Zoning Law, and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the approval of Zone Change No. 2005-07: 1. The proposed zone change will not be: a) detrimental to the health, safety, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed Zone Change or within the City, or b) injurious to the property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City. The proposed Zone Change has been analyzed relative to its potential to have detrimental effects. It has been determined that the health, safety and welfare of surrounding residents may be improved as a result of future improvements to infrastructure such as water, sewer, paving and drainage facilities brought to the site as a requirement of any future development. The proposed "Spyglass Ranch SP" zoning will ensure that development standards and design guidelines of the specific plan will be consistently applied throughout the site. ACENDA iTEM NO. ~ PAGE .)-8 OF S'- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_ PAGE 2 OF 2 2. The proposed Zone Change will permit reasonable development of the area consistent with its constraints and will make the area more compatible with adjacent properties. The proposed zoning of Spyglass Ranch SP will allow for the continuation of the residential neighborhoods that already exist or are planned in the vicinity of the project site. 3. The proposed Zone Change would establish a land use density and usage more in character with the subject property's location, access, and constraints. The Zone Change proposes a boundary adjustment to allow for an integration of the Property with the adjacent existing or planned residential developments. 4. In accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), impacts have been reduced to a level of less than significant, or in the case where impacts remain significant; a statement of overriding considerations must be adopted to justify the merits of project implementation. Environmental Impact Report No. 2007-01 was adequately prepared and analyzed the environmental effects of the Zone Change in accordance with the CEQA. SECTION 3. Based upon all of the evidence presented, and the above findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore approve Zone Change No. 2005-07. SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of January 2008, by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission ATTEST: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development AGENDA ITEM NO. -:?' PAGE~q OF Jr- PLANNING DEPARTMENT General Conditions 1. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, and Agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning the MSHCP Consistency Findings, General Plan Amendment No. 2005-06, Zone Change No. 2005-07, and Specific Plan No. 2005-02 for the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan project attached hereto. 2. The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department two (2) cashier's check or money orders to the City within 48 hours of project approval for the filing of the Notice of Determination. The first check shall be in the amount of $2,606.75 and made payable to California department of Fish and Game. The second check shall be in the amount of $64.00 and made payable to the Riverside County Clerk. 3. The Applicant shall comply with all applicable mitigation measures listed in the Mitigation Monitoring Program associated with the Environmental Impact Report for the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan. 4. The applicant shall comply with any/all requirements of the Lake Elsinore Unified School District. 5. The applicant shall comply with any/all requirements of the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. 6. The applicant shall comply with any/all requirements of the Department of the Army Los Angeles District Corps of Engineers. 7. Any modification (Le. changes to residential density, development standards, housing product location, etc.) to the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan will require a Specific Plan Amendment approved by the City of Lake Elsinore City Council. 8. The applicant shall be in full compliance with Caltrans requirements prior to recordation of the first tract/parcel map within the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan. AOENDA ITEM NO. 5 PAOE 30 OF~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2005-06, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2005-02, AND SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005-02 "SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN" PAGE 2 OF 14 Zone Change No. 2005-07 9. Future development shall comply with those standards and guidelines contained within the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan. Specific Plan No. 2005-02 10. All future development shall comply with those standards and guidelines contained in the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan. 11. Those issues, standards, guidelines, etc, not addressed in the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan will revert to the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and/or Zoning Code in effect at the time future development within the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan are proposed. 12. The applicant shall provide all project-related on-site and off-site improvements as described in the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan document. 13. The Draft Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan document shall be revised to incorporate the following modifications and corrections and all changes required by the Planning Commission and/or City Council: a. The 14-foot wide medians shown on page 3-37 along both Camino Del Norte and Elsinore Hills Drive (Road) shall be revised to be fully landscaped and irrigated raised medians subject to the review and approval of the City's Landscape Architect consultant and Engineering Department. b. Figure IV-39 shall be revised to more clearly denote the specific location of all masonry walls both within and on the perimeter of the specific plan boundary. c. The text discussion on Page 4-72 for project walls, pilaster theme walls and interior privacy walls shall be revised to match the design details shown on Figure IV-40. In addition, the text and figures shall be modified to indicate that all streetscape walls along major roadways shall be constructed as green walls using precision block, vines and necessary irrigation. Stone faced pilasters with pre-cast concrete caps shall be provided seventy-five feet on center. In addition, no plain precision block walls shall be utilized along any streets visible from the public within the development. ACENDA ITEM NO. 5 PAce-3..L-oF liS-- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2005-06, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2005-02, AND SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005-02 "SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN" PAGE 3 OF 14 d. The text discussion on page 4-71 and Figure IV-35 shall be revised to denote the use of stone faced pilasters with a pre-cast concrete cap to be located every one-hundred feet on center along interior block privacy walls which abut private roads within the development. e. The text shall be revised to include a detailed discussion regarding maintenance responsibilities for streetscapes, roads, maintained slopes, and parks throughout the development. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be added as a figure showing specific maintenance responsibility areas within the development. f. Table V-1 shall be revised to require a minimum of one (1) guest parking space per three (3) units. In addition, some guest parking shall be provided for the proposed courtyard home products. The specific number of parking spaces shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development or designee. 14. A Final Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan document shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Director or designee prior to the submittal of any design review, tentative parcel or tract map application. No permit shall be issued until the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan document and any required revisions are administratively approved by the Community Development Director or designee. 15. Future development shall comply with those standards and guidelines contained in the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan document. 16. Those issues, standards, guidelines, etc. not addressed in the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan will revert to the City Municipal Code and/or Zoning Code in effect at the time future projects are proposed. 17. The applicant shall participate and annex into the City of Lake Elsinore Citywide Landscaping and Street Lighting District, as appropriate. 18. A detailed noise mitigation analysis shall be performed, at the final map stage (for individual planning areas) for all future sensitive noise uses potentially exposed to noise levels in excess of 50dB CNEL to verify that planned noise protection will meet City of Lake Elsinore standards. 19. The applicant shall provide all project-related on-site and off-site improvements as described in these Conditions of Approval or the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan document. AGENDA ITEM NO.__5" PACE 3~_~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2005-06, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2005-02, AND SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005-02 "SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN" PAGE 4 OF 14 20. Prior to approval of a design review or tentative map for individual planning areas, the developer and City staff will review plans for multi-family housing areas, commercial uses, and parks for the provision of appropriate, necessary and adequate pedestrian and bicycle facilities. 21. The developer or the developer's successor in-interest shall be responsible for maintaining the undeveloped portion of the site including weed abatement and litter removal. 22. All streetscape improvements including landscaping and irrigation shall be fully constructed along the entire length of the proposed project along Camino Del Norte and Elsinore Hills Drive prior to issuance of the first building permit within Phase 1 of project development as identified on the approved landscape plans. ENGINEERING DIVISION GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 23. A grading plan signed and stamped by a Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall be required if the grading exceeds 50 cubic yards or the existing flow pattern is substantially modified as determined by the City Engineer. If the grading is less than 50 cubic yards and a grading plan is not required, a grading permit shall still be obtained so that a cursory drainage and flow pattern inspection can be conducted before grading begins. 24. Prior to commencement of grading operations, the applicant is to provide to the City a map of all proposed haul routes to be used for movement of export material. All such routes shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 25. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained prior to any work on City and/or State right-of-way. 26. Any grading that affects "waters of the United States", wetlands or jurisdictional streambeds, shall require approval and necessary permits from respective Federal and/or State agencies. 27. All arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. All overhead utilities shall be under grounded. ACENDA ITEM NO. ~ PACE ~ 3~~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2005-06, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2005-02, AND SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005-02 "SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN" PAGE 5 OF 14 28. All underground water rights shall be dedicated to the City pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.52.030 (LEMC), and consistent with the City's agreement with the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. 29. The applicant shall install permanent bench marks per Riverside County Standards and at locations to be determined by City Engineer. 30. The applicant shall coordinate with Riverside County Transit Authority for location and installation of bus transit facilities. 31. The applicant shall pay all development fees, including but not all inclusive: TUMF, MSHCP, TIF, and Area Drainage Fees. 32. 10 year storm runoff shall be contained within the curb and the 100 year storm runoff shall be contained within the street right-of-way. When either of these criteria is exceeded, drainage facilities shall be provided. 33. All drainage facilities in this project shall be constructed to Riverside County Flood Control District Standards. 34. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 l'2" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of public works improvements will be scheduled and approved. 35. All slopes and landscaping within public right-of-way shall be maintained by the property owner or property owner's association. 36. All open space and slopes except for public parks and schools and flood control district facilities, outside the public right-of-way shall be owned and maintained by property owner or property owner's association. 37. In accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal & recycling, the applicant shall be required to contract with CR&R Incorporated for removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of construction. 38. A drainage study shall be provided. The study shall identify the following: identify storm water runoff from and upstream of the site; show existing and proposed off-site and onsite drainage facilities; and include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of the facilities. The drainage system shall be AGEND;'~ iTEr;; NO. S PACE_~OF '-f~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2005-06, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2005-02, AND SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005-02 "SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN" PAGE 6 OF 14 designed to ensure that runoff from a 10-yr storm of 6 hours or 24 hours duration under developed condition is equal or less than the runoff under existing conditions of the same storm frequency. Both 6 hour and 24hour storm duration shall be analyzed to determine the detention basin capacities necessary to accomplish the desired results. 39. All natural drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer. All off-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility, accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance, or conveyed to a drainage easement. 40. All roof drains shall not be allowed to outlet directly through coring in the street curb. All roofs should drain to a landscaped area. 41. The applicant shall comply with all NPDES requirements in effect; including the submittal of an Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) as required per the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. The requirements of WQMP may affect the overall layout of the project. Therefore, WQMP submittal should be during the initial process of the project. 42. Education guidelines and Best Management Practices (BMP) shall be provided to residents of the development in the use of herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers as well as other environmental awareness education materials on good housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of storm water quality and met the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. (Required for lot of one acre or more) 43. The applicant shall provide BMP's that will reduce storm water pollutants from parking areas and driveway aisles. (Required for lot of one acre or more) 44. The City of Lake Elsinore has adopted ordinances for storm water management and discharge control. In accordance with state and federal law, these local storm water ordinances prohibit the discharge of waste into storm drain system or local surface waters. This includes non-storm water discharges containing oil, grease, detergents, trash, or other waste remains. Brochures of "Storm water Pollution, What You Should Know" describing preventing measures are available at City Hall. "r.E"''''1\ '!T;::cP ~JO C; - I"'\"~ ~\lv~~.\ OJ ...ii'1 I'll . PJ-VJE :5 s: _Of 4r- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2005-06, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2005-02, AND SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005-02 "SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN" PAGE 7 OF 14 PLEASE NOTE: The discharge of pollutants into street, gutters, storm drain system, or waterways -without Regional Water Quality Control Board permit or waver - is strictly prohibited by local ordinances and state and federal law. 45. The applicant shall construct full street improvements and dedicate additional right-of-way on Camino Del Norte, along the project frontage, such that the ultimate right-of-way width conforms to the General Plan street right-of-way cross-sections. The cross section of roadway improvements with a raised median, parkway, street lights, and multiuse trail shall be consistent with other proposed development on Camino Del Norte, as recommended by the City. The road improvements for Camino Del Norte shall be consistent with the approved Traffic Study dated October 11, 2996 and the General Plan Circulation Plan. 46. The applicant shall construct full street improvements and dedicate the right- of-way on Elsinore Hills Road per General Plan street right-of-way requirements. The cross section of roadway improvements with a raised median, parkway, street lights, and multiuse trail shall be consistent with other proposed development on Camino Del Norte, as required by the General Plan. 47. The applicant shall be responsible for acquiring right-of-ways in which the applicant or the City has no legal title or interest. If the applicant is unsuccessful in acquiring such right-of-ways, the City could assist the applicant in the Eminent Domain process at the applicant's cost. 48. All streets shall be constructed per Riverside County Standards. Any deviation from Riverside County standards shall be approved by the City Engineer. 49. The applicant shall implement mitigation measures identified in the approved Traffic Study. 50. The applicant shall construct the traffic signals at Main/115 SB and NB on/off ramps, Camino del Norte/Main Street, Camino del Norte/Elsinore Hills Road, Camino del Norte/La Strada. 51. The applicant shall participate in "fair share" payment of off-site improvements as described in Table 10 of the approved Traffic Study dated October 11, 2006. ACENDA ITEr,,~ NO. S- PACE 3" OF~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2005-06, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2005-02, AND SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005-02 "SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN" PAGE 8 OF 14 52. The applicant shall submit street improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and the plans shall include curb and gutter, sidewalk, ac pavement, street lighting, median, trail, and drainage improvements. 53. The applicant shall provide signing and striping plans for the required improvements of this project. 54. A portion of the required improvements for this development may be covered under the Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) or Area Drainage Fee program. Any request for reimbursement or credits shall be approved by the City Engineer and based on allowable costs in the fee program and availability of funds. 55. This project shall provide trail and roadway connections to adjacent developments unless otherwise deemed unfeasible as concurred by the city. 56. The development of each Planning Area or Phase shall be subject for specific review and conditions of approval. Note that with a completion of a Project Study Report of the 115/Main Street Interchange Upgrade, additional right of way could be required along Camino Del Norte. 57. The applicant shall submit a WQMP of the project for City's review and approval. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT 58. The applicant shall submit grading plans with appropriate security, Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer for approval by the City Engineer. Developer shall mitigate any flooding and/or erosion downstream caused by development of the site and/or diversion of drainage. 59. The grading plan shall show that no structures, landscaping, or equipment are located near the project entrances that could reduce sight distance. 60. All construction Project access and hauling route shall be submitted and approved by the City Engineer, 61. The applicant shall provide soils, geology and seismic report including street design recommendations. The applicant shall provide a final soils report showing compliance with recommendations. r...GENDl~ ITEM NO.~. PACE '3--, OF l (- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2005-06, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2005-02, AND SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005-02 "SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN" PAGE 9 OF 14 62. An Alquist-Priolo study shall be performed on the site to identify any hidden earthquake faults and/or liquefaction zones present on-site unless previously submitted. 63. The applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site easements and/or permits for off-site grading, improvements, and/or drainage acceptance from the adjacent property owners, prior to grading permit issuance. 64. The applicant shall provide a copy of an encroachment permit or any approval documents from the Riverside County Flood Control District and/or Caltrans for encroaching, grading, or discharging into County flood control facilities or Caltrans right of way. 65. All grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer and he shall certify all slopes steeper than 2-to-1 for stability and proper erosion control. All manufactured slopes greater than 30 ft. in height shall be contoured. 66. The applicant to provide erosion control measures as part of their grading plan. The applicant shall contribute to protection of storm water quality and meet the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. 67. The applicant shall provide the city with proof of his having filed a Notice of Intent with the Regional Water Quality Control Board for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program with a storm water pollution prevention plan prior to issuance of grading permits. The applicant shall provide a SWPPP for post construction, which describes BMP's that will be implemented for the development including maintenance responsibilities. The applicant shall submit the SWPPP to the City for review and approval. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT 68. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of this development and as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), prior to building permit issuance. 69. All street improvement plans, traffic signal plans, signing and striping plans shall be completed and approved by the City Engineer. 70. The applicant shall submit a 'Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer AGENDA iTEM NO. c; PACE 39 OF~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2005-06, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2005-02, AND SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005-02 "SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN" PAGE 10 OF 14 arrangements have been made for this project and specify the technical data for the water service at the location, such as water pressure and volume etc. The applicant shall submit this letter, prior to applying for a building permit. 71. The applicant shall show that no structures, landscaping, or equipment are located near the project entrance that minimizes sight distance standards. 72. The applicant shall pay all Capital Improvement TIF and Master Drainage Fees and Plan Check fees (LEMC 16.34). PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICA TE OF OCCUPANCY 73. The applicant shall pay all fees and meet requirements of an encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Division for construction of onsite and/or off- site public works improvements (LEMC12.08, Res.83-78). All fees and requirements for an encroachment permit shall be fulfilled before issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 74. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 1/2" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of off-site improvements will be scheduled and approved. 75. The traffic signals at the following locations shall be completed prior to first issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. The traffic signal locations are Camino Del Norte/Elsinore Hills Road, at Camino del Norte/Main Street, at Main StreeUI15 NB on-off ramps, at Main StreeUI15 SB on-off ramps and at Camino Del Norte/La Strada. The developer may request the completion of some signals at a higher occupancy threshold as determined by a specific technical study and approved by the City Engineer. 76. All signing and striping and traffic control devices for the required improvements of this development shall be installed. 77. All public improvements shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans or as condition of this development to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 78. The fair share cost of future improvements as a condition of this development shall be paid. I~CEl~DA iTEM NO. 5 PAGE 39 OF. Lf5 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2005-06, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2005-02, AND SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005-02 "SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN" PAGE 11 OF 14 79. All water and sewer improvements shall be completed in accordance with the applicable Water District requirements. 80. Proof of acceptance of maintenance responsibility of slopes, open spaces, landscape areas, and drainage facilities shall be provided. 81. Railroad Benefit District Cost and TUMF fees shall be paid. The TUMF fees shall be the effective rate at the time when the Certificate of Occupancy is obtained. 82. As-built plans shall be completed and signed by the City Engineer. 83. All improvement plans shall be digitized. The applicant shall submit tapes and/or discs which are compatible with City's ARC Info/GIS or developer to pay $1,000 per sheet for City digitizing the plans. ADMINISTRA TIVE SERVICES DEPARMENT 85. On Table VI-3 (Public Financing Summary) of the Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan; the applicant shall submit a revised Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan, which indicates that the check mark under Community Facilities District or Assessment District next to Dry Utilities is removed from the document. Dry utilities are not fundable through a CFD or AD in the City of Lake Elsinore because they are not publicly owned. The revised Spyglass Ranch Specific Plan shall be resubmitted to the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. Annex into CFD 2003-1 86. Prior to approval of the Final Map, Parcel Map, Site Development Plan, or Special Use Permit (as applicable), the applicant shall annex into Communities Facilities District to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on public safety operations and maintenance issues in the City of Lake Elsinore. Annex into LLMD No.1 87. Prior to approval of the Final Map, Parcel Map, Site Development Plan, or Special Use Permit (as applicable), the applicant shall annex into Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District No.1 to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on public right-of-way landscaped areas to be maintained by the City and for street lights in the public right-of-way for which the City will pay for electricity and a maintenance fee to Southern California Edison. A~'-~!D'" "r'm" , 1\10 c::; . Vl:iulj..\ l i::f,'1 . PAGf~OF Y. 5 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2005-06, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2005-02, AND SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005-02 "SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN" PAGE 12 OF 14 Fire Station Impact Fee and Other Impact Fees 88. Upon completion of the Fire Station Impact Study and other impact fee studies; the Developer shall pay the impact fee. CFD for Park, Parkway, Open Space and Storm Drain Maintenance 89. Prior to approval of the Final Map, Parcel Map, Site Development Plan, or Special Use Permit (as applicable), the applicant shall annex into the Mello- Roos Community Facilities District to fund the on-going operation and maintenance of the new parks, parkways, open space, and public storm drains constructed within the development and federal NPDES requirements to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project. RECREA TION AND PARKS DEPARTMENT 90. The City is to maintain all landscape improvements in the public right-of-way for Camino Del Norte and Elsinore Hills Drive including all primary (pages 4- 28) and neighborhood entry (pages 4-29) monumentation signage and areas. 91. The Home Owner's Association is to maintain all internal street landscaping including all natural and manufactured slopes. 92. The Home Owner's Association is to maintain all open space areas. 93. The Home Owner's Association is to maintain all exterior walls including those facing main arterials (i.e. Camino Del Norte, Elsinore Hills Drive, Etc.) 94. The Home Owner's Association is to maintain all flow control/drainage facilities and structures. 95. The Home Owner's Association is to maintain all private parks (PA 3, PA 13) and common areas. 96. The applicant shall construct a minimum 2.5 acre private park to be maintained by the HOA in the Northwest (PA 1 and PA 2) area of the development. 97. The applicant shall convey the 3.4 acre park site identified in Planning Area 7 to the City, and utilize park fees generated by the development for the construction of the park site to include the remodel/rehabilitation of the historical residence as part of the park. J~GENDA !TEf,l NO. c:; P,L\tGE~Ol: Yr:; CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2005-06, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2005-02, AND SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005-02 "SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN" PAGE 13 OF 14 98. The applicant shall utilize the City's Landscape Architect for the design and implementation plan for the community park in PA 7. 99. The applicant shall provide a trails diagram outlining proposed trail locations and utility easement locations as part of the development of the trail system. 100. The applicant shall comply with all NPDES storm water requirements. 101. The applicant shall provide the City with an inventory of all street signs, street markings, street trees, fire hydrants, etc. and total square-footage of all streets in a digital format acceptable to the City. 102. The applicant shall meet all City curb, gutter, and sidewalk requirements. 103. The applicant shall comply with all City ordinances and requirements regarding construction debris and removal and recycling, as per Section 8.32 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. 104. The City shall review and approve all park development and implementation plans. 105. The City's Landscape Architect is to review all landscape and/or irrigation plans. 106. The applicant shall pay park fees based on the Quimby Act requirement. City will provide Park Capital Improvement Fund Fees for future calculation. 107. The applicant shall be required to participate in the City-wide LLMD. 108. The applicant shall be required to participate/annex into the LLMD District 1 for all exterior landscaping to be maintained by the City. 109. The applicant shall be required to participate in the "Public Facility" program. 110. The applicant shall utilize CFD funds for the construction of all parks in the development. 111. The applicant shall construct the community park prior to the issuance of the 1 oath Certificate of Occupancy. ,.'''....,.."''''.'\'~'',.''''''O~. Avb\.!.iH i I /;;;Ull\.' . PAGE,. Lfd.- ... OF .. d. ' CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2005-06, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2005-02, AND SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2005-02 "SPYGLASS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN" PAGE 14 OF 14 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 112. The Applicant shall comply with all of the attached Riverside County Fire Department conditions and standards. RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT 113. The Applicant shall comply with any/all requirements of the Riverside County Sheriff Department. nE?1 NO. c::; PAGE~Or- Y Sr John R. Hawkins Fire Chief Proudly serving the unincorporated areas of Riverside County and the Cities of: Banning .:. Beaumont .:. Calimesa .:. Canyon Lake .:. Coachella .:. Desert Hot Springs .:. Indian Wells .:. Indio .:. Lake Elsinore .:. La Quinta .:. Moreno Valley .:. Palm Desert .:. Perris .:. Rancho Mirage .:. San Jacinto .:. Temecula Board of Supervisors Bob Buster, District 1 John Tavaglione, District 2 Jeff Stone, District 3 Roy Wilson, District 4 Marion Ashley, District 5 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT In cooperation with the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection 210 West San Jacinto Avenue . Perris, California 92570 . (951) 940-6900 · Fax (951) 940-6910 September 5, 2007 Erik Lunde/Spyglass Ranch, LLC 2751 W. Coast Highway, Suite 210 Newport Beach, CA 92663 Re: Spyglass Ranch SP 2005-02; GP 2005-06; ZC 2005-07 Screen check # 3 With respect to the referenced project (EIR), the Riverside County Fire Department offers the following: The proposed project(s) will add to the cumulative adverse affect on the Fire Department's ability to maintain the current level of service. These impacts include fire and medical emergencies as well as public service calls, all due to the increased presence of people and structures. Based on the adopted Riverside County Fire Protection Master Plan, one new fire station and/or appropriate fire company is recommended 1 for every 8-20 new dwelling units, per acre. Up to (1) new fire station/company MAY be needed to meet anticipated service demands and response time criteria. Mitigation measures, as defined by the City of Lake Elsinore, should be considered in order to help reduce these impacts to a level below significant. Examples of mitigation measures might include: . Developer participation in land acquisition and fire facility construction; . Equipment upgrade and/or purchase; . Participation in a fire mitigation fee program which would allow one-time capitol improvements such as land and equipment purchases, and construction development. . Participation in the cost of adding additional personnel. Costs necessary to maintain the increased level of service may be at least partially offset by taxes acquired by the new construction; however additional funding sources may have to be identified to cover any shortfalls. The 3 nearest Fire stations that would respond to any incident are: RCO Station #10, Elsinore. 410 W. Graham Ave., Lake Elsinore RCO Station #94, Canyon Hills. 21775 Railroad Canyon Rd. lake Elsinore. RCO Station #85, McVicker Park. 29405 Grand Ave., Lake Elsinore.. All the above mentioned RCO Fire stations are staffed full-time, 24 hoursl7 days a week, with a minimum 3 person crew operating "Type-I" structural fire fighting apparatus. Jl.GBWA ITEM NO. c::::; PACE--Y-~OF~ The first unit should arrive within 3-5 minutes after dispatch, the second within 5-10 minutes and the third between 8-12 minutes. These times are approximate. Current minimum staffing levels of 3 persons per responding unit presently meet existing demands. As with any additional construction within a response area, a "cumulative" increase in requests for service will add to the Fire Department's ability to provide adequate service. This project is within the "Very High Fire Severity Zone" of Riverside County as shown on a map on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. Project will need to provide a fuel modification plan prepared by an approved Fire Protection Engineer. The plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department before any permits are issued. Fire flow requirements within commercial projects are based on square footage and type of construction of the structures. The minimum fire flow for any commercial structure is 1500 gallons per minute, at a residual operating pressure of20-psi, and can rise to 8000 gallons per minute, (per Table A-111 of the California Fire Code) . Any water system shall be designed in accordance with the appropriate section of Riverside County Ordinance 460 and/or 787.2, subject to the review and approval by the Riverside County Fire Department. Primary and secondary access points were not shown on the example, although it appears accesses) can be provided from existing Main Street. Fire will need to review any proposed access/road circulation plan pertaining to this proj ect. Jason Neuman, Assistant Fire Marshal Planning and Engineering Section Riverside County Fire Department (951) 955-4777 AOEflOA ITEM NO. ~ PACE LIs OF ~