Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/05/2008 PC Reports CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MICHAEL O'NEAL, CHAIRMAN JOHN GONZALES, VICE CHAIRMAN JIMMY FLORES, COMMISSIONER AXEL ZANELLI, COMMISSIONER PHIL MENDOZA, COMMISSIONER ROLFE PREISENDANZ,DIR. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WWW.LAK6ELSINORE.ORG (951) 674-3124 PHONE (951) 674-2392 FAX LAKE ELSINORE CULTURAL CENTER 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 ******************************************************************* TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 2008 6:00 P.M. The City of Lake Elsinore appreciates your attendance. Citizens' interest provides the Planning Commission with valuable information regarding issues of the community. Meetings are held on the 1st and 3rd Tuesday of every month. If you are attending this Planning Commission meeting, please park in the Parking Lot across the street from the Cultural Center. This will assist us in limiting the impact of meetings on the Downtown Business District. Thank you for your cooperation. The agenda is posted 72 hours prior to each meeting outside of City Hall and is available at each meeting. The agenda and related reports are also available in the Community Development Department on the Friday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should contact the Community Development Department at (951) 674-3124, ext. 289, at least 48 hours before the meeting to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON AGENDIZED ITEMS - 3 MINUTES (Please read & complete a Speaker's Form at the podium, prior to the start of the Planning Commission Meeting) PAGE 2 - PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA- FEBRUARY 5, 2008 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS (All matters on the Consent Calendar are approved in one motion, unless a Commissioner or any members of the public requests separate action on a specific item.) 1. Reaular Plannina Commission Meetina Minutes for Auaust 21. 2007 Recommendation: Approval PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS (Please read & complete a Speaker's Form at the podium prior to the start of the Planning Commission Meeting. The Chairman will call on you to speak when your item is called). 2. General Plan Amendment No. 2007-06. Industrial Desian Review No. 2006-02. Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-02. and Tentative Parcel Map No. 33531. "Elsinore West Business Park" Tom Weiner. Plannina Manaaer Ext. 295. tweiner@lake-elsinore.org Recommendation: Approval 3. Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-25. Commercial Desian Review No. 2007-18 for Bank of America Linda Miller. Plannina Consultant Ext. 209. Imiller@lake-elsinore.ora Recommendation: Approval 4. Residential Desian Review No. 2006-08; for the development of 7 Sinale Familv Residences located at a vacant lot at the northeast intersection of Summerhill Drive and Scenic Ridae Drive (APN's: 363-313-016 Throuah 022) Aaustin Resendiz. Associate Planner Ext. 232. aresendiz@lake-elsinore.ora Recommendation: Denial 5. Zonina Ordinance Text Amendment No. 2007-01; A request to amend the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code related to the establishment of a Planned Unit Development Overlav District within various zonina districts CityWide as outlined in Chapter 17.37 (Planned Unit Development Overlav District) Justin Carlson. Associate Planner Ext. 295. icarlson@lake-elsinore.org Recommendation: Continuance PAGE 3 - PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA- FEBRUARY 5, 2008 BUSINESS ITEMS INFORMA TIONAL STAFF COMMENTS PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT The Lake Elsinore Planning Commission will adjourn to a regular meeting to be held on Tuesday, February 19, 2008, at 6:00 p.m. to be held in the Cultural Center located at 183 N. Main Street, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, ROLFE PREISENDANZ, Secretary to the Planning Commission, do hereby affirm that a copy of the foregoing agenda was posted at City Hall, 72 hours in advance if this meeting. ROLFE PREISENDANZ DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 183 NORTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 TUESDAY, AUGUST 21, 2007 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman O'Neal called the regular Planning Commission meeting to order at 6:04 pm. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Flores led the Pledge of ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: O'NEAL, (30NZALES, MENPOZA, ZA-NELLI FLORES, ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Also present wer~;!2irector8f Community Development Preisendanz, Planning Manager Weiner, Del?~ty CitYi~ttorney Santana, Engineering Manager Seumalo, Associate Planner Res~nqiz,~~~ociat~J?lanner Carlson, and Office Specialist Herrington. PUBLIC COMMENTS~Non-Aaenda Items) No requests to speak. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS Chairman O'Neal pulled Item Number's 2 & 4 for separate review and requested a motion on the balance. MOVED BY MENDOZA, SECONDED BY ZANELLI AND PASSED BY A VOTE OF 5-0, TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NUMBER'S 2 & 4. ACENDA ITE~J1 NO. I P""_ I ",: I . "l\)l:,:.--L__I:-;,j..;, .... PAGE 2 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - AUGUST 21, 2007 3. Minor Desian Review for a Sinale-Familv Residence located at 212 Silver Street (APN: 374-131-005) Chairman O'Neal asked if the applicant was present. Associate Planner Resendiz stated that the applicant was not present. Associate Planner Resendiz stated that the applicant read and agreed with the Conditions of Approval. MOVED BY MENDOZA, SECONDED BY ZANELLI AND PASSED BY A VOTE OF 5-0, TO ..f\PPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 2007-151, A RESQl4l:1JION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OFTHE>CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALlFORNIf\, APPROVING A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR>A TWO-STORY SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLlNG>UNIT LOCATED AT 212 SILVER STREET. 2. CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSleN JOINT STUDY SESSION MEETING MINUTES FOR TUESDAY, JULY 31, 2007 Chairman O'Neal asked that the City~oungillf?lan.n.in!;liCommission Joint Study Session Meeting Minutes of Tuesday,yuly31, 2008;>be revised on page 4 of 6, to include some of his ideas. MOVED BY ZANELLI, SECeNDED BY FLORES AND PASSED6Yf\VOTl;>OF 4-0, TO APPROVE REVISION <~f. THE> CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF TUESDAY, JUL Y>31, 2008, TO BE REVISED WITH COMMISSIONER MENDOZA ABSTAINING BECAUSEHE WAS ABSENT AT THE MEETING. 4. Minor Desian Review of a Sinale-Familv Residence located at 32166 MachadoStl'e~t (APN: 379-360-078) Director of Community Development Preisendanz provided a brief overview of the proposed project and requested Associate Planner Carlson to review it with the Commission and answer questions. Associate Planner Carlson provided an overview of the project. AGENDA m:;r,1 rm. J P,^",,.. ') "'. ,,, ---, MV;:~___",;,'t" '".__~~ PAGE 3 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - AUGUST 21,2007 REQUEST TO SPEAK The applicant, Chris Hildebrand who was representing the owner, Bob Rice, asked that Condition No's 12, 58, 64 of the Conditions of Approval be addressed. Director of Community Development addressed Condition No. 12 regarding roofing materials. Public Works Director Seumalo addressed Condition No. 58 regarding final soils report showing compliance with recommendations, and Condition No. 64 regarding grading plans, Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports. Associate Planner Carlson read modifications made to Condition No's 58 and 64. MOVED BY ZANELLI, SECONDED BY FLO.RES AND PASSED BY A VOTE OFi5-0,TO APPRc;>VE MODIFICATIONS MADE TO. CONDITION NO'S 58 AND 64 AND WITH THE PROVISION THAT THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND THE APPLICANT REACH AN AGREEMENT UPON THE TYPE OF ARCHITECTURAL TILE TO BE USED ON THE ROOF~ 5. Conditional Use Permit No. 2006~15, Tentative Parcel Map No. 34978 (for condominium purposes), and Residential Design Review No. 2006-09 for HUl']ter's Ridge Chairman O'Neal stated Commission date. Item would be continued to a future Planning NO REQUESTS TO SPEAK Chairman O'Neal closed the Public Hearing at 6:25 pm. MOVED BY ZANELLI, SECONDED BY FLORES AND PA$SED BY A VOTE OF 5-0, TO CONTINUE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006-15, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 34978 (FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES), AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-09 FOR HUNTER'S RIDGE. 6. Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-16, Tentative Parcel Map No. 34979 (for condominium purposes), and Residential Design Review No. 2006-10 for Hidden Oaks Chairman O'Neal opened the Public Hearing at 6:26 pm. AOENDA ITEM NO. I PAC!:-.-i.._._o:~_ -, PAGE 4 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - AUGUST 21, 2007 NO REQUESTS TO SPEAK Chairman O'Neal closed the Public Hearing at 6:26 pm. Chairman O'Neal stated that this Item would be continued to a future Planning Commission date. MOVED BY GONZALES, SECONDED BY MENDOZA AND PASSED BY A VOTE OF 5-0, TO CONTINUE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006- 16, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 34979 (FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES), AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-10 FOR HIDDEN OAKS Ms. Sally Damene requested to speak about the<Minor D~~ign Review for a Single-Family Residence located at 212 $iIver>Street which got approved previously in the meeting. Chairman O'Neal told Ms. Damene that she Should have filled out a Request to Speak form regarding this project at the beginning of the meeting. Ms. Damene indicated that she cOl.Ugnot find the R~quest to Speak form but wanted to speak about her concernsabburth(3 project. Chairman O'Neal stated that since he voted on this project in the affirmative, he asked for a vote to reconsider this Item to entertain discussion from the audience that was not allowed. MOVED ~.~.0'~5AL, ~5PONDED BY ZANELLI AND PASSED BY<A'l()TE OF 5-0, TO BRING BAC1<\.ITEM #3, TO GIVE MS. DAMENE AN OPPORTUNITY TO<SPEAK ABOUT THIS ITEM. 3. Minor. Desian Review for a Sinale-Familv Residence located at 212 SilverStreet (APN: 374-131-005) REQUESTS TO SPEAK Sally Damene, 207 Silver Street, stated that she had a few concerns that the neighborhood would like to address. Ms. Damene stated that if the project is built she had concerns about down hill drainage and soil problems with the properties that are near the proposed project. Public Works Director Seumalo stated that the drainage and the grading, as well as the concern of compaction with respect to the weight of the building has been addressed through the Conditions of Approval. AGE.NDA iTEM NO.~ PAGE~Cr- I PAGE 5 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - AUGUST 21,2007 Cynthia Graves, 210 Silver Street, Lake Elsinore, had concerns about drug traffic on their street. Commissioner Gonzales referred her to contact the Sheriff's Department, Neighborhood Watch. The applicant of the Minor Design Review for a Single Family Residence located at 212 Silver Street, Marco Sorosco, had some questions about the Conditions of Approval. Commissioner Mendoza asked Mr. Sorosco if he signed a statement saying that he read and agreed with the Conditions of Approval. Mr. Sorosco stated yes but it wasn't something he was going to argue with the Commission about and stated that he had a question about Condition No. 54 under Street Improvements. Public Works Director Seumalo addresseq.Mr. SOrosco's concern regarding Condition No. 54. Chairman O'Neal suggested continying the project~I"lO asked the Commission to vote on a Continuance. MOVED BY MENDOZA, SECONDED BY ZANELLI AND PASSED BY A VOTE<OF 4-1,/TO CONTINUE A MINOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 212 SILVER STREET, TO THE SEPTEMBER 4, 2007, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. STAFF COMMENTS Public Works Director Seumalogave the Capital Improvement Update. Associate Planner Agustin had no comments. Associate Planner Carlson had no comments. Planning Manager Weiner had no comments. Director of Community Development Preisendanz stated that the Mayor's State of the City would be Thursday, August 23, 2007, at 5:00 pm, at the Civic Center, and the Study Session with City Council was scheduled on Thursday, August 30, 2007. Deputy City Attorney Santana had no comments. AOENDA ITEM i'JO. I PAGE 5 OF ., PAGE 6 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - AUGUST 21,2007 PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Commissioner Zanelli asked Director of Community Development Preisendanz if anyone contacted the County Health Department regarding the septic system status throughout the Country Club Heights area. Director of Community Development Preisendanz stated that he had not contacted the County Health Department he would follow up with Commissioner Zanelli on this. Commissioner Flores asked Public Works Director Seumalo about construction and road closure on Corydon and Palomar. Public Works Director Seumalo stated that Palomqris a<County project and is part of the KB Homes project and stated thatthe>intersection of Palomar and Corydon needed to be lowered on the County/Side. He said he would follow-up with Commissioner Flores with the grade details and schedule. Commissioner Mendoza asked Vice Chair Gonzales about the Civic Center Study Session. Vice Chair Gonzales stated that the public will speak first, then the Session will<pE:l open to the public, and will ask theHrquestions. BUSINESS ITEMS INFORMATIONAL STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, CHAIRMAN O'NEAL ADJOURNED THE MEETING AT 6:49 pm. Michael O'Neal, Chairman Respectfully Submitted, Kris Herrington Office Specialist III f.\eE,NDA ITEM NO.~ 'PACE ... ~ o::~ - -r.._-- PAGE 7 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - AUGUST 21, 2007 ATTEST: Rolfe Preisendanz, Director of Community Development AGENDA ITEM NO. I PAGE I OF { CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: FEBRUARY 5, 2008 ....'!f PROJECT TITLE: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2007-06, INDUSTRIAL DESfGN REVIEW NO. 2006-02, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006-02, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 33531, "ELSINORE WEST BUSINESS PARK" APPLICANT: MICHAEL QUIRK/ELSINORE WEST LLC, 2838 VIA AMAPOLA, SAN CLEMENTE, CA 92673 OWNER: SAME PROJECT REQUEST The applicant is requesting the following: . General Plan Amendment No. 2007-06 to change the land use designation on all three (3) of the affected parcels (APN No. 377-190-002 and portions of APN Nos. 377-190-003 and 377-190-003) from "Floodway" to "Freeway Business." . Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-02 to allow for optional office, showroom and commercial uses within Building No. 1 (as identified on the site plan) and in conjunction with Tentative Parcel Map No. 33531. . Industrial Design Review No. 2006-02 for consideration for the design and construction of five (5) light-industrial buildings ranging in size from 5,181 square- feet to 9,951 square-feet on a vacant 3.03 acre site. . Tentative Parcel Map No. 33531 to allow for the consolidation of three (3) parcels and "condominium" subdivision of proposed industrial buildings and common areas. The project site has a zoning designation of Limited Manufacturing (M-1) and General Plan land Use Designation of "Floodway" and "Freeway Business." Review is pursuant to Government Code Section 65348, Chapter 17.56 (Light Manufacturing District) Chapter 17.74 (Conditional Use Permit), Chapter 16 (Subdivisions), Chapter 17.66 (Parking /. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FEBRUARY 5, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: ELSINORE WEST BUSINESS PARK Requirements) and Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. PROJECT LOCATION The project site is a "through lot" with street frontage on both Collier Avenue and Minthorn Street, south of Chaney Avenue. APN: 377-190-002,003,004 within Redevelopment Project Area No.1. BACKGROUND The project site consists of three (3) vacant parcels totaling 3.03 acres in size. The zoning designation of all three (3) parcels is Limited Manufacturing (M-1). Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Section (LEMC) 17.55.020 allows for a wide variety of industrial uses as permitted uses in the M-1 zone. The General Plan land use designation forthe site is "Floodway" with a small portion of the southernmost parcel containing a "Freeway Business" land use designation. The applicant is requesting removal of the "Floodway" designation as part of this request. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING EXISTING LAND USE ZONING GENERAL PLAN Project Limited Site Vacant Manufacturing Flo 0 dway and (M-1) Freeway Business) Limited North Riverside County Flood Manufacturing Floodway Control Wasson Canyon (M-1) Basin Limited South Industrial Manufacturing Freeway Business (M-1) Limited East Industrial Manufacturing (M-1) Limited Industrial Limited West Vacant Manufacturing Business Park (M-1) PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FEBRUARY 5, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: ELSINORE WEST BUSINESS PARK PROJECT DESCRIPTION General Plan Amendment The applicant is requesting a General Plan Amendment to amend the General Plan Land Use Map by changing the land use designation of APN No. 377-190-002 and portions of APN Nos. 377 -190-003 and 377-190-003 from "Floodway" to "Freeway Business" (Attachment 5). The subject property is located immediately adjacent to a flood control basin (Riverside County) and bounded by Minthorn Street and Collier Avenue to the east and west. The City of Lake Elsinore received a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) (Attachment 6) from the Federal Agency of Emergency Management (FEMA) in May 2006, which indicated a revision to the Flood Insurance Rate Map managed by FEMA. Hydraulic analysis performed by FEMA, which incorporate updated topographic information and channel improvements, resulted in a revised delineation of the regulatory floodway area. This resulted in the subject parcels being categorized in the FEMA maps as lying within Zone X, therefore removing them from a floodway area. FEMA defines Zone X on their Flood Insurance Map as follows: Zones B, C, and X are the flood insurance rate zones that correspond to areas outside the 1-percent annual chance floodplain, areas of 1-percent annual chance sheet flow flooding where average depths are less than 1 foot, areas of 1-percent annual chance stream flooding where the contributing drainage area is less than 1 square mile, or areas protected from the 1-percent annual chance flood by levees. No Base Flood Elevations or depths are shown within this zone. Insurance purchase is not required in these zones. --FEMA Website Staff believes the site is well suited for industrial-type uses as designated in the current zoning map as well as a land use designation change to Freeway Business as the site is surrounded by other light industrial and freeway business type of uses. With the approval of the General Plan Amendment, the City would achieve consistency with the Land Use Element of the Lake Elsinore General Plan by creating a commercially viable area while, ".. .provid(ing) good access to Interstate 15 and provid(ing) good visibility for aspects of the business." The General Plan Land Use Element further states that "Limited industrial and wholesale distribution centers are also compatible with this (Freeway Business) designation." The proposed change would allow economic use of an otherwise non- beneficial area that, according to FEMA, is no longer considered to lie within a floodway. Conditional Use Permit The applicant is requesting the option of using Building No.1, which directly fronts Collier PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FEBRUARY 5, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: ELSINORE WEST BUSINESS PARK Avenue, as either offices and/or commercial showroom buildings. LEMC Section 17.56.030.M allows the Planning Commission the authority to approve other conditional uses not currently listed in the Limited Manufacturing (M-1) District when it can be determined that the uses will have similar characteristics to those currently allowed in the district. A Conditional Use Permit is being requested to allowforthese optional uses onsite. The Light Manufacturing District currently only allows office uses in association with on-site management or leasing or having a single user with a minimum size of 30,000 square feet. Moreover, commercial showrooms are only allowed for exhibition of products manufactured on the premises or available for wholesale distribution. Planning staff believes that the requested option of using Building NO.1 for either office or commercial showroom use would be appropriate on the project site given that such uses would be restricted to the building fronting onto Collier Avenue which accounts for only a portion of the light industrial park. In addition, other office and commercial uses currently exist along the Collier Avenue corridor and the building being proposed for such uses would have visibility from this same street frontage thus ensuring that patrons could easily identify the proposed use. The applicant has provided sufficient parking on-site to meet minimum LEMC requirements based on the commercial/office guideline of one space per 250 square feet of floor area. Furthermore, the commercial/office uses are consistent with the "Freeway Business" designation outlined in the General Plan. Pursuant to Section 17.30.020 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), the applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit for the establishment of the subject tentative parcel map. According to the LEMC, the Planning Commission has authority to grant or deny applications for Conditional Use Permits and to impose reasonable conditions upon the granting of Conditional Use Permits. Aspects of the proposed parcel map are discussed later in this report. Tentative Parcel Map The applicant is also requesting the approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 33531 to establish industrial "condominium" units within the airspace of each of the buildings. Condominium projects are defined as "subdivisions" pursuant to Section 66424 of the California Subdivision Map Act (CSMA). Consequently, this project requires Planning Commission and City Council consideration pursuant to the requirements of Section 16 "Subdivisions" of the LEMC. The condominium concept would enable the applicant to offer individual office units for sale as airspace condominiums within the building structures as defined by Tentative Parcel Map No. 33531, while sharing common interest, ownership and maintenance responsibilities within the common areas. These common areas entail onsite parking areas, landscaped areas, and onsite underground and above ground utility infrastructure improvements necessary to service and support the office buildings. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FEBRUARY 5, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: ELSINORE WEST BUSINESS PARK Industrial Desiqn Review The applicant is proposing to construct five (5) separate single-story light industrial buildings ranging in size from 5,181 square-feet to 9,951 on a 3.03 acre vacant site. The buildings will be sited evenly across the site with the largest building (Building No.1) to be located at the eastern end of the property along Collier Avenue. The largest parking lot area will be provided on the eastern end of the property along Collier Avenue. Smaller parking areas will be provided along the front and rear of the buildings. Required loading spaces are provided throughout the site. Onsite/Ortiste Improvements & Circulation Access to the site will be provided from two (2) separate points including Minthorn Street and Collier Avenue. The applicant will provide necessary dedication(s) and construct full half width street improvements along Collier Avenue. Onsite circulation will provide thru- access to both access points within the park. Twenty-six foot (26') wide access aisles will be provided throughout the interior of the site and required loading zones will be provided at either the sides or rears of the buildings. Architecture A "Contemporary" architectural style has been chosen for the buildings within the park facility. Concrete tilt-up construction will be utilized. Building designs will include the use of wall offsets and recessed entries that varying in depth from two (2) to eleven (11) feet. In addition, multiple parapet heights, decorative cornice treatments, decorative score lines of various widths and depths and canopies will all be incorporated on the buildings. Decorative stone (slate) and light fixtures will also be used in order to provide an enhanced aesthetic from Collier Avenue, Minthorn Street, and Interstate 15. Landscapinq The site design includes landscaping improvements covering over 16% of the site, which exceeds the minimum 12% requirement of the overall project site area as outlined in the LEMC. The landscape plan proposes two varieties of perimeter screen trees along interior property lines. A variety of accent trees will be planted at the project entries to achieve formalization and identification. In addition, several varieties of parking lot and interior accent trees will also be provided to break-up expanses of pavement and provide shading. A variety of shrubs will be planted onsite serving as foundation plantings, screening or accent plantings to further enhance the aesthetics of the development. Decorative paving treatments and accent lighting will also be utilized at site entrances. Bermed sod areas along Collier Avenue and Minthorn Street have also been provided. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FEBRUARY 5, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: ELSINORE WEST BUSINESS PARK Riverside County Flood Control maintains a 15-foot easement along the north property line (adjacent to the flood control basin), which inhibits the applicant from constructing a block wall or planting any landscaping with substantial root systems along this property line. As an alternative, the applicant has provided eight (8) decorative planters containing 36 inch box trees along the north property line in conjunction with shrubs and other groundcover treatment. These planters will be permanently irrigated while being maintained by the common ownership interest provided in the CC & Rs for the project site, as required by the accompanying Tentative Parcel Map. The applicant also has provided evergreen vines along the existing 6-foot chain link fence, which straddles the existing property line between the subject site and the adjacent flood control property. The existing block wall along the southern property line will remain. No other perimeter block walls orfences are proposed at this time. Colors and Materials The applicant is proposing seven (7) different colors with varying color schemes to be evenly distributed on the buildings throughout the park. This even distribution will ensure that a variety of colors are seen as a visitor traverses the park complex. The proposed storefront glazing will further serve to compliment the building color schemes. Siqnaqe The developer has been conditioned to draft and submit a Uniform Sign Program document for review and approval by the Planning Commission prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The Uniform Sign Program will ensure that all signage within the business park complex will have a cohesive and complimentary appearance as tenants change into the future. ANAL YSIS Sitinq and Parkinq The proposed site plan meets all applicable development standards and criteria outlined in the Limited Industrial (M-1) zoning district and the non-residential development standards outlined in Chapter 17.38 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, including setbacks and building height. The project also complies with the onsite parking standards listed in lake Elsinore Municipal Code Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requirements) including loading space and accessible parking requirements. A parking breakdown is reflected in the matrix below: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FEBRUARY 5, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: ELSINORE WEST BUSINESS PARK BUILDING DESCRIPTION BUILDING SQUARE I PARKING REQUIRED I FOOTAGE BUILDING 1 II 9,615 I (based on m~: commercial ratio of 1/250 sq ft) BUILDING 2 II 5,162 II 11 BUILDING 3 II 5,757 II 12 BUILDING 4 n 7,900 II 20 BUILDING 5 II 5,654 II 12 I II Total Required II 94 I II Provided II 118 Based on the square footages of the buildings (including the potential for commercial uses to be established in Building No.1) a minimum of 94 parking spaces are required for the site. A total of 118 parking spaces are provided, which exceeds minimum LEMC standards. Architecture The architectural design of the proposed light industrial buildings within the park complex is consistent serving to create an overall theme for the facility. The building designs comply with the Architectural Design Guidelines listed in the Community Design Element of the City General Plan. Additionally, the architecture has been designed to achieve harmony and compatibility with surrounding commercial, office and industrial buildings in the vicinity of the project site. Correspondingly, the applicant has provided a variety of building design features and forms by employing treatments, such as articulated planes along the exterior walls, attractive storefront window system, decorative stone (slate) and a variety of rooflines which will create depth and shadow. Landscapinq LEMC Section 17.56.100 requires a minimum of twelve percent (12%) of the site to be landscaped; the applicant is providing 16.7 percent. The proposed landscaping improvements serve to enhance the building designs and soften portions of building elevations, provide shade and break-up expanses of pavement. In addition, project entry plantings serve to formalize the industrial park and compliment the building architecture. Decorative paving at entry driveways is also provided. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FEBRUARY 5,2008 PROJECT TITLE: ELSINORE WEST BUSINESS PARK Colors and Materials The colors and materials proposed for this project meet the intent of the Architectural Design Guidelines listed in the Community Design Element of the City's General Plan because the colors and materials produce diversity and enhance the architectural effects. Additionally, the colors and materials proposed will assist in blending the architecture into the existing landscape and are compatible with other colors and materials used on other properties in the vicinity of the project site. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The City conducted an Initial Study to determine if the Project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based upon the results of that Initial Study, there was substantial evidence that any potential impacts to the environment associated with the Project could be mitigated to less than significant levels. As such, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared to assess potential environmental impacts and to propose mitigation for those impacts. Two (2) agencies and one (1) Tribe submitted letters on the Mitigated Negative Declaration during the public review period. None of the letters included outstanding issues of concern. All three (3) entities will be provided notice of City Council hearing not less than ten (10) days prior to that date of February 26th. Staff has determined that the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project is adequate and has been completed in accordance with CEOA, the State CEOA Guidelines, and the City's procedures for implementation of CEOA. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2008-_ recommending that the City Council adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2007-12; Resolution No. 2008-_ recommending that the City Council adopt findings that the project is consistent with the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan; Resolution No. 2008-_ recommending City Council approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2007-06; Resolution No. 2008-_ approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-02; Resolution No. 2008-_ recommending City Council approval of Industrial Design Review No. 2006-02 and Resolution No. 2008-_ recommending approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 33531. This recommendation is based upon the Findings, Exhibits, and the proposed Conditions of Approval attached to this Staff Report. PREPARED BY: TOM WEINER, PLANNING MANAGER APPROVED BY: ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, n/J/Y\ /' DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN"t! t/ / / / '----"""" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FEBRUARY 5, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: ELSINORE WEST BUSINESS PARK ATTACHMENTS: 1. LOCATION MAP 2. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIONS 3. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 4. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 5. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP 6. FEMA LETTER OF MAP REVISION (LOMR) 7. RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 8. EXHIBITS . PLAN REDUCTIONS (8 % x 11) · FULL SIZE PLAN SET VICINITY MAP INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-02, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 33531, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006-02, AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2007-06 FOR THE "ELSINORE WEST BUSINESS PARK" .--------------------- s~ ~ /' I PLANNING COMMISSION I RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_ RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE ADOPTION OF MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2007-12 WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elsinore wishes to commence proceedings to consider General Plan Amendment No. 2007-06, Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-02, Industrial Design Review No. 2006-02, and Tentative Parcel Map No. 33531, also known as Elsinore West Business Park (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the Project is subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code, Sections 21000, et seq.: "CEQA") and the State Implementation Guidelines for CEQA (14 California Code of Regulations, Sections 15000, et seq.: "CEQA Guidelines") because the Project involves an activity which may cause either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, and involves the issuance of a lease, permit license, certificate, or other entitlement for use by one or more public agencies (Public Resources Code, Section 21065); and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15063, the City conducted an Initial Study to determine if the Project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based upon the results of that Initial Study, there was substantial evidence that all potential impacts to the environment associated with the Project could be mitigated to less than significant levels; and WHEREAS, based upon the results of the Initial Study, and based upon the standards set forth in CEQA Guidelines, Section 15070, it was determined appropriate to prepare and circulate Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2007-12 for the Project; and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15072, on January 7, 2008, the City duly issued a notice of intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council regarding mitigated negative declarations; and WHEREAS, public notice of the Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration have been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on February 5, 2008. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has evaluated all comments, written and oral, received from persons who have reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration. PLANNING COMMISION RESOLUTION 2008-_ PAGE 2 OF 3 SECTION 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council that the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project is adequate and has been completed in accordance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's procedures for implementation of CEQA. The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration and finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration represents the independent judgment of the City. SECTION 3. The Planning Commission further finds and determines that none of the circumstances listed in CEQA Guidelines Section 15073.5 requiring recirculation of the Mitigated Negative Declaration are present and that it would be appropriate to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration as proposed. SECTION 4. The Planning Commission hereby makes, adopts, and incorporates the following findings regarding the lack of potential environmental impacts of the Project and the analysis and conclusions set forth in the Mitigated Negative Declaration: 1. Revisions in the Project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant before a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study are released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur. Based upon the Initial Study conducted for the Project, there is substantial evidence suggesting that all potential impacts to the environment resulting from the Project can be mitigated to the less than significant levels. 2. There is no substantial evidence, in the light of the whole record before the agency, that the Project as revised may have significant effect on the environment. Pursuant to the evidence received, and in the light of the whole record presented, the Project will not have a significant effect on the environment. SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PLANNING COMMISION RESOLUTION 2008-_ PAGE 3 OF 3 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of February 2008, by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission ATTEST: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_ RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPT FINDINGS THAT THE ENTITLEMENTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP) WHEREAS, Michael Quirk of Elsinore West LLC filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2007-06, Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-02, Industrial Design Review No. 2006-02, and Tentative Parcel Map No. 33531 for the design and construction of five (5) light industrial/commercial buildings totaling 41,308 square feet on a 3.03 acre site with related improvements (the "Entitlements"), bounded by Collier Avenue and Minthorn Street, south of Chaney Street, APNs: 377-190-002, -003, and -004 (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP requires that all projects which are proposed on land covered by an MSHCP criteria cell and which require discretionary approval by the legislative body undergo the Lake Elsinore Acquisition Process ("LEAP") and a Joint Project Review ("JPR") between the City and the Regional Conservation Authority ("RCA") prior to public review of the project applications; and WHEREAS, Section 6.0 further requires that development projects not within an MSHCP criteria cell must be analyzed pursuant to the MSHCP "Plan Wide Requirements"; and WHEREAS, the Applications are discretionary in nature and require review and approval by the Planning Commission and/or City Council; and WHEREAS, the Applications are not within an MSHCP Criteria Cell, Core or Linkage, but are within the Elsinore Plan Area of the MSHCP, and therefore, the Project was reviewed pursuant to the MSHCP "Plan Wide Requirements"; and WHEREAS, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP requires that the City adopt consistency findings prior to approving any discretionary project entitlements for development of property that is subject to the MSHCP; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council regarding the consistency of discretionary entitlements with the MSHCP; and WHEREAS, public notice of the Entitlements has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on February 5, 2008. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_ PAGE 2 OF 4 NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed application and its consistency with the MSHCP prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council adopt findings that the Entitlements are consistent with the MSHCP. SECTION 2. That in accordance with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code and the MSHCP, the Planning Commission makes the following findings: 1. The proposed project is a project under the City's MSHCP Resolution, and the City must make an MSHCP Consistency finding before approval. The Property is not located within a MSHCP Criteria Cell. However, the Property is within the Elsinore Plan Area and must be reviewed for consistency with the MSHCP "Plan Wide Requirements." 2. The proposed project is subject to the City's LEAP and the County's Joint Project Review processes. As stated above, the Property is not located within a MSHCP Criteria Cell and therefore the Entitlements were not reviewed through the LEAP or JPR processes. 3. The proposed project is consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools Guidelines. The proposed project would not impact any water features that meet the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) definition of a riparian/riverine resource. In addition, no vernal pools exist on the project site; therefore, due to the lack of suitable habitat, there is a very low potential for vernal pool species to occur. The project is therefore consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pool Guidelines set forth in Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP. No further action regarding this section of the MSHCP is required. 4. The proposed project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines. Per MSHCP requirements, the Property is not subject to the Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines set forth in Section 6.1.3. No further action regarding this section of the MSHCP is required. 5. The proposed project is consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_ PAGE 3 OF 4 Per MSHCP requirements, the Property is not subject to any of the Critical Area Species Survey Area Guidelines as set forth in Section 6.3.2 of the MSHCP. As required by the MSHCP, mitigation has been included to conduct a Burrowing Owl survey 30 days prior to any ground-disturbance, including removal vegetation or other debris. No further action regarding this section of the MSHCP is required. 6. The proposed project is consistent with the UrbanIWildlands Interface Guidelines. The Property is surrounded by existing urbanized areas and is not located adjacent to any conserved or open space areas. Therefore, the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines set forth in Section 6. 1.4 of the MSHCP are not applicable. No further action regarding this section of the MSHCP is required. 7. The proposed project is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements. The project site does not encompass any vegetation resources requiring mapping set forth in Section 6.3.1 of the MSHCP. No further action regarding this section of the MSHCP is required. 8. The proposed project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines. As stated above, the Property is surrounded by existing urbanized areas and is not located adjacent to any conserved or open space areas. Therefore, the Fuels Management Guidelines as set forth in Section 6.4 of the MSHCP are not applicable. No further action regarding this section of the MSHCP is required. 9. The proposed project will be conditioned to pay the City's MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee. The developer will be required to pay the City's MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee. 10. The proposed project is consistent with the MSHCP. The Entitlements are consistent with all applicable provisions of the MSHCP. No further actions related to the MSHCP are required. SECTION 3. Based upon the evidence presented, the above findings, and the attached conditions of approval, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore adopt findings that the Entitlements are consistent with the MSHCP. SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. J PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_ PAGE 4 OF 4 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of February 2008, by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission ATTEST: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_ RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2007-06 WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elsinore is considering an amendment to the General Plan Land Use Map, General Plan Amendment No. 2007-16, which will change the land use designation of three (3) of parcels (APN No. 377-190-002 and portions of APN Nos. 377-190-003 and 377-190-003) from "Floodway" to "Freeway Business." (the "General Plan Amendment") allowing for the development of a light industrial park " Elsinore West Business Park"; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of making recommendations to the City Council for changes to the approved General Plan Land Use Map; and WHEREAS, public notice of the General Plan Amendment has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on February 5, 2008. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed General Plan Amendment, prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve the proposed amendment to the City's Land Use map. The Planning Commission finds and determines that Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2007-12 is adequate and prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). SECTION 2. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning law and the City of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2007-14: 1. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not be: a) detrimental to the health, safety, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed amendment or within the City, or b) injurious to the property or improvements in the neighborhood or within the City. a. Hydraulic analysis performed by FEMA, which incorporate updated topographic information and channel improvements, resulted in a revised delineation of the regulatory f100dway area. This resulted in the subject parcels being categorized in the FEMA maps as lying within Zone X, therefore removing them from a f10 0 dway area. A PLANNING COMMISION RESOLUTION 2008-_ PAGE 2 OF 2 b. FEMA defines Zone X on their Flood Insurance Map as a zone that corresponds to areas outside the 1-percent annual chance floodplain, areas of 1-percent annual chance sheet flow flooding where average depths are less than 1 foot, areas of 1-percent annual chance stream flooding where the contributing drainage area is less than 1 square mile, or areas protected from the 1-percent annual chance flood by levees. No Base Flood Elevations or depths are shown within this zone. Insurance purchase is not required in these zones. c. The proposed change would allow economic use of an otherwise non- beneficial area that, according to FEMA, is no longer is considered to lie within a floodway. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not have a significant effect on the environment. d. The General Plan Amendment does not propose any significant change from surrounding land use designations and will not result in any significant environmental impacts as explained in Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2007-12. SECTION 3. Based upon all of the evidence presented, and the above findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore approve General Plan Amendment No. 2007-06. SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of February 2008, by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission ATTEST: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development RESOLUTION NO. 2008- RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006-02 WHEREAS, Michael Quirk, Elsinore West LLC, filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of Conditional Use Permit 2006-02 (the "CUP") for the potential establishment and operation of office and commercial showroom uses within Building NO.1 of the "Elsinore West Business Park" project and in conjunction with Tentative Parcel Map No. 33531 on a "through lot" with street frontage on both Collier Avenue and Minthorn Street, south of Chaney Avenue. APN: 377-190- 002,003,004 (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of approving Conditional Use Permits for expanded conditional uses and in conjunction with Tentative Maps; and WHEREAS, public notice of the CUP has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on February 5, 2008. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-02 and has found it acceptable. The Planning Commission finds and determines that this Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-02 is consistent with the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). SECTION 2. The Planning Commission has considered Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2007-12 and has determined that the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. SECTION 3. That in accordance with Chapter 17.74 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the approval of Conditional Use Permit 2007-21: 1. The proposed use, on its own merits and within the context of its setting, is in accord with the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the site is located. In order to achieve a well-balanced and functional mix of residential, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses, the project has been evaluated in light of land use compatibility, noise, traffic and other environmental hazards. The proposed allowance for office and commercial showroom uses within Building No. 1 within the light industrial park comports with PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_ PAGE NO.2 OF 4 the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the site is located. The optional land uses would only be operated within a small portion of the light industrial park and are similar to other uses already permitted within the vicinity of the project site. In addition, to the extent necessary, conditions of approval have been imposed upon the Conditional Use Permit to ensure that the additional uses will not negatively impact surrounding properties. The proposed subdivision has also been evaluated against applicable Development Code provisions and necessary conditions of approval have been imposed to ensure land use compatibility. 2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or the City, or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or the City. Given the potential for the proposed office and commercial showroom uses to have a potential impact, the welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood or the City, all applicable City Departments and Agencies have been afforded the opportunity for a thorough review of the uses and have incorporated all applicable comments and/or conditions related to installation and maintenance of the buildings, landscaping, signage and onsite parking improvements so as to eliminate any negative impacts to the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of the surrounding neighborhood or the City. 3. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, and for all the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, buffers and other features required by Title 17 of the LEMC. The proposed office and showroom commercial uses as well as the proposed subdivision have been designed in consideration of the size and shape of the property, thereby strengthening and enhancing the immediate light industrial area. Further, the project as proposed, will complement the quality of existing development and will create a visually pleasing, non-detractive relationship between proposed and existing projects. The project has been reviewed to ensure adequate provision of landscaping and onsite parking. 4. The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways with proper design both as to width and type of pavement to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated by the subject use. The proposed office and commercial showroom uses as well as the proposed subdivision have all been reviewed in relation to the width and type of pavement needed to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated by the uses. Moreover, all potential impacts have been evaluated prior to the Planning Commission's approval of the Conditional Use Permit. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_ PAGE NO.3 OF 4 5. In approving the subject use located at Assessor Parcel Number 377-140-024, there will be no adverse affect on abutting property or the permitted and normal use thereof. The proposed uses has been thoroughly reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City Departments and outside Agencies, eliminating the potential for any and all adverse effects on the abutting property. 6. Adequate conditions and safeguards pursuant to Section 17.74.50 of the LEMC have been incorporated into the approval of the Conditional Use Permit to insure that the use continues in a manner envisioned by these findings for the term of the use. Pursuant to Section 17.74.050 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the proposed office and showroom commercial land uses as well as the subdivision request for the project site has been scheduled for consideration and approval of the Planning Commission. SECTION 4. Based upon the evidence presented, the above findings, and the attached conditions of approval, the Planning Commission hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-02. SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of February, 2008, by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Rolfe Preisendanz Director of Community Development t. RESOLUTION NO. 2008- RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-02 WHEREAS, Michael Quirk, Elsinore West LLC, filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of Industrial Design Review No. 2006-02 for the design and construction of five (5) light industrial buildings ranging in size from 5,181 square-feet to 9,951 square-feet on a vacant 3.03 acre site with related improvements (the "Project") located on a "through lot" with street frontage on both Collier Avenue and Minthorn Street, south of Chaney Avenue. APN: 377-190-002,003,004 (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of considering and making recommendations to the City Council for industrial design review applications; and WHEREAS, on February 5, 2008, at a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the Industrial Design Review prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve the application. The Planning Commission finds that the Industrial Design Review satisfies all requirements set forth in Chapter 17.82 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. SECTION 2. The Planning Commission has considered the Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2007-05 and has determined that the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. SECTION 3. That in accordance with the State Planning and Zoning Law and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the approval of Industrial Design Review 2006-03: 1. The Project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan, Specific Plan and the Zoning District in which the Project is located. The Project complies with the goals and objectives of the General Plan because it will assist in achieving the development of a well balanced and functional mix of residential, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational, and institutional land uses. The Project will serve to greater diversify and expand Lake Elsinore's economic base. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_ PAGE 2 OF 3 2. The Project complies with the design directives contained in the General Plan Urban Design Element and all other applicable provisions of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. The Project is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments in that the light industrial park consisting of twenty (20) buildings has been designed in consideration of the size and shape of the property. Sufficient setbacks and enhanced onsite landscaping have been provided thereby creating interest and varying vistas as a person moves along abutting streets and within the park. In addition, safe and efficient circulation has been achieved onsite. The Project will compliment the quality of existing development and will create a visually pleasing, non-detractive relationship between the proposed development and existing projects through the use of a 'Contemporary' architectural design that is similar to existing industrial developments in the vicinity. A variety of architectural elements and colors are proposed including recessed building entries, multiple parapet heights, decorative score lines and eye brow canopies. In addition, proposed neutral tone colors will serve to blend with surrounding developments and provide evidence of a concern for quality and originality. 3. Subject to the attached conditions of approval, the Project is not anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. The Planning Commission has considered the Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2007-05 and has determined that the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. All potential impacts can be mitigated to less than significant levels, and as such, the Project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the Project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter 17.82. Pursuant to Section 17.82.070 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Project has been scheduled for consideration and approval of the Planning Commission on February 5, 2008. SECTION 4. Based upon all of the evidence presented, the above findings, and the conditions of approval imposed upon the Project, the Planning Commission hereby approves Industrial Design Review 2006-02. SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_ PAGE 3 OF 3 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of February 2008, by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development RESOLUTION NO. 2008-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 33531 WHEREAS, Michael Quirk, Elsinore West LLC, filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of Tentative Parcel Map for Condominium Purposes No. 33531 for the establishment of industrial condominium units within an industrial park containing five (5) light industrial buildings ranging in size from 5,181 square-feet to 9,951 square-feet on a vacant 3.03 acre site with related improvements (the "Project") located on a "through lot" with street frontage on both Collier Avenue and Minthorn Street, south of Chaney Avenue. APN: 377-190-002,003,004 (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of recommending approval of Tentative Parcel Maps for commercial and industrial projects to the City Council; and WHEREAS, public notice of the Map has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on February 5, 2008. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the Map and has found it acceptable. The Planning Commission finds and determines that the Map comports with the requirements of Section 16 "Subdivisions" of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC), and Section(s) 66424 and 66427 of the California Government Code. SECTION 2. The Planning Commission has considered Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2007-12 and has determined that the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. SECTION 3. That in accordance with Government Code Sections 66424 and 66427 and LEMC Title 16 "Subdivisions," the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the approval of the Tentative Parcel Map 33531: 1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan (Government Code Section 66473.5). The Map, as designed, assists in achieving the development of a well-balanced and functional mix of residential, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses (GOAL 1.0, Land Use Element), and provides PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008- PAGE 2 OF 2 additional commercial and industrial development thus improving the City's professional environment. 2. The effects that this Map is likely to have upon the economic needs of the region, the business requirements of its residents and the available fiscal and environmental resources have been considered and balanced. The additional industrial and commercial units provided by the Map will serve to enhance and improve the economic needs of the region and the business needs of the Lake Elsinore community by providing additional industrial and commercial space opportunities for local residents and businesses. 3. Subject to the attached conditions of approval, the Map is not anticipated to result in any significant environmental impact. The Map has been adequately conditioned by all applicable departments and agencies and will not result in any significant environmental impacts. SECTION 3. Based upon the evidence presented, the above findings, and the attached conditions of approval, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve Tentative Parcel Map No. 33531. SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of February, 2008, by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Rolfe Preisendanz Director of Community Development CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2007-06 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006-02 INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-02 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 33531 PLANNING DEPARTMENT General Conditions: 1. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, and Agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning the MSHCP Consistency Findings, General Plan Amendment No. 2007-06 Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-02, Industrial Design Review No. 2006-02, Tentative Parcel Map No. 33531 and any related determinations. 2. The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the Riverside County Clerk in the amount of $1,864.00 to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination. Said filing fee shall be provided to the City within 48 hours of project approval. 3. Applicant shall place a weatherproof 3' x 3' sign at the entrance to the project site identifying the approved days and hours of construction activity and a statement that complaints regarding the operation can be lodged with the City of Lake Elsinore Code Enforcement Division at (951) 674-3124. The sign shall be installed prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 4. All Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced upon page one of building plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division for Plan Check. 5. Applicant shall comply with all applicable mitigation measures listed in the Mitigation Monitoring Program associated with the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Elsinore West Business Park. 6. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the Applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgement of Conditions," and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records. 7. The Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City's Grading Ordinance. Construction generated dust and erosion shall be mitigated in accordance with the provisions of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Chapter 15.72 and using accepted control techniques. Interim erosion control measures shall be provided thirty (30) days after the site's roLJnh nr~rlinn ~~ approved by the City Engineer. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ELSINORE WEST BUSINESS PARK PAGE 2 OF 11 8. The Applicant shall comply with the City's Noise Ordinance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, with regard to hours of operation, construction activity shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday, and no construction activity shall occur on Saturdays, Sundays or legal holidays. 9. The proposed location of onsite construction trailers shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Designee. A cash bond of $1,000.00 shall be required for any construction trailers placed on the site and used during construction. Bonds will be released after removal of trailers and restoration of the site to an acceptable state, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or Designee. 10. The Applicant shall comply with all applicable City codes and ordinances. Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-02: 11. The Conditional Use Permit shall comply with all applicable requirements of Title 17 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, unless modified by approved Conditions of Approval. 12. The Conditional Use Permit granted herein shall run with the land and shall continue to be valid upon a change of ownership of the site or structure which was the subject of this approval. 13. Exterior security lighting shall be shielded and directed on-site so as not to create glare onto neighboring properties. The proposed light fixtures shall compliment the building architecture and shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development or Designee. 14. All security measures requested by the Riverside County Sheriff's Department shall be followed and adhered to at all times. 15. Outdoor storage of any kind shall require a new Conditional Use Permit. Industrial Design Review No. 2006-02: 17. Approval for Industrial Design Review No. 2006-02 will lapse and be void unless building permits are issued within one (1) year following the date of approval. 18. Unless specifically provided otherwise in these conditions, any alteration or expansion of a project for which there has been a "Design Review" approval as well as all applications for modification or other change in the conditions of approval of a "Design Review" shall be applied for in accordance with the provisions of Section 17.82.120. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ELSINORE WEST BUSINESS PARK PAGE 3 OF 11 19. No structure which has received a "Design Review" or "Minor Design Review" approval shall be occupied or used in any manner or receive a Certificate of Occupancy until the Director of Community Development has determined that all Conditions of Approval have been complied with. 20. All site improvements approved with this request shall be constructed as indicated on the approved site plan and elevations. Revisions to approved site plans or building elevations shall be subject to the review of the Community Development Director. 21. Plan Check shall conform to the submitted plans as modified by Conditions of Approval, or the Planning Commission/City Council through subsequent action. 22. All roof mounted or ground support air conditioning units or other mechanical equipment incidental to development shall be architecturally screened or shielded by landscaping so that they are not visible from neighboring property or public streets. Any material covering the roof equipment shall match the primary wall color. 23. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any building onsite, a Uniform Sign Program shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission. 24. Applicant shall comply with all ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) requirements. 25. Trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standards as approved by the Community Development Director or Designee prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. 26. No exterior roof ladders shall be permitted. 27. All exterior downspouts shall be concealed within the buildings. 28. Materials and colors depicted on the plans and materials board shall be used unless modified by the Director of Community Development or Designee. 29. All exposed slopes in excess of three feet (3') in height shall have permanent irrigation system and erosion control vegetation installed and approved by the Planning Division. 30. On-site surface drainage shall not cross sidewalks. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ELSINORE WEST BUSINESS PARK PAGE 4 OF 11 Prior to Issuance of Building/Grading Permit: 37. Prior to issuance of Building Permit, the Applicant shall submit a photometric study to the Community Development Department for review and approval. The study shall show locations of all exterior lighting fixtures and shall verify that a minimum 1-foot candle of illumination is achieved throughout the onsite parking area. Moreover, the study shall demonstrate that a minimum of 5-foot candles are achieved at building entrances. 38. All exterior wall mounted and freestanding light fixtures shall be submitted for review and approval by the Director of Community Development. Light fixtures shall compliment the architectural style of the buildings onsite. 39. The color, finish and pattern of all decorative paving onsite shall be submitted for review and approval by the Director of Community Development. 40. Three (3) sets of the Final Landscaping/lrrigation Detail Plan shall be submitted, reviewed and approved by the City's Landscape Architect Consultant and the Community Development Director or Designee, prior to issuance of building permit. A Landscape Plan Check & Inspection Fee will be charged prior to final landscape approval. a. All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic sprinkler system with 100% plant and ground cover coverage using a combination of drip and conventional irrigation methods. b. All planting areas shall be separated from paved areas with a six inch (6") high and six inch (6") wide concrete curb. c. Plantings within fifteen feet (15') of ingress/egress points shall be no higher than thirty-six inches (36"). d. Any ground mounted transformers and mechanical or electrical equipment shall be indicated on landscape plan and screened as part of the landscaping plan. e. Shrubs and vines shall be planted around the onsite trash enclosures to soften the structures. f. Final landscape plans shall include planting and irrigation details and shall include all tree and shrub container sizes to be reviewed and approved by the City's landscape architect consultant. g. The landscape plan shall provide for ground cover, shrubs, and trees and meet all requirements of the City's adopted Landscape Guidelines. Special attention to the use of Xeriscape or drought resist~mt olantinas A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ELSINORE WEST BUSINESS PARK PAGE 5 OF 11 with combination drip irrigation system to be used to prevent excessive watering. h. A Landscape Maintenance Bond shall be provided prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. The bond shall cover ten percent (10%) of the total cost of landscaping improvements onsite. Release of the bond shall be requested by the Applicant at the end of the required one year maintenance period subject to the approval of the City's Landscape Architect Consultant and Community Development Director or Designee. i. All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed within affected portion of any phase at the time a Certificate of Occupancy is requested for any building. Final landscape plan must be consistent with approved site plan. j. One twenty-four inch (24") box size tree shall be installed for every five parking spaces within the onsite parking area. k. One twenty-four inch (24") box size tree shall be installed for every thirty-linear feet (30') of street frontage, selected from the approved City street tree list. I. The landscape plan shall provide for larger sized plantings around the perimeter of the employee parking areas so as to achieve immediate screening of these areas. The specific types of plantings and associated sizes shall be reviewed and approved by the City's landscape architect consultant. 41. Prior to issuance of building permits, Applicant shall provide assurance that all required fees to the Lake Elsinore Unified School District have been paid. 42. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall provide assurance that the Public Building Impact Fee has been paid. 43. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall provide assurance that the Library Capital Improvement Fund fee has been paid. 44. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall provide assurance that all Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan fees have been paid. 45. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall provide evidence that all Riverside County Fire Department standards and requirements have been complied with. A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ELSINORE WEST BUSINESS PARK PAGE 6 OF 11 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT General: 46. A grading plan signed and stamped by a Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall be required if the grading exceeds 50 cubic yards or the existing flow pattern is substantially modified as determined by the City Engineer. If the grading is less than 50 cubic yards and a grading plan is not required, a grading permit shall still be obtained so that a cursory drainage and flow pattern inspection can be conducted before grading begins. 47. Prior to commencement of grading operations, applicant to provide to the City with a map of all proposed haul routes to be used for movement of export material. Such routes shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 48. All grading shall be done under the supervision of a licensed geotechnical engineer who shall certify all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and proper erosion control. 49. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained prior to any work within City right- of-way. 50. Arrangements for relocation of utility company facilities (power poles, vaults, etc.) out of the roadway or alley shall be the responsibility of the property owner or his agent. Overhead utilities shall be relocated underground. 51. Underground water rights shall be dedicated to the City pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.52.030 (LEMC), and consistent with the City's agreement with the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District. 52. The applicant shall install permanent bench marks per Riverside County Standards and at locations to be determined by the City Engineer. 53. The applicant shall install blue dot markers at Fire Hydrant locations per Riverside County Standards. 54. Provide fire protection facilities as required in writing by Riverside County Fire. 55. Applicant shall pay all applicable development tees, including but not limited to TUMF, MSHCP, TIF and Area Drainage Fees. 56. 10 year storm runoff shall be contained within the curb and the 100 year storm runoff shall be contained within the street right-ot-way. It either of these criteria are exceeded, drainage facilities shall be designed and constructed. J CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ELSINORE WEST BUSINESS PARK PAGE 7 OF 11 57. All drainage facilities in this project shall be constructed to Riverside County Flood Control District Standards. 58. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 ~" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of public works improvements will be scheduled and approved. 59. Slope maintenance along right-of-ways and open spaces shall be maintained by a property owner's association or other maintenance mechanism approved by the City. 60. All waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or other phases of the construction shall be disposed of at appropriate recycling centers. The applicant should contract with CR&R Inc. for recycling and storage container services, but the applicant may use the services of another recycling vendor. Another recycling vendor, other than CR&R Inc., cannot charge the applicant for bin rental or solid waste disposal. If the applicant is not using CR&R Inc. for recycling services and the recycling material is either sold or donated to another vendor, the applicant shall supply proof of debris disposal at a recycling center, including verification of tonnage by certified weigh master tickets. 61. On-site drainage shall be conveyed to a public facility, accepted by adjacent property owners by a letter of drainage acceptance, or conveyed to a drainage easement. 62. All natural drainage traversing the site shall be conveyed through the site, or shall be collected and conveyed by a method approved by the City Engineer. 63. Roof drains shall not be allowed to outlet directly through coring in the street curb. Roofs should drain over a landscaped area for a minimum of 20-feet before entering into a conveyance facility and into the gutter. 64. All trash enclosures shall be enclosed in a structure with a water proof roof. 65. Education guidelines and Best Management Practices (BMP) shall be provided to residents of the development in the use of herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers as well as other environmental awareness education materials on good housekeeping practices that contribute to protection of storm water quality and met the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. (Required for lot of one acre or more) 66. Applicant shall provide BMP's that will reduce storm water pollutants from parking areas and driveway aisles. (Required for lot of one ac-- - CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ELSINORE WEST BUSINESS PARK PAGE 8 OF 11 67. City of Lake Elsinore has adopted ordinances for storm water management and discharge control. In accordance with state and federal law, these local storm water ordinances prohibit the discharge of waste into storm drain system or local surface waters. This includes non-storm water discharges containing oil, grease, detergents, trash, or other waste remains. Brochures of "Storm water Pollution, What You Should Know" describing preventing measures are available at City Hall. PLEASE NOTE: The discharge of pollutants into street, gutters, storm drain system, or waterways -without Regional Water Quality Control Board permit or waver - is strictly prohibited by local ordinances and state and federal law. 68. Dedicate right-of-way and construct street improvements (part-width improvements) on Corydon Street, along the property frontage, such that the centerline to property line is 50 feet and centerline to curb face is 40 feet. The improvements include ac pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lighting, and signing and striping. Adequate ac transition beyond project limits shall be provided. In addition, adequate drainage protection shall be provided at the end of the transition area. 69. The developer shall provide cash in-lieu of improvements (half-width) for the proposed raised median on Collier Avenue. 70. Provide on-site circulation for trucks by superimposing the required truck- turning template. 71. Provide street lighting and show lighting improvements as part of street improvement plans as required by the City Engineer. 72. Applicant shall submit signing and striping plans and traffic control plans for the required street improvements on site and off site. All signing and striping and traffic control devices shall be installed prior to occupancy. 73. A Calif. Registered Civil Engineer shall prepare the street and traffic improvement plans. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to Riverside County Road Department Standards, latest edition, and City Codes (LEMC 12.04 and 16.34). Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 74. Submit grading plans with appropriate security, Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer for approval by the City Engineer. Developer shall mitigate any flooding and/or erosion downstream caused by development of the site and/or diversion of drainage. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ELSINORE WEST BUSINESS PARK PAGE 9 OF 11 75. An approved Drainage Study shall be provided and reviewed for approval. 76. The grading plan shall show that no structures, landscaping, or equipment are located near the project entrances that minimize sight distance standards. 77. Construction Project access and hauling route shall be submitted and approved by the City Engineer, 78. Provide soils, geology and seismic report including street design recommendations. Provide final soils report showing compliance with recommendations. 79. An Alquist-Priolo study shall be performed on the site to identify any hidden earthquake faults and/or liquefaction zones present on-site. 80. The applicant shall obtain all necessary off-site easements and/or permits for off-site grading and/or drainage acceptance from the adjacent property owners prior to grading permit issuance. 81. Applicant to provide erosion control measures as part of their grading plan. The applicant shall contribute to protection of storm water quality and meet the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. 82. Applicant shall provide the city with proof of his having filed a Notice of Intent with the Regional Water Quality Control Board for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program with a storm water pollution prevention plan prior to issuance of grading permits. The applicant shall provide a SWPPP for post construction, which describes BMP's that will be implemented for the development including maintenance responsibilities. The applicant shall submit the SWPPP to the City for review and approval. 83. A WQMP plan shall be submitted for review and approval. 84. Dedicatee right-of-way along Collier Avenue such that the half width measurement from the centerline to the property line measures 50-feet. 85. Dedicate right-of-way along Minthorn Avenue such that the half width measurement from the centerline to the property line measures 30-feet. 86. Provide on-site detention of the increase in storm water runoff as a result of this development. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit 87. All Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ELSINORE WEST BUSINESS PARK PAGE 10 OF 11 development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to building permit. 88. Submit a 'Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project and specify the technical data for the water service at the location. such as water pressure and volume etc. Submit this letter prior to applying for a building permit. 89. No structures, landscaping, or equipment shall be located near the project entrances that compromise sight distance requirements. 90. Pay all Capital Improvement TIF and Master Drainage Fees and Plan Check fees (LEMC 16.34). 91. Process a lot line adjustment through the City's Engineering Division such that parcel lines do not cross through single tenant buildings and land between the boundary walls of multi-tenant buildings. 92. Provide reciprocal access easements over all property lines to allow for shared circulation and parking. Prior to Occupancy 93. Pay all fees and meet requirements of an encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Division for construction of off-site public works improvements (LEMC12.08, Res.83-78). All fees and requirements for an encroachment permit shall be fulfilled before Certificate of Occupancy. 94. All compaction reports, grade certifications, monument certifications (with tie notes delineated on 8 1/2" x 11" Mylar) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division before final inspection of off-site improvements will be scheduled and approved. 95. All public improvements shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans or as conditions of development to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 96. All required easements, dedications, or vacation as conditions of this development shall be completed and recorded. 97. All signing and striping and traffic control devices onsite and on both Collier Avenue and Minthorn Avenue shall be approved and installed. 98. Water and sewer improvements shall be completed in accordance with Water District requirements. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ELSINORE WEST BUSINESS PARK PAGE 11 OF 11 99. Proof of maintenance responsibility and acceptance shall be provided for all open space, slopes, and drainage facilities, outside the public right-of-way. 100. TUMF fees shall be paid. The TUMF fees shall be the effective rate at the time when the Certificate of Occupancy is obtained. 101. The applicant shall pay cash in-lieu of the median improvements on Collier Avenue. The cost shall be based on an estimate approved by the City Engineer. 102. Complete all Street improvement construction including any transitions between the proposed improvements and the existing improvements. Transitions shall be constructed so as to not be a hazard to the traveling public or interfere with the drainage patterns. 103. The applicant shall submit as-built plans and shall be responsible for revising the mylar plans. A digital copy of all completed public improvement plans shall also be provided. A bond (amount to be determined by the City Engineer) is required to guarantee compliance of this requirement. ADMINISTRA TIVE SERVICES DEPARMENT 104. Participate in Public Safety and Maintenance Services CFD Prior to approval of the Final Map, Parcel Map, Site Development Plan, Special or Conditional Use Permit or building permit (as applicable), the applicant shall participate in the Public Safety and Maintenance Services Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project. Applicant shall make a four thousand two hundred dollar ($4,200) non-refundable deposit to cover the cost of the legal process to participate in the CFD. Contact Dennis Anderson, Harris & Associates at (949) 655-3900 x334 or danderson@harris-assoc.com. RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 100. The Applicant shall comply with all of the attached Riverside County Fire Department conditions and standards. RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT 101. The Applicant shall comply with all Riverside County Sheriff Department requirements. CITY OF ~~ LAKE ,6,LSiNORf; ~ DREAM EXTREME", A CKNOWLEDEGEMENT OF DRAFT CONDITIONS RE: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2007-06, INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-02, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006-02, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 33531, "ELSINORE WEST BUSINESS PARK" I hereby state that I/We acknowledge the draft Conditions of Approval for the above named project. I/We understand that these are draft conditions only and do hereby agree to accept and abide by all final conditions prescribed by the City of lake Elsinore staff, as set forth in the attachments to the approval letter that will be sent after final project approval. All final conditions shall be met prior to issuance of permits or prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy, or otherwise indicated in the Conditions, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director of the City of lake Elsinore. Date: Applicant's Signature: Print Name: Address: Phone Number: /,<~' ~.'- -----::::: ""/. ,,/.' 1f;" <l,.. ,.,fI / c..> z ~1~ ...\0, ,,\~ , ~f". \~O C~f. , . ", y\" y\" .', . i aJ U. ~ .r "./;J' -l J', ;S>Q-v/7, "v ,,' ,tf " ,A~ f ~/' ~" :1:' , "'. .> "'"" '" , '''"' .; ,,' ,/" I'".r ~F ,,,,l t ,,,,' ",,/ .".iI" '> ':.:~y~. ~ {;E<c':r~ Ii., j(::) " / .::.;~~~ '" ".: ....<> . :,' i7" /~..: :,,:,: ::: d~' ::.,....:.::: ,/>.:>:..:.:.)., .< '.::L .::" c".... <:.... : :.... : :..../'" "> 'i:"'.':.":' 2; .:~'/ ::;!/.' .:>" /t:\,. ~:~ ,/',:y ~~~?/ :.::i;:> .ll . )> :" yO:: . ..'1.;/.:.:. ". ./.:.;.:,'..... . .. (7:; :: ~':>;;" .' . ~ /;/ :,y .' r.':,: :t, . /.:::::"::::: ;.x: :,': ... :,p!;\. ':. : l, :"", >(:: Iii~;/: :.::.' '.,:::: r :.: .'::....:>;::::,..' .'. . ", .... j....... ~ ::.:,' '?:~?'T.>>~ ::'. :':: ::.:. ".:":<.:::: ~::;c, .-.:.::.:.'::i.::...::...., ::::'-::.'>> :':::0;"::...:..:: . :::::.:::,':, .:=.:::. ,::. ....:'<.'-:,..:: :";.:.',', :..':;~ """:::':i.:':," )> ::.,:.:......: .":.'. :'. "\, ::::: :::::.::,..:: ., .';/ . :}:,: ::) (<: :::. .. :::::{:: /:.:.:::. :.:: ..... .,. ':>: '.',':: r:,'::'::-' ::i:" <:. ". u. /. ,:( >.:::>, .::,.::>. -. ..: ':".:::..,'::::"'>:>" "'::"::.::::'. ::::.:: ':":: :.::': ":: '::: jf. .//"" ~'.'..".,' '::: '.:::::.:-.>': .'.: ;:':':",:,,)'"/. :::::,', :.,'.' ::':/ ~&./ :'.' '.-.::.:>" ,,~:: .'.:.: ;.::.:. /:-::': . .. ':: ;~ . '" <'f:::: '.' . '''-.:. ., :l(::."'"'::': :.... ".". '., ;;,' .:... ::: ....... .:.:.: ...v:.: .:.... .'::: ..'. < ",.; :.:.:-=::.. ;.:~::: '~...-:':;.::::.: ::.: ....: .: ;:':::'.' ..' ;:< :.'. ..... .... ....: '.:'.: ':: :;. ..::.. -:.': "::..' :::.. :..::...... ::' ..... ....'.. ... .::.. .:... :,,:, '.c:': .':'.:.:'-:::" :". ..... .... .':: :::;.. .': ::.,".:: :.... .'.: <...: :"'i ~:;:: ::: ':':'.: ::: r:'~:;., .:..: ....: ':i :..::' t ..':: :.,:.:....:. :" :::.ii .'.: _\>,. .... '.:-::" :J :.: ':' .:.... ..,:.::" i~t0f! ::: :::........' ':,:; '::: :':". ..:..:....:.. ".::: :., .:.',;",::, :::.:.:: :::: :c:. ;.i,::.:'" .: .:~; ::. ::> '.:.>; ...... :i ';.:. :. ". ...... .. .. ............. .' .......... ....... :.:;. ::'- ~<::. "::.: ..... ....: I.ji <:0:',:'.:,.:: =,:.:" =:,; -, :. :.." ~ '! ;; ;.;:::.., .... . ,', ........ ., ......" ,..... .... " ...., .... . . . Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, D.C. 20472 MAY 11 2006 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED IN REPLY REFER TO: Case No.: 06-09-B090P Community Name: City of Lake Elsinore, CA Community No.: 060636 Ef~ective.~ate ofSE.F) 2 1 2006 ThIS RevlSlon: The Honorable Robert Magee Mayor, City of Lake Elsinore Administrative: Office, City Hall 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Dear Mayor Magee: The Flood Insurance Study report and Flood Insurance Rate Map for your community have been revised by this Letter of Map Revision (LOMR). Please use the enclosed annotated map panel(s) revised by this LOMR for floodplain management purposes and for all flood insurance policies and renewals issued in your community. Additional documents are enclosed which provide information regarding this LOMR. Please see the List of Enclosures below to determine which documents are included. Other attachments specific to this request may be included as referenced in the Determination Document. If you have any questions regarding floodplain management regulations for your community or the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) in general, please contact the Consultation Coordination Officer for your community. If you have any technical questions regarding this LOMR, please contact the Director, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Division of the Department of Homeland Security's Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in Oakland, California, at (510) 627-7175, or the FEMA Map Assistance Center toll free at 1-877-336-2627 (1-877-FEMA MAP). Additional information about the NFIP is available on our web site at http://www.fema.gov/nfip. Sincerely, ~~~ Michael B. Godesky, Project Engineer Engineering Management Section Mitigation Division For: William R. Blanton Jr., CFM, Acting Chief Engineering Management Section Mitigation Division List of Enclosures: Letter of Map Revision Determination Document Annotatl~d Flood Insurance Rate Map Annotated Flood Insurance Study RepOlt cc: Mr. Ken Seumalo, P.E. City Engineer City of Lake Elsinore -.. Fairway Commercial Partners fJor Hydraulic Engineer WEST Consultants, Inc. Page 1 of 5 Issue Date: MAY 11 ZUG6 I Effective Date: SEP 2 1 lUaG Case No.: 06.09-B090P LOMR-APP Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, D.C. 20472 LETTER OF MAP REVISION DETERMINATION DOCUMENT COMMUNITY AND REVISION INFORMATION City of Lake Elsinore Riverside County California PROJECT DESCRIPTION CHANNEL RELOCATION CHANNELIZATION BASIS OF REQUEST HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS FLOODWAY NEW TOPOGRAPHIC DATA COMMUNITY COMMUNITY NO.: 060636 IDENTIFIER Temescal Wash / lake Elsinore Outlet Channel and Third Street Drain APPROXIMATE LATITUDE & LONGITUDE: 33.670. -117.330 SOURCE: Other DATUM: NAD 83 ANNOTATED MAPPING ENCLOSURES ANNOTATED STUDY ENCLOSURES TYPE: FIRM' TYPE: FIRM TYPE: FIRM TYPE: FIRM NO.: 0606362053 F NO.: 0606362054 F NO.: 0606362061 F NO.: 0606362062 F DATE: August 18, 2003 DATE: August 18,2003 DATE: August 18, 2003 DATE: August 18,2003 DATE OF EFFECTIVE FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY: August 18, 2003 FLOOD PROFilES: OBP,09P FlOODWAY DATA TABLE: 4 Enclosures reflect changes to flooding sources affected by this revision. , FIRM - Flood Insurance Rate Map; .. FBFM . Flood Boundary and Floodway Map; .., FHBM . Flood Hazard Boundary Map FLOODING SOURCE(S) & REVISED REACH(ES) Temescal Wash - from just downstream of Chaney Street to approximately 1,100 feet downstream of Riverside Drive See Page 2 for Additional Flooding Sources SUMMARY OF REVISIONS Flooding Source Temescal Wash Effective Flooding Zone AE Floodway BFEs' Zone X (shaded) Revised Flooding Zone AE Floodway BFEs Zone X (shaded) Increases YES YES YES YES Decreases YES YES YES YES , BFEs . Base Flood Elevations DETERMINATION This document provides the determination from the Department of Homeland Security's Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) regarding a request for a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) for the area described above, Using the information submitted, we have determined that a revision to the flood hazards depicted in the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report and/or National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) map is warranted. This docume,nt revises the effective NFIP map. as indicated in the attached documentation. Please use the enclosed annotated map panels revised by this LOMR for floodplain management purposes and for all flood insurance policies and renewals in your community. This determination is based on the flood data presently available. The enclosed documents provide additional information regarding this determination. If you have any questions about this document, please contact the FEMA Map Assistance Center toll free at 1-877-336-2627 (1.877-FEMA MAP) or by letter addressed to the lOMR Depot, 3601 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22304. Additional Information about the NFIP is availabla on our website at http://www.fema.gov/nfip. ./~"'z.. ~~ J _ //4-.r/~~--- Michael B. Godesky, Project Engineer Engineering Management Section Mitigation Division Page 2 of 5 I Issue Date: MAY 11 2U06 I Effective Date: SEP 2 1 tOGG J Case No.: 06-09-B090P I LOMR.APP ~"'1VAii'TAt~ '"?"'4\';ro ::; .~!!!!!~,' .." r-.... ' ~~..ei ...~.,: ~J ~~~ ~.8ND S~G - Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, D.C. 20472 LETTER OF MAP REVISION DETERMINATION DOCUMENT (CONTINUED) COMMUNITY INFORMATION (CONTINUED) OTHER FLOODING SOURCES AFFECTED BY THIIS REVISION FLOODING SOURCE(S) & REVISED REACH(ES) Temescal Wash - from just downstream of Chaney Street to approximately 1,100 feet downstream of Riverside DI'ive Third Street Drain- from the confluence with Temescal Wash upstream approximately 2200 feet to the Collier Avenue Culvert SUMMARY OF REVISIONS Flooding Source Temescal Wash Effective Flooding Zone X (unshaded) Zone AO Revised Flooding Increases Zone X (unshaded) NONE Zone AO NONE Decreases YES YES . BFEs - Base Flood Eleva1ions This determination is based on the flood data presently available. The enclosed documents provide additional information regarding this determination. If you have any questions about this document, please contact the FEMA Map Assistance Center toll free at 1-877-336-2627 (1-877-FEMA MAP) or by letter addressed to the LOMR Depot, 3601 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22304. Additional Information about the NFIP is available on our website at http://www.fema.gov/nfip. ~~~~ Michael B. Godesky, Project Engineer Engineering Management Section Mitigation Division , - Page 3 of 5 I Issue Date: MA,( 1 1 2~n5 I Effective Date: SEP 2 1 Z006 I Case No.: 06-09-B090P I LOMR-APP .- ~"~"ARtl_~ \)~:,j.. ~"/I'Q!:-'9n ~,~, ~;::. ;~) ~. ..... ...~ ,,~ ~8lVD s~c; - Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, D.C. 20472 LETTER OF MAP REVISION DETERMINATION DOCUMENT (CONTINUED) COMMUNITY INFORMATION APPLICABLE NFIP REGULATIONS/COMMUNITY OBLIGATION We have made this determination pursuant to Section 206 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (P.L. 93-234) and in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended (Title XIII of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, P.L. 90-448), 42 U.s.e. 4001-4128, and 44 CFR Part 65. Pursuant to Section 1361 of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended, communities participating in the NFlP are required to adopt and enforce floodplain management regulations that meet or exceed NFlP criteria. These criteria, including adoption of the FIS report and FIRM, and the modifications made by this LOMR, are the minimum requirements for continued NFIP participation and do not supersede more stringent State/Commonwealth or local requirements to which the regulations apply. We provide the floodway designation to your community as a tool to regulate floodplain development. Therefore, the floodway revision we have described in this letter, while acceptable to us, must also be acceptable to your community and adopted by appropriate community action, as specified in Paragraph 60.3(d) of the NFIP regulations. NFIP regulations Subparagraph 60.3(b )(7) requires communities to ensure that the flood-carrying capacity within the altered or relocated portion of any watercourse is maintained. This provision is incorporated into your community's existing floodplain management ordinances; therefore, responsibility for maintenance of the altered or relocated watercourse, including any related appurtenances such as bridges, culverts, and other drainage structures, rests with your community. We may request that your community submit a description and schedule of maintenance activities necessary to ensure this requirement. COMMUNITY REMINDERS We based this determination on the l-percent-annual-chance flood discharges computed in the FIS for your community without considering subsequent changes in watershed characteristics that could increase flood discharges. Future development of projects upstream could cause increased flood discharges, which could cause increased flood hazards. A comprehensive restudy of your community's flood hazards would consider the cumulative effects of development on flood discharges subsequent to the publication of the FIS report for your community and could, therefore, establish greater flood hazards in this area. Your community must regulate all proposed floodplain development and ensure that permits required by Federal and/or State/Commonwealth law have been obtained. State/Commonwealth or community officials, based on knowledge of local conditions and in the interest of safety, may set higher standards for construction or may limit development in floodplain areas. If your State/Commonwealth or community has adopted more restrictive or comprehensive floodplain management criteria, those criteria take precedence over the minimum NFIP requirements. We will not print and distribute this LOMR to primary users, such as local insurance agents or mortgage lenders; instead, the community will serve as a repository for the new data. We encourage you to disseminate the information in this LOMR by preparing a news release for publication in your community's newspaper that describes the revision and explains how your community will provide the data and help interpret the NFIP maps. In that way, interested persons, such as property owners, insurance agents, and mortgage lenders, can benefit from the information. This determination is based on the flood data presently available. The enclosed documents provide additional information regarding this determination. If you have any questions about this document. please contact the FEMA Map Assistance Center toll free at 1-877-336-2627 (1-877-FEMA MAP) or by letter addressed to the LOMR Depot, 3601 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22304. Additional Information about the NFIP is available on ourwebsite at http://www.fema.gov/nfip. ~~~ Michael B. Godesky, Project Engineer Engineering Management Section Mitigation Division Page 4 of 5 !tssue Date: MAY 1 1 Z.Q06 I Effective Date: SEP 2 1 Z006 I Case No.: 06-09.B090P I LOMR-APP ~'~L ;;::;;TAt." ~~.j,. ~"?"vr:~ ~~e;~ \~l (-11VO s"c ''"'- Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, D.C. 20472 LETTER OF MAP REVISION DETERMINATION DOCUMENT (CONTINUED) We have designated a Consultation Coordination Officer (CCO) to assist your community. The CCO will be the primary liaison between your community and FJEMA. For information regarding your CCO, please contact: Ms. Sally M. Ziolkowski Director, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Division Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region IX I III Broadway Street, Suite 1200 Oakland, CA 94607-4052 (510) 627-7175 STATUS OF THE COMMUNITY NFIP MAPS We will not physically revise and republish the FIRM and FIS report for your community to reflect the modifications made by this LOMR at this time. When changes to the previously cited FIRM panel(s) and FIS report warrant physical revision and republication in the future, we will incorporate the modifications made by this LOMR at that time. This determination is based on the flood data presently available. The enclosed documents provide additional information regarding this determination. If you have any questions about this document, please contact the FEMA Map Assistance Center toll free at 1-877-336-2627 (1-877-FEMA MAP) or by letter addressed to the LOMR Depot, 3601 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22304. Additional Information about the NFIP is available on our website at http://www.fema,gov/nfip. //~~ Michael B. Godesky, Project Engineer Engineering Management Section Mitigation Division Page 5 Of_~_J Issue Date: MAY 1 1 2~06 I Effective Date: SEP 2 1 2,005 I Case No.: 06.09.B090P I LOMR-APP Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, D.C. 20472 LETTER OF MAP REVISION DETERMINATION DOCUMENT (CONTINUED) PUBLIC NOTIFICATION OF REVISION Within 90 days of the second publication in the local newspaper, a citizen may request that we reconsider this determination. Any request for reconsideration must be based on scientific or teclmical data. Therefore, this letter will be effective only after the 90-day appeal period has elapsed and we have resolved any appeals that we receive during this appeal period. Until this LOMR is effective, the revised BFEs presented in this LOMR may be changed. A notice of changes will be published in the Federal Register. This information also will be published in your local newspaper on or about the dates listed below. LOCAL NEWSPAPER Name: Press Enterprise Dates: 06/15/2006 06/22/2006 PUBLIC NOTIFICATION MAP PANEL NUMBER S FLOODING SOURCE LOCATION OF REFERENCED ELEVATION Temescal Wash Approximately 1,150 feet downstream of Chaney Street 1,260 1,261 2062 F Approximately 80 feet downstream of Riverside Drive 1,258 1,259 2053 F This determination is based on the flood data presently available. The enclosed documents provide additional information regarding this determination. If you have any questions about this document, please contact the FEMA Map Assistance Center toil free at 1-877-336-2627 (1-877-FEMA MAP) or by letter addressed to the LOMR Depot, 3601 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22304. Additional Information about the NFIP is available on our website at http://www.fema.gov/nflp. ~~~ Michael B. Godesky, Project Engineer Engineering Management Section Mitigation Division CHANGES ARE MADE IN DETERMINATIONS OF BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS FOR THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, UNDER THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM On August 18, 2003, the Department of Homeland Security's Federal Emergency Management Agency identified Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFRAs) in the City of Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, California, through issuance of a Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). The Mitigation Division has determined that modification of the elevations of the flood having a I-percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year (base flood) for certain locations in this community is appropriate. The modified Base Flood Elevations (BFEs) revise the FIRM for the community. The changes are being made pursuant to Section 206 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (Public Law 93-234) and are in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended (Title XIII of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, Public Law 90-448), 42 U.S.C. 4001-4128, and 44 CFR Part 65. A hydraulic: analysis was performed to incorporate updated topographic information and the effects of channel improvements along Temescal Wash and has resulted in a revised delineation of the regulatory floodway, increases and decreases in SFHA width, and increased and decreased BFEs for Temescal Wash from just downstream of Chaney Street to approximately 1, I 00 feet downstream of Riverside Drive. The table below indicates existing and modified BFEs for selected locations along the affected lengths of the flooding source( s) cited above. Location Existing BFE (feet) * Modified BFE (feet)* Approximately 1150 feet downstream of Chaney Street Bridge Approximately 80 feet downstream of Riverside Drive Bridge 1,260 1,258 1,261 1,259 *National Geodetic Vertical Datum, rounded to nearest whole foot Under the above-mentioned Acts of 1968 and 1973, the Mitigation Division must develop criteria for floodplain management. To participate in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), the community must use the modified BFEs to administer the floodplain management measures of the NFIP. These modified BFEs will also be used to calculate the appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings and their contents and for the second layer of insurance on existing buildings and contents. Upon the second publication of notice of these changes in this newspape:r, any person has 90 days in which he or she can request, through the Chief Executive Officer of the community, that the Mitigation Division reconsider the determination. Any request for reconsideration must be based on knowledge of changed conditions or new scientific or technical data. All interested parties are on notice that until the 90-day period elapses, the Mitigation Division's determination to modify the BFEs may itself be changed. Any person having knowledge or wishing to comment on these changes should immediately notify: The Honorable Robert Magee Mayor, City of Lake Elsinore Administrative Office, City Hall 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 z>- 0<1: -~ 1-0 ~8 oUJ-l 0...J~ UJ~ OUJ- ...J(.)~ u.<( UJu. (/) a::: t- >- <( :::l ::J <( aJ(/)O~ I J: 0 a::: ~ 0 UJ :;: 0 1->[[ ~ ~ ;: o o o ...J U. UJ (.) a::: :::l o (/) e" z Q o o ...J U. UJ (/) <( UJ a: U ~ >- a: o t- :5 ::J <:> UJ a: >-a:~ zt-UJO <(ua.z UJot-O :i;...JUJU UJUJUJ >~(/) z UJ QL5~f=' t-a:::JUJ U<(oUJ UJ (/)LL (/) ~ If=' 5 ill ~~ ru u z <( t- (/) is z o f= u UJ Cf) Cf) Cf) o a: U ~om~oo~~~~~~~~~mm~~ 0000000000000000000 5' > <:> z t- UJ UJ ~ O~N~~~~~~~~~~~moo~~ ~~m~~~~mo~~~~~~mmmo ~NN~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~O~~O~~~N~~NN~~~~ ~~ro~~~~moo~~~~~rororoo ~NN~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~.~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~O~~O~~~N~MNN~~~~ ~~ro~~~~moo~~~~~rororoo ~NNMM~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~O~~~Mm~N~~N~NN~M~~ ~mW~m~~~N~~~~~NOO~N N ~ ~Om~N~~Oom~No OMN~~~~~~M~~~m~~~N~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ri~~ ...~ N.,.... ~ .,.... ("") ~ .,.... N .,... ..- N ...... ~ <0 O~~~M~~o~m~~~m~~~~m ~~m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ g~~~~~~~~~~~8~~gg~~ ~OO~~~~OOONNMN~~~Mm ci~Nri~ID~rocio~Nri~~IDro~~ O"-"-"-""'"",""""-"-NNNNNNNNMM .,......-.,.....,.....,....,....,....,...~.,.....,.....,....,....,....,....,....,....,....,.... ro ().r::: ~~<(OOOOWU.0I-,~...J~ZO~O~(/) ~5 I- ~ ~ .... ~ C "tI ~ 1Il ':;: ~ 0:: -- <( ~ Cl ~ s: Cl o o ....J U. ::t: V) ~ ...J <( U V) W ~ W I- >- (.) :z UJ (!) <l: I- Z UJ :!: UJ ~ z <l: :!: >- (.) z UJ (!) n:: UJ :!: UJ ~ UJ o UJ u. <( U ui 0::>; 0.... Z 5 en 0 ...JU W ~ w-o ~ 'iij <( ~ ...J ~ U. '- oe:. ~ u ... III > a: C1l c <( ~ c C1l Cf) ,s ~ III o C III ::l 'E o U III > o .0 <( ., ~ l-d'tn...JUJ ~ ELEVATION IN FEET (NGVD) .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... N N N N N N N N N N I:,:) ... ... C)> C)> 0) 0) "" "" 0> -C)> 0 C)> 0 C)> 0 C)> 0 C)> 0 11:1 C:, - 1\:1 C:, C, - N en. "" >-3 ::>;l t'l > s:: - l::l N "" en en >-3 > Z (j t'l .... N Z CD >-3 ::I: 0 c::: - en. N > ?' z l::l C)> en. 0 "!j "!j - N t'l <0- t'l >-3 _ J..... r > ttI -, - 0 - < N t'l :0 1 I (j C)> 0 Z "!j t"" c::: .... I t'l I:,:) T Z 0 (j + t'l :l!l :=:3 - -1+- ::I: I:,:) 1 0 en. en > -i Z :r- >-3 > > .... t Z I:,:) > - 1-1 "'.-'-'1- o~ I I ::>;l <: , t'l - I ::>;l I:,:) - , 0. I t"" t'l n ~ ~ ~ ii .. ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ t'l !'E z z ~~ C ~ z - ~ ii z '" I:,:) ~ i" i" N i ~ ~ ~ li I z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i - I:,:) N - .... - - en N N N N ... C)> 0) 0> C)l 0 C)> 0 0 FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY CO CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE. CA. 'l:l (RIVERSIDE CO.) ELEVATION IN FEET (NGVD) - - - - - - - - - - N N N N N N N N N N ...... ... C)l C)l 0) 0) -.2 -.2 ~ ~ I:.~O C)l 0 C)l 0 C)l 0 C)l 0 C)l N C;" .... 1:.) 1:.0) I' - ~ c..? 00 o. ..., ~ ~ > s:: ..... 0 c.:' Ui .... ..., > Z n ~ - 1:.0) Z ... 0. ..., ::: , 0 -++ 1 c: 00 - > 1:.0) .L Z C)l 0 . . 00 .++ 0 ..,..,1...... . ~ ......-... ~ ~ tt ~ ..., > t:l:l 0 <: ~ + .f: ..+. n --j ~ 0 t c. Z ~ t. t""' c: I ~ z J: n ~ :::E ~ - ::: 1:.0) , I' 00 -.2 -~~ > ''1'' Z ..., ..ti > > ~ .-\ -rr Z -.2 > 0. ~ o~ I :;,: , ~ I ~ - 1:.0) 00 , I &i i ~ ~ !l i'i p0 ~ !l~ ~ ~ ~ ~Z - " ~ 1:.0) ~ 5 z ~ ~o ~ ~ ~ " ~ C)l " = ~ ..+ ~ ~ ~ z z " z 1.l .. r:l ~ ~ ~ ~ OJ! S .. g 1:.0) - - - - - ~ N N N N N N C)l C)l -.2 -.2 ~ ~ 0 C)l 0 C)l 0 C)l FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY PROFILES 0 1:.0 CI1'Y OF LAKE ELSINORE. CA. ~TEMESCAL '1:J (RIVERSIDE CO.) WASH II !SC"'lf;'Oj!! I~~~g~ '" ~o~.., z::::WO n tn en:=. o .... C !i>~ $! .., i:l:I Z 0< !"I ~ ~ ~ .." II ~ ~~ ~ II~ ~ II -0- I ~. ~~-~ ~ O'#. O~ .... <;> <;>. ~Q) -<~ -<~ ~r- ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t>> --~Q) i~ ~i if ~ s.B l !!. " ~ =- ~ !. ~ Ja g ~ ~ ., 1:1 .. 'Ii = .. ~ > 'Ii " ~ " r o -10 mO ~z mG> (J)m ~=R m ~o >0-1 (J)(J) :r:" :;0 o :s:: ~ z m )> m ~ z m >< CIl~C ~~~ .....t'.l 0'0 /' ~i~/ ~<>c~) C::~~S' ~'::J C7') @ ~ ~ <;> ~~~ I:~ ."'. ".~ ~,.:;:4~ II >>""~(",)'T1 -> -r- ~~ ""lO ~~ '<0 r/l~ Oc eotJ!J""iz tol~t"4 (I) ("')::s~ c o>z ~ ~ 0 Z ~ ~ ~ .. ~ -l m ~ "tJ s:: ~ ~ "tl CIl~ 9 ~ ~ . (J1 o q """0 ~N C?~ ~Ol Ol :J .., :J _ c= ,,!B.. OC'l o=r a.W -o::J -C'l e!.CD :J ~...I.~~ o '#. 0 '#. OOl OOl r ~:a ~:J CD ........ CD:J (Q ~~WC=CD _- .,:::!..!B.. 5- :!l 9- :!J 9- OOlOW ~g 8.g <CD "!2..CD ~ ~. ~ m r- N o - CJ1 """ ." (;i o b ;rg !'J III Oii it iil ,.;~ ~ ~-'" z y m .,. ,.~ r- \S~g ~ 0 ~ 8 m--4 ~ C_;;~::'ON ~F'~;::l ~7f! r- t.I'I ~g~ s; . ~ Q " .~ en~ ~> O?11 :ole ~o_ sClt>'J~~:::O "'!';it"" z:::::lII ('):;:jtl.:l en ~ 0>:2 ~ ~ ~ ~ . m S m ~ ." <n'~~~1 0""' o'f/!.. ..J>.-" ~* '?Ill ~* ~3gg;;<3i ,:;:;fii ~~.!tffi ~ QO~g.:!lg:o. 8.ffi~~~CJ ~j ~!il ~~ :> '< III :; ~gS:Q?l'" :Il~[:l~O - 60[oJ~~;;o '" z;! ~ ti::lll ('J =S." C:;:=. ~>~ ~ :! 1:.1 ~ . ~ m ~ II ~o~ I ~;., --~- c;:>:.e ?~ o~ -<~ ~~ T'QJ i "''' ",,, -<" !i2~ffim~(t) -n'" ~- .::J.1ll. 5- og: ~g. :!lg. %'" &~ [~ ~.j ~ lil %lil :::J "< -. " ~ z m r- g S N ... 2l ~ ~~ ~ lI~ ~ ~ _N 00 'jJZ J!m -=~ , I;; 8~ ~I <:, 0 III " 0 . :- ~ ~ c( u tJj a. c( :;; 0 0 ~ l 1 ~I ~I ...J II a: 81 I I ~ ~ z f III In lji it.! 11 H ,1 i /i1 Jl: .Ht III a:"- w'" ..... lIE!:! il ~l.!: ffiii "'''' ;;;" w= a:~ .... 0.... c::J lIE'" ::J C [ <( I I '1 & .!.~; j li:i ~~ ~. EttlgE 8H"~ a'i. i ~ l~ ~ ~m; I 0. ~ m::i: '!!~8 ~~ ~ E~ '6~.8~~ 8:J ~ 0 lL ~8 2 t ~ ;~~i] ~~i ~ & ~.~~~~ ~~'"8 "h~ ; 'i i~ ~ ~ i ,z" :E a: u: ... c :IE ~ ~ ~~~~ g; ~~8~ ~i:;~o~~ ~6~~!~ ~l ~~ LAKE ELSINORE FIRE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Elsinore West Business Park I 2006-02, CUP 2006-02 January 29,2008 General Conditions CASE - CITY CASE STATEMENT With respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced project, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognize fire protection standards: USE-#01A - SHELL/FPE/COMM. THESE CONDITIONS ARE FOR A SHELL BUILDING ONLY. Shell building will receive a shell final only. No Certificate of Occupancy (human occupant and/or materials) will be issued until the building occupant has been identified with their occupancy classification and have been conditioned by Lake Elsinore Fire Services. Occupant or tenant identification is imperative for orderly and prompt processing. Upon identification of the occupant or tenant a Fire Protection Analysis report maybe required prior to establishing the requirements for the occupancy permit. Failure to provide a comprehensive data analysis and/ or technical information acceptable to the Fire Department may result in project delays. A complete commodity listing disclosing type, quantity, level of hazard and potential for "Reactivity" must be provided within_ days. The forgoing is necessary to properly classify the building (s). Failure to provide comprehensive data and/or high technical information, will result in project delay and requirement for a complete Fire Protection study for review. USE-#04-HIGH PILE/RACK STORAGE A separate permit may be required for high-pile storage and/or racks. Sprinkler plans and/or sprinkler review must be submitted by a licensed sprinkler contractor with storage and/or rack plans to Lake Elsinore Fire Services for review and approval of the 2007 CFC Article 32 compliance. Complete Article 32 information re: all commodities stored, rack dimensions, placement in building, sprinkler densities, etc. must be provided with suppression system for racks and/or high-pile storage review. A complete listing of commodities, classified using CFC Article 32, 2007 Edition and NFPA 13, 2002 Edition guidelines by a licensed Fire Protection Engineer (or other consultant approved by this jurisdiction). (Current plan check fee is $348.00) USE-#50-BLUE DOT REFELECTOR Blue retro reflective pavement markers shall be mounted on private street, public streets And driveways to indicate location of fire hydrants. Prior to installation, placement of markers must be approved by Lake Elsinore Fire Services. USE*-#23 - MIN REO FIRE FLOW Minimum required fire flow shall be 1500 GPM for 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, which must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. Fire flow is based on type V-B construction per the 2007 CBC and building(s) having a fire sprinkler system. USE-#20-SUPER FIRE HYDRANT The average spacing between Super fire hydrant (s) (6" x 4" x 2 %"x 2 % ") shall be not exceed 500 feet between hydrants and have a maximum distance of 250 feet from any point on the street or road frontage to a hydrant as measured along approved vehicular travel ways. USE-#19-0N/OFF LOOPED HYD A combination of on-site and off site super fire hydrants, on a looped system with the average spacing between Super fire hydrant (s) (6" x 4" x 2 %" x 2 % ") shall be not exceed 500 feet between hydrants and have a maximum distance of 250 feet from any point on the street or road frontage to a hydrant as measured along approved vehicular travel ways. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrants (s) in the system. USE-#84 - TANK PERMITS Applicant and/or developer shall be responsible for obtaining under/aboveground fuel, chemical and mixed liquid storage tank permit, from the Lake Elsinore Fire Services and Environmental Health Departments. Plans must be submitted for approval prior to installation. Aboveground fuel/mixed liquid tank (s) shall meet the following standards: Tank must be tested and labeled to UL2085 Protected Tank Standard or SwRI 93-01. The test must include the Projectile Penetration Test and the Heavy Vehicle Impact Test. A sample copy of the tank's label from an independent test laboratory must be included with your plans. (Current plan check fee is $217.00 for the first Tank, each additional tank $32.00) USE-#89-RAPID HAZMAT BOX Rapid entry Hazardous Material data and key storage cabinet shall be installed on outside of the building. Plans shall be submitted to the Lake Elsinore Fire Services for approval prior to installation (Current plan check fee is $126.00) USE-#75-WATER PLANS The applicant or developer shall separately submit two copies of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Lake Elsinore Fire Services." USE-#17 A-SLOG PLAN CHECK $ Building plan check deposit fee of $1 ,056.00, shall be paid in a check or money order to the City of Lake Elsinore before plans have been approved by our office. USE-#51- WATER CERTIFICATION The applicant or developer shall be responsible to submit written certification from the water company noting the location of the existing fire hydrant and that the existing water system is capable of delivering 1500 GPM fire flow for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure. If a water system currently does not exist, the applicant or developer shall be responsih1p. tn nrovide written certification that financial arrangements have been made to provide them. USE-#4 - WATER PLANS The applicants or developer shall separately submit two copies of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review and approval. Calculated velocities shall not exceed 100 feet per second. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed and approved by a registered civil engineer and the local Water Company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Lake Elsinore Fire Services." PRIOR TO BUILDING FINAL INSPECTION USE-#45 - FIRE LANES The applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating required fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs. USE-#66- DISPLAY BOARDS Display Boards will be as follows: Each complex shall have an illuminated diagrammatic representation of the actual layout which shows name of complex, all streets, building designators, unit members, and fire hydrant locations within dimension and located next to roadway access. USE*-#77 -SUPER FH/FLOW Minimum required fire flow shall be 1500 GPM for 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, which must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. Fire flow is based on type V-B construction per the 2007 CBC and building(s) having a fire sprinkler system. The average spacing between Super fire hydrant (s) (6" x 4" x 2 %" x 2 % ") shall be not exceed 500 feet between hydrants and have a maximum distance of 250 feet from any point on the street or road frontage to a hydrant as measured along approved vehicular travel ways. USE-#12A- SPRINKLER SYSTEM Install a complete fire sprinkler system per NFPA 132002 edition (130 and 13R system are not allowed) in all buildings requiring a fire flow of 1500 GPM or greater sprinkler system (s) with pipe size in excess of 4" inch diameter will require the project structural engineer to certify (wet signature) the stability of the building system for seismic and gravity loads to support the sprinkler system. All fire sprinkler risers shall be protected from any physical damage. The post indicator valve and fire department connection shall be located to the front, within 50 feet of a hydrant, and the minimum of 25 feet from the building (s). A statement that the building (s) will be automatically fire sprinkled must be included on the title page of the building plans. (Current sprinkler plan check fee is $164.00 per riser) Applicant or developer shall be responsible to install a .L. Central Station Monitored Fire Alarm System. Monitoring System shall monitor the fire Sprinkler system (s) water flow, P.I.V.'s and all control valves. Plans must be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation. Contact Fire Department for guideline handout (current Monitoring plan check fee is $192.00) USE-#27 -EXTI NGU I SH ERS Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A-1 OBC and signage. Fire Extinguishers located in public areas shall be in a recessed cabinet mounted 48" (Inches) to enter above the floor level with Maximum 4" projection from the wall. Contact Fire Department for proper placement of equipment prior to installation. USE-#32- TITLE 19 Comply with Title 19 of the California Administrative Code. : : : : : :~. ~: i i Ili!llll j all~ftUI I g.. I ; I ~i i I 1~lli~l: I 'i~ilq · -liiik t I I lil~i~1 Ic~ I Ii II i ~ ~ ~ n ~~ n I ~ ~ ~ I r > Q ~~~I ~~m wI m~~ ~~I~I ulfl~ ~~jg~ n~i~ !ill' I ~ml 'l~ j-~~~ I~- ~ iMI l~ b ; ~g- ~ Hi~~ M ~~~~ ~. . ~~N ~-~ ~ r~ ;i~ ~In ~H ~~ '~i t~~!1 ~. Ilil' m~f I -JiJ~ ,. - 'm ~ ~ ~ iJ ~~ !.~ ~ f Ii ~ I ~ ~ f ~ ~ I i ~ ~ I i J ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 " " ~~ ~~ II n n ~~ ~~ n ~~ u ~ ~ ~ ~ . · t . " - I "ll I . · t . " - I i ~~m ~ Ii ~ ~ Ilr~1 ~I j i ~m~~ ~n Q~ M I ~ ~ I I a i i ~ ~ ~ 5 9 i S i I ~ I m ~ Ii i~ ~U ~~? (') i . . I & I Ii l 5 g i ; ; l .f~ ~ ilm ~I ~ ! iU ~ 1-< > ~ ~ ~ i :;;! f 5 5 fi i i I fg j f Ii 5 fi i i II lUll i > ~~~ : Illf,g~1 ~8~;;;;i~ I ~ ; iiii~IH iiliSfiiill~ f lii;.,d .E=~DI~I~~ tl tl tl .1 "I =1 ~ ! i i 1 1 I ! I B :':1:1:1=1:111 !IS I i II II li!!!!!!~ \:::~~:II 1111111111 111111I11 \~III~i:il "'I :::::::::1 n ~IWlm II i~UUu~ ~Imm i~W ~ n!HH!W~ ! iiQriW i ~ hU~~~U; ; ~ . ~ ~~~ ~ ~ Ih ~ . ~ ~ 1/ i I : 1i1l11 , L !I-- ~ ~ tr1 ~ r:/J Z 00 0 ~N G; @nel t"""t"""oo ~tIj~ ~~!~ ~ \O-Jn~ ~8>O j,.001Ot'" 10 N > r:/J 00 0\ , ..... ~ w ~ ~ . ~ . n . ;:;;ORE WEST L.~ - Ii :SC:=92673 J ph: 949-218-1\lO8 fax: 949-498.0041 j I ~ t-4 rIJ. ~ Z o ~ .~ ~~ ~~ ~ rIJ. ~ J ~ ~ g = ~ ~ e c:J ~ rIJ. ~ ~ Z ~ rIJ. rIJ. ~ > ~ ~ in~~ 1-.,1\1. ~II ELSINORE WEST BUSINESS PARK lAKE ~ CALFllIlNIA AlSEISOR"S PARCB. NOS. m.t.... oa.. OIM ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I~ I~~~ I ~~ ~;~! ~Im~ il l I~ ~ II ~BJ;;~I ii8iii ~ ij I~ *;I~i ~~8~ 8~1 -18e I~I ill ~~ ~I~ i~ li~ i~ ~~ I~ 8~ Ii 85~ I .1 =i; ~ il :;;1 Iii; Ii! !; Ii ~!iiiil !~~~ ~ i ~I !I ;I~~~ =ii Iii 8!1 ~ -i: Ii ~!i != IiI j; 1= jl :1 ~i i;; I 11 II! Iii ill ~l! i!ji 'I i !! Ii filiii l~!~ I ! il !~!! Iii li!~! i ji Ii IIi I! i~;j ! ~ ~ Ii !ll : ; i ; ! Ii; II i ~!;; il~i !! i!!i IS- I; I!; i i Ii ii~:1 ~!i il! I~! i i!~: 8!!~ :~~ ii ! i~1 i~ ~I ;i~ ~ II~i~~ I I ~~! I; ; I!; I~!~ ~: ~ i II I; I!I! : ! I!~II I:; ~;I :;1 ; ii i~ !8 I! !8~~! i le!~ e ;1; ~ ;~m;li R i~1 I : IIi ii= II ~ 9 a II is ;i~ i i ; i!l~~ ~:! I!! ril; ! i! ~i ill ; ~;i i j ! Ii i ~8i '" ! ~ll ~ a,~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~.." ~ !ii~ Ii ~ J j~Ki ~i" ~*~ i ~;~ . I ~~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~c: ~ I ~ :~; I ;~I ;11 ; s ~ I ! a;;J=i 1= ;'~ i I : s~ ;~l; i ~ ~~ ~ ~! : ~~ ~ : ~ s i .A ~~8h d~ ~ ~ ~~~ i ~ i~i!I ~~ d i ~ ~~~ ~. 1* ~ . ~ i!~~~ ~~n i ~~"!l t III~' I' i I II ~ii" I ~ ~ ~ Ii · ~ a ~ P " a I :: s ~ ' I ~~~!l T \ T I I I m I!!i ~ ; ; ~ ; ; ; ; ~ ! ~ i III ~ III j !!; I i q n i II iJ !! 1111 i I~ n" i A ~ ~t;;; I S~!I~i sir =~!~~!~ i ~~ g Q ~ =~ Q ~ ~ Q ~ c:: :i. i ~ i ~~ .. II ~ ~ ~ g s~! il IS'" ~ ~ <l I I i !l~ e i · ~ I i J i - ~ i~iIP~IGl di~~~~~~ n~n~""c . e~ial~iP~ i .~~I:z ~i .~ .a~,,~~. . ~ - ~ . ~ '" - q ~ ~ '" ~~ ;! !n. I II file;" I nni I n1illl Ii!Ii~i!GI ~IIII. u::~! IUi~ n~~~ l~ini~1 ~~ I ~h ~ ~I~ ~ al~1 gy~ :~ IIi; ~ ! ~ :J - 8~ 'i I ~ IU ~~~~ ~~~lIli I ~ ~. - ~ ~ ~\ I ! ~;h!lllibha I! II~ 1111 ~ ~ ~~ 19 biUh j"i:Dd I~ ~I 8~11 ! ; ! &~e~~11 ~ I ,; I~ I~I~ III ~i ~ I mU!I! ;1 i: i!l! Ii! I ~!I ~ ~ ~ ~ miih ~.d ; II Sh! ji!1 ~ ;!; ~ ~ ~ ~ I l:sIZil! !i;I~I; i!1 I~!I ~;!:~i~ ..I ~ In t !f1 ~ g~'i ~!! d il ~8 _. ~aae~"ii1 I~ ill ~ ~ !;j a ~i~S !!; 8~ a I~ ;~ :~~~i~a II II i~~i!; ;~i:l; !~; t~ i!i:;!1 I ~ ~I- I ~ l~~~~ ~I..I ~ i i !h~i PREUIllNARY. FOR PLAN CHECK ONLY Wednesday November 14 2007.2:12:33 pm s ~ a ~_ ~~id ': !': '= ~ Iq G c;; c;; 'lI ~ i ~ I UI !j~1 !;~i Ilii !I~i !i~1 i ~:I~ ;:i ;~!~ ;~I~ ~il~ ~ ~i i!l !l~1 ~~I ~!ll I ~ . II U ,n a d I '. "~S~,~~ ~:::-':'~.:;.,~~.. ~~~':.......,..::~:~..c"}->.. :)~;;;~~'!;ls~~"":'""" \ t" ....'::::-.s'~~t..;:::... ":'~1h-'" ......... ........ -....;: '~,..::,~. .......'%~>....... .... -......:' "'~",.:::::"~~":~::~:n-;'",,,,, '" '~~:--~".!!'4- ~r'... .... '.",< ~-";"':::,:-';:-~-....b~'<~~..... " - .',,";.. """~,,..~~~..... .~. I_~~~:~~~~~~ . _-......; "':"I~"""<'o.... -- _._-_.-'~~- ..~:~~~ .................,. /1' .-// ./ r I I .~ i L ~~ ~~ ~ I~ I~ ~ ~;~.~i I~ ~ ~~~~~~ o ~ o '"T1 > m ^ r ~ Q2 ~iJ-I2 z:omQ OmZ::o ;:;Or-l !11-)>m OS:-1< OZ< <: ~)>mm ~~~(J) 00:0-1 '"T1 :0 0 (D ;:;0 )> m C ~O~(J) ;:;OZ::::..._ (1)0)>2 ~iJ-Um -r(,.)(J) ~)>~(J) ~Z(,.) m ......." o )> '"T1 ::0 ~ ^ C '"T1 o ;:;0 Z )> ...... III1 ~ 1111 ~ Ui~ I : ~IN ; PREL.MNARY - FOR PLAN CHECK ONLY WedI..-y NoNmber 14 2007 - 2:27:57 pm -< "\:~~:-s:>_ , --"' '"" "\ ., " , "< '" ~ li! Iii .. I ~~~!j I ~ill' ~-~!j m ~qljl1 --- .5 5 m ~~!j Sl: --& Ss eee eeeeee ~ ~~:u I i II ~IIIIII ~ ~~ii~ II ~ Iii .. i ~ ~ ~ g &i~..ri ~ ~ I ,. ~ H q !i1 ...~ q ~IPPz d~ I!I i I !I ~ all ~ ~iil ft BiB ~ ~ ~ '" ~~~ !I ~ ~ ~ i ~!ja ~ Ii ~ I Ii ~ ~ .. Ii~ i!l~~I~ P I ~ i !I ~ ~: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M I i ~ ;; h 01 it .- ~! t i!S "' \ ~iii!" !i~!i " ft ~i! !II i~~ ~a Ii ~~i ; ~" !h mill ~ii ~i i~ ~'I ' ~ I! i ~ ~...--ll/,,\ ~ ~ ",.. >0 !:1m <;1g n"" J:;::;! d~ ~g <an ",,0 ~ l" 8s i ! I ij ~ i l:l ~ R . t ~ ~ !! I ~ i ~! ~ mli~ I -i .( ~ ~~ ~~; ~ ~ ~ I :: ~ ~~Ib ill ~i~i~ ~ ~;i~~ . !,., I ill' m i=j~ --- ~ 5 mr 1= --S 88 "'''1 i1j!iil lIl~a:i '" Ilg ~ij i;~ I I 2 a i! I. I · :,-1 II Ii ~li . ff * ~,~ I : i : ~ ! ~ I I : i 1 ! ~l ;;i~ . !I- I ! :i ~ ~ ~ ~ << :i ~ . h ~~ \ I ~~ LJ I I I ~ \ I ~ __ 1_PRlJ!!TLLJCE ~ I >-..J I_~IJI[ ~! ~ !l~ ~! T 5m ~!~I .. i2 !i T I i ~ ~ i I ~ ~~; ~ I e~a Sjl '. ~ 18ji ~ - i~ ~ Ii l'I I ; ~ /L> a PREUMINARY - FOR PLAN CHECK ONLY Wednesday November 14 2007 - 2:15:41 pm - ! ,~ ~ e ~ J;1 i j E ~ II;i;~ I a i.m!li ~ ~~I~ii :: ~ihd '~I}I !!~~l ~;p In..; !i1I~ mi';'; in 5!: It: ""Ii I. =,:u I ~:iii ill .' ~"'~I liil 'iil 1;1 il ~~1 Ii ~. Ii is ~.. ... HIli ni i i I il ,i u:; ~ ~.. ~ i '. , ~ 1:1 ~ s.ill Ii" !. · I : i ~~ ~ ~u: m ~~& . I II' Je i llii II! P ,J I ~ i ! . h . ill - r! Iii :Ii III B I I I ~I I A 1113 !!I~ l!~' '1'1'111 "q i ~ i.! -II ;;!i ;.!i I!!! I I I. ~d · I II I III lill :11 !;I i~~ I ; !~ II ,..~fi:' . ~ I~ :, Ii UIi~.1 I :Ni;~ '11'11 II .. ill~ig I f!il~; 'l~' I !i!i!i I ... m m m~ m , ........, '"'' " z "' d N <-i '" "' '" l!t 8- N '!. ii :J . \ o ~ o "Tl ~ m m r m (J) r- - ~ 0 Z ~ 00 ~ z ::IJ ~om 0- g-;:E zOrn ~Z(J) o ):> -I "Tlr ~ c aJ < en c ~m(J) en ""'0 - om Z J11 ::c m ~~(J) ~ -; (J) m ""'tJ ~ )> ~ ~ "Tl o ::tI Z i> '" c: , i c . ~ ~ ! ~ ~ l!i i:l .... ~ Uiii~ I i ~R;li ;;; ! =ei~i ~ ~li~11 ~~It. ~i~l~ alll~=:; i!I~ ~ ;U!U e -'I"" ni~l~ I . iI nlillll rl~1 ;iii !! 1m ~, !II Ii ~ ; ~ . 1\ ., i~i!il i , ~ a 11.!li i -.~ ~~~ I .lll~ ill m nil z I -~ I~ Ii! ! ~! --f m Z ~ --f <: m ~ ::Om ("). moo .- - Z ~3:0 ~ )> ::0 :;! -u m ~ CN :2E ~~m m CN 00 fa ~ --f i5 . fit "'T1 OJ ~oc ~ 00 o::Oz ~ (") m :;; 0 00 jzoo >O-u 0)> 3:::0 Z^ C s:: -u c ::0 -u o 00 m 00 ...., '...... "......, '......, , '......, , '...... ."......"......,~~~:-'-~:tj') ":It '......,'...... "';.,,'......!~ -~-~NO.:~......"......,'...... .. ............. "4'. ... i "'-!I7t3r ~............._.,. ................ '~I "~~,-r-':-'-......_~~"......,'......,'......, : I -'....." '- " ! ! ""'...... '-, l ii I r'",...... -'-...... . I! : I ............... ... I s:lr I ............ ~~ i ;: I "......, ~ ~I .' i: II ii-I l I ~I i: , '"' 11 : 1 I ~I 1(1 ~i i I I ~: I I : I ~ I I : i I. I : I~ I 1"1 : i Ii I I I( I I ~ ~ ~: I ~ ~ ~: I I Iii .. : q i : ......" r- II i : ......,'-1.."......" 'I' j I '-... ................ ...............1 : ~'-............. .... ..1'.... 1 i .'......, -......If''...:...''.......;.,,... i : .................... ~.. ~~~..~.... i : " '- . 4l."'" ...:--''~ I " ,_ ... ""':'" ""~ I ..............- ..............-...... "~"": - . ~ " ......" .............. 0((/." ................. .. I" ....................... "'......,,:'................... ............l....'" '...... ...... "...... --......" '-, -'......,-...... ......,-...... '-, -'......, '-......, , ............................ ................. "...... ......... "...... "...... J l!~:~ I 9i_1' ~-~~ II! i~l .'; I. Zi~.= I ~.i~! !11 ~~ a:i II~ ~i; ~;I B ; a ij !II mill f~ f,p-I .11 dl~ i ~ I ~ I nil ~I!il ~j~i IJ!!; ~I~; ~~~II ~:I~ ;:i :.I~ ;.i~ ~ii~ ~ ~B 1~ ~~I ~III 9~; 5 II : U hI ill; i i Ii jiB il I~ !!ii ~Q - ~=! ~ ~ "; , ~ a ~~ I i,~: ! I~~ ~. IS: hi! ; IG~ OJ IS! i! ~: I ~ i I - I~ .. .i~ m i i ~ i ~ i i iii If~ . i ~ I ; M !U -I! B B I I ~ :e:~ ~$!> ~ !ft i ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ i~~~! s! ~ I ~~~~ I ;il)' m li!i h= ww; D8 ~~~u I ~;:il llilll!~ m..l!~i I~~ ~iil B~I I I m r Q2 Z o :D m :E m ~ (D m C fii en ~O Z ~ 0 rn oZen gO." z 0)> I :c! 3:: :D / ~ Z ^ :: // a.I C I ~/ ~ 3:: n1 ~i /!e'" Z ~ ,~r)>--1 I I en )> I' I ~ z-I III' > <- II! ,~ m ~ L 0 II I 'TI ." :i ~ ~ )> I, I _ :D 1 i 2J 0 I I ~ m Ii !); r II I ~ II i )> L ." I - L- ~ : 01 I (.) \ ...... \ \ , "- , ............. ............. '.... -b I ~ ~ se I ~I z: ~ ~ m .ur I I I I I I I : I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I o :c! o 'TI i OM ~ ;.., .... " i ............. ............. " ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. U~i~~ I i ie~;li ~ B~Ni ~ ~Ii;~i qe.h ~jei!f ~~a*~ i!I. . i ~~q!a I ~'Il' <l~<l!a ~~~ g;;l' !.H ~~~. m ~a!a sl: -is s ze'lUI ~liU ~~i;i '1<. ~!I ~ HH qq I ; ~ 1- I ............................ '-"'--",- ._,._, "'--"'-- --, ....._-,-- "'--",-- --'--,-- '--"- "'--"'--",- 4t, ",.,.,::_,__, '" -"'- '70 -_ '--, -"'-- ~ '" '--, '-IF', "'--......._....... 8.,.~';,.>_, I -~.-., ''''--",- <;: ~h-:" - I '---r----t.,,,,,,, -"'--....... !f-"--'- 1 ,-.~ _" _, i ,",<V'-~ !("$ _"'-_ __,__, I i i" __ "'-_",- __'__ I ! i 1lli;b.'" ~ _......._"'- _ I ! i j_ _. _"'-_ i : I '_" "'-_..... 'i, : I _"__ i I: I"" [ i '-.,--, :1 Iii i : I i:1 ~ ! il' ~ Z i : ~, ~Hi j ~ : I " i" I ~~ ~ I i I ! I il~ : , i i i I" i a I : i", I i Ii: I i I ....._-, ._'-.,. ''''-, ", '-, i , I '--, '" '.. --" , , , '- "'-''''- ", ,- '. , I I '-,,- -'- , '-'" : I "" "'-'-"", .~..~ "'~ I '-. Co '",- ..... -. , __ I '-. ll,':---"', ~-'-l "-, I I ""-.,..,~ ~ ~'i;-""":---'" tj-'tj-'~::::t--l' --'" ~ '" f.J 'i::--, 'Y" :::,1(" "- <;: - '--, '--,-- !( "$ ''''-''''- '-'-. . '",- '--, - '-'- ''''--",- --, "--, ''''--",- ._'-., -"'-'",- -', ._'--,.- ~ ~~ -tl ! :: I \ """'" ...... ----, """'" ......, ~i I~~~ I~!; Ii m r Q2 z o :JJ m 00 =E :C!Om o Z en "TI 0 -I s; 0 OJ ~~ C m - en ~z _ zC Z o~ m ~ ""lJ ~ 8 r ""lJ c)>)> ~z:JJ o I ^ "TI""lJ I ;u :JJ -I ~O m fg c.... Z Bm ~ .rn 0 -I en -I _ ~ < ~OJm o 0 ""lJ "TI C )> ~z:JJ =n 0 0 0)> m ~:JJr 5> -< 3: )> ""lJ eN eN 01 ~ . , I o ~ ~ ~ s ~ R I.;a S ~ I:l .... ~ n~ln I ~ pe~ Ii !i! l,,~ II S !:ebi ~ ~li~'1 "~~:I ~i~l~ ~biil.. jli,,~ 0 ". . i ~~"'I ~lil~ "-". m i~~" m ~J~~ Ii: "is s Zl1!:lUI ~.m ~ lli~~iil; '" Ij; "'; ~!I ~ I iH I m~ i ~~ I"'.. ~ .. . ~ :: I \ 1"'... ~ ' . ~ : . ~ ~ I"'.. .. ~ .. . ~ ................... "....... ........... '....... .'........ '........,........ ................... ". '........ '........ , ,................. ~ ........,....... ........,........ ......... .'........ '........, .........., ............... '......... ........,........ .:o;-,~ .......,. Co '........ "oi'. ";:-.,. ................. 1.1. i '--'........ ........'........,............... '.......,. ~ ~ ':'-.., ~,. I ................,. .... v........':'-.., " .'......." ................,. ~ '" f.J ~........,tj" ........... ................ '9 '; '........, ................ " ,~ ........'........, .'.......,......... ..........,....... ........'......... ..... "....... .......,........ ........... '........,....... ................ .'....... .........., m r 00 z o :IJ m Q :E ~ 0 rn "T1 0 -I ~ Z OJ mO ~ ~O _ z~ Z 0- m ::0 z 00 !"coo 8 ~ "'tJ ~ "'tJ )> ~r:IJ 0)> ^ "T1 Z I a! -I ;i; I m ~m Z -c-I IilF~ ~O - "0.:_< ==izm ~ C) "'tJ "T1 -I )> ~ ffi :IJ ;;000 o m ~ r 5> 3: )> "'tJ cu cu ~ z~~u I ~1:lllil '~I~~ ~~m ~~il ~;I i ~ I ~H I rq ........................ ,.,-, :: 1\ I I I I ':: ~ I: i : h ~ " i BI4JllNG ! l ": ~: '~ _Uf !I ~ '" ~ 5.5ll' 11.00' q po .illIG' lUIO' 3lLOO':- Ul' '--, '..-, '--,-- I ""~"~"~" ""'", "- ~ ~ ' '-, --'- ~ !il!~ --'-- -'- -'--, J '-- '-, --'- "- '--,- -'- .,--............... -'--, C ()l.-'- ""~""--ib;;:.-__ ~ --'-- l./J;:;---, ~_,__ '--, .. ~ -"- -- -- -1 V ---- -:---.. __,_ '--,--,__ ~ At (J l:~~~-:f;::._ .. _ __,__, '--'--7/-,_, __'__, -- -'- --, --'- '-, --, -, -, --,-- -'-, '--, -, ............................... ................, ,,,-,,, m r en Z 00 0::0 zm 00 :E ~o m ~~ ~ s;~(D ~c C m~en r- _ ~ ""tJ Z ~r m ~ )> en .Zen o o I ""tJ c ~ m)> o~ ~ "11 m I ~;!l~ 6J 0 Z c::o~ JT1 :E -I en )> _ ~ < :TIrm o r ""tJ "11 0 )> ~-::o - 3:: 0 ~m m ~~ r >-3: 0)> ~""tJ CA) CA) ~ --'--, --,-, --, -'- --,--, '-" '-,- '-'-. ~-. '- '-. '-. '-, 41, A, '-_, '--, -'- ''''''11 --,_ --"-, '-" 0 ~ A, .,__,. -- ""S-, .............~.,-'-,~!!.I: 1:;"- __, "t<> . -'-'U~ '--, ~. It '_, !!! -""""s.,. ~ _, ~ __"_ g ITJ" '$ -'-,- '--,--. ill '_,_, - ~ """', 6 __, ~ ~ ~ --'--, ~~ w " ...,. :: I \ !~ ! ~ J# ~E [] !l ~ i!5 l!! ~ ~ ~5St. i ...r = ~ii .. ii I I I '::"'" ""'<::-,,- ~ I '--,.- -'-, --'-- ............. '- -, 1;;;-__-.............. -'--,--, Co {i:,-,- ~""-~--?i-""""""" --'-- I: ~ '-,- -- __ I '--,-- -1 V ~,_, tj~ --'l_ '--,-- U I: - _ It __,__, '--,-- ~ '$ -'-,- --'--,- -- '- -, --'--, '-". --, '-'-- ,-,-, .......................... ~"- -, ................................. m r Q2 z o :JJ m ~o ~ o 0 Cf.) "T1 Z --I ~ 0 (D mO ~ Fii~_ -- z ZZ m 0_ ~ c Cf.) .~Cf.) o o "1J "1J c:r)> ~ )> :JJ oz ^ "T1 I ::u I --I ~c m iz z - =i --I ~ ~ ~O _ ~- < ~~ m mm oZ"1J "T1 Cf.) )> ~-:JJ -00 ~Z m ~ Cf.) r ); 3: )> "1J (...) (...) 01 ~ r ; II"" [1]" "-,,,~:. " ,,:.,:_.,C'.. ."" ,;':.::, '.~. -:-.:-:': i I I i I ,.",~ ~ --.......,... R. --....... ~..,~ ",--- , ~ '--- ''---, "~~ ',--- " .~ ; ~ -< ~ en ii1 I-- \ ( .. ~ :c: ~ ~ . I E ~ , II, ~ ~ 01 ,.. ~ iJ S~ ~~ ~z II~ )>~, ~Pl~1Iq b . i~i I f H ~ i ~INORE WEST BUSINESS PARK .....ElJlNORE,CAUFOROIA ASSESIQR'S PARCELNOI. .rN__,,1IM ==WESTL.LOCol; 0'~. tIPUH=llm I San Clemente, CA 92ti73 1ill1 Ii ~ ~ : ph: 949-2111-79ll8 1. m8 . fax:949-I~1 I . L ~ s::: )0 "V IN! "--4" n !4I'-O" I r IJ ~ E I ~ l5 Co> 5 "" "T1 r- 0 ~~ S:D ~~ ~s: ~z !I~ !I~ ~ ~, ~il1~1rwl E U III~ ( H ~ ~ !l- - - ~:"LL~ II (9 1&lIln~1 ~~_1 ft 11j; ELSINORE WEST BUSINESS PARK l.AICl! ELIINORE, CAL.JFORNIA ASSESSOR'S PARCEl NOS. 377~1to-082, 103,104 L < 5 ~ ~ ~ I ~ CII 5 I~ ,~ ~z II~ L-LJ ~ '1 ~~Il: ! ; r ! I · ,'. L ~l- ~ o ::!! Gl .,. )> po .,. Dl ;II ~ ~ !I~ trl !!e'-4" I !lI'-4' ri rr -- -- - - -- - - - - ----- - -- - -- - - (- ------ --- - - -- - - ------ m II' M ~OREWESTL.L.C. i 0 ,1 flU ftI: 1m j 2838 VIa AmapoIa I i ii ~ ~ . . San CIon8q, CA 92673 J _ . _ _ pII: 94&-218-7908 1 08 . 1Bx:!l49-4_1 I . I 21...... W M~ ELSINORE WEST BUSINESS PARK UUCE",-_ ASSESSOR'I PARCELN08. J77-1--' _ 004 m > ~ m r m ~;; ~g ~z III 1 I II ~;- lu 0 m ." fO p~ g;- fq Ie i , : Gl z q >;- Gl m In ~ 0 m i Ie Gl ~ m L-l -l , I .. . . ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ :II m -4 en ::t -4 ~ ~ m m ~;; ~;; ~g ~::! '0 ~z ~z I I! . lu % p~ d q ~ ~~~~~~~ i N'~'IN' ~ d ~ ~ d I~HHI Hnq 8 r i ~ 2 -4 -< ~ ~ 4 ~ I' m I: 1,W 11 ' . L ~I- EUINORE WEST BUSINESS PARK UJCI' EI.IIlORl; CA1.FOAIIIA A8SESIOR'I PARCB.. NO&. m....... _. 004 en o ~ ::t m r m ~;; ~::! '0 ~z ~ n . ~ I II lu ,H ~H I : q I~i ~~~~~ I~~GI- ~ ~~~~~ 7~ QII [J- ii' ~ H~nHpiR ~jP~d i i~ ~ i ~ iR~1 !~=llhm i ~ ~ .. r j i . f"2 ~ g I ~ ~ ~ II ' I~; ~ . j ~ I. ~ II B ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ il I · ; i I d I I ; ~ i ~il ~ ~ ~ ~ S g ~ . ELSINORE WEST L 2838 VIS AmapoIa San CIemenlll, CA 92673 ph: 949-2111-7908 fax: 949-4_1 , I ./ Q~ Ii . . , s 0 ~ ~ "'II I ., R+ L W " I h LW rh # L.-J ~ II L.-J :II :i! ~ II =++ L.-J S ~ r ,::1 L .~ I I ~ I ij~ Q' u I i -- I } WJ rh H+ L ( .. =tt= LW : ~ 1 I -{ I-- 0 ') I-- ~m Ih f-> L .J I-- 21 LI--J ~L-. :II _l/! ----' ~ J. I-- i $ ,:: ., ~ - i ,h ~ rn1 --'" R+ L J 4' * L P"- I ., :j rh I I I Ih ~ L .J ! ~ LW I J LW . I Bt ., ~ C4 l rh -- . en ~ 0 I ~rf Ih :e ~ ~ ~ ~ LW I # L W, Cl - Iz,.: - I-- I -l -l - I<~ 21 ~ it I ~rf TT I ., ~ s~ :II It - II ! ~ 3 ~ j- S~ L .J - I :~ ~ \\ m ,g I ~g ( . z I I .z 1 )~ I I I \ I ) I 1 . [" . -. .]~ ~ 'I~ [~[. ~ % ~ 0 ~ n I ij~ u ij~ I' 4~ ij. Q' Q' !' Q~ Q~ i ! I i I i I I I ~ ~~~~~~~ i ~ffil0 00000 0000 00G]0 El0 ElG El I ::IIi ~'!i'I~' II I ,.., III ' I III' 'I II 'II fi ~ ~ ~=~~ ,I ~ ,~ niHil ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i Ii ~ ~ I' J i ~. I ~ ~ Hq 8 i i i W ! I I ~ ~ I I ~i i I i I d ! I; ~ II~; l lq J. J . i ~ ~: II i . . ; ~ I Jig \. I ; ~ I ii ! ~~ ~ I . J ~ ~ . -- ~ I' m I: 111V 11 · ~i - LAKE EL8NlRE, CAlJFORMA L ---n ,~ ELSINORE WEST BUSINESS PARK ASIESSOR'S PARCEL NOI. m-t9N12. oa. 1M ri ~ ~ -a ~ rn -l ~ S~ ,:::I ~~ 4~ '/ ~ II 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ I I. )> ~~~! ~ ~ ~ ~ i j~! I f H ~ s~ ,:::I ,~ m > ~ ~I- ~ n i ~<a><d>4><d><d>~ i ~'!i'~N' f~rHd qplH ~~~Hq 0 o i ELSINORE WEST BUSINESS PARK lAKE~ CA1FOAIIlA AISESSOR'S PARea. NOS. 317-1""" ID3. 804 z o :II ~ ~ S~ ~~ il In~ Qh' II 1 n i OJ ~ m i!l :II OJ ; t m I I I I rn I 0 S I :I: I m .... I s~ I :~ I il n :W i I i I~I ~~~~~ I~~BI- ~ ~~~~~ 7B,' ~IIG i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I I ~ ii I ~ I j I ~ i. i i:i is i Ii. ! I I ~ ~ j 1'1 ~ I lid ! n ! h g; 4 II I. ~ I~ ~ ! ; i I I II I ~ . ~ I I~ I , I '~ii I ~ ; ~ ~ ! ~ . I ~. i , I ~ ELSINC 2838 v..1vnr. San ClemenIo pI1:ll49-218-T.... fax: 949-498-0841 fi . ~pifr~l < (') 2 :;! ~ I! ~ ~ I~ ~ 4 :a.. I'~~~ P ~ ~ 11 II : i~;i I i H L ~ -i p:I ~~ ,g ~z ~~~~~<3>~ i N'~'~N' amr~111 PHHi H~nq ~ en o ~ :I: m r m ~;; ,g ~z 1 i~ ~ z ~ :i! m ~~ ,-i ~~ 1 1 i~ i~ i' Q' Q' j ~ i i~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ;01" ~I 01- ~I' ~ q~ nniii~l~ IPi H. I ~ ~ i I iJ!II~~llhm I I I d ! n ~ ti~; ~ ,qt- In. : i i I I 'I I ~ ; ~ I ~ i , . I ~ IiI ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. q I ~. i ~ ~ . ,. I ~INORE WEST BUSINESS PARK ~..-.~ A8SESSOR'S PARCEL 1108. 3T1-1IN02, on.- ELSINORJ 2838 v..~ san Clemente. Q ph: 949-218-7908 fax: 949-4_1 - '---' "-'-~I r II .. ~ m Cl :JI .. 15 ~ ~ m ~ I I en I 0 ~ ~ I ~~ I ~- ~~ I }l n !W i II :E m ~ ~ ~~ ~::l ~~ " f' i ,~ H ~ 4 ~ ~ :a- i' ~~~ ; ~ l' 11 q : . U! I fl~ i ~ -l m r m ~~ ~ n f' i ~~~~~~~ i ~ >> ~ >> ~ ~ . ~I~~I~I I~PHI e~nq 8 ~ en ~. I ~INORE WEST BUSINESS PARK lNCE ........... CALJF<A&t. AS8EISOR'8 PARCEl. NOS. 3TJ-1.....103, IN z o ~ J!! m ~~ ~g "z 1 l' r- i A i~ i~ ~..' Ii ~OO0 00000000 ooElBOO 0oo0[!] El0 ElG B ' ;;>i P I H H liP I UP q ~ I eu I ~I ~ ~ i ~ 5 5 5 I i ill i ~ Ii! i i. I i ~i ~ i i i i ! I f ~ ~ I I:i Z! ~ ~ · I ~'i' ~i ~ RIH ~H' ~~g ~ , ~ I I. J II . ~ R ~ I i II i I ; i i ~ I ; ~ ~Ii}! ~ I ~ ~ ~ I . ELSINOR: 2838 VIa Amap<> San Clemente, C ph: 949-218-m fax: 949-498-llll4 j t } 0 @ 'illll. IfffJf I r I J l '( r I I, I ( 0 ~ll ~ll I I 'illfl I r I' " r n I, ( niij\' I~~II ffJ I Ifri1 [ . ( f f . qfl"~",IPI ( (I ( . 'Ollluu, r :S ........... " ...............~ '~ ~, ""'-" ...., "'- , "",- " " ""'-" " " ............... I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i /' - /' /' /::;;~-- // /' II / _ If / /'\ II / \ if! /,-, I, I " I I ' , , I, i " I " I ~ :LJ:O " r:e! 1 i h I ~;ll I 2Q I 1JI~ , > "L ~s J ':--i-> L-'..-~- I ' I " I " \ " \ , \ \, , ........v/ " , , , , \ en II --I' \ il!~ \.. Q 2" \i ~l i 011.= '~.e,g, !~ Ill;: ", 'C !i fIJ ," ~a:a "CD ~~ \ !I .....-.r......... u.___ -- ELSINORE Wi _VIIA-* 8m ClIoIMIt, C\82m ph: I4N1a.7ID8 _.....1 r~ lilrrnrmf -----.... (J) =i m "'tl s; Z (J) m Q I 0 z ~ (J) ~ .... ~ ~ ..... . ~ II ~ I Q I I (J) m Q o z ~ I ..... 6 . - @ 'JIG . (J) ~ .... ~ ~ ~ . II I I ..... 6 . ~ 111 i,1i11}1:1VI ~I -- ~_""IUI". ... ua___ ------- 1~:",LU:i 0J~IHI I L CITY OF ..~ LA~ 5LSh'10RJ; \ , ~.~ DREAM EXTREME... CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: FEBRUARY 5, 2008 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2007-25, COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2007-18 FOR BANK OF AMERICA PROJECT TITLE: APPLICANT: OWNER: JORGE CEL V, GENSLER, 4675 MACARTHUR COURT, SUITE 350, NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92660 GLEN DAIGLE, OAK GROVE EQUITIES, INC., 25109 JEFFERSON STREET, MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA 92562 PROJECT REQUEST The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit and Commercial Design Review consideration for the design and construction of a 5,845 square-foot, single-story building with a two lane automated teller machine (A TM) drive through and teller access to be for the bank, Bank of America. The project site is zoned General Commercial (C-2) with a General Plan Designation of General Commercial (GC). Review is pursuant to Chapter 17.48 General Commercial District (C-2) and Chapter 17.82 (Design Review) and Chapter 17.74 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). PROJECT LOCATION The project site is located on the corner of Central Avenue and Collier Avenue within the Commercial Center known as Oak Grove Crossing (Assessor Parcel Number 377-120-054) within Redevelopment Project Area No.1. AGENDA ITEM 3 PAGE~OF-3.9 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FEBRUARY 5, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2007-25, COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2007-18 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Project Commercial C-2 General Commercial GC - General Commercial Site Center North Commercial C-2 General Commercial GC - General Commercial Center South Commercial C-2 General Commercial GC - General Commercial Center East Commercial C-2 General Commercial GC - General Commercial Center West Commercial C-2 General Commercial GC - General Commercial Center BACKGROUND The parcel under consideration is part of an original fourteen (14) acre parcel that was subdivided during the processing of several entitlements including a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and Tentative Parcel Map 33056. The City Council approved these entitlements on March 22, 2005. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Sitina The proposed 5,845 square foot building will be constructed on a 31,079 square foot parcel, within the Oak Grove Crossing Shopping Center. The single story building will occupy approximately nineteen percent (19%) of the total site area, well within the maximum building coverage allowance of forty percent (40%) per the City of Lake Elsinore's General Plan. The main entrance for the building is located at the southeastern side ofthe building. Twenty-six (26) parking spaces, including two (2) handicap spaces, are located adjacent to the building. The number of parking proposed complies with the minimum parking requirements of the LEMC. The building siting meets all of the LEMC setback requirements. AGENDA ITEM 3 PAGE~OF 3cr PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FEBRUARY 5, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2007-25, COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2007-18 On site Circulation Patrons of the bank will enter the site from a driveway located at the southwestern corner of the parcel. Those patrons who desire to use the drive-thru teller service will continue and enter the single lane one way driveway, following it around the building until it divides into two (2) lanes. Architecture The applicant is proposing to use the same style of architecture that has been used on existing buildings found within the Oak Grove Crossing Shopping Center. This includes the use of stone veneer, large pane glass windows at the entrance, construction of varying parapet roof heights, varying wall planes including pop outs and insets, the use of decorative reveals and colors that blend with the neighboring buildings. The A TM drive thru will be covered with a porte-cochere trellis structure with stone veneer columns. The architectural style of the bank building is compatible with and compliments the architecture of the shopping center complex. Landscapinq Approximately 9,293 square feet or thirty percent (30%) of the project site will be landscaped. The project will exceed the minimum landscaping requirement of fifteen percent (15%) for commercial developments. In general, the same species oftrees, plants and shrubs that have been used in the Oak Grove Center will be used for the Bank of America site. This includes three (3) varieties of twenty-four inch (24") box trees (Crape Myrtle, Bradford Pear Tree, and Chinese Elm). In addition, several varieties of shrubs and vines are proposed. These include Fortnight Lily, Indian Hawthorn and Giant Bird of Paradise. Colors and Materials As previously mentioned, the applicant will continue using colors that match the color scheme that have been established for the Center. Primary colors proposed to be used on the building are "whole wheat" and "sycamore tan." Trim colors are "boycroft adobe" and "brite red." The generous use of masonry trim in "EI Dorado" will further enhance the overall appearance of the building. AGENDA ITEM ?> PAGEloF 39 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FEBRUARY 5, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2007-25, COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2007-18 Siqnaqe The applicant chose not to include a request of the approval of signs for the current Bank of America Design Review. The applicant is aware that all signs proposed for the Bank of America project are required to comply with the approved Sign Program established by the Oak Grove Crossing Shopping Center. In addition, since the two previously approved projects located on Collier Avenue within the Shopping Center have been conditioned to provide dual (halo) illumination for all wall mounted signs. The Design Review for the Bank of American has also been conditioned to follow this requirement. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT According to Section 17.48.030.A of the LEMC all projects proposing drive-thru lanes require the approval and consideration of a Condition Use Permit. Section 17.66.060 has set requirements for drive-thru lanes. These requirements include: 1) minimum stacking for eight (8) vehicles measured at twenty feet (20') each; 2) provide that the drive-thru lane will not interfere with the free and orderly circulation of the parking lot and 3) provide that the drive-thru lane shall not encroach upon or block driveways or parking spaces and shall be separated from adjoining driveways, parking spaces, and property lines. ANALYSIS Staff found that all development standards established by the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code relating to the proposed commercial project, including setbacks, building height, and parking requirements have been met. Staff found that the drive-thru component of the project has met all the minimum requirements established in the LEMC. The architectural design of the bank building follows the design elements, including colors and materials, that have been established within the Oak Grove Crossing Shopping Center. These elements include varying roof lines, varying wall planes, stone veneer, and large expanses of glass. The design also is compatible with the adjacent surrounding commercial, office and industrial buildings. The landscape design for the project site complies with the requirements set forth within Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Sections 17.52.090 and 17.66.100. The amount of planting area exceeds the minimum landscaping required. The landscaping palette proposed is consistent with the plant palette that has been established by the existing shopping center. AGENDA ITEM 3 PAGE l OF-.3:l PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FEBRUARY 5, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2007-25, COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2007-18 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION On March 22, 2005, the City Council approved and certified the Oak Grove Crossing Environmental Impact Report (EIR), which analyzed the environmental impacts associated with development of the Oak Grove Crossing Shopping Center. Conditional Use Permit 2007 -25 and Commercial Design Review 2007-18, are part of the whole action that was analyzed in the Oak Grove Crossing EIR. The Conditional Use Permit and the Commercial Design Review will not result in a change in the density or intensity of development that was analyzed in the Oak Grove Crossing EIR. Moreover, the entitlements do not involve any changed circumstances or new information that would trigger the need for additional environmental analysis. Therefore, in accordance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, no further environmental evaluation is necessary. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2008-_ recommending that the City Council adopt findings that the project is consistent with the MSHCP, Resolution No. 2008-_ approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-25 and Resolution No. 2008-_ recommending City Council approval of Commercial Design Review No. 2007-18. This recommendation is based upon the Findings, Exhibits and the proposed Conditions of Approval. PREPARED BY: LINDA M. MILLER, PROJECT PLANNER APPROVED BY: ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, .11'v1/1/1 DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTU I r r L---' A IT ACHMENTS: 1. LOCATION MAP 2. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIONS 3. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 4. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AGENDA ITEM 3 PAGE~OF 3<1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FEBRUARY 5, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2007-25, COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2007-18 5. EXHIBITS . REDUCTIONS (8 % x 11) Exhibit A Title Sheet Exhibit B Data Sheet Exhibit C Grading Plan Exhibit D landscape Plan Exhibit E Expanded Site Plan Exhibit F Site Plan Exhibit G Floor Plan Exhibit H Building Elevation Exhibit I Building Elevation Exhibit J Trash Enclosure Detail · FUll SIZE PLAN SET AGENDA ITEM '3 PAGE~OF 39 VICINITY MAP CUP 2007-25 C 2007-18 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 PACE f Of 3'1 RESOLUTION NO. 2008- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT FINDINGS OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP) FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2007-25 AND COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2007-18 WHEREAS, Glen Daigle of Oak Grove Equities, Inc., filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-25 and Commercial Design Review No. 2007-18 for a 5,845 square-foot single-story Bank of America building with an associated automated teller machine drive-thru (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the total area of the Project Site is 31,079 square feet and is located on Collier Avenue near the corner of Central Avenue and Collier Avenue within the existing Oak Grove Crossing Shopping Center (APN: 377-120-054) (the "Project Site"); and WHEREAS, Section 6.0 of the MSHCP indicates projects which are proposed for development in an area not covered by an MSHCP criteria cell shall be analyzed pursuant to the MSHCP "Plan Wide Requirements" and the City of Lake Elsinore shall make findings that the Project is consistent with those requirements; and WHEREAS, public notice of the Project has been given, and the Planning Commission has considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties at a public hearing held with respect to this item on February 5, 2008. NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the Project and its consistency with the MSHCP "Plan Wide Requirements" prior to making a recommendation that the City Council adopt Findings of Consistency. SECTION 2. In accordance with the MSHCP, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for MSHCP consistency: 1. The Project is a project under the City's MSHCP Resolution, and the City must make an MSHCP Consistency finding before approval. The Project Site is not located within an MSHCP Criteria Cell. However, pursuant to the City's MSHCP Implementing Resolution, the Project is required to be reviewed for consistency with the following "Plan Wide Requirements": Section 6.1.2 Protection of Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pool Guidelines, Section 6.1.3 Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines, Section 6.1.4 Guidelines Pertaining to Urban/Wildlands Interface, Section 6.3.1 AOFNDA m:M NO. PAGE ~ -:s Or:: 3<7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008- PAGE 2 OF 3 Vegetation Mapping, Section 6.3.2 Additional Survey Needs and Procedures, and Section 6.4 Fuels Management. 2. The Project is subject to the City's LEAP and the County's Joint Project Review processes. As stated above, the Project is not located within a MSHCP Criteria Cell and therefore it was not processed through a LEAP or Joint Project Review. 3. The Project is consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools Guidelines. No riverine/riparian areas or vernal pools are present on the Project Site. The Project is therefore consistent with the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pool Guidelines set forth in Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP. No further action regarding this section of the MSHCP is required. 4. The Project is consistent with the Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species Guidelines. The Project Site has already been graded. The Project Site is located within the Oak Groves Crossing shopping center, which was approved by the City in 2005. Most of the construction associated with Oak Groves Crossing has been completed. There is no suitable habitat for Narrow Endemic Plan Species on the Project Site because it has been disturbed. No further action regarding this section of the MSHCP is required. 5. The Project is consistent with the UrbanlWildlands Interface Guidelines. The Project is surrounded by existing development on all sides. Therefore, the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines set forth in Section 6.1.4 of the MSHCP are inapplicable. No further action regarding this section of the MSHCP is required. 6. The Project is consistent with the Vegetation Mapping requirements. There are no resources existing on the Project Site that would be subject to the requirements of Vegetation Mapping set forth in Section 6.3. 1 of the MSHCP. No further action regarding this section of the MSHCP is required. 7. The Project is consistent with the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures. The Project is subject to Burrowing Owl surveys. As mentioned above, the Project Site has been completely graded in conjunction with development of the Oak Groves Crossing shopping center. The Project is located on a busy road and is surrounded by development. There is no suitable habitat for Burrowing Owl on the Project Site. No further action regarding this section of the MSHCP is required. AC I: ND,:{ ['W. PAGE 9 3 C~~ 3'1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008- PAGE 3 OF 3 8. The Project is consistent with the Fuels Management Guidelines. As stated above, the Project is surrounded by existing development. Therefore, the Fuels Management Guidelines as set forth in Section 6.4 of the MSHCP are inapplicable. No further action regarding this section of the MSHCP is required. 9. The Project will be conditioned to pay the City's MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee. The developer will be required to pay the City's MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee. 10. The Project is consistent with the MSHCP. The Project is consistent with all applicable provisions of the MSHCP. No further actions related to the MSHCP are required. SECTION 3. Based upon the evidence presented, the above findings, and the attached conditions of approval, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council find the Project consistent with the MSHCP. SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of February 2008, by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman Lake Elsinore Planning Commission ATTEST: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development ACEND;\ m,._ ~ PAGE I 0 C~ '3 9 RESOLUTION NO. 2008- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2007 -25 WHEREAS, Glen Daigle of Oak Grove Equities, Inc., filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-25, for the establishment of a two-lane drive-thru automated teller machine facility in association with a Bank of America bank building located on Collier Avenue near the corner of Central Avenue and Collier Avenue (APN 377-120-054) (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elsinore recognizes that certain uses have operational characteristics that, depending upon the location and design of the use, may have the potential to negatively impact adjoining properties, businesses or residents and therefore are permitted subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit, which allows the City to comprehensively review and approve the use; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of considering and approving, conditionally approving, or denying conditional use permits; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code 21000, et seq.: "CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R. 15000, et seq.: "CEQA Guidelines") public agencies are expressly encouraged to reduce delay and paperwork associated with the implementation of CEQA by using previously prepared environmental documents when those previously prepared documents adequately address the potential impacts of the proposed project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15006); and WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 establishes the standard to be used when determining whether further environmental documentation is necessary and says that when an environmental document has already been adopted for a project, no subsequent environmental documentation is needed for subsequent entitlements which comprise the whole of the action unless substantial changes or new information are presented by the project; and WHEREAS, on March 22, 2005, the City of Lake Elsinore approved and certified a project Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2004111053) for the Oak Grove Crossing Shopping Center, which evaluated the environmental impacts that would result from development of the shopping center, including the pad where the Project will be located; and WHEREAS, the Project does not present substantial changes or new information regarding the potential environmental impacts of development and it is found that no further environmental review would be required; and ACE rn::::'.1 ~~O. 3 PAGEJL-Or: '39 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008- PAGE 2 OF 4 WHEREAS, on February 5, 2008, at a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the proposed Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-25 and finds that the requirements of Chapter 17.74 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code have been satisfied. SECTION 2. The Planning Commission finds and determines that in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, Conditional Use Permit 2007 -25 does not propose substantial changes and does not present any new information, circumstances, or changes to the Project that was analyzed under the Oak Groves Crossing Final Environmental Impact Report. The Conditional Use Permit application is part of the whole action analyzed in the Oak Groves Crossing Final Environmental Impact Report. The Conditional Use Permit does not change density or intensities of use. Therefore, it is not necessary to conduct any further environmental review for the Project. SECTION 3. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning Law and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for approval of CUP 2007-25: 1. The proposed use, on its own merits and within the context of its setting, is in accord with the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the site is located. Issuance of this Conditional Use Permit will facilitate the creation of a well balanced and functional mix of residential, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational and institutional land uses. The proposed land use conforms to the objectives of the General Plan and the purpose of the planning district in which the site is located. 2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the general health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of persons residing or working within the neighborhood of the proposed use or the City, or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or the City. All applicable City departments and agencies have been afforded the opportunity to review the use permit and their comments have been addressed in the conditions of approval attached to the staff report for this Project. Conditions have been applied relating to the installation and maintenance of landscaping, walls, regulations of points of vehicular ingress and egress and control of potential nuisance. The Project will not result in any negative impacts to the fV'~ ,- I d-- ",;.1,\,;,::::_ 3 c;: ;) ~ t~C E t~O. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008- PAGE 3 OF 4 general health, safety, comfort, or welfare of the surrounding neighborhood or the City. 3. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, and for all the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, buffers and other features required by Title 17 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. The proposed automated teller machine drive-thru facility use has been designed in consideration of the size and shape of the property, thereby strengthening and enhancing the immediate commercial area. Further, the Project will complement the quality of existing development and will create a visually pleasing, non- detractive relationship between the proposed and existing projects in that the facility design has been reviewed to ensure adequate provision of screening from the adjacent properties. 4. The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways with proper design both as to width and type of pavement to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated by the subject use. The automated teller machine drive-thru facility use has been reviewed in relation to the width and type of pavement needed to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated. The City has adequately evaluated the potential impacts associated with the proposed facility prior to its approval and has conditioned the Project to be served by roads of adequate capacity and design standards to provide reasonable access by car and truck. 5. In approving the subject use, there will be no adverse affect on abutting property or the permitted and normal use thereof. The proposed use has been thoroughly reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City departments and outside agencies, eliminating the potential for any and all adverse effects on the abutting property. 6. Adequate conditions and safeguards pursuant to Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Section 17.74.50 have been incorporated into the approval of the Conditional Use Permit to insure that the use continues in a manner envisioned by these findings for the term of the use. Pursuant to Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Section 17.74.050, the Project has been scheduled for consideration by the Planning Commission at the regularly scheduled meeting on February 5, 2008. SECTION 4. Based upon the evidence presented, the above findings, and the attached conditions of approval, the Planning Commission hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-25. SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. AGEi\H).\ ne:}l NO. 3 PAGE__ 13 OF 3~ .- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008- PAGE 4 OF 4 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of February, 2008, by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Rolfe Preisendanz Director of Community Development ACl:i~I\\ ITEM ~~O. PACE III 3 of=.31-_ RESOLUTION NO. 2008- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE APPROVAL OF COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2007-18 WHEREAS, Glen Daigle of Oak Grove Equities, Inc. filed an application with the City of Lake Elsinore requesting approval of Commercial Design Review No. 2007-18 for the design and construction of a 5,845 square-foot Bank of America building with related improvements within the existing Oak Grove Crossing Shopping Center complex located on Collier Avenue near the corner of Central Avenue and Collier Avenue APN: 377 -120-054 (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Elsinore has been delegated with the responsibility of considering and making recommendations to the City Council for commercial design review applications; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code 21000, et seq.: "CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R. 15000, et seq.: "CEQA Guidelines") public agencies are expressly encouraged to reduce delay and paperwork associated with the implementation of CEQA by using previously prepared environmental documents when those previously prepared documents adequately address the potential impacts of the proposed project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15006); and WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 establishes the standard to be used when determining whether further environmental documentation is necessary and says that when an environmental document has already been adopted for a project, no subsequent environmental documentation is needed for subsequent entitlements which comprise the whole of the action unless substantial changes or new information are presented by the project; and WHEREAS, on March 22, 2005, the City of Lake Elsinore approved and certified a project Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2004111053) for the Oak Grove Crossing Shopping Center, which evaluated the environmental impacts that would result from development of the shopping center, including the pad where the Project will be located; and WHEREAS, the Project does not present substantial changes or new information regarding the potential environmental impacts of development and it is found that no further environmental review would be required; and WHEREAS, on February 5, 2008, at a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission considered evidence presented by the Community Development Department and other interested parties with respect to this item. AS01\:~).\ n"[M ~'JO. 3 PAGE_ I 5 OF '3 'f PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008- PAGE 2 OF 3 NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission has considered the Commercial Design Review prior to making a decision to recommend that the City Council approve the application. The Planning Commission finds that the Commercial Design Review satisfies all requirements set forth in Chapter 17.82 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. SECTION 2. The Planning Commission finds and determines that in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, Design Review 2007-18 does not propose substantial changes and does not present any new information, circumstances, or changes to the Project that was analyzed under the Oak Groves Crossing Final Environmental Impact Report. The Design Review application is part of the whole action analyzed in the Oak Groves Crossing Final Environmental Impact Report and will not change density or intensity of use within the shopping center. It simply establishes standards for color palates, articulation, orientation, and design. Therefore, it is not necessary to conduct any further environmental review for the Project. SECTION 3. That in accordance with State Planning and Zoning Law and the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Planning Commission makes the following findings for the approval of Commercial Design Review 2007-18: 1. The Project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan, Specific Plan and the Zoning District in which the Project is located. The Project complies with the goals and objectives of the General Plan because it will assist in achieving the development of a well balanced and functional mix of residential, commercial, industrial, open space, recreational, and institutional land uses. The Project will serve to greater diversify and expand Lake Elsinore's economic base. 2. The Project complies with the design directives contained in the General Plan Urban Design Element and all other applicable provisions of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. The Project is appropriate to the site and surrounding developments in that the bank building has been designed in consideration of the size and shape of the property. Sufficient setbacks and enhanced on site landscaping have been provided thereby creating interest and varying vistas as a person moves along abutting streets and within the center. In addition, safe and efficient circulation has been achieved onsite. The Project will compliment the quality of existing development and will create a visually pleasing, non-detractive relationship between the proposed development and existing projects through the use of architectural design that is similar to ^ (;""'" ~ ''';-',,~ flO 3 A,.d;: l~/;,'>'~ ~ ~ ~II.#'~" . ... PAGE l Co Of '3 c:r PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008- PAGE 3 OF 3 existing buildings in the shopping center. A variety of materials and colors are proposed including architectural stone accents and earth tone colors that blend with surrounding developments and provide evidence of a concern for quality and originality. 3. Subject to the attached conditions of approval, the Project is not anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. The Project was reviewed and conditioned by all applicable City departments to ensure that the bank building blends into existing development, creates the least amount of disturbance, and does not negatively impact the residents or businesses of Lake Elsinore. The Project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the Project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter 17.82. Pursuant to Section 17.82.070 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, the Project has been scheduled for consideration and approval of the Planning Commission on February 5, 2008. SECTION 4. Based upon all of the evidence presented, the above findings, and the conditions of approval imposed upon the Project, the Planning Commission hereby approves Commercial Design Review 2007-18. SECTION 5. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of February, 2008, by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Michael O'Neal, Chairman City of Lake Elsinore ATTEST: Rolfe M. Preisendanz Director of Community Development PAGE ''If) '3 L.v. I ~ OF '3 Cf C\Jt.' CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2007-25 AND COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2007-18 Note: Fees listed in the Conditions of Approval are the best estimates available at the time of approval. The exact fee amounts will be reviewed at the time of permit issuance and may be revised. GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. The applicant shall defend (with counsel acceptable to the City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, and Agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its Officials, Officers, Employees, or Agents to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning the single family residential project attached hereto. 2. The decision of the Planning Commission shall be final fifteen (15) days from the date of the decision, unless an appeal has been filed with the City Council pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 17.80 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 3. Applicant shall place a weatherproof 3' x 3' sign at the entrance to the project site identifying the approved days and hours of construction activity and a statement that complaints regarding the operation can be lodged with the City of Lake Elsinore Code Enforcement Division at (951) 674-3124. The sign shall be installed prior to the issuance of a Building Permits. 4. All Conditions of Approval shall be reproduced upon page one of building plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division for Plan Check. 5. Applicant shall comply with all applicable mitigation measures listed in the Mitigation Monitoring Program associated with the Environmental Impact Report for the Oak Grove Crossing Shopping Center. 6. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the Applicant shall sign and complete an "Acknowledgement of Conditions," and shall return the executed original to the Community Development Department for inclusion in the case records. 7. The Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City's Grading Ordinance. Construction generated dust and erosion shall be mitigated in accordance with the provisions of Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Chapter 15.72 and using accepted control techniques. Interim erosion control measures shall be provided thirty (3D) days after the site's rough grading, as approved by the City Engineer. ""Ii.....''. !',""~"~r,\'J 3 AG t t\i L'i~';' u ~ "'.~~ i\1 ~ . .. PAGE.-il.- OF 3 ~ ,_ ~ 8. The Applicant shall comply with the City's Noise Ordinance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, with regard to hours of operation, construction activity shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday, and no construction activity shall occur on Saturdays, Sundays or legal holidays. 9. The proposed location of onsite construction trailers shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Designee. A cash bond of $1,000.00 shall be required for any construction trailers placed on the site and used during construction. Bonds will be released after removal of trailers and restoration of the site to an acceptable state, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director or Designee. 10. The Applicant shall comply with all applicable City codes and ordinances. Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-25 11. The Conditional Use Permit shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Title 17 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code, unless modified by approved Conditions of Approval. 12. The Conditional Use Permit granted herein shall run with the land and shall continue to be valid upon a change of ownership of the site or structure which was the subject of this approval. 13. The hours of operation for the drive-thru A TM facility shall be limited to the hours of operation expressed within the Business Plan submitted. 14. The Applicant shall at all times comply with Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Section 17.78 relating to noise control. 15. Exterior security lighting shall be provided in association with the drive-thru A TM facility. The lighting shall be shielded and directed on-site so as not to create glare onto neighboring properties. The proposed light fixtures shall compliment the building architecture and shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development or Designee. 16. Necessary traffic circulation signage shall be erected onsite in association with the drive-thru A TM lanes and one-way drive aisle around the rear and sides of the bank building. Signage shall be reviewed by the Community Development Director or Designee. 17.AII security measures requested by the Riverside County Sheriffs Department shall be followed and adhered to at all times. Commercial Design Review No. 2007-18 18.Approval for Commercial Design Review No. 2007-18 will lapse and be void unless building permits are issued within one (1) year following the date of approval. l'..:'....':.' k\,J~, l'~ rm. '3 Of 3 cr ,_ PAt:;!:, 19 19. Unless specifically provided otherwise in these conditions, any alteration or expansion of a project for which there has been a "Design Review" approval as well as all applications for modification or other change in the conditions of approval of a "Design Review" shall be applied for in accordance with the provisions of Section 17.82.120. 20. No structure which has received a "Design Review" or "Minor Design Review" approval shall be occupied or used in any manner or receive a Certificate of Occupancy until the Director of Community Development has determined that all Conditions of Approval have been complied with. 21.AII site improvements approved with this request shall be constructed as indicated on the approved site plan and elevations. Revisions to approved site plans or building elevations shall be subject to the review of the Community Development Director. 22. Plan Check shall conform to the submitted plans as modified by Conditions of Approval, or the Planning Commission/City Council through subsequent action. 23.AII roof mounted or ground support air conditioning units or other mechanical equipment incidental to development shall be architecturally screened or shielded by landscaping so that they are not visible from neighboring property or public streets. Any material covering the roof equipment shall match the primary wall color. 24. All exterior on-site lighting shall be shielded and directed on-site so as not to create glare onto neighboring property and streets. All light fixtures shall compliment the architectural style of the building and shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development or Designee. 25.AII freestanding and wall mounted signage proposed onsite shall comply with the currently approved "Lake Elsinore Center Sign Criteria" document. 26.AII wall mounted signage, proposed on the building, including logos, shall be designed with dual (halo) illumination. 27.AII ground mounted directional signage proposed in association with the drive-thru facility shall be designed with a stone veneer base to match the stone veneer on the building. The stone base shall extend a minimum of six inches beyond the sides of the sign. 28. Applicant shall comply with all ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) requirements. 29.A covered trash enclosure is required. Details of the trash enclosure shall be included in the Plan Check submittal package. The trash enclosure shall be constructed prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. 30. No exterior roof ladders shall be permitted. 31. All exterior downspouts shall be concealed within the buildings. ;:..:-;; ri [;:i~ rm.--3_._. Pt,GE dO Of __2~L 32. Materials and colors depicted on the plans and materials board shall be used unless modified by the Director of Community Development or Designee. The colors and materials include the following: a. Cement Plaster Walls: Whole Wheat b. Wainscot Walls: Sycamore Tan c. Cornice Trim: Tequila d. Steel Trellis: Roycroft Adobe e. Entry Canopy: Brite Red f. Stone Veneer: EI Dorado Stone g. Storefront Glass: Insulated clear glass "Solarban" 60 33. Parking stalls shall be double-striped with four-inch (4") lines two feet (2') apart. 34. All exposed slopes in excess of three feet (3') in height shall have permanent irrigation system and erosion control vegetation installed and approved by the Planning Division. 35. On-site surface drainage shall not cross sidewalks. Prior to Issuance of Building/Grading Permit 36. Prior to issuance of Building Permit, the Applicant shall submit a photometric study to the Community Development Department for review and approval. The study shall show locations of all exterior lighting fixtures and shall verify that a minimum 1-foot candle of illumination is achieved throughout the onsite parking area. Moreover, the study shall demonstrate that a minimum of 5-foot candles are achieved at building entrances. 37. Three (3) sets of the Final Landscaping/Irrigation Detail Plan shall be submitted, reviewed and approved by the City's Landscape Architect Consultant and the Community Development Director or Designee, prior to issuance of building permit. A Landscape Plan Check & Inspection Fee will be charged prior to final landscape approval. a. All planting areas shall have permanent and automatic sprinkler system with 100% plant and ground cover coverage using a combination of drip and conventional irrigation methods. b. All planting areas shall be separated from paved areas with a six inch (6") high and six inch (6") wide concrete curb. P;:\GE d- r 3 OF '3 <1 AGE-r~[~.~\ L~O. c. Plantings within fifteen feet (15') of ingress/egress points shall be no higher than thirty-six inches (36"). d. Any ground mounted transformers and mechanical or electrical equipment shall be indicated on landscape plan and screened as part of the landscaping plan. e. Shrubs and vines shall be planted around the onsite trash enclosures to soften the structures. f. Final landscape plans shall include planting and irrigation details. g. The landscape plan shall provide for ground cover, shrubs, and trees and meet all requirements of the City's adopted Landscape Guidelines. Special attention to the use of Xeriscape or drought resistant plantings with combination drip irrigation system to be used to prevent excessive watering. h. A Landscape Maintenance Bond shall be provided prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. The bond shall cover ten percent (10%) of the total cost of landscaping improvements onsite. Release of the bond shall be requested by the Applicant at the end of the required one year maintenance period subject to the approval of the City's Landscape Architect Consultant and Community Development Director or Designee. i. All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed within affected portion of any phase at the time a Certificate of Occupancy is requested for any building. Final landscape plan must be consistent with approved site plan. J. One twenty-four inch (24") box size tree shall be installed for every thirty- linear feet (30') of street frontage, selected from the approved City street tree list. 38. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall provide assurance that all required fees to the Lake Elsinore Unified School District have been paid. 39. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall provide assurance that the Public Building Impact Fee has been paid. 40. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall provide assurance that the Library Capital Improvement Fund fee has been paid. 41. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall provide assurance that all Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan fees have been paid. 42. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall provide evidence that all Riverside County Fire Department standards and requirements have been complied with. {,.Ii::, 3 Pi~GE__ d- d-- OF ., q ~:O. ENGINEERING DIVISION General Conditions 43.AII Public Works requirements shall be complied with as a condition of development as specified in the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC) prior to building permit. 44. Submit a "Will Serve" letter to the City Engineering Division from the applicable water agency stating that water and sewer arrangements have been made for this project and specify the technical data for the water service at the location. such as water pressure and volume etc. Submit this letter prior to applying for a building permit. 45.ln accordance with the City's Franchise Agreement for waste disposal & recycling, the applicant shall be required to contract with CR&R Inc. for removal and disposal of all waste material, debris, vegetation and other rubbish generated during cleaning, demolition, clear and grubbing or all other phases of construction. 46. All grading and street improvement plans submitted to engineering shall be drawn on 24" x 36" Mylar and be set into City's specific border and title block and include city specific general notes for grading or street improvements respectively. Digital files for the border and the notes are available by request to "agutierrez@lake- elsinore.org" . Grading 47. Developer shall obtain all necessary off-site easements for off-site grading, if any, from the adjacent property owners prior to issuance of grading permit approval. 48.Apply and obtain a grading permit with appropriate security prior to any grading activity. 49.A grading plan stamped/signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer is required if the sum of the cut and fill for grading exceeds 50 cubic yards and the existing drainage flow pattern is substantially modified as determined by the City Engineer. The grading plan shall show volumes of cut and fill, adequate contours and/or spot elevations of the existing ground as surveyed by a licensed surveyor or civil engineer. Contours shall extend to minimum of 15 feet beyond property lines to indicate existing drainage pattern. Apply and obtain a grading permit with appropriate security prior to grading permit issuance. 50. Applicant to provide erosion control measures as part of their grading plan. The applicant shall contribute to protection of storm water quality and meet the goals of the BMP in Supplement "A" in the Riverside County NPDES Drainage Area Management Plan. Pi\C= km. '3 d- ':? OF 3 Cf t'\, . ' i'~'",: ~. ~'... :j j- ~ 51.AII grading shall be done under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer and he shall certify all slopes steeper than 2 to 1 for stability and proper erosion control. The geotechnical engineer shall make recommendation for the minimum distance of building foundation to the top and toe of slopes. Drainage 52. Roof drains shall not be allowed to outlet directly through coring in the street curb. Roofs shall drain to a landscaped area. Driveways shall be sloped to drain into landscaping prior to entering street facilities. 53. Provide a solid roof over the trash area. Fees 54. Pay all Capital Improvement and Plan Check fees (LEMC 16.34). The current traffic mitigation fee is $3.84.00 per square foot of building; and the current TUMF amount is $5.71.00 per square foot of building; the amount of fees shall be adiusted accordina to the fee schedule current at the time of payment. Stormwaterl Cleanwater Protection Program 55. City of Lake Elsinore has adopted ordinances for storm water management and discharge control. In accordance with state and federal law, these local storm water ordinances prohibit the discharge of waste into storm drain system or local surface waters. This includes non-storm water discharges containing oil, grease, detergents, trash, or other waste remains. Brochures of "Storm water Pollution, What You Should Know" describing preventing measures are available at City Hall. PLEASE NOTE: The discharge of pollutants into street, gutters, storm drain system, or waterways -without Regional Water Quality Control Board permit or waver - is strictly prohibited by local ordinances and state and federal law. ADMINISTRA TIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT 56. Prior to approval of the Final Map, Parcel Map, Site Development Plan, Special Use Permit or building permit {as applicable), the Applicant shall annex into Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 to offset the annual negative fiscal impacts of the project on public right-of-way landscaped areas to be maintained by the City and for street lights in the public right-of-way for which the City will pay for electricity and a maintenance fee to Southern California Edison. Applicant shall make a four thousand seven hundred dollar ($4,700) non-refundable deposit to cover the cost of the annexation process. Contact Dennis Anderson, Harris & Associates at (949) 655-3900 x334 or danderson@harris-assoc.com. ~"!n'" I~'~\ ~ ~'O ~ AG,~r\lii,.O" !t~~'i t'~' '. PAGE~OF 3~ COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 57. The Applicant shall pay park fees of $0.10 per square foot for all interior commercial space. 58. The Applicant shall participate in the Citywide Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District. 59. The Applicant shall comply with all City Ordinances regarding construction debris removal and recycling as per Section 8.32 of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code. RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 60. The Applicant shall comply with all of the attached Riverside County Fire Department conditions and standards. End of Conditions '., ..,'" t.t_, ... 1-, r:-,}' ~S,O 3 . .. ~~ \I ; 'OJ . Pij.GE d- r OF 3 or LAKE ELSINORE FIRE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CUP 2007-25 Bank of America January 3, 2008 General Conditions CASE - CITY CASE STATEMENT With respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced project, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognize fire protection standards: USE-#005- ROOFING MATERIAL All buildings shall be constructed with class B roofing materials as per the California Building Code. USE-#50-BLUE DOT REFELECTOR Blue retro reflective pavement markers shall be mounted on private street, public streets And driveways to indicate location of fire hydrants. Prior to installation, placement of markers must be approved by Lake Elsinore Fire Services. USE*-#23 - MIN REQ FIRE FLOW Minimum required fire flow shall be 1500GPM for 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, which must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. Fire flow is based on type V-B construction per the 2007 CBC and building(s) having a fire sprinkler system. USE-#20-SUPER FIRE HYDRANT The average spacing between Super fire hydrant (s) (6" x 4" x 2 %" x 2 % ") shall be not exceed 500 feet between hydrants and have a maximum distance of 250 feet from any point on the street or road frontage to a hydrantas measured along approved vehicular travel ways. USE-#31-0N/OFF NOT LOOPED HYD A combination of on-site and off site super fire hydrants, not on a looped system with the average spacing between Super fire hydrant (s) (6" x 4" x 2 %") shall be not exceed 500 feet between hydrants and have a maximum distance of 250 feet from any point on the street or road frontage to a hydrant as measured along approved vehicular travel ways. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrants (s) in the system. USE-#89-RAPID ENTRY KNOX BOX Rapid entry Knox key storage box shall be installed on outside of the building. Plans shall be submitted to the Lake Elsinore Fire Services for approval prior to installation (Current plan check fee is $126.00) \""~" r,~o -:t t.\ ' ' . i:::';; ,\j. .-J Y PAGE db OF 3 ~ USE-#75-WA TER PLANS The applicant or developer shall separately submit two copies of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Lake Elsinore Fire Services." USE-#17 A-BLDG PLAN CHECK $ Building plan check fee of $1,056.00, shall be paid in a check or money order to the City of Lake Elsinore before plans have been approved by our office. USE-#51- WATER CERTIFICATION The applicant or developer shall be responsible to submit written certification from the water company noting the location of the existing fire hydrant and that the existing water system is capable of delivering 1500 GPM fire flow for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure. If a water system currently does not exist, the applicant or developer shall be responsible to provide written certification that financial arrangements have been made to provide them. USE-#4 - WATER PLANS The applicants or developer shall separately submit two copies of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review and approval. Calculated velocities shall not exceed 100 feet per second. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed and approved by a registered civil engineer and the local Water Company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Lake Elsinore Fire Services." PRIOR TO BUILDING FINAL INSPECTION USE-#45 - FIRE LANES The applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating required fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs. USE*-#77 -SUPER FH/FLOW Minimum required fire flow shall be 1500 GPM for 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, which must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. Fire flow is based on type V-B construction per the 2007 CBC and building(s) having a fire sprinkler system. The average spacing between Super fire hydrant (s) (6" x 4" x 2 %") shall be not exceed 500 feet between hydrants and have a maximum distance of 250 feet from any point on the street or road frontage to a hydrant as measured along approved vehicular travel ways. t,,,._... rr::~:'J rJo. 3 pj;,J'/:L.2 -, OF '3 '1 USE-#12A- SPRINKLER SYSTbvl Install a complete fire sprinkler system per NFPA 13 2002 edition (130 and 13R system are not allowed) in all buildings requiring a fire flow of 1500 GPM or greater sprinkler system (s) with pipe size in excess of 4" inch diameter will require the project structural engineer to certify (wet signature) the stability of the building system for seismic and gravity loads to support the sprinkler system. All fire sprinkler risers shall be protected from any physical damage. The post indicator valve and fire department connection shall be located to the front, within 50 feet of a hydrant, and the minimum of 25 feet from the building (s). A statement that the building (s) will be automatically fire sprinkled must be included on the title page of the building plans. (Current sprinkler plan check fee is $164.00 per riser) Applicant or developer shall be responsible to install a .L. Central Station Monitored Fire Alarm System. Monitoring System shall monitor the fire Sprinkler system (s) water flow, P.I.V.'s and all control valves. Plans must be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation. Contact Fire Department for guideline handout (current Monitoring plan check fee is $192.00) USE-#83- AUTO/MAN FIRE ALARM Applicant or developer shall be responsible to install a manual and automatic Fire Alarm System. Plans must be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation. (Current plan check fee $627.00) USE-#27 -EXTINGUISHERS Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A-10BC and signage. Fire Extinguishers located in public areas shall be in a recessed cabinets mounted 48" (Inches) to enter above the floor level with Maximum 4" projection from the wall. Contact Fire Department for proper placement of equipment prior to installation. USE-#32- TITLE 19 Comply with Title 19 of the California Administrative Code. i:.GfND,:\ m:M NO. 3 PAGE .;;)S Of ?/'t I I !::; '" II: l:i w '" 0 ... .... C'j 0 ~ .... ~ o 0 <( .. u .. ~ .. t; ~ w III fQ ~ ~ I ~ Q) g~ ~ S II: II ~ ~ ~ ~In ~ ~ ~ f~nl; tIl 0 ~ Q) Q ~ OJ) . ~ Q) . ,...( ~ ~ ....-l ca cd ~~ ~ U . ,...( I Q) .- > U ~ Q) Q) "C c>> ~5 ~ E Ol)~ . ~.Uj Q) .,...( ....... ~< C ~~ ~u .... Q) " ~~ .~ Q) Q ....-l ~ ....-l 0 ~ ~~ o s rB~oo u. lZl C . ....-l Q)O~ U~ ca ~O~ ~ Q) m 00 .~ -- .~ ooU~ Z~ ~ 0 L r ^"'^f"-' '\ "''''~~l ~'O 3 ~~':..::;. -'~~~F'"l & i .;.;..:~u ri-- . PI~GE ~ '1 or- ..J '1 ~ ~ ~ dl~ I I / ~ 11m Q9 ~ ~~;; II.. ~<: ou~ 6 I~ I ~ ~.! i J I I c ~ ! ~~ i c iil I I! J ;1 d I h~ f I c ~<:~ :3 (. , i .1 I <( J 0: I ~ ~~~ n iii ,IIi Jhl ~ i dhhUb ~ ~ ~ i ~ I!!. ~ Uu;;um~ f ~lil 0: W z Ii: ~ ~d i B ~IUU it ~~dAi! t- o l!:! :E o 0: ~ ~ o :J Do Do c( t- 5 I~ i ~ i IIHI ~ !!j;II~ln Do m I 5 Ai! Ai! << w ... 9 ~ ~ w z ~ ~~ II ~~Im ..."Uh 0: W W Z . - 5 Ii ~ ~hl ~ ~ 131~ ~ ~ gl/i o ;d~i! t- o w ~ ~ ~ ~ w l!l ~ ~ ~ o !!~ ~ II) ~ -8 Ii ~ il13U ~ ~I Ai! I I = ! t ~ ~LH,~I 0: i!3 0: i!3 t II ~ !III ~ Sill : uh II) mnl > mmu w gin ~ ~ JU ~ B ~.~ ~ ~ i ;~II I ! I ! filii I 1111111 1111 ti I; I~ ~ I 11~1 ~ I dl III ~ d Ih d i~!h! I i U II II I i n ~ , III I 11!1~lllil ~II) e UII ~llil !i ~Iul nl ~ :J i= ::I Z I ~ ~ I II ~ i ; al.3iu ~ ~Ih Cl fil II 0 ~nl I d !illl I~ II ;..5 !I i II III ~ ~~ ~~~~ If' U ~uil Ii 2 55 !!!5 . I~I ~ .! 8- I ~ Ii nil " I ~ i d.! ! ! ! i I I1I1 (I If i ~ I ~ IIi IIi II~ 19i I-I ~ ~ ~ ~ :l ~. ~ ~ I ! I I ~ ~ z U > L Do c( :IE z I ~ EBg ACElm.t\ rn:,;M I'm. P[-\\Gt: _:3 0 3 OF 6; ~ . ; ..'_ HI n l r!.. br! ~ '~l..r!!" '6 l .'~' ~i .'~ 6 H !',~ I :1,. n ill . 1'lhiU...iJlll'l~n ! I....~.~....L..~ Iii ;i..t....~..lI. .~...l'wl...,.;.I.I.I.I.'..H U B ,B ! III I .! tt~~ -. ~ I t .dh t~~UHflflUIIII e e eeeG>eGle@e@:@,@@Gl~@@@@@@ "'~:" .:b-. B...... .... i:~i'V' l ~. .~. ~ --+-'-'------~ .---------- ------ .~ --: ..- === -.-:: .. .., . .:. .- ('~ 'AMH31~J,S},~r 1Ii1IT70~ '" "'~ 771 ~ ~<:<:,<<, ( 1 ...~~~. '~ ",~~l&t. I'~ .~~ . J.ll.!tf. ' 1~~~~!' . m. '-'I .' , , ,.~ III : ,'- .' . m':l": ""11"1 " 'n. .:: lll.t. ' '"' ~II;" :::' UK.,' u" }j}ft ...11 i' ltGt:rJ[);:-:';, ~T;:[\~_.rJO. 3 Pt,SE . 31 Of 3 't ' ~ di~ ~ ~ Illl < .Ii ~~M lall ~ <( 8 OU r ~pLJ h . ~ ~~ i/:I. ) ~~~ ~<( a tl~" n~ nnn ! ~ ~ )i )i to )i)i Ii)i ",' to ~ "''" ~ I :/: :: I; .. !In ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i i i I g I I I i U H; iBid; I !I! Iii i ;1 hi JII~ II! dllll ! II ' I&io~e 'I~II: 3nN3^" ~31110~ L... ~ ei! ~ I I .', i ",-,'" t '<~:j-, ....-....- 1\ _--- ~....-.... \\ ...... .... ..... ....-.....-..--..... L ~ I I ~ I i eLl I I .-.l I II II Ii I ~ 1Il ... 9 ~ o 1< 1Il Z 3: o~ ~ 5 II nli"1 g: ~nii I I ~ I I ! ! i i I i I i I i I i L\10. PACE ~ III ~ ! 'I' t I.N .- q ,jlH ~ 6~;; '"'"' ~ ;5 o u ~~ I~~ I ~~lil ~ h~ hi >>>>>>>~ L ~i I~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ .- " 0: ~ ~ t) .. . .. il !~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ I I l8l 1;1, , . It ~ o It) o o c( ~ III .. S ~ o ii! III Z ~ ~I II Uh.1 IE gull AC~ND,:i. lTt]:! 1'~O. 3 PAyf. ?, '3 of 3 '( J ~ ~ ~<e: o ~ .1;:; i! ~ ~ ~.~ ~~.. :<:::S.:l;ii i~~ a:l <e: ~ ~ h~ g ~; ~I ~ · I n I i i !~ ; I!; I! I ~ n i U l ~illl I I; ; nl UU lid illl llii 111111 111;!l n Ii! Ii ! illll nil n I 1111111 II 11111 II hU III H II III I II 12ee eeeae€l€le€l€l€l €l00€le ee€lCCCOC!llGC!ll ~ ~ 6"- dl~ III Iii u .1 I ~ =3nN3^ \f ~31110~ ~ III . .:.:. '.:.:.: . ~:?:. a:::.::::.: ,.:.' It :\. . .' ------ ...._---..~~.u.vadCHI.. --..--.....------ ~~ L ACr/,'''''. r'~'~ "10 3 '. '(" V:iLiI~~~ '~ t~';D 1""11 P/1)~IE :s '+ o~_= ~ ~ ~ lit Itll i ~~" llIU f.t.t < 8 OU r ~ ~ d U~ I ~ < a ~h i.. ill IIH! II II II Ii II ii I !I i I u ~I I I!;! ; d o I,ll 1~li i II Ii i Ii i II ill i II i dill Ii ;11; I il lid! !I~; II H I ! lillllllllll ! llllllllllllli i ! IIII1 !I II, IIIIII ! II! i1lmlmllh!1 ~- Ell EleeeEleeee e 00 €!l0e eelll 0 o CClI GClI OClloe=eCll0 I I @ I II d II i it U ilJ !~ Iq III' L 11m m !I II (I h Ii Ii lllIi ~ ili Illh II; III1 !1m ill < n I ~ I . I ! k ! a <1 , <1 , <1A~.'" ~: IP'" PO 3 ..;.. (\.' ~_,.). "",,,J. iii. . -'t ',-.7" ~.) OF 3'1 P,VJC: :::J' L ~ di~ ~ ~ I " IN I ~ ~ Q9 .~ 6~N lUU ~<r: :3 ~ OU P ~ E2 . ~~ !~ I iii . ! ! . .... ~3H r . ~ I ~ i": o:l a3 ~Lg , ! -I I I ~~~ Ii !II ~I ~~ I ~ r t i I ! i I- '. 'I I I.I! ~ ! t I II IS I iJ !I I i I i I Iii II o IllIn 1111 I II II ! h z I · ~ i ; I.i 0 ~ i i i I I II~ I!! 0 ! Ii ulHII II 11.1 n I hi; i Ii ~ I I I i I lI! z Iii w ...... :J: ~ - €Ie eeeeeee€l00€lee0 0 N c: W ... r rrr ff i 9 ~ Q .. IP I Ii I i< I ~ w - ~ ~ I " I I " I III I II I ~III ~ lilll ... II ( ~ ~I I ! ~ > ~~ w. j!:; ~i ~ ~~ w. t-k ~I L ~CtNM ITEM No.3 PACE 3b oiJ 3 ~ ~ J !ll ~] ~~" Mil ~ <C ~ OU ~~~ ij. ~ ~ ~] i U ~ ~~~ ;!~~ ~~~~! ~~m , rr ti~1 ~~ H g , .: ~ ! ; I ; l s. I" I f il ~ II ~ i ~ I IIdl 'Ijl I lilllq ~ illl !!Hi 1111 I,ll! I hh n 1 Z'i s.~ ~i 5 €I eCHU) 0 ef> ~ ~ eEl e €I €I ee J ~N q . Cl I I ~ I rf I I II ! , . Ii m i i; i Gs ~ ~ I I I ~ ! Iii z i I I I ; i I;! m :I: ll: ., W s 11.... N ... ~ ~ i i fITHli ~I i I ~ ~II!I I,~~~U~ ~ ll:~Uji i III I III L ~ ~~ w. H 13~ si r."mA ITEM NO. . ') 't G~ J" OF --t2---- PAGE.:2 ~ I I . f . 1'11'11 I. Ii i i.1 " .1>1>1>1>1> . '~'_clli!al .. '.' . '. . . .ca.:!....I.:..'. .'. C~glS '. . 01 ,I ...... D;hl i . .I'BI g)'~' ~...a C 'iC1 ~. .85 ~.~ ii1!g I ~~. I ~iB~ t ~~ith J,qu .~ .[n~n II ,i l ~ >l....Il.~ e B i _I .1 i . ~~ti~!f f II ... .0'.' 1'50MO '~1$'3111 . ~.i~ 1 ..n-.v.. . ffi M ;R~~ iHW!! ib~ ) 11 :~" iU~ ... . a. :a: --- ~. ! ~II; ti Iii Q ~ 0 ~~ I ..... K !t: ~ .S .C(.~ u .~ ~wii '. ~i c:J~ g~ w f. ~'t ~I ~ Iil~ ~ ~ i ~I ~i @ i. I> ~:~ ~.~ 5 ~ ~ It. Il) lof <.! o~ .:.\!I 1 7" :~ I!I I' C . ! fi!i' I ;1.; ~! I a .~. ~I I & ; ~;lj 5 III Q ii5 15i: 1 j @ "le~ "t.... II! ~I nile . I I ILl .o~.II .0-.. ...01: 10 II, 111I:=~! ~ gi-i1 I-i-. . II i "bl; I .~. !Iil...a 5:KaL.I.;I w ~ ... a: g ':) fI U) a: 9 ... ~ (.) Z~ 1&1;- a: :c- o .~ al . @ 'l' N .. ~./t ..y..u .0-.91 .. Ii.. . CITYOF.A.. . LAKE t;LsiNOR& ~ DREAM EXTREME... ACKNOWLEDEGEMENTOF DRAFT CONDITIONS RE: Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-27 and Commercial Design Review No. 2007-18 I hereby state that l!We acknowledge the draft Conditions of Approval for the above named project. l!We understand that these are draft conditions only and do hereby agree to accept and abide by all final conditions prescribed by the City of lake Elsinore staff, as set forth in the attachments to the approval letter that will be sent after final project approval. All final conditions shall be met prior to issuance of permits or prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy, or otherwise indicated in the Conditions, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director of the City of lake Elsinore. Date: ~ Applicant's Signature: ~. e'1 ~'~ Print Name: ~. '... " Address: ./{, ~~ M ~ > .. C:..x ~. ~",ik 35'6 ~~J.. aA '12';'<;;0 Phone Number: (.. . 2.. . .~ I~. .AGENDAITEM NO. ~ PAGE, ~9 OF 3'1 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: FEBRUARY 5,2008 PROJECT TITLE: ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 2007-01; A REQUEST TO AMEND THE LAKE ELSINORE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT WITHIN VARIOUS ZONING DISTRICTS CITYWIDE AS OUTLINED IN CHAPTER 17.37 (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT) APPLICANT: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, 130 SOUTH MAIN STREET, LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 PROJECT REQUEST Staff is requesting a continuance of the proposed project to the regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting on February 19, 2008. PREPARED BY: JUSTIN CARLSON, ASSOCIATE PLANNER-# APPROVED BY: ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, /Yvv\ DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTV' / / / - A...l:"~"""\ I'i",",,'" "0 S- 1.11;;,1'111.)0"\ a i\.:m f~ . PAGE---L-o;-L- CITY OF .~ LAKE 6LSiNO~ \ I Y DREAM EXTREME... CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: FEBRUARY 5, 2008 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-08; FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 7 SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS AT THE NORTHEAST INTERSECTION OF SUMMERHILL DRIVE AND SCENIC RIDGE DRIVES, (APN'S 363-313-016 THRU 022). CESAR AND MIREY ANDAYA; 1420 PONDEROSA LANE, RIVERSIDE, CA 92504. CESAR AND MIREY ANDAYA; 1420 PONDEROSA LANE, RIVERSIDE, CA 92504. PROJECT: APPLICANT: OWNER: PROJECT REQUEST The applicant is requesting design review consideration of seven (7) conventionally built two (2) story single-family dwelling units with attached two (2) car garages located at the northeast intersection of Summerhill and Scenic Ridge Drives (APN's: 363-313-016 thru 022), also known as Tentative Tract Map 31779. The project site is approximately 2.3 acres in size. Review is pursuant to Chapter 17.23 (R-1, Single-Family Residential), Chapter 17.66 (Parking Requirements), Chapter 17.82 (Design Review), and Chapter 17.14 (Residential Development Standards) of the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code (LEMC). PROJECT LOCATION The proposed vacant property is generally located at the northeast intersection Summerhill Drive and Scenic Ridge Drives (APN's: 363-313-016 thru 022). The subject property is Zoned Canyon Creek/Summerhill Specific Plan. AGE.NDA ITEM NO. PJ'.CE \ t or: -\ k REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 5, 2008 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-08, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 7 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS. BACKGROUND On June 22, 2004, the Lake Elsinore City Council approved the land subdivision known as Tentative Tract Map 31779, for the development of seven (7) parcels for single- family residential development, with lot sizes ranging from 6,957 square feet to 25,841 square feet. Subsequently on September 12, 2006, staff reviewed the proposed project and provided comments to the applicant regarding deficiencies in the selected architectural style and the required development standards. Specifically, the side and front yard setbacks, walls, landscape, and most importantly that more architectural enhancement should be applied to every elevation of the proposed products. The applicant and staff worked on several revisions for the proposed project in regards to the applicable development standards, and most importantly the architectural design elements related to the architectural style selected. Once again, several revisions and comments were provided and consequently, the proposed project was scheduled for DRC on May 3,2007. The DRC meeting concluded that additional treatments and enhancements should be applied to the second floor of the proposed residences. Staff, also provided comments related to the perimeter walls, specifically the walls along Summerhill and Scenic Ridge Drives. Staff also commented on the maintenance and treatment of the slopes located behind lots 5, 6, 7, and along the side of lot 1, which is located at the entrance of the proposed development. Following, on June 19, 2007, the applicant provided staff with a revised set of plans in which the architectural style selected was described as "Spanish and Spanish Colonial", however the plans reflected very little of this architectural style and Staff indicated there was a need to provide additional architectural features and elements that would properly represent the "Spanish and Spanish Colonial" architecture. Once again comments were provided and several revisions were made. On November 13, 2007, the applicant provided staff with a revised set of plans in which the architectural style selected was indicated as "McMansion", which was best described by the applicant as the concept intended to fill a gap between the modest suburban tract home and the upscale custom homes found in gated, waterfront, or golf- course communities. On December 13, 2007, staff discussed the probability of proceeding to the Planning Commission with a recommendation of denial. Finally on January 3, 2008, Staff met with the applicant's architect to see if a consensus could be reached regarding the re-submitted elevations. The applicant notified staff that his client wanted to proceed and requested to be scheduled for the earliest possible Planning Commission meeting. Therefore, staff scheduled the project for the February 5, 2008 Planning Commission meeting. AGENDA ITEM NO. PACE 1r 4- Of \A- . REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 5, 2008 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-08, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 7 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Project Site North EXISTING LAND USE Vacant AL PLAN Single-Family Residential Canyon Creek/Summerhill S ecific Plan Canyon Creek/Summerhill S ecific Plan Canyon Creek/Summerhill S ecific Plan Canyon Creek/Summerhill S ecific Plan Canyon Creek/Summerhill S ecific Plan Vacant Single-Family Residential South Residential Single-Family Residential) East Vacant Single-Family Residential West Vacant Single-Family Residential PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting design review consideration for the design and establishment of seven (7) conventionally built two (2) story single-family dwelling units located at the northeast intersection of Summerhill and Scenic Ridge Drives. The first floor plan shows a living room, den, kitchen, great room, full bathroom, laundry room and three (3) car garages. The second floor plan shows three bedrooms, a bathroom, and a master bedroom with a master bathroom. The proposed single-family dwelling units will range in size from 2,726 square feet to 2,841 square feet and will have a net lot coverage between thirteen percent (13%) to forty-nine percent (49%). The proposed dwelling units comply with the maximum lot coverage requirement of fifty-percent (50%), required for single-family dwelling units as outlined in Section 17.23.090 of the LEMC. Sitinq The proposed development is located on a relatively flat area, except for the slopes located along Summerhill and Scenic Ridge Drives at the rear of lots 5, 6, 7, and 1. Architecture The applicant has indicated identified the architectural style of the proposed dwelling units as "Mc Mansion" which includes three (3) different elevations that are derived from this architectural style and are identified as Plan I-A, II-A, III-A, and their appropriate reverse images, and finally Plan II-B. The applicant has also defined "McMansion" architectural style as the "impression of largeness". The other common feature, according to the applicant, is the tendency to incorporate architectural elements from non-native historical styles. The most dominating characteristic of the "McMansion" style 4- jlt;.f2 '2.. . 1 4I:n--_~_ ."..,,"'-.....,.:.J~,~..~~ ~ >--~, - REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 5, 2008 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-08, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 7 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS. is that these various elements are combined ungrammatically and disproportionately at random. Elements taken from these architectural styles are often decorative, rather than design oriented or construction features. Another characteristic often found in "McMansion" architecture is the use of brick, stone or decorative rock on the front side of the house. Stucco or siding is usually placed on the sides not directly facing the street. Flat concrete tiles are normally proposed for the roofing material. Colors and Materials Plan I-A & I-A Reverse Roof Wall Finish Return wall Columns Trim Wainscot Gara e Door Tile Stucco Stucco Wood Foam Coronado Stone Aluminum "Blend of tan, brown, red, and blue" "Ivor Powder" "Merlex P18 "White" "Merlex P1 00" "Florentine" "Brown" Plan II-A & II-A Reverse Roof Wall Finish Return wall Columns Trim Wainscot Gara e Door Tile Stucco Stucco Wood Foam Coronado Stone Aluminum "Terracotta Gold" "Merlex P2" "Merlex P2 "White" "Merlex P18" "Desert Rid e" "White" Plan III-A & IliA Reverse Roof Wall Finish Return wall Columns Trim Wainscot Gara e Door Tile Stucco Stucco Wood Foam Coronado Stone Aluminum "Carlsbad Blend" "Merlex P2" "Merlex P2 "White" "Merlex P18" "Carmel Mountain" "Tan" ACE.NOA ITEM NO. PAGE ~ 4- Of -1'\ '<l'f"' REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 5, 2008 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-08, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 7 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS. Plan II-B Roof Wall Finish Return wall Columns Trim Wainscot Gara e Door Tile Stucco Stucco Wood Foam Coronado Stone Aluminum "Blend of tan, brown, red, and blue" "Merlex P450" "Merlex P450 "White" "Merlex P192" "Verona" "Tan" ANAL YSIS According to Lake Elsinore Municipal Code Section 17.82.080, the Planning Commission shall make the following findings before recommending Design Review approval: 1. The Project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the Zoning District in which the Project is located. 2. The Project complies with the design directives contained in Section 17.82.060 and all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. 3. Subject to the attached conditions of approval, the Project is not anticipated to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. 4. Conditions and safeguards pursuant to Chapter 17.82.070 of the Zoning Code, including guarantees and evidence of compliance with conditions, have been incorporated into the approval of the Project to ensure development of the property in accordance with the objectives of Chapter 17.82. As indicated in the LEMC, if the Planning Commission is unable to make anyone of these findings, the request for the Residential Design Review should not be approved. Based upon the application and plans submitted as well as all of the evidence presented, Staff believes that Finding NO.1 (identified above) cannot be made. Again Finding NO.1 states: The Project, as approved, will comply with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the Zoning District in which the Project is located. First, the City's General Plan Community Design Element encourages developers to achieve excellence in the implementation of projects within the City of Lake Elsinore by applying the following residential guidelines: AGENDA ITEM r~o. PAGE ~ 4- OF -14 REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 5, 2008 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-08, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 7 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS. . Avoid long, unbroken building elevations and make offsets in the plan an integral part of the design plan. Structural projections/features should be incorporated to create visual interest. (In this case it should be applicable to Plan III-A). . Vary streetscape by utilizing varied setbacks; therefore there should not be no more than two adjacent units with the same front yard setbacks. . Elevations facing the road right-of-way or major roads should receive special architectural treatments. Contrarily, although the applicant has indicated "McMansion" as the architectural style of the proposed dwelling units, which includes three (3) different elevations that are derived from this architectural style there is still the need to provide additional architectural elements and upgrades in order to meet the architectural design guidelines applicable to residential developments as required in the General Plan. Likewise the Canyon Creek "Summerhill" Specific Plan also requires adherence to the General Plan Design Guidelines. Although, the project meets the Lake Elsinore Municipal Code's minimum setback, landscape, and fencing requirements, the proposed "McMansion" plans as presented need to demonstrate additional design elements and details in order to properly obtain a product which satisfies the requirements of the General Plan. The City's acceptable level of architectural design requires that structural projections/features be incorporated in the architecture providing and creating visual interest as well as a more defined style of architecture with varying dimensions, features, and design accents. Therefore, Staff has indicated to the applicant that the project as proposed could not be supported. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission deny the request for the Residential Design Review for the development of seven (7) single-family dwelling units located at northeast intersection of Summerhill Drive and Scenic Ridge Drive. If the Planning Commission wishes to approve the Residential Design Review of the proposed residential project located at northeast intersection of Summerhill and Scenic Ridge Drives and determines that all necessary findings can be made, Staff will be required to prepare all of the applicable conditions of approval and a resolution for the approval of the project, including the proper environmental assessment. AGE.NDA ITEM NO. PAGE (11 4- OFjA- REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 5, 2008 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. 2006-08, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 7 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS. PREPARED BY: AGUSTIN RESENDIZ, ASSOCIATE PLANNER APPROVED BY: ROLFE M. PREISENDANZ, /J/J/1/J1 DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT / / f / ' ( ATTACHMENTS 1. VICINITY MAP 2. EVMWD WATER AND SEWER MAP 3. REDUCED SET OF PLANS 4. FULL SIZE SET OF PLANS 5. COLOR ELEVATIONS 6. COLOR SWATCHES AGENDA ITEM r~o. 4 PAGE--1-oF.l.1:- VICINITY MAP RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW R 2006-08 r i i ! / :1" p- C\ ~~.. \ \ \ \ \ /~ / /~ \---- / '" .// ~ c. ~/./ ~.......Y....OOA;~'.::.... ~//~/ /"~Q ~/~ / ".~ ",./" / [_./~ /i / . SUMMERHILL DR ______- ~-l--__---- - r ..__u i I I I r I / / ,! '-- WILLdw / II ~WPL '~, // // "1..0 . / .,~. ~vGG ,/ / . . ~v/~ . ~l "!!:. "". z . '/'~" / ." PLANNING COMMISSION , no. 4- pr,::"'2__~_OF~ ~ In ...11 i ~ 01 ~ -;; II c: &: ~ " \0 ... ... l"l M co .. . ... . .. . .. . <0 0 ..~ ;;; C') <0 ~ (") ;; ~ N (") <0 (") SCENIC RIDGE DR (") .... ,... 0 .... ~ 0 N .... N 0 (") (") ;; <0 (") (") C') <0 0 (") C') (") N co ;; (") ~ '" a: N ~ 0 0 (") ::> ;; .... <0 ~ .... (") (") r ~ (") ~ 0 a: ~ ~ .... ;; (") .... 0 Ol (") W ;; .~ iil~ J!l .~ ;; N ;; ~ ~ 0 ;"El:'~ ~ 0 (:)- ::i; 0 ~ ~ (") (") N P (") C') 0 [l ::l N N ~~~iS Q1 co co C') '" Ol Ul (") ..... C') C') (") 0 <0 . ~. g- o <0 0 C') S:aa ~ i7 (") ~ C') ~4!!~ ~ ~ c: (") 0 ::l 0 ;; 0 C') 8 ;; N C') I::~e~ii N 0 co ~ (") 0 N (") ~C3~ ~'- (") (") 0 0 <0 C') C') .... ~.....\,/ l'.!.e :;: C') <0 (") CIO 0 o.c:: eil:: ~ C') <0 0 ~ ~5~~t'! lO (") 0 in C') N .... N 0 C') G.~~J!l ~c:: ~ 0 .... N (") <0 ::::: i5 ~ 'I;: ,0 ;; 0 0 (") C') ~~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ::l (") N N <0 bl C') ~ 0 C') <0 C') .!II .~.t! '~.e B C') (") C') ~~~'5 .1:: 2l co <0 C') (") r.C~NDJ\ !'f.--..".....,'l... h ~: llIo.~_ woo~,_ 'IN:JtL<<-t1Il.{jQlll ~hQlll .........,- atlJ'$ '_-,,_ .........- """'''''- ,....,"""""""''''''' VA~VJ3lll.lCHr1iflf9.l) 6LLl'C.~ 531'V1S3 'V1511\ ~30ln09 _~G; iI:wnJ..Oil.LlHO~ .. l031IHO~Y A13S3A AWn.. . ~ ~I ! dj i II I ~ 11 B ! ii I i a ~ U~I ii: at!! 9: ~n' III ...~ l!l ieU ... ~IU ~ hli I~I 1M II. II!:I l!! II~i Iliil :i 'Ris 'Rji . hi! Ui!i ~ 1m lUll <<J ~ ~. ~~~ h~ ~~~ ~~ I~~ ~~~ ~ ~ " ; ~ ~ ~ # # # ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ # # # ." oD." (:! A ~ t ttt: " , i ~ I i ii i ~ni U! " , " , ! iii i Ii !in In i i i ~ 1 :i: j 1, l l'11 i' , ,,,. Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !'!!l !' un in \\\i ni II ~ . i L i~ ~ !~ z !Ii ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , , . , I! 'j -1 " 'I 11 0) W l E ~ u ~! i ~ j~ ~ ]. ~ o ~ ~ lS'l E ~ 1: .8 IS !~ 0) '*'H~~ ~~ 01 ~D!~~ l~ ~ df~~ ii\ t~~~ ~J1\S~~ .;,~d:g Ji q~~. gOd'l.,!\j "- LJ) ~......... ~l'l.1i .. ~ (\: n, 'lll: IL ~ ~ '" .. ~ tlSO n: lc ,08 ~ 8 ~u 8 ~ ~zj~. "j !ilU~~8 ~ u->t::::m~ U o ., ~ tIS J,~ +iJ~ ~, -" tllflW E\9.1i Jill'l {j G ~ 80 15~ ~~~ i I AGENDA iTEM NO. -::-- f'''"'''''= ""'""""'1 PAGE { v Of Ik>'~-_ ..--~,- -- """,..,.., 3nN3'\....~N 00..9 ....^....CNrt....J.32t~ClN'l'~ X't:I~(~zl ~(~W1 .,.. ....,..... S_'__1&IlIPI14I1lllIIl 3Io1n.1.0:;;U.l....owv .. .1:>3.1IH:>~V A 13S3A A~V1.. , b , ~ ., '<r?'~~~ 9.L01 6/..1lF. ~ IWElF.F.9F.1:DWd S31'v'l.53 'v'lSI/\ ~30lnog ~H Iii I .l-a .11-,& i I II !! !! iI!l! h ! 11 ill.!,!.!!! ! I lUll!!!!!! L"I "~~. " _OOJ~ 5 i; ~ ~ <X> rn .l'a ...<< AGmDA!TEMNO. . -:L~ PJ.\,..,e I r ~ ~--'-"'- U,IOQ~- I't~U!Ol-rlL(~llIIl Otllt1tl:(*' 8e::~-= ~"9Cll.!I(e0r6) "".""""'" a"1Na'\....~=i!iJ ....A.....00h'....~~~ l;i~~~;~v ~..,i;;.~;~;; II ,~ I I I' I I . I I' I I L_ ~!! " ! i ~i I I 9 J01 6L/J'i~ 1W8'i'i9'i~d S3.l\fJ.S3 \fJ.SI^ ~3Q1nOg ! I I! I, I '!' Ii' ~ I" ! ! "I,. .!. ,i , 1 "I" Ij' ~ II!i h!; II; I II 'I' 'I! ;~ [{ '! ~ _ ~ . ~r a *~~~# _0 ~ I 5 lii~ i/!. 5 il 5 ~; c I~ , AGfNDA.ITE;'IIlO. ~.=~ : P,t\CE_ ()- OF lIJa~'_ woo'.........ow.._ J't'~UU1'lLlnlll) OI.9Ntlh,O$l 1I:~~-= ni'I>C-9Ol5~) "'."""""" ::nN3o\'o''P'I'W1CJ\oIOOI.9 'o'J..'o'00H'o'J.3/:&..l~~ !;i~~~o~v A ,i;;'~;;; II ,- I I I' I I I I' I I L_ ~!! '. I i ~l I I 9 J01 6WE: J.:l'v'I!i lWElE:eE: l3:lWd 53.L'i.LS3 'i.LSV\ 2l3CJlnOg _IJ~<IJ 2 ~, ~ ~!.m ~.. I I 5 lib I~ 5 !li~ It i~ ~ t ~ !!~ ! ; ; ~~ ~ ~i ID ~ ~ ~ H ~ ~ r h ~ 2~ ~ ~ h i~ ~~ ~ ~ r i U I h I Co i ~~ ~~ h II ~ ~ ~~ ~ h ~ 1{1<S0~0~~~ ... ~~ at AGENDA ITEM Nli:':"~ rp.CE_J3~ --- --,. [ u.G)~:"" IIOID-=--= 1I...._lIllJPl4IlllIIII l:>~;;;;\f A ,;;;:"~;;; II EJI ] ~'~1S1a3:>tVI 6LLL€~ 531.'9'1.53 '9'1.SV\ C:l3alnog ~l I I ~ E3 ~!! I" Ii ! 1.1 !!! t ~ H ~ ~ ~ i"1 illl'i I Ii! i!! I I, ! ~ i I! F ,',! 1111 hi j ~ ill ,I ~! ! ; ! .lll!, i ~~~~*~ _miJ ~ I ~ I; rd"r~.,,,,1'I ,"1'""'" l\IO~ "'IV,.:rH./i" H ;.;."a I'~: . PAGE t If:..-Q&..